Hubbry Logo
Alexandroff extensionAlexandroff extensionMain
Open search
Alexandroff extension
Community hub
Alexandroff extension
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Alexandroff extension
Alexandroff extension
from Wikipedia

In the mathematical field of topology, the Alexandroff extension is a way to extend a noncompact topological space by adjoining a single point in such a way that the resulting space is compact. It is named after the Russian mathematician Pavel Alexandroff. More precisely, let X be a topological space. Then the Alexandroff extension of X is a certain compact space X* together with an open embedding c : X → X* such that the complement of X in X* consists of a single point, typically denoted ∞. The map c is a Hausdorff compactification if and only if X is a locally compact, noncompact Hausdorff space. For such spaces the Alexandroff extension is called the one-point compactification or Alexandroff compactification. The advantages of the Alexandroff compactification lie in its simple, often geometrically meaningful structure and the fact that it is in a precise sense minimal among all compactifications; the disadvantage lies in the fact that it only gives a Hausdorff compactification on the class of locally compact, noncompact Hausdorff spaces, unlike the Stone–Čech compactification which exists for any topological space (but provides an embedding exactly for Tychonoff spaces).

Example: inverse stereographic projection

[edit]

A geometrically appealing example of one-point compactification is given by the inverse stereographic projection. Recall that the stereographic projection S gives an explicit homeomorphism from the unit sphere minus the north pole (0,0,1) to the Euclidean plane. The inverse stereographic projection is an open, dense embedding into a compact Hausdorff space obtained by adjoining the additional point . Under the stereographic projection latitudinal circles get mapped to planar circles . It follows that the deleted neighborhood basis of given by the punctured spherical caps corresponds to the complements of closed planar disks . More qualitatively, a neighborhood basis at is furnished by the sets as K ranges through the compact subsets of . This example already contains the key concepts of the general case.

Motivation

[edit]

Let be an embedding from a topological space X to a compact Hausdorff topological space Y, with dense image and one-point remainder . Then c(X) is open in a compact Hausdorff space so is locally compact Hausdorff, hence its homeomorphic preimage X is also locally compact Hausdorff. Moreover, if X were compact then c(X) would be closed in Y and hence not dense. Thus a space can only admit a Hausdorff one-point compactification if it is locally compact, noncompact and Hausdorff. Moreover, in such a one-point compactification the image of a neighborhood basis for x in X gives a neighborhood basis for c(x) in c(X), and—because a subset of a compact Hausdorff space is compact if and only if it is closed—the open neighborhoods of must be all sets obtained by adjoining to the image under c of a subset of X with compact complement.

The Alexandroff extension

[edit]

Let be a topological space. Put and topologize by taking as open sets all the open sets in X together with all sets of the form where C is closed and compact in X. Here, denotes the complement of in Note that is an open neighborhood of and thus any open cover of will contain all except a compact subset of implying that is compact (Kelley 1975, p. 150).

The space is called the Alexandroff extension of X (Willard, 19A). Sometimes the same name is used for the inclusion map

The properties below follow from the above discussion:

  • The map c is continuous and open: it embeds X as an open subset of .
  • The space is compact.
  • The image c(X) is dense in , if X is noncompact.
  • The space is Hausdorff if and only if X is Hausdorff and locally compact.
  • The space is T1 if and only if X is T1.

The one-point compactification

[edit]

In particular, the Alexandroff extension is a Hausdorff compactification of X if and only if X is Hausdorff, noncompact and locally compact. In this case it is called the one-point compactification or Alexandroff compactification of X.

Recall from the above discussion that any Hausdorff compactification with one point remainder is necessarily (isomorphic to) the Alexandroff compactification. In particular, if is a compact Hausdorff space and is a limit point of (i.e. not an isolated point of ), is the Alexandroff compactification of .

Let X be any noncompact Tychonoff space. Under the natural partial ordering on the set of equivalence classes of compactifications, any minimal element is equivalent to the Alexandroff extension (Engelking, Theorem 3.5.12). It follows that a noncompact Tychonoff space admits a minimal compactification if and only if it is locally compact.

