Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Interest rate
View on Wikipedia| Part of a series on |
| Finance |
|---|
| Part of a series on |
| Macroeconomics |
|---|
An interest rate is the amount of interest due per period, as a proportion of the amount lent, deposited, or borrowed. Interest rate periods are ordinarily a year and are often annualized when not. Alongside interest rates, three other variables determine total interest: principal sum, compounding frequency, and length of time.
Interest rates reflect a borrower's willingness to pay for money now over money in the future.[1] In debt financing, companies borrow capital from a bank, in the expectation that the borrowed capital may be used to generate a return on investment greater than the interest rates. Failure of a borrower to continue paying interest is an example of default, which may be followed by bankruptcy proceedings. Collateral is sometimes given in the event of default.
In monetary policy and macroeconomics, the term "interest rate" is often used as shorthand for a central bank's policy rate, such as the United States Federal Reserve's federal funds rate. "Interest rate" is also sometimes used synonymously with overnight rate, bank rate, base rate, discount rate, coupon rate, repo rate, prime rate, yield to maturity, and internal rate of return.
Definitions
[edit]Real versus nominal
[edit]The nominal interest rate is the interest rate without adjusting for inflation, whereas the real interest rate takes inflation into account. Real interest rates measure the interest accumulated and repayment of principal in real terms by comparing the sum against the buying power of the amount at the time it was borrowed, lent, deposited or invested. Where inflation is the same as nominal interest rate, the real interest rate is zero.
The real interest rate is given by the Fisher equation:
where p is the inflation rate.
For low rates and short periods, the linear approximation applies:
The Fisher equation applies both ex ante and ex post. Ex ante, the rates are projected rates, whereas ex post, the rates are historical.
Other rates
[edit]The term "interest rate" is also often used as shorthand for a number of specific rates, most commonly the overnight rate, bank rate, or other interest rate set by a central bank.[citation needed] In this regard, the United States Federal Reserve's Federal Funds Rate is often simply known as the "interest rate" or "rate",[2] due to its global macroeconomic and financial significance.[citation needed] In United Kingdom contexts, Official Bank Rate of the Bank of England is also known as "the interest rate".[3] "Interest rate" is also sometimes used synonymously with base rate, discount rate, coupon rate, repo rate, prime rate, yield to maturity, internal rate of return, spot rate, forward rate, and benchmark rates such as Libor and SONIA.[citation needed]
Base rate usually refers to the annualized effective interest rate offered on overnight deposits by the central bank or other monetary authority.[citation needed]
The annual percentage rate (APR) may refer either to a nominal APR or an effective APR (EAPR). The difference between the two is that the EAPR accounts for fees and compounding, while the nominal APR does not.[citation needed]
The annual equivalent rate (AER), also called the effective annual rate, factors into account compounding frequencies of products, but does not account for fees.[citation needed]
Discount rate can both refer to the discount window of central banks and more generally as the annual rate used to discount future values into present value.[4]
For an interest-bearing security, coupon rate is the ratio of the annual coupon amount (the coupon paid per year) per unit of par value, whereas current yield is the ratio of the annual coupon divided by its current market price.[citation needed]
Yield to maturity is a bond's expected internal rate of return, assuming it will be held to maturity, that is, the discount rate which equates all remaining cash flows to the investor (all remaining coupons and repayment of the par value at maturity) with the current market price.[citation needed]
Based on the relationship between supply and demand of market interest rate, there are fixed interest rate and floating interest rate.[citation needed]
Monetary policy
[edit]Interest rate targets are a vital tool of monetary policy and are taken into account when dealing with variables like investment, inflation, and unemployment. The central banks of countries generally tend to reduce interest rates when they wish to increase investment and consumption in the country's economy. However, a low interest rate as a macro-economic policy can be risky and may lead to the creation of an economic bubble, in which large amounts of investments are poured into the real-estate market and stock market. In developed economies, interest-rate adjustments are thus made to keep inflation within a target range for the health of economic activities or cap the interest rate concurrently with economic growth to safeguard economic momentum.[5][6][7][8][9]
History
[edit]
In the past two centuries, interest rates have been variously set either by national governments or central banks. For example, the Federal Reserve federal funds rate in the United States has varied between about 0.25% and 19% from 1954 to 2008, while the Bank of England base rate varied between 0.5% and 15% from 1989 to 2009,[10][11] and Germany experienced rates close to 90% in the 1920s down to about 2% in the 2000s.[12][13] During an attempt to tackle spiraling hyperinflation in 2007, the Central Bank of Zimbabwe increased interest rates for borrowing to 800%.[14]
The interest rates on prime credits in the late 1970s and early 1980s were far higher than had been recorded – higher than previous US peaks since 1800, than British peaks since 1700, or than Dutch peaks since 1600; "since modern capital markets came into existence, there have never been such high long-term rates" as in this period.[15]
Before modern capital markets, there have been accounts that savings deposits could achieve an annual return of at least 25% and up to as high as 50%.[16]
Influencing factors
[edit]- Political short-term gain: Lowering interest rates can give the economy a short-run boost. Under normal conditions, most economists think a cut in interest rates will only give a short term gain in economic activity that will soon be offset by inflation. The quick boost can influence elections. Most economists advocate independent central banks to limit the influence of politics on interest rates.
- Deferred consumption: When money is loaned the lender delays spending the money on consumption goods. Since according to time preference theory people prefer goods now to goods later, in a free market there will be a positive interest rate.
- Inflationary expectations: Most economies generally exhibit inflation, meaning a given amount of money buys fewer goods in the future than it will now. The borrower needs to compensate the lender for this.
- Alternative investments: The lender has a choice between using his money in different investments. If he chooses one, he forgoes the returns from all the others. Different investments effectively compete for funds.
- Risks of investment: There is always a risk that the borrower will go bankrupt, abscond, die, or otherwise default on the loan. This means that a lender generally charges a risk premium to ensure that, across his investments, he is compensated for those that fail.
- Liquidity preference: People prefer to have their resources available in a form that can immediately be exchanged, rather than a form that takes time to realize.
