Hubbry Logo
DentilDentilMain
Open search
Dentil
Community hub
Dentil
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Dentil
Dentil
from Wikipedia
Closeup of dentils, above a Corinthian order capital, Town Hall, Westport, Connecticut, U.S.
Long view of same

A dentil (from Lat. dens, a tooth[1]) is a small block used as a repeating ornament in the bedmould of a cornice.[2] Dentils are found in ancient Greek and Roman architecture, and also in later styles such as Neoclassical, Federal, Georgian Revival, Greek Revival, Renaissance Revival, Second Empire, and Beaux-Arts architecture.[3] Dentillation refers to use of a course of dentils.

History

[edit]

Origin

[edit]

The Roman architect Vitruvius (iv. 2) states that the dentil represents the end of a rafter (asser). It occurs in its most pronounced form in the Ionic temples of Asia Minor, the Lycian tombs, and the porticoes and tombs of Persia, where it clearly represents the reproduction in stone of timber construction. The earliest example is found carved into the rock of the tomb of Darius, c. 500 BC, reproducing the portico of his palace. Its first employment in Athens is in the cornice of the caryatid portico of the Erechtheum (480 BC). When subsequently introduced into the bed-mould of the cornice of the Choragic Monument of Lysicrates it is much smaller in its dimensions. In the later temples of Ionia, as in the temple of Priene, the larger scale of the dentil is still retained.[2]

Later use

[edit]

The dentil was the chief feature employed in the bedmould by the Romans and in the Italian Renaissance architecture. As a general rule, the projection of the dentil is equal to its width, thus appearing square, and the intervals between are half this measure. In some cases, the projecting band has never had the sinkings cut into it to divide up the dentils, as in the Pantheon at Rome, and it is then called a dentil-band. In the porch of the Studion cathedral at Constantinople, the dentil and the interval between are equal in width, and the interval is splayed back from top to bottom; this is the form it takes in what is known as the Venetian dentil, which was copied from the Byzantine dentil in Santa Sophia, Constantinople. There, however, it no longer formed part of a bed-mould: its use at Santa Sophia was to decorate the projecting moulding enclosing the encrusted marbles, and the dentils were cut alternately on both sides of the moulding. The Venetian dentil was also introduced as a label round arches and as a string course.[2]

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A dentil is one of a series of small projecting rectangular blocks forming a molding, particularly under a in . The term derives from the Latin word dens, meaning "," reflecting the tooth-like appearance of these evenly spaced, cube-shaped projections. Dentils originated in and Roman architecture, where they served as decorative elements in the bedmould of cornices, often in Ionic, Corinthian, and occasionally Doric orders, adding rhythm and visual depth to building facades. Early examples appear in structures like the in , dating to the Roman era around 135 AD. During the , architects revived dentil motifs as part of classical proportions, integrating them into entablatures to evoke antiquity and grandeur. In later styles, such as Georgian and Neoclassical, dentils continued as ornamental trim, typically crafted from wood, stone, or plaster, enhancing both interior moldings and exterior without significant structural function.

Definition and Characteristics

Physical Description

A dentil is defined as one of a series of small projecting rectangular blocks forming a molding, particularly under a cornice. These blocks resemble teeth and serve as a repeating ornamental element, typically square or rectangular in profile. In many modern and traditional configurations, dentils exhibit equal width and projection, appearing roughly square, with height (vertical dimension) equal to or slightly greater than the width to maintain proportion. In the classical per , the width is half the height and projection, with spaces one-third the projection. Representative examples include blocks measuring approximately 2.25 inches in width, 2.5 inches in height, spaced at intervals of 2.25 inches to produce a rhythmic, closely packed . Traditional spacing is often half the dentil's width, though variations equal to the width appear in certain styles. The typical profile features flat tops and straightforward rectangular forms, with the square dentil being the most common variation. Dentils are positioned within the bedmold of a , where their projecting undersides create a tooth-like effect along the .

