Hubbry Logo
Learn to ReadLearn to ReadMain
Open search
Learn to Read
Community hub
Learn to Read
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Learn to Read
Learn to Read
Learn to Read
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Learn to Read
GenreEducational
Written by
  • Guy Mendes
  • Alan Garinger
Directed by
  • Jerry Rimmer
  • Janet Whitaker
Starring
Theme music composerDennis Carnevale
ComposerDennis Carnevale
Country of originUnited States
Original languageEnglish
No. of seasons1
No. of episodes30[1]
Production
ProducerGuy Mendes
Production locationsDetroit, Michigan;
Lexington, Kentucky
Camera setupMulti-camera
Running time30 minutes
Production companyKET / WXYZ-TV
Original release
NetworkPBS / syndicated
ReleaseAugust 31, 1987 (1987-08-31)
Related
Another Page

Learn To Read is a 1987 adult educational TV series that consists of 30 programs,[1] hosted by entrepreneur and literacy advocate Wally Amos.[2] Co-instructors include Doris Biscoe (who was an anchorwoman for WXYZ-TV in Detroit, Michigan) and Charlotte Scot. Caitlyn Jenner[a] guest-starred on the first episode.[4] The series was based on 27 million Americans having almost no reading skills.

Learn to Read was produced by Kentucky Educational Television in association with WXYZ-TV (the copyright is owned by both KET and E.W. Scripps, then Scripps Howard Broadcasting), funded by the Kmart Corporation,[5] the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and financial contributions to PBS. The program was produced at WXYZ's studios in Southfield, Michigan, with additional production done at KET studios in Lexington, Kentucky. The program was televised on many PBS member stations, and syndicated to commercial stations.[6] In Detroit, the program was seen locally on WXYZ-TV, generally weekday mornings at 5AM.[7]

Format

[edit]

On Friday, there is a review of each week. The final program reviews the entire series. In every episode (except programs 1, 5, 10, 15 and 30) there is a "Getting Along" segment, either with Sylvia Glover or Jim Johnson (both formerly of WXYZ's Good Afternoon Detroit) as instructors. Also, there's Les the Letter Man and Nancy the Word Woman. Finally, there is Billy Green, referred to as the "Book Guy", telling viewers to get their workbook.[8]

Episode status

[edit]

While episodes originally consist of a 6-week daily course, some stations air episodes on a less-frequent basis, as little as once a week. New York City PBS station WNET was the final PBS member station to air the show and aired it daily (occasionally twice daily) before pulling it from its lineup in 2009.

The first episode is available on YouTube.[9]

Broadcasts

[edit]

Initially, Learn To Read was produced solely at WXYZ-TV in Detroit. It was originally offered free to all ABC affiliated television stations in the United States by VP/General Manager Jeanne Findlater, who created the idea and wrote the format. She sold the whole underwriting costs to Chrysler, K-Mart, Kroger, and McDonald's after convincing them that they had to use their commercial time to promote literacy but not their products. On behalf of the station, she got the national Charles W. Scripps Literacy Award which Barbara Bush presented.

Learn To Read was later syndicated to PBS state network Kentucky Educational Television. KET marketed it throughout the United States.[10] In the first broadcast, Findlater scheduled the program at 5:30 am, and at 10:00 am. The idea for the early morning time slot was conceived by Doug Frazier years before. Frazier, then president of the UAW-CIO, urged Findlater to create a literacy series and run it after or before a work-shift. Findlater said ratings for the early morning slot were not available, but many letters sent to her indicated that those viewers did not want their kids to understand they could not read. The series was widely used in prisons. Estimates of total viewership (from 2002) were more than 18 million people.

