Hubbry Logo
CharacidaeCharacidaeMain
Open search
Characidae
Community hub
Characidae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Characidae
Characidae
Characidae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Characidae
Charax stenopterus
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Actinopterygii
Order: Characiformes
Suborder: Characoidei
Family: Characidae
Latreille, 1825[1]
Type genus
Charax[1]
Subfamilies

Aphyocharacinae
Characinae
Cheirodontinae
Exodontinae
Tetragonopterinae

Characidae, the characids, is a family of freshwater subtropical and tropical fish belonging to the order Characiformes. They are found throughout much of Central and South America, including such major waterways as the Amazon and Orinoco Rivers.[3] These fish vary in length; many are less than 3 cm (1.2 in).[4]

The name "characins" is a historical one,[5] but scientists today tend to prefer "characids" to reflect their status as a, by and large, monophyletic group (at family rank). This family includes some of the first characiforms to be described to science, such as Charax and Tetragonopterus, and thus lend their name to the order, as well as to common names such as "characin" and "tetra".[6]

Past taxonomic treatments had a much more expansive definition of the family, including numerous South American fish families such as the piranhas and dorados, as well as the African alestids. Following multiple taxonomic revisions, this was eventually restricted to just the American "tetra" type characins by the 2010s. However, even this definition of Characidae was found to obscure much of the evolutionary diversity within the group, and in 2024 the "tetra" families Acestrorhamphidae and Stevardiidae were split out of the Characidae, leaving it with just five subfamilies.[7][8]

Classification

[edit]
Aphyocharax anisitsi (Aphyocharacinae)

Taxonomy

[edit]

The following classification is based on Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes (2025):[8][9][1]

Family Characidae

Former members

[edit]
Phylogeny of Characidae from Melo et al. 2015[12] with clade names from van der Laan 2017.[13]
Characidae

This family has undergone a large amount of systematic and taxonomic change. More recent revision has moved many former members of the family into their own related but distinct families – the pencilfishes of the genus Nannostomus are a typical example, having now been moved into the Lebiasinidae, the assorted predatory species belonging to Hoplias and Hoplerythrinus have now been moved into the Erythrinidae, and the sabre-toothed fishes of the genus Hydrolycus have been moved into the Cynodontidae. The former subfamily Alestiinae was promoted to family level (Alestiidae) and the subfamilies Crenuchinae and Characidiinae were moved to the family Crenuchidae.[3]

Other fish families that were formerly classified as members of the Characidae, but which were moved into separate families of their own during recent taxonomic revisions (after 1994) include Acestrorhynchidae, Anostomidae, Chilodidae, Citharinidae, Ctenoluciidae, Curimatidae, Distichodontidae, Gasteropelecidae, Hemiodontidae, Hepsetidae, Parodontidae, Prochilodontidae,[14] Serrasalmidae, and Triportheidae.[15] In 2024, the families Stevardiidae and Acestrorhamphidae, containing a high proportion of the famous ornamental aquarium tetras, were also split out of the family, in addition to the small family Spintherobolidae.[7]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Characidae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Characidae is a family of ray-finned fishes in the order , comprising 203 species of primarily freshwater Neotropical fishes that inhabit rivers, streams, and floodplains across and , from southern to northern . A 2024 phylogenomic study based on ultraconserved elements (UCEs) redefined the formerly broader Characidae (encompassing approximately 1,259 species, more than half of all characiforms) by dividing it into four monophyletic families to better reflect evolutionary relationships: Spintherobolidae (6 species), Stevardiidae (365 species), the current Characidae (203 species), and Acestrorhamphidae (685 species). The family is recognized for its morphological diversity within the redefined limits, including small-bodied species in subfamilies like Cheirodontinae as well as larger forms up to 1 meter in length, such as dorados (Salminus spp. in Characinae). Key diagnostic features include the presence or absence of an adipose fin, a spine-like process on the pelvic bone in some taxa, and specialized dentition, such as outward-projecting teeth in scale-eating species like the buck-toothed tetra (Exodon paradoxus) and Roeboides spp. in Exodontinae. Members of Characidae play roles in Neotropical aquatic ecosystems as omnivores, insectivores, and predators, contributing to nutrient cycling; for instance, species like Astyanax (now in Acestrorhamphidae, but related) facilitate phosphorus recycling in some habitats. Many exhibit adaptations to varied flow regimes, from fast-moving Andean rivers to lowland floodplains. The family's evolutionary history is marked by accelerated diversification driven by the dynamic Neotropical landscape since the , shared with relatives like Anostomidae and Serrasalmidae. Species from the broader former Characidae, such as the (Paracheirodon innesi, now in Acestrorhamphidae), are significant in the aquarium trade, though overcollection and habitat loss pose conservation threats to many endemics. Ongoing taxonomic revisions, informed by multilocus and phylogenomic data, continue to refine boundaries, including new subfamilies like Argopleurinae and Planaltininae within Stevardiidae.

