Hubbry Logo
Wikipedian in residenceWikipedian in residenceMain
Open search
Wikipedian in residence
Community hub
Wikipedian in residence
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Wikipedian in residence
Wikipedian in residence
Wikipedian in residence
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The relationship between a Wikipedian in residence and the community. The diagram represents the stakeholders and what each stakeholder provides and receives in a typical Wikipedian in residence project.

A Wikipedian in residence or Wikimedian in residence (WiR) is a Wikipedia editor, a Wikipedian (or Wikimedian), who accepts a placement with an institution, typically an art gallery, library, archive, museum, cultural institution, learned society, or institute of higher education (such as a university) to facilitate Wikipedia entries related to that institution's mission, encourage and assist it to release material under open licenses, and to develop the relationship between the host institution and the Wikimedia community. A Wikipedian in residence generally helps to coordinate Wikipedia-related outreach events between the GLAM ("galleries, libraries, archives, and museums") and the general public such as editathons.

Institutions that have hosted a Wikipedian in residence include large institutions like the National Library of Wales, the University of Edinburgh, the British Museum,[1] the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the British Library,[2] the Smithsonian Institution,[3] the Royal Society of Chemistry,[4] UC Berkeley,[5] Columbia University,[6] City University of New York,[7] the University of Toronto, the National Library of Norway, and the Federal Archives of Switzerland and smaller venues like the Derby Museum and Art Gallery and The New Art Gallery Walsall[8] in the UK; the Palace of Versailles in France; the Museu Picasso and the Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya in Catalonia; the National Book Council[9] and the Times of Malta[10] in Malta; and the Children's Museum of Indianapolis,[11] Consumer Reports,[12][13] the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library,[14] and the National Archives and Records Administration[15] in the United States.

Role and duties

[edit]
  • UNESCO Memory of the World WiR talking at the Zeeuws Archief
    UNESCO Memory of the World WiR talking at the Zeeuws Archief
  • WiR running a training course for librarians in Stockholm
    WiR running a training course for librarians in Stockholm
  • WiRs who are librarians in Tunis
    WiRs who are librarians in Tunis
  • WiR teaching digitization skills at the Archivo Histórico de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
    WiR teaching digitization skills at the Archivo Histórico de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
  • WiR teaching about various Wiki Projects to School students
    WiR teaching about various Wiki Projects to School students

The primary role of the Wikipedian in Residence (WiR) is often to serve as a liaison between the host institution and the Wikimedia community by assisting with events and training that support the missions of both organisations. Typical training duties include arranging and/or leading training events and editathons[2][16] and providing explanations to other staff and members of the public about policies and practices, such as policies about conflict of interest. Editing activities may include making contributions to articles relevant to the institution's materials and mission, such as articles about significant cultural objects in an organization's collection,[17] or articles in a specific field of knowledge.[18]

Another common form of collaboration involves digital collections.[19] A WiR can provide training on digitization and help upload media (with any existing metadata) to Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia volunteers can then translate, extend, and reverify metadata, categorizing media[20][21][22] and manually transcribing and structuring scanned documents on Wikisource.[23] The description and categorization functions on Wikimedia Commons are sometimes preferred to those of commercial websites[24] and the institution's catalogue software. Media added to Commons are used in Wikipedia, both by the WiRs and by volunteer editors.[20]

A third form of collaboration involves datasets and APIs in their own right; for instance, the Wikimedia Foundation funded a Wikipedian in Residence at OCLC to integrate the OCLC's WorldCat Search API into Wikipedia's citation autocompletion tools, making adding references faster for Wikipedia editors.[25] WiRs have also helped integrate ORCID metadata[26] and rights statement data.[27] Some WiRs work for only a short period, as little as a few weeks, while others have permanent positions. In the case of short-term positions, it is important that the work to be done be well-planned in advance.[20]

Compensation

[edit]

While Wikipedia discourages direct paid compensation for article editing and prohibits undisclosed advocacy, Wikipedians in residence are permitted to be compensated for work on-wiki[28] – either by offering credit, stipend, or salary – through their sponsoring institutions provided that they adhere to strict guidelines against engaging in public relations or marketing for their institution.[citation needed]

Developing interest

[edit]
The image above is interactive when clicked
Interactive map of Wikimedians in residence listed, sorted by year

In 2010, Australian Liam Wyatt became the first Wikipedian in residence when he volunteered at the British Museum for a period of five weeks.[1][29] He noted the need for Wikipedia to strengthen partnerships with museums to create the most up-to-date and accurate information,[11] saying "we are doing the same thing for the same reason, for the same people, in the same medium. Let's do it together." The Children's Museum of Indianapolis became involved with the program after Wikipedian Lori Phillips volunteered for a GLAM event in 2010,[11] becoming the second Wikipedian in residence. The third, Benoît Evellin, spent six months at the Palace of Versailles in Versailles, France.[30] The Museu Picasso in Barcelona, Spain[31] and the Derby Museum and Art Gallery in Derby, England were also early adopters of the idea.[32]

