Hubbry Logo
KrasukhaKrasukhaMain
Open search
Krasukha
Community hub
Krasukha
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Krasukha
Krasukha
Krasukha
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Krasukha (Russian: Красуха; English: Belladonna or Deadly Nightshade) is a Russian mobile, ground-based, electronic warfare (EW) system. This system is produced by the KRET corporation on different wheeled platforms.[1] The Krasukha's primary targets are airborne radio-electronics (such as UAVs) and airborne systems guided by radar. The Krasukha has multiple applications in the Russian Armed Forces,[2] has been deployed beyond Russian borders, and supplied to additional armed forces, such as those of Iran.[3]

Key Information

Krasukha-2

[edit]

The Krasukha-2 is a S-band system designed to jam Airborne Early Warning and Control (AWACS) aircraft such as the Boeing E-3 Sentry at ranges of up to 250 kilometres (160 mi).[2][4][5] The Krasukha-2 can also jam other airborne radars, such as those for radar-guided missiles. The missiles, once jammed, then receive a false target away from the original to ensure that the missiles no longer pose a threat. The Krasukha-2 guards mobile high-priority targets such as the 9K720 Iskander SRBM.[2]

Krasukha-4

[edit]

The Krasukha-4 is a broadband multifunctional jamming station mounted on a BAZ-6910-022 four-axle-chassis. It complements the Krasukha-2 system by operating in the X-band and Ku-band, and counters airborne radar aircraft such as the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTAR) Northrop Grumman E-8.[5] The Krasukha-4 has enough range to effectively disrupt low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites and can cause permanent damage to targeted radio-electronic devices.[6] Ground based radars are also a viable target for the Krasukha-4.[1]

Operators

[edit]

Operational history

[edit]

Krasukha jammers were reportedly deployed to support Russian forces in Syria.[13] They have reportedly been blocking small U.S. surveillance drones from receiving GPS satellite signals.[14] During the Turkish intervention in the Syrian civil war, the complex apparently destroyed a Bayraktar drone by causing it to lose control, subsequently crashing.[15] The Israeli Defense Force had problems in 2021 with the Krasukha S-4 GPS denial system, which led to Israel's successful development of non-GPS weapons targeting and anti-GPS-jamming technology.[16]

In July 2018, an OSCE monitoring mission drone recorded a 1L269 Krasukha-2 among other electronic warfare equipment deployed near Chornukhyne, Ukraine.[17]

In 2018, Russia’s Krasukha-4 microwave cannon reportedly grounded an American AH-64 Apache attack helicopter in Syria by damaging its electrical circuits.[18]

In 2020, Krasukha was claimed (without evidence)[19] to have operated around the Russian military base at Gyumri in Armenia to counter the use by Azerbaijan of Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 armed drones as well as Israel-made Harop loitering munition (suicide drones).[20]

The first export contract was officially signed in August 2021.[21]

Krasukha-4 models are also being employed in the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, as Ukrainian forces captured one of these devices in the field near Kyiv. A photograph posted to social media claims to show part of the system, which has been separated from its truck mount and shows some damage.[22][23] The unit was then sent to the United States for examination.[24]

On 9 August 2023, a source in the Russian defense industry told the state news agency TASS that several Southeast Asian nations and an Eastern European country have ordered the Krasukha and Sapphire EW systems.[25]

In August 2025, it was confirmed that Russia had supplied Iran with Krasukha EW systems,

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Krasukha

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Krasukha is a family of mobile, ground-based electronic warfare systems developed by Russia's (KRET) to detect, disrupt, and suppress enemy airborne, ground-based, and systems through broadband jamming. Key variants include the Krasukha-2 (1L269E), which primarily targets systems (AWACS) by jamming their radars, and the more advanced Krasukha-4 (1RL257E), capable of neutralizing low-Earth orbit (LEO) spy satellites, airborne radars, and ground-based installations within an effective radius of up to 300 kilometers. These truck-mounted systems, typically based on wheeled for mobility, have been integral to Russian military operations, including extensive deployment in the conflict with to counter drones, GPS-guided munitions, and assets. has also exported Krasukha systems to allied nations, with confirmed deliveries to and reported presence in , enhancing their defensive capabilities against aerial and satellite threats. While effective in jamming radar signals and disrupting targeting, the systems' in contested environments has drawn regarding limitations against adaptive countermeasures.

