Hubbry Logo
White-JacketWhite-JacketMain
Open search
White-Jacket
Community hub
White-Jacket
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
White-Jacket
White-Jacket
from Wikipedia

White-Jacket; or, The World in a Man-of-War is the fifth book by American writer Herman Melville, first published in London in 1850.[1] The book is based on the author's fourteen months' service in the United States Navy, aboard the frigate USS Neversink (actually USS United States).

Key Information

Although early biographers of Melville assumed the account was reliably autobiographical, scholars have shown that much in the book was taken and transformed from popular sea books.

Overview

[edit]

Based on Melville's experiences as a common seaman aboard the frigate USS United States from 1843 to 1844, stories that other sailors told him, and earlier sea books, the novel is severely critical of virtually every aspect of American naval life and thus qualifies as Melville's most politically strident work.[citation needed] At the time, though, the one thing that journalists and politicians focused on in the novel was its graphic descriptions of flogging and the horrors caused by its arbitrary use; in fact, because Harper & Bros. made sure the book got into the hands of every member of Congress, White-Jacket was instrumental in abolishing flogging in the U.S. Navy forever. Melville scholars also acknowledge the huge number of parallels between White-Jacket and Billy Budd and view the former as "a major source for naval matters" in the latter.[2]

The novel takes its title from the outer garment that the eponymous main character fashions for himself on board ship, with materials at hand, being in need of a coat sufficient for the rounding of Cape Horn. Due to a ship-wide rationing of tar, however, White-Jacket is forever denied his wish to tar the exterior of his coat and thus waterproof it. This causes him to have two near-death experiences, once when he is reclining among the canvases in the main-top and, his jacket blending in with the surrounding material, he is nearly unfurled along with the main sail; and once when, having been pitched overboard while reeving the halyards, he has to cut himself free from the coat in order not to drown. He having done so, his shipmates mistake the discarded jacket for a great white shark and harpoon it, sending it to a watery grave.

The symbolism of the color white, introduced in this novel in the form of the narrator's jacket, is more fully expanded upon in Moby-Dick, where it becomes an all-encompassing "blankness".[3] The mixture of journalism, history, and fiction; the presentation of a sequence of striking characters; the metaphor of a sailing ship as the world in miniature, all prefigure Moby-Dick, his next novel.

White-Jacket and the log of the USS United States

[edit]

Many of the actual crew and the incidents of the voyage recorded in the ship log are transformed and figure prominently in White-Jacket. As one Melville scholar has stressed, "Melville rarely invents..." and "the ship's records bear him out."[4] Foremost among them is Melville's hero Jack Chase, captain of the maintop, in reality Englishman John J. Chase, age 53, whom Melville introduces in White-Jacket, Chapter 4, Jack Chase, thus, "First and foremost was Jack Chase, our noble First Captain of the Top." Melville described Chase, as having fought at the Battle of Navarino and deserted USS St. Louis to fight for Peruvian independence. The ship log confirms Melville's narrative, Chase returned to the frigate on 29 May 1842 and was pardoned, at the request of the Peruvian ambassador for his services to the government of Peru.[5][6]

Similarly among the officers, Melville's paragon is a lieutenant he calls, "Mad Jack". Melville describes Mad Jack as a model of excellence in chapter 8, in contrast to an ineffectual lieutenant whom Melville refers to as "Selvagee." "Mad Jack is in his saddle on the sea. That is his home ... Mad Jack was a bit of tyrant — they say all good officers are — but the sailors loved him all round; and would much rather stand fifty watches with him, than one with a rose-water sailor."[7] Mad Jack's original was Lt. Latham B. Avery, who two of Melville's shipmates identified as Mad Jack.[8] Melville writes (chapter 27), "In time of peril, like the needle to the loadstone, obedience, irrespective of rank, generally flies to him who is best fitted to command." Melville recorded one other telling detail about his hero: "But Mad Jack, alas! has one fearful. He drinks."[9] Melville adds, "in very fine weather he was sometimes betrayed into a glass too many. But with Cape Horn before him, he took the Temperance Pledge outright, till that perilous promontory should be far astern."[10] The log for 15 August and 6 September 1842 confirms that Lt. Lantham B. Avery was court-martialed and reprimanded for leaving the deck while he was drunk.[11]