- Taxes: Because some of the gains from interest may be subject to taxes, the lender may insist on a higher rate to make up for this loss.
- Banks: Banks can tend to change the interest rate to either slow down or speed up economy growth. This involves either raising interest rates to slow the economy down, or lowering interest rates to promote economic growth.[17]
- Economy: Interest rates can fluctuate according to the status of the economy. It will generally be found that if the economy is strong then the interest rates will be high, if the economy is weak the interest rates will be low.
Zero rate policy
[edit]A so-called "zero interest-rate policy" (ZIRP) is a very low—near-zero—central bank target interest rate. At this zero lower bound the central bank faces difficulties with conventional monetary policy, because it is generally believed that market interest rates cannot realistically be pushed down into negative territory.
In the United States, the policy was used in 2008-2015, following the 2008 financial crisis, and 2020-2022, during the COVID-19 pandemic.[18]
Negative nominal or real rates
[edit]Nominal interest rates are normally positive, but not always. In contrast, real interest rates can be negative, when nominal interest rates are below inflation. When this is done via government policy (for example, via reserve requirements), this is known as financial repression, which was practiced by countries such as the United States and United Kingdom following World War II until the late 1970s or early 1980s, during and following the Post–World War II economic expansion.[19][20] In the late 1970s, United States Treasury securities with negative real interest rates were deemed certificates of confiscation.[21]
A so-called "negative interest rate policy" (NIRP) is a negative central bank target interest rate.
Theory
[edit]In theory, profit-seeking lenders will not lend below 0% if given the alternative of holding cash, as that will guarantee a loss. Likewise, a bank offering a negative deposit rate will find few takers, as savers will instead hold cash.[22]
Negative interest rates have been proposed in the past, notably in the late 19th century by Silvio Gesell.[23] A negative interest rate can be described as a "tax on holding money"; Gesell proposed it as the Freigeld (free money) component of his Freiwirtschaft (free economy) system. To prevent people from holding cash, Gesell suggested issuing money for a limited duration, after which it must be exchanged for new bills; attempts to hold money thus result in it expiring and becoming worthless. Along similar lines, John Maynard Keynes approvingly cited the idea of a carrying tax on money,[23][24] but dismissed it due to administrative difficulties.[25] In 1999, a carry tax on currency was proposed by Federal Reserve employee Marvin Goodfriend, to be implemented via magnetic strips on bills, deducting the carry tax upon deposit, the tax being based on how long the bill had been held.[25]
It has also been proposed that a negative interest rate can in principle be levied on existing paper currency via a serial number lottery, such as randomly choosing a number 0 through 9 and declaring that notes whose serial number end in that digit are worthless, yielding an average 10% loss of paper cash holdings to hoarders; a drawn two-digit number could match the last two digits on the note for a 1% loss. This was proposed by an anonymous student of Greg Mankiw,[23] though more as a thought experiment than a genuine proposal.[26]
Practice
[edit]Both the European Central Bank starting in 2014 and the Bank of Japan starting in early 2016 pursued the policy on top of their earlier and continuing quantitative easing policies. The latter's policy was said at its inception to be trying to "change Japan's 'deflationary mindset.'" In 2016 Sweden, Denmark and Switzerland—not directly participants in the Euro currency zone—also had NIRPs in place.[27]
Countries such as Sweden and Denmark have set negative interest on reserves—that is to say, they have charged interest on reserves.[28][29][30][31]
In July 2009, Sweden's central bank, the Riksbank, set its policy repo rate, the interest rate on its one-week deposit facility, at 0.25%, at the same time as setting its overnight deposit rate at −0.25%.[32] The existence of the negative overnight deposit rate was a technical consequence of the fact that overnight deposit rates are generally set at 0.5% below or 0.75% below the policy rate.[32][33] The Riksbank studied the impact of these changes and stated in a commentary report[34] that they led to no disruptions in Swedish financial markets.
Government bond yields
[edit]
During the European debt crisis, government bonds of some countries (Switzerland, Denmark, Germany, Finland, the Netherlands and Austria) have been sold at negative yields. Suggested explanations include desire for safety and protection against the eurozone breaking up (in which case some eurozone countries might redenominate their debt into a stronger currency).[36]
Macroeconomics
[edit]Output, unemployment and inflation
[edit]Interest rates affect economic activity broadly, which is the reason why they are normally the main instrument of the monetary policies conducted by central banks.[37] Changes in interest rates will affect firms' investment behaviour, either raising or lowering the opportunity cost of investing. Interest rate changes also affect asset prices like stock prices and house prices, which again influence households' consumption decisions through a wealth effect. Additionally, international interest rate differentials affect exchange rates and consequently exports and imports. These various channels are collectively known as the monetary transmission mechanism. Consumption, investment and net exports are all important components of aggregate demand. Consequently, by influencing the general interest rate level, monetary policy can affect overall demand for goods and services in the economy and hence output and employment.[38] Changes in employment will over time affect wage setting, which again affects pricing and consequently ultimately inflation. The relation between employment (or unemployment) and inflation is known as the Phillips curve.[37]
For economies maintaining a fixed exchange rate system, determining the interest rate is also an important instrument of monetary policy as international capital flows are in part determined by interest rate differentials between countries.[39]
Interest rate setting in the United States
[edit]
The Federal Reserve (often referred to as 'the Fed') implements monetary policy largely by targeting the federal funds rate (FFR). This is the rate that banks charge each other for overnight loans of federal funds, which are the reserves held by banks at the Fed. Until the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed relied on open market operations, i.e. selling and buying securities in the open market to adjust the supply of reserve balances so as to keep the FFR close to the Fed's target.[40] However, since 2008 the actual conduct of monetary policy implementation has changed considerably, the Fed using instead various administered interest rates (i.e., interest rates that are set directly by the Fed rather than being determined by the market forces of supply and demand) as the primary tools to steer short-term market interest rates towards the Fed's policy target.[41]
Impact on savings and pensions
[edit]Financial economists such as World Pensions Council (WPC) researchers have argued that durably low interest rates in most G20 countries will have an adverse impact on the funding positions of pension funds as "without returns that outstrip inflation, pension investors face the real value of their savings declining rather than ratcheting up over the next few years".[42] Current interest rates in savings accounts often fail to keep up with the pace of inflation.[43]
From 1982 until 2012, most Western economies experienced a period of low inflation combined with relatively high returns on investments across all asset classes including government bonds. This brought a certain sense of complacency[citation needed] amongst some pension actuarial consultants and regulators, making it seem reasonable to use optimistic economic assumptions to calculate the present value of future pension liabilities.
