Hubbry Logo
Secondary citySecondary cityMain
Open search
Secondary city
Community hub
Secondary city
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Secondary city
Secondary city
Secondary city
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pokhara, a secondary city in Nepal, is the capital of Gandaki Province. It is a major tourist center for mountain trekking.

A secondary city is an urban hub that fills specific regional and local needs related to governance, economics, finance, education, trade, transportation. A secondary city is defined by population, area, function, and economic status, but also by their relationship to neighboring and distant cities and their socio-economic status. A secondary city may emerge from a cluster of smaller cities in a metropolitan region or may be the capital city of a province, state, or second-tier administrative unit within a country. Secondary cities are the fastest-growing urban areas in lower- and middle-income countries, experiencing unplanned growth and development. By 2030, there will be twice as many medium-size cities as there were in 1990, outnumbering the total number of megacities.[1] According to the World Bank, secondary cities make up almost 40% of the world cities population.[2] Many secondary cities in the Global South are expected to undergo massive expansions in the next few decades comparable to city growth in Europe and North America over the past two centuries.[3] These cities are unique environments that generally have limited data and information on infrastructure, land tenure, and planning.

Secondary city vs megacities

[edit]

Secondary cities are often eclipsed by megacities that dominate urbanization programs due to their size and influence. However, secondary cities represent a larger percentage of the urban population worldwide and there are many more secondary cities than megacities. For example, in sub-Saharan Africa secondary cities are experiencing more than fifty percent of the continent's urban growth.[4] The U.N. World Urbanization Prospects 2018[1] note that approximately only seven percent of the world's population live in megacities of 10 million or more.[5]

Secondary cities have their own socio-economic and political culture that differ from megacities. They have more land, are less developed, and offer more opportunities for investment, adaptation, and improvisation. These cities are important emerging centers of economic activity that relieve the pressures of migration to megacities.[6][7] While the large cities play a significant role in shaping the economic geography of cities in fostering global trade, travel and investment, it is secondary cities which will have a much stronger influence in the future upon the economic development of countries.[8]

The rapid growth of secondary cities and general lack of infrastructure, particularly in lower and middle income countries, make these cities prime locations for urban sprawl and informal settlements with inadequate basic services. According to UN-HABITAT, "slum population now expands annually by 25 million."[9] Countries like India are developing secondary cities to absorb informal dwellers—as India's chief economic planner, Montek singh Ahluwalia in 2007, observes: "One hundred million people are moving to cities in the next 10 years, and it’s important that these 100 million are absorbed into second-tier cities instead of showing up in Delhi or Mumbai."[10]

Characteristics of a secondary city

[edit]

Secondary cities are difficult to define and vary from country to country and amongst the variety of urban reporting tools such as the U.N. World Urbanization Prospects and the Atlas of Urban Expansion. Secondary cities reflect their countries' demographic and geographic characteristics. The population of a secondary city may range from 10-50% of the country’s largest city, although some may be smaller than this.[11] Population is a measure of the urban scale but does not reflect the role and function of the city. For example, while a secondary city in Costa Rica will have significant population differences from a secondary city in China, their functional roles may be similar.

Secondary cities can be characterized into three general categories: sub-national functional centers (i.e., provincial capital, industry center, university hub, tourist attraction); city clusters or satellite urban areas surrounding a larger metropolitan region; and an economic trade corridor developing along major transportation routes.[8] These categories define the regional importance of secondary cities and their linkages to the surrounding hinterland and rural areas. Secondary cities have a diffuse genealogy creating a hybrid, socio-cultural urban dynamic often in contrast to larger urban areas.[12] The secondary city is a location for improvisation and innovation. Local patterns of commerce, the interactions of civil society, and decentralized political activities in secondary cities reflect a shifting economies, changing stakeholder alliances, and adaptive governance structures.[13]

Climate resilience and secondary cities

[edit]

Climate change and cities are at the forefront of urban development and investment in the 21st century. Secondary cities are an emerging arena in which to devise climate change initiatives. These adaptations include initiatives specifically focused on new immigrants and vulnerable populations (i.e., the elderly, children, women), expanding informal settlements and the need for strategies for access to basic services (i.e., electricity, water, community gardens), urban zoning to enhance green spaces (i.e., tree planting, riparian restoration), and building designs and materials to create structures that reflect the seasonal changes caused by climate change (i.e., access to air conditioning; adequate heating facilities).  

Secondary cities around the world

[edit]

Secondary cities are found in all parts of the world, however, nearly two-thirds of secondary cities are located in Asia and Africa. These secondary cities reflect the specific geography of the countries in which they are found. While Asian countries are very diverse, secondary cities within these countries are distinct. For example, China's secondary cities are very different from Indonesia's secondary cities. China's second and third-level cities are locations where private sector global expansion occurs that include top hotel companies, increased domestic travel via train and air, and international meeting facilities. These secondary cities are part of the global and local economy demonstrating their importance as regional hubs of commerce and transportation.[14] Indonesia's secondary cities have experienced rapid growth and expansion. Greater Surabaya is illustrative of patterns of suburban expansion supporting industrial development and facilitating commuter culture to the urban center. The rapid urban expansion has resulted in extensive informal settlements with inadequate infrastructure (i.e., electricity) and limited access to basic services (i.e., water supply).[15]

African secondary cities host 80% of the continent's urban population outside of the largest urban agglomerations and has over 70 cities with greater than 1 million inhabitants.[16] These rapidly growing urban areas attract rural migrants who move into informal settlements without basic amenities, high levels of pollution, loss of biodiversity, and poor sanitation.[17] However, economic development and infrastructure improvements have largely been concentrated in capital cities many of which are megacities such as Nairobi, Lagos, and Kampala. Global evidence suggests that secondary cities provide better opportunities for poverty reduction as well as relieving population pressures on larger cities.[18] Examples of African secondary cities include Pemba, Mozambique; Boke-Kamsar, Guinea; and Mekelle, Ethiopia. Both Pemba and Kamsar are port cities that provide important trade services for economic development. Boke-Kamsar is a rapidly expanding urban corridor for coastal trade and inland mining intersect.[19] Mekelle, Ethiopia is the provincial capital of Tigray and the center of regional conflict (2020 - 2022) and staging area for provisioning of food and resources.

Latin American secondary cities are locations of economic and social development. According to the Development Bank of Latin America, these urban areas are home to 32% of Latin Americans and are estimated to include 17% of GDP.[20] In Latin America, where primary cities long monopolized growth, secondary cities like Tijuana, Curitiba, Temuco, Salvador, and Belém are booming, "with the fastest growth of all occurring cities with between 100,000 and 500,000 inhabitants."[21]

The future of secondary cities

[edit]

In the future, secondary cities will have a strong influence on the economic development of countries.[8] While the importance of secondary cities is increasingly recognised, growing inequalities are emerging between systems of cities and regions, with metropolitan areas often prospering at the expense of smaller cities and rural areas. Secondary cities are areas where experimental strategies and innovative planning can be tested.

