Hubbry Logo
CabchargeCabchargeMain
Open search
Cabcharge
Community hub
Cabcharge
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cabcharge
Cabcharge
Cabcharge
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Cabcharge account payment system was established in 1976 to provide taxi passengers a way to pay for taxi fares by non-cash means. The payment system is owned and operated by A2B Australia (formerly Cabcharge Australia), part of ComfortDelGro.[1] In the UK and Singapore, Cabcharge is operated by other subsidiaries of ComfortDelGro.[2][3]

Cabcharge Australia's commercial activities, in which the Cabcharge payment system is an integral part, have been controversial at times and the company has faced regular accusations of excessive charging or profiteering and predatory and anti-competitive practices. The company was recently subject to adverse court proceedings and a major settlement arising from these behaviours.

Cabcharge system

[edit]

The Cabcharge system has several aspects:

  • Cabcharge accounts – customers can create a line of credit for use to pay for taxi fares and related charges, and involves the use of a Cabcharge credit card, e-ticket or paper voucher. The value of taxi fares paid using such instruments in Australia in 2007/08 was over A$455 million. Cabcharge levies a 10% service fee on such payments.
  • payment processing system – drivers can process Cabcharge instruments and other non-cash payments (e.g. credit and debit cards) manually or electronically. The manual system uses dockets and cheque-like vouchers supplied by Cabcharge, which are processed using credit card imprinters. The electronic system uses EFTPOS terminals and other equipment supplied by Cabcharge. In 2008, customers in Victoria paid at least $350 million in taxi fares using banking cards.[4] Cabcharge's EFTPOS terminals were present in approximately 95% of Australia's taxis. Cabcharge does not charge drivers, owners or networks for supplying equipment for the payment processing system, instead charging passengers a 10% service fee. Networks are paid a commission out of the service fee.
  • taximeters and meter updates – Cabcharge began supplying these from late 2004. Taximeters, which record the charge for each passenger's journey, require regular updates for taxi fare changes. Updates cannot be installed by drivers or operators. A significant point of difference of Cabcharge's meters compared to their competitors is that updates can be installed "over the air" by mobile telephony and Cabcharge's EFTPOS systems, whereas competitors' meter upgrades have to be physically installed, requiring taxis to be off the road for a period of time. The meters and updates are part of an integrated electronic payment and radio dispatch system with other taxi equipment supplied by Cabcharge.[5]

Controversy over surcharge

[edit]

Though called a service fee by Cabcharge, to the general public and government authorities the charge for processing credit card payments is commonly referred to as a surcharge, and in the case of Cabcharge the initial 10% charge has given rise to controversy, litigation and government legislative intervention. Cabcharge has been criticised for the 10% surcharge it collects on taxi fares paid by credit and debit cards and for the general anti-competitive control it exerts on other industry participants through its control of electronic payments and other areas of the taxi system such as vehicle and related repairs and installation of in-vehicle equipment, insurance, vehicle leasing and training. Criticism has emanated from various sources including the chair of the Taxi Industry Inquiry, Professor Allan Fels, the former head of the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission, and leading card companies. The 10% charge was reviewed by the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2012.[6] It was found to be excessive and predatory, and in February 2013 Victoria was the first State to restrict the surcharge to 5%, following recommendations made by the Taxi Industry Inquiry, and a further review of the surcharge in that State may lead to the figure being set at well below 5%.[7] In December 2014 the surcharge was also reduced to 5% in New South Wales. Western Australia reduced the surcharge to 5% in February 2015.

The practice was also investigated by the Reserve Bank of Australia.[6]

Cabcharge provides EFTPOS terminals, free of charge or below cost, to approximately 97% of taxis in Australia. However, there are competitors like Live taxi and Motorpass. Cabcharge justifies the surcharge on the basis that it incurs the costs associated with transactions including card and other product production, in-taxi processing, administration, fraud protection and investigation, provision of statements and driver education. However, this situation also allows the company to exert substantial and anti-competitive control over most of the Australian taxi industry.[8]

Criticism by Professor Allan Fels

[edit]

Professor Allan Fels approached the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2011 to help lower the 10% surcharge. He has been reported as saying that -

"Cabcharge has a monopoly. You have no choice if you pay electronically, you have to pay 10 per cent extra. That's really high. There is no competition. You either pay 10 per cent or you pay cash."[9]
"The 10 per cent surcharge looks extremely high," he said. "For Victoria, the charges total (is) $25m (a year), so extrapolating that for Australia it must be around $100m. When a consumer pays the taxi fare, there are many hands in the till . . . if they pay by card, Cabcharge gets 10 per cent. We think that needs to be looked at."[10]

Criticism by major credit operators

[edit]

Representatives from major credit card operators Visa and MasterCard have also criticised the 10% fee.

Visa spokesman Adam Wand yesterday said Cabcharge was making taxi passengers pay more than ten times the average merchant fee charged by banks, and five times more than the average fee charged by retailers, based on Reserve Bank data. "Surcharges in the order of 10 per cent are simply excessive and way above the cost of accepting a Visa card," he said. "It's certainly more than 10 times the average Reserve Bank published cost."

Mastercard head of strategy David Masters said there was "no way" that credit-card processing could cost Cabcharge 10 per cent of a fare. "I don't know how they can justify it," he said. "There is no question it pads out their bottom line, rather than reflecting the cost of the transaction."[10]

State limits on surcharge

[edit]

Victoria legislated in late June 2013[7] to limit the surcharge to 5% or less from 1 February 2014,[11] following recommendations of the Taxi Industry Inquiry. The Essential Services Commission is required to review the charge, which may lead to the surcharge being reduced below 5%, to reflect Cabcharge's reasonable cost of providing a non-cash payment option in taxis.[12]

New South Wales reduced the surcharge to 5% from 12 December 2014.[13]

Western Australia reduced the surcharge to 5% from 24 February 2015.[14]

Reserve Bank action to limit card surcharges in response to the criticism

[edit]

Reserve Bank (RBA) data is reported as showing that banks charge merchants an average fee of 0.81% to process Visa or Mastercard payments,[6] while the average fee passed on from the merchant to customers is 1.9% for Visa and 1.8% for MasterCard.[10]

The RBA considers that some companies charges are excessive and, as a result, it is drafting new rules to compel offenders to limit their charges to the costs actually incurred by merchants,[6] and that "In the gun will be the 10% charge imposed by Cabcharge and similar companies for using credit cards to pay taxi fares..."[6]

Findings of the Taxi Industry Inquiry

[edit]

The Taxi Industry Inquiry headed by Professor Fels has made a number of major criticisms of Cabcharge and its activities in a recent report.

