Hubbry Logo
National Highways Development ProjectNational Highways Development ProjectMain
Open search
National Highways Development Project
Community hub
National Highways Development Project
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
National Highways Development Project
National Highways Development Project
National Highways Development Project
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) was a project of four laning of existing national highways and six laning of selected major national highways of India. The project was started in 1998 under the leadership of Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee. National Highways account for only about 2% of the total length of roads, but carry about 40% of the total traffic across the length and breadth of the country. This project is managed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) under the Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways. The NHDP represents 49,260 km of roads and highways work and construction in order to boost economic development of the country. The government has planned to end the NHDP program in early 2018 and subsume the ongoing projects under a larger Bharatmala project.

The Network of National Highways in India

Project phases

[edit]

The project is composed of the following phases:

  • Phase I: The Golden Quadrilateral (GQ; 5,846 km) connecting the four major cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata. This project, connecting four metro cities, is 5,846 km (3,633 mi). Total cost of the project is Rs.300 billion (US$6.8 billion), funded largely by the government’s special petroleum product tax revenues and government borrowing. In January 2012, India announced the four-lane GQ highway network as complete.[1][2]
  • Phase II: North-South and East-West corridors comprising national highways connecting four extreme points of the country. The North–South and East–West Corridor (NS-EW; 7,142 km) connecting Srinagar in the north to Kanyakumari in the south, including spur from Salem to Kanyakumari (Via Coimbatore and Kochi) and Silchar in the east to Porbandar in the west. Total length of the network is 7,142 km (4,438 mi). As of 31 October 2016, 90.99% of the project had been completed, 5.47% of the project work is under Implementation and 3.52% of the total length is left.[3][4] It also includes Port connectivity and other projects — 435 km (270 mi). The final completion date to 28 February 2009 at a cost of Rs.350 billion (US$8 billion), with funding similar to Phase I.
  • Phase III: The government on 12 April 2007 approved NHDP-III to upgrade 12,109 km (7,524 mi)of national highways on a Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) basis, which takes into account high-density traffic, connectivity of state capitals via NHDP Phase I and II, and connectivity to centres of economic importance.
  • Phase IV: The government on 18 June 2008 approved widening 20,000 km (12,000 mi) of highway that were not part of Phase I, II, or III. Phase IV will convert existing single-lane highways into two lanes with paved shoulders.
  • Phase V: As road traffic increases over time, a number of four-lane highways will need to be upgraded/expanded to six lanes. On 5 October 2006 the government approved for upgrade of about 5,000 km (3,100 mi) of four-lane roads.
  • Phase VI: The government is working on constructing 1,000 km (620 mi) expressways that would connect major commercial and industrial townships. It has already identified 400 km (250 mi) of Vadodara (earlier Baroda)-Mumbai section that would connect to the existing Vadodara (earlier Baroda)-Ahmedabad section. The World Bank is studying this project. The project will be funded on BOT basis. The 334 km (208 mi) Expressway between Chennai—Bangalore and 277 km (172 mi) Expressway between Kolkata—Dhanbad has been identified and feasibility study and DPR contract has been awarded by NHAI.
  • Phase VII: This phase calls for improvements to city road networks by adding ring roads to enable easier connectivity with national highways to important cities. In addition, improvements will be made to stretches of national highways that require additional flyovers and bypasses given population and housing growth along the highways and increasing traffic. The government has planned to invest Rs. 16,680 Cr for this phase. The 19 km (12 mi) long Chennai Port—Maduravoyal Elevated Expressway is being executed under this phase.
National Highways Development Project at a glance
NHDP Phase Particulars Length Indicative cost ₹ ( in cr)
NHDP-I & II Balance work of GQ and EW-NS corridors 13,000 km (8,100 mi) 42,000
NHDP-III 4-laning 10,000 km (6,200 mi) 55,000
NHDP-IV 2-laning 20,000 km (12,000 mi) 25,000
NHDP-V 6-laning of selected stretches 5,000 km (3,100 mi) 17,500
NHDP-VI Development of expressways 1,000 km (620 mi) 15,000
NHDP-VII Ring Roads, Bypasses, Grade Separators, Service Roads etc. 700 km (430 mi) 15,000
Total 45,000 km (28,000 mi) 1,690,500 (Revised to 2,200,000)

Note: 1 crore= 10 million

Timeline of the National Highways Development Project
Priority NHDP Phase Length (km) Status Approval Completion Target
1 Phase I 5,846 km (3,633 mi) Complete December 2000 December 2006
2 Phase II 7,300 km (4,500 mi) Award in progress December 2003 December 2009
3 Phase III A 4,000 km (2,500 mi) Already identified March 2005 December 2009
4 Phase V 6,500 km (4,000 mi) 5700 km of GQ + 800 km to be identified November 2005 December 2012
5 Phase III B 6,000 km (3,700 mi) Already identified March 2006 December 2012
6 Phase VII A 700 km (430 mi) Ring roads to be identified December 2006 December 2012
7 Phase IV A 5,000 km (3,100 mi) To be identified December 2006 December 2012
8 Phase VII B Ring roads to be identified December 2007 December 2013
9 Phase IV B 5,000 km (3,100 mi) To be identified December 2007 December 2013
10 Phase VI A 400 km (250 mi) Already identified December 2007 December 2014
11 Phase VII C Ring roads to be identified December 2008 December 2014
12 Phase IV C 5,000 km (3,100 mi) To be identified December 2008 December 2014
13 Phase VI B 600 km (370 mi) To be identified December 2008 December 2015
14 Phase IV D 5,000 km (3,100 mi) To be identified December 2009 December 2015

"Financing of the National Highway Development Programme" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2007.

