Hubbry Logo
Texture splattingTexture splattingMain
Open search
Texture splatting
Community hub
Texture splatting
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Texture splatting
Texture splatting
Texture splatting
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Example of texture splatting, except an additional alphamap is applied

In computer graphics, texture splatting is a method for combining different textures. It works by applying an alphamap (also called a "weightmap" or a "splat map") to the higher levels, thereby revealing the layers underneath where the alphamap is partially or completely transparent. The term was coined by Roger Crawfis and Nelson Max.[1]

Optimizations

[edit]

Since texture splatting is commonly used for terrain rendering in computer games, various optimizations are required. Because the underlying principle is for each texture to have its own alpha channel, large amounts of memory can easily be consumed. As a solution to this problem, multiple alpha maps can be combined into one texture using the red channel for one map, the blue for another, and so on. This effectively uses a single texture to supply alpha maps for four real-color textures. The alpha textures can also use a lower resolution than the color textures, and often the color textures can be tiled.

Terrains can also be split into chunks where each chunk can have its own textures. Say there is a certain texture on one part of the terrain that doesn’t appear anywhere else on it: it would be a waste of memory and processing time if the alpha map extended over the whole terrain if only 10% of it was actually required. If the terrain is split into chunks, then the alpha map can also be split up according to the chunks and so now instead of 90% of that specific map being wasted, only 20% may be.

[edit]

Alpha-based texture splatting, though simple, gives rather unnatural transitions. Height-based texture blending attempts to improve on quality by blending based on a heightmap of each texture.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Texture splatting

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Texture splatting is a computer graphics technique primarily employed in terrain rendering to blend multiple textures seamlessly across a polygonal surface, such as a heightmap-based landscape, by using control maps known as splat maps or alphamaps to specify the contribution of each texture at vertex or pixel locations. These maps encode weights—typically in multiple channels (e.g., RGBA for up to four textures)—that interpolate between base materials like grass, rock, sand, or snow, enabling realistic variations without requiring high-resolution geometry or excessive texture memory. Originally popularized in the early 2000s for real-time applications, the method leverages GPU capabilities for efficient multitexturing, often implemented via fragment shaders that sample and combine textures based on the control data. The core advantage of texture splatting lies in its ability to automate texturing decisions using terrain attributes, such as vertex elevation and surface slope, through rule-based systems that assign weights dynamically. For instance, steeper slopes might favor rocky textures, while flatter areas prioritize grass or soil, creating emergent detail in large-scale environments like those in video games or simulations. This approach extends traditional texture mapping by supporting arbitrary numbers of textures (beyond hardware limits like four, via techniques such as texture atlases or iterative blending) and integrates well with optimizations like level-of-detail (LOD) systems for distant views. In contemporary usage, texture splatting has evolved to incorporate advanced features, including for added depth illusion on flat surfaces and triplanar projection to minimize stretching artifacts on irregular geometry. It remains a staple in game engines (e.g., Unity and Unreal) for procedural terrain generation, balancing visual fidelity with performance in real-time rendering pipelines, though it can introduce challenges like seams at texture boundaries or increased complexity for high texture counts.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

Texture splatting is a technique for combining multiple textures on a surface by using an alphamap—also referred to as a weightmap or splat map—to modulate the opacity of each texture layer and blend them seamlessly. The term was introduced by Roger Crawfis and Nelson Max in their paper, which applied textured splats to volume visualization for 3D scalar and vector fields. The technique's purpose is to facilitate the rendering of intricate, heterogeneous surfaces, such as terrains incorporating diverse materials like grass, rock, and sand, while avoiding visible seams and minimizing the need for dense polygon meshes. It is especially valuable in real-time applications, including video games, where it supports efficient depiction of expansive, detailed environments without compromising frame rates. Among its key benefits, texture splatting mitigates repetition artifacts common in tiled textures, enables smooth transitions between layers for natural-looking results, and optimizes resource use for large-scale scenes by leveraging hardware-accelerated blending. This approach allows artists to achieve high visual fidelity with a limited set of base textures, streamlining production for interactive graphics.

Historical Development

The term "texture splatting" was coined in 1993 by Roger Crawfis and Nelson Max in their seminal on volume visualization techniques, where it described a method for rendering 3D scalar and vector fields by projecting textured Gaussian "splats" onto planes to efficiently handle large sets. This approach built on earlier splatting concepts from , such as Lee Westover's 1990 work on footprint evaluation for soft objects, but introduced texture integration to enhance visual in scientific representation. Initially focused on , the technique addressed challenges in approximating continuous fields with discrete samples, achieving interactive frame rates on hardware of the era. In the mid-to-late 1990s, as consumer 3D graphics hardware advanced with improved capabilities—exemplified by the rise of accelerators like the Voodoo series in 1996—texture splatting began extending beyond volume visualization to surface rendering applications, particularly for terrains. This evolution was facilitated by the growing availability of multitexturing support in APIs like , allowing multiple textures to be blended in a single pass. By 2000, Charles Bloom formalized its use for terrain texturing in a , describing frame-buffer blending of high-resolution texture tiles via alphamaps to create seamless, detailed landscapes without excessive memory demands. Surface splatting variants, such as those proposed by Matthias Zwicker et al. in 2001, further refined the method for opaque and transparent point-based surfaces, incorporating elliptical weighted averages (EWA) filtering to mitigate . By the early 2000s, texture splatting saw widespread adoption in game engines for real-time terrain rendering, influencing titles like (2004), which leveraged CryEngine's alphamap-based layering to blend diverse environmental textures across expansive open worlds. This period marked a shift toward practical implementation in consumer software, driven by shader programmability in GPUs like NVIDIA's series. A key milestone came in 2013 with Andrey Mishkinis's Gamasutra article on advanced splatting techniques, which introduced depth-aware blending and noise modulation for more natural transitions in dynamic terrains, enabling runtime adjustments without performance penalties. As of 2025, texture splatting remains a foundational technique in modern game engines such as Unity and , deeply integrated with GPU shaders for efficient real-time blending via compute pipelines and virtual texturing extensions. Despite the rise of neural rendering methods like 3D Gaussian splatting—introduced in 2023 for photorealistic scene reconstruction—no major paradigm shifts have displaced it for traditional surface texturing tasks, where its simplicity and hardware compatibility continue to ensure broad utility.

Core Principles

Alphamap Mechanism

The alphamap serves as a control texture in texture splatting, typically implemented as a grayscale image where each pixel value ranges from 0 to 1, representing the opacity weight for blending overlaying textures onto a base layer. In this structure, a value of 1 (white) indicates full opacity of the top texture, completely obscuring the underlying layer, while 0 (black) reveals the bottom texture entirely; intermediate values (grays) enable smooth transitions between materials. For multi-channel alphamaps, separate channels (e.g., red for one texture layer, green for another) encode weights for multiple overlays, allowing independent control without requiring additional textures. This mechanism ensures seamless integration of diverse surface details, such as grass over dirt, by modulating texture contributions spatially. The blending process uses the alphamap to compute the final color through . For two texture layers, the formula is given by: C=(Ttop⋅A)+(Tbottom⋅(1−A))\mathbf{C} = (\mathbf{T}_{\text{top}} \cdot A) + (\mathbf{T}_{\text{bottom}} \cdot (1 - A)) where C\mathbf{C} is the resulting color, Ttop\mathbf{T}_{\text{top}} and Tbottom\mathbf{T}_{\text{bottom}} are the sampled colors from the respective textures, and AA is the alphamap value at the current . This extends to multiple layers via iterative application, where each subsequent texture is blended against the accumulated result using its corresponding alphamap channel, normalized to ensure weights sum to 1 and prevent over-brightening. Such iterative blending maintains efficiency while supporting complex material distributions on surfaces. Alphamaps are generated either manually by artists to define precise material boundaries or procedurally to align with features. Procedural methods often leverage , angles, or functions—such as —to derive weights that correlate with elevation changes (e.g., rocky textures on steep ) or material transitions (e.g., sand to based on simulations). For instance, -based masking applies ramp functions to and normal , with added for irregularity, ensuring blends follow natural without manual intervention. These approaches enable dynamic adaptation to large-scale . To optimize memory usage, alphamaps are typically rendered at lower resolutions than the primary color textures, such as 64x64 pixels per chunk compared to 256x256 for detail maps. During rendering, samples the alphamap to upscale it smoothly, mitigating artifacts from the reduced detail while preserving blend continuity across the surface. This resolution strategy balances visual fidelity with resource constraints in real-time applications.

Texture Layering Process

In texture splatting, the layering process begins with a base texture, such as dirt or rock, which serves as the foundational layer covering the entire terrain surface. Subsequent layers, like grass or snow, are overlaid hierarchically using dedicated alphamaps to modulate their contribution. Each alphamap acts as a control mask, where pixel values between 0 and 1 determine the opacity of the overlaying texture at specific locations; for instance, a value of 1 fully reveals the upper layer, while 0 preserves the underlying result unchanged. This modulation is applied sequentially, with each new layer blending onto the cumulative output of the previous ones, ensuring a progressive buildup of surface detail. For an extension to N textures, the process employs N-1 alphamaps to derive weights that facilitate multi-layer blending. The final surface appearance is computed as a cumulative weighted sum: final color = Σ (texture_i × weight_i), where the weights for each texture_i are derived from the intersections and normalizations of the relevant alphamaps, ensuring the sum of weights across all layers equals 1 at every point to avoid over-brightening or darkening. This generalization allows for complex interactions, such as partial grass coverage on a base modulated further by snow in high-elevation zones, with dynamic flow control in shaders skipping computations for layers with zero weight in given areas. Alphamaps enable seamless transitions by providing smooth gradients that prevent hard edges between texture regions, particularly when using tiled textures (typically 256×256 pixels) that repeat across the without visible seams due to the modulating weights. In handling overlaps, areas of full coverage by an upper layer completely obscure lower ones, while partial overlaps produce natural blends, such as moss gradually appearing on rock surfaces through interpolated alpha values. These mechanisms rely on the alphamap's opacity control to create realistic, continuous variations without abrupt discontinuities.

Implementation Details

Rendering Pipeline

The rendering pipeline for texture splatting begins with loading the terrain mesh, typically divided into manageable chunks such as 32x32 vertex grids, along with the detail textures and the corresponding alphamap. These chunks facilitate efficient processing by allowing selective rendering based on . The alphamap, often generated at a resolution like 64x64 per chunk, encodes weights for blending multiple textures (up to four or more layers) and is aligned to the terrain geometry for precise control over transitions. In the vertex processing stage of the modern GPU pipeline, UV coordinates are computed for both the alphamap and the detail textures. The vertex shader passes interpolated UVs to the fragment stage, with texture UVs scaled by tiling factors (e.g., repeating a 512x512 texture multiple times across a chunk) to ensure seamless coverage without stretching. Alphamap UVs are stretched over the entire chunk (from 0 to 1), enabling per-fragment sampling that aligns with the terrain's world-space layout. This setup supports real-time dynamic views by processing only visible geometry per frame. The core blending occurs in the fragment shader, where the alphamap is sampled to retrieve normalized weights (summing to 1.0) for each texture layer. These weights are applied to linearly blend the colors from the detail textures, sampled via GPU texture units in APIs like (using GLSL mix functions) or (using HLSL lerps). For example, the final color cc for two layers can be computed as c=w1⋅t1+w2⋅t2c = w_1 \cdot t_1 + w_2 \cdot t_2, where w1,w2w_1, w_2 are alphamap weights and t1,t2t_1, t_2 are texture samples; this extends to multiple layers via iterative mixing. The resulting blended color is output to the , often after applying or other effects. In earlier fixed-function pipelines, this was achieved via multi-pass alpha blending across texture stages, but programmable shaders enable single-pass efficiency for multiple layers on modern hardware. To support real-time performance, the incorporates frustum culling to skip off-screen chunks, reducing draw calls and fill-rate demands while maintaining high frame rates (e.g., 60 FPS on hardware like GeForce2-era GPUs for the original implementation, scalable to contemporary systems). This process integrates seamlessly with broader texture layering blends, where weights control the contribution of each layer based on features.

