Hubbry Logo
Probus ClubsProbus ClubsMain
Open search
Probus Clubs
Community hub
Probus Clubs
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Probus Clubs
Probus Clubs
Probus Clubs
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Probus Clubs are clubs for retired or semi-retired people from all walks of life.

Organisation

[edit]

Probus is a local, national, and international association of retired people who come together in non-political, non-sectarian, non-profit, autonomous clubs which provide regular opportunities for members to meet others in similar circumstances, with similar levels of interest, make new friends, and maintain and expand their interests. Probus Clubs can be made up of men, women or be mixed (men and women) clubs. It is normal for the spouses of club members and widows of former members to be encouraged to participate in the social activities.[1]

In some places Rotary Clubs sponsor Probus Clubs but many clubs are sponsored by other Probus Clubs.

By 2018, there were over 400,000 members in approximately 4,000 Probus clubs worldwide.

History

[edit]

The Probus Club movement was formed in the United Kingdom in 1965. The Probus movement had its beginnings in two clubs, both created by members of Rotary Club. The first was found in 1965: Fred Carnill, a member of the Welwyn Garden City Rotary Club, met other retired friends for morning coffee—mostly ex-commuters to London, with professional and business backgrounds. From this, he started a luncheon club. The Rotary Club president arranged the first meeting and 45 men attended. This club was known as ‘The Campus Club’, the name deriving from the fact that the meeting place was facing the centre of town, 'The Campus'.[2]

The Rotary District took up the scheme with the result that Rotary International, Britain and Ireland published a leaflet about the idea to encourage other Rotary Clubs to sponsor a similar club:The Probus club was conceived by three businessmen travelling to London by train. The three; James Raper, Harold Blanchard and Edward Mockett OBE (died 1978) were reaching the point of retirement and realized they had a need for fellowship. Thus in the same time period, September 1965 Harold Blanchard the chairman of Caterham Rotary Club Vocational Service Committee (by now retired from business) presented the idea to the Rotary Club.

The members of the Rotary Club Vocational Service Committee decided to organise a monthly lunch. In February 1966, a meeting was advertised for all retired professional and businessmen aged 60 and over. 42 men turned up. A monthly lunch was arranged, at which the Rotary Club President took the chair until the Club had formed its own rules and committee. The inaugural luncheon of the first Probus Club in the United Kingdom (by that name) was on the 2 March 1966.

In May 1966 a Committee was formed with Harold Blanchard as chairman, who is seen as one of the 'Father Figures' of Probus along with James Raper. The name “Probus” was suggested by a member who took the first three letters from 'PROfessional and BUSiness'. It had the advantage that it was a Latin word from which 'probity' is derived. The Probus Club of Caterham was met with success, and became known among other Rotary Clubs with new clubs being founded.

In 1974, Probus expanded into New Zealand and by 1976 the idea had spread to Australia.[3] The first Probus club for seniors in North America was sponsored by the Rotary Club of Galt in Cambridge, Ontario, Canada in 1987. Currently there are 250+ clubs with more than 36,500 members in Canada.[4][5]

Although Probus membership has its greatest concentrations in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand,[6] clubs today exist in many parts of the world, including the United States, Belgium, India, South Africa and several other countries in Africa and Asia.

Structure

[edit]

Probus clubs have no central governing body but in some countries Probus Centres have been established by country to disseminate information and assist clubs. Offices are staffed largely by volunteers and operating costs are met by member contributions.

Probus clubs are local to towns and districts. Typically, meetings are held at regular intervals, normally monthly, with a break (sometimes) during the summer. In some countries Probus Club meetings may consist of a lunch followed by a guest speaker whilst others have the speaker before the meal. Some clubs are run on a more informal basis.

Many Probus club members engage in sporting tournaments, have groups for special interests within the club and enjoy regular outings and holidays at home and abroad.

By 2014 there were around 2000 clubs in the UK alone. Despite equality legislation in the UK, membership of most Probus clubs in the UK is restricted to men only,[7] although wives and partners are welcome on social outings.

In the UK and Ireland, a full colour magazine entitled Probus is published quarterly, free of charge to members and distributed to clubs for the cost of delivery. In May 2014 Probus magazine launched a website for Probus members [8] where every club can create its own page free of charge.

