Hubbry Logo
Bit-level parallelismBit-level parallelismMain
Open search
Bit-level parallelism
Community hub
Bit-level parallelism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bit-level parallelism
Bit-level parallelism
Bit-level parallelism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Bit-level parallelism is a form of parallel computing based on increasing processor word size. Increasing the word size reduces the number of instructions the processor must execute in order to perform an operation on variables whose sizes are greater than the length of the word. (For example, consider a case where an 8-bit processor must add two 16-bit integers. The processor must first add the 8 lower-order bits from each integer, then add the 8 higher-order bits, requiring two instructions to complete a single operation. A 16-bit processor would be able to complete the operation with single instruction.)

Originally, all electronic computers were serial (single-bit) computers. The first electronic computer that was not a serial computer—the first bit-parallel computer—was the 16-bit Whirlwind from 1951.

From the advent of very-large-scale integration (VLSI) computer chip fabrication technology in the 1970s until about 1986, advancements in computer architecture were done by increasing bit-level parallelism,[1] as 4-bit microprocessors were replaced by 8-bit, then 16-bit, then 32-bit microprocessors. This trend generally came to an end with the introduction of 32-bit processors, which were a standard in general purpose computing for two decades. 64 bit architectures were introduced to the mainstream with the eponymous Nintendo 64 (1996), but beyond this introduction stayed uncommon until the advent of x86-64 architectures around the year 2003, and 2014 for mobile devices with the ARMv8-A instruction set.

On 32-bit processors, external data bus width continues to increase. For example, DDR1 SDRAM transfers 128 bits per clock cycle. DDR2 SDRAM transfers a minimum of 256 bits per burst.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bit-level parallelism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Bit-level parallelism (BLP) is a form of in that enables the simultaneous processing of multiple bits within a single processor word, allowing basic operations such as arithmetic and logical functions to be executed across those bits in parallel. This technique fundamentally relies on increasing the processor's word size—typically from early 4-bit or 8-bit formats to modern 64-bit or wider registers—to reduce the total number of instructions required for data manipulation, thereby enhancing computational efficiency at the hardware level. Historically, BLP dominated the evolution of during the first three decades of computing, from the through the 1970s, as counts grew and architects widened data paths to exploit more bits per operation. For instance, transitioning from 4-bit processors, which handled minimal parallelism, to 32-bit and 64-bit systems allowed for exponentially greater throughput in bitwise operations without proportional increases in clock speed. This approach was a direct response to the limitations of early hardware, where each additional bit represented a form of built-in parallelism that scaled with Moore's Law-like improvements. In the broader context of parallel computing, BLP serves as the foundational layer in a hierarchy that includes (ILP), thread-level parallelism (TLP), and data-level parallelism (DLP), as outlined in seminal works on . While higher-level parallelisms build upon BLP by coordinating multiple instructions or data streams, bit-level techniques remain essential in contemporary designs, particularly for optimizing low-level operations in CPUs, GPUs, and specialized accelerators like those used in and . Today, BLP continues to influence innovations, such as in reconfigurable architectures that dynamically adjust bit widths for energy-efficient computation.

Fundamentals

Definition

Bit-level parallelism refers to the simultaneous processing of multiple bits within a single word or operation, where hardware performs identical operations across all bits in parallel to enhance computational . This form of parallelism exploits the inherent of digital systems to manipulate bits concurrently, reducing the number of instructions required for tasks involving large sets. For instance, in arithmetic or logical operations, each bit position is handled independently yet simultaneously, allowing for throughput gains proportional to the data word size. Unlike serial bit processing, which sequentially handles one bit at a time and incurs linear latency for multi-bit operations, bit-level parallelism achieves by leveraging wider paths, such as 8-bit, 16-bit, or 32-bit words, to enable inherent parallelism at the finest granularity. This approach originated in early digital logic design, where logic gates operate on individual bits independently, but when scaled across a multi-bit bus or data path, they execute in parallel to form the basis of modern processors. Historical developments, including the transition from 4-bit to 32-bit microprocessors in the and , underscored this evolution by demonstrating how increasing word sizes amplified parallel . Key terminology includes bit width, which specifies the number of bits in a word and directly determines the degree of parallelism available; parallel bit operations, referring to synchronized actions like or logical functions applied across all bits; and data path parallelism, the capacity of processor pathways to conduct concurrent bit-level computations. Representative examples encompass bitwise AND or OR operations executed across an entire register, where each bit pair is ANDed or ORed in without sequential dependency. These concepts establish bit-level parallelism as a foundational element of , distinct from higher-level forms by its focus on the lowest unit of representation.

