Hubbry Logo
ZechsteinZechsteinMain
Open search
Zechstein
Community hub
Zechstein
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Zechstein
Zechstein
Zechstein
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Permian of Central Europe (Dyas)
−305 —
–
−300 —
–
−295 —
–
−290 —
–
−285 —
–
−280 —
–
−275 —
–
−270 —
–
−265 —
–
−260 —
–
−255 —
–
 
Guadalupian
Lopingian
Gzhelian
Asselian
Sakmarian
Artinskian
Kungurian
Roadian
Wordian
Capitanian
Wuchiapingian
Changhsingian
Zechstein
Rotliegend
 
 
 
 
ICS approved stages


Central
European stages

The Zechstein (German either from mine stone or tough stone) is a unit of sedimentary rock layers of Late Permian (Lopingian) age located in the European Permian Basin which stretches from the east coast of England to northern Poland. The name Zechstein was formerly also used as a unit of time in the geologic timescale, but nowadays it is only used for the corresponding sedimentary deposits in Europe.

The Zechstein lies on top of the Rotliegend; on top of the Zechstein is the Buntsandstein or Bunter. The Zechstein is associated with the accumulation of large amounts of salt rock between 257.3 and 251.0 million years ago.

Formation

[edit]
Map of Earth during the Late Permian, around 255 million years ago

The evaporite rocks of the Zechstein Group were laid down by the Zechstein Sea, an epicontinental or epeiric sea that existed in the Guadalupian and Lopingian epochs of the Permian period. The Zechstein Sea occupied the region of what is now the North Sea, plus lowland areas of Britain and the north European plain through Germany and Poland. The Zechstein Sea lay in the rain shadow of the Central Pangean Mountains to the south.[1] At times the Zechstein Sea may have connected with the Paleo-Tethys Ocean through southeastern Poland; the point is disputed by researchers.

Though situated at the time near the equator (where high temperatures and arid conditions facilitated evaporation), the sea's inception likely stemmed from a marine transgression rooted in a phase of de-glaciation; the southern portion of Pangaea, the former (and future) Gondwanaland, supported ice sheets in the early Permian. The eventual disappearance of the Zechstein Sea was part of a general marine regression that preceded and accompanied the Permian–Triassic extinction.[2][3]

Stratigraphy

[edit]

The Zechstein is usually given the status of a lithostratigraphic group and as such encompasses a number of geologic formations. It consists of at least five depositional cycles of evaporite rocks, which are labelled Z1 to Z5, respectively. The lithologies found are halite ("rock salt"), anhydrite, dolomite and shale.

Zechstein Sea shown on a map of Northern Europe

Economic importance

[edit]

The Zechstein has significant economic importance in the North Sea Oil province. In the southern gas basin, it forms the main cap rock to the gas fields with Rotliegend reservoirs. It also forms a reservoir in the Auk oilfield in the central part of the North Sea. Further north, the Zechstein salt becomes diapiric, forming salt domes which form the structure for several oil fields, such as Machar. Zechstein dolomites crop out near the coast of County Durham, England where they are known as the Magnesian Limestone.

Just above the base of the Zechstein Group is a fairly thin layer of shale, or slate, where it has been metamorphized, known as the kupferschiefer for its high copper content. In its unmodified form, this layer is high in sulfur compounds that are typical of silt deposited in stagnant shallow marshland. Where faults have allowed mineral-rich groundwater to circulate through this layer, the sulfur has oxidized metal ions to metallic sulfide ores. From the Middle Ages into the modern era, this thin but widely dispersed constellation of ore bodies has been of immense importance as a source of copper across much of northern Europe.

