Hubbry Logo
Racing lineRacing lineMain
Open search
Racing line
Community hub
Racing line
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Racing line
Racing line
Racing line
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In motorsport, the racing line, or simply "the line," is the optimal path around a race course.[1] In most cases, the line makes use of the entire width of the track to lengthen the radius of a turn: entering at the outside edge, touching the "apex"—a point on the inside edge—then exiting the turn by returning outside.

Description

[edit]
Tyre marks showing the line at Brands Hatch (2008).

Driving the racing line is a primary technique for minimizing the overall course time. As the optimal path around a race course, the racing line can often be glimpsed on the asphalt in the form of tire skid marks.[2] A. J. Baime described its formation in the early laps of a race at Le Mans:

As the pack stretched out in single file—carving the black stripe into the pavement that was the racing line—the real competition began.[3]

Geometric line and variations

[edit]

In theory, the optimal path around a race course follows a geometric line, which takes the widest possible arc through a corner. The line starts at the outside of the road, clips a point on the inside, and finishes back outside while maintaining a constant radius throughout. The clipping point is called the apex. In a 90 degree corner, for example, where the inner-edge radius is 30 feet (9.1 m) and the outer-edge radius is 50 feet (15 m), the geometric line radius is 80 feet (24 m).[4]

But while this line theoretically represents the fastest way through the corner, it may result in longer overall track times due to slower speeds on the straightaways. To compensate, drivers often delay the point where they begin to turn, thereby shortening the radius when entering the corner and lengthening the radius when exiting. This late apex line allows for earlier acceleration when exiting the corner into the straightaway, but requires slower speeds going in. Race driver Ross Bentley suggests as a rule of thumb: "The faster the corner, the closer to the geometric line you should drive" in order to maintain more speed through the turn. Conversely, "the slower the corner, the more you need to alter your line with a later apex." Doing so allows the driver to gear down for faster acceleration on the exit.[5]

An early apex line, where the driver turns early into the curve, allows a faster entry but a slower exit. The practice is largely considered a beginner mistake.[6]

Compound turns

[edit]

Where two corners are linked together, the goal is to exit the second turn onto the straightaway at the maximum speed. To achieve this, the driver will "sacrifice the line" on the first turn in order to be in the optimal position for the second.[7]

Geometry

[edit]

The radius of the ideal racing line must be dependent on 3 factors: outer radius , inner radius and the angle between the lines perpendicular to the entrance and exit of the turn .

It can be proven that


References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Racing line

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The racing line is the optimal trajectory a vehicle follows around a circuit to achieve the fastest possible time, utilizing the full width of the track to maximize cornering speed and minimize traveled through turns. This path is not necessarily the shortest geometric route but the one that balances braking, , and to maintain , typically involving a late apex approach where the driver turns in later to allow earlier full-throttle exit. In professional , the racing line is critical for , as even small deviations can cost seconds per , and teams use tools like GPS to refine it for specific cars, tracks, and conditions. Key components of the racing line include the braking point, where deceleration begins in a straight line to optimize grip; the turn-in point, marking the initiation of into the corner; the apex, the innermost clip point that defines the turn's radius; and the exit point, where the straightens to accelerate onto the following straight. These elements vary by corner type—such as tight hairpins typically using a late apex to maximize or sweeping bends favoring an early apex to maintain —and are influenced by factors like setup, compounds, , and track surface. Drivers and engineers iteratively adjust the line through practice and , emphasizing smooth inputs to avoid unsettling the car's balance and ensuring consistency across laps. In elite series like Formula 1 or the , mastering the racing line integrates advanced engineering, with onboard data systems providing real-time feedback on speed traces and grip limits to shave fractions of a second. While the concept applies broadly to circuit racing, including karting and endurance events, adaptations are essential for tracks or off-road disciplines where banking or alters the path. instruction, such as BMW's programs, underscores its teachable nature, enabling amateurs to approach pro-level efficiency.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

