Hubbry Logo
Chrysler LH platformChrysler LH platformMain
Open search
Chrysler LH platform
Community hub
Chrysler LH platform
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chrysler LH platform
Chrysler LH platform
Chrysler LH platform
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
1994 Dodge Intrepid

The LH platform served as the basis for the Chrysler Concorde, Chrysler LHS, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid, Eagle Vision, and the Chrysler New Yorker. A Plymouth to be called the "Accolade" was planned, but never saw production. The platform pioneered Chrysler's "cab-forward" design; featured on some Chrysler, Dodge, and Eagle cars in the 1990s and early 2000s.

Development

[edit]

As the 1990s dawned, Chrysler faced a renewed round of financial troubles. The US economy slipped into a recession following the 1987 Black Monday stock market crash and the Savings and Loan Crisis, but the company's main problems were due to a lack of engineering innovation and careless spending during the years of prosperity in the 1980s. Most of Chrysler's lineup was based on the proven, but dated K-car platform, plus debt accumulated from expensive purchases including Italian automaker Lamborghini along with American Motors, and critics routinely criticized their inability to produce cars that were competitive with Japanese companies or Ford, which had just struck a coup-de-grace with the Taurus line. It was time for Chrysler to make a fresh start for the 1990s. The Board of Directors at Chrysler announced that Lee Iacocca would retire at the end of 1992.[1] Iacocca was promoting Gerald Greenwald as his replacement, but that brought opposition.[1] Although some suspected that he would later turn the leadership over to Bob Lutz, the board instead designated an outsider, the straightlaced Bob Eaton as the new chairman.[1] With Chrysler facing an uncertain future in the late 1980s, engineering teams were now allowed to explore new designs that had been largely discouraged under Iacocca's tenure.

The LH platform was based on the American Motors-developed and Renault-derived Eagle Premier. According to Bob Lutz, "[t]he Premier had an excellent chassis and drove so damned well that it served as a benchmark for the LH ... the spiritual father, the genetic antecedent of the LH is the Premier."[2] Like the Premier, the LH-cars featured a longitudinally-mounted engine with a front-wheel drive drivetrain, unusual in most U.S. front-wheel drive cars, but a hallmark of Renault's designs.[3] This arrangement meant that the design team had to use a chain to connect the automatic transmission with the front differential, a design reminiscent of the original Oldsmobile Toronado though subject to greater wear and noise.

The LH platform team was headed by François Castaing, who was previously responsible for product engineering and development at American Motors Corporation (AMC). Working with an engineering team of only 700, it took just over three years from the styling studio to the showrooms.[4] To give focus for the platform engineering team, the benchmark target was the Eagle Premier.[5]

Exterior styling was heavily influenced by another Chrysler design which debuted as the Lamborghini Portofino, a concept car introduced at the 1987 Frankfurt Auto Show.[6]

The Dodge and Eagle LH cars competed directly against the Ford Taurus and other mid-size cars, largely replacing the K-based C-bodies. The Chrysler models competed with upmarket domestics such as Buick and Oldsmobile. The LH cars debuted in 1992 and were updated in 1997. The LH platform was replaced with the rear-wheel drive Chrysler LX platform for the 2005 model year. While Chrysler's sales never rose to the levels of those popular rivals, the LH vehicles succeeded in altering Chrysler's previously dowdy public image, recasting the automaker as an innovative design leader. The cab-forward look also influenced Chrysler's subsequent compact PL (Chrysler Neon) and midsize JA platform car designs in the 1990s. [citation needed]

Much as the company had done in the months leading up to the introduction of the K-platform cars in 1980, Chrysler referred directly to the LH platform in advertisements touting the advantages of its "cab-forward" architecture (generally meant to imply wheels moved out towards the corners of the body; a short, sloping hood; and a large windshield extending from its base over the front wheels), and also referred to the platform name for the Chrysler LHS sedan. Although the real "gold mine" of Chrysler's acquisition of AMC was the Jeep brand, their minivans and LH sedans also helped to bail the company out of almost certain bankruptcy in the 1990s.[7]

First generation (1993–1997)

[edit]
1993–1997 Chrysler Concorde
1994–1997 Chrysler LHS

The first generation LH cars used the existing 3.3 L OHV V6 as well as a new 3.5 L SOHC V6, with a four-speed automatic transmission as standard.

