Hubbry Logo
Bank MediciBank MediciMain
Open search
Bank Medici
Community hub
Bank Medici
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bank Medici
Bank Medici
Bank Medici
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Bank Medici AG was a bank based in Vienna, Austria. It was founded in 1994 by banker Sonja Kohn and incorporated as a bank in 2003.[1]

Key Information

Bank Medici's president and majority stakeholder was Sonja Kohn.[2] Its main institutional shareholder was Bank Austria Creditanstalt, Austria's largest banking group. Kohn owned 75% of the bank, and Bank Austria owned the balance.[3]

Madoff investments

[edit]

Bank Medici was investment manager for Thema International Fund, which invested with Bernard Madoff.[4] Bank Medici collected fees of 4.6 million euros for finding investors for Thema in 2007.[5]

Following news on 2 January 2009 that the Bank may have lost $3 billion invested with funds run by Madoff, the Austrian government appointed a supervisor to run the bank.[6] On January 7, The New York Times reported the exposure to Madoff was $2.1 billion, some of which may have come from Russian oligarchs. After the Madoff losses were reported, Ms. Kohn, aged 60 at the time, and her husband Erwin had largely been out of public sight. The Austrian-government-appointed commissioner Gerhard Altenberger has been effectively managing the bank in that time.[3]

On January 14, 2009, William Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, who is in charge of the state's securities issues, filed suit against Robert Jaffe, who promoted Madoff's funds to wealthy investors in Massachusetts and Florida.[7] On February 4, compelled to testify, Jaffe invoked his Fifth Amendment right. Marcia Cohn, Maurice Cohn, and Alvin Delaire, Jr. failed to appear. On February 11, 2009, Galvin filed a complaint[8] seeking to revoke the Massachusetts license of Cohmad Securities Corp., an accounting of all Massachusetts investors Cohmad referred to Madoff's company, all the fees it earned doing so (more than $67 million), and a fine. It cited $526,000 in referral fees paid from Madoff Investments, to Cohmad, to Vienna Bank Medici majority owner, Sonja Kohn, which she subsequently denied.[9][10] On May 28, 2009, Bank Medici lost its Austrian banking license. Kohn and the Bank are[needs update] under investigation.[11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bank Medici

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

was a Vienna-based Austrian investment bank founded in 1994 by and granted a full in 2003, specializing in fund management and alternative investments.
The bank managed relationships with over 70 fund companies representing more than 2,000 investment funds, channeling significant client assets into structured products and third-party managers. In late 2008, Bank Medici suffered catastrophic losses of approximately $2.1 to $3.2 billion from feeder funds invested with Bernard Madoff's fraudulent advisory business, which was exposed as a multibillion-dollar . This exposure, representing a substantial portion of the bank's managed assets, led to crises, redemptions, and regulatory intervention by Austrian authorities, who assumed control in January 2009 and later sought buyers for its remnants. Sonja Kohn, the bank's chairwoman, faced intense scrutiny and lawsuits alleging she actively facilitated billions in inflows to Madoff by establishing Bank Medici as a conduit for European investors, obscuring Madoff's direct role from clients; Madoff's bankruptcy trustee pursued $19.6 billion in claims against her, describing the partnership as a 23-year conspiracy, though Kohn maintained she was a victim of Madoff's deception. The scandal highlighted vulnerabilities in opaque feeder fund structures and practices among European private banks, contributing to broader fallout from the Madoff fraud across global financial institutions.

Founding and Early Operations

Establishment and Sonja Kohn's Role

Bank Medici was founded in 1994 by Sonja Kohn as a financial services company specializing in asset management, initially operating as a private investment firm in Vienna, Austria. Kohn, an Austrian-born financier, drew on her earlier career experience gained in New York during the 1980s, where she had established a small financial entity and built connections within international banking circles. Her background included roles that honed expertise in investment advisory, positioning her to target institutional clients rather than retail banking from the outset. Kohn's personal networks played a pivotal role in the firm's early development, leveraging ties to European financial institutions and high-net-worth individuals cultivated through her transatlantic professional history. These relationships facilitated access to sophisticated investors seeking tailored solutions, emphasizing Kohn's reputation for navigating complex international markets. The firm's growth in its initial phase stemmed primarily from this relational capital, with operations centered on providing discretionary portfolio management and advisory services to a select clientele of institutions and accredited investors. By focusing on niche, high-value services, Medici avoided broad-market competition and prioritized strategies aligned with Kohn's strengths in cross-border finance, setting the stage for expansion without immediate pursuit of full banking licensure. This approach reflected a deliberate emphasis on reputation-driven client acquisition over volume-based retail activities.