Non-Hausdorff one-point compactifications

[edit]

Let be an arbitrary noncompact topological space. One may want to determine all the compactifications (not necessarily Hausdorff) of obtained by adding a single point, which could also be called one-point compactifications in this context. So one wants to determine all possible ways to give a compact topology such that is dense in it and the subspace topology on induced from is the same as the original topology. The last compatibility condition on the topology automatically implies that is dense in , because is not compact, so it cannot be closed in a compact space. Also, it is a fact that the inclusion map is necessarily an open embedding, that is, must be open in and the topology on must contain every member of .[1] So the topology on is determined by the neighbourhoods of . Any neighborhood of is necessarily the complement in of a closed compact subset of , as previously discussed.

The topologies on that make it a compactification of are as follows:

  • The Alexandroff extension of defined above. Here we take the complements of all closed compact subsets of as neighborhoods of . This is the largest topology that makes a one-point compactification of .
  • The open extension topology. Here we add a single neighborhood of , namely the whole space . This is the smallest topology that makes a one-point compactification of .
  • Any topology intermediate between the two topologies above. For neighborhoods of one has to pick a suitable subfamily of the complements of all closed compact subsets of ; for example, the complements of all finite closed compact subsets, or the complements of all countable closed compact subsets.

Further examples

[edit]

Compactifications of discrete spaces

[edit]
  • The one-point compactification of the set of positive integers is homeomorphic to the space consisting of K = {0} U {1/n | n is a positive integer} with the order topology.
  • A sequence in a topological space converges to a point in , if and only if the map given by for in and is continuous. Here has the discrete topology.
  • Polyadic spaces are defined as topological spaces that are the continuous image of the power of a one-point compactification of a discrete, locally compact Hausdorff space.

Compactifications of continuous spaces

[edit]
  • The one-point compactification of n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn is homeomorphic to the n-sphere Sn. As above, the map can be given explicitly as an n-dimensional inverse stereographic projection.
  • The one-point compactification of the product of copies of the half-closed interval [0,1), that is, of , is (homeomorphic to) .
  • Since the closure of a connected subset is connected, the Alexandroff extension of a noncompact connected space is connected. However a one-point compactification may "connect" a disconnected space: for instance the one-point compactification of the disjoint union of a finite number of copies of the interval (0,1) is a wedge of circles.
  • The one-point compactification of the disjoint union of a countable number of copies of the interval (0,1) is the Hawaiian earring. This is different from the wedge of countably many circles, which is not compact.
  • Given compact Hausdorff and any closed subset of , the one-point compactification of is , where the forward slash denotes the quotient space.[2]
  • If and are locally compact Hausdorff, then where is the smash product. Recall that the definition of the smash product: where is the wedge sum, and again, / denotes the quotient space.[2]

As a functor

[edit]

The Alexandroff extension can be viewed as a functor from the category of topological spaces with proper continuous maps as morphisms to the category whose objects are continuous maps and for which the morphisms from to are pairs of continuous maps such that . In particular, homeomorphic spaces have isomorphic Alexandroff extensions. The latter is the arrow category of topological spaces, often constructed as category of functors from interval category , where interval category is the category with 2 objects connected by single arrow.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In the mathematical field of , the Alexandroff extension, also known as the one-point compactification, is a construction that adjoins a single point, often denoted \infty or the "point at infinity," to a given XX, forming an extended space X=X{}X^* = X \cup \{\infty\} that is always compact. The topology on XX^* consists of all open sets of XX (regarded as subsets of XX^*) together with sets of the form XCX^* \setminus C, where CC is a compact subset of XX. This extension, introduced by Pavel Sergeyevich Alexandroff in 1924, provides a minimal way to achieve compactness while preserving the original topology on XX. Key properties of the Alexandroff extension include its universal : every open cover of XX^* has a finite subcover because any cover must include a set containing \infty, whose complement in XX is and thus finitely coverable. The subspace XX is dense in XX^* XX is non-, and X is open in XX^*. For the extension to be , XX must be locally and , in which case XX^* is a and a true compactification of XX. Without local , the extension may fail to separate points involving \infty, leading to non-Hausdorff behavior, but it still yields a . The construction is foundational in algebraic topology and analysis, enabling the study of limits at infinity and the extension of continuous functions; for instance, continuous functions on XX that have a limit at infinity extend continuously to XX^* by assigning that limit as the value at \infty. Notable examples include the extension of the real line R\mathbb{R} to the circle S1S^1, or the complex plane to the Riemann sphere. All one-point compactifications of a given locally compact Hausdorff space are unique up to homeomorphism, underscoring the canonical nature of the Alexandroff extension in this context.