Hardware Foundations

Bit-level parallelism in digital circuits is fundamentally enabled by principles, where simple logic functions such as AND, OR, and XOR, as well as arithmetic operations like and , are executed bit by bit through replicated across multiple bit positions. For basic logic functions, these process corresponding bits of the input operands independently and simultaneously, without any inherent sequential dependencies between bit stages. In contrast, arithmetic operations involve carry or borrow propagation mechanisms that introduce sequential dependencies between bit positions, though the gate operations within each bit slice occur in parallel. This replication ensures that each bit position operates as a self-contained unit where possible, scaling the parallelism with the word width. The theoretical foundation for these bit-level operations lies in , which provides a mathematical framework for expressing and implementing digital logic functions uniformly across each bit pair. As established by , Boolean operations such as conjunction (AND), disjunction (OR), and (NOT) directly map to switching circuits, enabling the design of logic gates that perform identical functions on individual bits in parallel. This uniform application of Boolean functions to bit pairs underpins all bit-level parallelism, transforming algebraic expressions into gate-level implementations that operate concurrently on multiple bits. In arithmetic operations, bit-level parallelism manifests through carry propagation mechanisms, exemplified by the ripple-carry adder, where each bit stage computes its sum and carry output based on the inputs and the incoming carry from the previous stage. This structure chains full adders, with each full adder handling one bit position in a manner that allows sum bits to be generated in parallel across stages once carries propagate. The core equations for a full adder are: Sum=A⊕B⊕Cin\text{Sum} = A \oplus B \oplus C_{\text{in}} Cout=(A∧B)∨(A∧Cin)∨(B∧Cin)C_{\text{out}} = (A \land B) \lor (A \land C_{\text{in}}) \lor (B \land C_{\text{in}}) These equations demonstrate how the sum bit is derived via exclusive-OR operations on the bit inputs and carry-in, while the carry-out is computed using AND and OR gates, enabling parallel evaluation within each bit slice despite the sequential ripple of carries. Clock signals play a crucial role in synchronizing these parallel bit computations within synchronous digital systems, ensuring that all combinational logic operations complete and stabilize before the next clock edge to maintain valid logic states across the circuit. By defining discrete time intervals (clock cycles), the signal coordinates the timing of bit-level evaluations, preventing race conditions and guaranteeing that parallel gate operations resolve within the allotted period without introducing storage elements.

