Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Dryolestida
View on Wikipedia
| Dryolestida | |
|---|---|
| Skeleton of Henkelotherium | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Mammalia |
| Clade: | Cladotheria |
| Superorder: | †Dryolestoidea Butler, 1939 |
| Order: | †Dryolestida Prothero, 1981 |
| Families and genera | |
Dryolestida is an extinct order of mammals, known from the Jurassic and Cretaceous. They are considered basal members of the clade Cladotheria, close to the ancestry of therian mammals. It is also believed that they developed a fully mammalian jaw and also had the three middle ear bones. Most members of the group, as with most Mesozoic mammals, are only known from fragmentary tooth and jaw remains.
The group contains Dryolestidae and the possibly paraphyletic Paurodontidae, and some other unplaced genera, which were small insectivores, known from the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Laurasia, primarily Europe and North America, with a single record from Asia. During the Late Jurassic in North America and from the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous in Europe, they were among the most diverse mammal groups.[1] They have sometimes been placed as part of a broader group, the "Dryolestoidea", which typically includes Dryolestida and Meridiolestida, a diverse group of mammals including both small insectivores and mid-large sized herbivores known from the Late Cretaceous to Miocene of South America and possibly Antarctica. However, in many phylogenetic analyses, Meridiolestida are recovered as an unrelated group of basal cladotherians, rendering "Dryolestoidea" paraphyletic.[2]
Dryolestids were formerly considered part of Pantotheria and/or Eupantotheria. The clade Quirogatheria, erected by José Bonaparte in 1992, is often used as a synonym for Dryolestida. Originally, Quirogatheria was meant to include Brandoniidae, but this family is now included with the dryolestids.
Morphology
[edit]Dryolestids are mostly represented by teeth, fragmented dentaries and parts of the rostrum. The Jurassic forms retained a coronoid and splenial, but the Cretaceous forms lack these. Another primitive feature is the presence of a Meckelian groove (Meridiolestidans lost it altogether).[3] A fundamentally modern ear is known in at least Dryolestes and mesungulatids.[4][5]
The basal non dryolestid dryolestidan Henkelotherium from the Late Jurassic of Portugal is known from a partial articulated skeleton, and is thought to have been arboreal, adapted to climbing and living in trees.[6]
Tooth enamel evolved differently in marsupials and eutherians. In a first phase, during the late Triassic and Jurassic, prisms separated from the interprismatic matrix, probably independently in several Mesozoic mammal lineages. More derived enamel types evolved in a second phase, during the Tertiary and Quaternary, but without replacing the old prismatic enamel, instead forming various combinations of three-dimensional structures (called schmelzmuster). Dryolestid dentition is thought to resemble the primitive mammalian dentition before the marsupial-eutherian differentiation and dryolestids are candidates to be the last common ancestor of the two mammalian subclasses.[7] In mesungulatids molar tooth eruption is delayed compared to other dryolestoids.[8]
Distribution
[edit]Dryolestids are known from the Jurassic through Early Cretaceous of the Northern Hemisphere (North America, Eurasia, and North Africa) and from the Late Cretaceous through to the Miocene of South America.[3] Drylestoids are very rarely found in the Cenozoic, as are the few other Mesozoic mammals with later descendants, such as multituberculates, monotremes, and gondwanatheres.[9]
The oldest named member of Dryolestidae is Anthracolestes from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) aged Itat Formation in western Siberia.[10] Fragmentary remains attributable to dryolestidans are known from the equivalently aged Forest Marble Formation of England[11] and the Anoual Formation of Morocco.[12]
The youngests fossils of Dryolestidans in the Northern Hemisphere are the dryolestids Crusafontia cuencana from Uña and the Camarillas Formation, Spain and Minutolestes submersus and Beckumia sinemeckelia from Balve, Germany, which all date to the Barremian-Aptian stages of the Early Cretaceous,[13] though a fragmentary lower molar from the late Cretaceous Mesaverde Formation in Wyoming has been tentatively attributed to Dryolestidae.[14] In South America, by contrast, Meridiolestida thrived in the Late Cretaceous, diversifying in a myriad of forms such as the saber-toothed Cronopio and the herbivorous mesungulatids, becoming some of the most ecologically diverse Mesozoic South American mammals.[15] Groebertherium from the Late Cretaceous of South America has a more primitive morphology similar to Northern Hemisphere dryolestids and may be more closely related to the North Hemisphere dryloestidans than to Meridiolestida.[16]
With the advent of the Cenozoic, dryolestoids declined drastically in diversity, with only the large dog-sized herbivore Peligrotherium being known from the Palaeocene. The exact reasons for this decline are not clear; most likely they simply did not recover from the K-Pg event. Nonetheless, meridiolestidans would continue to survive until the Miocene, from when Necrolestes is known; a gap of 50 million years exists between it and Peligrotherium.[17] A tooth fragment, now lost, found in the Eocene aged La Meseta Formation of the Antarctic peninsula, is possibly a meridiolestidan.[18]
Taxonomy
[edit]A phylogenetic analysis conducted by Rougier et al. (2012) indicated that meridiolestidans might not be members of Dryolestoidea but instead slightly more closely related to the placental mammals, marsupials and amphitheriids. Paurodontids were also recovered as not belonging to Dryolestida, but instead as a sister group of Meridiolestida in this analysis.[19] An analysis conducted by Averianov, Martin and Lopatin (2013) did not recover meridiolestidans as members of Dryolestida as well, but it found them to be the sister group of spalacotheriid "symmetrodonts" instead. However, paurodontids were recovered as members of Dryolestida in this analysis.[20] On the other hand, an analysis conducted by Chimento, Agnolin and Novas (2012) did recover meridiolestidans as members of Dryolestoidea.[21]
Cladogram after Lasseron and colleagues (2022), which found Donodontidae and Meridiolestida unrelated to Dryolestida:[2]
| Cladotheria |
| ||||||||||||
References
[edit]- ^ Martin, Thomas; Averianov, Alexander O.; Schultz, Julia A.; Schwermann, Achim H.; Wings, Oliver (2021-05-16). "A derived dryolestid mammal indicates possible insular endemism in the Late Jurassic of Germany". The Science of Nature. 108 (3): 23. Bibcode:2021SciNa.108...23M. doi:10.1007/s00114-021-01719-z. ISSN 0028-1042. PMC 8126546. PMID 33993371.
- ^ a b Lasseron, Maxime; Martin, Thomas; Allain, Ronan; Haddoumi, Hamid; Jalil, Nour-Eddine; Zouhri, