Hubbry Logo
Inverted repeatInverted repeatMain
Open search
Inverted repeat
Community hub
Inverted repeat
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Inverted repeat
Inverted repeat
Inverted repeat
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

An inverted repeat (or IR) is a single stranded sequence of nucleotides followed downstream by its reverse complement.[1] The intervening sequence of nucleotides between the initial sequence and the reverse complement can be any length including zero. For example, 5'---TTACGnnnnnnCGTAA---3' is an inverted repeat sequence. When the intervening length is zero, the composite sequence is a palindromic sequence.[2]

Both inverted repeats and direct repeats constitute types of nucleotide sequences that occur repetitively. These repeated DNA sequences often range from a pair of nucleotides to a whole gene, while the proximity of the repeat sequences varies between widely dispersed and simple tandem arrays.[3] The short tandem repeat sequences may exist as just a few copies in a small region to thousands of copies dispersed all over the genome of most eukaryotes.[4] Repeat sequences with about 10–100 base pairs are known as minisatellites, while shorter repeat sequences having mostly 2–4 base pairs are known as microsatellites.[5] The most common repeats include the dinucleotide repeats, which have the bases AC on one DNA strand, and GT on the complementary strand.[3] Some elements of the genome with unique sequences function as exons, introns and regulatory DNA.[6] Though the most familiar loci of the repetitive sequences are the centromere and the telomere,[6] a large portion of the repeated sequences in the genome are found among the noncoding DNA.[5]

Inverted repeats have a number of important biological functions. They define the boundaries in transposons and indicate regions capable of self-complementary base pairing (regions within a single sequence which can base pair with each other). These properties play an important role in genome instability[7] and contribute not only to cellular evolution and genetic diversity[8] but also to mutation and disease.[9] In order to study these effects in detail, a number of programs and databases have been developed to assist in discovery and annotation of inverted repeats in various genomes.

Understanding inverted repeats

[edit]

Example of an inverted repeat

[edit]
The 5 base-pair sequence on the left is "repeated" and "inverted" to form sequence on the right.

Beginning with this initial sequence:
            5'-TTACG-3'

The complement created by base pairing is:
            3'-AATGC-5'

The reverse complement is:
            5'-CGTAA-3'

And, the inverted repeat sequence is:
            5'---TTACGnnnnnnCGTAA---3'

"nnnnnn" represents any number of intervening nucleotides.

Vs. direct repeat

[edit]

A direct repeat occurs when a sequence is repeated with the same pattern downstream.[1] There is no inversion and no reverse complement associated with a direct repeat. The nucleotide sequence written in bold characters signifies the repeated sequence. It may or may not have intervening nucleotides.

5´ TTACGnnnnnnTTACG 3´
3´ AATGCnnnnnnAATGC 5´

Linguistically, a typical direct repeat is comparable to rhyming, as in "time on a dime".

Vs. tandem repeat

[edit]
Main article: Tandem repeat

A direct repeat with no intervening nucleotides between the initial sequence and its downstream copy is a Tandem repeat. The nucleotide sequence written in bold characters signifies the repeated sequence.

5´ TTACGTTACG 3´
3´ AATGCAATGC 5´

Linguistically, a typical tandem repeat is comparable to stuttering, or deliberately repeated words, as in "bye-bye".

Vs. palindrome

[edit]
Main article: Palindromic sequence

An inverted repeat sequence with no intervening nucleotides between the initial sequence and its downstream reverse complement is a palindrome.[1]
    EXAMPLE:
        Step 1: start with an inverted repeat: 5' TTACGnnnnnnCGTAA 3'
        Step 2: remove intervening nucleotides: 5' TTACGCGTAA 3'
        This resulting sequence is palindromic because it is the reverse complement of itself.[1]

5' TTACGCGTAA 3'   test sequence (from Step 2 with intervening nucleotides removed)
3' AATGCGCATT 5'   complement of test sequence
5' TTACGCGTAA 3'   reverse complement     This is the same as the test sequence above, and thus, it is a palindrome.

Biological features and functionality

[edit]

Conditions that favor synthesis

[edit]

The diverse genome-wide repeats are derived from transposable elements, which are now understood to "jump" about different genomic locations, without transferring their original copies.[10] Subsequent shuttling of the same sequences over numerous generations ensures their multiplicity throughout the genome.[10] The limited recombination of the sequences between two distinct sequence elements known as conservative site-specific recombination (CSSR) results in inversions of the DNA segment, based on the arrangement of the recombination recognition sequences on the donor DNA and recipient DNA.[10] Again, the orientation of two of the recombining sites within the donor DNA molecule relative to the asymmetry of the intervening DNA cleavage sequences, known as the crossover region, is pivotal to the formation of either inverted repeats or direct repeats.[10] Thus, recombination occurring at a pair of inverted sites will invert the DNA sequence between the two sites.[10] Very stable chromosomes have been observed with comparatively fewer numbers of inverted repeats than direct repeats, suggesting a relationship between chromosome stability and the number of repeats.[11]

Regions where presence is obligatory

[edit]

Terminal inverted repeats have been observed in the DNA of various eukaryotic transposons, even though their source remains unknown.[12] Inverted repeats are principally found at the origins of replication of cell organism and organelles that range from phage plasmids, mitochondria, and eukaryotic viruses to mammalian cells.[13] The replication origins of the phage G4 and other related phages comprise a segment of nearly 139 nucleotide bases that include three inverted repeats that are essential for replication priming.[13]

In the genome

[edit]

To a large extent, portions of nucleotide repeats are quite often observed as part of rare DNA combinations.[14] The three main repeats which are largely found in particular DNA constructs include the closely precise homopurine-homopyrimidine inverted repeats, which is otherwise referred to as H palindromes, a common occurrence in triple helical H conformations that may comprise either the TAT or CGC nucleotide triads. The others could be described as long inverted repeats having the tendency to produce hairpins and cruciform, and finally direct tandem repeats, which commonly exist in structures described as slipped-loop, cruciform and left-handed Z-DNA.[14]

Common in different organisms

[edit]

Past studies suggest that repeats are a common feature of eukaryotes unlike the prokaryotes and archaea.[14] Other reports suggest that irrespective of the comparative shortage of repeat elements in prokaryotic genomes, they nevertheless contain hundreds or even thousands of large repeats.[15] Current genomic analysis seem to suggest the existence of a large excess of perfect inverted repeats in many prokaryotic genomes as compared to eukaryotic genomes.[16]

Pseudoknot with four sets of inverted repeats. Inverted repeats 1 and 2 create the stem for stem-loop A and are part of the loop for stem-loop B. Similarly, inverted repeats 3 and 4 form the stem for stem-loop B and are part of the loop for stem-loop A.

For quantification and comparison of inverted repeats between several species, namely on archaea, see [17]

Inverted repeats in pseudoknots

[edit]

Pseudoknots are common structural motifs found in RNA. They are formed by two nested stem-loops such that the stem of one structure is formed from the loop of the other. There are multiple folding topologies among pseudoknots and great variation in loop lengths, making them a structurally diverse group.[18]

Inverted repeats are a key component of pseudoknots as can be seen in the illustration of a naturally occurring pseudoknot found in the human telomerase RNA component.[19] Four different sets of inverted repeats are involved in this structure. Sets 1 and 2 are the stem of stem-loop A and are part of the loop for stem-loop B. Similarly, sets 3 and 4 are the stem for stem-loop B and are part of the loop for stem-loop A.

Pseudoknots play a number of different roles in biology. The telomerase pseudoknot in the illustration is critical to that enzyme's activity.[19] The ribozyme for the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) folds into a double-pseudoknot structure and self-cleaves its circular genome to produce a single-genome-length RNA. Pseudoknots also play a role in programmed ribosomal frameshifting found in some viruses and required in the replication of retroviruses.[18]

In riboswitches

[edit]

Inverted repeats play an important role in riboswitches, which are RNA regulatory elements that control the expression of genes that produce the mRNA, of which they are part.[10] A simplified example of the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) riboswitch is shown in the illustration. This riboswitch exists in the mRNA transcript and has several stem-loop structures upstream from the coding region. However, only the key stem-loops are shown in the illustration, which has been greatly simplified to help show the role of the inverted repeats. There are multiple inverted repeats in this riboswitch as indicated in green (yellow background) and blue (orange background).

In the absence of FMN, the Anti-termination structure is the preferred conformation for the mRNA transcript. It is created by base-pairing of the inverted repeat region circled in red. When FMN is present, it may bind to the loop and prevent formation of the Anti-termination structure. This allows two different sets of inverted repeats to base-pair and form the Termination structure.[20] The stem-loop on the 3' end is a transcriptional terminator because the sequence immediately following it is a string of uracils (U). If this stem-loop forms (due to the presence of FMN) as the growing RNA strand emerges from the RNA polymerase complex, it will create enough structural tension to cause the RNA strand to dissociate and thus terminate transcription. The dissociation occurs easily because the base-pairing between the U's in the RNA and the A's in the template strand are the weakest of all base-pairings.[10] Thus, at higher concentration levels, FMN down-regulates its own transcription by increasing the formation of the termination structure.

Mutations and disease

[edit]

Inverted repeats are often described as "hotspots" of eukaryotic and prokaryotic genomic instability.[7] Long inverted repeats are deemed to greatly influence the stability of the genome of various organisms.[21] This is exemplified in E. coli, where genomic sequences with long inverted repeats are seldom replicated, but rather deleted with rapidity.[21] Again, the long inverted repeats observed in yeast greatly favor recombination within the same and adjacent chromosomes, resulting in an equally very high rate of deletion.[21] Finally, a very high rate of deletion and recombination were also observed in mammalian chromosomes regions with inverted repeats.[21] Reported differences in the stability of genomes of interrelated organisms are always an indication of a disparity in inverted repeats.[11] The instability results from the tendency of inverted repeats to fold into hairpin- or cruciform-like DNA structures. These special structures can hinder or confuse DNA replication and other genomic activities.[7] Thus, inverted repeats lead to special configurations in both RNA and DNA that can ultimately cause mutations and disease.[9]

Inverted repeat changing to/from an extruded cruciform.   A: Inverted Repeat Sequences;   B: Loop;   C: Stem with base pairing of the inverted repeat sequences

The illustration shows an inverted repeat undergoing cruciform extrusion. DNA in the region of the inverted repeat unwinds and then recombines, forming a four-way junction with two stem-loop structures. The cruciform structure occurs because the inverted repeat sequences self-pair to each other on their own strand.[22]

Extruded cruciforms can lead to frameshift mutations when a DNA sequence has inverted repeats in the form of a palindrome combined with regions of direct repeats on either side. During transcription, slippage and partial dissociation of the polymerase from the template strand can lead to both deletion and insertion mutations.[9] Deletion occurs when a portion of the unwound template strand forms a stem-loop that gets "skipped" by the transcription machinery. Insertion occurs when a stem-loop forms in a dissociated portion of the nascent (newly synthesized) strand causing a portion of the template strand to be transcribed twice.[9]

Antithrombin deficiency from a point mutation

[edit]

Imperfect inverted repeats can lead to mutations through intrastrand and interstrand switching.[9] The antithrombin III gene's coding region is an example of an imperfect inverted repeat as shown in the figure on the right. The stem-loop structure forms with a bump at the bottom because the G and T do not pair up. A strand switch event could result in the G (in the bump) being replaced by an A which removes the "imperfection" in the inverted repeat and provides a stronger stem-loop structure. However, the replacement also creates a point mutation converting the GCA codon to ACA. If the strand switch event is followed by a second round of DNA replication, the mutation may become fixed in the genome and lead to disease. Specifically, the missense mutation would lead to a defective gene and a deficiency in antithrombin which could result in the development of venous thromboembolism (blood clots within a vein).[9]

Osteogenesis imperfecta from a frameshift mutation

[edit]

Mutations in the collagen gene can lead to the disease Osteogenesis Imperfecta, which is characterized by brittle bones.[9] In the illustration, a stem-loop formed from an imperfect inverted repeat is mutated with a thymine (T) nucleotide insertion as a result of an inter- or intrastrand switch. The addition of the T creates a base-pairing "match up" with the adenine (A) that was previously a "bump" on the left side of the stem. While this addition makes the stem stronger and perfects the inverted repeat, it also creates a frameshift mutation in the nucleotide sequence which alters the reading frame and will result in an incorrect expression of the gene.[9]

Programs and databases

[edit]

The following list provides information and external links to various programs and databases for inverted repeats:

  • non-B DB A Database for Integrated Annotations and Analysis of non-B DNA Forming Motifs.[23] This database is provided by The Advanced Biomedical Computing Center (ABCC) at then Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR). It covers the A-DNA and Z-DNA conformations otherwise known as "non-B DNAs" because they are not the more common B-DNA form of a right-handed Watson-Crick double-helix. These "non-B DNAs" include left-handed Z-DNA, cruciform, triplex, tetraplex and hairpin structures.[23] Searches can be performed on a variety of "repeat types" (including inverted repeats) and on several species.
  • Inverted Repeats Database Archived 2020-09-01 at the Wayback Machine Boston University. This database is a web application that allows query and analysis of repeats held in the PUBLIC DATABASE project. Scientists can also analyze their own sequences with the Inverted Repeats Finder algorithm.[24]
  • P-MITE: a Plant MITE database — this database for Miniature Inverted-repeat Transposable Elements (MITEs) contains sequences from plant genomes. Sequences may be searched or downloaded from the database.[25]
  • EMBOSS is the "European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite" which runs on UNIX and UNIX-like operating systems.[26] Documentation and program source files are available on the EMBOSS website. Applications specifically related to inverted repeats are listed below:

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Inverted repeat

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An inverted repeat (IR), also known as an inverted duplication or palindrome in DNA, is a sequence motif consisting of two copies of a nucleotide segment arranged in reverse complementary orientation on the same strand, typically separated by a non-repetitive spacer region of variable length. This configuration allows the DNA to form stable secondary structures, such as hairpins or cruciforms, particularly under conditions of negative supercoiling or in single-stranded contexts. Inverted repeats are ubiquitous in the genomes of prokaryotes and eukaryotes, with lengths ranging from short motifs (≥5 base pairs) to longer elements exceeding 100 base pairs, and they often exhibit high AT content or specific dinucleotide patterns that influence their stability. These structures play critical roles in various biological processes, including the mobility of transposable elements, where terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) of 9–40 base pairs serve as recognition sites for transposase enzymes, enabling the "cut-and-paste" mechanism of excision and insertion that drives genomic rearrangements. Inverted repeats also contribute to gene regulation by excluding nucleosomes from promoter and terminator regions, thereby facilitating transcription initiation, elongation, and termination, as observed in organisms like Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Additionally, they promote DNA repair and amplification by mediating inverted duplications and protecting damaged ends from degradation, though this recombinogenic potential often leads to genomic instability, such as replication fork stalling, double-strand breaks, and non-allelic homologous recombination.

Definition and Structure

Core Definition

An inverted repeat (IR) is a sequence motif in nucleic acids consisting of a segment of nucleotides followed downstream by its reverse complement, which may be adjacent or separated by a spacer sequence. This arrangement allows the two halves to base-pair with each other, potentially forming stable secondary structures. Inverted repeats occur in both DNA and RNA, where they contribute to various regulatory and structural roles in molecular biology. Inverted repeats can be classified as perfect or imperfect based on the degree of sequence complementarity between the two arms. Perfect inverted repeats exhibit exact matching between the sequence and its reverse complement, enabling complete base pairing without mismatches. Imperfect inverted repeats, in contrast, contain one or more mismatches, insertions, or deletions, resulting in partial complementarity. A common notation for an inverted repeat is 5'-XYZ...Z'Y'X'-3', where the first half (XYZ...) is followed by the reverse complement (Z'Y'X'...) of that sequence, with primes denoting the complemented bases. In DNA, inverted repeats can extrude into hairpin or cruciform structures, particularly under conditions of negative supercoiling, where the two arms pair to form a stem with a loop or junction. In RNA, these motifs typically fold into stem-loop structures, with the paired arms creating a double-stranded stem and the spacer or mismatched region forming an unpaired loop.

Structural Characteristics

An inverted repeat consists of two arms composed of repeated sequences that are reverse complements of each other, separated by an intervening spacer region of non-repeated sequence. The arms enable intrastrand base pairing, while the spacer typically remains unpaired and can form a loop in the folded structure. Inverted repeats exhibit significant length variations, with short forms ranging from 2-6 base pairs (often termed micro-inverted repeats) to longer ones exceeding 30 base pairs, and extended versions reaching tens of kilobases, as seen in the large inverted repeats of many genomes. Imperfect inverted repeats incorporate mismatches, insertions, or bulges within the arms, reducing complementarity but still allowing partial base pairing. These motifs possess the potential to fold into secondary structures through Watson-Crick base pairing between the arms, forming cruciforms in double-stranded DNA or hairpins in single-stranded . The thermodynamic stability of such structures is determined by the change (ΔG), primarily through nearest-neighbor interactions and loop contributions, with more negative ΔG indicating greater stability. Detection of inverted repeats generally requires a minimum arm length of 5-10 nucleotides to ensure stable pairing, with maximum spacer lengths limited to under 50 nucleotides for efficient folding and hybridization.

Illustrative Examples

A simple example of an inverted repeat in DNA is the sequence 5'-GAATTC...CTTAAG-3', where "GAATTC" is followed by its reverse complement "CTTAAG" after a spacer region; this illustrates the core principle of an inverted repeat as one segment being the reverse complement of the other. In , an inverted repeat can form a stem-loop structure, such as 5'-GCAAGC...GCUUCG-3', where "GCAAGC" pairs with its reverse complement "GCUUCG" via base pairing in the folded form, demonstrating how such sequences enable intramolecular hybridization. A longer example occurs in the inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of adenovirus genomes, which consist of approximately 100-140 base pairs at both ends of the linear DNA molecule, with each end being the reverse complement of the other to facilitate circularization or replication initiation. To visualize an inverted repeat, consider its linear form as a single-stranded sequence like 5'-ABC...CBA-3', where "CBA" is the reverse complement of "ABC"; in the folded form, it adopts a double-stranded stem with a loop in the spacer, represented schematically as:

5'- A B C -3' | | | 3'- T S G A B C -5' (loop omitted for simplicity)

5'- A B C -3' | | | 3'- T S G A B C -5' (loop omitted for simplicity)

This depiction highlights the antiparallel base pairing enabled by the reverse complement orientation.