Status from NHAI website

[edit]

National Highways Development Project is being implemented in all phases. The present phases are improving more than 49,260 km of arterial routes of NH network to international standards. The project-wise details of NHDP all phases is below as of 18 May 2021:

NATIONAL HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(NHDP)
Projects Total Length(Km.) Already 4/6 Laned(Km.) Under Implementation (Km.) Contracts Under Implementation (No.) Balance length for award(Km.)
NHDP GQ 5,846 5,846

(100.00%)

0 0 -
NS - EW

Ph. I & II

7,142 6,568 300 28 274
Port

Connectivity

435 383 52 7 -
NHDP Phase III 11,809 7,621 2,161 71 2,027
NHDP Phase IV 13,203 4,058 6,050 105 3,095
NHDP Phase V 6,500 2,564 1,428 33 2,508
NHDP Phase VI 1,000 - 184 9 816
NHDP Phase VII 700 22 94 4 584
NHDP Total 46,635 27,062 10,269 257 9,304
Others (Ph.-I, Ph.-II & Misc.) 2,048 1,743 305 18 -
SARDP -NE 110 110 0 1 -
Total by NHAI 48,589 28,915* 10,574 276 9,304
*Total 20,000 km was approved under NHDP Phase IV, out of which 13,203 km was assigned to NHAI and remaining Km with MoRTH. [5]

Subsummation in Bharatmala project

[edit]

National Highway Development Project will close by first half of 2018, with the launch of Bharatmala project.[6] 10,000 km of highway construction left under NHDP will be merged with Phase I of the Bharatmala.[6] Sagarmala and Setu Bharatam are also expected to fill in the void created by closure of NHDP project.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]
Similar rail development
Similar roads development
Similar ports and river transport development
Similar air transport development
Highways in India
General

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

National Highways Development Project

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) was a comprehensive infrastructure program launched by the in 1998 to upgrade and expand the national highway network, emphasizing the four- and six-laning of critical corridors to improve connectivity between major cities, ports, and economic hubs. Administered by the (NHAI), the initiative's initial phases focused on the 5,846 km linking , , , and , alongside the approximately 7,142 km North-South and East-West corridors, with a total envisioned scope across phases exceeding 30,000 km of upgraded roadways. Estimated at over . 65,000 for Phases I and II alone (at 2004 prices), the project leveraged public-private partnerships, toll financing, and government funding to rehabilitate aging , aiming to reduce logistics costs, enhance , and foster regional development. Notable achievements include the substantial completion of flagship segments, which empirical studies link to accelerated manufacturing growth and along upgraded routes, demonstrating causal benefits from improved transport links. Despite these advances, the NHDP encountered persistent challenges, including delays from land acquisition disputes, environmental clearances, and funding shortfalls, which extended timelines and inflated costs beyond initial projections. By the mid-2010s, remaining works were subsumed under the , reflecting an evolution in India's highway strategy while underscoring the original project's role in laying the foundation for a modernized road system.

History and Launch

Inception and Objectives

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) was launched by the in 1998 under [Atal Bihari Vajpayee](/page/Atal Bihari Vajpayee) as a flagship infrastructure initiative to modernize the country's road network. The project emerged in response to the recognized deficiencies in , which at the time constituted a small fraction of the total road length but bore a disproportionate share of freight and passenger traffic, leading to congestion, delays, and higher logistics costs that constrained . It was announced during the NDA government's early tenure, with initial planning tied to the 1998-99 Union , emphasizing public-private partnerships and non-budgetary financing to accelerate implementation. The core objectives of NHDP centered on upgrading approximately 56,000 kilometers of across multiple phases to four- or six-lane standards, aiming to establish roads comparable to international benchmarks with features such as improved , , and measures. This was intended to enhance inter-city connectivity, particularly linking major metropolitan areas, ports, industrial centers, and key economic corridors, thereby reducing travel times, fuel consumption, and accident rates while boosting overall transport efficiency. The project sought to catalyze broader by lowering expenses, which were estimated to account for 14% of India's GDP at the time—significantly higher than in comparator economies—and facilitating faster movement of goods to support and trade growth. Implementation was designed with a focus on phased execution, starting with high-priority segments like the connecting , , , and , to demonstrate quick wins and attract investment, while incorporating toll-based revenue models to ensure long-term maintenance viability. These goals reflected a strategic shift toward infrastructure-led growth, prioritizing empirical improvements in capacity and reliability over incremental maintenance, though early phases faced challenges in land acquisition and contractor mobilization that tested the program's ambitious timeline.

Political and Economic Rationale

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) was launched in January 2000 under Atal Bihari Vajpayee's administration to address deficits that constrained India's post-liberalization economic expansion. , comprising about 2% of the total road network, handled approximately 40% of road traffic, yet suffered from inadequate capacity, poor maintenance, and frequent bottlenecks, leading to high costs estimated at 13-14% of GDP—significantly above the 8% average in developed economies. The project aimed to upgrade key corridors to four- or six-lane standards, thereby reducing travel times, vehicle operating costs, and fuel consumption while enhancing freight efficiency and inter-regional trade, with expected multiplier effects on and agriculture through better market access. Economically, the initiative was justified as a catalyst for sustained GDP growth, drawing on evidence from global precedents where highway investments yielded returns via improved mobility and reduced economic friction. Proponents anticipated that modernized highways would lower accident rates—then exceeding 100,000 fatalities annually—and stimulate ancillary sectors like , , and , generating direct for millions during . The allocated an initial Rs 30,000 crore for Phase I ( and North-South/East-West corridors), funded through tolls, bonds, and a restructured Central Road Fund from , reflecting a shift toward user-financed to minimize fiscal strain amid a growing economy averaging 6% annual growth in the late . Politically, NHDP embodied Vajpayee's vision of national integration through physical connectivity, aiming to forge economic unity across diverse regions and mitigate separatist tendencies by linking remote areas to economic hubs, as articulated in his parliamentary addresses emphasizing highways as the "lifelines" of . The Bharatiya Janata Party-led coalition positioned it as a flagship reform, contrasting with prior administrations' slower pace, and leveraged it to build public support via tangible progress in underserved states, though implementation faced delays due to land acquisition hurdles and environmental clearances. This rationale aligned with broader fiscal prudence under Finance Minister , who proposed highway-focused schemes to balance deficit reduction with growth imperatives.