Cars built on the first version of the LH platform:

All versions shared a 113 in (2,870 mm) wheelbase. One year after the original three cars were introduced, the "stretched" LHS and New Yorker had different rear bodywork providing 5 in (127 mm) more overall length as well as a revised rear seat providing more legroom.

Originally, Chrysler came close to giving Plymouth a variant of the LH platform, called the Plymouth Accolade, a name consistent with the then-current Plymouth Acclaim. It was to be a base model below the equipment level of the Intrepid. The Accolade never made it into production.[8]

Second generation (1998–2004)

[edit]
1999 Chrysler Concorde
2001 Chrysler LHS

The second generation LH cars used the 2.7 L DOHC V6 and 3.2 L SOHC V6, as well as an updated version of the older 3.5 L, with a four-speed automatic transmission as standard.

Cars built on the second version of the LH platform:

When Chrysler discontinued the Eagle brand after 1998, the Chrysler 300M was introduced which was originally intended as a replacement for the Eagle Vision. All models again shared a wheelbase of 113 inches (2,870 mm). The 300M was several inches shorter than Concorde, Intrepid, & LHS, due to shorter front and rear overhangs in order to bring the car's length under 5 meters.

Media

[edit]

One episode of Robert Reich's 1992 PBS miniseries Made In America focused on the then-yet-to-be-released LH's development and its role in reversing Chrysler's flagging fortunes. A camouflaged Dodge Intrepid is seen being put through the paces at Chrysler's test track, along with concept sketches and other behind-the-scenes activities.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chrysler LH platform

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Chrysler LH platform is a front-wheel-drive automobile platform developed by Corporation in the early , serving as the basis for several mid- to full-size sedans produced from 1993 to 2004, characterized by its innovative cab-forward design that prioritized passenger space and a mounting atypical for front-drive vehicles. Originating from the Eagle Premier platform acquired through Chrysler's 1987 purchase of American Motors (itself derived from the Renault 25), the LH platform represented a bold redesign effort amid the company's financial challenges, initially dubbed the "Liberty Project" and intended to support front-, rear-, and all-wheel-drive configurations, though only front-wheel drive reached production. Its development emphasized cross-functional engineering teams, benchmarking against competitors, and early supplier involvement to enhance quality and efficiency, marking a shift in Chrysler's manufacturing philosophy. The first generation (1993–1997), built on a 113-inch wheelbase, powered models such as the Chrysler Concorde, LHS, and New Yorker; Dodge Intrepid; and Eagle Vision with either a 3.3-liter OHV V6 or 3.5-liter SOHC V6 engine paired to a four-speed automatic transmission, delivering performance benchmarks like 0-60 mph in 8.8 seconds for the 3.5-liter variant. The second generation, known as LH² (1998–2004), introduced lighter aluminum-block engines including 2.7-liter DOHC, 3.2-liter SOHC, and updated 3.5-liter SOHC V6 options, along with a stiffer chassis, improved side-impact protection, and models like the Chrysler Concorde, LHS, and 300M, as well as the continued Dodge Intrepid, enhancing handling, fuel economy, and luxury appeal. Production occurred at facilities like the Bramalea Assembly Plant in Ontario, utilizing advanced techniques such as robotic welding and pallet-based assembly to achieve high output of up to 65 cars per hour while minimizing defects. The platform's influence extended to competitors, prompting redesigns like Ford's 1996 Taurus, but it was ultimately phased out following the 1998 DaimlerChrysler merger in favor of newer architectures like the LX.

