Hubbry Logo
Polyurethane dispersionPolyurethane dispersionMain
Open search
Polyurethane dispersion
Community hub
Polyurethane dispersion
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Polyurethane dispersion
Polyurethane dispersion
Polyurethane dispersion
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Polyurethane dispersion, or PUD, is understood to be a polyurethane polymer resin dispersed in water, rather than a solvent, although some cosolvent may be used. Its manufacture involves the synthesis of polyurethanes having carboxylic acid functionality or nonionic hydrophiles like PEG (polyethylene glycol) incorporated into, or pendant from, the polymer backbone.[1] Two component polyurethane dispersions are also available.[2]

Background

[edit]

There has been a general trend towards converting existing resin systems to waterborne resins, for ease of use and environmental considerations.[3][4][5] Particularly, their development was driven by increased demand for solventless systems since the manufacture of coatings and adhesives entailed the increasing release of solvents into the atmosphere from numerous sources.[6] Using VOC exempt solvents is not a panacea as they have their own weaknesses.

The problem has always been that polyurethanes in water are not stable, reacting to produce a urea and carbon dioxide. Many papers and patents have been published on the subject.[7][8] For environmental reasons there is even a push to have PUD available both water-based and bio-based or made from renewable raw materials.[9][10][11] PUDs are used because of the general desire to formulate coatings, adhesives, sealants and elastomers based on water rather than solvent, and because of the perceived or assumed benefits to the environment.

Synthesis

[edit]

The techniques and manufacturing processes have changed over the years from those described in the first papers, journal articles and patents that were published. There are a number of techniques available depending on what type of species is required. An ion may be formed which can be an anion thus forming an anionic PUD or a cation may be formed forming a cationic PUD. Also, it is possible to synthesize a non-ionic PUD.[12] This involves using materials that will produce an ethylene oxide backbone, or similar, or a water-soluble chain pendant from the main polymer backbone.

Anionic PUDs are by far the most common available commercially. To produce these, initially a polyurethane prepolymer is manufactured in the usual way but instead of just using isocyanate and polyol, a modifier is included in the polymer backbone chain or pendant from the main backbone. This modifier is/was mainly dimethylol propionic acid (DMPA).[13] This molecule contains two hydroxy groups and a carboxylic acid group.[14] The OH groups react with the isocyanate groups to produce an NCO terminated prepolymer but with a pendant COOH group. This is now dispersed under shear in water with a suitable neutralizing agent such as triethylamine. This reacts with the carboxylic acid forming a salt which is water soluble. Usually, a diamine chain extender is then added to produce a polyurethane dispersed in water with no free NCO groups but with polyurethane and polyurea segments.[15] Dytek A is commonly used as the chain extender.[16][17] Various papers and patents show that an amine chain extender with more than two functionalities such as a triamine may be used too.[18] Chain extender studies have been carried out.[19]

There is also a push to have a synthesis strategy that is non-isocyanate based.[20] When blocked isocyanates are used there is no isocyanate (NCO) functionality and hence the water reaction producing carbon dioxide so dispersion is easier.[21] Modifiers other than DMPA have been researched.[22]

It is also possible to introduce hydrophilicity into the polymeric molecule by using a modified chain extender rather than doing so in the polymer backbone or a pendant chain. Lower viscosity materials are often the result, as well as higher solids.[23] A variation on this technique is to incorporate sulfonate groups. PUD/polyacrylate blends can be prepared this way also utilizing internal emulsifiers.[24]

Cationic PUD also introduce hydrophilic components when synthesized. This includes phosphonium entities.[25] Techniques have and are being researched to improve the performance and water resistance properties by various techniques. This includes introducing star-branched polydimethylsiloxane.[26]

Research has been done and published that shows it is not the dispersion speed, mechanical agitation or high shear mixing that has the biggest effect on properties, but rather the chemical makeup. However, particle size distribution can be controlled by this to some extent.[27]

Uses

[edit]

They find use in coatings, adhesives, sealants and elastomers. Specific uses include industrial coatings,[28] UV coating resins,[29][30] floor coatings,[31] hygiene coatings,[32] wood coatings,[33] adhesives,[34] concrete coatings,[35] automotive coatings,[36][37] clear coatings[38] and anticorrosive applications.[39] They are also used in the design and manufacture of medical devices such as the polyurethane dressing, a liquid bandage based on polyurethane dispersion.[40] To improve their functionality in flame retardant applications, products are being developed which have this feature built into the polymer molecule.[41] They have also found use in general textile applications such as coating nonwovens.[42] Leather coatings with antibacterial properties have also been synthesized using PUDs and silver nanoparticles.[43] On a similar theme, recent (post 2020) innovations have included producing a waterborne polyurethane that has embedded silver particles to combat COVID.[44] On a similar theme, PUD with antimicrobial properties have been developed.[45]

Weaknesses and disadvantages

[edit]

Although they are perceived to have good environmental credentials[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] waterborne polyurethane dispersions tend to suffer from lower mechanical strength than other resins. The use of polycarbonate based polyols in the synthesis can help overcome this weakness.[59] The wear and corrosion resistance is also not as good and hence they are often hybridized.[60][61] Other strategies used to overcome some of the weaknesses include molecular design and mixing/compounding with inorganic rather than polymeric materials.[62] The use of an anionic or cationic center or indeed a hydrophilic non-ionic manufacturing technique tends to result in a permanent inbuilt water resistance weakness. Research is being conducted and techniques developed to combat this weakness.[63] Simple blending has also been employed. This has the advantage in that if no new molecule has been formed but merely blending with existing registered raw materials, then that is a way around the work required to get registration of the material under various country regimes such as REACH in Europe and TSCA in the United States. Because of the surface tension of water being so high, pinholes and other problems of air-entrainment tend to be more common and need special additives to combat.[64] They also tend not to be manufactured with biobased polyols because vegetable based polyols don't have performance enhancing functional groups. Modification is possible to achieve this and enable even greener versions.[65]