Versus Direct Repeats

Direct repeats are segments of DNA consisting of two or more identical or nearly identical nucleotide sequences arranged in the same orientation along the same strand, typically denoted as 5'-XYZ...XYZ-3'. In contrast, inverted repeats feature sequences that are reverse complements of each other, oriented in opposite directions. This fundamental difference in orientation dictates their structural behaviors: inverted repeats facilitate antiparallel base pairing, enabling the formation of cruciform or hairpin structures, whereas direct repeats support parallel alignment or strand slippage during DNA replication or repair. The structural outcomes of these motifs diverge significantly in genomic contexts. Direct repeats are commonly linked to tandem duplications, where replication slippage causes misalignment and copying of intervening sequences, resulting in expanded repeat units. Inverted repeats, however, promote cruciform extrusion or inversion events through homologous recombination, where misalignment between the oppositely oriented arms leads to flipping of the enclosed DNA segment. These outcomes highlight how orientation influences higher-order DNA folding and stability, with inverted repeats often inducing double-strand breaks due to their secondary structures. Mutational tendencies further underscore these distinctions. Direct repeats exhibit a propensity for expansions, particularly in short tandem forms like trinucleotide repeats, which can amplify during replication and contribute to disorders such as through polymerase slippage. Conversely, inverted repeats are more associated with deletions mediated by recombination, as their structures stimulate RecA-independent annealing or cleavage at flanking direct repeats, often enhancing deletion rates by orders of magnitude. This deletion bias arises from the propensity of inverted repeats to form extrachromosomal dimers or resolve Holliday junctions, contrasting the expansion-favoring slippage of direct repeats.

Versus Tandem Repeats

Tandem repeats consist of multiple copies of a short DNA sequence arranged adjacently in the same orientation, such as the microsatellite 5'-CACACA-3', where the dinucleotide "CA" is repeated contiguously without intervening sequences. In contrast, inverted repeats feature two copies of a sequence in opposite orientations, typically separated by a non-repetitive spacer region, enabling intramolecular base pairing that tandem repeats cannot achieve due to their uniform directionality and lack of spacer. The primary structural distinction lies in their arrangement: tandem repeats form contiguous arrays that expand or contract through mechanisms like polymerase slippage during replication, resulting in highly variable copy numbers, whereas inverted repeats promote secondary structures such as cruciforms or hairpins due to their reversed complementarity, often requiring the spacer to stabilize these folds. Tandem repeats thus contribute to microsatellites (short units of 1-6 base pairs repeated in ) and satellite DNA (longer arrays forming heterochromatic regions), which influence genomic stability and polymorphism. Inverted repeats, by comparison, drive loop formations or extrusions in DNA, facilitating processes like recombination or structural transitions without the adjacency seen in tandem configurations. Evolutionarily, tandem repeats predominantly arise from replication slippage, where misalignment of the nascent strand during DNA synthesis leads to insertions or deletions of repeat units, amplifying these sequences over generations. Inverted repeats, however, often originate from transposition events involving mobile elements with terminal inverted repeats or through ectopic recombination between dispersed homologous sequences, promoting genomic rearrangements like inversions. This divergence underscores how tandem repeats foster local expansions in stable chromosomal regions, while inverted repeats enable broader architectural changes across the genome.

Versus Palindromes

A in DNA is defined as a segment that exhibits dyad symmetry, reading identically on both complementary strands when oriented from 5' to 3'. For instance, the recognition site for the , 5'-GAATTC-3', pairs with its complement 3'-CTTAAG-5', such that the reverse complement sequence also reads 5'-GAATTC-3' in the 5' to 3' direction. The primary distinction between palindromes and inverted repeats lies in their continuity and potential for interruption. Palindromes are continuous self-complementary sequences with no intervening spacer between the inverted elements, enabling direct base pairing across the strands without disruption. In contrast, inverted repeats comprise two homologous sequences arranged in opposite orientations that may include a central spacer region, rendering them interrupted or quasi-palindromic structures. There is significant overlap in their , as inverted repeats without a spacer are indistinguishable from perfect palindromes, both capable of forming symmetric, self-annealing configurations. Imperfect inverted repeats, characterized by mismatches or short spacers, approximate palindromic behavior but with reduced symmetry. This relationship underscores that all perfect palindromes are a of inverted repeats, while the latter encompass a broader category including spaced variants. In terms of structural stability, perfect palindromes promote the formation of tight hairpin loops in single-stranded DNA contexts, such as during replication, due to their uninterrupted complementarity. Conversely, inverted repeats with spacers typically extrude cruciform structures in double-stranded DNA under conditions of negative supercoiling, where the spacer forms a central loop flanked by paired stems. These differences in architecture influence their susceptibility to enzymatic recognition and genomic instability.

Genomic and Organismal Occurrence

Distribution in Genomes

Inverted repeats (IRs) are ubiquitous genomic elements found across both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, with their distribution varying by length, type, and location. In the , short IRs (typically 6-25 arms) number in the millions, with over 6.6 million short inverted repeats (SIRs) identified, covering approximately 1-5% of the total genomic sequence when accounting for their repetitive and overlapping nature. Longer IRs, with arms exceeding 100 , are less frequent but still contribute to structural complexity, totaling around 22,000 detectable instances with at least 75% identity and spacers up to 100 kb. These elements are classified into short micro-IRs, which dominate in number, and longer forms often associated with repetitive DNA families. IRs exhibit distinct positional biases within genomes, particularly in regions critical for chromosomal maintenance and replication. They are enriched in centromeric regions, where both and inverted repeats facilitate assembly and contribute to formation, as observed across eukaryotic chromosomes including human. In telomeric and subtelomeric areas, IRs appear in telomeric sequences, promoting structural rearrangements, though less densely than in centromeres. At origins of replication, IRs are commonly present, forming stem-loops or cruciforms that influence replication initiation in mammalian cells, plasmids, and viral genomes. Regarding types, long IRs frequently flank transposable elements, such as miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs), which are non-autonomous DNA transposons characterized by terminal IRs of 10-30 bp that enable mobility without coding capacity. In contrast, short IRs predominate in promoter regions, where they exhibit non-random distribution and associate with regulatory pathways, potentially influencing transcription through secondary structure formation. Evolutionary patterns reveal higher IR density in compact prokaryotic genomes compared to expanded eukaryotic ones, reflecting selection pressures for stability in smaller genomes. Bacterial genomes show the highest average IR density (e.g., up to 139 IRs/Mb in certain psychrophilic strains), driven by roles in replication and transposition, whereas eukaryotic genomes like display expanded but sparser distributions due to increased tolerance for repetitive elements. This conservation underscores IRs' integral role in genomic architecture across domains of .