Description

Morphology

Characidae species typically exhibit a small to medium-sized body, ranging from approximately 2 to 30 cm in standard length, with a laterally compressed shape that facilitates maneuverability in freshwater environments. The body is covered in scales, which are smooth and rounded, providing flexibility and protection without the rough texture of ctenoid scales found in other groups. The fin configuration is a defining feature, with most species possessing an adipose fin located on the dorsal midline between the dorsal and caudal fins. This fin, often a fleshy, rayless structure, aids in stability and flow sensing during swimming, particularly in turbulent waters, by acting as a precaudal sensor that enhances hydrodynamic efficiency. The usually originates posterior to the midpoint of the body and consists of 9 to 10 branched rays (preceded by 2 unbranched rays), while the anal fin is typically long with 10 to 20 or more branched rays, contributing to and steering. Pectoral and pelvic fins are positioned ventrally, with pectoral fins often reaching the pelvic insertion and pelvic fins bearing 6 to 7 branched rays; these support agile movements in vegetated habitats. A key diagnostic feature of the narrowed Characidae is the presence of a pseudotympanum, a hiatus in the hypaxial musculature along the gas bladder that varies in shape across subfamilies. The system begins at the operculum and runs along the body flank, featuring perforated scales that detect water vibrations and pressure changes for navigation and predator avoidance. Scale counts vary, but typically include 30 to 50 or more in the longitudinal series, with 5 to 10 rows above and below the . Dentition in Characidae is highly variable, reflecting adaptations to diverse prey, with teeth ranging from tricuspid (three-cusped) forms in many to multi-cusped or even blade-like structures in predatory genera. Teeth are arranged in single or multiple rows on the , , and dentary, often multicuspidate in herbivorous or omnivorous , while carnivorous forms exhibit sharper, sectorial teeth for grasping. This variation underscores the family's ecological breadth without barbels, which are absent in most . Sensory organs emphasize vision suited to dimly lit freshwater settings, with large, well-developed eyes that provide wide-angle detection in low-light conditions common to their habitats. Unlike catfishes, barbels are generally lacking, relying instead on the and visual cues for orientation. Morphological diversity includes contrasts such as the elongated snout in genera like Charax, adapted for predatory strikes, versus the more rounded heads in small species like those in Cheirodon, which favor schooling behaviors.

Diversity and Variation

Under the 2024 proposed classification, the family Characidae comprises 203 species distributed across approximately 30 genera in five subfamilies (Aphyocharacinae, Cheirodontinae, Exodontinae, Tetragonopterinae, and Characinae), forming a significant component of Neotropical diversity within . This taxonomic revision highlights the family's prominence in Neotropical ecosystems, where species exhibit a wide array of adaptations while adhering to a generalized . Morphological variation is pronounced, particularly in body size, with species ranging from diminutive forms measuring about 2 cm in total length, such as Cheirodon spp., to larger forms exceeding 30 cm, exemplified by certain in genera like Charax. Coloration further diversifies the family, featuring iridescent scales that produce striking hues in some , contrasted by cryptic, mottled patterns in wild populations that aid among vegetation or substrates. is common, often manifesting in fin elongation, where males develop extended anal or dorsal fins during breeding seasons to facilitate displays. Specialized adaptations highlight functional diversity, including scale-eating behaviors in species like Exodon paradoxus, which possesses asymmetrical jaws enabling it to rasp scales from prey fish with either the left or right mandible protruding. Genetic diversity is elevated due to high endemism confined to specific river basins across , where isolation by waterfalls and geographic barriers fosters ; for instance, numerous species are restricted to tributaries of the Amazon, , or Paraná systems. This pattern is evidenced by ongoing taxonomic revisions, reflecting intensified surveys in understudied drainages.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