Development and Design

Origins and Production

The Krasukha family of electronic warfare systems was developed by Russia's Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies (KRET), a subsidiary of Rostec, to provide mobile ground-based countermeasures against airborne early warning radars, satellite reconnaissance, and other surveillance assets. Serial production began around 2010-2011, with systems entering service in the Russian armed forces by 2014-2015. The platforms are built on heavy wheeled chassis, such as the BAZ-6910-022 for the Krasukha-4 variant, enabling rapid deployment and mobility. Export production has expanded, with the first international contract signed in August 2021 at the Army 2021 forum by Rosoboronexport, followed by orders from Southeast Asian countries in August 2023. Ongoing manufacturing continues at Rostec facilities, as evidenced by leaked production photos and documents for the Krasukha-4 released in October 2025, which detail the intricate assembly processes involved.

Technical Architecture

The Krasukha electronic warfare systems employ a modular, vehicle-based architecture optimized for rapid deployment and mobility in contested environments. Each complex typically consists of two primary mounted on rugged wheeled , such as the BAZ-6910-022 or Kamaz-6350, enabling off-road operation and high tactical maneuverability. One integrates the core jamming suite, featuring high-power transmitters capable of signal generation across targeted frequency bands, while the second functions as a command post for detection, analysis, and control functions. This dual- configuration allows for distributed operations, reducing vulnerability to and facilitating coordinated jamming against multiple threats. Key structural elements include containerized shelters housing electronic components, with deployable telescopic masts extending antennas to elevated positions for line-of-sight jamming efficacy. Antenna systems feature directional arrays, often mounted on rotatable turrets or masts, designed to emit noise or deception signals that overload enemy radar receivers. Hydraulic stabilizers deploy from the chassis undercarriage to ensure stability during transmission, mitigating vibration and enhancing signal precision. Frontal crew cabins, accommodating 3-4 operators, incorporate optional ballistic armor rated against small-arms fire, with auxiliary power units at the rear shelter to support sustained high-energy operations independent of external grids. Dimensional parameters for representative platforms, such as the Krasukha-4 on Kamaz-6350 chassis, include a length of 9.87 meters, width of 2.78 meters, and height of 3.26 meters in transit configuration, with combat setup elevating antennas via masts for omnidirectional or sector coverage. The design prioritizes in and threat prioritization, drawing from Soviet-era principles but incorporating digital receivers for real-time adaptation to emissions. Overall, the architecture emphasizes survivability through mobility, with systems achieving operational readiness in minutes after halting, supported by for field maintenance.

Variants

Krasukha-2

The Krasukha-2 (NATO designation 1L269) is a mobile, ground-based electronic warfare system developed by Russian defense enterprises, including the All-Russian in , with production at the Bryansk Electromechanical Plant. It primarily targets S-band s (operating in the 2.3–2.5 GHz and 2.7–3.7 GHz ranges) on airborne platforms, such as (AWACS) aircraft including the . The system functions by detecting incoming signals, analyzing their parameters, and emitting targeted jamming radiation to degrade or deny enemy functionality. Mounted on an wheeled , typically two KamAZ-6350 or similar heavy trucks—one for the jamming station and another for support—the Krasukha-2 provides mobility for rapid deployment with . It entered service with the around 2014, forming part of independent electronic warfare brigades capable of suppressing not only AWACS but also radar-guided missiles and other airborne reconnaissance systems. In addition to aerial threats, the system offers protection to maneuvering ground units by interfering with detection from overhead assets. Unlike the Krasukha-4 variant, which focuses on higher-frequency X- and Ku-band radars, the Krasukha-2 specializes in longer-range S-band suppression, making it complementary for layered electronic countermeasures. Deployments often pair the two systems to broaden coverage against diverse radar threats. While Russian sources claim effective jamming ranges extending to 250 km against specific targets, independent assessments emphasize variability based on , power output, and countermeasures, with no universally verified maximum .

