Hubbry Logo
Goldberg VariationsGoldberg VariationsMain
Open search
Goldberg Variations
Community hub
Goldberg Variations
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Goldberg Variations
Goldberg Variations
from Wikipedia

Title page of the Goldberg Variations (first edition)

The Goldberg Variations (German: Goldberg-Variationen), BWV 988, is a musical composition for keyboard by Johann Sebastian Bach, consisting of an aria and a set of thirty variations. First published in 1741, it is named after Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, who may also have been the first performer of the work.

Composition

[edit]

The story of how the variations came to be composed comes from an early biography of Bach by Johann Nikolaus Forkel:[1]

[For this work] we have to thank the instigation of the former Russian ambassador to the electoral court of Saxony, Count Kaiserling, who often stopped in Leipzig and brought there with him the aforementioned Goldberg, in order to have him given musical instruction by Bach. The Count was often ill and had sleepless nights. At such times, Goldberg, who lived in his house, had to spend the night in an antechamber, so as to play for him during his insomnia. ... Once the Count mentioned in Bach's presence that he would like to have some clavier pieces for Goldberg, which should be of such a smooth and somewhat lively character that he might be a little cheered up by them in his sleepless nights. Bach thought himself best able to fulfill this wish by means of Variations, the writing of which he had until then considered an ungrateful task on account of the repeatedly similar harmonic foundation. But since at this time all his works were already models of art, such also these variations became under his hand. Yet he produced only a single work of this kind. Thereafter the Count always called them his variations. He never tired of them, and for a long time sleepless nights meant: "Dear Goldberg, do play me one of my variations." Bach was perhaps never so rewarded for one of his works as for this. The Count presented him with a golden goblet filled with 100 Louis d'or. Nevertheless, even had the gift been a thousand times larger, their artistic value would not yet have been paid for.

Forkel wrote his biography in 1802, more than 60 years after the events related, and its accuracy has been questioned. The lack of dedication on the title page also makes the tale of the commission unlikely. Goldberg's age at the time of publication (14 years) has also been cited as grounds for doubting Forkel's tale, although it must be said that he was known to be an accomplished keyboardist and sight-reader. Williams (2001) contends that the Forkel story is entirely spurious.

Arnold Schering has suggested that the aria on which the variations are based was not written by Bach.[citation needed] More recent scholarly literature (such as the edition by Christoph Wolff) suggests that there is no basis for such doubts.

Publication

[edit]

Rather unusually for Bach's works,[2] the Goldberg Variations were published in his own lifetime, in 1741. The publisher was Bach's friend Balthasar Schmid of Nuremberg. Schmid printed the work by making engraved copper plates (rather than using movable type); thus the notes of the first edition are in Schmid's own handwriting.

The title page, shown in the figure above, reads in German:

Clavier Ubung / bestehend / in einer ARIA / mit verschiedenen Verænderungen / vors Clavicimbal / mit 2 Manualen. / Denen Liebhabern zur Gemüths- / Ergetzung verfertiget von / Johann Sebastian Bach / Königl. Pohl. u. Churfl. Sæchs. Hoff- / Compositeur, Capellmeister, u. Directore / Chori Musici in Leipzig. / Nürnberg in Verlegung / Balthasar Schmids[3] Keyboard exercise, consisting of an ARIA with diverse variations for harpsichord with two manuals. Composed for connoisseurs, for the refreshment of their spirits, by Johann Sebastian Bach, composer for the royal court of Poland and the Electoral court of Saxony, Kapellmeister and Director of Choral Music in Leipzig. Nuremberg, Balthasar Schmid, publisher.

The term "Clavier Ubung" (nowadays spelled "Klavierübung") had been assigned by Bach to some of his previous keyboard works. Klavierübung part 1 was the six partitas, part 2 the Italian Concerto and French Overture, and part 3 a series of chorale preludes for organ framed by a prelude and fugue in E major. Although Bach also called his variations "Klavierübung", he did not specifically designate them as the fourth in this series.[4]

Nineteen copies of the first edition survive today. Of these, the most valuable is the Handexemplar (Bach's personal copy of the published score),[5] discovered in 1974 in Strasbourg by the French musicologist Olivier Alain and now kept in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris. This copy includes printing corrections made by the composer and additional music in the form of fourteen canons on the Goldberg ground (see below). The nineteen printed copies provide virtually the only information available to modern editors trying to reconstruct Bach's intent, as the autograph (handwritten) score has not survived. A handwritten copy of just the aria is found in the 1725 Notebook for Anna Magdalena Bach. Christoph Wolff suggests on the basis of handwriting evidence that Anna Magdalena copied the aria from the autograph score around 1740; it appears on two pages previously left blank.

Instrumentation

[edit]

On the title page, Bach specified that the work was intended for harpsichord. It is widely performed on this instrument today, though there are also a great number of performances on the piano (see Discography below). The piano was rare in Bach's day and there is no indication that Bach would have either approved or disapproved of performing the variations on this instrument.

Bach's specification is, more precisely, a two-manual harpsichord, and he indicated in the score which variations ought to be played using one hand on each manual: Variations 8, 11, 13, 14, 17, 20, 23, 25, 26, 27 and 28 are specified for two manuals, while variations 5, 7 and 29 are specified as playable with either one or two. With greater difficulty, the work can nevertheless be played on a single-manual harpsichord or piano.

Form

[edit]

After a statement of the aria at the beginning of the piece, there are thirty variations. The variations do not follow the melody of the aria, but rather use its bass line (Play) and chord progression. The bass line is notated by harpsichordist and musicologist Ralph Kirkpatrick in his performing edition[6] as follows.


\relative
{
  \key g \major
  \clef bass
  \omit Staff.TimeSignature
  \repeat volta 2 {
    g1 fis^"6" e^"3,5,6♯" d b^"6" c^"3,5,6" d g, \break
    g' fis^"6" e a^"♯" fis^"6" g^"6" a^"♯" d,
  } \break
  \repeat volta 2 {
    d' b^"6" c^"6" b^"♯" g^"6" a^"3,5,6" b^"♯" e, \break
    c^"6" b^"6" a d g, c^"3,5,6" d g,
  }
}

The digits above the notes indicate the specified chord in the system of figured bass; where digits are separated by comma (stacked vertically in a proper figured bass), they indicate seventh chords in first inversion.

Every third variation in the series of 30 is a canon, following an ascending pattern. Thus, variation 3 is a canon at the unison, variation 6 is a canon at the second (the second entry begins the interval of a second above the first), variation 9 is a canon at the third, and so on until variation 27, which is a canon at the ninth. The final variation, instead of being the expected canon in the tenth, is a quodlibet, discussed below.

As Kirkpatrick has pointed out,[7] the variations that intervene between the canons are also arranged in a pattern. If we leave aside the initial and final material of the work (specifically, the Aria, the first two variations, the Quodlibet, and the aria da capo), the remaining material is arranged as follows. The variations found just after each canon are genre pieces of various types, among them three Baroque dances (4, 7, 19); a fughetta (10); a French overture (16); two ornate arias for the right hand (13, 25); and others (22, 28). The variations located two after each canon (5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, and 29) are what Kirkpatrick calls "arabesques"; they are variations in lively tempo with a great deal of hand-crossing. This ternary pattern—canon, genre piece, arabesque—is repeated a total of nine times, until the Quodlibet breaks the cycle.

All the variations are in G major, apart from variations 15, 21, and 25, which are in G minor.

At the end of the thirty variations, Bach writes Aria da Capo e fine, meaning that the performer is to return to the beginning ("da capo") and play the aria again before concluding.

Aria

[edit]

The aria is a sarabande in 3
4
time, and features a heavily ornamented melody:


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff \relative c''' {
  \key g \major \time 3/4
  g4 g( a8.)\mordent b16 |
  a8 \appoggiatura g16 fis8 \appoggiatura e16 d2 |
  g,4\mordent g4.\downprall fis16 g |
  a32( g fis16) g32( fis e16) \appoggiatura fis8 d2 |
  d'4 d( e8.)\mordent f16 |
  e8 \appoggiatura d16 c8 \appoggiatura b16 a4. fis'!8\turn |
  g32( fis16.) a32( g16.) fis32( e16.) d32( c16.) \appoggiatura c a'8. c,16 |
  b32( g16.) fis8 \appoggiatura fis g2\mordent |
 }
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \voiceOne \clef bass \key g \major
   s4 f\rest d |
   s4 e\rest d |
   s4 d\rest cis |
   s4 d\rest a |
   s4 d\rest g, |
   s4 d'\rest a |
   r8 c~ c b16 a g fis e fis |
   g8 a b2 |
  }
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \voiceThree
   r4 b2 |
   r4 a2 |
   r4 g2 |
   r4 fis2 |
   r4 d2 |
   r4 e4. s8 |
  }
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \voiceTwo
   g2. |
   fis2. |
   e2. |
   d2~ d8 c |
   b2. |
   c2~ c8 d |
   e8 c d2 |
   g,4. d'8[ e8.^\mordent fis16] |
  }
 >>
>>

The French style of ornamentation suggests that the ornaments are supposed to be parts of the melody; however, some performers (for example Wilhelm Kempff on piano) omit some or all ornaments and present the aria unadorned.