Interest-free economy
[edit]An interest-free economy or interest free economy is an economy that does not have pure interest rates. An interest free economy may use either barter, debt, credit, or money as its medium of exchange. Historically, there has been a taboo against usury and charging interest rates across many cultures and religions. In some contexts, "interest-free economy" may refer to a zero interest-rate policy, a macroeconomic concept for describing an economy that is characterized by a low nominal interest rate.
The total interest rate typically consists of four components: pure (risk-free) interest, a risk premium, expected inflation or deflation, and administrative costs. In an interest-free economy, the pure interest rate component of the total interest rate would not exist, by definition. Depending on how the economy is structured, the other three components of interest of the total interest may or may not remain, so an interest-free economy does not necessarily have to be free of all types of interest.
Banks could still profit from loaning money in an interest-free economy, if they are paid by the administrative costs component of the total interest rate.[44]Private markets
[edit]There is a market for investments, including the money market, bond market, stock market, and currency market as well as retail banking.
Interest rates reflect:
- The risk-free cost of capital
- Expected inflation
- Risk premium
- Transaction costs
Inflationary expectations
[edit]According to the theory of rational expectations, borrowers and lenders form an expectation of inflation in the future. The acceptable nominal interest rate at which they are willing and able to borrow or lend includes the real interest rate they require to receive, or are willing to pay, plus the rate of inflation they expect. Under behavioral expectations, the formation of expectations deviates from rational expectations due to cognitive limitations and information processing costs. Agents may exhibit myopia (limited attention) to certain economic variables, form expectations based on simplified heuristics, or update their beliefs more gradually than under full rationality. These behavioral frictions can affect monetary policy transmission and optimal policy design.[45]
Risk
[edit]The level of risk in investments is taken into consideration. Riskier investments such as shares and junk bonds are normally expected to deliver higher returns than safer ones like government bonds.
The additional return above the risk-free nominal interest rate which is expected from a risky investment is the risk premium. The risk premium an investor requires on an investment depends on the risk preferences of the investor. Evidence suggests that most lenders are risk-averse.[46]
A maturity risk premium applied to a longer-term investment reflects a higher perceived risk of default.
There are four kinds of risk:
- repricing risk
- basis risk
- yield curve risk
- optionality
Liquidity preference
[edit]Most economic agents exhibit a liquidity preference, defined as the propensity to hold cash or highly liquid assets over less fungible investments, reflecting both precautionary and transactional motives. Liquidity preference manifests in the yield differential between assets of varying maturities and convertibility costs, where cash provides immediate transaction capability with zero conversion costs. This preference creates a term structure of required returns, exemplified by the higher yields typically demanded for longer-duration assets. For instance, while a 1-year loan offers relatively rapid convertibility to cash, a 10-year loan commands a greater liquidity premium. However, the existence of deep secondary markets can partially mitigate illiquidity costs, as evidenced by US Treasury bonds, which maintain significant liquidity despite longer maturities due to their unique status as a safe asset and the associated financial sector stability benefits.[47][48]
A market model
[edit]A basic interest rate pricing model for an asset is
where
- in is the nominal interest rate on a given investment
- ir is the risk-free return to capital
- i*n is the nominal interest rate on a short-term risk-free liquid bond (such as U.S. treasury bills).
- rp is a risk premium reflecting the length of the investment and the likelihood the borrower will default
- lp is a liquidity premium (reflecting the perceived difficulty of converting the asset into money and thus into goods).
- pe is the expected inflation rate.
Assuming perfect information, pe is the same for all participants in the market, and the interest rate model simplifies to
Mathematical note
[edit]Because interest and inflation are generally given as percentage increases, the formulae above are (linear) approximations.
For instance,
is only approximate. In reality, the relationship is
so
The two approximations, eliminating higher order terms, are:
The formulae in this article are exact if logarithmic units are used for relative changes, or equivalently if logarithms of indices are used in place of rates, and hold even for large relative changes.
Spread
[edit]The spread of interest rates is the lending rate minus the deposit rate.[49] This spread covers operating costs for banks providing loans and deposits. A negative spread is where a deposit rate is higher than the lending rate.[50]
Influencing factors
[edit]Interest rates vary according to:
- the government's directives to the central bank to accomplish the government's goals
- the currency of the principal sum lent or borrowed
- the term to maturity of the investment
- the perceived default probability of the borrower
- supply and demand in the market
- the amount of collateral
- special features like call provisions
- reserve requirements
- compensating balance
as well as other factors.[51]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Fisher, Irving (1907). The Rate of Interest: Its Nature, Determination and Relation to Economic Phenomena. New York: The MacMillan Company. p. 3. ISBN 1578987458.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Stauffer, Jason (2023-07-26). "Why now is the best time to lock in a high APY CD after the Fed's rate raise". CNBC. Retrieved 2025-08-08.
- ^ "Interest rates and Bank Rate". www.bankofengland.co.uk. 2025-08-07. Retrieved 2025-08-08.
- ^ "Discount Rate Defined: How It's Used by the Fed and in Cash-Flow Analysis". Investopedia. Retrieved 2023-05-08.
- ^ "INSIGHT-Mild inflation, low interest rates could help economy". Reuters. 2 August 2011.
- ^ Sepehri, Ardeshir; Moshiri, Saeed (2004). "Inflation-Growth Profiles Across Countries: Evidence from Developing and Developed Countries". International Review of Applied Economics. 18 (2): 191–207. doi:10.1080/0269217042000186679. S2CID 154979402.
- ^ "Inflation : Finding the right balance" (PDF). Imf.org. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- ^ "Finance & Development, June 2003 - Contents". Finance and Development – F&D.
