Hubbry Logo
Asset-based lendingAsset-based lendingMain
Open search
Asset-based lending
Community hub
Asset-based lending
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Asset-based lending
Asset-based lending
Asset-based lending
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Asset-based lending is any kind of lending secured by an asset. This means, if the loan is not repaid, the asset is taken. In this sense, a mortgage is an example of an asset-based loan. More commonly however, the phrase is used to describe lending to business and large corporations using assets not normally used in other loans. Typically, the different types of asset-based loans include accounts receivable financing, inventory financing, equipment financing, or real estate financing.[1] Asset-based lending in this more specific sense is possible only in certain countries whose legal systems allow borrowers to pledge such assets to lenders as collateral for loans (through the creation of enforceable security interests).

Usage

[edit]

Asset-based lending is usually done when the normal routes of raising funds is not possible, such as the capital markets (selling bonds to investors) and normal unsecured or mortgage secured bank. This is often because the company has exhausted other capital raising options or needs more immediate capital for project financing needs (such as inventory purchases, mergers, acquisitions, and debt purchasing). Asset-based loans are also usually accompanied by lower interest rates, as in the event of a default the lender can recoup its investment by seizing and liquidating the assets tied to the loan.[2]

Many financial services companies now use asset-based lending package of structured and leveraged financial services. Many banks, both national investment banks (e.g. Citi, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, et al.) and regional banks, offer these services to corporate clients.

Asset-based lenders are known for taking out tombstone ads in much the same way as investment banks.[3]

An example of asset-based loan usage was when the global securitization market shrank to an all-time low after the collapse of investment bank Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc in 2008.[4] Within Europe in 2008, over 710 billion euros worth of bonds were issued, backed largely by asset-based loans, such as home and auto loans.

Asset-based lending, once considered a last-resort finance option, has become a popular choice for companies and individuals that do not have the credit ratings, track record, or patience to pursue more traditional capital sources.

Features of asset-based loans

[edit]

Asset-based loans

[edit]

An asset-based business line of credit is usually designed for the same purpose as a normal business line of credit: to allow the company to bridge itself between the timing of cashflows of payments it receives and expenses. The primary timing issue involves what are known as accounts receivables—the delay between selling something to a customer and receiving payment for it.[5]

A non-asset-based line of credit will have a credit limit set on account opening by the accounts receivables size, to ensure that it is used for the correct purpose. An asset-based line of credit however, will generally have a revolving credit limit that fluctuates based on the actual accounts-receivable balances that the company has on an ongoing basis. This requires the lender to monitor and audit the company to evaluate the accounts receivable size, but also allows for larger limit lines of credits and can allow companies to borrow that which it normally would not be able. Generally, terms stipulating seizure of collateral in the event of default allow the lender to profitably collect the money owed to the company should the company default on its obligations.[2]

Factoring receivables

[edit]

Factoring of receivables is a subset of asset-based lending (which uses inventory or other assets as collateral). The lender mitigates its risk by controlling with whom the company does business to make sure that the company's customers can actually pay.[6]

Lines of credit may require that the company deposit all of its funds into a "blocked" account. The lender then approves any withdrawals from that account by the company and controls when the company pays down the line of credit balance.[citation needed]

Pledging receivables

[edit]

Still another subset of a collateralized loan is a pledging of receivables and an assignment of receivables as collateral for the debt. In these instances, receivables are transferred to the lender when they are pledged as collateral. When the receivables are pledged as collateral, or assigned with the condition that the lender has recourse in the event the receivables are uncollectible, the receivables continue to be reported as the borrower's asset on the borrower's balance sheet and only a footnote is required to indicate these receivables are used as collateral for debt. The debt is reported as a liability on the borrower's balance sheet and as an asset (specifically, a receivable) on the lender’s balance sheet.

