Hubbry Logo
Static wickStatic wickMain
Open search
Static wick
Community hub
Static wick
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Static wick
Static wick
Static wick
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Static wicks on the winglet and aileron of an Germanwings Airbus A319-132

Static wicks, also called static dischargers or static discharge wicks, are devices used to remove static electricity from aircraft in flight. They take the form of small sticks pointing backwards from the wings, and are fitted on almost all civilian aircraft.[1]

Function

[edit]

Precipitation static is an electrical charge on an airplane caused by flying through rain, snow storms, ice, or dust particles. Charge also accumulates through friction between the aircraft hull and the air. When the aircraft charge is great enough, it discharges into the surrounding air. Without static dischargers, the charge discharges in large batches through pointed aircraft extremities, such as antennas, wing tips, vertical and horizontal stabilizers, and other protrusions. The discharge creates a broad-band radio frequency noise from DC to 1000 MHz, which can affect aircraft communication.[citation needed]

To control this discharge, so as to allow the continuous operation of navigation and radio communication systems, static wicks are installed on the trailing edges of aircraft. These include (electrically grounded) ailerons, elevators, rudder, wing, horizontal and vertical stabilizer tips. Static wicks are high electrical resistance (6–200 megaohm) devices with a lower corona voltage and sharper points than the surrounding aircraft structure.[citation needed] This means that the corona discharge into the atmosphere flows through them, and occurs gradually.[2]

Static wicks are not lightning arresters and do not affect the likelihood of an aircraft being struck by lightning. They will not function if they are not properly bonded to the aircraft. There must be a conductive path from all parts of the airplane to the dischargers, otherwise they will be useless. Access panels, doors, cowls, navigation lights, antenna mounting hardware, control surfaces, etc., can create static noise if they cannot discharge through the static wick.[citation needed]

History

[edit]
A portion of a static wick on an aircraft. Note the two sharp metal micropoints and the protective yellow plastic.

Static dischargers were first proposed in a patent application by Howard Dudley Blanchard in 1920.[3] At this time most aircraft were constructed from cloth and wood, and rigid body airships were widely used. Therefore, a method of gradually discharging static accumulation was necessary since static discharge on these craft could cause serious damage and start fires. Static discharge is the likely cause of the Hindenburg disaster.[citation needed]

The first static wicks were developed by a joint Army-Navy team led by Dr. Ross Gunn of the Naval Research Laboratory and fitted onto military aircraft during World War II. They were shown to be effective even in extreme weather conditions in 1946 by a United States Army Air Corps team led by Capt. Ernest Lynn Cleveland.[citation needed]

Dayton Granger, an inventor from Florida, received a patent on static wicks in 1950.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Static wick

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A static wick, also known as a static discharger, is a specialized device used on aircraft to safely dissipate static electricity that builds up on the airframe due to friction with the atmosphere during flight. These devices typically consist of fine conductive wires, braids, or graphite particles embedded in a flexible material that projects from the trailing edges of wings, tail surfaces, or other extremities, allowing charges to discharge gradually through corona discharge at their sharp tips. The primary purpose of static wicks is to prevent the accumulation of high-voltage , which can interfere with critical systems such as , communication radios, and radio frequency (RF) equipment by generating or radio frequency interference (RFI). This buildup occurs as air molecules rub against the aircraft's surface, creating an electrostatic charge that, if unmanaged, can increase the risk of damage during strikes; static wicks help mitigate this by providing a controlled path for energy dissipation. Static wicks operate by maintaining a high resistance—typically ranging from 6 to 200 megohms—to lower the corona inception voltage at their tips, enabling the static charge to leak off into the surrounding air without arcing or sparking.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A static wick, also known as a static discharger, is a small conductive device typically consisting of wires, rods, or carbon fiber brushes attached to the trailing edges of an 's wings, , or other surfaces. These devices are designed to provide a controlled path for the dissipation of accumulated on the during flight. The primary purpose of static wicks is to safely transfer static charges from the to the surrounding atmosphere, thereby preventing potential hazards associated with electrical buildup. This includes protecting , communication, and navigation systems from interference that could disrupt radio transmissions or compromise instrument accuracy. Additionally, they help mitigate risks to fuel systems by reducing the chance of sparks that might lead to ignition. Key benefits of static wicks include enhanced flight safety through the maintenance of reliable radio communications, particularly in conditions where static buildup is more pronounced, and the prevention of interference that could affect interactions. By dissipating excess electrical energy, including from strikes, these devices safeguard critical equipment from damage. Static wicks are commonly employed on a range of aircraft, including commercial airliners such as the and Airbus A320, as well as general aviation models like the Cessna 182. They are required for electrical bonding and protection in transport category aircraft under FAA regulation 14 CFR § 25.899.