Prevalence Across Organisms

Inverted repeats (IRs) are highly abundant in prokaryotic genomes, particularly in , where they exhibit the highest average density among major taxonomic groups. In Escherichia coli, for instance, short perfect IRs (arm lengths of 5–20 bp) number over 27,000 in non-coding regions alone, averaging approximately 9 per non-coding region, with enrichment increasing for longer arms compared to random expectations. This prevalence extends across Proteobacteria, with significant evolutionary conservation in orthologous non-coding regions (62% higher than expected in analyzed strains). In prokaryotes generally, IRs occur more frequently in intergenic and regulatory regions, such as near promoters and stop codons, than in coding sequences. In eukaryotic genomes, IRs are widespread but vary by organism and compartment. In , large IRs are a hallmark of chloroplast genomes, typically spanning 15–30 kb and comprising about one-third of the plastid genome size in most land plant species; these structures contain conserved rRNA and tRNA genes and are present in nearly all analyzed angiosperms, gymnosperms, and ferns, though losses occur in select lineages like and . In animals, IRs manifest prominently through inverted pairs of Alu elements, which are primate-specific short interspersed nuclear elements () constituting ~10% of the ; these inverted Alu pairs form the most abundant class of cellular double-stranded RNAs when transcribed from oppositely oriented loci, with nearly half residing in introns and contributing to genomic architecture in . Viruses frequently incorporate inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) at genome ends, essential for replication and packaging. In parvoviruses, such as adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) and human parvovirus B19, ITRs range from 145–165 bp and enable DNA replication when provided with helper proteins; these are functional across parvovirus hybrids and conserved for virion production. Adenoviruses similarly feature ITRs of ~100–140 bp, with highly conserved initial sequences (e.g., the first 50 bp across human serotypes) that support replication origins and show homology between subgroups. Across taxa, IR prevalence trends toward ubiquity, with recent analyses (2025) identifying over 34 million IRs in 118,101 genomes spanning prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and viruses, where only a minority (e.g., ~1 and half of viral genomes) lack them entirely; the invertiaDB provides a comprehensive database for these data. Organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts display elevated IR densities due to their compact sizes—e.g., 45-fold higher in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria than in chromosomal DNA—reflecting adaptations for stability in reduced genomes. Variations in IR length and frequency underscore evolutionary pressures, with shorter IRs (<10 bp) dominating prokaryotes and longer ones (>15 kb) characteristic of plant plastids.

Obligatory Genomic Regions

Inverted repeats (IRs) are indispensable structural elements in specific genomic regions, where their presence ensures chromosomal stability, replication fidelity, or mobility of genetic elements. These obligatory sites highlight the critical role of IRs in maintaining across eukaryotes, particularly in regions prone to structural challenges like ends of linear chromosomes or repetitive arrays. In such contexts, IRs facilitate protein binding, loop formation, or enzymatic recognition essential for function. In telomeres, IRs manifest as inverted variants of the canonical TTAGGG telomeric repeats, contributing to the protective architecture at ends. A prominent example occurs at the fusion site of human 2, where two arrays of degenerate telomeric repeats are arranged in an inverted (head-to-head) orientation, remnants of an ancestral telomere-telomere fusion event that stabilized the resulting structure. These IRs, spanning approximately 800 base pairs with partial TTAGGG/CCCTAA motifs, prevent end-to-end fusions and support centromeric function in the fused , underscoring their obligatory role in evolutionary chromosomal rearrangements. Centromeres rely on IRs within alpha-satellite DNA for proper kinetochore assembly and chromosome segregation. Human centromeric alpha-satellite consists of tandem 171-bp monomers organized into higher-order repeats, incorporating head-to-head and tail-to-tail inverted repeats that form the core functional domain. These IRs, often spanning megabases, recruit centromere proteins like CENP-A and CENP-B, enabling kinetochore formation essential for mitotic spindle attachment; disruption of this IR organization leads to centromere inactivation and aneuploidy. In primate centromeres, the presence of such IRs in alpha-satellite arrays is conserved and obligatory for de novo centromere establishment. Origins of replication in , such as (ARS) elements, incorporate flanking IRs that are crucial for replication initiation. For instance, the ARS307 element features a pair of approximately 599-bp inverted repeats bordering the essential ARS consensus sequence (ACS), positioning the origin at their junction to facilitate (ORC) binding and loading. These IRs enhance replication efficiency by stabilizing the origin structure and promoting bidirectional fork progression; mutations disrupting the IR symmetry abolish ARS activity in . In class II DNA transposons, terminal IRs (TIRs) flank the gene and are obligatory for element mobility. The Tc1/mariner superfamily exemplifies this, with TIRs of 20–30 bp serving as binding sites for the transposase DDD-domain enzyme, which recognizes the inverted sequences to excise and reintegrate the element via a cut-and-paste mechanism. In elements like Mos1 (mariner), these TIRs are essential for transposition in diverse hosts, including humans and ; alterations in TIR sequence or abolish mobility and transposon propagation.

Biological Functions

Roles in DNA Replication and Repair

Inverted repeats (IRs) play significant roles in DNA replication by facilitating the initiation of replication forks at origins of replication. In various biological systems, including phages, plasmids, mitochondria, eukaryotic viruses, and mammalian cells, IRs are enriched at replication origins where they can extrude into cruciform structures. These cruciforms promote bidirectional replication initiation by providing a structural platform for the assembly of replication initiation complexes, stabilizing the unwound DNA and enabling the loading of helicases and polymerases. During the elongation phase of replication, IRs can impede fork progression, leading to stalling. The formation of secondary structures such as hairpins or cruciforms within IR sequences causes slippage or pausing, particularly when the repeats are prone to base-pairing. This stalling is exacerbated in repetitive regions and can result in replication fork collapse if not resolved, contributing to genomic instability. For instance, in mammalian cells, short perfect IRs (≤30 bp) form cruciforms that trigger fork , highlighting their role as hotspots for replication stress. In , IRs are involved in pathways where they mediate the formation of Holliday junctions during strand invasion and exchange. These junctions arise from recombination events between IR sequences, and their resolution is facilitated by structure-specific resolvases such as RuvC in , which bind and cleave the junctions symmetrically to restore intact duplexes. This process is essential for repairing double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiated at or near IRs, preventing chromosomal aberrations. Additionally, IR-induced structures serve as recognition sites for structure-specific endonucleases, such as the SLX1-SLX4 complex in eukaryotes, which cleave the extruded arms to initiate repair. IRs contribute to mutagenicity through the induction of DSBs during replication or repair, which are subsequently processed by (NHEJ) or (HR). In NHEJ, DSBs at IR-flanked regions often result in insertions or deletions (indels) due to imprecise ligation, while HR can lead to inverted duplications if the repeats facilitate strand annealing. For example, DSBs near natural IRs in promote high-frequency inverted duplications via error-prone repair in cells deficient in Sae2 or Mre11, underscoring the mutagenic potential of these sequences.

Involvement in RNA Structures

Inverted repeats (IRs) in sequences enable the formation of pseudoknots, tertiary structures characterized by two helical stems arising from base-pairing between non-adjacent complementary regions, resulting in crossing interactions that stack coaxially for enhanced stability. These pseudoknots often involve IRs where one sequence pairs with a distant inverted complement, creating loops (L1, L2, L3) that connect the stems (S1, S2), as seen in H-type pseudoknots prevalent in functional . In bacterial tmRNA, multiple pseudoknots (PK1–PK4) incorporate such IR-derived pairings to mimic tRNA structure during trans-translation, rescuing stalled ribosomes by tagging incomplete proteins. In viral genomes, IR-mediated pseudoknots play critical roles in , notably in HIV-1 where the gag-pol frameshift signal forms a from IR sequences downstream of a slippery heptanucleotide, inducing -1 ribosomal frameshifting to produce the Gag-Pol polyprotein essential for . This structure features a minor groove triplex interaction between S1 and L3, stabilizing the motif against unfolding during translation. Similarly, the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribozyme relies on IRs to fold into its active rod-like conformation, enabling self-cleavage during rolling-circle replication, with the pseudoknot-like junction contributing to catalytic efficiency. IRs also contribute to riboswitch architectures, where they form stems in domains that undergo conformational changes upon binding to regulate downstream . In the (TPP) riboswitch, IR sequences create parallel helices (P3, P4, P5) in the aptamer, facilitating specific TPP recognition and sequestration of the expression platform in the absence of . binding stabilizes these IR-derived stems, often involving long-distance base-pairing over hundreds of , as observed in eukaryotic TPP variants that modulate . The stability of IR-formed pseudoknots is quantified using free energy (ΔG) calculations, which account for stacking interactions, loop entropies, and effects; for instance, H-type pseudoknots exhibit ΔG values ranging from -10 to -20 kcal/mol, with loop size influencing flexibility—smaller L2 loops (3–6 nt) enhance stability by reducing penalties. These metrics, derived from nearest-neighbor models extended to pseudoknots, highlight how IRs promote compact, functional folds in compact viral genomes. High-throughput RNA-seq analyses have revealed the prevalence of IRs in long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), with over 55% overlapping inverted repeat regions that likely form pseudoknot-like structures influencing nuclear retention and regulatory interactions. Such findings underscore IRs' role in lncRNA secondary structure diversity, as detected in diverse organisms including and mammals.

Contributions to Gene Regulation

Inverted repeats (IRs) contribute to gene regulation by serving as binding sites for transcription factors in promoter regions. In the bone sialoprotein (BSP) gene promoter, an inverted TATA box sequence (5'-TTTATA-3') binds the (TBP) with affinity comparable to the consensus TATA box (5'-TATAAA-3'), facilitating assembly of the preinitiation complex and directing downstream transcription initiation. Similarly, in the TATA-less promoter of the catalase gene, IR sequences flanking multiple transcription initiation sites bind nuclear factors, forming distinct protein-DNA complexes that modulate basal transcription levels. IRs also participate in enhancer and silencer functions through mechanisms such as DNA looping and RNA-mediated silencing. Regulatory proteins often recognize IRs as palindromic motifs to stabilize chromatin loops that bring distant enhancers into proximity with target promoters, enhancing or repressing transcription. In plants, transcripts from IR constructs or endogenous loci form double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), which is processed by Dicer-like enzymes into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs); these siRNAs then guide the (RISC) to complementary target mRNAs, leading to their cleavage and post-transcriptional . In epigenetic regulation, IRs, particularly those derived from transposable elements, recruit machinery to induce formation. In , polymorphic IRs near coding genes trigger siRNA-directed and H3K9 dimethylation, establishing repressive states that silence nearby genes and maintain epigenetic inheritance. A prominent example of IRs in involves inverted Alu repeats in human introns, which influence . These SINE-derived IRs form dsRNA stem-loop structures across flanking introns, promoting or backsplicing to generate circular RNAs; for instance, in the RABL5 gene, an antisense AluSx suppresses exon 3 inclusion, while a sense AluJo partially counteracts this effect to fine-tune isoform production. In the SMN genes, high-density inverted Alus drive diverse circRNA biogenesis, with RNA-binding proteins like NF90 enhancing and DHX9 repressing the process.

Formation and Stability Factors

Conditions Favoring Formation

Inverted repeats (IRs) arise and persist under specific evolutionary pressures that confer selective advantages, particularly in regions of high recombination activity. IRs are often enriched in recombination hotspots due to their role in facilitating genetic mobility and rearrangement events, such as those mediated by transposable elements that utilize terminal IRs for excision and insertion. Additionally, sequences with elevated are more likely to form stable IR structures, as the stronger base pairing in GC-rich stems enhances or extrusion, promoting their evolutionary conservation in functional genomic contexts. Biochemical conditions significantly influence the formation of IRs by promoting the adoption of non-B DNA conformations. Negative supercoiling in DNA, a common feature during replication and transcription, unwinds the double helix and drives the extrusion of cruciform structures from IR sequences, with stability increasing at superhelical densities of -0.03 or higher. In RNA contexts, divalent cations like Mg²⁺ ions are essential for stabilizing folded structures, including hairpins formed by IRs, by neutralizing phosphate backbone repulsions and facilitating tertiary interactions at physiological concentrations around 1-10 mM. Mutational processes contribute to the origins of IRs through mechanisms that generate or amplify these sequences. Transposition events, particularly involving DNA transposons with inherent terminal IRs, can insert or duplicate IR motifs across the genome, leading to their proliferation. Genomic contexts that predispose to replication errors further favor IR accumulation. AT-rich regions exhibit higher IR density owing to increased polymerase slippage during DNA synthesis, where the lower stability of AT pairs allows template-primer misalignment, facilitating the creation or expansion of short IRs via hairpin-mediated deletions or insertions. These conditions collectively enhance the likelihood of IR formation without relying solely on post-formation stability dynamics.