Williams opines that this is not the theme at all, but actually the first variation (a view emphasising the idea of the work as a chaconne rather than a piece in true variation form).

Variatio 1. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

This sprightly variation contrasts markedly with the slow, contemplative mood of the aria. The rhythm in the right hand forces the emphasis on the second beat, giving rise to syncopation from bars 1 to 7. Hands cross at bar 13 from the upper register to the lower, bringing back this syncopation for another two bars. In the first two bars of the B part, the rhythm mirrors that of the beginning of the A part, but after this a different idea is introduced.

Williams sees this as a sort of polonaise. The characteristic rhythm in the left hand is also found in Bach's Partita No. 3 for solo violin, in the A major prelude from the first book of The Well-Tempered Clavier, and in the D minor prelude of the second book. Heinz Niemüller also mentions the polonaise character of this variation.

Variatio 2. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

This is a simple three-part contrapuntal piece in 2
4
time, two voices engage in constant motivic interplay over an incessant bass line. Each section has an alternate ending to be played on the first and second repeat.

Variatio 3. Canone all'Unisono. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

The first of the regular canons, this is a canon at the unison: the follower begins on the same note as the leader, a bar later. As with all canons of the Goldberg Variations (except the 27th variation, canon at the ninth), there is a supporting bass line. The time signature of 12
8
and the many sets of triplets suggest a kind of a simple dance.

Variatio 4. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

Like the passepied, a Baroque dance movement, this variation is in 3
8
time with a preponderance of quaver rhythms. Bach uses close but not exact imitation: the musical pattern in one part reappears a bar later in another (sometimes inverted).


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c'' {
   \key g \major \time 3/8
   r8 b g |
   \voiceOne d'8 a d |
   g4.~ |
   g8 fis r |
   \oneVoice R1*3/8 |
   \voiceOne R1*3/8 |
   r8 a, c~ |
   c16 a b8 r |
  }
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \voiceTwo
   s4. |
   r8 d fis |
   b,8 g' c |
   b16 g a8 r |
   s4. |
   r8 c, e |
   a,8 d4~ |
   d8 g r |
  }
 >>
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \clef bass \key g \major \voiceOne
   s4. |
   s4. |
   r8 b g |
   d'4 r8 |
   r8 g, b |
   e,8 a g~ |
   g8 fis16 e fis8 |
   g8 d r |
  }
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \voiceTwo
   g4. |
   fis4. |
   e4. |
   r8 d fis |
   b,4. |
   c4. |
   d4. |
   r8 b d |
  }
 >>
>>

Each repeated section has alternate endings for the first or second time.

Variatio 5. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav.

[edit]

This is the first of the hand-crossing, two-part variations; the title means "for one or two manuals".[8] The movement is written in 3
4
time. A rapid melodic line predominantly in sixteenth notes is accompanied by another melody with longer note values, which features very wide leaps:


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff \relative c' {
  \key g \major \time 3/4
  r16 d e fis g fis g a b a g b |
  a16 g fis e d e fis g a fis e d |
  g16 fis e d cis d e fis g b a g |
  fis16 e d cis d a d e fis d fis a |
 }
 \new Staff \relative c' {
  \key g \major \clef bass
  g8 r \clef treble b' r \clef bass g,4 |
  fis8 r \clef treble a' r \clef bass fis,4 |
  e8 r \clef treble g' r \clef bass e,4 |
  d8 r \clef treble fis' r \clef bass d, c! |
 }
>>

The Italian type of hand-crossing such as is frequently found in the sonatas of Scarlatti is employed here, with one hand constantly moving back and forth between high and low registers while the other hand stays in the middle of the keyboard, playing the fast passages.

Variatio 6. Canone alla Seconda. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

The sixth variation is a canon at the second: the follower starts a major second higher than the leader. The piece is based on a descending scale and is in 3
8
time. Kirkpatrick describes this piece as having "an almost nostalgic tenderness". Each section has an alternate ending to be played on the first and second repeat.

Variatio 7. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav. al tempo di Giga

[edit]

The variation is in 6
8
meter, suggesting several possible Baroque dances. In 1974, when scholars discovered Bach's own copy of the first printing of the Goldberg Variations, they noted that over this variation Bach had added the heading al tempo di Giga. But the implications of this discovery for modern performance have turned out to be less clear than was at first assumed. In his book The Keyboard Music of J. S. Bach[9] the scholar and keyboardist David Schulenberg notes that the discovery "surprised twentieth-century commentators who supposed gigues were always fast and fleeting." However, "despite the Italian terminology [giga], this is a [less fleet] French gigue." Indeed, he notes, the dotted rhythmic pattern of this variation (pictured) is very similar to that of the gigue from Bach's second French suite and the gigue of the French Overture. This kind of gigue is known as a "Canary", based on the rhythm of a dance which originated from the Canary islands.


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff \relative c'' {
  \key g \major \time 6/8
  b8. a16 b8 d,8. g16 b8 |
  a8.\prall g16 a8 d4. |
  g8.\mordent fis16 g8 a,8. e'16 g8 |
  fis8.\prall e16 fis8 d4. |
 }
 \new Staff \relative c' {
  \key g \major \clef bass
  g4\mordent g,8 g'4.~\mordent |
  g4. fis8.\prall e16 d8 |
  e4 d'8 cis4 a8 |
  d4.~ d8. e16 c8 |
 }
>>

He concludes, "It need not go quickly." Moreover, Schulenberg adds that the "numerous short trills and appoggiaturas" preclude too fast a tempo.

The pianist Angela Hewitt, in the liner notes to her 1999 Hyperion recording, argues that by adding the al tempo di giga notation, Bach was trying to caution against taking too slow a tempo, and thus turning the dance into a forlane or siciliano. She does however argue, like Schulenberg, that it is a French gigue, not an Italian giga and does play it at an unhurried tempo.

Variatio 8. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

This is another two-part hand-crossing variation, in 3
4
time. The French style of hand-crossing such as is found in the clavier works of François Couperin is employed, with both hands playing at the same part of the keyboard, one above the other. This is relatively easy to perform on a two-manual harpsichord, but quite difficult to do on a piano.

Most bars feature either a distinctive pattern of eleven sixteenth notes and a sixteenth rest, or ten sixteenth notes and a single eighth note. Large leaps in the melody occur. Both sections end with descending passages in thirty-second notes.

Variatio 9. Canone alla Terza. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

This is a canon at the third, in 4
4
time. The supporting bass line is slightly more active than in the previous canons.

Variatio 10. Fughetta. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

Variation 10 is a four-voice fughetta, with a four-bar subject heavily decorated with ornaments and somewhat reminiscent of the opening aria's melody.


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c''' {
   \key g \major \time 2/2 \voiceOne
   R1*8 |
   g2\mordent g4.\prallprall fis16 g |
   a4 fis d fis |
   b,4 e e, d' |
   cis4\prall b8 c a b c a |
   d4 d, d'2~ |
   d4 d, d'2~ |
   d2 cis |
   d1 | \bar ":|."
  }
  \new Voice \relative c'' {
   \voiceTwo
   R1*10 |
   \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = -8 R1 |
   R1 |
   a2\mordent a4.\prallprall g16 a |
   b4 g e g |
   e4 a a, g' |
   fis4\prall e8 fis d2 |
  }
 >>
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \key g \major \clef bass \voiceOne
   \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = 4 R1*2 |
   \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = 6 R1 |
   \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = 4 R1 |
   d2\mordent d4.\prallprall c16 d |
   e4 c a c |
   a4 d d, c' |
   b4\prall a8 b g b a c |
   b8 a b4 e2~ |
   e4 a, d2~ |
   d4 b e2~ |
   e4 d cis e |
   a,8 b a g fis2 |
   g2 r |
   r4 e a2~ |
   a8 a g a fis |
  }
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \voiceTwo
   g2\mordent g4.\prallprall fis16 g |
   a4 fis d fis |
   e4 a a, g' |
   fis4\prall e8 fis d e c d |
   b8 d e fis g4 b, |
   c2 r4 a |
   fis2 r4 d |
   g4 d' b d |
   g2 r4 e |
   fis2 r4 d |
   g2 r4 e |
   a2 r4 g |
   fis2 r4 d |
   g,4 b g e |
   a2 r4 a |
   d1 |
  }
 >>
>>

The exposition takes up the whole first section of this variation (pictured). First the subject is stated in the bass, starting on the G below middle C. The answer (in the tenor) enters in bar 5, but it's a tonal answer, so some of the intervals are altered. The soprano voice enters in bar 9, but only keeps the first two bars of the subject intact, changing the rest. The final entry occurs in the alto in bar 13. There is no regular counter-subject in this fugue.