Implementation

In Arithmetic Logic Units

Multi-bit arithmetic logic units (ALUs) implement bit-level parallelism by constructing the unit from replicated logic slices, one for each bit position in the operand word, enabling simultaneous execution of arithmetic and logical operations across all bits. This parallel structure allows the ALU to process an entire multi-bit operand in a single clock cycle, rather than sequentially bit by bit, fundamentally leveraging hardware replication to achieve parallelism at the finest granularity. Control signals route to the appropriate functional units and select the desired operation, such as addition, subtraction, or bitwise AND, ensuring coordinated parallel computation. In such ALUs, core components like adders and are organized as parallel arrays of bit slices, where each slice handles the logic for one bit while propagating signals like carries to adjacent slices for dependent operations. For instance, the Am2901, a foundational 4-bit ALU slice introduced in 1975, integrates an arithmetic-logic core capable of performing operations including , , and logical functions on its bits, with microinstruction controls (9 bits total: 3 for source selection, 3 for function, and 3 for destination) enabling flexible parallel execution; multiple Am2901 chips could be cascaded to form wider ALUs, such as 16-bit or 32-bit units in minicomputers. This bit-sliced design exemplifies how ALUs achieve parallelism through modular replication, minimizing propagation delays within each slice while managing inter-slice interactions for operations like . Parallel execution in multi-bit ALUs relies on identical logic being duplicated for every bit position, allowing all bits of the operands to be processed concurrently via these mirrored circuits. In a 32-bit ALU, for example, 32 independent full-adder slices handle the in parallel, with only the carry chain linking them sequentially; this replication ensures that bitwise operations, which have no inter-bit dependencies, complete with minimal latency across the entire word. The stems from the combinational nature of the logic, where propagate through gates in parallel paths for each bit. Bitwise shift operations in ALUs demonstrate unadulterated bit-level parallelism, as they operate independently on each bit without carry or dependency chains, making them ideal for illustrating parallel throughput. A logical left shift, for instance, repositions bits such that each higher bit receives the value from the preceding lower bit, filling the lowest bit with zero; this can be expressed as: Result={Input[i−1]if i>00if i=0\text{Result} = \begin{cases} \text{Input}[i-1] & \text{if } i > 0 \\ 0 & \text{if } i = 0 \end{cases} Such shifts are implemented via parallel wiring or multiplexers in the ALU shifter unit, processing all bits simultaneously for fixed or variable amounts. The evolution of ALU designs reflects advancing semiconductor technology and demand for larger data words, progressing from 4-bit ALUs in 1970s minicomputers—such as those in the processor (1971), which handled 4-bit arithmetic for calculators—to 64-bit ALUs in modern general-purpose processors like Intel's x86-64 family, introduced in 2003 with the AMD64 architecture and enabling operations on 64-bit integers for enhanced performance in data-intensive applications. This increase in bit width has exponentially amplified bit-level parallelism, allowing ALUs to handle larger operands natively while maintaining parallel bit .

In Bit-Slice Architectures

Bit-slice architectures represent a modular approach to achieving bit-level parallelism by employing standardized integrated circuits, each processing a single bit (or small group of bits) in parallel across multiple chips to form wider data paths. Introduced in the 1970s, these components, such as the AMD Am2901, handle one 4-bit slice of data, including (ALU) operations, register storage, and shifting, allowing designers to stack multiple slices—e.g., four for a 16-bit processor—to create custom word lengths without fabricating entirely new chips. This design enabled flexible construction of central processing units (CPUs) for minicomputers and specialized systems, where each slice performs identical operations simultaneously on its bit position. Interconnections between slices facilitate synchronized parallel execution, primarily through daisy-chained carry-in and carry-out lines that propagate signals across chips for arithmetic operations like , supporting either ripple carry for simplicity or lookahead carry (via auxiliary chips like the Am2902) for faster performance in wider configurations. Control signals and shift lines, such as Q and RAM pins linking adjacent slices, enable barrel shifting and movement, while microprogramming via 9-bit microinstructions—decoded by a sequencer like the Am2909—directs ALU functions, register selection, and branching, allowing the overall processor to emulate diverse instruction sets through programmable (PROM). A key advantage of bit-slice designs lies in their , permitting engineers to tailor processor widths (e.g., 12, 24, or 64 bits) to application needs without full redesigns, which proved valuable in . However, by the 1980s, advances in very-large-scale integration (VLSI) and technology enabled single-chip processors with comparable or superior performance at lower cost and complexity, leading to the obsolescence of bit-slice architectures in favor of fully integrated designs.

