Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Alexandroff extension
View on WikipediaIn the mathematical field of topology, the Alexandroff extension is a way to extend a noncompact topological space by adjoining a single point in such a way that the resulting space is compact. It is named after the Russian mathematician Pavel Alexandroff. More precisely, let X be a topological space. Then the Alexandroff extension of X is a certain compact space X* together with an open embedding c : X → X* such that the complement of X in X* consists of a single point, typically denoted ∞. The map c is a Hausdorff compactification if and only if X is a locally compact, noncompact Hausdorff space. For such spaces the Alexandroff extension is called the one-point compactification or Alexandroff compactification. The advantages of the Alexandroff compactification lie in its simple, often geometrically meaningful structure and the fact that it is in a precise sense minimal among all compactifications; the disadvantage lies in the fact that it only gives a Hausdorff compactification on the class of locally compact, noncompact Hausdorff spaces, unlike the Stone–Čech compactification which exists for any topological space (but provides an embedding exactly for Tychonoff spaces).
Example: inverse stereographic projection
[edit]A geometrically appealing example of one-point compactification is given by the inverse stereographic projection. Recall that the stereographic projection S gives an explicit homeomorphism from the unit sphere minus the north pole (0,0,1) to the Euclidean plane. The inverse stereographic projection is an open, dense embedding into a compact Hausdorff space obtained by adjoining the additional point . Under the stereographic projection latitudinal circles get mapped to planar circles . It follows that the deleted neighborhood basis of given by the punctured spherical caps corresponds to the complements of closed planar disks . More qualitatively, a neighborhood basis at is furnished by the sets as K ranges through the compact subsets of . This example already contains the key concepts of the general case.
Motivation
[edit]Let be an embedding from a topological space X to a compact Hausdorff topological space Y, with dense image and one-point remainder . Then c(X) is open in a compact Hausdorff space so is locally compact Hausdorff, hence its homeomorphic preimage X is also locally compact Hausdorff. Moreover, if X were compact then c(X) would be closed in Y and hence not dense. Thus a space can only admit a Hausdorff one-point compactification if it is locally compact, noncompact and Hausdorff. Moreover, in such a one-point compactification the image of a neighborhood basis for x in X gives a neighborhood basis for c(x) in c(X), and—because a subset of a compact Hausdorff space is compact if and only if it is closed—the open neighborhoods of must be all sets obtained by adjoining to the image under c of a subset of X with compact complement.
The Alexandroff extension
[edit]Let be a topological space. Put and topologize by taking as open sets all the open sets in X together with all sets of the form where C is closed and compact in X. Here, denotes the complement of in Note that is an open neighborhood of and thus any open cover of will contain all except a compact subset of implying that is compact (Kelley 1975, p. 150).
The space is called the Alexandroff extension of X (Willard, 19A). Sometimes the same name is used for the inclusion map
The properties below follow from the above discussion:
- The map c is continuous and open: it embeds X as an open subset of .
- The space is compact.
- The image c(X) is dense in , if X is noncompact.
- The space is Hausdorff if and only if X is Hausdorff and locally compact.
- The space is T1 if and only if X is T1.
The one-point compactification
[edit]In particular, the Alexandroff extension is a Hausdorff compactification of X if and only if X is Hausdorff, noncompact and locally compact. In this case it is called the one-point compactification or Alexandroff compactification of X.
Recall from the above discussion that any Hausdorff compactification with one point remainder is necessarily (isomorphic to) the Alexandroff compactification. In particular, if is a compact Hausdorff space and is a limit point of (i.e. not an isolated point of ), is the Alexandroff compactification of .
Let X be any noncompact Tychonoff space. Under the natural partial ordering on the set of equivalence classes of compactifications, any minimal element is equivalent to the Alexandroff extension (Engelking, Theorem 3.5.12). It follows that a noncompact Tychonoff space admits a minimal compactification if and only if it is locally compact.
