Hubbry Logo
Picatinny railPicatinny railMain
Open search
Picatinny rail
Community hub
Picatinny rail
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Picatinny rail
Picatinny rail
Picatinny rail
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Picatinny rail (MIL-STD-1913 rail or 1913 rail) is an American rail integration system designed by Richard Swan[1] that provides a mounting platform for firearm accessories. It forms part of the NATO standard STANAG 2324 rail. It was originally used for mounting of telescopic sights atop the receivers of larger caliber rifles.

Once established as United States Military Standard, its use expanded to also attaching other accessories, such as: iron sights, tactical lights, laser sights, night-vision devices, reflex sights, holographic sights, foregrips, bipods, slings and bayonets.

An updated version of the rail is adopted as a NATO standard as the STANAG 4694 NATO Accessory Rail.

Close-up of a 4x scope mounted on a Picatinny Rail.

History

[edit]
MIL-STD-1913 rail dimensions, cross section (dimensions in inches)

Attempts to standardize the Weaver rail mount designs date from work by the A.R.M.S. company and Richard Swanson in the early 1980s.[citation needed] Specifications for the M16A2E4 rifle and the M4E1 carbine received type classification generic in December 1994.[citation needed] These were the M16A2[2] and the M4[3] modified with new upper receivers where rails replaced hand guards. [verification needed]

The MIL-STD-1913 rail is commonly called the "Picatinny Rail", in reference to the Picatinny Arsenal in New Jersey. Picatinny Arsenal works as a contracting office for small arms design (they contracted engineers to work on the M4[4]).

Picatinny Arsenal requested Swan's help in developing the rail, but did not draft blueprints or request paperwork for a patent. That credit goes to Richard Swanson of A.R.M.S., who conducted research and development and acquired a patent for the rail in 1995.[5] Swan has litigated in civil court against Colt and Troy industries regarding patent infringement. The courts found that Troy had developed rifles with rail mounting systems nearly identical to the MIL-STD-1913 rail.[6]

A metric-upgraded version of the 1913 rail, the STANAG 4694 NATO Accessory Rail, was designed in conjunction with weapon manufacturers like Aimpoint, Beretta, Colt, FN Herstal and Heckler & Koch, and was approved by the NATO Army Armaments Group (NAAG), Land Capability Group 1 Dismounted Soldier (LCG1-DS) on May 8, 2009.

Many firearm manufacturers include a MIL-STD-1913 rail system from the factory, such as the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle.[7]

Design

[edit]

The rail consists of a strip undercut to form a "flattened T" with a hexagonal top cross-section, with cross slots interspersed with flats that allow accessories to be slid into place from the end of the rail and then locked in place. It is similar in concept to the earlier commercial Weaver rail mount used to mount telescopic sights, but is taller and has wider slots at regular intervals along the entire length.

The MIL-STD-1913 locking slot width is 0.206 in (5.23 mm). The spacing of slot centres is 0.394 in (10.01 mm) and the slot depth is 0.118 in (3.00 mm).[8]

Comparison to Weaver rail

[edit]
MIL-STD-1913 rail side view, illustrating recoil grooves (dimensions in inches)

The only significant difference between the MIL-STD-1913 rail and the similar Weaver rail mount are the size and shapes of the slots. Whereas the earlier Weaver rail is modified from a low, wide dovetail rail and has rounded slots, the 1913 rail has a more pronounced angular section and square-bottomed slots. This means that an accessory designed for a Weaver rail will fit onto a MIL-STD-1913 rail whereas the opposite might not be possible, unless the slots in the Weaver rail are modified to have square bottoms.[9]

While some accessories are designed to fit on both Weaver and 1913 rails, most 1913 compatible devices will not fit on Weaver rails. From May 2012, most mounting rails are cut to MIL-STD-1913 standards.[10] Many accessories can be secured to a rail with a single spring-loaded retaining pin.