General anti-competitive conduct

[edit]
"There are now significant anti-competitive forces at play within the industry, most notably the concentration of power with the major taxi networks and Cabcharge."[15]
"The inquiry is concerned primarily about the effectiveness of competition in markets for payments processing and payment instruments. Over time, it appears to the inquiry that Cabcharge has been extremely effective in stifling the development of competition in these markets."[16]

Predatory use of payment instruments

[edit]
"In relation to payment instruments, if the market is defined for taxi-specific payment instruments, then Cabcharge has a very strong position in this market. It appears to have largely captured the network effects and has reinforced this by integrating into payments processing and network services."[17]
"There is a high level of market concentration in the non-cash payment systems market with one enterprise, Cabcharge, historically holding market power in both taxi-specific payment instruments and payments processing. Cabcharge is the only significant taxi-specific payments instrument, and Cabcharge estimates that its electronic payment processing system is found in approximately 97 per cent of Australian taxis, limousines and water taxis, including all – or nearly all – taxis in Victoria."[18]
"...markets for payment instruments and processing are characterised by strong network effects. Cabcharge has been able to take advantage of these network effects by tying its branded cards to its processing facilities; that is, only Cabcharge EFTPOS terminals are permitted to process Cabcharge cards. Cabcharge has not given other payment providers access to process Cabcharge’s own cards and vouchers. As Cabcharge cards are the most widely used payment instrument, and the only significant taxi-specific payment instrument, a taxi operator that does not have the ability to process these cards will be seriously disadvantaged. This means that alternative processors face a significant barrier to establishing a market presence. Market inquiries indicate that Cabcharge branded charge account cards and eTickets account for up to 40 per cent of non-cash transactions in the taxi industry. This was a key issue that the ACCC sought to address in ACCC v Cabcharge Australia Ltd."[19]

Predatory activities through mergers and service controls

[edit]
"Numerous vertical mergers involving Cabcharge have been cause for concern for the ACCC over the past 15 years. Cabcharge’s acquisition of network service providers (NSPs) in Australian capital cities is considered to have given Cabcharge valuable influence over the payment systems installed in its affiliated taxis and raised barriers to entry that have protected its position in the payments system market."[20]
"Through its NSPs, Cabcharge also provides a wide range of services to the industry, including driver training, taxi vehicle 'fit-outs', taxi cameras and meters, licence brokerage and insurance for taxi operators. It is the inquiry’s view that these activities have implications for competition in the payments services markets. More specifically, they help to maintain market power in payment instruments and payments processing: that is, Cabcharge is not likely to be seeking to 'foreclose' downstream markets by providing affiliated NSPs with lower cost access to payments services, but is seeking to make it more difficult for entrants into payments processing to provide services to taxi operators. Through this strategy, elements of the market essentially become foreclosed to other processors, making it harder for them to build scale and compete with Cabcharge. This protection of the 10% surcharge is a key consideration for Cabcharge given that income from the service fee contributes around $87.3 million to its annual revenue (almost 50 per cent of the company’s total annual revenue)."[20]

Observations about Cabcharge's 10% surcharge

[edit]
"... even with the lessening of some barriers to competition – such as access to processing Cabcharge-branded cards and the removal of the MPTP-Cabcharge monopoly – the 10 per cent surcharge is likely to remain common practice. Market pressure for a reduction in the surcharge may only occur if and when taxi operators and networks effectively compete for consumers by lowering fares and the costs of associated payment methods."[21]
"The inquiry is concerned that consumers pay excessive fees for processing electronic payments of taxi fares. The significant market power historically exercised by Cabcharge in setting its 10 per cent service fee appears to act as a 'marker' for other payment service providers. This is a particular concern in relation to general bank issued or third party payment instruments, given that average surcharges applied by merchants in other sectors are between one and four per cent."[22]
"The lack of access to Cabcharge branded cards has also reduced competition nationwide in markets for taxi payments processing. However, the Victorian Government has little power to effect change in this area. Competition law rests in the federal domain, with the ACCC being responsible for ensuring that payments system arrangements comply with the competition and access provisions of the Commonwealth Competition and Consumer Act 2010. As discussed above, the ACCC has endeavoured to address the commercial barriers to entry in the past and continues to monitor Cabcharge’s behaviour. The inquiry supports the ACCC’s continued scrutiny of this issue."[23]
"... the inquiry remains concerned about the 10 per cent surcharge currently imposed on Victorian taxi users. The fact that half of these fees overall are funnelled back to drivers, NSPs and operators strongly suggests that the 10 per cent is unnecessarily high and that there will be significant consumer benefit in lowering the charge to a level where these payments are minimal or eliminated."[24]

Concluding criticisms about misuse of commercial power

[edit]
"Perceptions of poor service performance, high fares and a low level of innovation are major contributors to stagnating demand for taxi services. The uneven distribution of income derived by the taxi industry also affects service quality. Licence holders benefit significantly from the scarcity of licences; others in the industry with market power, such as network service providers (NSPs) and Cabcharge, also do well. On the other hand, taxi drivers engaged by operators receive around half the wage they would be entitled to if they were treated as employees. Taxi operators who are paying fees to licence holders under assignments are also under increasing cost pressures. ... there are now significant anti-competitive forces at play within the industry, with many years of constraints on competition creating an industry mindset that is heavily focused on protecting incumbent interests, rather than seeking ways to improve services to consumers."[25]
"NSPs generally appear to have significant market power. They have few competitors and, in many cases, have no other competitors in their allocated zones. There appear to be significant economies achieved by having larger network size, but regulation has also contributed to high market concentration. Where firms have significant market power, this may be extended into other markets by vertical integration and other vertical relationships. Of particular concern in this regard, are the links between Cabcharge and one of the major metropolitan NSPs and the extension of NSP activities to in-vehicle equipment supply."[26]
"The inquiry’s view is that commercial barriers set up by Cabcharge are best addressed by the ACCC and the Reserve Bank of Australia, who oversee and enforce regulation of anti-competitive behaviour in payment systems markets and the efficiency of the payment systems and are best placed to ensure regulatory consistency between the states."[27]

Winner of one of Australia's shonkiest products

[edit]

The Australian consumer magazine Choice confers awards annually, the Shonky Awards, to recognise Australia's poorest or "shonkiest" products. Choice states that the competition "recognises and reprimands misleading claims, false advertising, lack of transparency, faulty goods and/or poor service."[28]

Cabcharge was awarded a Shonky Award in 2012 for its 10% surcharge on taxi fares paid by card.[28][citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cabcharge

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cabcharge is an Australian electronic and associated services provider for the industry, established in to enable non-cash fare payments and improve for operators.
Operated by A2B (formerly Cabcharge Limited, rebranded in 2018), the system supports tap-and-go contactless transactions, digital wallets, and cloud-based expense management, with acceptance across approximately 98% of the nation's fleet.
As part of Singapore-based ComfortDelGro's operations in , Cabcharge has facilitated over one million rides annually through its affiliated network, evolving from paper vouchers to integrated digital solutions amid competition from ride-hailing services.
The company has achieved market dominance in payments but encountered regulatory challenges, notably a 2010 Federal Court settlement with the Australian and Commission imposing $15 million in penalties for admitted contraventions of trade practices law, including misuse of to hinder competitors via below-cost metering and restrictions on alternative payment methods.

