Hubbry Logo
Concealed carryConcealed carryMain
Open search
Concealed carry
Community hub
Concealed carry
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Concealed carry
Concealed carry
Concealed carry
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An inside the waistband (IWB) concealment holster, which clips or mounts to a belt and allows the user to securely holster the weapon inside the pants. Some IWB holsters give the wearer the option of tucking a shirt over the firearm and holster.

Concealed carry, or carrying a concealed weapon (CCW), is the practice of carrying a weapon (usually a sidearm such as a handgun), either in proximity to or on one's person in public places in a manner that hides or conceals the weapon's presence from surrounding observers. In the United States, the opposite of concealed carry is called open carry.

While most law enforcement officers carry their handguns in a visible holster, some officers such as plainclothes detectives or undercover agents carry weapons in concealed holsters. In some countries and jurisdictions, civilians are legally required to obtain a concealed carry permit in order to possess and carry a firearm. In others, a CCW permit is only required if the firearm is not visible to the eye, such as carrying the weapon in one's purse, bag, trunk, etc.

By country

[edit]
See also: Overview of gun laws by nation § Comparison

United States

[edit]
Main articles: Concealed carry in the United States and Constitutional carry
See also: Open carry in the United States
A New York Times study reported how outcomes of active shooter attacks varied with actions of the attacker, the police (42% of total incidents), and bystanders (including a "good guy with a gun" outcome in 5.1% of total incidents).[1]

Concealed carry is legal in most jurisdictions of the United States. A handful of states and jurisdictions severely restrict or ban it, but all jurisdictions make provision for legal concealed carry via a permit or license, or via constitutional carry. Illinois was the last state to pass a law allowing for concealed carry, with license applications available on January 5, 2014.[2] Most states that require a permit have "shall-issue" statutes, and if a person meets the requirements to obtain a permit, the issuing authority (typically, a state law enforcement office such as the state police) must issue one, with no discretionary power given. Prior to June 2022, a few states enforced "may-issue" statutes, which gave authorities discretionary power in issuing permits to otherwise qualified applicants. However, these laws were found to be unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen. Furthermore, in most states obtaining the permit is required to bring a weapon into public, (e.g. shopping center). If the gun remains in one's vehicle but is not on said person's property, a permit is required in places like New Jersey.

Concealed-carry recognition by state (2017)

Further complicating the status of concealed carry is recognition of state permits under the laws of other states. The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the US Constitution pertains to judgments and other legal pronouncements such as marriage and divorce rather than licenses and permits that authorize individuals to prospectively engage in activities. There are several popular combinations of resident and nonresident permits that allow carry in more states than the original issuing state; for example, a Utah nonresident permit is recognized for carry in 30 states. Some states, however, do not recognize permits issued by other states to nonresidents of the issuing state: Colorado, Florida, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Dakota and South Carolina. Some other states do not recognize any permit from another state: California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois (recognizes permits while in vehicle), Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island (recognizes permits while in vehicle) and the District of Columbia.

United Kingdom

[edit]
Main article: Firearms policy in the United Kingdom

Concealed or open carry of any weapon is generally prohibited in Great Britain (i.e. England, Wales, and Scotland), the Prevention of Crime Act 1953 prohibiting this in a public place.[3][4][5] Permission exists only with lawful authority or reasonable excuse. As per Section 1(4) Prevention of Crime Act 1953, the definition of an offensive weapon is: "offensive weapon" means any article made or adapted for use for causing injury to the person, or intended by the person having it with him for such use by him or by some other person.[6] Self defence is no longer considered a legitimate reason for the granting of a Firearms Certificate (FAC) in Great Britain.

Unlike Great Britain, Northern Ireland still allows the carry of concealed handguns for the purpose of self defence. An FAC for a personal protection weapon will only be authorised where the Police Service of Northern Ireland deems there is a "verifiable specific risk" to the life of an individual, and that the possession of a firearm is a reasonable, proportionate and necessary measure to protect their life.[7] Permits for personal protection also allow the holder to carry their firearms concealed.[8] In reality – aside from off-duty constables – the only individuals who will be granted a permit to carry will be those who are government officials or retirees, such as prison officers, military personnel, or politicians still considered to be at risk from paramilitary attack.

Canada

[edit]
Main article: Firearms regulation in Canada

The practice of CCW is generally prohibited in Canada. Section 90 of the Criminal Code prohibits carrying a concealed weapon unless authorized for a lawful occupational purpose[9] under the Firearms Act.[10] Section 20 of the Firearms Act allows issuance of an Authorization to Carry (ATC) in limited circumstances. Concealment of the firearm is permitted only if it is specifically stipulated in the conditions of the ATC, as section 58(1) of the Firearms Act allows a CFO to attach conditions to an ATC.

Provincial chief firearm officers (CFOs) may only issue an authorization in accordance with the regulations. Specifically, SOR 98-207 section 2 requires, for an ATC for protection of life, for an individual to be in imminent danger and for police protection to be insufficient. As such, if the relevant police agency determines its protection is sufficient, the CFO would have difficulty in issuing the ATC over police objections.

For issuance of an ATC under 98-207(3) for lawful occupations, provision is made for armored car personnel under subsection a), for wildlife protection (while working) and trapping under subsections b) and c). Unless hunting or other activity is occupational, it would not be possible to issue an ATC under the section.[9] As noted, a CFO can exercise some discretion but must follow the law in considering applications for an ATC.[11]

Brazil

[edit]
Main article: Gun laws in Brazil

Concealed carry in Brazil is generally illegal, with special carry permits granted to police officers allowing them to carry firearms off duty, and in other rare cases.[12] In May 2019, President Jair Bolsonaro signed a decree allowing several people to have license to carry a weapon based on the intrinsic risk of the profession, including lawyers, reporters and politicians.[13]

Czech Republic

[edit]
Main article: Gun politics in the Czech Republic

A gun in the Czech Republic is available to anybody subject to acquiring a shall-issue firearms license. Gun licenses may be obtained in a way similar to driving licenses – by passing a gun proficiency exam, medical examination and having a clean criminal record. Unlike in most other European countries, the Czech gun legislation also permits a citizen to carry a concealed weapon for self-defense – 246,715 out of some 303,936 legal gun owners have E category licenses which permit them to carry concealed firearms. The vast majority of Czech gun owners possess their firearms for protection, with hunting and sport shooting being less common.

Hunters who hold C category licenses may carry their hunting firearms openly on the way to and from hunting grounds.

Unlike state policemen, members of the municipal police are regarded as civilians and need to obtain D category licenses in order to be armed. Municipal policemen while on duty carry their municipality-issued firearms openly. D category license holders who work in private security services can carry their firearms only in a concealed manner.

All firearms licenses are shall-issue.

License category Age Carrying
A - Firearm collection 21 No carry
B - Sport shooting 18
15 for members of a shooting club 		Transport only
(concealed, in a manner excluding immediate use)
C - Hunting 18
16 for pupils at schools with hunting curriculum 		Transport only
(open/concealed, in a manner excluding immediate use)
D - Exercise of profession 21
18 for pupils at schools conducting education
on firearms or ammunition manufacturing 		Concealed carry
(up to 2 guns ready for immediate use)
Open carry
for members of municipal police, Czech National Bank's security while on duty
E - Self-defense 21 Concealed carry
(up to 2 guns ready for immediate use)

Mexico

[edit]
Main article: Gun laws in Mexico

In Mexico, the issuance of a private individual firearms license, despite being guaranteed as a right in Article 10 of the 1917 Constitution, is neither common nor easy to obtain. Article 10 of the Constitution quotes:

The inhabitants of the United Mexican States have the right to possess arms in their homes, for their security and legitimate defense, with the exception of federal law and those reserved for the exclusive use of the Army, Navy, Air Force and National Guard. Federal law shall determine the cases, conditions, requirements and places in which inhabitants may be authorized to carry weapons.[14]

Even when a carrying permit is granted, it is usually limited to weapons permitted for civilians (also called "non-exclusive military use"). The carrying of arms in Mexico is limited to those detailed in Articles 8 and 9 of the Federal Law on Firearms and Explosives.2 which states

   Weapons with the following characteristics may be possessed or carried, under the terms and with the limitations established by this Law:

   I. I. Semi-automatic pistols of caliber no greater than .380" (9 mm), with the exception of .38" Super and .38" Comando calibers, and also in 9 mm calibers, Mauser, Luger, Parabellum and Comando, as well as similar models of the same caliber of the exempted ones, of other brands.