Designed to mount heavy sights of various kinds, a great variety of accessories and attachments are now available and the rails are no longer confined to the rear upper surface (receiver) of long arms but are either fitted to or machine milled into the upper, side or lower surfaces of all manner of weapons from crossbows to pistols and long arms up to and including anti-materiel rifles.

Impact

[edit]

Because of their many uses, 1913 rails and accessories have replaced iron sights in the design of many firearms and are available as aftermarket add-on parts for most actions that do not have them integrated, and they are also on the undersides of semi-automatic pistol frames and grips.[11]

Their usefulness has led to them being used in paintball, gel blasters, airsoft and foam dart blasters.[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Picatinny rail

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Picatinny rail, formally known as the MIL-STD-1913 rail, is a standardized tactical rail mounting system designed for attaching accessories to weapons, establishing uniform dimensioning methods to ensure interchangeability across U.S. Department of Defense systems. It consists of a linear raised platform with a series of evenly spaced transverse slots, each 0.206 inches (5.23 mm) wide and spaced 0.394 inches (10 mm) on center, allowing secure, adjustable attachment of devices such as optical sights, aimers, weapon lights, and grenade launchers without the need for custom fittings. Distinguished from earlier Weaver rails by its deeper, uniform slots and precise tolerances—including edge breaks of 0.002 inches ± 0.010 inches and fillet radii of 0.020 inches ± 0.015 inches—the Picatinny rail promotes and reliability in environments. Developed in the late 1980s at the U.S. Army's in , the rail addressed the fragmentation caused by proprietary mounting systems on military firearms, aiming to create a single, versatile standard for accessory integration. Mechanical engineer Gary Houtsma led the design team, measuring existing commercial rails like the Weaver to refine dimensional requirements that balanced strength, ease of use, and compatibility. The resulting MIL-STD-1913 specification was finalized and adopted by the U.S. military in 1995, rapidly becoming the de facto global standard for firearm accessories due to its robustness and widespread implementation on platforms like the and . Beyond its military origins, the Picatinny rail's influence extends to civilian firearms, equipment, and even non-weapon applications such as guns and tactical gear, underscoring its role in enhancing weapon versatility and operator effectiveness. Its enduring design has inspired compatible systems, including NATO's STANAG 4694, which maintains while introducing minor enhancements for international use.

History

Origins and Development

The Picatinny rail originated in the late 1980s at the U.S. Army's in , where a team of engineers sought to develop a standardized mounting system for optics and accessories on firearms. Led by mechanical engineer Gary Houtsma, the project addressed the inconsistencies of prior systems, such as the Weaver rail, which often resulted in loose or overly tight fits for attachments on modular weapons like variants. The primary motivation was to create a universal, recoil-resistant platform that could accommodate the increasing demand for customizable firearms in applications, ensuring reliable attachment and retention under operational stresses. Development began in the early , with prototypes tested for in recoil-heavy environments and compatibility across various accessories. The team refined the concept through iterative evaluations, incorporating feedback to enhance overall robustness. Early field trials with U.S. Army units revealed challenges related to environmental exposure, prompting adjustments for improved corrosion resistance in adverse conditions. These efforts laid the groundwork for the rail's eventual formal standardization.

Standardization and Adoption

The Picatinny rail was formally ratified as MIL-STD-1913 on February 3, 1995, by the U.S. Department of Defense, establishing standardized dimensions for accessory mounting rails on small arms weapons to ensure uniform attachment of optical sights, lasers, and illumination devices across military platforms. This military standard, developed at Picatinny Arsenal, mandated adherence by all Department of Defense units to promote interoperability and reliability in accessory integration. Key adoption milestones followed shortly after ratification, with the rail integrated into the M4A1 carbine variant through upper receiver upgrades introduced in 1994, enabling enhanced modularity for tactical accessories on this platform. In the , the (SAW), designated as the M249, began incorporating Picatinny rails as part of product improvement programs, including railed forearms and top-cover mounts to support optics and other devices in squad-level automatic fire roles. These integrations marked the rail's transition from prototype to standard equipment in U.S. Army small arms inventories. The Picatinny rail's extended internationally through 's STANAG 2324, which defined the MIL-STD-1913 as the alliance-wide standard for optical and electronic sight mounts, promoting among allied forces' small arms systems. This standardization facilitated shared logistics and accessory compatibility across members, building on the U.S. military's foundational implementation. Early faced resistance primarily due to the added costs of existing weapons, though this was overcome by demonstrations of the rail's superior reliability in operations.