History

Founding and Early Expansion

Cabcharge was established in 1976 by Reginald Kermode as a payment system for the Australian taxi industry, initially launched by Taxis Combined Services Pty Ltd—Sydney's largest taxi operator at the time—in partnership with the Yellow Cab Group. The system addressed the need for non-cash fare management, providing passengers with account-based charge cards and operators with manual processing equipment to handle payments securely without relying solely on cash. Under Kermode's direction, who assumed roles as Chairman, Managing Director, and on 27 July 1980, Cabcharge rapidly extended its account services beyond taxis. Early growth focused on building affiliations with additional taxi networks, achieving nationwide coverage by incorporating fleets in major cities including , , , and Perth, while diversifying to include hire cars and other transport modes such as water taxis and coaches. By the late 1990s, this expansion had positioned Cabcharge to affiliate with approximately 14,000 taxis, representing 96% of Australia's total fleet, and grow its account holder base to over 44,000 corporate and individual customers. The company's listing on the Australian Securities Exchange on 14 December 1999 marked a key milestone in formalizing its national dominance in taxi payment processing.

Technological Innovations and Market Growth

Cabcharge pioneered electronic payment solutions in the Australian taxi industry, introducing the country's first in-taxi (EFT) system in the late , which enabled cashless transactions directly within vehicles and reduced reliance on paper vouchers. This innovation facilitated faster processing and improved cash flow for taxi operators, contributing to broader adoption of non-cash payments amid rising demand for corporate and travel accounts. By the early , increased usage of third-party charge cards and bank-issued cards drove and EBITDA growth, as electronic systems scaled to handle higher transaction volumes efficiently. Subsequent developments included the rollout of handheld terminals such as Spotto and , which integrated payment processing with fare calculation and were deployed across , Victoria, and by 2018, enhancing operational efficiency and spurring market penetration in those states. In 2017, Cabcharge adopted a Azure-based cloud platform to support intelligent data analytics and scalable payment , allowing real-time transaction monitoring and customization for fleet operators. The 2018 acquisition of Mobile Technologies International bolstered in-vehicle hardware capabilities, introducing wireless meters, terminals, and tablets that rivaled ride-sharing apps' digital interfaces, thereby sustaining Cabcharge's competitive edge as traditional usage evolved. These technological advancements correlated with market expansion, achieving acceptance by approximately 95% of Australian and positioning Cabcharge as the dominant provider in the sector. Innovations like RFID-enabled "windows up" , trialed in facilities by 2015 and extended to , further diversified revenue streams beyond . By 2024, integration of meter-linked terminals nationwide aimed to curb discrepancies, reinforcing trust and encouraging sustained usage amid regulatory pressures. Overall, Cabcharge's focus on electronic and contactless systems propelled its growth from a voucher-based model to a comprehensive digital network, though it faced challenges from ride-sharing platforms that accelerated industry-wide digital shifts.

Merger with A2B Australia

In October 2018, Cabcharge Limited announced its intention to rebrand as A2B Limited, marking a strategic pivot from its historical focus on payment dockets to a broader integrated model incorporating electronic booking apps, dispatch networks, and services amid competition from ride-sharing platforms. This change, approved by shareholders on November 21, 2018, took effect on December 17, 2018, ending 42 years under the Cabcharge name and reflecting four years of operational overhaul to sustain in a disrupted market. The rebranding unified Cabcharge's core payments infrastructure—operated post-change through its wholly owned subsidiary Cabcharge Payments Pty Ltd—with expanded taxi affiliations and technology platforms, such as the acquisition of Mobile Technologies International Pty Ltd in August 2018 to bolster app-based services. This integration aimed to create a comprehensive mobility solutions provider, with A2B operating brands like 13cabs and alongside the retained Cabcharge payment system, which processed fares via dockets, cards, and integrations. The transition did not involve a traditional merger with an external A2B entity but rather an internal consolidation of assets and reorientation, enabling the company to leverage its nationwide network of over 9,000 affiliated for diversified revenue streams beyond surcharged payments. By early 2019, A2B had further expanded through mergers like the July 2019 acquisition of Gold Coast Cabs, reinforcing its position as Australia's largest operator at the time. This evolution positioned A2B for subsequent developments, including its full acquisition by Australia in April 2024 for approximately A$182 million, which integrated its operations into a fleet exceeding 12,000 vehicles.

Operations

Core Payment System Mechanics

Cabcharge facilitates non-cash taxi payments through a dedicated electronic funds transfer at point of sale (EFTPOS) network integrated with taxi operations. Account holders, typically businesses or government entities, maintain prepaid or credit-linked accounts from which fares are debited. Passengers present a physical Cabcharge card, which functions similarly to a contactless credit card, or an eTICKET—a digital voucher generated via the Cabcharge app or portal and either printed or displayed on a mobile device for scanning. In manual scenarios, blue dockets serve as paper vouchers pre-authorized by the account holder and issued to users for submission to drivers. Upon journey completion, drivers initiate processing using the FARE WAYplus terminal, a Cabcharge-provided device compatible with taxi meters for automated fare capture. The driver taps, swipes, or inserts the card/eTICKET, or imprints a docket via a manual imprinter if electronic systems are unavailable; the metered is then entered or auto-populated. The terminal communicates with Cabcharge's backend for real-time authorization against the passenger's account, confirming sufficient funds or credit before approving the transaction. This closed-loop system ensures secure, immediate validation while supporting additional inputs like digital wallets (e.g., ) or government subsidy cards (e.g., , TTSS) for hybrid payments. Settlement occurs daily, with Cabcharge transferring approved funds directly to the driver's nominated bank account, net of processing fees, via mechanisms. Transaction data, including fare details, timestamps, and identifiers, is logged for reconciliation and reporting through Cabcharge's online portal, enabling drivers to access daily summaries and trails. This structure minimizes cash handling risks and supports fleet-wide integration, though reliance on Cabcharge terminals has historically limited with non-affiliated payment processors.

Surcharge Implementation and Processing

Cabcharge surcharges are applied to non-cash fares processed through its , typically adding a to the metered amount at the point of transaction to cover processing costs, , and administrative expenses. Historically, this surcharge stood at 10% for Cabcharge-branded cards and vouchers, with the full amount—including the added —charged to the passenger's account while Cabcharge retained the surcharge without sharing it with operators or drivers. Implementation occurs via Cabcharge terminals installed in or through dockets, where the driver inputs the fare, the system automatically calculates and appends the surcharge, and the passenger authorizes the total by or PIN for electronic transactions. For electronic payments, the terminal communicates with Cabcharge's network to validate the card or account, ensuring real-time or batched before the proceeds. State regulations cap these surcharges to prevent excess; for instance, Victoria's Commission set a maximum of 6% (including GST) specifically for Cabcharge instruments in 2020, recognizing higher costs associated with its charge-card model compared to standard debit or cards, which are capped at 4%. Processing involves Cabcharge acting as an : post-transaction, it bills the cardholder or account holder (often businesses or entities) within a statement cycle, collects funds, and remits the net fare—excluding the surcharge—to the operator, typically within days for electronic dockets or longer for paper ones. This model incurs costs for Cabcharge including prevention, recovery, and reconciliation, justifying surcharges above standard merchant fees of 1-2% for direct card processing, though critics argue historical 10% rates exceeded reasonable recovery. Following 2015 (ACCC) undertakings, Cabcharge opened its system to third-party terminals, enabling lower effective fees through , which indirectly influenced surcharge levels by reducing operator reliance on Cabcharge-exclusive hardware. In practice, surcharges remain higher in than retail due to low transaction volumes per terminal and the deferred payment nature of Cabcharge accounts.