   II. Revolvers in calibers not superior to .38" Special, being excepted the caliber .357" Magnum.

   Ejidatarios, comuneros and rural workers, outside urban areas, may possess and carry with the only demonstration, one of the aforementioned weapons, or a .22" caliber rifle, or a shotgun of any caliber, except those with a barrel length of less than 635 mm. (25"), and those with a caliber greater than 12 (.729" or 18.5 mm.).

   III. Those mentioned in Article 10 of this Law.

   IV. Those that form part of collections of arms, in the terms of Articles 21 and 22.

The issuance of carrying licences in Mexico is similar to the United States "may-issue" model, in which the authorities responsible for issuing such licences (Secretariat of National Defense) reserve the right to issue them at their discretion.

Pakistan

[edit]
Main article: Gun laws in Pakistan

Pakistan allows any citizen with a firearm licence to carry a concealed handgun, except in educational institutions, hostels or boarding and lodging houses, fairs, gatherings or processions of a political, religious, ceremonial or sectarian character, and on the premises of courts of law or public offices.[15]

Philippines

[edit]
Main article: Gun laws in the Philippines

Concealed carry in the Philippines requires a Permit To Carry (PTC), which may be issued to licensed firearms owners based on threats to their lives or because of the inherent risk of their profession. The Permit to Carry must be renewed annually.

During gun ban, which is the time of election or as declared by the president, no civilian can carry a gun outside residence even with PTC.

In some private learning institutions, CCW (Carrying Concealed Weapon) is permitted by the management of the institution. Here are the necessary scenarios for a student to request or have a CCW in the institution: When a student is a possible target of life, if the student has experienced sexual harassment, if the student is a VIP student, etc. The student/s may be restricted to 1 non lethal weapon. VIP students and endangered students are immune to the gun ban during all elections. Permit to Carry is signed by the institution for the student.

Poland

[edit]

Polish firearm licences for handguns allow concealed carry, regardless of whether they are given for self defence or sporting reasons. Self defence licences are only for those the police consider at heightened risk of attack, and are rare. Sports shooting licences require active participation in competitions every year.

South Africa

[edit]
Main article: Gun politics in South Africa

In South Africa, it is legal to carry all licensed firearms and there is no additional permit required to carry firearms open or concealed, as long as it is a licensed firearm that is carried:

  • in the case of a handgun, in a holster or similar holder designed, manufactured or adapted for the carrying of a handgun and attached to his or her person or in a rucksack or similar holder.
  • in the case of any other firearm, in a holder designed, manufactured or adapted for the carrying of the firearm.

A firearm contemplated in subsection must be completely covered and the person carrying the firearm must be able to exercise effective control over the firearm (carrying firearms in public is allowed if it is done in that manner).[16]

In South Africa, private guns are prohibited in educational institutions, churches, community centres, health facilities, NGOs, taverns, banks, corporate buildings, government buildings and some public spaces, such as sport stadiums.[16]

Slovakia

[edit]

Concealed carry in Slovakia is not common and subject to generally permissive may-issue license (depends on jurisdiction; some are essentially shall-issue, while others don't issue without bribe or verifiable proof to being in danger), only 2% of the population hold a licence allowing concealed carry.[17]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Concealed carry

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Concealed carry is the practice of carrying a concealed firearm, typically a handgun, on or about one's person in public spaces, hidden from ordinary observation. In the United States, where the topic is most prominently regulated and debated, all 50 states authorize concealed carry under laws that range from permitless "constitutional carry" to mandatory licensing with training and background checks. As of 2025, 29 states permit constitutional carry for eligible adults without requiring a government-issued permit. The U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to carry handguns in public for self-defense, striking down subjective "may-issue" licensing regimes that required demonstrations of special need. State laws often include reciprocity agreements allowing valid out-of-state permits to be honored, though no federal mandate exists, leading to ongoing legislative efforts for nationwide recognition. Proponents emphasize concealed carry's role in enabling defensive gun uses, with surveys estimating tens of thousands to millions of such incidents annually, potentially deterring crime through armed citizens. Critics highlight risks, including accidental discharges and escalations, while peer-reviewed analyses present conflicting findings on net effects, with some evidence linking shall-issue laws to higher rates of violent crime and firearm homicides, and others to reductions in specific offenses. These debates underscore concealed carry's position at the intersection of individual rights, public safety, and empirical uncertainty in causal impacts on societal violence.

Definition and Principles

Definition and Distinctions

Concealed carry is the practice of carrying a , typically a , on or about one's person in a manner that hides it from the ordinary view of others. This involves positioning the weapon under clothing or in a , purse, or holster designed to prevent . The primary purpose is to enable lawful while minimizing detection, distinguishing it from offensive armament. It differs from open carry, in which the firearm remains plainly visible, such as in a holster exposed on the hip or chest. Open carry emphasizes deterrence through visibility, whereas concealed carry prioritizes discretion and surprise in potential defensive scenarios. Concealed carry also contrasts with constitutional carry, also known as permitless carry, where eligible adults face no permit requirement to carry concealed, unlike systems mandating government-issued authorization. Micro-compact 9mm pistols are generally favored for concealed carry, offering a balance of stopping power, manageable recoil, high capacity, and affordable ammunition compared to smaller calibers like .380 or larger ones like .40/.45. Common firearms for concealed carry are compact or subcompact handguns, selected for their size that facilitates hiding without —unintended outlines under fabric. Retention holsters, such as inside-the-waistband or appendix styles, secure the weapon close to the body. Appendix carry, typically in the 1-2 o'clock position (with significant overlap including 2 o'clock often categorized under appendix or appendix inside-the-waistband definitions), directs the muzzle toward the body, presenting a primary safety concern of negligent discharge potentially striking the groin or femoral artery—unlike traditional strong-side hip carry (3-4 o'clock positions), where the muzzle points away from vital areas. With quality holsters that fully cover the trigger guard, strict trigger discipline, and proper training, appendix carry is considered comparably safe to hip carry, benefiting from improved firearm retention and accessibility. No substantial safety differences exist specifically between 1 o'clock and 2 o'clock positions. These methods, often paired with loose or to maintain concealment, ensure the carrier retains quick access while adhering to the concealed nature of the practice. The philosophical foundations of concealed carry rest on the natural right to self-preservation, which entails the means necessary for effective defense against threats to life and liberty. John Locke, in his Second Treatise of Government (1689), posits self-preservation as the fundamental law of nature, whereby individuals possess the executive power to punish aggressors and protect their lives, extending to the use of force proportionate to the harm. This right presupposes access to instruments of defense, as mere abstract entitlement without practical capability undermines the principle; Locke argues that in the state of nature, individuals retain authority to employ violence for preservation until civil society delegates it, but core self-defense remains inalienable. English traditions reinforced this by recognizing the right to bear arms as an auxiliary to personal security. William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of (1765–1769) describes the subject's right "of having arms for their defence, suitable to their condition and degree," framing it as essential to counter sudden where state protection is absent or delayed. St. George Tucker's annotations to Blackstone emphasize that "the right of self defence is the first law of ," inherently including arms as the primary tool, with limitations only to prevent abuse rather than negate the entitlement. These traditions view bearing arms not as a privilege but as a to the duty of self-reliance, grounded in the causal reality that threats often arise unpredictably, rendering reliance on distant authorities insufficient for immediate survival. Concealed carry aligns with these foundations by enabling discreet readiness, minimizing provocation while preserving the capacity for swift response. theorists argue that the right to logically requires possession and carriage of effective arms, as defense demands proximity to the means; without concealment, open carry might escalate non-violent encounters, whereas hidden armament allows rational deterrence through uncertainty—aggressors, modeled as self-interested actors weighing risks without assuming victim or , face elevated costs from potential armed resistance. This reasoning prioritizes individual agency over collective dependency, acknowledging that human behavior under scarcity favors proactive measures for preservation, independent of state monopolies on force.