Core Components and Phases

Golden Quadrilateral Phase

The Golden Quadrilateral Phase, designated as Phase I of the National Highways Development Project (NHDP), entailed the upgradation and construction of 5,846 km of primarily four- to six-lane highways forming a circuit connecting , , , and . This network targeted existing , incorporating bypasses, bridges, and service roads to achieve divided carriageways capable of handling higher traffic volumes. Initiated under Atal Bihari Vajpayee's administration as a flagship component of the NHDP launched in 1998, physical upgrades began in 2001 with an ambitious target completion by December 2004. The phase's core objective was to forge efficient inter-metropolitan connectivity, thereby curtailing logistics costs, accelerating freight and passenger transport, and fostering economic corridors by linking industrial hubs and ports. Estimated at over Rs. 25,050 crore, the project leveraged a special purpose vehicle, the (NHAI), for execution through build-operate-transfer (BOT) models and (EPC) contracts. Progress milestones included 23% completion by end-2002 and 80% by end-2004, though timelines slipped due to protracted land acquisition, environmental clearances, and contractor disputes—issues emblematic of early public-private infrastructure challenges in . By June 2006, 5,319 km stood four-laned, with the balance under active development. Targets were iteratively revised, from December 2003 to 2007, reflecting adaptive planning amid execution hurdles. Full operational completion was declared on January 7, 2012, after 128 contracts spanning the network. Actual costs aligned closely with estimates, avoiding significant overruns despite inflationary pressures, as confirmed in mid-decade assessments. Empirical evaluations attribute the phase's success to tangible connectivity gains, with reduced travel durations—such as Delhi-Mumbai routes dropping from over 40 hours to under 24—and heightened vehicle throughput, underpinning subsequent GDP contributions via multiplier effects on and . However, uneven regional benefits emerged, with urban-proximate stretches yielding faster agglomeration economies compared to rural spurs, necessitating complementary investments for balanced causal impacts. Maintenance and capacity enhancements continue post-completion to address rising freight demands, which constitute about 50% of India's road-based along such axes.

North-South and East-West Corridors

The North-South and East-West Corridors form the core of Phase II of the Development Project, launched to develop approximately 7,300 kilometers of multi-lane highways linking India's extremities for improved freight and passenger mobility. This phase prioritized upgrading existing national highways to four- or six-lane standards, addressing bottlenecks in long-haul transport that previously constrained economic integration between regions. The North-South Corridor extends roughly 4,000 kilometers from in Jammu and Kashmir to in , traversing 13 states including , , , , , , , , , and . It incorporates a 631-kilometer spur linking to Salem to bolster southern connectivity. Key alignments pass through major hubs such as , , , , Hyderabad, Bangalore, and , facilitating access to industrial and agricultural heartlands. The East-West Corridor covers about 3,300 kilometers from in to in , connecting seven states: , , , , , , and . Principal routes traverse , , , , and , integrating western ports with northeastern trade routes and reducing transit times across the country's width. Implementation began in the early , with initial awards for 817 kilometers completed by December 2002 and ongoing works on additional segments. By December 2014, approximately 5,836 kilometers of the corridors' targeted length had been upgraded. Subsequent progress integrated remaining stretches into broader initiatives like Pariyojana, achieving near-completion of viable sections by the mid-2020s, though some northeastern and high-altitude portions faced delays due to terrain and environmental clearances. These corridors, upon full operationalization, were projected to handle 20-30% of India's traffic, enhancing efficiency.

Subsequent Phases and Expansions

Following the completion of Phases I and II, the National Highways Development Project (NHDP) expanded through Phases III to VII, approved progressively between 2006 and 2010 to address remaining high-priority upgrades and new constructions on national highways. Phase III focused on four-laning approximately 12,109 km of high-density corridors at an estimated cost of Rs. 76,546 crore, with government approval in June 2008; implementation emphasized public-private partnerships (PPP) for stretches connecting state capitals and other critical links. Phase IV targeted upgrading 20,000 km of single- or intermediate-lane highways to two lanes with paved shoulders to enhance safety and capacity in underserved regions. Phase V involved six-laning 6,500 km of existing four-lane sections to accommodate growing traffic volumes, while Phase VI planned 1,000 km of greenfield expressways for high-speed connectivity. Phase VII addressed ancillary , including ring roads, bypasses, grade separators, flyovers, and elevated corridors to mitigate congestion in urban and peri-urban areas. By 2017, unfinished NHDP stretches totaling about 10,000 km were subsumed into the Pariyojana, a larger initiative approved on October 24, 2017, shifting from point-to-point links to corridor-based development for optimized freight and passenger movement. Phase I encompasses roughly 34,800 km, integrating residual NHDP works with 24,800 km of new alignments, including 26,000 km of economic corridors, inter-corridor routes, border connectivity roads, coastal and port links, and efficiency improvements to the and North-South/East-West systems. This expansion prioritizes multimodal integration and logistics parks, with 35 such parks planned under the program.

Implementation Mechanisms

Funding and Financing Models

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) was initially financed primarily through the Central Road Fund (CRF), established under the Central Road and Infrastructure Fund Act, 2000, which draws from a cess levied on petrol and high-speed diesel consumed in . This cess, initially set at Rs. 1.50 per liter and later increased to Rs. 2.00 per liter by 2005, provided the bulk of funding for Phases I and II, covering maintenance, development, and debt servicing for national highways. Supplementary allocations came from the Union Budget as gross budgetary support, including capital infusions to the (NHAI) for equity and project execution. To address funding constraints and leverage private capital, NHDP increasingly adopted Public-Private Partnership (PPP) models from the mid-2000s onward, with NHAI awarding over 200 highway projects under these frameworks by 2015. The predominant models included Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) variants: BOT-Toll, where private developers finance, construct, and operate stretches while bearing traffic revenue risk through toll collections before handing over to NHAI; and BOT-Annuity, involving fixed semi-annual payments from the government to mitigate revenue uncertainty for developers. These were supplemented by Viability Gap Funding (VGF), providing up to 20% of project costs from government or multilateral sources for economically unviable but strategically important segments. Evolving from earlier BOT structures, the Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM), introduced in 2016 for NHDP extensions and subsequent programs, blended government contributions (40% during construction) with annuity payments (40% over the operations period) and private toll revenues (20%), reducing risk and improving bid attractiveness. NHAI supplemented these through internal mechanisms like toll revenues, market borrowings via bonds, and loans from institutions such as the (e.g., $245 million for specific NHDP components in the early 2000s) and the World Bank, which supported institutional capacity and integration. By fiscal year 2022-23, NHAI's funding portfolio diversified further with capital grants and maintenance allocations, though reliance on persisted amid rising project scales.

