Hubbry Logo
HeterostraciHeterostraciMain
Open search
Heterostraci
Community hub
Heterostraci
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Heterostraci
Heterostraci
Heterostraci
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Heterostraci
Temporal range: Wenlock[1]–Late Devonian, 433–359 Ma
Panamintaspis
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Infraphylum: Agnatha
Class: †Pteraspidomorpha
Subclass: †Heterostraci
Lankester 1868
Orders
Among the most primitive heterostracans are tolypelepids (top right). Most heterostracans are pteraspidiforms, such as the pteraspidids (bottom right), doryaspidids (bottom left) and the huge psammosteids (top left), which are the youngest known members of the group.[2]

Heterostraci (Ancient Greek, ἕτερος+ὄστρακον "those [with] a different shell" [-i is pl. of -us]) is an extinct subclass of pteraspidomorph, ostracoderm, jawless vertebrate that lived primarily in marine and estuary environments. Heterostraci existed from the mid-Ordovician to the conclusion of the Devonian.

Description and anatomy

[edit]

The heterostracans differed from other Paleozoic agnathan taxa both in the arrangement and histology of their scales.

Most heterostracans had two plates which form a large dorsal shield and a large ventral shield, and had series of scales arranged in various patterns on the sides of their bodies, the exact pattern differing from one group to another. In a few primitive forms, such as Lepidaspis, the dorsal and ventral shields are composed of a mosaic of tiny scales. In most other known forms, though, these tiny scales have fused together to form the shield-plates.

The scales of heterostracans are histologically distinct from other vertebrates, having three layers composed of dentine and aspidine, an acellular bony tissue unique to animals of this class and Thelodonti. The middle layer was honeycombed with tiny spaces called "cancella."

As with many agnathan groups, heterostracans had no fins besides the tail or caudal fin. In some pteraspids, especially in the psammosteids, the ends of the branchial plates (the plates that covered the gills) is drawn out to form wing-like extensions.

Taxonomy

[edit]

Heterostraci are divided into several orders, including the two most diverse orders, Cyathaspidiformes ("Cup Shields"), and Pteraspidiformes ("Wing Shields"), as well as the Cardipeltida, Corvaspidida, Tolypelepidida, Tesseraspidida, and the Traquairaspidiformes. The predominantly Silurian Tolypelepidida (the best known member being Athenaegis), is regarded as being a sister group of the Cyathaspids and Pteraspidids, while the Early Devonian Lepidaspis is regarded as being incertae sedis, possibly close to the original basal forms.

Cyathaspidiformes

[edit]

Cyathaspidiformes is divided into two main subgroups: the Amphiaspidida of Early Devonian Siberia (i.e., Amphiaspis, Gabreyaspis, and Edaphaspis, grouped together with their relative Ctenaspis of Canada), and the Cyathaspidida (i.e., Cyathaspis, Poraspis, and Anglaspis), grouped together with their relative Nahanbiaspis.

Pteraspidiformes

[edit]

The Pteraspidiformes is divided up into five families, four of which, Anchipteraspididae, Gigantaspididae, Pteraspididae, and Protaspididae are monophyletic: Protopteraspididae has recently been determined to be paraphyletic within Pteraspidiformes, and thus, no longer valid, while Psammosteidae is now regarded as a separate subtaxon within Pteraspidiformes, "Psammosteida," as the sister taxon of the most basal family, Anchipteraspidae. Pteraspididae, Gigantaspididae and Protaspididae, in turn form the suborder Pteraspidoidei, with various genera of Protopteraspididae as sister taxa.[3]

Phylogeny

[edit]

Based on the work of Mikko Haaramo.[4]

Heterostraci

The most comprehensive study on pteraspidomorph relationships is by Randle et al. (2025). The result of their maximum parsimony analysis is shown below:[5]