Drying, curing and cross-linking is also not usually as good and hence research is proceeding in the area of post crosslinking to improve these features.[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]

Hybrids

[edit]

The disadvantages of PUDs are being improved by research.[78][79][80][81] Hybridization using other materials and techniques is one such area. PUDs that are waterborne and UV curable are being intensely researched with well over 100 research papers produced in the 2000-2020 time period.[29][82][83][84][85][86] Waterborne PUD- Acrylates based on epoxidized soybean oil that is also UV curable have been produced and are feasible.[87] The nature of the acrylate affects the properties.[88] One use of hybrids is in textile finishes.[89]

As ionic centers are introduced with waterborne PUDs, the water resistance and uptake in the final film has been studied extensively. The nature of the polyol and the level of COOH groups and hydrophobic modification with other moieties can improve this property. Polyester polyols give the biggest improvements.[82][90] Polycarbonate polyols also enhance properties,[91] especially if the polycarbonate is also fluorinated.[92] Reinforcing PUDs with nanomaterials also improves properties,[93][94] as does silicone modification.[95][96][97]

To make PUDs more hydrophobic and water repellent and thus remove a weakness, a number of techniques have been researched. One way is to add hydroxyethyl acrylate to the polyol reacting with isocyanate. Once the PUD is made it will have terminal double bond functionality from the acrylate. This may now be copolymerized with a very hydrophobic acrylate such as stearyl acrylate using free radical techniques. This long alkyl chain introduced confers hydrophobicity.[98]

Another method of hybridization is to make a PUD that is both anionic but with a very substantial nonionic modification utilizing a polyether polyol based on ethylene oxide. In addition, a silicone diol maybe incorporated.[99]

As epoxy resins have some outstanding properties, research using epoxy to modify PUD is taking place.[100]

PUDs that are based on thiol rather than hydroxyl and also modified with both acrylate as well as epoxy functionality have been produced and researched.[101]

As PUDs are resin dispersed in water, when cast as a film and dried they are inherently high gloss. They can be designed to be matte/flat by incorporating siloxane functionality.[102]

Since PUDs are usually considered green and environmentally friendly, techniques being researched also include capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to make the raw materials and then further synthesis.[103]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Polyurethane dispersion

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs), also known as waterborne s, are colloidal systems comprising fine particles dispersed in as the continuous phase, stabilized by ionic or non-ionic hydrophilic groups and interfacial forces. These dispersions typically contain 30–50% solids by weight, with particle sizes ranging from 100 to 600 nm, and are designed to form durable films upon without the need for high (VOC) solvents. As an alternative to traditional solvent-based polyurethanes, PUDs have gained prominence since the late for reducing emissions and complying with regulatory standards on air quality. The composition of PUDs generally involves the reaction of polyols—such as polyesters, polyethers, or polycarbonates—with diisocyanates like isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) or (HDI), incorporating hydrophilic chain extenders such as dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA) to impart water dispersibility. Preparation commonly employs the method, where an isocyanate-terminated is synthesized, neutralized with a base like triethylamine, dispersed in , and then chain-extended using diamines such as to build molecular weight. This process allows for solvent-free or low-solvent production, aligning with principles, and can be optimized for specific particle size and stability through variables like temperature and addition steps. PUDs exhibit a range of desirable properties, including low for easy handling, high molecular weight for mechanical strength, excellent abrasion resistance, strong to substrates like , metal, and plastics, and flexibility at low temperatures. Their typically falls between 1.05 and 1.10 kg/dm³, and they offer tunable and depending on formulation. These attributes stem from the segmented structure of polyurethanes, with soft segments providing elasticity and hard segments contributing rigidity. Applications of PUDs span multiple industries, including protective coatings for transportation, , and ; adhesives and sealants; inks and overprint varnishes; treatments for and ink receptivity; and synthetic bases with high folding resistance. They are also used in medical products like gloves and shoe bonding, leveraging their and durability. Ongoing innovations focus on bio-based variants and self-crosslinking systems to further enhance and performance.

Introduction

Definition and Composition

Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs), also known as waterborne polyurethane dispersions, are colloidal emulsions consisting of polyurethane particles dispersed in an aqueous medium, serving as alternatives to solvent-based systems. These dispersions typically feature particle sizes ranging from 10 to 500 nm, enabling stable suspensions with low , and solid contents of 30-50% by weight, which facilitates handling and application in various formulations. At the molecular level, PUDs are composed of segmented block copolymers characterized by alternating hard and soft segments. The soft segments, derived from polyols such as polyethers or polyesters, provide flexibility and elasticity, while the hard segments, formed from diisocyanates and short chain extenders, contribute rigidity and cohesive strength through hydrogen bonding. These segments are linked by urethane (carbamate) bonds, resulting in a microphase-separated structure that imparts the unique thermomechanical properties of polyurethanes. The formation of these urethane linkages occurs via the polyaddition reaction between and hydroxyl groups: \ceR−N=C=O+R′−OH−>R−NH−C(=O)−O−R′\ce{R-N=C=O + R'-OH -> R-NH-C(=O)-O-R'} This carbamate linkage is fundamental to the polymer's backbone. To achieve aqueous dispersibility, PUDs incorporate hydrophilic components for stabilization, classifying them into anionic, cationic, or non-ionic types. Anionic dispersions are stabilized by negatively charged groups like carboxylates from dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA), neutralized with bases such as triethylamine; cationic variants use positively charged quaternary ammonium groups; and non-ionic types rely on polyethylene oxide chains or external surfactants. The basic composition includes a NCO-terminated polyurethane prepolymer (synthesized from diisocyanates and polyols), chain extenders (e.g., diols or diamines) to build molecular weight, neutralizing agents to ionize hydrophilic moieties, and water as the continuous phase, often with minor cosolvents for processability.