Memory and Resource Handling

In texture splatting systems, color textures are typically stored as power-of-two sized tiles, such as 512×512 pixels in RGBA format, to facilitate efficient GPU and mipmapping. These tiles allow for modular coverage of surfaces without requiring a single monolithic texture, reducing the overall demands compared to generating expansive seamless textures. Alphamaps, which control the blending weights, are stored in single-channel or packed formats to minimize VRAM usage; for instance, they can employ 16-bit 4444 ARGB packing, where each 64×64 alphamap occupies approximately 8 KB per splat texture. Resource allocation in texture splatting involves summing the sizes of individual color textures and their corresponding alphamaps, enabling scalable memory budgets tailored to the number of splat layers. For a setup with four 512×512 RGBA color textures, the uncompressed totals around 4 MB, plus alphamaps adding roughly 32 KB, starkly contrasting with a single large seamless texture that might exceed 100 MB for equivalent coverage at high resolution. This additive approach promotes efficiency, as only necessary layers are loaded, avoiding the overhead of baking blends into oversized assets. To manage large-scale terrains, loading strategies emphasize streaming textures based on the view frustum, loading only visible chunks and fading distant splats to a base texture to prevent exhaustive dataset ingestion into memory. Mipmaps are integral for distance-based quality control, with trilinear filtering applied to splat textures and specialized alpha mip levels (e.g., 4×4 maps set to full transparency) to smoothly transition blends without aliasing. Format choices further optimize efficiency through compression: color textures often use DXT (now BC1-3) formats, compressing 512×512 tiles to about 128 KB each while preserving visual fidelity, and alphamaps leverage single-channel floating-point or packed integer representations for compact storage. Modern extensions incorporate advanced compressors like BC7 for higher-quality lossy encoding of color data, ensuring reduced VRAM footprint without significant perceptual loss in terrain rendering.

Optimizations

Multi-Channel Alphamap Techniques

Multi-channel alphamap techniques in texture splatting involve packing multiple weight maps into the color channels of a single texture to optimize resource usage during terrain rendering. Typically, the red (R), green (G), and blue (B) channels are used to store up to three separate alphamaps, with the alpha (A) channel either left unused or reserved for a fourth layer or additional details such as noise modulation. For instance, the R channel might encode the weight for grass coverage, G for rock, and B for sand, allowing a single RGBA texture to control blending across three or four base textures efficiently. In the shader, these packed channels are decoded using component swizzling to extract individual weights during the fragment processing stage. A common implementation samples the alphamap once and accesses specific channels, such as weight_grass = texture(alphamap, uv).r; weight_rock = texture(alphamap, uv).g; weight_sand = texture(alphamap, uv).b;, before normalizing the values to ensure they sum to 1 for proper alpha blending (e.g., total_weight = weight_grass + weight_rock + weight_sand; normalized_grass = weight_grass / total_weight;). This approach leverages hardware texture sampling to perform the blending in a single pass, referencing basic alphamap sampling principles for weight computation. The primary benefits include fewer texture binds and samplings, which reduces GPU overhead and improves rendering performance, particularly for large terrains with multiple layers. Memory usage is also streamlined, as a single × RGBA8 texture (approximately 4 MB) replaces multiple single-channel textures, avoiding potential overhead from separate loads despite comparable raw byte counts for grayscale storage. This method efficiently supports 3–4 texture layers without additional passes, making it suitable for real-time applications. However, these techniques are limited by the four-channel constraint of standard RGBA textures, capping the number of splats per alphamap at four; exceeding this requires multiple alphamap textures, which reintroduces binding costs, or alternative formats like indexed splatting with palette textures. Precision loss can occur in low-bit-depth channels, potentially leading to visible artifacts in smooth transitions if not mitigated by normalization or dithering.