Construction and Execution Strategies

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) was executed primarily by the (NHAI), established under the NHAI Act of 1988, which outsourced to private contractors through competitive tendering processes to accelerate implementation. Projects were divided into smaller, manageable contracts—such as separate segments for roads and bridges—to facilitate specialized execution, with independent supervision consultants overseeing quality and progress via Project Management Units (PMUs) at regional levels. This decentralized approach, supported by state-level coordinating committees, enabled NHAI to monitor adherence to technical specifications, including four- to six-laning of highways, of bypasses, and integration of service roads. The core execution strategy relied on public-private partnerships (PPP), with the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model dominating early phases like the Golden Quadrilateral, where private developers financed up to 40% of costs, built the infrastructure, operated it for toll collection during a 15- to 20-year concession period (including 2-3 years for construction), and transferred ownership back to NHAI. BOT contracts were awarded via a two-stage competitive bidding process: initial technical qualification followed by financial bids based on the lowest toll rates or positive net present value, with NHAI injecting viability gap funding for uneconomic stretches. For instance, Phase IIIA projects under NHDP involved BOT concessions of 20 years, encompassing 30 months of construction time. A "waterfall" mechanism prioritized BOT-toll for revenue-generating projects; if bids failed, alternatives like BOT-annuity (fixed payments to developers) were pursued to ensure execution without compromising financial returns. Where full private financing proved challenging, NHAI supplemented BOT with (EPC) contracts, under which developers received lump-sum payments from government budgets or bonds, shifting risk to fixed-price delivery rather than toll revenues. Later NHDP expansions incorporated the Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM), blending EPC (40% government payment during ) with BOT elements (residual annuity and operation), to mitigate developer risks amid rising material costs and land delays, though this evolved post-initial NHDP rollout. Execution emphasized milestone-based payments, quarterly progress reviews, and integration of technologies like machine-controlled equipment for precision in grading and paving, aiming to scale from under 10 km per day in the early 2000s to over 20 km daily by the mid-2010s.

Key Milestones and Progress Metrics

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) was initiated with Cabinet approval for Phase I in January 2000, encompassing the 5,846 km connecting , , , and , funded initially through a mix of tolls, bonds, and budgetary support estimated at Rs. 30,000 . Phase II, approved in December 2003, added the 6,647 km North-South and East-West corridors at an estimated cost of Rs. 34,339 , linking India's extremities from to and to . Phase III received approval on March 5, 2005, targeting the four-laning of 12,109 km of high-density on a Build-Operate-Transfer basis to address traffic bottlenecks. Subsequent expansions under Phases IV, V, and VI extended the program to include 20,000 km of two-lane highways with paved shoulders (Phase IV, approved 2007), 1,000 km of expressways (Phase V, approved 2011), and strategic economic corridors (Phase VI). Overall, NHDP Phases I and II envisioned 14,330 km of four- to six-laning at Rs. 65,000 crore ( prices). Progress metrics indicate substantial execution, with the fully operational by 2012, reducing travel times and enhancing freight efficiency along major axes. By fiscal year 2015-16, NHDP had driven upgrades contributing to a national highway four-lane length of approximately 25,000 km cumulatively, though exact phase-wise completions varied due to land acquisition delays and contractor issues. Residual NHDP works totaling 6,758 km were integrated into Pariyojana Phase I, with 5,058 km completed by early 2025, reflecting near-complete realization of the original ~49,000 km target scope across phases.
PhaseLength (km)Key FocusEstimated Cost (Rs. crore)Status as of 2025
I (GQ)5,846Four major metros linkage30,000Completed (2012)
II (NS-EW)6,647Continental corridors34,339Largely completed
III12,109High-density upgradesVariable (BOT)Integrated into ; residual executed
IV-VI~22,000+Two-laning, expressways, corridors16,680+ (Phase V example)Substantial progress; residuals minimal

Economic and Developmental Impacts

Infrastructure and Connectivity Gains

The National Highways Development Project upgraded significant portions of India's national highway network to four- and six-lane standards, enhancing capacity and durability. Under its initial phases, approximately 13,150 kilometers were targeted for development, including the spanning 5,846 kilometers linking , , , and , as well as the North-South and East-West Corridors totaling around 7,300 kilometers. By the time of its subsumption into the Pariyojana in , over 28,000 kilometers had been four- or six-laned, transforming previously narrow and pothole-prone routes into high-speed corridors capable of handling increased traffic volumes. These upgrades directly improved connectivity by bridging major urban centers, industrial hubs, and ports, enabling seamless north-south integration from to and east-west linkage from to . The , for instance, provided direct, high-capacity access between India's four largest economic metropolises, reducing bottlenecks at critical junctions and facilitating the movement of goods across diverse regions. Subsequent phases extended these benefits to peripheral states, connecting underdeveloped areas to growth poles and improving inter-regional trade routes. Connectivity gains manifested in measurable reductions in travel times and inefficiencies on upgraded sections. Project evaluations indicated up to a 50 percent decrease in travel duration on improved highways, allowing vehicles to operate at higher average speeds with fewer interruptions. This enhancement in road quality and alignment minimized delays from seasonal disruptions and overloading, while bypasses and grade separators around urban areas streamlined , thereby elevating overall network reliability and accessibility for both passenger and .

Contributions to GDP and Trade

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP), through its expansion of the national highway network from approximately 65,000 km in 2000 to over 90,000 km by 2014, enhanced freight mobility and reduced transportation inefficiencies, thereby supporting GDP growth via direct construction spending and indirect productivity gains. Roads accounted for about 65% of India's freight transport during the project's peak implementation, with NHDP corridors enabling faster goods movement and lower operational costs for industries reliant on just-in-time supply chains. Empirical analyses attribute multiplier effects to highway investments, where each unit of expenditure on construction generated broader economic activity, including in manufacturing and services sectors that depend on reliable logistics. The (GQ), NHDP's core 5,846 km network linking , , , and , demonstrated causal impacts on sectoral output. Construction phases from 2001 to 2012 led to disproportionate growth in proximate districts, with studies estimating a 20% relative increase in industrial output and 7-10% rise in for firms gaining access. Aggregate real income rose by 2.72% due to improved and , as resources shifted toward higher-productivity activities along the upgraded routes. These effects stemmed from reduced intranational trade costs, enabling firms to expand operations and integrate into national supply networks more effectively. NHDP's contributions to materialized through enhancements, with upgraded highways cutting travel times by up to 40% on key stretches and yielding 15-20% reductions in regional freight costs via shorter lead times and higher reliability. This facilitated domestic volumes, particularly for in hubs, while indirectly bolstering competitiveness by streamlining internal distribution to ports. However, aggregate causal effects on overall GDP remain contested; one econometric analysis found significant highway expansion under NHDP but no identifiable direct influence on national GDP or gross state domestic product, attributing growth more to concurrent factors like . costs, while declining post-NHDP due to better , persisted at 13-14% of GDP in the early , higher than global averages, underscoring that highway improvements alone did not fully resolve systemic bottlenecks like multimodal integration.