Overview

Design philosophy

The Chrysler LH platform embodied a revolutionary cab-forward design philosophy, which positioned the passenger compartment ahead of the and extended the over the front wheels, thereby maximizing interior volume and outward while substantially reducing front and rear overhangs. This approach transformed the traditional vehicle by prioritizing occupant space over mechanical components, allowing the cabin to comprise over 75% of the overall vehicle length—compared to the typical 60-65% in conventional designs. By minimizing overhangs, the design enhanced proportional balance and reduced the visual bulk often associated with front-wheel-drive sedans. In , the cab-forward directly addressed the inherent limitations of earlier front-engine, front-wheel-drive layouts in mid-size sedans, where the bay and typically intruded into passenger areas, resulting in cramped interiors, compromised sightlines, and elongated overhangs that affected handling and . Developed amid Chrysler's financial challenges in the late and early , this philosophy drew from explorations like the 1987 Portofino, enabling engineers to create more efficient use of the platform without expanding exterior dimensions. The result was a driver-centric layout that improved and perception through better forward visibility. Central to these principles were optimized proportions, with the A-pillar and windshield base shifted forward to accommodate a longer wheelbase relative to body length; for instance, initial models like the 1994 Chrysler LHS utilized a 113-inch wheelbase within a 207.4-inch overall length. This configuration not only amplified rear legroom and trunk space but also promoted a lower center of gravity for superior stability. Integral to the philosophy was the seamless integration of aerodynamic styling, featuring a gently sloped nose, rounded contours, and a tapered rear deck to minimize air resistance and achieve low drag coefficients around 0.30 Cd. This aerodynamic focus complemented the cab-forward structure by reducing wind noise and enhancing fuel economy without sacrificing the emphasis on spaciousness. Overall, these tenets played a pivotal role in revitalizing Chrysler's competitive standing in the automotive market during the 1990s.

Platform significance

The LH platform emerged as a critical response to the waning appeal of Chrysler's aging K-car derivatives, whose sales had declined amid shifting consumer preferences for more modern vehicles in the early 1990s. Launched in 1993, it debuted with the , , and , injecting fresh energy into the company's sedan offerings and signaling a bold departure from outdated designs. As a front-wheel-drive tailored for mid-to-full-size sedans, the LH platform uniquely accommodated longitudinal V6 engines, contrasting with transverse-engine setups prevalent in rivals such as Ford's DN101 platform for the Taurus. This longitudinal orientation, facilitated by the innovative cab-forward philosophy, optimized interior space and ride dynamics while maintaining a competitive footprint. Under the "LH cars" branding, which unified models across Chrysler's, Dodge's, and Eagle's divisions, the platform underpinned production exceeding 2 million units over its 12-year lifecycle from 1993 to 2004. This volume underscored its commercial viability and played a key role in Chrysler's corporate turnaround, restoring profitability by the mid-1990s—positioning the company as the world's most profitable automaker at the time—and elevating its U.S. large-car segment from approximately 10% to over 14% through robust initial sales.

Development

Background and conception

In the 1980s, Chrysler Corporation faced ongoing financial challenges stemming from its near-bankruptcy in the late 1970s, exacerbated by high fuel prices, economic recession, and a heavy reliance on aging platforms like the K-car introduced in 1981, which, while instrumental in the company's initial recovery, had become outdated by the decade's end and unable to compete effectively in the evolving midsize sedan market. The LH platform's conception began in 1988 under the leadership of Chairman , as part of a broader "platform strategy" to develop shared architectures that would modernize Chrysler's lineup and restore competitiveness, with an initial development budget of $1.5 billion allocated to replace the K-car derivatives. This initiative drew from the acquisition of in 1987, incorporating innovative engineering approaches led by figures like , who emphasized cross-functional teams starting in 1987-1988 to streamline development. Development influences included competitive benchmarking against Japanese sedans such as the and for superior space efficiency and packaging, alongside European luxury vehicles for refined ride quality and responsiveness, aiming to blend these attributes into an American design. Early goals focused on achieving class-leading interior passenger volume exceeding 100 cubic feet—ultimately reaching 104.4 cubic feet in production models—while maintaining affordability through efficient manufacturing and shared components. Initial prototypes, previewed through concepts like the 1989 Chrysler Millennium and 1990 Eagle Optima, underwent testing by 1990 to validate the cab-forward layout and overall viability.

