Hubbry Logo
Taika ReformTaika ReformMain
Open search
Taika Reform
Community hub
Taika Reform
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Taika Reform
Taika Reform
Taika Reform
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Taika Reforms (大化の改新, "Taika no Kaishin; Reformation of Taika") were a set of doctrines established by Emperor Kōtoku (孝徳天皇 Kōtoku tennō) in the year 645. They were written shortly after the death of Prince Shōtoku and the defeat of the Soga clan (蘇我氏 Soga no uji), uniting Japan. The reforms also artistically marked the end of the Asuka period and the beginning of the Hakuhō period.[1][2] Crown Prince Naka no Ōe (the future Emperor Tenji), Nakatomi no Kamatari, and Emperor Kōtoku jointly embarked on the details of the Reforms. Emperor Kōtoku then announced the era of "Taika" (大化), or "Great Reform".

The Reform began with land reform, based on Confucian ideas and philosophies from Tang China, but the true aim of the reforms was to bring about greater centralization and to enhance the power of the imperial court, which was also based on the governmental structure of China. Envoys and students were dispatched to China to learn seemingly everything from the Chinese writing system, literature, religion, and architecture, to even dietary habits at this time. Even today, the impact of the reforms can still be seen in contemporary Japanese cultural life.

Background

[edit]
Isshi Incident

After the regency of Shōtoku Taishi ended, the Soga clan, from which Shōtoku's ancestry was derived, took hegemony of the Yamato court. The clan was opposed to Shōtoku's son Yamashiro Ōe and killed him in 643. Under the reign of Empress Kōgyoku the Soga clan head, Soga no Iruka, was virtually an almighty leader of the court.

Those who were against Soga's dictatorship included the emperor's brother Karu, the emperor's son, Prince Naka no Ōe, along with his friend Nakatomi no Kamatari, and his son-in-law Soga no Ishikawamaro (Iruka's cousin). They ended Iruka's regime by a coup d'état in 645 (Isshi Incident). As Kōgyoku renounced her throne, Karu ascended to be Emperor Kōtoku.

The new emperor, together with the Imperial Prince Naka no Ōe, issued a series of reform measures that culminated in the Taika Reform Edicts in 646. At this time, two scholars, Takamuko no Kuromaro and priest Min (who had both accompanied Ono no Imoko in travels to Sui China, where they stayed for more than a decade), were assigned to the position of Kuni no Hakase (国博士; National doctorate). They were likely to take a major part in compiling these edicts which in essence founded the Japanese imperial system and government.

The ruler according to these edicts was no longer a clan leader but Emperor (in Japanese, Tennō), who exercised absolute authority. The reform was much inspired by the Japanese missions to China in the Sui and Tang dynasties, and sought to emulate China's system of centralized imperial control and Confucianism.[3]

Reform

[edit]

From today's vantage point, the Taika Reform is seen as a coherent system in which a great many inherently dissonant factors have been harmonized, but the changes unfolded in a series of successive steps over the course of many years.[4] The major objective was to reassert imperial authority through reorganizing the government, including abolishing the kabane hereditary title system previously in place.[3] A major reform on the law include the Taihō (Great Law) Code written in 702, consisting of criminal and administrative laws modeled after Tang China, leading to the ritsuryō system.[3] New offices created include that of the Daijō daijin (chancellor), who presided over the Dajōkan (Grand Council of State), which included the Minister of the Left, the Minister of the Right, eight central government ministries, and a prestigious Ministry of Deities.[3]

Locally, the country was reorganized into 66 imperial provinces and 592 counties, with appointed governors.[3] Subjects were to be surveyed, land was to be nationalized and redistributed, and private weapons were to be stored in government armories.[3] A land tax, military service and labor obligations were instituted on subjects.[3] A permanent capital was also established in Nara, emulating the grid system of Tang China's capital Xi'an.[3] An exam system was also established, although unlike in China, it was open only to those from noble families.[3] The role of women became much more restricted in Japan, especially in official domains, in emulation of China.[3]