Employment and Regional Development

The construction phases of the National Highways Development Project (NHDP) generated substantial direct , sustaining nearly 300,000 skilled and unskilled workers daily across its highway building activities. Empirical analyses of district-level data from India's national expansions, including NHDP components, reveal that a 10% increase in highway length correlates with 1-6% growth in private sector , as estimated through static and dynamic panel regressions controlling for historical trends and regional factors. These effects stem from labor-intensive roadwork, encompassing earthmoving, paving, and bridge , which prioritized local hiring in rural and semi-urban areas to minimize logistical costs. Indirect arose via supply chains for materials like and aggregates, while long-term opportunities emerged from ancillary , including dhabas, fuel stations, and maintenance services along upgraded corridors. The project's enhancements to inter-regional connectivity drove uneven but verifiable , particularly by lowering freight costs and enabling market integration for peripheral districts. Studies on the —a flagship NHDP segment completed between 2001 and 2012—show it boosted manufacturing output and rural non-farm jobs in connected areas, with causal identification via counterfactual network designs indicating higher agricultural prices and firm entry in beneficiary regions compared to unconnected peers. North-South and East-West corridors under NHDP similarly facilitated industrial clustering in backward states like and , where improved access reduced travel times by up to 50% on key routes, spurring small-scale enterprises in and agro-processing. However, gains varied by proximity to highways, with urban-adjacent districts capturing disproportionate manufacturing income increases, while remote interiors experienced slower spillover due to persistent local bottlenecks like power shortages. Overall, these developments contributed to broader economic multipliers, with investments yielding sustained GDP uplifts through enhanced trade flows, though attribution to NHDP alone requires isolating it from concurrent policies like special economic zones.

Criticisms and Challenges

Delays and Cost Overruns

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) encountered substantial delays in project execution, with approximately 70% of initiatives experiencing time overruns ranging from 3 to 78 months. These delays were predominantly caused by protracted land acquisition processes, utility relocation challenges, delays in securing environmental and forest clearances, and issues related to contractor performance, such as inadequate resource mobilization and suboptimal execution. Initial phases, including the (Phase I) and North-South East-West Corridors (Phase II), were particularly affected due to pioneering implementation hurdles, though subsequent phases showed marginal improvements as procedural refinements were introduced. http://ijream.org/papers/IJREAMV07I0173089.pdf[](http://ijream.org/papers/IJREAMV07I0173089.pdf) Cost overruns proved less widespread but still notable, impacting roughly 10% of projects with escalations up to 18% above initial estimates. Such increases typically stemmed from cascading effects of time , which amplified and labor inflation, alongside design modifications, variation orders, and unforeseen site conditions. Across the broader road transportation sector encompassed by NHDP-related efforts, the aggregate reached about ₹2,067 , elevating total expenditures from an original ₹102,321.44 to ₹104,388.44 . http://ijream.org/papers/IJREAMV07I0173089.pdf[](http://ijream.org/papers/IJREAMV07I0173089.pdf) Factors like political interference and inaccurate initial bidding estimates further exacerbated these overruns in select cases, though systematic underestimation during feasibility stages contributed to baseline inaccuracies. https://www.ijcsmc.com/docs/papers/March2018/V7I3201817.pdf[](https://www.ijcsmc.com/docs/papers/March2018/V7I3201817.pdf)
  • Primary Causes of Delays and Overruns:
    • Land acquisition delays, often spanning years due to disputes and compensation negotiations.
    • Utility shifting and right-of-way encroachments, requiring coordination with multiple state agencies.
    • Environmental compliance hurdles, including forest clearances for ecologically sensitive stretches.
    • Contractor inefficiencies, such as delays in approvals for road-over-bridges (ROBs) and under-bridges (RUBs), compounded by seasonal factors like monsoons.
These issues underscored systemic bottlenecks in India's infrastructure delivery during the NHDP era (1998–2010s), where only about 30% of public-private partnership (PPP)-based highway projects under the program were completed on time and within budget. http://ijream.org/papers/IJREAMV07I0173089.pdf[](http://ijream.org/papers/IJREAMV07I0173089.pdf) Despite these setbacks, the project's overall completion—such as the Golden Quadrilateral in 2012—demonstrated resilience, albeit at elevated temporal and fiscal costs reflective of evolving execution capabilities.

Corruption and Governance Issues

One of the most notable corruption scandals associated with the National Highways Development Project (NHDP) involved widespread irregularities in contract execution under the component, where contractors engaged in unauthorized subcontracting to unqualified parties, often linked to local mafia elements, and used substandard materials to cut costs. , a (NHAI) project manager overseeing a segment in , documented these practices by a Larsen & Toubro subcontractor, including the employment of gangsters for enforcement and diversion of funds, in a 2003 whistleblower complaint to the Prime Minister's Office under the Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers (PIDPI) resolution. Despite PIDPI safeguards for anonymity, Dubey's identity was leaked by government officials, leading to his murder on November 27, 2003, in Gaya, , which exposed systemic governance failures in whistleblower protection and internal oversight within NHAI. The case prompted judicial scrutiny and convictions; in March 2010, a court sentenced three individuals—Mantu Tiwari, Schindra Rai, and —to for the , underscoring the violent repercussions of anti-corruption efforts in highway projects. Broader audits and investigations revealed recurring governance issues, such as inadequate monitoring of build-operate-transfer (BOT) contracts, which facilitated graft through manipulated bids and inflated claims; for instance, a 2005 analysis by the World Road Association highlighted how complexity in NHDP processes enabled bribes at multiple stages, from tendering to quality certification. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probes into NHAI officials during NHDP implementation uncovered bribery networks, including a 2002 case where officials accepted payoffs to overlook substandard work on national highway stretches, though convictions were limited due to evidentiary challenges. Governance shortcomings were compounded by insufficient internal audits and weak enforcement of subcontracting rules, contributing to an estimated 10-15% leakage in project costs from corrupt practices, as per sector analyses. These issues reflected deeper institutional biases toward expediency over accountability, with NHAI's decentralized execution model enabling local-level collusion without robust central oversight.