Pteraspidomorphi

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Heterostraci

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Heterostraci were an extinct clade of primitive jawless vertebrates (), known as ostracoderms, that flourished during the and periods of the Era, approximately 443 to 358 million years ago. Classified within the subclass Pteraspidomorphi, Heterostraci comprised over 300 species characterized by a distinctive dermal forming heavy bony armor, primarily covering the head and anterior trunk in the form of a made of fused plates or tesserae. This primitively consisted of four layers: superficial odontodes of dentine and enameloid, followed by compact acellular bone, trabecular aspidin, and basal isopedin, providing protection while reflecting early vertebrate mineralization. Lacking jaws, paired fins, and true teeth, they possessed a single branchial opening on each side of the head shield for respiration, with body forms ranging from flattened bottom-dwellers to more streamlined swimmers adapted to diverse aquatic environments. The group is divided into several orders, including Astraspidiformes, Cyathaspidiformes, Psammosteiformes, Pteraspidiformes, and Amphiaspidiformes, evolving from primitive tessellated forms into more specialized lineages such as the large, plate-armored psammosteids of the Late . Heterostraci played a pivotal role in vertebrate evolution as one of the earliest groups to develop a mineralized , offering insights into the transition from soft-bodied chordates to jawed fishes () and highlighting the diversification of aquatic ecosystems. They became extinct by the end of the , likely due to environmental changes and competition from more advanced vertebrates.

Anatomy

Body plan

Heterostraci were jawless agnathans characterized by an elongated, spindle- or fusiform-shaped body that lacked paired fins, with most species measuring 10–30 cm in length, although larger forms such as certain psammosteids exceeded 1.5 m. Their overall morphology emphasized a streamlined form adapted for aquatic life, with the body divided into a heavily armored anterior region and a more flexible posterior section. The caudal fin was typically hypocercal, featuring a larger ventral lobe that contributed to and stability, while dorsal and anal fins were absent. In some taxa, particularly within the Pteraspidiformes, pectoral spine-like structures—such as elongate cornual or branchial plates—extended laterally from the head shields, potentially aiding in maneuvering. The head and trunk were encased in prominent dorsal and ventral shields formed from fused dermal plates, which transitioned posteriorly into a tapering covered by smaller, overlapping scales that allowed greater flexibility. Variations in body proportions occurred across major subgroups, reflecting diverse ecological adaptations. Cyathaspidids, for example, often exhibited more disc-like or semi-circular forms with a single large dorsal shield incorporating a lateral brim and fewer separate plates, resulting in a broader anterior profile. In contrast, pteraspidids displayed more elongated bodies, characterized by distinct dorsal, ventral, rostral, and pineal plates that contributed to a narrower, arrowhead-like silhouette.

Armor and ornamentation

The dermal armor of Heterostraci primarily consisted of robust dorsal and ventral head shields, complemented by smaller scales covering the body, providing comprehensive external protection. These head shields were formed through the fusion of numerous small scales into continuous plates, a process evident in primitive forms where a of tiny scales is preserved, while more derived taxa exhibit seamless consolidation. The body was clad in overlapping rhomboid scales that articulated to allow flexibility, particularly in the region for . The armor's composition was multilayered, reflecting an early innovation in skeletal mineralization. Primitively, it featured four distinct layers: a superficial odontode layer of dentine tubercles capped with enameloid, a compact basal layer (L1) of acellular , a spongy middle layer (L2) of aspidin with vascular canals (cancella) for , and an underlying isopedin layer (L3) anchoring the to the . Aspidin, the dominant acellular tissue, formed laminated sheets lacking osteocytes, interspersed with dentine ridges or tubercles that added structural reinforcement and aesthetic complexity. In some taxa, such as certain pteraspidiforms, the scales retained a simpler three-layered , omitting the compact L1. Ornamentation varied across Heterostraci, enhancing both functionality and identification of subgroups. The superficial dentine tubercles often displayed star-shaped (stellate) patterns or radiating ridges, with vascular pores surrounding them for sensory or growth purposes. Cyathaspidiforms typically exhibited tuberculate surfaces with stellate or rounded tubercles on smoother shields, promoting hydrodynamic efficiency, whereas pteraspidiforms, like Pteraspis, bore pronounced longitudinal ridges or serrated ornamentation, potentially increasing drag resistance or . These decorative features were added incrementally through marginal accretion or superposition of new generations, allowing repair and growth without compromising integrity. Evolutionarily, this armor served as a primary defense mechanism against predators and abrasive environmental conditions in shallow marine and freshwater habitats. The dense aspidin-dentine composite resisted penetration and crushing, as evidenced by rare traces of bite marks repaired via dentine overgrowth, underscoring its role in survival during an era of intensifying predation pressure from early gnathostomes. Thickness variations, such as the robust L3 in psammosteids (up to 750 μm), further adapted armor to specific ecological niches, balancing with mobility.