Following recent phylogenomic reclassification, the narrowed Characidae are native to freshwater systems across the , extending from southern to northern in , encompassing diverse riverine and lacustrine habitats throughout Central and . This distribution reflects the family's adaptation to a variety of continental freshwater environments, with northernmost populations in southern , separated from the main South American range by geographic barriers. The core geographic range centers on major South American river basins, including the , , Paraná, and São Francisco, where the family achieves high abundance and . Biogeographic patterns reveal a pronounced in diversity, with high in Amazonia contrasting with lower numbers in northern latitudes due to historical barriers such as the closure of the around 3 million years ago, which limited northward dispersal and . These patterns underscore the role of tectonic and climatic events in shaping the family's distribution, with Amazonian tributaries serving as hotspots for and radiation. Introduced populations of certain Characidae species have arisen outside their native range primarily through the aquarium trade, leading to feral groups in regions like and . Historical range shifts within the native distribution have been influenced by Pleistocene glaciation events, which caused periodic contractions and expansions of suitable habitats, as well as temporary river connections that facilitated dispersal across basins during lower sea levels. These dynamics contributed to the current mosaic of populations, with refugia in equatorial regions preserving amid glacial cycles.

Ecological Niches

Characidae species predominantly inhabit freshwater environments, including rivers, streams, lakes, and rapids across tropical and subtropical regions of the . They show a marked preference for slow-flowing blackwater or clearwater rivers, where low levels and high transparency support their ecological adaptations, such as diurnal visual in nutrient-poor systems reliant on allochthonous from surrounding forests. These habitats are characterized by low conductivity (typically 5–40 μS cm⁻¹) and varying loads, with blackwater systems featuring acidic conditions and clearwater systems neutral , fostering diverse assemblages dominated by small-bodied characids. Optimal water parameters for most Characidae align with tropical to subtropical conditions, with temperatures ranging from 22–28°C to support metabolic processes and reproduction. pH levels vary from 5.5–7.5, accommodating soft to moderately hard water, though many species thrive in the acidic blackwater environments (pH <6) of rainforest drainages. While primarily stenohaline freshwater dwellers, some species exhibit brief tolerance to brackish conditions during seasonal floods or coastal migrations, though prolonged exposure leads to osmoregulatory stress. Within these habitats, Characidae occupy distinct microhabitats, often shoaling in mid-water columns to exploit planktonic resources in lentic zones. Rheophilic species within the family prefer fast-flowing currents in and headwaters, where high oxygen levels and rocky substrates facilitate streamlined morphologies for sustained . In contrast, limnophilic forms inhabit still waters of lakes and pools, associating closely with leaf litter accumulations for foraging on and , which provide essential microhabitat structure and food sources. Many Characidae maintain symbiotic associations with in stream margins and floodplains, where decaying supports prey and shelters juveniles from predators. However, these species are vulnerable to deforestation-induced , as riparian clearing alters inputs, increases , and shifts community dominance away from characids toward more tolerant taxa. Characidae exhibit sensitivity to temperature fluctuations, with southern distributional limits in tied to frost lines around 37°S–39°S, beyond which lethal cold events restrict viable populations. This thermal constraint underscores their reliance on stable warm-water regimes, making them susceptible to climate-driven shifts in range and habitat suitability.

