Hubbry Logo
Charles CanadyCharles CanadyMain
Open search
Charles Canady
Community hub
Charles Canady
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Charles Canady
Charles Canady
Charles Canady
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Charles Terrance Canady (born June 22, 1954) is an American attorney and judge who served as a justice of the Supreme Court of Florida from 2008 to 2025. He previously served as Chief Justice from 2010 to 2012 and from 2018 to 2022.[1]

Key Information

Prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court, Canady was a judge on Florida's Second District Court of Appeal from 2002 to 2008, and a Republican member of the United States House of Representatives from 1993 to 2001.

Early life and career

[edit]

Born in Lakeland, Florida, Canady graduated with a Bachelor of Arts from Haverford College in 1976 and a Juris Doctor from Yale Law School in 1979. He was admitted to the bar the same year and began his practice in Lakeland. In 1983, he was hired as the legal counsel for the Central Florida Regional Planning Commission. From 1984 to 1990, Canady served as a member of the Florida House of Representatives, initially elected as a conservative Democrat, he switched parties in June 1989. The change created many hard feelings as it happened after he accepted Democratic money for his re-election campaign. He ran for the Florida State Senate in 1990, but was unsuccessful.

U.S. House of Representatives

[edit]

In 1992, Canady made a successful bid for the U.S. House of Representatives, narrowly defeating his Democratic opponent Tom Mims. In Congress, Canady was credited for coining the term "partial-birth abortion" while developing the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 1995.[2][3] According to Keri Folmar, the lawyer responsible for the bill's language, the term was developed in early 1995 in a meeting among herself, Canady and National Right to Life Committee lobbyist Douglas Johnson.[4] Canady could not find this particular abortion practice named in any medical textbook and therefore he and his aides named it.[5] Canady served as the Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the House Judiciary Committee between January 1995 and January 2001.[6] During this tenure, Canady led an inquiry on the question of assisted suicide in the United States. The report published was later cited in the Supreme Court decision, Washington v. Glucksberg, which ruled that the Constitution did not protect a right to assisted suicide.[7][8] Canady was one of the House managers appointed to prosecute the impeachment trial proceedings of President Bill Clinton.[9] He did not seek re-election to a fifth term in 2000, keeping a term limits pledge he made in 1992.

Judicial service

[edit]

After leaving Congress, Canady served as general counsel for Florida Governor Jeb Bush before he was appointed a judge on the Second Florida District Court of Appeal in 2002, taking seat in November of that year. On August 27, 2008, Governor Charlie Crist appointed Canady to the Supreme Court of Florida to replace Justice Raoul Cantero, who was returning to private practice. He became the 82nd justice of the Florida Supreme Court on September 6, 2008.[10]

In 2013, Governor Rick Scott signed the Timely Justice Act (HB 7101)[11] which overhauled the processes for capital punishment;[12] the United States Supreme Court struck down part of this law in January 2016 in Hurst v. Florida,[13][14] leading the Florida legislature to pass a new statute.[15] The new sentencing scheme came before the Florida Supreme Court in October 2016, which held that a death sentence must be issued by a unanimous jury.[16] Canady was one of two justices to dissent from this opinion, with coverage noting his inclusion amongst Donald Trump's list of potential U.S. Supreme Court nominees[17] which was released less than a month earlier.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Charles Canady

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Charles Terrance Canady (born June 22, 1954) is an American attorney, politician, and jurist serving as a justice of the Supreme Court of Florida since 2008. Born in Lakeland, Florida, Canady earned a B.A. from Haverford College in 1976 and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1979, after which he practiced law in private firms before entering public service. He served three terms in the Florida House of Representatives from 1984 to 1990 and four terms in the U.S. House of Representatives for Florida's 12th district from 1993 to 2001, where he chaired the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the House Judiciary Committee and played a key role in advancing conservative legislative priorities, including coining the term "partial-birth abortion" in efforts to ban the procedure. Following his congressional service, he acted as general counsel to Governor Jeb Bush and was appointed to the Second District Court of Appeal in 2002, before Governor Charlie Crist elevated him to the state supreme court. Canady's tenure on the Florida Supreme Court has been marked by a commitment to originalist interpretation and frequent dissents emphasizing separation of powers and restraint against judicial overreach, including in redistricting and administrative rulemaking cases; he served as the court's 54th Chief Justice from 2010 to 2012 and was re-elected to the position for additional terms ending in 2022, the longest such service in the modern unified court era.