Structural Stability Mechanisms

The stability of inverted repeat structures, such as hairpins in single-stranded DNA or RNA and cruciforms in double-stranded DNA, is fundamentally governed by thermodynamic principles that favor free energy minimization through base stacking and hydrogen bonding interactions. The formation of these structures involves branch migration, where the equilibrium constant KK for the transition from duplex to cruciform is related to the Gibbs free energy change by ΔG=−RTln⁡K\Delta G = -RT \ln K, with longer stem arms (typically at least 6 base pairs) providing more favorable ΔG\Delta G due to increased stacking energy contributions from adjacent bases. Shorter loops between arms further enhance this stability by reducing entropic penalties associated with loop flexibility. Protein factors play a crucial role in maintaining inverted repeat structures by binding specifically to junction points and modulating local . High-mobility group (HMG) proteins, such as and Hmo1, bind with high affinity to four-way junctions, bending the DNA and stabilizing the extruded form against branch migration reversal, thereby preserving negative supercoiling . Topoisomerases, including TOP1 and TOP2, contribute by relieving torsional stress through strand cleavage and religation, preventing unwinding that could destabilize the structure while facilitating its persistence during cellular processes. Environmental conditions significantly influence the persistence of these structures by altering electrostatic and hydrogen bonding equilibria. Salt concentrations, particularly monovalent (e.g., Na+^+) and divalent (e.g., Mg2+^{2+}) cations, stabilize cruciforms at physiological levels (around 100-200 mM) by screening phosphate repulsion in the stacked-X configuration, with higher concentrations promoting extrusion in supercoiled DNA. Temperature effects follow standard denaturation kinetics, where elevated temperatures (above 37°C) increase thermal motion, weakening base pairing and reducing stability, while neutral pH (5-9) supports hydrogen bond integrity; deviations to acidic or basic extremes disrupt these bonds, favoring duplex reversion. In RNA inverted repeats, stem dynamics involve "breathing" motions—transient opening and closing of base pairs at the termini—which allow adaptive conformational sampling without full denaturation, enhancing overall structural resilience under fluctuating conditions.

Pathological Effects

Mutational Mechanisms

Inverted repeats (IRs) contribute to genomic instability primarily through , where the complementary sequences of the repeats pair abnormally, forming structures such as Holliday junctions that resolve into deletions or inversions of the intervening DNA segment. This process is often initiated by replication fork stalling at IR-induced secondary structures, promoting Rad51-dependent strand invasion and subsequent annealing, which can lead to non-allelic events. In models, long IRs (LIRs) have been shown to induce gross deletions by facilitating such pairings, with breakpoints frequently occurring near the repeat boundaries. Replication slippage represents another key mutational mechanism involving IRs, particularly during when the pauses or dissociates within repetitive regions, allowing the nascent strand to realign with the template in a mispaired configuration. For inverted repeats, this misalignment can invert sequences between the repeats or generate frameshift mutations through small insertions or deletions, as the resumes extension from the slipped position. Expansions may also occur if the slippage favors loop-out formation on the template strand, extending the repeat length, a phenomenon observed in bacterial systems where quasipalindromic sequences act as hotspots. IRs can adopt non-B DNA conformations, such as cruciform structures, which are prone to cleavage and subsequent erroneous repair, exacerbating genomic instability. These cruciforms, formed by extrusion of the inverted arms during replication or transcription, are recognized and diagonally cleaved by nucleases like GEN1 at the four-way junction, generating hairpin-capped ends that resemble double-strand breaks (DSBs). The hairpins are then opened by , producing ligatable ends that are joined via non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), often resulting in translocations or deletions with microhomology-mediated errors. Recent studies have highlighted the role of short IRs, including quasi-palindromes with imperfect complementarity, in elevating rates in somatic cells by 1.8- to 90-fold relative to non-IR regions, particularly within spacer sequences of genomes. This hypermutability is domain-specific, with the highest rates in spacers between the IR arms, and is independent of common repair deficiencies like mismatch repair, suggesting direct structural interference with replication fidelity. Such findings underscore how even brief IRs (typically 10-30 arms) can drive localized instability across diverse genomic contexts.

Associated Diseases

In , frameshift mutations in the COL1A1 gene, which encodes the alpha-1 chain of , can lead to truncated or abnormal proteins that compromise integrity and cause brittle bones. Such mutations, often resulting from insertions or deletions, shift the and introduce premature stop codons, reducing functional secretion and manifesting as type I with frequent fractures and skeletal deformities. Additional diseases linked to inverted repeats include Friedreich ataxia, where expansions of GAA trinucleotide repeats in the FXN gene form non-B DNA structures such as triplexes, promoting replication stalling and gene silencing that causes progressive neurodegeneration and . In (FSHD), contractions of D4Z4 macrosatellite repeats, which contain inverted repeat elements, lead to derepression of the DUX4 gene, resulting in and atrophy. In cancer, inverted repeats can contribute to genomic instability by facilitating chromosomal translocations through double-strand breaks at repeat sites. Therapeutic strategies targeting inverted repeats in these diseases include editing to correct point mutations or contract repeat expansions, restoring normal gene expression; for instance, has been used to excise GAA repeats in models, alleviating deficiency and improving cellular function. Similarly, AAV-based approaches have been applied to repair mutations in osteoblasts, potentially preventing disease progression through precise genomic correction.