Engineering and manufacturing innovations

The development of the Chrysler LH platform introduced cross-functional teams in the late , comprising approximately 850 members drawn from , , purchasing, suppliers, designers, financial administrators, and union-represented hourly workers, who collaborated on integrated through regular staff meetings emphasizing consensus over hierarchical authority. These teams, often structured around specific vehicle platforms like the LH, included up to 80 core members with cradle-to-grave responsibility for the project, meeting weekly for convergence discussions to resolve issues and incorporate diverse perspectives early in the process. This approach, influenced by prior practices at , marked the first application of such teams at for a major platform, fostering accountability and reducing finger-pointing by publicly addressing decisions. A key element was the benchmarking process, where LH engineers analyzed best-in-class competitor vehicles from Japanese and European manufacturers for critical attributes such as throttle response, leading to targeted adjustments like modifying the throttle curve to provide greater initial responsiveness without increasing peak power. For instance, these efforts resulted in the 3.5-liter V6 engine achieving 0-60 mph acceleration in 8.8 seconds, competitive with leading rivals in the segment. The process involved tear-down sessions of competitor components to set performance targets and cost benchmarks, ensuring the LH platform addressed market-leading standards in ride quality, handling, and efficiency from the outset. Manufacturing advancements centered on early supplier integration and platform teaming, where major suppliers were involved from to enable just-in-time delivery and avoid production delays, with suppliers demonstrating machinery capabilities well ahead of deadlines. involvement began 95 weeks before launch in November 1991, allowing Bramalea plant employees to build pre-production cars a year early, including the first on-line pilot builds at the facility; this phase incorporated 900,000 hours of training for 3,000 workers to enhance quality and readiness. Specific innovations included simplifying electronic systems, such as reusing the transmission's existing signals for the PRNDL indicator, which reduced costs from $6.80 to under $1 per vehicle, yielding approximately $5.80 in savings per car. These measures contributed to a streamlined 39-month development cycle for the 3.5-liter V6 and 42LE , with trial runs, such as for the 42LE , occurring in early 1992 ahead of full production starting in June 1992.

Technical features

Chassis and suspension

The Chrysler LH platform employed a unibody construction, utilizing extensive high-strength steel in the body structure to enhance rigidity while maintaining a lightweight design, with curb weights typically around 3,500 pounds for sedan variants. The suspension system featured fully independent setups at all four corners, with MacPherson s in the front paired to a single-pivot lower and rubber-isolated tension , and a multi-link design in the rear supported by an aluminum crossmember and coil springs. This configuration was tuned to balance ride comfort and handling responsiveness, providing stability across varied driving conditions. Anti-roll bars were standard on higher trims to further reduce body lean during cornering. The second generation (LH², 1998–2004) introduced a stiffer for improved handling and structural integrity, along with enhanced side-impact protection through reinforced door beams and energy-absorbing materials. A standard 113-inch was shared across LH models, complemented by a track width of approximately 62 inches, which contributed to composed stability and a planted stance. Safety integrations included reinforced A- and B-pillars for enhanced cabin protection, along with engineered in the front structure designed to absorb energy in low-speed offset impacts up to 5 mph. These features helped the LH vehicles achieve 4-star frontal crash ratings from the (NHTSA) in early testing.