In 2010, the Smithsonian Institution expressed interest in the idea, which led to the hiring of Sarah Stierch in July as Wikipedian in residence.[3][33][34][35] The following year, the National Archives and Records Administration followed suit and hired Dominic McDevitt-Parks, a student from Simmons College, who was pursuing a master's degree in history and archives management, to work at its Archives II location in College Park, Maryland.[15][36] McDevitt-Parks had been editing Wikipedia since 2004 and was hired for this position by David Ferriero.[36][37][38]

In July 2011 Wikimedia UK engaged Andy Mabbett, an editor since 2003, as an "outreach ambassador" in residence at the Bristol-based wildlife charity Wildscreen, working on the ARKive project.[39] Since then Mabbett has been a Wikipedian in residence at other organisations such as the New Art Gallery Walsall[8] and the Royal Society of Chemistry.[4]

In January 2013, the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library became the first presidential library to hire a Wikipedian in residence, when they hired Michael Barera, a master's student at the University of Michigan.[14] In September 2013, the National Archives and Records Administration became the first organisation to employ a permanent full-time Wikipedian in residence when it hired Dominic McDevitt-Parks to join its Office of Innovation in that capacity.[38]

In March 2014, Harvard University posted a job listing seeking applicants to be their Wikipedian in residence at the Houghton Library.[40] In October 2014, the University of Victoria Libraries announced that in collaboration with the Electronic Textual Cultures Lab (ETCL) and the Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences that Christian Vandendorpe had been named honorary resident Wikipedian in residence for the 2014/2015 academic year.[41] Constance Crompton took on the role from 2014 to 2016, followed by Erin Glass from 2019 to 2020 and Silvia Gutiérrez De la Torre from 2020 to 2021.[42]

By 2016, more than 100 Wikipedians had taken part in the role,[40] most of whom were paid by either the institution where they work or a Wikimedia-related organization, and others as volunteers. From July 2018 to June 2019 Mike Dickison was the first "Wikipedian at large", undertaking many short residencies at various institutions throughout the New Zealand, such as Wellington City Archives, the University of Canterbury, and Auckland Museum.[43][44]

Reception

[edit]

One such advertised post has been reported positively by others as being a "unique opportunity to help enrich Wikipedia and its sister projects and share with the world ... resources and knowledge."[17] Conversely, journalist Andrew Orlowski criticized another advertised post as a waste of government funds.[2] In 2013, a part-time temporary position was advertised by the National Library of Scotland and was noted as being "the first large-scale partnership" between a Scottish institution and Wikimedia UK.[16] This initiative was followed by the University of Edinburgh, where a Wikimedian in residence was appointed in December 2015.[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Selected bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Wikipedian in residence

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Wikipedian in Residence (WiR) is an experienced editor of or related Wikimedia projects who serves as a liaison embedded within a host organization, typically a gallery, library, archive, museum (GLAM), university, or government body, to enhance content on Wikimedia platforms using the institution's expertise and resources. The role involves coordinating outreach events, staff and volunteers in skills, facilitating the of images and to and , and creating or improving articles related to the institution's collections or mission, thereby bridging institutional knowledge with the open-editing model of Wikimedia projects. Initiated in the early , the program traces its origins to the first volunteer residency by Liam Wyatt at the in 2010, aimed at contributing detailed information about its holdings to . Over time, WiR positions have expanded globally, with both paid and volunteer roles hosted by diverse entities including libraries, universities, and nonprofits, leading to sustained partnerships that have resulted in thousands of new articles, edits, and media contributions. Defining characteristics include adherence to Wikimedia's neutral point of view policy and notability guidelines, though the embedded nature can raise questions about potential conflicts of interest or amplification of institutional perspectives within Wikipedia's volunteer-driven ecosystem. Notable achievements encompass improved representation of underrepresented topics, such as and scientific literature, as seen in residencies at institutions like the and Annual Reviews, where WiRs have supported content accuracy and initiatives. While controversies specific to WiRs are limited, the role operates amid broader critiques of Wikipedia's content moderation and systemic biases, underscoring the tension between institutional advocacy and encyclopedic impartiality.

Definition and Role

Core Concept and Responsibilities

A Wikipedian in Residence (WiR), also referred to as a Wikimedian in Residence, is a Wikimedia editor embedded within a host institution, such as a gallery, , , or (GLAM), to facilitate the integration of the organization's expertise and resources into Wikimedia projects like , , and . The core concept emphasizes acting as an ambassador for , promoting the sharing of verifiable institutional content under open licenses while adhering to Wikimedia's neutral point of view and no-special-privileges for editors. This role bridges the gap between institutional collections and the volunteer-driven Wikimedia community, enabling structured contributions that enhance public access to reliable information without prioritizing institutional branding over encyclopedic standards. Key responsibilities include serving as a liaison to organize and , such as workshops for staff on Wikimedia practices and policies. WiRs typically coordinate events like edit-a-thons to create or improve articles related to the host's domain, facilitate the upload of media and datasets to Wikimedia repositories, and advocate internally for open-access policies. Additional duties encompass strategic planning to identify content gaps, measuring program impact through metrics like edit volumes or page views via tools such as the Programs & Events , and supporting to sustain long-term collaborations. While responsibilities vary by , the focus remains on verifiable knowledge dissemination rather than promotional activities, ensuring contributions align with Wikimedia's verifiability and neutrality guidelines.

