Hubbry Logo
Arizona StripArizona StripMain
Open search
Arizona Strip
Community hub
Arizona Strip
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Arizona Strip
Arizona Strip
Arizona Strip
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Arizona Strip
Side canyon in the Arizona Strip
The Wave, Arizona: a sandstone formation in the Arizona Strip

The Arizona Strip is the part of Arizona lying north of the Colorado River.[1] Despite being larger in area than several U.S. states, the entire region has a population of fewer than 10,000 people. Consisting of northeastern Mohave County and northwestern Coconino County, the largest settlements in the Strip are Colorado City, Fredonia, and Beaver Dam, with smaller communities of Scenic, Littlefield and Desert Springs. The Kaibab Indian Reservation lies within the region. Lying along the North Rim of the Grand Canyon creates physical barriers to the rest of Arizona. Only three major roads traverse the region: I-15 crosses the northwestern corner, while Arizona State Route 389 and U.S. Route 89A cross the northeastern part of the strip, and US 89A crosses the Colorado River via the Navajo Bridge, providing the only direct road connection between the strip and the rest of the state. The nearest metropolitan area is the St. George, Utah, metro area, to which the region is more connected than to the rest of Arizona.

Aside from the scattered settlements throughout the region, most of the land is protected areas, with various units of the National Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management, or the U.S. Forest Service covering most of the region.

General characteristics

[edit]

The Strip is typical of the American West in its red-rock canyon country, and the aridity of the climate, which leads to the predominance of sagebrush vegetation. However, the first European settlers were witness to great stretches of grassland in such areas as House Rock Valley, which are returning under better ranching practices. The land is also dotted with juniper trees, moving into pinyon pine and juniper forests, and eventually ponderosa pines, spruce, firs, and aspen in the higher elevations such as the Kaibab Plateau.[citation needed]

It has been divided between Coconino County in the east (east of Kanab Creek) and Mohave County in the west. The only significant settlements are Fredonia on Kanab Creek and Colorado City (the Strip's largest community) on the Utah border to the northwest (see also Hildale, Utah). In the extreme west on the Virgin River are the small settlements of Beaver Dam, Littlefield and Scenic, just off Interstate 15. However, the Strip provides the only route accessing the North Rim of the Grand Canyon, and numerous service communities catering to tourists exist along the Strip's main routes heading south from Jacob Lake.[citation needed]

The Strip has a total surface area of 7,878.11 square miles (20,404.2 km2), larger than the total area of three different US states: Rhode Island, Delaware and Connecticut. Of this, 7,856.45 square miles (20,348.12 km2) is land, and only 56.08 km2 (21.653 sq mi, or 0.275%) is water. Its land area is larger than that of seven different US states, the aforementioned three and each of New Jersey, New Hampshire and Massachusetts. The Strip's land area comprises 6.9 percent of Arizona's land area. About 64.4 percent of its area is in Mohave County and 35.6 percent in Coconino County. Its total population was 8,095 inhabitants at the 2000 census, with 6,221 residing in Mohave County and 1,874 in Coconino County.[2]

History

[edit]

Since the area was first settled by Mormon Pioneers led by Jacob Hamblin in the mid-19th century, the Arizona Strip has been one of the last strongholds of the nineteenth-century practice of polygamy, though this practice was officially disavowed by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) in 1890. Over the last century, the region has been the subject of controversy because of the control that groups such as the United Effort Plan, a polygamist Mormon offshoot, exert within the region; nonetheless, such groups remain merely a visible minority.

The Arizona Strip was long a cattleman's paradise with large stretches of grassy meadow in the valleys and the high Kaibab Plateau as summer forage. At the beginning of the 20th century, the Grand Canyon Cattle Company, otherwise known as the Bar Z Brand, ran upwards of 100,000 cattle throughout the strip. Land and water use often led to friction between competing brands, and there are accounts of limited range wars between different outfits and between sheepmen and cattlemen.

The strip had been a battleground between Native American and white settlers during the 19th century, with Navajo parties crossing over the Colorado River and raiding Mormon settlements. Peace was largely maintained through the diplomatic efforts of Jacob Hamblin. It also served as the primary route from Utah into Arizona, as the Grand Canyon and the Colorado River serve as almost impenetrable barriers to the south.

Access

[edit]

The Arizona Strip is very sparsely populated and connected to the rest of Arizona by only limited highway links, at Navajo Bridge and the Glen Canyon Dam bridge, both at the eastern end on U.S. Route 89 and crossing the Colorado River, a few Arizona state highways and U.S. Route 89A at Fredonia, Arizona. It does have multiple road links to Utah to the north; as a result, the region has stronger historic, economic and cultural ties to Utah than to Arizona. Residents of Littlefield, Arizona, and the surrounding northwestern corner of the state, near Interstate 15, must physically leave the state and reenter from Utah, Nevada, or California.

Four primary unpaved roads enter the core of the strip: from Mesquite, Nevada; St. George, Utah; Colorado City, Arizona; and Fredonia, Arizona. All four are dirt/gravel and should not be driven by vehicles with low ground clearance. Motorists should check with the BLM locally before heading into the strip on these roads, and are advised to be prepared – even rangers may not know current conditions, such as snow/ice cover and washouts.

Nature and monuments

[edit]

Protected lands

[edit]
Cabin on the historic Kane Ranch, a conservation project of the Grand Canyon Trust.

Most of the land in the Arizona Strip is managed by the United States Bureau of Land Management or the United States Forest Service. The area holds several U.S. Wilderness Areas and U.S. National Monuments and the Kaibab Indian Reservation. The southern part of the Arizona Strip includes the north rim of Grand Canyon National Park and the northern section of the Lake Mead National Recreation Area.

