Hubbry Logo
Computer-assisted telephone interviewingComputer-assisted telephone interviewingMain
Open search
Computer-assisted telephone interviewing
Community hub
Computer-assisted telephone interviewing
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Computer-assisted telephone interviewing
Computer-assisted telephone interviewing
Computer-assisted telephone interviewing
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) is a telephone surveying technique in which the interviewer follows a script provided by a software application. It is a structured system of microdata collection by telephone that speeds up the collection and editing of microdata and also permits the interviewer to educate the respondents on the importance of timely and accurate data.[1] The software is able to customize the flow of the questionnaire based on the answers provided, as well as information already known about the participant. It is used in B2B services and corporate sales.

CATI may function in the following manner:

  • A computerized questionnaire is administered to respondents over the telephone.
  • The interviewer sits in front of a computer screen.
  • Upon command, the computer dials the telephone number to be called.
  • When contact is made, the interviewer reads the questions posed on the computer screen and records the respondent's answers directly into the computer.
  • Interim and update reports can be compiled instantaneously, as the data are being collected.
  • CATI software has built-in logic, which also enhances data accuracy.
  • The program will personalize questions and control for logically incorrect answers, such as percentage answers that do not add up to 100 percent.
  • The software has built-in branching logic, which will skip questions that are not applicable or will probe for more detail when warranted.
  • Automated dialers are usually deployed to lower the waiting time for the interviewer, as well as to record the interview for quality purposes.

Automated computer telephone interviewing

[edit]

Automated computer telephone interviewing (ACTI) is a technique by which a computer with speaker-independent voice recognition capabilities asks respondents a series of questions, recognizes then stores the answers, and is able to follow scripted logic and branch intelligently according to the flow of the questionnaire based on the answers provided, as well as information known about the participant. This technique is also referred to as interactive voice response (IVR).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Computer-assisted telephone interviewing

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) is a method in survey research where interviewers conduct telephone interviews guided by computer software that displays questions on a screen, automatically branches to relevant follow-up items based on prior responses, and records answers directly into a database. This approach replaces traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires, enabling real-time consistency checks, validation of entries, and automated dialing or scheduling of calls to streamline the process. CATI originated in 1971 when Chilton Research Services pioneered its use in centralized telephone facilities to accelerate survey administration and double interviewing productivity from about four to eight interviews per hour compared to manual methods. By the late 1970s, organizations such as the , and the had adopted CATI for large-scale studies, including disability assessments and consumer surveys involving thousands of respondents. The technology advanced in the 1980s and 1990s with the integration of minicomputers and networks, supporting decentralized operations across multiple locations and handling complex questionnaires with over 200 questions. CATI offers significant advantages in , including reduced errors through immediate editing, improved timeliness of results via faster processing, and enhanced interviewer supervision for . It supports random digit dialing for representative sampling and accommodates large-scale applications, such as the U.S. ' monthly collection from approximately 121,000 businesses and agencies or the National Agricultural Statistics Service's Agricultural Survey, which annually surveys around 35,000 farms, as of 2025. Despite these benefits, challenges include the need for reliable access among respondents and substantial upfront investment in programming and training. Today, CATI remains a cornerstone of telephone-based research in , academic, and market settings, often integrated with other computer-assisted methods for hybrid data collection.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) is a in which interviewers use computer software to administer questionnaires over the telephone, with the system displaying scripted questions on-screen for the interviewer to read aloud while simultaneously capturing and validating responses entered in real time. This approach integrates digital tools to streamline data collection, replacing traditional paper-based scripts with automated guidance that ensures standardized delivery and immediate error detection. At its core, CATI operates on principles designed to enhance accuracy and efficiency in telephone surveys. Branching logic allows the software to dynamically skip irrelevant questions based on prior responses, adapting the flow to the respondent's answers without manual intervention. of question or response category order is another key feature, implemented to minimize order effects and response biases by varying presentation sequences across interviews. Additionally, built-in consistency checks validate responses as they are entered, flagging inconsistencies—such as follow-up answers that contradict earlier ones—for immediate correction, thereby reducing data errors during the interview process. The basic process flow in CATI begins with the interviewer initiating a call, often via computer-automated dialing, after which the software presents the first question on the screen. The interviewer reads the question verbatim, records the respondent's answer directly into the system, and the software then advances to the next appropriate item, managing pacing, transitions, and any required probes automatically. Completed interviews are stored digitally for seamless integration into analysis databases. Unlike manual telephone interviewing, which relies on paper scripts where interviewers must manually track skips, verify responses, and transcribe data post-call, CATI automates script management to support more complex questionnaires and enforce uniformity across interviewers. This automation eliminates common errors in manual methods, such as incorrect branching or overlooked validations, enabling higher-quality at scale.