Environmental and Land Acquisition Disputes

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) faced persistent land acquisition disputes, which emerged as a primary cause of delays across its phases. Landowners frequently resisted alignments that fragmented agricultural holdings or bisected villages, demanding compensatory such as overbridges and underpasses to maintain access and viability of remaining land parcels. Encroachments by religious institutions on the right-of-way exacerbated tensions, prompting protests and necessitating relocations or reconstructions that inflated costs and timelines. State governments' slow processes for notifications, surveys, and compensation disbursements under the pre-2013 land acquisition framework further compounded these issues, with special units established in several states to accelerate efforts yet yielding uneven results. In the (Phase I, approved 2000), these disputes contributed to only 6,370 km of the targeted 7,507 km being completed by December 31, 2008, representing 85% progress amid broader overruns affecting 35% of analyzed highway projects from 1994-2007. Farmer-led protests highlighted grievances over inadequate compensation rates, often based on outdated circle rates, and fears of livelihood loss without viable rehabilitation, mirroring patterns in subsequent (NHAI)-managed initiatives. By the late 2000s, NHDP constraints explicitly included land acquisition bottlenecks alongside utility shifting and structure removals, as documented in official economic surveys. Environmental disputes under NHDP centered on delays in clearances and non-compliance during execution, particularly impacting forest areas and local ecosystems. Phase I advancements were stalled by protracted environmental impact assessments and approvals, intertwining with land issues to hinder timely rollout. The NHAI, as NHDP's executing agency, faced scrutiny for violations including insufficient dust and noise suppression during construction, leading to (NGT) interventions holding it liable for subcontractor-induced damages in highway corridors. In a notable 2024 ruling, the NGT imposed a Rs 45 crore penalty on NHAI for breaching norms in land acquisition and project development for select corridors, underscoring failures in mitigation measures. Forest clearance irregularities drew allegations of procedural lapses in ecologically sensitive stretches, with NHAI refuting claims of unauthorized while affirming adherence to protocols in disputed segments. Broader concerns involved and elevated from expanded road networks, though empirical data on NHDP-specific attribution remains limited to general sector estimates of 161 million metric tonnes annually by the mid-2010s. These disputes prompted enhanced scrutiny under post-NHDP frameworks, revealing systemic gaps in balancing imperatives with verifiable ecological safeguards.

Transition and Current Status

Subsumption into Bharatmala Pariyojana

The Bharatmala Pariyojana, an umbrella highway development initiative, subsumed the unfinished stretches totaling approximately 10,000 km from the National Highways Development Project (NHDP) as part of its Phase-I implementation. This integration was formalized following the program's Cabinet approval on October 25, 2017, with an estimated outlay of ₹5.35 lakh crore for Phase-I, encompassing 24,800 km of new highways alongside the NHDP balance to reach 34,800 km overall. The move consolidated fragmented NHDP phases—such as the and North-South/East-West Corridors—into a unified framework prioritizing economic corridors (9,000 km), inter-corridors and feeder routes (6,000 km), and enhancements for national corridor efficiency, border, and coastal connectivity. The subsumption effectively phased out the standalone NHDP by early 2018, redirecting ongoing contracts, funding, and execution under and other public-private partnership mechanisms to accelerate progress on residual NHDP segments. This transition addressed NHDP's completion gaps, where over 28,000 km had been built by 2017 but delays persisted in the remaining stretches due to land acquisition and funding constraints, by embedding them into aligned with initiatives like Sagarmala. Official records from the indicate that subsumed NHDP projects contributed to Bharatmala's awarded length of 26,425 km as of February 2025, with 19,826 km constructed, though the original NHDP-specific targets were recalibrated within the larger program's phased rollout.

Ongoing Projects and Recent Developments

The residual works under the National Highways Development Project (NHDP), totaling approximately 10,000 km, have been integrated into Phase I of the Pariyojana, with ongoing construction focusing on completing four- and six-laning of key corridors such as the and North-South/East-West alignments. As of November 2024, Phase I, which subsumes these NHDP balances, has awarded 26,425 km of projects, with 18,926 km constructed, including upgrades to NHDP stretches for enhanced freight and passenger mobility. In fiscal year 2024-25, constructed 10,660 km of , incorporating progress on NHDP-derived projects amid efforts to resolve land acquisition delays and improve execution efficiency. The (NHAI) plans to award 124 new national highway projects spanning 6,376 km in 2025-26, valued at Rs 3.5 lakh , prioritizing completion of legacy NHDP segments alongside expressway developments like the Delhi-Mumbai corridor extensions. Recent completions under this framework include four-laning of the Rimuli-Koida section of NH-215 (now NH-520) and Biramitrapur-Brahmani bypass on NH-215A, awarded in 2024 to bolster connectivity in eastern . Challenges persist with no new projects planned under beyond Phase I due to execution hurdles, shifting focus to hybrid annuity models for faster NHDP residual delivery, targeting over 10,000 km annually through 2025-26 despite a noted slowdown from peak years. The Ministry of and Highways reported as of March 2025 that the national highway network exceeds 146,204 km, with NHDP legacies contributing to reduced costs via improved arterial links.