Historical Development

The foundational chemistry of polyurethanes was established in when and his team at developed the polyaddition process using diisocyanates and polyols, marking the invention of materials. This breakthrough initially focused on rigid foams and elastomers, but by the and , solvent-based polyurethane formulations gained prominence in coatings applications due to their durability and adhesion properties, with commercial production scaling up for industrial uses such as protective finishes. These early solvent-borne systems dominated the market, offering superior performance in weather-resistant coatings, though they relied heavily on volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The transition to waterborne polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) began in the 1970s, driven by emerging environmental regulations aimed at reducing VOC emissions from solvent-based coatings, particularly following the U.S. Clean Air Act amendments and similar global initiatives. Initial research focused on emulsifying polyurethanes in water to minimize solvent use, with the first commercial PUDs introduced in the 1980s by companies like Bayer (now Covestro) and BASF, enabling eco-friendlier alternatives for paints and adhesives. A pivotal advancement came in 1975 with Bayer's patent (US4108814A) for preparing aqueous PUDs using internal emulsifiers incorporating sulfonate groups in diols, which improved dispersion stability without external surfactants and facilitated solvent-free prepolymer processes. Post-2000 developments in PUDs emphasized , spurred by the European Union's REACH enacted in 2007, which restricted hazardous substances like certain isocyanates and promoted low-VOC formulations to enhance worker safety and environmental compliance. Innovations included the integration of bio-based polyols derived from renewable sources such as vegetable oils and , reducing reliance on petroleum-derived feedstocks and further lowering VOC content in dispersions for coatings and textiles. These advancements have enabled high-performance, greener PUDs with improved biodegradability and reduced . The global PUD market has experienced significant growth, valued at USD 1.9 billion in and projected to reach USD 2.7 billion by 2025. As of 2025, estimates place the market size at approximately USD 2.9 billion.

Synthesis and Production

Key Components and Monomers

dispersions (PUDs) are formulated primarily from diisocyanates and polyols that react to form the polyurethane backbone, with additional components ensuring water dispersibility and stability. Isocyanates serve as the hard segment contributors, typically di- or polyfunctional, and include both aliphatic and aromatic types. Aliphatic isocyanates, such as (HDI) and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), are preferred in waterborne systems due to their lower and reduced volatility compared to aromatic counterparts like (MDI) and (TDI), which can pose handling risks from higher reactivity and potential sensitization. Polyols provide the soft, flexible segments and are selected based on the desired end properties, with common types including polyester polyols (often derived from and diols), polyether polyols (such as polytetramethylene ether glycol, PTMEG), and polycarbonate polyols. These polyols typically have molecular weights ranging from 1000 to 4000 g/mol to balance flexibility and mechanical strength in the dispersion. Chain extenders are employed post-prepolymer formation to increase molecular weight and enhance tensile properties, commonly using short diols like or diamines such as and , which introduce urea linkages for added rigidity. Emulsifiers are critical for achieving colloidal stability in aqueous media, with internal emulsifiers like dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA) incorporated into the chain via its hydroxyl and groups (typically at 4-8 wt% of ), while external such as (SDS) may be added for additional stabilization. Neutralizers, often tertiary amines like triethylamine, are used to ionize anionic groups (e.g., from DMPA carboxylates), adjusting the to 7-9 for optimal dispersion without aggregation. In prepolymer synthesis, the NCO:OH index is typically maintained at 1.5-2.0 to ensure sufficient end-groups for subsequent chain extension while controlling and in the waterborne formulation.