Core Components

CATI systems rely on a combination of hardware elements to facilitate interviewer operations and central coordination. Interviewers typically use dedicated computer terminals equipped with adequate processing power, sufficient (typically at least 4 GB RAM), and storage capacity to run the interviewing software smoothly. Headsets ensure clear audio communication during calls, while telephone lines or Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) integration provide connectivity, often requiring reliable for remote setups. Server infrastructure serves as the backbone for central , hosting and enabling multi-user access in call centers. Software forms the operational core of CATI, with questionnaire authoring tools allowing designers to create dynamic scripts that incorporate branching logic for adaptive questioning. Databases track respondent details, call histories, and progress, ensuring efficient sample management. Automated dialing systems, such as predictive dialing—which anticipates interviewer availability to maximize connect rates—or preview dialing, which allows manual call selection, optimize outreach efforts. Real-time reporting modules generate dashboards for ongoing metrics like response rates and completion status, supporting immediate adjustments. Data management in CATI emphasizes and , with responses stored in centralized databases using standard protocols to protect sensitive during transmission and storage. This secure storage complies with standards, preventing unauthorized access. Integration with statistical software enables preliminary , such as distributions or cross-tabulations, directly from the system for rapid insights. Quality control features are integral to maintaining interview integrity, including audio recording capabilities that capture calls for post-interview review and training. Supervisor monitoring interfaces allow real-time observation, with options for audio listening and screen sharing to assess adherence to protocols without interrupting the call. These tools, often supported by automated feedback systems like control charts tracking error rates, ensure consistent performance across interviewers.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Innovations

In the , telephone interviewing relied on paper-and-pencil methods, where interviewers manually followed scripts, skipped questions based on responses, and recorded answers by hand, leading to frequent errors such as accidental skips, inconsistent routing, and post-interview mistakes that required separate editing phases. These processes limited survey complexity, slowed data collection to about four interviews per hour, and increased the risk of inaccuracies due to the lack of real-time validation. The push toward computer assistance arose from the need for more efficient as telephone ownership surged post-World War II, rising from about 45% of U.S. households in 1945 to approximately 78% by 1960 and 91% by 1970, enabling broader population coverage for surveys amid rising costs and demands for timely insights. This growth, combined with advancements in computing, motivated innovations to automate repetitive tasks and reduce errors in telephone-based research. Early innovations emerged in the early 1970s when U.S. market research firms began adopting basic computers to assist with data entry and question prompting during telephone interviews. Chilton Research Services pioneered the first operational computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) system in 1972, developed through years of research for American Telephone and Telegraph, which integrated cathode-ray tube displays for on-screen scripts and initial automation of respondent selection via random digit dialing. By 1971, Chilton had conducted the inaugural CATI survey, marking commercial firms as early adopters for streamlining workflows in market studies. A 1978 paper presented at the ACM annual conference detailed initial CATI prototypes, highlighting how computers could handle dynamic question branching, insert personalized elements like respondent names, perform validation, and support interviewer monitoring to enhance accuracy and speed. Key pioneers included academic institutions such as the Universities of at Los Angeles, , and , which designed early systems in the mid-1970s, alongside government entities like the U.S. Bureau of the Census, which initiated CATI research and pretests around the same period. The U.S. also showed early interest in leveraging video display terminals for scripted interviews to improve labor surveys.