Sensory and internal structures

Heterostraci lacked true jaws, possessing instead a small ventral opening in the form of a transverse slit covered by thin, rod-like oral plates bearing rows of denticles that functioned in filtering food particles for suspension or deposit feeding. These oral plates, preserved in three dimensions in fossils such as Rhinopteraspis dunensis, articulate to form an apparatus for moderating gape and facilitating particle capture. Recent three-dimensional reconstructions using have revealed detailed internal , including the arrangement of oral plates and sensory structures in taxa like Anglaspis heintzi. This configuration distinguishes heterostracan feeding from the suction-based mechanisms of modern agnathans. The sensory systems of Heterostraci were adapted for aquatic life, with prominent features including a pineal eye for detection and a well-developed system for mechanoreception. The pineal organ, evident as a median dorsal opening or impression on the head in many taxa such as pteraspidids, likely served photoreceptive functions similar to the in living vertebrates, positioned anteriorly to monitor overhead . canals formed an extensive network of closed grooves within the dermal armor, opening externally via pores to detect water movements and pressure changes; in psammosteids, these canals were particularly elaborate, branching across the head and trunk s to enhance sensitivity in low-visibility environments. Olfactory pits, inferred from paired anterior openings on the head , provided chemosensory input, potentially fused with hypophyseal structures in a naso-hypophyseal complex as seen in related pteraspidomorphs. Internal anatomy, primarily known from natural molds and impressions on the undersides of head shields, reveals a rudimentary supporting key organs. The braincase was a simple, cartilaginous structure enclosing a small , with faint endocasts showing divisions for olfactory lobes, optic tracts, and otic capsules containing for balance; no ossified elements are preserved, indicating a primitive condition. The served as the primary axial support, extending into the tail without vertebral centra, consistent with the agnathan and providing flexibility for undulatory swimming. Branchial arches, numbering around 6-10 pairs, framed the pharyngeal region for respiration, supporting filaments that extracted oxygen from water; these arches were likely cartilaginous and unossified, inferred from the arrangement of external openings. Respiratory structures featured multiple internal gill openings that converged externally into a single pair per side, covered by operculum-like dermal plates in advanced forms such as cyathaspidoids, which helped protect the s while allowing efficient water flow. This configuration, with 6-10 internal slits per side in pteraspidids, optimized ventilation in shallow marine or freshwater habitats, differing from the multiple exposed slits of more basal pteraspidomorphs.