In some situations, the lender can actually repledge or sell the collateral the borrower used to secure the loan from the lender. In this instance, the borrower continues to recognize the receivables as an asset on its balance sheet, and the lender only records the liability associated with the obligation to return the asset.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Asset-based lending

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Asset-based lending (ABL) is a specialized form of financing in which loans or lines of are secured by a borrower's collateral, typically consisting of current assets such as , , or , to provide for operations. This approach allows lenders to extend based on the value and of these assets rather than solely on the borrower's or , making it accessible for companies with stable but asset-heavy balance sheets. The mechanics of ABL revolve around a borrowing base, a formula that calculates the maximum available as a of eligible collateral values, such as 70-85% of and 50-80% of the net orderly value (NOLV) of , depending on the valuation method and risk factors. Lenders maintain strict monitoring through mechanisms like field audits, lockbox arrangements for collections, and covenants that trigger cash dominion—directing all receipts to the lender—in case of borrowing base deficiencies or covenant breaches. Facilities are often structured as revolving lines of , with primary repayment sourced from the conversion of pledged assets into cash during the borrower's operating cycle. ABL offers several advantages, including lower interest rates compared to unsecured loans due to the collateral's protective role, which mitigates lender , and greater flexibility for businesses in seasonal or cyclical industries to access funds without selling assets outright. However, it comes with drawbacks such as higher administrative costs from ongoing collateral verification, limitations on using pledged assets for other purposes, and the potential for asset seizure in default scenarios. This financing is particularly suited to small- and mid-sized enterprises with significant tangible assets but weaker cash flows, as well as firms undergoing turnarounds or operating in volatile sectors like or retail. For instance, a manufacturer might secure a $100,000 line against $200,000 in and receivables, advancing 50% on less liquid items, enabling it to bridge cash shortfalls during production cycles. Regulatory oversight, such as from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), emphasizes robust in ABL portfolios due to elevated credit and operational risks.

Overview

Definition

Asset-based lending (ABL) is a form of secured financing in which a borrower pledges specific assets, such as , , or , as collateral to obtain , with the amount available for borrowing directly tied to the appraised value of those assets. This approach is particularly suited for businesses with high leverage, seasonal operations, or inconsistent flows that may not qualify for traditional unsecured loans. At its core, ABL operates as a facility where loan advances are calculated as a of the eligible collateral's value, known as the advance rate, ensuring the lender maintains a margin of safety. Typical advance rates range from 70% to 90% against eligible and 50% to 70% against , depending on the asset quality and borrower's profile. The primary repayment source is the conversion of these assets to through the borrower's operating cycle, emphasizing collateral convertibility to over the term. Unlike lending, which assesses a borrower's ability to repay based on projected future operating s and typically does not require collateral, ABL focuses on the current liquidation value of assets to mitigate . In the basic process, the lender conducts initial to verify asset eligibility, advances funds against the pledged collateral via a borrowing base formula, and performs ongoing monitoring through reports and audits to adjust availability as asset values fluctuate.

Historical development

Asset-based lending traces its roots to merchant factoring practices in during the , where financiers like provided advances against future receivables to support trade ventures, enabling merchants to fund operations without waiting for payment on goods sold. These early forms of collateralized financing laid the groundwork for securing loans with tangible assets such as and . By the , similar practices evolved in the United States, particularly in , where factoring emerged in the early 1800s to support rapidly growing manufacturers and other industries like and apparel, allowing businesses to borrow against shipments and sales in an era of expanding domestic commerce. The modern structure of asset-based lending began to take shape in the , with receivables factoring and discounting structures gaining prominence in the as a response to industrial expansion. Post-World War II, the practice experienced significant growth in the and , driven by postwar industrial recovery and the need for in sectors; this period saw the establishment of the Commercial Finance Association in 1944 (now the Secured Finance Network), which standardized practices and advocated for the industry amid rising demand. The adoption of the Uniform Commercial Code's Article 9 starting in 1952, with widespread state-by-state implementation by 1970 and revisions in 1972, further propelled asset-based lending by providing a uniform legal framework for secured transactions in , making it more accessible and enforceable. In the 1980s, asset-based lending surged alongside the boom, serving as a key financing tool for acquisitions where high debt levels required collateralized facilities to mitigate risk, often integrated with syndicated loans and high-yield bonds. Following the , the practice resurged as a lifeline for distressed firms, with non-bank lenders filling gaps left by tightened traditional bank lending and markets expanding to over $1.6 trillion in assets by the mid-2020s, emphasizing asset-backed structures for stability. In the 2020s, integration with innovations like has enhanced asset verification and transparency in lending processes, while global adoption has accelerated in emerging markets, where the overall asset-based lending market grew from approximately $701 billion in 2024 to projections exceeding $1.3 trillion by 2030, supporting in regions like Asia and .

