Hubbry Logo
Return addressReturn addressMain
Open search
Return address
Community hub
Return address
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Return address
Return address
Return address
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Envelope with return address in top left corner

In postal mail, a return address is an explicit inclusion of the address of the person sending the message. It provides the recipient (and sometimes authorized intermediaries) with a means to determine how to respond to the sender of the message if needed.

The return address should include an address or P.O. box details in the same way as the delivery address should. In most countries such as the United States, Canada, Australia, France, the return address is located in the upper left-hand corner of the envelope, card, or label,[1][2][3][4] which is also recommended by the Universal Postal Union.[5] In the United Kingdom, the return address is usually placed on the reverse of the envelope, after the words "Return address".[6]

Businesses often use envelopes preprinted with a return address. Many individuals have sheets of adhesive labels preprinted with their home address to affix to their correspondence. Charities sometimes include such sheets in mailshots. Rolls of return address labels can be purchased from companies that sell personalized labels to provide individuals an easy way to peel and stick return address labels to their envelopes.

The return address is not required on postal mail. However, lack of a return address prevents the postal service from being able to return the item if it proves undeliverable; such as from damage, postage due, or invalid destination. Such mail may otherwise become dead letter mail.[7]

History

[edit]

The return address has been used on US postage since the 1880s. As pressure printing became more commonplace during the early 1900s, labels became cheaper and more easily distributed. The profession involved with producing these labels was known as lithography.

During the 1950s in the United States, more and more mail was not arriving at intended recipients, and as a result of the lack of a return address, said mail ended up in the dead letter office. With this rise in dead mail, the post office pleaded for people to use a return address. Even after this, the public still tended to neglect to add a return address. This prompted the postmaster to inform the public that mail without a return address would be less of a priority than mail with a return address.

Still, the public did not widely use a return address until the 1960s when companies began to offer deals for preprinted return labels such as 2,500 labels for $2.00. They became more popular with the invention of label dispensers. With the invention of the personal computer, software enabled people to print their own labels. As email began to overtake written mail, the return address became automatic in an e-mail.[8]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Return address

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A return address is the explicit address of the sender included on an , , or package, typically placed in the upper left corner, enabling postal services to return undeliverable pieces to the originator. In the United States, the (USPS) recommends including a return address on all to facilitate the return of undeliverable items and to support branding for business mailers through company names or logos. The return address must contain the sender's name and a complete delivery address. It should be printed in a legible font of 8 points or larger and positioned so as not to interfere with barcodes, stamps, or the delivery address. Return addresses serve critical functions beyond basic delivery, including enabling ancillary services such as address correction, forwarding, or return upon request, which help maintain accurate mailing lists and reduce waste from discarded undeliverable mail. While not mandatory for all domestic First-Class Mail, they are required for bulk mailings and mail with special services like insured or registered items; for international shipments, they are required regardless of class or service. Without a return address, undeliverable mail may be disposed of by the post office, potentially leading to lost communication or marketing materials. For international mail, USPS mandates a complete return address on all outbound pieces regardless of class or service, a policy effective January 4, 2010, to ensure compliance with global postal standards and efficient handling by foreign posts. The return address must contain the sender's full legal name—using roman letters and , with no abbreviations except as part of a —and a complete delivery address, including "USA" on the final line, and be formatted to align with the Universal Postal Union guidelines, typically placed in the upper left corner. This requirement applies to letters, postcards, and parcels, with customs forms necessitating the return address for regulatory purposes.