Biology and Ecology

Feeding and Diet

Members of the Characidae family exhibit a wide range of dietary habits, spanning from omnivory to carnivory, consuming , detritus, , small , and matter depending on and . Many are planktivores that feed in open water columns, while others act as benthic feeders near substrates, targeting aquatic and organic debris. This dietary flexibility supports their ecological roles across diverse Neotropical freshwater systems. Specialized feeding strategies have evolved in certain characids, such as lepidophagy in genera like Roeboides, where individuals use specialized cutting teeth to scrape scales from larger hosts. In environments, some characids contribute to , though frugivory is more prominent in related characiform families. Foraging behavior in Characidae often involves shoaling, which enhances predator avoidance while allowing coordinated feeding on patchy resources. Most species display diurnal activity patterns, actively during daylight hours. Characids primarily occupy secondary consumer trophic levels, preying on primary producers and herbivores, and contribute to nutrient cycling through the consumption and egestion of . Morphological adaptations, including protrusible mouths for surface feeding and robust for grinding tougher plant and detrital material, link their to ecological niches.

Reproduction and Life Cycle

Members of the Characidae family typically reproduce through , with most species engaging in scatter-spawning where females release batches of adhesive, demersal eggs that attach to submerged , roots, or other substrates in shallow waters. Parental care is generally minimal or absent, though some larger characids exhibit limited guarding behaviors correlated with reduced . Breeding in Characidae is often triggered by environmental cues associated with seasonal changes, particularly the onset of rains and floods that increase levels and oxygen availability in Neotropical rivers and floodplains. Courtship displays commonly involve males chasing s, flaring fins, and rapid color changes to signal readiness. varies with body size, ranging from hundreds to thousands of eggs per , with absolute positively correlated to . Eggs typically hatch within 16-24 hours post-fertilization at 27-28°C, yielding pre-larvae that absorb their and become free-swimming fry within 24-48 hours, initiating exogenous feeding shortly thereafter. The life cycle of Characidae features rapid early growth, with larvae reaching juvenile stages in 4-6 weeks and exhibiting significant size increases in the first year, driven by abundant planktonic food resources. is attained relatively early, between 6 and 12 months, at lengths of 18-50 mm depending on species and environmental conditions, enabling multiple reproductive cycles. In the wild, lifespan typically ranges from 2 to 5 years, influenced by predation and habitat stability, though individuals in can live up to 10 years with optimal conditions. Following the 2024 reclassification, the narrowed Characidae emphasizes predatory lineages like Characinae, with reproductive strategies adapted to variable riverine habitats.

Taxonomy and Systematics

Historical Classification

The family Characidae was established by in 1825 as part of his of fishes, initially encompassing a broad array of Neotropical characiforms characterized by their small to medium size, compressed bodies, and adipose fin. This early definition included diverse forms from South American freshwaters, but 19th-century taxonomists often lumped together morphologically similar species across wide geographic ranges, leading to an overly inclusive group that extended to some African lineages like alestids before their separation into distinct families. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, systematic studies advanced the understanding of Characidae through detailed monographic works. Carl H. Eigenmann and collaborators, including C. H. Kennedy, conducted extensive surveys of South American collections, with key contributions from 1902 to 1910 that described numerous species and established foundational genera such as Hyphessobrycon (proposed by Durbin in Eigenmann, 1908). Eigenmann's multi-volume "The American Characidae," published between 1917 and 1929, synthesized these efforts into comprehensive revisions, emphasizing osteological and meristic characters to delineate genera and subfamilies like Tetragonopterinae, while highlighting the family's remarkable diversity exceeding 500 species at the time. These works addressed the challenges of high , which often resulted in taxonomic lumping of cryptic forms or splitting based on minor morphological variations, particularly in regions like the Amazon and Paraná basins. Early 20th-century classifications retained serrasalmids— including (Serrasalmus and related genera) and pacus— as subfamilies within Characidae, based on shared characiform traits like the adipose fin and dentition patterns, until revisions in the elevated them to separate family status (Serrasalmidae). This period also saw influences from ecological studies, such as those on in tetra-like characids, where convergent color patterns among unpalatable species complicated generic boundaries and prompted cautious approaches to synonymy. A major milestone came with Jacques Géry's 1977 revision in "Characoids of the World," which refined over 100 genera through integrated morphological analysis, reducing artificial groupings and providing a more stable framework for the family's estimated 1,000+ species amid ongoing debates over Neotropical .