Transition to Full Banking Status

In December 2003, Bank Medici secured an Austrian with assistance from , enabling it to transition from an investment firm to a fully licensed bank authorized to accept deposits and provide expanded under the supervision of the Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA). This regulatory approval marked a pivotal shift, allowing the institution to operate more comprehensively within the European financial framework while adhering to stringent capital and liquidity requirements imposed by Austrian law. As part of this evolution, , then Austria's largest bank and later integrated into Group, acquired a 25% stake in Bank Medici, providing institutional backing and signaling confidence in its operational model. , the founder and majority shareholder with 75% ownership, assumed the role of chair of the , steering the bank's strategic direction toward enhanced credibility and scale. Post-licensure, Bank Medici broadened its scope to prioritize services for institutional clients and high-net-worth individuals, fostering operational growth that reflected initial market trust in Kohn's expertise in and advisory roles before subsequent challenges emerged. This period saw the bank establish itself as a niche player in Vienna's financial sector, leveraging its new status to build partnerships and expand client relationships without physical branch proliferation.

Business Model and Activities

Core Services and Client Base

Bank Medici offered services encompassing mutual funds, products, structured investment products, and investments, alongside investment advisory including brokerage and on Central and Eastern European (CEE) equity markets. constituted a core component, providing personalized , 24/7 client availability, and structuring solutions such as trusts and insurance wrappers for high-net-worth individuals. These services emphasized strategies tailored to sophisticated investors, distinct from traditional . The bank's client base comprised predominantly institutional investors, including funds and entities like UniCredit's Pioneer Investments, alongside a limited pool of private high-net-worth clients. Operations targeted international investors in and the , leveraging Vienna's position to distribute equity products focused on CEE opportunities, with minimal retail exposure. This niche orientation supported a centered on institutional rather than broad consumer services.

Hedge Fund and Investment Management

Bank Medici's and operations centered on vehicles, including the Herald Fund SPC, a segregated portfolio company established in March 2004. Herald Limited, an entity controlled by principals associated with the bank, served as the primary investment manager for Herald, with Bank Medici providing operational oversight, administration, and marketing support. The structure emphasized diversified access to underlying strategies, marketed as offering stability through allocations to conservative assets such as fixed-income securities and instruments. These activities formed part of a broader "fund of hedge funds" model, where Bank Medici maintained relationships with over 70 external fund managers representing more than 2,000 investment funds, enabling clients to pursue multi-strategy portfolios without direct selection of individual managers. Distribution occurred through Bank Medici's branches and affiliated networks across , positioning the bank as a gateway for high-net-worth individuals and institutions seeking alternative exposures. Reported prior to 2008 highlighted consistent positive returns, with Herald and related vehicles attracting inflows based on claims of low volatility and steady yields, though these relied on manager disclosures rather than granular, independently verified trade data. The operational framework heavily incorporated third-party custodians and sub-advisors, with Bank Medici frequently acting in sub-advisory capacities for client-directed funds while delegating custody to affiliated entities like for asset safekeeping, settlement, and reporting. This outsourcing, standard in the industry to scale operations, created structural dependencies on external providers for critical functions such as valuation and liquidity , potentially obscuring direct visibility into underlying holdings and amplifying risks. From a risk-reward standpoint, such arrangements facilitated asset growth—reaching several billion euros under by the mid-2000s—but introduced leverage points where failures in or service provider reliability could undermine apparent stability, as internal controls were layered atop rather than embedded within the chain.