Terrain Chunking Strategies

Terrain chunking strategies in texture splatting involve dividing large meshes into smaller, manageable grids to facilitate efficient rendering, particularly for handling localized texture applications via alphamaps. Typically, the is split into square grids, such as 64x64 vertices per chunk (yielding 63x63 quads), where each chunk maintains its own dedicated alphamap and associated texture set. This localization ensures that only relevant texture weights are stored and processed for specific regions, avoiding the overhead of a monolithic alphamap for the entire . A common approach integrates geometrical mipmapping (geo-mipmapping), where the is organized into fixed-size blocks—often 17x17 vertices—and precomputed levels of detail () are generated for each block based on resolution hierarchies analogous to texture mipmaps. selection occurs dynamically per chunk, using screen-space error metrics (e.g., a threshold of 8 pixels) and distance from the viewer to choose coarser resolutions for distant chunks (e.g., step size of 4 vertices) and finer ones nearby, ensuring adaptive detail without excessive . Frustum culling is applied via bounding boxes on these chunks, rendering only those within the view, which further optimizes performance by discarding up to 90% of non-visible in expansive scenes. Memory efficiency is a primary benefit, as chunking allows selective loading of alphamaps and textures; for instance, in a full 1 km² terrain without partitioning, a high-resolution alphamap (e.g., 1024x1024) might waste up to 90% of its storage on zero-valued regions where textures are absent, whereas chunking confines alphamaps to 32x32 or 64x64 per block, reducing waste to 10-20% by loading subsets tailored to local content. This is particularly effective when combined with progressive streaming, where only nearby or visible chunks are resident in memory, bounding total usage for massive (e.g., reducing from ~51 MB to ~9.5 MB for a comparable through and compression). To ensure visual continuity, seamless stitching at chunk boundaries requires careful alignment of UV coordinates and alphamap values along shared edges, preventing discontinuities in blending during texture splatting; techniques like triangle fans or vertical skirts connect adjacent chunks of varying LODs without introducing T-junctions or gaps. This alignment is crucial, as mismatched border alphamap values can otherwise produce visible seams, and is often achieved by sharing edge texels or interpolating weights consistently across partitions.

Applications

Terrain Rendering in Games

Texture splatting is widely integrated into major game engines for rendering expansive terrains in open-world titles, enabling seamless blending of multiple surface materials such as grass, rock, and sand to simulate diverse biomes. In Unity, the built-in system employs splat maps—alpha-based weight textures—to layer up to 8 diffuse textures per terrain patch, allowing artists to paint and blend materials directly in the editor or at runtime for dynamic environments. Similarly, Unreal Engine's Landscape tool uses weight maps to blend up to 8 layers (expandable via material functions) across vast procedural or hand-crafted worlds, facilitating efficient GPU-accelerated rendering of kilometer-scale maps. This technique has been used in games like , which combined virtual texturing with splatting for its destructible jungles. A key advantage in games is the support for runtime alphamap editing, which allows real-time modifications to terrain appearance without full rebakes, often leveraging compute shaders for performance. Developers can update splat weights via scripts or shaders to simulate environmental changes, such as erosion or player impacts; for instance, in procedural generation systems, compute shaders dispatch threads to alter alpha values in a RenderTexture-based alphamap, enabling effects like footprints displacing grass splats in snowy or muddy areas. This is particularly useful in interactive titles, where tools like Unity's TerrainData API permit targeted pixel modifications, integrated with compute pipelines to handle large-scale updates efficiently on the GPU. Such dynamic capabilities appear in modern open-world games, allowing adaptive terrain responses to gameplay events without stutters. Performance-wise, texture splatting achieves 60+ FPS on large maps when paired with level-of-detail () systems, which reduce texture resolution and splat complexity at distance to minimize draw calls and . Early implementations highlighted challenges with shader-based splatting on unoptimized hardware, prompting shifts to hybrid approaches for scalability. However, in titles from the like Crysis—which used virtual texturing alongside splatting for its destructible jungles—to 2020s releases such as Ghost Recon Wildlands, optimizations like mipmapped alphamaps and LOD-biased sampling maintain smooth framerates across expansive vistas, even on mid-range GPUs. For massive worlds, chunking divides the landscape into loadable sections, integrating splatting without overwhelming VRAM, as explored in dedicated strategies. Visual enhancements in games extend texture splatting to (PBR) by associating detail maps—such as normal and specular maps—with each splat layer, adding micro-surface details like bumpiness or reflectivity without additional render passes. In Unity's TerrainLayer assets, each texture includes optional normal maps for occlusion and specular multipliers for metallic sheen, blending seamlessly under dynamic to simulate wet rocks or dry soil (as of Unity 2023 LTS). landscapes similarly pack PBR channels into material layers, where splat weights modulate roughness and metallic values per pixel, enabling realistic interactions like specular highlights on dewy grass under sunlight (as of 5.4). This per-splat PBR integration incurs minimal overhead, as the blending occurs in a single pass, contributing to the lifelike terrains in games without compromising frame rates.