Current Taxonomy

Characidae is a family of primarily Neotropical freshwater fishes within the order and superorder Otophysi. Recent phylogenomic analyses have redefined the family to include approximately 203 valid across multiple genera, representing a narrower circumscription than previously recognized, with the broader Characidae sensu lato encompassing over 1,250 now distributed among four families: Spintherobolidae, Stevardiidae, Characidae, and Acestrorhamphidae. This classification is based on extensive sampling of 494 and 123 genera using ultraconserved elements and other molecular markers. The updated framework recognizes five formal subfamilies: Aphyocharacinae, Cheirodontinae, Exodontinae, Tetragonopterinae, and Characinae. The type genus is Charax, with a diagnosis characterized by the presence of an adipose , absence of barbels, and typically 10–14 dorsal rays, alongside other osteological features like a pseudotympanum. Significant recent taxonomic changes include the elevation of certain lineages to distinct families, such as Triportheidae in 2015, which removed five genera and 23 species from Characidae based on molecular phylogenies. Ongoing revisions incorporate and phylogenomic data, revealing cryptic diversity and supporting genus-level synonymies (e.g., Aphyodite under Aphyocharax) and expansions (e.g., Hemigrammus). Primary authorities for the taxonomy include , which lists 38 genera and 207 under the traditional view, and Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes (updated November 2025), recognizing 40 genera and 204 with the five subfamilies. Recent 2025 updates in Eschmeyer's Catalog incorporate new descriptions, including Peruvian endemics that refine genus boundaries within the family.

Phylogenetic Relationships

Characidae forms a key component of the derived Characoidea superfamily within the order . Phylogenetic analyses consistently place Characidae as sister to (sometimes including Hepsetidae), with this sister to Gasteropelecidae and then to Crenuchidae. This arrangement is supported by both morphological and molecular data, highlighting the family's position within the Neotropical radiation. Internally, Characidae exhibits several well-defined alongside regions of unresolved relationships. The " clade" encompasses small-bodied, often schooling forms adapted to diverse freshwater environments, while Characinae comprises larger predatory species with specialized . However, studies from 2011 to 2018 reveal persistent polytomies in lineages now assigned to other families, such as Stevardiinae (in Stevardiidae) and Stethaprioninae (in Acestrorhamphidae), where tribal-level relationships lack strong resolution due to limited sampling or conflicting signals between morphological and genetic markers. Recent phylogenomic efforts have begun to clarify these, proposing a division of former Characidae into four families: the core Characidae, Stevardiidae, Spintherobolidae, and Acestrorhamphidae. Molecular phylogenies of Characidae rely on multilocus datasets, including mitochondrial genes (e.g., 16S rRNA, ) and nuclear markers (e.g., , RAG2, Myh6), which demonstrate a major Neotropical radiation approximately 100 million years ago during the . Seminal work by Oliveira et al. (2011) analyzed over 200 species across 166 genera, using Bayesian, maximum likelihood, and parsimony methods to establish and key intergeneric links. More recent phylogenomics, incorporating ultraconserved elements from 575 specimens representing 494 species and 123 genera, further refines these relationships with high-resolution trees. Post-2000 phylogenetic revisions have transferred several former Characidae members to distinct families based on accumulated molecular and morphological evidence. For instance, Serrasalmidae (including ) was elevated to family status due to its distinct clade within Characoidea, as confirmed in multilocus analyses. Similarly, Gasteropelecidae (hatchetfishes) and Erythrinidae (traíras) were separated, reflecting their basal positions and unique adaptations outside the core characid lineage. Several genera remain or tentatively placed within Characidae following the 2024 reclassification, including species of Roeboides, due to insufficient data for stable placement in current trees.