Paleobiology

Locomotion and feeding

Heterostraci propelled themselves through undulatory , generating lateral waves along their elongate bodies using axial musculature, with the hypocercal serving as the primary generator. In this configuration, the extended downward into an enlarged ventral lobe, optimizing hydrodynamic efficiency for near-bottom locomotion and providing upward lift to counter the downward force from their heavy cephalic armor. Their dorsoventrally flattened , combined with a broad head shield and absence of paired fins, further indicates a predominantly bottom-dwelling , enabling stable positioning on soft substrates during rest or . Feeding in Heterostraci was adapted for microphagy, with individuals acting as detritivores or suspension feeders that ingested fine organic particles from sediments or the , lacking any capacity for biting to the absence of jaws. A 2024 study using on the pteraspid heterostracan Rhinopteraspis dunensis revealed a three-dimensionally articulated oral apparatus consisting of imbricated plates with tuberculated ornamentation (lacking denticles), supporting deposit or suspension feeding of fine particles while precluding filter-feeding to limited plate mobility. They employed mechanisms, involving muscular contractions of the orobranchial chamber to create , which drew in water or substrate laden with , , or microorganisms; specialized oral plates then processed this material. evidence from preserved oral apparatuses reveals recurrent patterns of wear on these structures, consistent with abrasive contact during the handling of particulate food via deposit ingestion. Direct traces of Heterostraci activity are scarce, but sinuous trails in sediments, attributed to ostracoderm-like undulation, support inferences of slow swimming paths during feeding excursions. The energy demands of Heterostraci were likely met through low metabolic rates, characteristic of ectothermic jawless vertebrates in the thermally stable seas, allowing sustained low-energy foraging without high-speed pursuits. This efficiency aligned with their microphagous diet and sedentary habits, minimizing the need for rapid locomotion or active predation.

Ecology and behavior

Heterostraci primarily inhabited shallow marine and environments, including nearshore settings and lagoons associated with reefal systems during the and periods. occurrences often co-occur with diverse and early faunas, such as other ostracoderms and primitive arthropods, suggesting these habitats supported complex benthic communities conducive to suspension feeding. Some taxa may have ventured into freshwater, but the majority are linked to marginal marine ecosystems around paleocontinents like the Continent. In predator-prey interactions, the heavy dermal armor of heterostracans served as a primary defense against early gnathostome predators, including placoderms and sarcopterygians, as evidenced by bite marks on specimens. These traces, found on about 1.4% of examined heterostracan remains spanning the Wenlock to stages, show increasing predation pressure correlating with rising diversity (Spearman's ρ = 0.70, p = 0.037), and include sublethal injuries with signs of repair in 24% of affected individuals. Dense assemblages dominated by heterostracans in certain localities suggest possible gregarious or schooling behavior, potentially as an anti-predator strategy, though remains circumstantial. Reproduction in heterostraci is inferred from analogs among modern agnathans, such as lampreys, which exhibit releasing large numbers of small, eggs into the water column without . No direct evidence exists for their reproductive strategies, but the absence of structures in preserved specimens supports this external mode, likely occurring in shallow, protected waters to enhance egg survival. As basal consumers in food webs, heterostracans functioned as microphagous suspension or deposit feeders, processing microorganisms and organic detritus using oral plates, thereby contributing to nutrient cycling in coastal ecosystems. Their feeding apparatus, with forward-facing structures and minimal wear on plate edges, indicates a non-predatory lifestyle focused on small particles, positioning them low in trophic levels and supporting higher predators indirectly through transfer.

Geological distribution

Temporal range

Heterostraci first appeared in the fossil record during the Middle , specifically in the Wenlock epoch around 433 million years ago (Ma), with early representatives such as Athenaegis chattertoni known from deposits in the Canadian Arctic. These initial forms mark the onset of heterostracan diversification among early jawless vertebrates, coinciding with the broader radiation of ostracoderms in shallow marine and marginal environments. The group achieved its peak diversity during the Early to Middle , spanning the Lochkovian to Eifelian stages from approximately 419 to 391 Ma, when heterostracans dominated assemblages across Euramerica and other paleocontinents. This period saw high taxonomic richness, with multiple families such as cyathaspidids and pteraspidids exhibiting rapid evolutionary turnover and morphological innovation, reflecting adaptive responses to expanding shallow-water habitats. Heterostraci persisted through the Late but went extinct by the end of the Famennian stage around 359 Ma, near the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary, as jawed fishes diversified and outcompeted them in marine ecosystems. The final known heterostracans, including psammosteids, coexisted with advanced placoderms like before their decline, which aligned with the Hangenberg and associated biotic crises. Overall, the temporal range of Heterostraci encompassed roughly 74 million years, punctuated by turnover events tied to episodes that reshaped communities.