Design and Specifications

Physical Dimensions and Features

The Picatinny rail, standardized under MIL-STD-1913, features a uniform base width of 0.835 inches (21.2 mm) to ensure compatibility across mounting platforms. This width supports the rail's central raised platform, flanked by sloped sides that form a dovetail profile for secure attachment to the host . Key tolerances include edge breaks of 0.002 inches ± 0.010 inches and fillet radii of 0.020 inches ± 0.015 inches. The rail includes transverse slots spaced 0.394 inches (10 mm) center-to-center, providing multiple mounting points for accessories depending on rail length. Each slot measures 0.206 inches (5.23 mm) wide at the top and extends to a depth of 0.118 inches (3 mm), forming a T-shaped groove with a narrower base that engages accessory clamps or lugs to prevent slippage under firing stress. Construction typically employs 6061-T6 aluminum alloy for standard applications or 7075-T6 for heavier duty, finished with to enhance resistance; aluminum variants typically weigh approximately 0.3-0.4 ounces per inch. A key feature is the integrated numbering system along the rail, etched at intervals corresponding to slot positions, which allows for repeatable and precise accessory placement during removal and reinstallation.

Mounting and Compatibility Mechanisms

Accessories attach to the Picatinny rail primarily through clamp-style mounts that utilize thumbscrews or quick-detach (QD) levers to engage the rail's grooves within the transverse slots. These clamps secure by gripping the rail's elevated side walls and locking into the 0.206-inch-wide slots, distributing forces evenly to prevent slippage. Thumbscrews provide adjustable tension for permanent installations, while QD levers enable tool-free, rapid attachment and removal by pivoting against the rail's profile. Manufacturer-recommended torque for these fasteners typically ranges from 15 to 25 in-lbs to resist vibration and without over-stressing components. The rail's adherence to MIL-STD-1913 specifications guarantees universal compatibility with compliant accessories, standardizing the mounting interface across military and civilian applications. This protocol allows seamless interchangeability, as the rail's 0.394-inch center-to-center slot spacing and precise dimensions support a wide array of devices without modification. Weaver-style mounts are generally compatible with Picatinny rails due to overlapping design elements, though adapters are often used for optimal fit when mounting Picatinny-specific accessories on narrower Weaver slots to avoid instability. During installation, users align accessories using the rail's numbered slots, which facilitate repeatable positioning for consistent performance; for example, on a typical AR-15 rail spanning the upper receiver, slots are numbered sequentially from 1 at the front to around 13 at the rear. This system enables precise placement, such as mounting an optic at a specific slot to achieve initial bore alignment before zeroing. For optics zeroing, the slot selection provides coarse angular adjustment, with each 0.394-inch slot spacing equating to approximately 0.38 of shift at 100 yards, complemented by the optic's finer 1/4 turret increments for final calibration. To enhance safety and reliability, mounts often include mechanisms like polymer-tipped set screws that apply against the rail without causing damage, effectively countering forward creep or loosening under sustained . These inserts provide a non-marring lock that maintains zero during extended firing sessions, contributing to the system's robustness in high-vibration environments.