Comparisons

With Word-Level Parallelism

Word-level parallelism refers to a form of in which multiple complete data words—each comprising multiple bits—are processed simultaneously as , often through vector or SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) instructions that operate on packed vectors such as 128-bit or 256-bit registers. This approach, also known as superword-level parallelism (SLP), packs independent scalar operations into a single instruction to execute them in parallel across multiple data elements, leveraging multimedia extensions like Intel's SSE and AVX. In contrast to bit-level parallelism, which achieves intra-word parallelism by performing operations across all bits of a single word simultaneously—such as a 64-bit that implicitly handles 64 individual bit operations in one cycle—word-level parallelism extends this to inter-word operations, applying the same instruction to several words at once. For instance, while a standard 64-bit ADD in bit-level parallelism computes the sum of two 64-bit integers by parallelizing bit-wise carries within one word, a word-level vector ADD using AVX-256 might add four 64-bit elements in parallel across a 256-bit register, treating each 64-bit segment as a separate atomic word. Historically, computing shifted from bit-level parallelism dominant in early 8-bit microprocessors, which processed small word sizes to manage limited counts, to word-level parallelism in vector processors designed for scientific workloads; the (introduced in 1964) marked a key step by standardizing 32-bit words in scalar architectures, paving the way for vector extensions in machines like the CDC STAR-100 (1972) and (1976), which enabled parallel processing of entire arrays of words. This evolution reduced instruction counts for data-intensive tasks by factors of 4 to 16 times compared to scalar bit-level operations on smaller words. Word-level parallelism often incorporates bit-level parallelism as an underlying mechanism, where each packed word in a vector register undergoes bit-parallel operations internally, allowing SIMD units to build upon the foundational intra-word efficiency of larger processor words.

With Instruction-Level Parallelism

(ILP) refers to the ability of a processor to execute multiple instructions simultaneously, leveraging techniques such as pipelining, superscalar execution, and out-of-order to overlap independent operations within a program. This form of parallelism operates at the of entire instructions, independent of the internal bit manipulations within each operation, and is designed to maximize throughput by identifying and exploiting concurrency in the instruction stream. In contrast, bit-level parallelism provides fixed hardware-level concurrency strictly within a single operation, such as performing arithmetic on all bits of a word simultaneously, bounded by the processor's word width. While bit-level is inherently static and tied to the data representation—processing, for example, 64 bits in parallel for a 64-bit add instruction—ILP dynamically schedules and reorders instructions across multiple operations, allowing unrelated instructions to proceed concurrently regardless of their bit-level details. This distinction highlights ILP's focus on control and data flow dependencies at the instruction level, rather than the sub-operation bit manipulations emphasized in bit-level approaches. For instance, in a (CPU), bit-level parallelism enables the parallel computation of all bits during an addition operation on a multi-bit operand, but ILP extends this by permitting multiple such addition instructions from different parts of the program to execute in parallel if they lack dependencies. Techniques like further enhance ILP by rearranging instruction completion order to hide latencies, a capability absent in pure bit-level designs. The scalability of bit-level parallelism is fundamentally limited by the processor word width, typically 32 or 64 bits in modern systems, which caps the parallel bits processed per operation. In comparison, ILP is constrained by the program's —true data dependencies, control dependencies, and resource conflicts—and hardware provisions such as reorder buffers and functional unit counts, with practical limits often yielding 3 to 6 in real workloads even under ideal conditions.

Applications

In General-Purpose Processors

In modern general-purpose processors such as those based on the x86 and ARM architectures, bit-level parallelism is fundamentally integrated through 64-bit arithmetic logic units (ALUs) that execute operations on integer and floating-point data in parallel across all bits of a word. For instance, in x86 processors, instructions like ADD and MUL apply the same operation simultaneously to each bit position within 64-bit registers, leveraging dedicated hardware circuits such as carry-lookahead adders to propagate signals across the entire width without sequential processing. Similarly, ARM's AArch64 implementation in processors like the Cortex-A series employs 64-bit ALUs for scalar operations, where bit-parallel execution enables efficient handling of general-purpose tasks ranging from arithmetic computations to data manipulation. This design ensures that basic operations on word-sized data exploit inherent parallelism at the bit level, forming the core of scalar processing in these architectures. The evolution of bit widths in these processors has progressively enhanced bit-level parallelism, as seen in Intel's x86 lineage. The 8086, introduced in 1978, operated with 16-bit registers and a 16-bit data bus, providing initial bit-parallel capabilities over prior 8-bit designs by processing twice as many bits concurrently. This progressed to 32-bit widths in the 80386 (1985), doubling the parallel throughput for integer operations, and culminated in 64-bit extensions with the AMD64 in 2003, adopted by Intel, which standardized uniform bit parallelism across general-purpose registers and ALUs. In floating-point units, adherence to the standard further embodies this parallelism; for double-precision (64-bit) numbers, the 52-bit mantissa undergoes bit-parallel or after alignment by exponent differences, with hardware shifters and adders operating on all bits simultaneously to minimize latency while ensuring precise via guard bits. Optimizations in these processors sustain bit-parallel throughput amid control dependencies, notably through branch prediction mechanisms that prevent pipeline stalls and keep ALUs utilized. In Intel's and subsequent designs, dynamic branch prediction via a branch target buffer (BTB) with history-based predictors achieves over 90% accuracy in many workloads, allowing of bit-parallel instructions without frequent flushes, thereby maintaining high that feeds the ALU. This is particularly beneficial for power efficiency in mobile systems-on-chip (SoCs), such as ARM-based designs in smartphones, where bit-level parallelism on wider words reduces the cycles per operation compared to narrower predecessors, contributing to lower by minimizing switching activity across parallel bit circuits. As of 2025, open-source architectures like continue to emphasize bit-level parallelism through ratified extensions, enabling custom instruction set architectures (ISAs) tailored for general-purpose use. The Extension (B), frozen in 2021 and widely implemented, introduces instructions such as bit permutation and population count that operate in parallel across 64-bit registers, preserving and extending bit-level efficiency in extensible cores without proprietary constraints. This allows designers to integrate bit-parallel operations seamlessly into -based processors for diverse applications, from embedded systems to .

