Hubbry Logo
Alpha privativeAlpha privativeMain
Open search
Alpha privative
Community hub
Alpha privative
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Alpha privative
Alpha privative
Alpha privative
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

An alpha privative or, rarely,[1] privative a (from Latin alpha prīvātīvum, from Ancient Greek α στερητικόν) is the prefix a- or an- (before vowels) that is used in Indo-European languages such as Sanskrit and Greek and in words borrowed therefrom to express negation or absence, for example the English words of Greek origin atypical, anesthetic, and analgesic, as well as the English word of Sanskrit origin ahimsa (ahinsa).

It is derived from a Proto-Indo-European syllabic nasal *n̥-, the zero ablaut grade of the negation *ne, i.e. /n/ used as a vowel. For this reason, it usually appears as an- before vowels (e.g. an-alphabetism, an-esthesia, an-archy).[2] It shares the same root with the Greek prefix nē- or ne-, in Greek νη- or νε-, that is also privative (e.g. ne-penthe).[3]

It is not to be confused with, among other things, an alpha copulative (e.g. a-delphós) or the prefix an- (i.e. the preposition aná with ecthlipsis or elision of its final vowel before a following vowel; e.g. an-ode).

Cognates

[edit]

Sanskrit

[edit]

The same prefix appears in Sanskrit, also as a- before consonants; and an- before vowels (written अ and अन्, respectively in Devanagari).

Latin

[edit]

In Latin, the cognate prefix is in-, which leaves its traces in English words like invisible and inaccessible, and in its assimilated form in words like irresistible, irrelevant, irresponsible, illegitimate, illegal, illiterate. The prepositional prefix in- is unrelated.

Germanic languages

[edit]

In English and other West Germanic languages, the cognate is un- (or on-).

In North Germanic languages, the -n- has disappeared and Old Norse has ú- (e.g. ú-dáins-akr), Danish and Norwegian have u-, whereas Swedish uses o- (pronounced [u]), and Icelandic and Faroese use the related ó-.

Homonym

[edit]

The prefix ἁ- ha- (also ἀ- a- from psilosis), copulative a, is nearly homonymous with privative a, but originates from Proto-Indo-European *sm̥.[2]

See also

[edit]
Look up alpha privative in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Look up Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/n̥- in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Alpha privative

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The is a morphological prefix in , appearing as a- (ἀ-) before consonants and an- (ἀν-) before vowels, which or indicates the absence of the quality, state, or entity expressed by the base word to which it is attached. This prefix functions primarily to form adjectives and nouns denoting privation or , such as átheos (ἄθεος, "without " or "godless") from theós (θεός, "") or ánarkhos (ἄναρχος, "without ruler" or "rulerless") from árkhōn (ἄρχων, "ruler"). Etymologically, the alpha privative derives from the Proto-Indo-European syllabic nasal n̥-, representing the zero-grade (or reduced) form of the negation particle ne, which evolved through phonetic changes in the development of Greek. In Greek usage, it was highly productive from the earliest attested texts, such as Homer's Iliad, where forms like admētḗ (ἀδμήτη, "unbroken" or "untamed") appear in compounds to convey lack or reversal, as in "a yearling heifer … unbroken" (Iliad 10.293). The prefix often interacts with accentuation rules, typically remaining short (ᾰ) in classical Greek, and it could combine with verbal roots or nouns to create terms with philosophical, ethical, or descriptive implications, such as alḗtheia (ἀλήθεια, "truth," literally "un-forgetting" from lḗthē, λήθη, "forgetfulness"). Its semantic range emphasizes deprivation rather than mere opposition, distinguishing it from other negators like ou- (οὐ-, "not"). The alpha privative's influence extends beyond Greek into Latin and modern European languages, particularly English, through loanwords where it retains its negating force, as seen in terms like atheist ("without god"), anarchy ("without rule"), atom ("indivisible" or "uncut"), apathy ("without feeling"), and anesthesia ("without sensation"). In scientific and medical nomenclature, it remains productive, forming words such as achromatic ("without color") and aphasia ("without speech"). This enduring legacy underscores its role as a key element in Indo-European derivational morphology, facilitating the expression of absence across diverse lexical fields from antiquity to the present.