Affiliations and Network Coverage

Cabcharge maintains extensive affiliations with over 150 taxi networks throughout , primarily through partnerships that enable acceptance of its payment cards, eTICKETs, and digital solutions for fares. These affiliations are integrated with A2B Australia's operations, including its ownership of the 13cabs network, which spans metropolitan and regional areas across all states and territories. Key national partners include 13cabs and Cabs, both providing broad metro and regional coverage. The network's coverage encompasses all Australian states and territories, with strong presence in major cities such as , , , Perth, , Darwin, and , alongside numerous regional operators. In , affiliations extend to operators like Legion Cabs, Premier Cabs, and over 50 regional networks including Taxis. Victoria features partnerships with Silver Top Taxi Service, Cab Connect, and more than 40 regional entities such as Geelong Taxi Network. Similar breadth applies in (e.g., 20+ regional networks like Cairns Taxis), (e.g., Suburban Taxi Services), (e.g., Swan Taxis Co-op), , the , and the Australian Capital Territory (e.g., ACT Cabs). This structure supports acceptance by approximately 98% of nationwide, accommodating both hailed and pre-booked trips while prioritizing compatibility with licensed operators adhering to and payment standards. Through these ties, Cabcharge facilitates seamless cashless payments for corporate and individual users, though acceptance can vary by specific operator policies.

Market Position and Economic Role

Dominance in Australian Taxi Payments

Cabcharge achieved near-monopolistic dominance in Australian payment processing by the early , supplying electronic terminals to approximately 95% of the nation's , enabling the handling of non-cash fares across an estimated 17,800 vehicles. This penetration rate rose to 98% of around 21,000 by 2016, positioning Cabcharge to process over $ in annual fares through its network. The company's business model relied on providing terminals to operators at subsidized or no upfront cost, recouping revenue via a standard 10% surcharge on processed fares, which applied to the full amount including GST and tolls. This approach, combined with ownership stakes in major networks and dispatch services, reinforced loyalty among operators and limited alternatives, as few competitors could match the scale or convenience. By the mid-2010s, Cabcharge's underpinned the bulk of non-cash transactions nationwide, with market inquiries noting its role in up to 40% of such payments via branded cards and e-tickets, though terminals facilitated broader and use. Regulatory scrutiny from bodies like the ACCC highlighted this entrenchment, describing Cabcharge's position as a leading processor amid limited rivalry in the sector. Post-merger with A2B in , the combined entity retained this stronghold, with payment terminals still equipped in 97% of Australian cabs as of early 2025, sustaining Cabcharge's oversight of payment flows despite industry shifts. This enduring coverage underscores Cabcharge's foundational in the traditional , processing fees that form a core revenue stream amid evolving transport dynamics.

Contributions to Industry Efficiency and Adoption of Digital Payments

Cabcharge pioneered non-cash payment options for Australian upon its launch in , initially through paper dockets that enabled cross-network transactions, reducing reliance on cash handling and associated risks such as or shortages for drivers. This system facilitated efficient reimbursement for corporate and users by centralizing fare processing, allowing fleets to minimize administrative burdens and improve through prompt settlements. By , Cabcharge's supported nearly 40 years of non-cash facilitation, contributing to broader industry of electronic methods ahead of general consumer trends. The company advanced efficiency further by introducing Australia's first in-taxi (EFT) solution in the late 1990s, enabling real-time processing that accelerated driver payouts and reduced float times compared to manual voucher systems. This innovation laid groundwork for digital integration, with subsequent developments like in-vehicle terminals and wireless meters streamlining transactions and minimizing calibration needs. By providing daily electronic settlements and up to 1% transaction rebates, Cabcharge lowered operational costs for operators, while its acceptance by 98% of taxis ensured reliable network coverage, enhancing overall sector reliability. In promoting digital payments, Cabcharge transitioned to contactless options, including NFC-enabled cards and pilots for services like in 2018, which supported mobile tourism inflows and preempted broader shifts. The launch of Cabcharge Plus on a cloud platform delivered real-time GPS tracking and trip visibility, processing digital fares that grew from $22.3 million in to a $100 million annual run rate by mid-year, fostering data-driven efficiency. Subsequent products like the Digital Pass (July 2018) and eTICKET enabled phone-based and tap-and-go payments, marking world-firsts in taxi-specific digital solutions and accelerating industry-wide contactless adoption amid declining cash usage. These advancements provided ATO-compliant e-receipts, automating expense reconciliation and reducing paper-based errors for businesses.

Challenges from Ride-Sharing Disruption

The entry of ride-sharing platforms such as into the Australian market from 2012 onward significantly eroded the traditional industry's market share, directly impacting Cabcharge's core business of facilitating payments. By 2015, 's rapid adoption led to a noticeable decline in trips, with Cabcharge reporting a 16.6% drop in annual statutory net profit to A$46.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2015, alongside a 4.7% fall to A$188 million, as passengers shifted to app-based alternatives offering lower fares and greater convenience. This disruption intensified in 2016, when Cabcharge's half-year profit slumped further amid overtaking taxis in major cities, contributing to a 45% tumble in full-year net profit, even as the company attributed some losses to regulatory fee caps rather than solely . Cabcharge, which processed payments for approximately 97% of Australian taxis prior to widespread ride-sharing, faced existential threats as its voucher and card system became less relevant in a digital, app-dominated ecosystem. Taxi patronage in states like and Victoria fell by up to 20-30% in the years following 's in late 2015 and 2016, reducing transaction volumes for Cabcharge's network and prompting a pivot toward developing its own payment app to retain users. Efforts to counter included a proposed called iHail with operators to create a competing app-based service, but the Australian and Consumer Commission (ACCC) opposed it in October 2015 on antitrust grounds, citing Cabcharge's dominant position in payments as a barrier to innovation. Regulatory and legal repercussions amplified these challenges, with ride-sharing's rise prompting government inquiries and compensation schemes totaling over A$1 billion for taxi license holders whose asset values plummeted. In 2024, Uber agreed to a A$272 million settlement in a lawsuit by taxi operators, acknowledging losses stemming from its "aggressive" market entry, which indirectly validated claims of economic harm to incumbents like Cabcharge-dependent s. Despite adaptations such as integrating with new terminals and expanding non-taxi services, Cabcharge's revenue from taxi networks declined 3.1% to A$91.9 million in fiscal , underscoring the structural shift away from regulated taxi monopolies toward unregulated, scalable ride-sharing models.