In Specialized Hardware

Graphics processing units (GPUs) exploit bit-level parallelism through their architecture, featuring thousands of cores equipped with arithmetic logic units (ALUs) that perform bitwise operations on fixed-width words, such as 32-bit or 64-bit integers, in a single clock cycle. These ALUs support standard bitwise operations including AND, OR, XOR, NOT, and shifts, enabling simultaneous processing of all bits within a word across multiple threads. In pixel shaders, for instance, bit-parallel manipulations are common for tasks like texture sampling and color blending, where operations such as bit masking accelerate rendering pipelines. NVIDIA's further enhances this by allowing threads organized into SIMT (Single Instruction, Multiple Thread) warps—typically 32 threads—to execute identical bit operations concurrently on different data elements, achieving high throughput for compute-intensive workloads. Digital signal processors (DSPs) leverage bit-level parallelism in to optimize high-throughput tasks in audio and , particularly through parallel multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations in (FIR) filters. Fixed-point representations allow bitwise operations and additions to process multiple bits in parallel within word boundaries, reducing complexity compared to floating-point while maintaining precision for applications like audio equalization. In FIR filters, bit-level transformations of adder trees enable efficient multiple constant multiplications (MCM) by decomposing operations into bitwise shifts and additions, executed concurrently across filter taps to achieve up to 21% speed improvements over traditional designs. For example, transposed direct-form FIR structures in DSPs use these bit-parallel techniques to compute sums rapidly, supporting real-time processing in devices like ' fixed-point DSPs. Application-specific integrated circuits () and field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) implement custom bit-parallel circuits tailored for , where bitwise operations dominate algorithms like the (AES). In AES, bit-parallel designs process all 128 bits of a block simultaneously using XOR networks for affine transformations in the SubBytes step and Galois field multiplications in MixColumns, minimizing latency through fully unrolled pipelines. On FPGAs, these circuits utilize lookup tables (LUTs) for S-boxes—requiring about 58 LUTs per byte—and multi-input XOR for column mixing, enabling throughput rates exceeding 2 Gb/s in compact implementations. ASICs further optimize by employing logic-only S-boxes with 88 XOR and 36 AND , reducing area while preserving parallelism for high-speed in secure hardware. Seminal works, such as Satoh et al.'s compact Rijndael architecture, demonstrate these efficiencies with throughputs up to 2.29 Gb/s on ASICs. Bitcoin mining ASICs exemplify bit-level parallelism in specialized hashing hardware, optimizing the double SHA-256 algorithm through parallel pipelines that process bitwise operations across 256-bit states. These ASICs employ carry-save adders (CSAs) and carry-propagate adders (CPAs) to compute compression functions in parallel, handling 64 rounds with bit-parallel word updates to generate multiple hashes per cycle for nonce searching. The embarrassingly parallel nature of mining allows thousands of independent SHA-256 cores to operate concurrently, with bit-level optimizations like approximate adders reducing critical path delays and boosting energy efficiency to 55.7 MHash/J in pipelined designs. For instance, counter-based architectures eliminate unnecessary shifts, focusing bit-parallel additions on active registers to achieve latencies as low as 204.6 ns per hash.