Polymerization Techniques

Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) are primarily synthesized through techniques that incorporate hydrophilic groups into the backbone to enable stable emulsification in , avoiding the use of large amounts of organic solvents. The most common methods include the prepolymer process, acetone process, melt dispersion or hot process, and in-situ , each addressing challenges like high and poor water compatibility during production. In the prepolymer process, an isocyanate-terminated is first formed by reacting diisocyanates with polyols and a hydrophilic chain terminator, such as dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA), optionally using a minimal amount of such as NMP. The is then neutralized with a base like triethylamine to ionize the carboxylic groups from DMPA, facilitating dispersion; this is followed by high-shear mixing with to create a dispersion, and finally extension in the aqueous phase using diamines or diols to build molecular weight. This method typically incorporates 2-5% DMPA by weight to achieve hydrophilization via ionic stabilization, addressing the inherent hydrophobicity of polyurethanes. The acetone process employs water-miscible solvents like acetone to reduce during the synthesis of high-molecular-weight , allowing for efficient reaction control. Here, the NCO-terminated is synthesized, diluted with acetone, neutralized, and dispersed into under high shear, followed by chain extension and subsequent removal of the acetone via or to yield a stable aqueous dispersion. This technique enables higher solids content and better reproducibility but requires energy-intensive solvent recovery. Melt dispersion, also known as the hot process, offers a solvent-free alternative by directly emulsifying the molten NCO-terminated into water at elevated temperatures (around 80-100°C) using high-shear mixing, followed by cooling and chain extension at lower temperatures. This eco-friendly method minimizes emissions and operational costs, though it demands precise control to limit side reactions between groups and water, aiming for over 90% NCO retention. In-situ polymerization techniques, such as miniemulsion or inverse , involve forming the polyurethane directly in the aqueous phase by dispersing monomers or prepolymers into stabilized by , then initiating under controlled conditions. These methods allow for the incorporation of additives during synthesis and produce finer particle sizes, but they require careful emulsifier selection to maintain colloidal stability. Key steps across these techniques—prepolymer synthesis to generate NCO-terminated oligomers, neutralization for ionic activation, dispersion via high-shear mixing, and aqueous chain extension—address core challenges like achieving water dispersibility through hydrophilization with ionic groups (e.g., 2-5% DMPA content for anionic stabilization). Post-2010 innovations have focused on solvent-free variants, such as reactive hot melt processes and bio-based emulsifiers, enhancing by reducing environmental impact and improving process efficiency. Recent advances as of 2024 include the incorporation of bio-based polyols derived from and vegetable oils in solvent-free processes to further promote principles.

Physical and Chemical Properties

Colloidal and Rheological Properties

Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) exhibit colloidal properties that ensure their stability as aqueous suspensions of nanoparticles, typically ranging from 100 to 600 nm in size, with a preference for monodisperse distributions to minimize and aggregation. is commonly measured using (DLS), revealing diameters often below 60 nm in well-formulated anionic PUDs neutralized with triethylamine (TEA) at a 1.1:1 ratio to dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA), while higher sizes up to 360 nm occur at lower neutralization ratios. These nanoparticles carry a , quantified via electrophoretic light scattering, typically ≤ −30 mV in magnitude for electrostatic repulsion, with values around −50 mV promoting excellent long-term stability by preventing . Higher zeta potentials correlate with smaller particle sizes, particularly in metal cation-neutralized systems compared to ammonium-based ones. The rheological behavior of PUDs in their liquid state transitions from Newtonian at low shear rates to shear-thinning (pseudoplastic) at intermediate rates (4.5–49.5 s⁻¹), where decreases with increasing shear, facilitating application processes like spraying or brushing. typically spans 10–1000 mPa·s, strongly dependent on solids content (e.g., rising sharply above 47 wt%), with lesser influence from (20–40 °C) at high shear rates (>37.5 s⁻¹); thixotropic effects can emerge upon addition of associative thickeners, allowing temporary recovery post-shear for sag resistance. Unmodified PUDs often display Newtonian flow under low stress, shifting to non-Newtonian with formulation adjustments. Stability in PUDs arises from complementary electrostatic and steric mechanisms, with electrostatic repulsion dominant in ionic variants via or groups (e.g., 2–4 wt% DMPA) that form an electrical double layer upon neutralization, enhanced by counterions like . Steric stabilization supplements this through nonionic or hydrophilic polyethylene oxide chains extending into the aqueous phase, creating physical barriers to particle approach; combined use yields shelf-lives exceeding 6 months at neutral to mildly alkaline (7–9). At below 7 or above 9, stability diminishes due to or excessive charge repulsion, leading to , while optimal around 8 maintains dispersion integrity. Coalescence during drying is governed by the minimum film-forming temperature (MFFT), typically 5–20 °C for PUDs, below which particles fail to deform and merge into a continuous ; this threshold is lowered by soft segments like polyether or polyols that reduce the temperature (Tg). Hard:soft segment ratios below 50:50 preserve low MFFT while embedding reinforcing domains, with MFFT values as low as 2 °C observed in commercial formulations. Commercial PUDs often feature solids content of 35–45 wt%, 7–9, and approximately 1.05 g/cm³, balancing processability and stability.

Film-Forming Characteristics

Films formed from polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) after coalesce into continuous, flexible coatings with a microphase-separated morphology consisting of soft and hard segments, contributing to their balanced performance profile. The mechanical properties of these films, including tensile strength typically in the range of 10-50 MPa, elongation at break from 100-500%, and between 1-100 MPa, are primarily governed by the hard-to-soft segment ratio, where higher hard segment content increases strength and modulus at the expense of flexibility. PUD films exhibit excellent to diverse substrates such as wood and metal, owing to the presence of polar urethane and groups that promote interfacial bonding. can be further enhanced through crosslinking with or s, which react with carboxylic or hydroxyl functionalities to form covalent networks, improving without compromising flexibility. In terms of abrasion resistance, PUD films demonstrate superior performance compared to acrylic dispersions, with Taber abrasion weight often below 50 mg after 1000 cycles under CS-17 wheels at 1000 g load. This toughness arises from the segmented , providing inherent resilience against . Thermally, PUD films display temperatures (Tg) ranging from -50°C for soft segments to 50°C for hard segments, enabling low-temperature flexibility and elevated service temperatures. Hydrolytic stability is notably improved by using polyols in the soft segment, which resist and maintain integrity in humid environments. Optically, these films offer high clarity with light exceeding 90% and adjustable gloss units (GU) from 20 to 100 at 60°, depending on and additives, making them suitable for transparent applications. For aging resistance, films based on aliphatic isocyanates show enhanced UV stability, with yellowing index values remaining below 5 after 1000 hours of QUV-A exposure, minimizing discoloration in outdoor settings.