Historical Development

Pre-20th Century Origins

In ancient and medieval societies characterized by decentralized authority and frequent threats from bandits, rival factions, and , individuals commonly concealed small blades for personal defense, as overt armament could provoke conflict or signal vulnerability. Roman legionaries carried the pugio, a short hidden under tunics for close-quarters protection during campaigns or urban unrest. In medieval Europe, civilians relied on compact daggers—such as the rondel or —as everyday backups to larger weapons, often sheathed discreetly in belts or clothing to enable surprise against assailants in travel or markets, where judicial enforcement was sporadic and demanded readiness. These practices stemmed from causal necessities: in environments lacking monopolized police power, concealed arms provided asymmetric advantages in defensive encounters, prioritizing survival over visibility. The American colonial era extended this tradition amid frontier perils, where settlers faced indigenous raids, wildlife, and scarce governance, fostering normative self-armed vigilance without modern constabularies. English common law, inherited by the colonies, generally frowned on concealed weapons as duplicitous, yet practical exigencies led to widespread carrying of pistols or knives under cloaks during journeys or settlements; statutes in places like and even mandated armed presence at churches and militia musters to deter threats collectively. This reflected first-principles reliance on individual agency for security, as colonial records document pioneers equipping concealable firearms for hunts, patrols, and trade routes, underscoring arms as extensions of personal in ungoverned expanses. By the , U.S. and post-independence —exacerbated by dueling cultures and saloon brawls—prompted initial regulations targeting concealed carry, viewed in Southern states as emblematic of stealthy malice rather than honorable defense. enacted the first statewide ban in 1813, prohibiting concealed to curb impulsive crimes, followed swiftly by that year and in 1820; by 1850, most Southern legislatures had similar statutes, often rationalized as preserving open, "manly" over hidden treachery. Nonetheless, varied, and in Western frontiers like , where 1880s ordinances restricted public carry to mitigate gunfights, pioneers and lawmen pragmatically concealed sidearms for survival against outlaws, as empirical accounts of holdups and ranch disputes attest. These early laws, while curbing urban excesses, tacitly acknowledged concealed carry's roots in self-reliant contexts, where causal threats necessitated discreet preparedness absent reliable state intervention.

20th Century Shifts

In the early , U.S. states increasingly enacted discretionary "may-issue" permitting systems for concealed carry, driven by urban violence linked to Prohibition-era from 1920 to 1933. These laws granted authorities broad latitude to approve or deny permits based on subjective assessments of need, marking a shift from prior open or unregulated practices in many areas. Enforcement varied regionally, with stricter application in cities amid concerns over cheap handguns fueling , while rural jurisdictions often exhibited greater tolerance due to reliance on personal armament for self-defense and frontier traditions. New York's of 1911 exemplified this restrictive archetype, prohibiting concealed carry of concealable firearms without a police-issued license and imposing rigorous criteria, including demonstrations of "." Sponsored amid rising pistol-related homicides in immigrant-heavy neighborhoods, the law centralized discretion with urban police officials, influencing subsequent may-issue statutes in states like and influencing national debates on public safety. By mid-century, similar frameworks proliferated, reflecting progressive-era state centralization that empowered legislatures—often dominated by urban interests—to override local customs and impose uniform controls, ostensibly to curb impulsive violence but effectively limiting armed self-reliance. Post-World War II exacerbated crime pressures, with surplus military firearms entering civilian hands amid demographic shifts to cities, yet prompting further entrenchment of permit barriers rather than liberalization. The witnessed a sharp violent crime escalation, as FBI documented homicide rates rising from 5.1 per 100,000 in 1960 to 9.7 by 1970, straining under-resourced police forces and highlighting gaps in rapid response capabilities. Contemporary debates, including reactions to events like California's 1967 —which restricted open carry in response to armed patrols—underscored tensions, with proponents of armed citizens arguing they supplemented policing in high-crime urban voids, though restrictive may-issue dominance persisted amid calls for centralized authority to manage perceived threats.

Late 20th and Early 21st Century Expansion

In the , rising rates across the prompted legislative shifts toward more permissive concealed carry policies, culminating in Florida's enactment of a shall-issue law on October 1, 1987, which required authorities to issue permits to qualified applicants meeting objective criteria such as background checks and firearms training. This reform addressed prior may-issue discretion that often resulted in arbitrary denials, and Florida's model—emphasizing amid urban crime surges—influenced subsequent adoptions, with states like Georgia, , , and following in 1989. By the late , at least 31 states had implemented shall-issue laws, expanding access for law-abiding citizens and correlating with empirical analyses suggesting deterrence effects on in adopting jurisdictions. Economist John R. Lott Jr.'s 1997 study, "Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns," analyzed county-level data from 1977 to 1992 and concluded that shall-issue laws reduced s, including murders by up to 7.65% and rapes by 5.01%, by increasing the risks faced by potential offenders through civilian armament. Lott's findings, later expanded in his 1998 book More Guns, Less Crime, informed policy debates and legislative testimonies, contributing to further adoptions as national violent crime peaked in 1991 before declining sharply in right-to-carry states during the . While subsequent research has debated the causal magnitude—some studies finding null or modest effects—these analyses underscored rationales amid real-world crime reductions, bolstering momentum for reform without relying on discretionary permitting barriers. The early marked a transition toward permitless carry, building on Vermont's longstanding constitutional tradition of allowing concealed handgun carry without government permission since the state's founding. became the second state to adopt such a on June 11, 2003, repealing permit requirements for concealed carry by eligible adults, a move framed as restoring inherent Second Amendment protections for outside the home. This "constitutional carry" approach accelerated in the , with states eliminating discretionary hurdles in favor of verifiable eligibility checks at purchase, reflecting growing recognition that permitting regimes imposed undue burdens on lawful exercise of carry rights amid persistent public safety concerns.

United States Overview

In the , the right to concealed carry of firearms derives from the Second Amendment, which protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms for , extending to public carry outside the home. The Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen on June 23, 2022, affirmed that this right encompasses concealed carry of handguns in public spaces, rejecting subjective "proper cause" requirements for permits as inconsistent with historical traditions of from the founding era. The ruling mandates that modern regulations must align with the nation's historical analogue of allowing law-abiding citizens to bear arms for self-protection, without undue restrictions on the manner of carry such as blanket prohibitions on concealment. Federal law establishes no national concealed carry permit system and imposes no general prohibition on concealed carry by eligible individuals, leaving primary regulation to the states. The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits certain categories of persons—such as felons, fugitives, unlawful drug users, and those adjudicated mentally defective—from possessing firearms or ammunition, thereby restricting carry eligibility nationwide, but it does not regulate the carrying of concealed weapons by non-prohibited persons in public. Post-Bruen, federal constraints remain limited to prohibitions on carry in specific federal facilities and properties, with no overarching mandate for permits or training at the national level. As of October 2025, approximately 29 states permit concealed carry without a government-issued license for adults aged 21 and older who meet federal eligibility criteria as non-prohibited persons, reflecting a shift toward "constitutional carry" aligned with Bruen's historical standard. These permitless regimes vary in scope, often requiring minimum age compliance and excluding prohibited venues, while the remaining states operate shall-issue permitting systems that approve qualified applicants without discretionary denial. Interstate variances persist absent federal reciprocity legislation, though proposed bills like H.R. 38 seek to standardize recognition of valid state permits across borders. This landscape underscores the Second Amendment's preeminence over state-level discretion in public bearability.

