Hubbry Logo
KalkrieseKalkrieseMain
Open search
Kalkriese
Community hub
Kalkriese
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Kalkriese
Kalkriese
Kalkriese
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Suspected site of the final Battle of the Teutoburg Forest

Kalkriese is a village now administratively part of the city of Bramsche in the district of Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany. It is on the northern slope of the Wiehen Hills, a ridge-like range of hills, north of Osnabrück. The Kalkrieser Berg or Schmittenhöhe, a hill with a height of 157 m (515 ft), is considered by archaeologists to be the likely site of the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest.

The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest (German: Schlacht im Teutoburger Wald, Hermannsschlacht or Varusschlacht), described as clades Variana (the "Varian disaster") by Roman historians, took place in what the Romans called the saltus Teutoburgiensis and has since been identified as Kalkriese in 9 AD, when an alliance of Germanic tribes ambushed and decisively destroyed three Roman legions and their auxiliaries, led by Publius Quinctilius Varus. The anti-Roman alliance was led by Arminius, an officer of Varus' auxiliary forces who had acquired Roman citizenship and received a Roman military education.

The Romans' saltus Teutoburgiensis (Teutoburg Pass) is taken to refer to the strip of cultivated land with a width of 220 m (720 ft) which lies between the Kalkrieser Berg and a large area of wetland to its north, the great bog of Großes Moor. The passage along the northern slope of the Kalkrieser Berg is a difficult one because of the need to cross many deep brooks and rivulets.[1] Since the start of official explorations in 1988 more than 5,500 Roman objects, mainly pieces of military equipment, have been found in an area covering 17 km2 (6.6 sq mi):[2] The objects include Roman swords and daggers, parts of javelins and spears, arrowheads, sling stones, fragments of helmets, soldiers' boot nails, belts, chainmail hooks, and fragments of armor.[1] Among the most significant items is the earliest known Imperial face-mask.[2]

Other items include locks, keys, razors, a scale, weights, chisels, hammers, pickaxes, buckets, finger rings, surgical instruments, seal boxes, a stylus, cauldrons, casseroles, spoons, and amphorae. Jewelry, hairpins, and a disk brooch suggest the presence of women.[1] One of the inscribed objects is a plumb bob with "CHOI", or "C(o)HO(rtis) I", i.e. "property of the first cohort". The other one is a chainmail fastener with the inscription: "M AIUS (cohortis) I (centuriae) FABRICI(i) M AII (cohortis) I (centuriae) FAB(ricii)" ("Marcus Aius of cohort I, centuria of fabricii; property of Marcus Aius of cohort I, centuria of fabricii").[3] A coin struck to commemorate Augustus's adoption of his grandsons Lucius and Gaius in 2 BC has also been found at Kalkriese.[3] In 2016, an archaeological investigation found eight aurei close together at the site, adding to the seven Roman gold coins previously found and tending to corroborate the identification of Kalkriese as the site of the battle.[4][5]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Kalkriese

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Kalkriese is a village and in the district of , , , situated on the northern slope of Kalkrieser Berg near the town of . It is widely recognized as the location of the in 9 CE, where three Roman legions under were ambushed and annihilated by a coalition of Germanic tribes led by , marking one of the Roman Empire's most catastrophic defeats. The battle unfolded over several days in late summer or early autumn of 9 CE, as Varus's army of approximately 15,000–20,000 soldiers, including auxiliaries, marched through difficult terrain in the region, misled by , a Cheruscan noble who had served as a Roman auxiliary officer. Germanic warriors employed guerrilla tactics, trapping the legions in a narrow pass between the hill and a bog, leading to their systematic destruction; Varus ultimately took his own life to avoid capture. This disaster halted Roman attempts to conquer and administer east of the , reshaping the empire's frontiers and influencing subsequent policies under Emperor Augustus. Archaeological investigations at Kalkriese, initiated in and intensified since , have provided compelling evidence confirming the site as the battleground, with systematic excavations uncovering a dense concentration of Roman remains in a 220-meter-wide strip of land. Key findings include over 6,000 artifacts, such as fragments of military equipment (swords, helmets, armor, and spearheads), personal items (jewelry, tools, and surgical instruments), more than 1,500 coins dating to the early CE, and skeletal remains indicating post-battle plundering, body-stripping, and delayed burials in bone pits. These discoveries, including a notable silver parade mask, illustrate the scale of the Roman collapse and the involvement of non-combatants and pack animals. The Museum und Park Kalkriese, established in 2000 on approximately 20 hectares encompassing the battlefield, serves as a major cultural and educational institution dedicated to interpreting the event through its permanent exhibition, opened in 2009, which displays original artifacts and reconstructs the historical context of Roman-Germanic interactions. The site features walking trails, guided tours, and interdisciplinary research programs, emphasizing the battle's role in European history while promoting themes of cultural exchange and ; it received the Europa Nostra Award in 2004 as the first archaeological museum to earn this distinction.