Applications

Coatings and Paints

Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) are widely utilized in architectural coatings, particularly for water-based finishes and varnishes, where they provide durable surface protection with minimal environmental impact. These dispersions enable the formulation of low-viscosity coatings that penetrate substrates effectively, forming tough, flexible films upon . In varnishes, PUDs contribute to excellent water resistance in standardized immersion tests, such as passing 144-hour immersion without visible damage, making them suitable for high-traffic interior spaces like residential and commercial . In automotive and industrial applications, PUDs serve as key binders in clear coats and primers, offering enhanced gloss retention and weatherability. Two-component systems, which combine PUDs with polyisocyanates, deliver superior by enabling crosslinking at ambient temperatures, resulting in coatings that withstand mechanical stresses and environmental exposure in exteriors and machinery components. These systems are particularly valued for their ability to form uniform layers on complex metal surfaces, improving overall . Formulation of PUD-based coatings often involves blending with acrylic emulsions to balance cost and performance, achieving hybrid systems that combine the flexibility of polyurethanes with the of acrylics. Incorporation of fluoropolymers further enhances hydrophobicity and resistance in specialty formulations. PUDs exhibit strong compatibility, supporting loadings up to 20% by weight without compromising stability or application , which allows for vibrant, opaque finishes in decorative . Additionally, PUDs are used in printing inks and overprint varnishes, providing adhesion and flexibility for flexible and publication inks. Performance in these coatings is characterized by robust scratch resistance, typically achieving pencil hardness ratings of 2H to , which ensures longevity under abrasion. Additionally, PUD films demonstrate strong chemical resistance to dilute acids and bases, protecting substrates from household cleaners and industrial spills. These attributes stem from the inherent film-forming characteristics of PUDs, which coalesce into dense, impermeable barriers. By 2025, the coatings segment accounts for approximately 40% of the waterborne polyurethane dispersions market, propelled by stringent regulations favoring low-VOC formulations under 50 g/L. This growth reflects the shift toward sustainable alternatives in both residential and commercial sectors. Specific applications include coatings, where PUDs provide soft-touch finishes with abrasion resistance for automotive interiors, and metal corrosion protection primers, which form barrier layers inhibiting in marine and structural environments.

Adhesives and Textiles

Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) are extensively utilized in adhesive formulations due to their excellent capabilities, flexibility, and environmental compatibility compared to solvent-based alternatives. In pressure-sensitive adhesives, PUDs provide tackiness and cohesion for applications such as laminating films to substrates, while heat-activated variants enable at temperatures between 80-120°C, facilitating efficient processing in industrial settings. For instance, in production, PUD-based adhesives effectively bond (EVA) soles to uppers, offering durable adhesion under mechanical stress, and are used in medical products like shoe bonding and gloves for . Laminating adhesives derived from PUDs are commonly applied in paper and packaging industries, where they form strong bonds between dissimilar materials like foil and paperboard. These adhesives typically contain 40% solids content, making them suitable for sprayable applications that ensure uniform coverage and minimal waste. To enhance wet strength, formulations often incorporate crosslinkers such as hexamethoxymethyl melamine (HMMM), which react with hydroxyl or ionic groups in the PUD to form a networked structure, improving resistance to moisture and hydrolysis. Performance metrics for these adhesives include T-peel strengths ranging from 5-10 N/cm, depending on curing conditions and additives like nanosilica, which further bolster thermal stability and shear resistance up to approximately 776 kPa. In textile applications, PUDs serve as versatile finishing agents, imparting and enhanced tactile properties to fabrics. For , PUD coatings are applied to create breathable barriers in PU-backed s, such as those used in outdoor apparel, achieving hydrostatic resistance exceeding 1000 mbar even after multiple laundering cycles. Finishing treatments with PUDs improve fabric softness and stretch by forming flexible films with elongation greater than %, ideal for knitted and woven materials. Specific uses include backings for nonwoven , where biocompatible PUDs enhance barrier properties and mechanical integrity for wound dressings and protective garments, as well as synthetic leather bases offering high folding resistance. Performance in textiles is evaluated through standards like the AATCC scale, where PUD-treated fabrics exhibit laundry fastness ratings greater than 4, maintaining color and integrity after 10 washes at 40°C. The rheological properties of PUDs, such as moderate , aid in uniform application via methods like knife-over-roll . Since 2020, the development of bio-based PUDs derived from renewable sources like oils has gained traction for sustainable finishing, reducing reliance on petroleum-derived monomers while preserving and durability.

Advantages and Limitations

Environmental and Performance Benefits

Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) offer significant environmental advantages over traditional solvent-based polyurethane systems, primarily due to their low (VOC) content, typically under 50 g/L, compared to over 400 g/L in solvent-based formulations. This reduction enables compliance with stringent EPA limits for architectural coatings, such as 50-250 g/L depending on category, and Decopaint Directive thresholds, like 140 g/L for single-pack performance coatings. By using water as the primary carrier, PUDs minimize and photochemical contributions from VOC emissions. The water-based nature of PUDs further enhances safety and by reducing flammability risks associated with organic solvents, thereby improving worker safety during handling and application. Additionally, many PUD formulations incorporate biodegradable soft segments, such as (PCL), which facilitate environmental degradation under suitable conditions, contrasting with persistent solvent residues. In terms of performance, PUDs provide inherent flexibility without the need for plasticizers, maintaining elasticity through their segmented structure, which supports applications requiring and abrasion resistance. They also exhibit excellent recoatability, allowing subsequent layers to adhere effectively without extensive surface preparation, and show strong compatibility with water-based additives like pigments and thickeners for customized formulations. Sustainability benefits extend to production and lifecycle processes, where the recyclable water phase eliminates solvent recovery steps, reducing energy consumption by avoiding distillation and associated heating. This shift was driven by the Clean Air Act Amendments, which imposed VOC emission controls and spurred widespread adoption of waterborne technologies, achieving significant market share for PUDs in coatings. Overall, PUDs demonstrate a lower , with lifecycle assessments indicating about 30% reduced compared to solvent-based systems, owing to decreased solvent production and evaporation impacts.