Detection and Analysis Tools

Software Programs

Several software programs have been developed to detect and analyze inverted repeats (IRs) in DNA and RNA sequences, enabling researchers to identify these structures with varying degrees of approximation and specificity. The Inverted Repeats Finder (IRF), developed at , is a widely used command-line tool for detecting approximate IRs in genomic sequences. It employs an alignment-based algorithm to identify mirror repeats, allowing users to tune parameters such as arm length, spacer length, and mismatch tolerance to target specific IR configurations. Originally introduced in a 2004 study analyzing the , IRF has been applied to reveal large-scale IR distributions, with updates enhancing accuracy through improved endpoint detection. Palindrome Analyser is a user-friendly web-based server designed for predicting and evaluating IRs in both DNA and RNA sequences. It scans for potential palindromic structures and provides stability scores based on thermodynamic parameters, facilitating the assessment of IR formation potential. Launched in 2016, the tool supports sequence submissions up to 100 kb and outputs detailed visualizations of predicted IRs, making it accessible for non-specialists in structural genomics research. For specialized detection of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in eukaryotic genomes, MiteFinderII offers an efficient algorithm adapted from earlier MITE-finding methods. This open-source tool identifies short IR-flanked sequences that may be obscured by sequence divergence, using a combination of and alignment to achieve high sensitivity across large datasets. Introduced in , MiteFinderII has been validated on diverse eukaryotic genomes, outperforming predecessors in recovering non-autonomous transposable elements. UGENE Repeat Finder, integrated within the open-source UGENE bioinformatics platform, provides a versatile plugin for searching direct, inverted, and tandem repeats in DNA sequences. Users can configure parameters like minimum repeat length and identity threshold to locate unique or clustered IRs, with results visualized in sequence annotations. This tool supports and integration with other UGENE workflows, making it suitable for analyses. In the 2020s, TotalRepeats emerged as a de novo tool for large-scale genomic repeat detection, including IRs, through efficient k-mer-based clustering and masking. It processes entire genomes to identify and categorize repetitive elements with multiple copies, supporting both perfect and imperfect matches, and is particularly useful for preprocessing sequences in PCR design or assembly projects.00270-7) Developed as part of a comprehensive , TotalRepeats handles interspersed and clustered repeats at genome-wide scales without relying on pre-annotated libraries.00270-7.pdf)

Databases and Resources

Several specialized databases provide curated collections of inverted repeat (IR) sequences and annotations, facilitating research into their genomic distribution, evolutionary roles, and functional implications. One prominent resource is invertiaDB, launched in 2025, which serves as the first comprehensive multi-taxa database of IRs, encompassing over 34 million IR sequences identified across 118,101 genomes from , viruses, eukaryotes, and . This database offers advanced search functionalities, interactive visualizations of IR biophysical properties such as arm and spacer lengths, and downloadable datasets in formats like and CSV, enabling detailed analyses of IR density and nucleotide composition across taxa. For plant-specific studies, the Plant Chloroplast Inverted Repeats (PCIR) database, established in 2019, focuses on IRs within chloroplast genomes of 113 plant species, including 21,433 IR sequences, 16,948 functional genes, and visual maps for phylogenetic analysis. PCIR provides an online tool for IR prediction from user-submitted DNA sequences and supports comparative studies of IR-mediated genome stability in chloroplasts. Repbase, a widely used repository of eukaryotic repetitive elements maintained by the Genetic Information Research Institute, includes for IRs as components of transposable elements and other repeats, with over 44,000 prototypic sequences available for annotation pipelines. These IR annotations in Repbase are particularly valuable for identifying miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and their contributions to . The UCSC Genome Browser integrates IR tracking through its RepeatMasker track, which annotates interspersed repeats including IRs in reference genomes like human GRCh38, using Repbase libraries to mask and visualize repetitive regions for downstream functional studies. This resource allows users to query IR locations alongside gene models and conservation scores, aiding in the interpretation of IRs in regulatory contexts. Furthermore, Ensembl enhances IR accessibility by linking its repeat feature annotations—derived from RepeatMasker and other sources—to functional data, such as gene regulatory elements and variant impacts, across vertebrate and plant genomes for integrated genomic analysis.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6420913/
  2. https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/transposons-the-jumping-genes-518
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC55881/
  4. https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-021-03983-2
  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/?term=Inverted+Repeat+Sequences
  6. https://tandem.bu.edu/irf/home
  7. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113349
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC326756/
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1170141/
  10. https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06930.x
  11. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/53/8/gkaf329/8118974
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273639821_Short_Inverted_Repeats_Are_Hotspots_for_Genetic_Instability_Relevance_to_Cancer_Genomes
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6835207/
  14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6545/
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1204734/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3166569/
  17. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.00963-07
  18. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1418384112
  19. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.73.11.9303-9313.1999
  20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh?Db=mesh&Cmd=DetailsSearch&Term=%2522Repetitive%2BSequences%2C%2BNucleic%2BAcid%2522%255BMeSH%2BTerms%255D
  21. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051064
  22. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/humu.20202
  23. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0701631104
  24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559254/
  25. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.111008398
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC40140/
  27. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Tandem-Repeat
  28. https://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html
  29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00294-010-0302-6
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5054066/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1186966/
  32. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/11/6171
  33. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep08300
  34. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2305298120
  35. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0015654
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7999016/
  37. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/45/19/11213/4090957
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC524409/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10813616/
  40. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1319313110
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8891900/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3278479/
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088875431930850X
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12019632/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5941160/
  46. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.13743
  47. https://www.nature.com/articles/s12276-024-01177-3
  48. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.86.20.8078
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0092867479902770
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC187548/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6121732/
  52. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl4178
  53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38254628/
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923250812000435
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4689423/
  56. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/microbiolspec.mdna3-0033-2014
  57. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/15/3692
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7083089/
  59. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(15)00197-7
  60. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.1093/emboj/17.6.1838
  61. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/embj.2022111998
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42640-5
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7096944/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9366995/
  65. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/41/5/3022/2414997
  66. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23376932/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2661829/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7126452/
  69. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0242530
  70. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.13718
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1135850/
  72. https://academic.oup.com/jb/article/121/6/1035/858318
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/inverted-repeat
  74. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02874
  75. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(23)00040-2
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6013304/
  77. https://www.cell.com/fulltext/0092-8674%2883%2990024-7
  78. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.96.22.12471
  79. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.338.6108.758
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC24662/
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9180970/
  82. https://bmcmolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2199-12-33
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1303095/
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022283698918551
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2574756/
  86. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27443-w
  87. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04076.x
  88. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2595
  89. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2295701/
  90. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001270
  91. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-021-00386-0
  92. https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/29/17/2831/5879705
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162253123003293
  94. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27603574/
  95. https://bmcmedgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12920-018-0418-y
  96. https://ugene.net/docs/extensions/repeat-finder/
  97. https://primerdigital.com/tools/repeats.html
  98. https://github.com/Benson-Genomics-Lab/IRF
  99. https://tandem.bu.edu/irf/whats_new
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006291X16314620
  101. https://bioinformatics.ibp.cz/
  102. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30453969/
  103. https://ugene.net/docs/extensions/repeat-finder/repeats-finding/
  104. http://ugene.net/search-for-repeats-in-a-dna-sequence/
  105. https://academic.oup.com/database/article/doi/10.1093/database/baz127/5611292
  106. https://www.girinst.org/repbase/
  107. https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?g=rmsk
  108. https://www.ensembl.org/info/genome/genebuild/assembly_repeats.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.