Another actual crew member is "the Purser, who was a southern gentleman...."[12] The purser was Edward Fitzgerald, who like many naval officers of the era was a slaveholder.[13][14] On 18 October 1841 Fitzgerald, requested the consent of the Secretary of the Navy, Abel P. Upshur, to entered his "servant" (slave), Robert Lucas, as a landsman (in reality his personal steward) as a crew member and whose nine dollar per month wages Fitzgerald collected.[15][16][17] In reply, Secretary Upshur, on 26 October 1841, wrote, "the department grants your request to take your own servant aboard the frigate United States."[18] In White-Jacket, Lucas becomes "Guinea" the purser's body servant, the only person aboard except the hospital steward and the invalids who is exempt from being present at muster for punishment.[19] Once in Boston, Robert Lucas was able with the help of sympathetic shipmates to flee the vessel and successfully petition Lemuel Shaw, Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Superior Court, Melville's family friend and future father-in-law, for freedom.[20][21] This important case Commonwealth vs. Edward Fitzgerald re Robert Lucas, became a precedent in the naval service, effectively barring enslaved individuals as seamen.[22]

"In both the ship log and White-Jacket, mortality is prominent; with Melville relating and the log confirming the various modes of death." For sailors death and burial at sea or on a foreign shore was a commonplace."[23] During the long voyage, six crew members died, including David Black, the ship's cooper, "Bungs", who fell overboard and perished on 4 October 1843. The actual log entry for 4 October 1843, is terse: "From 4 to 8 moderate breezes and clear weather at 5.22 David Black (Cooper) fell overboard, hove to with maintop sail to the mast and sent the Barge & 2nd Cutter in search of him … at 10.15 wore to the N hove to and hoisted up the 2nd Cutter, all search proving ineffectual."[24] In White-Jacket, chapter 17, headed, "Away! Second, Third, and Fourth Cutters, Away!" Melville, transforms this brief passage into art,

"Do you see him?" shouted the officer of the watch through his trumpet, hailing the mainmast-head. "Man or buoy, do you see either?" "See nothing, sir," was the reply. "Clear away the cutters!" was the next order. "Bugler! call away the second, third, and fourth cutters' crews. Hands by the tackles!" In less than three minutes the three boats were down. More hands were wanted in one of them, and, among others, I jumped in to make up the deficiency.... For a time, in perfect silence, we slid up and down the great seething swells of the sea, but saw nothing. "There, it's no use," cried the officer; "he's gone, whoever he is. Pull away, men — pull away! they'll be recalling us soon." "Let him drown!" cried the strokesman; "he's spoiled my watch below for me." "Who the devil is he?" cried another. "He's one who'll never have a coffin!" replied a third. "No, no! they'll never sing out, 'All hands bury the dead!' for him, my hearties!" cried a fourth.

Log of USS United States, re David Black,(Cooper), dated 4 Oct 1843. Black was swept overboard. Herman Melville records and transforms the same incident, in White-Jacket, chapter 17.

The same incident is described by the anonymous author of Journal of A Cruise to the Pacific Ocean, 1842-1844, in the Frigate United States, who recounts a similar set of facts and circumstances.[25]

United States Navy, Muster of the crew of the frigate USS United States 1844 re Robert Lucas Landsman crew no. 428.
Purser Edward Fitzgerald USN to Secretary of the Navy, Abel P. Upshur, 18 Oct 1841 re permission to bring his enslaved "servant", Robert Lucas (Guinea), aboard USS United States

Characters

[edit]

This list is not exhaustive.

  • White-Jacket, the main character and narrator, so nicknamed because his coat is the only white one on board; a novice sailor (at least on a naval ship), his jacket often gets him into trouble, mostly because of its whiteness
  • Jack Chase, a sailor of British origin who is universally regarded by his fellow seamen and even by the officers as the epitome of a true and good sailor; he shows contempt for any man who has shipped out on a whaler
  • Captain Claret, a captain of usually severe tendencies, his name reflects the fact that he is also an alcoholic
  • Commodore
  • Selvagee, a foppish lieutenant whose leadership style is tyrannical
  • Mad Jack, a lieutenant whose leadership style is collegial
  • Old Coffee, the ship's cook
  • Mayday, a ship's cook deputy
  • Rosewater, a ship's cook deputy
  • Lemsford, a sailor who aspires to be a poet
  • Quoin, a sailor "indefatigable in attending to his duties, which consisted in taking care of one division of the guns"[26]
  • Nord, a sailor of surly look and melancholy disposition; when White-Jacket first encounters him, the only friend Nord has on board is Lemsford
  • Williams
  • Wooloo, the commodore's Polynesian servant
  • Old Revolver
  • Old Combustibles
  • Chaplain
  • Cuticle, the ship's Surgeon
  • Shakings
  • Bland, the ship's master-at-arms
  • Tawney, a sheet-anchor man, a "staid and sober seamen, very intelligent," whom White-Jacket sometimes invites to join the crew in the main top and tell stories. Tawney is the only black character in the novel to be treated equitably in relation to the other characters.[27]
  • Guinea, a slave owned by the ship's purser
  • Ushant, a much admired sexagenarian and crew member of the fore top who, along with many other sailors, cultivates a long flowing beard or "homebounder." When Captain Claret commands all facial hair be shorn to meet Navy regulations, a small rebellion ensues but ultimately Ushant is the sole remaining dissenter. He is flogged, put in chains, and held in the brig for weeks, but arrives in Norfolk harbor with his beard intact and a hero among his peers. White-Jacket takes a hair from Ushant's beard as a memento.
  • Don Pedro II, Emperor of Brazil