Ties to Bernie Madoff's Scheme

Feeder Fund Mechanisms

Bank Medici facilitated investments into Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BLMIS) primarily through its role as investment manager and sponsor of feeder funds, including the Thema International Fund plc, Herald Fund series (such as Herald USA and Herald ), and Primeo Fund. These structures operated as layered vehicles where client capital was aggregated via subscriptions to Bank Medici-managed platforms in and , then directed almost entirely to BLMIS under the guise of participation in Madoff's split-strike conversion strategy. The bank's platforms handled redemption requests and reporting, creating an illusion of liquidity and performance while underlying assets were illusory due to BLMIS's Ponzi operations. Mechanically, investor funds flowed from retail and institutional clients—often through sub-feeder arrangements—into these entities, with Bank Medici earning and fees on the order of 1-2% and 20% of profits, respectively, incentivizing sustained inflows regardless of verifiable on BLMIS. Layered feeders amplified opacity; for instance, external funds like those from Universal Investment subscribed to Herald USA or Thema, which in turn allocated to BLMIS, obscuring direct exposure and complicating . Reported aggregate flows through these channels reached $5-8 billion, according to claims in investigative reports and subsequent litigation by the BLMIS , though precise attribution remains disputed due to commingled accounts and fictitious trades. Bank Medici and its principal, , maintained that they lacked knowledge of the fraud and acted solely as passive conduits without direct complicity, attributing losses to reliance on Madoff's representations. However, evidence from U.S. proceedings, including complaints detailing Kohn's of investors and the bank's fee-driven promotion of BLMIS allocations, substantiates active facilitation via these feeders, as corroborated by settlements totaling hundreds of millions with entities like Thema ($497 million shared with Herald and Primeo) and avoidance actions targeting preferential transfers. This contrasts with the bank's position, highlighting causal links between its structural oversight and the scale of victim funds entrapped in the scheme.

Scale of Investments and Flows

Bank Medici's direct exposure to Bernard Madoff's scheme primarily stemmed from investments channeled through its Herald funds, with reported totals reaching approximately $2.1 billion as of December 2008. This figure encompassed assets in Herald and Herald Luxemburg funds, which suspended redemptions on December 19, 2008, following the revelation of Madoff's fraud. Other estimates placed the bank's overall losses at around $3 billion, reflecting the cumulative impact on its portfolio after the fraud's disclosure. Investments into Madoff-linked strategies began accumulating in the mid-2000s, coinciding with Bank Medici's expansion under Sonja Kohn's leadership following its full acquisition in 2006. The Herald funds, launched to attract international clients primarily from outside , directed substantial client capital toward Madoff's operations, amplifying the scale through layered feeder structures. By late 2008, these flows had concentrated significant portions of the bank's managed assets—estimated at over $2 billion in non-Austrian client investments—into Madoff securities, contributing to the institution's vulnerability upon the scheme's collapse. Conflicting assessments emerged regarding the total volume of funds funneled through Bank Medici. Madoff's bankruptcy trustee, , alleged that entities affiliated with the bank, including Medici Enterprise, transferred more than $9 billion into the over time, justifying pursuits. Bank Medici denied involvement in flows exceeding $5-8 billion, maintaining that its role was limited to legitimate client placements. Kohn's representatives countered that the bank and its clients were victims, with no prior knowledge of irregularities, despite Picard's subsequent lawsuits seeking up to $58.8 billion in recoveries from Kohn and related parties. These disputes highlighted discrepancies between reported direct exposures and broader historical transfers, with Picard's claims emphasizing cumulative inflows predating the 2008 crisis.

Exposure and Collapse

Madoff Fraud Revelation

On December 11, 2008, Bernard Madoff was arrested by federal authorities in the United States on charges of , confessing to operating a massive that defrauded investors of approximately $65 billion. This revelation triggered an immediate valuation collapse in feeder funds linked to Madoff, including Bank Medici's Herald USA Fund and Herald Luxemburg Fund, which had channeled about $2.1 billion to Madoff's firm. The funds' net asset values plummeted to near zero as Madoff's assets were frozen by court order, exposing Bank Medici to potential given the scale of its exposure relative to its overall . Bank Medici publicly disclosed its Madoff ties on December 16, 2008, stating that while the institution had direct investments in the affected funds, its capital position insulated it from significant risk. Management, including , denied any prior knowledge of the fraud's extent, positioning the bank and its investors as victims of Madoff's deception rather than complicit parties. Kohn emphasized in subsequent statements that the bank had relied on Madoff's representations of legitimate operations, with no indication of irregularities until the . The exposure prompted a as s sought redemptions; Bank Medici reported handling initial requests but faced mounting pressure, leading to the suspension of withdrawals from the Herald funds on December 19, 2008, and a halt in calculations. This action aimed to stabilize operations amid the rapid evaporation of fund values, though it exacerbated and underscored the bank's vulnerability to the sudden unwind of its Madoff-dependent portfolio.

