Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
T44 (classification)
View on Wikipedia

T44 is a disability sport classification for disability athletics, applying to "Single below knee amputation or an athlete who can walk with moderately reduced function in one or both legs." It includes ISOD A4 and A9 classes.
Definition
[edit]This classification is for disability athletics.[1] This classification is one of several classifications for athletes with ambulant related disabilities. Similar classifications are T40, T42, T43, T44, T45 and T46.[2] Jane Buckley, writing for the Sporting Wheelies, describes the athletes in this classification as: "Single below knee amputation or an athlete who can walk with moderately reduced function in one or both legs."[1] The Australian Paralympic Committee defines this classification as being for athletes who have the "Single leg below knee amputation. Combined lower plus upper limb amputations. Ambulant with moderately reduced function in one or both lower limbs."[3] The International Paralympic Committee defined this class in 2011 as: "This class is for any athlete with a lower limb impairment/s that meets minimum disability criteria for: lower limb deficiency (section 4.1.4.a); impaired lower limb PROM (section 4.1.5.b); impaired lower limb muscle power (section 4.1.6.b); or leg length difference (section 4.1.7)."[4] The International Paralympic Committee defined this classification on their website in July 2016 as, "(Lower limb affected by limb deficiency, leg length difference, impaired muscle power or impaired range of movement)".[5]
-
Colour guide for understanding fully body diagrams
-
Disability type for some T44 classified competitors
Disability groups
[edit]Amputees
[edit]People who are amputees compete in this class, including ISOD A4 and A9.[6][7][8] In general, track athletes with amputations should consider track surfaces, and avoid asphalt and cinder .[7]
Lower limb amputees
[edit]
This class competes in T44 and F44.[6][7][9] In modern pentathlon, they compete in P44.[10] Shank length for people in this class is not uniform, with competitors having different lengths of leg found below the knee.[10] People in this class use a three-part prosthetic limb when competing in athletics: a socket, a shank, and a foot.[7] People in this class can use standard starting blocks because their amputation generally allows for the use of a standard starting position.[7] Use of a specially made carbon fibre running prosthetic leg assists runners in this class in lowering their heart rate compared to using a prosthetic not designed for running.[11] Runners in this class can have lower metabolic costs compared to elite runners over middle and long distances.[11]
Inside the class, shank length does not impact the distance that male long jumpers can jump.[10] A study comparing the performance of athletics competitors at the 1984 Summer Paralympics found no significant difference in performance times between women in A3 and A4 in the javelin; women in A2, A3 and A4 in the long jump; men in the A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8 and A9 in the discus; men in A2, A3 and A4 in the discus; men in A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8 and A9 in the javelin; men in A2, A3 and A4 in the javelin; men in A2, A3 and A4 in the shot put; men in A2, A3 and A4 in the high jump; men in A4, A5 and A6 in the high jump; and men in A1, A2, A3 and A4 in the 400 meter race.[12]
Because of low participation rates in men's T43 races, the class has been combined with the T44 class. The combined class was then called T44, and included both single and double below the knee amputees. There was a push in 2008 to avoid this happening because of a perception that double below knee amputees had a competitive advantage compared to single below knee amputees.[9][13][14] Subsequent research related to results for men at the 2012 Summer Paralympics in London confirmed this to be the case for both the 200 meters and 400 meters.[9]
The nature of a person's amputations in this class can effect their physiology and sports performance.[7][15][16] Because of the potential for balance issues related to having an amputation, during weight training amputees are encouraged to use a spotter when lifting more than 15 pounds (6.8 kg).[7] Lower limb amputations effect a person's energy cost for being mobile. To keep their oxygen consumption rate similar to people without lower limb amputations, they need to walk slower.[16] People in this class use around 7% more oxygen to walk or run the same distance as someone without a lower limb amputation.[16]
People in this class can have problems with their gait. There are a number of different causes for these issues and suggested ways to modify them. For a gait that has abrupt heel contact, the cause can be excessive heel lever. This can be fixed by realigning their prosthetic foot. For jerky knee motions, the cause could be a loose socket in the knee or inadequate suspension. In that case, the socket might need replacing or they may need to realign the prosthesis. If they have prolonged heel contact, the cause could be problems with the heel lever in their prosthesis or a worn heel. Increasing heel stiffness or realigning the prosthesis corrects these issues. In some cases, prolonged heel contact or knees remaining fulling extended is a problem with training prosthesis use. Foot drag - often caused by an ill-fitting prosthesis - can be corrected by shortening the length of the prosthesis. Uneven length strides can be a result of problems with hip flexion or insecurity about their walk, both of which can be corrected by physical therapy.[15]
Upper and lower limb amputees
[edit]
Members of the ISOD A9 class compete in T42, T43, T44, F42, F43, F44, F56, F57, and F58.[6][7][8] The shank length of people in this class can differ dramatically.[17] A study comparing the performance of athletics competitors at the 1984 Summer Paralympics found no significant difference in performance in times between men in the A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8 and A9 in the discus; men in A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8 and A9 in the javelin; and men in A8 and A9 in the shot put.[12]
The nature of an A9 athletes's amputations can effect their physiology and sports performance.[7][16] Because of the potential for balance issues related to having an amputation, during weight training amputees are encouraged to use a spotter when lifting more than 15 pounds (6.8 kg).[7] Lower limb amputations effect a person's energy cost for being mobile. To keep their oxygen consumption rate similar to people without lower limb amputations, they need to walk slower.[16] They are also more prone to injuries including rotator cuffs tearing, shoulder impingement, epicondylitis and peripheral nerve entrapment.[16]
Les Autres
[edit]People who are Les Autres compete in this class. This includes LAF3 and LAF5 classified athletes.[6][18] In general, Les Autres classes cover sportspeople with locomotor disabilities regardless of their diagnosis.[19][20][21][22][23][24]
LAF3
[edit]In athletics, LAF3 competitors may compete in T44. This is a standing class for people with weakness in one leg muscle or who have joint restrictions.[6] At the 1984 Summer Paralympics, LAF1, LAF2 and LAF3 track athletes had the 60 meters and 400 meter distances on the program.[6] There was a large range of sportspeople with different disabilities in this class at the 1984 Summer Paralympics.[6]
LAF3 is an Les Autres sports classification.[6][25] Sportspeople in this class use wheelchairs on a regular basis as a result of reduced muscle function. They have normal trunk functionality, balance and use of their upper limbs.[25] Medically, this class includes people with hemiparsis, and hip and knee stiffness with deformation in one arm. It means they have limited function in at least two limbs. In terms of functional classification, this means the sportsperson uses a wheelchair, has good sitting balance and has good arm function.[26] For the 1984 Summer Paralympics, LAF3 was defined by the Games organizers as, "Wheelchair bound with normal arm function and good sitting balance."[27]
LAF5
[edit]LAF5 competitors can be classified into several athletics classes including F42, F43, and F44.[6][28][29] People in this class have normal functionality in their throwing arm.[28] At the 1984 Summer Paralympics, LAF4, LAF5 and LAF6 track athletes had the 100 meters and 1,500 meters on their program. In field events, they had shot put, discus, javelin and club throws. No jumping events were on the program for these classes.[30] There was a large range of sportspeople with different disabilities in this class at the 1984 Summer Paralympics.[30] In 1997 in the United States, this class was ambulant for field events It was for people with reduced function in their lower limbs or who had balance problems. People in this class had normal function in their throwing arm.[31]