Powertrains

The Chrysler LH platform employed a longitudinal front-engine, drivetrain layout, which was distinctive for American vehicles of the era and allowed for better and packaging of the components. Standard traction control was available as an option on models equipped with higher-output engines to manage wheel spin under acceleration. Power was provided exclusively by V6 engines paired with a four-speed automatic transmission, as no manual option was offered across the platform. The standard transmission was the Ultradrive 41TE, an electronically controlled unit featuring adaptive shift logic that adjusted shift points based on driving style, throttle input, and vehicle speed for optimized performance and efficiency; it also included a lock-up torque converter to reduce slippage and improve fuel economy during cruising. First-generation (1993–1997) models used cast-iron block engines. The base powertrain consisted of the 3.3L OHV V6 engine (codes EGC and EGY), producing 153 horsepower at 5,300 rpm and 180 lb-ft of torque at 2,800 rpm, suitable for entry-level models emphasizing smooth, reliable operation over outright performance. Higher-trim variants used the 3.5L SOHC V6 (code EGJ), delivering 214 horsepower and 221 lb-ft of torque in its standard configuration, providing stronger acceleration and refinement for luxury-oriented applications. A high-output version of the 3.5L, tuned for premium fuel, generated 253 horsepower and 255 lb-ft of torque specifically in the , enhancing its sporty character while maintaining compatibility with the platform's chassis adaptations. Second-generation (1998–2004) models introduced lighter aluminum-block engines. The base engine was the 2.7L DOHC V6, producing 200 horsepower at 5,600 rpm and 190 lb-ft of torque at 4,200 rpm, paired with the updated 42LE four-speed automatic for improved efficiency. Mid-level options included the 3.2L SOHC V6 with 225 horsepower at 6,400 rpm and 225 lb-ft of torque at 4,000 rpm, used in performance-oriented models like the R/T. The 3.5L SOHC V6 was revised with aluminum construction, offering 235 horsepower and 230 lb-ft of torque in standard form for models like the LXi, while the high-output variant retained 253 horsepower and 255 lb-ft of torque in the and LHS. Fuel economy ratings reflected the engines' balance of power and efficiency for full-size sedans, with the first-generation 3.3L achieving an EPA-estimated 17 city and 26 highway, while the standard 3.5L was rated at 16 city and 25 highway. Second-generation engines improved slightly, with the 2.7L at 18 city and 27 highway, the 3.2L at 17 city and 26 highway, and the updated 3.5L at 16 city and 25 highway (standard) or 16 city and 24 highway (high-output).
EngineConfigurationHorsepowerTorque (lb-ft)EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway, mpg)
3.3L OHV V6 (EGC/EGY)First gen base models153 @ 5,300 rpm180 @ 2,800 rpm17/26
3.5L SOHC V6 (EGJ, standard)First gen higher trims21422116/25
3.5L SOHC V6 (high-output)300M (first gen tuning)25325516/24
2.7L DOHC V6Second gen base200 @ 5,600 rpm190 @ 4,200 rpm18/27
3.2L SOHC V6Second gen mid-level225 @ 6,400 rpm225 @ 4,000 rpm17/26
3.5L SOHC V6 (updated, standard)Second gen higher trims23523016/25
3.5L SOHC V6 (high-output)300M/LHS (second gen)25325516/24

Generations

First generation (1993–1997)

The first-generation Chrysler LH platform debuted in 1993 with the introduction of the , , and sedans, followed by the and LHS in 1994. These models were positioned as affordable luxury vehicles in the cases of the LHS, New Yorker, and Vision, offering upscale features and styling at accessible price points starting around $20,000, while the and Intrepid targeted family buyers seeking spacious, practical sedans with innovative cab-forward design for enhanced interior room and visibility. Key features included standard dual front airbags and four-wheel antilock disc brakes (ABS) across the lineup, marking early adoption of these safety technologies in the midsize sedan segment. The interior provided class-leading passenger volume of 104.4 cubic feet, contributing to the sedans' reputation for comfort and versatility. For 1995, minor updates refined the design with revised taillight assemblies for improved aesthetics and durability, alongside enhancements to (NVH) levels through targeted body structure modifications, resulting in a quieter cabin experience. Baseline powertrains consisted of a 3.3-liter paired with a four-speed . Production for the first generation spanned 1993 to 1997, totaling approximately 1.2 million units across all LH variants, with the leading sales at over 400,000 units due to its broad appeal and competitive pricing. Common issues included transmission cooler line failures, which prompted a 1997 NHTSA recall (97V084000) affecting certain 1996-1997 models to replace vulnerable quick-connect fittings and prevent potential leaks or fires. The platform played a pivotal role in revitalizing Dodge's sedan lineup, which had struggled in the late 1980s, and the Intrepid earned Car and Driver's 10 Best award for 1993 and 1994, recognizing its engineering innovation and value.

Second generation (1998–2004)