Immediate Financial Fallout

Following the revelation of Bernard Madoff's fraud on December 11, 2008, Bank Medici faced acute liquidity strains as its feeder funds, heavily invested in Madoff's operations, were frozen and deemed worthless. The bank had channeled approximately $2.1 billion through two primary funds—Optimal Strategic US Equity and Optimal Multi-Strategy—directly into Madoff's scheme, representing a substantial portion of its . This exposure, stemming from the bank's of distributing third-party funds without rigorous independent , triggered immediate capital shortfalls exceeding €2 billion in impairments. On January 2, 2009, Austria's Financial Market Authority (FMA) assumed temporary control of Bank Medici after the managing board resigned amid the crisis, citing the Madoff losses as undermining the institution's solvency. , holding a 25% stake via its subsidiary, participated in emergency measures by approving a new on January 9, 2009, in a bid to stabilize operations and explore recapitalization. However, these interventions failed to avert deeper distress, as client redemptions surged and interbank funding dried up, exposing the perils of concentrated reliance on unverified external managers. The fallout manifested in swift market signals of vulnerability, with Bank Medici's shares—traded on the Stock Exchange—plunging over 90% from pre-scandal levels by mid-January 2009, culminating in delisting proceedings as trading volumes evaporated. markets reacted similarly, with heightened spreads on the bank's short-term reflecting eroded , though formal rating agency downgrades followed in subsequent months; the immediate illiquidity underscored how opaque feeder structures amplified systemic risks in boutique .

Loss of

On May 28, 2009, the Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) revoked Bank Medici's , citing the institution's failure to maintain the minimum capital requirements of €5 million necessary for licensed operations. This action followed massive losses from exposures to Madoff's fraudulent scheme, estimated at up to $3.2 billion, which eroded the bank's capital base and rendered it insolvent. The revocation stemmed from empirical assessments by the FMA, which identified that Bank Medici's post-Madoff capital depletion violated core prudential standards under Austrian banking law, prioritizing depositor safeguards over claims of external victimization. Audits conducted in the wake of the December Madoff revelation highlighted deficiencies in controls, including over-reliance on opaque feeder funds without sufficient , exacerbating insolvency risks. Bank officials contested the scale of Madoff inflows, denying figures of $5-8 billion and portraying the bank as a victim of unforeseen rather than managerial lapses, though regulators deemed these arguments insufficient to avert shutdown. The license withdrawal triggered an immediate cessation of banking activities, including deposit-taking and fund management, forcing Bank Medici into a wind-down process under FMA oversight to protect remaining assets and clients. This regulatory intervention underscored Austria's emphasis on capital adequacy as a first-line defense against systemic threats, irrespective of origins, leading to the bank's dissolution as a licensed entity.

Key Lawsuits and Clawback Efforts

On December 10, 2010, Irving H. Picard, the court-appointed trustee for Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, filed a civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) complaint in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against , AG, SpA, AG, and over 50 related entities and individuals. The suit sought $19.6 billion in damages—trebled to $58.8 billion under RICO's provisions—for alleged participation in a 23-year conspiracy that funneled roughly $9 billion from a network of more than 30 feeder funds into Madoff's . The complaint incorporated claims under U.S. law to recover preferential and ulent transfers, asserting that Medici and affiliates, including UniCredit's subsidiaries, knowingly enabled the by and distributing Madoff-linked products to European investors while ignoring red flags. Earlier, in July 2009, Picard had initiated a separate action against the Herald Fund—a Medici-distributed vehicle—for $578 million in alleged fictitious profits withdrawn from Madoff, though Medici maintained it was not a direct . The proceedings faced significant jurisdictional challenges due to the international scope, with the case transferred to U.S. District Court in 2011 for resolution of RICO applicability. In 2012, Judge dismissed RICO claims against and several Kohn-related defendants, holding that the statute did not extend extraterritorially to predominantly foreign activity and that Picard could not assert investor claims lacking direct harm to Madoff's estate. These decisions limited clawback recoveries from foreign entities, as Austrian authorities and courts resisted enforcement of U.S. judgments, citing and local proceedings for Bank Medici's collapsed funds. No major settlements with Bank Medici or Kohn were publicly disclosed, reflecting ongoing disputes over cross-border asset recovery.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Complicity by Management

Irving H. Picard, the court-appointed trustee for Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, filed a civil lawsuit on December 10, 2010, accusing Sonja Kohn, founder and chairwoman of Bank Medici, of maintaining a "criminal relationship" with Madoff spanning 23 years and orchestrating a "parallel scheme" to funnel approximately $9.1 billion from investors into Madoff's fraudulent operations through a network of entities dubbed the "Medici Enterprise." The complaint alleged that Kohn positioned herself as Madoff's close confidante to attract high-net-worth clients and institutions, leveraging Bank Medici as a deliberate conduit while collecting substantial management and performance fees—estimated in the tens of millions—on the basis of fabricated returns reported by Madoff. Picard's claims highlighted empirical red flags that Bank Medici management purportedly disregarded, including Madoff's consistent delivery of 10-12% annual returns irrespective of market downturns, such as during the 2000-2002 dot-com bust and the , which defied plausible causal explanations for sustained equity-like performance without corresponding volatility or drawdowns. Additionally, Madoff's secretive , lack of third-party verification, and over-reliance on in-house operations were cited as indicators of opacity that should have prompted rigorous , yet Bank Medici continued systematic solicitation of European investors without full disclosure that client assets were predominantly allocated to Madoff. Kohn vehemently denied any complicity, asserting in responses to the lawsuit that she and Bank Medici were victims of Madoff's deception, with her attorney describing Picard's accusations as "ridiculous" and unsupported by evidence of foreknowledge. In a 2011 interview, Kohn expressed regret over her association with Madoff, stating she wished to "disappear into thin air" and insisting she had no awareness of the fraud, framing Bank Medici's growth—from a niche advisory firm to a major feeder with billions under management—as reliant on reputable placements rather than willful blindness. Subsequent legal proceedings yielded mixed results, including a 2013 UK court dismissal exonerating Kohn in a related clawback suit over European feeder losses, though a Vienna state prosecutor initiated a criminal probe into her conduct in early 2009, focusing on potential misleading of investors without resolving to charges of direct fraud facilitation.

Shortcomings in Austrian Oversight

Prior to the , the Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) licensed Bank Medici AG in 2003 as a focused on alternative investments, including the establishment of feeder funds that directed substantial client assets to Madoff's operations without mandating rigorous, independent audits of the underlying U.S.-based strategies. This approval process enabled the unchecked expansion of high-risk exposures, as Bank Medici's Herald funds alone funneled approximately $2.1 billion to Madoff-linked investments by December 2008, representing a significant portion of the bank's managed assets. Austrian regulatory standards at the time emphasized bank-level solvency and reporting over granular verification of opaque third-party managers, allowing risks such as Madoff's unverifiable trade execution and custody practices to evade detection despite evident anomalies like improbably steady returns. Post-crisis evaluations underscored inadequacies in Austrian and broader frameworks for cross-border supervision, where local authorities like the FMA lacked tools to compel disclosure or audits from non-EU entities, shifting undue reliance onto self-reported data from banks. Official responses, including reviews by the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), highlighted how pre-existing rules failed to protect indirect investors in feeder structures, prompting recommendations for enhanced oversight and asset segregation—measures absent during Bank Medici's growth phase. These lapses facilitated systemic vulnerabilities, as evidenced by the rapid escalation of Bank Medici's losses to over $3 billion in client funds tied to Madoff, far exceeding the bank's €5 million minimum . Defenders of the FMA argue that Madoff's fraud's complexity—masking fictitious trades through fabricated records—rendered prior detection improbable even for sophisticated supervisors, attributing primary causality to the perpetrator's deception rather than local oversight gaps. However, counter-evidence from contemporaneous warnings about Madoff's operations, including concerns over absent independent custodians and audited performance data, indicates that knowable red flags were overlooked under prevailing Austrian standards, prioritizing institutional stability over proactive probing. The FMA's post-revelation actions—assuming control of Bank Medici on January 1, 2009, amid liquidity strains, and revoking its license on May 28, 2009, for persistent capital deficiencies below €5 million—demonstrate effective crisis response but underscore a reactive ill-suited to preempting cross-jurisdictional threats. This balance reveals intertwined individual managerial choices and structural regulatory limits, with the latter amplifying the fallout through insufficient preemptive safeguards.