Definition and Purpose

Core Concept

A return address is the sender's contact information, typically consisting of their full name and complete , placed on outgoing postal items to enable the return of undeliverable to the originator. This information may occasionally include additional details such as a phone number or for further contact, though these are not standard requirements. The primary purpose is to provide postal services with a destination for items that cannot be delivered to the intended recipient due to issues like incorrect addressing, , or inability to locate the addressee. The return address is distinct from the delivery address, which is the recipient's information always required for routing the to its destination; in contrast, the return address—representing the sender's details—is optional for most types of but strongly recommended to facilitate recovery and avoid loss. Without a return address, postal authorities cannot readily send undeliverable items back, leading to their classification as dead . Such is then processed at Mail Recovery Centers, where it may be opened in an attempt to identify the sender or recipient; if unsuccessful, valueless items are disposed of as waste, while those of apparent value are handled separately through auctions or other means. A basic return address format includes the sender's name on the first line, followed by the street address, city, state, and , typically positioned in the upper-left corner of an . For example, it might appear as:
123 Main Street
Anytown, CA 90210 This standardized structure ensures legibility and compatibility with automated sorting systems. Omitting a return address increases the risk of the being treated as junk or irretrievable, potentially resulting in its destruction rather than return.

Role in Mail Systems

The return address plays a crucial role in postal systems by enabling the return of undeliverable mail to the sender, thereby ensuring accountability within the delivery ecosystem. When mail cannot be delivered as addressed—due to reasons such as an incorrect recipient address, refusal, or vacancy—postal services like the (USPS) rely on the return address to redirect the item back to the originator. This process is outlined in USPS Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) Section 507, which specifies that undeliverable mail is returned to the sender using the provided return address, often at no additional postage cost for classes like First-Class Mail and Priority Mail. Beyond return functionality, the return address verifies the sender's identity and facilitates notifications about delivery issues. Postal workers and security personnel check the return address to confirm the sender's legitimacy, particularly for suspicious or restricted mail, allowing contact with the originator if needed. For instance, in handling potentially hazardous items, the USPS instructs staff to verify the return address and reach out to the sender via the security office if unrecognized. Additionally, through endorsements like "Return Service Requested," the return address receives address correction notices or electronic updates via the Address Change Service (ACS), informing senders of issues such as outdated recipient details and enabling proactive adjustments. In postal workflows, return addresses integrate with automated sorting and recovery processes to support efficient redirection. While primary sorting machines, such as optical character readers, scan the delivery address to apply barcodes and route mail, undeliverable pieces are flagged for return using the sender's address during secondary handling. At facilities like Mail Recovery Centers (formerly dead letter offices), items with a valid return address are redirected to the sender; without one, they may be held, auctioned, or disposed of after attempts to identify contents. This integration minimizes operational bottlenecks, as seen in USPS protocols where return addresses guide holds (e.g., up to 30 days per sender instructions) and Package Intercept services for mid-delivery redirections. The use of return addresses yields benefits such as reduced waste and enhanced sender tracking within systems. By facilitating returns, postal services avoid unnecessary disposal of recoverable items; for example, in 2018, the USPS processed nearly 6 billion pieces of undeliverable-as-addressed (UAA) mail—about 4% of total —much of which was returned via return addresses rather than treated as waste, lowering environmental impact through and optimization. More recent data indicate a decline, with FY2023 marking the lowest UAA and percentage on record, and nearly 2 billion pieces of First-Class marked UAA in FY2024. Senders gain improved tracking by receiving physical returns or notices, allowing them to update records and reduce future UAA occurrences. In contrast to forwarding addresses, which are recipient-initiated for redirecting mail to a new location upon a change of , return addresses remain under the sender's control to specify the destination for any undeliverable items.