The racing line refers to the optimal trajectory a follows through a circuit's corners to minimize overall time by maximizing average speed. It represents the path that balances key physical constraints, including generated during turns, the grip limits of the tires, and the conservation of to sustain high velocities without excessive deceleration or . In essence, while straight-line travel between corners is the fastest possible route due to its minimal distance and constant speed potential, curved sections of a track necessitate a deviated path to avoid barriers while preserving as much velocity as possible. This deviation transforms the challenge from simply covering distance to optimizing the between path length and cornering speed. The primary purpose of the racing line is to reduce total duration by enabling drivers to enter, navigate, and exit corners at the highest feasible speeds, thereby shortening the effective travel distance through bends relative to tighter, slower alternatives. By widening the radius of turns—often utilizing the full track width—the line allows for smoother inputs and later braking points, which compound into faster exits onto straights. In professional motorsports, such as Formula 1 and , optimizing the racing line can yield significant time savings per compared to suboptimal paths, with gains accumulating across a circuit's multiple turns. Adhering to the optimal racing line also delivers key benefits beyond raw speed, including enhanced margins through smoother trajectories that reduce the risk of losing traction or control. It promotes by minimizing erratic and braking adjustments, allowing more consistent power delivery. Additionally, the line helps mitigate tire wear by distributing lateral loads more evenly across the rubber, extending usable life during a race stint.

Historical Context

The concept of the racing line, the optimal path around a circuit to minimize lap times, traces its origins to the dawn of organized in late 19th-century . Early road races, such as the 1894 Paris-Rouen event covering 80 km at an average speed of 16.4 kph and the 1895 Paris-Bordeaux round spanning 1,178 km at 24.15 kph, required drivers to intuitively select paths that balanced speed and control on irregular public roads. By the early 1900s, with the introduction of closed-circuit events like the 1898 Course de (145 km on a single lap) and speeds surpassing 80 kph by 1900, optimizing corner entry and exit became essential for safety and performance in European road racing. These foundational races laid the groundwork for line theory, as competitors learned to use the full track width to straighten turns geometrically. In the 1930s, Grand Prix racing elevated line optimization amid rising speeds and technical sophistication. Pioneers like , a dominant driver, emphasized precise path selection in events such as the , where his mastery of cornering—particularly in wet conditions—contributed to three European Championships (1935, 1937, 1938). By the 1950s, drivers like advanced apex concepts, clipping the inside of turns with controlled four-wheel drifts to maximize exit speed, as exemplified in his record-breaking at the , where he set nine lap records despite mechanical setbacks. The underscored line importance early in Formula 1, as navigated chaos from a freak wave at Tabac corner—washing out half the field—by braking astutely and maintaining his path to secure victory after 100 laps. The 1970s marked a pivotal shift with reshaping line priorities in Formula 1. Innovations like Lotus's ground-effect cars (e.g., the 1978 ) generated suction via sidepods and skirts, boosting for higher cornering speeds and tighter lines, enabling drivers like to win six races that season. Technological evolution accelerated in the 1980s, as in —building on McLaren's 1975 system capturing 14 data points per lap—exposed inconsistencies in drivers' lines by contrasting subjective feel with objective metrics like speed and trajectory. The 1994 San Marino Grand Prix tragically highlighted line errors' consequences, with Rubens Barrichello's qualifying crash at Variante Bassa stemming from a minor path misjudgment at 138 mph, contributing to the weekend's fatalities and prompting safety reforms.