State Variations in the US

As of October 2025, 29 states authorize for eligible adults, generally those aged 21 or older who are not prohibited from firearm possession under federal or state law, such as felons or individuals with certain convictions. These states determine eligibility through prohibited categories rather than requiring a separate or permit application for , though many continue issuing optional permits to facilitate reciprocity with other jurisdictions. exemplifies this shift, enacting permitless carry via House Bill 543, signed by Governor and effective July 1, 2023, thereby joining 25 prior adopters and expanding access without mandatory training or fees for basic carry. The remaining 21 states operate under shall-issue frameworks, where concealed carry permits must be granted to applicants meeting objective criteria, including background checks, minimum age, residency, and often firearms training mandates. For instance, states like require eight hours of training and live-fire proficiency for permits, with legislative updates in 2025 refining eligibility to align with federal prohibitions while preserving issuance standards. A small number of holdout jurisdictions, including , , , , , New York, and , retain may-issue systems granting officials discretion over approvals, though these have been subject to federal court challenges post the 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which struck down subjective "good cause" requirements as inconsistent with historical Second Amendment traditions. Reciprocity agreements among states allow valid out-of-state permits to be honored for concealed carry, with permitless carry in one state sometimes extended recognition in others through legislative or judicial means, though inconsistencies persist. Tools such as the Concealed Carry Association's reciprocity maps track these variations, aiding travelers amid roughly 21 million active permits nationwide as of late 2024—down from peaks before permitless expansions reduced demand in adopting states. These divergent models reflect ongoing state-level experimentation following Bruen, with permitless frameworks correlating to broader access but prompting debates over uniform standards absent federal reciprocity legislation like H.R. 38.

International Perspectives

In much of , concealed carry of firearms by civilians is heavily restricted or outright prohibited, reflecting a policy emphasis on public safety through disarmament following high-profile incidents. In the , following the 1996 where 16 children and a teacher were killed, enacted the Firearms () Act 1997, banning private ownership of most handguns and effectively prohibiting concealed carry for , with exceptions limited to specific professional needs under strict licensing. Similar prohibitions prevail across , where may-issue permits for concealed carry are rare and typically require demonstrated exceptional need, such as verified threats, rather than general rights. The stands as a notable exception in , operating a shall-issue system for concealed carry permits grounded in a constitutional right to , requiring applicants to pass proficiency tests, medical exams, and background checks but granting licenses upon meeting objective criteria without discretionary denial for ordinary citizens. This framework has supported relatively high civilian firearm ownership—around 16 firearms per 100 residents—and concealed carry prevalence, though recent amendments post-2023 mass shooting introduced tighter reporting on unfit owners. In , trends toward liberalization are evident; Poland issues concealed carry permits on a shall-issue basis for when applicants provide a justified reason, such as sport shooting or protection needs, leading to a record 46,000 permits issued in 2024 amid rising applications. maintains a more discretionary may-issue approach for concealed carry, varying by locality, but permits possession under regulated conditions. Outside Europe, select high-crime nations have expanded concealed carry allowances to address security gaps. In , during President Jair Bolsonaro's tenure from 2019 to 2022, over a dozen decrees eased restrictions, enabling shall-issue elements for concealed carry permits, increasing civilian registrations by over 1,400% and correlating with a 34% drop in homicides from pre-2019 peaks, though subsequent administrations reimposed limits like shorter license durations. permits up to four firearms for under the Firearms Control Act of 2000, including concealed carry with a dedicated license requiring competency certification and motivation of genuine threat, amid persistently high rates that have spurred reliance on private security over state policing. In regions with stringent carry prohibitions and inadequate , such expansions reflect causal pressures from crime victimization, where restricted legal options may incentivize unregulated , as observed in pre-liberalization and South African townships.
CountryConcealed Carry PolicyKey Licensing Features
Prohibited for civiliansHandgun ban post-1997; no self-defense permits
Shall-issueProficiency test, medical exam; constitutional basis
Shall-issue with justified reasonRising permits; self-defense allowed
Brazil (2019-2022)Expanded shall-issue elementsPermit surge tied to crime reduction
May-issue for self-defenseUp to 4 firearms; threat motivation required

Implementation Practices

Permit Processes and Requirements

Eligibility for concealed carry permits is governed by federal prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which bar individuals from possessing firearms if they have been convicted of a , are fugitives from justice, unlawful users of controlled substances, adjudicated as mentally defective or committed to a mental institution, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged from the military, subject to restraining orders, or convicted of crimes. These federal disqualifiers are verified through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), operated by the FBI, which cross-references applicant data against criminal, , and other records during the permitting process. States may impose additional eligibility criteria, such as residency requirements or restrictions on certain convictions, but must align with federal baselines. Minimum age for concealed carry permits is typically 21 years in most states, though some permit 18-year-olds under specific conditions like active or honorable discharge. For example, allows applicants as young as 19 with military credentials, while sets the threshold at 21 without exceptions for younger applicants. In shall-issue jurisdictions, which encompass the majority of states following the 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, permitting authorities are required to approve applications meeting objective statutory criteria, eliminating discretionary "may-issue" denials based on subjective assessments like need or good cause. Post-Bruen reforms in former may-issue states, such as and New York, have standardized processes around verifiable background checks rather than interviews or character references for initial eligibility. The application process generally involves submitting a form to a local sheriff's office or state police agency, providing proof of identity and residency, undergoing fingerprinting for comprehensive background verification (including NICS and state records), and paying a fee typically ranging from $50 to $100. Applicants often supply a photograph and may need to affirm non-prohibited status under oath. Processing times in shall-issue states vary from 30 to 90 days, depending on agency workload and completeness of submission; for instance, North Carolina sheriffs have up to 45 days to issue or deny after receiving all materials. Permits, once issued, authorize concealed carry subject to restrictions on prohibited places, such as schools under the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act (18 U.S.C. § 922(q)) and federal facilities like courthouses, enforced through permit conditions and state laws emphasizing objective compliance over issuer discretion. Renewals follow similar processes, often every 4 to 5 years, with updated background checks to confirm ongoing eligibility.

Training Standards

Training for concealed carry permits in shall-issue states typically mandates 8 to 16 hours of instruction, combining classroom sessions on safety, legal responsibilities, and practical range time for live-fire qualification. The National Rifle Association's Basic Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) course, often used to meet these standards, spans approximately 8 to 10 hours and covers selection, safe handling, basic marksmanship, and defensive shooting fundamentals. Live-fire components generally require firing 20 to 50 rounds at targets from distances of 3 to 15 yards, with passing thresholds around 70 percent accuracy, such as 35 out of 50 shots in some jurisdictions. The primary objectives of these programs are to instill proficiency in safe firearm manipulation, accurate shooting under controlled conditions, knowledge of applicable laws including use-of-force doctrines, and strategies for threat avoidance or prior to lethal response. Instruction emphasizes drawing from concealment, holster management, and malfunction clearing to minimize accidents during carry, while underscoring that training prioritizes judgment over marksmanship alone for real-world application. In permitless or constitutional carry states, now numbering at least 29, no formal training is required for concealed carry, though organizations strongly advise voluntary courses to build essential skills and awareness of state-specific statutes. Renewal requirements vary, with most states imposing no retraining, but enacted House Bill 24-1174 effective July 1, 2025, mandating a refresher course for permit holders to demonstrate ongoing competence through live-fire and assessment. Qualification standards across programs exhibit low failure rates, typically under 5 percent per instructor reports, reflecting their design for accessibility to law-abiding adults with basic prior familiarization, though remedial practice is offered for initial misses.