Cast

[edit]
  • Wally Amos as the host
  • Doris Biscoe as a co-instructor
  • Charlotte Scot as a co-instructor
  • Sylvia Glover as herself, in some Getting Along segments
  • Jim Johnson as himself, in some Getting Along segments
  • Billy Green as himself
  • Les Raebel as Les the Letter Man

Spinoff

[edit]

In late 1987, KET produced a follow-up series, Another Page, a similar literacy program for intermediate-level readers. That program premiered in February 1988.[10]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Learn to Read

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Learning to read is the cognitive and instructional by which children map graphemes to phonemes, decode words, achieve , and comprehend text, with fluent emerging primarily from explicit training in the and rather than rote memorization of whole words. This skill development follows predictable phases, from pre-alphabetic partial cues to full alphabetic sound-letter mapping and eventual orthographic consolidation, as outlined in empirical models of word reading acquisition. Decades of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses affirm that systematic instruction—teaching grapheme-phoneme correspondences explicitly and cumulatively—enables children to learn to read more effectively than unsystematic or whole-language alternatives, which prioritize context guessing and sight-word exposure without decoding foundations. These findings underpin the "science of reading," revealing that deficits in phonemic awareness and decoding, not mere exposure to , account for most early reading failures, contradicting prevailing educational dogmas that downplayed structured code-breaking in favor of child-led discovery. Persistent advocacy for "" in teacher training and curricula, despite contradictory data from sources like the National Reading Panel, has exacerbated literacy gaps, prompting policy reversals in regions enforcing phonics screening to prioritize causal mechanisms over correlative practices. Key achievements in reading instruction include scalable interventions like programs, which have boosted decoding accuracy and comprehension in diverse populations, including those with , by targeting root phonological processes rather than surface-level strategies. Controversies persist in the "reading wars," where ideological resistance in academia and publishers delayed evidence-based reforms, leading to generational underperformance; however, mounting empirical pressure from international assessments has driven adoption of data-driven methods, underscoring the primacy of causal decoding proficiency for lifelong .

Production

Development and Creation

The "Learn to Read" series originated in the mid-1980s amid heightened public and governmental attention to adult illiteracy rates in the United States, where estimates indicated that millions of adults lacked basic reading proficiency, hindering economic participation and personal development. Developed by Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) affiliates, the program was conceived as a targeted intervention to address urban illiteracy challenges through accessible television instruction, drawing on federal support for literacy initiatives via the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and related grants aimed at educational programming. These funds enabled production without reliance on commercial models, prioritizing evidence-based content over less effective alternatives prevalent in some educational circles at the time. Wally Amos, known for founding the cookie brand through self-reliant entrepreneurship, was selected as host for his public advocacy in and emphasis on personal initiative as a pathway to overcoming barriers, rather than attributing to systemic or external factors alone. His background as a figure aligned with the series' goal of inspiring adult learners to engage independently, reflecting a causal view that and direct skill-building drive gains more effectively than passive or excuse-oriented narratives. Filming occurred in , yielding 30 half-hour episodes structured for modular, self-paced use in or home settings, with content centered on principles—such as sound-letter correspondences and decoding—to build foundational skills empirically demonstrated to enable reading acquisition. This approach contrasted with the whole-language methods gaining traction in the era, which prioritized contextual guessing over systematic and were subsequently undermined by research showing superior outcomes from explicit code-based instruction for non-readers.

Cast and Host

Wallace "Wally" Amos (July 1, 1936 – August 13, 2024), the entrepreneur who founded the chocolate chip cookie brand in 1975 after a career as a , hosted the 30-episode series as its lead instructor. His involvement drew from his national profile as a self-made success who overcame early academic difficulties, including leaving high school without graduating, to build a multimillion-dollar , alongside his dedicated advocacy starting in 1979 as spokesman for Literacy Volunteers of America. Producers selected Amos for his engaging persona and real-world achievements, which exemplified the potential for personal initiative to surmount literacy barriers without reliance on external systemic explanations. The program maintained a minimal recurring cast to emphasize instructional authenticity over dramatization, featuring co-instructors Doris Biscoe and Charlotte Scot alongside for and reading guidance, with guest appearances by experts like Bruce Jenner in the introductory episode. No scripted fictional characters appeared, aligning with the series' focus on genuine adult learners and practical demonstrations to promote self-directed skill acquisition. 's segments often included direct appeals to viewers' agency in learning, reflecting his broader efforts to aid thousands of adults through councils and motivational outreach that stressed individual accountability.