The second-generation LH platform, introduced for the 1998 model year, featured a mid-cycle refresh that refined the original cab-forward design with smoother body lines and updated exterior elements, including more rounded headlights and a revised for improved and visibility. This redesign applied to the continuing , LHS, and models, enhancing while maintaining the platform's emphasis on spacious interiors. In 1999, launched the 300M as a new performance-oriented variant, essentially a rebadged and refined successor to the discontinued , equipped with a high-output 3.5-liter SOHC producing 253 horsepower. The 300M's styling drew from European influences, with a sleeker profile and aggressive front fascia to appeal to import buyers. Building on this, introduced the Intrepid R/T in 2000 as a sportier trim, sharing the 300M's 3.5-liter high-output V6 detuned to 242 horsepower for broader accessibility, along with upgraded brakes, stiffer anti-roll bars, and 17-inch Pilot tires for sharper handling. Feature enhancements across the lineup included standard side-impact airbags starting in 2000, auto-dimming rearview mirrors on higher trims, and speed-sensitive for better highway stability. The 2001 received a minor refresh with a revised grille design featuring a more prominent chrome surround, complementing the updated taillights and interior accents introduced earlier in the generation. Production of second-generation LH vehicles totaled approximately 800,000 units across all models from 1998 to 2004, with the 300M achieving peak annual sales of around 50,000 units in 2000. Reliability saw notable improvements over the first generation, particularly in transmission durability, as the updated 42LE four-speed automatic benefited from refined bodies and software calibrations that minimized early slipping and harsh shifting issues reported in pre-1998 models. Special editions added variety, such as the limited 2002 300M Special, which featured unique 18-inch alloy wheels shod with 245/45ZR18 performance tires, a retuned suspension for enhanced cornering, and a slight power bump to 255 horsepower. The , the platform's Eagle-brand offering, was phased out after the 1997 model year as Chrysler consolidated its lineup under Dodge and Chrysler badges, allowing the LH architecture to continue uninterrupted through the refreshed models. By 2004, amid a market shift toward SUVs and crossovers, Chrysler discontinued the LH platform entirely, with the final Intrepid and units rolling off the , assembly line, marking the end of an era for these front-wheel-drive sedans.

Production and market impact

Manufacturing processes

The primary manufacturing facilities for the Chrysler LH platform vehicles included the Plant in , , for body assembly with an annual capacity of approximately 260,000 units; the Plant in , for producing the 3.3 L, 3.5 L, and 3.8 L V6 engines; and the Plant in , for the 41TE/42LE automatic transaxles. These U.S. and Canadian sites handled the core production, with engines and transmissions shipped to for final vehicle integration. Assembly at incorporated innovative -based chassis lines, where a metal template positioned components like the and at eye level, reducing the number of assembly stations from 40 to 6 and cutting floor space usage by 25 percent while minimizing worker errors and fatigue. Robotic spray-brazing was employed for the A- and C-pillars to join metal sections efficiently, eliminating the need for extensive post-weld finishing. Just-in-time sequencing supported an output of 65 vehicles per hour, with supplier parks located adjacent to the plants reducing logistics delivery times by 50 percent through streamlined parts flow. Quality controls emphasized comprehensive end-of-line testing, including 100 percent checks for (NVH) performance as well as to ensure structural integrity. The Brampton facility operated with around 3,000 workers, contributing to peak annual LH platform production of over 300,000 units across the three sites through coordinated operations and extensive .

Sales and reception

The LH platform vehicles achieved strong initial market performance , with combined annual across models peaking at over 300,000 units in the mid-, driven by the debut of the , , and . The emerged as the platform's bestseller, accumulating over 1.5 million units sold through 2004, while the saw robust early uptake of around 50,000-60,000 units in its debut years following the 1999 launch. began to decline in the late amid shifting consumer preferences toward SUVs and light trucks during the economic boom, dropping to under 70,000 units across the lineup by 2004 as sedan demand waned. Consumer reception highlighted the LH platform's innovative cab-forward design, which delivered exceptional interior spaciousness and perceived value for money, positioning the vehicles as competitive alternatives to imports in the full-size sedan segment. The , in particular, earned praise from automotive publications for its bold styling and comfortable ride, securing spots on Car and Driver's 10Best list in 1993 and 1999. However, criticisms focused on the use of low-cost interior materials that felt plasticky compared to rivals, alongside reliability concerns such as failures in the 3.5L and overheating issues in later models. Post-1998 redesigns improved perceptions, with several LH models receiving dependability awards for high owner satisfaction in initial quality and long-term reliability surveys. These accolades underscored the platform's refinement, though broader economic factors like the SUV surge continued to pressure sedan sales. Regionally, over 90% of LH platform sales occurred in the U.S. market, reflecting its domestic focus, with limited exports to where models like the Vision ( rebadged) and LHS were offered under branding but achieved modest volumes of a few thousand units annually.