The second section develops using the same thematic material with slight changes. It resembles a counter-exposition: the voices enter one by one, all begin by stating the subject (sometimes a bit altered, like in the first section). The section begins with the subject heard once again, in the soprano voice, accompanied by an active bass line, making the bass part the only exception since it doesn't pronounce the subject until bar 25.

Variatio 11. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

This is a virtuosic two-part toccata in 12
16
time. Specified for two manuals, it is largely made up of various scale passages, arpeggios and trills, and features much hand-crossing of different kinds.

Variatio 12. a 1 Clav. Canone alla Quarta in moto contrario

[edit]

This is a canon at the fourth in 3
4
time, of the inverted variety: the follower enters in the second bar in contrary motion to the leader.

In the first section, the left hand accompanies with a bass line written out in repeated quarter notes, in bars 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. This repeated note motif also appears in the first bar of the second section (bar 17, two Ds and a C), and, slightly altered, in bars 22 and 23. In the second section, Bach changes the mood slightly by introducing a few appoggiaturas (bars 19 and 20) and trills (bars 29–30).

Variatio 13. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

This variation is a slow, gentle and richly decorated sarabande in 3
4
time. Most of the melody is written out using thirty-second notes, and ornamented with a few appoggiaturas (more frequent in the second section) and a few mordents. Throughout the piece, the melody is in one voice, and in bars 16 and 24 an interesting effect is produced by the use of an additional voice. Here are bars 15 and 16, the ending of the first section (bar 24 exhibits a similar pattern):


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff \relative c'' {
  \key g \major \time 3/4
  cis32 g fis g a g fis g e' cis b cis d cis b cis g' e d e a g fis e |
  << { fis16 cis cis d d g, g fis fis4 } \\ { s4 r8 cis d4 } >> | \bar ":|."
 }
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \key g \major \clef bass \voiceOne
   a8[ cis] g' e cis4 |
   d8[ e,] f bes a4 |
  }
  \new Voice \relative c {
   \voiceTwo
   a8 a'16. g32 a4. a8 |
   d,2. |
  }
 >>
>>

Variatio 14. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

This is a rapid two-part hand-crossing toccata in 3
4
time, with many trills and other ornamentation. It is specified for two manuals and features large jumps between registers. Both features (ornaments and leaps in the melody) are apparent from the first bar: the piece begins with a transition from the G two octaves below middle C, with a lower mordent, to the G two octaves above it with a trill with initial turn.

Bach uses a loose inversion motif between the first half and the second half of this variation, "recycling" rhythmic and melodic material, passing material that was in the right hand to the left hand, and loosely (selectively) inverting it.

Contrasting it with Variation 15, Glenn Gould described this variation as "certainly one of the giddiest bits of neo-Scarlatti-ism imaginable."[10]

Variatio 15. Canone alla Quinta. a 1 Clav.: Andante

[edit]

This is a canon at the fifth in 2
4
time. Like Variation 12, it is in contrary motion with the leader appearing inverted in the second bar. This is the first of the three variations in G minor, and its melancholic mood contrasts sharply with the playfulness of the previous variation. Pianist Angela Hewitt notes that there is "a wonderful effect at the very end [of this variation]: the hands move away from each other, with the right suspended in mid-air on an open fifth. This gradual fade, leaving us in awe but ready for more, is a fitting end to the first half of the piece."

Glenn Gould said of this variation, "It's the most severe and rigorous and beautiful canon ... the most severe and beautiful that I know, the canon in inversion at the fifth. It's a piece so moving, so anguished—and so uplifting at the same time—that it would not be in any way out of place in the St. Matthew's Passion; matter of fact, I've always thought of Variation 15 as the perfect Good Friday spell."[10]

Variatio 16. Ouverture. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

The entire set of variations can be seen as being divided into two halves, clearly marked by this grand French overture, commencing with particularly emphatic opening and closing chords. It consists of a slow prelude with dotted rhythms with a following fugue-like contrapuntal section. Here Bach follows his custom of beginning the second half of a major collection with a movement in French style, as with the earlier Clavier-Übung volumes, in both parts of the Well-Tempered Clavier, in the Musical Offering (#4 of the numbered canons) and in the early version of the Art of Fugue (#7 of P 200).

Variatio 17. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

This variation is another two-part virtuosic toccata. Peter Williams sees echoes of Antonio Vivaldi and Domenico Scarlatti here. Specified for two manuals, the piece features hand-crossing. It is in 3
4
time and usually played at a moderately fast tempo. Rosalyn Tureck is one of the very few performers who recorded slow interpretations of the piece. In making his 1981 re-recording of the Goldberg Variations, Glenn Gould considered playing this variation at a slower tempo, in keeping with the tempo of the preceding variation (Variation 16), but ultimately decided not to because "Variation 17 is one of those rather skittish, slightly empty-headed collections of scales and arpeggios which Bach indulged when he wasn't writing sober and proper things like fugues and canons, and it just seemed to me that there wasn't enough substance to it to warrant such a methodical, deliberate, Germanic tempo."[10]

Variatio 18. Canone alla Sesta. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

This is a canon at the sixth in 2
2
time. The canonic interplay in the upper voices features many suspensions. Commenting on the structure of the canons of the Goldberg Variations, Glenn Gould cited this variation as the extreme example of "deliberate duality of motivic emphasis ... the canonic voices are called upon to sustain the passacaille role which is capriciously abandoned by the bass." Nicholas Kenyon calls Variation 18 "an imperious, totally confident movement which must be among the most supremely logical pieces of music ever written, with the strict imitation to the half-bar providing ideal impetus and a sense of climax."[11]

Variatio 19. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

This is a dance-like three-part variation in 3
8
time. The same sixteenth note figuration is continuously employed and variously exchanged between each of the three voices. This variation incorporates the rhythmic model of variation 13 (complementary exchange of quarter and sixteenth notes) with variations 1 and 2 (syncopations).[12]

Variatio 20. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

This variation is a virtuosic two-part toccata in 3
4
time. Specified for two manuals, it involves rapid hand-crossing. The piece consists mostly of variations on the texture introduced during its first eight bars, where one hand plays a string of eighth notes and the other accompanies by plucking sixteenth notes after each eighth note. To demonstrate this, here are the first two bars of the first section:


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff \relative c'' {
  \key g \major \time 3/4
  r16 b r g r d r b r \clef bass g fis e |
  fis8 a \clef treble d fis a d |
 }
 \new Staff \relative c' {
  \key g \major
  g8 b d g b cis |
  r16 d r a r fis r d r \clef bass a g fis |
 }
>>

Variatio 21. Canone alla Settima

[edit]

The second of the three minor key variations, variation 21 has a tone that is somber or even tragic, which contrasts starkly with variation 20.[13] The bass line here is one of the most eloquent found in the variations, to which Bach adds chromatic intervals that provide tonal shadings.[13] This variation is a canon at the seventh in 4
4
time; Kenneth Gilbert sees it as an allemande despite the lack of anacrusis.[14] The bass line begins the piece with a low note, proceeds to a slow lament bass and only picks up the pace of the canonic voices in bar 3:


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff \relative c'' {
  \key g \minor
  r2 r16 a bes c d c bes a |
  g8 d' g, c~ c16 fis, g a bes a g fis |
  g8 r r g as g as a |
 }
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \key g \minor \clef bass \voiceOne
   r16 bes c d es d c bes a8 es' a, d~ |
   d16 g, a bes c bes a g a8 r r a |
   bes8 a bes b c16 d es d c bes a g |
  }
  \new Voice \relative c {
   \voiceTwo
   g4 g' fis f |
   e4 es d16 a bes c d8 d, |
   g16 d' e fis g f e d c8 b c cis |
  }
 >>
>>

A similar pattern, only a bit more lively, occurs in the bass line in the beginning of the second section, which begins with the opening motif inverted.

Variatio 22. a 1 Clav. alla breve

[edit]

This variation features four-part writing with many imitative passages and its development in all voices but the bass is much like that of a fugue. The only specified ornament is a trill which is performed on a whole note and which lasts for two bars (11 and 12).

The ground bass on which the entire set of variations is built is heard perhaps most explicitly in this variation (as well as in the Quodlibet) due to the simplicity of the bass voice.

Variatio 23. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

Another lively two-part virtuosic variation for two manuals, in 3
4
time. It begins with the hands chasing one another, as it were: the melodic line, initiated in the left hand with a sharp striking of the G above middle C, and then sliding down from the B one octave above to the F, is offset by the right hand, imitating the left at the same pitch, but a quaver late, for the first three bars, ending with a small flourish in the fourth:


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff \relative c'' {
  \key g \major \time 3/4
  r8 g b'16 a g fis e d cis b |
  a16 g fis8 a'16 g fis e d cis b a |
  g16 fis e8 g'16 fis e d cis b a g |
  fis16 e d8 r r16 e32 fis g a b cis d8 |
 }
 \new Staff \relative c'' {
  \key g \major
  g8 b'16 a g fis e d cis b a g |
  fis8 a'16 g fis e d cis b a g fis |
  e8 g'16 fis e d cis b a g fis e |
  d8 \clef bass r16 c!32 b a g fis e d8 r r16 c! |
 }
>>

This pattern is repeated during bars 5–8, only with the left hand imitating the right one, and the scales are ascending, not descending. We then alternate between hands in short bursts written out in short note values until the last three bars of the first section. The second section starts with this similar alternation in short bursts again, then leads to a dramatic section of alternating thirds between hands. Williams, marvelling at the emotional range of the work, asks: "Can this really be a variation of the same theme that lies behind the adagio no 25?"[This quote needs a citation]

Variatio 24. Canone all'Ottava. a 1 Clav.