Technical Challenges and Disadvantages

Polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) exhibit sensitivity to coalescence issues, particularly when applied below their minimum formation (MFFT), leading to incomplete particle fusion and defects such as mud cracking in the resulting . To mitigate this, coalescing aids like Texanol are commonly incorporated at levels of 3-5% based on resin solids to plasticize particles and lower the effective MFFT, enabling proper formation without excessive (VOC) emissions. Polyester-based PUDs suffer from hydrolytic instability due to the susceptibility of linkages to water-induced cleavage, which accelerates degradation in humid environments and reduces . This vulnerability often limits the service life of such systems under prolonged moisture exposure, prompting the preference for polyether alternatives in demanding applications. Mechanically, waterborne PUDs generally achieve lower compared to their solvent-borne counterparts, attributed to reduced cross-linking and the presence of hydrophilic stabilizers that soften the matrix. This compromises abrasion resistance and rigidity in high-wear scenarios. Production of PUDs requires high shear forces during dispersion to break down the into stable nanoparticles, as insufficient mixing leads to unstable emulsions prone to . Additionally, these dispersions are susceptible to when exposed to electrolytes, such as salts in additives, due to charge screening that collapses the electrostatic stabilization layer. Economically, PUDs incur higher production costs than acrylic dispersions, stemming from the intricate multi-step synthesis involving handling and chain extension processes. Safety concerns arise from low levels of residual in PUDs, typically below 0.1% to comply with handling regulations, though unreacted monomers like retain inherent toxicity during handling and processing; EU REACH regulations since 2023 require worker training for products containing >0.1% free diisocyanates.

Variants and Hybrids

Hybrid Polyurethane Systems

Hybrid polyurethane systems combine dispersions (PUDs) with other types, such as acrylics, silicones, or epoxies, to leverage synergistic properties that address limitations in pure PUDs, like balancing and flexibility while enhancing overall performance in coatings and adhesives. These hybrids are formed through methods like sequential , where one is synthesized in the presence of the other to create interpenetrating networks (IPNs) or core-shell structures, or physical blending, which requires careful control of to ensure compatibility and uniform dispersion. Sequential often involves miniemulsion techniques for precise control over particle morphology, while blending uses to stabilize the mixture and prevent coalescence issues. Acrylic-PU hybrids are among the most common, typically featuring core-shell structures where the soft polyurethane core provides flexibility and the hard acrylic shell imparts durability and chemical resistance, achieving balanced mechanical properties ideal for waterborne coatings. These hybrids often employ 50/50 weight ratios of polyurethane to acrylic components to optimize hardness and elongation at break. Formation via sequential emulsion polymerization of acrylic monomers onto pre-formed PU seeds ensures strong interfacial bonding, reducing phase separation. Silicone-PU hybrids incorporate polysiloxane segments to enhance surface properties, particularly in coatings requiring low friction and water repellency. These systems are synthesized by copolymerizing monomers with PU precursors or blending -modified PU with base dispersions, resulting in hybrid particles that exhibit improved slip resistance and hydrophobicity due to the migration of to the surface during film formation. Applications in anti-fouling and protective coatings benefit from this, as the phase increases water contact angles above 90 degrees (often >100°). Epoxy-PU hybrids are typically formulated as two-part systems for adhesives, where the resin provides high strength and the PU component adds and flexibility to prevent brittle . These are prepared by blending pre-polymers with PU dispersions, often with a curing agent in the second part, allowing room-temperature curing while achieving lap shear strengths exceeding 20 MPa on metals and plastics. The hybrid nature improves impact resistance over pure epoxies, making them suitable for structural in automotive and uses. Overall, hybrid PU systems offer benefits such as significantly improved adhesion to low-surface-energy substrates like —often doubling peel strength compared to neat PUDs—and reduced minimum film-forming temperature (MFFT) to below 5°C, enabling application at ambient conditions without high co-solvent levels. These enhancements stem from the complementary polymer interactions, where PU contributes elasticity and acrylic or phases add rigidity and cross-linking potential. Commercial examples include Covestro's Bayhydrol UA series, introduced in the , which are waterborne PU-acrylic hybrids used in durable wood and coatings with low VOC emissions. As of 2025, recent advances include expanded production capacities for such hybrids, such as BASF's 2024 facility upgrade for sustainable PUD variants.