Definition and Etymology

Definition

The alpha privative is a prefix in derived from the Proto-Indo-European syllabic nasal *n̥-, the zero-grade form of the particle *ne- meaning "not," functioning to denote the absence, lack, or reversal of a quality expressed by the base word. It is classified grammatically as an inseparable prefix that attaches directly to nouns and adjectives (or their stems), thereby altering the base word's meaning to express privation or . The prefix manifests in two primary forms: a short "a-" (ᾰ-) used before words beginning with consonants, and "an-" (ᾰν-) employed before those starting with vowels, with the rough breathing (indicating an aspirate h-sound) appearing in certain pronunciations, particularly in earlier dialects. This morphological distinction ensures smooth integration into the word's phonetic structure while preserving the negating function across various stem types. Historically, the alpha privative originated in early Greek and became a standard feature of Classical Greek during the 5th and 4th centuries BCE, continuing to appear in and subsequent Hellenistic and Byzantine linguistic forms as a productive element for forming negative compounds.

The alpha privative originates from the Proto-Indo-European () negation particle *ne "not," particularly its zero-grade ablaut variant *n̥-, a syllabic nasal that underwent vocalization to /a/ in Greek through patterns of vowel gradation in pre-Greek phonetic development. This syllabic nasal form, common in PIE privative constructions, lost its consonantal quality and merged with the system, resulting in the characteristic a- prefix seen in Greek compounds expressing privation or absence. In early Greek dialects, the privative a- emerges in as recorded in tablets dating to approximately 1400 BCE, where it functions as a negating element in nominal compounds, marking the onset of its systematic use. This form further evolved and became entrenched in the epic language of by the 8th century BCE and in the classical dialect of the 5th–4th centuries BCE, reflecting a stabilization of its morphological role across dialectal variations. The aspiration associated with the alpha privative, represented by the rough breathing (spiritus asper, ῾), was formalized in post-Classical Greek orthography during the Hellenistic period (3rd–1st centuries BCE), when Alexandrian scholars like of introduced diacritical marks to indicate initial /h/-sounds, thereby tying the privative prefix phonetically to the aspirated of the letter alpha (Α/α). This marking preserved the audible /ha-/ onset in reconstructed classical , distinguishing it visually in texts. From a comparative philological perspective, the operates as a integrated into for expressing inherent or lack, in contrast to the independent particles οὐ (ou), which negates indicative statements, and μή (mē), which serves for non-indicative moods, infinitives, and broader prohibitive or subjective contexts in Greek .

Usage in Ancient Greek

Formation Rules

The alpha privative in follows specific phonetic guidelines to ensure smooth integration into base words. It appears as a- when prefixed to stems beginning with , facilitating easy insertion without disrupting the word's prosody. Before stems starting with vowels, the form shifts to an-, incorporating a to prevent hiatus—a sequence of two adjacent vowels that would otherwise create an awkward phonetic break. This adjustment adheres to broader principles of Greek euphony, where the privative adapts to maintain rhythmic flow in speech and verse. Morphologically, the alpha privative attaches directly to the stems of nouns and adjectives, primarily forming negative adjectives that denote absence or privation, with derived nouns or verbs often stemming from these bases. In , integration may involve standard rules if the privative encounters certain vowel combinations in compounds, where a final short of a preceding element drops before an initial vowel, though the privative itself rarely triggers such elision due to its consonantal adaptation in an-. Vowel adjustments, akin to in avoiding clashing qualities, occur through the nasal insertion, ensuring the prefix blends seamlessly with the stem's initial without altering the base's core morphology. This process preserves the stem's inflectional endings while negating its semantic content. Dialectal variations affect the privative's realization, particularly in Ionic and Doric Greek. In Ionic, the form remains consistently a- or an-, with no lengthening of the vowel and a tendency toward psilosis—loss of initial aspiration—for smoother articulation. Doric dialects, by contrast, occasionally feature a lengthened ā- following historical postconsonantal (ϝ), and may introduce aspiration as ha- in certain regional forms, such as in Laconian or Cretan inscriptions, reflecting broader West Greek phonological shifts. These differences highlight how the privative adapts to dialect-specific sound patterns without fundamentally altering its negating function. The alpha privative can interact with other prefixes, often combining to form complex negatives or contrasting meanings. It may precede or follow augmentative prefixes like eu- ("good"), resulting in compounded forms where the privative asserts over the positive , such as in structures denoting "not good" or absence of benefit, though conflicts arise if both imply opposition, requiring contextual resolution in usage. Additionally, it combines with copulative or separable prefixes, like en- or anti-, to create layered meanings, while historical interactions with lost sounds (e.g., initial or in bases) lead to assimilated forms without the privative altering its core shape. These combinations follow general rules for prefix stacking in Greek, prioritizing phonetic compatibility.