The Reform Edicts severely curtailed the independence of regional officials and constituted the imperial court as a place of appeal and complaint about the people. In addition, the last edicts attempted to end certain social practices, in order to bring Japanese society more in line with Chinese social practices. A legal code was enacted, with a reformed bureaucracy and law.[3] Nonetheless, powerful clans continue to exercise power in the imperial court and in regional governments.[3] It would take centuries for the conceptual idea of the Chinese-style emperor to take root in Japan.[5] Chinese civilization, including its art, philosophy, literature and architecture, would become much more entrenched in Japan compared to China's system of government.[3]

See also

[edit]
  • Shōen—the form of Japanese fiefdom that developed after the Taika Reforms.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Taika Reform

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Taika Reforms (大化の改新, Taika no Kaishin), enacted in 645 CE during the reign of , represented a foundational shift toward centralized imperial governance in , precipitated by the —a coup that assassinated Soga no Iruka and dismantled the Soga clan's dominance. Led by Prince Naka no Ōe (later ) and Nakatomi no Kamatari (founder of the ), the reforms drew from models to assert the emperor's direct authority over the realm, supplanting the prior clan-based (uji) system of regional control. Central to the reforms were edicts abolishing private land titles and hereditary serfdom, reallocating to households based on gender and age (e.g., two tan for adult males, two-thirds for females), and mandating periodic reapportionment to prevent consolidation. Accompanying measures established a national (hokō), tax registers, and a hierarchical administration of provinces, districts, and villages, with governors and officials appointed by the to enforce commuted taxes in rice, cloth, and labor. These changes, articulated in edicts like the 646 proclamation on capital, taxes, and the , aimed to curb elite exploitation and fund state functions, including military levies. The Taika Reforms laid the groundwork for the subsequent ritsuryō legal codes, such as the of 701, institutionalizing a bureaucratic state that endured for centuries and marking the inception of the imperial polity as a unified entity under divine mandate from the sun goddess. While implementation faced resistance and evolved incrementally, they diminished clan autonomies, enhanced fiscal capacity, and integrated Confucian principles of equitable rule, profoundly shaping political structure amid ongoing adaptations to local realities.

Historical Context

Political and Social Conditions Prior to 645

The Yamato court in the early operated within a decentralized political framework dominated by aristocratic clans, or , which wielded hereditary titles (kabane) and managed regional territories, militias, and labor through networks, thereby subordinating the emperor's symbolic to clan consensus. This clan-based structure, rooted in the 5th-6th century consolidation of power among lineages like the Soga, Mononobe, and Nakatomi, prioritized familial alliances over centralized command, with the throne functioning more as a ritual and diplomatic figurehead than an absolute sovereign. The exemplified this dominance, securing control over court administration by the late 6th century through strategic marriages, regencies, and monopolization of the oomi (great minister) rank; , for instance, orchestrated the enthronement of in 593 CE and positioned relatives in key diplomatic and fiscal roles, effectively directing imperial policy on trade and foreign relations. Socially, this entrenched elite stratification, where clan heads commanded dependent peasants (kōmin) and slaves, perpetuated inequality and localized loyalties, undermining broader imperial cohesion. Land tenure reinforced this decentralization, as powerful held hereditary estates known as tato—private domains cultivated by bound laborers—which generated tribute flows to clan patrons rather than systematic levies for the court, constraining the emperor's revenue to sporadic gifts and from allied territories. By the 630s CE, this fragmented system yielded insufficient resources for campaigns or administrative expansion, exacerbating fiscal vulnerabilities amid growing external pressures from Korean kingdoms. Concurrent exposure to models via diplomatic missions—initiated under Prince Shōtoku's regency with envoys like Ono no Imoko to Sui China in 607 CE and continued to Tang from the 630s—imported ideals of bureaucratic , Confucian , and state-controlled land allocation, highlighting the inefficiencies of Japan's clan-centric governance to reform-minded elites. Buddhism's court patronage, accelerated by Soga sponsorship since the 552 CE introduction of its icons, served as a conduit for these continental concepts, merging spiritual authority with visions of a unified, emperor-centered .