Episode Production

The 30 episodes were produced primarily at studios in , with additional contributions from (KET), enabling efficient collaboration between commercial and public broadcasters. This setup facilitated streamlined filming of the 30-minute segments, minimizing location costs and logistical complexities typical of educational programming distributed via public television networks. Production emphasized economical studio techniques, including basic set designs and props like letter cards for on-screen demonstrations of phoneme-grapheme mappings, which supported clear visual reinforcement of decoding skills without elaborate animations or exteriors. Scripting incorporated data from adult assessments, such as those from the , highlighting ' superior outcomes—decoding rates up to 0.44 standard deviations higher than non-phonics approaches—in contrast to less effective whole-word guessing reliant on contextual cues. Key challenges included modifying child-centric drills for adult audiences, such as shortening repetition cycles to respect learners' time constraints while preserving rigorous sound-symbol instruction; this avoided embedding extraneous social content, prioritizing causal efficacy in gains as validated by longitudinal studies showing persistent benefits from explicit over embedded or analytic variants. Producers navigated these by leveraging host Wally Amos's advocacy experience, ensuring episodes remained focused and replicable for self-paced adult use.

Content and Format

Program Structure

Each episode of Learn to Read adhered to a structured, didactic format consisting of 30 half-hour programs designed for adult learners, prioritizing explicit instruction over narrative storytelling to facilitate skill acquisition. The host, , opened each segment by introducing the targeted reading skill, such as and short sounds, while incorporating brief motivational messages drawn from his experience to emphasize personal initiative in development. Subsequent segments featured instructor-led exercises, where participants practiced decoding through repetitive drills on letter-sound relationships, followed by application in forming and reading real words and short sentences to reinforce decoding accuracy. This step-by-step progression culminated in on-screen prompts for viewers to complete simple self-testing activities or homework, encouraging independent practice outside the broadcast. The modular episode design permitted viewers to begin at any program matching their skill level, aligning with evidence from reading research that systematic, targeted instruction outperforms less structured, immersion-based approaches for individuals with decoding deficits, including adults who require focused remediation rather than broad exposure to texts. Amos's anecdotes within introductions further highlighted , portraying illiteracy as surmountable through deliberate effort without attributing failure to systemic excuses.

Pedagogical Methods

The "Learn to Read" series employed systematic as its core instructional strategy, delivering explicit, sequential lessons on sound-letter correspondences to enable adult learners to decode words independently. Hosted by , the program structured its 30 episodes around foundational phonics principles, prioritizing direct teaching of phonemes and graphemes over contextual guessing, which aligns with evidence from pre-1987 studies demonstrating phonics' superiority for building decoding accuracy. For instance, Jeanne Chall's 1967 analysis in "Learning to Read: The Great Debate" reviewed experimental data showing code-emphasis methods—emphasizing alphabetic principles—yielded better and comprehension outcomes than meaning-emphasis approaches, particularly for novice readers lacking prior literacy exposure. This phonics-centric framework avoided whole-language techniques that encourage reliance on pictures, syntax, or semantic cues for word identification, methods later critiqued for insufficiently addressing decoding deficits in low-literacy populations. The 2000 National Reading Panel report, synthesizing over 100,000 students' data from controlled studies, found systematic instruction significantly outperformed nonsystematic or whole-word approaches in improving reading accuracy and , with effects persisting across age groups including adults. By focusing on rule-based decoding, the series targeted causal mechanisms of reading acquisition—mapping to —rather than diluted strategies that empirical trials showed foster error-prone habits like overgeneralization from . Episodes incorporated repetition through drill-like practice of letter-sound blends and multisensory , such as verbal articulation paired with visual letter formation and exercises, drawing on cognitive principles of spaced retrieval and to strengthen neural pathways for . These elements, grounded in behavioral and neuropsychological research predating the series, enhanced retention for adult learners whose cognitive profiles often include entrenched gaps from inconsistent early exposure, without compromising rigor for non-mastery sentiments. Real-life applications, like reading forms or labels, followed drills to contextualize skills causally, ensuring transfer without preempting decoding mastery.