In Canada, meetings are typically held monthly with a guest speaker followed by social time and then updates on club activities. There is a national website supporting all 250+ clubs in Canada.[9]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Probus Clubs

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Probus Clubs are international social associations comprising retired and semi-retired and owners, designed to foster fellowship, stimulation, and recreational pursuits through regular meetings, guest speakers, and group outings without formal service commitments. The "Probus" derives from " and ," reflecting the typical membership of individuals who held positions of responsibility in their careers. Originating in the in 1965 as an initiative by Rotary Club members seeking a relaxed forum for retirees, the movement quickly spread to regions such as , , , and the , where autonomous clubs operate under regional coordinating bodies. Today, Probus emphasizes low-cost, member-driven activities like travel groups, hobby explorations, and networking events, distinguishing itself from service-oriented organizations by prioritizing personal enrichment and social bonds over or . With thousands of clubs worldwide, the network supports active aging by connecting like-minded individuals, often adapting to modern formats such as online meetings.

History

Origins and Founding

The Probus Club movement originated in the in 1965 as an initiative by Rotary Club members to combat among retirees, particularly former professionals and business executives seeking continued fellowship and intellectual stimulation after leaving active careers. The concept emerged from observations within Rotary circles that many skilled retirees experienced diminished social networks post-retirement, prompting a voluntary, non-charitable response focused on peer-led gatherings rather than dependency on external aid. This approach prioritized self-sustaining clubs emphasizing camaraderie and mental engagement through regular meetings, without formal fundraising or welfare elements. The inaugural club, named the Campus Club, was founded in , , by the Rotary Club of Welwyn Garden City, approximately 20 miles north of . This group served as a prototype for retiree-focused social networks, drawing directly from Rotary's vocational service ethos but tailored to post-career autonomy. In 1966, the Rotary Club of , , established the second foundational club, adopting the name "Probus"—derived from the first three letters of "" and "" to specifically attract accomplished retirees while evoking the Latin term for integrity. The suggestion for the name came from a club member, highlighting an early emphasis on exclusivity to those with professional backgrounds to foster substantive discussions. These pioneer clubs operated on low-cost, member-funded principles, with meetings centered on speakers, outings, and informal exchanges to sustain purpose and prevent idleness, as documented in Rotary-sponsored formation records. The model rejected hierarchical structures or charitable obligations, instead promoting egalitarian, autonomous operations that relied on participants' initiative for longevity and relevance. By design, Probus clubs avoided welfare-oriented interventions, positioning themselves as proactive social mechanisms grounded in retirees' inherent capacities for .

Early Expansion in the UK and Commonwealth

Following the establishment of initial Probus clubs in the during the late 1960s, the movement expanded rapidly within the UK, reaching approximately 150 clubs by 1971, primarily through sponsorship by local Rotary clubs and informal networks among retired professionals seeking structured after leaving active careers. This growth was propelled by the model's demonstrated effectiveness in addressing isolation among retirees, with clubs providing regular meetings featuring guest speakers and fellowship opportunities tailored to former executives and business owners. The concept crossed into the via Rotarian expatriates and visiting professionals, with the first club outside the forming in New Zealand's Kapiti Coast region on November 5, 1974, sponsored by the Rotary Club of and starting with 12 members drawn from local retirees familiar with the prototype. This South Pacific expansion was facilitated by word-of-mouth among British migrants and Rotary affiliates who recognized the value of Probus in mitigating post-retirement disengagement, leading to subsequent clubs in modeled on the Kapiti Coast format. In , adoption accelerated in the mid-1970s, with the inaugural club established as the Probus Club of Hunters Hill in on February 3, 1976, under the sponsorship of the Rotary Club of Hunters Hill, supported by insights from the Rotary Club of in the . By the end of 1981, this had burgeoned to 47 clubs within alone, reflecting organic proliferation through professional retiree networks and migration patterns from the , where clubs emphasized intellectual stimulation to counter in aging populations. Canada saw initial uptake in the early , influenced by Canadian Rotarian John Reynolds Morris, who encountered Probus during a 1980 visit to and advocated for its introduction; the first club formed in , in 1987, sponsored by the local Rotary chapter, marking the start of measured growth amid similar retiree demographics and cross- ties. Overall, by the late , hundreds of clubs operated across the and Commonwealth nations, underscoring the model's causal appeal in fostering community among skilled retirees via Rotary linkages and empirical reports of enhanced well-being.