The Zechstein salt layer is also used for underground gas storage in England, Germany and France.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Zechstein

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Zechstein Group is a major Late Permian stratigraphic unit, deposited approximately 258 to 251 million years ago in a restricted evaporitic basin spanning . Characterized by cyclic sequences of evaporites such as , , and salts, interspersed with carbonates like dolomite and , and minor red mudstones and siltstones, it formed through repeated marine transgressions and intense in the Zechstein Sea. This , analogous to a hypersaline environment like the modern , covered areas from modern-day to , with thicknesses ranging from 100 meters at the basin margins to over 1,200 meters in the depocenter. The deposits overlie the Rotliegend Group unconformably and underlie sediments, marking a key transition in the Southern Permian Basin following the . The Zechstein Group's stratigraphy is divided into several formations, including the basal Werra (Z1) with lagoonal to deep marine settings, the thick Stassfurt (Z2) dominated by rock salt, and the Leine (Z3) featuring bittern salts and shallow marine carbonates, reflecting progressive shallowing and aridification over its roughly 7-million-year duration. Regionally, it varies from fully evaporitic in the North Sea basin to more siliciclastic towards the southern edges, influenced by tectonic subsidence and eustatic sea-level changes. Economically, the group is vital for potash and salt extraction, as seen in mines like Boulby in England, and plays a critical role in the North Sea petroleum system, where Zechstein evaporites serve as seals for underlying Rotliegend reservoirs and carbonate reefs act as hydrocarbon traps. Post-depositional halokinesis has produced salt domes and minibasins, shaping the basin's structure and facilitating ongoing exploration for oil, gas, and even salt cavern storage.

Geological Context

Age and Chronology

The Zechstein Group encompasses a significant portion of the Late Permian ( Epoch) in northwestern and , with deposition occurring between approximately 258 and 252.3 million years ago (Ma). This temporal range is established through a combination of magnetostratigraphic correlations, biostratigraphic data from fossil assemblages such as and , and of interbedded layers and associated igneous rocks. For instance, Re-Os dating of the basal Kupferschiefer unit yields an age of 257.3 ± 1.6 Ma, anchoring the onset of Zechstein sedimentation in the early (Wuchiapingian Stage). The Zechstein overlies the underlying Rotliegend Group, which records early Late Permian continental to shallow marine environments transitioning into the marine incursions that initiated Zechstein deposition, and is conformably or unconformably succeeded by the Buntsandstein Formation. Initially defined as a chronostratigraphic stage by Friedrich August von Alberti in 1834 based on exposures in the Thuringian region of , the Zechstein was reclassified in the mid-20th century as a lithostratigraphic supergroup to better reflect its rock-based subdivisions and regional variations, aligning with modern stratigraphic practices that separate time and rock units. This reclassification facilitated more precise correlations across the Southern Permian Basin. Within the broader Permian timeline, the Zechstein occupies the final stages of the period, immediately preceding the Permian-Triassic boundary dated at 251.902 ± 0.024 Ma. Its upper units thus approach the timing of the end-Permian mass extinction event around 251 Ma, which profoundly impacted global marine and terrestrial ecosystems, though Zechstein deposits themselves preserve diverse faunal assemblages indicative of pre-extinction conditions. This proximity underscores the Zechstein's role in late paleoenvironmental reconstructions.

Regional Extent and Paleogeography

The Zechstein Basin formed a major component of the European Permian Basin system, encompassing a vast intracratonic depression that stretched from eastern eastward across the , through the , , and into , reaching as far as the region. This east-west trending basin, often referred to as the Southern Permian Basin in its central and southern sectors, was bounded to the north by structural highs such as the Mid North Sea High and the Ringkøbing-Fyn High, to the east by the East European Platform, and to the south by the remnants of the Variscan . In the depocenters, particularly within the Anglo-Dutch and Northwest German sub-basins, the Zechstein succession achieved thicknesses exceeding 2,000 meters, reflecting significant and accommodation space development. Paleogeographically, the Zechstein Basin occupied a position along the equatorial to subtropical latitudes of the supercontinent during the Late Permian, within an arid climatic belt conducive to formation. The basin hosted the Zechstein Sea, a large but restricted epeiric sea that connected episodically to open marine realms. Marine waters primarily entered from the north via the Boreal Seaway, linked to the Panthalassic Ocean through proto-rift systems like the Viking Graben and a transient Mid High seaway, leading to a cooler, boreal-influenced with limited southern input. Influence from the to the south was minimal, restricted by topographic barriers and the basin's northern orientation, resulting in a predominantly isolated . The structural evolution of the basin was profoundly shaped by the collapse of the , which had culminated in the Late Carboniferous, creating a configuration through downward flexure from collisional loading between and . Subsequent early rifting phases, precursors to the breakup of Pangea, further modified the basin architecture, promoting differential and the development of distinct morphological elements. These included broad carbonate-sulfate platforms along the margins, such as the London-Brabant Platform to the southwest, gently sloping shelves transitioning into deeper clastic and evaporitic depocenters, and localized minibasins that controlled sediment distribution and thickness variations.