Regulatory Interactions

ACCC Investigations and Proceedings

In June 2009, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) instituted proceedings in the Federal Court against Cabcharge Australia Limited, alleging breaches of section 46 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (now the Competition and Consumer Act 2010) through misuse of substantial . The ACCC claimed Cabcharge had refused to supply its non-cash payment services or integrate with competitors' electronic payment terminals on reasonable commercial terms between 2005 and 2009, thereby deterring entry into the taxi payment docket and terminal markets. Specific conduct included rejecting integration requests from rivals such as Mobilec, Integrated Payment Services, and Eclipz, which the ACCC argued maintained Cabcharge's dominance by limiting and foreclosing competition. Cabcharge initially defended the allegations but later admitted to three contraventions of the misuse of provision, including refusals to deal that had the purpose or effect of substantially lessening . In September 2010, the Federal Court in imposed a total penalty of $15 million on Cabcharge, comprising $14 million in pecuniary penalties and $1 million in costs, following joint submissions by the parties. The court also issued declarations confirming the anti-competitive nature of the conduct and ordered Cabcharge to implement a compliance program, though no broader structural remedies like forced divestitures were mandated. Subsequent appeals by Cabcharge on procedural grounds, including discovery obligations, were dismissed by the Full Federal Court in August 2010, upholding the primary proceedings' trajectory. No further major ACCC proceedings against Cabcharge have been publicly initiated since the 2010 resolution, though the case contributed to heightened regulatory scrutiny of payment systems in the taxi industry amid emerging ride-sharing competition.

State and Federal Surcharge Regulations

At the federal level, the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), enforced by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), prohibits businesses from imposing surcharges exceeding their actual cost of accepting card payments, defined as the merchant service fee plus any related processing costs. This applies to payment systems like Cabcharge, but enforcement in the taxi sector has been complicated by state-specific regulations on fares and non-cash payments, which often supersede or exempt taxis from strict federal cost-based caps. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) monitors payment surcharging through its oversight of retail payments systems, having noted in past reviews that Cabcharge's historical 10% surcharge on taxi fares exceeded reasonable costs and contributed to higher overall charges compared to standard credit card fees (typically 1-1.5%). Despite federal guidelines introduced in 2016 to limit surcharges to evidenced costs, taxi operators using Cabcharge have frequently applied rates up to 5-10% until state interventions aligned them closer to processor costs of 3.5-3.9%. State regulations vary, with most jurisdictions capping non-cash surcharges for taxis—including Cabcharge transactions—to balance driver recovery of equipment and processing costs against passenger affordability, often diverging from federal cost-recovery ideals. In , where Cabcharge originated and maintains significant market share, the state regulates maximum metered fares under the Point to Point Transport (Taxis and Hire Vehicles) Regulation 2017 but does not impose a specific cap on non-cash surcharges, leaving them subject to federal prohibitions while allowing historical practices of up to 10% for Cabcharge to persist in some cases until aligned with industry norms around 5%. Victoria's Essential Services Commission (ESC) sets explicit maximums, determining in its 2022 review that a 4% surcharge (including GST) applies to most non-cash methods, but permitting 6% for Cabcharge instruments due to evidenced higher costs from specialized dockets and processing infrastructure. In , the Department of Transport and Main Roads caps all card surcharges at 5% of the total journey fare (including GST) effective July 1, 2025, encompassing Cabcharge payments without differentiation for system-specific costs. These state caps reflect periodic reviews acknowledging Cabcharge's role in enabling non-cash s but critiquing its higher fees relative to modern alternatives, with regulators like the ESC justifying differentiated rates for legacy systems based on empirical cost data from providers. Federal oversight continues to influence through RBA consultations, which have pressured reductions from Cabcharge's pre-2010s 10-11% levels (including GST on the base fee), though persistent gaps between regulated caps and actual processing costs (often below 4%) highlight tensions between industry infrastructure recovery and . Non-compliance risks ACCC penalties, as seen in broader surcharge enforcement, but taxi-specific exemptions under state laws have allowed higher rates than in retail sectors.

Reserve Bank of Australia Interventions

In 2011, during its review of card surcharging standards, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) received submissions highlighting Cabcharge's dominant position in taxi non-cash payments, including a 10% surcharge on its branded cards in Victoria, which exceeded typical credit card fees. The RBA acknowledged the unique challenges of the taxi sector, such as fixed in-vehicle devices and revenue flows primarily to intermediaries like Cabcharge before deductions to drivers, but did not extend its surcharging caps or prohibitions to taxi services, explicitly excluding them from national standards to defer to state and territory regulators. This exclusion persisted, as confirmed in RBA Standard No. 3 (2016), which omits non-cash taxi payments from surcharging limits applicable to general retail transactions. Professor Allan Fels, leading Victoria's Taxi Industry Inquiry, approached the RBA in 2011 seeking federal assistance to reduce Cabcharge's 10% surcharge, arguing it imposed undue costs on passengers amid the company's market dominance. The RBA expressed criticism of the prevailing arrangements, noting high fees and limited in , yet refrained from direct intervention, citing the sector's regulatory complexities and state-level oversight. Cabcharge responded by defending the surcharge as necessary for service provision, while competitors urged the RBA to designate its system under the Payment Systems (Regulation) Act 1998 for greater scrutiny and access by rivals. In 2012, alternative provider CabFare formally applied to the RBA to designate Cabcharge's payment network, aiming to subject it to federal access regimes and reduce , but the RBA declined to act, maintaining the without formal designation. Subsequent calls, including from payment providers like , echoed this push for RBA designation to foster competition and lower fees, but no regulatory action followed, leaving surcharge levels and system access governed primarily by state authorities. As of 2025, the RBA's ongoing review of merchant card costs proposes broader surcharging bans for debit and credit cards but continues to exempt taxi-specific systems like Cabcharge, prioritizing efficiency in general payments over sector-specific overhaul.

