Hubbry Logo
Rolling circle replicationRolling circle replicationMain
Open search
Rolling circle replication
Community hub
Rolling circle replication
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Rolling circle replication
Rolling circle replication
Rolling circle replication
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Rolling circle replication produces multiple copies of a single circular template.

Rolling circle replication (RCR) is a process of unidirectional nucleic acid replication that can rapidly synthesize multiple copies of circular molecules of DNA or RNA, such as plasmids, the genomes of bacteriophages, and the circular RNA genome of viroids. Some eukaryotic viruses also replicate their DNA or RNA via the rolling circle mechanism.

As a simplified version of natural rolling circle replication, an isothermal DNA amplification technique, rolling circle amplification was developed. The RCA mechanism is widely used in molecular biology and biomedical nanotechnology, especially in the field of biosensing (as a method of signal amplification).[1]

Circular DNA replication

[edit]
Illustration of rolling circle replication.

Rolling circle DNA replication is initiated by an initiator protein encoded by the plasmid or bacteriophage DNA, which nicks one strand of the double-stranded, circular DNA molecule at a site called the double-strand origin, or DSO. The initiator protein remains bound to the 5' phosphate end of the nicked strand, and the free 3' hydroxyl end is released to serve as a primer for DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase III. Using the unnicked strand as a template, replication proceeds around the circular DNA molecule, displacing the nicked strand as single-stranded DNA. Displacement of the nicked strand is carried out by a host-encoded helicase called PcrA (the abbreviation standing for plasmid copy reduced) in the presence of the plasmid replication initiation protein.

Continued DNA synthesis can produce multiple single-stranded linear copies of the original DNA in a continuous head-to-tail series called a concatemer. These linear copies can be converted to double-stranded circular molecules through the following process:

First, the initiator protein makes another nick in the DNA to terminate synthesis of the first (leading) strand. RNA polymerase and DNA polymerase III then replicate the single-stranded origin (SSO) DNA to make another double-stranded circle. DNA polymerase I removes the primer, replacing it with DNA, and DNA ligase joins the ends to make another molecule of double-stranded circular DNA.

As a summary, a typical DNA rolling circle replication has five steps:[2]

  1. Circular dsDNA will be "nicked".
  2. The 3' end is elongated using "unnicked" DNA as leading strand (template); 5' end is displaced.
  3. Displaced DNA is a lagging strand and is made double stranded via a series of Okazaki fragments.
  4. Replication of both "unnicked" and displaced ssDNA.
  5. Displaced DNA circularizes.

Virology

[edit]

Replication of viral DNA

[edit]

Some DNA viruses replicate their genomic information in host cells via rolling circle replication. For instance, human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6)(hibv) expresses a set of "early genes" that are believed to be involved in this process.[3] The long concatemers that result are subsequently cleaved between the pac-1 and pac-2 regions of HHV-6's genome by ribozymes when it is packaged into individual virions.[4]

A model for HPV16 rolling circle replication.

Human Papillomavirus-16 (HPV-16) is another virus that employs rolling replication to produce progeny at a high rate. HPV-16 infects human epithelial cells and has a double stranded circular genome. During replication, at the origin, the E1 hexamer wraps around the single strand DNA and moves in the 3' to 5' direction. In normal bidirectional replication, the two replication proteins will disassociate at time of collision, but in HPV-16 it is believed that the E1 hexamer does not disassociate, hence leading to a continuous rolling replication. It is believed that this replication mechanism of HPV may have physiological implications into the integration of the virus into the host chromosome and eventual progression into cervical cancer.[5]

In addition, geminivirus also utilizes rolling circle replication as its replication mechanism. It is a virus that is responsible for destroying many major crops, such as cassava, cotton, legumes, maize, tomato and okra. The virus has a circular, single stranded, DNA that replicates in host plant cells. The entire process is initiated by the geminiviral replication initiator protein, Rep, which is also responsible for altering the host environment to act as part of the replication machinery. Rep is also strikingly similar to most other rolling replication initiator proteins of eubacteria, with the presence of motifs I, II, and III at is N terminus. During the rolling circle replication, the ssDNA of geminivirus is converted to dsDNA and Rep is then attached to the dsDNA at the origin sequence TAATATTAC. After Rep, along with other replication proteins, binds to the dsDNA it forms a stem loop where the DNA is then cleaved at the nanomer sequence causing a displacement of the strand. This displacement allows the replication fork to progress in the 3’ to 5’ direction which ultimately yields a new ssDNA strand and a concatameric DNA strand.[6]

Bacteriophage T4 DNA replication intermediates include circular and branched circular concatemeric structures.[7] These structures likely reflect a rolling circle mechanism of replication.