Modified Dispersions

Modified polyurethane dispersions (PUDs) refer to waterborne systems where the base structure is altered through chemical incorporation of functional groups, blending with other polymers, or addition of nanoparticles and bio-based materials to enhance attributes such as mechanical strength, stability, resistance, and biodegradability. These modifications address limitations of standard PUDs, like or poor , while maintaining environmental benefits like low VOC emissions. Common approaches include hybridizing with acrylics or silicones and functionalizing with elements like or . One prominent category involves hybrid PUDs, particularly polyurethane-acrylic hybrids, synthesized via sequential or simultaneous methods. In the sequential approach, a polyurethane is formed first using diisocyanates (e.g., IPDI) and polyols (e.g., PTMEG), followed by acrylic grafting through with monomers like . This yields core-shell structures where the PU provides flexibility and the acrylic shell enhances hardness and chemical resistance. For instance, PU/acrylic hybrids exhibit tensile strengths up to 40 MPa and improved gloss retention in coatings, outperforming pure PUDs by 20-30% in abrasion resistance. Seminal work by Kim and Lee (1994) demonstrated the role of ionic/nonionic segments in stabilizing such hybrids. Applications include architectural paints and finishes, where the hybrids offer balanced toughness and weatherability. Recent developments as of 2025 include acrylic-urethane hybrids tailored for finishing with enhanced . Silicone-modified PUDs incorporate (PDMS) or aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) into the soft segments during synthesis, improving surface smoothness and hydrophobicity. The mixing process, involving chain extension with , results in dispersions with particle sizes of 50-150 nm and enhanced contact angles (>100°), reducing water uptake by up to 50% in films. Mechanical properties are boosted, with tensile strength increasing from 18 MPa to 30 MPa upon 2-5 wt% APTMS addition, due to hydrogen bonding between and urethane groups. These modifications are particularly useful in coatings and textiles for better repellency and . Studies by Cheng et al. (2021) highlight their superior thermal stability, with decomposition temperatures raised by 20-30°C. Phosphorus- and nitrogen-containing modifications introduce flame-retardant elements via reactive emulsifiers like N-(2-hydroxyethyl) or derivatives during the polyaddition step. For example, incorporating 3-5 wt% compounds yields self-extinguishing films with limiting oxygen indices >28%, alongside improved tensile strength (from 10 MPa to 25 MPa) from cross-linked networks. Wang et al. (2021) reported that such PUDs maintain colloidal stability ( >-40 mV) and are applied in coatings for textiles and . Similarly, sulfur-modified PUDs using 4,4'-dithiodibutane-1,2-diol enhance , achieving elongation at break >400% and tensile strength of 36 MPa, ideal for flexible adhesives. Bio-based and nanoparticle modifications focus on sustainability, such as integrating chitosan or cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) as chain extenders or fillers. Chitosan-grafted PUDs, prepared by Schiff base formation, improve antibacterial activity (99% reduction in E. coli) and mechanical properties (tensile strength to 29 MPa), suitable for biomedical scaffolds and wound dressings. Adding 1 wt% CNC via in-situ dispersion increases Young's modulus by 125% through hydrogen bonding reinforcement. Nanda and Wicks' (2006) optimization of emulsifier content (2-4 wt% DMPA) remains foundational for these eco-friendly variants, which also enhance biodegradability (up to 60% weight loss in soil over 90 days). As of 2025, advances include chitosan-grafted graphene oxide reinforcements in bio-based hybrids for improved nanocomposites in coatings and biomedical applications. These are widely used in green coatings and packaging. Overall, modified PUDs expand the versatility of waterborne systems, with synthesis often solvent-free to minimize environmental impact, as advanced by Wang et al. (2017). Challenges include optimizing compatibility to avoid , but these innovations drive adoption in high-performance, sustainable applications.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079670009000823
  2. https://www.gantrade.com/blog/the-chemistry-of-waterborne-polyurethane-coatings
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/polyurethane-dispersion
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9863305/
  5. https://www.lubrizol.com/solutions/technologies/resins-and-binders/polyurethane-dispersions
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7865350/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7760167/
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7918248/
  9. https://www.bayer.com/en/history/otto-bayer
  10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK524881/
  11. https://www.paint.org/coatingstech-magazine/articles/waterborne-industrial-coatings-regulatory-changes-slowly-driving-shift-waterborne/
  12. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4108814A/en
  13. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/polyurethane-dispersions-market-874.html
  14. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/polyurethane-dispersion-market-4991
  15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5627
  16. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20020028875A1/en
  17. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122875
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235918305_Effects_of_NCOOH_ratios_on_physicomechanical_properties_of_polyurethane_dispersion
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542504820300270
  20. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02046
  21. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC01197C
  22. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/16/13/1889
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12044684/
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300944015000247
  25. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c03959
  26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00218460902997190
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030094401200149X
  28. https://www.kremer-pigmente.com/media/pdf/76805e.pdf
  29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.56515
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749623000210
  31. https://carbodiimide.com/crosslinking-methods-of-waterborne-polyurethane-and-commonly-used-crosslinking-agents/
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300944097000106
  33. https://www.pcimag.com/articles/88594-1k-polyurethane-dispersion-for-conventional-2k-applications
  34. https://insights.basf.com/home/article/read/better-than-blending
  35. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15685551.2016.1152541
  36. https://www.gantrade.com/blog/ultimate-performance-polyurethanes-based-on-polycarbonate-diols
  37. https://hauthaway.com/polyurethane-dispersion-composition/