Controversies and Debates

Surcharge Fairness and Economic Justifications

Cabcharge's surcharge on non-cash taxi payments, historically set at 10% of the fare in most Australian jurisdictions, has been defended by the company as necessary to recover the full costs of its specialized payment processing system, including bank transaction fees, communication charges for mobile devices, administrative processing, and the provision of payment dockets that minimize cash-handling risks for drivers. This fee structure was intended to ensure prompt settlement to taxi operators while accounting for credit risks in account-based payments, particularly for business and government clients, thereby facilitating broader adoption of non-cash methods in an industry reliant on small, independent operators. Economically, proponents argue the surcharge reflects the value added by Cabcharge's integrated network, which historically covered over 90% of Australian taxis and provided rebates to taxi networks from its revenue, subsidizing industry infrastructure like device installation and maintenance without requiring upfront capital from drivers. However, regulatory assessments have challenged this rationale, with the Essential Services Commission (ESC) in Victoria determining in 2022 that payment processors, including Cabcharge's parent A2B , required only 3.5% to 3.9% of fares to recover reasonable costs, excluding GST, based on detailed cost modeling of transaction volumes and overheads. This gap suggests the 10% rate incorporated margins beyond direct costs, potentially enabled by Cabcharge's dominant market position prior to reforms. Fairness concerns intensified as empirical evidence from state inquiries revealed surcharges exceeding standard card acquirer fees (typically 1-2%), leading to interventions like Victoria's reduction to 5% and further caps, with the ESC setting a 4% maximum (including GST) for all non-cash payments effective September 23, 2024, to align fees more closely with verifiable processing expenses. Critics, including consumer advocates, contend this over-recovery burdened passengers for convenience while netting Cabcharge substantial revenue—estimated at a 4.5% profit hit from Victoria's initial cut—without proportional benefits to drivers, who often received no rebate and faced reduced net fares. In response to such scrutiny, reforms in and other states halved the cap to 5% by , reflecting a consensus that demanded surcharges tied to actual costs rather than historical allowances.

Allegations of Anti-Competitive Practices

In June 2009, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) initiated Federal Court proceedings against Cabcharge Australia Limited, alleging breaches of sections 45 and 46 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 through misuse of substantial market power in non-cash taxi payment processing and meter supply markets. The ACCC specifically claimed Cabcharge refused to contract with rival electronic payment processors, preventing taxi operators from accepting alternative non-cash payments and thereby excluding competitors from accessing its dominant network of installed terminals, which covered over 95% of Australia's taxi fleet at the time. Additionally, the regulator accused Cabcharge of predatory pricing by supplying and maintaining taxi meters at or below cost to undermine rival meter providers and reinforce its payment system exclusivity. Cabcharge's market position, with payment terminals in approximately 97% of Australian taxis by 2012, amplified these concerns, as it allowed the company to levy processing fees of up to 10% on fares while limiting with competing systems. Competitors and industry observers argued this created , stifling in electronic payments and forcing reliance on Cabcharge's , though the company maintained its practices were pro-competitive and necessary for network reliability. In September 2010, Cabcharge admitted to three contraventions, including the refusal to deal and below-cost metering, leading the Federal Court to impose a $15 million penalty in penalties and costs, the largest then for misuse under the Act. The settlement included court orders requiring Cabcharge to negotiate in with third-party providers for payment integration. Subsequent ACCC scrutiny in 2011–2012 uncovered further allegations of refusal to deal with emerging payment rivals, prompting Cabcharge to provide a court-enforceable undertaking in 2015 to facilitate third-party access and reduce surcharges, amid pressure from state regulations capping fees at 5–10% depending on the . Cabcharge's then-CEO Reg Kermode rejected monopoly characterizations, asserting ample from cash payments and other operators. These episodes highlighted tensions between Cabcharge's scale efficiencies and risks of entrenching dominance in a sector slow to adopt open digital alternatives prior to ride-sharing proliferation.

Taxi Industry Inquiry Outcomes and Responses

The Victorian Taxi Industry Inquiry, initiated on March 28, 2011, and chaired by Allan Fels, identified Cabcharge's market dominance in payment processing as a key factor contributing to high surcharges and reduced . The inquiry's draft report, released on May 31, 2012, specifically targeted Cabcharge's 10% surcharge on non-cash payments—applied to the full fare including GST and tolls—as excessive and monopolistic, recommending interventions to foster and lower fees. The final report, delivered on September 28, 2012, contained 139 recommendations, including measures to cap surcharges and promote alternative payment providers to diminish Cabcharge's control over approximately 95% of electronic transactions in Victoria. In response, the Victorian government accepted most recommendations and, on May 28, 2013, announced regulatory action to halve Cabcharge's surcharge to 5% or less, effective , 2014, via new legislation passed in late June 2013. This cap applied to all non-cash payments, aiming to pass savings to passengers and drivers while addressing the inquiry's findings on Cabcharge's , which included ownership of payment hardware and dockets that deterred rivals. Cabcharge contested the surcharges' necessity for covering processing costs and industry subsidies but faced immediate market repercussions, with its shares dropping 15% on the announcement day; the company stated it would study the reforms and respond in due course. Parallel inquiries, such as the Legislative Council's 2010 probe into the taxi industry, raised similar concerns about Cabcharge's role in payment processing and its rebates to networks, which subsidized operations but entrenched dominance; however, it yielded fewer direct regulatory changes specific to Cabcharge compared to Victoria's outcomes. These inquiries collectively pressured Cabcharge to adapt, contributing to later ACCC undertakings in allowing competitors to process its cards, though enforcement focused more on federal competition law than state-level reforms.

Broader Criticisms and Defenses

Critics have argued that Cabcharge's dominant position in the taxi payment processing market has enabled it to extract excessive rents from an already regulated industry, imposing high surcharges—often around 10%—that inflate fares for passengers and reduce net earnings for drivers without commensurate benefits. Allan Fels, in his review of the taxi industry, described Cabcharge as operating a monopoly, where electronic users face no viable alternatives, leading to "super profits" for the company while stifling competition and innovation in payment systems. This structure, critics contend, exacerbates inefficiencies in the taxi sector by creating dependency on Cabcharge's , discouraging adoption of lower-cost alternatives and contributing to higher overall transport costs amid limited . Such dominance is seen as intertwined with broader taxi industry protections, like license caps, allowing Cabcharge to leverage network effects—where widespread acceptance reinforces its position—without bearing full competitive pressures, ultimately transferring costs to end-users in a market shielded from full until ride-sharing disruptions. In defense, Cabcharge executives have maintained that the company does not hold a monopoly, pointing to the existence of alternative payment methods like cash and direct , and emphasizing its role in pioneering non-cash transactions in a historically cash-reliant industry. CEO Reg Kermode argued in 2010 that competitors operate in the space and that Cabcharge's fees reflect the value provided, including immediate fund advances to drivers (mitigating their ) and deferred payments for account holders, which facilitate and industry liquidity without banks initially filling the gap. The company has positioned itself as an innovator, introducing solutions over two decades ago and supporting over 98% of Australia's affiliated fleet, thereby enhancing convenience, safety, and operational efficiency for networks and drivers. Proponents further contend that surcharges economically justify the intermediation costs, including fraud prevention, , and extension in a high-risk sector, arguing that without such systems, the shift to digital payments would have lagged, limiting industry growth and passenger access to traceable, accountable rides. While acknowledging regulatory scrutiny, defenders highlight that Cabcharge's model has sustained viability against cash-handling vulnerabilities, with fees enabling investments in technology amid evolving payment landscapes.

