Hubbry Logo
ProanthocyanidinProanthocyanidinMain
Open search
Proanthocyanidin
Community hub
Proanthocyanidin
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Proanthocyanidin
Proanthocyanidin
Proanthocyanidin
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Proanthocyanidins are a class of polyphenols found in many plants, such as cranberry, blueberry, and grape seeds. Chemically, they are oligomeric flavonoids. Many are oligomers of catechin and epicatechin and their gallic acid esters. More complex polyphenols, having the same polymeric building block, form the group of condensed tannins.

Proanthocyanidins were discovered in 1947 by Jacques Masquelier, who developed and patented techniques for the extraction of oligomeric proanthocyanidins from pine bark and grape seeds.[1] Proanthocyanidins are under preliminary research for the potential to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) by consuming cranberries, grape seeds or red wine.[2][3]

Distribution in plants

[edit]

Proanthocyanidins, including the lesser bioactive and bioavailable polymers (four or more catechins), represent a group of condensed flavan-3-ols, such as procyanidins, prodelphinidins and propelargonidins. They can be found in many plants, most notably apples, maritime pine bark and that of most other pine species, cinnamon,[4] aronia fruit, cocoa beans, grape seed, grape skin (procyanidins and prodelphinidins),[5] and red wines of Vitis vinifera (the European wine grape). However, bilberry, cranberry, black currant, green tea, black tea, and other plants also contain these flavonoids. Cocoa beans contain the highest concentrations.[6] Proanthocyanidins also may be isolated from Quercus petraea and Q. robur heartwood (wine barrel oaks).[7] Açaí oil, obtained from the fruit of the açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea), is rich in numerous procyanidin oligomers.[8]

Apples contain on average per serving about eight times the amount of proanthocyanidin found in wine, with some of the highest amounts found in the Red Delicious and Granny Smith varieties.[9]

An extract of maritime pine bark called Pycnogenol bears 65–75 percent proanthocyanidins (procyanidins).[10] Thus a 100 mg serving would contain 65 to 75 mg of proanthocyanidins (procyanidins).

Proanthocyanidin glycosides can be isolated from cocoa liquor.[11]

The seed testas of field beans (Vicia faba) contain proanthocyanidins[12] that affect the digestibility in piglets[13] and could have an inhibitory activity on enzymes.[14] Cistus salviifolius also contains oligomeric proanthocyanidins.[15]

Dietary source[16] Proanthocyanidin

(mg/100g)

Fruits
Grape seeds 3532
Blueberries 332
Apples 70–141
Pears 32–42
Nuts
Hazelnuts 501
Other
Cinnamon bark 8108
Sorghum grains 3965
Baking chocolate 1636
Red wine 313

Analysis

[edit]

Condensed tannins may be characterised by a number of techniques including depolymerisation, asymmetric flow field flow fractionation or small-angle X-ray scattering.

DMACA is a dye that is particularly useful for localization of proanthocyanidin compounds in plant histology. The use of the reagent results in blue staining.[17] It can also be used to titrate proanthocyanidins.

Proanthocyanidins from field beans (Vicia faba)[18] or barley[19] have been estimated using the vanillin-HCl method, resulting in a red color of the test in the presence of catechins or proanthocyanidins.

Proanthocyanidins can be titrated using the Procyanidolic Index (also called the Bates-Smith Assay). It is a testing method that measures the change in color when the product is mixed with certain chemicals. The greater the color changes, the higher the PCOs content is. However, the Procyanidolic Index is a relative value that can measure well over 100. Unfortunately, a Procyanidolic Index of 95 was erroneously taken to mean 95% PCO by some and began appearing on the labels of finished products. All current methods of analysis suggest that the actual PCO content of these products is much lower than 95%.[20][unreliable medical source?]

Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analysis allows separation of monomers from larger proanthocyanidin molecules.[21]

Monomers of proanthocyanidins can be characterized by analysis with HPLC and mass spectrometry.[22] Condensed tannins can undergo acid-catalyzed cleavage in the presence of a nucleophile like phloroglucinol (reaction called phloroglucinolysis), thioglycolic acid (thioglycolysis), benzyl mercaptan or cysteamine (processes called thiolysis[23]) leading to the formation of oligomers that can be further analyzed.[24]

Tandem mass spectrometry can be used to sequence proanthocyanidins.[25]

Oligomeric proanthocyanidins

[edit]

Oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC) strictly refer to dimer and trimer polymerizations of catechins. OPCs are found in most plants and thus are common in the human diet. Especially the skin, seeds, and seed coats of purple or red pigmented plants contain large amounts of OPCs.[6] They are dense in grape seeds and skin, and therefore in red wine and grape seed extract, cocoa, nuts and all Prunus fruits (most concentrated in the skin), and in the bark of Cinnamomum (cinnamon)[4] and Pinus pinaster (pine bark; formerly known as Pinus maritima), along with many other pine species. OPCs also can be found in blueberries, cranberries (notably procyanidin A2),[26] aronia,[27] hawthorn, rosehip, and sea buckthorn.[28]

Oligomeric proanthocyanidins can be extracted via Vaccinium pahalae from in vitro cell culture.[29] The US Department of Agriculture maintains a database of botanical and food sources of proanthocyanidins.[6]

Plant defense

[edit]

In nature, proanthocyanidins serve among other chemical and induced defense mechanisms against plant pathogens and predators, such as occurs in strawberries.[30]

Bioavailability

[edit]

Proanthocyanidin has low bioavailability, with 90% remaining unabsorbed from the intestines until metabolized by gut flora to the more bioavailable metabolites.[16]