Physical Mail Applications

Envelope and Package Formatting

The return address on envelopes is typically placed in the upper-left corner of the address side, ensuring it does not interfere with barcodes, stamps, or the delivery address, with the delivery address positioned at least 1/2 inch from the edges and 1 inch below and to the right of the return address. This positioning aligns with the delivery address, which is centered or placed below, both printed parallel to the envelope's longest side. A minimum font size of 8-point type, preferably in a sans-serif style with uniform stroke thickness, is recommended to facilitate optical character recognition (OCR) during processing. Formatting the return address begins with the sender's full name on the first line, followed by the address (or P.O. Box), city, state abbreviation, and on subsequent lines, all in uppercase letters without punctuation except for the hyphen in the ZIP+4 if used. Abbreviations should follow USPS standards, such as "ST" for , "" for Avenue, or "BLVD" for Boulevard, to maintain consistency and avoid sorting errors. For international sent from the , the return address must include the full U.S. address with "USA" as the country designation on the last line to clearly identify the origin. Dark ink on a light background enhances , and the entire block should not exceed five lines. On packages, the return address follows similar guidelines but may be positioned on the top or largest flat surface to accommodate irregular shapes, always in the upper-left area relative to the delivery and parallel to the package's longest dimension. For durability, especially on parcels exposed to handling or , the is applied using labels or waterproof markers rather than handwritten directly on the surface, ensuring it remains intact throughout transit. Variations in formatting occur based on mail type. For business letters, the return address is often pre-printed on company within the document itself, but the envelope requires a separate upper-left placement, sometimes integrated with a for branding while adhering to the same size and style standards. Parcels, such as padded boxes, use reinforced labels affixed to a stable surface like the top panel; for example, on a standard 10x13-inch padded , the return address block (approximately 2x4 inches) sits 0.5 inches from the edges, contrasting against the material for visibility. Bulk mail, including promotional or pieces, frequently employs pre-printed return addresses on envelopes or wrappers, combined with indicia permits to streamline high-volume processing without individual stamps. A sample layout for a #10 envelope (4 1/8 x 9 1/2 inches) positions the in a compact block:
JOHN DOE
123 MAIN ST
ANYTOWN, CA 90210 This contrasts with a , where the same appears on a label spanning the top flap:
Sender: ABC Corp
(attached label, 4x6 inches)
456 BUSINESS AVE
CITY, ST 12345 Such designs prioritize clarity and automation compatibility, supporting efficient delivery while minimizing returns.

Postal Service Regulations

In the United States, the (USPS) mandates a return address on mailpieces under specific conditions, including all mail paid with precanceled stamps, meter stamps, or permit imprints, as well as items bearing ancillary service request legends such as "Address Service Requested." For standard First-Class Mail letters and flats weighing 13 ounces or less, a return address is optional but recommended to enable the return of undeliverable items; however, for any mail exceeding 13 ounces—which must be classified as Priority Mail or higher—a return address is required, and items lacking one may be refused at acceptance. The return address must include the sender's full legal name and complete in legible roman letters and , typically placed in the upper left corner of the mailpiece. As of 2023, with the introduction of USPS Ground Advantage replacing some package services, return address requirements continue to apply to these classes per DMM 602.1.5. Violations involving false or fictitious return addresses, particularly in cases of , can result in civil penalties imposed by USPS of up to $10,000 per violation through false representation orders, in addition to potential criminal charges under 18 U.S. § 1342 carrying fines up to $250,000 and imprisonment. Internationally, the Universal Postal Union (UPU), founded in , requires member countries to facilitate the redirection or return of undeliverable cross-border mail, as stipulated in its Universal Postal Convention, which supports the use of return addresses on mailpieces. UPU standards, such as the S10 technical specification for 13-character item identifiers, further support return processes by enabling tracking from origin to potential sender return, with the identifier often affixed via barcodes on customs forms like CN 22 or CP 72. USPS implements UPU standards by requiring return addresses on outbound international bulk mailings and recommending them for all international mail to ensure proper handling and return if undeliverable. USPS provides limited exceptions for anonymous mail without a return address, permitting such items only if they weigh 10 ounces or less and measure one-half inch or less in thickness; heavier or thicker must be presented directly at a retail counter and cannot be deposited in collection boxes. While specific waivers apply to sensitive mail like election ballots to protect voter , all such items carry tracking obligations to ensure delivery integrity. For compliance, USPS offers tools like Certified Mail, which requires a return address on the PS Form 3800 label placed above the delivery address and provides electronic tracking that embeds sender details for automated returns if undeliverable. Non-compliance with return address rules can lead to penalties including mailpiece refusal at acceptance, treatment as undeliverable, or disposal if no return is possible.