Recent Developments

Fraud Allegations and Industry Leaks (2025)

In February 2025, a significant leak of internal documents from A2B Australia, the parent company of Cabcharge, revealed allegations of widespread fraud perpetrated by taxi drivers exploiting vulnerabilities in Cabcharge payment systems and dockets. Dubbed "Taxileaks" by media outlets, the files—obtained by The Sydney Morning Herald and 60 Minutes—detailed systematic overcharging, including fare padding on short trips and scams targeting vulnerable passengers, such as those from NDIS-funded services and aged care facilities. The leaks highlighted repeated internal alerts to senior management about these issues dating back years, with accusations that A2B failed to implement adequate safeguards or fully refund affected large clients despite detecting irregularities. A former A2B integrity officer, speaking anonymously, described the as "all over the place," claiming the company prioritized revenue over remediation, including incomplete refunds to entities like hospitals and providers. Specific instances included drivers manipulating Cabcharge dockets to inflate fares by up to 50% on routine trips, with hidden camera footage aired by on February 16, 2025, showing drivers colluding to overcharge elderly passengers. Monash Health, a major Victorian , confirmed detecting multiple fraudulent Cabcharge fares through its auditing processes and condemned the conduct as "utterly disgraceful, unethical, and unacceptable." Other clients, such as Villa Maria Catholic Homes, were similarly targeted, prompting calls for systemic overhaul. A2B, a of Singapore-based , responded by launching an internal investigation, asserting that the stemmed from individual driver actions exploiting terminal and weaknesses rather than company policy, and denying any failure to act on known risks. The company emphasized cooperation with authorities and implementation of enhanced monitoring, while noting that Cabcharge products are widely used across the industry and that vulnerabilities affected multiple providers. In response to the leaks, the Victorian government announced a review of Cabcharge usage in taxpayer-funded organizations on 16, 2025, with Premier describing the exposed practices as "absolutely vile" and advocating for stricter driver accreditation, including a "two strikes" policy for offenders. No criminal charges against A2B executives had been filed as of late 2025, though the leaks intensified scrutiny on the sector's transition to digital payments amid ongoing from ride-sharing services.

Adaptation to Post-Pandemic and Digital Shifts

Following the , Cabcharge accelerated its emphasis on contactless and digital payment solutions to address heightened demand for hygienic, cashless transactions in the industry. The pandemic expedited a pre-existing trend toward electronic payments in , with cash usage dropping significantly as consumers favored tap-and-go options for safety and convenience. Cabcharge's FASTCARD system, equipped with contactless technology supporting fares under $100 via 'Tap and Go', enabled seamless in-taxi payments using bank cards or mobile wallets, reducing physical contact between drivers and passengers. In response to digital shifts, Cabcharge introduced the Digital Pass in recent years, a virtual single-use or multi-use issued electronically for occasional travelers, contractors, or staff, integrable with corporate expense systems for streamlined reimbursements. Complementing this, the eTICKET—a single-use, paper-based card with embedded contactless functionality—was promoted for secure, one-off trips, allowing tap payments while maintaining compatibility with traditional meters. These innovations supported post-pandemic recovery by facilitating touch-free processing amid reduced patronage and from app-based ride-hailing services, which inherently offer digital booking and payment integration. Despite these adaptations, Cabcharge faced ongoing challenges from digital-native competitors like , whose app ecosystems bypassed traditional voucher systems. Earlier attempts to launch a competing booking app, such as iHail, were blocked by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission in 2015 over anti-competitive concerns, limiting Cabcharge's direct entry into ride-hailing software. By 2025, Cabcharge's strategy remained centered on payment infrastructure enhancements rather than full app development, positioning it as a backend enabler for integrating third-party digital tools. This focus aligned with industry-wide but highlighted persistent vulnerabilities to platforms offering end-to-end digital experiences.