Networks are critical to improving the level of communications, exchange and movement among systems of secondary cities. Many networks will require investment in hard infrastructure, such as transport and communications, and soft infrastructure to facilitate greater economic, social, cultural and governance exchange. This involves building city, industry and firm partnerships, as well as collaborative governance and economic development. Collaboration is vital to finance hard and soft strategic infrastructure, through arrangements to share revenue as well as development, operating and maintenance costs. If enhanced connectivity is to be used as a strategy to support the economic development of secondary cities, policy makers must understand the need for integration of hard and soft connectivity elements, and how governments can facilitate their development.[22] If the efficiency of secondary cities were to improve this could increase the GDP of many poor cities and rural regions.[23]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Secondary city

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A secondary city is an urban settlement typically comprising 100,000 to 500,000 inhabitants, positioned outside a nation's primary metropolitan core, and functioning as a regional center for governance, economic activity, education, trade, and transportation. These cities bridge rural hinterlands and larger urban systems by facilitating resource flows, market access, and service provision at intermediate scales. In lower- and middle-income countries, secondary cities represent the fastest-expanding urban category, driving much of global population growth while often confronting inadequate infrastructure, unplanned sprawl, and underinvestment relative to primate capitals. Collectively, over 2,400 such cities worldwide, with populations from 150,000 to 5 million, house approximately 1.3 billion people and hold potential as engines for balanced regional development if supported by targeted policies. Their hierarchical role in urban networks underscores causal dynamics of agglomeration economies, where proximity to resources and lower congestion costs enable specialized functions distinct from megacities.

Definition and Classification

Core Definition

A secondary city is an urban center positioned at an intermediate level within a national or regional , subordinate to a or primary city but integral to broader systems of cities through functions such as regional , economic intermediation, , , and transportation infrastructure. These cities act as connectors between rural hinterlands and dominant metropolitan areas, facilitating value addition in production, , and supply chains while mitigating over-reliance on a single oversized urban node. In contrast to cities, which by definition exceed twice the of the next largest and centralize disproportionate national resources, secondary cities distribute developmental pressures more evenly across territories. While absolute population serves as a loose benchmark—often spanning 150,000 to 5 million residents—the defining attribute lies in functional and locational contributions to national economies rather than scale alone. Secondary cities emerge as hubs for localized job creation, cultural exchange, and administrative services, particularly in developing contexts where urban primacy hinders diversification; empirical analyses highlight their role in sustaining rural-urban linkages and fostering when integrated into coordinated infrastructural networks. This positioning underscores their potential to alleviate congestion in capital-dominant systems, though realization depends on policy-enabled connectivity rather than inherent attributes.

Population and Functional Criteria

Secondary cities are distinguished from or primary cities through a blend of demographic thresholds and functional attributes that reflect their intermediate role in urban hierarchies. serves as an initial benchmark, though not a rigid criterion, with definitions often specifying ranges that exclude megacities (typically over 10 million inhabitants) and smaller towns. For instance, the (UN-Habitat) classifies secondary cities as urban areas generally encompassing 100,000 to 500,000 residents, positioning them as significant yet non-dominant centers capable of supporting regional economies without overwhelming national infrastructure. In sub-Saharan African contexts, the World Bank identifies secondary cities as those with 250,000 to 1 million inhabitants, accounting for about 34% of the region's urban and serving as engines for localized growth. These thresholds adapt to national contexts; in , for example, the World Bank considers any urban center exceeding residents—excluding provincial capitals—as secondary, emphasizing over absolute size. Functional criteria extend beyond mere headcount, prioritizing a city's capacity to fulfill economic, administrative, and service-oriented roles that complement rather than compete with primary urban nodes. This includes connectivity to global and national city systems, enabling secondary cities to act as hubs for trade, manufacturing, and labor markets without relying on dominance. Key indicators encompass diversified employment in non-agricultural sectors, provision of higher-order services like and healthcare to surrounding rural areas, and contributions to national GDP through regional specialization—such as functions or agro-processing. Unlike smaller locales, secondary cities demonstrate self-sustaining , with infrastructure supporting commuting zones and functional urban areas that integrate peri-urban economies, as outlined in analyses of metropolitan extents. Empirical assessments, such as those from the World Bank, stress that functional viability hinges on enabling investment attraction and , rather than alone, to avoid over-reliance on capital inflows. In practice, integrates both elements via hierarchical : a qualifies as secondary if its falls within intermediate bands and it exhibits polycentric functions that deconcentrate development from the national core. This dual approach, evident in frameworks from organizations like Cities Alliance, underscores causal links between scale, connectivity, and resilience, where undersized entities lack agglomeration benefits and oversized ones strain resources. Variations persist due to data inconsistencies in definitions—ranging from density thresholds (e.g., 300 inhabitants per km² in some Asian models) to mixed metrics—but consensus holds that functional primacy, verifiable through economic output data, validates secondary status over demographic proxies alone.

Variations Across Contexts

The concept of secondary cities adapts to diverse geographical, economic, and developmental settings, with definitions emphasizing functionality, regional connectivity, and scale relative to cities rather than rigid population thresholds. In systems influenced by polycentric urban structures, such as those prevalent in parts of , secondary cities integrate into networks of multiple centers that distribute economic activities, services, and to mitigate dominance by a single metropolis; for instance, in countries like or the , cities such as or function as complementary hubs fostering balanced territorial development and enhancing overall regional productivity through shared agglomeration effects. In contrast, secondary cities in developing regions, particularly and , often exhibit rapid, unplanned expansion driven by rural-to-urban migration, serving as intermediate nodes that link rural economies to larger urban systems while absorbing over 75% of populations in settlements under 500,000. These cities, typically ranging from 150,000 to 5 million residents, prioritize logistical, trade, and production roles at sub-national scales but grapple with constrained capacities for and job creation, necessitating investments estimated at USD 20-25 billion annually for basic services to harness their potential as and agro-processing hubs. Across , secondary cities emerge as engines of amid , with evolving roles in national systems that emphasize connectivity over mere size, enabling of economic power from capitals and supporting structural shifts in and local development. In specifically, these cities bridge urban-rural divides by generating markets for agricultural outputs and non-farm employment, yet face policy neglect and underdeveloped economies that favor primaries, underscoring opportunities for targeted interventions to boost without exacerbating primate overconcentration.

Historical Development

Origins in Mid-20th Century Urban Studies

In the aftermath of World War II, urban studies increasingly focused on hierarchical structures within national and regional settlement systems, drawing from empirical analyses of city sizes and functions. Classifications distinguishing "secondary" urban centers from primary or primate cities emerged in the 1950s, defining them as intermediate settlements typically with populations between 100,000 and 500,000, serving regional rather than national roles in economic and administrative hierarchies. These categorizations built on earlier spatial economics but gained traction through post-war data on urbanization patterns, particularly in Europe and North America, where rapid industrial relocation and suburbanization revealed the stabilizing function of mid-tier cities in balancing metropolitan dominance. Scholars in developing regions applied similar frameworks to address imbalances observed in urban growth during the 1950s and early , when import-substitution industrialization policies concentrated development in capital or primate , often leading to overcrowding and inefficient . Studies documented how secondary , by contrast, facilitated more dispersed economic activity, such as agro-processing and local , countering the "millionaire city" phenomenon critiqued in Latin American and Asian contexts. This perspective aligned with causal observations that over-reliance on single dominant urban poles strained and exacerbated rural-urban disparities, prompting early calls—rooted in —for investing in secondary nodes to promote balanced national development. By the late , quantitative assessments, including rank-size distributions and indices, underscored secondary cities' empirical role in urban systems, where they captured 20-30% of national urban populations in many mid-century case studies from and . These findings, derived from data and field surveys, challenged assumptions of inevitable primacy in trajectories and laid groundwork for later policy-oriented research, though initial academic emphasis remained on descriptive hierarchies rather than prescriptive interventions. Such analyses, while influenced by Western planning paradigms, reflected first-hand observations of spatial inequalities verifiable through demographic records of the era.

Popularization and Evolution Since the 1970s

The concept of secondary cities gained prominence in during the late 1970s and as scholars addressed the risks of over-concentration in or primary cities in developing countries, advocating for decentralized to foster balanced national growth. Dennis A. Rondinelli, in his 1983 analysis, argued that secondary cities could serve as intermediate nodes for diffusing economic activities, reducing excessive rural-to-capital migration and alleviating strains in dominant urban centers; he proposed policy strategies including investments and administrative deconcentration to enhance their roles in . This perspective built on earlier critiques of unbalanced urban hierarchies observed in and , where empirical data showed cities capturing disproportionate shares of investment and population, leading to inefficiencies like proliferation and economic bottlenecks. By the , the idea evolved into a staple of policy, with organizations emphasizing secondary cities' potential to integrate rural economies and support export-oriented growth amid . The Bank's urban lending programs increasingly targeted these cities, recognizing their faster rates—often exceeding 4% annually in low-income regions—compared to stagnant or oversized capitals, though with persistent deficits. John Friedmann's world city framework, refined in the mid-1980s, positioned secondary cities within semi-peripheral networks, influencing analyses of global urban systems where these cities facilitated and labor flows without the scale advantages of global hubs. This period saw empirical studies, such as those on Asian and African contexts, documenting how secondary cities with populations between 100,000 and 1 million inhabitants often outperformed primaries in agricultural processing and light , provided investments addressed capacity gaps. Since the , the has shifted toward systems-of-cities approaches, viewing secondary cities not in isolation but as networked drivers of national competitiveness, particularly in rapidly urbanizing regions of the Global South. Reports from the Cities Alliance in 2011 highlighted their role in accommodating projected urban growth—expected to house over 50% of new urban dwellers by 2050—while critiquing neglect in and that perpetuated underinvestment. Recent , including 2021 research agendas, has extended the concept beyond developing contexts to the Global North, examining secondary cities' contributions to polycentric urban regions amid economic restructuring, such as in where they mitigate dominance through specialized functions like and clusters. This reflects causal recognition that secondary cities' empirical advantages—lower congestion costs and proximity to resource bases—can yield higher GDP growth when supported by targeted policies, though challenges like fiscal weakness persist, as evidenced by comparative analyses showing 20-30% lower spending versus primaries.

Comparison with Primary and Megacity Structures

Structural and Scale Differences

Secondary cities differ from primary and structures primarily in scale and territorial extent, with secondary urban areas typically ranging from 100,000 to 5 million inhabitants, excluding the dominant national or regional primary . In contrast, primary cities, often cities in rank-size distributions, concentrate 20-30% or more of a nation's urban , as seen in cases like () or (), where the largest exceeds twice the size of the next largest. , defined by the as urban agglomerations surpassing 10 million residents, such as (37 million in 2023) or (33 million), operate at a vastly larger scale, encompassing metropolitan regions that dwarf secondary cities in both density and sprawl. This scale disparity results in secondary cities exhibiting lower urban densities—often 5,000-15,000 persons per square kilometer compared to megacities' 20,000+—enabling more contained expansion patterns driven by regional rather than national migration flows. Structurally, secondary cities feature decentralized administrative frameworks relative to the centralized hierarchies of primary cities, which typically integrate national governance functions like policy-making and international . For instance, secondary cities such as () or () rely on provincial or municipal for service delivery, fostering localized decision-making but limiting fiscal capacity compared to primate capitals with disproportionate national . Megacities, by comparison, develop complex polycentric structures with multiple sub-centers for specialized sectors (e.g., in or manufacturing in Shenzhen's outskirts), supported by extensive intermodal transport networks handling millions of daily commuters. Secondary cities, however, maintain simpler monocentric or weakly polycentric forms, with core downtowns serving regional commerce and agriculture linkages, as evidenced in Latin American cases where secondary urban nodes like León (Nicaragua) prioritize agro-processing over global trade hubs. Economic structures further diverge, with secondary cities anchoring diversified regional economies—often 10-50% the size of the primary city's GDP contribution—focused on mid-tier , services, and resource extraction rather than the innovation-driven or finance-dominated cores of megacities. Primary cities exhibit dominance through agglomeration economies that concentrate skilled labor and capital, leading to higher per-capita but also inefficiencies like congestion; secondary cities, by scale, avoid such extremes, with evidence from African urban systems showing lower infrastructure overload and more adaptive supply chains. Institutional capacity in secondary cities lags megacities in scale but benefits from agility, as smaller bureaucracies enable faster policy implementation, though they face chronic underinvestment in utilities—e.g., water coverage rates 20-30% below averages in developing contexts. These differences underscore causal links between urban scale and structural resilience, where secondary cities' intermediate size mitigates the overload risks of sprawl while compensating for primary cities' monopolistic resource pulls.