Publication history

[edit]

White-Jacket was published in London by Richard Bentley on February 1, 1850, and in New York by Harper & Brothers on March 21, 1850.[28] Melville referred to it and his previous book Redburn as "two jobs which I have done for money—being forced to it as other men are to sawing wood."[29]

[edit]

At the urging of New Hampshire Senator John P. Hale (whose daughter, Lucy, would later become the fiancée of John Wilkes Booth, the murderer of President Abraham Lincoln[30]) the United States Congress banned flogging on all U.S. ships in September 1850.[31] He was inspired by Melville's "vivid description of flogging, a brutal staple of 19th century naval discipline" in his "novelized memoir" White-Jacket.[31]

The officer whom Melville based his fictional commodore on, Thomas ap Catesby Jones, a former commander of USS United States, was later brought up on a court-martial in 1850 and found guilty on three counts mostly related to "oppression" of junior officers. Jones was relieved of command for two and a half years. In 1853, President Millard Fillmore reinstated him, and in 1858 the United States Congress restored his pay.[32]

Log of USS United States August 18, 1843 record of entry of author Herman Melville O. S.(Ordinary Seaman) as crew

During Melville's time on the USS United States from 1843–1844, the ship log records 163 floggings, including some on his first and second days (18 and 19 August 1843) aboard the frigate at Honolulu, Oahu.[33] The official log entry for 18 August 1843 simply states:

Commenced with moderate breezes from the Nd & Ed. and clear. Shipped Herman Melville. "O.S." and Griffith Williams "O.S." ... at 9 a m . mustered the crew at Quarters, Punished Jno Hall, "O.S" with 12 lashes with cats for striking sentry on Post. Geo Clark "OS" with 12 of cats for smuggling liquor, Bos. C. B. Stanly "App" with 12 lashes with Kittens for fighting and Wm B Ewing "App" with 6. for using provoking language. Suspended the Boatswain from duty for disrespectful - conduct to the Officer of the Deck,- by replying when ordered by same through – Midn [Midshipman] Key, to call all hands stand by their washed clothes "that he would 'receive no more orders in this Ship", or words to that effect.

The following day, 19 August 1843, the log records yet another muster for punishment. "From 8 to meridian, moderate breezes from the Nd & Ed and clear, at 9. hoisted in the 3d Cutter, and got the lower booms alongside. Punished Geo Davis, Wm Stewart and Antonio Guavella "Bandsmen" with 12 lashes each for drunkenness." In "A Flogging" (chapter 33), Melville changed this brutal scene from 19 August 1843 in Honolulu Oahu to sometime later when the frigate was at sea. He also changed the names of the crewmen punished to John, Peter, Mark, and Antone and the charge from drunkenness to fighting. "Antone, the Portuguese" is clearly based on his recollection of Antonio Guavella."[34][35]

USS United States 1843–1844 muster roll Herman Melville Ordinary Seaman is recorded as number 572

Notes

[edit]

References and further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
is a semi-autobiographical novel by American author , first published in on January 23, 1850, by and in New York on March 21, 1850, by Harper & Brothers. Drawing directly from Melville's eighteen-month service as an aboard the U.S. USS United States from August 1843 to October 1844, the narrative follows the experiences of its protagonist, a landsman named White-Jacket, so called for his distinctive homemade jacket fashioned from white duck cloth. The offers a vivid, often scathing portrayal of daily life on a , renamed the Neversink in the text, encompassing the rigid hierarchies, monotonous routines, and arbitrary authority that defined naval service in the era. Melville highlights the dehumanizing effects of naval discipline, including overcrowding, inadequate provisions, and the pervasive threat of , with particular emphasis on flogging as a routine tool of control. Through episodic chapters blending personal anecdotes, philosophical digressions, and social critique, the work exposes systemic abuses while advocating for humane reforms, such as the abolition of flogging and improvements in sailors' rights. White-Jacket's publication exerted tangible influence on U.S. naval policy; its detailed condemnation of flogging, appearing amid growing congressional scrutiny, preceded the passage of legislation in September 1850 that banned the practice aboard American warships. As Melville's fifth book—following , , , and —it marked a shift toward more realistic depictions of maritime life, bridging his earlier tales with the introspective depth of later masterpieces like . The novel's blend of and moral urgency underscores its role as both literary artifact and instrument of reform, grounded in the empirical realities of mid-19th-century seafaring.