National Monuments

[edit]

National Parks

[edit]

National Recreation Areas

[edit]

Wilderness Areas

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Arizona Strip

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Arizona Strip is a remote, arid region in north of the , isolated from the rest of the state by the Grand Canyon and encompassing roughly five million acres of plateaus, shrublands, and woodlands across Mohave and Coconino counties. This sparsely populated area, with fewer than 3,000 residents historically concentrated in small ranching communities, features elevations from 4,000 to 6,500 feet and supports limited economic activities centered on cattle grazing, remnants, and backcountry recreation. Managed predominantly by the Bureau of Land Management's Arizona Strip Field Office, which oversees nearly 1.7 million acres, the region includes protected areas like Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument and , valued for their geological diversity, endemic species, and challenging terrain that limits infrastructure development. Settlement traces to indigenous Paiute habitation since around 1150 AD, followed by in the establishing ranches and outposts like Pipe Spring, amid ongoing tensions involving federal oversight, management, and historical cultural conflicts such as 1950s interventions against isolated fundamentalist communities. Its geographic separation has periodically fueled discussions on administrative realignment with neighboring , though no formal has occurred due to entrenched state boundaries established in the .

Geography

Location and Boundaries

The Arizona Strip constitutes the remote northwestern portion of Arizona, located entirely north of the Colorado River and the Grand Canyon, spanning parts of Mohave and Coconino counties. This region covers approximately 8,000 square miles, an area larger than the state of Massachusetts. Its boundaries are defined as follows: to the north along the Arizona-Utah state line at 37° north latitude; to the west along the Arizona-Nevada state line; to the south by the , which forms the dramatic barrier of the Grand Canyon; and to the east extending across the until the river's bend near , where the canyon's topography begins to integrate with broader Arizona plateaus. The inclusion of this in stems from the of 1863 establishing the , which set the northern boundary at 37° N latitude—a political decision by that placed the Strip under Arizona jurisdiction despite its geographic and cultural ties to . This demarcation, confirmed upon Arizona's statehood in 1912, resulted in the region's administrative isolation from the state's population centers south of the canyon. The Strip's physical separation by the Grand Canyon exacerbates its detachment, rendering it accessible primarily via routes from or rather than , with no direct road connections across the canyon itself. The area supports a sparse of around 8,000 residents, concentrated in small communities such as Fredonia, Colorado City, and Beaver Dam.

Topography and Geology

The Arizona Strip features rugged topography dominated by elevated plateaus, steep escarpments, and incised canyons typical of the southern province. Elevations vary significantly, from about 1,760 feet (536 meters) near the in the west to over 9,200 feet (2,800 meters) along the 's high points in the east. The , a prominent uplift reaching up to 9,209 feet (2,807 meters), extends northward from the Grand Canyon's North Rim, forming broad, relatively flat expanses dissected by drainages. Steep escarpments, such as the , drop abruptly hundreds of feet, creating isolated mesas and badlands amid arid desert surfaces averaging 5,000 to 7,000 feet (1,500 to 2,100 meters). Geologically, the region exposes a stratigraphic sequence from metamorphic rocks—such as , , and visible along the —to overlying and layers, including Permian Kaibab Limestone capping the plateaus. The consist primarily of siltstones and shales and sandstones, cemented by carbonates and vividly stained red by minerals, recording early depositional environments of deserts and floodplains from 248 to 65 million years ago. These cliffs represent a step in the "Grand Staircase" of progressively younger, down-dropped strata eroded along faults. basalt lava fields, associated with the Uinkaret , mantle western portions like the Mount Trumbull area, with flows dating to about 3.6 million years ago overlying older sedimentary rocks. The landscape's formation stems from Laramide-era uplift of the beginning around 70 million years ago, followed by to recent epeirogenic doming and entrenchment by the , which has incised extensions of the Grand Canyon and exposed ancient rock layers through differential erosion. Slot-like incisions, such as those of the Paria River, result from fluvial abrasion in resistant formations like the Jurassic , producing narrow, meandering gorges with undulating walls. This ongoing erosional regime, combined with sparse vegetation and flash flooding, maintains the Strip's dramatic relief without significant tectonic activity in recent epochs.

Climate and Ecology

The Arizona Strip exhibits a semi-arid to arid , with annual typically ranging from 6 to 12 inches, varying by and influenced by winter frontal systems and the season from July to September. Higher plateaus, such as those near the , receive up to 12 inches annually, while lower valleys see as little as 6 inches, often in sporadic heavy events rather than consistent rainfall. Summer daytime temperatures frequently reach 90–100°F (32–38°C) or higher in exposed areas, with significant diurnal swings exceeding 30°F due to clear skies and low humidity; winters bring average highs of 40–50°F (4–10°C) and lows dipping to 20°F (-7°C) or below, occasionally with light snowfall at elevations above 6,000 feet. Ecological communities reflect this harsh, drought-prone environment, featuring transitional zones between shrublands and influences. Pinyon-juniper woodlands dominate mid-elevation plateaus (5,000–7,000 feet), supporting drought-adapted conifers like Utah juniper () and singleleaf pinyon (), interspersed with understory shrubs such as mountain mahogany and antelope bitterbrush. Lower valleys host desert shrublands with blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima), (), and scattered and species resilient to aridity; limited riparian zones along intermittent streams sustain narrow corridors of cottonwood, , and sedges where persists briefly. includes (Odocoileus hemionus), (Ovis canadensis nelsoni), endemic Kaibab squirrels (Sciurus aberti kaibabensis), coyotes (Canis latrans), and reptiles like sidewinders (); avian diversity exceeds 100 species, with raptors such as golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) and ferruginous hawks (Buteo regalis) prominent. Hydrological features underscore the region's , with most drainages consisting of ephemeral streams that flow only after rare intense storms, feeding into slot canyons prone to flash flooding that can produce peak discharges exceeding 10,000 cubic feet per second in small watersheds. Permanent is limited to isolated springs, including Pipe Spring, which discharges from aquifers at rates historically around 50–100 gallons per minute, supporting localized oases amid otherwise groundwater-dependent systems. These dynamics foster ecosystems reliant on subsurface moisture and episodic recharge, with vegetation and fauna exhibiting adaptations like deep roots, seasonal migration, and behavioral to endure prolonged dry periods.