LAF5 is an Les Autres sports classification.[6][32] This is an ambulant class for people with normal upper limb functionality but who have balance issues or problems with their lower limbs.[32] Medically, this class includes people with contracture of the hip or knee, paresis of one arm, or kyphoscoliosis. In practice, this means they have limited function in at least one limb. In terms of functional classification, this means the sportsperson is ambulatory with good arm function. They have issues with balance or reduced function in their lower limbs.[26]
Spinal cord injuries
[edit]F8
[edit]

F8 is standing wheelchair sport class.[33][34] The level of spinal cord injury for this class involves people who have incomplete lesions at a slightly higher level. This means they can sometimes bear weight on their legs.[35] In 2002, USA Track & Field defined this class as, "These are standing athletes with dynamic standing balance. Able to recover in standing when balance is challenged. Not more than 70 points in legs."[36] In 2003, Disabled Sports USA defined this class as, "In a sitting class but not more than 70 points in the lower limbs. Are unable to recover balance in challenged standing position."[33] In Australia, this class means combined lower plus upper limb functional problems. "Minimal disability."[37] It can also mean in Australia that the athlete is "ambulant with moderately reduced function in one or both lower limbs."[37] In Australia, the corresponding class for based on disability type classes are A2, A3, A9, and LAF5.[37]
Field events open to this class have included shot put, discus and javelin.[33][38] In pentathlon, the events for this class have included Shot, Javelin, 200m, Discus, 1500m.[33] For F8 javelin throwers, they can throw the javelin from a standing position and they use a javelin that weights .8 kilograms (1.8 lb).[39]
Performance wise, a 1999 study of discus throwers found that for F5 to F8 discus throwers, the upper arm tends to be near horizontal at the moment of release of the discus. F5 and F8 discus throwers have less average angular forearm speed than F2 and F4 throwers. F2 and F4 speed is caused by use of the elbow flexion to compensate for the shoulder flexion advantage of F5 to F8 throwers.[40] A study of javelin throwers in 2003 found that F8 throwers have angular speeds of the shoulder girdle similar to that of F3, F4, F5, F6, F7 and F9 throwers.[39]
F9
[edit]F9 is a standing wheelchair sport class used in the United States.[33][41][42] It is sometimes referred to as Standing F8.[33][42] This is a standing class for people with neurological disorders, the only one of the nine wheelchair sport classes for standing competitors.[33][41] The level of spinal cord injury for this class is largely confined to the sacral region, or involves people who have incomplete lesions at a slightly higher level. This means they can sometimes bear weight on their legs.[43] In 2003, Disabled Sports USA defined this class as, "Is a standing class but not more than 70 points in the lower limbs. Able to maintain Balance when in a challenged standing position. Internationally this class would compete in the 42,43,44 class with other ambulatory classes. Justification: Internationally there is no longer a wheelchair standing class."[33] In some competitions, F8 and F9 classes have been merged as F9, or they compete as F42, F43, or F44.[33][42]
In javelin, F9 throwers throw the javelin from a standing position and use a javelin that weighs .8 kilograms (1.8 lb).[39][44] A study of javelin throwers in 2003 found that F9 throwers have angular speeds of the shoulder girdle similar to that of F4, F5, F6, F7, F8 and F3 throwers.[39] Throwers or all types in this class use a stopboard, making them the only wheelchair class that requires the use of one.[45] In junior events in the United States, the F9 class does not participate in the pentathlon, while F3 to F8 do.[46]
Performance and rules
[edit]People in this class are not required to use a starting block. They have an option to start from a standing position, a crouch or a 3-point stance. In relay events involving T40s classes, no baton is used. Instead, a handoff takes place via touch in the exchange zone.[47] People in this class who are lower limb amputees are required to wear their leg prosthesis when they are on the track, and they must run. They cannot hop.[47]
People with arm amputations in this class can have elevated padded blocks to place their stumps on for the start of the race. These blocks need to be in a neutral color or a color similar to that of the track, and they must be placed entirely behind the starting line. Their location needs to be such that they do not interfere with the start of any other athlete.[47]
In field events for this class, athletes are not required to wear a prosthetic. In jumping events, athletes have 60 seconds during which they must complete their jump. During this time, they can adjust their prosthetic.[47]
If during a jump the athlete's prosthesis falls off and lands closer to the takeoff board than the athlete, the mark is taken where the prosthesis landed. If prosthesis lands outside the landing zone nearer the board than where athlete landed, the jump counts as a failure.[47]
In throwing events, implement weights are as follows:
| Event | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Shot put | 6.00 kg (13.23 lb) | 4.00 kg (8.82 lb) |
| Discus throw | 1.50 kg (3.3 lb) | 1.00 kg (2.20 lb) |
| Javelin throw | 800 g (28 oz) | 600 g (21 oz) |
Events
[edit]There are a number of events open to people in this class, often with different qualifying scores for international competitions.
| Event | Men | Women | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQS | BQS | AQS | BQS | |
| 100 metres | 11.75 | 12.50 | 14.20 | 15.40 |
| 200 metres | 23.30 | 25.80 | 30.50 | 33.00 |
| 400 metres | 50.80 | 53.50 | 1:20.00 | 1:30.00 |
| High jump | 1.70 | 1.50 | — | |
| Long jump | 5.80 | 5.20 | 4.30 | 3.80 |
| Discus throw | 46.00 | 40.00 | 22.00 | 18.00 |
| Javelin throw | 48.00 | 43.00 | — | |
| gender | EVENT | Class | AQS/MQS | BQS | Event |
| men's | 100m | T43/44 | 14.5 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| women's | 100m | T43/44 | 16 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | 100m | T44 | 00:13.1 | 2016 CAIXA Loteria Athletics Open Championship | |
| women's | 100m | T44 | 00:20.0 | 2016 CAIXA Loteria Athletics Open Championship | |
| men's | 100m | T43/44 | 12.25 | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| women's | 100m | T43/44 | 15.1 | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| men's | 100m | T43/44 | 13 | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | 100m | T43/44 | 16 | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | 100m | T43/44 | 12.4 | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | 100m | T43/44 | 16.6 | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | 100m | T43/44 | 15.5 | 12.5 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships |
| men's | 100m | T43/44 | 13.4 | 2015 Parapan American Games | |
| men's | 200m | T43/44 | 30 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| women's | 200m | T43/44 | 38 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | 200m | T44 | 00:28.3 | 2016 CAIXA Loteria Athletics Open Championship | |
| women's | 200m | T44 | 00:38.0 | 2016 CAIXA Loteria Athletics Open Championship | |
| men's | 200m | T43/44 | 24.5 | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| women's | 200m | T43/44 | 31.5 | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| men's | 200m | T43/44 | 27 | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | 200m | T43/44 | 33 | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | 200m | T43/44 | 26.5 | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | 200m | T43/44 | 33 | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | 200m | T43/44 | 30 | 25.8 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships |
| men's | 200m | T43/44 | 26 | 2015 Parapan American Games | |
| men's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:05.0 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| women's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:30.0 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | 400m | T43/44 | 58 | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| women's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:20.0 | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| men's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:07.0 | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:30.0 | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:08.0 | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:30.0 | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:10.0 | 01:01.0 | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships |
| men's | 400m | T43/44 | 01:01.0 | 2015 Parapan American Games | |
| men's | discus | F43/44 | 30.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| women's | discus | F43/44 | 21.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | discus | F44 | 34.96 | 2016 CAIXA Loteria Athletics Open Championship | |
| men's | discus | F43/44 | 44.00m | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| women's | discus | F43/44 | 22.00m | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| men's | discus | F43/44 | 33.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | discus | F43/44 | 33.00m | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | discus | F43/44 | 15.00m | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | discus | F43/44 | 24.00m | 40.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships |
| men's | discus | T43/44 | 1.50m | 1.50m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships |
| men's | discus | F43/44 | 33.00m | 2015 Parapan American Games | |
| women's | discus | F43/44 | 15.00m | 2015 Parapan American Games | |
| men's | high jump | T43/44 | 1.50m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | high jump | T44 | 1.5 | 2016 CAIXA Loteria Athletics Open Championship | |
| men's | high jump | T44 | 1.65m | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| men's | high jump | T43/44 | 1.50m | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | high jump | T44 | 1.55m | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | high jump | T44 | 1.50m | 2015 Parapan American Games | |
| men's | javelin | F43/44 | 34.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | javelin | F44 | 40 | 2016 CAIXA Loteria Athletics Open Championship | |
| men's | javelin | F43/44 | 42.00m | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| men's | javelin | F42/43/44 | 35.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | javelin | F43/44 | 32.00m | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | javelin | F43/44 | 34.00m | 43.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships |
| men's | javelin | F43/44 | 38.00m | 2015 Parapan American Games | |
| men's | long jump | T43/44 | 5.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| women's | long jump | T43/44 | 3.80m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | long jump | T44 | 4.6 | 2016 CAIXA Loteria Athletics Open Championship | |
| men's | long jump | T43/44 | 5.70m | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| women's | long jump | T43/44 | 4.30m | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| men's | long jump | T43/44 | 5.15m | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | long jump | T43/44 | 3.60m | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | long jump | T43/44 | 5.15m | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| women's | long jump | T43/44 | 3.55m | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | long jump | T43/44 | 5.00m | 5.20m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships |
| men's | long jump | T43/44 | 5.15m | 2015 Parapan American Games | |
| men's | shot put | F43/44 | 8.40m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| women's | shot put | F43/44 | 7.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | shot put | F44 | 11.50m | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| women's | shot put | F43/44 | 8.00m | 2015 IPC Athletics World Championships | |
| men's | shot put | F43/44 | 10.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | shot put | F44 | 11.00m | 2014 IPC Athletics European Championships | |
| men's | shot put | F43/44 | 8.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships | |
| men's | shot put | F43/44 | 8.00m | 2016 IPC Athletics Asia-Oceania Championships |
History
[edit]The classification was created by the International Paralympic Committee and has roots in a 2003 attempt to address "the overall objective to support and co-ordinate the ongoing development of accurate, reliable, consistent and credible sport focused classification systems and their implementation."[48]
For the 2016 Summer Paralympics in Rio, the International Paralympic Committee had a zero classification at the Games policy. This policy was put into place in 2014, with the goal of avoiding last minute changes in classes that would negatively impact athlete training preparations. All competitors needed to be internationally classified with their classification status confirmed prior to the Games, with exceptions to this policy being dealt with on a case-by-case basis.[49] In case there was a need for classification or reclassification at the Games despite best efforts otherwise, athletics classification was scheduled for September 4 and September 5 at Olympic Stadium. For sportspeople with physical or intellectual disabilities going through classification or reclassification in Rio, their in competition observation event is their first appearance in competition at the Games.[49]
Becoming classified
[edit]For this class, classification generally has four phases. The first stage of classification is a health examination. For amputees in this class, this is often done on site at a sports training facility or competition. The second stage is observation in practice, the third stage is observation in competition and the last stage is assigning the sportsperson to a relevant class.[50] Sometimes the health examination may not be done on site because the nature of the amputation could cause not physically visible alterations to the body. This is especially true for lower limb amputees as it relates to how their limbs align with their hips and the impact this has on their spine and how their skull sits on their spine.[51] During the observation phase involving training or practice, all athletes in this class may be asked to demonstrate their skills in athletics, such as running, jumping or throwing. A determination is then made as to what classification an athlete should compete in. Classifications may be Confirmed or Review status. For athletes who do not have access to a full classification panel, Provisional classification is available; this is a temporary Review classification, considered an indication of class only, and generally used only in lower levels of competition.[52]
While some people in this class may be ambulatory, they generally go through the classification process while using a wheelchair. This is because they often compete from a seated position.[53] Failure to do so could result in them being classified as an ambulatory class competitor.[53] For people in this class with amputations, classification is often based on the anatomical nature of the amputation.[15][54] The classification system takes several things into account when putting people into this class. These include which limbs are affected, how many limbs are affected, and how much of a limb is missing.[55][56]
Competitors
[edit]American T44 competitor April Holmes is world record holder in the Women's T44 100m event, while French competitor Marie-Amélie Le Fur holds T44 world records at 200m, 400m and 800m distances.[57] United States runner Jerome Singleton is a strong competitor in the 100m event, winning at the IPC Athletics World Championships in 2011.[58] Richard Browne currently holds the T44 100m world record after coming second to Alan Oliveira with a time of 10.75 at the Paralympic Anniversary Games in London on 28 July 2013.[59] Other notable competitors in this class include Arnu Fourie and David Prince, who hold T44 200m and 400m world records respectively. German world record holder Markus Rehm with an 8.24m long jump was the first T44 athlete who won a national able-bodied competition, in consequence causing discussions about possible advantages of prosthesis techniques.
References
[edit]- ^ a b Buckley, Jane (2011). "Understanding Classification: A Guide to the Classification Systems used in Paralympic Sports". Archived from the original on 11 April 2011. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
- ^ "Summer Sports » Athletics". Australia: Australian Paralympic Committee. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
- ^ "Classification Information Sheet" (PDF). Sydney, Australia. 16 November 2011. Retrieved 19 November 2011.[permanent dead link]
- ^ Tweedy, Sean (16 July 2010). "Research Report - IPC Athletics Classification Project for Physical Impairments" (PDF). Queensland, Australia: International Paralympic Committee. p. 42. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2012. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
- ^ "IPC Athletics Classification & Categories". www.paralympic.org. Retrieved 2016-07-22.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j "CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY". Queensland Sport. Archived from the original on April 4, 2015. Retrieved July 23, 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Classification 101". Blaze Sports. June 2012. Archived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved July 24, 2016.
- ^ a b Consejo Superior de Deportes (2011). Deportistas sin Adjectivos (PDF) (in European Spanish). Spain: Consejo Superior de Deportes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- ^ a b c Hassani, Hossein; Ghodsi, Mansi; Shadi, Mehran; Noroozi, Siamak; Dyer, Bryce (2015-06-16). "An Overview of the Running Performance of Athletes with Lower-Limb Amputation at the Paralympic Games 2004–2012". Sports. 3 (2): 103–115. doi:10.3390/sports3020103.
- ^ a b c Nolan, Lee; Patritti, Benjamin L.; Stana, Laura; Tweedy, Sean M. (2011). "Is Increased Residual Shank Length a Competitive Advantage for Elite Transtibial Amputee Long Jumpers?" (PDF). Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 28 (3): 267–276. doi:10.1123/apaq.28.3.267. PMID 21725118.