Advantages and Limitations

Performance Benefits

Bit-level parallelism enables the simultaneous processing of multiple bits within an (ALU), achieving a constant-time complexity of O(1) for n-bit operations, in contrast to the O(n) time required for bit-serial processing. For instance, a 64-bit operation completes in a single clock cycle on a parallel ALU, whereas a bit-serial ALU would require 64 sequential cycles to process the same . This results in a theoretical factor of up to n for bitwise operations, such as AND or XOR across n bits, dramatically enhancing computational throughput in hardware designs. The adoption of wider data paths facilitated by bit-level parallelism significantly boosts memory bus bandwidth, allowing more data to be transferred per cycle between the processor and . A 64-bit data bus, for example, doubles the bandwidth compared to a 32-bit bus, enabling higher overall system throughput for data-intensive tasks. This scaling aligns with , which has historically driven increases in density to support progressively wider buses without proportional cost escalations, thereby sustaining performance gains in modern architectures. In terms of energy efficiency, bit-level parallelism reduces the number of clock cycles needed to complete operations, which can lower total dynamic power consumption for a given task by minimizing switching activity over time, particularly when compared to bit-serial approaches in resource-constrained environments like low-power IoT devices. For example, bit-parallel designs in processing-in-memory systems achieve up to 8.1 TOPS/W, outperforming bit-serial counterparts at 5.3 TOPS/W for certain arithmetic-heavy workloads, demonstrating improved utilization per operation. A representative metric illustrates this: a 32-bit parallel implementation can deliver 32 times the throughput in operations per second for bitwise tasks relative to a 1-bit serial processor, allowing completion of computations with fewer cycles and thus reduced expenditure overall.

Design Challenges

One major design challenge in bit-level parallelism arises from propagation delays in arithmetic operations, particularly in adders where carry signals must ripple through multiple bits, limiting overall speed. In ripple-carry adders, the worst-case delay scales linearly with bit width, as each carry bit depends on the previous one, potentially bottlenecking parallel bit processing. To mitigate this, carry-lookahead adders (CLAs) compute carry signals in parallel using generate and propagate terms defined as: Gi=Ai∧Bi,Pi=Ai⊕Bi,\begin{align*} G_i &= A_i \land B_i, \\ P_i &= A_i \oplus B_i, \end{align*} where GiG_i and PiP_i enable faster lookahead logic for higher-order carries, reducing delay from O(n)O(n) to O(log⁡n)O(\log n) for nn-bit widths, though at the cost of increased hardware complexity. Scaling bit-level parallelism to wider data paths introduces significant issues in VLSI implementation, including exponential growth in silicon area and power consumption. As bit width increases, the transistor count for parallel logic gates rises quadratically or worse, leading to larger die sizes and higher dynamic power dissipation proportional to capacitance and switching activity across more bits. Additionally, fan-out from driver gates to multiple parallel inputs exacerbates signal integrity problems, such as increased interconnect delays, crosstalk, and voltage drops, which degrade performance in deep submicron technologies. Error handling poses another hurdle, as parallel bit paths amplify vulnerability to transient faults like bit flips from cosmic or alpha particles, which can corrupt multiple bits simultaneously in wide registers. In space hardware, single-event upsets (SEUs) induced by high-energy particles are particularly problematic, necessitating error-correcting codes (ECC) such as Hamming or BCH codes to detect and correct single- or multi-bit errors, adding 10-20% overhead in area and latency. Without such mechanisms, uncorrected can propagate through parallel computations, leading to system failures in radiation-prone environments. Finally, designers face inherent trade-offs between bit width and operating , as wider parallel structures lengthen critical paths and increase capacitive loads, constraining maximum clock speeds to maintain timing closure. For instance, doubling bit width might halve achievable due to added logic depth, shifting performance gains toward throughput rather than latency reduction, while also elevating static power from leakage in larger arrays. Balancing these factors often requires pipelining or voltage scaling, but optimizing for specific workloads remains a core challenge in processor architectures.