Non-oxidative chemical depolymerisation

[edit]

Condensed tannins can undergo acid-catalyzed cleavage in the presence of (or an excess of) a nucleophile[31] like phloroglucinol (reaction called phloroglucinolysis), benzyl mercaptan (reaction called thiolysis), thioglycolic acid (reaction called thioglycolysis) or cysteamine. Flavan-3-ol compounds used with methanol produce short-chain procyanidin dimers, trimers, or tetramers which are more absorbable.[32]

These techniques are generally called depolymerisation and give information such as average degree of polymerisation or percentage of galloylation. These are SN1 reactions, a type of substitution reaction in organic chemistry, involving a carbocation intermediate under strongly acidic conditions in polar protic solvents like methanol. The reaction leads to the formation of free and derived monomers that can be further analyzed or used to enhance procyanidin absorption and bioavailability.[32] The free monomers correspond to the terminal units of the condensed tannins chains.

In general, reactions are made in methanol, especially thiolysis, as benzyl mercaptan has a low solubility in water. They involve a moderate (50 to 90 °C) heating for a few minutes. Epimerisation may happen.

Phloroglucinolysis can be used for instance for proanthocyanidins characterisation in wine or in grape seeds and skin.[33]

Thioglycolysis can be used to study proanthocyanidins[34] or the oxidation of condensed tannins.[35] It is also used for lignin quantitation.[36] Reaction on condensed tannins from Douglas fir bark produces epicatechin and catechin thioglycolates.[37]

Condensed tannins from Lithocarpus glaber leaves have been analysed through acid-catalyzed degradation in the presence of cysteamine.[38]

Research

[edit]

Urinary tract infections

[edit]

Cranberries have A2-type proanthocyanidins (PACs) which may be important for the ability of PACs to bind to proteins, such as the adhesins present on E. coli fimbriae and were thought to inhibit bacterial infections, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs).[39] Clinical trials have produced mixed results when asking the question to confirm that PACs, particularly from cranberries, were an alternative to antibiotic prophylaxis for UTIs: 1) a 2014 scientific opinion by the European Food Safety Authority rejected physiological evidence that cranberry PACs have a role in inhibiting bacterial pathogens involved in UTIs;[2] 2) an updated 2023 Cochrane Collaboration review supported the use of cranberry products for the prevention of UTIs for certain groups.[3]

A 2017 systematic review concluded that cranberry products significantly reduced the incidence of UTIs, indicating that cranberry products may be effective particularly for individuals with recurrent infections.[40] In 2019, the American Urological Association released guidelines stating that a moderate level of evidence supports the use of cranberry products containing PACs for possible prevention from recurrent UTIs.[41]

Wine consumption

[edit]

Proanthocyanidins are the principal polyphenols in red wine that are under research to assess risk of coronary heart disease and lower overall mortality.[42] With tannins, they also influence the aroma, flavor, mouth-feel and astringency of red wines.[43][44]

In red wines, total OPC content, including flavan-3-ols (catechins), was substantially higher (177  mg/L) than that in white wines (9  mg/L).[45]

Other

[edit]

Proanthocyanidins found in the proprietary extract of maritime pine bark called Pycnogenol were not found (in 2012) to be effective as a treatment for any disease:

"Current evidence is insufficient to support Pycnogenol(®) use for the treatment of any chronic disorder. Well-designed, adequately powered trials are needed to establish the value of this treatment."[46]

Sources

[edit]

Proanthocyanidins are present in fresh grapes, juice, red wine, and other darkly pigmented fruits such as cranberry, blackcurrant, elderberry, and aronia.[47] Although red wine may contain more proanthocyanidins by mass per unit of volume than does red grape juice, red grape juice contains more proanthocyanidins per average serving size. An eight US fluid ounces (240 ml) serving of grape juice averages 124 milligrams proanthocyanidins, whereas a five US fluid ounces (150 ml) serving of red wine averages 91 milligrams (i.e., 145.6 milligrams per 8 fl. oz. or 240 mL).[6] Many other foods and beverages may also contain proanthocyanidins, but few attain the levels found in red grape seeds and skins,[6] with a notable exception being aronia, which has the highest recorded level of proanthocyanidins among fruits assessed to date (664 milligrams per 100 g).[47]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Proanthocyanidin

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Proanthocyanidins, also known as condensed , are a class of polyphenolic composed of oligomers and polymers formed by the linkage of monomers such as (+)- and (−)-epicatechin. These compounds are characterized by their carbon-carbon interflavan bonds, primarily B-type (C4→C8 or C4→C6), though A-type variants feature additional linkages (C2→O→C7 or C2→O→C5) that enhance stability and bioactivity. Their varies from dimers (, DP=2) to high-molecular-weight polymers (DP >10), influencing solubility, absorption, and physiological effects. Proanthocyanidins are widely distributed in the plant kingdom, serving roles in defense against herbivores and pathogens while contributing to the sensory qualities of foods like astringency in fruits and bitterness in beverages. Rich sources include grape seeds and skins, , apples, berries (such as blueberries and strawberries), cocoa beans, and nuts like and almonds. For instance, grape seeds contain high concentrations of galloylated oligomers, while are notable for A-type proanthocyanidins that inhibit bacterial adhesion. Processing methods, such as heating or high-pressure treatment, can alter their content and in foods. These compounds exhibit potent activity due to their polyhydroxy structure, scavenging free radicals and modulating pathways like Nrf2. Health benefits linked to dietary intake include cardiovascular protection by reducing LDL oxidation and , anti-inflammatory effects via inhibition of and production, and antidiabetic actions through α-glucosidase inhibition and improved glucose . Additionally, proanthocyanidins show promise in preventing urinary tract infections, supporting skin health by promoting synthesis, and exerting anticancer properties through induction in tumor cells. Their low in the upper gut leads to colonic by , yielding bioactive metabolites that further contribute to systemic effects.