Geometric Principles

Single-Turn Dynamics

In single-turn dynamics, the geometric racing line for an isolated corner consists of a straight-line entry to a that reaches the apex, followed by a straight-line exit also to the arc. This configuration maximizes the effective by utilizing the full width of the track, thereby reducing the lateral required to navigate the corner and allowing for higher sustainable speeds. The portion approximates the smoothest possible path under constant radius, minimizing abrupt changes in input and loading. The apex represents the innermost point of the turn, where the comes closest to the inside or boundary, typically positioned to balance entry and exit speeds for overall time minimization. In this geometry, the apex serves as the transition point where the 's angle is at its minimum for the , enabling equalized velocities into and out of the by optimizing the transition from deceleration on entry to on exit. This positioning ensures that the driver can maintain application longer post-apex, prioritizing exit momentum for the subsequent straight. For a typical 90-degree , the apex often occurs near the of the turn's angular extent to facilitate this balance. The optimal single-turn line minimizes the overall time through the corner by shortening the length of the curved section relative to a tighter path while extending the straight segments before and after, which permits higher average speeds due to reduced time under braking and constraints. Although the total path length may increase slightly compared to hugging the inside edge, the larger compensates by allowing cornering speeds up to 15% higher—for instance, from approximately 47 mph at a tight 150-foot to 54 mph at a 200-foot under lateral . This trade-off enhances lap times by emphasizing "slow in, fast out" principles, where the elongated straights post-exit enable quicker re. Conceptual diagrams of single-turn lines illustrate this radius expansion: a tight inside path might follow a small along the (e.g., 15-meter ), while the geometric line sweeps outward to a larger arc (e.g., 35-meter ), visually demonstrating the broader sweep that clips the apex and fans out to the outer edge. Such visualizations highlight qualitative speed gains of 10-20% in cornering velocity, translating to reduced sector times of 20-30% compared to suboptimal lines, underscoring the geometric line's role in foundational corner optimization.

Multi-Turn Configurations

In , compound turns refer to a series of connected corners that form a continuous sequence, such as chicanes or esses, where the optimal racing line requires compromising the ideal path through individual turns to achieve overall flow and preservation. Unlike isolated corners, these configurations demand a unified approach, treating the cluster as a single extended maneuver to minimize total time loss across the sequence. The construction of a racing line through compound turns typically involves a sweeping arc that clips multiple apexes— the innermost points of each curve—while reducing abrupt direction changes and maintaining higher average speeds. This technique, often employing late apexing in the initial turn to widen the radius progressively, allows drivers to link turns with smoother inputs, prioritizing exit velocity from the final corner over peak speed in the entry. For instance, in S-curves or esses, the line follows an inside-outside-inside progression, enabling a fluid transition that exploits the track's width without excessive braking or adjustments. In sequences like a followed by a straight, a late apex in the hairpin facilitates a wider, faster exit arc, building on single-turn principles but extending them for sequential optimization. Key challenges in multi-turn configurations include balancing the sacrifice of entry speed into the first turn against potential gains in subsequent ones, where qualitative trade-offs often result in net time savings of 0.3 to 0.7 seconds per sequence through improved momentum. For example, at Misano Circuit's Turns 12 and 13, missing the first apex by approximately 2 meters allows a 105 mph speed through the pair, yielding a 0.67-second advantage over isolated optimizations. These compromises demand precise curvature management to stay within traction limits, as excessive tightening in linked turns can lead to understeer or oversteer, disrupting the continuous arc. Seminal analyses emphasize that such lines minimize integrated curvature (∫k ds) across the cluster for energy-efficient paths, as explored in early optimization frameworks.

Line Variations

Apex Strategies

The early apex strategy involves clipping the inside kerb of a turn earlier than the geometric , creating a tighter overall through the corner while offering improved visibility and a straighter entry path. This approach reduces the total distance traveled and is particularly suited to decreasing turns, where the corner tightens progressively, allowing drivers to position the vehicle for the narrowing section without oversteering or running wide later. However, it carries significant risks, including a reduced exit that can limit acceleration onto following straights and increase the likelihood of sliding wide if grip is marginal. In contrast, the late apex delays the inside clip until later in the turn, permitting a wider entry for higher entry speed and optimizing the exit for maximum . This method excels in increasing turns, where the corner widens toward the exit, or in scenarios prioritizing post-corner straight-line speed, as it enables earlier application and better alignment for the next section. Advantages include higher average cornering speed and reduced correction on exit, though it demands precise braking and control to avoid understeer during the tight entry phase. The double apex serves as a hybrid tactic for non-uniform or compound turns, featuring two inside clips to balance speed maintenance across varying radii within a single corner sequence. By treating the turn as interconnected segments, it allows sustained momentum through irregular profiles, such as those combining compression and elevation changes, and is prevalent in oval racing or circuits with asymmetric layouts. This strategy mitigates the drawbacks of a single apex in complex geometry but requires advanced modulation of steering and throttle to avoid unsettling the vehicle between clips. Selection of the appropriate apex strategy hinges on turn-specific attributes, including angle, camber banking, and available runoff areas, to balance cornering speed against overall lap time. For instance, sharper angles under 90 degrees with minimal camber often favor late apexes to maximize exit velocity, as seen at Monza's high-speed Lesmo curves, while broader, multi-phase turns exceeding 90 degrees with significant camber may necessitate double apexes, exemplified by Suzuka's redesigned 130R section. Ample runoff supports late or double apexes by providing margin for error on wider exits, whereas limited space promotes early apexes to stay within bounds. Basic apex geometry, as the point of minimum radius in single-turn dynamics, informs these choices by highlighting trade-offs in path curvature.