History

Indigenous Occupation

Archaeological evidence indicates human presence in the Arizona Strip dating to Paleoindian times, approximately 12,000 years ago, with discoveries of Clovis points and other bifacial tools at multiple sites spanning several cultural complexes. These artifacts reflect mobile groups exploiting and local resources in the region's prehistoric landscape. From around 1150 AD, the Virgin Branch of the , associated with the Kayenta Anasazi tradition, maintained settlements involving dryland , masonry structures, and cliff dwellings adapted to the rugged topography along the Vermilion Cliffs and canyons. Their occupation emphasized cultivation supplemented by foraging, though environmental constraints limited dense populations, with sites showing evidence of periodic abandonment linked to cycles. The Kaibab Band of Paiute emerged as the predominant pre-contact group by the late prehistoric period, with estimated band-wide numbers ranging from 1,200 to 1,800 individuals across their territory including the Arizona Strip. Subsistence relied on gathering pinyon nuts, hunting small game like rabbits and deer, and seasonal migrations to exploit riparian zones and higher elevations for seeds, roots, and berries, reflecting adaptations to the area's aridity and low productivity. Prehistoric sites across the Arizona Strip, totaling over 4,000 recorded locations, feature panels such as those at Nampaweap with thousands of petroglyphs depicting and abstract motifs, alongside cliff granaries for seed storage and scattered shards indicative of transient, low-density use rather than large-scale villages. This pattern underscores opportunistic resource strategies in a harsh environment, with minimal evidence of intensive land modification.

European Exploration and Mormon Settlement

The of 1776, led by Franciscan friars Francisco Atanasio Domínguez and Silvestre Vélez de Escalante, represents the earliest documented European traversal of portions of the Arizona Strip while seeking an overland route from Santa Fe to Monterey. The priests and their party of eight, including Ute and guides, navigated harsh terrain in the region, marking the first known European sighting of the area despite facing severe hardships like water shortages and difficult crossings. No settlements resulted from this or subsequent limited Spanish and Mexican expeditions, as northern Arizona beyond the remained peripheral to colonial interests focused southward. Mormon colonization of the Arizona Strip commenced in the mid-1860s under Brigham Young's directive to extend settlements from into for ranching and self-sufficiency. Pioneers valued the region's isolated plateaus for livestock grazing, establishing outposts like Pipe Spring, where initiated ranching operations in 1863 to supply beef to southern communities. Communal efforts emphasized ditches to harness scarce springs and organized drives northward, fostering resilient economies adapted to the arid . Settlers faced acute challenges, including geographic isolation that hindered supply lines and frequent Navajo raids crossing the Colorado River starting in 1865, which targeted herds and resulted in losses of thousands of animals. In 1866, Whitmore and a herder were killed during an attempt to recover stolen stock, prompting fortified houses and defenses to protect operations at sites like Pipe Spring and emerging communities such as Short Creek. These adaptations underscored pioneer ingenuity in overcoming and indigenous conflicts to sustain agricultural and ventures.

19th-20th Century Developments and Boundary Issues

The Arizona Strip was detached from the upon the enactment of the Arizona Organic Act on February 24, 1863, which established the Territory of Arizona with a north-south orientation bounded by 37° north latitude, placing the region south of that line despite its geographic continuity with . This division stemmed from congressional compromises amid Civil War-era sectional tensions, including efforts to curb pro-slavery influences in potential by rejecting an earlier east-west boundary proposal that would have aligned more with southern interests. Initial surveys of the 37th parallel in the late 1860s encountered errors, leading Utah officials to protest the boundary and petition for readjustment to retain control over the area, citing its Mormon settlements and practical ties; however, Congress reaffirmed Arizona's claim during the state's on February 14, 1912, solidifying the strip's separation. In the late 19th century, the region's ranching economy intensified with competition over scarce grazing lands and water sources, pitting small-scale Mormon settlers against larger operations that drove herds into for open-range foraging. Conflicts arose as and rustling escalated, exemplified by tensions involving expansive outfits like the Aztec Land and Cattle Company (Hash Knife), which imported thousands of via rail from starting in 1885, straining local resources in adjacent rangelands. These "range wars" were mitigated through the adoption of barbed-wire fencing in the 1880s–1890s and judicial adjudication of water rights under prior appropriation doctrines, which prioritized established users and reduced violent disputes by the early 1900s. Early 20th-century efforts under the Enlarged Homestead Act of 1909 yielded limited success in the Arizona Strip due to its arid conditions, with average annual precipitation below 10 inches rendering much soil unsuitable for dry farming or sustained agriculture without irrigation, resulting in few viable claims amid vast federal holdings. By the 1930s, the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934 curtailed unregulated open-range practices, transitioning management to federal oversight via the Division of Grazing (predecessor to the BLM) and U.S. Forest Service, which allocated permits for livestock on public lands comprising over 90% of the region. A surge followed , driven by U.S. Atomic Energy Commission purchases from 1948 onward, as prospectors exploited breccia pipe deposits in the strip's , producing high-grade ore that fueled nuclear programs until market declines in the 1950s.