Common Examples

One prominent classical example of the alpha privative is átheos (ἄθεος), formed by prefixing a- to theós (θεός, ""), denoting "without " or "godless." This term conveys the absence of or , and it appears in Plato's Laws, where it describes individuals who reject the gods' or providential role. Similarly, anómos (ἄνομος), combining a(n)- with nómos (νόμος, "" or "custom"), means "lawless" or "without ," implying a state of disorder or violation of norms; it is attested in Euripides' , highlighting moral or social deviance. Another key instance is apáthes (ἀπαθής), from a- and páthes (πάθος, related to "" or "feeling"), signifying "without feeling" or "impassive," which underscores or insensitivity. In literary contexts, the alpha privative features in epic compounds in , such as áptoros (ἄπτερος) in the phrase áptoros múthos ("wingless word"), appearing four times in (e.g., 17.57), to describe silent obedience without verbal response, contrasting with the common "winged words" (épea pteróenta) that introduce spoken discourse. In Plato's philosophical works, terms like aló gos (ἄλογος), prefixed to lógos (λόγος, "reason" or "account"), denote "" or "without reason," as in the Timaeus (53a), where it refers to incommensurable ratios in cosmology, emphasizing a lack of rational order. Semantically, the alpha privative often expresses not mere absence but opposition or privation, as seen in from , such as anaisthēsía (ἀναισθησία), from an- and aísthēsis (αἴσθησις, "sensation"), meaning "insensibility" or "lack of feeling"; in the Corpus Hippocraticum (e.g., Epidemics 1.26), it describes numbness as a symptom of imbalance, implying a pathological opposition to normal sensory function rather than simple . During the Classical period (5th–4th centuries BCE), the alpha privative was highly productive, particularly in forming compound adjectives to denote or lack, though it was less common in verbs, where other negating strategies like ou- prevailed. This productivity reflects its role as a core morphological tool for conceptualizing privation in Greek thought.

Cognates in Indo-European Languages

Sanskrit Equivalents

In , the equivalent of the Greek alpha privative is the prefix a- (before consonants) or an- (before vowels), derived from the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) privative *n̥- , the zero-grade form of the negation particle */né/ 'not'. This prefix functions to denote privation or , expressing the absence or lack of the quality indicated by the base word, much like its Greek counterpart. The prefix appears in Vedic Sanskrit as early as the (ca. 1500 BCE), where it forms compounds such as a-mṛta- 'immortal' (from mṛta- 'dead' or 'mortal'), referring to the of or divine beings exempt from death. Another example is a-vidyā- '' or 'lack of ' (from vidyā- ''), a term that later gained philosophical significance in Vedantic texts to denote spiritual delusion. These Vedic usages demonstrate the prefix's role in creating antonymic compounds, often integrated as an upasarga (verbal prefix) or nominal prefix in ritual and cosmological contexts. In classical Sanskrit, the prefix's morphology and application were systematized in Pāṇini's (ca. 4th century BCE), which describes a- and an- as inseparable prefixes (avyrddhi) that trigger rules, such as vowel alternation and euphonic insertion of n before vowels to avoid hiatus. Phonetically, this parallels Greek patterns, with the prefix maintaining a separate syllabic status (a- + stem → σ[stem]σ) and exhibiting aspiration influences in certain environments, as seen in compounds like a-jñāna- 'non-knowledge'. Semantically, while the Sanskrit a- primarily conveys privation akin to Greek a-, it can extend to imply reversal or opposition in some contexts, such as a-kṛta- 'undone' or 'reversed action' (from kṛta- 'done'), contrasting with the Greek's stricter focus on absence. This nuance arises from the prefix's integration into Sanskrit's broader system of upasargas, which often modify verbal actions beyond mere .