Extensions to Other Graphics Contexts

Texture splatting originated in volume visualization as a technique for rendering 3D scalar and vector fields by projecting textured Gaussian "splats" onto implicit surfaces, enabling efficient of volumetric data without explicit . This approach, introduced in , allows for the visualization of complex datasets such as medical scans or simulations by blending textures based on data values, providing smooth transitions and reducing artifacts in large-scale 3D environments. In architectural visualization, blending techniques facilitate the integration of diverse materials on building facades and urban , supporting interactive walkthroughs with realistic surface variations. By using weight maps to modulate texture contributions, it enables seamless integration of elements like , , and on complex geometries, enhancing in design reviews without excessive memory usage. Scientific applications leverage texture splatting in geographic systems (GIS) for rendering planetary surfaces, where it blends satellite-derived textures to represent extraterrestrial accurately. For instance, tools for planetary visualization incorporate blending methods to overlay high-resolution on global models, allowing scientists to visualize Mars or lunar landscapes with layered details from and . In real-time flight simulators, the technique applies alphamaps to meshes for dynamic ground rendering, ensuring consistent during high-speed navigation over varied landscapes, as demonstrated in underwater glider simulations where it composites bathymetric with surface textures. Extensions integrate texture splatting with advanced rendering in (VR) environments, supporting immersive landscape rendering by enabling real-time blending of procedural , as seen in VR simulations where alphamaps adapt to user movement for seamless, high-detail virtual worlds.

Height-Based Texture Blending

Height-based texture blending refines texture splatting by incorporating terrain height data to dynamically modify alphamap weights, ensuring textures align with topographic features for greater realism. This technique integrates heightmaps—typically grayscale representations of terrain —with alphamaps to adjust blending based on derived properties like and . For example, rocky textures are prioritized on steep slopes, while grass or dominates flatter regions, mimicking natural and deposition patterns. In implementation, the process occurs primarily in the fragment shader, where local terrain properties are computed from the heightmap. Slope angle is derived from partial derivatives of the height function or the y-component of the surface normal (ranging from 1 for flat areas to 0 for vertical surfaces), often using finite differences across neighboring samples. The blend factor is then defined as a function of this slope angle, such as a smoothstep interpolation that increases weights for rugged textures (e.g., rocks) above a threshold like 0.75, while reducing them for smoother ones below it. This adjusts the standard alphamap weights, with steeper angles favoring durable materials to avoid unrealistic coverage on inclines. Snow textures are applied using height thresholding, typically on higher elevations to simulate snow caps. This approach offers significant advantages in visual fidelity, reducing artifacts like unnatural flat blending across diverse elevations and producing more immersive terrains without manual alphamap authoring. For instance, automated rules based on height bands and slopes can generate seamless transitions, such as grass-to-rock shifts on hillsides. It builds on standard alphamap blending by adding topographic awareness, promoting ecological plausibility in large-scale rendering. However, height-based blending introduces drawbacks, including elevated computational overhead from per-pixel calculations and additional texture samples, which can strain performance on lower-end GPUs. Accurate, high-resolution height data is essential, as inaccuracies lead to banding or erroneous placements, such as misplaced rocks on mild slopes; moreover, sharp slope changes may produce visible seams without functions.