Krasukha-4

The Krasukha-4 (1RL257) is a multifunctional electronic warfare system produced by Russia's (KRET), a of . First delivered to the Russian Defense Ministry in November 2013, it serves to detect, disrupt, and suppress enemy and communication signals, particularly those from low-frequency systems. Designed to neutralize low Earth orbit (LEO) spy satellites—such as the U.S. Lacrosse/Onyx series—airborne early warning and control (AWACS) aircraft like the E-8 Joint STARS, ground-based radars, and radio-controlled missiles, the system operates at effective ranges of 150 to 300 kilometers. It jams satellite communications in the X-band (7.9–8.4 GHz), Ku-band (10.9–14 GHz), and Ka-band (18–40 GHz), while also targeting radars on strike/reconnaissance aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and low-altitude platforms, often forcing intruding aircraft to higher altitudes where they are more exposed to surface-to-air defenses. In contrast to the Krasukha-2, which focuses on S-band frequencies for AWACS jamming up to 250 kilometers, the Krasukha-4 provides complementary coverage across wider spectra, emphasizing low-frequency disruption for and large airborne threats. The system is mounted on a KamAZ-6350 high-mobility equipped with a KamAZ-740.50-360 producing 360 horsepower.
SpecificationDetail
Weight12,450 kg
Dimensions9.87 m () × 2.78 m (width) × 3.26 m ()
Crew3
ArmorClass 5a (protection against 7.62 mm small arms fire)
Maximum speed95 km/h
Operational range1,000 km
Fording depth1.75 m
Detailed technical parameters, including exact frequency bands and power output, remain classified by Russian authorities.

Capabilities

Jamming and Interference Mechanisms

The Krasukha family of electronic warfare systems primarily utilizes active noise jamming to disrupt enemy operations by transmitting high-power interference signals that overwhelm targeted receivers. This elevates the , reducing signal-to-noise ratios and breaking track custody, which prevents effective detection and guidance of airborne targets such as AWACS aircraft or UAVs. In the Krasukha-2 variant, jamming targets S-band frequencies associated with airborne early warning radars, including those on platforms like the , at effective ranges up to 250 km; it also interferes with radar-guided missiles by suppressing their illumination signals. The system employs directional antennas to focus jamming energy, enabling selective disruption of specific threats while minimizing impact on friendly systems. The Krasukha-4 extends this capability with broadband multifunctional jamming across X-band (7.9–8.4 GHz) and Ku-band (10.9–14 GHz) spectra, neutralizing (LEO) spy satellites, satellite communications (SATCOM), and ground-based or airborne radars within a 300 km radius. This variant corrupts data links and suppresses radar emissions from aircraft, helicopters, and drones, often in coordination with other assets to saturate multiple frequency bands simultaneously. Both variants incorporate automated signal detection and analysis to identify and adapt jamming parameters in real-time, prioritizing high-threat emitters like fire-control radars; however, their effectiveness depends on power output, antenna gain, and the victim's counter-EW resilience, with public assessments noting limitations against low-probability-of-intercept radars.

Detection and Range Parameters

The Krasukha electronic warfare systems employ passive and active detection mechanisms to identify and communication emissions, primarily through wideband receivers that scan for specific frequency bands associated with airborne early warning aircraft, UAVs, and satellite links. Detection parameters focus on the range at which the system can reliably locate and classify signal sources, enabling subsequent jamming. Reported detection ranges for the Krasukha-2 reach up to 250 kilometers for S-band airborne s, allowing identification of targets like AWACS platforms before initiating interference. For the Krasukha-4 variant, detection capabilities extend to 200–250 kilometers against low-Earth orbit satellites, ground-based s, and X/Ku-band signals from and drones, with the system using directional antennas to triangulate sources for precise targeting. Jamming ranges typically fall within or slightly below detection limits to account for power output and propagation losses, with the Krasukha-2 effective up to 250 kilometers for suppressing returns during ground force maneuvers. The Krasukha-4 achieves broader operational ranges, disrupting signals from , UAVs, and communications up to 300 kilometers in under manufacturer specifications, though real-world performance depends on terrain, atmospheric conditions, and emitter power. These parameters derive from Russian defense industry data and Western analyses, which note potential overstatements in maximum ranges but confirm the systems' design emphasis on standoff engagement to protect deployed units.
VariantDetection RangeJamming Range
Krasukha-2Up to 250 km (airborne radars)Up to 250 km
Krasukha-4200–250 km (satellites, aircraft)Up to 300 km (multitarget)

Operators and Deployments

Russian Military Use


Krasukha systems are operated primarily by independent electronic warfare brigades within the , integrated across the nation's five military districts: Western, Southern, Northern, Central, and Eastern. These brigades, each comprising several hundred personnel, employ Krasukha platforms to suppress enemy airborne and space-based radars, providing spectrum dominance in support of ground operations. The Krasukha-4 serves as a of Russia's strategic electronic warfare arsenal, typically paired with the Krasukha-2 to target a broad of frequencies, including S-band search radars and X-, Ku-, and Ka-band fire control radars. At the tactical level, maneuver brigades incorporate dedicated electronic warfare companies—approximately 100 personnel strong—that coordinate with higher-echelon Krasukha deployments for layered defense against and precision-guided munitions. This structure reflects Russia's emphasis on electronic warfare as a force multiplier, enabling the protection of mobile assets such as launchers and command posts from aerial threats. Deployments within focus on safeguarding , airfields, and troop concentrations during exercises and readiness postures, with systems mounted on mobile wheeled chassis for rapid repositioning. Production and upgrades continue under the KRET corporation, ensuring ongoing integration into evolving prioritizing denial of adversary .

Export and Foreign Operators

Iran operates the Krasukha-4 electronic warfare system, which was deployed to bolster its defense against airborne and satellite-based threats, with reports confirming its integration into Iranian units as of 2025. Confirmed sightings of Krasukha systems in , including the advanced Krasukha-4 variant capable of jamming threats up to 300 km away, indicate a strategic enhancement in electronic warfare capabilities. Serbia acquired both Krasukha-2 and Krasukha-4 systems from , publicly displaying them for the first time during a in on September 22, 2025, despite on Russian arms transfers. Leaked production documents from October 2025 suggest Serbia as a potential recipient, aligning with the observed operational integration. Ethiopia received shipments of the Krasukha-4 system, representing one of Russia's targeted technology transfers to sub-Saharan African nations amid declining overall arms exports to the region. has promoted Krasukha systems internationally, signing contracts including for electronic warfare equipment at events like Army 2021, though specific additional recipients beyond confirmed operators remain undisclosed. Foreign interest in Krasukha-2 and Krasukha-4 variants was noted as early as 2015, with the first official export contract signed in August 2021.

Operational History

Deployment in Syria

deployed the Krasukha-4 electronic warfare system to in November 2015, shortly after initiating airstrikes in support of the Assad government on September 30, 2015, and following the downing of a Russian Su-24M by Turkish forces on November 24, 2015. The system was stationed primarily at the Hmeimim air base near to bolster defenses amid escalating threats from surveillance and potential aerial reconnaissance. Krasukha-2 units were also observed in operational use during the conflict. The Krasukha-4 served as the outermost layer in a multi-tiered air defense architecture at Hmeimim, complementing systems such as S-400, S-300, Buk-M2E, and Pantsir-S1 surface-to-air missiles. Its primary role involved suppressing enemy airborne and space-based radars, including those on AWACS , platforms, and low-Earth orbit satellites, with an effective jamming range of 150 to 300 kilometers. This deployment transformed into a live testing ground for Russian electronic warfare capabilities, aimed at disrupting adversary intelligence gathering and radar-guided munitions while protecting Russian assets from detection. U.S. military officials reported frequent disruptions from Russian electronic warfare in , describing the operational environment as the most aggressive encountered, with daily jamming of communications and sensors affecting forces. In particular, General of U.S. Command noted interference rendering EC-130 inoperable, while jamming targeted GPS signals of U.S. drones. Paul Funk confirmed that Russian systems, including Krasukha variants, routinely disrupted U.S. communications and enabled Syrian radars to illuminate pilots, heightening risks from nearby launches. These accounts, drawn from U.S. and assessments, underscore the system's tactical impact in denying Western forces persistent over Russian operations.

Use in Russo-Ukrainian Conflict

Russian forces deployed Krasukha-2 and Krasukha-4 electronic warfare systems in following the full-scale on February 24, 2022, primarily to suppress Ukrainian airborne radars, disrupt reconnaissance drones, and interfere with reconnaissance. The Krasukha-2 targeted S-band radars operating in the 2-4 GHz range, while the Krasukha-4 focused on higher-frequency X-band and Ku-band systems, including those on Ukrainian UAVs and potential surveillance assets. These mobile platforms, mounted on BAZ-6910 trucks, provided ground-based jamming to create electronic denial zones, protecting Russian troop concentrations and advance routes from guided munitions and air threats. Operational reports indicate the systems contributed to degrading Ukrainian drone operations by spoofing or overwhelming control links and onboard sensors, though effectiveness varied due to Ukrainian adaptations like frequency-hopping and low-observable tactics. In eastern and southern theaters, such as and oblasts, Krasukha units supported artillery and air defense by jamming radar-guided missiles, but several systems were lost to Ukrainian strikes, including a confirmed destruction of a Krasukha-4 via drone attack in in late 2023. Ukrainian sources claim captures or partial recoveries, such as a damaged Krasukha-4 near in early 2022, highlighting vulnerabilities when systems are static or poorly protected. Assessments from military analysts note that while Krasukha deployments initially disrupted Ukrainian reconnaissance, Russian EW overall faced challenges from attrition and the need for constant repositioning, limiting sustained dominance in contested . No independent verification exists for claims of widespread jamming against Western providers, and losses underscore the systems' exposure to precision counter-EW fires.