Key mechanisms

Borrowing base calculation

The borrowing base in asset-based lending represents the maximum amount a borrower can draw from a facility, calculated as a of the value of eligible collateral to account for and risk. This dynamic limit ensures that advances are tied directly to the borrower's verifiable assets, such as and , providing lenders with a safety margin against potential losses. The standard formula for the borrowing base is: Borrowing Base=(Eligible Receivables×Advance Rate)+(Eligible Inventory×Advance Rate)+(Other Eligible Assets×Advance Rate)−Reserves\text{Borrowing Base} = (\text{Eligible Receivables} \times \text{Advance Rate}) + (\text{Eligible Inventory} \times \text{Advance Rate}) + (\text{Other Eligible Assets} \times \text{Advance Rate}) - \text{Reserves} Advance rates typically range from 70-85% for receivables and 50-65% for inventory, reflecting discounts or "haircuts" of 15-50% to cover liquidation costs and illiquidity risks; reserves are deductions for factors like outstanding fees or anticipated dilution. Eligibility criteria determine which assets qualify for inclusion, ensuring only liquid and collectible items are considered. For receivables, only those arising from ordinary business operations with terms up to 90 days are eligible, excluding those over 90 days past due, concentrations exceeding 20% from any single , or receivables from affiliates, entities, or foreign buyers without additional safeguards. eligibility requires assets to be owned outright, salable in the ordinary course, and free of liens, while excluding obsolete, perishable, work-in-progress, or consigned ; other assets like may be included at lower advance rates if appraised as . The calculation process involves several procedural steps to establish and update the borrowing base. First, assets are appraised at or net orderly value through borrower reports or third-party audits. Second, eligibility filters are applied to exclude non-qualifying items. Third, advance rates—serving as haircuts of 10-20% or more for illiquidity—are multiplied by the eligible values, with additional discounts for specific risks like seasonal fluctuations. Finally, reserves are subtracted, and the base is reconciled monthly (or more frequently) via borrowing base certificates submitted by the borrower, often verified through field examinations to confirm accuracy. For example, consider a borrower with $1 million in eligible receivables qualifying for an 85% advance rate and $500,000 in eligible at a 60% advance rate, with no reserves applied. The borrowing base would be calculated as (1,000,000×0.85)+(1,000,000 × 0.85) + (500,000 × 0.60) = $850,000 + $300,000 = $1,150,000, representing the maximum available credit at that time.

Collateral evaluation and monitoring

In asset-based lending, collateral evaluation begins with initial audits conducted prior to to assess the quality, liquidity, and eligibility of pledged assets, such as and . These audits typically involve field examinations by the lender or third-party firms to verify asset existence, condition, and documentation, including on-site inspections and reviews of internal controls to detect potential or inaccuracies. Appraisals by independent experts are often required for complex assets like or to establish baseline values, ensuring the collateral provides adequate for the . Valuation techniques prioritize conservative estimates to mitigate liquidation risks. For inventory, lenders commonly use net orderly value (NOLV), which represents the estimated proceeds from an orderly sale over a reasonable period (typically 6 to 12 months), net of selling costs and discounts, as determined by certified appraisers. are valued using aging schedules to categorize invoices by due date, identifying delinquencies (e.g., those over 90 days past terms) and dilutions—reductions in collectible value due to returns, allowances, or disputes—which are excluded or reserved against to reflect true realizable amounts. These methods ensure valuations align with the borrowing base formula's requirements for eligible collateral. Ongoing monitoring is essential to maintain collateral integrity and involves regular field examinations, often quarterly for higher-risk borrowers, to re-verify asset values and compliance. Lenders employ automated reporting systems for borrowers to submit borrowing base certificates, aging reports, and summaries on a weekly or monthly basis, enabling real-time tracking of fluctuations. Covenants typically mandate minimum asset coverage ratios, such as maintaining excess availability at 10% to 15% of the borrowing base, with triggers for reductions if concentrations exceed thresholds (e.g., over 10% from a single customer) or dilution surpasses acceptable levels (e.g., 5%). These tools, combined with lockbox arrangements for cash control, allow lenders to adjust advances promptly in response to deteriorating collateral quality. For specific asset categories, verification includes customer confirmations—positive or negative requests sent directly to obligors—to substantiate balances and terms, supplemented by reviews of disputes and concentrations during field exams. is categorized into raw materials, work-in-progress, and , with evaluations focusing on salability and ; and marketable raw materials generally receive higher eligibility due to quicker potential, while work-in-progress is often discounted or excluded for its lower . These processes ensure continuous oversight tailored to each asset type's risk profile.