Early Life and Education

Upbringing in Florida

Charles T. Canady was born on June 22, 1954, in Lakeland, Polk County, Florida, where he spent his formative years. His father, Charles E. Canady, worked as an educator and public servant who also served as a political aide to then-State Senator Lawton Chiles, instilling early exposure to civic engagement in the family environment. As a junior high school student, Canady assisted in local political campaigns, including distributing brochures for Chiles and other candidates, reflecting the politically active household and community ties in Lakeland. He later attended and graduated from Lakeland Senior High School, completing his in the same city before leaving for college.

Academic Achievements

Canady earned a degree from in 1976. He subsequently attended , obtaining his in 1979.

Law Practice and Initial Political Forays

Following his admission to the Florida Bar in 1979, Canady commenced private practice in Lakeland, initially joining the firm of , where he worked from 1979 to 1982. His early legal work focused primarily on matters. In 1983, he transitioned to the firm of Lane, Trohn, et al. (later known as Lane, Trohn, Fredericks & McGowan), continuing his practice there until 1992 while overlapping with his initial legislative service. During this time, Canady also served as counsel to the Council. Canady's entry into politics began with an unsuccessful bid in 1982 for the Florida House of Representatives in District 44, running as a Democrat against incumbent Gene Ready; he received 3,483 votes to Ready's 4,679 in the general election. He reentered the race in 1984 for the same district, securing the Democratic nomination with 68.2% of the primary vote and winning the uncontested general election, thereby beginning his tenure in the Florida House in November 1984. Canady, described as a conservative Democrat during this period, maintained his real estate practice alongside his legislative duties through much of the 1980s.

State Legislative Career

Service in the Florida House of Representatives

Charles Canady was elected to the in 1984 as a Democrat, representing District 44, which encompassed parts of Polk County including Lakeland. He won the Democratic primary on September 4, 1984, with 68.2% of the vote against one opponent, and secured the general election unopposed on November 6, 1984. Canady took office in November 1984 and was reelected in 1986 and 1988, serving three consecutive terms until November 1990. As a state representative, Canady focused on issues related to public health and emergency services, sponsoring legislation to allocate additional funding for emergency medical services in Florida. His service occurred during a period of Democratic control in the Florida House, where he contributed to routine legislative work amid the state's post-recession economic recovery efforts in the 1980s. Canady did not seek reelection in 1990, transitioning to private law practice before entering federal politics as a Republican.

Federal Legislative Career

Election and Tenure in the U.S. House

Charles T. Canady was elected as a Republican to represent in the U.S. in the November 3, 1992, general , defeating Democratic Tom Mims by approximately 4 percentage points, securing 52.1% of the vote in the open seat vacated by retiring incumbent Tom Lewis. The district encompassed rural areas including Polk County. Canady was reelected in 1994, 1996, and 1998 with comfortable margins exceeding 65% in each subsequent race, reflecting strong constituent support in the increasingly Republican-leaning . He served four terms from January 3, 1993, to January 3, 2001, during the 103rd through 106th Congresses. During his tenure, Canady was assigned to the House Judiciary Committee, where he chaired the Subcommittee on the , focusing on issues such as civil rights oversight and constitutional matters. In line with a term-limits pledge from his 1992 campaign, Canady did not seek a fifth term in 2000, opting instead to return to state service as general counsel to Governor .