Demographics and Communities

Population Centers

Fredonia, situated in Coconino County approximately four miles south of the Arizona-Utah border, serves as the primary administrative center for the Arizona Strip with a of 1,295 as of 2025 estimates. City, located in Mohave County along the state line, is the largest community in the region, recording 2,478 residents in the 2020 census and projected to reach 2,904 by 2025. , a in Mohave County near the border, supports around 1,590 inhabitants as of 2023 data, functioning as a modest agricultural outpost. Smaller hamlets such as Littlefield and Scenic dot the landscape, primarily along corridors, but remain unincorporated with negligible populations under 500 each based on regional surveys. The Arizona Strip's overall population totals approximately 8,000 across these scattered settlements, reflecting a low-density rural configuration with limited urban development. Basic prevails, including essential utilities and schools, though residents frequently travel to , or , for specialized medical care, shopping, and higher education due to the area's isolation.

Cultural and Social Dynamics

The Arizona Strip's social fabric is deeply shaped by Mormon heritage, particularly through fundamentalist communities like those in , and adjacent , established in the 1930s as refuges for practitioners of plural marriage following schisms from the mainstream Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints over the abandonment of . These groups, including the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS), maintained insular practices centered on religious authority and large families, with leaders exerting significant control over community life. Law enforcement interventions intensified in the mid-2000s, targeting underage marriages and related abuses; for instance, investigations in 2005 highlighted systemic issues, culminating in the 2006 arrest of FLDS leader on charges including sexual conduct with minors, leading to his 2011 conviction. Beyond fundamentalist enclaves, the region's culture reflects a broader ranching ethos inherited from early and homesteaders, fostering values of , hard work, and amid geographic isolation from mainstream Arizona. This independence is evident in rural lifestyles emphasizing family, land stewardship, and interaction, with political leanings strongly conservative, aligning with rural Arizona's patterns of Republican support. Cultural events, such as those at Pipe Spring National Monument, integrate Kaibab Paiute indigenous traditions with Mormon settler history through demonstrations of crafts, lifeways, and commemorations that highlight shared yet distinct narratives of adaptation to the arid landscape. Social dynamics are marked by low diversity, with the population predominantly white descendants of and a small Native American presence, including Paiute groups, contributing to a homogeneous community identity. Isolation promotes resilience and low crime rates but can engender insularity, historically punctuated by range feuds between and sheep interests over lands in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These tensions underscored the challenges of resource scarcity in a remote , reinforcing a culture of pragmatic self-sufficiency over external dependencies.

Economy and Land Use

Ranching and Livestock Grazing

Ranching has served as the primary economic activity in the Arizona Strip since the late 1800s, when Mormon settlers introduced and sheep to the region's arid rangelands. Livestock operations expanded rapidly following European exploration, with thousands of and sheep driven into the area during the 1860s under Brigham Young's directives for land stewardship. By 1863, early herds arrived via efforts of settlers like James M. Whitmore, establishing the foundation for sustained on lands that would later fall under federal management. The (BLM) now administers approximately 100,000 Animal Unit Months (AUMs) of permitted across allotments in the Arizona Strip, sustaining multi-generational family ranches that form the economic core of local communities. These operations primarily involve , with historical inclusion of sheep, focusing on cow-calf production adapted to the sparse and isolation. The annual economic output from reaches about $7.1 million, supporting beef sales primarily to markets and bolstering regional through heritage practices. Ranchers employ systems, including rest-rotation and deferred-rotation methods developed in the 1960s and 1970s by experts like Gus Hormay, to optimize recovery in the semi-arid environment. Water management adaptations, such as catchments and spring developments installed collaboratively with agencies since the , enable access to remote pastures, while resilience is achieved through selection and supplemental feeding during dry periods. These techniques have maintained productivity despite climatic challenges, preserving the agrarian heritage central to Arizona Strip identity.

Mining and Natural Resources

The Arizona Strip features significant historical uranium extraction from breccia pipe deposits, with mining activity intensifying during the Cold War era as the U.S. government procured ore from southwestern prospectors. By the 1980s, eight mines on the Arizona Strip had produced 19 million pounds of U3O8 from seven breccia pipes, contributing to national nuclear programs and local economic activity. Copper mining in breccia pipes dates to the 1870s, yielding high-grade ore from sites like Grand Gulch, which proved among the richest in the region and supported early hardrock operations alongside prospects for gold and other metals. Contemporary remains small-scale, focused on aggregates such as and for local building and , constrained by the area's remoteness from major markets but essential for sustaining sparse communities and infrastructure. The (BLM), overseeing most lands under multiple-use principles, administers claims for locatable minerals via the 1872 Mining Law, enabling citizen access without royalties to the federal treasury and generating jobs in an otherwise isolated economy. Undeveloped potential persists in oil and gas shales within northern Arizona's sedimentary basins, including overthrust belt structures identified for exploratory viability, alongside geothermal resources evidenced by hot springs and low-to-moderate temperature gradients suitable for energy production. These opportunities align with federal mandates prioritizing mineral development on public lands to bolster domestic supply chains and regional self-reliance.