Reciprocity and Interstate Issues

Concealed carry reciprocity in the involves state-level agreements where one state recognizes valid concealed carry permits issued by another state, allowing permit holders to carry concealed firearms across state lines subject to the host state's laws. As of 2025, most states maintain reciprocity with a varying number of other states, often based on factors including the issuing state's training standards, permit duration, and rigor. Interactive online maps and mobile applications, such as those provided by the United States Concealed Carry Association, enable permit holders to verify real-time reciprocity status for specific permits before travel. Seven states—, , , , , , and New York—do not recognize concealed carry permits from any other U.S. state, creating significant barriers for interstate carriers entering these jurisdictions. In such non-reciprocal states, out-of-state permit holders must either forgo carrying or comply with stringent local permitting processes, which typically require residency and extensive application procedures unavailable to non-residents. Federal proposals seek to address these inconsistencies through national standards. The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 (H.R. 38 and S. 65) would require states to honor concealed carry permits or constitutional carry eligibility from other states for individuals not prohibited from possessing firearms, effectively creating uniformity while preserving state authority over issuance. advanced from in the on March 25, 2025, but has not been enacted into law as of October 2025. For interstate transport without active carrying, the (FOPA) of 1986 provides a federal exception under 18 U.S.C. § 926A, permitting individuals to transport through states where possession would otherwise be illegal, provided the is unloaded, secured in a locked inaccessible from the passenger compartment, and the journey is between locations where the owner may legally possess and carry the . This provision applies to vehicles and does not authorize stopping or unloading en route except for lawful purposes like refueling.

Empirical Impacts

Effects on Crime Rates

Empirical research on the effects of concealed carry laws, particularly "shall-issue" right-to-carry (RTC) policies, on rates has produced mixed results, with early studies suggesting deterrence benefits and later analyses often finding null or adverse impacts. and David Mustard's 1997 analysis of county-level data from 1977 to 1992 concluded that states adopting RTC laws experienced significant reductions in , estimating drops of approximately 5-8% in , , and aggravated assault rates following implementation, attributed to the increased risk of armed resistance deterring potential offenders. Subsequent updates to Lott's work, incorporating data through the , maintained that RTC expansion correlated with lower trends, even after controlling for factors like , , and rates, positing a causal mechanism where higher concealed carry prevalence elevates criminals' perceived costs of attack. However, critiques of Lott's methodology highlight potential endogeneity, where states with declining crime trends may self-select into RTC adoption, biasing results; the National Research Council (2004) review deemed the evidence inconclusive due to model sensitivity and failure to robustly address such confounders. More recent peer-reviewed studies, often using synthetic control methods or difference-in-differences designs on post-2000 data, have frequently found no crime-reducing effects or slight increases in specific violent offenses. For instance, a 2022 study of states relaxing concealed carry restrictions (e.g., reducing training or permitting barriers) reported a 24% rise in assault rates, equivalent to 12.75 additional assaults per 100,000 population annually, after controlling for demographics, policing, and economic variables. RAND Corporation's systematic reviews, updated through 2024, classify the overall evidence as supportive of shall-issue laws increasing total homicides, firearm homicides, and other s, though effects on robberies, assaults, and rapes remain inconclusive due to heterogeneous findings across studies. Proponents of RTC critique opposing research for underemphasizing deterrence dynamics and omitting concurrent policy shifts, such as enhanced policing under broken windows strategies, which could confound attributions of changes to carry laws; longitudinal data from high-adoption states like show declines post-RTC amid broader security improvements, suggesting armed citizens contribute to elevated offender risks without isolated causation provable. Academic sources advancing null or positive associations with RTC often originate from institutions with documented left-leaning biases in , potentially influencing variable selection and interpretation toward restrictive policy preferences, though rigorous controls mitigate but do not eliminate such concerns.

Defensive Gun Uses

Estimates from national surveys suggest that defensive gun uses (DGUs)—incidents in which civilians employ firearms to thwart crimes—occur between 1 million and 3 million times annually in the United States, with concealed handguns comprising the majority of firearms involved due to their portability and concealability. A 1995 random-digit-dial telephone survey of 5,218 respondents by criminologists Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz, published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, yielded an estimate of 2.1 to 2.5 million DGUs per year, far exceeding violent crimes reported to police. In these incidents, victims often repelled assailants without firing shots (about 80% of cases) or wounding them, highlighting non-lethal deterrence. The (NCVS), conducted by the , produces lower figures of approximately 65,000 to 100,000 DGUs annually, based on interviews with crime victims. However, this methodology undercounts total DGUs by design, as it excludes incidents where crimes were deterred before completion (no victimization occurred) and relies on retrospective self-reports to authorities, which victims may omit to avoid police scrutiny, legal complications, or escalation risks. Surveys by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1996–1998, covering multiple states, corroborated higher estimates of 1 to 2.5 million DGUs yearly, aligning with Kleck's findings despite subsequent controversies over data presentation influenced by advocacy pressures. FBI data on justifiable homicides—fatal DGUs by civilians—records around 300 to 400 cases annually, representing only a fraction of total DGUs since most do not result in death (e.g., brandishing or warning shots suffice in over 90% of Kleck's sample). Concealed carry enhances efficacy in high-threat scenarios by preserving surprise, allowing armed citizens to intervene before attackers fully execute plans, as criminals cannot preemptively target visible threats. In verifiable active shooter interventions, concealed handgun permit holders have neutralized attackers in documented cases, such as the July 17, 2022, Greenwood Park Mall shooting in Indiana, where 22-year-old Elisjsha Dicken, legally carrying concealed, fired 10 rounds from 40 yards, killing the gunman (who had murdered three and wounded two) within 15 seconds and likely averting further casualties. An analysis by the Crime Prevention Research Center of 515 active shooter incidents from 2014 to 2023 found armed civilians, primarily concealed carriers, stopped 180 attacks—51.5% of civilian interventions—outpacing police stops (44.6%), with fewer errors due to on-scene presence.

Associated Risks and Incidents

Unintentional firearm deaths in the United States total approximately 500 to 600 per year, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) mortality data, with the vast majority stemming from improper storage, handling errors, or children's access rather than concealed carry activities. The subset attributable to concealed carry permit holders or active carrying is minimal, as comprehensive reviews indicate accidental discharges during carry represent a small fraction of overall incidents, often linked to equipment failure or negligence rather than the act of concealment itself. Empirical analyses of permit revocation data from states like and reveal that concealed carry holders exhibit firearm accident rates far below the general population average, with revocation for accidental discharge or mishandling occurring at rates less than 0.02% annually among millions of permittees. Concealed carry permit holders demonstrate lower overall involvement in firearm-related mishaps compared to non-permittees, as evidenced by state-level administrative records. In , permittees committed violent crimes at rates 1/100th to 1/10th those of the general population, with accidental incidents similarly underrepresented. data corroborates this, showing permit holders' arrest rates for weapons violations or accidents at under 2% of the non-permittee rate, suggesting self-selection for responsibility and training mitigates risks. These patterns hold despite millions of active permits nationwide, indicating that while absolute risks exist, they are statistically rare relative to the licensed population size exceeding 20 million by 2020. Firearm thefts occur at an estimated 200,000 annually across the U.S., per and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) tracing data from 2017-2021, with a portion involving guns removed from vehicles or persons during carry. Concealed carry elevates theft vulnerability when firearms are left unattended, such as in parked , accounting for up to half of reported thefts in some urban analyses; however, recovered crime gun traces link only a fraction directly to carry-related losses. Some econometric models posit that relaxed carry laws correlate with 50% higher gun theft rates due to increased public exposure, potentially feeding into subsequent crimes, though causal attribution remains debated amid confounding factors like overall trends. Permit-required systems may reduce this by vetting carriers, but post-permitless carry data from 2023-2025 shows no uniform spike in thefts used in crimes across adopting states. Incidents of escalation, such as unnecessary drawing or "going hot" by concealed carriers, remain rare and poorly quantified due to inconsistent reporting, with administrative data from large cohorts indicating fewer than 0.3% of permit interactions involve unwarranted brandishing or discharge. High-profile cases, like road-rage shootings or mistaken interventions, occur sporadically—e.g., isolated events in 2023-2024 totaling under 100 documented nationally—but represent outliers amid millions of daily carries, often amplified by media favoring negative outcomes over routine compliance. Analyses of police interactions further show permit holders de-escalate more frequently than aggressors, with escalation risks tied more to individual than carry status itself. Relative to defensive uses, such events underscore operational hazards but occur at rates dwarfed by the licensed demographic's general law-abiding profile.