Key Legislative Initiatives

Canady's legislative efforts in the U.S. House emphasized constitutional constraints on government power, particularly regarding religious exercise, racial preferences, and late-term abortion procedures. Serving on the House Judiciary and chairing its Subcommittee on the Constitution from 1997, he sponsored or led initiatives reflecting a strict constructionist approach to federal authority. A central focus was curtailing federal programs through measures prohibiting racial and gender preferences in government contracting, hiring, and grants. In , Canady co-sponsored H.R. 995, the Equal Opportunity Act, with Senate Majority Leader , which barred the use of such preferences unless tied to specific remedies for proven , aiming to eliminate what sponsors described as systemic reverse . The bill advanced from but did not reach the floor amid partisan divisions. Follow-up legislation, including H.R. 2128 in and the of 1997, sought similar reforms by redefining civil rights enforcement to prioritize color-blind standards, though these efforts were rejected by House committees due to concerns over undermining minority opportunities. In response to the Supreme Court's 1997 ruling in City of Boerne v. Flores, which invalidated parts of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Canady sponsored the Religious Liberty Protection Act (RLPA) as H.R. 4019 in the 105th Congress (1998) and H.R. 1691 in the 106th (1999). These bills mandated strict scrutiny for state and local laws substantially burdening religious exercise, requiring a compelling governmental interest and least restrictive means, while exempting application to civil rights laws like the Fair Housing Act. H.R. 4019 passed the House by a 224-202 vote on September 9, 1998, but failed in the Senate; the 1999 version cleared subcommittee under Canady's chairmanship but progressed no further amid debates over federalism and civil liberties impacts. Canady also advanced restrictions on late-term abortions, contributing to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 1995 (H.R. 1833) through Judiciary Committee hearings and amendments targeting dilation and extraction procedures. The bill passed the House but was vetoed by President Clinton in 1996; Canady continued advocacy in subsequent sessions, including oversight of enforcement mechanisms. Additional sponsored measures, such as H.R. 5530 (Chapter 12 Extension and Bankruptcy Judgeship Act of 2000), addressed agricultural bankruptcy extensions and judicial resources, enacting temporary relief for family farmers before its lapse. These initiatives underscored Canady's priority on limiting expansive federal interventions in favor of enumerated powers and individual rights.

Judicial Career

Appointment to the Florida Court of Appeals

Charles T. Canady was appointed to the Second District Court of Appeal of Florida by Republican Governor Jeb Bush on November 20, 2002, to succeed retiring Judge Oliver L. Green, Jr. The appointment followed Florida's Judicial Nominating Commission process, where the commission forwarded nominees to the governor, who selected Canady based on his prior experience as general counsel to Bush after departing the U.S. House of Representatives in 2001. Canady, a Lakeland native and graduate, brought a background in legislative service and private practice to the intermediate appellate bench, which covers 35 counties in west-central . His term began immediately upon appointment, with District of judges serving six-year terms subject to merit retention votes rather than partisan elections. In his initial retention election in November 2004, Canady received approval from 74.6% of voters, securing his position through the end of his term in January 2009. During his tenure on the Second District, which hears appeals from circuit courts in civil, criminal, and administrative matters, Canady participated in over 1,000 decisions, often authoring opinions on issues including constitutional law and statutory interpretation. He resigned from the court in September 2008 upon his subsequent appointment to the Florida Supreme Court.

Elevation to the Florida Supreme Court

On August 28, 2008, Florida Governor Charlie Crist appointed Charles Canady, then a judge on the Second District Court of Appeal, to the Florida Supreme Court to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Raoul Cantero. Canady, aged 54 at the time, was selected from nominees recommended by the Florida Judicial Nominating Commission, as required under the state's merit selection process for appellate judges outlined in Article V, Section 3 of the Florida Constitution. This marked Crist's first appointment to the seven-member court. Canady assumed office on September 8, 2008, and underwent a ceremonial on December 3, 2008. Unlike federal judicial appointments, justices do not require legislative confirmation; instead, they face periodic merit retention votes by the electorate after an initial six-year term. Canady's elevation reflected his prior experience as a state legislator, U.S. Congressman, and appellate , positioning him as a with a demonstrated conservative judicial philosophy emphasizing and . Subsequent retention elections, including in 2012, 2018, and 2022, affirmed his continued service, with voters approving retention by margins exceeding 60% each time.

Chief Justiceship and Administrative Role

Charles T. Canady was elected by his fellow justices to serve as of the Florida Supreme Court for a two-year term from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2012. He was re-elected to the position twice more, serving non-consecutive terms from approximately 2018 to 2020 and 2020 to 2022, for a total of three terms that concluded on June 30, 2022, marking him as the longest-serving Chief Justice in the of Florida's unified court system. In this role, Canady assumed administrative leadership over Florida's judicial branch, including oversight of court operations, budget allocation, and the assignment of judges across the state's trial courts. He chaired the Judicial Management Council, a body tasked with advising on policies to enhance judicial efficiency and while maintaining the separation of judicial administration from executive influence. During the , Canady issued administrative directives to adapt court procedures, promoting expanded use of remote hearings and other measures to sustain judicial functions amid restrictions. These actions prioritized continuity of essential services, such as emergency hearings in family and criminal matters, without compromising requirements.