Background and Motivation

Historical Development

The historical development of the Alexandroff extension is closely tied to the emergence of in the early 1920s within the Soviet mathematical school, spearheaded by Pavel S. Alexandrov and Pavel S. Urysohn. Building on Felix Hausdorff's seminal 1914 book Grundzüge der Mengenlehre, which formalized separation axioms and axiomatic , Alexandrov and Urysohn initiated systematic research on topological spaces during a collaborative summer at Bolshevo near in 1922. This work marked the beginning of the influential Moscow school of , emphasizing abstract spaces and their properties independent of metric structures. In this context, Urysohn contributed foundational ideas on connected sets and dimension theory, with early explorations appearing in his 1922 manuscript "Über die Mächtigkeit der zusammenhängenden Mengen," later published posthumously in 1925. This paper addressed the of connected continua. Alexandrov introduced the construction in 1924, generalizing it to arbitrary in his paper "Über die Metrisation der im Kleinen kompakten topologischen Räume," published in Mathematische Annalen. This work, independent of a similar result by Heinrich Tietze, defined the Alexandroff extension by adding a single point to any non-compact and specifying the topology such that the result is compact, without requiring local compactness. The construction bears Alexandrov's name and solidified the role of compactifications in abstract .

Stereographic Projection Example

The real line R\mathbb{R}, equipped with its standard topology, is a classic example of a non-compact space, as it contains unbounded sequences that do not converge within R\mathbb{R}. To compactify it, one can intuitively add a single "point at infinity" \infty, envisioning the resulting space as topologically equivalent to a circle S1S^1, where distant points on the line approach this infinity point from both directions. This compactification arises naturally via the inverse , which maps R\mathbb{R} homeomorphically onto the unit circle S1S^1 minus its (0,1)(0,1). Specifically, for xRx \in \mathbb{R}, the projection is given by (2x1+x2,1x21+x2)S1{(0,1)},\left( \frac{2x}{1+x^2}, \frac{1-x^2}{1+x^2} \right) \in S^1 \setminus \{(0,1)\}, and adjoining the as \infty yields the full circle as the compactified space R{}\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}. In this topology, basic open neighborhoods of \infty are sets of the form {}((,R)(R,))\{\infty\} \cup ( (-\infty, -R) \cup (R, \infty) ) for R>0R > 0, which correspond to the complements in R\mathbb{R} of compact intervals [R,R][-R, R]; these align with the small spherical caps around the under the stereographic map, confirming the compact nature of the extension. This concrete geometric provided key for Alexandrov's development of general compactification methods beyond Euclidean cases.

Definition and Construction

General Alexandroff Extension

The Alexandroff extension of a topological space XX, denoted αX\alpha X, is constructed by adjoining a single point X\infty \notin X to the underlying set, yielding αX=X{}\alpha X = X \cup \{\infty\}. The topology on αX\alpha X is generated by the basis consisting of all open subsets of XX (viewed as subsets of αX\alpha X not containing \infty) together with all sets of the form αXK\alpha X \setminus K, where KXK \subset X is a closed compact subset of XX. This collection forms a basis for the topology: for points in XX, the original open sets of XX serve as a local basis, while the sets αXK\alpha X \setminus K provide a local basis at \infty, consisting precisely of the open neighborhoods of \infty. The singleton {}\{\infty\} is closed in αX\alpha X, as its complement XX is open in the subspace topology inherited from XX. Consequently, the open neighborhoods of \infty are exactly the complements (in αX\alpha X) of closed compact subsets of XX, ensuring that sequences or nets escaping every closed compact set in XX converge to \infty. For instance, when X=RX = \mathbb{R} with the standard topology, this construction realizes the stereographic projection model of the extended real line. To verify that this collection defines a basis for a on αX\alpha X, first note that it covers αX\alpha X: every point in XX is in some of XX, and \infty is in αX\alpha X \setminus \emptyset. For the property, consider two basis elements B1B_1 and B2B_2, and pB1B2p \in B_1 \cap B_2.
  • If both B1,B2XB_1, B_2 \subseteq X are open in XX, then B1B2B_1 \cap B_2 is open in XX, so contained in itself as a basis element.
  • If B1XB_1 \subseteq X open and B2=αXKB_2 = \alpha X \setminus K with KK closed compact, and pB1B2p \in B_1 \cap B_2, then if p=p = \infty, B1B2=B_1 \cap B_2 = \emptyset, impossible; if pXp \in X, then pB1Kp \in B_1 \setminus K, and since KK closed, B1KB_1 \setminus K is open in XX, so a basis element containing pp inside the intersection.
  • If both B1=αXK1B_1 = \alpha X \setminus K_1, B2=αXK2B_2 = \alpha X \setminus K_2 with K1,K2K_1, K_2 closed compact, then B1B2=αX(K1K2)B_1 \cap B_2 = \alpha X \setminus (K_1 \cup K_2), and K1K2K_1 \cup K_2 is closed compact (finite union), so a basis element.
Thus, the conditions for a basis are satisfied, defining a topology on αX\alpha X. Finally, XX is an open subspace of αX\alpha X, since X=αX{}X = \alpha X \setminus \{\infty\} and {}\{\infty\} is closed, as established. The i:XαXi: X \to \alpha X is thus a topological , preserving the original on XX.