Replication of viral RNA

[edit]

Some RNA viruses and viroids also replicate their genome through rolling circle RNA replication. For viroids, there are two alternative RNA replication pathways that respectively followed by members of the family Pospiviroidae (asymmetric replication) and Avsunviroidae (symmetric replication).

Rolling circle replication of viral RNA

In the family Pospiviroidae (PSTVd-like), the circular plus strand RNA is transcribed by a host RNA polymerase into oligomeric minus strands and then oligomeric plus strands.[8] These oligomeric plus strands are cleaved by a host RNase and ligated by a host RNA ligase to reform the monomeric plus strand circular RNA. This is called the asymmetric pathway of rolling circle replication. The viroids in the family Avsunviroidae (ASBVd-like) replicate their genome through the symmetric pathway of rolling circle replication.[9] In this symmetric pathway, oligomeric minus strands are first cleaved and ligated to form monomeric minus strands, and then are transcribed into oligomeric plus strands. These oligomeric plus strands are then cleaved and ligated to reform the monomeric plus strand. The symmetric replication pathway was named because both plus and minus strands are produced the same way.

Cleavage of the oligomeric plus and minus strands is mediated by the self-cleaving hammerhead ribozyme structure present in the Avsunviroidae, but such structure is absent in the Pospiviroidae.[10]

Rolling circle amplification (RCA)

[edit]
The molecular mechanism of Rolling Circle Amplification (RCA)

The derivative form of rolling circle replication has been successfully used for amplification of DNA from very small amounts of starting material.[1] This amplification technique is named as rolling circle amplification (RCA). Different from conventional DNA amplification techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), RCA is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique where the polymerase continuously adds single nucleotides to a primer annealed to a circular template which results in a long concatemer ssDNA that contains tens to hundreds of tandem repeats (complementary to the circular template).[11]

There are five important components required for performing a RCA reaction:

  1. A DNA polymerase
  2. A suitable buffer that is compatible with the polymerase.
  3. A short DNA or RNA primer
  4. A circular DNA template
  5. Deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs)
The detection methods of RCA product

The polymerases used in RCA are Phi29, Bst, and Vent exo-DNA polymerase for DNA amplification, and T7 RNA polymerase for RNA amplification. Since Phi29 DNA polymerase has the best processivity and strand displacement ability among all aforementioned polymerases, it has been most frequently used in RCA reactions. Different from polymerase chain reaction (PCR), RCA can be conducted at a constant temperature (room temperature to 65C) in both free solution and on top of immobilized targets (solid phase amplification).

There are typically three steps involved in a DNA RCA reaction:

  1. Circular template ligation, which can be conducted via template mediated enzymatic ligation (e.g., T4 DNA ligase) or template-free ligation using special DNA ligases (i.e., CircLigase).
  2. Primer-induced single-strand DNA elongation. Multiple primers can be employed to hybridize with the same circle. As a result, multiple amplification events can be initiated, producing multiple RCA products ("Multiprimed RCA").
  3. Amplification product detection and visualization, which is most commonly conducted through fluorescent detection, with fluorophore-conjugated dNTP, fluorophore-tethered complementary or fluorescently-labeled molecular beacons. In addition to the fluorescent approaches, gel electrophoresis is also widely used for the detection of RCA product.

RCA produces a linear amplification of DNA, as each circular template grows at a given speed for a certain amount of time. To increase yield and achieve exponential amplification as PCR does, several approaches have been investigated. One of them is the hyperbranched rolling circle amplification or HRCA, where primers that anneal to the original RCA products are added, and also extended.[12] In this way the original RCA creates more template that can be amplified. Another is circle to circle amplification or C2CA, where the RCA products are digested with a restriction enzyme and ligated into new circular templates using a restriction oligo, followed by a new round of RCA with a larger amount of circular templates for amplification.[13]

Applications of RCA

[edit]
illustration of immuno-RCA

RCA can amplify a single molecular binding event over a thousandfold, making it particularly useful for detecting targets with ultra-low abundance. RCA reactions can be performed in not only free solution environments, but also on a solid surface like glass, micro- or nano-bead, microwell plates, microfluidic devices or even paper strips. This feature makes it a very powerful tool for amplifying signals in solid-phase immunoassays (e.g., ELISA). In this way, RCA is becoming a highly versatile signal amplification tool with wide-ranging applications in genomics, proteomics, diagnosis and biosensing.

Immuno-RCA

[edit]

Immuno-RCA is an isothermal signal amplification method for high-specificity & high-sensitivity protein detection and quantification. This technique combines two fields: RCA, which allows nucleotide amplification, and immunoassay, which uses antibodies specific to intracellular or free biomarkers. As a result, immuno-RCA gives a specific amplified signal (high signal-to-noise ratio), making it suitable for detecting, quantifying and visualizing low abundance proteic markers in liquid-phase immunoassays[14][15][16] and immunohistochemistry.