- ^ a b Broad, Elizabeth (2014-02-06). Sports Nutrition for Paralympic Athletes. CRC Press. ISBN 9781466507562.
- ^ a b van Eijsden-Besseling, M. D. F. (1985). "The (Non)sense of the Present-Day Classification System of Sports for the Disabled, Regarding Paralysed and Amputee Athletes". Paraplegia. 23. International Medical Society of Paraplegia. Retrieved July 25, 2016.
- ^ Zettler, P. Is It Cheating to Use Cheetahs? The Implications of Technologically Innovative Prostheses for Sports Value and Rules; Stanford Law School: Stanford, CA, USA, 2009.
- ^ Dyer, B. An Insight into the Acceptable Use & Assessment of Lower-Limb Running Prostheses in Disability Sport. Ph.D. Thesis, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK, 2013.
- ^ a b c DeLisa, Joel A.; Gans, Bruce M.; Walsh, Nicholas E. (2005-01-01). Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 9780781741309.
- ^ a b c d e f Miller, Mark D.; Thompson, Stephen R. (2014-04-04). DeLee & Drez's Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9781455742219.
- ^ Nolan, Lee; Patritti, Benjamin L.; Stana, Laura; Tweedy, Sean M. (2011). "Is Increased Residual Shank Length a Competitive Advantage for Elite Transtibial Amputee Long Jumpers?" (PDF). Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 28 (3): 267–276. doi:10.1123/apaq.28.3.267. PMID 21725118.
- ^ Consejo Superior de Deportes (2011). Deportistas sin Adjectivos (PDF) (in European Spanish). Spain: Consejo Superior de Deportes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- ^ Tweedy, S. M. (2003). The ICF and Classification in Disability Athletics. In R. Madden, S. Bricknell, C. Sykes and L. York (Ed.), ICF Australian User Guide, Version 1.0, Disability Series (pp. 82-88)Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
- ^ Albrecht, Gary L. (2005-10-07). Encyclopedia of Disability. SAGE Publications. ISBN 9781452265209.
- ^ "Paralympic classifications explained". ABC News Sport. 2012-08-31. Retrieved 2016-07-31.
- ^ Sportbond, Nederlandse Invaliden (1985-01-01). Proceedings of the Workshop on Disabled and Sports. Nederlandse Invaliden Sportbond.
- ^ Narvani, A. A.; Thomas, P.; Lynn, B. (2006-09-27). Key Topics in Sports Medicine. Routledge. ISBN 9781134220618.
- ^ Hunter, Nick (2012-02-09). The Paralympics. Hachette Children's Group. ISBN 9780750270458.
- ^ a b Consejo Superior de Deportes (2011). Deportistas sin Adjectivos (PDF) (in European Spanish). Spain: Consejo Superior de Deportes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- ^ a b MD, Michael A. Alexander; MD, Dennis J. Matthews (2009-09-18). Pediatric Rehabilitation: Principles & Practices, Fourth Edition. Demos Medical Publishing. ISBN 9781935281658.
- ^ Broekhoff, Jan (1986-06-01). The 1984 Olympic Scientific Congress proceedings: Eugene, Ore., 19-26 July 1984 : (also: OSC proceedings). Human Kinetics Publishers. ISBN 9780873220064.
- ^ a b Consejo Superior de Deportes (2011). Deportistas sin Adjectivos (PDF) (in European Spanish). Spain: Consejo Superior de Deportes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- ^ International Paralympic Committee (June 2009). "IPC Athletics Classification Project for Physical Impairments: Final Report - Stage 1" (PDF). International Paralympic Committee Governing Committee Reports.
- ^ a b Broekhoff, Jan (1986-06-01). The 1984 Olympic Scientific Congress proceedings: Eugene, Ore., 19-26 July 1984 : (also: OSC proceedings). Human Kinetics Publishers. ISBN 9780873220064.
- ^ "Men & Women 800 Meter Run - Results - 1997 National Summer Games". Disabled Sports US. Retrieved 2016-07-28.
- ^ a b Consejo Superior de Deportes (2011). Deportistas sin Adjectivos (PDF) (in European Spanish). Spain: Consejo Superior de Deportes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i National Governing Body for Athletics of Wheelchair Sports, USA. Chapter 2: Competition Rules for Athletics. United States: Wheelchair Sports, USA. 2003.
- ^ Consejo Superior de Deportes (2011). Deportistas sin Adjectivos (PDF) (in European Spanish). Spain: Consejo Superior de Deportes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- ^ Foster, Mikayla; Loveridge, Kyle; Turley, Cami (2013). "S P I N A L C ORD I N JURY" (PDF). Therapeutic Recreation.
- ^ "SPECIAL SECTION ADAPTATIONS TO USA TRACK & FIELD RULES OF COMPETITION FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES" (PDF). USA Track & Field. 2002.
- ^ a b c Sydney East PSSA (2016). "Para-Athlete (AWD) entry form – NSW PSSA Track & Field". New South Wales Department of Sports. Archived from the original on 2016-09-28.
- ^ Consejo Superior de Deportes (2011). Deportistas sin Adjectivos (PDF) (in European Spanish). Spain: Consejo Superior de Deportes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- ^ a b c d Chow, John W.; Kuenster, Ann F.; Lim, Young-tae (2003-06-01). "Kinematic Analysis of Javelin Throw Performed by Wheelchair Athletes of Different Functional Classes". Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2 (2): 36–46. ISSN 1303-2968. PMC 3938047. PMID 24616609.
- ^ Chow, J. W., & Mindock, L. A. (1999). Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athletes. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise,31(9), 1272-1279. doi:10.1097/00005768-199909000-00007
- ^ a b Consejo Superior de Deportes (2011). Deportistas sin Adjectivos (PDF) (in European Spanish). Spain: Consejo Superior de Deportes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- ^ a b c "OFFICIAL GUIDE & RULES OF GAMES 2006" (PDF). GAELIC ATHLETICS & CYCLE ASSOCIATION. 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-03-05. Retrieved 2016-08-03.
- ^ Foster, Mikayla; Loveridge, Kyle; Turley, Cami (2013). "S P I N A L C ORD I N JURY" (PDF). Therapeutic Recreation.
- ^ Foster, Mikayla; Loveridge, Kyle; Turley, Cami (2013). "S P I N A L C ORD I N JURY" (PDF). Therapeutic Recreation.
- ^ USA Track & Field (2007). "Special Section Adaptions to the USA Track & Field Rules of Competition for Individuals with Disabilities" (PDF). USA Track & Field.
- ^ "National Junior Disabled Sports Championships 2004 Registration Packet" (PDF). Mesa Association of Sports for the Disabled. 2004.
- ^ a b c d e "PARALYMPIC TRACK & FIELD: Officials Training" (PDF). USOC. United States Olympic Committee. December 11, 2013. Retrieved August 6, 2016.
- ^ "Paralympic Classification Today". International Paralympic Committee. 22 April 2010. p. 3.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|url=(help) - ^ a b "Rio 2016 Classification Guide" (PDF). International Paralympic Committee. March 2016. Retrieved July 22, 2016.
- ^ Tweedy, Sean M.; Beckman, Emma M.; Connick, Mark J. (August 2014). "Paralympic Classification: Conceptual Basis, Current Methods, and Research Update". Paralympic Sports Medicine and Science. 6 (85): S11-7. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.04.013. PMID 25134747. S2CID 207403462. Retrieved July 25, 2016.