Debates and Controversies

Pro-Concealed Carry Arguments

Proponents argue that concealed carry laws enhance deterrence against by increasing the risks faced by potential offenders. Empirical analyses, such as those by and David Mustard, indicate that states adopting shall-issue concealed carry laws between 1977 and 1995 experienced an average 8.5% reduction in murder rates, 5% in rape rates, and 7% in aggravated assaults compared to states without such laws, with effects most pronounced in high-crime areas where the probability of encountering an armed victim rises. More recent econometric studies corroborate this, finding right-to-carry laws associated with significant declines in murder rates, as the expanded pool of permit holders alters criminals' risk calculations. From a first-principles perspective rooted in rational choice theory, criminals weigh expected costs and benefits before acting, including the heightened chance of resistance from an armed victim under concealed carry regimes. Economic models of crime, as developed by Gary Becker, posit that raising the anticipated costs—such as injury or death from defensive gunfire—discourages offenses, particularly against soft targets like the elderly or isolated individuals, without relying on police intervention that arrives post-harm. This causal mechanism implies that concealed carry shifts the balance toward prevention, as rational actors avoid uncertain confrontations, a dynamic amplified in urban or rural areas with sparse law enforcement presence. Concealed carry empowers citizens to address gaps in state-provided protection, especially for physically vulnerable groups like women and the elderly, who benefit from the equalizing effect of personal in scenarios. Surveys estimate 2.1 to 2.5 million defensive gun uses annually in the United States, many involving concealed handguns that avert assaults or burglaries without firing a shot, underscoring the utility for those unable to rely on or timely aid. Recent trends show women increasingly citing self-protection as the primary motive for firearm ownership, with ownership rates rising to 25% among women by , reflecting perceived against disproportionate victimization risks. Historically, states implementing right-to-carry reforms in the and , such as Florida's shall-issue law, saw rates decline more sharply than in restrictive jurisdictions through the , aligning with broader adoption of these policies and contributing to national drops in and . Advocates contend that stringent permitting restrictions function as a form of class-based exclusion, reserving effective to elites with private security while denying average citizens—often in high-risk occupations or neighborhoods—the same recourse, thereby undermining equal access to personal security.

Anti-Concealed Carry Arguments

Opponents of concealed carry policies argue that permitting widespread hidden carriage heightens escalation in interpersonal conflicts, leading to elevated rates of and homicides. A 2022 study published by the Center for Solutions analyzed state-level data from 2000 to 2020 and determined that transitioning to less restrictive concealed carry laws, such as shall-issue or permitless regimes, correlated with a 24% increase in assault rates, equating to an additional 12.75 assaults per 100,000 residents annually. This research, conducted by public health academics, attributes the rise to reduced training requirements, which fail to mitigate impulsive or aggressive responses in tense situations. A separate 2023 county-level analysis in Injury Epidemiology found bidirectional associations between rising concealed carry permits and gun homicides, suggesting that permit proliferation exacerbates local violence cycles. Public safety advocates further claim that concealed carry contributes to non-defensive fatalities, undermining overall crime reduction. The Violence Policy Center, a gun control , documented 2,817 deaths by concealed carry permit holders in non-self-defense incidents from May 2007 through mid-2025, including 1,475 homicides, 1,044 suicides, 170 unintentional shootings, and 128 killings. These figures, drawn from media reports and public records, are presented as evidence that permit holders misuse weapons at rates disproportionate to defensive benefits, with critics arguing that "more guns" in circulation predictably yield "more killing" absent stringent vetting. RAND Corporation's 2023 review of econometric studies supports limited evidence for shall-issue laws increasing total homicides and , particularly in urban settings where population density amplifies confrontation risks. Additional risks stem from accidents and thefts, which enable firearms to enter criminal hands. Concealed carry permit holders experience higher theft rates than non-holders, per a 2023 analysis of data, as frequent public carrying exposes weapons to opportunistic crimes like break-ins. Nationally, -related thefts surged to 40% of all reported thefts by 2022, doubling from 2018 levels, with critics linking lax carry laws to unsecured storage practices that arm prohibited users. Unintentional discharges by permit holders, categorized within non-self-defense tallies, underscore training inadequacies, as evidenced by incidents where mishandling during routine activities results in bystander injuries. Equity concerns emphasize disproportionate burdens on urban minority populations, where concealed carry expansions allegedly intensify existing disparities without equitable safeguards. Gun homicides disproportionately affect Black Americans, who comprise 60% of victims despite being 13% of the , and critics argue permitless carry aggravates this by flooding high-crime areas with accessible weapons, heightening police encounters vulnerable to . A 2023 review in Injury Epidemiology of firearm law effects by race found heterogeneous outcomes, with permissive carry potentially worsening rates in minority-heavy locales due to limited impulse-control measures like waiting periods. Proponents of stricter regimes advocate mandatory training and delays to screen for , citing evidence that such filters reduce spikes post-law changes. These arguments, often from and advocacy sources, prioritize causal links between carry liberalization and localized harms over broader deterrence claims. In (2008), the held 5-4 that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms for in the home, unconnected to service. This ruling invalidated Washington, D.C.'s ban and trigger-lock requirement but explicitly did not resolve the extent of public carry rights. Two years later, (2010) extended the Second Amendment's protections against the states via the Fourteenth Amendment's , striking down Chicago's similar restrictions. The 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen marked a pivotal expansion, ruling 6-3 that the Second Amendment also safeguards the right to carry handguns publicly for , rejecting subjective "may-issue" permitting schemes like New York's, which required applicants to demonstrate proper cause. Bruen established a historical-tradition test for evaluating gun regulations, leading to widespread lower-court invalidations of discretionary may-issue systems in jurisdictions including , , , and , as these regimes granted officials undue discretion to deny permits without objective criteria. Central disputes involve gun-free zones and sensitive-place restrictions, where post-Bruen challenges argue that broad prohibitions—such as Hawaii's bans on carry in bars, restaurants serving alcohol, and without owner permission—exceed historical analogues and infringe core Second Amendment protections. The granted in October 2025 for Wolford v. Lopez to review Hawaii's restrictions, including its default on concealed carry on open to the public, highlighting tensions between state-defined sensitive areas and the presumption of public-carry rights for law-abiding citizens. Similar conflicts arise over federal and state school-zone laws, with courts upholding some buffer zones under historical rationales while rejecting others as overbroad. Policy flashpoints center on concealed-carry reciprocity, pitting federal mandates for nationwide recognition of permits against state autonomy in setting issuance standards. Proponents of national reciprocity, as in the reintroduced Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025, argue it prevents discrimination against out-of-state permit holders and aligns with the Second Amendment's uniformity, allowing valid permits from any state to suffice for interstate travel and carry. Opponents contend such laws undermine local safety by forcing states to honor permits issued under laxer criteria, potentially importing unqualified carriers and overriding tailored regulations, as evidenced by law enforcement concerns over inconsistent background checks and training equivalency. Conservative agendas, including elements aligned with , advocate overriding restrictive state concealed-carry laws to prioritize federal Second Amendment enforcement over varying local policies. These clashes underscore the Second Amendment's unique textual and historical basis in the U.S. Constitution, rendering foreign regulatory analogies—such as strict European carry bans—inapplicable due to America's founding commitment to armed self-reliance.