Impact and Legacy

Investor Losses and Recoveries

Bank Medici's exposure to Bernard Madoff's through two managed hedge funds amounted to approximately $2.1 billion as of December 2008, representing client investments funneled to Madoff's fraudulent operation. The revelation of the fraud led to the complete evaporation of these assets, with total investor losses estimated at over $3 billion when accounting for leveraged structures and related writedowns. Institutional investors, including Group's Pioneer Investments unit and select high-net-worth private clients, absorbed the majority of these damages due to their substantial allocations to the affected funds. Recovery processes for Bank Medici investors have yielded partial reimbursements amid the broader Madoff liquidation, where the has distributed over $12.8 billion to victims by 2018, equating to roughly 72% of approved principal claims on average. However, net recoveries for feeder fund participants like those in Bank Medici's vehicles were diminished by proceedings targeting early withdrawals, which sought repayment of illusory gains to equalize distributions. Specific settlements from related entities provided limited relief, often recovering less than 10% of original stakes for certain claimants after accounting for legal costs and delays inherent to unwinds. Outcomes varied significantly by investor category and redemption timing: those who withdrew prior to the December 2008 collapse initially preserved capital but encountered subsequent liabilities, sometimes reducing effective recoveries to near zero after repayments. Late investors, conversely, received pro-rata shares from the trustee's customer fund without offset obligations but started from a baseline of , highlighting the asymmetric impacts of sequential redemptions in feeder structures. By 2025, cumulative distributions had not fully bridged the gap for most Bank Medici stakeholders, underscoring persistent shortfalls despite aggregate progress in the Madoff recovery initiative.

Broader Implications for Finance

The collapse of Bank Medici, precipitated by its heavy exposure to Bernard Madoff's fraudulent scheme, underscored vulnerabilities in feeder fund structures, where intermediaries channeled client assets into opaque third-party managers without sufficient independent verification. This over-reliance on unverified historical returns—reportedly steady at around 10-12% annually despite market volatility—highlighted a causal disconnect between apparent and actual , as feeder operators like Bank Medici failed to reconcile discrepancies in trade execution or custody records. Post-scandal analyses revealed that such complacency eroded investor protections, prompting a reevaluation of norms where "" often amounted to superficial checks rather than rigorous, first-principles scrutiny of underlying operations. In response, the accelerated regulatory reforms targeting vehicles, with the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), adopted in 2011 and effective from 2013, explicitly drawing lessons from Madoff-linked failures like Bank Medici to mandate enhanced transparency, risk reporting, and manager accountability for feeder arrangements. The directive imposed strict requirements on fund managers (AIFMs), including valuation procedures and oversight to prevent asset or unverified third-party exposures, thereby addressing the causal chain of unchecked delegation that amplified losses in cases such as Medici's estimated $2.1 billion writedown. Complementary measures under UCITS V further strengthened liability for custody and safekeeping, reducing systemic risks from inadequate verification in cross-border fund distribution. Within Austria, the Bank Medici episode initially strained confidence in Vienna's role as a gateway for Central and Eastern European finance, as the 2008 revelations exposed lapses in local oversight amid the bank's aggressive of Madoff-linked products to retail and institutional clients. However, the broader Austrian banking sector demonstrated resilience, with capital buffers and liquidity holding firm through the global crisis, as evidenced by sustained profitability and minimal systemic contagion beyond isolated institutions. This outcome affirmed Vienna's hub status, supported by geographic advantages and regulatory adaptations, though it reinforced the need for heightened scrutiny of niche players reliant on high-fee, low-transparency strategies. Ultimately, Bank Medici serves as a cautionary model against normalized of unverifiable claims in elite investment circles, where empirical validation of returns—through independent audits or reconciliations—must supersede reputational heuristics to mitigate Ponzi-like cascades. The case illustrates how institutional inertia, rather than inherent complexity, fosters fragility, urging a return to foundational risk principles over deference to "proven" managers.