Chemical Properties

Structure and Composition

Proanthocyanidins are a class of polyphenols classified as oligomers and polymers of units, derived from the in . These compounds, also known as condensed tannins, consist of multiple monomers linked together, forming complex that contribute to their biological and sensory properties. The primary monomeric units of proanthocyanidins are (+)-catechin and (-)-epicatechin, both flavan-3-ols with a core structure featuring two aromatic rings (A and B) connected by a heterocyclic pyran ring (C). These monomers possess chiral centers at C2, C3, and C4, which determine their stereochemistry and influence the overall configuration of the polymer. Specifically, (+)-catechin exhibits 2,3-trans stereochemistry, while (-)-epicatechin has 2,3-cis stereochemistry, with the C4 position serving as the linkage site in polymerization. Other monomers, such as (epi)gallocatechin, may occur in certain proanthocyanidins like prodelphinidins, but procyanidins primarily derive from catechin and epicatechin units. Proanthocyanidins are connected via interflavanoid bonds, predominantly B-type linkages formed by single carbon-carbon bonds between the C4 of one and the C8 or C6 of another (4→8 or 4→6). A-type linkages, found in some , include an additional bond (2→O→7 or 2→O→5), resulting in a more branched and rigid structure. These linkage patterns, combined with the of the s, dictate the flexibility and of the resulting oligomers and polymers. The (DP) classifies proanthocyanidins as monomers (DP=1), oligomers (DP=2–10), or polymers (DP>10), with the average DP significantly affecting their physicochemical properties. Higher DP values generally lead to decreased and increased astringency due to enhanced interactions with proteins. The general molecular for procyanidins, composed of /epicatechin units, is represented as (C15H14O6)n, where n corresponds to the number of monomers; for example, the B-type dimer B1 has the C30H26O12. Physically, proanthocyanidins exhibit good solubility in polar solvents such as and , particularly in their oligomeric forms, which facilitates their extraction from plant materials. Their bitterness and astringency arise from the ability of these polyphenols to bind salivary and other proteins through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, causing a puckering sensation in the . This protein-binding affinity intensifies with increasing DP, making higher polymers more .

Classification and Types

Proanthocyanidins are classified primarily according to the types of monomers that constitute their polymeric structures, which can form either homopolymers from a single type or heteropolymers from mixed monomers. Procyanidins, the most prevalent type, consist of (+)- and/or (−)-epicatechin units linked together. Prodelphinidins are composed of gallocatechin and/or epigallocatechin monomers, while propelargonidins derive from afzelechin and/or epiafzelechin units. These polymers are further categorized by their interflavan linkages, which determine their structural subtypes. B-type proanthocyanidins feature single carbon-carbon (C-C) bonds, typically at positions 4→8 or 4→6, forming linear chains and being abundant in grapes. A-type proanthocyanidins include an additional (C-O-C) linkage at position 2→7 alongside a C-C bond, resulting in more branched structures commonly found in cranberries. C-type proanthocyanidins are rarer and characterized by two C-C bonds between units, often observed in trimers. Proanthocyanidins can also be distinguished as galloylated or non-galloylated based on whether their monomers are esterified with . Non-galloylated forms rely solely on the core, whereas galloylated variants, such as those incorporating epicatechin gallate, feature galloyl groups attached to the hydroxyl at the 3-position, enhancing their polarity and potential reactivity. The structural classification influences key properties of proanthocyanidins. A-type linkages contribute to greater bioactivity in anti-adhesion effects, as seen in extracts that inhibit bacterial attachment to urinary tract cells. In contrast, B-type proanthocyanidins predominate in contributing to astringency in wines, where their interaction with salivary proteins imparts the characteristic . The modern classification of proanthocyanidins evolved from early work on their oligomeric forms, notably following Jacques Masquelier's 1947 discovery and patenting of extraction methods for oligomeric proanthocyanidin complexes (OPCs) from grape seeds and pine bark, which emphasized their nature and .

Biosynthesis and Occurrence

Biosynthetic Pathways

Proanthocyanidins (PAs) originate from the phenylpropanoid pathway in plants, beginning with the , which is converted to p-coumaroyl-CoA through the action of (PAL), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), and 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL). This intermediate then enters the branch via chalcone synthase (CHS), which catalyzes the formation of s in combination with (CHI), leading to flavan-3,4-diols known as leucoanthocyanidins. The pathway diverges from biosynthesis at this stage, with leucoanthocyanidins serving as direct precursors for PA monomers. Key enzymes in the committed steps include dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), which reduces dihydroflavonols to leucoanthocyanidins, leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR), which converts leucoanthocyanidins to , and anthocyanidin reductase (ANR), which reduces to epicatechin. These flavan-3-ols ( and epicatechin) act as the primary building blocks for PA polymers, with DFR playing a pivotal role in directing flux toward the PA branch rather than or anthocyanins. of these monomers occurs primarily through non-enzymatic condensation, involving electrophilic attack at the C4 position of an extension unit on the C8 or C6 of a starter unit, though some evidence suggests enzyme-assisted mechanisms involving polyphenol oxidases or laccases in specific contexts. Biosynthesis is tightly regulated by transcription factors, such as the MYB factor TT2, the bHLH factor TT8, and the protein TTG1, which form a ternary complex in that activates genes like BAN (encoding ANR) specifically in endothelium. Environmental triggers, including (UV) radiation and mechanical wounding, induce PA accumulation by upregulating pathway genes through stress-responsive MYB factors like MYB134 in poplar. Genetic variations, such as the ban (banyuls) mutation in , which disrupts ANR function, result in PA deficiency and pale coats, highlighting the enzyme's essential role. Evolutionarily, the PA pathway derived from the branch in early vascular plants approximately 350 million years ago, enabling adaptation to terrestrial stresses through specialized polymers.