Legacy and Evaluations

Comparative Performance Across Governments

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP), launched in December 1999 under Atal Bihari Vajpayee's NDA government, marked the beginning of systematic national highway expansion in , with Phase I targeting the 5,846 km and North-South/East-West corridors; however, early construction averaged under 2 km per day due to nascent institutional frameworks and land acquisition hurdles. Under the UPA governments (2004–2014), NHDP expanded to Phases II–VII, encompassing over 50,000 km of projects, but execution lagged with an average construction rate of 11.27 km per day from 2010–2014, resulting in approximately 24,425 km added during UPA-II alone amid policy paralysis, fiscal constraints, and rising project costs that outpaced completions. In contrast, the NDA government from onward, while subsuming NHDP into broader initiatives like , achieved markedly higher performance, constructing 28,531 km in the first four years at 19.5 km per day—73% more than the UPA's preceding equivalent period—and escalating to 34 km per day by 2024, expanding the total national highway network from 91,287 km in to 146,204 km, driven by annual budget hikes (e.g., from ₹25,000 in 2013–14 to over ₹1 by 2023–24), innovative financing via hybrid annuity models, and over 60% increase in project awards.
Period/GovernmentAverage Construction Pace (km/day)Key Achievements/Notes
NDA I (1999–2004)~1.3–2Initiated NHDP; ~11,000 km awarded but limited completions due to startup phase.
UPA (2004–2014)11–13.5Expanded phases; ~40,000–45,000 km total added, but stalled by delays and single-lane focus.
NDA II (2014–2024)20–34~55,000 km added; multi-laning emphasis, with metrics shifting to lane-km from to capture capacity (e.g., 4-lane vs. 2-lane equivalence), reflecting substantive upgrades over raw length.
These gains under the later NDA regime stem from causal factors including reduced bureaucratic bottlenecks—evidenced by faster environmental clearances (from 695 days under UPA to under 100 days post-2014)—and higher private participation, though critics from opposition sources contend pace metrics inflate via the lane-km methodology without adjusting historical data comparably; official Ministry of Road Transport and Highways records, however, validate the acceleration through audited completions and network growth, prioritizing empirical output over prior eras' underutilized allocations.

Long-Term Assessments and Lessons Learned

The National Highways Development Project (NHDP), implemented from 2000 to approximately 2017, demonstrated substantial long-term economic benefits, particularly through its flagship component, which connected major cities via upgraded highways. Districts located 0–10 km from the network experienced a 49% increase in output between 2001 and 2010, driven by enhanced firm entry, higher survival rates among incumbents, and improved in resource use across industries. These gains offset the costs of upgrades and contributed to broader productivity improvements in , which accounts for a significant portion of India's organized sector output. Additionally, the project reduced transport costs and stimulated firm-level responses, including expanded operations and investment in affected regions, fostering sustained economic activity beyond initial construction phases. Employment and outcomes further underscore the project's enduring impacts. National highway expansions under NHDP correlated with positive employment growth, as increased density stimulated economic activities and attracted investments, yielding measurable job creation in connected areas. Long-term socio-economic effects included enhanced physical connectivity leading to welfare improvements and job opportunities, though benefits were unevenly distributed, with proximity to highways determining the magnitude of gains in income and expenditure. Key lessons from NHDP emphasize refinements in public-private partnership (PPP) execution and institutional coordination. While PPPs accelerated highway development by leveraging private financing and efficiency, pitfalls arose from inadequate inter-agency coordination and suboptimal policy selections, such as misaligned risk-sharing mechanisms, which triggered delays and renegotiations in projects. Effective implementation necessitated stronger upfront frameworks to mitigate these issues, including realistic traffic forecasting and balanced concession structures to ensure financial viability without overburdening public resources. Sustainability and maintenance emerged as critical areas for improvement, informing subsequent initiatives. Early NHDP phases highlighted the need for integrated road safety measures, as inadequate attention to and contributed to persistent rates despite expanded networks. Lessons underscored proactive incorporation of environmental protections, such as and resilient materials, to address long-term degradation from heavy usage, alongside dedicated funding models for upkeep to prevent deterioration and maximize lifecycle value. These insights have shaped hybrid approaches in later programs, prioritizing adaptive and green technologies to sustain economic returns while minimizing ecological costs.