Key Milestones and Widespread Adoption

A pivotal milestone in the adoption of computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) occurred in 1982 when the U.S. Census Bureau conducted its first major test of the technology as a nonresponse follow-up for the National Survey of Natural and Social Scientists and Engineers. This initiative involved interviewing approximately 7,500 nonrespondents using a system supporting up to 30 stations, which achieved higher response rates compared to traditional paper-and-pencil methods through efficient case management and call scheduling. The test demonstrated CATI's scalability for large-scale operations, paving the way for plans to implement networked production sites nationwide by the mid-1980s. By 1984, CATI saw widespread software implementations and growing documentation in professional literature, as evidenced by presentations at the American Statistical Association's proceedings. Systems like the Census Bureau's Questionnaire Implementation System-Census (QISC) enabled advanced features such as edit checks, branching logic, and real-time data validation, with adaptations from earlier university designs at UCLA and UC Berkeley. These developments were highlighted in a key paper reviewing CATI applications across government, academic, and sectors, underscoring the technology's maturation for complex surveys. This period also built on the 1979 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, which emphasized CATI's role in enhancing survey quality through automated controls, timely , and reduced errors, influencing 1980s implementations by promoting stricter quality standards. The marked a significant expansion of CATI, particularly through integration with predictive dialing technologies that optimized call efficiency in telephone surveys. This era saw global adoption in firms, where CATI became a standard for handling complex questionnaires and large samples, transitioning from academic and government use to commercial dominance. In parallel, institutional milestones continued into the 2000s, with adopting CATI for health surveys like the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), launched in 2000 with a sample of 130,000 respondents annually and an 85% response rate, enabling timely sub-provincial collection. Commercial growth extended to (B2B) sectors, where CATI facilitated scalable customer and market insights amid rising demand for data-driven decisions.

Operational Aspects

Survey Design and Implementation

The design of surveys for computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) begins with questionnaire authoring, where survey developers program the instrument using specialized software to incorporate complex logic tailored to the medium. Branching logic is implemented through skip patterns and conditional , allowing the to dynamically present relevant questions based on prior responses, such as skipping income details for non-employed respondents. Validation rules, including range checks for numerical responses (e.g., ensuring age entries fall between 0 and 120) and consistency edits (e.g., verifying that reported size matches the number of listed members), are embedded to provide real-time feedback during , minimizing errors and interviewer interruptions. These features are programmed using metadata systems like the Questionnaire Design Metadata (QDM), which define business rules for navigation and . Multimedia integration enhances CATI questionnaires by incorporating elements like audio prompts for sensitive questions or text-to-speech for instructions, though primarily limited to auditory cues due to the telephone interface. For instance, audio can support instructions in multilingual surveys. Programming these elements involves embedding media triggers within the script using CATI software that supports audio integration. Pilot testing follows authoring to refine the through iterative simulations that mimic live interviews, identifying logic errors such as infinite loops in branching or validation failures under varied respondent scenarios. These tests typically involve small-scale runs with mock data and volunteer interviewers, allowing rapid modifications—often within hours—to address issues like unclear prompts or inefficient skips. evaluations during piloting ensure the instrument's flow supports efficient interviewing, with metrics like completion time and error rates guiding revisions before full deployment. Implementation entails uploading the finalized script to CATI software platforms, such as or mainframe-based systems, where it is compiled into an executable format for interviewer stations. Scripts are then assigned to centralized or distributed stations, often via local area networks supporting multiple users, with sample management tools generating call lists that prioritize contacts based on factors like time zones or prior attempt history. Scheduling integrates automated callbacks and case tracking, ensuring efficient across interviewer teams. Customization in CATI design tailors questions to respondent profiles by incorporating dynamic elements like text fills (e.g., inserting a respondent's name or age-specific phrasing) and profile-based skips, such as directing elderly participants to simplified options. This is achieved through roster management in the software, where pre-loaded demographic data from sampling frames triggers personalized paths, enhancing response quality while reducing interview length.