Genera and Species

Recognized Genera

The family Characidae encompasses approximately 141 recognized genera in the traditional broad sense (Characidae sensu lato), though recent phylogenomic studies propose splitting this into four families, restricting Characidae to about 40 genera; this section focuses on the broader historical grouping for comprehensive cataloging. Among these, stands out as the largest genus with around 150 , consisting of widespread omnivores that inhabit diverse freshwater habitats from to , often exhibiting high adaptability to varying environmental conditions. Hyphessobrycon, with over 160 commonly known as tetras, includes many staples of the aquarium trade due to their vibrant colors, small size, and peaceful schooling behavior in streams and rivers across . Charax, comprising about 20 referred to as headstanders, features predatory forms characterized by their unique inverted swimming posture for surface ambushes. Genera within Characidae can be broadly grouped by body size and ecology: small-bodied forms, such as Hemigrammus with over 50 species of slender, schooling tetras adapted to fast-flowing waters, contrast with large-bodied specialists like Roeboides, known for scale-eating habits and reaching up to 20 cm in length. Taxonomic updates continue to refine the family, including the description of Trochilocharax as a new monotypic genus endemic to Peruvian streams in 2010, alongside resolutions of synonyms in comprehensive catalogs that have stabilized for dozens of genera. As of 2025, additional species continue to be described, contributing to the family's diversity. Distribution patterns highlight regional specialization, with many genera centered in the (e.g., numerous Cheirodontinae endemics) versus more widespread ones like , which span multiple Neotropical drainages. Conservation concerns affect the family, particularly several monotypic genera that are threatened by , , and in their restricted ranges, underscoring the need for targeted protection efforts.

Notable Species

The (Paracheirodon innesi) is a small characin native to the tributaries of the basin in , , and , where it inhabits blackwater streams with dense vegetation and acidic, soft water. This typically reaches a length of 2–3 cm in adulthood, featuring a distinctive iridescent stripe along its and a bright red caudal peduncle stripe that intensifies during breeding. First exported for the aquarium trade in the mid-1930s from , it quickly became one of the most popular ornamental worldwide due to its striking coloration and schooling behavior, with millions exported annually from and later farmed in . Its prominence in the trade has raised concerns over overcollection in wild populations, prompting sustainable efforts. The bucktoothed tetra (Exodon paradoxus) is a predatory characin endemic to the Amazon and Orinoco River basins, including the Orinoco drainage in Venezuela and Colombia, where it occupies slow-flowing rivers and flooded forests. Growing to about 15 cm, it is notable for its lepidophagous (scale-eating) diet and morphological antisymmetry, with individuals exhibiting left- or right-biased mandibular asymmetry that allows specialized attacks on the preferred flank of prey fish. This asymmetry correlates with behavioral laterality, where "lefties" (right-jawed) preferentially approach prey from the right side, enhancing hunting efficiency in schools of smaller characins. Its aggressive scale-stripping behavior makes it unsuitable for community aquariums but highlights adaptations to niche predation in Neotropical ecosystems. The Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus) occurs in surface rivers and cave systems across central , from the to the Sierra de Tamaulipas, with surface forms sighted and blind cave morphs in aquifers. Surface populations are pigmented and eyed, reaching 12 cm, while cave-adapted forms are depigmented (pinkish-white) and eyeless due to constructive degeneration of ocular and melanophore tissues during development. These serve as a key for , illustrating of traits like enhanced , starvation resistance, and constructive loss of eyes and pigment across over 30 independent cave populations. Genetic studies reveal between surface and cave forms, underscoring ongoing adaptation to aphotic, nutrient-poor environments. Several Characidae species hold economic significance in fisheries and the ornamental trade, though classifications have evolved; for instance, the (Colossoma macropomum), historically placed in Characidae, is now in Serrasalmidae but remains a vital Amazonian food fish yielding over 100,000 tons annually through aquaculture and capture fisheries. The aquarium trade, dominated by species like the , generates substantial revenue—estimated at $1–2 billion globally for freshwater ornamentals—but exerts pressure on wild stocks via export from the , necessitating regulations under for sustainable management.