- ^ Gilbert, Keith; Schantz, Otto J.; Schantz, Otto (2008-01-01). The Paralympic Games: Empowerment Or Side Show?. Meyer & Meyer Verlag. ISBN 9781841262659.
- ^ "CLASSIFICATION Information for Athletes" (PDF). Sydney Australia: Australian Paralympic Committee. 2 July 2010. Retrieved 19 November 2011.[permanent dead link]
- ^ a b Cashman, Richmard; Darcy, Simon (2008-01-01). Benchmark Games. Benchmark Games. ISBN 9781876718053.
- ^ Pasquina, Paul F.; Cooper, Rory A. (2009-01-01). Care of the Combat Amputee. Government Printing Office. ISBN 9780160840777.
- ^ Tweedy, Sean M. (2002). "Taxonomic Theory and the ICF: Foundations for a Unified Disability Athletics Classification" (PDF). Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 19 (2): 220–237. doi:10.1123/apaq.19.2.220. PMID 28195770. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-17. Retrieved July 25, 2016.
- ^ International Sports Organization for the Disabled. (1993). Handbook. Newmarket, ON: Author. Available Federacion Espanola de Deportes de Minusvalidos Fisicos, c/- Ferraz, 16 Bajo, 28008 Madrid, Spain.
- ^ "IPC Athletics World Records". International Paralympic Committee. Retrieved 24 January 2013.
- ^ Davies, Gareth A Davies (26 Jan 2011). "Jerome Singleton pips Oscar Pistorius in 100 metres T44 final at IPC Athletics World Championships". Retrieved 15 August 2012.
- ^ "Oliveira breaks T43 100m world record". BBC Sport. Retrieved 2021-11-23.
T44 (classification)
View on GrokipediaOverview
Definition
The T44 classification is a track-specific category (denoted by the "T" prefix) in World Para Athletics for athletes with a single below-knee amputation or an equivalent lower limb impairment that permits walking but with a moderate reduction in function, and who compete without a prosthesis.[6] This class targets impairments affecting one lower leg, such as limb deficiency through amputation or non-amputation conditions like impaired muscle power or passive range of motion in the ankle, knee, or foot, resulting in coordinated but limited propulsion and stability.[7] Eligibility requires meeting minimum impairment thresholds, including for limb deficiency a below-knee amputation or an anatomical equivalent in muscle power (e.g., weakness in plantar flexors or knee extensors) or range of motion (e.g., restricted ankle dorsiflexion), as assessed through functional testing.[6] These criteria ensure the impairment demonstrably impacts running performance without rendering the athlete unable to ambulate independently.[2] In contrast to the F44 field classification, which applies identical impairment criteria to jumping and throwing events, T44 focuses exclusively on track disciplines like sprints and middle-distance races to account for event-specific demands on lower leg function.[7] By grouping athletes with similar moderate deficits in lower leg propulsion and balance, T44 promotes equitable competition, minimizing advantages from varying impairment severities.[6]Scope and Purpose
The T44 classification in World Para Athletics serves to group athletes based on the degree of activity limitation caused by their impairments, rather than on medical diagnosis, ensuring fair and equitable competition by minimizing the impact of disability on performance outcomes. This evidence-based approach aligns with the core principles of the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) Athlete Classification Code, which emphasizes functional assessment to promote meaningful participation in Para sports. By focusing on how impairments affect sport-specific tasks like running propulsion and stability, T44 facilitates balanced groupings that highlight athletic ability over etiology, as detailed in the World Para Athletics Rules and Regulations.[8][9] The scope of T44 encompasses individual track events such as sprints (100m, 200m, 400m), along with relays like the 4x100m, where athletes must demonstrate verifiable minimum impairment criteria established by the IPC, including moderate lower limb dysfunction affecting speed and endurance. This classification applies exclusively to competitions under World Para Athletics and the Paralympic Games, integrating seamlessly with the broader T40-47 group for coordination and lower limb impairments while avoiding overlap with upper body or more severe classes like T40-41.[9][2] Ultimately, T44 benefits athletes by enabling fair competition among those with diverse impairment origins—such as amputation or neurological conditions—based solely on comparable functional effects on running performance, thereby fostering inclusivity and competitive integrity across Paralympic track disciplines.[8]Impairment Types
Amputee Impairments
The T44 classification in World Para Athletics encompasses athletes with lower limb impairments equivalent to a single below-knee (trans-tibial) amputation, focusing on those who compete without a prosthesis.[10] This includes individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation or bilateral lower limb losses that result in a comparable overall reduction in function, ensuring fair grouping based on similar biomechanical impacts during athletic performance.[7] Such impairments typically arise from traumatic events, surgical interventions, or congenital limb deficiencies, where the affected limb's loss or dysfunction does not extend above the knee joint.[11] Functional eligibility for T44 requires that athletes can ambulate independently without assistive devices, though they often exhibit moderate gait asymmetry due to the unilateral or equivalent bilateral impairment.[12] The knee joint on the affected side must remain fully functional, enabling effective power generation and stability during propulsion, which distinguishes T44 from higher-impairment classes like T42 or T43 that involve above-knee losses.[2] This criterion ensures that classified athletes possess sufficient lower limb control for track and field events, with the impairment primarily affecting ankle and foot mechanics rather than proximal joint function.[13] Athletes with above-knee amputations are explicitly excluded from T44, as their greater functional loss—such as reduced hip and knee involvement—places them in T42 (bilateral above-knee) or T43 (unilateral above-knee) for equitable competition. In T44 events, the absence of prosthetic use during competition is mandatory to maintain class integrity, highlighting the reliance on residual limb function and compensatory strategies for performance. Representative examples include runners with a traumatic trans-tibial amputation from injury or those born with partial congenital absence of the lower leg, both meeting the minimum impairment threshold for reduced propulsion efficiency without compromising knee stability.[11]Les Autres Conditions
Les Autres conditions within the T44 classification category address orthopedic and musculoskeletal impairments that cause lower limb dysfunction, distinct from those arising from limb absence or central neurological origins. This group accommodates conditions such as joint disorders and muscle weaknesses that do not align with amputation or other neurological classifications, ensuring eligibility for athletes whose impairments result in comparable functional limitations to a single below-knee amputation. These impairments fall under eligible types like impaired muscle power or impaired passive range of movement, where the condition must demonstrably affect sport performance through reduced lower limb strength or mobility.[6] Functional qualifiers for Les Autres in T44 include profiles akin to historical LAF4 for moderate lower limb function loss—such as ankle fusion or severe arthritis in one leg—and LAF5 for milder yet qualifying impacts on propulsion, where athletes exhibit sufficient overall mobility but with targeted deficits. Assessment involves evaluating joint range of motion, muscle strength, and gait symmetry, confirming that the impairment meets minimum criteria without compensatory overuse of unaffected limbs. For example, severe arthritis may limit ankle dorsiflexion to less than 15 degrees, directly hindering efficient force generation during strides.[10][6] The primary functional impact of these conditions in T44 centers on diminished push-off power in the affected leg, as seen in sequelae of poliomyelitis or hip dysplasia, leading to asymmetrical propulsion and reduced acceleration without spinal cord involvement. Athletes typically maintain intact knee function and upper body coordination, allowing controlled power transfer but at a performance level equivalent to T44 standards. This results in challenges like uneven block clearance in sprints or altered landing mechanics in jumps, yet enables competitive participation through adaptive techniques.[6] While amputee athletes predominate in T44, Les Autres representations are fewer, fostering inclusion of diverse orthopedic impairments and upholding the classification's goal of equitable grouping based on activity limitation rather than diagnosis alone.[3]Spinal Cord Injuries