Recent International Deployments

In August 2025, reports confirmed the presence of Russian-supplied Krasukha electronic warfare systems in , with deployments noted in western regions capable of jamming airborne radars, downlinks, and , , sensors at extended ranges. These systems, transferred post a brief Israel-Iran escalation earlier in the year, are assessed to enhance Iran's defensive posture against aerial threats, potentially interfering with NATO-standard platforms like E-3 AWACS and Rivet Joint over the . In September 2025, took delivery of Krasukha jamming systems from , deploying them to counter airborne threats including those from , unmanned aerial vehicles, and satellites via high-power interference signals. This acquisition bolsters Serbia's electronic warfare capabilities amid regional tensions, focusing on suppression of enemy air assets without kinetic engagement. No verified combat applications have been reported for these Serbian units as of late 2025.

Assessment and Impact

Verified Effectiveness

In Syria, Russian deployments of the Krasukha-4 system contributed to effective jamming of U.S. and communications, sensors, and operations, as acknowledged by U.S. leaders. U.S. Command's Gen. described Syria as "the most aggressive electromagnetic environment in the world," citing repeated instances where Russian electronic warfare disabled EC-130 and disrupted drone signals, with Krasukha-4 specifically implicated in countering U.S. airborne reconnaissance up to 300 km range. These disruptions limited U.S. intelligence gathering and logistics support for anti-ISIS operations, forcing adaptations like reduced reliance on jammed platforms. During the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, Krasukha systems have demonstrated partial effectiveness against low-altitude drones by jamming radar and communication links, degrading Ukrainian UAV targeting and navigation in the Donbas region as of 2023. However, verified successes remain limited, with multiple units destroyed by Ukrainian precision strikes using JDAM-guided bombs and artillery, such as a Krasukha-4 lost near Kherson in November 2023, indicating vulnerability to detection and counter-battery fire despite jamming attempts on Western-supplied radars. Deployments behind front lines have complicated some airborne sensing, but high attrition—over a dozen confirmed losses by open-source tracking—suggests operational effectiveness is constrained against adaptive adversaries employing standoff munitions. No independent, peer-verified data confirms Krasukha's ability to neutralize advanced Western systems like satellite-guided munitions or high-altitude ISR platforms in contested environments, with U.S. assessments noting attempts to jam signals but ongoing operational continuity for affected assets. Effectiveness appears strongest against legacy or short-range threats, reliant on power-aperture advantages for noise-floor elevation rather than sophisticated deception.

Limitations and Countermeasures

The Krasukha series, including variants like the Krasukha-4, faces inherent limitations stemming from its design as high-power, truck-mounted jammers. These systems are bulky and power-intensive, demanding extensive logistical support for deployment and sustainment, which hampers their utility in fast-paced, maneuver-oriented warfare. During the early 2022 Russian advance on Kyiv, Krasukha-4 units proved unwieldy for rapid operations and were abandoned to facilitate withdrawal, resulting in the capture of a command module by Ukrainian forces in mid-March 2022. Their effective jamming range, typically 150–300 km against airborne radars and low-Earth orbit assets, is directional and leaves coverage gaps against dispersed or low-signature targets, reducing efficacy in irregular conflicts involving hit-and-run tactics. Additionally, the systems struggle against frequency-agile technologies, such as SINCGARS radios that hop across 30–88 MHz at 100 times per second, and in urban settings where civilian signals obscure military emissions. A primary vulnerability arises from the strong radio emissions required for jamming, which enable detection via electronic support measures and facilitate targeting by precision-guided munitions. Ukrainian forces have destroyed multiple Krasukha-4 installations, including one in the Zaporizhzhia region struck by guided bombs, exploiting this detectability. While not exclusively documented against Krasukha, U.S.-supplied AGM-88 HARM anti-radiation missiles—deployed by Ukrainian aircraft since 2022—home in on such emitters, as evidenced by successful strikes on Russian radar and EW assets. Logistical dependencies and static positioning further expose units to drone reconnaissance and artillery, as seen in battlefield abandonments and captures. Effective countermeasures emphasize electronic resilience and kinetic suppression. Frequency-hopping and spread-spectrum communications, implemented in systems like Ukraine's Himera G1 Pro radios, evade Krasukha's interference by rapidly shifting frequencies. Satellite-based links, such as Starlink terminals adopted by Ukrainian units, provide jam-resistant command-and-control, bypassing ground-based EW effects. Non-RF alternatives, including optical fiber cables for drone operations, render jamming irrelevant by avoiding radio dependencies. Operationally, mobile and dispersed formations exploit Krasukha's non-omnidirectional coverage, while dedicated ECCM like low-probability-of-intercept radars and directional antennas maintain functionality. Kinetrically, anti-radiation munitions and counter-drone EW systems—such as U.S. high-power microwave jammers—neutralize emitters by disrupting their operations or destroying hardware outright.