Latin and Italic Parallels

In Latin, the primary privative prefix equivalent to the Greek alpha privative is in-, which expresses or absence of a quality, derived from the Proto-Indo-European syllabic nasal *n̥-. This prefix undergoes assimilation based on the following : im- before labials (p, b, m), ir- before r, il- before l, and remains in- elsewhere, a pattern evident from (c. 700 BCE) onward and solidified in by the BCE. For instance, infans denotes "without speech" (from fari, "to speak"), while imberbis means "beardless" (from barba, ""), illustrating the prefix's role in forming adjectives of privation. The historical development of in- traces back to earlier forms like en-, seen in compounds, evolving into the standardized negative marker under Greek influence during the , though its core privative function predates such borrowings. Assimilation rules ensured euphony, as in ir-rationalis ("without reason," from ), preventing awkward consonant clusters. This prefix's use expanded in to denote not only physical absence but also or conceptual lack, such as inutilis ("useless"). In other , similar privative formations appear, particularly in Oscan and Umbrian, where an- serves as the negative prefix, reflecting a shared Indo-European heritage with Latin in-. Oscan inscriptions, such as the Tabula Bantina (2nd century BCE), feature ancensto ("not censused" or "unassessed") and amprufid ("unlawful" or "improper"), demonstrating an-'s privative shift in legal contexts. Umbrian texts, like the Iguvine Tables (c. 300–100 BCE), employ an- in ritual negations, as in antakres ("not touched" or "untouched"), highlighting variations in vowel assimilation before consonants. These parallels underscore a common Italic pattern of prefixal , distinct yet to Latin developments. Latin also directly adopted the Greek alpha privative in scientific and medical neologisms, particularly from the late onward, integrating forms like a- or an- without alteration to convey absence in technical terminology. For example, anaesthesia (from Greek an- "without" + aisthesis "sensation") entered Latin scientific vocabulary via Hellenistic influences, denoting "lack of sensation," and was used in medical texts by the Imperial period. Such borrowings enriched Latin's expressive capacity in and natural sciences, preserving the Greek privative's phonetic and semantic integrity.

Germanic Language Forms

The alpha privative's reflex in Proto-Germanic is the prefix *un-, derived from the Proto-Indo-European syllabic nasal *n̥-, which developed into a vocalic sequence through the insertion of /u/ between consonants in medial position. This evolution contrasts with the Greek retention of the initial vowel in forms like a- or an-, where the laryngeal *h₁ (if present) was lost without triggering a similar vocalization in Germanic. In Proto-Germanic, *un- functioned primarily as a privative or negative prefix attached to adjectives, nouns, and verbs to denote absence, , or opposition, though its productivity was more restricted than in , often limited to existing bases rather than freely generating new compounds. Historical attestations appear in early , notably Gothic, where un- is used in ' 4th-century translation to form privative adjectives such as unsibjis ("unlawful" or "without "), paralleling Greek constructions but adapted to Gothic syntax. In West Germanic, employs un- in terms like unriht ("unright" or ""), denoting moral or legal privation, as recorded in Anglo-Saxon texts. Phonetic shifts under indirectly influenced the prefix's integration, as the broader sound changes (e.g., loss of aspiration in stops and fricativization) affected surrounding elements in compounds, leading to forms like unreht without the aspirated quality retained in Greek equivalents. In North Germanic, the prefix evolved further to ó- or ú- through vowel rounding and nasal loss, as seen in Old Norse ófriðr ("unpeace" or "hostility"), illustrating persistent but less innovative use compared to the prolific compounding in Ancient Greek. While Gothic also featured the negation particle ni- (from PIE *ne-), derived separately as an adverbial form, it occasionally influenced privative semantics in translations but did not replace un- as the primary prefix. Overall, Germanic forms diverged by emphasizing reversal alongside privation, with reduced morphological flexibility relative to Greek.

Modern Linguistic Influence

In English Words

The alpha privative, the Greek prefix a- or an- meaning "without" or "not," has entered English primarily through loanwords from ancient Greek, often directly or via Latin intermediaries, retaining its function of negation in borrowed stems. Direct borrowings include anarchy, derived from Greek anarkhia ("lack of a leader"), combining an- (privative) with arkhos ("ruler"), first attested in English in the 1530s to denote absence of government. Similarly, atheism stems from Greek atheos ("without god"), formed by a- + theos ("god"), entering English in the 1580s via French to signify disbelief in deities. In these cases, English pronunciation has shifted, with the loss of ancient Greek's rough breathing (aspirated h sound) on following elements, resulting in smooth initials like /ˈæn.ər.ki/ for anarchy rather than a hissed onset. Many terms filtered through Latin, particularly in scientific and medical contexts, preserve the privative sense. For instance, anemia comes from Latinized Greek anaimia ("lack of blood"), via an- + haima ("blood"), adopted into English in 1824 from French to describe blood deficiency. Apathy, from Latin apathia and Greek apatheia ("freedom from suffering"), merges a- with pathos ("feeling" or "suffering"); introduced around 1600, it initially connoted stoic impassivity but evolved by the 18th century to mean emotional indifference or lack of interest. This semantic shift from literal privation to broader figurative uses is evident also in anonymous, from Greek anōnumos ("without name"), via an- + onoma ("name"), entering English circa 1600 to indicate unknown authorship and later extending to any unnamed or impersonal entity. While not highly productive in native English word formation, the alpha privative appears in technical neologisms, especially in 19th-century science. Anaerobic, coined in 1884 from French anaérobie by Louis Pasteur, combines an- ("without") + aēr ("air") + bios ("life") to describe organisms not requiring oxygen, contrasting with aerobic (with air). Such formations remain confined to specialized jargon, underscoring the prefix's role in English as a marker of Greek-derived negation rather than a freely generative element.