Interviewer Workflow and Software Features

In computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI), the interviewer typically begins the session by logging into the dedicated software platform using secure, individual credentials on a provided device, such as a tablet or computer, to ensure privacy and . Once logged in, the interviewer accesses a centralized call queue that automatically assigns cases based on factors like respondent , region, or prior attempt history, allowing for efficient distribution of workloads across a team. The interviewer then selects a case from the queue and initiates the call, following on-screen prompts that display the scripted , including introductions, questions, and response options, which guide the conversation in real time. Responses are entered directly via keyboard or during the call, with the software advancing to the next prompt based on programmed logic from the . Interruptions, such as no-answer or busy signals, trigger callbacks, where the software reschedules attempts according to predefined protocols, such as limiting daily calls per respondent or reassigning cases to available interviewers. Advanced software features in CATI systems enhance the interviewer's efficiency by supporting data validation to flag inconsistent or invalid entries, such as mismatched age and birth year, with checks occurring during or after the interview to allow probing or correction. Automated pacing mechanisms control the interview flow by enforcing timing guidelines, skipping irrelevant questions based on prior responses, and suggesting probes for unclear answers to maintain a natural rhythm and prevent respondent fatigue. Integration with systems like case management tools allows interviewers to view respondent history, such as previous survey participation or contact notes, pulled from a shared database to personalize interactions and avoid repetition. These features collectively support seamless execution, with the software often recording metadata like call duration and outcomes automatically upon completion or termination. Supervisor monitoring is facilitated through dedicated dashboards that provide live oversight of interviewer activities, displaying metrics such as active calls, progress rates, and response patterns in real time for multiple sessions simultaneously. These dashboards enable supervisors to listen in on calls via audio feeds or review screen shares without interrupting, allowing for immediate intervention if deviations from protocol occur, such as incorrect probing. Post-call, supervisors can access full recordings for audits, reviewing interviewer adherence to scripts and respondent to inform training adjustments. This oversight ensures consistency across the team while minimizing disruptions to the live workflow. Error handling in CATI software includes protocols for identifying issues, such as skipped mandatory questions or illogical response sequences, with incomplete or erroneous interviews flagged for remediation by interviewers or supervisors. For instance, ambiguous answers may require probing, and cases can be rejected and reassigned based on findings, thereby upholding overall survey integrity.

Benefits and Limitations

Advantages

Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) enhances through built-in validation checks and automated consistency verifications that prevent invalid entries and reduce inconsistencies during . These features minimize nonsampling errors, such as item nonresponse and interviewer-induced biases, by prompting interviewers in real-time to clarify ambiguous responses or correct implausible answers. For instance, studies in research have shown that CATI systems significantly lower data transfer errors compared to paper-based telephone methods, leading to more reliable datasets. CATI improves by automating dialing processes, which boost contact rates and shorten interview durations through programmed skip patterns and routing logic tailored to respondent answers. This allows for immediate data availability upon completion, enabling faster analysis without separate transcription or entry steps. In resource-constrained settings, such as rural areas, CATI has demonstrated the ability to reach up to 75% of targeted participants efficiently, even in challenging environments. Quality assurance in CATI is supported by centralized monitoring and audio recording capabilities, which promote standardized interviewing practices across multiple interviewers and locations. These tools facilitate supervisor oversight, reducing variability in question delivery and enhancing overall survey reliability. Consequently, CATI often achieves higher response rates than non-assisted methods, particularly for sensitive topics, by maintaining a personal yet structured interaction. From a cost perspective, CATI yields long-term savings by eliminating manual and optimizing sample to avoid redundant calls, despite initial software setup investments. Quantitative evaluations indicate per-interview s as low as US$5 for CATI, compared to US$16 for in-person alternatives, making it viable for large-scale surveys. Better call further minimizes wasted efforts, contributing to overall in survey operations.

Disadvantages

Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) entails significant initial costs, primarily due to the need for specialized hardware, development, and comprehensive for personnel. These upfront investments can be substantial, often requiring dedicated resources for system setup and programming tailored to specific surveys. Ongoing , including software updates and technical support, further adds to the financial burden, making CATI less feasible for small-scale or one-off studies. CATI relies heavily on skilled interviewers who must navigate complex software interfaces while maintaining over the phone, which demands extensive to minimize errors and ensure consistent . Prolonged screen-based work during extended calling sessions can lead to interviewer , potentially resulting in reduced focus and higher rates of incomplete interviews or staff turnover. This dependency on human operators introduces variability, as interviewer characteristics, such as accents or experience levels, may influence respondent cooperation and response accuracy. Coverage limitations pose a major challenge for CATI, as the method traditionally depends on random digit dialing, which increasingly excludes mobile-only households amid declining landline penetration. For instance, mobile-only households rose from 1.4% to 8.7% between 1999 and 2008 in surveyed Australian populations, and by 2024, wireless-only phone usage has reached approximately 71.7% among U.S. adults, systematically underrepresenting younger, lower-income, unemployed, and rural individuals who are more likely to rely solely on mobiles. This non-coverage can introduce in and demographic estimates, such as underreporting of or prevalence. While modern CATI systems increasingly incorporate mobile random digit dialing to address this, challenges persist in reaching mobile-only users due to higher refusal rates and regulatory restrictions on mobile sampling in some regions. Additionally, verbal delivery in telephone settings may amplify , where respondents provide idealized answers to sensitive questions to align with perceived social norms. Technical issues in CATI can disrupt survey operations, including system crashes, network connectivity problems, and dialing errors such as wrong numbers or engaged tones, which contributed to failure rates of up to 20% in mobile-adapted implementations. These disruptions not only prolong but also frustrate interviewers and respondents, potentially lowering overall response rates. concerns arise from the recording of calls for , as respondents may suspect intrusive questioning—such as household composition details—prompting refusals or omissions to protect .