Geographic occurrence

Heterostraci fossils are predominantly known from deposits in the of Euramerica, with rich assemblages preserved in the formations of the , , and the . These continental red beds, formed in marginal marine and fluvial environments, yield numerous specimens from regions such as , the Welsh Borderlands, the Canadian Arctic (including and ), and the (including , , and ). Additional records occur in the () and (), reflecting a broad distribution across Laurentia-Baltica landmasses during the and periods. Siberian localities, such as and the Tajmyr Peninsula in , further document occurrences on the margins of the Angaran , bridging Euramerican and Asian faunas. Over 300 described species underscore this predominantly northern high-latitude fossil record. Paleobiogeographic patterns indicate a distribution confined to northern hemispheric realms from their onset, likely due to environmental preferences for cooler, shallow-water habitats in Euramerica, , and . Key sites highlight this pattern: the Wenlock deposits in Arctic preserve early forms like Athenaegis, while the Bone Bed in the UK yields fragmented cyathaspidids, indicating diverse coastal assemblages. In contrast, the Miguasha Fossil-Fish-Lagerstätte in , , reveals Devonian diversity with well-preserved boothiaspid and other heterostracan specimens, showcasing articulated armor from estuarine settings. Preservation biases favor durable dermal plates in coarse sediments, but exceptional lagerstätten like Miguasha occasionally reveal soft tissues and internal structures, providing rare insights into heterostracan beyond typical fragmented remains. Such sites mitigate taphonomic losses, though overall distribution reflects sampling in accessible northern deposits rather than complete ecological range.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Classification history

The subclass Heterostraci was established in the late as part of early efforts to classify the diverse armored jawless vertebrates known as . E. Ray Lankester introduced the name Heterostraci in 1868 to encompass forms characterized by a distinctive heterostracan (scattered odontode) pattern in their dermal armor, distinguishing them from the more uniform osteostracan pattern seen in cephalaspids; he grouped them under the subclass Pteraspides within the broader ostracoderm assemblage. Ramsay H. Traquair further refined this in 1899 by recognizing three principal families—Pteraspidae, Drepanaspidae, and Psammosteidae—based on variations in the arrangement and ornamentation of the cephalic and thoracic bony plates. In the early , classifications became more detailed through morphological and anatomical studies. Johan Kiaer, in his 1915 analysis of Upper fish remains from Ellesmere Land, highlighted the diversity of heterostracan forms and their stratigraphic ranges, contributing to the separation of pteraspid-like and cyathaspid-like morphologies; he later (1932) formalized a division into three suborders: Pteraspida, Psammosteida (including Drepanaspida), and Cyathaspida. Erik A. Stensiö advanced this framework in 1927 with his comprehensive study of Downtonian and vertebrates from , proposing the superorder Pteraspidomorphi to unite Heterostraci with certain cyclostome-like forms, while separating them from the Cephalaspidomorphi; this reflected a growing recognition of their phylogenetic distinctiveness within ostracoderms. By mid-century, L. B. Halstead Tarlo (1957) synthesized these efforts into an evolutionary classification, delineating seven orders—Astraspidiformes, Eriptychiiformes, Cyathaspidiformes, Psammosteiformes, Pteraspidiformes, Cardipeltiformes, and Amphiaspidiformes—based on shared derived features in armor and inferred locomotor adaptations. By the 1990s, advances in paleontology repositioned Heterostraci as stem-gnathostomes rather than direct ancestors of modern agnathans, emphasizing their role in early jawed . Philippe Janvier's 1996 monograph on early vertebrates portrayed Heterostraci as a monophyletic of jawless stem-gnathostomes, with "higher" forms (e.g., Cyathaspididae and Pteraspidiformes) showing derived branchial and sensory structures; this shifted views from earlier polyphyletic interpretations of ostracoderms toward a more resolved pteraspidomorph lineage. Recent analyses, such as Sansom et al. (2015), have used non-random models of recovery to uncover cryptic evolutionary patterns, supporting while accounting for biases in the record that previously suggested greater diversity. Ongoing debates include the placement of taxa like Lepidaspis, a tessellated form often retained within Heterostraci but assigned to a separate family due to its mosaic of primitive and derived traits, reflecting transitions from polyphyletic to unified classifications.