Notable Opinions and Judicial Philosophy

Canady's judicial philosophy emphasizes strict adherence to statutory text and constitutional provisions as enacted, prioritizing legislative intent and over policy-driven interpretations. He has articulated that judges must apply the based on reason and facts, without injecting personal preferences or favoring any party, reflecting a commitment to and . This approach aligns with his view that courts should not "make up the law" but enforce that promulgated by elected representatives. In practice, Canady has frequently dissented in cases where he perceived the majority as exceeding judicial bounds or undermining legislative authority. For instance, in In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure (2009), he partially dissented from a rule prohibiting shackling of juvenile defendants absent a hearing, arguing it unduly restricted courts' discretion to maintain order without sufficient justification, potentially compromising courtroom security. Similarly, in redistricting disputes like League of Women Voters of Florida v. (2015), Canady dissented, contending the majority ignored by effectively redrawing congressional districts itself rather than deferring to legislative processes. Canady's dissents in death penalty matters underscore his emphasis on statutory fidelity. In Hurst v. Florida (2016), he dissented from the majority's ruling—prompted by U.S. precedent—that 's capital sentencing scheme required unanimous recommendations, describing the decision as "badly flawed" and inconsistent with state law's historical framework. This position gained traction when the Supreme Court later overruled aspects of the 2016 holding in cases like State v. Dixon (2020), aligning with Canady's earlier critique by restoring greater deference to majorities and judicial override provisions under revised statutes. He has joined dissents in multiple capital appeals rejecting sentences on procedural grounds, advocating for consistent application of aggravating factors without retroactive invalidation of prior valid verdicts. Other notable positions include dissents upholding stricter jurisdictional limits in conflict reviews and defending agency rulemaking authority against judicial expansion, as seen in challenges to Rick Scott's administrative reforms (2011). In In re Standard Jury Instructions (2018), Canady dissented from invalidating a legislative admissibility standard, arguing the court lacked direct conflict jurisdiction and overstepped into policymaking. These opinions reflect a pattern of prioritizing textual limits on judicial power, often aligning with conservative colleagues like Justice Ricky Polston in 5-2 splits favoring business interests and executive discretion over expansive tort or regulatory claims.

Controversies and Criticisms

Conflict of Interest Allegations

In 2023, Florida Supreme Court Justice Charles Canady faced allegations of for declining to recuse himself from cases reviewing the state's restrictions, including the 15-week ban enacted in 2022 and the subsequent six-week ban passed in April 2023. Critics highlighted Canady's spousal ties, noting that his wife, State Representative Jennifer Canady (R-Lakeland), co-sponsored House Bill 5, the six-week "Heartbeat Protection Act," which imposed near-total prohibitions after detection of embryonic cardiac activity. Former Florida Supreme Court Justice Barbara Pariente, appointed by a Democratic , publicly urged recusal, stating that the spousal legislative involvement created an appearance of impropriety under judicial ethics canons requiring avoidance of cases where impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Additional concerns stemmed from Canady's historical financial support from anti-abortion donors and his prior legislative record. Campaign finance records indicate Canady received over $225,000 in contributions from anti-abortion groups and individuals for his judicial retention campaigns since 2000, including donations from organizations like Family Action and pro-life political committees. During his tenure as a U.S. Representative (1993–2001), Canady sponsored H.R. 3660, the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2000, and co-sponsored earlier versions like H.R. 1833 in 1995, as well as the , which extended legal protections to infants born alive during attempts. These ties, opponents argued, warranted disqualification under 's Code of Judicial Conduct, which mandates recusal for personal bias or extrajudicial activities affecting impartiality. Canady did not recuse from oral arguments held on September 1, 2023, in of Southwest and v. State, nor from the court's April 2024 decision upholding the 15-week ban by a 6–1 vote, with Canady joining the interpreting the state privacy clause as not encompassing abortion rights. Legal analysts, including law professor Sam Levine, observed that Supreme Court rules lack explicit provisions barring participation based solely on spousal legislative roles absent direct financial interests, allowing Canady's involvement despite the controversy. No formal ethics complaint was filed against Canady with the Judicial Qualifications Commission over the matter, and he issued no public statement addressing the recusal demands. These allegations, primarily advanced by pro-abortion rights advocates and outlets critical of conservative judicial appointments, underscore broader debates on recusal standards for justices with political histories but did not result in any disciplinary action.