Adaptive Lines

Adaptive racing lines refer to the dynamic modifications drivers make to their optimal path during a race or session in response to evolving track conditions, vehicle state, and competitive situations. These adjustments allow drivers to maintain performance while adapting to variables such as increasing grip from rubber deposition or decreasing traction from tire wear. In Formula 1, for instance, initial laps often feature conservative lines on a "green" track with low grip, but as rubber builds up in high-load areas like braking zones and apexes, drivers can tighten their lines to exploit the enhanced friction, shaving seconds off lap times. Lap-to-lap changes are particularly evident in tire management, where degradation prompts drivers to widen their lines slightly to reduce lateral forces and overheating, preserving grip for longer stints. Early in a race or qualifying, conservative approaches minimize risk on or unclean tires, but as rubber accumulates and tires warm, more aggressive, tighter lines become viable toward the end of a stint. This evolution contrasts with static apex strategies by prioritizing real-time adaptation over predefined geometry. During practice sessions, lines refine progressively through , with teams using to optimize paths and shave milliseconds as the track "rubbers in." Debris like marbles—loose rubber particles pushed off the ideal line—accumulates on outer edges, compelling drivers to avoid wider trajectories to prevent grip loss and . In response, sessions see iterative adjustments, such as earlier apex entries to stay within the grippy groove. Overtaking demands temporary line deviations, such as inside dives at corner entries, where the attacking driver sacrifices the optimal path for position gain before reverting to it post-pass. Defending drivers may shift off-line to block, but regulations require leaving , ensuring safe re-integration to the racing line. These maneuvers highlight adaptive lines' role in wheel-to-wheel combat, balancing aggression with control. Long-term alterations arise from track modifications, like resurfacing, which can shift ideal lines by altering surface texture and camber. At , the 2019 reprofiling—completed ahead of the 2020 season—eliminated bumps and adjusted corner cambers, altering the ideal racing lines. Such changes necessitate relearning lines, impacting strategies across multiple events.

Influencing Factors

Vehicle Characteristics

The racing line, defined as the optimal path through a corner to minimize time by balancing speed, grip, and , is profoundly shaped by a 's core design elements including suspension, tires, , and . These characteristics dictate the limits of cornering dynamics, influencing whether a driver can clip a tight apex or must opt for a wider arc to maintain control. Understanding these interactions is essential for tailoring lines to a specific machine's strengths and weaknesses. Fuel load and , including driver weight, influence weight transfer and may require line adjustments as the race progresses, particularly in longer events. Suspension and chassis configurations fundamentally alter the racing line by governing body roll, weight transfer, and tire loading during cornering. Stiff setups, common in high-downforce race cars with natural frequencies around 3.0-5.0 Hz or higher, minimize roll to keep the chassis flat, enabling tighter lines that exploit precise steering response and even tire contact at elevated speeds. In contrast, compliant suspensions with lower frequencies (1.5-3.0 Hz) accommodate more roll but enhance compliance over uneven surfaces, often necessitating wider corner radii to manage excessive body lean and prevent grip loss from uneven loading. Understeer-prone chassis, frequently induced by disproportionate front roll stiffness that overloads the front tires during turns, compel drivers to select earlier apexes, allowing a gentler turn-in to counteract the tendency to push wide and extend the corner's effective radius. Tire selection and inherent grip levels critically determine the aggression feasible at the apex and throughout the line. High-grip slick s, featuring soft compounds that maximize adhesion through extensive contact patches and energy dissipation, support late or tight apexes by sustaining higher lateral forces without slip, thus permitting faster minimum speeds in corners. Vehicles with understeer characteristics, often exacerbated by tires operating near their grip threshold, require earlier apex strategies to distribute forces more evenly, avoiding the wide exits that result from front overload and reduced capability. Power delivery mechanisms shape racing line choices, particularly in balancing entry aggression with exit acceleration. Rear-wheel-drive (RWD) cars leverage late apexes to optimize traction on corner exit, as the rear-biased power application facilitates rotation and power deployment without front-end push, maximizing straight-line speed post-apex. All-wheel-drive (AWD) systems, by distributing across all wheels for superior overall grip, enable more neutral lines that tolerate varied apex timings, though they still benefit from late entries to capitalize on balanced exit . Aerodynamic properties modulate racing line feasibility by altering effective grip through speed-dependent forces. Downforce-generating designs, such as those with wings and diffusers, increase vertical tire loads to boost lateral —up to 5-6g in high-downforce setups like Formula 1 cars, compared to approximately 1.5g without significant downforce depending on grip—allowing tighter lines and higher corner speeds by expanding the grip envelope at elevated velocities. Drag-optimized vehicles, prioritizing low resistance over , conversely emphasize wider lines or early apexes to favor straight-line exits, as their limited cornering tolerance demands conservative trajectories to avoid speed loss from aerodynamic inefficiency in turns.