[edit]

This variation is a canon at the octave, in 9
8
time. The leader is answered both an octave below and an octave above; it is the only canon of the variations in which the leader alternates between voices in the middle of a section. [citation needed]

Variatio 25. a 2 Clav.: Adagio

[edit]

Variation 25 is the third and last variation in G minor; it is marked adagio in Bach's own copy[15] and is in 3
4
time. The melody is written out predominantly in sixteenth and thirty-second notes, with many chromaticisms. This variation generally lasts longer than any other piece of the set.

Wanda Landowska famously described this variation as "the black pearl" of the Goldberg Variations.[16] Williams writes that "the beauty and dark passion of this variation make it unquestionably the emotional high point of the work",[17] and Glenn Gould said that "the appearance of this wistful, weary cantilena is a master-stroke of psychology."[18] In an interview with Gould, Tim Page described this variation as having an "extraordinary chromatic texture"; Gould agreed: "I don't think there's been a richer lode of enharmonic relationships any place between Gesualdo and Wagner."[10]

Variatio 26. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

In sharp contrast with the introspective and passionate nature of the previous variation, this piece is another virtuosic two-part toccata, joyous and fast-paced. Underneath the rapid arabesques, this variation is basically a sarabande.[14] Two time signatures are used, 18
16
for the incessant melody written in sixteenth notes and 3
4
for the accompaniment in quarter and eighth notes; during the last five bars, both hands play in 18
16
.

Variatio 27. Canone alla Nona. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

Variation 27 is the last canon of the piece, at the ninth and in 6
8
time. This is the only canon where two manuals are specified not due to hand-crossing difficulties, and the only pure canon of the work, because it does not have a bass line.

Variatio 28. a 2 Clav.

[edit]

This variation is a two-part toccata in 3
4
time that employs a great deal of hand crossing. Trills are written out using thirty-second notes and are present in most of the bars. The piece begins with a pattern in which each hand successively picks out a melodic line while also playing trills. Following this is a section with both hands playing in contrary motion in a melodic contour marked by sixteenth notes (bars 9–12). The end of the first section features trills again, in both hands now and mirroring one another:


\new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \key g \major \time 3/4 \voiceOne
   \set Score.currentBarNumber = 13
   fis16 r r8 g16 r r8 a16 r r8 |
   b16 r r8 a16 r r8 g16 r r8 |
   a16 r r8 b16 r r8 a16 r r8 |
   \oneVoice fis16 d cis d \clef bass a fis e fis d4 | \bar ":|."
  }
  \new Voice \relative c' {
   \voiceTwo
   \repeat unfold 8 { r32 d e d e d e d } r cis d cis d cis d cis |
  }
 >>
 \new Staff <<
  \new Voice \relative c {
   \key g \major \clef bass \voiceOne
   \repeat unfold 8 { r32 fis g fis g fis g fis } r e fis e fis e fis e |
  }
  \new Voice \relative c {
   \voiceTwo
   d16 r r8 b16 r r8 a16 r r8 |
   g16 r r8 a16 r r8 b16 r r8 |
   a16 r r8 g16 r r8 a16 r r8 |
   \oneVoice d,16 fis e fis a d cis d fis4 |
  }
 >>
>>

The second section starts and closes with the contrary motion idea seen in bars 9–12. Most of the closing bars feature trills in one or both hands.

Variatio 29. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav.

[edit]

This variation consists mostly of heavy chords alternating with sections of brilliant arpeggios shared between the hands. It is in 3
4
time. A rather grand variation, it adds an air of resolution after the lofty brilliance of the previous variation. Glenn Gould states that variations 28 and 29 present the only case of "motivic collaboration or extension between successive variations."

Variatio 30. a 1 Clav. Quodlibet

[edit]
The Quodlibet as it appears in the first edition

The final variation is titled after the quodlibet tradition, in which multiple popular songs are played at once or in succession. According to Forkel, the many musicians of the Bach family practiced this tradition at gatherings:

As soon as they were assembled a chorale was first struck up. From this devout beginning they proceeded to jokes which were frequently in strong contrast. That is, they then sang popular songs partly of comic and also partly of indecent content, all mixed together on the spur of the moment. ... This kind of improvised harmonizing they called a Quodlibet, and not only could laugh over it quite whole-heartedly themselves, but also aroused just as hearty and irresistible laughter in all who heard them.

Though Bach never noted the sources of Variation 30,[19] Forkel's anecdote led to the belief that it is composed from German Volkslied melodies, as if to evoke the Bach gatherings.[20]

Since folk tunes commonly shared melodies, music alone does not identify the songs intended.[21] For example, part of Variation 30 traces back to the melody of the Italian Bergamask dance,[19] which not only gave rise to compositions by many musicians (such as Dieterich Buxtehude, under the title of La Capricciosa, for his thirty-two partite in G major, BuxWV 250[22]), but is even sung to various words in regions such as Iceland today.[23]

A handwritten note found in a collector's copy of the Clavier Ubung claims that Bach's student, Johann Christian Kittel, identified two folk tunes making up Variation 30 by their first lines. Siegfried Dehn of the Prussian royal library later appended purported full texts to this note:

  • Ich bin solang nicht bei dir g'west, ruck her, ruck her ("I have so long been away from you, come closer, come closer") and
  • Kraut und Rüben haben mich vertrieben, hätt mein' Mutter Fleisch gekocht, wär ich länger blieben ("Cabbage and turnips have driven me away, had my mother cooked meat, I'd have opted to stay"), ascribed to the Bergamask theme.[24]

Dehn's texts, though unsourced, stand as the only historical evidence for the provenance of Bach's Quodlibet and are commonly quoted. Today, the identity of "Kraut und Rüben..." is uncontroversial, since multiple versions of the text, including some explicitly set to the Bergamask theme, are preserved.[19] In contrast, the "Ich bin solang..." text is much more obscure,[25] and these words have not been found in any Volkslied archives.[19]

Other bars of Variation 30 can be heard as incipits of yet more songs, though none have been identified.[26]

Aria da Capo

[edit]

A note-for-note repeat of the aria at the beginning. Williams writes that the work's "elusive beauty ... is reinforced by this return to the Aria. ... no such return can have a neutral Affekt. Its melody is made to stand out by what has gone on in the last five variations, and it is likely to appear wistful or nostalgic or subdued or resigned or sad, heard on its repeat as something coming to an end, the same notes but now final."[27]

Canons on the Goldberg ground, BWV 1087

[edit]
Haussmann's portrait of Bach depicts him holding the manuscript to BWV 1076, which is also the thirteenth canon in the Goldberg Canon cycle.

When Bach's personal copy of the printed edition of the Goldberg Variations (see above) was discovered in 1974, it was found to include an appendix in the form of fourteen canons built on the first eight bass notes from the aria. It is speculated that the number 14 refers to the ordinal values of the letters in the composer's name: B(2) + A(1) + C(3) + H(8) = 14.[28] Among those canons, the eleventh and the thirteenth are first versions of BWV 1077 and BWV 1076; the latter is included in the famous portrait of Bach painted by Elias Gottlob Haussmann in 1746.[29]

Transcribed and popularized versions

[edit]

The Goldberg Variations has been reworked freely by many performers, changing either the instrumentation, the notes, or both. The Italian composer Busoni prepared a greatly altered transcription for piano. According to the art critic Michael Kimmelman, "Busoni shuffled the variations, skipping some, then added his own rather voluptuous coda to create a three-movement structure; each movement has a distinct, arcing shape, and the whole becomes a more tightly organized drama than the original."[30] Other arrangements include:

Editions of the score

[edit]
  • Ralph Kirkpatrick. New York/London: G. Schirmer, 1938. Contains an extensive preface by the editor and a facsimile of the original title page.
  • Hans Bischoff. New York: Edwin F. Kalmus, 1947 (editorial work dates from the nineteenth century). Includes interpretive markings by the editor not indicated as such.
  • Christoph Wolff. Vienna: Wiener Urtext Edition, 1996. An urtext edition, making use of the new findings (1975) resulting from the discovery of an original copy hand-corrected by the composer. Includes suggested fingerings and notes on interpretation by the harpsichordist Huguette Dreyfus.
  • Reinhard Böß. München: edition Text+Kritik, 1996. Verschiedene Canones ... von J. S. Bach (BWV 1087). ISBN 3-88377-523-1 Edition of the canons in BWV 1087 only. The editor suggests a complete complement of all fourteen canons.
  • Werner Schweer, 2012. The Goldberg Variations, MuseScore Edition created for the Open Goldberg Variations Project and released as public domain. Available online at MuseScore.com