Natural Distribution

Proanthocyanidins are widely distributed across angiosperm , serving as secondary metabolites in various tissues to aid in defense and . They are particularly ubiquitous in fruits, , bark, and skins, with notable accumulation in such as , apples, cocoa, and . In (Vitis vinifera), for instance, approximately 60-70% of grape polyphenols are concentrated in the , contributing to protection against and microbial invasion during seed development. This distribution pattern extends to other angiosperms, where proanthocyanidins are less prevalent in vegetative tissues like leaves compared to reproductive structures. Quantitative assessments reveal significant variations in proanthocyanidin concentrations among plant sources, often highest in spices and (as per USDA Database Release 2.0, 2015). Ground () exhibits one of the highest levels, with polymers at approximately 2,509 mg/100 g of edible portion and total proanthocyanidins at approximately 8,084 mg/100 g, primarily as polymers, while cocoa powder () contains around 4,252 mg/100 g total proanthocyanidins, encompassing monomers through oligomers. Apples (Malus domestica) show moderate content ranging from 70 to 141 mg/100 g across cultivars, predominantly in the skin and flesh, whereas vegetables like and carrots typically register negligible amounts below 10 mg/100 g. These values are compiled in databases such as the USDA Database for the Proanthocyanidin Content of Selected Foods (Release 2.0, 2015), which catalogs data for over 280 food items based on analytical measurements. Tissue-specific localization underscores proanthocyanidins' ecological roles: in seeds, they form protective barriers against herbivory and pathogens to ensure , as seen in seeds and seeds; in bark and skins, they deter browsing and , exemplified by high polymer content in bark. Environmental factors and further modulate concentrations; for example, red cultivars generally exhibit higher proanthocyanidin levels (up to 6.4 mg/g fresh weight) than white varieties due to enhanced pathways influenced by sunlight exposure and soil nutrients. Climatic conditions, such as warmer temperatures and nutrient-rich soils, can increase content by 20-50% in fruits like , linking distribution to biosynthetic responses in stressed environments. While microbial production of proanthocyanidins occurs rarely in , sources remain the primary .

Extraction and Analysis

Extraction Techniques

Proanthocyanidins are commonly isolated from matrices through extraction, where ethanol-water mixtures prove effective owing to the compounds' polarity and . A 70:30 (v/v) ethanol-to-water ratio is often optimal, as demonstrated in extractions from grape seeds and other sources, achieving high yields when conducted at moderate temperatures (e.g., 60–75°C) for 30–60 minutes, followed by to separate the crude extract from insoluble debris. This method typically recovers 5–11% of proanthocyanidins by weight from grape seeds, depending on the solvent-to-solid ratio (e.g., 1:20 w/v). Advanced extraction techniques enhance efficiency and purity beyond conventional solvents. Ultrasound-assisted extraction disrupts cell walls, increasing yields by 20–30% over traditional methods; for instance, 60% at 35°C for 15 minutes from skins yields up to 9.07% proanthocyanidins. Microwave-assisted extraction further accelerates the process, reducing time to under 20 minutes while achieving 81.56 mg/g from camphora leaves using 77% at 530 W. Supercritical CO2 extraction, frequently combined with as a co-solvent, offers superior purity by selectively extracting non-polar impurities like oils (>95% removal from grape seeds), resulting in cleaner proanthocyanidin fractions suitable for pharmaceutical applications. Recent advances (as of 2025) emphasize green and sustainable methods to reduce solvent use and environmental impact. Natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES), such as – mixtures, have shown promise; for example, an 80% NADES solution at 80°C for 40 minutes extracted 5.26% proanthocyanidins from seed shells. -assisted extractions, often combined with , improve yields by degrading cell walls; ultrasonic- synergistic extraction from grape seeds achieved optimized proanthocyanidin content under conditions like enzyme dosage of 2-3% at 50°C for 60 minutes. These approaches align with growing industrial demands for eco-friendly processing. Purification of crude extracts involves techniques to isolate proanthocyanidins from co-extracted phenolics and impurities. using LH-20 resin is widely adopted, where the extract is loaded in and eluted with acetone- gradients (e.g., % acetone), separating fractions by degree with recovery rates exceeding 80% for -derived proanthocyanidins. Extraction faces challenges due to proanthocyanidins' sensitivity to oxidation under heat, light, or alkaline conditions, which can degrade up to 20–% of the yield; incorporating antioxidants like ascorbic acid (0.1–0.5%) mitigates this, preserving bioactivity. Yields are source-dependent, ranging from 3.39% in optimized microwave extractions from seeds to 65–75% procyanidins in standardized bark extracts like Pycnogenol. Industrially, seed achieves extract yields of up to 11% via extraction, with final products standardized to 95% oligomeric proanthocyanidins for commercial use in supplements.