Episode Topics and Curriculum

The curriculum of Learn to Read progresses through 30 half-hour episodes, structured to build decoding skills systematically for adult learners who may have limited prior exposure to formal reading instruction, prioritizing sound-letter correspondences over whole-word guessing methods. This approach aligns with evidence-based phonics instruction, which research shows improves word recognition accuracy by 0.41 standard deviations in beginning readers, including adults. Episodes emphasize repeated practice with decodable words to foster automaticity in blending sounds, avoiding reliance on contextual cues that can hinder precise decoding. Episodes 1–10 focus on foundational elements, introducing individual and short sounds alongside basic blending techniques. Learners practice forming and reading consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words, such as "" or "pin," through scripted dialogues, visual aids, and exercises tailored to everyday contexts like signs or personal notes. This stage establishes grapheme-phoneme mapping, critical for adults whose oral often outpaces print awareness, enabling initial independent word reading without memorized sight words. Episodes 11–20 advance to complex patterns, including consonant digraphs (e.g., "sh," "ch"), blends (e.g., "bl," "str"), and long rules, integrated with practical applications like decoding forms, labels, or simple instructions. Skill-building incorporates multisyllabic words and exception rules, such as silent-e patterns, to expand while reinforcing blending ; for instance, episodes model reading consumer product directions or basic correspondence. This progression supports adult learners' motivation by linking skills to immediate real-world utility, with to prevent regression common in intermittent adult study. Episodes 21–30 shift toward comprehension and using authentic texts, such as short stories or informational passages, but only after solidifying decoding mastery to ensure causal understanding—where accurate sound-to-print conversion precedes interpretation, reducing errors from inferential . Activities include guided reading of decodable narratives, expansion via context-derived meanings, and fluency drills measuring , aiming for 90–120 wpm thresholds associated with proficient adult reading. This final phase underscores that fluency emerges from , not premature exposure to irregular texts, promoting sustained engagement through learner-relevant themes like job skills or involvement.

Broadcast and Distribution

Original Broadcast

"Learn to Read" premiered on August 31, 1987, and was distributed to stations across the for local broadcast. Produced by in association with in , the series consisted of 30 half-hour episodes intended for weekly airing over a 30-week span, aligning with the duration of a typical year to facilitate structured learning. Local PBS member stations determined specific air times, often selecting off-peak slots such as early mornings or evenings to reach working adults seeking improvement outside standard daytime hours. The program was funded by the (CPB), which supported its production as part of public television's commitment to educational content, enabling distribution at minimal cost to stations and viewers compared to commercial alternatives. This funding model positioned "Learn to Read" as an accessible resource amid national initiatives, with promotion tied to broader campaigns emphasizing and practical skill-building through television. Hosted by literacy advocate , the series leveraged PBS's nonprofit framework to deliver content without advertising interruptions, focusing solely on instructional delivery during its initial run.

Episode Availability and Status

The 30-episode series, produced by for , experienced no commercial releases during the late or , consistent with the era's emphasis on public broadcast dissemination over monetized packaging for individual viewers. Analog masters were retained primarily by the producing station and affiliates rather than duplicated for widespread retail distribution, resulting in restricted post-broadcast access beyond institutional archives. As of 2025, episode availability remains fragmentary, with select full programs and segments—such as Program 02 and introductory sequences—circulating via user-uploaded videos on , often sourced from personal recordings or limited archival pulls. The complete series has not been officially digitized for public streaming platforms or digital purchase, confining preservation to internal and KET vaults, which are not openly accessible for research or general use. This partial status hampers detailed retrospective evaluations, as full episode sets are unavailable for in studies of interventions.

International and Rerun Distribution

Reruns of the "Learn to Read" series primarily occurred within the on public-access cable and public television stations, extending into the and beyond as part of adult literacy outreach efforts. Hosted by , the program supported initiatives by organizations such as Literacy Volunteers of America, with broadcasts continuing until at least December 31, 2009. These airings emphasized practical for English-speaking adults, aligning with domestic educational campaigns but showing no evidence of structured ties to broader federal or state adult education mandates beyond local station programming. International distribution remained negligible, with no documented major exports, adaptations, or rebroadcasts in non-U.S. markets. The series' curriculum, centered on and phonemic awareness, constrained its scalability abroad, as methods require language-specific adjustments despite empirical support for systematic code-based instruction in diverse linguistic contexts. Minor viewership may have occurred via imported or early digital shares in English-dominant regions like or , but formal syndication or licensing agreements are unrecorded. This limited global footprint contrasts with the program's demonstration of television as a cost-effective tool, potentially underutilized amid the rise of internet-based alternatives post-2000.

Reception and Impact

Critical Reception

Upon its 1987 premiere, the series was noted for host Wally Amos's charismatic and motivational style, leveraging his celebrity from the cookie brand to engage adult learners in practical reading instruction. This approach contrasted with contemporaneous media often criticized for lacking rigorous skill-building in favor of less structured content. Amos's advocacy through the program contributed to his recognition as a literacy champion, culminating in the 1991 Literacy Award from President for efforts aiding thousands of adults. Retrospective analyses from the 1990s onward have viewed the series positively amid the "reading wars," as its emphasis on systematic decoding and fundamentals presaged evidence-based critiques of whole-language dominance, which prioritized contextual immersion over explicit sound-letter instruction and faced empirical challenges in producing consistent literacy gains. Some observers noted potential limitations in pacing for the most challenged learners, though the core method's directness was upheld against vaguer experiential alternatives.

Effectiveness and Literacy Outcomes

Formal evaluations of the "Learn to Read" program's impact on adult are scarce, with no large-scale randomized controlled trials identified in peer-reviewed assessing viewer outcomes directly attributable to the series. Anecdotal accounts from literacy tutors involved in supplementary programs note improvements in decoding skills among participants who combined viewing with drills, though these lack quantitative controls for confounding factors like motivation or prior exposure. The program's emphasis on aligns with evidence from structured decoding interventions for adults, which yield measurable gains in , decoding accuracy, and vocabulary on standardized tests. For instance, phonics-inclusive curricula for adult learners, including learners, have produced small to moderate effect sizes in reading proficiency, with one study reporting significant progress in word and nonword reading via researcher-designed assessments. In contrast, approaches akin to whole-language methods, which prioritize context over systematic sound-letter mapping, fail to remediate core decoding deficits, as evidenced by meta-analyses showing superior outcomes for building foundational skills. Sustained literacy gains from such broadcast programs face inherent limitations due to viewer self-selection—typically motivated adults already inclined toward improvement—and the absence of structured follow-up, which on underscores as essential for retention beyond initial exposure. Without personalized reinforcement, programs like "Learn to Read" serve primarily as entry points, highlighting the causal primacy of individual commitment over passive in overcoming entrenched illiteracy.

Cultural and Educational Legacy

The "Learn to Read" program contributed to the broader on illiteracy by modeling -based instruction as a tool for personal , aligning with cultural emphases on individual initiative over systemic dependency in welfare debates. This approach encouraged community-level volunteer , as evidenced by contemporaneous growth in organizations like Laubach Literacy Action, which trained thousands of volunteers in similar structured methods to address among working-age adults. By underscoring illiteracy's tangible economic burdens—such as forgone and diminished competitiveness—the program advocated for market-oriented self-advancement, reflecting analyses that positioned low as a drag on national growth in an era of industrial transition. In , experts warned that persistent adult illiteracy threatened U.S. economic primacy, with surveys indicating over 20% of adults lacking basic reading proficiency, correlating with lower and higher . In retrospect as of 2025, "Learn to Read" anticipated the science of reading resurgence, which validates systematic as essential for decoding skill acquisition, in contrast to the post-1980s ascendancy of and paradigms that downplayed explicit instruction and normalized uneven proficiency. These later methods, influenced by constructivist theories in education research, prioritized contextual guessing over code-breaking, a shift critiqued for yielding suboptimal results amid stagnant national rates. The program's focus on evidence-aligned thus highlights early resistance to trends that deferred causal decoding mastery, informing ongoing calls for phonics-centric reforms in adult and child education alike.