Comparisons to Other Systems

Weaver Rail

The Weaver rail system, an early standardized mounting platform for firearm optics, was developed around 1930 by William Ralph Weaver, founder of W.R. Weaver Co., primarily to secure scope rings on rifles. Unlike the later Picatinny rail, which features uniform slot spacing of 0.394 inches (10 mm) center-to-center and a slot width of 0.206 inches (5.23 mm), the Weaver design employs a narrower slot width of 0.180 inches (4.57 mm) with non-standardized spacing between slots, often limited to just a few grooves on shorter bases. This configuration provided a reliable dovetail-style interface for civilian and sporting applications but lacked the precision for broader accessory integration. A key distinction lies in compatibility: Weaver-style mounts can generally attach to Picatinny rails due to the narrower slot fitting within the wider Picatinny groove, though the mismatch in spacing and dimensions often results in reduced stability or potential shifting under use. Conversely, Picatinny mounts do not reliably secure to Weaver rails without widening the slots or using adapters, as the broader recoil lugs on Picatinny accessories exceed the Weaver slot dimensions. Prior to the , Weaver rails dominated designs, particularly on rifles and early tactical models, necessitating the development of hybrid adapters following the U.S. military's of the MIL-STD-1913 Picatinny standard in 1995. These adapters allowed legacy Weaver-equipped s to interface with modern Picatinny accessories, facilitating a gradual transition; however, Picatinny's universal standardization largely phased out standalone Weaver systems by the early in favor of enhanced modularity. In terms of performance, Weaver rails feature shallower and less uniform slot depths compared to the Picatinny's standardized 0.118 inches (3 mm), which diminishes secure engagement of recoil lugs and can compromise hold during heavy- firing scenarios. This limitation made Weaver suitable for lighter loads but prompted the evolution toward Picatinny for demanding applications requiring robust accessory retention.

Modern Modular Rails (e.g., and KeyMod)

Modern modular rails represent an evolution in accessory mounting systems, prioritizing reduced weight, enhanced , and direct attachment capabilities over the heavier, rail-heavy Picatinny design. Introduced in the early 2010s, these systems utilize slotted patterns on handguards to allow accessories like lights, grips, and lasers to mount without full-length rails, minimizing bulk while maintaining versatility. KeyMod, released in 2012 as an open-source standard, was jointly developed by VLTOR Weapon Systems and to address the limitations of traditional rails. The system features keyhole-shaped slots spaced at 0.788-inch intervals, with a 0.380-inch diameter circular hole transitioning to a 0.234-inch wide slot, enabling accessories to slide in and lock via recoil lugs and nuts. This design supports direct mounting at various angles and positions, reducing overall handguard weight compared to Picatinny-equipped equivalents. However, early implementations faced challenges with accessory slippage under sustained loads. M-LOK (Modular Lock), introduced by Magpul Industries in 2014, emerged as a competing open-licensed system developed entirely in-house without external collaboration. It employs rectangular slots measuring 1.260 inches long, 0.276 inches (7 mm) wide, and spaced 0.315 inches (8 mm) apart, where T-nuts rotate to secure accessories via transverse locking. This configuration provides stronger retention through anti-rotation tabs and is compatible with or aluminum handguards, offering a sleeker profile and weight savings similar to KeyMod. Magpul's design built on prior MOE slots but refined them for broader compatibility and reliability. Comparisons between KeyMod and M-LOK highlight differences in robustness and user experience relative to Picatinny. Both systems are lighter and more modular than Picatinny, which relies on continuous rails for fixed-slot mounting, but M-LOK demonstrated superior performance in 2016-2017 testing by the Crane Division for U.S. Command (USSOCOM). In drop, endurance, and point-of-aim retention tests across multiple handguards, M-LOK showed 140-220% higher sustained load capacity and 73% less average shift than KeyMod, with no failures under cyclic loading up to 10,000 cycles. Picatinny, while the most durable for heavy accessories, added unnecessary weight (often 2-4 ounces per section) and snagged clothing. These results led USSOCOM to adopt M-LOK as the preferred system in 2017, influencing broader military and civilian uptake; KeyMod production has since declined, though legacy components remain available.