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, is a monumental keyboard composition by the German Baroque master Johann Sebastian Bach, consisting of an opening aria followed by thirty diverse variations that return to the aria at the end, all structured around a repeating bass line and harmonic pattern in G major. Published in 1741 as the fourth and final part of Bach's Clavier-Übung series—a collection of pedagogical yet virtuoso works for harpsichord—it was explicitly titled Clavier-Übung, consisting of an Aria with Diverse Variations for the Harpsichord with Two Manuals, Prepared for the Recreation of the Soul of Music Lovers. The work's intricate architecture divides the variations into ten groups of three, with every third variation forming a canon that progressively increases in interval from unison to ninths, culminating in the thirtieth variation as a lively quodlibet blending folk tunes; this symmetrical design, rich in numerical symbolism (such as multiples of three), showcases Bach's mastery of counterpoint, stylistic diversity—from French overtures to Italian concertos—and technical demands like hand-crossing and ornamentation. Though no formal dedication appears in the original edition, a famous anecdote from Johann Nikolaus Forkel's 1802 of Bach claims the variations were commissioned by Russian ambassador Count Hermann Karl von Keyserlingk to soothe his , with performances by the fourteen-year-old harpsichordist Johann Gottlieb Goldberg—a pupil of Bach—earning the work its posthumous nickname; scholars now view this story as largely apocryphal, citing the lack of contemporary evidence and Goldberg's youth, though the piece may have been a gift to Keyserlingk around the time of publication. Bach's own annotated copy, discovered in 1974, includes fourteen additional canons (BWV 1087) appended as an enigmatic puzzle, possibly incorporating his personal numerical signature (14 = B-A-C-H in German notation), further underscoring the composition's depth as a summation of his keyboard art. Rarely performed publicly during the century after Bach's death in 1750 due to its complexity and the decline of the harpsichord, the Goldberg Variations experienced a revival in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, with Wanda Landowska's 1933 recording on harpsichord reintroducing it to modern audiences; its enduring popularity surged further with Glenn Gould's influential 1955 piano recording, which emphasized its rhythmic vitality and has inspired countless interpretations across instruments, cementing its status as one of Bach's supreme achievements in variation form. Praised by contemporaries like Johann Philipp Kirnberger in 1774 as Bach's finest set of variations, the work continues to captivate performers and scholars for its blend of intellectual rigor, emotional range—from the poignant minor-key passacaglia in Variation 25 to the exuberant finale—and innovative fusion of Baroque genres.

Historical Background

Composition Circumstances

The Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, were likely composed by Johann Sebastian Bach in 1741 during his mature period in , where he had served as of the Thomasschule since 1723. This timing aligns with the culmination of Bach's systematic publication of keyboard works under the Clavier-Übung series, of which the Variations form the fourth and final installment, following the partitas (1726–1731), the Italian Concerto and (1735), and the organ chorales (1739). The work's creation occurred amid Bach's demanding responsibilities as director of the city's Collegium Musicum from 1729 onward, a role akin to that of a , where he curated weekly concerts featuring both sacred and secular repertoire. Bach's compositional approach in the Variations drew from contemporary variation practices prevalent in European keyboard music, including the expansive sets found in George Frideric Handel's suites. The aria's underlying structure—a repeating eight-bar ground bass—reflects influences from the English ground bass tradition, as seen in earlier works by composers like , where a fixed bass line supports melodic elaboration over multiple statements. These elements allowed Bach to expand the genre beyond simple diversions, integrating French dance styles, Italian counterpoint, and German polyphony into a cohesive cycle. Personal motivations for the Variations appear tied to Bach's longstanding interest in pedagogical compositions for advanced keyboard students, as evidenced by his earlier Clavier-Übung volumes designed to cultivate technical and musical proficiency. In , Bach's household remained a vibrant center of musical activity, with his family—including sons like Carl Philipp Emanuel and Christoph Friedrich—actively participating in performances and studies that informed his creative output. This domestic environment, combined with Bach's role in mentoring pupils such as Johann Friedrich Agricola and Johann Philipp Kirnberger, likely shaped the work's intricate demands on performers.

Commission and Dedication

The Goldberg Variations originated from a legendary commission by Count Hermann Karl von Keyserlingk, the Russian ambassador to the in , who reportedly suffered from and requested soothing keyboard music to ease his sleepless nights. According to Johann Nikolaus Forkel's 1802 biography of Bach, the Count employed a young harpsichordist, Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, to perform such pieces and specifically asked Bach for compositions that were "of such a soothing and somewhat lively character" to make the time pass more agreeably; Bach duly provided the variations, which the Count named after Goldberg and rewarded with a gift of 100 . This portrays the work as a personalized remedy, composed around 1740–1741 during one of Bach's visits to . Johann Gottlieb Goldberg (baptized March 14, 1727, in Danzig; d. 1756 in ), a prodigious talent, served as the Count's personal musician from about 1739 and studied with , J.S. Bach's eldest son, during visits to . As a despite his youth—he was only 14 when the variations were published—Goldberg is traditionally credited as the work's first performer, though its technical demands raise doubts about his readiness at that age. The 1741 printed edition, titled Aria mit verschiedenen Veränderungen ("Aria with Diverse Variations") for with two manuals, bears no dedication to Keyserlingk or Goldberg; instead, its title page states it was "prepared for the refreshment of their spirits" (zur Gemüths-Ergetzung) by Bach for musical connoisseurs (denen Liebhabern). This omission, combined with the lack of contemporary evidence beyond Forkel's account—derived secondhand from Bach's sons nearly 60 years later—has prompted scholars to view the insomnia story as possibly embellished or apocryphal, emphasizing instead the work's broader artistic purpose within Bach's Clavier-Übung series.

Publication and Early History

Initial Publication

The Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, were first published in 1741 as the fourth installment of Johann Sebastian Bach's Clavier-Übung series, a collection of keyboard works issued over the course of his career. The edition was produced by Balthasar Schmid, a Nuremberg-based engraver and who had previously collaborated with Bach on other projects, including the third part of the Clavier-Übung in 1739. Schmid handled the entire process of copperplate engraving, printing, and initial distribution, releasing the work during the fair in autumn 1741 to capitalize on the event's commerce in printed music. Bach personally subsidized a significant portion of the engraving and production costs, undertaking the publication at his own —a common practice for composers of the era seeking greater control over their output but one that often yielded limited returns due to the specialized nature of the . The featured the German inscription Clavier-Übung bestehend in einer mit verschiedenen Veränderungen vors Clavicimbal mit 2 Manualen. Denen Liebhabern zur Gemüths-Ergetzung verfertiget von Johann , emphasizing the work's purpose as a diverting exercise for harpsichordists while omitting any reference to Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, the pupil later linked anecdotally to its commission. No formal dedication appears in the edition, though the work's association with Count Hermann Carl von Keyserlingk stems from a later . Priced at 3 thalers per copy—a substantial sum equivalent to several days' wages for a skilled —the edition was marketed toward musicians and discerning connoisseurs rather than broad audiences, given the variations' technical complexity and requirement for a two-manual . Distribution occurred primarily through Schmid's networks in and book fairs, though sales were modest, leaving surplus copies in circulation for decades and underscoring the work's initial niche appeal among elite performers.

Manuscript Copies and Early Editions

No autograph manuscript of Johann Sebastian Bach's Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, survives, with the 1741 printed edition serving as the for the work. The earliest manuscript copies date from the 1740s and were prepared by Bach's pupils, such as the one held by Harvard University's Loeb Music Library, which preserves the structure of the 1741 publication while introducing minor scribal variants in notation. These copies, such as the one held by Harvard University's Loeb Music Library, preserve the structure of the 1741 publication while introducing minor scribal variants in notation. Among the key early manuscripts is the so-called P 271 copy, housed in the (Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Mus. ms. Bach P 271), which is Bach's personal annotated exemplar of the first printed edition, discovered in 1974. This handexemplar includes Bach's own fingerings for certain variations, such as those in Variation 25, as well as corrections to the printed text, providing insight into his interpretive intentions. Textual variants across these early copies and the printed edition primarily concern repeats and ornaments, influencing subsequent interpretations. For instance, some pupil copies indicate optional repeats in variations like and No. 15 that are absent or ambiguous in the 1741 edition, while ornamentation differs in the execution of trills and mordents, particularly in the and canonic variations. Bach's annotations in P 271 further specify ornament realizations, such as added appoggiaturas in Variation 7, highlighting flexibility in performance practice. The first 19th-century edition appeared around 1804 from Hans Georg Nägeli's publishing house in Zurich, marking a revival of interest in Bach's keyboard works amid growing Romantic-era appreciation. This edition reproduced the 1741 text with minimal alterations but introduced modern clefs for broader accessibility. Carl Czerny's edition, published around 1850 by C.F. Peters in , added extensive fingerings, dynamic markings, and pedal indications tailored to , diverging from the harpsichord-oriented original and shaping 19th-century performances. These changes, including suggested repeats and expressive ornaments, reflected evolving instrumental techniques while preserving core structural variants from earlier sources.