Legacy

Industry influence

The cab-forward architecture of the Chrysler LH platform, which shifted the passenger compartment forward to enhance interior space efficiency in front-wheel-drive vehicles, marked a significant evolution in American sedan design and contributed to the broader adoption of space-optimized layouts across the industry. This design philosophy, pioneered under Thomas C. Gale, maximized occupant room relative to exterior dimensions, influencing the trend toward more passenger-centric front-wheel-drive configurations in mid-size sedans during the decade. Chrysler's implementation of cross-functional platform teams for the LH platform represented a pivotal advancement in automotive manufacturing practices, integrating engineering, design, and production expertise from project inception to completion. These teams, comprising up to 80 members with early supplier involvement, reduced vehicle development timelines by more than 40 percent—from approximately five years in the late 1980s to around three years for the LH cars—while achieving substantial cost savings, such as $75 million on the 1998 refresh. This approach, combined with rigorous benchmarking against best-in-class competitors for attributes like ride quality and packaging, became a model for streamlined development processes, encouraging similar collaborative structures at other U.S. automakers, including General Motors' team-based Saturn division. The LH vehicles also played a key role in Chrysler's financial turnaround, helping the company achieve profitability and regain market share in the mid-1990s. Safety innovations on the LH platform, including front and rear to absorb crash energy and optional front side airbags introduced in later models, elevated protection levels for mid-size sedans and aligned with evolving federal guidelines. The design effectively managed impact forces in frontal collisions, as noted in early evaluations of LH vehicles, while side airbags have been shown in general NHTSA evaluations to reduce nearside occupant fatalities by 24 percent (torso and head airbags) or 12 percent (torso only) in crashes when combined with structural improvements. The LH platform's emphasis on innovative front-wheel-drive sedans temporarily redirected U.S. automakers' strategies toward car-based architectures, influencing Chrysler's subsequent JS platform for mid-size vehicles through shared design principles such as cab-forward styling. This shift underscored a broader cultural move within the industry toward prioritizing passenger space and efficiency in non-truck segments before the resurgence of SUV dominance.

Replacement and successors

The production of the Chrysler LH platform for sedans concluded in 2004, marking the end of the second generation after 11 years of use. This discontinuation aligned with Chrysler's strategic shift away from front-wheel-drive architectures in the full-size sedan segment, primarily to meet growing demand for rear-wheel-drive performance and handling characteristics that better suited luxury-oriented vehicles. The aging LH design, which had debuted in 1993, was increasingly viewed as outdated amid evolving consumer preferences for more dynamic driving experiences in larger sedans. The LH platform was directly succeeded by the rear-wheel-drive , which debuted in 2005 with models such as the , , and . The LX architecture derived key elements from the LH, including aspects of the front suspension and the 3.5-liter SOHC , but repositioned the longitudinally for to enhance traction and performance. Certain LH-derived powertrain components, such as the 3.3-liter and 3.5-liter , continued in use within Chrysler's lineup, including the Chrysler Town & Country, where they provided reliable family-hauling capability into the mid-2000s. In the aftermarket, enthusiast communities have sustained interest in LH vehicles through dedicated clubs, such as the Chrysler 300M Enthusiasts Club and Dodge Intrepid forums, which organize events, share restoration tips, and facilitate part swaps. Genuine replacement parts remain available via , Chrysler's official parts division, supporting preservation efforts well into the 2020s despite the platform's age.