Immuno-RCA follows a typical immuno-adsorbent reaction in ELISA or immunohistochemistry tissue staining.[17] The detection antibodies used in immuno-RCA reaction are modified by attaching a ssDNA oligonucleotide on the end of the heavy chains. So the Fab (Fragment, antigen binding) section on the detection antibody can still bind to specific antigens and the oligonucleotide can serve as a primer of the RCA reaction.

The typical antibody mediated immuno-RCA procedure is as follows:

Illustration of aptamer based immuno-rca

1. A detection antibody recognizes a specific proteic target. This antibody is also attached to an oligonucleotide primer.

2. When circular DNA is present, it is annealed, and the primer matches to the circular DNA complementary sequence.

3. The complementary sequence of the circular DNA template is copied hundreds of times and remains attached to the antibody.

4. RCA output (elongated ssDNA) is detected with fluorescent probes using a fluorescent microscope or a microplate reader.

Aptamer based immuno-RCA

[edit]

In addition to antibody mediated immuno-RCA, the ssDNA RCA primer can be conjugated to the 3' end of a DNA aptamer as well. The primer tail can be amplified through rolling circle amplification. The product can be visualized through the labeling of fluorescent reporter.[18] The process is illustrated in the figure on the right.[19]

Other applications of RCA

[edit]

Various derivatives of RCA were widely used in the field of biosensing. For example, RCA has been successfully used for detecting the existence of viral and bacterial DNA from clinical samples,[20][21] which is very beneficial for rapid diagnostics of infectious diseases. It has also been used as an on-chip signal amplification method for nucleic acid (for both DNA and RNA) microarray assay.[1]

In addition to the amplification function in biosensing applications, RCA technique can be applied to the construction of DNA nanostructures and DNA hydrogels as well. The products of RCA can also be use as templates for periodic assembly of nanospecies or proteins, synthesis of metallic nanowires[22] and formation of nano-islands.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Rolling circle replication

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Rolling circle replication (RCR) is a unidirectional replication mechanism utilized by certain circular DNA and RNA genomes, such as those in plasmids, viruses, and viroids, in which a site-specific nick in one strand of the nucleic acid initiates continuous synthesis of a new leading strand by a polymerase, displacing the original nontemplate strand to produce single-stranded linear concatemers that can be further processed into double-stranded forms. First observed in the single-stranded DNA ΦX174, RCR was described in 1968 as a process generating multimeric tail-like structures during replication. The mechanism begins when a multifunctional initiator protein—typically a HUH endonuclease with a conserved catalytic residue—binds to the double-strand origin (dso) and cleaves one strand via a reversible reaction, covalently attaching itself to the 5' phosphate end and exposing a 3'-OH primer for leading-strand elongation. This displacement synthesis continues around the circular template, extruding single-stranded that may form secondary structures or be packaged directly in some viruses, while lagging-strand synthesis occurs later at single-strand origins (sso) using host-encoded polymerases and primases. RCR is prevalent in bacterial plasmids (e.g., pT181 and pMV158 families), single-stranded DNA phages (e.g., M13 and ), archaeal plasmids, eukaryotic viruses like parvoviruses and (AAV), RNA pathogens such as viroids and hepatitis delta virus, and mobile elements such as integrative conjugative elements, enabling high-copy-number maintenance and facilitating . Unlike bidirectional replication, RCR is asymmetric, generates single-stranded intermediates without requiring for unwinding, and relies on the initiator's helicase-like activity for strand separation. The initiator proteins, often encoded by the replicating element (e.g., Rep proteins), are remarkably versatile, performing not only replication initiation but also roles in conjugation (as Mob proteins) or transposition (as Tnp proteins), which underscores RCR's evolutionary significance in genetic mobility and diversity.