Global Spread and Modern Growth

The expansion of Probus Clubs into began with the establishment of the first club in , , on March 17, 1987, sponsored by the Rotary Club of Galt. This marked the initial entry into the continent, followed by organic growth through local initiatives and Rotary affiliations, leading to over 250 clubs across by the early 2020s, serving more than 35,000 members. Internationalization post-1990s accelerated via replication in regions like , where networks expanded to over 100 clubs by the early 2000s, driven by retiree demand rather than centralized directives. By the 2020s, Probus had grown to approximately 4,000 clubs worldwide, with around 350,000 members engaging in regular fellowship activities across diverse geographies including , , and the . This decentralized model, emphasizing club autonomy, facilitated adaptation to local demographics, including a steady rise in mixed-gender clubs as traditional men's groups evolved to include women amid declining single-gender participation in some areas. The disrupted operations from 2020 onward, causing membership declines due to isolation measures and reduced in-person interactions, with many clubs reporting dwindled attendance. Recovery ensued through adoption of virtual and hybrid meeting formats, enabling continuity of speakers and social bonds; for instance, clubs in regions like maintained solely online gatherings during peak restrictions. By 2025, resilience was evident in recognitions such as the Probus Award of Excellence, presented to exemplary clubs and individuals for sustaining engagement post-pandemic. Proclamations like PROBUS Clubs Month in Canadian municipalities further highlighted ongoing vitality amid aging populations.

Organization and Governance

Local Club Autonomy

Probus clubs function as autonomous, member-driven entities, each operating independently as a non-profit association without subordination to a central . This decentralized structure emphasizes , with clubs establishing their own operational rules, meeting schedules, and internal policies while adhering to core principles of non-political, non-sectarian fellowship. Governance at the local level relies on elected committees comprising members who serve in voluntary roles such as president, secretary, treasurer, and committee members, typically selected annually to handle administrative duties, event planning, and financial oversight. Operations are sustained through modest monthly membership dues collected from participants, which cover venue costs, guest speakers, and basic administration without dependence on external funding or subsidies. Clubs adopt a standard constitution outlining foundational objectives but permit local adaptations to bylaws for flexibility in addressing community-specific needs, thereby promoting self-reliance and minimizing bureaucratic interference. For instance, the Probus Club of , founded on July 23, 1982, as the 49th such club in , maintains this independent model by managing its activities through member-elected leadership and locally tailored practices, while occasionally referencing shared resources like operational guides for best practices without mandatory compliance. This autonomy fosters personal responsibility among members, enabling clubs to evolve organically in response to local demographics and preferences, distinct from any regional or international coordination.

Regional and International Coordination

Probus clubs operate autonomously but engage with regional and international associations that offer advisory support for resource sharing, such as management guides, communication platforms, and directories of affiliated groups. Probus Global, for instance, coordinates worldwide through regional representatives who facilitate interclub exchanges, joint responsibilities like advice, and national-level events, while maintaining no enforceable oversight on local decisions. These networks assist in establishing new clubs by providing formation resources, including reference handbooks and sponsorship guidance, often involving endorsements from or established Probus groups to ensure alignment with core principles of fellowship without political or sectarian affiliations. Probus South Pacific, as a key regional entity covering , , and , supports club startups and ongoing networking via member benefit schemes and club locator tools, emphasizing voluntary participation to sustain growth. National associations exemplify this model; in , for example, bodies overseeing about 250 clubs deliver directories, training materials, and event coordination to bolster local initiatives while upholding club . This decentralized structure, rooted in non-binding collaboration, has enabled expansion to approximately 4,500 clubs and 300,000 members across 26 countries as of 2025, with empirical growth tracked through voluntary affiliations rather than mandates.

Activities and Programs

Core Meeting Formats

Probus clubs typically hold monthly general meetings structured around a formal agenda that includes brief business items such as welcomes, apologies, minutes approval, and reports, followed by a guest speaker presentation on diverse topics including history, personal experiences, and current events. These gatherings, often formatted as luncheons or social lunches, prioritize brevity in formal proceedings to maximize time for member interaction and speaker engagement, with programs planned several months in advance by a dedicated guest speakers officer. Informal networking forms a core element of these meetings, facilitated through pre-meeting socializing, member introductions, and post-speaker discussions, which encourage fellowship among retired professionals. Club handbooks recommend tracking attendance via lists and enforcing minimum participation requirements outlined in club constitutions or standing resolutions to maintain operational viability and active membership. Following the , many clubs adopted hybrid meeting options combining in-person attendance with virtual participation via platforms like Zoom, enabling broader access for members facing mobility limitations common in aging demographics. These adaptations, supported by international Probus networks, allow scheduling flexibility across time zones while preserving core routines of speaker sessions and networking.

Outings, Speakers, and Special Interest Groups

Probus clubs supplement their core monthly meetings with organized outings, including day trips, excursions, and group travel opportunities tailored to members' preferences and local contexts, such as coastal walks, hiking, or multi-club tours to nearby destinations. These activities foster social connections beyond formal gatherings while accommodating varying mobility and interests among retirees. Guest speakers feature prominently in club programs, delivering presentations on diverse topics ranging from and to personal experiences, often sourced from dedicated directories of volunteers willing to speak in person or via Zoom. For instance, the Probus Club in hosted historian Sean Szmalc for a talk on the life and assassination of U.S. President at a meeting on March 6, 2025, addressing key events and conspiracy theories. Such sessions, typically held during regular meetings, provide intellectual stimulation and opportunities for discussion without requiring additional fees beyond standard attendance costs. Special Interest Groups (SIGs), formed by members sharing common hobbies, operate as autonomous subgroups focused on activities like , , book clubs, , movie viewings, or TED Talks discussions, enabling deeper engagement in niche pursuits. Examples include the Ascot Probus Club's Movie Monday gatherings and the Northwest Bay Probus Club's emphasis on SIGs as the "backbone" for smaller-scale socializing. These groups enhance club vitality by aligning with post-retirement needs for purposeful activity, often meeting independently to sustain member involvement. Funding for outings, speakers, and SIGs derives primarily from membership dues—such as annual fees of $42 to $50 per member plus one-time initiation charges—and event-specific costs like meals or transport, promoting without . Clubs may subsidize activities from surpluses to keep participation accessible, ensuring operations remain member-driven and financially independent.

Membership and Eligibility

Requirements and Demographics

Membership eligibility for Probus clubs centers on retired or semi-retired individuals with , , or vocational backgrounds entailing substantial responsibility, serving as a mechanism to ensure interpersonal compatibility and shared perspectives among members. Applicants are ordinarily expected to be at least 60 years of age, with provisions for semi-retired candidates under special circumstances, and must typically complete a sponsored application endorsed by two current members. Absent formal assessments of wealth or income, the professional filter inherently favors participants from established career trajectories, promoting homogeneous without overt exclusionary tests. Participant profiles skew toward those over 60, encompassing former executives, entrepreneurs, and specialists whose prior roles facilitate rapport in club settings. Globally, engagement remains highest in English-speaking nations, exemplified by ’s roster of roughly 106,500 members across 1,541 clubs in March 2020, reflecting entrenched adoption in regions. Clubs preserve internal harmony through self-selection, wherein incompatible individuals often depart voluntarily, thereby constraining rosters—spanning 5 to over 600—to viable scales reliant on 10-20% volunteer involvement for operational continuity.

Gender Policies and Inclusivity Debates

Probus Clubs originated in the in 1965 as men-only organizations, sponsored by Rotary Clubs to provide social and intellectual engagement for retired professional and business men. By the 1970s and onward, the model expanded to include women-only clubs and mixed-gender clubs, reflecting broader societal changes and demand for inclusive options, with a steady increase in mixed clubs reported in regions like the UK and . Many early clubs, such as the Probus in , transitioned from men-only status—e.g., admitting women starting September 5, 1995—while others retained single-gender formats. Single-gender Probus Clubs have persisted alongside mixed variants, with clubs exercising to define membership criteria based on member preferences for homogeneous groups, often citing comfort in shared professional backgrounds and life experiences as a rationale. In the UK, the explicitly permits private member clubs, including Probus, to restrict membership to one sex without constituting , provided the club is not open to the public and maintains genuine . This legal framework has enabled the continuation of men-only and women-only clubs, countering pressures for universal mixing by affirming rights. Debates on inclusivity have centered on whether single-gender policies exclude potential members or promote exclusionary , with some viewing them akin to broader critiques of sex-segregated private clubs as reinforcing outdated norms. Proponents defend these policies through causal emphasis on member choice, arguing that forced integration could reduce participation among those preferring single-gender settings for candid discussions or reduced social friction, though empirical data on retention specifically comparing formats remains limited to general club health metrics showing sustained viability across types. Growth trends indicate mixed clubs expanding—e.g., alongside increases in ladies' clubs—yet single-gender clubs endure without mandated dissolution, prioritizing empirical fit over ideological uniformity.