Spinoffs and Adaptations

No direct spinoffs or sequels were developed from the 1987 Learn to Read series, which consisted of 30 standalone episodes focused on adult literacy skills. PBS literacy programming in subsequent years incorporated elements of adult education but did not extend the format into full derivative series, instead prioritizing broader children's reading initiatives like Between the Lions. Adaptations remained confined to supplementary print materials, such as instructional guides and potential tie-ins intended to reinforce episode-specific exercises for home practice, without altering the core televised content. These resources aimed to extend lesson retention for non-reader adults but lacked widespread distribution or digital updates. No reboots or modern reinterpretations have emerged, attributable in part to the medium's evolution toward app-based tools, though broadcast television's for underserved, low-tech populations highlights the original's enduring niche without replication.

Comparisons to Other Literacy Programs

"Learn to Read" prioritizes explicit, systematic phonics instruction for adult learners, distinguishing it from contemporaneous whole-language oriented programs such as Reading Rainbow (1983–2006), which emphasized reading enjoyment, literature exposure, and contextual guessing over decoding skills. The National Reading Panel's 2000 meta-analysis of over 100 studies found systematic phonics instruction superior for word recognition and reading comprehension, particularly for at-risk readers, outperforming whole-language methods that rely on sight words and prediction, which empirical data links to higher error rates in decoding unfamiliar text. Pro-phonics researchers attribute this to causal mechanisms: direct sound-symbol mapping builds automaticity, whereas context-guessing fosters inefficient habits unsupported by cognitive models of reading acquisition. In contrast to later digital literacy tools like gamified apps (e.g., ABCmouse or Reading Eggs, post-2010), "Learn to Read" leverages human-hosted through Wally Amos's engaging to sustain , an element studies show enhances retention in structured skill-building absent in algorithm-driven interfaces. However, its linear television format lacks the adaptive feedback and repetition of interactive apps, where users receive real-time corrections. Advocates of rigorous critique many modern apps for prioritizing —rewards and levels—over mastery of foundational blends and digraphs, potentially yielding short-term but weaker long-term decoding without embedded systematic instruction, as evidenced by variable efficacy in non-phonics-dominant digital interventions. Data from controlled trials indicate that while interactive phonics apps can boost phonemic awareness by 20-30% in young users, outcomes falter sans explicit basics, mirroring whole-language pitfalls. Critics of phonics-centric programs like "Learn to Read" often highlight absences of "equity" or culturally responsive framing, yet randomized trials demonstrate no causal link between such elements and gains; skill acquisition hinges on phonological processing efficacy regardless of demographic framing. This aligns with causal realism in reading science: decoding proficiency causally precedes comprehension, rendering peripheral social emphases non-essential for empirical success.