Topology of the Extension

The topology on the Alexandroff extension αX=X{}\alpha X = X \cup \{\infty\} of a XX is generated by the basis of all open sets of XX together with sets of the form {}(XK)\{\infty\} \cup (X \setminus K), where KXK \subseteq X is closed compact. A subset UαXU \subseteq \alpha X is open if it is a union of basis elements, which ensures that the original on XX is preserved as an open subspace, while neighborhoods of \infty capture the "behavior at infinity" by excluding only closed compact portions of XX. In terms of convergence, a net (xλ)(x_\lambda) in XX converges to \infty in αX\alpha X if and only if for every closed compact subset KXK \subseteq X, there exists an index λ0\lambda_0 such that xλKx_\lambda \notin K for all λλ0\lambda \geq \lambda_0. This property reflects the intuitive notion that sequences or nets "escaping to infinity" in XX approach the adjoined point. Regarding closed sets, every closed compact subset KXK \subseteq X remains compact in αX\alpha X, as its closure in αX\alpha X is contained within the compact space αX\alpha X. Moreover, the singleton {}\{\infty\} is closed in αX\alpha X, since its complement XX is open by the definition of the topology.

Properties and Characterizations

Compactness Conditions

A XX is said to be locally compact if every point of XX has a compact neighborhood. The Alexandroff extension αX\alpha X of a XX is always . To see this, consider any open cover U\mathcal{U} of αX\alpha X. Select U0UU_0 \in \mathcal{U} containing \infty; then U0={}(XK)U_0 = \{\infty\} \cup (X \setminus K) for some compact KXK \subseteq X. Since KK is compact, it can be covered by finitely many sets from U\mathcal{U}, say U1,,UnU_1, \dots, U_n. The finite subcollection {U0,U1,,Un}\{U_0, U_1, \dots, U_n\} then covers αX\alpha X, as it includes \infty and all of X=K(XK)X = K \cup (X \setminus K). Local compactness of XX is not required for this compactness but ensures additional properties, such as αX\alpha X being Hausdorff when XX is also Hausdorff.

Hausdorff and Separation Properties

The Alexandroff extension αX\alpha X of a XX is Hausdorff if and only if XX is Hausdorff and locally compact. This equivalence arises because separation of points within XX requires XX to be Hausdorff, while separation of any point xXx \in X from the added point \infty demands a compact neighborhood of xx in XX. Without local compactness, some xXx \in X lacks such a neighborhood, so every open set containing xx intersects every neighborhood of \infty (whose complements in XX are ), preventing disjoint open neighborhoods for xx and \infty. For instance, if XX is Hausdorff but not locally compact, sequences in XX may lack closures, allowing limits to accumulate at both xx and \infty in αX\alpha X. Despite potential failures of the Hausdorff axiom, αX\alpha X always satisfies the weaker T1T_1 , where singletons are closed sets. This holds because the complement of any singleton {x}\{x\} for xXx \in X in αX\alpha X contains \infty and has complement {x}\{x\} in XX, which is compact (as finite sets are compact in any topology); similarly, {}\{\infty\} is closed since XX is open in αX\alpha X. However, αX\alpha X need not be regular or normal in general, as these require stronger control over closed sets and neighborhoods beyond mere compactness of finite sets. If XX is locally compact and Hausdorff, then αX\alpha X is regular. In this case, αX\alpha X is compact and Hausdorff, hence normal (and thus regular, as normality implies regularity in T1T_1 spaces). This follows from the standard result that compact Hausdorff spaces are normal, with local compactness of XX ensuring the required separation for points and closed sets involving \infty.