Institutional Partnerships and Variations

Wikipedians in Residence primarily establish partnerships with GLAM institutions—galleries, libraries, archives, and museums—to integrate institutional knowledge into Wikimedia projects, often by facilitating content uploads, training staff, and organizing editing events. These collaborations aim to improve Wikipedia's coverage of while adhering to Wikimedia's neutral point of view policies. The model originated in the GLAM-Wiki initiative, with the first formal residency at the in summer 2010, where Liam Wyatt coordinated outreach and content development. Notable partnerships include the Archives, which hosted Sarah Stierch as its Wikipedian in Residence from March to June 2012 to enhance archival content on . In 2012, appointed a Wikipedian in Residence to strengthen ties between libraries, stakeholders, and , focusing on community coordination. The collaborated with a resident in 2011 to donate educational content to . More recently, partnered with a Wikipedian in Residence to upload specialized content, such as from the Memory of the World program, emphasizing targeted . Variations in these roles depend on the partnering 's goals and resources, ranging from short-term volunteer positions to full-time paid . Some focus on liaison duties, bridging the and Wikimedia editors, while others emphasize , such as workshops for librarians or digitization skills for archives. Positions may target specific improvements, like addressing gaps in articles through equity-focused residencies at universities. Beyond traditional GLAM, roles have extended to universities and non-cultural entities since the , adapting to broader outreach needs like academic referencing and public engagement. These adaptations reflect the program's flexibility but also highlight challenges in and sustainability for non-GLAM hosts.

Historical Development

Origins in the Late

The role of Wikipedian in Residence emerged from informal collaborations between cultural institutions and Wikipedia editors in the late , during which galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAM) increasingly donated images and data to to enhance to collections. These efforts highlighted the need for dedicated coordination to improve article quality and resolve notability disputes, paving the way for a formalized liaison position. The first explicit Wikipedian in Residence pilot was launched by the in June 2010, with Australian editor Liam Wyatt serving as a volunteer for five weeks. Wyatt, a administrator, focused on bridging curators and volunteer editors by reviewing collection-related articles, organizing edit-a-thons, and training staff on Wikimedia policies to ensure reliable sourcing and neutral content. His unpaid role emphasized mutual benefits: institutions gained broader dissemination of verified knowledge, while benefited from expert input to address systemic gaps in cultural coverage. This initiative coincided with the launch of the GLAM-Wiki program by the , which aimed to systematize such partnerships through targeted residencies rather than contributions. The pilot demonstrated measurable outcomes, including expanded articles on artifacts and increased uploads of public-domain images, influencing subsequent adoptions despite initial skepticism over Wikipedia's volunteer-driven reliability.

Expansion During the 2010s

The Wikipedian in Residence role underwent significant expansion during the , evolving from an experimental volunteer position into a formalized program adopted by diverse institutions worldwide. Following Liam Wyatt's inaugural five-week volunteer residency at the in June 2010, which focused on facilitating content contributions and outreach, interest surged among galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAM sector). By 2011, residencies had extended to organizations like the , which inquired about hosting dedicated Wikipedia liaisons to enhance digital outreach. This period marked a shift toward professional, funded positions, with early adopters including the and the , where an 18-month residency supported content integration and editor training. Expansion accelerated mid-decade, driven by Wikimedia chapters and initiatives like the establishment of the Wiki Education Foundation, which embedded residencies in settings to promote Wikipedia use in academia. Programs proliferated beyond GLAM to nonprofits, research institutes, and government entities, with notable examples including the Château de Versailles (six-month residency) and various European libraries. Geographically, growth spanned , , , and , reflecting Wikimedia's global outreach efforts; by 2019, mappings documented residencies across multiple continents, indicating dozens of active or completed programs accumulated over the decade. In the UK, Wikimedia UK's flagship program became a model, embedding residents to foster institutional-Wikipedia collaborations and measurable content improvements. This proliferation was supported by grants from the and chapters, enabling sustained engagements that yielded thousands of article edits, image uploads to , and training sessions for institutional staff. While exact annual figures remain undocumented in aggregate, the transition from isolated pilots to over 200 cumulative residencies by the early 2020s underscores the 2010s as the foundational era of institutional embedding, enhancing Wikipedia's reliability through expert-sourced contributions.