Geography

Location

Kalkriese lies at approximately 52°24′23″N 8°07′43″E, within the Osnabrück district of Lower Saxony in northwestern Germany. This positioning places it in a rural area characterized by its integration into the broader administrative structure of the region, which is known for its historical and archaeological significance. The site is situated adjacent to the town of Bramsche, serving as a village administratively incorporated into it, and is roughly 20 kilometers north of the city of Osnabrück. It forms part of the Wiehen Hills landscape, a low mountain range that extends through the area, providing a defined regional boundary in northwestern Lower Saxony. In the ancient context, Kalkriese was encompassed within , the Roman designation for the territories east of the Rhine River and north of the , lying beyond the empire's established frontier along the Rhine. This region was primarily inhabited by the , a Germanic tribe whose domain included the plains and forests of what is now northwestern , around the upper River valley.

Terrain and environment

The terrain of Kalkriese is dominated by the Kalkrieser Berg, a prominent hill reaching an elevation of 157 meters that forms a northern extension of the Wiehen Hills, characterized by a narrow ridge with steep northern slopes and a constricted pass creating a natural bottleneck approximately one kilometer in length. This hill rises sharply above the surrounding lowlands, with moderate inclines of 3-4% on its toe slopes transitioning into damp, sandy depressions known as the Kalkriese-Niewedder area. To the north, the site borders extensive fens and bogs, such as the Großes Moor at about 47 meters above , while the southern flanks connect to the densely forested Lower Saxon Mountains. In antiquity, the landscape around Kalkriese consisted of dense and forests covering the hills and ridges, interspersed with open areas of scattered fields and pastures, while the northern lowlands featured extensive marshy expanses fed by the Hase River and its tributaries, resulting in wet, poorly drained soils that severely limited mobility for large formations and obscured through thick undergrowth and fog-prone mires. These environmental features, including the boggy depressions with high tables, created a challenging matrix of elevated terrain and impassable wetlands, funneling any passage through the narrow strip between the hill and . Paleo-botanical confirms the predominance of deciduous hardwoods like and in the Teutoburg region during the Roman period, contributing to the area's reputation as a formidable . Over the centuries, the modern landscape of Kalkriese has experienced significant alterations through partial and systematic drainage since the , enabling intensive on the hillside sands and forming Plaggic Anthrosols from medieval land management practices. Despite these changes, including mechanized farming that has homogenized the topsoil, the northern boggy have been largely preserved, maintaining their anoxic, waterlogged conditions that inhibit bacterial decay and thereby aid the natural conservation of buried organic artifacts. This ongoing preservation in the anaerobic environments contrasts with the poorer organic survival in the adjacent sandy uplands.

The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest

Background and prelude

In the late 1st century BCE, Roman expansion into accelerated under Emperor Augustus, with leading campaigns from 12 to 8 BCE that subdued numerous tribes east of the and advanced Roman control toward the River. These efforts established a network of forts and alliances, but Drusus's in 9 BCE shifted command to , who continued pacification until 6 CE. In 7 CE, , a seasoned administrator previously governor of , was appointed to oversee the nascent province of Germania Magna, tasked with consolidating Roman authority through administrative reforms, taxation, and cultural assimilation. Varus, viewing the region as subdued, relied heavily on local Germanic chieftains for governance and intelligence, treating them as integrated subjects rather than potential threats. Opposing Roman ambitions was Arminius, a noble of the tribe born around 18/17 BCE, who had been raised as a in , educated in Latin, and served as an officer in the auxiliary forces, earning equestrian rank and . Despite his integration, Arminius harbored resentment toward Roman domination and, upon returning to around 7 CE, secretly plotted resistance while feigning loyalty to Varus. He forged an alliance among the , his own tribe, along with the neighboring Bructeri and , as well as other groups like the and Chauci, uniting them against further Roman encroachment through promises of independence and shared spoils. This exploited internal divisions among Germanic tribes, many of whom had previously allied with Rome but grew wary of its exploitative policies. In the summer of 9 CE, Varus established a camp near modern along the River, preparing to lead his forces to winter quarters at Castra Vetera near . Arminius, accompanying Varus as a trusted advisor, fabricated reports of a rebellion to the north, urging a swift through unfamiliar terrain to suppress it. Unaware of the trap—despite warnings from Arminius's rival —Varus diverted his column from the safer route, marching into the forested and marshy region of the Teutoburg area. The Roman force comprised Legions XVII, XVIII, and XIX, totaling approximately 15,000 legionaries, supplemented by around 5,000 auxiliaries, including Germanic contingents, for a combined strength of 15,000–20,000 men, encumbered by supply trains, civilians, and non-combatants.