Depositional History

Formation of the Zechstein Sea

The formation of the Zechstein Sea was triggered by a major post-glacial marine transgression approximately 257 million years ago (Ma), which rapidly flooded the underlying arid Rotliegend continental landscape across northern and central Europe. This event marked the onset of the Late Permian Zechstein depositional phase, with seawater incursing into pre-existing intracratonic basins developed during the earlier Permian. The sea was connected primarily to the Boreal Sea through narrow northern gateways, such as in the Barents Sea area, with possible temporary connections to the Paleo-Tethys Ocean through southeastern Poland (a point disputed by researchers), allowing initial influx of normal marine waters before progressive restriction. The environmental conditions during the early Zechstein were characterized by an arid, hot equatorial climate at paleolatitudes of approximately 20–30°N, where low rainfall and high evaporation rates dominated due to the position within the rain shadow of the emerging Central Pangean Mountains. Initial water depths in the basin varied from 100 to 300 meters in central areas, supporting the deposition of marine carbonates and shales, but the sea quickly became semi-restricted as connections to the open ocean narrowed, leading to increasing hypersalinity and evaporative drawdown. This transition from open marine to evaporitic conditions was driven by the basin's epicontinental setting, where high evaporation exceeded inflow, fostering the development of salinity gradients across the water body. Subsequent regression phases were influenced by a combination of tectonic uplift along basin margins and ongoing , which reduced water input and promoted repeated -level falls over the Zechstein's duration. These processes culminated in the progressive of the by around 251 Ma, coinciding with the Permian-Triassic mass , as the basin shifted to sabkha-like environments with widespread subaerial exposure and precipitation.

Evaporite Cycles and Processes

The Zechstein Supergroup is characterized by five major depositional cycles, designated Z1 through Z5, which reflect repeated marine transgressions and regressions across the Southern Permian Basin during the Late Permian. These eustatic fluctuations, linked to glaciation cycles combined with high evaporation rates, initiated each cycle with normal marine conditions that transitioned to increasingly restricted hypersaline environments. The Z2 cycle represents the volumetrically largest deposit, with subsequent cycles (Z3–Z5) showing progressively thinner and more restricted distributions, culminating in halite-dominated units without basal carbonates in Z4 and Z5. The primary depositional processes within these cycles were governed by evaporation rates exceeding marine inflow, leading to a progressive increase in basin salinity and the precipitation of evaporite minerals in a characteristic sequence. Each cycle typically began with the deposition of normal marine carbonates under open conditions, followed by or as salinity rose, then in more restricted settings, and finally salts (such as and ) in the most hypersaline phases. These processes were strongly influenced by an at approximately 20°N paleolatitude and progressive basin restriction through tectonic barriers, which limited seawater replenishment and promoted density-stratified brines. Recent studies since 2000 have emphasized the role of episodic inflows in disrupting these cycles, with data indicating up to 99% freshwater contribution to brines in the basal Z1 cycle, altering gradients and promoting . Such influxes, sourced from rainfall and river runoff, facilitated partial dissolution of , leading to collapse breccias and resedimentation of detrital carbonates and within cycle units. The cumulative effect across the Zechstein produced an estimated total salt volume of 90,000–200,000 km³, predominantly , underscoring the scale of these repeated evaporation-driven processes.