Applications

Military and Tactical Use

The Picatinny rail serves as a foundational mounting system in military and tactical applications, enabling the integration of critical accessories on weapons to enhance operational effectiveness. Primary examples include such as the ACOG 4x32 riflescope, designed specifically for the M4 and M4A1 platforms with its thumbscrew mount securing directly to the rail for reliable zero retention in combat. devices like the monocular attach via dedicated Picatinny-compatible mounts, allowing hands-free weapon integration during low-light operations. Laser aiming modules, including the L3Harris AN/PEQ-15 ATPIAL, mount seamlessly on the rail to provide infrared and visible aiming capabilities for -assisted engagements. Vertical foregrips also commonly affix to the rail on rifles like the M4A1 and HK416, improving weapon control and stability for close-quarters maneuvers. These configurations are standard across U.S. forces, with the rail appearing on nearly every weapon from carbines to machine guns. The rail's tactical advantages stem from its standardization under MIL-STD-1913, which promotes versatility and durability while allowing quick, tool-free attachment and detachment of accessories for mission-specific adaptations. This enables rapid reconfiguration in dynamic field environments, such as swapping or lasers to suit changing threats without compromising weapon integrity. During Operations Enduring Freedom (2001-2014), the Picatinny rail supported modular setups on the predominant U.S. platforms, facilitating enhanced accuracy, illumination, and targeting in scenarios. Its robust design ensures accessories remain secure under recoil, vibration, and environmental stresses typical of prolonged deployments. In contexts, particularly for teams, Picatinny rails are commonly added to platforms like the Remington 870 shotgun to accommodate tactical lights for illumination and weapon-mounted cameras for documentation during entry operations. This integration supports and evidence collection in high-risk incidents, with widespread use across U.S. agencies due to its compatibility with existing gear. Recent evolutions underscore the rail's enduring relevance, as seen in the U.S. Army's Modular System (MHS), with the XM17 (fielded as M17/M18) featuring an integrated MIL-STD-1913 Picatinny rail for suppressor attachment and other enablers. This design maintains with legacy accessories while supporting suppressed operations for reduced signature in special missions, with full integration continuing through 2023 upgrades.

Civilian and Sporting Applications

In civilian hunting applications, the Picatinny rail has become a standard feature on bolt-action rifles such as the Remington 700, enabling the secure mounting of variable-power scopes for precise targeting across diverse conditions, including low-light environments where illuminated reticles enhance visibility. These rails also support bipod attachments for improved stability during prone shooting, a common setup in modern hunting rifles that facilitates better accuracy on uneven terrain. This configuration is widely adopted in contemporary hunting setups, with many rifle manufacturers integrating Picatinny rails as standard or optional equipment to accommodate a range of optics and accessories. In competitive shooting disciplines like 3-gun and (IPSC) events, Picatinny rails facilitate rapid optic swaps and accessory changes, allowing competitors to adapt quickly between stages requiring different sighting systems. On pistols such as the 19 Modular Optic System (MOS), these rails enable the addition of red dot sights, which accelerate by providing unobstructed views and faster re-engagement compared to traditional . This versatility contributes to the rail's prevalence in speed-oriented competitions, where modular mounting supports customized setups for enhanced performance. Among civilian firearm enthusiasts, Picatinny rails are integral to custom AR-15 builds, with aftermarket options from manufacturers like offering full-length rails for attaching tactical lights, slings, and other accessories to suit personal preferences. These customizable platforms have surged in popularity within the U.S. civilian market, where an estimated 24 million AR-15-pattern rifles are in private hands as of 2025. The rail's compatibility with a broad ecosystem of components allows hobbyists to tailor rifles for recreational shooting or home defense without professional modification. The accessibility of Picatinny rail kits, priced between $10 and $30 for basic sections and hardware suitable for home installation, has further driven adoption among hobbyists since the expiration of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban in 2004, which lifted restrictions on certain semi-automatic features and spurred interest in modular designs. This affordability, combined with straightforward DIY installation using standard tools, has democratized customization for non-professional users, aligning with the post-ban growth in civilian AR-15 ownership and experimentation.