- ^ "Finance & Development, March 2010 – Back to Basics". Finance and Development – F&D.
- ^ moneyextra.com Interest Rate History Archived 2008-10-16 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 2008-10-27
- ^ "UK interest rates lowered to 0.5%". BBC News. 5 March 2009.
- ^ (Homer, Sylla & Sylla 1996, p. 509)
- ^ Bundesbank. BBK – Statistics – Time series database Archived 2009-02-12 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 2008-10-27
- ^ worldeconomies.co.uk Zimbabwe currency revised to help inflation Archived 2009-02-11 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ (Homer, Sylla & Sylla 1996, p. 1)
- ^ Ellis, William; Dawes, Richard (1857). Lessons on the Phenomena of Industrial Life: And the Conditions of Industrial Success. Groombridge. pp. iii–iv.
- ^ Commonwealth Bank Why do Interest Rates Change? Archived 2014-02-26 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Federal Funds Effective Rate (FEDFUNDS)". Retrieved 20 March 2025.
- ^ William H. Gross. "The Caine Mutiny Part 2 – PIMCO". Pacific Investment Management Company LLC. Archived from the original on 2012-10-13. Retrieved 2011-12-21.
- ^ "Financial Repression Redux (Reinhart, Kirkegaard, Sbrancia June 2011)" (PDF). Imf.org. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- ^ Norris, Floyd (28 October 2010). "U.S. Bonds That Could Return Less Than Their Price". The New York Times.
- ^ Buiter, Willem (7 May 2009). "Negative interest rates: when are they coming to a central bank near you?". Financial Times blog.
- ^ a b c Mankiw, N. Gregory (18 April 2009). "It May Be Time for the Fed to Go Negative". The New York Times.
- ^ 1936, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
- ^ a b McCullagh, Declan (27 October 1999). "Cash and the 'Carry Tax'". WIRED. Archived from the original on 17 June 2008. Retrieved 2011-12-21.
- ^ See follow-up blog posts for discussion: "Observations on Negative Interest Rates", 19 April 2009; "More on Negative Interest Rates", 22 April 2009; "More on Negative Interest Rates", 7 May 2009, all in Greg Mankiw's Blog: Random Observations for Students of Economics
- ^ Nakamichi, Takashi, Megumi Fujikawa and Eleanor Warnock, "Bank of Japan Introduces Negative Interest Rates" (possibly subscription-only)[permanent dead link], Wall Street Journal, January 29, 2016. Retrieved 2016-01-29.
- ^ Goodhart, C.A.E. (January 2013). "The Potential Instruments of Monetary Policy" (PDF). Financial Markets Group Paper (Special Paper 219). London School of Economics. 9–10. ISSN 1359-9151. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
- ^ Blinder, Alan S. (February 2012). "Revisiting Monetary Policy in a Low-Inflation and Low-Utilization Environment". Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 44 (Supplement s1): 141–146. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00481.x.
- ^ Thoma, Mark (August 27, 2012). "Would Lowering the Interest Rate on Excess Reserves Stimulate the Economy?". Economist's View. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
- ^ Parameswaran, Ashwin (2013-01-07). "On The Folly of Inflation Targeting In A World Of Interest Bearing Money". Macroeconomic Resilience. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
- ^ a b "Repo rate table". Sveriges Riksbank. Archived from the original on 5 February 2013. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
- ^ Ward, Andrew; Oakley, David (27 August 2009). "Bankers watch as Sweden goes negative". Financial Times. London. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10.
- ^ Beechey, Meredith; Elmér, Heidi (30 September 2009). "The lower limit of the Riksbank's repo rate" (PDF). Sveriges Riksbank. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
- ^ Figure. Irish yield curve
- ^ Wigglesworth, Robin (18 July 2012). "Schatz yields turn negative for first time". Financial Times. London. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
- ^ a b Blanchard, Olivier; Amighini, Alessia; Giavazzi, Francesco (2017). "Monetary policy:a summing up". Macroeconomics: a European perspective (3rd ed.). Harlow London New York Boston San Francisco Toronto Sydney Dubai Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Seoul Taipei New Delhi Cape Town São Paulo Mexico City Madrid Amsterdam Munich Paris Milan: Pearson. ISBN 978-1-292-08567-8.
- ^ "Federal Reserve Board - Monetary Policy: What Are Its Goals? How Does It Work?". Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 29 July 2021. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
- ^ "Fixed exchange rate policy". Nationalbanken. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
- ^ "Open Market Operations". www.federalreserve.gov. Federal Reserve System. 26 July 2023. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
- ^ Ihrig, Jane; Weinbach, Gretchen C.; Wolla, Scott A. (September 2021). "Teaching the Linkage Between Banks and the Fed: R.I.P. Money Multiplier". research.stlouisfed.org. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
- ^ M. Nicolas J. Firzli quoted in Sinead Cruise (4 August 2012). "Zero Return World Squeezes Retirement Plans". Reuters with CNBC. Retrieved 5 Aug 2012.
- ^ thesavingsguy (2021-11-16). "Why You Can't Afford to use Savings Accounts for Saving - Ask The savings guy". Archived from the original on 2021-11-16. Retrieved 2021-11-18.
- ^ Sidman, Josh (11 March 2024). "Silvio Gesell: Beyond Capitalism vs Socialism" Class #3 (Video). Henry George School of Economics. Event occurs at 1:28. Retrieved 26 May 2025.
- ^ Benchimol, Jonathan; Bounader, Lahcen (2023). "Optimal monetary policy under bounded rationality". Journal of Financial Stability. 67 101151. doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2023.101151. hdl:10419/212417.
- ^ Benchimol, J., 2014. Risk aversion in the Eurozone, Research in Economics, vol. 68, issue 1, pp. 39–56.
- ^ Krishnamurthy, Arvind; Vissing-Jorgensen, Annette (2012). "The Aggregate Demand for Treasury Debt" (PDF). Journal of Political Economy. 120 (2): 233–267. doi:10.1086/666589.
- ^ Krishnamurthy, Arvind; Vissing-Jorgensen, Annette (2015). "The impact of Treasury supply on financial sector lending and stability". Journal of Financial Economics. 118 (3): 571–600. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.09.001.