References

  1. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents//34420-013-pcr.pdf
  2. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/48.pdf
  3. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget_archive/es2008-09/chapt2009/chap98.pdf
  4. https://academic.oup.com/ej/article/126/591/317/5077429
  5. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/936541468051881261/pdf/PID010Appraisal0stage.pdf
  6. https://nhai.gov.in/nhai/sites/default/files/2020-11/NHAI_AR_18_19_ENG_for_web.pdf
  7. https://publicprivatepartnership.asia/National_Highway_Development_Program_India.php
  8. http://www.arthapedia.in/index.php/National_Highways_Development_Programme
  9. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/ilovepdf_merged%2520%285%29.pdf
  10. https://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/www.siliconindia.com/shownews/vajpayee-inaugurates-part-of-national-expressway-network-nid-18366-cid-3.html
  11. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=1025
  12. https://www.gktoday.in/national-highways-development-programme/
  13. https://edukemy.com/blog/national-highways-development-project-nhdp-upsc-economy-notes/
  14. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents//23251-ind-pcr.pdf
  15. https://www.adb.org/projects/34420-013/main
  16. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/express-economic-history-seriesour-highways-as-our-bhagyarekha-a-lesson-from-ex-pm-vajpayee/
  17. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/atal-bihari-vajpayee-golden-quadrilateral-5310899/
  18. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ndas-flagship-nhdp-pmgsy-schemes-were-my-ideas-yashwant-sinha/articleshow/70217878.cms
  19. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/726b2f2f-51bd-55d2-bb3f-93e754e1a38f/content
  20. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=18156
  21. https://archive.pib.gov.in/archive/releases98/lyr2002/roct2002/11102002/r111020021.html
  22. https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/web/govt-declares-golden-quadrilateral-complete/
  23. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=10570
  24. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-06/FreightReportNationalLevel.pdf
  25. https://archive.pib.gov.in/release02/lyr2002/rdec2002/24122002/r2412200216.html
  26. https://www.economicsdiscussion.net/india/national-highway-development-project-with-statistics/20969
  27. https://morth.nic.in/en/public-private-participation-ppp
  28. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Outcome_Budget_2012_13.pdf
  29. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=133917
  30. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=58088
  31. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Annual-Report-2010-2011.pdf
  32. https://archive.pib.gov.in/documents/rlink/2017/oct/p2017102504.pdf
  33. https://sansad.in/getFile/loksabhaquestions/annex/179/AU2042.pdf?source=pqals
  34. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Bharat%20Mala.pdf
  35. https://morth.nic.in/en/bharatmalaphase
  36. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetailm.aspx?PRID=2091508
  37. https://nhai.gov.in/nhai/sites/default/files/2024-08/NHAI-Annual_Report_2022-23-English-30-05-24.pdf
  38. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/haldea-indian-roads.pdf
  39. https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=133917
  40. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/implementing.pdf
  41. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/309551468774898994/pdf/multi0page.pdf
  42. https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/5564292122012-07-01.pdf
  43. https://www.projectstoday.com/News/NHAI-awards-three-BOT-contracts-under-NHDP-IIIA
  44. https://www.nios.ac.in/media/documents/377_TWM/Chapter-4.pdf
  45. https://www.india.gov.in/national-highway-development-project
  46. https://www.facebook.com/BJP4Goa/posts/new-india-takes-the-rapid-road-to-progressthe-national-highway-network-grew-by-o/1146487383503584/
  47. https://environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/15042022n5uik1jrsmo22974292PKG2DPR.pdf
  48. https://nhai.gov.in/nhai/sites/default/files/2019-03/AnnualReport201516.pdf
  49. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/AR-MoRTH_Annual%2520Report_2023-24_English.pdf
  50. https://indianexpress.com/article/business/no-projects-bharatmala-pariyojana-delays-9845162/
  51. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/other_files/chapter31046475801.pdf
  52. https://www.scribd.com/document/468970011/About-NHDP-National-Highways-Authority-of-India-Government-of-India
  53. https://akhandelwal8.github.io/files/wp_SDHI/SDHI.pdf
  54. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/evaluation-document/370556/files/pvr-517.pdf
  55. https://crei.cat/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CWGTI-pub-1.pdf
  56. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2098788
  57. https://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/infrastructure/highway-development-gave-a-boost-to-economic-growth-iim-bangalore-study/articleshow/117603649.cms
  58. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w18524/w18524.pdf
  59. https://voxdev.org/topic/infrastructure/competition-and-welfare-gains-transportation-infrastructure-india
  60. https://www.roadvision.ai/blog/10-surprising-facts-about-indias-national-highway-development-programme-nhdp
  61. https://www.ijraset.com/research-paper/an-analysis-of-the-influence-of-national-highway-development-on-supply-chain-and-logistics
  62. https://indianjournalofmanagement.com/index.php/aijer/article/view/131654
  63. https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/logistics/indias-logistics-sector-set-to-soar-to-800-billion-by-2030/123361280
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X17307321
  65. https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/social-identity/highway-network-designs-and-regional-economic-development.html
  66. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2015/04/08/the-impact-of-highways-on-regional-development-in-india/
  67. https://insider.finology.in/juicy-scams/satyendra-dubey-story
  68. https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/three-convicted-of-killing-dubey/articleshow/5714097.cms
  69. https://www.piarc.org/ressources/documents/552%2C2.3s-Singh-1005C13.pdf
  70. https://web.iima.ac.in/publications/data/2009-03-07Raghuram.pdf
  71. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=67520
  72. https://www.landconflictwatch.org/conflicts/unfair-compensation-and-infrastructure-development-in-the-nh-334d-land-dispute
  73. https://supremetoday.ai/doc/news/principal-liable-for-environmental-violations-by-sub-contractors-national-green-tribunal-IND_NGT_40_2024_DELHI
  74. https://legal.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/litigation/ngt-directs-nhai-to-pay-rs-45-crore-fine-for-violating-environmental-rules/107732769
  75. https://www.instagram.com/p/DPEY-DciQrA/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195925524000647
  77. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099041824075512369
  78. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/officers/BharatMala%2520Pariyojna%2520Ebook-2076088661.pdf
  79. https://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/infrastructure/rs-10-trillion-umbrella-road-project-to-subsume-nhdp/articleshow/58242655.cms
  80. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2111286
  81. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2091508
  82. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/business/india-builds-10660-km-of-highways-in-fy25-eyes-rs-3-trillion-push-road-minister-ajay-tamta-to-boost-road-reforms-at-rahsta-expo-2025-2/
  83. https://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/infrastructure/nhai-to-take-up-124-nh-projects-in-2025-26-to-cost-rs-3-5-lakh-crore/articleshow/122384222.cms
  84. https://m.economictimes.com/industry/transportation/roadways/govt-targets-creation-of-10000-km-of-national-highways-for-2025-26-lowest-in-seven-years/articleshow/118581178.cms
  85. https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2025/jun/doc2025611568101.pdf
  86. https://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/infrastructure/construction-of-national-highways-up-seven-times-under-bjp-nitin-gadkari/articleshow/48148447.cms
  87. https://www.financialexpress.com/business/industry-nda-government-built-73-pct-more-highways-than-upas-last-4-years-1203952/
  88. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/nda-pips-upa-ii-in-building-roads-but-most-are-2-lanes/articleshow/66112824.cms
  89. https://www.businesstoday.in/industry/infra/story/modi-government-constructed-73-percent-more-highways-compared-upa-last-4-years-148794-2018-06-13
  90. https://pib.gov.in/PressNoteDetails.aspx?NoteId=154624&ModuleId=3
  91. https://www.business-standard.com/economy/news/nda-better-on-infra-metrics-than-upa-tenure-says-nirmala-sitharaman-124051501388_1.html
  92. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1940027099365158/posts/5729509183750245/
  93. https://swarajyamag.com/insta/in-graphs-modi-government-built-more-highways-and-rural-roads-than-the-upa-and-did-it-much-faster
  94. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/national-highway-construction-set-to-touch-95000-km-in-10-years-of-modi-government/articleshow/108117513.cms
  95. https://www.reddit.com/r/india/comments/112oxog/is_it_true_that_govt_has_changed_the_formula_to/
  96. https://swarajyamag.com/infrastructure/roads-railways-and-more-nirmala-sitharamans-upa-vs-nda-comparison-on-infrastructure-development-explained-in-8-points
  97. https://m.thewire.in/article/government/fact-chec-highway-length-upa-nda
  98. https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/content/dam/enterprisesurveys/documents/research/Impact_of_Improved_Highways_Indian_Firms.pdf
  99. https://afeias.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Kurukshetra-Socio-economic-Impacts-of-National-Highways-14-05-22.pdf
  100. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0974930613488298
  101. http://www.civil.mrt.ac.lk/web/conference/ICSBE_2010/vol_01/15.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.