Mechanism

DNA Rolling Circle Replication

Rolling circle replication is a mode of DNA replication in which a circular template, either double-stranded (dsDNA) or single-stranded (ssDNA), is nicked at a specific origin site, enabling continuous synthesis of a complementary strand from the exposed 3'-OH end while displacing the non-template strand as a linear tail. This process contrasts with bidirectional theta replication by producing long, linear concatemeric products rather than discrete circles, and it is prevalent in certain bacteriophages and plasmids. The mechanism relies on strand displacement to unwind the template without the need for extensive primer synthesis on the displaced arm, allowing processive replication over multiple genome lengths. The process initiates with site-specific nicking of the circular template by an endonuclease or initiator protein, such as the A protein in phiX174, which cleaves one strand at the double-stranded origin (dso) and forms a between its tyrosine residue and the 5'- end. This generates a 3'-OH primer for while leaving the 5' end attached to the protein. Elongation follows as the , often the host's , extends the 3'-OH end processively, synthesizing a new strand complementary to the template and displacing the original non-template strand ahead of the replication fork. A , such as the E. coli Rep helicase in phiX174 replication, facilitates strand separation by unwinding the duplex ahead of the , while single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) coat the displaced strand to prevent reannealing. Topoisomerases, including , relieve the positive supercoils generated during elongation to maintain fork progression. Termination occurs when the replication fork completes one or more rounds and returns to the origin, where the initiator protein catalyzes a second cleavage to regenerate the original nick site and release the displaced linear strand as a circular via ligation or further processing. In dsDNA contexts, the displaced single strand can then undergo complementary strand synthesis to form a new dsDNA circle, completing the cycle. For ssDNA templates like those in phiX174, the process often produces multimeric tails that are resolved into unit-length circles. seals nicks in the regenerated template or newly formed circles to ensure covalently closed products. This resolution step may involve additional phage-encoded factors to regulate product length and prevent over-replication. Structurally, rolling circle replication features a characteristic sigma-shaped replication fork, resembling the Greek letter σ, where the circular template remains intact with an extending linear tail of the displaced strand, distinguishing it from the (θ) of bidirectional replication. In dsDNA circles, the mechanism transitions from an initial mode to rolling upon nicking, amplifying one strand asymmetrically. This sigma fork allows for high processivity, with the displaced arm serving as a scaffold for potential secondary synthesis. A canonical example is the replication of bacteriophage phiX174, an ssDNA phage with a 5.4 kb genome. Upon infection, the incoming +ssDNA circularizes and is converted to the dsDNA replicative form (RF I) through host-mediated complementary (-) strand synthesis primed at a single-strand origin (sso) by RNA polymerase or primase. The closed circular RF II then undergoes stage II replication via rolling circle mode: the phage-encoded A protein nicks the (+) strand at the dso, initiating displacement synthesis of a new (+) strand by host DNA polymerase III and Rep helicase, producing a long ssDNA (+) tail displaced from the RF template. The A protein terminates by cleaving at the origin after each genome length, regenerating the RF template and releasing ssDNA circles coated by SSBs; these ssDNA products are packaged into virions, while the persistent RF supports ongoing replication. This asymmetric process yields hundreds of ssDNA genomes per RF without net RF increase after initial rounds. The progression rate of the replication fork in rolling circle replication can be modeled using enzyme kinetics, where the strand displacement speed vv is given by v=k⋅[polymerase]v = k \cdot [\text{polymerase}], with kk as the catalytic constant (turnover number) of the polymerase under saturating dNTP conditions. This derives from the Michaelis-Menten equation for enzymatic velocity, v=Vmax⁡⋅[S]Km+[S]v = \frac{V_{\max} \cdot [S]}{K_m + [S]}, where at high substrate concentration [S]≫Km[S] \gg K_m, v≈Vmax⁡=kcat⋅[E]v \approx V_{\max} = k_{\text{cat}} \cdot [E]; here, k=kcatk = k_{\text{cat}} represents nucleotides incorporated per polymerase molecule per second, and the fork speed scales linearly with enzyme concentration due to processive elongation without dissociation. For E. coli DNA polymerase III, typical kcatk_{\text{cat}} values range from 500–1000 nt/s, enabling rapid tail extension in vivo. Illustrations of the mechanism typically depict: (1) the nicked circular dsDNA template with the initiator protein bound at the dso, showing the 3'-OH primer and attached 5' end; (2) the elongating structure with a sigma-shaped fork, and advancing along the circle while generating a linear ssDNA tail; and (3) termination products as multimeric linear ssDNA or resolved monomeric circles, highlighting the regenerated template for iterative cycles.