Accusations of Partisanship and Activism

Critics, including retired s and legal commentators aligned with progressive viewpoints, have questioned Canady's judicial impartiality due to his extensive prior political career, including service as a Republican U.S. Representative from Florida's 12th district from 1993 to 2001 and his role as a House manager in the 1998–1999 impeachment proceedings against President . Scott Jarvis, a retired circuit and critic of Canady, described him as "a who came to the court fairly late in his career, a very skilled who was successful on the state level and in ," suggesting that his background predisposes him to partisan decision-making rather than neutral . Such accusations portray Canady's elevation to the Florida Supreme Court in 2008 by then-Governor (R) and subsequent retention as evidence of entrenched Republican influence, with outlets like Balls and Strikes characterizing the court under his tenure as a "hyperpartisan stuffed with justices no different than the Republican governors who appointed them." In disputes, Canady's dissents have drawn charges of partisan bias favoring Republican interests. In League of Women Voters of v. Detzner (2015), he dissented from the majority's invalidation of congressional districts deemed racially gerrymandered in violation of 's Fair Districts Amendments, arguing that the court's intervention exceeded its authority; opponents viewed this position as protecting GOP-drawn maps that preserved partisan advantages. Similarly, the Supreme Court's 2024 upholding of Ron DeSantis's congressional plan—which eliminated a Democratic-leaning district in —prompted implicit criticisms of partisanship from voting rights advocates, though Canady did not author the opinion. These rulings, aligned with conservative outcomes, have fueled broader claims that Canady prioritizes political loyalty over textual interpretation, particularly given his appointments by Republican executives and the court's shift rightward after 2010. Accusations of have centered on penalty jurisprudence, where Canady's opinions sought to limit the impact of U.S. mandates. Following Hurst v. Florida (2016), which required unanimous recommendations for sentences, Canady dissented in state cases advocating for preservation of non-unanimous overrides (e.g., 10-2 or 8-4 verdicts), contending that the ruling did not retroactively invalidate prior sentences; defense attorneys criticized this as " at its worst," accusing the conservative bloc led by Canady of disregarding federal precedent to sustain executions aligned with state prosecutorial preferences. In 2019, the court's reconsideration of Hurst implementation drew further rebuke from critics like Robert Godfrey, a capital defense lawyer, who stated, "This is . The right has always complained about and not wanting judicial activist judges. But when you don't respect the , that's exactly what you're doing." Despite eventual conformity to unanimity requirements in 2020, these efforts were seen by opponents as an activist rollback of rights to favor , contrasting Canady's self-described textualist philosophy. Such criticisms, often emanating from advocacy groups and media outlets with progressive leanings like the Alliance for Justice and editorials, reflect partisan divides in evaluating conservative judicial outcomes, though Canady's defenders argue his positions adhere strictly to statutory language and rather than policy-driven activism. No formal ethics complaints alleging partisanship have resulted in discipline, and Canady has consistently won retention elections, including 67.5% in 2010 and 68% in 2016.