Types of asset-based financing

Receivables-based financing

Receivables-based financing, a core component of asset-based lending, utilizes as the primary collateral to provide businesses with immediate . This approach allows companies to convert unpaid invoices into cash, addressing gaps without relying on traditional lines. Lenders evaluate the , age, and collectibility of receivables to determine eligibility, typically advancing a portion of their while mitigating risks through monitoring and reserves. Factoring involves the outright sale of to a third-party factor at a discount, providing quick without adding to the borrower's . The factor purchases the , often advancing 80-90% of their value immediately, and collects payments directly from . Typical discount fees range from 1% to 5% of the amount, depending on factors like age, customer creditworthiness, and industry norms; these fees cover the factor's services and . Factoring can be structured with recourse, where the seller repurchases uncollected , or non-recourse, in which the factor assumes the collection , often at a higher . In notification factoring, are informed to remit payments to the factor, streamlining collections; a reserve account, typically holding 10-20% of the value, retains the remainder until full payment is received. In contrast, pledging receivables allows the borrower to retain and control of the invoices while granting the lender a as collateral for a revolving . The lender advances 80-90% of eligible receivables' value, with the borrower responsible for collections and remitting proceeds to reduce the loan balance. This on-balance-sheet arrangement fosters an ongoing lender-borrower relationship, often involving periodic reporting, aging schedules, and audits to ensure collateral integrity; ineligible items, such as those over 90 days past due, are excluded from advances. Unlike factoring, pledging does not transfer risk or , positioning it as a secured borrowing rather than a sale. The primary differences between factoring and pledging lie in ownership transfer, allocation, and financial reporting. Factoring provides treatment for true sales (non-recourse), delivering immediate with minimal administrative burden on the borrower, but at the of relationships potentially shifting to the factor. Pledging maintains on-balance-sheet receivables and collections under borrower control, supporting sustained financing needs through a , though it requires stricter compliance and monitoring. Both methods prioritize , high-quality receivables, but factoring suits businesses seeking speed and transfer, while pledging aligns with those preferring relational lending.