Recreation and Tourism

The Arizona Strip supports a range of activities centered on its rugged terrain and expansive public lands, including , , and off-road exploration. in Arizona Game and Fish Department Units 13A and 13B is renowned for producing trophy-class bucks exceeding 200 inches, with seasons divided into (August-September) and general periods (October-November) as outlined for 2025. Outfitters provide guided services, emphasizing the units' low deer densities and vast, road-accessible public lands comprising over 90% of the area. Hiking opportunities abound in areas like the , where slot canyons such as require day-use permits costing $6 per person, plus additional fees for dogs or overnight stays limited to 20 permits daily. These permits enforce low visitation to preserve the narrow, flood-prone passages, accessible via trails like Wire Pass. Off-road trails, including segments of U.S. Route 89A and backcountry routes like House Rock Valley, offer scenic drives through vistas and connect to remote sites, suitable for 4x4 vehicles amid sandy and rocky conditions. Tourism generates economic activity through low-impact dispersed camping and services in gateway communities like Fredonia, where motels and guides benefit from seasonal influxes tied to fall hunts and spring wildflower displays in the desert ecosystems. , a key draw, recorded 240,373 visits in fiscal year 2023, reflecting growing interest in the region's wave-like rock formations and wilderness solitude while maintaining its isolated character through limited infrastructure.

Access and Infrastructure

Transportation Routes

U.S. Route 89A serves as the primary north-south artery through the northeastern Arizona Strip, extending 87 miles from its junction with at Bitter Springs northward via Jacob Lake to Fredonia, where it continues into . This route navigates elevation gains exceeding 2,000 feet across the Kaibab Plateau's ponderosa pine forests and open meadows, with grades up to 6% requiring engineered cuts and fills to surmount volcanic ridges and fault scarps. Designated as the Fredonia-Vermillion Cliffs Scenic Road, it parallels the eastern escarpment of the , utilizing switchbacks and retaining walls to traverse slot canyons and landslide-prone slopes. Arizona State Route 389 provides essential east-west connectivity across the northern Strip, spanning 32.5 miles from the Utah state line at Colorado City to its terminus at U.S. Route 89A in Fredonia. Established to link isolated communities with Utah's Interstate 15 corridor near St. George, the highway crosses arid plateaus and shortens travel distances by avoiding detours through central Arizona, with pavement widths narrowed to 20-24 feet in places to conform to the rugged topography. Limited access in the northwestern Strip occurs via , which clips the region's corner near , enabling indirect supply routes from and southwestern without penetrating deeper into Arizona's isolated lands. Unpaved tracks, including House Rock Valley Road—a 30-mile corridor linking near the Utah-Arizona line southward to U.S. Route 89A—offer secondary entry to remote eastern sectors, graded intermittently by the for high-clearance and four-wheel-drive vehicles but prone to washouts and dust in dry conditions. The Arizona Strip contains no railroads or public airports, compelling reliance on these highways and adjacent and interstates for freight and long-distance travel. Early evolved from 19th-century Mormon trails radiating from settlements, later formalized into graded roads by to support livestock drives across the plateau divides.

Impacts of Isolation

The Grand Canyon acts as a formidable , severing the Arizona Strip from and necessitating detours exceeding 200 miles northward through to reach population centers like Flagstaff or Phoenix for routine travel or services. This remoteness exacerbates logistical challenges, including delayed responses, as rugged terrain and sparse roads hinder rapid access for medical or firefighting teams; for instance, legislative barriers in further restricted medical transport options for Strip residents, amplifying reliance on distant -based services. Elevated fuel and supply costs stem from these extended hauls, with remote delivery routes inflating expenses for essentials in an area where public infrastructure remains minimal. Residents and ranchers have adapted through practical measures that underscore , such as maintaining private airstrips for quick aerial access to remote properties—exemplified by facilities at operations like the Bar 10 Ranch, which supports over 200 daily flights during peak seasons for logistics and personnel. Communication gaps, marked by absent cellular coverage across vast tracts like the , are bridged via systems for internet, phones, and monitoring, enabling independent operation despite isolation. These adaptations cultivate a culture of , where communities handle maintenance, veterinary care, and minor emergencies internally, limiting external dependencies but constraining population influx and commercial expansion. Such seclusion yields advantages in safeguarding the region's character, shielding it from urban sprawl and intensive development that have transformed more accessible frontiers elsewhere. By deterring mass tourism and subdivision, isolation sustains expansive open spaces vital for traditional ranching, wildlife corridors, and unaltered ecosystems, preserving a frontier ethos of stewardship over vast, undivided lands rather than fragmented parcels. This dynamic has historically favored enduring land uses aligned with the area's arid, high-desert topography, fostering resilience against broader societal pressures for homogenization.

Natural Features and Conservation

Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems

The Arizona Strip features a diverse array of ecosystems shaped by its elevation gradient, from low-elevation scrublands dominated by bush () and () to mid-elevation desertscrub with blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima), (), and shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia), and higher-elevation pinyon-juniper woodlands transitioning to () edges. These plant communities reflect adaptations to arid conditions, with fire-resilient species in woodlands that historically experienced frequent low-intensity burns, promoting regeneration through serotinous cones and thick bark. Rare riparian habitats along streams like the Virgin and Paria Rivers support specialized flora such as cottonwoods (Populus fremontii) and willows (Salix spp.), fostering higher moisture-dependent biodiversity amid surrounding xeric landscapes. The region's vascular plant diversity includes numerous endemics and special-status species, such as the listed cacti Pediocactus sileri and P. bradyi, which occupy limestone habitats and contribute to localized ecological niches. Mammalian fauna includes (Antilocapra americana), which graze open shrublands, and (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) navigating rocky cliffs, alongside reptiles like the Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii), a herbivore reliant on perennial shrubs for forage in lowland deserts north of the . Avian feature reintroduced California condors (Gymnogyps californianus), which forage across the landscape scavenging large carcasses, particularly in areas like , supporting nutrient cycling in open terrains. The Strip serves as a migratory corridor for birds, with hummingbirds (Archilochus spp.) and warblers utilizing seasonal nectar sources and insect abundance during passage. Aquatic ecosystems in intermittent riparian zones harbor endemic fish adapted to variable flows, though populations of species like the (Xyrauchen texanus) remain marginal outside mainstem influences, emphasizing the fragility of these habitats in sustaining . Overall, these assemblages highlight the Strip's role in regional ecological connectivity, with species interactions driving resilience in a semi-arid matrix.