Environmental and Track Conditions

Environmental and track conditions significantly influence the optimal racing line, requiring drivers to adapt their paths to maintain grip, , and . In wet conditions, standing and reduced traction force drivers to widen their lines, steering clear of the outermost edges where risks are highest, as moisture diminishes to the surface. Conversely, in dry heat, elevated track temperatures can optimize within their ideal operating range, allowing drivers to follow tighter, more aggressive lines that maximize cornering speed without excessive slippage. Track surface irregularities, such as uneven curbs and bumps, often compel drivers to modify their lines to avoid unsettling the vehicle's balance or causing suspension damage. Curbs, particularly those with humps or sharp edges at apex points, can disrupt and induce understeer if clipped aggressively, prompting lines that skim or entirely bypass them for smoother progression. changes in hill turns further alter the racing line, as affects and braking; for example, uphill sections impact visibility and grip, while downhill crests reduce rear tire traction on exits. Temperature variations beyond weather also play a critical role, with cold tracks lowering rubber compound flexibility and overall grip, leading drivers to adopt more conservative lines that prioritize stability over speed to prevent slides. Debris accumulation, notably "marbles"—small rubber particles shed from tires—tends to gather on the outer track edges, reducing traction there and pushing drivers to shift their lines inward toward the cleaner racing groove for better control. Time-of-day shifts introduce visibility challenges that erode confidence in the standard line, particularly in endurance events like the , where dawn fog can obscure apex markers and night racing under limited lighting demands wider, more predictable paths to avoid unseen hazards. These adaptations highlight how external elements interact with vehicle grip limits, emphasizing the need for real-time adjustments in line selection.

Analysis and Applications

Simulation Tools

Simulation tools play a pivotal role in designing and analyzing racing lines by leveraging advanced physics engines to model vehicle behavior on virtual tracks. Popular software such as rFactor 2 employs a sophisticated physics simulator that generates dynamic racing environments, allowing users to compute optimal racing lines through iterative vehicle dynamics calculations. Similarly, iRacing utilizes a proprietary physics engine with detailed tire modeling systems to simulate realistic traction and handling, enabling the derivation of lap-minimizing paths that account for track geometry and vehicle limits. These tools often incorporate data logging capabilities, integrating GPS and telemetry data to record and visualize actual driving lines for comparison against simulated optima. Algorithmic approaches within these simulations focus on path optimization to minimize lap times, typically employing iterative solvers that refine trajectories based on vehicle constraints. Nonlinear programming methods, for instance, solve for the fastest path by balancing speed and curvature while respecting dynamic limits. Bayesian optimization techniques further enhance this by efficiently exploring the parameter space of possible lines to identify those that reduce overall lap duration. These algorithms incorporate models like the friction circle, which visualizes the combined longitudinal and lateral grip limits available to tires, ensuring paths stay within safe handling envelopes. Load transfer models are also integrated to simulate weight distribution shifts during cornering and acceleration, adjusting the racing line to optimize tire contact patches and maintain stability. Data integration bridges simulated racing lines with real-world performance through onboard s such as inertial measurement units () and accelerometers, which capture , orientation, and velocity data to map actual vehicle paths against virtual predictions. This allows engineers to validate accuracy by overlaying sensor-derived lines onto optimized models, identifying discrepancies in areas like corner entry speeds. In the 2020s, AI enhancements have introduced predictive adjustments, using to forecast line variations based on historical data and environmental inputs, thereby refining simulations for more adaptive outcomes. For example, neural network-based methods process sensor feeds to iteratively update racing lines in near-real-time during virtual testing. Despite their precision, racing simulations often assume ideal conditions such as perfect track surfaces and consistent weather, which can lead to over-optimistic line predictions that diverge from on-track realities. Real-track validation is essential to calibrate these models against variables like tire wear and surface irregularities, ensuring practical applicability. Formula 1 teams, for instance, leverage AWS cloud infrastructure for high-fidelity simulations that prototype setups influencing lines, though these require extensive physical testing to confirm efficacy.