Detection and Quantification

Proanthocyanidins are typically detected and quantified after extraction from materials, where various analytical techniques assess their presence, concentration, (DP), and structural features such as interflavan linkages. Spectrophotometric methods provide rapid, cost-effective screening for total proanthocyanidin content, while chromatographic and spectroscopic approaches offer higher specificity for individual oligomers and polymers. Spectrophotometric assays are among the most accessible for initial quantification. The vanillin-HCl assay reacts proanthocyanidins with vanillin under acidic conditions to form a colored complex, measured by absorbance at 500 nm, and is particularly sensitive to flavan-3-ol units in oligomers and polymers. This method uses catechin or procyanidin standards for calibration and is widely applied to crude extracts, though it can overestimate content due to interference from monomeric flavanols or other phenolics, with discrepancies up to 20% compared to depolymerization-based techniques. The DMACA (p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde) assay, performed in acidic media, produces a blue-green chromophore with an absorbance maximum around 640 nm, enabling quantification of total proanthocyanidins in extracts and histological staining for localization in plant tissues. Chromatographic methods separate and quantify proanthocyanidins based on their oligomeric size and composition. (HPLC) coupled with UV or diode-array detection (DAD) at 280 nm resolves monomers to tetramers using gradient elution with acidic aqueous-organic mobile phases, allowing identification via retention times and spectral profiles relative to standards like procyanidin B2. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS) extends this to higher DP (up to 10-15) and distinguishes linkage types (e.g., B-type C4β→C8 vs. A-type C4β→C8 with additional ether bonds) through (ESI) in negative mode, where fragment ions reveal subunit sequences and galloylation. Advanced spectroscopic techniques provide detailed structural elucidation. ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) determines molecular weight distributions and average DP by analyzing multiply charged ions from polymers, often integrated with UHPLC for comprehensive profiling. ¹³C-NMR spectroscopy identifies linkage types, with characteristic chemical shifts (e.g., 100-110 ppm for C2/C3 in A-type vs. broader signals in B-type) distinguishing interflavan bonds in purified fractions. To address limitations of direct methods, techniques like thiolysis and phloroglucinolysis cleave proanthocyanidin polymers under acidic conditions, releasing quantifiable monomers or adducts via post-reaction HPLC. Thiolysis with benzyl mercaptan yields thiomethylated derivatives for subunit analysis, while phloroglucinolysis produces adducts, preferred for its milder conditions and accuracy in estimating mean DP (mDP) up to 20-30. These methods use B2 as a reference standard for validation and correct for overestimation in spectrophotometric assays by providing true polymer content. Recent advances include matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), which offers improved resolution for high-DP proanthocyanidins (>20) through soft ionization and post-2020 enhancements in matrix selection and data processing for better polydispersity analysis in complex extracts. Overall, method selection depends on , with hybrid approaches combining UHPLC-MS and ensuring robust quantification.

Biological Roles

Plant Defense Mechanisms

Proanthocyanidins serve as key polyphenolic compounds in defense, contributing to resistance against biotic threats such as herbivores and pathogens, as well as abiotic stresses like (UV) radiation. Their protective functions stem from the polymers' ability to bind proteins, disrupt microbial processes, and neutralize (ROS), often accumulating in vulnerable tissues such as leaves, stems, and seed coats. These mechanisms are particularly evident in species like grapes, poplars, and , where proanthocyanidin is upregulated in response to environmental cues, enhancing overall resilience. In anti-herbivory defense, proanthocyanidins confer astringency that deters feeding by binding to salivary proteins in mammals and gut proteins in , thereby reducing digestibility and causing digestive discomfort. This protein-binding affinity forms insoluble complexes that lower the of tissues, as observed in persimmons and beans where high proanthocyanidin content correlates with reduced consumption. In poplars, proanthocyanidin levels increase by 10-20% following gypsy feeding, further illustrating their inducible role in deterring damage. Proanthocyanidins also exhibit properties by inhibiting bacterial adhesion to plant cell walls and inducing in pathogens through ROS generation and membrane disruption. For instance, grape seed extracts reduce growth by preventing adhesion, while peanut skin proanthocyanidins disrupt membranes. In grapes, proanthocyanidin levels increased by up to 36% with BTH treatment, reducing the incidence and severity of gray mold. These effects create a physical and chemical barrier, particularly in stems and leaves, enhancing resistance to bacterial and fungal invaders. For UV protection, proanthocyanidins accumulate in the plant epidermis, where their antioxidant capacity scavenges UV-induced ROS, mitigating oxidative damage to cellular components. In species like Cistus clusii and poplars, exposure to high sunlight elevates proanthocyanidin synthesis, with older plants showing pronounced accumulation that correlates with reduced photodamage. This ROS-neutralizing activity is crucial under intense UV-B , helping maintain and tissue integrity. In seed coats, proanthocyanidins promote and deter predators by forming impermeable barriers that prevent premature and bind proteins in potential seed-eating . In , they maintain high levels to inhibit , while PA-rich coats confer impermeability to water and exhibit astringency that discourages predation. This dual role ensures seed viability under adverse conditions, as seen in grape seeds where proanthocyanidins constitute a significant portion of the protective layer. Supporting evidence from genetic studies highlights proanthocyanidins' defensive efficacy: PA-deficient mutants, such as myb115 in poplar, display heightened susceptibility to fungal pathogens like Melampsora larici-populina due to impaired . Similarly, transparent testa mutants lacking proanthocyanidins in seed coats show reduced and increased vulnerability to and fungi. Across , proanthocyanidin concentrations positively correlate with stress exposure levels, reinforcing their role in adaptive defense responses.