The battle and its course

The Roman army under Publius Quinctilius Varus, comprising Legio XVII, Legio XVIII, Legio XIX, six auxiliary cohorts, and three cavalry alae—totaling approximately 15,000 to 20,000 combatants along with non-combatants—embarked on a march from their summer camp near the Weser River toward the Rhine in the autumn of 9 CE. Lured by false reports of a rebellion to the north, orchestrated by the Cheruscan chieftain Arminius, Varus diverted his column from the safer road through the Ems River valley into the challenging landscape of the Teutoburg Forest, where dense woods, swamps, and rain-saturated paths hindered organized movement. The Germanic coalition, numbering around 12,000 to 15,000 warriors from tribes including the Cherusci, Bructeri, Chatti, and Marsi, exploited this terrain for an extended ambush, employing hit-and-run tactics to harass the Romans without committing to open battle. The engagement unfolded over three days, traditionally dated to September 9–11, amid relentless rain and high winds that soaked equipment and turned the ground into mud, preventing the effective use of Roman bows, slings, and . On the first day, as the elongated column—stretching several kilometers with a vulnerable baggage train at the rear—advanced through narrow defiles, Germanic forces launched initial assaults, targeting and supplies to sow chaos and isolate the legions. By the second day, the Romans attempted to consolidate and , but continual skirmishes fragmented the units, with attackers emerging from cover to shower the flanks with javelins before vanishing into the undergrowth, exacerbating exhaustion and losses estimated in the thousands. The terrain's narrow paths and boggy areas, briefly referenced here for their role in enabling these tactics, further impeded Roman maneuvers. On the third day, the battered remnants reached an open area near a fortified hill, where the Germans intensified their assault, surrounding the survivors and overrunning the camp; Varus, wounded and despairing, fell on his sword alongside senior officers like Lucius Eggius, while the remaining troops either perished in the melee or were captured. The camp at Aliso (possibly modern Haltern am See), defended by prefect Lucius Caedicius, held out against a German siege before the survivors escaped to the Rhine, but the core army was annihilated, with the Germanic warriors desecrating captured Roman standards and the survivors' remains as trophies. In the immediate aftermath, Arminius and his allies celebrated the victory, parading severed heads before friendly tribes, which temporarily unified disparate groups against Rome. News of the disaster reached months later, prompting Emperor to exclaim in grief, "Quintilius Varus, give me back my legions!"—a he reportedly repeated while marking the anniversary as a day of mourning. The loss compelled to abandon expansion beyond the , reinforcing defenses and shifting to a policy of containment, with dispatched to stabilize the frontier.

Archaeological investigations

Initial discoveries

The area around Kalkriese has long been associated with Roman due to scattered finds of coins dating back to the . In 1885, the prominent historian analyzed these coin concentrations and proposed that the site could represent the location of the in AD 9, based on their Augustan-era dating and geographical fit with ancient descriptions. These early discoveries attracted limited attention, with additional Roman coins uncovered by locals in the early , including reports of a silver , but they were not subjected to systematic study and were often attributed to trade networks rather than military events. In , small-scale excavations revealed more coins, yet these were similarly dismissed as evidence of peaceful commerce, delaying recognition of the site's potential battlefield significance. A major turning point occurred in July 1987 when Tony Clunn, a major stationed nearby and an amateur metal detectorist, located over 100 Roman denarii and a silver vessel fragment during casual on Kalkriese Hill. Clunn's methodical recording of the finds—105 coins on his first two days alone—drew immediate interest from local authorities and prompted the involvement of professional archaeologists from the State Archaeological Department. Initial surveys in late 1987 and confirmed an exceptionally high density of Roman artifacts across the Oberesch field, including military items like sling bullets and weapon fragments, concentrated in a narrow passage suggestive of an ambush site. The denarii, minted between 2 BC and AD 9 under , aligned precisely with the chronology of Publius Quinctilius Varus's campaign, strengthening the interpretation that Kalkriese marked the climactic phase of the Varus disaster. This evidence led to the site's official declaration as a protected archaeological in , halting agricultural activity and enabling controlled research.