Spinal cord injuries qualify athletes for the T44 classification when they result in incomplete lesions that cause moderate impairments to lower limb function, specifically affecting one leg while preserving some voluntary muscle control and preventing full paralysis. These impairments typically arise from injuries at the T12-L2 neurological levels, leading to paraparesis characterized by reduced strength and coordination in the affected leg, but with sufficient residual function to allow standing and running without assistive devices like prostheses or orthoses.[6] Within the T44 framework, such spinal cord injuries align with functional equivalents to the F8 subclass, which denotes fair lower limb strength with noticeable weakness during propulsion, or the F9 subclass, indicating good overall strength but impaired coordination and balance due to neurological deficits. Eligibility is determined through standardized assessments, including muscle strength grading (e.g., Medical Research Council scale) and range of motion tests, ensuring the impairment minimally impacts the contralateral leg and trunk stability. This adaptation allows track events to group athletes with comparable activity limitations stemming from neurological origins.[6] Key functional criteria for T44 eligibility include the ability to run with assistive knee stability—often relying on compensatory hip and ankle strategies—resulting in reduced speed and asymmetric gait patterns due to unilateral weakness, without evidence of complete lower limb paralysis. Assessments evaluate spasticity levels (e.g., Ashworth scale grades 1-3) and joint excursion to confirm the impairment's impact on single-leg drive during dynamic activities. Representative examples encompass athletes with cauda equina syndrome, where nerve root compression at the L1-S5 levels disrupts distal leg innervation, or partial thoracic injuries (e.g., incomplete T10-T12 lesions) that asymmetrically affect quadriceps and plantarflexor function while maintaining proximal control.[6]Classification Process
Eligibility Assessment
The eligibility assessment for T44 classification begins with the pre-classification phase, where athletes submit a Medical Diagnostics Form (MDF) to World Para Athletics (WPA) through their National Paralympic Committee (NPC) or via the Secure Data Management System (SDMS). This form requires detailed documentation of the impairment's etiology, such as amputation or leg length difference affecting the lower limb, the year of onset (or confirmation if congenital), and evidence of stability, ensuring the condition is permanent and not temporary or reversible.[3][6] Verification of minimum impairment criteria follows, confirming the athlete meets WPA's threshold for an eligible physical impairment under T44, which includes single below-knee amputation or equivalent lower limb dysfunction. Proof of permanence is established through medical records, imaging (e.g., X-rays for limb deficiency), or photographs, excluding conditions like recent injuries that could resolve. This step ensures only athletes with verifiable, irreversible impairments proceed, aligning with WPA's evidence-based standards.[3][6] Classification occurs at national or international levels, with national assessments serving as an entry point for domestic competitions, often conducted by local panels, while international classification—required for events like the Paralympic Games—is performed by WPA-certified classifiers and may upgrade or confirm the national status. Initial reviews are handled by multidisciplinary classification panels comprising physicians, physiotherapists, and sports technicians, who evaluate submitted documentation for completeness and eligibility before advancing to full assessment. The process aligns with the IPC Classification Code (effective January 2025), incorporating assessments of Underlying Health Condition and Minimum Impairment Criteria.[3][6][14]Evaluation Methods
The evaluation of T44 classification in World Para Athletics involves a structured combination of medical and functional assessments conducted by certified classifiers to verify that athletes exhibit a moderate impairment affecting one lower limb, such as a single below-knee amputation or equivalent loss of function in the calf or ankle. These assessments aim to ensure the impairment minimally impacts sport performance while maintaining fairness in competition.[6] Medical evaluation begins with a physical examination, including range of motion (ROM) tests for key lower limb joints, such as hip flexion with the knee extended, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, to identify reduced motion in the affected limb. Muscle strength is graded using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale (0-5) for lower leg muscles, including the gastrocnemius, soleus, and tibialis anterior, to quantify weakness or paresis; for T44, scores indicate moderate reduction in affected muscles. Gait analysis follows, where the athlete walks a 5-meter pathway with a half-turn, scored from 0 (normal gait, no difficulties) to 8 (unable to walk even with support), confirming asymmetry or reduced propulsion without excessive compensation. These tests are performed in a controlled setting, often with three trials for reliability.[6] Functional benchmarks emphasize observation of running mechanics to assess real-world impact on track performance, conducted without prostheses or aids to isolate the impairment. Classifiers evaluate push-off efficiency during sprint starts and strides, noting moderate asymmetry in ground contact time or reduced plantarflexion power on the affected side, alongside balance tests such as tandem stance. These benchmarks ensure the athlete can generate controlled power from the knee joint while demonstrating clear but not severe limitations in acceleration and stability, distinguishing T44 from bilateral classes like T42 or T43, or other impairment types in T45/T46.[6] The process adheres to an evidence-based framework outlined in the World Para Athletics (WPA) classification rules (as of February 2023), incorporating a master list of verifiable impairments and standardized benchmark tests adapted for track events, such as timed walking or observational scoring rubrics, to promote consistency across international panels. Initial documentation from eligibility assessments, like medical records, informs but does not replace these hands-on evaluations.[6] Protests and re-evaluations provide mechanisms to challenge classifications if observed performance suggests a mismatch, such as unexpectedly high or low results in competition. Any athlete, coach, or official may submit a protest form to the Chief Classifier within 15 minutes post-event or by the competition's end, triggering a review by a separate classification panel that may include re-testing ROM, strength, and functional tasks. Successful protests can result in reclassification, with decisions final unless appealed to the WPA Classification Committee; this procedure upholds integrity.[6]Rules and Performance
Competition Standards
Competition standards for T44 athletes in World Para Athletics emphasize maintaining fairness by ensuring performances align with the expected impact of lower limb impairments, such as single below-knee amputations or equivalent functional losses. Minimum entry standards (MES) serve as key benchmarks to verify that athletes' abilities reflect the class's impairment level, preventing over- or under-performance that could undermine class integrity. For instance, male T44 athletes must achieve a 100m time of 13.00 seconds or faster at a recognized competition to qualify for major events like the 2025 New Delhi World Championships, while female athletes require 16.40 seconds; similar thresholds apply to other events like the 200m (27.40 seconds for men, 31.20 seconds for women). These criteria confirm the impairment's substantial effect on speed and propulsion, as performances exceeding able-bodied norms (e.g., sub-10 seconds for 100m) would indicate potential misclassification.[15] Ongoing monitoring during competitions uses observation assessments and video analysis to detect discrepancies between an athlete's classified impairment and actual performance, such as intentional underperformance or advantages from unreported changes in condition. Classification panels, including international classifiers, review footage and comparative data from heats to finals, ensuring athletes demonstrate consistent techniques like altered gait or prosthetic use that align with T44 expectations. This process, mandated at Paralympic Games and World Championships, allows for real-time protests if performances suggest the athlete belongs in a less impaired class, like T45 (upper limb impairments), or a more impaired class like T42 for double below-knee impairments.[8][16] Violations of these standards, such as intentional misrepresentation through underperformance or evidence of lesser impairment via superior results, trigger sanctions under the IPC Athlete Classification Code, including reclassification to T45 or exclusion from the event. Repeated non-compliance, like inconsistent prosthetic use, may result in disqualification, yellow/red card systems, or longer ineligibility periods to preserve sport equity. These measures align with the 2024-2025 World Para Athletics rules, which integrate the IPC Code for sport-specific fairness and are subject to annual reviews post-major competitions.[8][16]Equipment Restrictions