Recent Developments

US State Law Changes (2020-2025)

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen on June 23, 2022, which invalidated subjective "may-issue" permitting schemes requiring demonstrated special need for concealed carry, numerous states expanded access to for eligible adults. By July 2025, 29 states permitted concealed carry without a government-issued for individuals meeting basic eligibility criteria, such as being at least 21 years old (or 18 in some cases) and not prohibited from possessing firearms under federal or state law. This marked a rapid shift, with states like enacting House Bill 543 on April 3, 2023, effective July 1, 2023, authorizing eligible residents and non-residents to carry concealed firearms without a permit while preserving optional licensing for reciprocity and purchase benefits. Similar expansions occurred in states including (2022), Georgia (2022), and (2021, with further clarifications post-Bruen), driven by legislative responses aligning state laws with the Court's emphasis on historical tradition over modern balancing tests for public carry restrictions. These changes reflected a broader trend toward "constitutional carry," with proponents citing Bruen's affirmation of Amendment's protection for law-abiding citizens to bear arms in public for , leading to legislative overrides of prior discretionary permitting in states previously requiring permits for all concealed carry. However, not all states moved toward liberalization; some imposed or strengthened restrictions amid ongoing debates over public safety. In , House Bill 24-1174, effective July 1, 2025, mandated enhanced training requirements for concealed handgun permit applicants, including in-person courses with live-fire components conducted by state-verified instructors within six months of application, aiming to verify competency while maintaining a shall-issue framework. Similarly, implemented additional venue-specific prohibitions via Department of Justice Informational Bulletin 2025-DLE-06, effective March 27, 2025, barring concealed carry permit holders from locations such as bars, parks, playgrounds, casinos, and stadiums, pursuant to Senate Bill 2's post-Bruen adjustments to sensitive-place rules despite federal court injunctions against broader carry bans. The period also saw permit issuance trends stabilize amid permitless expansions, with national concealed carry permit holders totaling approximately 21.46 million as of late , a slight decline from prior peaks due to reduced demand in adopting states, though overall legal carriers expanded significantly as eligibility extended to millions more without bureaucratic hurdles. States like tightened public carry via Senate Bill 1 in 2023, prohibiting concealed firearms in most private buildings without owner consent effective October 1, 2023, illustrating countervailing efforts to limit carry in populated areas. These divergent state actions underscored a of responses to Bruen, with permitless adoption concentrated in the and Midwest, while coastal and Western states pursued targeted restrictions on permitting and venues.

Federal and Judicial Updates

In 2025, the U.S. introduced H.R. 38, the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, which seeks to establish national reciprocity for concealed carry permits by allowing individuals licensed in their home state to carry concealed firearms in other states that permit their residents to do so, provided they meet federal eligibility criteria such as background checks and age requirements. The bill advanced through the House Judiciary Committee on March 25, 2025, but has stalled without full passage or consideration as of October 2025, amid ongoing debates over federal overreach into state firearms regulation. Proponents argue it addresses interstate travel burdens post-New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), which struck down discretionary "may-issue" permitting schemes, while critics contend it undermines to enforce local public safety standards. Judicial developments have centered on challenges to post-Bruen restrictions, particularly expansive "sensitive places" designations that limit concealed carry. In Wolford v. Lopez, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld Hawaii's laws requiring permission from owners for concealed carry and designating broad categories like parks and hospitals as off-limits, reasoning that such limits align with historical traditions of regulation despite Bruen's emphasis on objective historical analogues. The Ninth Circuit similarly affirmed California's analogous restrictions, rejecting claims that default prohibitions on public carry in non-sensitive areas violate the Second Amendment. On October 3, 2025, the granted in Wolford, signaling potential clarification on the permissible scope of sensitive places and consent requirements, which could nationally constrain states' ability to impose blanket carry bans beyond historically justified locations. These federal and judicial actions reflect heightened scrutiny of concealed carry barriers following Bruen's invalidation of subjective permitting discretion, prompting lower courts to grapple with "sensitive places" definitions but exposing tensions over their breadth—such as whether they encompass everyday public areas without direct historical precedent. The pending review in Wolford may resolve ambiguities, influencing reciprocity efforts like H.R. 38 by establishing uniform constitutional baselines for carry outside the home.