References

  1. https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/cabcharge-australia
  2. https://www.cabcharge.com.au/about-us
  3. https://plus.cabcharge.com.au/
  4. https://www.cabcharge.com.au/
  5. https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/cabcharge-penalised-for-misuse-of-market-power
  6. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-09-24/cabcharge-to-pay-15m-penalty-in-accc-case/2273320
  7. https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/C/ASX_CAB_2000.pdf
  8. https://www.finnewsnetwork.com.au/CompanyReports/Cabcharge-Australia-Limited/0
  9. https://www.finnewsnetwork.com.au/company/asx-cab/1
  10. https://www.delisted.com.au/company/cabcharge-australia-limited/
  11. https://news.microsoft.com/en-au/features/cabcharge-hitches-rapid-ride-future-intelligent-cloud-platform/
  12. https://itwire.com/listed-tech/technology-a-key-contributor-to-growth-says-cabcharge.html
  13. https://www.afr.com/companies/infrastructure/cabcharge-buys-mobile-technologies-international-to-rev-up-tech-20180620-h11lt1
  14. https://www.merchants.cabcharge.com.au/new-in-vehicle-technology
  15. https://www.zdnet.com/article/cabcharge-extends-rfid-technology-to-car-parks/
  16. https://www.9news.com.au/national/taxi-technology-cracking-down-bad-drivers-australia/fe4eb8e2-ab4b-4517-8aba-e4a6ba3d9379
  17. https://www.afr.com/companies/transport/taxi-payments-group-cabcharge-dumping-name-to-drive-off-as-a2b-australia-20181019-h16ulr
  18. https://www.toastcreative.com.au/news/visionary-direction-for-heritage-brand
  19. https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/A2B-AUSTRALIA-47401279/news/Cabcharge-Australia-Limited-will-Change-its-Name-to-A2B-Australia-Limited-34477884/
  20. https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/A2B-AUSTRALIA-47401279/news/A2B-Australia-Limited-completed-the-acquisition-of-Mobile-Technologies-International-Pty-Ltd-from-Ma-34517294/
  21. https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/59317-30
  22. https://www.afr.com/companies/transport/singapore-giant-in-182m-buyout-of-13cabs-operator-a2b-20231222-p5etai
  23. https://comfortdelgro.com.au/comfortdelgro-australia-completes-a2b-australia-acquisition/
  24. https://www.merchants.cabcharge.com.au/blue-docket
  25. https://www.cabcharge.com.au/conditions-of-use
  26. https://www.merchants.cabcharge.com.au/
  27. https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/submissions/submissions-card-surcharging/vic-taxi.pdf
  28. https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/submissions/submissions-card-surcharging/australian-taxi-drivers-association.doc
  29. https://www.reddit.com/r/brisbane/comments/ickj87/taxi_drivers_seem_unhappy_when_i_need_to_pay_with/
  30. https://airporttaxibookingmelbourne.net.au/what-is-cabcharge-taxi-and-how-does-it-work-a-complete-guide/
  31. https://www.esc.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/taxi-non-cash-payment-surcharge-review-final-decision-20200324.pdf
  32. https://www.esc.vic.gov.au/transport/commercial-passenger-vehicles/commercial-passenger-vehicle-prices/taxi-non-cash-payment-surcharge
  33. https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/death-knell-for-surcharges-risks-plenty-of-unintended-consequences-20250715-p5mf1e
  34. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-29/cabcharge-fees-likely-to-fall-after-accc-action/6581500
  35. https://www.esc.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/Final%2520decision%2520paper%2520-%2520Taxi%2520Non-Cash%2520Payment%2520Surcharge%2520Review%25202022_2.PDF
  36. https://www.cabcharge.com.au/taxi-networks
  37. https://www.a2baustralia.com/aboutus/our-brands/
  38. https://www.afr.com/politics/taxi-payments-turn-rank-20090711-jmz72
  39. https://www.afr.com/companies/transport/cabcharge-ceo-hails-bigger-slice-of-61-billion-short-ride-economy-20161219-gtdzcq
  40. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-01/review-unleashes-on-cabcharge-taxi-monopoly/4045530
  41. https://www.intelligentinvestor.com.au/recommendations/taxi-for-cabcharge/60294
  42. https://www.smh.com.au/national/how-nation-s-largest-taxi-company-has-taken-public-for-a-ride-20250210-p5laz4.html
  43. https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/C/ASX_CAB_2014.pdf
  44. https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/public-registers/documents/D05%252B11273.pdf
  45. https://www.a2baustralia.com/upload/content/pdf/Tax-Transparency-Statement.pdf
  46. https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/C/ASX_CAB_2015.pdf
  47. https://www.afr.com/companies/retail/cabcharge-takes-alipay-as-china-tourism-dollars-signal-mobile-payment-trend-20180204-h0tbst
  48. https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20181022/pdf/43zgq0n3tvzh3r.pdf
  49. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cabcharge-aust-results-uber-tech/australias-cabcharge-pins-hopes-on-payment-app-amid-uber-competition-idUSKCN0QQ06720150821
  50. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/business-spectator/cabcharge-fy-profit-falls-17/news-story/f07a0403e5ae5db04aee244152489b83
  51. https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/australia-s-cabcharge-says-h1-profit-slump-as-uber-overtakes-idUSL3N1646SU/
  52. https://www.afr.com/companies/cabcharge-eyes-new-terminals-as-net-profit-tumbles-45pc-20160825-gr0vvt
  53. https://www.zdnet.com/article/cabcharge-welcomes-legalisation-of-uber/
  54. https://www.wsj.com/articles/plan-to-challenge-uber-hits-roadblock-in-australia-1444633177
  55. https://www.zdnet.com/article/cabcharge-response-to-uber-gets-rejected-by-accc/
  56. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/18/uber-taxi-settlement-compensation-australia-272m-lawsuit
  57. https://itwire.com/it-industry-news/market/cabcharge-revenue%2C-profits-down-as-regulatory-changes-hit-taxi-industry-industry.html
  58. https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/cabcharge-proceedings
  59. https://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/cabcharge2010.html
  60. https://www.brightlaw.com.au/misuse-of-market-power-accc-v-cabcharge/
  61. https://jade.io/summary/mnc/2010/FCAFC/111
  62. https://www.governmentnews.com.au/cabcharges-ticket-clipped-by-accc/
  63. https://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/pricing/card-surcharges
  64. https://www.australianfrequentflyer.com.au/community/threads/how-do-taxis-still-get-away-with-a-5-credit-card-surcharge.101737/
  65. https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/submissions/submissions-card-surcharging/nsw-transport-dept.pdf
  66. https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/regulation/2017/424/full
  67. https://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/business-industry/Taxi-and-limousine/Industry-information/Industry-regulations/Maximum-payment-surcharge
  68. https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/submissions/submissions-card-surcharging/cabcharge.pdf
  69. https://www.esc.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/Submission%2520%252322%2520-%2520Visa%2520-%25202024%2520taxi%2520review%2520-%252020240712.pdf
  70. https://www.afr.com/companies/transport/rba-fee-move-is-cabcharge-s-biggest-threat-20121210-jij4t
  71. https://www.smh.com.au/business/cabcharge-vows-to-fight-surcharge-cuts-20121128-2adh7.html
  72. https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/submissions/review-of-card-payments-regulation/cabfare.pdf
  73. https://www.tyro.com/about-tyro/media/one-step-closer-to-breaking-taxi-fare-monopoly/
  74. https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/review-of-retail-payments-regulation/2025-07/
  75. https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oceania-australia-new-zealand-south-pacific/1241661-why-do-cabcharge-get-10-extra-ccs-prob-long-after-equip-has-been-paid-off.html
  76. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/surcharge-cut-hurts-cabcharge-profit/lg7750cdm
  77. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-24/taxi-charge-fee-cap-should-benefit-consumers3a-transport-minis/6249240
  78. https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-institutes-action-against-taxi-industry-giant-cabcharge
  79. https://www.smh.com.au/business/cabcharge-conduct-anticompetitive-accc-20090626-czph.html
  80. https://www.news.com.au/finance/money/costs/cabcharges-virtual-monopoly-on-taxi-fare-card-payments-challenged/news-story/c6eacacadb4f170e01f96e964372ef51
  81. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2273320
  82. https://www.timebase.com.au/news/2015/AT245-article.html
  83. https://www.smh.com.au/national/kermode-denies-cabcharge-has-a-monopoly-20100331-re91.html
  84. https://www.smh.com.au/business/cabcharge-casualty-in-taxi-revamp-20130528-2n9ki.html
  85. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-28/cabcharge-shares-crash-on-victorian-taxi-fee-cuts/4717930
  86. https://www.smh.com.au/business/cabcharge-the-loser-in-taxi-reform-20130528-2n9kk.html
  87. https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-accepts-undertaking-from-cabcharge-to-allow-competitors-to-process-its-cards
  88. https://www.smh.com.au/business/cabcharge-monopoly-result-called-weak-20070830-gdqzhv.html
  89. https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/kermode-denies-cabcharge-operating-monopoly-20100331-ivrtl
  90. https://www.afr.com/companies/no-sin-at-cabcharge-20100401-ivrq0
  91. https://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs/fraud-all-over-the-place-taxi-giant-s-former-integrity-insider-blows-whistle-on-rampant-rip-offs-20250217-p5lct6.html
  92. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgrpodVFYIA
  93. https://www.smh.com.au/national/cabcharge-review-ordered-as-hospital-blasts-utterly-disgraceful-unethical-and-unacceptable-conduct-20250215-p5lcda.html
  94. https://www.theage.com.au/national/cabcharge-review-ordered-as-hospital-blasts-utterly-disgraceful-unethical-and-unacceptable-conduct-20250215-p5lcda.html
  95. https://www.straitstimes.com/business/comfortdelgros-australia-unit-investigating-allegations-of-fraud-after-documents-leaked-to-media
  96. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/australia-taxi-fraud-cases-driven-cabbies-not-company-comfortdelgro
  97. https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2023/2023-08/full.html
  98. https://www.merchants.cabcharge.com.au/fastcard
  99. https://www.cabcharge.com.au/travel-solutions/digital-pass
  100. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/olivia-birmingham-6731a9191_thecabcharge-eticketis-a-single-use-paper-based-activity-7350353425345241088-Ji69
  101. https://cabtreasure.com/how-the-rise-of-digital-payments-through-customer-apps-is-transforming-taxi-bookings/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.