Recent Developments in the 2020s

In December 2021, the National Institute for Health and Care (NIHR) in the appointed Adam Harangozó as its first Wikipedian in Residence, partnering with Wikimedia UK to integrate peer-reviewed health studies into articles for broader public dissemination. The initiative focused on adding citations from NIHR-funded to existing entries, creating new content on clinical trials and evidence-based practices, and training researchers in Wikimedia editing; by mid-2025, it had emphasized verifiable sourcing to counter in health topics, with Harangozó reporting sustained edits tracked via dedicated dashboards. This marked a shift toward research-oriented residencies beyond traditional GLAM institutions, prioritizing causal links between primary data and encyclopedic summaries. Universities expanded WiR roles amid digital volunteering pushes. In 2021, nonprofit publisher Annual Reviews hired Mary Mark Ockerbloom to incorporate high-quality scholarly references into , targeting gaps in scientific coverage. The University of 's longstanding program, renewed through 2025, facilitated student-led contributions via the Edinburgh Award for Digital Volunteering, culminating in March 2025 with eight participants adding over 80,000 words, 1,200 references, and achieving one million article pageviews on topics like historical archives and STEM fields. In March 2025, the (CUNY) initiated a two-year pilot with Richard Knipel as its first WiR, funded by Philanthropies, to train faculty and students in editing while uploading archival materials to Wikimedia platforms, building on prior campus editathons. Sustainability challenges intensified by 2025, as short-term contracts forced many WiRs to fundraise independently, exacerbated by unmaintained tools like Pattypan—used for 1.9 million Commons image uploads—and restricted access to the 2023-launched Wiki Commons Query Service. The Wikimedia Foundation's constrained GLAM team provided minimal technical or advocacy support, leaving positions without formal career progression. U.S. programs faced heightened risks from political shifts, including potential federal grant reductions and scrutiny of diversity-focused content as DEI efforts, potentially curtailing institutional partnerships.

Compensation and Funding

Remuneration Models

Wikipedians in Residence (WiR) typically operate under diverse remuneration structures, ranging from unpaid volunteer roles to grant-funded stipends and salaried positions funded by host institutions or external grants. The volunteer model predominates in early and smaller-scale residencies, aligning with Wikipedia's foundational ethos of crowdsourced, non-commercial editing, as exemplified by the inaugural WiR role at the in 2010, where the resident contributed without compensation. Paid arrangements, however, have become more common to sustain longer-term engagements, often through targeted grants that cover salaries or stipends calculated at entry-level rates for the role's scope. Grant funding from the or affiliated programs constitutes a primary remuneration pathway, enabling institutions to host WiR without direct outlays. For instance, in 2015, Libraries received a $27,100 grant to establish a WiR focused on addressing Wikipedia's content gap, supporting a dedicated role for content development and training. Similarly, the (PCORI) awarded $20,000 in 2019 to Dr. Jeffery Keefer for a WiR position emphasizing health-related improvements. These grants often fund part-time or project-specific terms, with budgets explicitly allocated for compensation to attract experienced editors while mitigating financial risks for hosts. In 2021, the secured grant funding for the first U.S. WiR, broadening to underrepresented communities through paid expertise. Direct employment by institutions represents another model, particularly in established programs where WiR integrate into staff structures. WikiAfrica's WiR initiative, for example, provides paid positions to continental contributors for training and content assistance, emphasizing institutional embedding over temporary grants. Such salaried roles can extend to full-time equivalents, though they frequently encounter scrutiny within the for potentially conflicting with the platform's volunteer-driven principles, prompting disclosures under paid editing policies to maintain transparency. Short-term contracts, often 6-12 months, blend grant and institutional funding, as seen in UNESCO's 2021 WiR consultancy, where remuneration was tied to project deliverables like knowledge dissemination. Hybrid and volunteer-supplemented models persist to address challenges, with some WiR combining stipends from multiple sources or transitioning from unpaid to funded status based on demonstrated impact. A 2023 Wikimedia Community Fund rapid grant of approximately $4,995 supported a WiR with Centre A, funding outreach while leveraging volunteer networks. These arrangements underscore the tension between professionalizing the role for institutional value and preserving Wikipedia's anti-commercial stance, with paid WiR required to declare affiliations to avoid conflicts. Overall, scales with ambition, from modest stipends under $5,000 for targeted initiatives to mid-five-figure for comprehensive residencies, reflecting empirical needs for expertise amid volunteer limitations.

Funding Sources and Sustainability

Funding for Wikipedian in Residence (WiR) positions primarily derives from grants awarded by the (WMF) and its national or regional chapters, which support targeted projects often lasting one to two years. For instance, in , the WMF's Project Grants program funded five WiR initiatives, including partnerships with cultural organizations in and other regions, emphasizing content expansion in underrepresented areas. Similarly, chapters such as Wikimedia Nederland have provided funding for residencies focused on institutional , like those extending Wikimedia's reach into educational and scientific bodies. These grants typically cover stipends, travel, and event costs, with amounts varying based on project scope—e.g., a WiR grant facilitated coordination between the organization and Wikimedia projects to enhance global knowledge dissemination. Institutional budgets and internal allocations also sustain some roles, particularly in libraries and universities where WiRs integrate into existing staff structures. Emory University's Libraries, for example, funded its inaugural WiR position through an internal innovation grant in 2018, enabling ongoing training and content development without external dependency. Philanthropic contributions provide additional streams; the (CUNY) launched a two-year pilot WiR program in 2025, backed by Philanthropies in partnership with Wikimedia New York City, highlighting private donors' role in bridging gaps left by public funding. However, such models remain ad hoc, with institutions weighing costs against benefits like improved digital visibility. Sustainability challenges arise from the predominance of short-term, grant-dependent financing, leading to frequent position terminations upon funding expiration. Many WiRs operate on one-year contracts, fostering instability as institutions hesitate to commit long-term resources amid competing priorities; this has prompted discussions on the model's viability, with critics noting underfunding and insufficient Wikimedia Foundation support exacerbate turnover. Efforts to enhance durability include integrating WiRs into permanent roles or leveraging technology for scalable impact, as explored in 2024 Wikimania sessions, though reliance on volunteer networks and chapter budgets limits scalability. Over-dependence on individual WiRs risks knowledge silos, underscoring the need for diversified to prevent program attrition.