Inventory and equipment financing

Inventory financing within asset-based lending allows businesses to obtain advances against their holdings of raw materials, work-in-process (WIP), or , serving as collateral to support needs. These advances typically feature lower rates of 50-70% of the eligible 's value, reflecting the assets' susceptibility to market volatility, perishability, and slower compared to receivables. Lenders categorize by type to determine eligibility, with often receiving higher advances than raw materials due to their proximity to sale, though all require verification of ownership and condition to mitigate risks like duplication or encumbrances. Equipment financing, another pillar of asset-based lending, provides loans or leases secured by machinery, , or other fixed assets essential to operations, enabling businesses to acquire or refinance such items. Valuations commonly rely on the forced value (FLV), which estimates the recoverable amount in a distressed sale scenario, ensuring lenders can recoup funds if the borrower defaults. This approach often incorporates purchase money security interests (PMSIs), where the lender retains priority over the specific financed, superseding prior liens under the . Advance rates for typically range from 40-60% of FLV, adjusted based on the asset's age, condition, and market . Key processes in these financings include tailored accommodations for business cycles, such as increased advances for seasonal builds in retail sectors to stock up ahead of periods like holidays. For , lenders track individual items via serial numbers or VINs to verify existence and location during collateral inspections, facilitating precise perfection and recovery. Appraisals are conducted by certified valuators adhering to standards like USPAP, providing or values to support borrowing base adjustments and ensure compliance with lending covenants. Valuation challenges in inventory financing arise from obsolescence risks, where goods may lose value due to technological changes or fashion shifts, and ongoing storage costs that erode collateral worth over time. In the apparel industry, for instance, seasonal stock builds heighten these issues, as unsold items from one cycle may become obsolete, requiring lenders to impose strict eligibility criteria like turnover ratios. For manufacturing, equipment financing faces similar hurdles with machinery prone to rapid depreciation or functional obsolescence, compounded by maintenance expenses that impact resale values. These factors necessitate rigorous due diligence, including field audits and insurance verification, to maintain collateral integrity. For small businesses, inventory and equipment financing offer distinct advantages and limitations. Pros include high approval rates due to the collateral nature of the financing; for equipment loans, approval rates reach 68% according to the Federal Reserve Banks’ 2024 Small Business Credit Survey. These options can finance 80-100% of equipment purchase costs (with possible down payments up to 20%), while inventory advances typically cover 50-70% of eligible value. Equipment financing also provides tax benefits, such as Section 179 deductions allowing businesses to write off up to $1,220,000 of equipment costs in the year of purchase for the 2024 tax year. However, both are limited to specific purchases—inventory financing to stock and equipment to machinery or vehicles—making them unsuitable for general working capital needs. They are particularly suitable for retail, manufacturing, and service businesses acquiring gear or inventory to support operations. Cons include potential repayment challenges if assets do not generate expected revenue, higher interest rates due to risks like obsolescence, and the requirement for businesses to cover maintenance or storage costs.

Applications and usage

Target industries and scenarios

Asset-based lending is predominantly utilized in asset-intensive sectors where businesses hold significant balances of receivables, , or that can serve as collateral. In , it provides to support production cycles, enabling companies to raw materials and labor during extended manufacturing periods before sales generate . Retail and wholesale businesses often rely on ABL to manage seasonal fluctuations, such as stocking up for peaks or bridging cash gaps between supplier payments and customer sales. Small businesses in retail, manufacturing, and service industries are prime candidates for inventory and equipment financing, which offers high approval rates and tax benefits, though limited to specific purchases; for details on these pros and cons, see the types of asset-based financing section. The frequently employs ABL against receivables from insurers and government programs to address delayed reimbursements, ensuring steady operational funding for providers like hospitals and clinics. Transportation firms, including trucking and operators, use it to fleets, covering , , and expansion without tying up equity in vehicles. Common scenarios for ABL deployment include periods of rapid business growth where companies require immediate capital infusions to scale operations without issuing new equity, preserving ownership control. It is also applied in turnaround situations for undercapitalized firms facing crunches, allowing them to restructure while leveraging existing assets for short-term survival. Additionally, ABL supports acquisitions and expansions, providing bridge financing for mergers or facility upgrades in industries with cyclical cash flows. As of 2023, asset-based lending accounted for approximately $519 billion in commitments in the , reflecting a 3.4% increase from the prior year and representing a substantial portion of secured commercial . As of the end of 2024, commitments reached approximately $542 billion. Following the , there has been a notable surge in ABL for e-commerce inventory financing, driven by accelerated online retail growth and the need to fund increased stock levels amid disruptions. Illustrative cases include manufacturers utilizing receivables-based ABL to finance imports from overseas suppliers, mitigating and timing risks in global supply chains. Distributors in wholesale sectors have bridged supplier payment gaps through inventory financing, enabling them to maintain stock without halting operations during economic downturns.