In the T44 classification, athletes with lower limb impairments, such as single below-knee amputation or equivalent, are required to compete without lower limb prostheses or blades to ensure that performance reflects the true extent of their impairment without technological enhancement.[9][1] This core restriction, outlined in World Para Athletics Rule 6.12 and 6.13.3, mandates the use of anatomical limbs during events, distinguishing T44 from classes like T62-T64, where carbon-fiber blades and prostheses are permitted for above-knee or bilateral below-knee impairments, subject to Maximum Allowable Standing Height (MASH) limits.[9] Limited aids are allowed to support stability without providing an unfair advantage. Orthotic braces may be used if they merely facilitate function and do not enhance performance beyond the athlete's moderate impairment level, as per Rule 6.13.[9] Standard running shoes are permitted, adhering to World Athletics standards, including a maximum sole thickness of 20 mm for events up to 800 m and up to 11 spikes no longer than 9 mm (or 6 mm on synthetic tracks).[9] Barefoot competition is also an option, but any equipment must not alter stride length or propulsion unrealistically.[9] Enforcement occurs through rigorous pre-competition inspections by Technical Delegates and Call Room Judges, who verify compliance with these WPA technical rules under Rule 6.16.[9] Non-compliant equipment results in disqualification or a "Did Not Start" status, ensuring equity across the field.[9]Events
Track Events
T44 athletes primarily compete in individual track events that emphasize speed, acceleration, and sustained effort, with eligible distances encompassing the 100m and 200m sprints. These events assess the functional impact of lower limb impairments, such as unilateral amputations or leg length differences, on propulsion and energy efficiency, allowing athletes to showcase compensatory strategies like enhanced upper body drive and prosthetic-assisted gait.[9][3] Competition in these events adheres to standard World Para Athletics rules, including lane assignments for sprints up to 200m and curved starts for longer distances, with no alterations to track surfaces or measurement protocols. Starts accommodate leg stability issues through options like standing positions or adjustable blocks without mandatory crouch techniques, and lower limb prostheses are permitted to promote bilateral symmetry during races.[9][6] Sprints attract the highest participation among T44 athletes due to their emphasis on explosive power, where prosthetic technology and core strength mitigate propulsion deficits effectively; for example, the men's 100m T44 at the 2024 Paris Paralympics drew competitors from 9 nations, with a winning time of 11.12 seconds.[17] The 2025 New Delhi World Championships featured competitive fields in the 100m and 200m T44, underscoring sustained global interest in shorter distances.[18][19] Races are segregated by gender into distinct men's and women's categories to ensure equitable groupings based on physiological differences, while youth pathways integrate T44 classifications through junior international competitions aligned with senior standards.[3][6]Relay Participation
T44 athletes are eligible to participate in the 4x100m universal relay, where they may run the second leg as part of the T42-47 or T61-64 classification group, alongside athletes from other impairment types in a fixed order that includes T11-13 for the first leg, T35-38 for the third, and T33-34 or T51-54 for the fourth.[9] This mixed-gender event requires two male and two female athletes per team, with a maximum of two athletes from specific higher-functioning classes such as T13, T46/47, T38, or T54 to maintain competitive balance across diverse impairments.[9] In addition, T44 athletes can compete in any leg of the ambulant 4x100m, 4x200m, or 4x400m relays designated for the T42-47 group, allowing integration with athletes from T43 to T47 classifications.[9] Team composition in T42-47 relays permits mixing of T43-T47 athletes to achieve balance, with a restriction of no more than two T46 or T47 athletes per team to prevent dominance by those with milder impairments.[9] This grouping ensures teams reflect comparable overall impairment levels within the ambulant lower limb category, promoting fair competition while enabling T44 athletes—characterized by single below-knee amputation or moderate gait deviation—to contribute effectively alongside peers.[9] Baton exchanges occur via touch within designated takeover zones (20m for the first, 30m for the second, and 40m for the third), adhering to lane discipline until the breakline.[9] The introduction of the 4x100m universal relay in 2018 marked a significant increase in T44 participation in mixed-classification team events following the 2016 Rio Paralympics, aiming to foster inclusivity and highlight Paralympic diversity by combining athletes from multiple impairment groups.[20] First contested at the Tokyo 2020 Games, this event has since expanded opportunities for T44 runners in collaborative formats beyond individual or single-class relays.[21]Historical Development
Origins and Early Classification
The origins of the T44 classification trace back to the early development of para-athletics during the Stoke Mandeville Games, which began in 1948 under Dr. Ludwig Guttmann as a rehabilitation tool for World War II veterans with spinal cord injuries. By the 1950s and 1960s, initial classification systems were established, primarily medical-based, grouping athletes by diagnosis rather than functional ability; this included separate categories for amputees and those with spinal injuries participating in track events such as archery and javelin, later expanding to running disciplines.[22][23] These groupings, managed by organizations like the International Stoke Mandeville Games Federation (ISMGF), aimed to facilitate participation but often resulted in heterogeneous fields where athletes with varying levels of impairment competed together.[24] In the 1980s, a pivotal shift occurred from diagnosis-focused medical classification to functional classification, emphasizing the degree of impairment's impact on sport performance to promote fairer competition. This evolution informed the development of classes like T44 for athletes with moderate lower limb impairments, such as single below-knee amputations or equivalent functional losses.[22][23] The International Sports Organization for the Disabled (ISOD), which handled amputee classifications, contributed to this transition by refining earlier A-class systems (e.g., A4 for single below-knee amputees) into more performance-oriented groups that informed the T44 designation. The T44 designation was first used at the 1992 Summer Paralympics in Barcelona, marking the implementation of the new functional classification system.[23][22] Prior to the formation of the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) in 1989, the T44 classification was influenced by the ISMGF and ISOD, with the first T44-like events appearing at the 1984 Paralympic Games in New York, where amputee track athletes competed in ISOD classes such as A4 over distances like 60m and 400m.[22][23] Early challenges included overly broad groupings that mixed athletes with disparate functional capacities—such as varying amputation levels or muscle power deficits—resulting in unfair races and inconsistent outcomes, which drove the need for subclass refinements to better align competition.[22][24]Key Changes and Updates