Musical Structure

Instrumentation and Performance Practice

The Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, were composed for the harpsichord with two manuals, as explicitly stated on the title page of the 1741 first edition published by Balthasar Schmid in Nuremberg: "Clavier-Übung IV: Aria mit verschiedenen Veränderungen für die Clavier mit 2 Manualen." The term "Clavier" in this context refers to the harpsichord, the predominant keyboard instrument in Bach's time, which allowed for registration changes between manuals to achieve contrasting timbres and textures. Bach's score includes markings such as "a 1 Clav." (for one manual) in simpler variations and "a 2 Clav." (for two manuals) in more complex ones, enabling the performer to play independent lines on separate keyboards without interference. Several variations exploit the two-manual harpsichord's capabilities through hand-crossing techniques, where the hands overlap or leap across manuals to create polyphonic interplay. For instance, Variation 5, marked "a 1 ô vero 2 Clav.," features rapid scalar passages that benefit from manual separation to avoid collisions, while Variation 14, designated "a 2 Clav.," presents a toccata-like hand-crossing in 3/4 time with abundant trills and ornaments. Similar demands appear in Variations 8, 11, 20, and 28, underscoring the work's technical virtuosity tailored to the instrument's mechanical advantages over single-manual alternatives. In historical performance practice within Bach's circle, variants like the lute-harpsichord (Lautenwerk) were employed for their plucked, lute-like tone, which Bach himself favored; estate inventories confirm he owned two such instruments, suggesting their potential use for intimate renditions of the Variations. The pedal , equipped with a foot-operated bass keyboard, also circulated in Baroque and could extend the work's pedal points, as demonstrated in early recordings like Isolde Ahlgrimm's 1954 performance. and ornamentation followed contemporary conventions outlined in Johann Joachim Quantz's 1752 treatise Versuch einer Anweisung die Flöte traversiere zu spielen, which provided guidelines for keyboard execution, including affekt-based speeds (e.g., vivace for energetic variations) and improvised embellishments like trills and appoggiaturas to enhance expression without altering the core structure. While the remains the instrument of choice for historically informed performances, modern adaptations on have gained prominence since the , offering greater dynamic nuance and sustain, though scholars caution that the piano's mechanisms introduce expressive elements absent in Bach's era, potentially compromising authenticity. Organ transcriptions occur occasionally for their resonant sustain in large spaces, but they diverge further from the original's chamber intimacy and manual-specific demands.

Overall Form and Architecture

The Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, are structured as an followed by thirty variations, with the work concluding via a return to the aria, creating a symmetrical frame around the central variations. This design totals thirty-two movements, mirroring the thirty-two-bar length of the foundational ground bass. The aria itself is a in 3/4 time in , establishing a recurring bass line that underpins every variation, ensuring harmonic continuity throughout the composition. Architecturally, the thirty variations divide into ten ternary groups, where every third variation—specifically numbers 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, and 27—takes the form of a canon, progressing in intervallic ascent from unison to ninth. This patterned placement of canons provides rhythmic and contrapuntal anchors amid the diversity of styles, while the intervening variations explore freer forms such as arabesques and dances. Bach composed the work for a two-manual harpsichord, incorporating manual indications like "a 1 Clav." (one manual) or "a 2 Clav." (two manuals) in fifteen variations to manage hand independence, crossings, and textural contrasts, with these directives appearing in a pattern that alternates between soloistic intimacy and fuller registrations. The selection of thirty variations invites interpretation through numerical symbolism, potentially evoking a Trinitarian schema of 3 × 10, reinforced by the canonic triads within each group and the overall ternary organization. This structure aligns with Bach's documented interest in mathematical and theological proportions in his keyboard works. Harmonically, the entire cycle adheres rigorously to the aria's bass line and its implied chord progressions, with variations progressively intensifying in rhythmic drive, melodic elaboration, and polyphonic density to build a unified yet expansive edifice.

Core Elements of the Work

The Aria

The Aria, which opens Sebastian Bach's Goldberg Variations (BWV 988), is a in 3/4 time, characterized by a lyrical played in the right hand over a repeating bass line in the left. The piece follows a binary structure of 32 bars, divided into two equal 16-bar sections, each typically repeated, creating a symmetrical framework that establishes the harmonic and rhythmic foundation for the entire cycle. The melody unfolds with a singing quality, beginning on a high note and descending gracefully, while the bass consists of a 32-note ground pattern—one note per bar—articulated through broken chords that provide steady harmonic progression. Stylistically, the Aria draws on French Baroque influences, particularly in its elegant ornamentation and flowing character, evoking the refined idiom of the period rather than stricter Italian or German forms. The right hand features extensive embellishments, such as trills and appoggiaturas, which add expressive depth and are intended to be played with subtle variation on repeats, aligning with 18th-century performance practices. The bass functions in a pedal-like manner, anchoring the harmony on strong beats and emphasizing the second beat typical of the , which contributes to the movement's dignified yet gentle poise. Although it shares some traits with the style, such as its stately opening gesture, the Aria's galant simplicity distinguishes it within Bach's oeuvre. As the thematic core of the Goldberg Variations, the 's bass line and chord sequence serve as the unvarying ground upon which all variations are built, ensuring structural unity across the work. It reappears at the conclusion as an , often without the final trill or with simplified ornamentation, to provide symmetrical closure and reinforce the cycle's architectural balance. Interpretively, the demands a slow with a leisurely , allowing its affective qualities to emerge in the tradition of Affektenlehre, where conveys specific through rhythmic and melodic nuance. This performance approach highlights its serene, reflective mood—described historically as gentle and somewhat lively to soothe —prioritizing expressive phrasing over haste to underscore the piece's intimate, consoling character.

Variation Categories

The 30 variations in Johann Sebastian Bach's Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, are broadly classified by their textural characteristics, requirements for manual usage on the , and adherence to or free forms, creating a diverse yet unified set of movements derived from the aria's bass line and harmonic structure. Single-manual variations, such as Nos. 1–4, primarily focus on right-hand figuration and polyphonic lines, allowing performance on a single keyboard manual while incorporating imitative and rhythmic patterns reminiscent of lighter styles. For instance, Variation 1 features a two-voice texture in 3/4 time with hand-crossing elements akin to a , while Variation 2 employs a three-voice imitative structure in 2/4, evoking a . Variation 3 presents a canon at the unison in 12/8, and Variation 4 uses four voices in 3/8 for a passepied-like , all emphasizing melodic elaboration over dense . In contrast, double-manual variations, exemplified by Nos. 5 and 8, demand the use of two manuals to achieve full chordal textures and greater hand independence, enabling dynamic contrasts and fuller sonorities. Variation 5 is a lively 3/4 with hand-crossing that highlights interplay between the hands, while Variation 8 similarly employs a two-voice in 3/4, requiring manual separation for articulate execution and expressive depth. These pieces exploit the 's capabilities for terraced dynamics, distinguishing them from the more linear single-manual types. Dance-based variations draw on established Baroque genres for their rhythmic and formal profiles, including the in No. 7, the ouverture in No. 16, and the in No. 22. Variation 7 adopts a dotted 6/8 rhythm in two voices, infusing energetic propulsion; No. 16 emulates a with its slow dotted introduction in followed by a faster 3/8 fugal section in two to four voices; and No. 22 proceeds in with four voices in a gavotte-like , balancing elegance and contrapuntal rigor. These selections integrate national stylistic influences, such as French and Italian elements, within the work's overarching scheme. Free variations, unbound by strict canonic or dance constraints, explore eclectic forms like the fughetta in No. 10 and the quodlibet in No. 30, blending structural invention with popular or contrapuntal flair. Variation 10 unfolds as a four-voice fughetta in 2/2, prioritizing thematic development over rigid imitation, while No. 30 culminates in a four-voice quodlibet in 4/4, weaving folk tunes into the aria's framework for a humorous yet intricate close. Canons represent a specialized subset of these free forms, appearing every third variation with increasing intervallic distance. Across these categories, the variations exhibit a clear progression of increasing technical and expressive demands, from the relatively straightforward of early single-manual pieces to the virtuosic hand-crossing, dense , and ornamental elaboration in later ones, such as the trill-laden No. 28. This escalation underscores Bach's intent to elevate keyboard and performance standards, culminating in a cycle that tests the limits of musical architecture and interpretation.