- ^ Interest rate spread (lending rate minus deposit rate, %) from World Bank. 2012
- ^ Negative Spread Law & Legal Definition, retrieved January 2013
- ^ Fama, Eugene F. (2006-07-01). "The Behavior of Interest Rates". The Review of Financial Studies. 19 (2): 359–379. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj019. ISSN 0893-9454.
References
[edit]- Homer, Sidney; Sylla, Richard Eugene; Sylla, Richard (1996). A History of Interest Rates. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-2288-3. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
Interest rate
View on GrokipediaDefinitions and Concepts
Fundamental Definition and Purpose
Interest rates constitute the price paid for the use of borrowed money or the compensation received for lending it, expressed as a percentage of the principal amount over a defined time period, such as annually.[10][11] This definition frames interest as the rental cost of capital, akin to rent for physical assets, where the borrower gains temporary control of funds in exchange for a periodic fee.[12] At their core, interest rates reflect the time value of money, the principle that funds available now possess greater utility than equivalent sums in the future due to their capacity for productive use, such as investment yielding returns.[13] Lenders require this premium to offset the opportunity cost of forgoing alternative employments of capital, including immediate consumption or other revenue-generating opportunities, thereby ensuring rational allocation of scarce resources across time periods.[14] Without positive interest rates, there would be no incentive to save or defer gratification, potentially leading to overconsumption and underinvestment in future-oriented production.[12] The purpose of interest rates extends to equilibrating supply and demand for loanable funds in markets, signaling the relative scarcity of capital and guiding intertemporal decision-making.[15] By adjusting to reflect savers' willingness to postpone consumption against borrowers' need for immediate funds, rates facilitate efficient capital deployment, curbing excesses like inflationary borrowing sprees while encouraging productive lending when savings abound.[16] Empirical observations, such as historical correlations between low rates and heightened investment booms followed by corrections, underscore this balancing role, though institutional interventions like central bank policies can distort natural market signals.[15]Nominal versus Real Rates
The nominal interest rate represents the rate of interest expressed in terms of currency units, without adjustment for changes in the purchasing power of money due to inflation.[17] It is the rate quoted by lenders and observed in financial contracts, such as the 5% annual rate on a loan where the principal and interest are repaid in nominal dollars.[18] In contrast, the real interest rate measures the rate of interest adjusted for inflation, reflecting the actual increase or decrease in purchasing power over time.[19] It indicates the true cost to borrowers and return to lenders in terms of goods and services, as inflation erodes the real value of nominal payments. For instance, a nominal rate of 5% with 3% inflation yields an approximate real rate of 2%, meaning lenders gain 2% in real terms after accounting for price increases.[17] The precise relationship between nominal interest rate , real interest rate , and expected inflation rate is captured by the Fisher equation: , which rearranges to .[20] This exact formula, derived from Irving Fisher's 1930 work, accounts for the compounding effect of inflation on nominal returns, avoiding underestimation in high-inflation environments.[17] An approximation, , holds for low inflation rates where the cross-term is negligible, simplifying calculations but introducing minor errors, such as overstating the real rate by about 0.15% when both rates are 5%.[18] Real interest rates are critical for intertemporal decision-making, as they determine the opportunity cost of current consumption versus future consumption in real terms. Negative real rates, occurring when inflation exceeds the nominal rate—as in the U.S. during 1979-1980 with nominal Treasury bill rates around 10% and inflation over 13%—discourage saving and incentivize borrowing, potentially fueling asset bubbles or malinvestment.[19] Ex ante real rates use expected inflation for forward-looking analysis, while ex post rates incorporate realized inflation, revealing discrepancies between expectations and outcomes that affect economic stability.[21] Central banks monitor real rates to gauge monetary policy effectiveness, as persistent low or negative real rates, like those below 1% in advanced economies from 2008-2020, correlate with subdued investment and productivity growth.[22]Types and Variations of Interest Rates
Interest rates are classified by their calculation method, stability over time, and application to specific financial instruments or markets. Simple interest applies only to the principal amount, calculated as principal multiplied by rate and time, and is used in short-term loans or bonds where interest does not accrue on prior interest.[1] Compound interest, by contrast, accrues on both principal and accumulated interest, typically calculated periodically (e.g., monthly or annually), leading to exponential growth and higher effective costs for borrowers over time.[23] The effective annual rate (EAR) adjusts for compounding frequency, providing a standardized measure; for instance, a nominal 12% rate compounded monthly yields an EAR of approximately 12.68%.[24] Fixed interest rates remain constant throughout the loan or investment term, shielding borrowers from market fluctuations but often starting higher than variable rates.[25] They predominate in long-term consumer products like 30-year mortgages or fixed-rate bonds, where the coupon rate—stated interest paid periodically—reflects the bond's face value yield at issuance.[1] Variable or floating rates adjust periodically based on a benchmark index plus a margin, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) for U.S. dollar loans following the phase-out of LIBOR by June 30, 2023.[26] This variability introduces repricing risk but can benefit borrowers if underlying rates decline.[27] Variations arise by instrument and market context. Policy rates, set by central banks to influence monetary conditions, include the U.S. Federal Funds Rate, targeted at 4.25–4.50% as of late 2024, serving as a floor for short-term borrowing.[28] Interbank or benchmark rates, like Euribor in the Eurozone or SOFR, reflect unsecured or secured overnight lending among banks and underpin derivatives, loans, and deposits.[29] For deposits, rates are typically lower and quoted as annual percentage yields (APY) to account for compounding, while loan rates incorporate credit risk premiums; prime rates for top borrowers averaged 8% in 2023, exceeding policy rates by about 3 percentage points.[1] Bond yields vary by maturity and issuer risk, with government securities approximating risk-free rates and corporate bonds adding credit spreads, as seen in U.S. Treasury yields ranging from 4.5% for 2-year notes to 4.2% for 10-year bonds in October 2024.[28] Risk-adjusted variations include the risk-free rate (e.g., Treasury bill yields) plus premiums for default, liquidity, or inflation expectations. Accrued interest accumulates unpaid on bonds between payment dates, quoted separately in secondary markets. Short-term rates (under one year) fluctuate more than long-term rates due to policy sensitivity, while term structure—the yield curve—often slopes upward, reflecting expectations of economic growth, though inversions preceded recessions like 2008 and 2020.[29]Theoretical Foundations