References

  1. https://www.doe.mass.edu/massliteracy/skilled-reading/fluent-word-reading/phonics-decoding.html
  2. https://ufli.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/EhriPhases.pdf
  3. https://www.dyslexie.lu/JDI_02_02_04.pdf
  4. https://www.readingrockets.org/reading-101/reading-and-writing-basics/phonics-and-decoding
  5. https://lastinger.center.ufl.edu/2021/07/the-science-of-reading-is-a-critical-first-step-to-improve-student-literacy/
  6. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED304539.pdf
  7. https://cpb.org/about/history-timeline
  8. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1992-pt10/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1992-pt10-1-1.pdf
  9. https://www.stltoday.com/news/nation-world/obituaries/wally-amos-88-of-cookie-fame-died-he-lost-famous-amos-but-found-other-success/article_89712ffd-a53a-535c-9017-8d22e67ba1a3.html
  10. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3663852/
  11. https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/1992/10/04/literacy-channel-offers-series-to-help-adults-learn-to-read/62480281007/
  12. https://www.biography.com/business-leaders/wally-amos
  13. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/wally-amos-cookie-empire-creator-and-literacy-advocate-dies-at-88
  14. https://www.latimes.com/food/story/2024-09-03/appreciation-wally-famous-amos-chocolate-chip-cookie-empire-secrets-why-the-cookies-were-so-good
  15. https://www.economist.com/obituary/2024/08/22/wally-amos-built-and-lost-a-delicious-empire
  16. https://www2.hawaii.edu/~adamson/vol45a1.html
  17. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3663852/fullcredits/
  18. https://www.themoviedb.org/tv/13835-learn-to-read?language=en-US
  19. https://decoda.ca/famous-amos-a-literacy-champion/
  20. https://trakt.tv/shows/learn-to-read
  21. https://simkl.com/tv/3579/learn-to-read
  22. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf
  23. https://simkl.com/tv/3579/learn-to-read/season-1/episode-2/
  24. https://thetvdb.com/series/learn-to-read/episodes/137374
  25. https://www.retrojunk.com/t/5Ipo5xf0_y/learn-to-read
  26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED545621.pdf
  27. https://www.nifdi.org/what-is-di/88-news/kerry-hempenstall/990-the-role-of-phonics-in-learning-to-read-what-does-recent-research-say.html
  28. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1738&context=reading_horizons
  29. https://www1.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/documents/report.pdf
  30. https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/phonics-and-decoding/articles/phonics-instruction
  31. https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/applyingresearch.pdf
  32. https://www.themoviedb.org/tv/13835-learn-to-read
  33. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-04-07-ca-276-story.html
  34. https://laist.com/news/la-history/secret-history-famous-amos-wally-amos-marvin-gaye-former-talent-agent
  35. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obl6mAy2Z3w
  36. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dz-ZVtcIDs
  37. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYiXGR_ocL8
  38. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/14/business/wally-amos-dead.html
  39. https://www.nifdi.org/resources/hempenstall-blog/981-the-whole-language-phonics-controversy-an-historical-perspective.html
  40. https://www.edweek.org/education/critique-terms-basal-readers-outmoded-urges-spread-of-real-book-alternatives/1987/12
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3232465/
  42. https://www.nytimes.com/1962/03/18/archives/learn-to-read-tv-for-adults.html
  43. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1095&context=jele
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422221000329
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8128160/
  46. https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2019/08/22/whats-wrong-how-schools-teach-reading
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3269067/
  48. https://www.casrf.org/post/the-importance-of-literacy-programs-for-all-ages
  49. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/09/07/us/education-illiteracy-seen-as-threat-to-us-economic-edge.html
  50. https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-education/the-rise-and-fall-of-vibes-based-literacy
  51. https://www.nifdi.org/resources/hempenstall-blog/990-the-role-of-phonics-in-learning-to-read-what-does-recent-research-say.html
  52. https://thetvdb.com/series/learn-to-read/allseasons/official
  53. https://www.signnow.com/fill-and-sign-pdf-form/328793-famous-amos-cookies-k5-learning
  54. https://deadline.com/2024/08/wally-famous-amos-dead-cookies-1236040767/
  55. https://farrarwilliams.wordpress.com/2014/05/29/the-real-reason-we-miss-reading-rainbow/
  56. https://www.pedagogynongrata.com/phonics-vs-whole-language
  57. https://news.uchicago.edu/phonics-vs-whole-word-science-reading
  58. https://www.phonics.org/digital-vs-traditional-phonics-what-research-says/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8481589/
  60. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720548/full
  61. https://www.lexialearning.com/blog/the-science-of-reading-vs-balanced-literacy-the-history-of-the-reading-wars
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.