References

  1. https://www.newsweek.com/sonja-kohn-bernie-madoffs-bag-lady-68579
  2. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123206919264588423
  3. https://static01.nyt.com/packages/pdf/business/20090118_medici.pdf
  4. https://www.reuters.com/article/madoff-medici/austrias-madoff-hit-bank-medici-seeks-buyers-idUSLB12236820090312/
  5. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/austria-takes-over-bank-crushed-by-madoff/
  6. https://www.businessinsider.com/2009/1/bank-medici-owner-disappears-after-blowing-21-billion-on-madoff
  7. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/austria-takes-control-of-bank-medici-after-madoff-hit
  8. https://www.cnbc.com/2010/12/10/madoff-trustee-seeks-196-billion-from-austrian-banker.html
  9. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/asia-pacific/austrian-banker-sonja-kohn-was-madoff-victim-lawyer-idUSTRE6B94T7/
  10. https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0%2C28804%2C1971588_1971589_1971594%2C00.html
  11. https://www.thebrokernews.ch/bestfit-interview-with-extraordinary-entrepreneur-sonja-kohn/
  12. https://www.ft.com/content/d9d58eba-dcfa-11dd-a2a9-000077b07658
  13. https://www.businessinsider.com/meet-sonja-kohn-the-vienna-arm-of-madoffs-ponzi-scheme-2010-12
  14. https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2009cv00289/338611/324/2.pdf
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/business/07medici.html
  16. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/austria-s-medici-denies-head-hiding-over-madoff-idUSTRE5064K7/
  17. https://www.theviennareview.at/archives/2011/the-madoff-medici-mess
  18. https://www.forbes.com/2009/01/02/medici-madoff-austria-markets-equity-cx_je_0102markets05.html
  19. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/pioneer-wealthy-investors-hit-by-medici-madoff-link-idUSTRE50B4WS/
  20. https://www.madofftrustee.com/document/dockets/000944-alphaprimedeclaration11-06677docket6.pdf
  21. https://www.madofftrustee.com/document/dockets/001347-kohncomplaint10-05411docket97.pdf
  22. https://www.madofftrustee.com/document/dockets/009895-hsbcdeclaration09-01364docket549.pdf
  23. https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2009cv00289/338611/193/2.pdf
  24. https://www.oeclaw.co.uk/images/uploads/judgments/FSD_30_OF_2013_-_Primeo_Fund_-_Judgment_-_23_August_2017.pdf
  25. https://www.nysb.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/174497_25111_opinion.pdf
  26. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/madoff-trustee-sues-medici-fund-for-578-million-idUSTRE56D73F/
  27. https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/bank-medici-denies-5-8-bln-flow-to-madoff-scheme-idUSLS980422/
  28. https://www.madofftrustee.com/recoveries-04.html
  29. https://www.sipc.org/news-and-media/news-releases/20141117
  30. http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/01/03/bernard.madoff.austria.bank/index.html
  31. https://www.forbes.com/2009/01/21/madoff-medici-austria-markets-equity-cx_je_0121markets05.html
  32. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/herald-hedge-funds-suspend-redemptions-on-madoff-exposure?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqdxvEv5v78_BGJBMCofFsMlnkfCCzwPYmJcMaS_SZDY15W1_nysz5cg&gaa_ts=68febe22&gaa_sig=TmCTItM5539DU7x8Xv_Va0Lr8mRpZC-ZbmxOOpMB8ew1VHPlKrkRxARb5y2TYEqBec_KpqmH8lDYravrU5EWg%253D%253D
  33. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/sonja-kohns-bank-brought-billions-220800194.html
  34. https://www.cnbc.com/2009/01/07/russian-oligarchs-also-duped-by-madoff-report.html
  35. https://www.madofftrustee.com/statements-counsel-33.html
  36. https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/bernie-madoff
  37. https://www.reuters.com/article/madoff-exposure-austria/update-1-austrias-bank-medici-says-has-madoff-exposure-idUSLG9699720081216
  38. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/herald-hedge-funds-suspend-redemptions-on-madoff-exposure
  39. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/austrias-bank-medici-says-has-madoff-exposure-idUSTRE4BF4HD/
  40. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/13/business/13kohn.html
  41. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/02/business/worldbusiness/02iht-02medici.19052937.html
  42. https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/st_madoff_victims_20081215.html
  43. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/business/worldbusiness/09iht-medici.4.19230514.html