Real-World Implementation

In circuit racing disciplines such as Formula 1, drivers prioritize precision in executing racing lines, particularly by accurately hitting apexes to optimize cornering speed and minimize time loss on tight, barrier-lined tracks like . This approach requires exact turn-in points and throttle modulation to clip the inside kerb while maintaining car balance, allowing for maximum track usage without exceeding limits. In GT racing, similar apex-focused strategies are employed, where drivers adjust lines to balance speed through high-speed sweeps and technical sections, emphasizing consistency over long stints to preserve tires and fuel. For oval adaptations in , high banking in turns—such as the 24 degrees at —enables drivers to run flatter, higher lines closer to the wall, leveraging gravity for greater cornering speeds compared to the shorter but less banked low line. In rally and , loose surfaces like demand wider entry lines to preserve momentum, as drivers aim to sweep loose material aside and expose a firmer surface beneath, facilitating quicker exits without excessive braking or turning that could induce slides. This momentum-preserving technique contrasts with tarmac by prioritizing straight-line acceleration post-corner over tight apex clipping. In and drifting contexts, techniques often involve exaggerated apexes and controlled oversteer, where drivers initiate slides around cones or obstacles to navigate tight patterns, using and modulation for precision in confined spaces. Driver training programs incorporate practical exercises like cone drills to ingrain optimal racing lines, with slalom setups simulating corner sequences to develop smooth turn-in, apex targeting, and exit acceleration under controlled conditions. These drills enhance spatial awareness and car control, progressing from basic weaves to complex figure-eights that mimic track demands. Complementing physical practice, mental mapping techniques train drivers to visualize tracks in detail, creating cognitive "maps" of reference points and lines for instinctive adherence during high-pressure races, reducing decision-making time and errors. Performance metrics underscore the impact of masterful line execution; for instance, Lewis Hamilton's precise line management at contributed to his 2021 lap record of 1:12.909 (which stood until 2025), enabling superior pace through the circuit's demanding corners. Conversely, line misjudgments can prove costly, as seen in the , where Hamilton's defensive line on the final lap allowed to overtake inside at Turn 5 using fresher tires, securing the championship in a decisive +2.256-second margin.