Comparisons and Applications

Comparison to Other Survey Methods

Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) offers distinct advantages over paper-and-pencil interviewing (PAPI) in reducing manual errors and accelerating post-collection processing. In CATI systems, built-in validation checks alert interviewers to invalid responses in real-time, minimizing inconsistencies that are common in PAPI where errors often occur during manual coding or keypunching. For instance, CATI enables interviewers to complete approximately twice as many interviews per hour compared to PAPI, as automated branching and skip patterns eliminate the need to flip through paper forms. However, CATI requires substantial technological infrastructure and initial programming investment, contrasting with the low-cost, minimal-setup nature of PAPI, which remains viable in resource-constrained environments. Compared to or self-administered web surveys, CATI excels in populations with limited digital access by providing direct interviewer guidance and probing to clarify ambiguous responses, leading to higher completeness and fewer skipped items. Studies show CATI achieves lower item nonresponse rates and better overall completion through human interaction, particularly beneficial for low-literacy or elderly respondents who may struggle with self-navigation on web platforms. Conversely, web surveys demonstrate superior , allowing rapid recruitment of large samples at lower costs, and elicit higher on sensitive topics due to reduced in anonymous, self-paced formats (e.g., 65.3% vs. 34.7% reporting concerns). CATI completion times are also longer (median 2.4–8.5 minutes more), reflecting the interactive nature but limiting throughput relative to automated web distribution. In contrast to in-person interviews, CATI significantly lowers costs and enables faster geographic coverage for broad samples, with timelines reduced by up to two months compared to face-to-face methods. Telephone-based CATI standardizes question delivery and minimizes interviewer variability through software prompts, yielding comparable results on factual items but potentially less depth on attitudes due to the absence of visual cues and rapport-building. While in-person approaches capture non-verbal responses and allow superior probing for complex behaviors—resulting in higher quality data in nine of twelve key survey areas—CATI avoids travel expenses and achieves broader reach, though it faces challenges like higher refusal rates (5–10% lower response) and exclusion of non-telephone households. Relative to (IVR) or fully automated telephone systems, human-led CATI handles complex and sensitive questions more effectively by fostering respondent rapport and reducing cognitive burden through adaptive clarification. CATI demonstrates over double the response (50.3% vs. 19.8%) and cooperation rates (85.2% vs. 35.9%) of IVR, with break-off rates under 2% versus 20%, particularly among less-educated groups who find automated keypad navigation challenging. IVR cuts costs by eliminating interviewer labor but sacrifices on nuanced topics, as it lacks the interpersonal that CATI provides to encourage fuller disclosures. In contemporary , CATI is widely employed for assessing and tracking B2B sales performance, enabling interviewers to probe deeper through follow-up questions and capture qualitative insights in real-time. Compliance with telemarketing regulations, such as the U.S. Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), is essential for ethical implementation. Organizations like GeoPoll utilize CATI across global call centers to target business respondents efficiently, integrating software for automated routing and data validation to minimize errors. Public health surveillance relies on CATI for timely data collection, as seen in Statistics Canada's Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), which uses monthly CATI cycles to monitor health trends among thousands of respondents annually, achieving high response rates through continuous sampling. Similarly, Pew Research Center applies CATI in political opinion gathering via its Global Attitudes Survey, conducting telephone interviews with random-digit-dial samples in countries like Canada and France to gauge public views on social and political issues, with up to seven call attempts for representativeness. For academic polling, Pew employs CATI in studies such as the International Science Survey, targeting attitudes toward science in nations like Germany to support scholarly analysis. Sector-specific adaptations enhance CATI's reach, particularly through integration with for hybrid landline-mobile sampling, which has become standard in surveys to accommodate shifting communication patterns. In developing regions, CATI facilitates voice-based in low-literacy areas across , , and , with multilingual software and offline capabilities allowing enumerators to conduct surveys via mobile networks where is limited. Looking ahead, AI enhancements are poised to transform CATI by incorporating during calls to detect respondent emotions and adjust questioning dynamically, as demonstrated in emerging AI-moderated telephone survey agents that automate parts of the process while maintaining human oversight. The shift toward VoIP protocols in CATI systems promises expanded global accessibility and cost reductions, enabling seamless international dialing without traditional infrastructure. Post-2020 adaptations, driven by , have solidified remote CATI operations with SMS pre-notifications and to boost response rates in distributed work environments. Hybrid CATI-IVR models are gaining traction, blending for initial screening with live interviews for complex topics, though CATI's role may diminish in favor of methods due to declining telephone response rates—as low as 1-6% as of 2024-2025 in various U.S. polls and surveys—yet it persists for sensitive subjects requiring personal .