  38. https://www.paint.org/coatingstech-magazine/articles/inherent-matte-polyurethane-dispersions-as-matting-agents/
  39. https://www.european-coatings.com/news/coatings-technologies/optical-properties-of-high-solid-water_borne-polyurethane/
  40. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/10/1/4
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11085269/
  42. https://insights.basf.com/home/article/read/superior-protection-and-clarity-for-wood-coatings-it-s-in-the-blend
  43. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20110251332A1/en
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222119884_Recent_developments_in_aqueous_two-component_polyurethane_2K-PUR_coatings
  45. https://solutions.covestro.com/-/media/covestro/solution-center/brochures/materials/brochures/coatings/dispersionen.pdf
  46. https://www.paint.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/jctSEPT96-Hegedus.pdf
  47. https://www.alberdingkusa.com/Products/Water-Based-Dispersions/Acrylic-polyurethane-hybrids/
  48. https://patents.google.com/patent/US7803867B2/en
  49. http://wernerblank.com/pdfiles/paper12b.pdf
  50. https://patents.google.com/patent/CZ232795A3/en
  51. https://www.paint.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1K-PUR-Dispersions-to-2K-Waterborne-Dispersions_Feb-2019.pdf
  52. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/waterborne-polyurethane-dispersions-market
  53. https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/waterborne-polyurethane-dispersions-market
  54. https://www.pcimag.com/articles/113574-low-voc-amine-free-waterborne-polyurethane-acrylic-hybrid-resin
  55. https://hauthaway.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/L-2245al.pdf
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232383101_Cross-linking_reaction_of_waterborne_polyurethane_adhesives_containing_different_amount_of_ionic_groups_with_hexamethoxymethyl_melamine
  57. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/993826d3-c6e9-4d61-b27b-45dd71abf68a/content
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8659624/
  59. http://advancedtextilesexpo.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/09/Sustainable-coatings-for-medical-textiles_Bentley-Mah.pdf
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373042130_Development_of_biocompatible_aqueous_polyurethane_dispersions_using_chitosan_and_curcumin_to_improve_physicochemical_properties_of_textile_surfaces
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356802308_Bio-Based_Waterborne_PU_for_Durable_Textile_Coatings
  62. https://blog.chasecorp.com/specialty-chemical-intermediates/3-reasons-why-polyurethane-dispersions-are-the-best-choice-for-your-coating
  63. https://www.paint.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Oil-Modified-Urethanes-for-Clear-Wood-Finishes-Distinction-or-Extinction.pdf
  64. https://www.ultrimaxstore.com/blogs/news/voc-levels-and-how-to-reduce-them-in-your-paint-application-process
  65. https://www.eurofins.com/media/1601/voc-in-paints-decopaint-directive-en.pdf
  66. https://industrial.sherwin-williams.com/na/us/en/protective-marine/media-center/articles/understanding-voc-regulations-in-water-infrastructure-coatings.html
  67. https://blog.chasecorp.com/specialty-chemical-intermediates/is-water-based-polyurethane-eco-friendly
  68. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2020/ra/d0ra04124f
  69. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/3/409
  70. https://www.cancork.com/polyurethane-finish-water-solvent/
  71. https://www.infinechem.com/news/industry-news/what-is-waterborne-polyurethane-dispersion-pud/
  72. https://www.allhdi.com/archives/77342
  73. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA375756.pdf
  74. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/polyurethane-dispersion-market
  75. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c00619
  76. https://www.covestro.com/press/improved-co2-footprint-achieved-through-rapid-drying/
  77. https://www.coatingsworld.com/film-coalescence-and-coalescing-surfactants/
  78. https://hauthaway.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/formulating-guidelines-for-hauthane-polyurethane-dispersions-II-5.pdf
  79. https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/4/961
  80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300944009002124
  81. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/chemistry/polyurethane-solvent-waterborne.php
  82. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4332710A/en
  83. https://www.freepatentsonline.com/4888379.html
  84. https://eureka.patsnap.com/report-acrylic-resin-vs-polyurethane-durability-in-coating-applications
  85. https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/Polyur092017FR.pdf
  86. https://www.european-coatings.com/news/raw-materials/diisocyanates-the-01-limit/
  87. https://www.osha.gov/isocyanates
  88. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02324
  89. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130281636A1/en
  90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300944099000818
  91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257441999_Synthesis_of_core-shell_acrylic-polyurethane_hybrid_latex_as_binder_of_aqueous_pigment_inks_for_digital_inkjet_printing
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001868615000615
  93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275962063_Silicone-containing_hybrid_polymer_dispersions_designed_for_coating_applications
  94. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2018001654A1/en
  95. https://www.masterbond.com/techtips/why-use-epoxy-hybrid-adhesives
  96. https://www.adhesivesmag.com/articles/98079-put-some-moxie-in-your-epoxy-toughening-epoxy-adhesives-with-a-polyurethane-prepolymer
  97. https://polymerestechnologies.com/product-category/application-epoxy-polyurethane-silicone-specialty-resins/epoxy-polyurethane-and-methyl-methacrylate-adhesives/
  98. https://www.coatingsworld.com/waterborne-urethane-acrylic-hybrid-resin-technology-for-high-performance-1k-coating-application/
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231701310_Synthesis_of_Acrylic-Polyurethane_Hybrid_Latexes_by_Miniemulsion_Polymerization_and_Their_Pressure-Sensitive_Adhesive_Applications
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50373548_Waterborne_Polyurethane-Acrylic_Hybrid_Nanoparticles_by_Miniemulsion_Polymerization_Applications_in_Pressure-Sensitive_Adhesives
  101. https://solutions.covestro.com/-/media/covestro/solution-center/materials/downloads/cov037-coatings--adhesives-north-america-product-index.pdf
  102. https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/polyurethane-dispersion-market
  103. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030409
  104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03814-7
  105. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02324
  106. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11820273/
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12608529/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.