Major subgroups

The Heterostraci are classified into several orders, with the two most diverse being Cyathaspidiformes and Pteraspidiformes, alongside other less speciose groups such as Psammosteiformes, Amphiaspidiformes, and minor orders like Corvaspidiformes and Phialaspidiformes; overall, the encompasses approximately 15 families and over 130 genera. The order Cyathaspidiformes, comprising families such as Cyathaspididae, Poraspididae, and Boothiaspididae, is characterized by a disc-shaped or semi-circular dorsal shield that often fuses the rostral, pineal, and orbital regions, along with tuberculate ornamentation featuring dentine ridges or epitega (ornamented fields); representative genera include Cyathaspis (with a divided dorsal plate and pineal macula) and Poraspis (lacking superficial dorsal divisions and bearing large trunk scales). This order dominated early heterostracan diversity in the and , with forms exhibiting variable branchial plate arrangements. In contrast, the order Pteraspidiformes includes elongated forms with a multi-plated head shield featuring separate dorsal, ventral, rostral, pineal, orbital, and branchial plates, often with branched or spine-like dorsal extensions; key families are Pteraspididae, Protaspididae, Protopteraspididae, and Doryaspididae, exemplified by Pteraspis (with ten main plates and post-oral laterals) and Protaspis (showing fused mature plates and diverse sensory canals). These pteraspidiforms, totaling around 46 genera and over 110 species, peaked in the and are noted for their pseudo-rostra and gill pouch structures. Other notable orders include Psammosteiformes, with families like Psammosteidae, Drepanaspididae, and Pycnosteidae, featuring large, multi-plated shields (up to twelve plates) separated by tesserae fields, stellate tubercles, and tooth-like oral lamellae, as seen in Psammosteus and Drepanaspis; Amphiaspidiformes, encompassing Amphiaspididae and related families, distinguished by a single undivided dorso-ventral shield, sensory grooves, and ventral or tubular mouths in genera such as Amphiaspis and Siberiaspis. Minor groups like Corvaspidiformes (e.g., Corvaspis) and Phialaspidiformes (or Traquairaspidiformes, e.g., Phialaspis) exhibit tessellate or bisected branchial plates but represent fewer taxa. Several heterostracan taxa remain due to ambiguous plate arrangements or fragmentary remains, including Lepidaspis (with tessellate armor of uncertain order affinity) and forms from Corvaspididae such as Corvaspis.