Selected Variations

Canonic Variations

The nine canonic variations (Nos. 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, and 27) represent a cornerstone of contrapuntal ingenuity in Johann Sebastian Bach's Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, systematically exploring imitation across ascending intervals while adhering to the underlying aria's bass line and harmonic structure. These variations, occurring every third number in the cycle, build an intellectual framework that underscores the work's architectural depth, with each canon introducing progressively wider separations between the imitating voices. Their placement not only punctuates the sequence but also elevates the compositional rigor, transforming the sarabande-derived theme into a laboratory for canonic exploration. The interval sequence commences with the simplest imitation in Variation 3, a canon at the in 12/8 time featuring three voices and a lively bass motion that emphasizes progression. It advances to in Variation 6 (3/8, three voices, heightening tension), in Variation 9 (4/4, three voices, with a slower allowing dissonances), and the fourth in Variation 12 (3/4, three voices, employing an inverted answer to evade strong beats). The progression continues with the fifth in Variation 15 (2/4, three voices, in minor mode with an inverted subject and an Andante marking for lyrical expression), the sixth in Variation 18 (2/2, three voices, evoking texture in major mode), the seventh in Variation 21 (4/4, three voices, chorale-like in minor mode), the in Variation 24 (9/8, three voices, in character), and culminates in the ninth in Variation 27 (6/8, two voices, requiring two manuals for textural contrast). This ascending order—from to ninth—spans all practical intervals within and beyond the , demonstrating Bach's mastery in maintaining the aria's 32-bar framework amid increasing spatial demands. Technically, the canons incorporate advanced contrapuntal devices, particularly in later entries, to sustain interest and complexity on a single manual harpsichord for most variations, though Variation 27 specifies two manuals. Inversion appears prominently in Variations 12 and 15, where the imitating voice mirrors the leader in contrary motion, creating dynamic interplay without disrupting the ground bass. Augmentation, doubling note values in the leader for Variation 27, imparts a majestic, expansive quality to the final canon, while stretto—overlapping entries of voices—intensifies the texture in selections like Variation 21, compressing the imitative process for rhythmic urgency. These elements ensure each canon remains idiomatic to the keyboard, balancing technical precision with the work's ornamental demands, such as trills and hand-crossing passages. The expressive arc of the canonic variations unfolds from relative simplicity in the early unison and second canons, which prioritize rhythmic vitality and harmonic clarity, to escalating complexity in the later ones, where wider intervals and modal shifts (minor in Nos. 15 and 21) introduce contemplative depth. Variation 15's Andante tempo marks a pivotal expressive turn, infusing the canon at the fifth with a song-like melancholy that contrasts the surrounding vivacity, signaling a midpoint reflection before the cycle's intensification. This progression culminates in Variation 27's canon at the ninth, a structural crescendo that resolves the series with serene elegance. At their core, the canons embody mathematical elegance, serving as the intellectual pinnacle of the Goldberg Variations through their rigorous enumeration of intervals and potential. The sequence's ascent to the —exceeding the —may evoke , mirroring in Bach's canonic oeuvre and underscoring the work's numerological sophistication, such as the 32-bar preserved across all variations. This systematic yet artistically fluid design highlights Bach's fusion of logic and lyricism, inviting performers and listeners to unravel layers of contrapuntal .

Binary and Gigue Variations

The binary variations in Bach's Goldberg Variations, BWV 988—specifically Nos. 4, 13, 19, and 26—employ a characteristic structure, where each half typically repeats after modulating to the dominant in the first section and returning to the tonic in the second, echoing the aria's bass line while introducing symmetrical thematic development and dance-like phrasing. These variations reflect French and Italian influences through their graceful contours and idiomatic keyboard figurations, such as arpeggiated patterns and ornamental runs that demand agility from the performer on or . For instance, Variation 4 unfolds in 3/8 time as a lively passepied-like movement with imitative four-part , where a single motivic figure is presented straightforwardly and then inverted, creating a balanced between voices that highlights contrapuntal clarity without overt . Similarly, Variation 13, marked andante for two manuals in 3/4, adopts a -like melodic profile with dotted rhythms in the bass and an independent upper voice weaving lyrical lines over sustained harmonies, emphasizing expressive elegance over speed. Variation 19, also in 3/8 for one manual, suggests a character through its succinct phrasing—one bass note per bar—and ternary echoes within the binary frame, fostering a poised, introspective flow. Variation 26, in 3/4 for two manuals, incorporates hand-crossing and appoggiaturas in a style, with a simpler bass exposition and bubbling semiquaver lines that convey French ornamental refinement, building tension through contrary motion in the . The gigue variation, No. 7, stands out for its spirited 6/8 meter, marked al tempo di Giga in Bach's autograph manuscript, evoking the concluding dance of a Baroque suite with its dotted rhythms, hemiola shifts, and playful slides that infuse vitality into the cycle. This two-voice binary structure presents paired themes over a straightforward bass, allowing for graceful interplay and optional double-manual flourishes that enhance its idiomatic keyboard agility, drawing on Italianate liveliness blended with French dance poise. Collectively, these binary and variations provide essential rhythmic contrast within the overall architecture of the Goldberg Variations, interspersing the intellectual rigor of the canonic movements and the ornamental flourishes of the hand-crossing variations with accessible, dance-derived energies that underscore Bach's mastery of stylistic diversity and performer demands. Their balanced forms and thematic echoes reinforce the work's unifying ground bass, while the 's buoyant specifically invigorates the early stages of the cycle, preventing monotony and highlighting the harpsichord's expressive range.

Ouverture and Quodlibet

Variation 16, marked as an Ouverture and designated for a single manual, adopts the traditional form, consisting of a slow introductory section in 2/2 time followed by a faster fugal section in 3/8 time. The opening portion features characteristic dotted rhythms and imitative entries among two to four voices, creating a stately and majestic character that contrasts with the preceding minor-key Variation 15 by returning to the major mode. This variation serves as a structural pivot, dividing the set into two halves of sixteen movements each and emphasizing the work's symmetrical architecture. Technically demanding, it includes rapidly ascending scale passages that require precise articulation and rapid hand-crossing, evoking grandeur despite the single-manual specification. The second half transitions into a concise with entries among two to three voices, blending French stylistic elements with Bach's contrapuntal mastery, though the develops more briefly than in typical examples. This fusion underscores the variation's role as a semi-climactic moment, bridging the first half's more intimate variations with the escalating complexity of the second. Variation 30, the concluding Quodlibet for a single manual, presents a medley that overlays fragments of German folk songs onto the persistent ground bass of the aria, achieving a festive and multifaceted closure to the cycle. The primary tunes include "Ich bin so lang nicht bei dir g’west" (I have been away from you for so long), appearing in canonic at the and fourth, and "Kraut und Rüben haben mich vertrieben" (Cabbage and turnips have driven me away), a bergamasca-based treated canonically at the fifth, , and ninth. These songs, sourced from 18th-century collections such as Erk-Böhme's Deutscher Liederhort ( edition reflecting earlier oral traditions), blend popular vernacular elements with the learned of the variations, creating vocal-like lines that evoke a humorous, hymn-like exuberance. While traditionally interpreted as a lighthearted capstone—possibly alluding to domestic or familial themes to amuse Count Keyserlingk—the quodlibet also carries deeper symbolic weight, harmonizing secular folk motifs with sacred undertones, such as potential links to Lutheran hymns, over the 's bass to signify divine order amid variety. Its four-voice texture, with quasi-stretto passages in the second section, demands agile hand independence and rhythmic precision, culminating the work's technical and expressive arc before the returning . This eclectic fusion not only provides theatrical relief but reinforces the variations' thematic unity through motivic echoes of the opening .

Fourteen Canons on the Goldberg Ground, BWV 1087

The Fourteen Canons on the Goldberg Ground, BWV 1087, were discovered in 1974 within Johann Sebastian Bach's personal copy (Handexemplar) of the first edition of his Goldberg Variations, BWV 988, which had been found in a in and is now held at the as MS-17669. This autograph addition, inscribed on the inner side of the back cover, consists of fourteen short canons built upon the first eight notes of the bass line from the Goldberg , serving as a supplement to the printed 1741 score. Prior to this discovery, only two of the canons—numbers 11 and 13—were known, with the thirteenth appearing separately as BWV 1076. Composed likely in the mid- to late 1740s, with handwriting analysis suggesting a fair copy dated to 1747–1748, the set may represent revisions or extensions from an earlier draft possibly begun around 1741–1742. Intended for keyboard or unspecified instruments such as lute, the canons demonstrate Bach's mastery of contrapuntal techniques, progressing in complexity from two-voice structures to a six-voice triple canon. They include single, double, and triple canons, often in perpetual motion over the repeating bass, with entries at various intervals ranging from unison to twelfth, and incorporate devices like contrary motion, retrograde, augmentation, and diminution. Many of the canons are presented as musical puzzles (Kunst canons) with enigmatic notations and instructions, such as "per augmentationem" in the third canon, where the follower enters in double note values, or cryptic symbols requiring inversion or mirroring to resolve. The fourteenth canon, notated as a single melodic line with the ambiguous directive "etc.," implies a quadruple canon for four voices at different speeds and orientations, including upside-down playback, adding a layer of interpretive whimsy. Accompanying this is a brief supplementary piece, sometimes described as a whimsical double canon or , further emphasizing the set's playful yet intellectually rigorous character. In relation to the Goldberg Variations, BWV 1087 extends the work's canonic variations—found at the third, sixth, and ninth intervals in the main cycle—by providing additional canons that continue the series up to the twelfth, potentially intended as a concealed appendix to enhance the original publication's contrapuntal depth. Titled "Verschiedene Canones über die ersten 8 Fundamental-Noten vorheriger Arie" (Various Canons on the First Eight Fundamental Notes of the Preceding ), the set underscores Bach's fascination with the Goldberg bass as a foundational theme for exhaustive exploration.