Special Cases and Examples

One-Point Compactification for Locally Compact Spaces

In the context of locally compact Hausdorff spaces, the Alexandroff extension specializes to the one-point compactification. For a non-compact locally compact Hausdorff space XX, the one-point compactification αX=X{}\alpha X = X \cup \{\infty\} is constructed by adjoining a single point \infty not in XX, with the topology consisting of all open sets in XX together with sets of the form αXK\alpha X \setminus K, where KXK \subset X is compact. This construction yields a compact Hausdorff space in which XX is embedded as a dense open subspace, and the added point \infty serves as the "point at infinity." The local compactness of XX ensures that αX\alpha X is Hausdorff, as neighborhoods of \infty are complements of compact sets, which are open due to the regularity properties of locally compact Hausdorff spaces. A key property of this compactification is its uniqueness up to . Any two one-point compactifications of the same locally compact XX are homeomorphic via a homeomorphism that fixes XX . This uniqueness follows from the universal property: αX\alpha X is the unique (up to unique ) compact containing XX as a dense open subspace such that every continuous from XX to a compact YY extends uniquely to a continuous from αX\alpha X to YY if the preimage of every point in YY has compact closure in XX. This distinguishes the one-point compactification from other compactifications, such as the Stone-Čech compactification. Continuous functions on αX\alpha X correspond precisely to those continuous functions on XX that admit a unique continuous extension to the point \infty, meaning they approach a well-defined limit as points tend to in XX. In particular, bounded continuous functions on XX extend uniquely to αX\alpha X they possess a limit at ; otherwise, the extension may fail to be continuous. For instance, the C(αX)C(\alpha X) of all continuous real-valued functions on αX\alpha X is isomorphic to the of continuous functions on XX that are "uniformly continuous at " in the sense of having consistent limits along nets escaping every compact subset. This functional perspective highlights how the one-point compactification captures the behavior of functions at large scales in XX. A prominent example is the one-point compactification of : αRnSn\alpha \mathbb{R}^n \cong S^n, the nn-dimensional . This arises via , where Rn\mathbb{R}^n is identified with SnS^n minus the , and the added point \infty corresponds to the . The compact sets in Rn\mathbb{R}^n map to closed sets not containing the in SnS^n, preserving the and demonstrating how the one-point compactification "closes" the space at infinity in a geometrically intuitive way. This equivalence is foundational in manifold theory and .

Non-Hausdorff Compactifications

The Alexandroff extension of a XX yields a αX=X{}\alpha X = X \cup \{\infty\} regardless of whether XX satisfies separation axioms or local , but the resulting topology often fails to be Hausdorff when XX does not. In such cases, αX\alpha X demonstrates how can coexist with severe defects in point separation, where distinct points cannot be distinguished by disjoint open neighborhoods. This generality distinguishes the construction from more restrictive compactifications, such as the Stone-Čech compactification, which requires complete regularity. A canonical example occurs when XX carries the indiscrete topology, meaning the only open sets are \emptyset and XX itself (assuming XX is infinite). Here, the compact subsets of XX are \emptyset and XX, so the open neighborhoods of \infty in αX\alpha X are {}\{\infty\} and αX\alpha X. The open sets of αX\alpha X thus consist of \emptyset, XX, {}\{\infty\}, and αX\alpha X. This space is compact, as it admits a finite subcover for any open cover (trivially, since there are few open sets). However, it fails to be T1T_1, as singletons {x}\{x\} for xXx \in X are neither open nor closed—the closed sets are only \emptyset, {}\{\infty\}, XX, and αX\alpha X. Another illustrative case is X=QX = \mathbb{Q} equipped with the subspace topology inherited from R\mathbb{R}. The Alexandroff extension αQ\alpha \mathbb{Q} is compact but not Hausdorff. Neighborhoods of \infty take the form (QK){}(\mathbb{Q} \setminus K) \cup \{\infty\}, where KQK \subset \mathbb{Q} is compact (hence finite, since Q\mathbb{Q} has no infinite compact subsets). Thus, these neighborhoods are cofinite in Q\mathbb{Q}. To separate \infty from a rational qQq \in \mathbb{Q}, one would need a neighborhood VV of qq disjoint from some cofinite neighborhood UU of \infty, but any open VV around qq (an intersection of open intervals with Q\mathbb{Q}) is infinite due to the density of Q\mathbb{Q}, ensuring UVU \cap V \neq \emptyset. Despite this, αQ\alpha \mathbb{Q} is T1T_1 (and even KC, meaning compact sets are closed), as singletons in Q\mathbb{Q} remain closed. For instance, a sequence of distinct rationals converging to an irrational in R\mathbb{R} will converge to ∞ in αℚ, as its tails escape every compact subset of ℚ. This highlights the separation failure, where ∞ cannot be separated from any point in ℚ by disjoint open neighborhoods. These non-Hausdorff compactifications highlight the Alexandroff extension's broad applicability, extending to pathological spaces without assuming local compactness or Hausdorff separation, as originally formulated for general topological spaces. Such examples reveal how the construction prioritizes over regularity, enabling study of limit behaviors in spaces like dense subsets of manifolds.