Time Preference and Intertemporal Choice
Time preference refers to the phenomenon where individuals assign greater value to goods available for consumption in the present compared to identical goods available in the future, even absent uncertainty or productivity differences. This preference implies that savers demand compensation, in the form of interest, to forgo current consumption and provide funds for others' use, establishing a foundational explanation for positive interest rates in voluntary exchange.[30] The pure time-preference theory, articulated by Austrian economists, asserts that this subjective valuation differential is the ultimate source of interest, independent of capital productivity or other factors, as it reflects an inherent human tendency to prioritize immediate satisfaction. Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, in his multi-volume work Capital and Interest (published between 1884 and 1909), developed the time-preference framework by identifying three complementary reasons for positive interest rates: the expectation of rising marginal utility of income over time due to anticipated future abundance; the enhanced productivity from complementary time-structured production processes; and the intrinsic undervaluation of future goods.[30] Böhm-Bawerk argued that time preference alone suffices to generate interest, as individuals would not lend without a premium to offset the psychological disutility of waiting, thereby linking personal valuation to market clearing rates where savings supply meets investment demand.[31] Intertemporal choice extends this concept by modeling how rational agents allocate resources across time periods to maximize lifetime utility, subject to endowment and borrowing constraints. Irving Fisher formalized this in The Theory of Interest (1930), using indifference curves to depict trade-offs between current and future consumption, where the equilibrium real interest rate equates the marginal rate of intertemporal substitution to the market price of deferring consumption (1 + r).[32] In Fisher's two-period framework, a higher time preference (steeper indifference curves) raises the interest rate needed to induce saving, as agents require greater future compensation to shift consumption forward; empirically, variations in elicited discount rates across individuals correlate with saving behaviors, though evidence shows deviations from exponential discounting, such as hyperbolic patterns implying inconsistent rates over long horizons.[33] [34] In aggregate, the natural interest rate emerges from the dispersion of time preferences across the economy: low-preference (patient) agents save more, funding high-preference (impatient) borrowers' projects, with the rate adjusting to clear the loanable funds market.[35] This mechanism underscores causal realism in rate determination, as deviations—such as artificially suppressed rates—distort intertemporal coordination, leading to malinvestment and resource misallocation, as observed in historical credit expansions preceding economic downturns. Empirical studies confirm time preferences influence macroeconomic saving rates, with cross-country data indicating lower discount rates in wealthier nations, though institutional biases in academic surveys may understate variability due to sampled populations.Risk, Uncertainty, and Premiums
In lending and investment contexts, interest rates exceed the pure real rate and expected inflation compensation by incorporating premiums that remunerate lenders for exposure to quantifiable risks and unquantifiable uncertainties. These premiums reflect the lender's opportunity cost of capital tied up in potentially non-performing assets, where default, illiquidity, or adverse economic shocks could erode principal or returns. For instance, corporate bond yields typically surpass equivalent-maturity Treasury yields by a spread that embeds both expected losses from default and a risk premium for bearing the variance in outcomes.[36] Empirical decompositions of such spreads indicate that the risk premium often accounts for 40-60% of the total, with the remainder attributable to anticipated defaults; in high-yield bonds from 1973 to 2012, this premium averaged 2.4 percentage points annually, comprising 43% of observed credit spreads.[37] Frank Knight's 1921 framework differentiates risk—events with known probability distributions amenable to insurance or hedging—from uncertainty, where outcomes lack assignable probabilities due to novelty or structural breaks. In interest rates, risk premiums primarily address the former, such as default risk priced via credit models incorporating historical default rates and recovery values; for example, Moody's-rated corporate bonds from 1983 to 2004 showed credit spreads driven partly by systematic risk factors beyond firm-specific losses.[38] Uncertainty, however, manifests in heightened premiums during periods of ambiguity, like geopolitical shocks or policy regime shifts, where lenders demand extra compensation for ambiguity aversion rather than probabilistic calibration; this effect is evident in widened spreads during the 2008 financial crisis, where unmodeled tail risks amplified yields beyond default forecasts.[39][40] Key subtypes of risk premiums include the default (or credit) premium, liquidity premium, and term premium. The default premium compensates for issuer-specific and systemic default probabilities, empirically proxied by the excess of lending rates over Treasury bill rates; World Bank data from 1976 to 2022 across economies show this averaging 2-5 percentage points in emerging markets versus under 1 point in advanced ones.[41] Liquidity premiums arise from transaction costs and market depth constraints, adding 0.2-0.5 percentage points to less-traded securities, as modeled in Federal Reserve analyses of money market effects from 1960-1990.[42] Term premiums, embedded in yield curves, reward exposure to interest rate fluctuations over longer horizons, with U.S. Treasury data indicating positive averages of 0.5-1.5 percentage points for 10-year bonds from 1961-2023, rising during volatility spikes.[43] Inflation risk premiums, a variant tied to nominal bonds, further adjust for covariance between inflation surprises and consumption, estimated at 0.3-0.8 percentage points in TIPS-nominal Treasury comparisons from 1997-2011.[44] These components collectively ensure rates equilibrate supply and demand under realistic frictions, though estimates vary with model assumptions and market conditions.Expectations, Inflation, and Liquidity