Arrangements and Interpretations

Keyboard Transcriptions and Adaptations

The Goldberg Variations, originally composed for , have been adapted for other keyboard instruments, particularly and organ, allowing performers to explore the work's contrapuntal complexity through different timbres and expressive possibilities. These transcriptions often introduce modifications to suit the instrument's capabilities, such as added dynamics and pedaling on or registration changes on the organ, while preserving Bach's structural integrity. In the , adaptations emphasized pedagogical utility, with Carl Czerny's edition providing detailed fingerings to facilitate performance on the pianoforte for students and teachers. Czerny's version, published around , redistributed voices and added interpretive guidance to bridge the gap between the harpsichord's and the 's legato potential, making the variations more accessible for practice and study. This approach reflected the era's growing interest in Bach's keyboard music as educational material, influencing subsequent editions. A landmark romantic-era piano transcription is Ferruccio Busoni's 1914 arrangement, which reimagines the variations for the modern grand , incorporating expansive dynamics, pedal markings, and occasional reorchestrations to heighten emotional expression. Busoni's edition celebrates the 's sonorous range and sustaining power, transforming Bach's precise into a more dramatic, symphonic narrative while retaining the original's formal architecture. This adaptation exemplifies the 20th-century trend toward interpretive freedom in Bach performance, prioritizing romantic lyricism over historical fidelity. For the organ, Bach's composition includes indications for two manuals ("a 1 Clav." and "a 2 Clav."), suggesting compatibility with a pedal —an instrument Bach owned and used for organ practice—allowing bass lines to be played by pedals for greater resonance. Although the printed score specifies , these features imply a possible intent for pedal-equipped keyboards, enabling sustained tones and fuller textures akin to organ registration. Modern organ transcriptions build on this, such as Hansjörg Albrecht's , which utilizes multiple stops and pedalwork to articulate the variations' canonic intricacies and rhythmic vitality on a large instrument like the 2003 Mühleisen organ in Bad Liebenzell. Albrecht's version, recorded in 2007, highlights the organ's capacity for coloristic variety, contrasting the 's articulate clarity with broader, echoing sonorities. Key differences in these keyboard adaptations arise from instrumental idioms: the piano introduces nuanced dynamics and half-pedaling to blend voices and sustain melodies, fostering a more fluid, expressive interpretation compared to the harpsichord's inherent detachment and even tone production. Organ versions, meanwhile, exploit pedal bass for foundational depth and manual changes for dramatic contrasts, shifting emphasis from intimate polyphonic to architectural grandeur, though both maintain the variations' mathematical precision.

Orchestral and Ensemble Versions

One of the earliest orchestral adaptations of Bach's Goldberg Variations is Józef Koffler's arrangement for chamber orchestra, completed in 1938 and designed to translate the keyboard work's intricate polyphony into a small ensemble setting. This version emphasizes the structural variations while assigning contrapuntal lines to distinct instrumental sections, allowing for dynamic contrasts not feasible on solo harpsichord. In the late 20th century, Dmitry Sitkovetsky expanded his 1985 transcription into a full arrangement, premiered by the Britten under Thomas Gould, which distributes the original's manual crossings across , viola, and sections to enhance timbral variety. Similarly, Bernard Labadie's 2019 for the of St. Luke's reimagines the work as an 18th-century-style string ensemble piece, evoking the scale of Bach's while preserving the variations' rhythmic vitality. Chamber ensemble versions further diversify interpretive possibilities, such as Marcel Bitsch's transcription for octet, which reallocates the and variations among winds and strings to highlight canonic elements. Sitkovetsky's original 1985 string trio arrangement, performed by ensembles like the Sitkovetsky Trio with Gerard Caussé and , dedicates the inner voices to viola and , enabling intimate exploration of the quodlibet and binary forms. Wind-focused adaptations include Veronica Kraneis's version for , viola, and , which adapts the ground bass for breathier articulations, and Éva Tamássy's edition for with or organ support. Contemporary and jazz ensembles have produced innovative expansions, notably Uri Caine's 2000 The Goldberg Variations for variable ensembles including , , and percussion, which reinterprets the 30 variations into 70 pieces blending with Bach's themes. Sebastian Gramss's jazz adaptation for ensemble maintains the complete cycle, incorporating bass-driven rhythms to underscore the aria's pulse. More recent adaptations include Chad Kelly's 2023 arrangement for solo and baroque ensemble, performed by with Brecon Baroque, which employs varied instrumentation to highlight the work's stylistic diversity while adhering to period practices. In 2025, the French ensemble released a new transcription for , , , and , offering a fresh, intimate reinterpretation that celebrates the tenth anniversary of the group. Arranging the Goldberg Variations for or presents challenges in redistributing the keyboard's independent manual lines to sectional instruments without muddling contrapuntal clarity, as seen in efforts to balance the canonic overlaps and hand-crossing figurations across strings or . These adaptations often prioritize timbral expansion to evoke the work's architectural depth while navigating the risk of overwhelming Bach's precise polyphonic texture.

Editions and Scholarship

Historical Editions

In the late 18th century, posthumous manuscript copies of the Goldberg Variations circulated among Bach's pupils and admirers; these copies, often held in institutions such as the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, included added realizations, such as fingerings or interpretive annotations, to aid performance on contemporary keyboards, reflecting the period's pedagogical needs. The 19th-century edition published by Breitkopf & Härtel as part of the Bach-Gesellschaft Ausgabe (BGA, vol. 3, 1853), edited by Carl Ferdinand Becker, marked a significant step in standardizing the work for modern use. Becker based his edition on his personal copy of the 1741 print, but introduced editorial interventions including arbitrary accidentals, note readings, and ornament realizations of doubtful authenticity, such as misinterpreting mordents as trills with turns. These changes, while aiming to clarify the score, introduced inaccuracies criticized by contemporaries like Edward Dannreuther for deviating from the original engraving's intent. In the early , the Peters Edition (EP 4462, 1937), edited by Soldan, incorporated manuscript sources alongside the first print to address some BGA shortcomings, adding performance suggestions like dynamic markings and phrasing slurs suited to transcription. This edition reflected romantic-era biases toward expressive elaboration, including resolved ornaments and suggested tempi that emphasized emotional contrast over structural rigor, influencing generations of performers despite later critiques of such liberties.

Modern Critical Editions

The seminal modern critical edition of Bach's Goldberg Variations is found in the Neue Bach-Ausgabe (New Bach Edition), Serie V/2: Klavierübung IV. Goldberg-Variationen, BWV 988, edited by Christoph Wolff and published by Bärenreiter in 1974. This Urtext edition draws on all extant sources, including the 1741 first printing, manuscript copies, and the Handexemplar—a personal copy of the printed edition annotated by Bach himself, discovered in 1974—which reveals additional variants, insertions, and the Fourteen Canons, BWV 1087, appended to the work. Wolff's provides detailed commentary on textual discrepancies, canonic structures, and structural puzzles, such as the numerical symbolism in the variations, establishing a benchmark for source-critical accuracy. Complementing the NBA, G. Henle Verlag's Urtext edition, edited by Rudolf Steglich and first published in 1962 with a revision in 1974, offers a performer-friendly score with an appended of the 1741 print and analytical notes addressing the integration of BWV 1087 as a potential appendix to the variations. Steglich's commentary emphasizes the work's architectural coherence and variant readings from early copies, aiding pianists while maintaining to primary sources. A fingered version, prepared by Hans-Martin Theopold, supports modern keyboard performance. Bärenreiter's ongoing performing editions, such as the 1997 update edited by Christoph Wolff with fingering by Ragna Schirmer, build directly on the NBA, incorporating its scholarly insights into a practical format suitable for both harpsichord and piano. These editions highlight adaptations for two-manual instruments and include forewords discussing performance implications of the Handexemplar annotations. Advancements in the 21st century have enhanced access through digital resources, notably the Bach Digital portal launched in 2014 by the Bach-Archiv Leipzig and partners, which provides high-resolution scans and metadata for the Goldberg sources, including the Handexemplar and early prints, facilitating remote scholarly analysis; as of 2025, the portal continues to receive updates with new metadata and cross-references. Recent performing editions, such as Pierre Tran's 2020 annotated version emphasizing historically informed practices, further support performers with detailed ornamentation and articulation guidance based on 18th-century sources. The influence of historically informed performance practices has shaped annotations in revised editions, with emphasis on Baroque ornamentation, articulation, and tuning derived from 18th-century treatises, as seen in Wolff's updated commentaries.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.