Introduction

Overview and Significance

White-Jacket; or, The World in a is the fifth by American author , published in on January 23, 1850, by Richard Bentley and in New York on March 21, 1850, by Harper & Brothers. The narrative centers on an unnamed protagonist known as White-Jacket, an aboard the fictional U.S. Neversink, chronicling the ship's voyage from the around to . Drawing from Melville's own experiences, the book depicts daily naval routines, interpersonal dynamics, and institutional abuses, blending episodic anecdotes with on maritime life. Composed rapidly over two months in the summer of 1849, the novel incorporates semi-autobiographical elements from Melville's fourteen-month service as an on the USS United States from August 1843 to October 1844. White-Jacket's distinctive white duck jacket serves as a symbol of his outsider status and eventual peril, mirroring Melville's reflections on isolation and survival at sea. The work critiques the rigid hierarchies and punitive practices of the mid-19th-century U.S. Navy, portraying a microcosm of societal power structures. The novel holds historical significance for its vehement opposition to , particularly flogging, which Melville details in a dedicated chapter as a barbaric relic incompatible with American ideals of . Published amid growing congressional scrutiny, White-Jacket's vivid depictions influenced debates, contributing to the on September 28, 1850, that prohibited flogging aboard U.S. naval vessels. This reform marked a pivotal shift in , underscoring the book's role in bridging and policy change.

Composition and Historical Context

Melville's Naval Service and Autobiographical Elements


Herman Melville enlisted in the United States Navy on August 17, 1843, at Honolulu, Hawaii, as an ordinary seaman aboard the frigate USS United States, flagship of the Pacific Squadron. The ship, under command during this period, conducted operations in the Pacific before returning eastward, with Melville serving for approximately 14 months and logging over 38,000 miles across the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, including 179 days at sea and 141 days in port at locations such as Honolulu, the Marquesas Islands, Tahiti, the Society Islands, Chile, and Peru. He was discharged in Boston in October 1844 upon the ship's arrival. During his service, Melville witnessed 163 instances of flogging as punishment, a practice central to naval discipline under the Articles of War.
White-Jacket; or, The World in a (1850) draws extensively from Melville's naval experiences, presenting a semi-autobiographical account fictionalized through the narrator White-Jacket, an who shares Melville's role as an on the USS Neversink (a for the ). The incorporates direct observations of shipboard life, including hierarchical routines, port visits mirroring the United States' itinerary, and critiques of informed by the floggings Melville observed. Key personal elements, such as the protagonist's self-made white duck —modeled after one Melville fashioned himself—and a near-fatal fall from the due to its billowing fabric, reflect authentic incidents from his service. While Melville transformed these events for narrative effect, the work's foundation in his 1843–1844 voyage provides a firsthand basis for its depictions of mid-19th-century American naval conditions. Melville's interactions with crew members, such as the charismatic Jack Chase, whom he later praised in correspondence and who influenced character development in subsequent works like , further underscore the autobiographical thread. The novel's emphasis on the dehumanizing aspects of naval authority and the sailor's isolation at sea stems from Melville's own disillusionment during the voyage, which he enlisted in amid financial pressures following prior desertions. This service not only supplied raw material for White-Jacket but also catalyzed Melville's advocacy against flogging, contributing to its abolition by in 1850 shortly after publication.

Mid-19th-Century U.S. Navy Practices

Enlistment in the U.S. during the 1840s typically occurred at naval rendezvous or foreign ports for durations tied to cruises, often one to two years, with recruits drawn from civilians including like , who joined the USS as an in on August 17, 1843. Boys' enlistments were discontinued in 1843, raising the minimum age focus to adults, though physical and character requirements applied. Crews included rated seamen (e.g., able, ordinary) and landsmen, with musters recording details like Melville's entry as crew number 572. Shipboard routine followed a rigid watch system dividing the crew into larboard and starboard watches, with four-hour shifts from 8:00 PM to 8:00 AM and two-hour watches in the evening to alternate sleeping periods. Duties commenced at 4:00 AM with , encompassing deck scrubbing via holystoning, handling, , and gunnery drills; daily musters occurred at 9:15 AM, with Sunday inspections emphasizing and . Meals included breakfast at 8:00 AM, dinner at noon, and supper before sunset, often cold leftovers, supplemented by rations issued ceremonially at 11:30 AM under supervision to prevent excess. Living conditions for enlisted men centered on the berth deck, where canvas hammocks with one and two blankets were slung; quarters remained unheated, relying on stoves for drying rather than warmth. Weekly rations per 1818 regulations, updated by 1842 to include coffee and fruits, comprised 3.5 pounds or 3 pounds , 98 ounces , and in port to combat via potatoes and onions. Clothing allotments provided one pea jacket, two blue jackets, shirts, and four pairs of shoes annually, with 25 pounds of for personal use; hygiene mandated washing two to three times weekly, though facilities were basic, using bath tubs on sailing ships. Medical care featured surgeons on frigates like the , with daily sick calls at 9:00 AM treating ailments such as and using lemon juice and special diets. Discipline enforced a strict , with commanding officers wielding summary over enlisted men viewed as requiring firm control to prevent mischief. Flogging with the cat-o'-nine-tails on the bare back—hands tied overhead, legs spread and secured—served as the primary for minor offenses like dirty utensils, administering up to 12 lashes per incident. In 1846–1847, 5,936 floggings occurred across 60 commissioned ships, averaging four per ship monthly; courts-martial imposed 12 to 100 lashes for graver infractions. Regulations required the captain's presence during flogging, but by the late 1840s, civilian petitions—271 submitted by 1849–1850—pressured , culminating in abolition on September 28, 1850, amid concerns over its barbarity despite officers' defense of its efficacy. Post-abolition alternatives included tricing up, and gagging, and reduced rations, though courts-martial rose, indicating persistent enforcement challenges.

Narrative Elements

Plot Summary

White-Jacket; or, The World in a (1850) is narrated in the first person by an unnamed American , referred to as White-Jacket due to his distinctive garment improvised from a discarded and painted white for visibility amid the crew's dark uniforms. The story is set aboard the fictional U.S. Neversink—a thinly veiled depiction of the real USS United States—during its homeward voyage from , , across the Pacific and around to in late 1843 and early 1844. The narrative unfolds episodically through White-Jacket's observations of shipboard life, emphasizing the vessel's microcosmic society stratified by rank, from the tyrannical captain and arbitrary lieutenants to the diverse crew of able seamen, idlers, and marines. Early chapters detail the protagonist's initiation into naval routines, including the chaotic muster divisions, the sailors' hammock-slung quarters below decks, and the enforced idleness punctuated by drills and punishments. White-Jacket recounts encounters with colorful characters, such as the mild-mannered who delivers ineffectual sermons, the sadistic who enforces discipline, and fellow sailors like the philosophical Lemsuel and the opportunistic Jack Chase, a handsome British who mentors the narrator. Incidents include a mock for a sailor's minor infraction, vivid depictions of flogging under the cat-o'-nine-tails as routine retribution for perceived offenses, and a brief, futile pursuit of a suspected slaver off the Brazilian coast, underscoring the Navy's operational inefficiencies. A climactic personal ordeal occurs during a when White-Jacket, while aloft in the , slips and is saved only by his jacket catching on a nail, leaving him dangling perilously over the until rescued by comrades; this episode symbolizes the precarious existence of the common amid indifferent authority. The voyage continues with reflections on naval , the chaplain's futile ministry, and the crew's covert resistances, such as liquor and forming informal hierarchies. Upon reaching New York on October 17, 1844, White-Jacket discards his tattered jacket ashore, marking his emancipation from the man-of-war's oppressive world, while the narrative closes with a fervent plea against at sea.

Characters and Characterization

The narrator, White-Jacket, an aboard the frigate Neversink, derives his from a bulky, sail-cloth jacket he fashions for protection against the elements, which ultimately leads to a near-fatal incident when he fears being mistaken for a and nearly jumps overboard. This semi-autobiographical figure, unnamed beyond his attire, observes and critiques naval life through a lens of personal experience, highlighting the absurdities and hardships faced by enlisted men during the voyage from the Pacific around to New York. Melville characterizes White-Jacket as an outsider—naive yet perceptive—whose evolving disillusionment with military discipline underscores themes of individual vulnerability amid institutional power. Foremost among the enlisted crew is Jack Chase, the British-born captain of the maintop, portrayed as a natural aristocrat of the forecastle: handsome, eloquent, and versed in literature from Shakespeare to Byron, he commands voluntary respect through charisma and competence rather than rank. Chase's progressive demeanor and disdain for flogging position him as a foil to the officers' authoritarianism, embodying Melville's ideal of merit-based leadership; he organizes amateur theatricals and mediates disputes, fostering a micro-society of mutual aid below decks. This characterization draws from a real sailor Melville encountered, emphasizing Chase's role as a "scholar-seaman" who humanizes the dehumanizing shipboard routine. The officers receive more satirical treatment, with Captain Claret depicted as a politically connected but seafaringly inept commander whose arbitrary decisions—such as ignoring seasoned advice during gales or inconsistently enforcing punishments—exacerbate crew suffering. Claret's favoritism toward certain subordinates and reliance on the "" without discernment reveal Melville's critique of over in naval appointments. In contrast, "Mad Jack" emerges as a paragon of practical : gruff, weather-beaten, and instinctively nautical, he prioritizes ship safety and , as seen in his for bold maneuvers against storms that Claret timidly avoids. This binary characterization illustrates Melville's preference for earned expertise over titular power. Supporting figures like the aged boatswain's mate , convicted on dubious charges yet revered for his artisanal skill and defiance, further exemplify resistance to systemic injustice; his and irons symbolize the navy's punitive excess. Junior officers such as the foppish Selvagee parody aristocratic idleness, lounging with novels while the ship founders. Overall, Melville's characterizations filter through White-Jacket's normative judgments—valuing moral autonomy and while condemning blind obedience—derived from the narrator's encounters to expose the "world in a " as a microcosm of flawed .