Impact and Reception

Social and Health Benefits

Probus Clubs provide retired professionals with structured opportunities for social interaction, which links to reduced feelings of isolation among older adults. Regular meetings and outings foster peer connections that counteract the loss of workplace camaraderie, with club organizers reporting that members experience lower rates of compared to non-participating retirees. General research on participation corroborates this, showing that sustained involvement in community networks decreases depression and anxiety symptoms by promoting emotional support and purpose. Health outcomes associated with Probus membership include enhanced mental acuity and physical vitality, driven by activities such as guest speaker sessions and group excursions that encourage cognitive engagement and light exercise. Participants often cite improved mood and from these interactions, aligning with broader studies indicating that social clubs for seniors maintain mental sharpness and reduce cognitive decline risks through discussion and shared experiences. Physical benefits emerge from outings involving walking or , mirroring findings from meta-analyses of group walking programs that demonstrate gains in cardiovascular , mobility, and overall with high adherence rates. While direct longitudinal data on Probus-specific is limited, the club's emphasis on organic parallels evidence that strong social ties contribute to extended lifespan by mitigating stress-related health deterioration. Post-pandemic, Probus Clubs have aided recovery from heightened isolation, with membership drives in 2023–2025 reflecting renewed demand for in-person fellowship; for instance, the Maple Ridge Probus Club in expanded to 73 members and continued growth after COVID restrictions, attributing resilience to resumed activities that rebuilt community ties without reliance on institutional interventions. This organic model outperforms solitary retirement lifestyles, as testimonials highlight self-directed support networks that enhance and satisfaction, contrasting with isolated routines that exacerbate health declines. Such benefits underscore the causal role of voluntary peer groups in promoting retiree through mutual reliance rather than top-down programs.

Criticisms and Challenges

Critics have pointed to the professional and business background requirement for membership as fostering perceived exclusivity, which may limit broader accessibility for retirees lacking such credentials. This criterion, while ensuring shared experiences among members, has been noted to exclude non-professional retirees seeking similar social outlets. Historically, many Probus clubs operated as male-only entities, with the first women's clubs emerging only in 1982, creating gender barriers that persisted in some groups into recent years. Certain clubs have remained resistant to including women, contributing to debates over inclusivity despite the availability of mixed-gender options today. Operational challenges include an aging membership base, which has led to attrition as older members pass away without sufficient younger recruits to replace them. Post-COVID-19 disruptions exacerbated attendance declines, with some clubs reporting membership halving—such as the Probus Club, where numbers dropped significantly by 2023—and average meeting attendance falling below 15 in others. Financial pressures arise from reliance on low or nominal dues, necessitating external support like local council grants to sustain operations amid rising costs. Despite these issues, Probus organizations report overall growth, with global membership expanding to support voluntary participation models that prioritize compatibility over mandated diversity, evidenced by sustained club formations even post-pandemic. No major scandals have marred the network, underscoring the robustness of its autonomous, low-overhead structure.