The Isshi Incident and Catalyst for Change

The Isshi Incident occurred on July 10, 645, when Prince Naka no Ōe, the future , and Nakatomi no Kamatari orchestrated the assassination of Soga no Iruka, the dominant figure of the , during a court ceremony at the imperial palace in response to Iruka's perceived overreach in installing a puppet prince on the throne. The attack took place amid a gathering attended by Empress Kōgyoku and foreign envoys, where armed conspirators struck Iruka down, leading to chaos as Soga loyalists were subdued. Soga no Emishi, Iruka's father and clan head, committed suicide upon learning of the events, effectively dismantling the 's grip on court politics. In the immediate aftermath, abdicated on July 12, 645, paving the way for her brother, Prince Karu, to ascend as , marking a pivotal shift toward factions opposing Soga influence and advocating for strengthened imperial authority modeled on continental systems. This transition empowered Prince Naka no Ōe and Nakatomi no Kamatari, who positioned themselves as key advisors, fostering an environment conducive to centralizing power away from aristocratic clans. The coup served as the direct catalyst for the Taika Reforms, as the new regime sought to legitimize its rule and consolidate control by issuing edicts that addressed longstanding issues of clan dominance and administrative fragmentation, initiating a broader program of imperial absolutism. This response was driven by the need to prevent future power imbalances, drawing on precedents from Tang China to restructure governance under direct imperial oversight.

Content of the Reforms

Core Doctrines and Edicts

The Reform Edict of 645, issued by following the , proclaimed the centralization of authority under the imperial throne, declaring all lands throughout the realm and the people therein as belonging to the sovereign domain. This edict explicitly abolished private land titles previously held by imperial princes, nobles, and officials, such as miyake estates and koshiro allocations, thereby asserting the emperor's overarching ownership as a foundational principle modeled on Tang Chinese precedents of imperial . Concomitant with the edict was the adoption of the era name Taika (大化), signifying "great transformation" or "great change," which underscored the doctrinal intent to overhaul the state's ideological framework toward a unified, emperor-centric infused with Confucian hierarchies and bureaucratic . The reforms' core edicts mandated a comprehensive to compile household registers (), enumerating population, land holdings, and productivity to enable equitable resource allocation and fiscal oversight, with households grouped into townships of fifty for administrative tracking by appointed aldermen. Central to these doctrines was the introduction of the handen shūju (班田収受) equal-field system, whereby arable land—measured in units of tan (approximately 30 paces by 12 paces) and chō (ten tan)—would be periodically redistributed to adult males (two tan) and females (1.33 tan), revocable upon death to revert to the state, thereby tying individual obligations directly to imperial grant. Corvée labor and taxation were doctrinally linked to these registers, with principles establishing fixed yields such as two sheaves and two bundles of rice per tan, supplemented by silk, cloth, and material tributes proportional to household and land capacity, replacing prior irregular exactions with standardized, state-enforced duties.

Administrative and Governmental Reorganization

The Taika Reforms of 645–646 fundamentally restructured Japan's governance to centralize power in the imperial court, diminishing the influence of hereditary clan leaders (uji) by modeling the administration on Tang China's bureaucratic system. Key edicts abolished private ownership of land and serfs held by powerful uji, while establishing appointed officials to administer provinces and districts directly under imperial oversight. Provincial governors, known as kuni no tsukasa, were dispatched from the capital to replace local hereditary rulers, with prefects (kōi no tsukasa) overseeing smaller districts comprising 40 villages for major units, 4–30 for medium, and fewer than 3 for minor ones; selections prioritized individuals of strong character from local nobility. In the capital, the reforms laid the groundwork for a formalized , culminating in the establishment of eight ministries and approximately 100 official posts by 649, handling functions such as civil administration and rites. This shift aimed to supplant the decentralized uji-kabane system—where positions derived from lineage and titles like omi or muraji—with ranks assigned based on merit and service to the state, including sustenance allowances (daibu) tied to performance rather than birth. However, loyalties persisted, rendering the merit-based transition incomplete in practice. To support centralized control, the edicts mandated the compilation of household population registers by village aldermen (overseeing groups of 50 households), enabling systematic tracking for obligations. These registers underpinned a national labor system, initially requiring direct service but later commuted to tribute payments like or per field unit, alongside military conscription that obligated households to provide weapons (swords, armor, bows, arrows), flags, drums, and horses (one per 100–200 households).