Interactions with Organisms

Proanthocyanidins play a key role in mutualistic interactions between and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, facilitating by localizing in nodules where they support processes. In species such as , genetic modifications to proanthocyanidin pathways alter nodule function, indicating their involvement in maintaining symbiotic efficiency. These compounds also modulate rhizobial signaling, acting as part of the network that regulates bacterial responses during and nodule development. Additionally, proanthocyanidins deter non-compatible microbes, enhancing the specificity of the legume-rhizobia partnership by inhibiting unwanted bacterial colonization in the . In interactions with animals, proanthocyanidins serve as deterrents by reducing the digestibility of forage and seeds, thereby limiting herbivory. In high-proanthocyanidin forages like Acacia cyanophylla and Sesbania species, these compounds form insoluble complexes with proteins and polysaccharides, decreasing fiber and protein breakdown in ruminants and leading to negative digestion coefficients for lignin and nitrogen fractions. For instance, birds such as sparrows avoid sorghum seeds with elevated proanthocyanidin levels (>5% in seed coats), as the compounds bind digestive enzymes and induce astringency, reducing palatability; mutations lowering proanthocyanidin content increase bird predation. This dynamic exemplifies an evolutionary arms race, where proanthocyanidins evolve as antiherbivore defenses in response to herbivore adaptations, driving diversification in plant secondary metabolites across species like those in the Fabaceae family. Proanthocyanidins influence and by modulating fruit palatability through temporal changes in astringency. In unripe fruits, such as those of (), high proanthocyanidin accumulation causes intense astringency via saliva protein precipitation, deterring premature consumption by animals and protecting developing . As fruits mature, proanthocyanidin levels decline or polymerize into insoluble forms—through mechanisms like the "dilution effect" from fruit expansion and "" by —reducing astringency and enhancing attractiveness to dispersers, thereby promoting . Similar patterns occur in grapes and berries, where early astringency safeguards against feeding while signals edibility. In the environment, proanthocyanidins undergo degradation by soil microbes, influencing nutrient cycling. Under anoxic conditions in wetland soils, such as Kosakonia (Proteobacteria) initiate of proanthocyanidins into oligomers and monomers like epicatechin via enzymes including and reductases, followed by further breakdown by Holophaga (Acidobacteria) using hydrolases. However, these compounds also inhibit by suppressing soil microbial enzymes; mixed proanthocyanidins from angiosperm litter reduce activity by up to 50% more than types and activity twofold over hydrolases, forming recalcitrant tannin-protein complexes that slow carbon and mineralization. Emerging research post-2020 highlights proanthocyanidins' role in modulating plant root , extending beyond traditional . As part of the class, proanthocyanidins recruit beneficial microbes under stress while suppressing pathogens in the , as seen in systems where they shape microbial community composition and enhance resilience to environmental pressures. Studies on flavonoid-mediated interactions, including condensed , demonstrate their influence on dynamic microbiome assembly, promoting nitrogen-fixing consortia and altering root exudation patterns in crops like soybeans.

Health Implications

Bioavailability and Metabolism

Proanthocyanidins demonstrate low oral in humans and animals, with absorption rates typically below 5% for low-molecular-weight oligomers (, DP, up to 4) and essentially none for higher polymers (DP > 4), which remain largely unabsorbed and reach the colon intact. Monomeric units, such as flavan-3-ols like and epicatechin derived from proanthocyanidin , are absorbed primarily in the through paracellular transport or active mechanisms, achieving higher bioavailability around 30% on average. In contrast, oligomeric and polymeric forms are poorly absorbed due to their larger size and hydrophobicity, limiting systemic exposure to intact proanthocyanidins. Following absorption, proanthocyanidins and their monomeric precursors undergo phase II in the liver and enterocytes, primarily through and sulfation to form conjugated metabolites that enhance for . Unabsorbed proanthocyanidins in the colon are extensively metabolized by , which cleave interflavan bonds and ring structures to produce low-molecular-weight phenolic acids, such as 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and 5-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-γ-valerolactone, via pathways involving intermediates and further degradation. These microbial metabolites, rather than intact proanthocyanidins, represent the primary circulating forms and contribute to biological effects. Pharmacokinetically, plasma concentrations of these metabolites peak at 2-4 hours post-ingestion, with urinary accounting for a significant portion (up to 30-50% of dose as conjugates) and fecal elimination dominating for unabsorbed polymers (over 70%). Several factors modulate proanthocyanidin bioavailability and , including the food matrix—such as co-consumption with milk proteins, which can enhance absorption of oligomers by improving —and individual composition, where diverse flora increase production of bioactive phenolic metabolites. Differences between A-type and B-type proanthocyanidins also influence handling; A-type linkages (with additional ether bonds) result in more compact structures that facilitate better small intestinal absorption of dimers compared to B-type (5-10% relative to monomers in models), and A-type forms exhibit superior inhibition of bacterial in the gut, potentially altering . Recent studies underscore the microbiome's pivotal role, showing that proanthocyanidin is highly dependent on microbial diversity, analogous to how ellagitannins yield urolithins, with enriched taxa like Akkermansia spp. promoting conversion to phenolic derivatives.