Empirical Advantages Over Megacities

Secondary cities, typically defined as urban areas with populations between 500,000 and 5 million, exhibit empirically measurable advantages in metrics compared to megacities exceeding 10 million residents. Surveys such as the Mercer Quality of Living Ranking consistently rank mid-sized cities higher than megacities in factors including safety, healthcare access, and recreational amenities, with smaller urban centers like (population ~2 million) outperforming giants like or in overall livability scores as of 2019. This edge arises from reduced density pressures, enabling more efficient public services and lower infrastructure strain; for instance, data from 2020 indicates urban residents in smaller cities report higher levels than those in megacities, correlating with shorter average commutes and greater access to green spaces. Traffic congestion imposes substantial economic and temporal costs in megacities, which secondary cities mitigate through scalable transport networks. Scaling analyses of U.S. urban centers reveal that congestion delays scale superlinearly with city size, generating 4.8 billion hours of annual delays across the largest 101 metros in 2011, with megacity equivalents like New York or incurring costs equivalent to 1-2% of regional GDP in lost productivity. In contrast, secondary cities experience proportionally lower congestion indices; European estimates peg annual congestion costs at over €110 billion continent-wide, disproportionately borne by megacities where average commute times exceed 45 minutes, versus under 30 minutes in mid-sized counterparts. This efficiency translates to higher , as reduced travel time preserves labor hours for economic output rather than idling in . Housing affordability further favors secondary cities, where median price-to-income ratios remain below critical thresholds that plague megacities. The 2025 Demographia International Housing Affordability report documents severely unaffordable markets in megacities like (ratio 9.5) and (17.8), driven by land scarcity and speculative demand, while secondary cities such as or maintain ratios under 5, enabling broader homeownership. World Bank analyses corroborate this, noting that secondary urban areas in developing regions absorb migrants with lower housing deprivation rates—often under 20% versus 40%+ in primate megacities—fostering by linking rural economies without exacerbating proliferation. Economically, secondary cities demonstrate superior potential for poverty alleviation and over megacity dominance. Empirical reviews indicate that investments in intermediate cities yield higher impacts per capita than in , as their ecosystems support efficient labor markets and agro-processing hubs with lower coordination costs. For example, World Bank studies in and show secondary cities generating 13.5% annual GDP per capita growth in top performers by decongesting primary hubs and creating accessible non-farm jobs, contrasting megacities' from overcrowding and inequality amplification. This balanced enhances national resilience, as secondary cities buffer shocks like pandemics or resource strains that overwhelm megacity infrastructures.

Empirical Disadvantages Relative to Primate Cities

Secondary cities often suffer from disproportionate allocation of national resources favoring cities, resulting in chronic underinvestment in and services. cities, as primary hubs for and economic activity, capture the majority of expenditures, with from developing countries showing that provision is skewed toward them due to high fixed costs and political priorities. For instance, in , cities monopolize economic and investments, leaving secondary cities with inadequate roads, systems, and grids to support rapid inflows. This underfunding exacerbates service delivery gaps, as secondary cities lack the fiscal capacity of counterparts, which benefit from centralized revenue streams and donor priorities. Economically, secondary cities lag in and diversification due to the agglomeration advantages concentrated in cities, which draw , high-value industries, and skilled labor. Empirical analyses indicate that urban primacy widens inter-regional inequalities, with secondary cities exhibiting lower GDP per capita and limited access to global markets compared to centers that serve as financial and gateways. In many low- and middle-income countries, secondary cities contribute disproportionately less to national GDP—often under 40% collectively—while struggling to foster ecosystems, as cities host the bulk of R&D and . This dynamic perpetuates dependency, where secondary cities rely on hubs for advanced services, hindering local and export-led growth. Human capital flight represents a core disadvantage, as educated and skilled workers migrate upward to primate cities for better opportunities, depleting secondary cities' talent pools. Studies of migration patterns in developing economies reveal that in the primate city stage of , high-skilled migrants concentrate in dominant urban centers, leading to brain drain from secondary locales and reduced local capacity for knowledge-intensive sectors. For example, in prior to recent deconcentration trends, secondary cities experienced net outflows of professionals to primate metropolises like and , correlating with stagnant wages and innovation rates in non-primate areas. This outflow compounds challenges, as secondary cities face managerial overload from unmanaged growth without commensurate administrative expertise or funding, unlike primate cities bolstered by national support. Overall, these patterns contribute to broader national inefficiencies, as urban primacy correlates with slower aggregate growth and heightened regional disparities, underscoring secondary cities' vulnerability to primate dominance without targeted policies. In African contexts, for instance, excessive primacy has distorted urban systems, stunting secondary city contributions to and economic resilience.

Key Characteristics

Demographic and Spatial Features

Secondary cities exhibit sizes typically ranging from 150,000 to 5 million inhabitants, distinguishing them from smaller towns and larger or megacities that dominate national urban hierarchies. This scale enables them to serve as key nodes in national urban systems, often comprising 10-50% of the of a country's largest , though functional roles increasingly supersede strict size thresholds in modern definitions. In regions like and Asia, these cities drive much of urban expansion, attracting rural migrants and contributing to faster demographic growth rates than capital cities in some contexts. Demographically, secondary cities often reflect diverse compositions shaped by , with higher proportions of working-age individuals compared to aging primary cities in developed economies, though data varies by global region. They house a significant share of global urban dwellers—up to 40% in some estimates—predominantly in the Global South, where rapid population influxes strain housing and services without the resources of megacities. Ethnic and socioeconomic heterogeneity is common, as these centers aggregate labor from surrounding rural areas, fostering mixed-income neighborhoods but also informal settlements. Spatially, secondary cities feature a central core—often a business district or service hub—encircled by suburbs, smaller settlements, and expanding peri-urban zones that integrate agricultural hinterlands. Their urban form tends toward greater sprawl relative to development when compared to primary cities, driven by lower land costs and decentralized growth patterns that prioritize peripheral expansion. This configuration supports intermediate-scale functions like regional and , with lower densities enabling connectivity to rural economies but complicating provision across fragmented land uses.

Economic and Functional Roles

Secondary cities primarily function as regional economic engines, channeling , , and service activities that complement rather than compete with cities. By hosting mid-scale industries such as agro-processing and light , they process rural outputs into higher-value goods, fostering value chains that link agricultural hinterlands to national and international markets. This role mitigates over-reliance on capital cities, distributing employment opportunities; for instance, in developing economies, secondary cities account for significant non-agricultural job creation, with urban areas in adding 162,000 jobs between recent assessments amid stagnant rural markets. Functionally, these cities serve as logistical and administrative nodes, facilitating the movement of goods, , and information across national urban systems. They often host regional offices, educational institutions, and healthcare facilities, reducing pressure on primary urban centers and enabling more equitable access to services. Empirical analyses indicate that growth in secondary cities correlates with more effectively than primate city expansion; a study of Indonesian urban patterns from 2000–2010 found that the proliferation of secondary towns lowered rates by enhancing local , without similar benefits from growth. In global supply chains, secondary cities contribute to export-oriented activities and resilience, particularly in hubs outside dominant metros. For example, in , secondary urban centers underpin economic recovery, supporting projected 2.4% GDP growth in 2024 through diversified and spillovers. However, their functional efficacy depends on , as undercapacity can limit scalability; World Bank assessments highlight that while secondary cities drive up to 40% of urban economic output in some systems, neglect leads to inefficiencies in and facilitation.