RNA Rolling Circle Replication

RNA rolling circle replication is a specialized mechanism employed by certain subviral pathogens, such as viroids, to amplify their circular RNA genomes using host-derived RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRp) without involving DNA intermediates. This process generates long, multimeric RNA transcripts that are subsequently processed into unit-length monomeric circles, enabling efficient propagation of small, non-protein-coding RNA molecules. Unlike the more prevalent DNA-based rolling circle replication, which relies on nicking endonucleases and DNA polymerases, the RNA variant utilizes self-cleaving ribozymes and host polymerases redirected to template RNA strands, highlighting its adaptation for RNA-only systems. The mechanism unfolds in three principal steps. Initiation begins with the circular RNA serving as a template, where a host polymerase—typically in the nucleus for Pospiviroidae family viroids—binds and creates a 3' end for priming, often facilitated by specific structural motifs like the left terminal loop in (PSTVd). Elongation proceeds via continuous, reiterative transcription by the RdRp, displacing the newly synthesized strand and producing linear, concatenated multimers of the complementary polarity; this yields exponential amplification, with the number of genomic units scaling with replication rounds and initial template size. of these multimers involves site-specific cleavage to generate unit-length RNAs, followed by ligation to reform circles; cleavage is mediated by viroid-encoded ribozymes, such as hammerhead ribozymes in avocado sunblotch viroid (ASBVd), or host enzymes like RNase III-like activities in PSTVd. Ligation may occur via host RNA ligases or autocatalytic means, completing the cycle. Key enzymes and factors underscore the reliance on host machinery. Host RdRp, such as nuclear-encoded chloroplastic (NEP) in Avsunviroidae, drives elongation after being hijacked to recognize templates. provide autonomous processing: the hammerhead ribozyme in ASBVd enables self-cleavage of multimeric transcripts in the under symmetric replication. In contrast, Pospiviroidae like PSTVd employ asymmetric replication in the nucleus, where host II initiates minus-strand synthesis via rolling circle, but plus strands form through distinct, non-rolling mechanisms. These factors ensure precise control without viral proteins. Structurally, single-stranded circular RNAs maintain stability without supercoiling, adopting rod-like (PSTVd) or quasi-rod-like (ASBVd) conformations that expose functional domains for binding and activity. The resulting concatenated transcripts form extended linear chains, which are resolved into monomers, preserving the circular form essential for infectivity. A representative example is the replication of PSTVd, a 359-nucleotide causing potato spindle tuber disease, which localizes to the host and hijacks for transcription. Here, the circular plus strand templates minus-strand multimers via rolling circle, which are cleaved and circularized; plus strands are amplified separately, supporting overall exponential propagation. This mechanism exemplifies how rolling circle replication amplifies compact, genomes autonomously in eukaryotic hosts.

Natural Biological Contexts

In Bacteriophages and Plasmids

Rolling circle replication plays a crucial role in the propagation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) bacteriophages, such as and M13, by enabling asymmetric synthesis of progeny viral genomes during the late stages of infection. In these phages, the process was first elucidated in the 1960s through studies on , where David T. Denhardt and colleagues identified rolling circle intermediates as key structures in ssDNA production. Upon infection, the incoming ssDNA genome is converted to a double-stranded replicative form (RF) by host polymerases, followed by initial RF amplification via bidirectional theta replication. Late in the , replication shifts to the rolling circle mode to generate up to 100-200 ssDNA copies per cell, matching the typical burst size of infections. For φX174, the viral gene A protein acts as a site-specific endonuclease, covalently binding to the 5' phosphate at the (ori) on supercoiled RF DNA to create a nick that initiates strand displacement. This protein remains attached during elongation, where host III extends the 3' end processively, displacing the non-template strand as a single-stranded tail that is coated by SSB proteins to prevent reannealing. Termination occurs when a full genome-length ssDNA is produced, with gene A cleaving the regenerated ori and ligating the new circle, allowing reinitiation. In parallel, viral coat proteins, particularly gene F product, inhibit further RF synthesis by binding the displaced ssDNA and promoting packaging into procapsids, thus favoring asymmetric ssDNA output over symmetric dsDNA replication. The filamentous phage M13 employs a similar , with its II protein performing the ori-specific nicking on RF DNA to launch rolling circle replication for ssDNA progeny synthesis. Unlike lytic phages like , M13 extrusion does not lyse the host, and protein assembly on the displaced ssDNA at the inhibits dsDNA synthesis, ensuring continuous virion release without . This mechanism integrates with the phage life cycle by producing ssDNA genomes that are packaged sequentially, supporting high-titer production in infected cells. In bacterial plasmids, rolling circle replication maintains stable, high-copy-number propagation of small extrachromosomal elements, typically under 10 kb in size, such as the Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pT181. These plasmids feature replication origins with iterons—short repeated sequences that facilitate binding of the plasmid-encoded initiator protein. For pT181, the RepC protein dimer binds the double-stranded origin (dso), nicking the top strand at a specific tyrosine residue to initiate leading-strand synthesis via host polymerases, displacing the non-template strand as ssDNA. After one replication round, producing a monomeric circle and a displaced linear ssDNA that circularizes via the single-strand origin (sso), the modified RepC* form resolves any dimers by nicking the bottom strand, ensuring copy number control through initiator inactivation. This mode allows some plasmids to transition from initial replication to rolling for , enhancing in diverse bacterial hosts. Biologically, rolling circle replication offers advantages for small circular genomes by enabling highly processive, high-fidelity synthesis using host machinery, which minimizes errors and supports rapid amplification without multiple initiation events. Additionally, the transient ssDNA intermediates reduce recombination risks compared to linear forms, as they are quickly converted to dsDNA or coated, promoting genetic stability in compact replicons.