In 2007, the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) implemented a comprehensive overhaul of its classification system through the adoption of the IPC Athlete Classification Code, which introduced an evidence-based functional approach to grouping athletes by the degree of activity limitation rather than medical diagnosis alone. This shift refined classes like T44 for athletes with lower-limb impairments, emphasizing measurable functional deficits in running and jumping events to ensure fairer competition.[25][26] Building on this foundation, World Para Athletics enacted significant reforms in 2017, effective from January 2018, which split the combined T42-44 classes to address inequities between athletes using and not using prosthetic devices. Under the new rules, athletes competing with lower-limb prostheses or blades in track and field events were reclassified into dedicated T61-64 categories—for instance, T64 for single below-knee amputation with prosthesis use—while T44 was preserved exclusively for competitors with natural anatomical feet and moderate lower-limb impairments equivalent to a single below-knee deficiency. These changes aimed to eliminate advantages from assistive technology and promote equitable outcomes within each class.[4] Following the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games, World Para Athletics incorporated further evidence-based refinements to the classification process, including updated benchmarks for minimum impairment criteria derived from scientific research on activity limitations in lower-limb function. The 2025 IPC Classification Code, resulting from a multi-year review initiated in 2019 and informed by post-Tokyo evaluations, permits the use of audio-visual technology, such as video recordings, during observation assessments to verify functional impairments more objectively and reliably. This update strengthens the evidence-based framework by requiring multidisciplinary panels to integrate performance data and biomechanical analysis for classes like T44.[14][27] These reforms have notably diminished controversies surrounding intentional underperformance, or "sandbagging," in mixed prosthesis classes by creating prosthesis-specific groupings that better align with functional realities, thereby fostering greater trust in the system and encouraging broader athlete participation in dedicated T44 events without the need for assistive devices.[28]Competitors and Records
Notable Athletes
April Holmes of the United States is a prominent figure in T44 sprinting, having lost her left leg below the knee in a car accident and subsequently becoming a four-time Paralympian. She captured the gold medal in the women's 100m T44 at the 2008 Beijing Paralympics with a time of 13.05 seconds, marking the first U.S. gold in women's Paralympic track events since 1996. Holmes also secured bronze in the same event at the 2012 London Paralympics and holds historical significance as the former world record holder in the 100m T44, setting a mark of 12.98 seconds in 2006. Her career includes multiple medals at IPC Athletics World Championships, such as silver in the 100m at the 2002 Lille event, contributing to greater visibility for female amputee athletes in the class.[29][30][31] Jonnie Peacock from Great Britain, born with a congenital below-knee amputation of his right leg, has been a dominant force in T44 sprinting since his debut. He won gold in the men's 100m T44 at the 2012 London Paralympics in a world record time of 10.90 seconds, electrifying home crowds and setting a benchmark for the class. Peacock defended his title at the 2016 Rio Paralympics and added silver in the T64 100m at Tokyo 2020, alongside multiple world championship golds, including the 2017 London event. His achievements have advanced prosthetic technology discussions and inspired youth participation in Para athletics, particularly among single-leg amputees.[32][33] Markus Rehm of Germany exemplifies T44 excellence in field events, having undergone below-knee amputation of his right leg following a wakeboarding accident at age 14. He claimed gold in the men's long jump T44 at the 2012 London Paralympics with a leap of 7.76 meters and repeated the feat at Rio 2016, while transitioning to the T64 class for blade use post-2018 classification updates. Rehm's career boasts eight world championship titles in long jump, including a 2025 New Delhi victory at 8.43 meters, and he has set multiple world records, such as 8.40 meters in 2017. As a prosthetist himself, his contributions extend to innovation in carbon-fiber blades, promoting inclusivity for lower-limb impaired athletes across impairment types like amputations and leg length differences.[34][35][36] Naif Almasrahi of Saudi Arabia is a leading current T44 sprinter, setting the men's 100m T44 world record of 10.94 seconds at the 2025 New Delhi World Para Athletics Championships on September 30, 2025, surpassing the previous mark and highlighting advancements in non-prosthetic performance.[37] Irmgard Bensusan of Germany holds the women's 100m T44 world record of 12.72 seconds, achieved on June 21, 2019, in Leverkusen, Germany, without prosthetic assistance, and remains unbeaten as of November 2025. Her record underscores the class's focus on unilateral impairments.[38] Nour Alsana of Saudi Arabia excels in middle-distance T44 events, setting the men's 400m T44 world record of 52.81 seconds on October 24, 2023, at the Asian Para Games in Hangzhou, China, with no updates through the 2025 New Delhi Championships.[39] Annie Carey of the United States won gold in the women's 200m T44 at the 2025 New Delhi World Para Athletics Championships, clocking 27.31 seconds and also earning silver in the 100m T44, contributing to U.S. success in the class as of October 2025.[40] Emerging as a recent star, Sherman Isidro Guity Guity of Costa Rica, a single below-knee amputee, made history at the 2024 Paris Paralympics by winning gold in both the 100m T64 (10.65 seconds, Paralympic record) and 200m T64 (21.32 seconds, Paralympic record), securing Costa Rica's first Para athletics medals. Prior to Paris, he claimed gold in the 100m T64 at the 2023 World Para Athletics Championships. Guity's rapid rise has brought global attention to underrepresented nations in T44/T64 sprinting, emphasizing the class's evolution post-classification changes and the impact of advanced prosthetics on performance.[41][42]World Records
The world records in T44 classification events reflect performances by athletes competing without prostheses, as per the updated classification rules implemented by World Para Athletics in 2018, which separated lower limb impaired athletes using assistive devices into T61-64 classes.[1] These records emphasize natural gait and muscle function for single below-knee or moderate lower limb impairments, resulting in times distinct from pre-2018 marks that included prosthetic use. As of November 2025, following the New Delhi World Para Athletics Championships, several sprint records have been updated, while middle-distance and relay benchmarks remain stable under the current verification standards. In the men's 100m T44, Saudi Arabia's Naif Almasrahi set the current world record of 10.94 seconds on September 30, 2025, in New Delhi, India, surpassing the previous mark of 11.00 seconds held by South Africa's Mpumelelo Mhlongo since November 11, 2019, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.[37][39] For the women's 100m T44, Germany's Irmgard Bensusan holds the record at 12.72 seconds, achieved on June 21, 2019, in Leverkusen, Germany, a mark ratified without prosthetic assistance and unchanged through 2025 competitions.[38] Middle-distance records in the 400m T44 highlight endurance within the class's constraints. The men's world record stands at 52.81 seconds, set by Saudi Arabia's Nour Alsana on October 24, 2023, in Hangzhou, China.[39] No updates occurred at the 2025 New Delhi Championships, where the event saw competitive but non-record performances. The women's 400m T44 lacks a fully ratified world record post-2018 reclassification, with the standing IPC benchmark at 1:00.07 from January 1, 2019.[39] Relay records involving T44 athletes fall under the universal 4x100m T42-47 format, allowing mixed impairments without prostheses. The men's world record is 40.52 seconds, achieved by Germany's team (Felix Strahler, David Behre, Tom Kierey, and Tim Plaz) on July 1, 2022, in Leverkusen, Germany.[39] The women's equivalent is 51.92 seconds by the Netherlands team (Marlou van Rhijn, Iris Hoek, Nadine de Boorder, and Fleur Jong) on the same date and location.[39] At the 2025 New Delhi Championships, the Netherlands won gold in the universal relay on October 4, but did not break the existing marks, finishing ahead of Indonesia and Australia.[43]| Event | Gender | Record Holder(s) | Time | Date | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100m T44 | Men | Naif Almasrahi (KSA) | 10.94 s | 30 Sep 2025 | New Delhi, India[37] |
| 100m T44 | Women | Irmgard Bensusan (GER) | 12.72 s | 21 Jun 2019 | Leverkusen, Germany[38] |
| 400m T44 | Men | Nour Alsana (KSA) | 52.81 s | 24 Oct 2023 | Hangzhou, China[39] |
| Universal 4x100m Relay T42-47 | Men | Germany (Strahler, Behre, Kierey, Plaz) | 40.52 s | 1 Jul 2022 | Leverkusen, Germany[39] |
| Universal 4x100m Relay T42-47 | Women | Netherlands (van Rhijn, Hoek, de Boorder, Jong) | 51.92 s | 1 Jul 2022 | Leverkusen, Germany[39] |