Historical Development

Early Origins

The earliest precedents for return addresses can be traced to ancient , where cylinder seals were used as personal signatures and identifiers on clay tablets dating back to approximately 3500 BCE. These seals, engraved with unique motifs representing the owner, were rolled across the surface of clay documents to authenticate transactions and indicate the sender's identity, functioning as a proto-form of sender verification in early written communication. In , the imperial courier system known as the , established around 20 BCE, relied on wax tablets for transporting official messages. These portable wooden tablets, coated with and inscribed with a , allowed couriers to carry lightweight correspondence across the empire. During the medieval period in , particularly from the 12th to 15th centuries, nobility and diplomatic envoys employed wax seals on letters to authenticate origins and secure confidential communications. These seals, pressed into attached to folded parchments, served as personal emblems verifying the sender for high-stakes diplomatic mail. The colonial era marked a shift toward formalized requirements for sender identification in British postal practices, exemplified by the Post Office Act of 1711, which unified the postal system across the and its colonies while addressing theft. This legislation set standardized rates and delivery protocols to enable tracing of misdirected or stolen items in expanding transatlantic networks. The invention of the in the 1450s by increased literacy and correspondence volume, gradually influencing epistolary conventions across .

Modern Standardization

The formalization of return addresses in modern postal systems began in the late with legislative reforms aimed at standardizing mail handling and accountability. The U.S. Postal Act of 1792 established uniform postage rates based on distance in a recipient-pays system, marking an early step toward systematic address inclusion for traceability across the growing network of post roads. This act laid the groundwork for consistent sender identification, reducing disputes over unpaid or undeliverable items. The mid-19th century saw further advancements with the introduction of adhesive postage stamps, which shifted to prepaid mail and encouraged standardized envelope designs incorporating dedicated return address fields. In 1847, the issued its first adhesive stamps—a 5-cent and a 10-cent Washington—prompting the widespread use of envelopes with pre-printed spaces for sender details to ensure efficient processing and return of misdirected mail. This innovation streamlined postal operations by embedding sender information directly into the mailing format, minimizing errors in an era of expanding volume. By the 20th century, technological integrations enhanced precision in return addressing. The introduction of the system in the United States on July 1, 1963, as part of the Zone Improvement Plan, enabled more accurate sorting and return of mail by appending a five-digit code to addresses, significantly reducing delivery times for undeliverables. In the 1970s, the U.S. Postal Service deployed (OCR) machines for automated sorting, mandating machine-readable address formats—including clear return details—to support high-speed processing of letters at rates up to 10,000 per hour. On a global scale, the Universal Postal Union (UPU) played a pivotal role in harmonizing return protocols through its congresses. The 1906 Rome Congress revised the Universal Postal Convention to standardize international mail exchange. The advent of in 1918 further influenced standards, as the U.S. Post Office Department's inaugural scheduled service necessitated durable address labeling to withstand aerial transport conditions, leading to reinforced envelope guidelines for international routes. In the 2020s, digital innovations have begun augmenting traditional return addresses while preserving physical requirements for accountability. The U.S. Postal Service's Electronic Return Receipt service provides digital with timestamped sender details, allowing hybrid electronic-physical tracking for certain classes. However, core regulations continue to mandate visible physical return addresses on envelopes and packages to ensure legal compliance and reliable undeliverable returns, even as e-postmarks facilitate authenticated digital submissions in specialized contexts like tax filings.

International and Digital Variations

Country-Specific Practices

In the United Kingdom, recommends the inclusion of a full postcode in the return address for efficient sorting and delivery, as postcodes are integral to the automated processing system. While not legally required for all letters, a return address is essential for redirecting undeliverable mail. China's State Post Bureau requires sender identification, including full name, , and contact details, for all domestic to enhance and , a policy strengthened after 2010 in response to national regulations on postal safety. In urban areas, return addresses follow a standardized format with postal codes, but rural regions permit simplified formats that rely more on local landmarks or village names due to less precise addressing infrastructure. India Post utilizes six-digit PIN (Postal Index Number) codes in return addresses to streamline sorting across its vast network, making them a core component of any effective sender details. Common divergences in return address practices include variations in order and language; for instance, in , the recipient's address is placed centrally on the with the return address in the top-left corner, following a hierarchy from to house number, while domestic requires Japanese script and international mail recommends Romanized English for clarity. These adaptations reflect national postal infrastructures and cultural conventions, diverging from Western left-to-right, sender-first formats.