References

  1. https://cacm.acm.org/opinion/accelerator-level-parallelism/
  2. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/parallel-computing
  3. https://books.google.com/books/about/Computer_Architecture.html?id=cM8mDwAAQBAJ
  4. https://research.cs.wisc.edu/multifacet/papers/Accelerator-level_Parallelism_2020_08.pdf
  5. https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~krste/papers/BerkeleyView.pdf
  6. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/academic/class/15740-s17/www/lectures/05-parallel-arch-models.pdf
  7. https://web.ece.ucsb.edu/~parhami/pubs_folder/parh18-mwscas-parallelism-comp-arith-180531.pdf
  8. http://faculty.etsu.edu/tarnoff/ntes2150/ch8_v02.pdf
  9. https://users.encs.concordia.ca/~asim/coen312/Lectures/RCA.pdf
  10. http://www-leland.stanford.edu/class/ee183/handouts_spr2003/synchronization_pres.pdf
  11. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-organization-architecture/introduction-of-alu-and-data-path/
  12. https://w140.com/tekwiki/images/2/2f/AM2901A_data_sheet.pdf
  13. https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/hardware/articles/what-is-alu/
  14. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-organization-architecture/shift-micro-operations-in-computer-architecture/
  15. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-organization-architecture/evolution-of-microprocessors/
  16. https://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/digital-logic/12/330
  17. http://www.righto.com/2020/04/inside-am2901-amds-1970s-bit-slice.html
  18. https://www.hp9845.net/9845_backup/downloads/articles/Bit-Sliced_Microprocessor_of_the_Am2900_Family.pdf
  19. https://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/2901/index.html
  20. https://groups.csail.mit.edu/cag/slp/SLP-PLDI-2000.pdf
  21. https://jes.ece.wisc.edu/papers/ics98.espasa.pdf
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/instruction-level-parallelism
  23. https://www.eecs.harvard.edu/cs146-246/wall-ilp.pdf
  24. https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/671368/architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.pdf
  25. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-organization-architecture/arm-processor-and-its-features/
  26. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-organization-architecture/microprocessor-intel-x86-evolution-and-main-features/
  27. https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1165766
  28. https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19957-01/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html
  29. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-organization-architecture/branch-prediction-in-pentium/
  30. https://www.sigarch.org/accelerator-level-parallelism/
  31. https://riscv.org/technical/specifications/
  32. https://gist.github.com/dominiksalvet/2a982235957012c51453139668e21fce
  33. https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/index.html#arithmetic-operators
  34. https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/index.html#simt-architecture
  35. https://www.ijtra.com/special-issue-download.php-paper-fir-filter-implementation-by-using-bit-level-transformation-of-adder-trees-for-mcms.pdf
  36. https://www.ti.com/lit/wp/spry061/spry061.pdf
  37. https://cryptography.gmu.edu/athena/sources/Cryptographic_Engineering_Chapter_10.pdf
  38. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-45682-1_18
  39. https://passat.crhc.illinois.edu/dac_16_cam.pdf
  40. https://zwtaoumich.github.io/paper/EECS570_Final_Report.pdf
  41. https://hurson.weebly.com/uploads/4/9/2/2/49225097/reading.paper1_performance_.pdf
  42. https://adacomputerscience.org/concepts/arch_performance
  43. https://www.refsmmat.com/courses/751/notes/parallelism.html
  44. https://arxiv.org/html/2509.22980v1
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/carry-lookahead-adder
  46. https://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~vojin/CLASSES/EEC280/Lecture-Material/Arith-Chapter-v6.PDF
  47. https://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-181/181A.pdf
  48. http://www.r-5.org/files/books/computers/hw-layers/datapath/risc-datapath/Paul_Chow-RISC_Architectural_Tradeoffs-EN.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.