Materials and Construction

Dentils are traditionally crafted from stone, such as or , where individual blocks are hand-carved using chisels to achieve the precise rectangular, tooth-like form required for ornamental consistency. In wooden constructions, dentils are typically produced by milling or sawing techniques, often employing a with a custom jig to cut uniform rectangular projections from solid stock, ensuring even spacing across the molding run. For interior applications, dentils are created through molding and casting processes, where liquid plaster is poured into reusable molds derived from original patterns, allowing for detailed replication and alignment of decorative elements like dentils in cornices. Modern adaptations have expanded material options to include prefabricated concrete blocks, which are cast in forms for durability in exterior settings, and synthetic polymers that offer lightweight alternatives to traditional stone. Precise replication is now facilitated by CNC machining, where computer-controlled tools mill dentil profiles from wood or polymer stock with high accuracy, reducing manual labor while maintaining uniformity in block dimensions and spacing. Attachment methods vary by material and context; stone and dentils are typically carved or cast as integral parts of the blocks and secured with mortar or during precast assembly, while wooden or versions are typically adhered to soffits using adhesives or mechanical fasteners to ensure secure, non-intrusive installation. Key challenges in dentil construction include achieving uniform spacing and alignment to prevent visual distortion, as inconsistencies in block projection or gaps can disrupt the rhythmic appearance essential to the feature's classical aesthetic.

Architectural Applications

Placement in Classical Orders

In , dentils are integrated into the primarily as ornamental elements within the , serving to enhance the horizontal composition while adhering to the proportional and stylistic principles of each order. Their placement varies by order, reflecting the evolving complexity from simplicity to elaboration in Greek and Roman design. While absent or minimal in the , dentils become more prominent in the Ionic and Corinthian orders, where they contribute to the rhythmic subdivision of the 's underside. In the , which emphasizes robust simplicity and structural clarity, dentils are rare or entirely absent, as the design prioritizes mutules aligned with triglyphs in the to evoke wooden beam ends without additional refinement. This restraint aligns with the order's origins in early Greek temples, where ornamentation is limited to essential elements like triglyphs and metopes; however, transitional or Roman-influenced Doric examples occasionally incorporate dentils sparingly in the bedmold to bridge toward more decorative styles. The features dentils prominently in the bedmold below the corona, arranged in a continuous row of small, evenly spaced blocks that add a layer of delicate refinement to the . As described by , this placement imitates the projections of common rafters in timber , positioned above mutules to maintain logical and avoiding placement beneath them to preserve authenticity in stone adaptations. In this order, dentils align loosely with the continuous , enhancing the overall elegance without the rigid spacing of Doric elements. In the Corinthian order, dentils appear elaborately on the underside of the corona, often combined with modillions—larger brackets spaced at intervals—to create layered ornamentation that underscores the order's luxurious character. This dual arrangement, with dentils filling spaces between modillions, amplifies the entablature's decorative depth, as seen in Roman examples where the combination supports richly sculpted . The placement here aligns dentils with metope-like divisions in the frieze for visual harmony. Dentils typically measure one-third the height of the , with their individual height equal to the middle , projection matching the height, and width half the height, while spaces between them are two-thirds the width; this proportioning ensures balanced projection equal to the vertical distance from to cymatium. Functionally, dentils provide visual by breaking the monotony of horizontal lines, introducing a toothy, repetitive that mimics wooden ends and imparts a sense of structural logic and aesthetic scale to the .