Comparisons to Multitexturing and Other Methods

Texture splatting represents a specialized application of multitexturing, where multiple tileable textures are blended dynamically using control maps (also known as alphamaps or splat maps) to achieve seamless coverage over surfaces, in contrast to traditional multitexturing's reliance on fixed UV coordinate layers for applying multiple textures simultaneously. This approach enables more adaptive blending tailored to terrain variations, such as or , making it particularly effective for large-scale, heterogeneous landscapes, though it demands additional preprocessing to generate the control maps. Compared to procedural texturing, which generates surface details algorithmically at runtime—often using functions or mathematical models for infinite, non-repeating patterns—texture splatting depends on a finite set of pre-authored, artist-created texture tiles that are composited via the control . Splatting offers quicker artistic and lower real-time computational overhead, as the blending occurs efficiently in shaders without on-the-fly generation, but it sacrifices the boundless variety and scalability of procedural methods, potentially leading to repetitive appearances if the tile library is limited. In the context of modern radiance field techniques, texture splatting for mesh surfaces differs fundamentally from 3D Gaussian splatting, a 2023 method that represents scenes as collections of anisotropic 3D Gaussians optimized for photorealistic novel view synthesis from image data, excelling in reconstruction quality for unbounded scenes but requiring significantly higher training and rendering compute due to its volumetric nature and optimization over point positions, opacities, and covariances. Overall, excels in for low-polygon meshes by leveraging GPU multitexturing units to apply detailed surfaces with minimal , achieving high frame rates on varied terrains; however, for localized, high-fidelity details such as footprints or , decals provide a superior alternative by projecting small textures onto surfaces without altering the broader splatting setup. Height-based refinements can further enhance splatting's transitions by modulating blends according to texture heightmaps, improving realism in overlap regions.

References

  1. https://www.cs.cit.tum.de/fileadmin/w00cfj/cg/Research/Publications/2020/TriplanarDisplacementMapping/short1020_CRC-Preprint.pdf
  2. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1690388.1690474
  3. https://ijvr.eu/article/view/2787
  4. http://www.cbloom.com/3d/techdocs/splatting.txt
  5. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/949845.949893
  6. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/398877
  7. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/383259.383300
  8. https://www.cryengine.com/
  9. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/programming/advanced-terrain-texture-splatting
  10. https://media.contentapi.ea.com/content/dam/eacom/frostbite/files/chapter5-andersson-terrain-rendering-in-frostbite.pdf
  11. https://www.realtimerendering.com/advances/s2007/Andersson-TerrainRendering(Siggraph07).pdf
  12. https://www.gamedev.net/tutorials/programming/general-and-gameplay-programming/texture-splatting-in-direct3d-r2238/
  13. http://www.bundysoft.com/docs/doku.php?id=l3dt:algorithms:splatting
  14. http://www.flipcode.com/archives/article_geomipmaps.pdf
  15. https://www.terrain.dk/terrain.pdf
  16. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/game-platforms/virtual-texture-terrain
  17. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36703547.pdf
  18. https://gliders.cs.rutgers.edu/documents/OceansSeattle2010.pdf
  19. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/723206/Thesis%2520template.pdf?sequence=2
  20. https://www.csse.canterbury.ac.nz/research/reports/HonsReps/2008/hons_0801.pdf
  21. https://www.gamedevs.org/uploads/quadtree-displacement-mapping-with-height-blending.pdf
  22. https://inria.hal.science/inria-00606769/file/ProcReproduction.pdf
  23. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.04079
  24. https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/12767/rendering-multiple-textures-on-a-terrain-in-xna-c
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.