The Fisher equation links nominal interest rates to real rates and inflation expectations, stating that the nominal rate compensates for both the real return and anticipated loss of purchasing power from inflation.[45] Formulated by Irving Fisher in his 1930 work The Theory of Interest, the equation holds that nominal rates adjust fully to changes in expected inflation in efficient markets, ensuring real returns remain stable.[46] The approximate form is , where is the real rate, the nominal rate, and expected inflation; the exact relation is .[17] Empirical evidence from U.S. Treasury data shows nominal yields rising with inflation expectations derived from inflation-protected securities, though short-run deviations arise from adaptive expectations or central bank interventions.[47] Expectations of future short-term rates shape the term structure under the expectations hypothesis, where long-term rates represent the geometric average of current and anticipated short rates.[48] If markets expect short rates to increase—as during economic expansions—long-term yields exceed short-term ones, producing an upward-sloping yield curve; conversely, expected rate cuts yield a flat or inverted curve.[49] Rigorous tests, such as those using vector autoregressions on bond yields from 1970 to 2000, frequently reject the unbiased expectations hypothesis, revealing persistent biases where forward rates overestimate future spot rates.[50] Liquidity introduces a premium to interest rates, reflecting investors' aversion to holding less liquid or longer-maturity assets.[51] In term structure models, the liquidity premium theory augments expectations by adding a positive term premium to long rates, compensating for reduced marketability and higher transaction costs in illiquid securities.[52] For instance, corporate bonds yield 0.5-1% more than comparable Treasuries due to liquidity risk, with premiums widening during market stress like the 2008 crisis when bid-ask spreads surged.[51] Keynes' liquidity preference framework explains rates as the price balancing money supply against demand motives—transactions for daily needs, precautionary for uncertainty, and speculative tied to expected capital gains on bonds—elevating rates when liquidity demand spikes amid uncertainty.[53] This premium empirically explains why yield curves slope upward even when rate increases are not anticipated, countering pure expectations theory.[50]Historical Evolution
Pre-Modern and Early Modern Periods
In ancient Mesopotamia, records from around 3200 BC indicate that interest was charged on loans, predating coined money, with barley loans carrying rates up to 33% annually and silver loans around 20% during the Sumerian period circa 3000 BC.[54][55] The Code of Hammurabi, enacted circa 1750 BC, regulated maximum interest rates at 20% for silver and 33.3% for grain to prevent exploitation while permitting lending.[56] In ancient Greece, customary rates stabilized at 10%, often linked to the fractional unit of the drachma, though philosophers like Aristotle condemned usury as unnatural.[57] Roman law initially capped rates at 8.33% under the Twelve Tables (circa 450 BC), later raising them to 12% by 88 BC under Sulla amid fiscal pressures from conquests, with provinces facing punitive rates to fund military campaigns.[58] Enforcement varied, but statutory limits aimed to curb debt bondage while enabling state borrowing. In the Byzantine Empire, successors to Rome maintained similar caps, around 4-12%, adjusted for currency debasement and imperial needs.[58] Medieval Christian doctrine, drawing from biblical interpretations, prohibited usury—defined as any interest on loans—as a mortal sin by the Third Lateran Council in 1179, viewing it as profiting from time owned by God.[59] This canon law stifled direct Christian lending, elevating effective rates through evasions like bills of exchange (cambium) or annuities, where Italian city-states such as Florence and Venice issued long-term public debt at 5-7% yields by the 13th-14th centuries, though private rates often exceeded 15-20% due to risk and scarcity.[60] Jewish communities, exempt from these restrictions, served as intermediaries, facing customary caps of 16-18% in some regions but higher risks from expulsions and pogroms.[61] In the Islamic world, riba (usury) bans under Sharia law from the 7th century onward rejected fixed interest, favoring profit-sharing contracts like mudaraba, though trade credits implied implicit rates of 10-15% in practice.[62] By the early modern period (circa 1500-1800), theological challenges to blanket usury bans gained traction, with reformers like John Calvin arguing moderate interest compensated risk and opportunity cost, leading England to legalize it at 10% maximum in 1571 via statute, reduced to 8% in 1604 and 6% by 1714 as capital deepened.[59][63] Dutch and Italian markets saw sovereign yields fall to 4-5% by the late 17th century, reflecting institutional innovations like the Amsterdam Exchange Bank (1609) standardizing bills and reducing default premia, though wartime spikes pushed rates above 10%.[64] These shifts enabled broader credit access, correlating with commercial expansion, but persistent evasion tactics in Catholic regions like Spain maintained higher effective costs until secular reforms.[65]19th and Early 20th Century Developments
During the 19th century, the widespread adoption of the gold standard by major economies, beginning with Britain's formal adherence in 1821 and expanding internationally from the 1870s, constrained monetary expansion and linked national interest rates through fixed exchange rates, fostering relatively stable long-term nominal rates around 3-5% in Britain and the United States while amplifying sensitivity to gold flows and liquidity shocks.[66][67] Under this regime, short-term rates, such as the Bank of England's discount rate, fluctuated in response to reserve pressures, often rising sharply during gold outflows to defend convertibility, as seen in periodic crises where rates exceeded 10% to attract bullion.[68] Real interest rates, estimated by subtracting expected inflation from nominal yields, trended lower globally from the mid-19th century onward, averaging approximately 2-3% in core economies, reflecting increased capital accumulation amid industrialization but interrupted by deflationary episodes.[69] In the United States, absent a central bank until 1913, interest rates exhibited pronounced regional and seasonal variations, with antebellum rural rates reaching 10-15% due to sparse banking networks and agricultural credit demands, while urban commercial paper rates hovered at 6-8% post-Civil War.[70] Financial panics recurrently drove call loan rates to extreme levels—peaking at 90% in 1873 and over 100% during the 1893 crisis—stemming from inelastic note issuance under the National Banking Acts and runs on fractional-reserve banks, which depleted reserves and halted lending.[71][72] These episodes underscored the gold standard's procyclicality, as specie drains to Europe exacerbated domestic tightness, though inflows later moderated rates, illustrating arbitrage across borders.[71] Theoretical advancements reframed interest as rooted in time preference and productivity rather than mere abstinence, with Austrian economist Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk's 1884-1909 works positing rates as compensation for deferred consumption in multi-stage production, integrating marginal utility analysis to explain variations beyond classical profit-rate equivalences advanced by David Ricardo.[73] Early distinctions between nominal and real rates gained traction, with Irving Fisher later formalizing in 1930—but building on 19th-century observations—that nominal rates approximate real rates plus expected inflation, though pre-20th-century data showed limited inflation volatility under gold constraining such premiums.[74] The Panic of 1907, marked by a liquidity crunch pushing New York call rates to 125%, catalyzed the Federal Reserve's creation via the 1913 Act, empowering regional banks to rediscount eligible paper and modulate short-term rates through a discount window, initially set at 4-6%, to mitigate inelasticity in the prior system.[75][76] World War I suspended gold convertibility in 1914, enabling belligerents like Britain to suppress rates via direct financing—Bank rate at 5-6% despite inflation surges—foreshadowing fiat-era manipulations, though postwar attempts to restore the standard in 1925 tied rates to gold parity, contributing to interwar instability.[77][78]Post-World War II to the Great Moderation