Equivalents in Electronic Communication

In electronic communication, the return address concept translates to sender identifiers that facilitate responses or while prioritizing and . In systems, the "From" header field acts as the primary digital analog to a physical return address, specifying the sender's for replies and originating the message. This field is mandated by RFC 5322, the current Internet Message Format standard, which requires a valid sender domain to ensure message integrity and enable routing. The foundational requirements for the "From" field trace back to RFC 822, published in 1982, which first standardized headers to include sender details in a structured format. Online marketplaces like Amazon and automate return address handling through generated shipping labels that embed buyer and seller details for logistics, while incorporating privacy safeguards. On Amazon, sellers configure default return addresses via Seller Central, which appear on auto-generated labels for buyer returns; options allow routing to the nearest facility to the buyer, reducing exposure of personal locations. eBay similarly provides return labels with seller-specified addresses, limiting direct access to buyer shipping information to comply with GDPR by restricting data sharing to essential transaction needs only. These features enable anonymous processing where possible, such as using fulfillment centers to mask home addresses. For SMS and messaging applications, the sender's phone number or ID functions as the return identifier, permitting direct replies without additional setup. Privacy protections include mandatory mechanisms, where recipients text keywords like "STOP," "END," or "UNSUBSCRIBE" to halt messages, aligning with TCPA requirements to respect user consent. Over time, digital return addresses have evolved from unverified plain-text entries to authenticated identifiers to mitigate spoofing risks. The protocol, first published on January 30, 2012, represents a pivotal shift by integrating SPF and DKIM validation with domain-owner policies for rejecting or quarantining suspicious emails. This framework verifies sender domains against published records, significantly reducing impersonation in electronic mail.

Privacy and Liability Issues

Disclosing a return address on physical mail can expose individuals to significant risks, as it reveals personal that may be exploited for , , or targeted spam. In cases of , unsolicited sent to a known or suspected address can confirm occupancy, enabling perpetrators to escalate threats without direct interaction. Similarly, physical spam campaigns, such as junk mail or unsolicited packages, often originate from address lists compiled through , leading to persistent unwanted solicitations that compromise personal security. Liability issues arise primarily from the financial and legal responsibilities borne by senders when mail is returned undelivered. Under (USPS) regulations, senders are typically responsible for return postage on undeliverable items unless prepaid return services are used, at standard rates for the mail class plus any applicable fees for forwarding or handling. This accountability extends to scenarios, where scammers use fake return addresses to perpetrate schemes like package redirection or brushing scams; in the latter, unsolicited goods are shipped to victims' addresses to generate fraudulent online reviews, with recent variants as of 2025 including QR codes in packages that lead to sites when scanned, potentially implicating innocent parties in delivery disputes or postage recovery efforts. Protections against these vulnerabilities include the use of (PO) Boxes, which have provided a layer of since their early implementation in the , allowing users to shield their residential addresses from direct exposure on outgoing mail. On an international scale, the Universal Postal Union (UPU) addresses data protection through provisions adopted at its 2016 Istanbul Congress, mandating that the International Bureau treat individual postal data, including address information, in strict confidence to prevent unauthorized access or misuse across member countries. A notable case illustrating return address vulnerabilities occurred in , when a flaw in the USPS online portal exposed account details, including addresses, for approximately 60 million users, highlighting risks in bulk mail processing where return data could be aggregated and breached, potentially fueling spam or identity-related crimes.

Guidelines for Effective Use

To ensure the highest rate of successful returns for undeliverable mail, return addresses should be printed in a clear, legible manner using simple fonts such as with uniform stroke thickness, dark ink on a background, and all capital letters without punctuation for optimal readability by postal sorting equipment and handlers. Including alternate contact information, such as an or phone number, alongside the physical return address can facilitate quicker resolution if the mail is returned, allowing recipients or postal services to reach the sender directly without delays. Prior to mailing, verify address accuracy using official USPS tools like the Lookup or Validation , which standardize and correct potential errors to prevent undeliverable returns. Businesses can optimize return processes by implementing standardized templates for return addresses that incorporate tracking numbers via Intelligent Mail barcodes, enabling real-time monitoring of returned items through the USPS . Obtaining a bulk mail permit, such as for Business Reply (BRM), allows companies to prepay return postage and reduce per-piece fees on high-volume returns, with specific formats requiring USPS approval of proofs to ensure compliance and cost efficiency. When troubleshooting bounced or undeliverable returns, businesses and individuals should regularly update mailing lists using the USPS National Change of Address (NCOA) Link database, which processes change-of-address records to minimize returns through standardized address corrections. For eco-friendly practices, opt for return address labels made from 100% post-consumer recycled paper with recyclable adhesives, as promoted in USPS sustainable supply options, to reduce environmental impact without compromising adhesion or legibility. In special cases like holiday mail surges, enhance return address visibility by using larger fonts or high-contrast colors on envelopes to counteract increased processing volumes, ensuring legibility amid peak-season handling. For international shipping, always include a complete return address in Roman letters and on both the package and required forms (e.g., PS Form 2976), matching exactly to avoid delays or seizures. While addressing risks from exposed return addresses, these practices help maintain recoverability without unnecessary personal details.