Land Redistribution and Taxation System

The Taika Reforms of 645–646 CE included edicts that nationalized land by abolishing private ownership held by powerful clans (uji), reverting all fields to imperial control to enable systematic allocation to cultivators. Land was to be distributed in fixed portions to adult males, with provisions for periodic redistribution every six years to account for and household needs, drawing from Chinese equal-field models to ensure equitable access and state oversight. This handenshūjū (allotment and redistribution) approach aimed to break clan monopolies on estates, tying land use directly to imperial authority rather than hereditary claims. Taxation shifted from irregular tributes to standardized assessments proportional to allocated and size, primarily in rice under the so (field tax) category, levied at two sheaves and two bundles per tan (approximately 0.1 ) or twenty-two sheaves per (about 1 ). A complementary ( ) required each to contribute one rod and two feet of cloth, plus surtaxes in salt and other goods, replacing levies with predictable revenue for the central . These rates, formalized in the 646 edicts, sought to fund and administrative functions while distributing the burden based on productive capacity, though implementation relied on accurate surveys. To enforce this system, a census via (household registers) was mandated, enumerating population, land holdings, and labor capacity across provinces for precise tax rolls and allocation. Registers grouped fifty households into villages (ri) under local headmen, facilitating centralized tracking but presupposing cooperation in a society still influenced by feudal loyalties. While intended for equitable taxation—linking payments to verified arable land and family units—the framework encountered challenges from incomplete surveys and resistance to surrendering clan-held fields.

Implementation and Outcomes

Initial Enforcement Measures

Following the of 645, the court under issued the Taika Reform Edicts on January 1, 646, which outlined initial measures for centralizing authority, including mandates for land surveys and household registrations to facilitate taxation and population mapping. These efforts commenced in 646 with preliminary registrations grouping households into units of 50 for administrative oversight, expanding into broader censuses by 647–649 across select provinces to quantify and taxable subjects under imperial control. Edicts explicitly required the appointment of centrally selected governors (kokushi) to oversee provinces, replacing hereditary clan control with direct imperial extensions into local governance. To symbolize and enforce this new order, the capital was relocated to Naniwa in late 645, prompting the construction of Naniwanomiya Palace and associated infrastructure, modeled on Tang Chinese urban plans to project imperial sovereignty. This move facilitated logistical centralization, including the establishment of post stations, barriers, and relay systems for communication and military readiness, as stipulated in the 646 . The reforms were disseminated through proclamations and dispatched officials to provincial , ensuring edicts reached elites via structured announcements and oversight mechanisms. Concurrently, the regime leveraged Buddhist institutions for ideological reinforcement, integrating temple networks into administrative propagation to affirm the emperor's divine mandate amid the shift to governance.

Resistance, Failures, and Partial Successes

Local elites and provincial governors mounted substantial resistance to the Taika Reforms' centralizing measures, particularly the land redistribution and taxation edicts that threatened their hereditary control over estates and labor. Powerful clans, entrenched in regional power structures, frequently disregarded orders for cadastral surveys and household registrations (hokeisei), continuing to administer private lands () and collect rents independently of Yamato court oversight. This non-compliance was exacerbated in eastern and northern provinces, where weak infrastructure and distance from the capital enabled autonomy, as evidenced by incomplete implementation reports in contemporary chronicles. Sporadic revolts, such as localized uprisings by disaffected officials in around 646–649, underscored the reforms' limited coercive reach against entrenched interests. Emperor Kōtoku's sudden death on November 24, 654, precipitated a crisis that further eroded reform momentum, as succession disputes shifted court priorities away from enforcement. Kōtoku's passing led to the re-enthronement of former as Saimei in 655, under whose reign influential reformers like Prince Naka no Ōe (future ) faced political marginalization, resulting in partial rollback of tax levies and bureaucratic mandates. By the late 650s, labor demands were relaxed in response to and discontent, and subsequent edicts under Saimei prioritized stability over radical restructuring, allowing clan networks to reclaim influence. These developments highlighted the reforms' dependence on Kōtoku's personal authority, which fragmented amid palace intrigues. Despite these setbacks, the Taika Reforms achieved partial successes in establishing administrative precedents and initial revenue streams, though they fell short of dismantling dominance due to Japan's underdeveloped agrarian infrastructure relative to Tang . Early censuses in 646 and 653 yielded some tax collections, funding court operations and signaling the viability of centralized , including the outline of eight ministries. However, the inability to impose uniform state control stemmed from Japan's reliance on clan-orchestrated wet-rice cultivation without 's extensive canal systems or bureaucratic density, rendering full eradication of local power infeasible in the short term. These limitations preserved a where central edicts coexisted uneasily with regional autonomy, foreshadowing iterative adjustments rather than immediate transformation.