Non-Hausdorff one-point compactifications
[edit]Let be an arbitrary noncompact topological space. One may want to determine all the compactifications (not necessarily Hausdorff) of obtained by adding a single point, which could also be called one-point compactifications in this context. So one wants to determine all possible ways to give a compact topology such that is dense in it and the subspace topology on induced from is the same as the original topology. The last compatibility condition on the topology automatically implies that is dense in , because is not compact, so it cannot be closed in a compact space. Also, it is a fact that the inclusion map is necessarily an open embedding, that is, must be open in and the topology on must contain every member of .[1] So the topology on is determined by the neighbourhoods of . Any neighborhood of is necessarily the complement in of a closed compact subset of , as previously discussed.
The topologies on that make it a compactification of are as follows:
- The Alexandroff extension of defined above. Here we take the complements of all closed compact subsets of as neighborhoods of . This is the largest topology that makes a one-point compactification of .
- The open extension topology. Here we add a single neighborhood of , namely the whole space . This is the smallest topology that makes a one-point compactification of .
- Any topology intermediate between the two topologies above. For neighborhoods of one has to pick a suitable subfamily of the complements of all closed compact subsets of ; for example, the complements of all finite closed compact subsets, or the complements of all countable closed compact subsets.
Further examples
[edit]Compactifications of discrete spaces
[edit]- The one-point compactification of the set of positive integers is homeomorphic to the space consisting of K = {0} U {1/n | n is a positive integer} with the order topology.
- A sequence in a topological space converges to a point in , if and only if the map given by for in and is continuous. Here has the discrete topology.
- Polyadic spaces are defined as topological spaces that are the continuous image of the power of a one-point compactification of a discrete, locally compact Hausdorff space.
Compactifications of continuous spaces
[edit]- The one-point compactification of n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn is homeomorphic to the n-sphere Sn. As above, the map can be given explicitly as an n-dimensional inverse stereographic projection.
- The one-point compactification of the product of copies of the half-closed interval [0,1), that is, of , is (homeomorphic to) .
- Since the closure of a connected subset is connected, the Alexandroff extension of a noncompact connected space is connected. However a one-point compactification may "connect" a disconnected space: for instance the one-point compactification of the disjoint union of a finite number of copies of the interval (0,1) is a wedge of circles.
- The one-point compactification of the disjoint union of a countable number of copies of the interval (0,1) is the Hawaiian earring. This is different from the wedge of countably many circles, which is not compact.
- Given compact Hausdorff and any closed subset of , the one-point compactification of is , where the forward slash denotes the quotient space.[2]
- If and are locally compact Hausdorff, then where is the smash product. Recall that the definition of the smash product: where is the wedge sum, and again, / denotes the quotient space.[2]
As a functor
[edit]The Alexandroff extension can be viewed as a functor from the category of topological spaces with proper continuous maps as morphisms to the category whose objects are continuous maps and for which the morphisms from to are pairs of continuous maps such that . In particular, homeomorphic spaces have isomorphic Alexandroff extensions. The latter is the arrow category of topological spaces, often constructed as category of functors from interval category , where interval category is the category with 2 objects connected by single arrow.
See also
[edit]- Bohr compactification
- Compact space – Type of mathematical space
- Compactification (mathematics) – Embedding a topological space into a compact space as a dense subset
- End (topology)
- Extended real number line – Real numbers with + and - infinity added
- Normal space – Type of topological space
- Pointed set – Basic concept in set theory
- Riemann sphere – Model of the extended complex plane plus a point at infinity
- Stereographic projection – Particular mapping that projects a sphere onto a plane
- Stone–Čech compactification – Concept in topology
- Wallman compactification – A compactification of T1 topological spaces
Notes
[edit]- ^ "General topology – Non-Hausdorff one-point compactifications".
- ^ a b Joseph J. Rotman, An Introduction to Algebraic Topology (1988) Springer-Verlag ISBN 0-387-96678-1 (See Chapter 11 for proof.)