Protected Lands and Monuments

The Arizona Strip includes multiple federally designated protected areas managed primarily by the (BLM) and (NPS), emphasizing preservation of geological formations and cultural sites while allowing certain multiple uses such as grazing, hunting, and fishing. Key designations stem from the of 1906, with expansions in the late to safeguard unique landscapes from development. Vermilion Cliffs National Monument, proclaimed on November 9, 2000, covers approximately 293,000 acres of rugged terrain featuring dramatic red rock cliffs, slot canyons, and colorful geological layers formed over millions of years. Managed by the BLM, it protects these features for scientific study and public appreciation, with access limited to maintain primitive conditions; activities like backcountry hiking and limited livestock grazing are permitted under resource management plans. Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument, established on January 11, 2000, spans 1,048,321 acres adjacent to the Grand Canyon, encompassing volcanic plateaus, deep canyons, and isolated wilderness. Jointly administered by the BLM (812,581 acres) and NPS (208,449 acres), it prioritizes the conservation of natural and cultural resources, including ancient petroglyphs, while authorizing compatible uses such as mineral exploration under existing rights and recreational hunting seasons. Pipe Spring National Monument, designated on May 31, 1923, preserves 40 acres centered on a historic spring vital to Kaibab Paiute Indigenous communities and later who constructed a fort in 1870. Operated by the NPS, the site interprets 12,000 years of human history through exhibits on traditional farming, ranching, and the first Arizona telegraph station established in 1871, with ongoing cultural demonstrations and limited grazing on surrounding lands. The , designated under the Arizona Wilderness Act of 1984, includes about 89,400 acres in within its total 112,500 acres straddling the border. Managed by the BLM, this wilderness area prohibits motorized vehicles, roads, and structures to preserve its pristine slot canyons, riparian habitats, and geological wonders like The Wave, while permitting non-motorized and hunting.

Controversies

Federal Management vs. Local Control

The (BLM) administers over two-thirds of the Arizona Strip's approximately 3 million acres through its Arizona Strip Field Office, which encompasses 1,679,896 acres dedicated to multiple-use management including grazing, recreation, and conservation. When combined with adjacent holdings by the (Grand Canyon National Park) and U.S. Forest Service, federal ownership surpasses 90 percent of the region, limiting state and private influence over land-use decisions. The BLM's Resource Management Plan (RMP), approved via a 2007 Record of Decision and finalized in 2008, mandates sustained yield under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 but prioritizes environmental protections, resulting in grazing allotments capped at sustainable levels often below historical capacities. Local stakeholders, including ranchers and Mohave County officials, contend that federal dominance undermines economic viability, citing the Strip's isolation from 's population centers and cultural affinity with southern as grounds for alternative governance. Historical efforts, such as 's post-1896 bids for the Strip—motivated by shared Mormon settler heritage and practical boundary adjustments—highlight persistent frustrations with 's administrative detachment, though these petitions failed amid interstate disputes. maintains claims to state trust lands interspersed as enclaves within federal tracts, arguing for sovereign authority over these holdings granted at statehood for revenue generation, despite BLM oversight complicating access and development. BLM-imposed grazing reductions, aligned with RMP utilization standards of 50 percent or less, have correlated with localized herd contractions, exacerbating rancher attrition as operational costs rise amid burdens like environmental assessments and permit renewals. For instance, broader ranching data show herd liquidations driven by federal restrictions alongside , with permittees facing surcharges and non-renewals that diminish land-based income. Conversely, evidence from managed systems on the Strip, including 1970s rest-rotation implementations with water catchments, demonstrates range enhancements such as uniform distribution and elevated plant species frequency, underscoring potential for local to yield ecological gains without prohibitive federal interventions. These outcomes fuel disputes, with ranchers attributing multimillion-dollar economic losses to perceived BLM overreach, as federal plans constrain adaptive practices proven effective in arid ecosystems.

Resource Extraction and Environmental Debates

The Arizona Strip contains significant deposits in breccia pipes, which have supported intermittent operations since the mid-20th century, contributing to national energy supplies but sparking debates over long-term environmental risks. In 2012, the U.S. Department of the Interior withdrew approximately 1 million acres of in , including parts of the Arizona Strip north of , from new claims to protect and quality amid concerns over from and . Proponents of extraction, including local stakeholders, argue that modern regulatory standards and economic benefits—such as job creation in rural Mohave and Coconino counties—outweigh risks, citing historical operations that operated without widespread verifiable harm to regional . Environmental organizations, however, reference elevated levels in monitoring wells near past sites as evidence of potential aquifer pollution that could affect the watershed, though peer-reviewed analyses indicate that documented exceedances often stem from natural background levels rather than mining alone. Livestock grazing on the Arizona Strip's arid rangelands, managed under Bureau of Land Management (BLM) allotments totaling over 1.6 million acres, employs rest-rotation systems implemented since the late 1960s to promote forage recovery and prevent degradation. These practices, combined with water catchment developments installed collaboratively since the 1940s, distribute grazing pressure evenly, enhancing habitat utilization by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and bighorn sheep while maintaining soil stability in a water-limited ecosystem. Critics alleging overgrazing cite visual indicators like reduced shrub cover, but empirical data from BLM monitoring and Arizona Game and Fish Department assessments show that moderate grazing correlates with stable or improved wildlife populations, including deer, compared to ungrazed exclosures where invasive species proliferation has been observed in analogous arid systems. Grazing also serves a verifiable role in fuel load reduction, mitigating wildfire intensity in pinyon-juniper woodlands prone to catastrophic burns, as demonstrated by targeted grazing studies reducing herbaceous fuels by up to 50% under controlled utilization rates. Off-highway vehicle (OHV) use for intersects with resource extraction debates through conflicts over trail proliferation damaging archaeological resources and sensitive habitats, prompting lawsuits such as those filed in 2009 and 2011 by conservation groups challenging BLM travel management plans for the Grand Canyon-Parashant and National Monuments. These suits alleged violations of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act by failing to minimize impacts on cultural sites and habitats, yet federal courts upheld BLM's mitigation strategies, including route designations and monitoring, finding insufficient evidence of irreversible harm. Local advocates emphasize that regulated OHV access supports eco-tourism revenue without precluding sustainable or claims, while environmental litigants push for broader closures, often prioritizing preservation over multipurpose use despite data indicating that balanced management sustains better than exclusionary policies, as evidenced by stable mule deer densities in actively grazed allotments. Monument expansions since 2000 have curtailed potential development on thousands of acres, illustrating trade-offs where verifiable conservation of scenic values coexists with forgone economic opportunities, underscoring causal tensions between federal restrictions and local resource-dependent livelihoods.