Stratigraphic Framework

Lithostratigraphy

The Zechstein Group is hierarchically organized into five conformable cycles, designated as Z1 (Werra), Z2 (Stassfurt), (Leine), Z4 (Aller), and Z5 (Ohre), each representing a major depositional cycle within the Late Permian basin. These cycles are further subdivided into formations and members based on dominant lithofacies, including basal claystones, platforms, and thick sequences. For instance, the Z1 Werra Cycle comprises the basal Kupferschiefer (a bituminous claystone), overlain by the Werra (sulphate-dominated) and Werra (dolomite and ); the Z2 Stassfurt Cycle includes the Stassfurt and the extensive Stassfurt (rock salt); the Z3 Cycle features the , , and salts; the Z4 Aller Cycle consists of the Aller and associated sulphates; and the Z5 Ohre Cycle encompasses upper s, clays, and minor s in more marginal settings. Additional minor cycles ( Friesland and Fulda) occur in select basins. The overall lithological composition of the Zechstein Group is dominated by evaporites, including , , and potassium-magnesium salts such as and bischofite, particularly concentrated in the basin center. Carbonates, primarily dolomite and forming platform and reefal buildups, are significant, while siliciclastics like claystones and sandstones occur as minor basal or interbedded units. Regional variations are pronounced, with evaporite thicknesses exceeding 1,500 m in the depocenter due to restricted basin conditions, compared to thinner, more carbonate-rich sections along basin margins in onshore and . Reference (type) sections for these lithostratigraphic units are primarily established in northern and central , with key exposures and boreholes near Hannover providing the stratotype for the Z1 to Z3 cycles, where complete sequences up to 1,000 m thick are preserved in the Southern Permian Basin. Advances in subsurface imaging from high-resolution 3D seismic surveys in the have refined correlations across the basin, revealing intra-cycle transitions and halokinetic structures that enhance the precision of lithostratigraphic mapping beyond traditional outcrop-based definitions. This framework underscores the conformable stacking of the cycles, briefly reflecting the repeated marine incursions and evaporative drawdown cycles that shaped the group.

Biostratigraphy and Correlation

The biostratigraphy of the Zechstein relies on limited fossil assemblages, primarily , brachiopods, and , which provide markers for cycle boundaries despite the overall sparsity of biota resulting from hypersaline conditions. In the basal carbonates of the Zechstein succession, more diverse assemblages occur, including smaller such as species of the genus Colaniella, which serve as index fossils for late Permian correlations. Brachiopods, such as Horridonia horrida, are prominent in the lower Zechstein limestones and define biozones corresponding to individual carbonate horizons across the Polish Zechstein Basin. , notably Merrillina divergens, have been recovered from Cycle 1 carbonates (EZ1 Ca) in northeast , offering precise markers for the base of the Zechstein and aiding in delineating cycle boundaries. Correlation of Zechstein strata to the global Permian timescale aligns the formation with the Wuchiapingian Stage of the Series (Late Permian), based on integrated evidence and regional stage equivalents like the upper Kazanian. In the region, palynomorphs—including spores from pteridosperms, pteridophytes, and —extracted from sequences enable high-resolution biostratigraphic frameworks, often integrated with wireline logs from wells to match Zechstein cycles across basins. These assemblages, preserved in and carbonates, facilitate correlations between the Northern and Southern Permian Basins, with fungal palynomorphs providing additional insights into late vegetation dynamics near the Permian-Triassic boundary. Biostratigraphic challenges in the Zechstein arise from low faunal diversity due to widespread anoxia and , particularly in deeper basin settings, which restricted benthic life and limited preservational windows. The Kupferschiefer black shales, representing the basal Zechstein unit, exhibit sparse trace fossils indicative of minimal bioturbation under anoxic bottom waters, while preserving abundant fish remains—such as those of Palaeoniscum freieslebeni and Platysomus gibbosus—that reflect photic-zone and rapid burial in a stratified . These features underscore the role of oxygen-depleted environments in shaping the fossil record, necessitating multiproxy approaches for reliable correlation.