References

  1. https://www.bmw.com/en/performance/how-to-find-the-racing-line.html
  2. https://driver61.com/uni/racing-line/
  3. https://www.motorsportuk.org/inside-revolution-racing-lines-how-to-get-the-perfect-lap/
  4. https://www.britannica.com/sports/automobile-racing
  5. https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/art-and-culture/museum/exhibition/legend-7/
  6. https://www.formula1.com/en/information/drivers-hall-of-fame-juan-manuel-fangio.6SSng3B5E6j6pxPNbyqQIv
  7. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/history/the-freak-wave-that-wiped-out-half-the-grid-in-1950-monaco-grand-prix/
  8. https://www.goodwood.com/grr/f1/winging-it-when-f1-really-started-to-fly/
  9. https://www.mclaren.com/racing/team/a-brief-history-of-computing-in-f1-1052199/
  10. https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/gary-anderson-on-imola-1994-and-barrichellos-crash/
  11. https://unisimracing.com/simracing-racing-line/
  12. https://physicsofformula1.wordpress.com/the-racing-line/
  13. https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/attachments/technical-stuff/814811d1317211860-brian-beckmans-physics-racing-beckman_-_the_physics_of_racing.pdf
  14. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/64669/706825301-MIT.pdf
  15. https://www.racelogic.co.uk/_downloads/Misc/Racelogic-ebook-advanced-circuit-driving.pdf
  16. https://www.vboxmotorsport.co.uk/index.php/us/ebook-extract-compound-corners
  17. https://www.paradigmshiftracing.com/uploads/4/8/2/6/48261497/the_perfect_corner_2_-_sample.pdf
  18. https://www.miata.net/sport/Physics/phor.pdf
  19. https://roar.berkeley.edu/third-place-solution-in-spring-2025-simulation-racing-series/
  20. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1647512/1647512.pdf
  21. https://www.catapult.com/blog/race-strategy-f1-track-surface
  22. https://frictionone.us/rubbering-in-the-essentials-of-motorsport-friction/
  23. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/f1-tyre-saving-what-why-how-is-it-done/10535074/
  24. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/the-insiders-guide-to-preparing-a-car-through-practice.5xWpgp8nsTh6PCowm7bDEE
  25. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/insiders-guide-rules-of-overtaking/7427184/
  26. https://www.wirtgen-group.com/en-us/magazine/the-road/passion/resurface-the-silverstone-circuit/
  27. https://www.mercedesamgf1.com/news/g-force-and-formula-one-explained
  28. https://www.mercedesamgf1.com/news/the-impact-of-track-elevation-in-f1
  29. https://auto.howstuffworks.com/auto-racing/nascar/nascar-basics/nascar-marbles.htm
  30. https://www.24h-lemans.com/en/news/the-24-hours-of-le-mans-a-feast-for-the-eyes-59084
  31. https://www.rfactor.net/
  32. https://www.iracing.com/car-technology/
  33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFEOtwpwOhU
  34. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200204794J/abstract
  35. https://www.miata.net/sport/Physics/07-Circle.html
  36. https://ftp.spaceneedle.com/browse/mL6B37/603187/Race%2520Car%2520Vehicle%2520Dynamics%2520Milliken.pdf
  37. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Errqyz3NCOI
  38. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.04868
  39. https://www.shellecomarathon.com/2025-programme/regional-asia-pacific-and-the-middle-east/_jcr_content/root/main/section_1633744779/call_to_action_1681610291/links/item0.stream/1740730639827/2231cc55fa45e1c94ef0fad92684e680b2ccfe08/apme-2025-ota-data-and-telemetry-batavia-gasoline-team.pdf
  40. https://maxattacksims.com/2023/07/12/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-a-racing-simulator-for-professional-training/
  41. https://aws.amazon.com/sports/f1/
  42. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/monaco-grand-prix-preview-quotes.4sW20hlBonEd9OoTzJMFlU
  43. https://tripletpowersports.com/racing-the-apex-line-choice-and-winning-at-every-corner/
  44. https://www.indycar.com/News/2013/06/6-7-Sport-Science-looks-at-G-forces
  45. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2011/10/19/its-banking-that-makes-indycar-ovals-dangerous/
  46. https://dirtfish.com/learn/how-to/how-to-choose-your-line/
  47. https://dirtfish.com/learn/how-to/how-to-drive-on-gravel-vs-asphalt/
  48. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tThAy5fKry0
  49. https://racetrackdriving.com/slalom-exercises/
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6099114/
  51. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/need-to-know-the-most-important-facts-stats-and-trivia-ahead-of-the-2025-monaco-grand-prix.7FbX7r8dNJZQF6jnyLnoJC
  52. https://www.formula1.com/en/results/2025/races/1261/monaco/fastest-laps
  53. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/explained-understanding-one-of-the-most-chaotic-controversial-title.4B98awxwP7JPgBWxIt5KnL
  54. https://www.formula1.com/en/racing/2021/united-arab-emirates
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.