Themes and Analysis

In White-Jacket, Melville depicts naval discipline aboard the fictional frigate Neversink—modeled on the —as a rigid system enforced through arbitrary authority, with flogging as its cornerstone. Drawing from his service as an from August 1843 to October 1844, Melville describes routine corporal punishments administered via the cat-o'-nine-tails, a whip delivering up to 39 lashes for offenses ranging from to minor infractions. The ship's log for the during this period records 163 floggings over 14 months, averaging two to three per week, often on bare backs with sailors' hands secured overhead and legs spread. Melville portrays these as dehumanizing spectacles that bred resentment rather than obedience, likening them to and arguing they contradicted American ideals of liberty. The novel's Chapter XXXVI, "Flogging Not Necessary," systematically critiques the practice's efficacy, citing historical precedents like Lord Nelson's aversion to it due to its mutinous effects. Melville contends that flogging fostered among officers, who inflicted pain while claiming , and eroded by equating sailors with brutes unfit for rational . He contrasts it with alternatives like confinement or reduction in rank, which British naval reformers had begun adopting, asserting that fear-driven punishment invited rebellion over loyalty. Empirical observations from Melville's voyage underscore this: floggings often followed trivial disputes, with surgeons routinely treating lacerations afterward, indicating a normalized . Broader naval discipline in the 1840s U.S. emphasized , with captains wielding near-absolute power under Articles for the Government of the United States (1797, revised 1800), permitting without trial for efficiency at sea. Defenders viewed flogging as swift and deterrent against or drunkenness, prevalent among impressed or low-wage crews, but critics, including civilian petitions from the 1840s, highlighted its barbarism amid growing abolitionist sentiments. Melville's vivid accounts—such as a lashed for questioning orders—amplified reform calls, contributing to Congress's ban on flogging via the Act of September 28, 1850, months after the novel's March publication. This legislation replaced it with alternatives like , reflecting a shift toward disciplined incentives over physical , though varied.

Hierarchy, Authority, and Social Order

In White-Jacket, Herman Melville depicts the man-of-war as a stratified microcosm of society, characterized by a rigid hierarchy that enforces strict obedience through formalized authority structures derived from the U.S. Navy's Articles of War. The captain, portrayed as Captain Claret, exercises near-absolute command, capable of ordering floggings or other punishments without immediate recourse, reflecting the 1840s naval practice where officers held unilateral power over subordinates to maintain order at sea. This top-down authority extends through lieutenants, midshipmen, and petty officers to ordinary seamen like the narrator, who occupy the lowest rung and perform menial duties such as scrubbing decks or handling sails. Social order aboard the USS Neversink—a fictional for the USS United States—relies on class divisions that segregate officers, who dine separately and wield privileges, from and sailors confined to communal messes. , numbering around 50 and predominantly Irish, form an intermediate layer officered by a , orderly , corporals, and musicians; they guard provisions, the , and officer cabins, acting as enforcers rather than combatants in routine operations. Sailors, in turn, organize into informal subgroups within their divisions, but petty officers often abuse minor authorities, lording over juniors in ways that exacerbate tensions. Melville contrasts this coercive with instances of natural leadership, such as that of Jack Chase, a competent and charismatic main-topman who earns voluntary respect from peers and even influences the captain to remit punishments, demonstrating how personal merit can challenge rank-based dominance. Yet, the prevailing system fosters antagonism—evident in the mutual contempt between sailors and —as a deliberate "checks and balances" mechanism, which Melville lambasts as a grinding, un-Christian apparatus that dehumanizes the crew and stifles individual agency. Ultimately, the novel critiques naval hierarchy as antidemocratic, compromising personal rights and echoing broader societal ills where arbitrary power overrides merit or , a view substantiated by Melville's own service as an from August 1843 to October 1844 aboard the . This portrayal underscores causal links between unchecked authority and crew alienation, advocating reform to align military order with republican ideals.