Discrete and Continuous Space Examples

The Alexandroff extension of a countably infinite discrete space provides a simple illustration of one-point compactification. Consider the space X=NX = \mathbb{N} equipped with the discrete topology, where every subset is open. The extension αN=N{}\alpha \mathbb{N} = \mathbb{N} \cup \{\infty\} adjoins the point at infinity \infty, with the topology consisting of all subsets of N\mathbb{N} and sets of the form (NF){}(\mathbb{N} \setminus F) \cup \{\infty\} for finite subsets FNF \subseteq \mathbb{N}. This space is homeomorphic to the convergent space ω+1\omega + 1, where the points of N\mathbb{N} form a discrete converging to \infty. The open neighborhoods of \infty are precisely the cofinite sets containing \infty, reflecting the compact subsets of N\mathbb{N} being the finite sets. Since the discrete topology on N\mathbb{N} renders every singleton compact (and hence N\mathbb{N} locally compact), the extension αN\alpha \mathbb{N} is compact. To verify, consider any open cover of αN\alpha \mathbb{N}. One set in the cover must contain \infty, hence includes a cofinite subset of N\mathbb{N} along with \infty, leaving only finitely many points of N\mathbb{N} uncovered. Each of these finite points can be covered by a singleton open set from the cover, yielding a finite subcover. This construction aligns with the general property that the Alexandroff extension of a is compact. For continuous spaces, the Alexandroff extension of [R](/page/R)n\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n with the standard yields a familiar geometric object. Here, [R](/page/R)n\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n is locally compact, as every point has a compact neighborhood basis consisting of closed balls. The extension α[R](/page/R)n=[R](/page/R)n{}\alpha \mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n = \mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n \cup \{\infty\} has open sets comprising the usual opens in [R](/page/R)n\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n and sets of the form U{}U \cup \{\infty\}, where UU is open in [R](/page/R)n\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n and [R](/page/R)nU\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n \setminus U is compact (e.g., contained in a large closed ball). This space is to the nn-sphere SnS^n. The neighborhoods of \infty correspond to the exteriors of compact balls in [R](/page/R)n\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n, such as {x[R](/page/R)nx>r}{}\{ x \in \mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n \mid \|x\| > r \} \cup \{\infty\} for r>0r > 0. This can be seen via stereographic projection, which identifies [R](/page/R)n\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n with SnS^n minus a point. The of α[R](/page/R)n\alpha \mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n follows from the local of [R](/page/R)n\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n: compact subsets include closed bounded sets by the Heine-Borel theorem, ensuring the extension satisfies the compactification criteria. An open cover of α[R](/page/R)n\alpha \mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n includes a set containing \infty, which covers the exterior of some compact set (e.g., a ), leaving a compact subset of [R](/page/R)n\mathbb{[R](/page/R)}^n to be covered by finitely many opens from the cover, again yielding a finite subcover. As a contrast, consider an uncountable XX, such as the set of real numbers with the discrete topology. Although XX remains locally compact (with singletons compact), the extension αX=X{}\alpha X = X \cup \{\infty\} features neighborhoods of \infty as complements of finite subsets of XX union {}\{\infty\}, which are uncountably infinite cofinite sets. Despite the uncountable cardinality, αX\alpha X is , as the standard open cover argument applies: a set covering \infty omits only finitely many points, covered by finitely many singletons. However, this space is not normal, illustrating limitations beyond mere compactness in higher cardinalities.