References
[edit]- Alexandroff, Pavel S. (1924), "Über die Metrisation der im Kleinen kompakten topologischen Räume", Mathematische Annalen, 92 (3–4): 294–301, doi:10.1007/BF01448011, JFM 50.0128.04, S2CID 121699713
- Brown, Ronald (1973), "Sequentially proper maps and a sequential compactification", Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Series 2, 7 (3): 515–522, doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-7.3.515, Zbl 0269.54015
- Engelking, Ryszard (1989), General Topology, Helderman Verlag Berlin, ISBN 978-0-201-08707-9, MR 1039321
- Fedorchuk, V.V. (2001) [1994], "Aleksandrov compactification", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
- Kelley, John L. (1975), General Topology, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90125-1, MR 0370454
- Munkres, James (1999), Topology (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-181629-2, Zbl 0951.54001
- Willard, Stephen (1970), General Topology, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 3-88538-006-4, MR 0264581, Zbl 0205.26601
Alexandroff extension
View on GrokipediaBackground and Motivation
Historical Development
The historical development of the Alexandroff extension is closely tied to the emergence of general topology in the early 1920s within the Soviet mathematical school, spearheaded by Pavel S. Alexandrov and Pavel S. Urysohn. Building on Felix Hausdorff's seminal 1914 book Grundzüge der Mengenlehre, which formalized separation axioms and axiomatic topology, Alexandrov and Urysohn initiated systematic research on topological spaces during a collaborative summer at Bolshevo near Moscow in 1922.[5][6] This work marked the beginning of the influential Moscow school of topology, emphasizing abstract spaces and their properties independent of metric structures.[7] In this context, Urysohn contributed foundational ideas on connected sets and dimension theory, with early explorations appearing in his 1922 manuscript "Über die Mächtigkeit der zusammenhängenden Mengen," later published posthumously in 1925. This paper addressed the cardinality of connected continua.[8] Alexandrov introduced the construction in 1924, generalizing it to arbitrary topological spaces in his paper "Über die Metrisation der im Kleinen kompakten topologischen Räume," published in Mathematische Annalen. This work, independent of a similar result by Heinrich Tietze, defined the Alexandroff extension by adding a single point to any non-compact space and specifying the topology such that the result is compact, without requiring local compactness. The construction bears Alexandrov's name and solidified the role of compactifications in abstract topology.[9][10]Stereographic Projection Example
The real line , equipped with its standard topology, is a classic example of a non-compact space, as it contains unbounded sequences that do not converge within . To compactify it, one can intuitively add a single "point at infinity" , envisioning the resulting space as topologically equivalent to a circle , where distant points on the line approach this infinity point from both directions.[11] This compactification arises naturally via the inverse stereographic projection, which maps homeomorphically onto the unit circle minus its north pole . Specifically, for , the projection is given by and adjoining the north pole as yields the full circle as the compactified space .[11] In this topology, basic open neighborhoods of are sets of the form for , which correspond to the complements in of compact intervals ; these align with the small spherical caps around the north pole under the stereographic map, confirming the compact nature of the extension.[12] This concrete geometric construction provided key motivation for Alexandrov's development of general compactification methods beyond Euclidean cases.[13]Definition and Construction
General Alexandroff Extension
The Alexandroff extension of a topological space , denoted , is constructed by adjoining a single point to the underlying set, yielding .[12] The topology on is generated by the basis consisting of all open subsets of (viewed as subsets of not containing ) together with all sets of the form , where is a closed compact subset of .[4] This collection forms a basis for the topology: for points in , the original open sets of serve as a local basis, while the sets provide a local basis at , consisting precisely of the open neighborhoods of .[12] The singleton is closed in , as its complement is open in the subspace topology inherited from .[12] Consequently, the open neighborhoods of are exactly the complements (in ) of closed compact subsets of , ensuring that sequences or nets escaping every closed compact set in converge to .[12] For instance, when with the standard topology, this construction realizes the stereographic projection model of the extended real line.[12] To verify that this collection defines a basis for a topology on , first note that it covers : every point in is in some open set of , and is in . For the intersection property, consider two basis elements and , and .- If both are open in , then is open in , so contained in itself as a basis element.
- If open and with closed compact, and , then if , , impossible; if , then , and since closed, is open in , so a basis element containing inside the intersection.
- If both , with closed compact, then , and is closed compact (finite union), so a basis element.