Notable Examples

Pioneering Residencies

The concept of the Wikipedian in Residence emerged with Liam Wyatt's unpaid volunteer role at the from June to July 2010, marking the inaugural instance of the position. Wyatt, an Australian Wikipedia administrator, spent five weeks collaborating with museum staff to enhance articles on its collections, upload public-domain images to , and foster mutual understanding between Wikipedians and cultural institutions. This experimental residency emphasized bridging gaps in knowledge dissemination without financial compensation, setting a precedent for institution- partnerships focused on to materials. Following Wyatt's initiative, appointed Lori Phillips as an early paid Wikipedian in Residence in late 2010, one of the first compensated roles. Phillips worked to integrate the museum's educational resources into , creating articles and training staff on editing practices, which demonstrated the model's applicability to audience-engagement strategies in environments. This residency contributed to increased visibility of the museum's exhibits online, highlighting the potential for residencies to drive tied to institutional missions. The U.S. advanced the model in June 2011 by selecting Dominic McDevitt-Parks as its first Wikipedian in Residence, a paid liaison position aimed at improving archival descriptions on and Wikimedia projects. McDevitt-Parks facilitated edit-a-thons, trained federal employees on reliable sourcing, and coordinated the release of over 100 public-domain photographs, establishing a framework for institutions to leverage for public outreach while adhering to neutrality guidelines. This residency underscored early efforts to embed Wikipedians within bureaucratic structures to enhance discoverability of historical records. These initial residencies, primarily in GLAM (galleries, libraries, archives, museums) sectors during 2010-2011, pioneered volunteer-to-professional transitions and emphasized , content uploads, and cross-community dialogue over direct article writing, influencing subsequent programs by prioritizing verifiable sourcing and conflict-of-interest disclosures to maintain integrity.

Contemporary Case Studies

In the , Wikimedian in Residence programs have increasingly emphasized integration with academic curricula, health information dissemination, and scientific archiving, often funded through institutional partnerships with Wikimedia chapters. These residencies have prioritized measurable outputs such as article creations, edit-a-thons, and sessions, amid challenges like sustainability and volunteer retention. The University of Edinburgh's ongoing residency, led by Ewan McAndrew since 2016 and extending into the 2020s, exemplifies educational embedding. By 2024, the program had supported over 100 assignments across disciplines, resulting in more than 1,000 new or improved articles on topics ranging from Scottish history to . Specific 2022 case studies included undergraduate contributions to geography and courses, where students added cited content under residency guidance, enhancing while addressing knowledge gaps in underrepresented areas. The initiative has produced annual reports documenting sustained student engagement, with 2025 outputs including a dedicated booklet of case studies. At the , Dr. Lucy Hinnie served as Wikimedian in Residence from March 2021 to February 2023, focusing on digitizing and wikifying archival materials. During this period, the residency organized virtual edit-a-thons that contributed to over 500 edits on library collections, including enhancements to articles on rare manuscripts and . Outcomes included increased visibility of items via uploads, though evaluations noted limitations in long-term volunteer retention post-residency. The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) launched a residency in with Wikimedia , appointing Adam Harangozó to bridge and editing. This effort targeted by improving articles on , yielding dozens of sourced additions to topics like clinical trials by mid-2022. The program emphasized conflict-of-interest disclosures to maintain neutrality, with reported impacts including higher-quality citations from NIHR publications. Similarly, the Library & Archives of the initiated a residency in March 2022 to document physics history. The role facilitated training for librarians and researchers, leading to edit-a-thons that expanded articles on pioneers and archival oral histories, with over 200 edits tracked by 2023. This case highlighted cross-pollination between institutional metadata and , though scalability depended on hybrid in-person/virtual formats adapted post-COVID.

Reception and Impact

Achievements and Measurable Outcomes

Wikipedians in Residence have facilitated the creation and enhancement of substantial content, including thousands of articles, edits, and media uploads, while training participants in Wikimedia editing practices. In the Wikipedian-in-Residence project spanning 2017-2018, 299 librarians enrolled in training, resulting in 749 articles added or improved, 369 new images or media files incorporated, and the activation of 236 new editors, with 91% of participants contributing edits post-training compared to 30% beforehand. At the during 2017, the resident coordinated edit-a-thons that produced over 40 new English-language articles and more than 250 articles across 14 other languages, alongside the release of over 375,000 public-domain images from the collection; articles featuring these images accumulated 10.5 million views in November 2017 alone. Aggregate early GLAM-Wikimedia collaborations from 2010-2011, supported by initial residencies, yielded over 194,000 images uploaded to , improvements to 2,000 articles in more than 50 languages, and 76 events conducted. Residencies at institutions like the have similarly generated hundreds of new articles and thousands of shared images over annual terms. Evaluations of over 50 residencies indicate average durations of 7 months, with longer placements correlating to sustained content contributions and institutional engagement, enhancing dissemination and editor skill development. These outcomes demonstrate WiR programs' role in bridging institutions with Wikimedia projects, amplifying global access to verified cultural and scholarly resources through quantifiable increases in content volume and readership.