Advanced Topics

Functorial Perspective

The Alexandroff extension, denoted αX=X{}\alpha X = X \cup \{\infty\} for a XX, can be extended to a functorial construction in the by defining its action on morphisms. Specifically, for a continuous f:XYf: X \to Y, the induced αf:αXαY\alpha f: \alpha X \to \alpha Y is given by αf(x)=f(x)\alpha f(x) = f(x) for xXx \in X and αf()=\alpha f(\infty) = \infty. This is continuous if and only if ff is proper, meaning that the preimage under ff of every compact of YY is compact in XX. This assignment defines a functor α\alpha from the category of locally compact Hausdorff spaces equipped with proper continuous maps as morphisms to the category of compact Hausdorff spaces (or pointed compact spaces, with \infty as the basepoint). The functor is faithful but not full, as not every continuous map between the extended spaces arises from a proper map between the originals. On this category, α\alpha preserves colimits such as coproducts, mapping the XYX \sqcup Y to the αXαY\alpha X \vee \alpha Y. A key limitation of this functorial perspective is that α\alpha is not defined on the full with all continuous maps, as arbitrary continuous maps do not generally induce continuous extensions. This contrasts with compactification functors like the Stone-Čech compactification, which extend to all continuous maps between Tychonoff spaces. The restriction to proper maps ensures the topological properties of the extension are preserved, but it restricts the functor's applicability to spaces admitting such morphisms.

Relations to Other Compactifications

The Alexandroff extension, also known as the one-point compactification αX\alpha X, applies primarily to locally compact topological spaces and adjoins a single point \infty whose neighborhoods consist of complements of compact subsets of XX, resulting in a compact space that minimally extends XX. In contrast, the Stone-Čech compactification βX\beta X is defined for any Tychonoff space and is the unique maximal compactification in the sense that it allows the continuous extension of all bounded real-valued functions on XX to the entire compact space, often requiring the addition of a much larger remainder βXX\beta X \setminus X. For instance, when XX is the discrete space of natural numbers N\mathbb{N}, αN\alpha \mathbb{N} adds just one point, while βN\beta \mathbb{N} has a remainder of cardinality 2202^{2^{\aleph_0}}, far exceeding the original space in size. The αX\alpha X and βX\beta X coincide precisely when XX is a non-compact, locally compact that is also pseudocompact, meaning every from XX to R\mathbb{R} is bounded; in such cases, the single added point suffices to embed all bounded functions, making the remainders identical. However, pseudocompact locally compact spaces are restrictive and exclude common examples like Rn\mathbb{R}^n, where αRn\alpha \mathbb{R}^n is homeomorphic to the nn-sphere SnS^n, but βRn\beta \mathbb{R}^n is vastly larger. Compared to the Freudenthal compactification, which for locally compact, σ-compact, connected metric continua with multiple ends adds points corresponding to equivalence classes of improper rays (or "ends"), the Alexandroff extension is coarser and limited to adding a single point suitable for spaces with one end. The Freudenthal construction provides a more refined for spaces like infinite trees or half-planes, where multiple ends require separate points, whereas for single-ended spaces such as Rn\mathbb{R}^n (n ≥ 2), the Freudenthal compactification aligns exactly with αRnSn\alpha \mathbb{R}^n \cong S^n. This distinction arises because Freudenthal's approach, introduced in , emphasizes the asymptotic structure of paths; the Alexandroff extension applies more generally but may fail to be Hausdorff without local compactness. In broader terms, the Alexandroff extension represents a minimal compactification by adding the fewest points necessary for compactness in locally compact cases, standing in opposition to the maximality of βX\beta X, which preserves the most functional information but at the cost of complexity. This minimality has found applications in , particularly in studying the ends of manifolds, where αX\alpha X models the behavior at for open manifolds with a single end, facilitating computations in and groups.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.