Contributions to Broader Urban Systems

Integration with Rural Economies

Secondary cities function as critical intermediaries in rural economies by aggregating and agricultural outputs from surrounding hinterlands, thereby facilitating and value addition for rural producers. In regions like , these cities serve as hubs where raw commodities such as crops and livestock are collected, stored, and initially before distribution to national or international markets, reducing transportation costs and post-harvest losses that can exceed 30% in remote rural areas. For instance, in Peru's , secondary city functions include agricultural that links rural highland farmers to urban consumers, generating employment in agro-industries and stabilizing rural incomes through consistent demand. This integration contrasts with primate cities, which often bypass rural peripheries due to scale inefficiencies, leading secondary cities to capture a disproportionate share of rural-urban trade flows—up to 60% in some Latin American cases. Empirical studies demonstrate that secondary cities' proximity to rural areas (typically within 100-200 km) enables efficient provision of non-agricultural services, including financial , veterinary care, and machinery repair, which boost rural productivity by 10-20% in accessible zones. In , extensive urban growth in secondary towns has correlated with reductions of 1-2 percentage points annually, outperforming large-city expansion due to localized supply chains that retain economic multipliers in rural economies rather than leaking to distant metros. Similarly, World Bank analyses in the highlight secondary towns as centers for rural markets and input distribution, where urban-rural labor mobility—such as seasonal farm-to-city migration—supports remittances equivalent to 15-25% of rural household incomes. These linkages foster industrial convergence, with secondary cities hosting small-scale agro-processing firms that process rural goods like or grains, creating jobs that absorb surplus rural labor during off-seasons. However, the depth of integration varies by quality and support; in underinvested areas, weak networks limit secondary cities' reach, confining benefits to immediate vicinities and exacerbating rural disparities. Causal evidence from across developing economies indicates that investments in secondary city-rural connectivity, such as improved links, yield higher returns on rural GDP growth (1.5-2 times) compared to equivalent spending in megacities, as they directly enhance volumes and service delivery without the congestion penalties of larger urban forms. This positions secondary cities as engines for balanced national development, where rural economies gain from urban spillovers like in farming techniques, observed in cases from to .

Support for National Urban Hierarchies

Secondary cities reinforce national urban hierarchies by functioning as intermediate service centers that complement cities, distributing essential economic, administrative, and logistical roles across regions to prevent over-reliance on a single dominant urban node. This distribution aligns with hierarchical urban theories, where smaller cities fill spatial and functional gaps, enhancing overall efficiency as national economies expand. Empirical analyses show that such structures reduce urban polarization, with national efforts supporting the growth of secondary cities to balance hierarchies otherwise skewed toward megacities. In terms of economic contributions, secondary cities add value to national production through specialized hubs and nodes, improving connectivity between rural peripheries and primary centers. For instance, in and , these cities have been documented to underpin broader urban systems by handling intermediate-scale manufacturing and trade, thereby stabilizing national GDP distribution. World Bank assessments emphasize their role in facilitating migration along the full , enabling labor mobility that sustains hierarchical equilibrium rather than funneling all flows to capitals. Policy frameworks in multiple countries, including those in and , increasingly recognize secondary cities' capacity to drive deconcentrated development, with evidence from the past decade indicating accelerated growth in non-capital urban areas that counters dominance. Comparative studies further attribute to them advancements in socio-economic innovation, as they host diversified functions like regional and specialized industries that propagate upward in the . This supportive dynamic has proven resilient, as hierarchical models self-organize with population increases, positioning secondary cities as vital stabilizers against disruptive urban primacy.

Major Challenges

Infrastructure and Resource Constraints

Secondary cities commonly face pronounced infrastructure deficits relative to cities, stemming from constrained public and weaker institutional capacities. National governments often allocate disproportionate resources to capital or hubs, leaving secondary urban centers with underdeveloped transportation, , and systems. For instance, a 2015 analysis of policies notes that secondary cities receive lower levels in core and services, hindering their ability to accommodate rapid population influxes. This disparity arises causally from cities' dominance in capturing fiscal transfers and foreign , as evidenced by patterns where larger metros draw higher public expenditures to mitigate , further marginalizing secondary nodes. Resource constraints compound these infrastructural gaps, as secondary cities typically possess smaller tax bases, limited land availability for expansion, and dependency on primate-city supply chains for energy and materials. World Bank assessments highlight that many such cities struggle to mobilize capital for essential upgrades, with growth-induced stresses like informal settlements exacerbating demands on scarce utilities. In , for example, secondary urban areas as of 2024 exhibit poorly planned expansion, with service delivery in and lagging behind population needs, increasing vulnerability to environmental hazards. Empirical studies further reveal rising urban inequalities during phases, where secondary cities experience slower provisioning of roads and power grids compared to primaries, driven by economies-of-scale advantages favoring the latter. These challenges manifest in heightened operational inefficiencies, such as unreliable public transit and intermittent water access, which undermine economic productivity and resident . In , secondary cities buffer migration pressures on capitals but contend with underfunded maintenance, risking premature decay without targeted interventions. Addressing them requires decentralized funding models, yet political centralization often perpetuates resource asymmetries, as secondary locales lack the lobbying power of counterparts.

Governance and Capacity Limitations

Secondary cities often operate under governance structures characterized by limited administrative and centralized oversight, which hinder responsive local policymaking. In African contexts, for example, local assemblies in countries like face presidential nomination of up to one-third of members, diluting independent authority and fostering reliance on national directives over tailored urban strategies. This fragmentation, evident in Ghana's expansion from three to twelve metropolitan districts in Greater by 2012, spreads resources thin and undermines cohesive planning. Human resource capacity remains a critical bottleneck, with secondary cities averaging just 0.4 managerial or technical staff per 1,000 residents in nations including , , and —equating to only 27% of benchmarked ideal levels per Cities Alliance evaluations. High staff turnover, frequent reassignments without incentives, and shortages in specialized areas like planning and finance—as seen in Ethiopia's —impede sustained implementation of projects, even under targeted initiatives like the Urban Local Government Development Project covering 26 secondary cities. These gaps amplify vulnerabilities to rapid , where cities lack the expertise to manage backlogs in and demands. Fiscal constraints exacerbate capacity shortfalls, as secondary cities generate under 2% of domestic revenues through own-source mechanisms, depending instead on erratic intergovernmental transfers that prioritize hubs. Inadequate data on economies, , , and —described as "very poor" in World Bank analyses—further obstructs investment attraction and evidence-based decisions, perpetuating cycles of underdevelopment. Institutional weaknesses, such as deficient land governance and inconsistent of spatial frameworks, foster uncontrolled peri-urban expansion and resource strain in secondary cities across the Global South. These factors collectively limit secondary cities' ability to capitalize on growth potential, often resulting in stalled service delivery and heightened exposure to shocks like flooding or economic downturns.