References

  1. https://www.hemmings.com/stories/what-could-have-been-chrysler-originally-intended-the-lh-platform-as-front-rear-and-all-wheel-drive/
  2. https://www.300mclub.org/history-of-the-lh/
  3. https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1066964_guilty-pleasure-first-gen-chrysler-lh-platform
  4. https://www.allpar.com/d3/history/lh-manufacturing.html
  5. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/08/29/Chrysler-names-its-LH-cars/9967683438400/
  6. https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/curbside-classic-2003-chrysler-concorde-limited-a-last-hurrah-for-the-lh/
  7. https://www.allpar.com/threads/was-the-chrysler-sebring-ever-built-on-the-lh-platform.240073/
  8. https://www.motortrend.com/vehicle-genres/ford-taurus-sho-history-generations-specifications
  9. https://www.autonews.com/article/19940110/ANA/401100761/93-sales-top-13-9-million-best-since-89-stars-ford-nissan-chrysler-trucks/
  10. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1993/11/22/chrysler-stock-revving-up/
  11. https://www.npr.org/2008/11/12/96922222/examining-chryslers-1979-rescue
  12. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/podcast/knowledge-at-wharton-podcast/lee-iacoccas-legacy/
  13. https://ateupwithmotor.com/editorials-commentary/chrysler-bailout-part-1/
  14. https://www.chathamthisweek.com/opinion/columnists/old-cars-lh-cars-represented-chryslers-miraculous-recovery
  15. https://www.allpar.com/d3/corporate/bios/castaing-interview.html
  16. https://autocatalogarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Chrysler-Concorde-1993-USA.pdf
  17. https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1993/518465/chrysler_concorde_3_5l_v-6_automatic.html
  18. https://www.story-cars.com/1989-chrysler-millenium
  19. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-04-26-fi-1449-story.html
  20. https://www.designnews.com/automotive-engineering/platform-teams-pair-with-suppliers-to-drive-chrysler-to-better-designs
  21. https://www.allpar.com/d3/model/300m-nvh.html
  22. https://www.motortrend.com/news/1999-chrysler-300m
  23. https://www.kbb.com/dodge/intrepid/1993/specs/
  24. https://www.allpar.com/d3/model/lh2/lh-body.html
  25. https://300mclub.org/what-do-the-experts-have-to-say/
  26. https://www.edmunds.com/dodge/intrepid/1993/sedan/st-8416/features-specs/
  27. https://www.kbb.com/dodge/intrepid/1993/
  28. https://www.automobile.fandom.com/wiki/Chrysler_LH_platform
  29. https://www.motales.com/engines/transmissions/ultradrives.php
  30. https://www.jegs.com/tech-articles/guide-to-chryslers-late-model-automatic-transmissions/
  31. https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/chrysler-concorde-1993.html
  32. https://www.import-car.com/ohc-engine-repairs-and-service-on-chrysler-s-3-5l-v6/
  33. https://www.allpar.com/d3/cars/chrysler/300M.html
  34. https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/chrysler-concorde-1999.html
  35. https://consumerguide.com/used/1993-97-chrysler-concordenew-yorkerlhs/
  36. https://www.cars.com/research/chrysler-concorde-1993/
  37. https://www.autointell.com/nao_companies/daimlerchrysler/dc-business-figures/chrysler-group-sales/chrysler-group-historic-sales.htm
  38. https://www.allpar.com/threads/1993-1997-dodge-intrepid-eagle-vision-and-chrysler-concorde-new-yorker-and-lhs.228908/
  39. https://www.allpar.com/d3/model/intrepid.html
  40. https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15140518/1999-chrysler-300m-review/
  41. https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15139322/dodge-intrepid-r-t-road-test/
  42. https://300mclub.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=22756
  43. https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/1999-chrysler-300m-3
  44. https://www.edmunds.com/chrysler/300m/2002/review/
  45. https://media.stellantisnorthamerica.com/newsrelease.do?id=322
  46. https://media.stellantisnorthamerica.com/newsrelease.do?id=9496
  47. https://www.consultingcase101.com/chrysler-to-implement-just-in-time-delivery-for-auto-parts/
  48. https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/dodge-intrepid-sales-figures-usa-canada/
  49. https://www.300mclub.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=22756
  50. https://media.stellantisnorthamerica.com/newsrelease.do?id=535&fIId=782&mid=1
  51. https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a15145284/1993-10best-cars/
  52. https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a15143661/1999-10best-cars/
  53. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrJTLNhojoY
  54. https://www.jdpower.com/cars/ratings
  55. https://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/02/business/chrysler-s-sales-of-cars-and-trucks-climb-18.html
  56. https://www.automotivehalloffame.org/honoree/thomas-c-gale/
  57. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-02-10-ls-30355-story.html
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397290978_An_Evaluation_of_Side_Impact_Protection_FMVSS_214_-_TTId_Improvements_and_Side_Air_Bags
  59. https://www.sae.org/papers/chrysler-corporations-1993-lh-platform-vehicle-development-922114
  60. https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/chrysler-300-history-production-end-tom-gale-interview
  61. https://www.hagerty.com/media/automotive-history/bringing-up-the-rear-chryslers-rear-wheel-drive-lx-cars/
  62. https://www.mopar.com/en-us/shop/parts.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.