Criticisms of Effectiveness

Critics have pointed to the precarious funding model of many Wikipedian in Residence (WiR) programs as a primary barrier to , with positions frequently dependent on short-term contracts necessitating annual renewals and individual , as documented in the 2024 GLAM Contributor Study Initiative report. This financial instability often results in program interruptions or terminations, limiting sustained contributions to content and institutional engagement. Technical and organizational support from the remains insufficient, exacerbating inefficiencies; for instance, key tools like Pattypan for batch uploads, which facilitated 1.9 million images, have fallen into disuse without maintenance, while services such as the Wiki Commons Query Service became inaccessible behind authentication barriers by 2023. The Foundation's small GLAM team prioritizes high-level partnerships over practical aid, leaving WiRs to navigate outdated infrastructure independently, which hampers measurable outputs like content uploads and edits. In academic libraries, WiR initiatives are frequently constrained by part-time roles and finite durations, such as the ' one-year pilot, restricting their ability to foster broad, enduring institutional changes beyond narrow tasks like facilitating access to special collections. These limitations prevent comprehensive integration into library workflows, with sustainability requiring supplementary positions like dedicated open technology specialists to maintain momentum. Cultural mismatches further undermine effectiveness, particularly in scholarly environments where Wikipedia's egalitarian model clashes with traditional reverence for , leading to academic resistance driven by unfamiliarity, lack of incentives, and concerns over professional repercussions for contributing to a perceived platform. Older scholars, in particular, exhibit suspicion toward Wikipedia's nonprofit structure and content reliability, resulting in uneven adoption and diluted collaborative impacts. Evaluations of long-term effects, such as Wikimedia UK's 2018 review of residencies from onward, highlight persistent barriers including suboptimal program design, resistant partner cultures, and external factors that impede lasting shifts in editing activity or institutional perspectives after a WiR departs, though quantitative data remains sparse. These challenges suggest that while initial outputs like sessions or article expansions occur, broader goals of enduring contributions often falter without robust legacy mechanisms.

Controversies

Neutrality and Bias Introduction

The Wikipedian in Residence (WiR) role, while intended to foster collaboration between Wikipedia and institutions such as libraries, archives, and museums, has raised concerns regarding adherence to Wikipedia's neutral point of view (NPOV) , which mandates that articles represent all significant viewpoints proportionally without advocacy. Critics argue that embedding a paid editor within an creates inherent conflicts of interest, as the resident's employment may incentivize edits that align with the host's priorities, such as enhancing institutional visibility or downplaying criticisms, potentially undermining encyclopedic impartiality. Although Wikipedia requires paid editors, including WiRs, to disclose affiliations and avoid direct promotion, enforcement relies on oversight, which some contend is inadequate against subtle biases introduced through topic selection or sourcing preferences. A notable example of these tensions emerged in September , when Wikimedia UK trustee Roger Bamkin and WiR Maximillion Klein faced scrutiny for editing articles on behalf of PR clients, including promoting paid interests under the guise of neutral contributions. This incident prompted Bamkin's resignation from Wikimedia UK and highlighted risks of WiRs leveraging their positions for undisclosed advocacy, eroding trust in the program's integrity. Further amplifying concerns, institutions hosting WiRs—often cultural or academic entities with documented ideological leanings—may steer residents toward content addressing "systemic biases" in ways that prioritize certain narratives, such as underrepresented demographics aligned with institutional agendas, over balanced coverage. Proponents of the WiR model maintain that disclosed paid roles enable unbiased contributions by facilitating access to reliable sources, provided residents adhere to conflict-of-interest guidelines that prohibit self-promotion or suppression of negative information. However, empirical analyses of Wikipedia editing patterns suggest that institutional partnerships can inadvertently import host biases, as evidenced by patterns where WiR-led initiatives focus on topics reflecting the partnering organization's worldview, potentially skewing article development away from comprehensive neutrality. These dynamics underscore broader debates about whether structural incentives in WiR programs compromise the volunteer-driven ethos of Wikipedia, necessitating vigilant disclosure and reversion processes to mitigate risks.