Physics of Static Electricity in Flight

Static electricity in aircraft arises primarily from the , where friction between the aircraft's surfaces and air molecules or particles leads to and charge imbalance. During flight, particularly at high speeds, the aircraft's leading edges collide with air, droplets, crystals, , , or other particulates, causing dissimilar materials to exchange electrons upon contact and separation. This process typically results in a net negative charge on the aircraft, as the vehicle's metallic or composite surfaces acquire electrons from the particles. Several factors influence the rate and magnitude of charge buildup. Airspeed accelerates particle impacts, enhancing triboelectric charging, with supersonic Mach speeds further intensifying the effect due to increased . Precipitation and dust-laden environments, such as thunderstorms, amplify charging by providing more particles for interaction, while altitude modulates the process—lower altitudes favor rapid accumulation, but higher speeds and particle densities can still yield significant charges. Observed potentials often reach thousands of volts, with examples up to 100 kV in cirrus clouds at high velocities. These accumulated charges pose hazards including , where high electric fields around sharp protrusions ionize air and produce streamers, leading to radio static and that disrupts communications and navigation systems. Additionally, spark risks emerge from potential near vulnerable areas, capable of igniting fuels or triggering electronic malfunctions, with total charges reaching 0.1–1 mC at potentials of 0.1–1 MV. The fundamental relationship governing this is Q=C⋅VQ = C \cdot V, where QQ is the accumulated charge, CC is the aircraft's (typically 100–500 pF, depending on size and configuration), and VV is the potential difference. The atmosphere plays a key role in mitigating full charge neutralization, as ionized air at high altitudes—due to cosmic rays and lower pressure—increases conductivity (from about 10−1410^{-14} S/m at to 10−1210^{-12} S/m at 10 km), facilitating partial corona discharges that bleed off some charge but insufficiently without supplemental aids. This elevated mobility reduces relaxation time constants from hundreds of seconds at ground level to much shorter durations aloft, yet persistent imbalances remain during flight.

Design and Construction

Materials and Components

Static wicks, also known as static dischargers, are primarily constructed from conductive materials designed to facilitate controlled dissipation of while ensuring durability in harsh environments. Core materials commonly include carbon-impregnated fibers for flexible, bristle-like configurations, as seen in Nylo-Wick designs, which provide high conductivity without excessive weight. Other variants utilize micro-wires, typically four-micron diameter strands numbering around 4,000 per tip in Micropoint dischargers, or pins embedded in molded rods for Nullfield types, offering corrosion resistance and mechanical strength. Metal alloys such as aluminum shanks or epoxied aluminum particles (as in Null-Strike models with Strikeguard coating) are also employed for enhanced lightning protection and structural integrity. These materials are selected for their ability to maintain conductivity and resist degradation from environmental exposure. Structural components of static wicks typically feature an external discharging element, such as bristle-like extending 3 to 5 inches or solid rods with protruding pins, paired with an internal conductive core that connects directly to the aircraft's grounding system via bonding jumpers. The core often incorporates a high-resistance element, such as distributed resistive inserts in aluminum shanks, to regulate charge flow. Retainers, including rivet-style (e.g., 610R-series) or adhesive-bonded types, secure the wick to trailing edges of wings, , or other surfaces, using non-conductive or conductive epoxies for attachment. This design ensures a low-impedance path to the while minimizing aerodynamic drag. Design specifications emphasize controlled electrical properties and environmental resilience. Resistance values generally range from 6 to 200 megaohms to limit discharge rates and prevent interference, with specific models like Null-Plus withstanding airspeeds up to 600 mph. These wicks must endure extreme conditions, including temperatures from -55°C to +85°C and high-velocity winds, as required for certification. adheres to FAA-approved standards outlined in (AC) 43.13-1B, which governs acceptable methods for electrical systems and inspections, ensuring components like those from Dayton-Granger meet MIL-DTL specifications for quality and performance.