Clinical Research Findings

Clinical research on proanthocyanidins (PACs) has primarily focused on their potential in preventing urinary tract infections (UTIs), with evidence centered on A-type PACs from cranberries. These compounds inhibit the adhesion of P-fimbriated Escherichia coli to uroepithelial cells, reducing bacterial colonization in the urinary tract. A 2023 Cochrane systematic review of 50 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 8,857 participants provided moderate-certainty evidence that cranberry products reduced the risk of symptomatic, culture-verified UTIs in women with recurrent infections by 26% (risk ratio [RR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.99), with an effective dose around 36 mg of PACs per day. This benefit was also observed in children and individuals susceptible to UTIs due to interventions like bladder catheterization, though evidence was of low certainty for other groups such as elderly or pregnant women. In cardiovascular health, B-type PACs from sources like red wine and grape seeds have shown modest protective effects through antioxidant mechanisms that reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and enhance endothelial function. A 2021 meta-analysis of 16 RCTs demonstrated that PAC supplementation significantly lowered systolic blood pressure by 4.6 mmHg (weighted mean difference [WMD] -4.598 mmHg, 95% CI -8.037 to -1.159) in hypertensive individuals, with no significant effect on diastolic pressure. Post-2020 meta-analyses further confirmed improvements in vascular health markers, including reduced arterial stiffness and better flow-mediated dilation, particularly in populations with metabolic syndrome. These effects are attributed to PACs' ability to modulate nitric oxide bioavailability and inhibit inflammatory pathways in endothelial cells. PACs exhibit and properties in human studies, notably by lowering circulating markers such as (CRP). A 2021 meta-analysis of RCTs on (rich in PACs) found it reduced biomarkers and had neutral to mildly beneficial effects on , with subgroup analyses showing CRP reductions in dyslipidemic participants. Emerging research highlights potential neuroprotective roles, particularly for neurodegeneration; preclinical and early clinical data from 2022–2025 suggest PACs inhibit amyloid-beta aggregation in models, though human trials remain limited to small-scale studies showing cognitive improvements in at-risk populations. For instance, a 2024 review of neurocognitive trials indicated PACs from grape seeds ameliorated amyloid pathology and in , but larger RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy. Preclinical studies in animal models further support the safety profile of PACs, with no reports of toxicity observed in immunosuppressed mice exposed to proanthocyanidins, including oligomers, polymers, and high polymers. Instead, research demonstrates protective effects against immune injury and oxidative stress induced by various agents. For example, grape seed proanthocyanidin extract (GSPE) alleviated aflatoxin B1-induced immune injury and oxidative stress in the spleen of mice by modulating NF-κB and Nrf2 signaling pathways. Similarly, GSPE and grape seed extract protected against cyclophosphamide-induced genotoxicity and histopathological damage in mice, reducing chromosomal aberrations and restoring tissue architecture without inducing toxicity themselves. In tumor-bearing mice, proanthocyanidins attenuated doxorubicin-induced mutagenicity, oxidative stress, and immunosuppression by suppressing lipid peroxidation and enhancing antioxidant defenses, while also improving sperm parameters and bone marrow function. These findings indicate that PACs may offer protective benefits in immunocompromised states, warranting further investigation for therapeutic applications. Evidence for other health effects is mixed. In diabetes management, PACs show promise for glycemic control; a 2024 systematic review of clinical studies reported that procyanidin supplementation improved insulin sensitivity and reduced fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes patients, though results varied by dose and duration. For skin health, PACs provide UV protection by mitigating oxidative damage; a 2023 review of human trials noted grape seed PACs reduced erythema and improved skin elasticity post-UV exposure, but benefits were modest and primarily observed in topical applications. Regarding chronic venous insufficiency, Pycnogenol (a PAC-rich pine bark extract) yielded inconclusive results in a 2020 Cochrane review of phlebotonics, with moderate-certainty evidence for slight reductions in edema (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.78) but low certainty for pain relief and no clear superiority over placebo in long-term outcomes. Post-2020 research has addressed gaps in gut health and cancer chemoprevention. PACs modulate by increasing beneficial taxa like and enhancing microbial diversity. In cancer chemoprevention, clinical evidence is emerging but preliminary; preclinical studies indicate PACs from grape seeds have anti-proliferative effects linked to induction, though no large-scale prevention trials have confirmed reduced incidence in . These findings underscore PACs' potential in microbiota-targeted therapies and , warranting further high-quality human studies.

Dietary and Commercial Applications

Major Dietary Sources

Proanthocyanidins are primarily obtained from dietary sources rich in plant-based polyphenols, with fruits serving as the most significant contributors in human consumption. stand out as a major source, containing approximately 419 mg of proanthocyanidins per 100 g of raw fruit. Grapes, particularly their skins and seeds, provide variable amounts, ranging from 61 mg/100 g in red grape skins to 81 mg/100 g in green grape skins, and up to 3,532 mg/100 g in grape seeds. Apples also contribute notably, with levels between 70 and 141 mg/100 g depending on the and whether the peel is included. Beverages derived from these fruits and other are common vectors for proanthocyanidin intake. Red typically contains 313 mg/L, reflecting extraction from grape skins during . Cocoa powder offers one of the highest concentrations among processed foods, at about 1,636 mg/100 g in unsweetened varieties. Black and green teas exhibit variable proanthocyanidin levels, generally low in brewed infusions (around 0.4 mg/100 g for black tea), though dry leaves can contain up to 0.84% by weight in green tea. Additional sources include other berries and nuts, such as aronia berries (chokeberries) with 664 mg/100 g and hazelnuts providing 501 mg/100 g. In Western diets, the average daily intake of proanthocyanidins is estimated at 58 mg per person , though studies in specific populations report higher means of around 215 mg/day. These values are derived from databases like the USDA Proanthocyanidin Content Database, which compiles analytical data for over 280 foods. Food processing influences proanthocyanidin retention, with juices often preserving higher levels than fermented products; for instance, purple contains 524 mg/L compared to 313 mg/L in . processes, as in , can reduce overall content through and . A standard serving of (240 mL) thus provides about 126 mg based on USDA measurements.