In Eukaryotic Viruses and Viroids

Rolling circle replication is essential for the replication of certain single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) eukaryotic viruses, particularly parvoviruses and adeno-associated virus (AAV). Parvoviruses, such as adeno-associated virus (AAV), depend on a helper virus or cellular factors for replication. The process begins with the conversion of the incoming ssDNA genome to a double-stranded replicative form (RF) in the nucleus. The viral Rep protein, a HUH endonuclease, binds to the terminal resolution site (trs) or inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) and nicks the RF to initiate strand displacement synthesis, producing single-stranded concatemers that are processed into progeny genomes. This mechanism allows for the production of high numbers of viral particles, up to 10^5 per cell in some infections, and is crucial for the virus's dependence on host replication machinery during S phase. Similar rolling circle dynamics are observed in other animal circoviruses, such as type 2 (PCV2), small ssDNA viruses that replicate via a double-stranded intermediate in the nucleus, using host polymerases to produce rolling circle concatemers for packaging into virions. In contrast, viroids—small, non-protein-coding s that infect plants—exemplify RNA-based rolling circle replication, primarily in members of the family Avsunviroidae. These viroids, discovered in 1971 by Theodor O. Diener as the causative agents of potato spindle tuber disease, consist of 250–400 nucleotide monomers and replicate entirely using host enzymes without encoding any proteins. Avsunviroidae members, such as sunblotch viroid (ASBVd), employ a symmetric rolling circle mechanism in chloroplasts, where a host nuclear-encoded (RdRp), potentially redirected from the nucleus, transcribes the template into multimeric complementary strands. These oligomers are then self-cleaved by hammerhead or twin hammerhead (sawhorse) ribozymes embedded in the RNA sequences, yielding unit-length monomers that are ligated by host or chloroplastic ligases to form new circular progeny. This compartmentalization in chloroplasts shields replication from nuclear surveillance and supports efficient amplification, leading to systemic infections that cause economic losses in crops like and . The biological significance of rolling circle replication in viroids lies in its ability to sustain latent, persistent infections in , where the circular 's stability evades degradation and exploits host turnover pathways for dissemination via plasmodesmata and the .

Rolling Circle Amplification

Principles and Implementation

Rolling circle amplification (RCA) is an isothermal amplification technique that mimics aspects of natural rolling circle replication, utilizing circularized DNA or templates to generate long, single-stranded products consisting of tandem repeats of the template . Developed as an extension of biological processes, RCA enables the synthesis of multiple copies from a single circular template without the need for thermal cycling, making it suitable for sensitive detection and analysis. The core principles of RCA involve the continuous displacement synthesis driven by a strand-displacing , which extends a primer annealed to the circular template, producing a concatemeric product while displacing the newly synthesized strand. This results in linear amplification kinetics in its basic form, where the product length grows proportionally with time, or geometric amplification if additional primers initiate branching. Unlike PCR, RCA operates isothermally at constant , avoiding denaturation steps and reducing artifacts such as primer dimers. The technique typically achieves amplification yields exceeding 10^9 copies per template molecule after several hours of reaction. Implementation of RCA begins with the preparation of a circular template, often through ligation of linear probes (such as padlock probes) that hybridize to a target , followed by enzymatic circularization using a thermostable like Ampligase. Next, a target-specific primer anneals to the circular template, and amplification proceeds via addition of a strand-displacing in a buffer containing deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), typically at 30–37°C for 1–16 hours. The reaction can be monitored in real-time using fluorescent intercalating dyes that bind to the accumulating product or via post-amplification hybridization with labeled probes for endpoint detection. For RNA-based RCA, alternatives such as Bst can be employed to accommodate RNA templates, though phi29 remains the gold standard for DNA due to its high processivity (>70 kb per event) and fidelity. The amplification yield in RCA can be modeled using an equation derived from the 's replication rate: N=N0(1+r)tN = N_0 (1 + r)^t, where NN is the final number of product molecules, N0N_0 is the initial template count, rr is the replication rate per unit time (dependent on polymerase processivity and concentration), and tt is the reaction time; this assumes geometric kinetics under optimal conditions, though linear models apply for unbranched synthesis. RCA was invented in the 1990s by Lizardi et al., who demonstrated its utility for mutation detection and single-molecule counting through isothermal replication of circularized probes, offering advantages over PCR such as simplicity, reduced equipment needs, and minimal amplification bias. The key enzyme, phi29 from φ29, provides exceptional strand displacement and processivity, enabling the production of products up to 100 kb long without dissociation.