Military Justice and Individual Rights

In White-Jacket, Melville depicts the U.S. Navy's military justice system as a mechanism that systematically erodes individual rights, suspending constitutional protections for sailors while vesting unchecked authority in officers. Sailors, as American citizens, are stripped of habeas corpus, trial by jury, and other civil immunities upon enlistment, with the narrator observing an "everlasting suspension of the Habeas Corpus" that allows indefinite imprisonment without recourse. This contrasts sharply with civilian justice, where principles from the Magna Carta and Blackstone's commentaries ensure due process, rendering naval law a form of martial absolutism incompatible with republican ideals. Central to this critique is flogging, which Melville argues is not merely harsh but unlawful, as it violates and the dignity of man by granting captains discretionary power under Article XXXII of the to punish undefined offenses without evidentiary standards. In peacetime, such punishments equate to under civilian precedents, yet naval courts-martial—often convened for trivial infractions—offer no appeal or impartiality, with captains embodying legislative, judicial, and executive functions in one. Examples abound, such as summary floggings for minor disobedience or the rare but severe "flogging through the fleet" for cowardice, where squadrons administer without proportional justice. The system's inequality further undermines individual rights, exempting officers from while subjecting enlisted men to it indiscriminately, fostering a where "one set of sea-citizens is exempted from a that is hung in terror over others." Melville highlights peacetime executions—three men hanged on the Neversink for mutiny attempts under Article XXII—without the exigencies of war justifying such extremes, and notes officers' frequent violations of naval codes go unpunished absent formal trials. This disparity echoes servitude, with sailors likened to slaves denied the Declaration of Independence's promises, their rights forfeit on the "floating timbers" of the ship. Ultimately, Melville advocates aligning naval with broader American principles of equality and , urging laws that bind commanders and crews alike to prevent abuses of power. He contends that true discipline arises not from terror but from mutual respect, warning that unchecked breeds resentment and moral decay rather than order. This portrayal underscores a causal tension: absolute authority, while enabling short-term control, erodes the voluntary service essential to a free republic's navy.

Publication and Reception

Publication History

was first published in on , 1850, by as a three-volume set. The American edition appeared shortly thereafter on March 21, 1850, issued by Harper & Brothers in New York as a single volume with brown cloth binding and gilt lettering on the spine. This marked Herman Melville's fifth major prose work, following earlier in 1849, and drew directly from his experiences aboard the USS United States from 1843 to 1844. The novel saw no significant authorial revisions during Melville's lifetime, with subsequent reprints maintaining the original text amid growing interest in his oeuvre. Early American printings included publisher's advertisements, such as six pages in the first edition, reflecting standard practices of the era. By the late 19th century, the work entered public domain, facilitating numerous reproductions, though it remained less commercially prominent than Melville's earlier nautical successes like Typee and Omoo. Modern scholarly editions, such as those from Northwestern University Press and Cambridge University Press, incorporate textual analysis but adhere closely to the 1850 versions without substantive alterations.

Contemporary Reviews and Initial Impact

White-Jacket was first published in on January 23, 1850, by , followed by a edition in March 1850 from Harper & Brothers. Contemporary reviews were mixed, with several praising the novel's vivid depiction of naval life and social critique while others criticized its structure and didactic tone. The London Sun commended Melville's prolific output and versatility, noting the book's revelations of American naval practices aboard the frigate Neversink, including detailed character sketches of officers like Captain Claret. Similarly, the New York Tribune review by George Ripley on April 5, 1850, highlighted Melville's "excellent service" in exposing the "secrets of his prison-house" through scenes of shipboard discipline and . The New York Knickerbocker in May 1850 echoed this enthusiasm, stating that "not a page... has escaped us" due to its "continuous interest," affirming Melville's restored popularity. Critics less favorable pointed to narrative flaws and excess. The London Britannia on February 2, 1850, lamented a "want of continuity of interest" and monotony, warning that without stylistic changes, Melville's popularity "will not survive the issue of another White Jacket." The Boston Post on April 10, 1850, dismissed its "didactic portions" as marked by "crudities and puerilities," describing a "stream of egotism, vapidness and affectation." Despite such reservations, at least eleven reviews from 1850 leaned favorable, appreciating the work's maturation from Melville's earlier fantasies to grounded sailor narratives. The novel exerted prompt influence on public discourse regarding naval reform, particularly . Melville distributed copies to members of , amplifying calls to end flogging amid ongoing debates. Its portrayal of flogging's brutality contributed significantly to legislative action; on September 28, 1850, the 31st passed a bill prohibiting flogging aboard U.S. naval and commercial vessels, which President signed into law on September 30, 1850—mere months after . Thomas O. Selfridge later attributed the abolition more to White-Jacket than any other factor, underscoring its role in shifting policy against entrenched practices. This outcome marked an early, tangible impact of Melville's advocacy, though the book's commercial success remained modest compared to his debut .