References

  1. https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/2bf0e5d3-8ac3-4bb8-8d3e-32cfb2737d31
  2. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/master/pnp/habshaer/az/az0500/az0599/data/az0599data.pdf
  3. https://npshistory.com/publications/grca/adj-lands-study-1981.pdf
  4. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2014/1141/pdf/ofr2014-1141_front.pdf
  5. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/BLM/AZstrip/ArizonaStripManagementPlanFEISRod.pdf
  6. https://www.blm.gov/blog/2025-04-15/arizona-strip-now-time-fire-and-fuels-work
  7. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/parkplanning/upload/Pipe-Spring-National-Monument-Foundation-Document-Overview.pdf
  8. https://stgeorgeutah.com/opinion/pipe-spring-day-an-epicenter-of-conflict-and-reconciliation-on-the-arizona-strip/article_acbb21a5-d11e-53e5-9033-0f02e30c1093.html
  9. https://wchsutah.org/az-strip/arizona-strip-utah.php
  10. https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/lup/95271/130270/158419/RecordofDecision%28ROD%29.pdf
  11. https://aztrail.org/visit-the-arizona-strip-remote-wild-sparsely-populated-beyond-the-grand-canyon/
  12. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/pisp/adhi/adhi1.htm
  13. https://www.uen.org/utah_history_encyclopedia/a/Arizona_Strip.shtml
  14. https://grcahistory.org/sites/beyond-park-boundaries/blms-arizona-strip/
  15. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr95559
  16. https://www.surgent.net/highpoints/az/range/kaibab.html
  17. https://www.peakbagger.com/peak.aspx?pid=3904
  18. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2004/2863/
  19. https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2440/report.pdf
  20. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/8847/vermilion-cliffs-and-paria-river-arizona
  21. https://www.geologypage.com/2018/03/vermilion-cliffs.html
  22. https://www.nps.gov/places/nampaweap.htm
  23. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1210/of2011-1210.pdf
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169555X06001322
  25. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3108/
  26. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5276/sir2012-5276.pdf
  27. https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/lup/95159/137643/168251/AZSTRIP_Chapter_3.pdf
  28. https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?azpipe
  29. https://awcs.azgfd.com/habitats/great-basin-desertscrub
  30. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1274/of2008-1274.pdf
  31. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1998/4263/report.pdf
  32. https://www.academia.edu/33366842/From_the_Canyon_to_the_Staircase_Expanding_the_Paleolithic_Presence_in_the_Arizona_Strip
  33. https://npshistory.com/publications/grca/ua-v7n1-1994.pdf
  34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/481516
  35. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/pisp/adhi/adhi1e.htm
  36. https://core.tdar.org/document/394734/man-models-and-management-an-overview-of-the-archaeology-of-the-arizona-strip-and-the-management-of-its-cultural-resources
  37. https://www.ancientartarchive.org/international_site/nampaweap-petroglyph-site-arizona-usa/
  38. https://www.blm.gov/visit/dominguez-escalante-site
  39. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/676356/azu_h9791v436z_b694e_w.pdf?sequence=1
  40. https://npshistory.com/publications/tuma/nmhr-v21n4-1946.pdf
  41. https://npshistory.com/publications/pisp/adhi/chap1.htm
  42. https://npshistory.com/publications/pisp/brochures/1966.pdf
  43. https://www.nps.gov/pisp/learn/photosmultimedia/the-mormon-militia-and-pipe-sprin.htm
  44. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/pisp/adhi/adhi1f.htm
  45. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/az-hashknife/
  46. https://www.arizonahighways.com/archive/issues/chapter/Doc.387.Chapter.2
  47. https://npshistory.com/publications/para/yanawant-2.pdf
  48. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/blm/history/chap5.htm
  49. https://kjzz.org/content/1699769/long-history-uranium-mining-arizona-strip
  50. https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/arizona/fredonia
  51. https://www.azcommerce.com/a/profiles/ViewProfile/61/Fredonia/
  52. https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/arizona/colorado-city
  53. https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0405490
  54. https://samnegri.wordpress.com/2014/02/03/the-arizona-strip-a-place-of-splendid-isolation/
  55. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fundamentalist-mormon-town-modernization-highlights-stark-divide-n948281
  56. https://www.npr.org/2005/05/03/4627871/polygamists-on-utah-arizona-border-under-scrutiny
  57. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/25/us/polygamous-community-defies-state-crackdown.html
  58. https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/red-vs-blue-rural-vs-urban-arizonas-voting-patterns-2022-show-familiar-divide
  59. https://www.nps.gov/pisp/planyourvisit/things2do.htm
  60. https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2014/4/26/1294892/-Bundyville-and-the-Arizona-Strip