Mounting Best Practices

When positioning scope rings on a Picatinny rail, users should avoid several common mistakes to ensure optimal stability, alignment, and performance of mounted optics. Placing the scope too far rearward can result in scope shadow or tunnel vision, restricting the field of view and compromising sighting effectiveness. Selecting rings that are positioned too close together may compromise stability, increasing the likelihood of movement or vibration under recoil. It is essential to push the rings fully forward into the rail slots to prevent shifting and maintain zero. Furthermore, rings must be clamped exclusively on straight, cylindrical sections of the scope tube, avoiding tapered areas, turrets, or objective bells to prevent damage, misalignment, or uneven pressure. Proper adherence to these practices enhances reliability in both tactical and sporting applications.

Impact and Legacy

Influence on Firearm Accessories

The Picatinny rail has significantly driven the growth of the accessories industry, fostering a market valued at over $500 million globally in 2024 and projected to expand to $750 million by 2033, primarily through its role as a universal mounting standard for optics, lights, lasers, and grips. This standardization has enabled manufacturers such as and to develop extensive product lines, with offering multiple dedicated mounts and adapters in its catalog, including low-profile Picatinny options for red dot sights and scopes, while produces compatible weapon lights like the X300U series that secure directly to the rail system. The rail's widespread adoption has resulted in thousands of compatible accessories available from various vendors, spurring innovation in aftermarket components and contributing to the broader guns and accessories sector's projected value of $7.39 billion in 2025. In terms of design ripple effects, the Picatinny rail has encouraged the development of modular firearm platforms by providing consistent attachment points that simplify accessory integration and reduce manufacturing complexities. For instance, the rifle series incorporates integrated Picatinny rails along the receiver and handguard, allowing for seamless customization with optics and other attachments, which has become a hallmark of modern tactical rifles. This standardization has lowered costs for manufacturers by enabling shared components and in production, as evidenced by the rail's role in streamlining logistics for equipping large-scale military inventories without custom engineering for each accessory. The Picatinny rail's influence extends to global standardization efforts, serving as the basis for NATO's STANAG 4694 specification, which ensures across allied forces' equipment and facilitates in and accessories. Adopted as MIL-STD-1913 by the U.S. and mirrored in various national standards, it has promoted compatibility in mounts and rail systems worldwide, reducing barriers to cross-border sales and enhancing supply chain efficiency for defense contractors. Although directives enacted post-2017, such as Directive () 2017/853, focus primarily on acquisition controls rather than mounting standards, the rail's prevalence has indirectly supported in and markets by aligning with broader goals in the 's internal market regulations. Economically, the Picatinny rail has enabled robust aftermarket innovation by allowing adapters that bridge legacy systems to modern accessories, thereby extending the utility of older firearms and sustaining demand for upgrades. These adapters, such as those converting Weaver-style rails to Picatinny compatibility, have proliferated in the industry, supporting small-scale manufacturers and contributing to job creation in precision machining and accessory design sectors. This ecosystem has bolstered the U.S. economy through increased exports of standardized components, with the rail's durability and versatility driving ongoing investment in compatible technologies.

Ongoing Relevance and Evolutions

The Picatinny rail maintains persistent dominance in applications, serving as the default mounting on many new rifles due to its extensive accessory ecosystem that supports rapid customization for , lights, and grips. For instance, the U.S. Marine Corps' (IAR), which continues to see widespread deployment as of 2024, features a free-floating Picatinny rail that enables seamless integration of mission-specific attachments. This entrenched compatibility ensures its role as a standard interface, even as modular designs evolve, with modularity via Picatinny rails driving much of the rifle market's growth. Post-2020 trends have led to hybrid integrations that combine Picatinny rails with lighter modular systems like on handguards, optimizing weight reduction while preserving for legacy accessories. A representative example is the Geissele Super Modular Rail MK4, which incorporates integrated M1913 Picatinny sections at key positions alongside M-LOK slots for enhanced versatility and reduced bulk. These designs balance the robustness of Picatinny for primary optics mounting with the minimalism of M-LOK for side attachments, reflecting a broader shift toward adaptable platforms without fully abandoning the Picatinny standard. As of , the rail continues to be integral to new U.S. military programs, such as the (NGSW), which features Picatinny-compatible interfaces for accessories. Manufacturing advances, particularly in CNC machining, have enabled precise production of custom Picatinny rails in lengths from 3 to 15 inches, tailored for specific configurations by major OEMs. Additionally, variants have emerged for lighter applications, such as rail sections, offering durable yet low-weight options that maintain secure accessory mounting without the heft of traditional aluminum. Looking ahead, the Picatinny rail's future appears secure through evolutions in , such as NATO's STANAG 4694 Accessory Rail, which builds on Picatinny dimensions for metric compatibility and tolerances while ensuring .