In Other Modern Languages

In Romance languages, the alpha privative persists primarily through loanwords borrowed from Latin and Greek, especially in scientific, philosophical, and technical domains. In French, the prefix appears as a- before consonants and an- before vowels, with occurring in the latter case to facilitate pronunciation, as seen in terms like anarchie (from Greek anarkhía, meaning absence of rule) and athéisme (from Greek átheos, meaning without god). Similarly, Spanish retains the structure in words such as anarquía and ateísmo, where the a- or an- directly echoes the Greek privative, often via Latin intermediaries like anarchia. This retention underscores the influence of classical languages on modern Romance vocabulary formation, particularly for abstract concepts. Beyond Romance languages, other Indo-European tongues incorporate the alpha privative through direct borrowings in specialized fields. In German, scientific and medical terminology frequently adopts the an- form, as in Anästhesie (anesthesia, from Greek an-aíthēsis, meaning without sensation), reflecting the prefix's role in neologisms derived from Greek roots. Russian, while relying on its native privative prefix bez- (meaning "without," as in bezvrednyj for harmless), indirectly reflects Greek influence via international loanwords that preserve the alpha privative, such as anarkhiya () and ateizm (). In non-Indo-European languages, the alpha privative appears mainly in transliterated borrowings for philosophical and political concepts. Japanese renders such terms as gairaigo (loanwords) in script, for example anārukī (アナーキー) for and ateizumu (アテイズム) for , maintaining the prefix's phonetic structure from Greek origins. In Arabic philosophical texts, Greek terms with the alpha privative are often transliterated, such as anārkīyah (أناركية) for , while the semantic equivalent is conveyed by prefixes like ghayr- (غير, meaning "not" or "without"). This cultural persistence extends to international terminology, where derivatives of "anarchy" appear in documents on and , translated across official languages to denote the absence of centralized authority.

Homonyms

The primary homonym of the in Greek is the letter "alpha" (ἄλφα), the first character of the Greek alphabet, which derives from the Phoenician letter (𐤀), meaning "," and bears no etymological connection to or privation despite the identical spelling in the term "alpha privative." The privative prefix itself, known in as ἄλφα στερητικόν (alpha stērētikón, "privative alpha"), employs the letter alpha (Α, α) to express absence or , but its origin traces to the Proto-Indo-European syllabic nasal *n̥-, the zero-grade form of the particle *ne, unrelated to the Semitic roots of the letter's name. Phonetically, both the letter name "alpha" and the privative prefix exhibit overlap in ancient Greek pronunciation, where the initial alpha carries a rough breathing (spiritus asper), rendering it as /ha/ in reconstructed Attic dialect—thus, the letter as approximately [ˈhal.pʰaː] and the prefix as [ha-] before consonants or [han-] before vowels—which can lead to ambiguity in Romanized transliterations lacking diacritics. This similarity arises from the shared use of the vowel sound /a/, but the full letter name includes additional syllables and aspiration distinct from the prefix's monosyllabic form. Historical instances of mix-up between the letter alpha and the privative prefix are uncommon in texts, where typically clarifies usage, but modern etymological references highlight the distinction, such as alpha's role as a numeral (representing 1 in the Greek ) versus its privative function in . In contemporary , resolution relies on orthographic markers like diacritics—ἄλφα for the letter versus ἀ- for the prefix—or syntactic to avoid , ensuring precise interpretation in philological .