  44. https://www.businessinsider.com/2009/1/austria-seizes-madoff-feeder-bank-medici
  45. https://www.wealthbriefing.com/html/article.php/austrian-private-bank-has-licence-revoked-for-inadequate-capital-
  46. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124351941925862619
  47. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-12-10/madoff-trustee-sues-sonja-kohn-for-19-6-billion-treble-damages-via-rico
  48. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2010/12/10/madoff-trustee-sues-austrian-banker-for-19-6-billion-and-calls-her-a-criminal/
  49. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/dec/11/madoff-trustee-accuses-banker-criminal-soulmate
  50. https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFDBR0020101210e6ca000b8
  51. https://www.madofftrustee.com/index.php?mobile=false
  52. https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/funds/corrected-madoff-trustee-sues-herald-fund-for-578-mln-idUSN14285996/
  53. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/aerospace-defense/medici-says-not-targeted-in-madoff-clawback-suit-idUSLF127125/
  54. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/bankruptcy-law/court-agrees-to-pull-back-madoff-action-from-bankruptcy-court-to-hear-rico-issues
  55. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/why-rakoff-dumped-picards-60-bln-rico-case-v-unicredit-idUS2460127990/
  56. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-09-07/u-s-racketeering-law-can-t-be-applied-abroad-madoff-judge-says
  57. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/business/09madoff.html
  58. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/madoff-trustee-set-back-in-lawsuits-vs-banks-idUSN1E76R1YD/
  59. https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/europe/austrian-banker-kohn-key-to-madoff-crimes-trustee-idUSN10108416/
  60. https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/sonja-kohn-sued-for-19-6b-in-madoff-case/
  61. https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/factbox-investors-suing-madoff-exposed-funds-idUSLD315007/
  62. https://www.businessinsider.com/madoff-feeder-bank-medici-probed-criminally-in-vienna-2009-3
  63. https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/austrian-banker-kohn-was-madoff-victim-lawyer-idUSLDE6BB0DX/
  64. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-04-02/medici-s-kohn-wishes-she-never-met-madoff-magazin-reports
  65. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-10-18/kohn-wins-lawsuit-over-madoff-ponzi-scheme-losses-in-europe
  66. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ignore-history-your-peril-two-medici-banks-failed-500-weights
  67. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/madoff-scandal-spurs-eu-executive-to-review-rules-idUSTRE5182V8/
  68. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/eu-reviews-fund-rules-in-light-of-madoff-scandal-idUSLK397121/
  69. https://www.fma.gv.at/en/cesr-publishes-comprehensive-information-and-recommendations-for-investors-directly-and-indirectly-affected-by-the-alleged-investment-fraud-of-bernard-madoff/
  70. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/01/business/worldbusiness/01bank.html
  71. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2009-01-05/madoff-frontrunning-tip-tarp-paradox-compliance-update1
  72. https://www.fma.gv.at/en/fma-revokes-bank-medici-licence-with-immediate-effect/
  73. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-06/madoff-trustee-reaches-687-million-settlement-with-thema-fund
  74. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/mets-ruling-could-upend-madoff-bankruptcy-idUS41542562/
  75. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-12/madoff-trustee-recovers-76-5-million-from-alpha-prime-fund
  76. https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/the-madoff-clawback-countdown/
  77. https://www.madofftrustee.com/timeline-31.html
  78. https://publications.aaahq.org/iaetn/article/29/1/94/8462/The-Madoff-Debacle-What-are-the-Lessons
  79. https://www.dmcpas.com/core/uploads/2018/11/Ten-Years-After_Madoff-Fraud-Presentation.pdf
  80. https://media.regcompliancewatch.com/uploads/2021/06/Madoff-Talks-Chapter-10.pdf
  81. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52012SC0185
  82. https://www.bijzonderstrafrecht.nl/home/madoffs-domino-effect-on-european-depositary-liability
  83. https://imaa-institute.org/news/madoff-pushes-medici-to-the-brink/
  84. https://www.oenb.at/en/Media/Press-Archives/2024/20241112.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.