References

  1. https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/202/1/zlae101/7748269
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3190395/
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/characidae
  4. https://www.fishbase.se/Summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=102
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9034337/
  6. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=102
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/characiformes
  8. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37040-5
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3534666/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7893225/
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/characidae
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263578980_A_taxonomic_review_of_the_species_of_Charax_Scopoli_1777_Teleostei_Characidae_Characinae_with_description_of_a_new_species_from_the_Rio_Negro_bearing_superficial_neuromasts_on_body_scales_Amazon_basin
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790322000756
  14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12345
  15. https://zse.pensoft.net/article/22106/
  16. https://www.aquariumcoop.com/blogs/aquarium/green-neon-tetra
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6919584/
  18. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029349
  19. https://mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5330.4.6
  20. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-8-340
  21. https://zse.pensoft.net/article/10049/
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790319302052
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272351181_Non-native_fishes_in_Florida_freshwaters_a_literature_review_and_synthesis
  24. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-015-0403-4
  25. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2018.00001/full
  26. https://fishbase.se/Summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=102
  27. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72349-0
  28. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/characiformes-characins
  29. https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Ecological-Risk-Screening-Summary-Red-Piranha.pdf
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366920030_A_new_rheophilic_species_of_Knodus_Eigenmann_Characiformes_Characidae_Stevardiinae_from_the_upper_rio_Juruena_rio_Tapajos_basin_Chapada_dos_Parecis_Mato_Grosso_Brazil
  31. https://www.scielo.br/j/ni/a/QMgzzNBDJRdDxhZMwP7qCwj/?format=pdf&lang=en
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227976378_Effects_of_deforestation_on_fish_community_structure_in_Ecuadorian_Amazon_streams
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23973321_Fishes_of_southern_South_America_A_story_driven_by_temperature
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260766575_Feeding_ecology_of_stream-dwelling_Characidae_Osteichthyes_Characiformes_from_the_upper_Tocantins_River_Brazil
  35. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Roeboides-descalvadensis
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1146609X08001409
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10164990/
  38. https://scite.ai/reports/daily-feeding-activity-of-bryconamericus-LWnPD1
  39. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/57/9/748/233690
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/hemigrammus
  41. https://www.scielo.br/j/isz/a/M3RCTL6G3JJ3W3nGt8xpzqN/?lang=en
  42. https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/30610/
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4415634/
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262614118_Reproductive_characteristics_of_characid_fish_species_Teleostei_Characiformes_and_their_relationship_with_body_size_and_phylogeny
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4415665/
  46. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=151961
  47. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-11-275
  48. https://www.gbif.org/species/2354684
  49. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/49183
  50. https://www.scielo.br/j/gmb/a/WQBqC6FyNFCmFPqwN8jmXXh/?lang=en
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239584114_A_new_species_of_Astyanax_Characiformes_Characidae_from_the_upper_rio_Bermejo_basin_Salta_Argentina
  52. https://www.amazon.com/Characoids-World-Jacques-Gery/dp/0876664583
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383848830_Phylogenomics_of_Characidae_a_hyper-diverse_Neotropical_freshwater_fish_lineage_with_a_phylogenetic_classification_including_four_families_Teleostei_Characiformes
  54. https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.bzkh189jw
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790315003711
  56. https://fishbase.se/summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=688
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51251845_DNA_barcoding_reveals_hidden_diversity_in_the_Neotropical_freshwater_fish_Piabina_argentea_Characiformes_Characidae_from_the_Upper_Parana_Basin_of_Brazil
  58. https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp?family=Characidae
  59. https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp
  60. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae101
  61. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00262.x
  62. https://etyfish.org/characidae-incertae-sedis/
  63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367302770_Phylogenomics_of_trans-Andean_tetras_of_the_genus_Hyphessobrycon_Durbin_1908_Stethaprioninae_Characidae_and_colonization_patterns_of_Middle_America
  64. https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hemigrammus
  65. https://vertebrate-zoology.arphahub.com/article/30995/
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234138774_Genera_incertae_sedis_in_Characidae
  67. https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Ecological-Risk-Screening-Summary-Neon-Tetra.pdf
  68. https://www.seriouslyfish.com/species/paracheirodon-innesi/
  69. https://www.aqualog.de/en/blog-en/the-neon-tetra-a-fish-that-changed-the-world/
  70. https://www.aquariumglaser.de/en/09-characoids-tetra-relationship/exodon-paradoxus-4/
  71. https://www.seriouslyfish.com/species/exodon-paradoxus/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6127114/
  73. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000326
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3594791/
  75. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-12-9
  76. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbzool/a/gQRV47qdG65ttvNgnDzb6cd/?lang=en
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.