Variations and Enhancements

Padlock probes represent a key variation in rolling circle amplification (RCA), consisting of circularizable oligonucleotides that hybridize to target DNA sequences flanking a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), enabling specific detection through splint-mediated ligation of the probe ends to form a closed circle suitable for subsequent RCA. This mechanism leverages the high fidelity of DNA ligase to discriminate SNPs, with the resulting circular template amplifying only perfectly matched probes, achieving detection sensitivities down to single-molecule levels in applications like in situ genotyping. Originally developed for multiplexed mutation analysis, padlock probes enhance specificity by minimizing non-specific amplification, as demonstrated in early studies detecting low-abundance hotspot mutations in genomic DNA. Multiplex RCA extends standard protocols by employing multiple primers or color-coded probes to simultaneously target and amplify distinct sequences, facilitating high-throughput on arrays. For instance, probe-based RCA (PLP-RCA) integrates with microarrays, where different primers generate localized, fluorescently labeled rolling circle products (RCPs) for parallel analysis of numerous SNPs or pathogens, improving throughput while maintaining single-molecule resolution. This approach has been pivotal in genotyping arrays, allowing discrimination of variants across hundreds of loci with error rates below 10^{-5} per base, attributed to the proofreading activity of φ29 . To achieve exponential rather than linear amplification, hyperbranched RCA (HRCA) incorporates secondary primers that bind to the initial RCP, initiating additional rounds of rolling circle synthesis and yielding branched, tree-like structures with dramatically increased product yield. This ramified process, often using a pair of primers under isothermal conditions, boosts signal intensity by orders of magnitude, enabling detection limits as low as 1-10 target molecules, particularly useful in resource-limited settings. Further enhancements integrate nanoparticles with HRCA, where or conjugated to probes amplify or enable , enhancing signal-to-noise ratios in low-abundance detection. For RNA targets, reverse transcription-RCA (RT-RCA) combines reverse transcription with RCA, using enzymes like avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV RT) to generate cDNA from , followed by circularization and amplification of the cDNA template. This variation addresses 's instability, enabling sensitive quantification of molecules with detection limits reaching single copies per cell, as applied in post-2010. Similarly, rolling circle transcription (RCT) produces from circular DNA templates using T7 , generating long, repetitive concatemers for applications in nanotechnology and vaccine development, with yields exceeding 10^9 molecules per template. Recent advances in the 2020s include CRISPR-RCA hybrids, where CRISPR-Cas systems like Cas12a guide padlock probe ligation for enhanced target specificity, reducing off-target amplification in complex samples such as SNP detection . Digital RCA further refines single-molecule counting by partitioning RCA reactions into microdroplets or nanowells, enabling absolute quantification without standards and achieving error rates under 10^{-5} through Poisson statistics, with applications in single-cell and extracellular vesicle analysis. These innovations, including HRCA in single-cell contexts, have expanded RCA's utility beyond traditional diagnostics, addressing limitations in sensitivity and observed in earlier protocols.

Applications

In Diagnostics and Detection

Rolling circle amplification (RCA) has emerged as a powerful tool in diagnostics for detecting pathogens, particularly viral genomes, through the use of padlock probes that enable high specificity and isothermal amplification. For instance, RCA combined with padlock probes achieves detection limits below 30 femtomolar for HIV-1 DNA in microfluidic formats suitable for resource-limited settings as an alternative to PCR. Similarly, RCA-based in situ hybridization assays detect HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression in cells with single-molecule resolution, facilitating early viral identification. These methods leverage RCA's isothermal nature to simplify equipment needs, making them ideal for point-of-care applications in infectious disease diagnostics. In biomarker assays, RCA supports precise of single polymorphisms () and detection of microRNAs (miRNAs) relevant to cancer diagnostics. Ligation-mediated RCA (L-RCA) enables allele-specific amplification directly from genomic DNA, achieving over 99% accuracy in for and disease susceptibility studies. For miRNA detection, multiple primer RCA coupled with enhances sensitivity for lung cancer-associated miR-21, detecting as few as 1 fM in clinical samples without reverse transcription steps. These applications highlight RCA's role in identifying low-abundance biomarkers for . Immuno-RCA integrates antibodies with RCA to amplify signals from protein targets, such as cytokines, enabling multiplexed detection in microarrays with femtomolar sensitivity. In this approach, DNA-tagged antibodies initiate RCA upon binding, producing detectable fluorescent products for profiling up to 75 cytokines from immune cells. Aptamer-based RCA extends this to small molecules, using aptamers as recognition elements for targets like or metabolites, with enhanced stability over antibodies in point-of-care formats. Aptamer immuno-RCA further improves portability by replacing antibodies with aptamers, reducing degradation in field conditions while maintaining high specificity for analytes like toxins. RCA offers advantages including high specificity from padlock probe ligation, minimal background noise due to isothermal conditions, and compatibility with portable lateral flow assays for visual readouts. These features support rapid, on-site testing without thermal cycling. During the , RCA-LAMP hybrids detected with >95% sensitivity for low-copy targets (down to 10 copies/reaction) in under 30 minutes, as demonstrated in colorimetric assays for clinical validation. Recent integrations of RCA with next-generation sequencing (NGS) enhance diagnostics by amplifying rare variants for deep sequencing, improving detection of in liquid biopsies with signal-to-noise ratios exceeding 100:1.