Controversies and Policy Debates

Critiques of Decentralization Mandates

Critiques of mandates, which often compel governments to redistribute resources and administrative powers toward secondary cities to counterbalance primary urban dominance, center on their frequent misalignment with economic agglomeration principles and local institutional realities. Empirical studies indicate that such policies can exacerbate inefficiencies by diverting investments from high-productivity primary hubs, where scale economies in labor markets, , and yield higher returns; for instance, forced promotion of secondary cities risks underutilizing these natural advantages, leading to suboptimal national growth trajectories. In China's County-to-City Upgrade policy, implemented from 2005 to 2018, incentives resulted in a 12.6% average increase in PM2.5 levels post-upgrade, as local officials prioritized short-term expansion over environmental controls, highlighting how mandates can incentivize unsustainable development without adequate safeguards. Governance capacity deficits in secondary cities amplify these issues, as decentralization transfers responsibilities without commensurate fiscal or , often yielding service delivery failures. A review of urban governance in developing regions shows that devolved local authorities frequently neglect needs, such as and , due to limited expertise and revenue bases, with officials focusing instead on visible projects that fail to address citizen priorities. In Ghana's Ketu South Municipal Assembly, post- efforts since the have demonstrably failed to foster citizen participation in planning, attributed to and weak mechanisms, resulting in persistent exclusion of marginalized groups from . Similarly, lax enforcement in China's upgrading reforms has been characterized as a broader failure, producing inefficient patterns akin to underused developments rather than vibrant economic nodes. Fiscal decentralization under these mandates introduces further distortions, including externalities from fragmented taxation and land-use decisions that undermine metropolitan efficiency. Analysis of U.S. metropolitan areas reveals that political decentralization leads to property tax distortions, where poorer jurisdictions subsidize richer ones indirectly, reducing overall welfare by up to 5-10% in simulated equilibria due to uninternalized spillovers in public goods provision. Secondary cities, often promoted via such policies, compound this by lacking the data and planning tools needed for effective management; World Bank assessments note severe informational gaps in economic and infrastructural metrics, impeding evidence-based policy and perpetuating ad-hoc growth that strains limited resources. Critics argue these outcomes stem from overreliance on ideological polycentrism, ignoring causal evidence that sustained investment in secondary cities requires organic market signals rather than top-down mandates, which historically foster dependency on central subsidies without building self-sufficiency.

Scrutiny of Resilience Narratives

Narratives promoting the resilience of secondary cities frequently emphasize their purported advantages over primate urban centers, such as closer integration with rural hinterlands, lower infrastructural , and greater cohesion, which ostensibly enable faster adaptation to shocks like economic downturns or natural disasters. These claims, advanced by organizations including the World Bank and UN-Habitat in reports advocating , suggest secondary cities can serve as buffers against national-level vulnerabilities by diversifying urban functions and reducing over-reliance on megacities. However, such portrayals often derive from policy-oriented frameworks rather than comprehensive empirical , potentially overlooking systemic constraints inherent to smaller-scale urban systems. Empirical studies reveal significant limitations in these resilience assertions, particularly in developing regions where secondary cities predominate. A household perception-based analysis of Ethiopian secondary cities, for example, identified infrastructure deficits, limited access to services, and weak institutional capacities as primary barriers to spatial resilience against uncertainties like flooding and economic volatility, with only select factors such as social networks providing marginal buffering effects. Similarly, during the , small to mid-sized cities in China's Province demonstrated economic resilience below pre-shock projections, with disruptions in labor mobility and supply chains exacerbating recovery lags compared to more diversified primary hubs; real GDP growth in these cities averaged 2-5% below expected levels in 2020-2021. These findings indicate that secondary cities' dependence on centers for capital, expertise, and markets causally undermines autonomous rebound, contradicting narratives of inherent . Critiques of the resilience paradigm further highlight its conceptual vagueness and tendency to depoliticize urban vulnerabilities, as it shifts focus from redistributive reforms to adaptive measures that may perpetuate inequalities. In contexts, resilience narratives risk masking root causes like uneven fiscal , where secondary cities receive disproportionate cuts in national funding—evidenced by subnational borrowing constraints in low-income countries limiting post-disaster investments by up to 40% relative to primary cities. data reinforces this, showing secondary cities in hazard-prone areas, such as flood-vulnerable settlements in , exhibit higher per capita exposure due to informal expansions and deficient early warning systems, with recovery times extending 1.5-2 times longer than in better-resourced primaries owing to constrained human and . Thus, while secondary cities may exhibit localized strengths, overstated resilience claims warrant caution, prioritizing evidence-based capacity-building over unsubstantiated optimism.

Global Examples

Secondary Cities in Developing Regions

Secondary cities in developing regions, often defined as urban centers with populations under one million excluding national capitals and megacities, serve as critical nodes in national urban hierarchies by facilitating regional economic integration and absorbing rural-to-urban migration. These cities, prevalent in , , and , contribute to value-adding processes in , , and , thereby enhancing efficiency and supporting decentralized growth. In alone, approximately 885 secondary cities house 180-200 million residents, with some experiencing annual exceeding 4 percent, positioning them to absorb the majority of the continent's projected urban expansion over the next two decades. In , secondary cities like in and regional capitals in exemplify rapid driven by and economic diversification, yet they often face constraints in and that hinder . These urban areas bridge rural economies by providing markets for agricultural produce and non-farm employment opportunities, potentially fostering more compared to cities overwhelmed by congestion. However, unmanaged expansion has led to inadequate service provision, with many secondary cities ill-equipped to handle influxes of migrants, resulting in informal settlements and strained resources. Across and , similar dynamics occur, as seen in Bangladesh's secondary cities targeted for climate-resilient development to mitigate congestion in and accommodate climate-displaced populations. World Bank initiatives highlight the need for targeted investments in these regions to leverage secondary cities' potential in economic specialization, such as agro-processing in African contexts or light in Asian hubs, though systemic underinvestment persists relative to primary metros. For instance, programs in emphasize migrant integration and to capitalize on secondary cities' role in regional productivity, underscoring their overlooked status in broader strategies.