Types and Variations

Static wicks, also known as static dischargers, are categorized into several primary types based on their physical and characteristics, primarily to accommodate varying operational demands. Brush-type wicks feature flexible bundles of fine conductive fibers or wires, such as micro-wires or carbon filaments, which provide a high surface area for gradual charge dissipation. These are commonly used in and lower-speed applications, where they effectively manage static buildup without excessive aerodynamic drag. Rod-type wicks, in contrast, employ rigid structures like metal rods or pins, often made of or , offering enhanced durability under high-stress conditions. They are particularly suited for high-performance military jets, such as the F-16 Fighting Falcon, where supersonic speeds and composite materials increase static accumulation risks. This design ensures reliable discharge in turbulent environments while maintaining structural integrity. Variations include carbon-point wicks, which utilize pointed carbon elements to lower the corona inception voltage and reduce radio frequency interference by over 40 dB in exceeding 200 knots. Hybrid designs combining with metallic shanks, such as those using for conductivity, further optimize weight and erosion resistance in demanding applications. Specialized variants, like those incorporating aluminum-epoxy composites for diversion, protect airframes by channeling high-energy discharges away from critical surfaces. Selection of static wick types depends on factors such as size, which influences the number of units required for adequate coverage; operational speed, with flexible brush types for subsonic civil and rigid rods for supersonic platforms; and environmental conditions, including in operations or in flights that exacerbate charge buildup. Manufacturers provide tailored recommendations, often including installation to ensure compliance with bonding standards for effective static dissipation.

Operation and Mechanism

Static Charge Buildup Process

The static charge buildup process on aircraft unfolds sequentially across flight phases, driven by triboelectric interactions with the atmosphere as outlined in fundamental physics principles. During takeoff and climb, initial friction between the wings, fuselage, and surrounding air generates charge on forward surfaces, where dielectric interactions with particles like snow or dust predominate. This phase initiates accumulation through induction from the atmospheric electric field and early engine effects, typically reaching initial potentials of several kilovolts. In the cruise phase, continuous airflow over the and collisions with atmospheric particles—such as ice crystals or dust—can contribute to charge accumulation under certain conditions. These interactions, often triboelectric in , sustain electrification, particularly in clear air or light where particle impacts transfer electrons unevenly. As the enters and , charge redistribution can occur due to changing atmospheric conditions, including increasing ambient , which alters conductivity and may affect charge distribution across the structure. Key influencing variables include engine exhaust , which imparts a negative charge to counter buildup (reducing peaks by up to 10%), and , whose high-velocity downwash disperses ions and promotes uneven charge distribution along trailing edges. Dry atmospheric conditions exacerbate these effects by limiting natural dissipation. Static voltmeters, often field-mill sensors or high-impedance probes like the Keithley VTVM, measure this process, recording peak voltages up to 35-50 kV and track accumulation in real-time during flight tests.

Discharge Mechanism

Static wicks neutralize accumulated static charges on through a corona discharge process initiated at their sharpened tips. The wick tips, typically constructed with fine conductive points such as or pins, generate a high-voltage gradient that exceeds the of the surrounding air, leading to . This creates a plasma region where air molecules are stripped of electrons, forming a conductive path for charge dissipation without producing disruptive sparks. The discharge occurs as a controlled corona, allowing electrons to flow gradually from the aircraft's charged surface to the atmosphere. This process prevents the buildup of voltages high enough to cause arcing, with the current limited by the wick's high resistance, typically ranging from 6 to 200 megaohms. Under flight conditions, the discharge current is generally low, on the order of 1 to 125 microamperes, ensuring safe dissipation without significant energy loss or interference generation. The relationship between the aircraft's potential and the discharge current can be approximated by adapted for corona onset: I=V−V0RI = \frac{V - V_0}{R}, where II is the discharge current, VV is the aircraft's voltage potential, V0V_0 is the corona inception voltage (approximately 3 to 5 kV for wick tips), and RR is the wick's resistance. This model highlights how the wick begins conducting only above the inception threshold, balancing charge inflow from atmospheric friction. In practice, airflow enhances this by clearing ionized , increasing the effective current. To achieve even dissipation across the , aircraft are equipped with multiple static wicks, typically 4 to 20 depending on size and type, positioned at extremities like wingtips and tail edges. Their effectiveness is demonstrated by substantial reductions in noise, often attenuating interference by 40 to 60 dB, thereby protecting and communication systems. Failure in the discharge mechanism often stems from wear on the wick tips, which increases resistance and raises the inception voltage, resulting in incomplete charge neutralization and potential resurgence of RF interference or localized arcing. Deterioration from bombardment or environmental exposure can further degrade performance, necessitating regular .