References

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/concealed_weapon
  2. https://socaldefenselawyer.net/san-bernardino-gun-crimes-attorney/concealed-carry-vs-open-carry-laws/
  3. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/constitutional-carry-states
  4. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf
  5. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/ccw_reciprocity_map/
  6. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307838
  7. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1150&context=law_and_economics
  8. https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/concealed-carry/violent-crime.html
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10447713/
  10. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30190/revisions/w30190.rev0.pdf
  11. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/what-is-concealed-carry/
  12. https://www.nraila.org/get-the-facts/right-to-carry-and-concealed-carry/
  13. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/what-is-open-carry-and-which-states-allow-it/
  14. https://www.botnicklawfirm.com/open-carry-vs-concealed-carry/
  15. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/terminology/types-of-concealed-carry-licensurepermitting-policies/unrestricted/
  16. https://gundigest.com/handguns/concealed-carry/best-concealed-carry-handguns
  17. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/terminology/carry-types/methods-of-carry/
  18. https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/locke1689a.pdf
  19. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/
  20. https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendIIs4.html
  21. https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendIIs7.html
  22. https://saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hsiao-JFPP-251.pdf
  23. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2018/10/42765/
  24. https://www.karatemart.com/hidden-knives
  25. https://www.medievalcollectibles.com/product-category/weaponry/daggers/medieval-daggers/
  26. https://fedsoc.org/fedsoc-review/concealed-carry-and-the-right-to-bear-arms
  27. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/cornell.pdf
  28. https://elitesurvival.com/blogs/news/what-is-the-history-of-concealed-carry-laws
  29. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/slave-state-origins-modern-gun-rights
  30. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/gun-control-old-west-180968013/
  31. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/concealed-carry-revolution-author-interview/
  32. https://www.montana.edu/swensen/documents/DS_SullivanAct_revisionEJ2021_EJ_Final.pdf
  33. https://academic.oup.com/ej/article-abstract/132/646/2118/6505130
  34. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/23/new-york-scotus-gun-laws-00041694
  35. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2458&context=ulj
  36. https://www.history.com/articles/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act
  37. http://www.claytoncramer.com/scholarly/shall-issue.html
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014481889800012X
  39. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/constitutional-carry-in-states/
  40. https://giffords.org/lawcenter/state-laws/concealed-carry-in-alaska/
  41. https://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-gun-laws/alaska/
  42. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt2-6/ALDE_00013266/
  43. https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/docs/0813-firearms-top-12-qaspdf/download
  44. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/federal-ccw-law/
  45. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/38
  46. https://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/Permitless_Carry_States.pdf
  47. https://my.concealedcoalition.com/2025-concealed-carry-map/
  48. https://www.flgov.com/eog/news/press/2023/governor-ron-desantis-signs-hb-543-constitutional-carry
  49. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/may-issue-vs-shall-issue-concealed-carry-states/
  50. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/shall-issue-states
  51. https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/concealed-carry.html
  52. https://www.usacarry.com/concealed-carry-permit-reciprocity-maps/
  53. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5040077
  54. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/38/text
  55. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/01/1102239642/school-shooting-dunblane-massacre-uvalde-texas-gun-control
  56. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-1996-dunblane-massacre-pushed-uk-enact-stricter-gun-laws-180977221/
  57. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35588594
  58. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/11/25/gun-rights-test-czech-republic/
  59. https://media.fsv.cuni.cz/2023/07/16/czech-gun-culture-a-path-forward-for-the-us/
  60. https://www.nraila.org/articles/20250331/more-polish-citizens-are-carrying-firearms-for-self-defense
  61. https://www.reddit.com/r/EuropeGuns/comments/1ihoik8/which_european_countries_issue_carry_permits_as/
  62. https://www.npr.org/2022/08/13/1116989125/brazil-firearm-ownership-booms-gun-laws-loosen-bolsonaro
  63. https://www.wsj.com/opinion/more-legal-gun-control-regulation-reduce-violent-crime-shooting-murder-brazil-semi-automatic-permit-supremep-court-new-york-decision-11656268995
  64. https://www.saps.gov.za/services/flash/firearms/faq_categories.php
  65. https://www.millers.co.za/OurInsights/ArticleDetail.aspx?Title=GUIDELINES-FOR-USING-A-FIREARM-IN-SELF-DEFENCE---UNDERSTANDING-THE-LAW-IN-SOUTH-AFRICA
  66. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gun-control-and-vigilantism-crime-america-war-home-p-102-143-1988
  67. https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/more-fbi-services-and-information/nics/about-nics
  68. https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/more-fbi-services-and-information/nics
  69. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/how-to-get-a-concealed-carry-permit/
  70. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/ccw-age-by-state
  71. https://www.azdps.gov/services/public-services-center/concealed-weapons-and-permits
  72. https://vsp.virginia.gov/services/firearms/resident-concealed-handgun-permits/
  73. https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2022/10/bruens-practical-impact-what-we-know-and-where-we-are-going
  74. https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/regs/ccwl
  75. https://ag.ny.gov/new-york-gun-laws
  76. https://www.ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByArticle/Chapter_14/Article_54B.pdf
  77. https://www.randolphcountync.gov/372/Concealed-Carry-Information-Fingerprinti
  78. https://mspfirearmstraining.com/get-a-maryland-wear-and-carry-permit/
  79. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/are-there-transfers-are-exempt-nics-background-check-requirement
  80. https://www.nrainstructors.org/CatalogInfo.aspx?cid=76
  81. https://www.dps.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Live_Fire_Qualification_1.10.18a.pdf
  82. https://lapdonlinestrgeacc.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/lapdonlinemedia/2022/10/ccw-shooting-proficiency-standards-form.pdf
  83. https://kwdefense.com/importance-of-ccw-training/
  84. https://calibers.net/the-importance-of-concealed-carry-classes-empowering-responsible-gun-ownership/
  85. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/firearms-training/classes/concealed-carry/
  86. https://coloradohandgunsafety.com/ccw-renewals/
  87. https://illinoiscarry.com/forum/index.php?/topic/52872-has-anyone-ever-had-a-student-fail-the-ilcc-class/
  88. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.DeltaDefense.ReciprocityByUSCCA&hl=en_US
  89. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/concealed-carry-reciprocity-states
  90. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/65
  91. http://schmidt.house.gov/media/press-releases/schmidt-backed-concealed-carry-bill-advances-house
  92. https://my.concealedcoalition.com/was-the-concealed-carry-reciprocity-act-passed/
  93. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/926A
  94. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/federal-ccw-law/federal-firearms-transportation-laws/
  95. https://www.hoplofobia.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/MGLC-3rd-Edition.pdf
  96. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w21566/w21566.pdf
  97. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/study-finds-significant-increase-in-firearm-assaults-in-states-that-relaxed-conceal-carry-permit-restrictions
  98. https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/sites/default/files/analyzing-the-effect-of-right-to-carry-laws-on-homicide-and-violent-crime.pdf
  99. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30190/w30190.pdf
  100. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6853&context=jclc
  101. https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhsieh/2018/04/30/that-time-the-cdc-asked-about-defensive-gun-uses/
  102. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/incidence-civilian-defensive-firearm-use
  103. https://www.buckeyefirearms.org/myth-3-25-million-defensive-gun-uses-each-year-cant-be-accurate
  104. https://thereload.com/emails-cdc-removed-defensive-gun-use-stats-after-gun-control-advocates-pressured-officials-in-private-meeting/
  105. https://vpc.org/studies/justifiable20.pdf
  106. https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/19/us/eli-dicken-indiana-mall-shooting-bystander
  107. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62217263
  108. https://crimeresearch.org/2025/03/at-the-federalist-study-concealed-carriers-do-a-better-job-of-stopping-active-shooters-than-police/
  109. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5205768
  110. https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/concealed-carry/unintentional-injuries.html
  111. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2629704
  112. https://naplesgunschool.com/site/images/2015-Report-from-the-Crime-Prevention-Research-Center-Final.pdf
  113. https://www.policinginstitute.org/projects/lost-and-stolen-firearms-reporting-research-policy-analysis/
  114. https://ammo.com/articles/stolen-gun-statistics
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094119025000269
  116. https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2025/08/beyond-just-so-stories-do-firearms-laws-really-affect-gun-theft
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144818824000541
  118. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c3625/c3625.pdf
  119. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6936&context=jclc
  120. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317660772_More_Guns_Less_Crime_Understanding_Crime_and_Gun_Control_Laws
  121. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/2023/study-finds-that-dropping-training-requirement-to-obtain-concealed-carry-permit-leads-to-significant-increase-in-gun-assaults
  122. https://vpc.org/press/more-than-2800-non-self-defense-deaths-involving-concealed-carry-killers-since-2007-latest-violence-policy-center-research-shows/
  123. https://concealedcarrykillers.org/
  124. https://stateline.org/2025/07/07/parked-cars-are-now-a-leading-source-of-stolen-guns-new-report-finds/
  125. https://vpc.org/press/more-than-2500-non-self-defense-deaths-involving-concealed-carry-killers-since-2007-latest-violence-policy-center-research-shows/
  126. https://www.bradyunited.org/resources/issues/gun-violence-is-a-racial-justice-issue
  127. https://injepijournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40621-023-00477-y
  128. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/fact-sheet-weakening-requirements-to-carry-a-concealed-firearm-increases-violent-crime/
  129. https://www.nraila.org/articles/20250609/rights-delayed-and-rights-denied-doj-steps-up-pressure-over-permit-delays-refusals-to-process
  130. https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/10/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-cases-on-guns-government-taking-of-property-and-several-other-issues/
  131. https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2025/06/litigation-highlight-fifth-circuit-upholds-buffer-zone-in-gun-free-school-zones-act
  132. https://www.theiacp.org/news/blog-post/law-enforcement-leaders-express-opposition-to-the-concealed-carry-reciprocity-act
  133. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-would-increase-gun-violence-reversing-historic-declines/
  134. https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2023/543
  135. https://www.cohousedems.com/news/law-to-improve-concealed-carry-training-takes-effect
  136. https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/2025-dle-06.pdf
  137. https://www.marylandshallissue.org/jmain/legislation-tracker/342-changes-carry-md
  138. https://www.nraila.org/articles/20250325/house-judiciary-committee-votes-to-advance-concealed-carry-reciprocity-legislation
  139. https://schmidt.house.gov/media/press-releases/schmidt-backed-concealed-carry-bill-advances-house
  140. https://everytownlaw.org/press/victory-for-gun-safety-ninth-circuit-upholds-key-components-of-california-hawaii-post-bruen-sensitive-places-laws/
  141. https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2025/10/whats-at-stake-in-wolford-supreme-court-grants-cert-to-review-hawaiis-sensitive-places-law
  142. https://www.courthousenews.com/ninth-circuit-wont-rehear-arguments-on-its-decision-to-uphold-gun-free-zones-in-hawaii-and-california/
  143. https://www.independent.org/article/2025/10/07/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-wolford-v-lopez/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.