Following World War II, the Bretton Woods system established fixed exchange rates with the U.S. dollar convertible to gold at $35 per ounce, constraining monetary policy to maintain pegs and promote stability.[79] Central banks, including the Federal Reserve, kept short-term interest rates low to support postwar reconstruction and economic growth, with the federal funds rate averaging around 2-3% in the 1950s.[80] This era featured low inflation, typically under 2%, and steady GDP growth, allowing real interest rates to remain positive but modest.[81] By the late 1960s, fiscal expansion from the Vietnam War and Great Society programs, combined with loose monetary policy, fueled rising inflation, which averaged 5.5% by 1970 and escalated further amid the 1971 Nixon Shock ending dollar-gold convertibility.[81] The 1973 and 1979 oil shocks exacerbated stagflation, with U.S. inflation reaching 11% in 1974 and 13.5% in 1980, while unemployment hovered above 6%.[82] Nominal interest rates rose in response, but real rates often stayed negative as the Federal Reserve under Arthur Burns accommodated inflation to avoid recessions, leading to federal funds rates climbing to 10-14% by the late 1970s without curbing price pressures.[81][83] In October 1979, newly appointed Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker shifted policy to target non-borrowed reserves, aggressively hiking the federal funds rate to combat inflation, peaking at nearly 20% in June 1981.[83] This induced the 1981-1982 recession, with unemployment surging to 10.8%, but successfully reduced inflation to 3.2% by 1983.[84] Post-recession, rates declined sharply, setting the stage for stability. The Great Moderation, spanning roughly 1984 to 2007, marked reduced volatility in output and inflation, attributed partly to credible monetary policy rules like Taylor-type targeting that anchored inflation expectations.[85] Federal funds rates stabilized around 4-6% in the 1990s under Alan Greenspan, with inflation averaging 2-3%, enabling sustained growth without major booms or busts.[80] Long-term rates also moderated, reflecting lower inflation risk premiums, though debates persist on whether improved policy, structural changes like better inventory management, or good luck from fewer supply shocks drove the era's calm.[86] This period contrasted sharply with prior volatility, fostering a perception of "conquered" business cycles until the 2008 crisis.[85]Global Financial Crisis, Low Rates Era, and Recent Volatility (2008–2025)
![Federal Funds Rate 1954 thru 2009 effective][float-right]The Global Financial Crisis of 2008 prompted central banks worldwide to slash policy interest rates to historic lows in an effort to avert deeper economic contraction and deflationary spirals. The U.S. Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds rate from 5.25% in mid-2007 to a target range of 0–0.25% by December 16, 2008, maintaining it near zero through unconventional monetary tools like quantitative easing (QE), which expanded its balance sheet from under $1 trillion to over $4 trillion by 2014.[80][87] The European Central Bank lowered its main refinancing operations rate to 1% by May 2009, while the Bank of Japan and others approached or entered negative territory in subsequent years, reflecting a coordinated global push to inject liquidity amid frozen credit markets and banking failures.[88] This initiated a prolonged era of suppressed interest rates from 2009 to roughly 2021, characterized by policy rates hovering near or below zero in advanced economies despite gradual GDP recoveries. Real interest rates, adjusted for inflation, fell sharply—by over 3.5 percentage points from pre-crisis peaks—fueled by factors including demographic shifts toward aging populations that lowered savings rates' time preference, a global savings glut from emerging markets, and subdued productivity growth that dampened investment demand.[89][90] Central banks' extended QE programs, such as the Fed's multiple rounds totaling $3.7 trillion in asset purchases by 2014, further compressed long-term yields, enabling record-low borrowing costs but also distorting asset prices and encouraging risk-taking in search of yield.[87] Critics, including analyses from financial institutions, attribute part of this persistence to post-crisis regulatory tightening that raised banks' capital requirements, reducing lending capacity and natural rate equilibrium, though empirical data show inflation remained anchored below 2% targets, allowing prolonged accommodation.[91] The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 reinforced this low-rates regime, with central banks reinstating near-zero policies and massive QE— the Fed's balance sheet surpassing $8 trillion by mid-2020— to support fiscal stimulus exceeding 20% of global GDP.[87] However, surging inflation from supply-chain disruptions, energy shocks following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and pent-up demand post-lockdowns prompted a sharp policy reversal. U.S. CPI peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, leading the Fed to hike the federal funds rate by 525 basis points from March 2022 to July 2023, reaching 5.25–5.50%, the fastest tightening cycle since the 1980s.[92] Global peers followed: the ECB raised its deposit rate from -0.5% to 4% by September 2023, and the Bank of England to 5.25% by August 2023, targeting double-digit inflation rates.[93] From 2023 to 2025, interest rate paths exhibited heightened volatility as central banks navigated disinflation—U.S. CPI falling to 3% by mid-2024—against persistent service-sector price pressures and fiscal deficits. The Fed initiated cuts in September 2024, reducing rates by 100 basis points through late 2024, followed by a further 25 basis points in September 2025 to 4.00–4.25%, amid softening labor markets but resilient growth.[93][92] Bond yields fluctuated wildly, with 10-year Treasuries swinging from 5% highs in 2023 to below 4% in 2025, driven by data-dependent forward guidance and geopolitical uncertainties, including tariff policies that rekindled inflation fears.[94] This era underscored central banks' challenges at the zero lower bound's unwind, where rapid hikes risked recessions—U.S. GDP contracted briefly in Q1 2022 but avoided deep downturns—while premature easing could reignite price spirals, reflecting causal links between monetary expansion and subsequent inflationary volatility rather than purely exogenous "secular" forces.[95]