Similar Prefixes in Greek

In Ancient Greek, the alpha privative (ἀ-/ἀν-) differs from other negation particles such as οὐ (ou/k), which serves as the primary negator in assertive indicative clauses to deny the truth of a statement, as in οὐκ ἔρχομαι ("I am not coming"). Unlike the alpha privative, which morphologically alters a base word to indicate absence or lack at the lexical level (e.g., ἄθεος, "godless," from θεός, "god"), οὐ operates at the clausal level without changing the core meaning of individual words. Similarly, μή (mē), used in non-assertive contexts like imperatives, subjunctives, and wishes (e.g., μή πορεύου, "Do not go"), conveys prohibition or potential negation, contrasting with alpha's fixed, derivational role in forming privative adjectives and nouns that express inherent deprivation rather than situational denial. Another related affix is ἀντί (anti-), which denotes opposition or reversal rather than mere absence, as in ἀντίθεσις (, "opposition") from τίθημι (tithēmi, "to place"). While alpha privative removes or negates a quality (e.g., ἄνομος, "lawless," without νόμος, "law"), anti- implies active counteraction or substitution, highlighting a semantic distinction between privation and antagonism in Greek word formation. Dialectal variants of the alpha privative include forms like ἁ- (ha-) before vowels in certain contexts, particularly in proper names such as Ἅιδης (Haides, from *a-widēs, "unseen"), where the (ἁ) reflects an initial *h- sound derived from the privative a- in Proto-Greek. The alpha privative often interacts with positive prefixes like εὐ- (eu-, "good" or "well") in compounds, creating contrasts that emphasize absence relative to an ideal state; for instance, εὐφωνία (euphōnia, "" or ) from φωνή (phōnē, "") pairs with ἀφωνία (aphōnia, "" or lack of ), illustrating how alpha negates the beneficial of eu- to denote deficiency. Such combinations underscore alpha's role in binary oppositions within the , where it systematically inverts positive attributes without altering the root's etymological structure. In later stages of Greek, including the Byzantine period, the alpha privative retained its core function of indicating privation, though its productivity waned in favor of periphrastic negations influenced by evolving ; however, it persisted in theological and philosophical texts to express absence in abstract concepts, such as in discussions of divine attributes via .

References

  1. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/greeklatinroots2/chapter/%C2%A7131-an-approach-to-greek-prefixes/
  2. https://classics-at.chs.harvard.edu/volume/classics15-a-concise-inventory-of-greek-etymology/
  3. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0007:smythp=885
  4. http://www.antiquitatem.com/en/alpha-privative-greek-etimologies/
  5. https://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3756
  6. http://people.umass.edu/glawall/LinB.pdf
  7. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/context/grs_honproj/article/1002/viewcontent/Leonard_1960.pdf
  8. https://dcc.dickinson.edu/grammar/age/breathing-marks
  9. https://www.academia.edu/116683773/Negation_and_Nonveridicality_in_the_History_of_Greek
  10. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/A_Greek_grammar_for_schools_and_colleges_%28IA_greekgrammarfor00smyt%29.pdf
  11. https://ia801300.us.archive.org/29/items/cu31924031214822/cu31924031214822.pdf
  12. http://gengo.l.u-tokyo.ac.jp/masatok/hpiac_2004.pdf
  13. https://brill.com/view/journals/ieul/1/1/article-p3_2.xml
  14. https://sanskritdictionary.com/?q=upasarga
  15. https://web.stanford.edu/~kiparsky/Papers/hyderabad.pdf
  16. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joll-2021-2020/html
  17. https://www.persee.fr/doc/igram_0222-9838_1989_num_43_1_1971
  18. https://archive.org/download/grammarofoscanum00buckuoft/grammarofoscanum00buckuoft.pdf
  19. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/schironi/wp-content/uploads/sites/259/2015/06/03_Schironi-F._scientific-vocabulary.pdf
  20. https://lrc.la.utexas.edu/books/pgmc/2-phonology
  21. https://lrc.la.utexas.edu/books/pgmc/4-derivation
  22. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/m/mec/med-idx?type=id&id=MED49581
  23. https://www.etymonline.com/word/a-
  24. https://www.etymonline.com/word/anarchy
  25. https://www.etymonline.com/word/atheism
  26. https://www.etymonline.com/word/anemia
  27. https://www.etymonline.com/word/apathy
  28. https://www.etymonline.com/word/anonymous
  29. https://www.etymonline.com/word/anaerobic
  30. https://www.lawlessfrench.com/vocabulary/prefix-a/
  31. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-458
  32. https://journals.viamedica.pl/medical_research_journal/article/viewFile/36871/26411
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-theory/article/discourse-of-anarchy-in-ir/F857A10D40894991CB2CC707A6B81932
  34. https://www.etymonline.com/word/A
  35. https://web.mit.edu/jmorzins/www/greek-alphabet.html
  36. https://www.academia.edu/41222741/Negation_in_Ancient_Greek_a_Typological_Approach
  37. https://kosmossociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Introducing_the_Ancient_Greek_Alphabet_Joel_Christensen.pdf
  38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/294520
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.