Advantages over traditional lending

Asset-based lending offers financial advantages over traditional lending by providing higher advance rates against eligible collateral, typically ranging from 70% to 90% of value and 50% to 70% for , compared to the lower loan-to-value ratios often seen in term loans, which may advance only 50% or less on similar assets. This structure enables borrowers to access greater liquidity relative to their asset base, with the revolving nature of ABL facilities allowing draws and repayments to fluctuate with collateral availability, eliminating the need for frequent unlike fixed-term traditional loans. For asset-rich firms, this can result in higher borrowing capacity than cash flow-based loans, which rely more on earnings multiples and offer limited borrowing capacity during periods of variable profitability. Operationally, ABL features faster approval processes, often completed in weeks rather than the months required for traditional loans that involve extensive financial projections and reviews. Lenders place less emphasis on historical profitability or future forecasts, focusing instead on verifiable asset values, making it particularly suitable for cyclical businesses with seasonal or unpredictable earnings. Additionally, interest rates for ABL are competitive for secured financing, often lower than the rates on unsecured traditional loans for similar risk profiles. Strategically, ABL preserves equity ownership by avoiding the dilution associated with or equity financing, while delivering for expansion without the rigid repayment schedules of term loans. This debt-based approach supports growth initiatives in industries like or retail, where asset turnover provides ongoing access tailored to operational needs.

Risks and considerations

Borrower and lender risks

Borrowers in asset-based lending arrangements face significant risks due to the structure's heavy reliance on collateral value for funding availability. If sales decline or receivables become uncollectible, the borrowing base can shrink rapidly, leading to liquidity crunches and potential inability to meet operational needs or repay advances. Additionally, borrowers often incur higher fees compared to traditional loans, including interest rates that are typically higher than traditional loans, with uplifts often ranging from 5% to 9% on accounts receivable advances, origination costs, and expenses from frequent collateral reporting and audits, which can strain cash flow. Covenant breaches, such as violating minimum excess availability thresholds or debt service ratios, are common triggers for default, potentially accelerating repayment demands or imposing cash dominion controls that restrict borrower access to funds. Lenders encounter risks primarily related to collateral quality and borrower behavior, which can erode the security of their position. Collateral dilution occurs when receivables face disputes, returns, or offsets, often reducing eligible value by up to 5%, while or may depreciate or become obsolete, limiting realizable proceeds. in reporting, such as overstating asset values or diverting collections, poses a direct , particularly in higher-risk borrower profiles where may be falsified. In liquidation scenarios following default, lenders may experience shortfalls, with historical recovery rates on secured assets around 70-80%, though recent averages (trailing five years as of ) have been approximately 66%, influenced by market conditions and asset . To mitigate these risks, lenders commonly implement reserves deducted from the borrowing base, such as 10-15% holdbacks on advances to cover potential dilution or costs, providing a buffer against over-reliance or value erosion. requirements on collateral, including credit insurance for receivables, help protect against uncollectible debts or physical damage, often enabling higher advance rates. Cross-collateralization, securing the across multiple asset types like receivables and , enhances overall protection and recovery potential. Post-2020, trends have incorporated AI-driven tools for detection and automated monitoring of affiliated entities in collateral reporting, improving early identification of irregularities. Upon default, outcomes typically involve and of pledged assets, where lenders seize and sell collateral to recover outstanding