Historical Development

Origins and Invention

During the and early , as increasingly incorporated radio communication systems, pilots frequently reported intermittent blackouts and interference in radio reception attributed to buildup from atmospheric and . These issues were particularly pronounced during flights through , , or storms, where the all-metal of emerging designs exacerbated charge accumulation on the . By the mid-, systematic documentation emerged through U.S. Army Air Corps flight tests and engineering studies, revealing that static—often called "P-static"—could render radios inoperable for extended periods, posing risks to and coordination. The foundational concept for mitigating such static buildup appeared in a 1920 U.S. patent (US 1,419,261) by Howard Blanchard, which proposed conductive elements to dissipate charges from surfaces, though practical implementation lagged due to the predominance of fabric-covered planes at the time. True development of static wicks accelerated during amid urgent needs for reliable communications in . In 1944–1945, a joint U.S. Army-Navy team led by Dr. Ross A. Gunn at the Naval Research Laboratory pioneered the first effective static dischargers, consisting of simple carbon-impregnated fiber or wire brush prototypes attached to trailing edges of wings and control surfaces. These early designs safely leaked accumulated charges into the atmosphere via , reducing radio interference by up to 90% in tests. United Air Lines utilized a modified as a flying in the late 1930s and early 1940s to evaluate static discharge techniques. The NRL's innovations were rapidly integrated into U.S. by 1945, marking a pivotal shift from ad-hoc solutions to standardized components that addressed wartime P-static challenges without compromising aerodynamic performance. analysis credited these developments with preventing numerous potential communication failures in high-altitude operations.

Adoption in Aviation and Standards

The adoption of static wicks in aviation accelerated following the December 8, 1963, crash of Pan American World Airways Flight 214, a 707-121, which was attributed to a causing ignition due to inadequate static discharge protection. In response, the (FAA) issued an emergency directive on December 18, 1963, mandating the installation of static dischargers on all U.S. commercial jet aircraft not already equipped, marking the beginning of widespread mandatory use in the . This requirement was integrated into subsequent 707 production and retrofits, influencing the design standards for early jetliners. Regulatory standards for static wicks were formalized in the FAA's Advisory Circular (AC) 43.13-1B, issued September 8, 1998, with Change 1 on September 27, 2001, and an editorial update in May 2024, which outlines acceptable methods for the inspection, repair, and installation of static dischargers to ensure they remain effective against radio frequency interference and precipitation static. For military aircraft, MIL-STD-464, initially released in 1997 and revised through 2020, establishes electromagnetic environmental effects requirements, including bonding and protection measures to mitigate static electricity buildup and discharge on platforms like fighters and transports. These standards emphasize low-resistance bonding paths and corona discharge points to prevent interference with avionics and communications. Globally, the (EASA) incorporated similar protections in Certification Specifications (CS) 25.581, effective from the onward as part of harmonized airworthiness codes derived from Joint Aviation Requirements, requiring aircraft to be protected against the effects of and accumulation. The (ICAO) supports these through Annex 8 to the Chicago Convention, which sets airworthiness standards mandating safeguards against electrostatic effects since its updates in the late , prompted by incidents of radio communication disruptions during adverse weather. A notable push for enhanced rules came from analyses of precipitation static incidents. Technological advancements in the addressed challenges with emerging composite materials in structures, which are less conductive than metals and prone to charge retention; wick designs evolved to include conductive bases and carbon-fiber elements for better integration and discharge efficiency on surfaces like those in the Boeing 757 and Airbus A300. For example, the Airbus A320 is equipped with 33 static dischargers.

Installation and Maintenance

Placement on Aircraft

Static wicks are primarily placed on the trailing edges of the , horizontal stabilizers, vertical stabilizers, and rudders to provide effective dissipation of static charges accumulated during flight. These locations target areas where static buildup is most pronounced due to over sharp edges and control surfaces. Commercial typically feature multiple static wicks per and on the assembly, with the exact number varying by model (e.g., 14 total on , 37 on A320). Secondary placement occurs at extremities such as wingtips and elevator tips to address high-charge accumulation zones. The (FAA) guidelines emphasize bonding static dischargers to the aircraft structure in positions that promote without compromising electrical continuity, with spacing determined by design to achieve uniform charge dissipation along external surfaces. Aerodynamic considerations guide installation to limit drag penalties, ensuring protrusions are streamlined and do not significantly alter . Aircraft-specific configurations vary by size and type; for instance, the A320 incorporates static wicks along the wing trailing edges, including positions on flap canoes, near winglets, and on the winglets themselves, with 12 per wing for optimal performance. In contrast, small aircraft like the Piper Cherokee may employ static wicks focused on trailing edges such as the for IFR operations, if equipped.