Secondary Cities in Developed Economies

In developed economies, secondary cities function as regional anchors within polycentric urban systems, specializing in sectors like advanced , , and to mitigate over-reliance on cities. These urban centers, typically with populations between 500,000 and 2 million, facilitate economic diversification and serve intermediate markets, though many have shifted from industrial legacies to service-oriented roles amid . Post-industrial transitions have led to varied outcomes: while some thrive through niche innovation, others experience stagnation or due to agglomeration effects favoring larger metros. European examples illustrate this dynamic, with second-tier cities like (), known for chemicals and ; (), a media and digital hub; and Munich (Germany), whose GDP exceeds Berlin's despite smaller political centrality. An analysis of 124 such cities across Europe highlights their consistent contributions to national welfare through enhanced connectivity and specialized production, often outperforming capitals in in Western nations. In , these cities drive higher innovative output relative to Eastern counterparts, where institutional legacies constrain growth, supporting broader socio-economic resilience via R&D clusters and value-chain integration. In the United States, secondary cities such as and (Colorado) exemplify post-2010 resurgence, with population gains of 10-30% fueled by tech migration and lower costs versus coastal primaries like . These hubs bolster national output through software, , and energy sectors, countering urban concentration; for instance, GDP growth outpaced many megacities in the 2020s via inflows. Japan's secondary cities, led by in the , anchor western economic activity with commerce, manufacturing, and ports, generating complementary GDP to Tokyo's financial dominance—'s metropolitan economy rivals major global peers in volume. Such cities sustain national competitiveness by processing regional resources and exports, though aging demographics pose shared challenges across developed contexts.

Growth Dynamics in the 2020s

In the early , secondary cities—typically defined as urban centers with populations between 150,000 and 5 million that are not the dominant in their national hierarchy—continued to drive a significant share of global urban expansion, particularly in developing economies where they absorb rural-to-urban migration and alleviate pressure on megacities. According to analyses from urban development organizations, these cities represent a major opportunity for economic diversification, with intermediate-sized urban areas (under 1 million inhabitants) historically accounting for approximately 59% of total urban due to their proximity to rural economies and lower entry barriers for migrants. This dynamic persisted into the decade amid ongoing global , where over half the world's population resided in cities by 2020, with projections indicating sustained expansion in non-primary urban nodes through decentralized investment patterns influenced by new factors like agglomeration benefits and connectivity improvements. Post-pandemic recovery amplified growth in secondary cities across developed economies, as remote work trends and preferences for affordability spurred net domestic migration from high-cost primaries. In the United States, second-tier metros such as Atlanta, Austin, Charlotte, Dallas, Denver, Miami, Nashville, and Raleigh recorded 10% to 30% population increases over the 2011–2021 period, with momentum carrying into the 2020s through accelerated inflows to Southern and Western regions; for instance, U.S. Census data showed broad city-level growth from 2023 to 2024, with 88% of metro areas gaining residents amid exurban and mid-sized expansions. Economically, this translated to thriving commercial real estate and job creation in sectors like logistics and tech outsourcing, as firms capitalized on lower operational costs and talent pools untapped by coastal hubs. In developing regions, secondary cities exhibited resilience through targeted infrastructure scaling, though growth varied by governance efficacy and resource access. World Bank frameworks highlight secondary urban hubs as essential for national systems of cities, advocating differentiated strategies to harness their potential amid 2020s challenges like supply chain disruptions, with examples in Latin America and Africa showing increased low-carbon investments to support projected demographic shifts. Recent peer-reviewed assessments confirm economic dynamism in intermediate cities globally, driven by trade integration and local value chains, though empirical metrics indicate uneven trajectories—faster in Asia's export-oriented nodes than in Africa's infrastructure-constrained ones—necessitating causal focus on enabling factors like port expansions and digital connectivity for sustained scaling. Overall, these dynamics underscore secondary cities' role in equilibrating urban hierarchies, with 2020–2025 data reflecting a pivot toward polycentric growth models over primacy concentration.

Forward-Looking Economic Projections

Secondary cities, defined as urban centers with populations typically ranging from 150,000 to 5 million inhabitants excluding primate capitals, are projected to absorb the majority of global urban through 2050, positioning them as key drivers of future economic expansion. forecasts indicate that intermediate and secondary cities will account for the largest share of urban demographic increases beyond 2030, with approximately 40% of urban from 2018 to 2050 occurring in midsize cities of 1 to 5 million residents, particularly in and . This influx is expected to fuel economic activity, as these cities leverage proximity to rural economies for agricultural processing, , and service sector development, potentially decongesting overburdened megacities while enhancing regional productivity. Economically, secondary cities are anticipated to contribute significantly to global GDP and , with mid-sized urban areas (1-5 million people) forecasted to add $2.6 trillion in over the next five years as of , underscoring their rising role in non-primary urban systems. In developing regions, where 90% of future urban expansion is projected in smaller cities, these centers could catalyze by fostering localized production and transportation hubs, though realizations depend on investments in connectivity and skills. In developed economies, second-tier cities have demonstrated post-pandemic resilience, with population gains of 10-30% over the past decade in examples like and Austin, supporting forecasts of sustained job creation in diversified sectors. However, these projections carry caveats due to structural constraints; World Bank analyses highlight that secondary cities, despite rapid growth, often lack the institutional capacity for effective and employment generation, risking uneven development and vulnerability to shocks like disruptions. assessments emphasize opportunities for balanced territorial growth if intermediary cities attract firms and residents through targeted policies, but warn of persistent disparities without enhanced governance. Overall, while secondary cities hold transformative potential—potentially equaling top-tier metros in collective spending power by 2040—their economic trajectories hinge on addressing deficits and fostering resilience to realize projected contributions to global prosperity.