References

  1. https://www.probusworld.com/About.html
  2. https://probusclub.net/chepstow/about/
  3. https://probusclub.net/chepstow/history-probus/
  4. https://www.probuscanada.ca/about-us/our-history
  5. https://probussouthpacific.org/
  6. https://portal.clubrunner.ca/50012/stories/rotary-and-probus-%25E2%2580%2593-what%25E2%2580%2599s-the-difference
  7. https://probusglobal.org/
  8. https://probusclub.net/dartmouth/what-is-probus/
  9. https://cromwellprobusclub.org.uk/History.html
  10. https://probusclub.net/caterham/history/
  11. https://www.goringandstreatleyprobus.co.uk/history-of-probus-clubs.html
  12. https://www.campusclubwgc.org.uk/
  13. https://www.probuscluboflaunceston.org.au/probus/
  14. https://www.rotarydistrict9685.org.au/sitepage/probus
  15. https://sorellprobus.org.au/history-of-probus/
  16. https://www.probusclubofoundle.co.uk/history
  17. https://www.kcnews.co.nz/2024/07/25/probus-club-of-kapiti-coast-to-celebrate-50th-anniversary/
  18. https://www.sydneyprobus.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/History_of_the_Probus_Club_of_Sydney.pdf
  19. https://www.probusclubwhiterock-southsurrey.ca/probus-club-history
  20. https://www.muskokaregion.com/news/connecting-with-friends-new-and-old-at-probus/article_88cf7bb7-0667-59f9-a6a6-fd00a321e83b.html
  21. https://www.beavervalleyprobus.com/Our-History
  22. https://www.probuscanada.ca/about-us/who-we-are
  23. https://probusglobal.org/Clubs/?cty=ca&region=Canada
  24. https://www.probusonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2021-03-PROBUS-Global.pdf
  25. https://probusglobal.org/FAQ.html
  26. https://probusglobal.org/Newsletters/2021-09_PROBUS_Global.pdf
  27. https://probusglobal.org/Newsletters/2025_09_PROBUS_Global.php
  28. https://www.townofbwg.com/en/news/bwg-proclaims-probus-clubs-month-2025.aspx
  29. https://www.probusonline.org/history/
  30. https://probusireland.com/about
  31. https://www.paqnetwork.com.au/about/probus-what-is-it
  32. https://probusvancouverwest.ca/Probus-Clubs
  33. https://www.comoxstrathconaprobusclub.com/uploads/1/2/5/5/125575100/standard_constitution_for_probus_clubs__2025_.pdf
  34. http://burlingtonlakeshoreprobus.org/?page_id=74
  35. https://probusglobal.org/ClubManagement.html
  36. https://probusglobal.org/Clubs/
  37. https://www.abertayprobus.club/the-probus-organisation/
  38. https://clubrunner.blob.core.windows.net/00000101591/en-us/files/homepage/probus-club-handbook-2025-26/2025-26_Probus_Club_Handbook.pdf
  39. https://www.normanhurstprobus.org.au/speakers.html
  40. https://probussouthpacific.org/probus/microsites/218/2024_Documents/Part_1_2024-25_Probus_Club_Handbook.pdf
  41. https://probusglobal.org/Meetings/
  42. https://probussouthpacific.org/ac198bf0/Summer_Outdoor_Activity_Ideas
  43. https://probussouthpacific.org/probus/microsites/918/Probus_Press_Release_April_2019_Final.pdf
  44. https://www.facebook.com/ProbusSouthPacific/posts/probus-clubs-offer-a-range-of-activities-including-trips-and-outings-for-members/979647394200624/
  45. https://probusglobal.org/Speakers/
  46. https://www.largsandmillportnews.com/news/24986957.largs-probus-talk-life-assassination-john-f-kennedy/
  47. https://www.probusonline.org/register-of-speakers/
  48. https://scugog-uxbridgeprobus.ca/interest-groups
  49. https://prettyriverprobus.ca/Activities
  50. https://nwbprobus.org/special-interest-groups-2/
  51. https://probussouthpacific.org/microsites/ascot/Special_Interest_Groups
  52. https://nwbprobus.org/category/special-interest-groups/
  53. https://mixedprobusburlington.ca/FAQs
  54. https://prettyriverprobus.ca/FAQ
  55. https://probussouthpacific.org/probus/microsites/658/2022-2023_PSPL_Handbook_.pdf
  56. https://www.marionprobus.com/membership/
  57. https://www.probusonline.org/form-a-club/
  58. https://ludlowprobusclub.weebly.com/probus-rules.html
  59. https://probusclub.net/eastbourne/frequently-asked-questions/
  60. https://seniorstoday.com.au/news/2021/03/30/probus-part-of-the-social-fabric/
  61. https://probusglobal.org/PDF/Port_Perry_How_Many.pdf
  62. http://www.probusnaas.com/files/Probus-History.pdf
  63. https://probussouthpacific.org/microsites/gympiecombined/History
  64. https://www.probusonline.org/okehampton/
  65. https://www.probusonline.org/equality-act-2010-information/
  66. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01081/SN01081.pdf
  67. https://falkirkprobus.org/the-probus-organisation/index.html
  68. https://probussouthpacific.org/probus/microsites/918/Probus-Media_Release_January_2020.pdf
  69. https://probussouthpacific.org/6249e47b/With_a_little_help_from_your_friends
  70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33387363/
  71. https://issuu.com/monikap-probussouthpacific/docs/active_retirees_september_2024_quarterly_magazine/s/56403778
  72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25601182/
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271444336_Is_there_evidence_that_walking_groups_have_health_benefits_A_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis
  74. https://mapleridgenews.com/2023/11/13/maple-ridge-probus-club-came-out-of-covid-pandemic-stronger-than-ever/
  75. https://probusglobal.org/Newsletters/2024_09_PROBUS_Global.php
  76. https://www.probusonline.org/newmarket/
  77. http://www.glossop-probus.co.uk/History.php
  78. https://probusglobal.org/Newsletters/2023_06_PROBUS_Global.pdf
  79. https://www.eastlothiancourier.com/news/23629612.dunbar-probus-club-membership-halved-since-covid/
  80. https://www.probusclub.net/crickhowell/minutes-2024/
  81. https://probusglobal.org/Newsletters/2025_03_PROBUS_Global.php
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.