Risks of Institutional Manipulation

The employment of a Wikipedian in Residence (WiR) by an institution introduces structural incentives for content alignment with organizational priorities, potentially compromising Wikipedia's neutrality policy (NPOV), which requires balanced representation of viewpoints proportionate to . Institutions, such as museums or universities, may seek to leverage the WiR to enhance their , including creating or expanding articles on affiliated topics, which risks selective emphasis on favorable narratives while downplaying criticisms or alternative perspectives. For instance, a WiR employed by a might prioritize uploads of collection materials to , framing institutional holdings as authoritative without equivalent scrutiny of provenance controversies or competing scholarly interpretations. Wikipedia's conflict of interest (COI) guidelines mandate disclosure of paid roles and prohibit direct editing of articles closely related to the employer, with WiRs typically focusing on , , and indirect contributions to mitigate these issues. However, enforcement relies on community oversight, which can be inconsistent, and subtle manipulations—such as guiding volunteer editors toward institutionally preferred sources or topics—may evade detection. Critics, including Wikipedia veterans, have expressed concerns that institutional funding creates dependency, where WiRs face implicit pressure to demonstrate through measurable outputs like article creations, potentially favoring promotional over neutral content. This dynamic echoes broader paid editing scandals, such as the 2012 revelations of undisclosed PR firm interventions, which prompted stricter disclosure rules but did not eliminate underlying incentives for influence. Empirical evidence of overt manipulation remains limited, with most documented cases involving unintentional bias rather than deliberate agenda-pushing; for example, WiR programs addressing Wikipedia's systemic gaps (e.g., underrepresentation of certain demographics) have been critiqued for prioritizing diversity initiatives that align with institutional social goals over comprehensive coverage. In academia-heavy environments, where left-leaning biases are prevalent in source selection and topic emphasis, WiRs risk amplifying these through curated training sessions or edit-a-thons focused on niche advocacy areas, such as gender or racial equity in historical narratives, without equivalent efforts for counterbalancing viewpoints. Such practices, while disclosed, can entrench institutional narratives in Wikipedia's high-traffic entries, influencing downstream AI training data and public perception, as biases in Wikipedia content propagate to generative models. To counter these risks, best practices include independent audits of WiR outputs and community vetting, yet sustainability challenges—such as short-term contracts tied to grant funding—exacerbate vulnerabilities by incentivizing high-volume, low-scrutiny contributions. Ultimately, while WiR roles facilitate valuable content enrichment, their embedding within potentially agenda-driven institutions underscores the need for vigilant adherence to verifiability and NPOV to prevent Wikipedia from serving as a vector for unacknowledged institutional .

Governance and Long-Term Viability

Wikipedian in Residence (WiR) programs operate under a decentralized model, primarily coordinated through partnerships between host institutions—such as libraries, museums, or government agencies—and Wikimedia chapters or the via grant programs. Positions are typically established , with host organizations defining specific goals like content improvement or events, while the resident reports trends in editing and to institutional leadership. Funding and oversight often fall to Wikimedia affiliates, which allocate resources from annual grants or project-specific funds, though residents may also serve as volunteers without compensation. This structure lacks a centralized , relying instead on contractual agreements that emphasize with the broader Wikimedia , but it can lead to inconsistencies in and performance evaluation across programs. Long-term viability of WiR roles is challenged by their heavy dependence on temporary grants and institutional priorities, with many positions lasting only one to two years before funding expires. For instance, the City University of New York's inaugural WiR pilot, launched in March 2025, is structured as a two-year initiative supported by external and Wikimedia New York City, highlighting reliance on non-recurring sources rather than core budgets. Renewal is limited when programs are tied to external grants, as institutions may hesitate to internalize costs amid competing priorities, resulting in high turnover and incomplete knowledge transfer. While some exceptions exist, such as a six-year residency at the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Library ending around 2025, broader evidence points to underfunding and insufficient support undermining sustainability, with critics noting broken editing tools and minimal advocacy exacerbating these issues. Efforts to enhance durability include Wikimedia chapters' strategic grants, such as those from the General Support Fund, which aim to foster sustained partnerships, but empirical outcomes remain mixed, with programs often prioritizing short-term outputs like article edits over enduring institutional integration. Institutional buy-in is crucial, yet reports indicate that without dedicated long-term funding—averaging under $100,000 annually for many roles—positions risk obsolescence, particularly as Wikimedia's volunteer-driven model struggles to scale amid declining chapter resources. Proponents argue for embedding WiRs into core operations to build resilience, but causal factors like grant cyclicality and host skepticism about return on investment suggest viability hinges on demonstrating measurable, ongoing value beyond initial pilots.