Strategic Role in Modern Warfare

The Krasukha family of electronic warfare systems, including the Krasukha-2 and Krasukha-4 variants, serves a critical strategic function in modern warfare by enabling ground forces to contest and deny adversaries' electromagnetic spectrum dominance, particularly in air-centric operations. Fielded starting in the early 2010s, with Krasukha-4 entering service in 2014, these mobile platforms generate high-power jamming signals across broad frequency bands—such as 1-18 GHz for Krasukha-2 and X-, Ku-, and Ka-bands for Krasukha-4—to suppress airborne early warning radars, synthetic aperture radars on UAVs and aircraft, and low-Earth orbit satellite reconnaissance systems. This capability extends to effective ranges of up to 250 km for anti-AWACS operations by Krasukha-2 and 300 km for broader suppression by Krasukha-4, forcing enemy platforms like E-3 Sentry or Bayraktar TB2 drones to operate ineffectively or retreat beyond engagement envelopes. In Russian military doctrine, Krasukha systems integrate into layered air defense and (A2/AD) architectures, prioritizing the achievement of electronic superiority as a prerequisite for maneuver and strike operations against technologically superior foes. By disrupting radar-guided precision munitions, signals, and command links—evidenced in jamming GPS M-code for weapons like JDAM and HIMARS during the Russo-Ukrainian conflict—these systems degrade the accuracy and responsiveness of adversary standoff fires, thereby shielding ground assets and enabling offensive advances under reduced surveillance. Deployments in from 2015 onward demonstrated this role, where Krasukha units reportedly interfered with U.S. and coalition communications and EC-130 aircraft operations, complicating in contested environments. Strategically, Krasukha exemplifies the shift toward spectrum warfare in peer or near-peer conflicts, where reliance on networked sensors amplifies the value of denial; in since 2014, intensified use from 2022 has neutralized numerous Ukrainian drones by severing control and data channels, preserving Russian rear-area assets against asymmetric threats and underscoring 's role in attrition-based campaigns. This approach challenges Western air power paradigms, which depend on persistent ISR for superiority, by imposing operational costs through forced reliance on less precise or hardened alternatives, though effectiveness varies against advanced countermeasures like frequency agility. Overall, Krasukha enhances and operational tempo for expeditionary forces facing aerial , positioning electronic attack as a force multiplier in hybrid and conventional theaters.