Evolutionary relationships

Heterostraci represent an extinct of jawless vertebrates that occupy a basal position on the stem leading to jawed vertebrates (), forming part of the broader assemblage of stem-gnathostomes known as ostracoderms. Their phylogenetic placement has been debated, with some analyses suggesting a position sister to or within the crown-group (modern jawless vertebrates including lampreys and hagfishes), though the prevailing view positions them as stem-gnathostomes outside the cyclostome lineage. Regarding internal structure, Heterostraci exhibit contested ; maximum parsimony analyses recover them as a monophyletic group basal to , while Bayesian approaches indicate , with certain subgroups like Cyathaspididae nesting outside a core Pteraspidiformes . Key phylogenetic reconstructions, such as those employing maximum parsimony on morphological datasets encompassing over 130 heterostracan taxa and outgroups, consistently place Heterostraci near the base of the gnathostome total group, often as to other stem lineages like or with Psammosteiformes embedded within derived heterostracans. Earlier cladistic frameworks, including those based on shared dermal armor and sensory structures, similarly depict a basal placement, emphasizing their role in early diversification. These analyses highlight Heterostraci as a paraphyletic or grade-like assemblage in broader trees, bridging putative ancestral jawless forms to the gnathostome crown. Evolutionary patterns within Heterostraci trace from origins, with the earliest definitive records in the Wenlock epoch around 433 million years ago, to a radiation peaking in diversity during the Early to Middle . Trends include progressive fusion of small dermal plates into larger, more integrated head shields, reflecting adaptations for enhanced protection and hydrodynamic efficiency, though late forms show variability in armor elaboration amid environmental shifts. This radiation culminated in decline and extinction by the Late , approximately 358 million years ago, coinciding with the rise of more mobile gnathostomes and possibly linked to ecological pressures rather than direct competition.

References

  1. https://www.digitalatlasofancientlife.org/learn/chordata/jawless-vertebrates/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4979667/
  3. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app07/app07-249.pdf
  4. https://www.palaeontologyonline.com/?p=2949
  5. https://doi.org/10.1002/spp2.70030
  6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2025.2476441
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3971664/
  8. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0031030107030069
  9. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2023.2258
  10. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1979.tb00640.x
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237550609_A_review_of_the_lateral_line_sensory_system_in_psammosteid_heterostracans
  12. https://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/geol431/lectures/05jawless.html
  13. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-024-06837-8
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291842228_Adaptation_for_Swimming_in_the_External_Morphology_and_Skeleton_of_Early_Vertebrates_Agnatha_Heterostraci
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11570539_Feeding_in_Extinct_Jawless_Heterostracan_Fishes_and_Testing_Scenarios_of_Early_Vertebrate_Evolution
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10965320/
  17. https://www.academia.edu/320329/Fish_Trails_From_the_Lower_Old_Red_Sandstone_of_Tredomen_Quarry_Powys_Southeast_Wales
  18. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-5730-1_1
  19. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aar3689
  20. https://palass.org/sites/default/files/media/publications/special_papers_in_palaeontology/number_18/spp18_pp1-214.pdf
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016787816300797
  22. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.1596
  23. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/spp2.70030
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286043653_Reproduction_in_Agnathan_Fishes_Lampreys_and_Hagfishes
  25. https://www.le.ac.uk/geology/map2/pdfs/ProcBhet.pdf
  26. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1973.tb01005.x
  27. http://www.paleofile.com/Fish/Agnatha/Athenaegis.asp
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/213773596_Evolution_of_generic_and_species_diversity_in_agnathans_Heterostraci_Orders_Cyathaspidiformes_Pteraspidiformes
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297944732_Revision_of_Psammosteus_livonicus_Obruchev_Agnatha_Heterostraci_from_the_Devonian_Amata_Regional_Stage_of_the_NW_of_the_East_European_Platform
  30. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01165.x
  31. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app66/app008112020.pdf
  32. https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/sites/default/files/articles/pdf/g2002n4a6.pdf
  33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2009.00895.x
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237008479_The_Miguasha_Fossil-Fish-Lagerstatte_A_consequence_of_the_Devonian_land-sea_interactions
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274322075_Histology_of_the_heterostracan_dermal_skeleton_Insight_into_the_origin_of_the_vertebrate_mineralised_skeleton_Histology_of_Heterostracan_Dermal_Skeletons
  36. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2019/2593-psammosteids-revision
  37. https://files.geocollections.info/cf4b7489-09a9-40e5-a6b1-7c1c937ee75d.pdf
  38. https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/181/4/910/3924641
  39. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.2245
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362686835_A_Phylogeny_for_Heterostraci_stem-gnathostomes
  41. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.08.11.503478v1.full.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.