References

  1. https://blogs.iadb.org/ciudades-sostenibles/en/secondary-cities/
  2. https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/mta-spotlight-33-growth-beyond-the-capital
  3. https://tripleline.com/downloads/9_-_Secondary_cities_v3_1.pdf
  4. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/can-secondary-cities-bridge-urban-and-rural-economies-in-africa/
  5. https://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/default/files/1d%2520%2528i%2529%2520-%2520Managing%2520Systems%2520of%2520Secondary%2520Cities%2520Book_low_res.pdf
  6. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/400881468181444474/pdf/898610BRI0CIVI00Box385295B00PUBLIC0.pdf
  7. http://wuf.unhabitat.org/event/wuf11/unlocking-secondary-cities-transformative-power-implement-sustainable-urban-development
  8. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/166/oa_edited_volume/chapter/3142480
  9. https://gsdrc.org/topic-guides/urban-governance/key-definitions/
  10. https://www.citiesalliance.org/themes/secondary-cities
  11. https://www.urbanet.info/systems-of-secondary-cities/
  12. https://www.thoughtco.com/primate-city-definition-1434834
  13. https://www.citiesalliance.org/resources/publications/global-knowledge/managing-systems-secondary-cities
  14. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/06/city_definition_what_is_a_city.pdf
  15. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099060624114031544/pdf/P1756071546dd400e1ba7b1b6a2bdeb3a49.pdf
  16. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/bac7fb89-8df1-5f66-875c-9037a6b83b6a/content
  17. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/06/cities-in-the-world_ea7810fc/d0efcbda-en.pdf
  18. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/5242c14f-0156-5eb9-8e81-e9e846d04f70/download
  19. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/sustainablecities/how-do-we-define-cities-towns-and-rural-areas
  20. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21681376.2023.2195465
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056819024000149
  22. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2014/04/assessing-polycentric-urban-systems-in-the-oecd_g17a247e/5jz5mpdkmvnr-en.pdf
  23. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/africacan/africa-path-to-claiming-the-21st-century-runs-through-its-cities
  24. https://www.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/9531IIED.pdf
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/214394
  26. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/pdf/10.3828/twpr.7.1.p3n515165034xp36
  27. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/global-cities/chpt/1-literature-review
  28. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/edcollchap/book/9781529212082/ch001.xml
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277816161_Secondary_Cities_and_the_Global_Economy
  30. https://www.megatrends-afrika.de/publikation/mta-spotlight-33-growth-beyond-the-capital
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780223000495
  32. https://www.mabnaa.com/blog/mega-cities-vs-secondary-cities-where-is-the-growth
  33. https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s41109-019-0229-x
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525000554
  35. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/05/these-cities-have-the-best-quality-of-life/
  36. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/cities-in-the-world_d0efcbda-en.html
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X17304626
  38. https://www.chapman.edu/communication/_files/Demographia-International-Housing-Affordability-2025-Edition.pdf
  39. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/trade/publication/competitive-cities-a-local-solution-to-a-global-lack-of-growth-and-jobs
  40. https://sites.duke.edu/djepapers/files/2016/10/Lim.pdf
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928765501000525
  42. https://www.theigc.org/blogs/costs-urban-giants-sub-saharan-africa
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692320309819
  44. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00130095.2020.1861935
  45. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241259923
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382877880_Migration_across_the_urban_hierarchy_Has_China%27s_urbanisation_transitioned_from_the_primate_city_stage_to_the_secondary_city_stage
  47. https://www.afdb.org/sites/default/files/2022/05/16/the_dynamics_of_systems_of_secondary_cities_in_africa_urbanisation_migration_and_development_-_2022.pdf
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4123908/
  49. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/86349/1/Henderson_Kriticos_Development%2520of%2520the%2520African%2520system%2520of%2520cities.pdf
  50. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02723638.2022.2085436
  51. https://www.naiop.org/research-and-publications/magazine/2021/fall-2021/business-trends/second-tier-cities-thrive-in-the-post-pandemic-world/
  52. https://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/default/files/2019-07/CA_ConnectingSystems_Web_FINAL%2520%25281%2529_0.pdf
  53. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/57b00713-78d0-4adc-b20a-b481fb609017
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X23000992
  55. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2024/07/03/secondary-cities-vital-for-thailand-s-economy-as-world-bank-projects-2-4-growth-for-2024
  56. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/400881468181444474/the-systems-of-secondary-cities-the-neglected-drivers-of-urbanising-economies
  57. https://urbantransformations.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42854-022-00042-8
  58. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Siba_OECD_Presentation.pdf
  59. https://rimisp.org/wp-content/files_mf/1422298948R_ULinkages_Urbanperspective_Final_edited.pdf
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22001310
  61. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/sustainablecities/secondary-cities-and-towns-sahel-creating-places-opportunity
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266668392500077X
  63. https://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/JWP-EEG%2520Issue%2520Brief%252002%2520-%2520Agro-Processing%2520_%2520EEG.pdf
  64. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2013/10/rural-urban-partnerships_g1g3715a/9789264204812-en.pdf
  65. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.956644/full
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S001429219800066X
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275120313470
  68. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/93cead79-9293-4dfd-b964-61d4e6374c39
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273442050_Managing_Systems_of_Secondary_Cities_Policy_Responses_in_International_Development
  70. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099060624114031544
  71. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2119890119
  72. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56539-w
  73. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/986321553833156431/pdf/Which-Way-to-Livable-and-Productive-Cities-A-Road-Map-for-Sub-Saharan-Africa.pdf
  74. https://www.afdb.org/sites/default/files/2023/01/18/the_state_of_urban_governance_in_africa_-_sudap_paper_-_afdb_umdf_-_2022.pdf
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9475317/
  76. https://www.nber.org/papers/w17251
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9737673/
  78. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/decentralized-governance-and-accountability/decentralization-and-urban-governance-in-the-developing-world/8D3544C8DE13B6B77F4ADA39FEC8AD1D
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402306108X
  80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666933121000204
  81. https://academic.oup.com/restud/article/79/3/1081/1535090
  82. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000/fiscal/breton.pdf
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8646157/
  84. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3561877.3561904
  85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315696981_Resilience_as_a_policy_narrative_potentials_and_limits_in_the_context_of_urban_planning
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6014243/
  87. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/technical/TP2019-4.pdf
  88. https://www.citiesalliance.org/resources/publications/book/dynamics-systems-secondary-cities-africa
  89. https://migrationnetwork.un.org/sites/g/files/tmzbdl416/files/docs/key_messages_for_side_event_on_the_role_of_secondary_cities_in_promoting_the_inclusion_and_integration_of_migrants.pdf
  90. https://gca.org/news/gca-partners-with-the-world-bank-and-the-government-of-bangladesh-to-develop-climate-resilient-secondary-cities/
  91. https://migrationnetwork.un.org/pledge/cities-alliance-global-programme-cities-and-migration-supporting-secondary-cities-latin
  92. https://www.europeanfinancialreview.com/secondary-cities-and-the-global-economy/
  93. https://homepages.tuni.fi/markku.sotarauta/verkkokirjasto/Second_tier_cities_policy.pdf
  94. https://archive.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/SGPTD_Executive_Summary_-_Final_Version_27.09.12.pdf
  95. https://espon.public.lu/content/dam/espon/fr/actualites/2014/04/secondary-cities/20140423_ESPON-EVIDENCE-BRIEF.pdf
  96. https://www.city.osaka.lg.jp/contents/wdu300/fukushuto_vision_guide/assets/pdf/fst_panf_en.pdf
  97. https://exporttojapan.co.uk/guide/getting-started/why-west-japan-matters/
  98. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/10/chapter_1_urbanization_and_cities.pdf
  99. https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization
  100. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2025/04/metro-area-trends.html
  101. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/928d19cf-ad95-4ab3-a7e9-4aaf3ef26d87
  102. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/publication/banking-on-cities
  103. https://publications.wri.org/transformations-equitable-sustainable-cities/current-urbanization-global-south-realities
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Xiangming-Chen/publication/277816161_Secondary_Cities_and_the_Global_Economy/links/5574b09808aeacff1ffcbf91/Secondary-Cities-and-the-Global-Economy.pdf
  105. https://blog.worlddatalab.com/press-releases/6000-cities-now-drive-half-of-global-consumer-spending-new-analysis-from-world-data-lab-highlights-the-strength-of-secondary-cities
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0197397525000554
  107. https://www.oecd.org/en/about/programmes/unlocking-the-potential-of-intermediary-cities.html
  108. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/06/how-cities-drive-global-prosperity/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.