In Biotechnology and Synthesis

Rolling circle amplification (RCA) has emerged as a key tool in for synthesizing long, repetitive single-stranded (ssDNA) scaffolds that serve as building blocks in . By generating periodic nanostructures such as nanorings and nanowires, RCA enables the creation of custom-length scaffolds with defined sequences, overcoming limitations of traditional viral-derived templates. For instance, RCA amplicons from and viral templates have been folded into nanorings and linear wire-like structures, facilitating programmable assembly for applications in molecular machines and sensors. These scaffolds, often exceeding 100 kb in length, support the construction of higher-order architectures like hydrogels and nanoflowers, enhancing structural stability and functionality in synthetic systems. Yields from such RCA reactions can reach up to 17 µg of amplified per reaction, enabling scalable production for prototypes. In gene synthesis, RCA facilitates the assembly of large DNA constructs by amplifying synthetic minicircles into high-fidelity templates suitable for . Linear DNA fragments are circularized and subjected to RCA using φ29 , producing multimeric ssDNA that can be processed into double-stranded forms for downstream applications like -Cas9 template design. This approach accelerates biocatalytic workflows, reducing preparation time by approximately 50% compared to plasmid-based methods while maintaining activity levels comparable to cellular systems. RCA products have been integrated into 2010s-era advances in , where repetitive scaffolds hybridize with staple strands to form extended nanostructures, such as block macromolecules for large-scale folding. Additionally, RCA supports the production of CRISPR guide RNAs by amplifying circular templates into long ssRNA precursors, which are then transcribed or directly incorporated into editing complexes, streamlining assembly of gene-editing tools. RCA contributes to protein engineering through display technologies that leverage amplified DNA libraries for directed evolution. In RCA-phage display systems, circular DNA templates encoding antibody fragments are amplified into tandem repeats, enabling the construction of large scFv libraries with up to 10^9 variants for high-throughput screening. This method enhances library diversity and transformation efficiency, supporting iterative evolution of binding proteins like aptamers in vitro. For aptamer evolution, RCA generates ultralong ssDNA backbones functionalized with aptamer motifs, such as Apt19S for cell-specific capture, allowing selection of high-affinity binders against targets like tumor cells. RCA has also been explored for creating artificial chromosomes by producing extended repetitive DNA arrays that mimic centromeric sequences, though yields remain in the microgram range for constructs over 100 kb. Emerging applications in 2025 include the engineering of synthetic viroids via rolling circle mechanisms for delivery. These circular RNAs, produced through RCA-inspired replication of viroid-like templates, form low-immunogenic carriers that encapsulate therapeutic payloads, such as mRNA for sustained expression in target cells. Platforms leveraging RCA for circRNA synthesis offer scalable production with minimal off-target effects, positioning them as vectors for engineering and viral mimicry in therapy.

References

  1. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02353/full
  2. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1968.033.01.055
  3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC232620/
  4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.4.1549
  5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.67.4.1934
  6. https://elifesciences.org/articles/11134
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3185496/
  8. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.85.23.9128
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1563867/
  10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15040183/
  11. https://ictv.global/report/chapter/avsunviroidae/avsunviroidae
  12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21994552/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8068583/
  14. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-virology-091919-092331
  15. https://doi.org/10.1038/898
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8675116/
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35476-y
  18. https://www.nature.com/articles/3780320
  19. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00438
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8567418/
  21. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0803240105
  22. https://bmcmolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2199-11-94
  23. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064583
  24. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c02317
  25. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0275471
  26. https://www.cell.com/chem/pdfExtended/S2451-9294%2818%2930116-5
  27. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.012589099
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/s12276-025-01434-z
  29. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/45/8/e59/2888443
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12468232/
  31. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00484
  32. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anbr.202300108
  33. https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/pcr/isothermal-nucleic-acid-amplification/multiple-displacement-rolling-circle-amplification.html
  34. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-67307-9
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326036050_DNA_Block_Macromolecules_Based_on_Rolling_Circle_Amplification_Act_as_Scaffolds_to_Build_Large-Scale_Origami_Nanostructures
  36. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.9b04663
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261139303_Exploitation_of_rolling_circle_amplification_for_the_construction_of_large_phage-display_antibody_libraries
  38. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00584
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773216925000236
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.