References

  1. https://www.biggerhammer.net/picatinny/1913_specs.pdf
  2. https://www.army.mil/article/137761/picatinny_engineer_recognized_for_developing_venerable_picatinny_rail
  3. https://hi-luxoptics.com/blogs/history/history-of-the-picatinny-rail
  4. https://firefield.com/blogs/news/a-history-and-evolution-of-mounts-and-rails-picatinny-keymod-and-m-lok
  5. https://www.shootingtimes.com/editorial/optics_st_railcrazy_200907/99242
  6. https://kids.kiddle.co/Picatinny_Arsenal
  7. http://everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD-1800-1999/MIL-STD-1913_17705/
  8. https://modernfirearms.net/en/assault-rifles/u-s-a-assault-rifles/m4-m4a1-eng/
  9. https://www.recoilweb.com/fn-m249-review-183754.html
  10. https://smallarmsreview.com/mounting-matters/
  11. https://warontherocks.com/2020/03/what-can-the-picatinny-rail-teach-us-about-artificial-intelligence/
  12. https://wooxstore.com/blogs/woox-journal/mastering-the-picatinny-rails-tips-and-tricks-form-beginner-to-expert
  13. https://egwguns.com/blog/picatinny-rail-guide
  14. https://palmettostatearmory.com/egw-standard-1-piece-picatinny-rail-6061-t6-aluminum-alloy-fits-bergara-b1410.html
  15. https://support.egwguns.com/hc/en-us/articles/7760483918235-What-are-your-torque-specs
  16. https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/torque-spec-for-rails-and-rings.6985187/
  17. https://www.loaddevelopment.com/rifle-scope-ring-torque/
  18. https://outerimpact.com/understanding-the-difference-between-the-weaver-picatinny-and-nato-specifications/
  19. https://warnescopemounts.com/bases-rails/picatinny-rails/
  20. https://www.thomasmechanicaldesign.com/the-mitch-blog/picatinny-and-nato-rails-gdt
  21. https://www.aftfasteners.com/nylon-tip-socket-set-screws/
  22. https://www.bushnell.com/weaveroptics-learn/w-about-us.html
  23. https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/weaver-vs-picatinny-mounts/
  24. https://www.gunmade.com/weaver-vs-picatinny/
  25. https://www.gunfinder.com/articles/76067
  26. https://www.at3tactical.com/blogs/news/the-complete-guide-to-the-m-lok-attachment-system
  27. https://www.5dtactical.com/blog/keymod-vs-mlok-which-is-better/
  28. https://www.outdoorlife.com/gear/keymod-vs-mlock/
  29. https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2017/armament/McGee19427.pdf
  30. https://danieldefense.com/wire/m-lok-vs-picatinny
  31. https://www.forwardcontrolsdesign.com/assets/images/M-LOK_Release_FAQs.pdf
  32. https://soldiersystems.net/2017/05/05/details-on-the-ussocom-sponsored-keymod-vs-m-lok-test-conducted-at-nswc-crane/
  33. https://www.gundigest.com/gear-ammo/accessories/keymod-vs-mlok
  34. https://www.trijicon.com/products/details/ta31rco-m4cp
  35. https://usnightvision.com/pvs-14-small-arms-weapon-mount/
  36. https://ownthenight.com/l3harris-atpial-an-peq-15
  37. https://www.usarmsco.com/advantages-of-a-picatinny-rail/
  38. https://versatactical.com/different-types-of-picatinny-rail-mounts/
  39. https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/03/07/picatinny-mounted-mk31-mod-0-pen-flare-operation-enduring-freedom/