Long-term Impact

The Taika Reforms of 645 initiated key principles of centralized imperial administration that directly informed the legal framework, serving as a precursor to the of 701, which systematically codified administrative, penal, and civil statutes. These statutes expanded on Taika's edicts by delineating a hierarchical , provincial governance, and fiscal obligations modeled after precedents, thereby formalizing the shift from clan-based authority to emperor-supervised state control. The subsequent Yōrō Code of 718 refined these elements, incorporating revisions to , taxation, and official ranks while preserving Taika's core aim of consolidating power in the imperial household over regional elites. Taika's land redistribution and labor mandates laid the groundwork for ritsuryō's cyclical handō system, which required periodic reapportionment of arable fields among households to ensure equitable tax yields supporting the central treasury. This mechanism, reiterated and detailed in the Taihō and Yōrō codes, aimed to undermine hereditary clan estates (shōen precursors) and enforce uniform provincial administration through appointed governors. The codes' emphasis on codified ranks and merit-based appointments echoed Taika's reorganization of the ō-omi and ō-muraji councils into a proto-ministerial , promoting bureaucratic continuity. The institutionalization of a fixed capital at Heijō-kyō (Nara) in 710 reflected Taika's enduring push for centralized symbolism, as the codes mandated imperial oversight of national rituals and archives to legitimize sovereign authority. This framework extended into the , where ritsuryō-derived offices and legal precedents upheld nominal emperor-centric rule, even as regental influences adapted enforcement without fully supplanting the codified hierarchy.

Societal and Economic Consequences

The Taika Reforms of 645–646 initially boosted state revenue by nationalizing land previously held by powerful clans and imposing a standardized taxation system, whereby arable fields were allocated to cultivators in proportion to their household size, with taxes levied in rice, cloth, and labor services. This , modeled on Tang Chinese precedents, enabled the to extract resources more systematically from the peasantry, funding imperial administration and military endeavors in the short term. However, enforcement proved inconsistent, as peasants faced escalating burdens from obligations and harvest-based assessments, often exacerbating rural indebtedness and flight to untaxed lands. Economically, the reforms inadvertently accelerated the emergence of —tax-exempt private estates—by the late , as aristocrats, temples, and shrines reclaimed or expanded holdings through legal exemptions and administrative loopholes, undermining the public land regime. By the , widespread evasion of cadastral surveys and rolls fragmented the tax base, shifting economic power toward these manorial entities and contributing to long-term fiscal decline for the central state. This transition from state-controlled allocation to privatized cultivation patterns sowed seeds for feudal-like agrarian structures, where elite accumulation of reduced incentives for broad-based productivity improvements. Societally, the abolition of hereditary clan () control over private lands and dependents curtailed regional , elevating imperial and embedding a Confucian-inspired that prioritized bureaucratic merit over ties. The adoption of Chinese script (), , and historiographical methods—integrated via edicts mandating official records—enhanced administrative literacy and record-keeping among the elite, facilitating governance but widening cultural divides between court officials and rural populations. While fostering an imperial ideology of centralized divine rule, the reforms paradoxically empowered court aristocrats over generations, as they monopolized bureaucratic posts and revenues, entrenching a hereditary that outlasted the reform's egalitarian intents.