References

  1. https://www.gao.gov/assets/pad-79-70a.pdf
  2. https://statspolicy.gov/assets/fcsm/files/docs/spwp19.pdf
  3. https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2003/pdf/st030330.pdf
  4. https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cesfaq.htm
  5. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-labor/
  6. https://www.gao.gov/assets/pemd-10.1.5.pdf
  7. https://www.unh.edu/institutional-research/sites/default/files/media/2022-05/what-is-a-survey.pdf
  8. https://www.retently.com/blog/cati-survey/
  9. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/189691588696451053/pdf/Guidelines-on-CATI-Implementation.pdf
  10. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/health-promotion-chronic-disease-prevention-canada-research-policy-practice/vol-25-no-2-2004/computer-assisted-telephone-interviewing-cati-health-surveys-public-health-surveillance.html
  11. https://uwsc.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2017/01/UWSC_Piche2011.pdf
  12. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/1996_020.pdf
  13. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/edvol/download/telephone-survey-methods/chpt/introduction.pdf
  14. https://www.nrpa.org/globalassets/journals/jlr/2014/volume-46/jlr-volume-46-number-1-pp-84-105.pdf
  15. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/dec/coh-phone.html
  16. https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter1/the-setting-of-global-transportation-systems/household-telecommunications-united-states/
  17. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/1984_113.pdf
  18. https://aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/AAPOR-History-Book-FINAL.pdf
  19. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/800178.810081
  20. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/1983_123.pdf
  21. https://aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Future-of-Telephone-Survey-Research-Report.pdf
  22. https://www2.census.gov/about/transformation/maximizing-operational-efficiency/data-centric-business-ecosystem/dice-capi-cati-guidelines.pdf
  23. https://ccsg.isr.umich.edu/chapters/instrument-technical-design/
  24. https://poverty-action.org/sites/default/files/publications/IPA-Phone-Surveying-in-a-Pandemic-Handbook-Updated-December-2020.pdf
  25. https://www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/default/files/research-resources/transitioning-to-CATI-Checklists.pdf
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560130/
  27. https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-abstract/48/1B/356/1931694
  28. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210050
  29. https://journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcare/abstract/1986/02000/telephone_surveys_in_public_health_research.2.aspx
  30. https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/sites/default/files/2018-07/64060.pdf
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2942894/
  32. https://www.chamberofcommerce.org/landline-phone-statistics
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38895514/
  34. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn063
  35. https://mental.jmir.org/2017/3/e37/
  36. https://gss.norc.org/content/dam/gss/get-documentation/pdf/reports/methodological-reports/MR028.pdf
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7388048/
  38. https://www.fcc.gov/general/telemarketing-and-robocalls
  39. https://www.geopoll.com/blog/cati-surveys-market-research-computer-assisted-telephone-interviewing/
  40. https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/feature/international-methodology/
  41. https://arxiv.org/html/2507.17718v1
  42. https://www.voxco.com/resources/computer-assisted-telephone-interviewing-software-cati
  43. https://covid-19-response.unstatshub.org/posts/carrying-out-a-telephone-survey-under-the-impact-of-covid-19/
  44. https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2017/05/15/what-low-response-rates-mean-for-telephone-surveys/
  45. https://ma-pdpcahps.org/globalassets/ma-pdp/comparative-data/2025/historic-mapdp-response-rates-by-mode.pdf
  46. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2024/pdf/2024-DQR-508.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.