  61. https://www.coconino.az.gov/DocumentCenter/View/68740
  62. https://www.nps.gov/pisp/planyourvisit/ranching.htm
  63. https://www.grandcanyontrust.org/sites/default/files/resources/Environmental_History_Kane_and_Two_Mile_Ranches.pdf
  64. https://extension.usu.edu/rangelands/research/grazing-on-the-arizona-strip-catchment-history-and-repair
  65. https://azgrazingclearinghouse.org/blm-arizona-strip-field-office-ranches/
  66. https://members.afgc.org/site_public_documents2.cfm?pk_association_document=34354
  67. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/rangelands/article/download/10783/10056
  68. https://tucson.com/news/local/arizona-has-long-history-of-uranium-mining/article_4ed3ae9a-9a29-5d10-9fce-bda6cd0f6ce3.html
  69. https://www.nps.gov/para/learn/historyculture/copper-from-discovery-to-boom-to-ruin.htm
  70. https://www.nps.gov/para/learn/nature/breccia-pipe-mining-on-the-arizona-strip-and-in-the-grand-canyon.htm
  71. https://azgs.arizona.edu/minerals/mining-arizona
  72. https://www.blm.gov/programs/energy-and-minerals/mining-and-minerals/about
  73. https://naturalgasintel.com/news/arizona-geological-survey-eyes-shale-potential/
  74. https://azgs.arizona.edu/energy/geothermal-arizona
  75. https://huntwise.com/field-guide/deer/what-to-know-about-the-az-strip-mule-deer-hunt
  76. https://outdoors-international.com/az-strip-13a-13b/
  77. https://www.gohunt.com/tools/profiles/arizona/units/big-game-unit-13b
  78. https://www.blm.gov/visit/buckskin-gulch
  79. https://www.recreation.gov/activitypass/10006175
  80. https://azoffroad.net/arizona-strip-trip
  81. https://mwg.aaa.com/via/road-trips/arizona-strip-route-89a
  82. https://www.fredoniaaz.gov/about-us
  83. https://npshistory.com/publications/blm/vermilion-cliffs/mgr-rpt-2023.pdf
  84. https://www.aaroads.com/guides/us-089a-az
  85. https://azdot.gov/adot-blog/highway-history-us-89a-bitter-springs-fredonia
  86. https://www.aaroads.com/guides/az-389
  87. https://mohavecountyhighways.com/state-highway-389/index.htm
  88. https://www.arizonahighways.com/house-rock-valley-road
  89. https://kanabtourcompany.com/blog/what-is-house-rock-valley-road-info-details-tips-part-one/
  90. https://www.blm.gov/office/arizona-strip-field-office
  91. https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2025/07/26/competitors-veto-blocks-rural-access-to-em-services/
  92. https://www.unitekemt.com/blog/rural-vs-urban-differences-in-emt-responses-and-resources/
  93. https://bar10.com/facility/landing-strip/
  94. https://www.arizonahighways.com/article/parashant-its-easier-said-done
  95. https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-environment/2025/07/19/grand-canyon-fires-imperil-wildlife-but-species-are-resilient/85263947007/
  96. https://extension.arizona.edu/sites/extension.arizona.edu/files/pubs/az1432.pdf
  97. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs/rmrs_p023/rmrs_p023_078_082.pdf
  98. https://www.guidefitter.com/hunt/16312-mule-deer-elk-sheep-antelope
  99. https://www.scfh.org/desert-tortoise
  100. https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/nature/condor-reintroduction-and-recovery.htm?fullweb=1
  101. https://phainopeplafables.com/2011/08/09/birding-the-arizona-strip/
  102. https://www.fws.gov/species/razorback-sucker-xyrauchen-texanus
  103. https://www.blm.gov/blog/2024-05-30/blm-arizona-partners-improve-ecosystem-health-gcpnm
  104. https://www.blm.gov/programs/national-conservation-lands/arizona
  105. https://www.nps.gov/para/learn/management/index.htm
  106. https://www.blm.gov/national-conservation-lands/arizona/vermilion-cliffs/proclamation
  107. https://www.blm.gov/national-conservation-lands/arizona/vermilion-cliffs
  108. https://www.nps.gov/para/planyourvisit/brochure.htm
  109. https://www.blm.gov/visit/grand-canyon-parashant-national-monument
  110. https://www.nps.gov/pisp/
  111. https://www.nps.gov/pisp/planyourvisit/pipe-spring-centennial.htm
  112. https://wilderness.net/visit-wilderness/?ID=444
  113. https://www.blm.gov/programs/recreation/permits-and-passes/lotteries-and-permit-systems/arizona/coyote-buttes-north
  114. https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/95271/510
  115. https://wchsutah.org/towns/washington-county-boundaries5.pdf
  116. https://land.az.gov/our-agency-mission/history-trust-land
  117. https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/impact-megadrought-arizona-cattle-ranchers-slashing-herds-cut-costs
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0190052816300906
  119. https://www.fb.org/news-release/afbf-challenges-blm-rule-that-destabilizes-ranching
  120. https://www.wise-uranium.org/upusaaz.html
  121. https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/nepa/65159/97609/117765/Water_Development_EA_%28Final%29.pdf
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000824
  123. https://earthjustice.org/press/2009/groups-sue-over-plans-harmful-to-arizona-strip-national-monuments
  124. https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/100411_az_strip/
  125. https://arizona.aws.openrepository.com/handle/10150/644690
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.