Historiographical Perspectives

Traditional Interpretations of Centralization

The , an official chronicle completed in 720 under imperial auspices, depicts the Taika Reforms of 645 as a heroic consolidation of imperial power, framing the assassination of Soga no Iruka and subsequent edicts as a deliberate overthrow of the Soga clan's monopolistic influence, which had undermined the throne's authority for decades. This narrative emphasizes the reforms' success in emulating the Tang dynasty's centralized administrative model, including the imposition of provincial governorships and land surveys to assert direct imperial control over resources previously held by aristocratic clans. The text portrays these measures as a triumphant restoration of doctrinal order, aligning governance with Confucian principles of hierarchical loyalty to the sovereign, thereby legitimizing the emperor as the unchallenged apex of the state. In traditional Japanese historiography, extending from classical compilations to 19th-century interpretations during the , the Taika Reforms were viewed as the origin of enduring imperial sovereignty, crediting the centralization with forging a unified from fragmented domains. Nationalist scholars of the period, influenced by restorationist , highlighted the reforms' role in enshrining the emperor's divine lineage as the causal foundation for state cohesion, positing that the adoption of Tang-inspired not only curbed aristocratic overreach but also instilled a purity of imperial mandate that prefigured modern . This perspective underscores the edicts' emphasis on equal land allocation under —such as the 646 redistributing fields to cultivable households—as evidence of effective rationalization, portraying the outcome as a seamless toward absolutist rule rather than contested imposition. Early Western observers, drawing on translated Japanese annals in the late , echoed these views by lauding Taika as a foundational "great change" that mirrored successful continental empires, attributing Japan's subsequent stability to the reforms' bold assertion of monarchical primacy over feudal particularism. Such interpretations prioritized the causal efficacy of imperial ideology, including rituals affirming the emperor's sacred status, as drivers that integrated diverse regions into a cohesive modeled on Tang precedents like the rishi land system.

Modern Critiques and Reassessments

Scholars in the late 20th and early 21st centuries have increasingly questioned the Taika Reforms' purported success in achieving comprehensive centralization, attributing incomplete implementation to Japan's technological and administrative disparities with Tang China, including rudimentary and capabilities that undermined equitable land allocation and tax collection. These mismatches fostered resistance from provincial elites accustomed to clan-based control, rendering many edicts more aspirational than enforceable. Economic reassessments underscore the land nationalization's practical failures, as persistent private holdings—often shielded through exemptions or evasion—evaded state oversight, while burdensome and grain levies sparked localized revolts and farmer impoverishment, evidencing inefficiency in disrupting entrenched feudal production relations. Mikiso Hane observed that equitable redistribution schemes faltered in practice, with six-year reallocations never materializing due to administrative overload and social pushback. Post-1980s scholarship reframes the reforms as largely symbolic gestures toward imperial legitimacy rather than revolutionary overhauls, with causal analyses emphasizing how pre-existing loyalties and decentralized power structures constrained deeper transformation, prioritizing rhetorical alignment with continental models over substantive fiscal or bureaucratic overhaul. This perspective counters earlier narratives of unmitigated triumph, highlighting empirical gaps in enforcement metrics like sustained yields or uniform provincial .

References

  1. https://www.colorado.edu/history/sites/default/files/2024-10/SPRING%25202017%2520-%2520Colorado%2520Historian%2520Journal.pdf
  2. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/ps/japan/taika.pdf
  3. http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~breilly2/world/taika.htm
  4. https://www.britannica.com/place/Japan/Rise-and-expansion-of-Yamato
  5. https://www.britannica.com/place/Japan/Yamato-decline-and-the-introduction-of-Buddhism
  6. https://www.japan-experience.com/plan-your-trip/to-know/japanese-history/early-japan
  7. https://www.britannica.com/place/Japan/The-Taika-reforms
  8. https://japansociety.org/news/the-japanese-missions-to-tang-china-7th-9th-centuries/
  9. https://www.utc.edu/document/51091
  10. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0r69q023/qt0r69q023.pdf
  11. https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0281/ch2.xhtml
  12. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Taika_Reforms
  13. https://factsanddetails.com/japan/cat16/sub106/entry-5296.html
  14. https://www.britannica.com/topic/so-Japanese-tax
  15. https://www.britannica.com/event/Taika-era-reforms
  16. https://laits.utexas.edu/~mr56267/HIST_341K/Outline_pages/Asuka_Early_Nara.html
  17. https://naniwanomiya.jp/history/?lang=en&mode=3
  18. https://naniwanomiya-ar.jp/en/chronology/
  19. https://geitan.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1059/files/KJ00004254151.pdf
  20. https://historyofjapan.co.uk/wiki/taika-reforms/
  21. https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2781/files/ACS31_04Hesselink.pdf
  22. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/politics-and-government/nengo-system-and-taika-reforms
  23. https://fee.org/articles/were-japans-taika-reforms-a-good-idea/
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2384665
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.