References

  1. https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/the-court/about-the-court/Justices/justice-charles-t.-canady
  2. https://history.house.gov/People/Detail/10579?current_search_qs=%253FCommand%252525%2526PreviousSearch%253DSearch%25252cLastName%25252c%25252c%25252c%25252c%25252cFalse%25252cFalse%25252cFalse%25252c%25252cLastName%2526CurrentPage%253D133%2526SortOrder%253DLastName%2526ResultType%253DGrid%2526Command%253DList
  3. https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/charles-t-canady-chief-justice-of-the-florida-supreme-court/
  4. https://2dca.flcourts.gov/Judges/former-judges/Judge-Charles-Canady
  5. https://northwesternlawreview.org/charles-canady/
  6. https://news.flcourts.gov/All-Court-News/Canady-ends-third-term-as-Chief-Justice
  7. https://history.house.gov/People/Detail/10579
  8. https://www.theledger.com/story/news/2009/06/18/charles-e-canady-a-great-example-of-a-fathers-influence/26189092007/
  9. https://polkschoolsfl.com/community/recognitionprograms/halloffame/justice_charles_t__canady
  10. https://ballotpedia.org/Charles_Canady
  11. https://fedsoc.org/bio/charles-canady
  12. https://www.legistorm.com/person/bio/51697/Charles_Terrance_Canady.html
  13. https://www.votingforjustice.com/appellate-candidate/justice-charles-t-canady
  14. https://www.rightdatausa.com/election_results?s=FL&y=1982&t=L044&d=all
  15. https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1992/11/05/u-s-house-district-12-canady-wins-with-a-4-lead/
  16. https://www.congress.gov/member/charles-canady/C000107
  17. https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-news/canady-sworn-in-as-floridas-chief-justice/
  18. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1995/07/28/dole-aims-at-affirmative-action/6a0e29a1-ef74-48c6-a07f-895734a7935a/
  19. https://www.heritage.org/report/the-dole-canady-bill-important-first-step
  20. https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal95-1100507
  21. https://www.govexec.com/federal-news/1997/07/canady-defends-rights-bill/3671/
  22. https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/4019
  23. https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/1691
  24. https://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju59929.000/hju59929_0.HTM
  25. https://commdocs.house.gov/committees/edu/hedwp106-78.000/hedwp106-78.htm
  26. http://fbaum.unc.edu/lobby/087_Late-term_Abortion/Congressional_Hearings/Testimony/H_Judiciary_Const_072000.htm
  27. https://ballotpedia.org/Judges_appointed_by_Jeb_Bush
  28. https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-news/canady-joins-the-court/
  29. https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-news/gov-crist-appoints-canady-to-the-supreme-court/
  30. https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-news/canady-re-elected-as-chief-justice-of-the-florida-supreme-court/
  31. https://www.heraldtribune.com/story/news/2008/12/04/former-congressman-joins-supreme-court/28679163007/
  32. https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/the-court/about-the-court/Court-System
  33. https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/News-Media/Court-News/Canady-ends-third-term-as-Chief-Justice
  34. https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/News-Media/Court-News/Chief-Justice-Canady-Provides-Insight-on-Florida-s-Judicial-Management-Council
  35. https://www.jud11.flcourts.org/coronavirus/ArtMID/2392/ArticleID/3596/Message-from-Florida-Supreme-Court-Chief-Justice-Charles-T-Canady-Regarding-COVID-19-Pandemic
  36. https://www.theledger.com/story/news/2010/05/11/justice-charles-canady-judge-must-follow-the-law/26269825007/
  37. https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-news/canady-our-courts-and-other-institutions-of-government-are-strong-and-resilient/
  38. https://law.justia.com/cases/florida/supreme-court/2009/sc09-141-1417.html
  39. https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-news/court-unchain-the-children/
  40. https://www.kktplaw.com/documents/Canady-II.pdf
  41. https://www.jacksonville.com/story/opinion/letters/2016/10/18/florida-supreme-court-made-wrong-decision-death-penalty/15728313007/
  42. https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/content/download/685153/opinion/sc18-2061.pdf
  43. https://www.wusf.org/2016-11-18/supreme-court-rejects-two-death-sentences
  44. https://www.fljustice.org/canady-polston-frequent-dissenters-in-scofla-cases/
  45. https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/almID/1202534130833/
  46. https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/florida-supreme-court-rules-expert-witness-law-unconstitutional/
  47. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2023/06/27/florida-supreme-court-justice-should-recuse-himself-on-key-abortion-case-says-ex-chief-justice/
  48. https://truthout.org/articles/florida-judge-deciding-abortion-ban-case-married-to-rep-who-sponsored-bill/
  49. https://www.floridabulldog.org/2023/06/justice-canady-ignores-his-conflict-of-interest-abortion-ban-case/
  50. https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/3660
  51. https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/1833/cosponsors
  52. https://newrepublic.com/post/175471/florida-judge-abortion-six-week-ban-charles-canady-cosponsor
  53. https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2023/09/07/florida-supreme-court-justices-have-personal-ties-to-abortion-disney-should-they-recuse-themselves/
  54. https://www.jezebel.com/judge-deciding-the-fate-of-abortion-in-florida-is-marri-1850817289
  55. https://www.wmnf.org/law-professor-says-no-rules-explicitly-prevent-justice-canadys-involvement-in-florida-supreme-court-abortion-case-despite-possible-conflict-of-interest/
  56. https://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article279100679.html
  57. https://ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics/florida-supreme-court-retention-elections-2022/
  58. https://www.floridabulldog.org/2022/02/is-florida-supreme-court-chief-justice-charles-canady-a-judge-or-a-politician-in-black-robes/
  59. https://www.wlrn.org/light/government-politics/2025-07-17/florida-supreme-court-upholds-desantis-backed-congressional-redistricting-plan
  60. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article230619504.html
  61. https://www.wlrn.org/2019-05-21/conservative-court-eyes-key-death-penalty-issue
  62. https://afj.org/article/how-quickly-should-courts-change-the-law-florida-tests-the-limit/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.