Major excavations and findings

Systematic archaeological excavations at Kalkriese began in the early 1990s under the direction of the Kalkriese Varusschlacht Foundation, following initial amateur discoveries, and have continued through 2025 in collaboration with universities and research institutions. These efforts have encompassed over 40 hectares across multiple sites, including the main Oberesch area, utilizing a combination of geophysical surveys for subsurface mapping, systematic metal detecting to locate ferrous and non-ferrous artifacts, and detailed stratigraphy to establish depositional layers and chronological sequences. By 2025, more than 30 years of professional digs have yielded a comprehensive dataset, with annual campaigns focusing on targeted trenches and non-invasive prospection to minimize site disturbance, including 2024 analyses identifying the metallurgic signature of Legio XIX in artifacts. The excavations have uncovered over 6,000 Roman artifacts, providing of the site's association with late Augustan-era conflicts. Prominent among these are iron weapons such as swords, including examples of the Mainz-type characterized by its waisted blade and long point, and pugiones (daggers) with tapered blades suitable for close combat. Armor fragments are also abundant, highlighted by the 2018 discovery of a nearly complete , featuring articulated iron bands and brass fittings, marking one of the earliest known examples of this segmented armor type from around 9 CE. Over 2,000 coins, predominantly denarii and asses minted between 2 BCE and 9 CE under , show a high concentration of issues from 7-9 CE, supporting a for the main deposition event. Human remains from at least 82 individuals, uncovered in a 2018 bone pit discovery, exhibit perimortem trauma such as cut marks from blades and fractures consistent with interpersonal violence, often found in scattered, disarticulated contexts. Germanic-associated items include lead sling bullets, some molded for production on-site, and wooden stakes from a possible barrier, indicating local involvement. These findings interpret Kalkriese as the site of a sudden ambush rather than a prolonged engagement, with artifact scatters concentrated along a narrow corridor suggesting a trapped Roman force funneling through boggy terrain. The presence of deliberately placed deposits, such as bundled weapons and isolated skulls, points to post-battle rituals by Germanic warriors, including dedications to deities like Nerthus. Notably, the absence of a full legionary camp or extensive fortification infrastructure reinforces the narrative of a chaotic defeat without established Roman positions, aligning with ancient accounts of rapid destruction.

Varusschlacht Museum and Park

History and development

The development of the Varusschlacht Museum and Park in Kalkriese began in 1987, when officer Tony Clunn, using a , discovered a of 105 Roman denarii dated before 9 CE on the Oberesch ridge, followed by three Roman sling leads in 1988, prompting systematic archaeological interest in the site as a potential location for the . These finds led to the establishment of the Kalkriese Varusschlacht Foundation in the early 1990s to coordinate excavations and preservation efforts, with major digs commencing in 1990 under the supervision of the State Archaeological Institute. The , encompassing 24 hectares of the historical landscape, officially opened to the public in 2000, allowing initial visitor access to the terrain while ongoing research continued. The museum building opened on April 21, 2002, designed by Swiss architects Gigon/Guyer as a long, low structure with a zinc roof and glass walls that integrates seamlessly into the surrounding moorland, emphasizing the site's natural contours over monumental architecture. Funding for construction and operations came from a combination of Lower Saxony state grants, the European Union through cultural heritage programs, and regional sponsors including the Osnabrück district and local savings banks foundations, enabling the display of over 3,000 artifacts recovered from the site. The institution, managed by VARUSSCHLACHT im Osnabrücker Land gGmbH under the foundation's oversight, allocates an annual research budget to support continued excavations and conservation, with expansions such as a new visitor center in 2009 enhancing facilities. By the 2020s, the museum and park had achieved significant growth, contributing to regional tourism initiatives like the Osnabrücker Land cultural routes that highlight Roman-Germanic heritage sites. This expansion reflects the site's evolution from a localized archaeological project into a key European cultural institution, recognized with the 2004 European Union Prize for Cultural Heritage / Europa Nostra Award for its innovative integration of research, landscape preservation, and public education.