Therapeutic and Industrial Uses

Proanthocyanidins are widely incorporated into dietary supplements, particularly grape seed extracts standardized to 95% oligomeric procyanidins (OPCs), with typical dosages ranging from 100 to 300 mg per day to support activity. extracts, standardized to 36 mg of proanthocyanidins (PACs), are commonly used in supplements for (UTI) prevention due to their anti-adhesive effects on bacterial pathogens. These products are marketed as nutraceuticals, often in capsule form, to leverage the compounds' potential in promoting vascular health and reducing . In pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications, proanthocyanidins feature in nutraceuticals aimed at by enhancing tissue repair and reducing , as demonstrated in formulations derived from grape seeds and pine bark. For anti-aging cosmetics, they protect from degradation by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinases and ultraviolet-induced damage, with topical creams and serums incorporating grape seed or sea buckthorn extracts to improve elasticity and minimize wrinkles. These uses stem from the compounds' free radical scavenging and protein-stabilizing properties, positioning them in over-the-counter products for dermatological benefits. In the , proanthocyanidins contribute to the astringency in red wines and beers, where polymeric forms from skins and interact with salivary proteins to impart and structure during aging. They also serve as natural colorants by stabilizing pigments in beverages and as preservatives in , extending through inhibition of microbial growth in fruit-based products. Historically, proanthocyanidins from vegetable sources like bark and have been used in tanning to bind proteins in hides, producing durable materials resistant to and decay, a practice dating back to ancient civilizations. In modern , post-2020 research highlights their role as additives, such as in sainfoin or grape seed extracts, to reduce enteric methane emissions in ruminants by modulating and inhibiting methanogens, achieving up to 20% reductions . Standardization of proanthocyanidin extracts often employs the Proanthocyanidolic Index, a spectrophotometric method measuring absorption at 545 nm after acid , though it can overestimate content due to interference from monomeric flavanols. The global market for proanthocyanidins, driven by supplement and demand, reached approximately $354 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to $522 million by 2030 at a of 8.1%.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5891158/
  2. https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.13352
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10215713/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8389005/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6520035/
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590346222003455
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8037856/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/procyanidin
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9547875/
  10. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Procyanidin-B1
  11. https://www.chemicalbook.com/article/properties-and-source-of-procyanidins.htm
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7570689/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2597504/
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332219305359
  15. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400525/Data/PA/PA02.pdf
  16. https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%2528SICI%25291097-0010%252820000515%252980%253A7%253C1094%253A%253AAID-JSFA569%253E3.0.CO%253B2-1
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10252413/
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4790394/
  19. https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/7774
  20. https://nutritionj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12937-016-0218-1
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6245171/
  22. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/9/1792
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1255985/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10030370/
  25. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.00007/full
  26. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02138.x
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2689947/
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC166587/
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16608-2
  30. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400525/data/pa/pa.pdf
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316623026846
  32. https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/methods-and-application-of-food-composition-laboratory/mafcl-site-pages/proanthocyanidin/
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12335405/
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756464620300852
  35. https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/93
  36. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051004
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11923327/
  38. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102179
  39. https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/29/10/2179
  40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39942723/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11096517/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9105534/
  43. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf980366j
  44. https://www.academia.edu/15686903/Method_for_Estimation_of_Proanthocyanidins_Based_on_Their_Acid_Depolymerization_in_the_Presence_of_Nucleophiles
  45. https://bioquochem.com/proanthocyanidins-pac-assay-kit-dmac-method/
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3706559/
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23143032_HPLC_Determination_of_Extractable_and_Unextractable_Proanthocyanidins_in_Plant_Materials
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6515400/
  49. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf501011y
  50. https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.541
  51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16968050/
  52. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11101-021-09764-2
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7922431/
  54. https://www.[sigmaaldrich](/page/Sigma-Aldrich).com/US/en/product/sial/42157
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5600295/
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7759826/
  57. https://dro.deakin.edu.au/articles/journal_contribution/Proanthocyanidins_a_comprehensive_review/20740177/1/files/36972754.pdf
  58. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22765383/
  59. https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12870-017-1037-z
  60. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nph.14569
  61. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10265-021-01258-8
  62. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02857916
  63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-004-1234-5
  64. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/viewFile/9645/9257
  65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.08.004
  66. https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/jrnl/2019/nrs_2019_champagne_001.pdf
  67. https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/12/1273
  68. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02158
  69. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22765-1
  70. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04346.x
  71. https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-022-01420-x
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10796613/
  73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32536248/
  74. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36207170/
  75. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33336996/
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264298792_Proanthocyanidin_Metabolism_a_mini_review
  77. https://edepot.wur.nl/7250
  78. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05625
  79. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001321.pub7/full
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11635990/
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661820316376
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8227852/
  83. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcp.14469
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11540257/
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4848972/
  86. https://sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648.j.cb.20140203.11
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3154042/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11847907/
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12442563/
  90. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003229.pub4/full
  91. https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/24/5971
  92. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.3.613
  93. https://www.vitaminexpress.org/en/opc-information
  94. https://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/Gyn/CranberryforUTI.pdf
  95. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/20/10116
  96. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1650328/abstract
  97. https://waterhouse.ucdavis.edu/whats-in-wine/proanthocyanidins
  98. https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.13630
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6099987/
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969724062910
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889157522005051
  102. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/proanthocyanidins-market
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.