  40. https://egwguns.com/hd-remington-870-shotgun-picatinny-rail
  41. https://www.tachyoninc.com/shotgun.html
  42. https://www.sigsauer.com/blog/u-s-army-fields-sig-sauer-m17m18-pistols
  43. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2017/army/2017mhs.pdf
  44. https://egwguns.com/hunter-series-remington-700-722-40x-ultimate-muzzleloader-short-action-picatinny-rail-20-moa
  45. https://www.longrangehunting.com/threads/bipod-suggestions-for-a-stock-with-a-picatinny-rail.244895/
  46. https://www.themeateater.com/hunt/firearm-hunting/best-lever-action-hunting-rifles
  47. https://warnescopemounts.com/blog/how-to-get-started-in-3gun-or-multigun-competition/
  48. https://botach.com/battlesteel-mos-picatinny-rail-for-glock-pistols/
  49. https://gogunnr.com/pages/tactical-shooting-competition-breakdown-differences-between-ipsc-3-gun-prs-and-uspsa
  50. https://www.silencershop.com/blog/daniel-defense-ar-15
  51. https://aliengearholsters.com/blogs/news/american-gun-sales-manufacturing-statistics
  52. https://www.ebay.com/b/Picatinny-Hunting-Rail-Sections/52510/bn_7023318117
  53. https://www.npr.org/2019/08/13/750656174/the-u-s-once-had-a-ban-on-assault-weapons-why-did-it-expire
  54. https://vortexoptics.com/blog/how-to-properly-mount-a-riflescope.html
  55. https://www.ssusa.org/content/6-common-errors-in-optics-mounting/
  56. https://www.accio.com/business/picatinny-rail-trends
  57. https://www.trijicon.com/uploads/page_content/PML4103_Rev%280%29_Trijicon_Mounts__Accessories_Guide.pdf
  58. https://www.amazon.com/SureFire-X300U-Output-Lumens-Battery/dp/B0CLHHH5Y3
  59. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/gun-and-accessories-market-103536
  60. https://www.adorama.com/lists/picatinny-rail-accessories
  61. https://fnherstal.com/en/blog/articles-rifle-modularity-maximising-fnscar-lethality/
  62. https://www.guns.com/news/2019/11/11/modular-rifle-champ-what-makes-the-fn-scar-so-special
  63. https://www.fastcompany.com/1664682/5-ways-that-standardization-can-lead-to-innovation
  64. https://www.optics-trade.eu/us/mounts/picatinny-rails.html
  65. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017L0853
  66. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/firearms-directive_en
  67. https://outerimpact.com/picatinny-rails-and-their-history/
  68. https://egwguns.com/blog/why-americanmade-gun-parts-matter-the-egw-commitment-to-quality-precision/
  69. https://www.americanspecialops.com/special-ops-weapons/m27-iar.php
  70. https://crateclub.com/blogs/loadout/what-assault-rifle-do-marines-use-an-in-depth-look-at-the-m27-infantry-automatic-rifle
  71. https://www.snsinsider.com/reports/military-rifle-market-1150
  72. https://geissele.com/10-super-modular-rail-mk4-m-lokr.html
  73. https://www.army.mil/article/271000/next_generation_squad_weapon
  74. https://www.focusedonmachining.com/blog/innovative-applications-for-custom-picatinny-rails
  75. https://magpul.com/firearm-accessories/rails/1913-picatinny-rail-sections.html
  76. https://betalight-tactical.com/knowledge-base/regulations/stanag-4694
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.