balances, often resulting in borrower loss of key operational resources like or . UCC filings play a critical role by perfecting security interests and establishing priority liens, ensuring lenders' claims supersede those of unsecured creditors in proceedings. In the , asset-based lending (ABL) operates within a robust legal framework centered on Article 9 of the (UCC), which governs secured transactions involving such as , , and . This provision details the attachment of security interests to collateral, the rights of secured parties, and mechanisms for enforcement upon default, ensuring lenders can claim priority over unsecured creditors. Perfection of these security interests, essential for establishing priority against third parties, is generally accomplished by filing a with the relevant state secretary of state's office, which provides public notice of the . The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 has influenced ABL syndication by imposing retention requirements on securitizations of syndicated loans, including those backed by ABL facilities in collateralized loan obligations (CLOs). Under Section 941, sponsors of such securitizations must retain at least 5% of the , aiming to align originator incentives with loan performance and curb excessive risk-taking observed in the ; this has increased costs and complexity for syndicating larger ABL deals, particularly those intended for resale in secondary markets. Internationally, regulatory approaches to ABL vary significantly. In the , the Financial Collateral Arrangements Directive (2002/47/EC, as amended) promotes cross-border efficiency by standardizing enforcement rules for financial collateral, such as cash, securities, and certain receivables, thereby reducing formalities like notarization or registration for pledges and enabling rapid realization in default scenarios. This directive applies to ABL structures involving cross-border collateral transfers, minimizing legal uncertainties in multinational financing. In the , while post-Brexit rules align closely with the EU framework, factoring and receivable assignments in ABL are regulated under principles of assignment, with any fixed or floating charges over company assets requiring mandatory registration under Part 25 of the within 21 days of creation to maintain enforceability against administrators, liquidators, or other creditors. Compliance obligations in ABL emphasize preventing illicit activities and ensuring transparency, particularly for public entities. Lenders must conduct anti-money laundering (AML) due diligence on receivables, verifying debtor legitimacy and transaction patterns to detect potential laundering through trade-based schemes; in the US, this aligns with the Bank Secrecy Act and FinCEN regulations, while in the UK, it follows the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017, mandating risk-based customer due diligence for all parties involved. For public companies, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 requires disclosure of material off-balance-sheet arrangements, including ABL facilities that could impact financial position, under Section 401, with CEOs and CFOs certifying the accuracy of these reports to enhance investor confidence. As of 2025, evolving ESG reporting mandates, such as those in the International Valuation Standards (IVS) 2025, require valuers to integrate measurable environmental, social, and governance factors into collateral assessments, influencing ABL borrowing bases by adjusting values for sustainability risks like climate exposure in inventory or equipment. Dispute resolution in ABL often centers on lien priorities during insolvency. In US Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, ABL lenders can obtain superpriority status under Section 364(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, elevating their claims above other administrative expenses and providing a on unencumbered assets to incentivize post-petition financing for debtors-in-possession. Intercreditor agreements further clarify these priorities, particularly in multi-lender ABL deals with split collateral structures, where the ABL facility typically holds first-priority s on revolving assets like receivables and , while term loans secure fixed assets, delineating , standstill periods, and remedies to prevent conflicts.