References

  1. https://pe.usps.com/businessmail101?ViewName=ReturnAddress
  2. https://pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/602.htm
  3. https://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc1_008.htm
  4. https://pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/507.htm#ep1113772
  5. https://about.usps.com/postal-bulletin/2009/pb22273/html/updt_008.htm
  6. https://www.usps.com/international/letters.htm
  7. https://pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/507.htm
  8. https://about.usps.com/publications/pub166/pub166_v04_revision_112019_tech_015.htm
  9. https://people.howstuffworks.com/usps4.htm
  10. https://faq.usps.com/s/article/How-is-Undeliverable-and-Misdelivered-Mail-Handled
  11. https://www.pitneybowes.com/content/dam/pitneybowes/us/en/shipping-and-mailing/address-management/19_PBCS_02698_Return_Mail_White_Paper_web_JUNE_2019_FINAL.pdf
  12. https://www.sepire.com/blog/undeliverable-as-addressed-mail-facts-figures-and-fixes-part-1
  13. https://www.d-4solutions.com/usps-undeliverable-mail-reasons/
  14. https://about.usps.com/postal-bulletin/2018/pb22491/html/info_009.htm
  15. https://www.usps.com/manage/forward.htm
  16. https://about.usps.com/publications/pub25/pub25_ch1_007.htm
  17. https://pe.usps.com/text/dmm100/addressing-mail.htm
  18. https://pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/202.htm
  19. https://pe.usps.com/text/pub28/28apc_002.htm
  20. https://www.usps.com/international/preparing-international-shipments.htm
  21. https://pe.usps.com/text/qsg300/q602.htm
  22. https://www.usps.com/ship/packages.htm
  23. https://store.usps.com/store/product/priority-mail-address-labels-P_LABEL_228
  24. https://pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/604.htm
  25. https://about.usps.com/postal-bulletin/2007/html/pb22203a/field_kit.8.12.html
  26. https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/judicial/admin-decisions/2015/fr-13-56-psd.htm
  27. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1342
  28. https://bdsc.indiana.edu/pdf/universal_postal_convention.pdf
  29. https://www.upu.int/UPU/media/upu/files/postalSolutions/programmesAndServices/standards/S10-12.pdf
  30. https://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/facilitation/instruments-and-tools/tools/upu/joint-wco-upu-guidelines.pdf?la=en
  31. https://about.usps.com/postal-bulletin/2019/pb22530/html/updt_003.htm
  32. https://www.uspsoig.gov/reports/white-papers/vote-mail-and-postal-service-primer
  33. https://faq.usps.com/s/article/Certified-Mail-The-Basics
  34. https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/the-origin-and-development-of-the-ancient-near-eastern-cylinder-seal/
  35. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/846/cylinder-seals-in-ancient-mesopotamia---their-hist/
  36. https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/ancient-history/roman-mail-system/
  37. https://www.ancient-origins.net/history/cursus-publicus-0019780
  38. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/medieval-seals/
  39. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/42983/42983-h/42983-h.htm
  40. https://historyofparliament.com/2024/02/08/18th-century-post-office-and-postmasters-general/
  41. https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-printing-press-impact-on-the-english-language.html
  42. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/postal-service-act-of-1792/
  43. https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/postal-history/domestic-letter-rates-1792-1863.pdf
  44. https://postalmuseum.si.edu/exhibition/about-us-stamps-classic-period-1847-1893-rawdon-wright-hatch-edson-1847-1851/1847-1851
  45. https://facts.usps.com/decoding-the-zip-code/
  46. https://www.sri.com/press/story/75-years-of-innovation-advanced-postal-address-recognition/
  47. https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/postal-history/airmail.pdf
  48. https://faq.usps.com/s/article/What-is-Electronic-Return-Receipt
  49. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-regs/td8807.pdf
  50. https://www.royalmail.com/retail-compensation-policy-loss
  51. https://help.royalmail.com/personal/s/article/How-to-address-your-mail-clear-addressing-tips
  52. https://english.shanghai.gov.cn/en-ResidentChecklist/20231215/c492629c319e40929eaf103d8396af9e.html
  53. https://www.etowertech.com/industry-news/know-about-china-postal-parcel.html
  54. https://www.indiapost.gov.in/documents/documents/ManualsGuides/PO_Guide_Part-II.pdf
  55. https://www.post.japanpost.jp/int/use/writing/normal_en.html
  56. https://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2224.html
  57. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322
  58. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc822
  59. https://sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/reference/external/G201711720
  60. https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/member-behaviour-policies/user-privacy-notice-privacy-policy?id=4260
  61. https://www.twilio.com/en-us/blog/insights/compliance/opt-in-opt-out-text-messages
  62. https://easydmarc.com/blog/what-is-dmarc-a-bit-of-history/
  63. https://dmarc.org/
  64. https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-return-mail-from-a-stalker-without-confirming-you-live-there-It-was-signature-required-but-they-dropped-it-off-anyway-Stalker-is-fishing-various-addresses-of-known-acquaintances
  65. https://blog.incogni.com/what-if-someone-uses-your-address/
  66. https://pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/notice123.htm
  67. https://www.reddit.com/r/usps_complaints/comments/16svh3o/have_to_pay_to_return_to_sender_seriously/
  68. https://www.uspis.gov/news/scam-article/brushing-scam
  69. https://consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2025/01/got-package-you-didnt-order-its-probably-scam
  70. https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/us-postal-service-war-private-mailboxes-privacy-rights
  71. https://www.upu.int/UPU/media/upu/files/aboutUpu/acts/08-actsAndOtherDecisionsPreviousCongresses/acts2016DecisionsIstanbulEn.pdf
  72. https://krebsonsecurity.com/2018/11/usps-site-exposed-data-on-60-million-users/
  73. https://smart.dhgate.com/mastering-the-from-address-a-clear-guide-to-writing-return-addresses-correctly/
  74. https://tools.usps.com/zip-code-lookup.htm
  75. https://www.usps.com/business/web-tools-apis/address-information-api.htm
  76. https://postalpro.usps.com/brm
  77. https://pe.usps.com/text/qsg300/q505.htm
  78. http://postalpro.usps.com/mailing-and-shipping-services/NCOALink
  79. https://store.usps.com/store/results/sustainable-supplies/_/N-19vsn4c
  80. https://about.usps.com/holidaynews/holiday-happenings/11-20-naughty-and-nice-guide-to-addressing-packages.htm
  81. https://www.usps.com/international/customs-forms.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.