Modern Scholarship and Interpretations

Modern scholars emphasize White-Jacket's role as a propagandistic work advocating naval reform, particularly the abolition of flogging as . Published in March 1850, the novel's vivid depictions of 163 floggings witnessed by Melville during his 1843–1844 service aboard the influenced congressional debates, with reformers distributing copies to lawmakers; flogging was banned in the U.S. just six months later in September 1850. Interpretations highlight how Melville's empirical observations from ship logs and muster rolls underpin his critique of arbitrary authority, framing the as a microcosm of unchecked power rather than mere . Literary analyses focus on the white jacket's symbolism, evolving from emblem of and to one of terror and alienation amid naval tedium. Scholars argue it represents the sailor's blurred identity amid mechanized labor and enforced , transitioning into depressive and critiquing militarized . Recent readings connect this to broader themes of , portraying the novel's subversive as exposing psychological that persists beyond legal reforms. Interpretations also link White-Jacket to antebellum slavery debates, with Robert S. Levine noting Melville's distinctions between naval "slaves" under impressment and literal chattel, using the ship's hierarchy to interrogate human rights and social bondage without equating the two. Modern scholarship views the text as prefiguring Billy Budd's naval motifs, shifting from reformist sympathy for sailors to tragic acceptance of martial necessity, while exploring unbelonging and democratic tensions in hierarchical orders. These readings prioritize Melville's first-hand realism over romanticized individualism, attributing the novel's enduring analysis to its causal dissection of authority's dehumanizing effects.

Legacy and Influence

Reforms in the U.S. Navy

The publication of White-Jacket in March 1850 coincided with and contributed to a broader reform campaign against corporal punishment in the U.S. Navy, particularly flogging, which had been a standard disciplinary measure since the early republic. Melville's vivid depictions of floggings aboard the fictionalized USS Neversink—drawn from his experiences on the USS United States in 1843–1844—highlighted the brutality, arbitrariness, and dehumanizing effects of the practice, including lashes administered by boatswain's mates under captains' orders, often for minor infractions. The novel's Chapter 68, "Flogging," and related passages argued that such punishment contradicted American democratic ideals and equated it to slavery, galvanizing public and legislative opposition to a tradition inherited from British naval customs. Melville strategically distributed copies of White-Jacket to every member of Congress, amplifying its role in the ongoing debate over naval discipline. This effort aligned with advocacy from figures like Senator John Parker Hale and naval reformers who had petitioned against flogging since the 1840s, citing its inefficacy in maintaining order and its tendency to provoke mutiny or desertion. Rear Admiral Thomas O. Selfridge later attested that the book "had more influence in abolishing corporal punishment in the Navy than anything else," reflecting contemporary perceptions of its impact amid a groundswell of petitions and congressional hearings. While the reform movement predated the novel, its timely publication and targeted dissemination provided a literary catalyst, framing flogging as incompatible with republican values and energizing final legislative action. On September 28, 1850, President signed into law an act passed by prohibiting flogging as punishment on all U.S. naval vessels, effective immediately and replacing it with alternatives like or reduction in rank. This marked the culmination of efforts to modernize naval justice, though enforcement varied initially due to entrenched traditions; by the Civil War era, the practice had effectively ceased. White-Jacket's influence extended indirectly to subsequent improvements in sailors' conditions, such as better oversight of courts-martial and reduced reliance on summary punishments, but its primary legacy remains tied to ending flogging—a that aligned naval more closely with civilian legal norms. No comparable direct causal links exist for other sweeping changes, like vessel or enlistment policies, attributable to the .

Broader Literary and Cultural Impact

White-Jacket solidified Herman Melville's reputation as the preeminent sea writer of his era, blending autobiographical elements with epic fiction to create a vivid social critique of naval life. The novel's portrayal of the as a microcosm of society influenced subsequent literary explorations of institutional hierarchies and , emphasizing the tensions between individual agency and rigid command structures. Beyond immediate literary acclaim, White-Jacket exerted influence in sociological discourse, notably through Erving Goffman's Asylums (1961), where it is cited 15 times as empirical evidence for analyzing "total institutions." Goffman drew on Melville's depictions of , autocratic rule, and crew adaptations—such as repurposing objects for personal use—to illustrate concepts like "secondary adjustments" and "free spaces" within oppressive systems. This application extended the novel's reach into mid-20th-century , treating its narrative as a documentary resource comparable to firsthand fieldwork. The work's enduring cultural resonance lies in its timeless depiction of naval traditions and the psychological dynamics of , which continue to resonate with modern readers, including U.S. Navy personnel, for insights into tradition-bound services. By foregrounding the human costs of and reformist zeal, White-Jacket contributed to broader antebellum discussions on power and restraint, though its direct adaptations or echoes in later fiction remain limited compared to Melville's more canonical works.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.