Exhibits and visitor experience

The permanent exhibition in the Varusschlacht Museum, titled "The Varus Battle," immerses visitors in the events of AD 9 through a dedicated hall featuring 1:1 scale reconstructions of tents and detailed dioramas that depict the chaotic clash between Roman forces and Germanic tribes. Interactive timelines allow guests to explore , course, and aftermath of the battle via touchscreens and displays, while artifact showcases highlight original finds such as swords, armor, and coins preserved under glass, providing tangible connections to the soldiers' experiences. These elements combine models, illustrations, and surprising audio effects to engage visitors of all ages, particularly children and youths, fostering an understanding of Roman and Germanic daily life. The surrounding park enhances the interpretive experience across its 24-hectare expanse, where a marked guides visitors through the recreated of the battle site, including reconstructed fortifications and earthen ramparts that evoke the tactical used by the Germanic warriors. A prominent rises 40 meters high, offering sweeping views of the and boggy areas reconstructed to match ancient conditions, helping visitors visualize the ambush's geography. Multimedia apps complement the outdoor exploration with tours accessible via , overlaying historical animations and narratives onto the real for an immersive, self-paced journey. Educational programs at the museum and park emphasize about the era, with guided tours led by experts covering the and grounds in multiple languages, including English. Workshops on Roman life introduce participants to aspects like and daily routines through hands-on activities, while annual reenactments during events such as Roman and Germanic Days bring the battle to life with costumed performers demonstrating combat and camp setups. Accessibility is prioritized through audio guides available in German and English for adults and children, offering tailored tours of the , park, and specialized paths like the Undercover soil parcours, ensuring broad participation.

Site identification debate

Evidence supporting Kalkriese

The topography of Kalkriese, featuring a narrow strip of land hemmed in by a hill to the north and extensive bogs to the south, closely matches the ancient descriptions of the battle site provided by Roman historians. , in his , depicted the disaster occurring in a constricted pass within the , characterized by dense woods and swampy ground that hindered Roman maneuverability, a configuration evident at Kalkriese near the Osning ridge, historically identified as the Teutoburg Forest. Furthermore, the site's location in the core territory of the tribe, under the leadership of , aligns with literary accounts of the ambush orchestrated by local Germanic forces against the Roman expedition. Archaeological evidence from Kalkriese includes a dense concentration of more than 1,500 Roman coins, many minted in the years leading up to AD 9 and bearing the image of Augustus, indicating limited circulation time consistent with the battle's date and the sudden destruction of the Roman force. Military artifacts, such as swords, spearheads, and armor fragments, bear metallurgical signatures traceable to the 19th Legion (Legio XIX), including trace elements unique to its equipment production. Human skeletal remains exhibit trauma patterns suggestive of close-quarters ambush violence, exemplified by a cranium pierced by a sword blow and other bones showing perimortem sharp-force injuries from Germanic weapons. Supporting scientific analyses reinforce this identification. Pollen and studies of sediments and organic residues at the site indicate heavy rainfall and conditions consistent with early , corroborating historical narratives of the battle unfolding in late summer amid worsening weather that turned the terrain into a quagmire. Geophysical surveys using magnetometry and from the through the detected no traces of pre-Roman settlements or structures in the core battle zone, consistent with a temporary site in otherwise undeveloped woodland rather than an established Roman outpost. While recent geoarchaeological research has questioned certain interpretations of the landscape features, the cumulative historical and material evidence continues to affirm Kalkriese as the primary locus of the Varus disaster.

Challenges and alternative theories

A 2024 geoarchaeological study led by W. Härtling has presented compelling evidence questioning the Roman-era dating of key linear structures at Kalkriese. Applying radiocarbon (¹⁴C) and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating methods, the research dated the southern rampart and associated ditch to approximately 900–1100 CE, while the northern V-shaped ditch fill was placed around 1000–1100 CE. These findings indicate that the structures, long interpreted as Germanic fortifications or a Roman defensive encampment from AD 9, originated in the Early rather than the Augustan period. The study posits that medieval agricultural practices likely disturbed and redistributed Roman artifacts across the site, creating a palimpsest landscape that complicates direct attribution to the Varus disaster. Beyond dating discrepancies, broader critiques highlight the site's archaeological profile as inconsistent with expectations for a major Roman defeat involving three legions. Notably, no large-scale mass burial pits have been uncovered, despite historical accounts suggesting thousands of casualties; instead, only eight small bone pits containing fragmented remains—possibly buried years later by ' expedition—have been found, hindered by high groundwater levels that complicate excavations. The absence of traces from a complete Roman marching camp, combined with the dispersed pattern of military equipment, coins, and personal items over a wide area, has led some scholars to interpret the finds as evidence of extended trade interactions or sporadic skirmishes rather than a concentrated three-day . Alternative site proposals persist, drawing on analyses of Roman itineraries and Tacitean descriptions, with locations near along the River or the plateau suggested as more aligned with Varus' likely route from summer to winter quarters. These challenges underscore the need for continued interdisciplinary efforts, including advanced geophysical surveys and re-examination of historical texts; however, as of 2025, they have not overturned the prevailing acceptance of Kalkriese but have prompted reevaluation of the site's role in the battle narrative.