References

  1. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/assetbasedlending.asp
  2. https://www.sba.gov/blog/asset-based-lending-what-upside-downside
  3. https://www.occ.treas.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/asset-based-lending/pub-ch-asset-based-lending.pdf
  4. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/091615/cash-flow-lending-vs-assetbased-lending.asp
  5. https://debanked.com/2021/03/merchant-cash-advance-is-as-old-as-the-renaissance/
  6. https://scomot.com/how-the-medici-family-innovated-banking-systems-to-better-manage-their-business/
  7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1882892
  8. https://wwd.com/business-news/financial/feature/origins-of-factoring-come-full-circle-561920-1973372/
  9. https://fluidcapitalnetwork.com/blog/history-of-factoring
  10. https://www.callodine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Callodine-Commercial-Finance_ABL-Primer_June-2021.pdf
  11. https://www.elfaonline.org/news-and-publications/industry-news/read/2019/07/24/commercial-finance-association-is-now-secured-finance-network
  12. https://www.abladvisor.com/blogs/1870/asset-based-lenders-know-thy-history-know-thyself
  13. https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1199&context=law_faculty
  14. https://www.abfjournal.com/a-primer-on-syndicated-asset-based-lending/
  15. https://caia.org/blog/2025/06/09/evolution-private-credit
  16. https://lex.substack.com/p/fintech-101-the-tokenization-of-real
  17. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/asset-based-lending-industry-worth-080700165.html
  18. https://www.wallstreetprep.com/knowledge/borrowing-base/
  19. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/commercial-lending/borrowing-base/
  20. https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/accts-rec-inventory-financing/pub-ch-accts-rec-inventory-financing.pdf
  21. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2011/aug/20113992/
  22. https://ecapital.com/blog/2022-invoice-factoring-rates-and-costs/
  23. https://www.abc-amega.com/articles/receivables-based-financing/
  24. https://icapital.com/insights/private-credit/asset-based-lending-unpacking-the-risks-and-rewards/
  25. https://www.firstcitizens.com/commercial/solutions/asset-based-lending
  26. https://www.equipmentappraisal.com/blog/topic/forced-liquidation-value
  27. https://www.citizensbank.com/corporate-finance/insights/asset-based-lending-flexible-financing-upswings-downturns.aspx
  28. https://vlx.ai/blog/how-to-ensure-effective-collateral-asset-inspections/
  29. https://www.solvei8.com/article/navigating-seasonal-slumps-apparel-production-planning-for-low-demand-periods
  30. https://www.uphance.com/blog/top-apparel-inventory-management-challenges/
  31. https://efinancialmodels.medium.com/the-challenges-of-starting-a-manufacturing-business-b0373fdcb690
  32. https://www.bankrate.com/loans/small-business/pros-cons-of-equipment-loan/
  33. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/inventory-financing.asp
  34. https://ecapital.com/financial-term/asset-based-lending-abl/
  35. https://www.huntington.com/Commercial/credit-loans-leasing/asset-based-lending
  36. https://www.hklaw.com/en/services/practices/corporate-transactions-and-finance/asset-based-lending
  37. https://www.commercialfund.com/case-studies/abl-for-trucking-company
  38. https://www.gibraltarbc.com/blog/exploring-abl-financing-real-world-scenarios/
  39. https://www.rok.biz/blog/case-study-how-asset-based-lending-helped-a-small-business-grow/
  40. https://www.abladvisor.com/news/38450/asset-based-loan-commitments-grew-in-2023-with-fewer-new-clients-larger-deals
  41. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/investment-banking/lpc/podcast/lending-lowdown/episode-33-evolving-taxonomy-for-direct-lender-vs-bank-arranged-loans
  42. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/asset-based-lending-market
  43. https://www.mhccna.com/en-ca/business-insights/articles/5-ways-manufacturing-companies-benefit-asset-based-lending
  44. https://brileyfarber.com/case-studies/asset-based-lending-the-key-to-unhindered-growth/
  45. https://portercap.com/asset-based-vs-traditional-bank-which-lending-type-should-i-get/
  46. https://www.liveplan.com/blog/funding/asset-based-vs-traditional-lending
  47. https://www.wellsfargo.com/assets/pdf/commercial/insights/business-viewpoints/asset-based-lending-vs-cash-flow-loans-infographic.pdf
  48. https://www.ablfunding.com/blog/asset-based-lending-vs-traditional-lending/
  49. https://www.nerdwallet.com/business/loans/learn/asset-based-lending
  50. https://www.usbank.com/corporate-and-commercial-banking/insights/credit-finance/lending/ABL-mythbusters-asset-based-lending.html
  51. https://caia.org/blog/2025/06/30/asset-based-lending-coming-age-2020s
  52. https://www.comcapfactoring.com/ca/blog/asset-based-loan-rates/
  53. https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/sourceId/101644815
  54. https://www.ssctech.com/blog/mitigate-the-risk-of-asset-based-lending-with-detailed-asset-tracking
  55. https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/9
  56. https://nacm.org/nacm-blog/3114-ucc-article-9-for-dummies
  57. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=ncbi
  58. https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2014/34-73407.pdf
  59. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/financial-markets/post-trade-services/financial-collateral-arrangements_en
  60. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/part/25
  61. https://www.betterbusinessfinance.co.uk/finance_type/asset-based-lending1
  62. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/money-laundering-regulations-your-responsibilities
  63. https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/2003/03/disclosure-required-sections-406-407-sarbanes-oxley-act-2002
  64. https://www.appraisers.org/docs/default-source/5---standards/esg-information-requests-guidance-for-the-business-valuation-professional-v5.pdf?sfvrsn=c15e0d5c_3
  65. https://www.uscourts.gov/court-programs/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-11-bankruptcy-basics
  66. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/2-620-2897?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.