Use in Non-Classical Styles

In , dentils were integrated into pediments and to evoke classical while adapting to new proportions, often scaled down for balanced facades. For instance, in the Palazzo Riccardi in , dentils appear in the bed moldings of the , supporting modillions and enhancing the overall harmony of the structure. Similarly, at the Château de Blois in , dentils feature in deep along the , blended with Gothic elements like gargoyles for a transitional effect. In , such as the Holy Trinity Anglican in , dentils adorn the of galleries, modified from plain faciae to suit local stone and promote aesthetic proportion. Baroque and Rococo styles adapted dentils with exaggerated scales or combinations with scrolls for dramatic visual impact, frequently gilded to heighten opulence. In Baroque cornices, dentils were often replaced by large ledges for a bolder profile, as seen in the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg, where Ionic order entablatures omit traditional dentils in favor of simplified, emphatic moldings. Rococo examples further embellish dentils with intricate scrollwork, transforming them into flowing, asymmetrical motifs, though specific architectural instances emphasize their role in ornate interior cornices rather than strict exteriors. Neoclassical and employed dentils in eclectic facades, occasionally oversized for emphasis in public buildings to convey grandeur. Neoclassical designs commonly include dentil moldings beneath cornices and friezes, as in the United States Capitol Building, where they underscore classical symmetry in pediments and entablatures. In Victorian contexts, such as Italianate public structures like the Davies Building in Topeka, dentils appear in oversized cornices alongside brackets, amplifying decorative rhythm on facades. Contemporary uses of dentils simplify the motif for minimalist designs or employ it as ironic accents in postmodern contexts, particularly on urban retail facades to subvert classical expectations. In modern minimalist architecture, dentils serve as subtle crown molding accents, providing rhythmic texture without overwhelming clean lines. Postmodern examples incorporate dentil-like blocks ironically amid colorful, eclectic ornamentation to critique historical revivalism in commercial settings. Over time, dentils have shifted symbolically from mimicking structural rafter ends in classical origins, as described by , to purely decorative motifs in modern contexts, emphasizing aesthetic rhythm over any functional pretense. This evolution highlights their versatility as ornamental tools across stylistic boundaries.

Historical Development

Ancient Origins

The term "dentil" derives from the Latin denticulus, a diminutive of dens meaning "tooth," aptly describing the small, tooth-like rectangular blocks that form a repeating ornamental molding. This nomenclature reflects their visual resemblance to a row of teeth, a motif rooted in classical architectural decoration. Dentils first appeared in Greek architecture during the Archaic period, with evidence from terracotta temple models at in eastern dating to the BCE, predating more widespread use in the BCE. Scholars suggest they evolved from the exposed ends of wooden rafters in earlier timber-roofed structures, transitioning to stone as temples shifted from wood to durable materials like and . Initially serving a practical role in casting shadows to accentuate profiles, dentils became purely decorative, enhancing visual rhythm and depth in temple cornices. Potential precedents include molded projections in architecture or Etruscan decorative bands, though direct influences remain unproven due to lack of conclusive archaeological links. The Romans adopted and standardized dentils, particularly in the Ionic and Corinthian orders, as detailed in ' De Architectura (c. 30–15 BCE), where they are described as symbolic representations of rafter ends that contribute to the entablature's aesthetic harmony. Surviving instances from the Classical period feature dentils in Ionic entablatures, integrating with hybrid designs to exemplify early experimentation with these elements.

Revival and Modern Adaptations

The dentil experienced a significant revival during the , spurred by the rediscovery and study of ancient Roman texts such as Vitruvius's , which described classical ornamental elements including the dentil course in s. Italian architects like , in his influential treatise (1452), advocated for the integration of these antique motifs into contemporary designs, emphasizing proportion and harmony derived from Roman precedents. Alberti's own projects, such as the Palazzo Rucellai in (completed around 1460), featured dentil moldings in the cornice, marking one of the first post-antique uses of this element and helping to popularize it across as a of humanistic revival. By the 18th and 19th centuries, dentils proliferated in , reflecting a broader enthusiasm for classical revival amid Enlightenment ideals. In the , incorporated dentil moldings extensively in his designs, such as the crown moldings in Monticello's interiors and the entablatures at , drawing from Palladian influences to evoke republican virtue and symmetry. This expansion extended to colonial architecture throughout the , where dentils adorned public buildings and residences, underscoring European imperial aesthetics in new contexts. The saw a marked decline in dentil usage with the rise of , which rejected decorative ornament as superfluous and antithetical to functionalism, as articulated in Adolf Loos's 1908 essay Ornament and Crime. Post-World War II further diminished such elements in favor of minimalist forms, though dentils endured in initiatives to maintain authenticity in restored structures. In modern adaptations, dentils have resurged in , often crafted from durable, recyclable materials like high-density polyurethane or PVC composites that reduce environmental impact compared to traditional stone or wood. Digital tools, including CNC milling and software, enable precise customization for restoration projects, allowing architects to replicate historical dentils with minimal waste and enhanced accuracy. This revival also reflects cultural influences, as seen in neoclassical colonial buildings across —such as those in the and —where dentils blended European motifs with local adaptations during imperial eras.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.