References

  1. https://www.livius.org/articles/battle/teutoburg-forest-9-ce/kalkriese/
  2. https://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/en/about-us/mission-statement.html
  3. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006.06.30/
  4. https://www.academia.edu/67689093/The_Battlefield_of_Kalkriese_Archaeological_Evidence_of_a_total_Roman_Defeat
  5. https://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/en/museum-park.html
  6. https://pleiades.stoa.org/places/98992
  7. https://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/en/the-varus-battle.html
  8. https://latitude.to/articles-by-country/de/germany/36108/kalkriese
  9. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/BarbarianCherusci.htm
  10. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/roman-geography/neighboring-lands-around-ancient-rome/germania/
  11. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/gea.22031
  12. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5057&context=facpub
  13. https://www.environmentandsociety.org/sites/default/files/1203_sickness_web_color.pdf
  14. https://theconversation.com/bogs-are-unique-records-of-history-heres-why-100627
  15. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/cassius-dio/cassius-dio-on-the-teutoburg-forest/
  16. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA502346.pdf
  17. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/56*.html#18
  18. https://www.academia.edu/30592845/The_Disaster_at_Teutoburg_Forest_in_September_9_AD
  19. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/56*.html#19
  20. https://www.livius.org/articles/battle/teutoburg-forest-9-ce/teutoburg-forest-2/
  21. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/56*.html#20
  22. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/paterculus-on-the-battle-in-the-teutoburg-forest/
  23. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/56*.html#21
  24. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/56*.html#22
  25. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28292/chapter/214487094
  26. https://www.hadas.org.uk/category/past-newsletters/page/3/
  27. https://www.world-archaeology.com/world/europe/germany/uncovering-kalkriese/
  28. https://www.academia.edu/129958210/The_Ancient_Battlefield_at_Kalkriese
  29. https://www.historyhit.com/kalkriese-archaeology-teutoburg-forest/
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270078400_Weapons_at_the_battlefield_of_Kalkriese
  31. https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/59648
  32. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1721372115
  33. https://www.academia.edu/91681316/The_Ancient_Conflict_Landscape_of_Kalkriese_Varian_Disaster_9_CE_New_Insights_into_the_Course_of_the_Battle_and_the_Post_Battle_Processes
  34. https://www.academia.edu/67689089/Looting_and_scrapping_at_the_ancient_battlefield_of_Kalkriese_9_A_D_
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320363246_Small_Finds_and_Roman_Battlefields_The_Process_and_Impact_of_Post-Battle_Looting
  36. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-ambush-that-changed-history-72636736/
  37. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z9BRaGoZ4E
  38. https://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/en/index.html
  39. https://www.gigon-guyer.ch/en/project/archaeological-museum-kalkriese/
  40. https://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/en/about-us/funding-organizations.html
  41. https://www.germany.travel/en/cities-culture/battle-of-varus-in-osnabruecker-land-kalkriese-museum-and-park.html
  42. https://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/en/museum-park/exhibitions/the-varus-battle-exhibition.html
  43. https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g616150-d2226737-Reviews-Museum_and_Park-Bramsche_Lower_Saxony.html
  44. https://mapy.com/en/?source=osm&id=111033071
  45. https://lostfort.blogspot.com/2006/08/kalkriese-overview.html
  46. https://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/en/your-visit/visitor-information/audio-guides.html
  47. https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/printthread.php?tid=18272
  48. https://www.heritagedaily.com/2022/12/metallurgical-fingerprint-points-to-lost-roman-legion/145436
  49. https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/ancient-history/teutoborg/
  50. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.22031
  51. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09592318.2020.1764714
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.