Economic and Environmental Significance

Hydrocarbon Resources

The Zechstein evaporites serve as a primary regional seal, or cap rock, for accumulations in underlying Permian Rotliegend sandstones across the Southern Permian Basin, effectively gas and oil by preventing vertical migration due to their low permeability and thickness exceeding 500 meters in many areas. This sealing capacity has been critical in the northern and southern , where the basal Zechstein evaporites overlie Rotliegend reservoirs, preserving hydrocarbons in structural and stratigraphic traps since the Late Permian. In the northern German Basin, of diagenetic confirms the evaporites' long-term integrity as a top seal, with no significant leakage observed over geological timescales. Zechstein salt structures, including diapirs and pillows, further enhance trapping mechanisms by creating structural closures that deform overlying strata and focus migration. In the Central , these diapirs have formed four-way dip anticlines, such as in the Machar field (Block 23/26a, sector), where a high-relief Zechstein salt diapir at depths of 2,500–3,000 meters supports a with total recoverable reserves exceeding 100 million barrels. Similarly, in the Auk field (Block 30/16, sector), Zechstein carbonates and associated salt movements contribute to the structural trap holding oil in and Zechstein reservoirs, with cumulative production surpassing 100 million barrels since discovery in 1970. These salt-induced features are widespread in the Central , hosting some of the basin's largest fields by deforming overburden and providing lateral seals. Zechstein platforms, particularly the Z2 Hauptdolomit (Werra equivalent), act as secondary reservoirs due to their dolomitized ranging from 5–20% in platform margins and slopes. These units, deposited as isolated platforms up to 10 km wide, have yielded hydrocarbons since the in multiple sectors, including the , , , and , where diagenetic enhancement via cementation and fracturing improves permeability. Production from Zechstein-related fields, encompassing both carbonates and underlying sealed Rotliegend traps, has exceeded 10 billion barrels of oil equivalent basin-wide, with notable contributions from German platforms producing over 360 billion cubic meters of gas from Z2 carbonates. In the Fore-Sudetic (Poland), Zechstein dolomites have delivered more than 50 million barrels of oil since the , underscoring their role in secondary recovery plays. Recent advancements in enhanced recovery techniques include CO2 injection into residual oil zones flanking Zechstein salt diapirs, as demonstrated in the Captain field (UK Central North Sea), where Permian salt structures separate oil accumulations and enable low-carbon EOR by mobilizing immobile oil through viscosity reduction. This method has potential to recover 5–15% additional while sequestering CO2, aligning with net-zero goals in mature fields. Seismic imaging progress in the , leveraging full-waveform inversion and 3D surveys, has revealed untapped Zechstein platform plays in the Polish and Dutch sectors; for instance, reprocessed data in the Dutch offshore Elbow Spit High identified isolated Hauptdolomit buildups previously obscured by salt velocity anomalies, prompting new exploration licenses. In northwest , advanced modeling has improved sub-Zechstein imaging, highlighting prospective reefs in the Obrzycko-Szamotuly area for future .

Mineral Extraction and Storage

The Zechstein Group hosts significant deposits, particularly (KCl) and rock salt (), which have been extensively in since the mid-19th century. The Stassfurt region in was pivotal, with the discovery of salts in 1856 leading to the establishment of the world's first commercial mines; these deposits, part of the Zechstein's Werra Formation, initially drove rapid industrial-scale extraction using conventional underground techniques. Today, remains a leading producer, with Zechstein-derived output reaching approximately 3 million metric tons of (KCl) equivalent in 2024, primarily from operations in the Werra and Upper Aller regions managed by companies like K+S Group, supporting global demands. The Kupferschiefer, the basal black shale unit of the Zechstein, has also been a historical source of , with documented since the in regions like Mansfeld and Sangerhausen in east-central . By the , extraction intensified using early industrial methods, with historical production in east-central totaling approximately 2.6 million tons of metal over more than 800 years of , before a shift in focus to in the 20th century due to economic factors. and dolomite from Zechstein carbonates, such as those in the Raisby Formation, are quarried for industrial uses, including as raw materials in cement production; in the UK, Zechstein contributed to and manufacturing until the early 1970s, with ongoing limited extraction for construction aggregates. Recent geophysical and stratigraphic analyses, including a 2024 study integrating seismic data and well logs, have refined understanding of potassium-magnesium (K-Mg) salt distribution within the Zechstein's upper cycles, revealing concentrated deposits in the UK's Forth Approaches Basin that enhance prospects for new exploration and development of resources. The impermeability of Zechstein has made it for solution to create underground caverns, widely used for in the region; facilities like the Aldbrough Gas Storage site in East utilize Zechstein salt pillars, with nine caverns providing a working gas storage capacity of approximately 280 million cubic meters, equivalent to about 0.4% of the UK's annual gas consumption (around 72 billion cubic meters as of 2024). This same low-permeability property—typically on the order of 10^{-20} to 10^{-22} m²—positions Zechstein salt as a candidate for potential CO₂ sequestration in engineered caverns, where it could ensure long-term isolation of injected fluids, though pilot-scale assessments are ongoing to address geochemical interactions. These storage applications complement the Zechstein's role in hydrocarbon systems by providing infrastructure for technologies. Environmental concerns associated with Zechstein resource extraction include land subsidence and groundwater contamination from potash and , particularly in densely populated areas of , as well as seismic risks from solution and potential leakage hazards in CO₂ storage projects, though these are mitigated through regulatory oversight and monitoring.