References

  1. https://www.army-technology.com/projects/krasukha-electronic-warfare-ew-system-russia/
  2. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/krasukha.htm
  3. https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/1L269E_Krasukha-2_Russian_8x8_Mobile_Electronic_Warfare_
  4. https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/1RL257E_Krasukha-4_Russian_8x8_Mobile_Multifunctional_Jammer
  5. https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/leaked-photos-reveal-russias-secretive-krasukha-4-electronic-warfare-system-in-production/articleshow/124474440.cms
  6. https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-fall-and-rise-of-russian-electronic-warfare
  7. https://odessa-journal.com/russia-has-supplied-ethiopia-with-the-krasukha-4-electronic-warfare-system
  8. https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/russia-krasukha-ew-system-confirmed-in-iran-middle-east-airpower-shift/
  9. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=1237
  10. https://defence-blog.com/leak-reveals-production-photos-of-russias-secret-ew-system/
  11. https://armyrecognition.com/military-products/army/electronic-warfare/1rl257-or-krasukha-4-jamming-station
  12. https://defence.nridigital.com/global_defence_technology_mar22/russia_electronic_warfare
  13. https://cenjows.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Maj-Gen-AK-Srivastava_-Article.pdf
  14. https://medium.com/dfrlab/minskmonitor-new-russian-electronic-warfare-systems-in-eastern-ukraine-5b913afbb455
  15. https://sprotyvg7.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/COGINT_Analytic_Insight_Report_Russian_EW_Systems__231119_114942.pdf
  16. https://tvpworld.com/89377984/pro-ukrainian-hackers-publish-photos-of-russian-electronic-warfare-system
  17. https://jamestown.org/program/electronic-warfare-in-contemporary-russian-military-thought/
  18. https://idstch.com/geopolitics/unveiling-the-krasukha-electronic-warfare-system-russias-shield-against-airborne-and-satellite-threats/
  19. https://debuglies.com/2025/04/15/russias-electronic-warfare-supremacy-in-2025-technological-innovation-geopolitical-implications-and-global-security-dynamics/
  20. https://www.armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/defence-security-industry-technology/analysis-how-russia-s-krasukha-electronic-warfare-system-disrupts-uavs-and-radars-in-ukraine
  21. https://theaviationist.com/2022/03/23/ukrainian-captured-krasukha-4/
  22. https://defapress.ir/en/news/86664/importance-of-deploying-the-krasukha-4-electronic-warfare-system-in-irans-defense-units
  23. https://www.binance.com/da-DK/square/post/28487360171401
  24. https://united24media.com/latest-news/serbia-unveils-russias-krasukha-ew-systems-in-belgrade-parade-raising-nato-threat-concerns-11833
  25. https://global.espreso.tv/serbia-shows-off-russian-krasukha-systems-signaling-continued-military-ties
  26. https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/russias-arms-exports-to-sub-saharan-africa-no-longer-the-main-actor-184986
  27. https://www.vayuaerospace.in/article.aspx?d=690&n=Rosoboronexport-signs-20-contracts-worth-%25E2%2582%25AC2-billion-at-Army-2021
  28. https://tass.com/russia/816597
  29. https://tass.com/defense/855430
  30. https://www.cnn.com/2015/10/09/opinions/syria-electronic-warfare-russia-nato
  31. https://breakingdefense.com/2018/10/russia-winning-information-electronic-war-over-syria-us-uk-generals-warn/
  32. https://thedefensepost.com/2018/05/01/russia-syria-electronic-warfare/
  33. https://indiandefencereview.com/russian-electronic-warfare-in-ukraine-2022-2023/
  34. https://claws.co.in/russia-ukraine-war-lessons-from-an-electronic-warfare-ew-perspective/
  35. https://armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/defence-security-industry-technology/analysis-how-russia-s-krasukha-electronic-warfare-system-disrupts-uavs-and-radars-in-ukraine
  36. https://militarnyi.com/en/news/ukrainian-forces-eliminate-russian-krasukha-4-ew-system-in-zaporizhzhia-region/
  37. https://www.afcea.org/signal-media/cyber-edge/russia-versus-ukraine-and-role-software-defined-radios
  38. https://raksha-anirveda.com/deployment-of-advanced-russian-ew-systems-in-iran-being-watched-closely-by-israel/?srsltid=AfmBOoq8DNZGmi6e6x3uPW8S-7mnjlucRs07zLUoPaO-M2-sQMe23LrH
  39. https://defence-blog.com/serbia-receives-krasukha-jamming-systems-from-russia/
  40. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/July-August-2019/Spring-Glace-Electronic-Warfare/
  41. https://armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/conflicts-in-the-world/russia-ukraine-war-2022/ukrainian-forces-destroy-russian-sophisticated-krasukha-4-ew-system-with-jdam-guided-bomb
  42. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2023-07/230731_Schwartz_War_Attrition.pdf?VersionId=uPaY7viz9tAFL.Og_ncrtmAeJ9yb3NcD
  43. https://irregularwarfare.org/articles/russian-electronic-warfare-from-history-to-modern-battlefield/
  44. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PE300/PE330/RAND_PE330.pdf
  45. https://aerospace.csis.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/230414_Bingen_SpaceThreatAssessment_2023_UPDATED-min.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.