Inspection, Testing, and Replacement

Routine inspections of static wicks involve visual examinations for wear, breakage, , , deterioration, or lightning damage, such as pitting, conducted every 400 to 800 flight hours or as part of standard 100-hour inspections. These checks also verify proper length, condition, security of mounting attachments, and the presence of all wicks. measurements, using a 500V instrument, confirm the wick's resistance falls within manufacturer-specified ranges, typically 6 to 200 megohms to facilitate controlled without being open-circuited; bonding to the structure must exhibit low resistance, not exceeding 0.1 . Testing methods include electrical resistance verification during periodic maintenance to ensure functionality and prevent static buildup that could cause interference. For commercial operations, the mandates pre-flight visual checks to confirm no broken or missing wicks, particularly before instrument flights, as part of broader airworthiness compliance under 14 CFR Part 91. These procedures align with FAA Advisory Circulars emphasizing and damage assessment using tools like a 10x and light source. Replacement is required for any wick showing visible damage, such as breakage, excessive , bent or blunted pins, or lightning strike damage exceeding 0.125 inches in depth, as well as upon detection of increased RF interference indicating impaired discharge capability. Damaged wicks must be removed, the mounting area cleaned with using a nonabrasive pad and acid brush, and new units installed per instructions, followed by application of a water-displacing preventive compound. Access for these tasks is facilitated by the strategic placement of wicks on trailing edges and extremities. Best practices during inspection, testing, and replacement include using grounding straps and protection to safeguard , along with lint-free cloths and approved solvents to avoid . Replacement costs typically range from $50 to $200 per wick, encompassing the part (around $37 to $51) and labor for installation. All work must be performed by certified maintenance personnel to meet FAA regulatory standards for static protection and .

References

  1. https://www2.anac.gov.br/anacpedia/ing-fra/tr375.htm
  2. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2019/november/flight-training-magazine/how-it-works-static-wick
  3. https://aviationconsumer.com/maintenance/airframe-static-wicks-worth-a-try-for-rfi/
  4. https://aerospaceweb.org/question/design/q0234.shtml
  5. https://monroeaerospace.com/blog/static-wicks-how-airplanes-deal-with-static-electricity/
  6. https://www.flyingmag.com/why-dont-all-airplanes-have-static-wicks/
  7. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-25/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFRc9b71c3b3664abd/section-25.899
  8. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/139140/Martell_martellb_sm_AeroAstro_2021_thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  9. https://www.dau.edu/cop/e3/resources/precipitation-static-p-static
  10. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19710004639/downloads/19710004639.pdf
  11. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0621521.pdf
  12. https://daytongranger.com/app/uploads/2025/01/DG-23-00-Rev-H.pdf
  13. https://daytongranger.com/app/uploads/2022/02/StaticDischargersTypes.pdf
  14. https://daytongranger.com/lighting-survivable-static-discharger/
  15. https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/esd1staticwick.php
  16. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/ac_43.13-1b_w-chg1.pdf
  17. https://www.chelton.com/what-we-do/airborne-antenna/aircraft-electrostatic-dischargers/
  18. https://www.cooperantennas.com/static-dischargers.php
  19. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_25_899-1.pdf
  20. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap7_section_6.html
  21. https://www.ema3d.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/AEP_3.pdf
  22. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD0726581.pdf
  23. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0299123.pdf
  24. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-W-03e76d080bf9be972e266b127608747c/pdf/GOVPUB-W-03e76d080bf9be972e266b127608747c.pdf
  25. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0295138.pdf
  26. https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-IRE/30s/IRE-1939-05.pdf
  27. http://www.aeroelectric.com/Reference_Docs/Patents/Static_Dissipation/1419261_Static_Dissipation.pdf
  28. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA127864.pdf
  29. https://shop.historynet.com/blogs/new-the-latest-from-historynet-com/was-the-boeing-247-really-everything-it-s-supposed-to-be
  30. https://www.faa.gov/lessons_learned/transport_airplane/accidents/N709PA
  31. https://avgeekery.com/how-lightning-doomed-pan-am-flight-214-in-1963/
  32. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_43.13-1B_CHG_1_Ed_Upd_FAA.pdf
  33. https://flightsafety.org/amb/amb_jul-aug92.pdf
  34. https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/static-charge-protection
  35. https://aeropeep.com/static-dischargers/
  36. https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=763739
  37. https://www.reddit.com/r/aviation/comments/4txs9o/airbus_a320a321_static_dischargers_dispatch_limit/
  38. https://www.glenair.com/qwikconnect/2023/jul/pdf/grounding-and-bonding-in-aircraft.pdf
  39. https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/278599-a320-static-wicks.html
  40. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_20-106.pdf
  41. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_43.13-1B_CHG_1.pdf
  42. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/instrument_procedures_handbook/FAA-H-8083-16B_Appendix_A.pdf
  43. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_43-206_CHG_1.pdf
  44. https://skygeek.com/dayton-granger-sw10-96-static-wick.html
  45. https://www.mcfarlaneaviation.com/products/ESD-3/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.