References

  1. https://ospolicyobservatory.uvic.ca/wikipedian-in-residence-programs/
  2. https://www.wikiblueprint.com/blog/what-is-a-wikipedian-in-residence
  3. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedian_in_residence
  4. https://information-services.ed.ac.uk/help-consultancy/is-skills/wikimedia
  5. https://talentally.com/job/temporary-wikipedian-in-residence
  6. https://update.lib.berkeley.edu/2025/01/09/the-bias-of-notability-in-wikipedia/
  7. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9b/Wikimedian_in_Residence_Programme_Review_-_WMUK_2014.pdf
  8. https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedian_in_Residence/en
  9. https://theconversation.com/on-the-job-with-a-wikipedian-in-residence-118494
  10. https://blogs.loc.gov/thesignal/2012/04/galleries-libraries-archives-museums-with-wikipedia-glam-wiki-insights-interview-with-lori-phillip/
  11. https://siarchives.si.edu/blog/meet-sarah-stierch-archives%25E2%2580%2599-wikipedian-residence
  12. https://hangingtogether.org/wanted-a-resident-wikipedian/
  13. https://www.aam-us.org/2011/04/21/museums-wikipedia-the-future-of-collaboration-and-accessibility/
  14. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedian_in_residence/Creating_a_Wikimedian_in_Residence_position/he
  15. https://www.diglib.org/building-collaboration-wikipedia-west-virginia-university-libraries/
  16. https://narations.blogs.archives.gov/2016/07/18/national-archives-program-trains-wikipedians-in-cultural-heritage-outreach/
  17. https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Submissions:2024/What_Is_the_Future_of_the_Wikipedian_in_Residence_Position%253F
  18. https://www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikipedia-glam-struggling-survival
  19. https://blog.okfn.org/2012/01/27/wikipedian-in-residence-two-years-of-open-culture/
  20. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/05/arts/design/05wiki.html
  21. https://wittylama.com/2010/03/13/the-british-museum-and-me/
  22. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/12/business/media/12link.html
  23. https://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2013/wikipedians-in-residence-a-recap/
  24. https://diff.wikimedia.org/2019/10/08/wikimedians-in-residence-navigating-the-impact-of-working-with-open-knowledge/
  25. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:PEG/MrjohnCummings/UNESCO_Wikimedian_in_Residence
  26. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/blog/where-should-we-share-health-information-if-not-where-people-are-looking
  27. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/blog/how-wikipedia-can-help-disseminate-research-innovative-nihr-project
  28. https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/National_Institute_for_Health_Research/Wikimedian_in_Residence_at_the_NIHR_2025
  29. https://diff.wikimedia.org/2025/06/20/rethinking-wiki-engagement-in-medical-research-insights-from-a-residency-at-nihr/
  30. https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Annual_Reviews/Wikipedian_in_Residence_2021_%28May_01%2C_2021_-%29
  31. https://thinking.is.ed.ac.uk/wir/
  32. https://www.cuny.edu/news/cuny-introduces-its-first-wikimedian-in-residence/
  33. https://www.pcori.org/about/procurement-opportunities/research-support-funding/wikipedian-residence
  34. https://www.urbanlibraries.org/innovations/wikipedian-in-residence-at-a-public-library
  35. https://www.wikiafrica.org/wir/
  36. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Programs/Wikimedia_Community_Fund/Rapid_Fund/Centre_A_x_Wikipedian_in_Residence_%28ID:_23099972%29
  37. https://www.wikiblueprint.com/blog/what-is-a-wikipedian-in-residence-lefjn
  38. https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2017/06/09/project-grants-round-one-2017/
  39. https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/lits/2018/11/09/wikipedian-in-residence/
  40. https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2024:Program/The_Future_of_the_Wikipedian_in_Residence_Position
  41. https://www.wikiblueprint.com/wikipedians-in-residence
  42. https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2011/nr11-130.html
  43. https://pro.europeana.eu/person/liam-wyatt
  44. https://wikimedia.org.uk/2021/12/national-institute-for-health-research-launches-wikimedian-in-residence-in-collaboration-with-wikimedia-uk/
  45. https://www.aip.org/library/wikipedia-dispatches-what-does-a-wikipedian-in-residence-do
  46. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/OCLC/A_Wikipedian-in-Residence_to_Engage_500_Librarians_and_their_Communities/Final
  47. https://www.metmuseum.org/perspectives/wikimedian-in-residence
  48. https://mw19.mwconf.org/paper/museum-collections-on-wikipedia-opening-up-to-open-data-initiatives/index.html
  49. https://wikimedia.org.uk/2016/02/a-year-as-wikipedian-in-residence-at-the-national-library-of-wales/
  50. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Evaluation/Evaluation_reports/2015/GLAM/WiR
  51. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_CSI_report_2024.pdf
  52. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Pattypan
  53. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_Academic_Libraries:_A_Global_Project/Chapter_15
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621000356
  55. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Long_term_impact_of_Wikimedians_in_Residence_%282018%29
  56. https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/corruption-in-wikiland-paid-pr-scandal-erupts-at-wikipedia/
  57. https://narations.blogs.archives.gov/2012/09/27/how-does-nara-avoid-conflicts-of-interest-on-wikipedia/
  58. https://shellypalmer.com/2012/09/wikipedia-honcho-caught-in-scandal-quits-defends-paid-edits/
  59. https://hal.science/hal-02473822/document
  60. https://thinking.is.ed.ac.uk/wir/conflict-of-interest/
  61. https://medium.com/wikiblueprint/hiring-a-wikipedian-in-residence-10-risks-112aea5f80d6
  62. https://www.thewikipedian.net/p/bats-in-the-belfer-a-beginners-guide-to-the-biggest-wikipedia-controversy-youve-probably-never-heard-of
  63. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2023/04/06/social-scientists-cant-ignore-the-power-of-wikipedia-or-its-systemic-biases/
  64. https://news.berkeley.edu/2014/02/25/berkeleys-wikipedian-in-residence-is-a-first/
  65. https://parcoursnumeriques-pum.ca/13-wikimedia/chapitreaddB.html
  66. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedian_in_residence/Creating_a_Wikimedian_in_Residence_position/id
  67. https://wikimedia.eventyay.com/talk/wikimania2025/talk/CJGD3Y/
  68. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Programs/Wikimedia_Community_Fund/General_Support_Fund
  69. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Programs/Wikimedia_Community_Fund/General_Support_Fund/Wikimedia_MKD_Annual_Grant_2026
  70. https://blog.biodiversitylibrary.org/2024/11/meet-tiago-bhl-wikimedian-in-residence.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.