References

  1. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=40599
  2. https://webapps.bgs.ac.uk/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?pub=ZG
  3. https://www.dinoloket.nl/en/stratigraphic-nomenclature/zechstein-group
  4. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/21/1/28/650796/K-Mg-salt-distribution-in-the-Zechstein-Group-of
  5. https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/science-and-policy/plate-tectonic-stories/zechstein-reef/
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269792103_The_Formation_and_Structure_Evolution_of_Zechstein_Upper_Permian_Salt_in_Northeast_German_Basin_A_Review
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/lopingian
  8. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00531-023-02365-8
  9. https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/b2211/B2211.pdf
  10. https://stratigraphy.org/chart
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817223005251
  12. https://journalofpalaeogeography.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42501-020-00066-w
  13. https://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Late_Permian_environment_and_lithostratigraphy%2C_Northern_England
  14. https://www.nlog.nl/sites/default/files/2018-12/spba-chapter8.pdf
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0034666721000233
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309040653_The_Tectonic_History_of_the_Zechstein_Basin_in_the_Netherlands_and_Germany
  17. https://www.ebn.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/An-evaluation-of-the-basin-architecture-and-dynamics-during-the-deposition-of-the-Zechstein-Late-Permian-2.pdf
  18. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpg.12882
  19. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JE005007
  20. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5090/u/pdf/sir2010-5090-U.pdf
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/zechstein
  22. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/books/book/1528/chapter/107232906/Permian
  23. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/14/7183
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326143521_Evaporite_thickness_and_composition_influence_rift_structural_style_Zechstein_Supergroup_offshore_Norway
  25. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12761
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191814110001173
  27. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/GSL.SP.1986.022.01.20
  28. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/books/edited-volume/2130/chapter/116225618/Permian-smaller-foraminifers-taxonomy
  29. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/books/book/1753/chapter-standard/107627913/Carbon-and-oxygen-isotope-records-of-Permian
  30. https://www.permian.stratigraphy.org/files/permophiles/20121027151852022.pdf
  31. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/palaios/article/37/6/318/614823/FIRST-REPORT-OF-FUNGAL-PALYNOMORPHS-FROM-THE
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254102001043
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240403522_Molecular_evidence_for_basin-scale_photic_zone_euxinia_in_the_Permian_Zechstein_Sea
  34. https://www.geodeatlas.nl/pages/play-6-zechstein
  35. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/books/edited-volume/2298/chapter/128443282/The-Machar-Field-Block-23-26a-UK-North-Sea
  36. https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/2204/c/pdf/B2204C.pdf
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817299000689
  38. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpg.12840
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1750583618301154
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372085759_SEISMIC_AND_PETROGRAPHIC_CHARACTERISATION_OF_THE_ZECHSTEIN_HAUPTDOLOMIT_PLATFORMS_AROUND_THE_ELBOW_SPIT_HIGH_DUTCH_OFFSHORE
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297451740_THE_INFLUENCE_OF_SEISMIC_VELOCITY_DISTRIBUTION_ON_THE_DEPTH_IMAGING_OF_THE_SUB-ZECHSTEIN_HORIZONS_IN_AREAS_AFFECTED_BY_SALT_TECTONICS_A_CASE_STUDY_OF_NW_POLAND
  42. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc12453/m2/1/high_res_d/Bulletin0274.pdf
  43. https://investingnews.com/daily/resource-investing/agriculture-investing/potash-investing/top-potash-countries-by-production/
  44. https://www.usgs.gov/news/technical-announcement/new-kupferschiefer-copper-assessment-available
  45. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/539924/1/B02695.pdf
  46. https://www.ssethermal.com/energy-storage/aldbrough/
  47. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/pg/article/20/2/169/383149/Dynamic-modelling-of-a-UK-North-Sea-saline
  48. https://www.bgr.bund.de/EN/Themen/Mineralische_Rohstoffe/Rohstoffinformationen/Potash/potash_node_en.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.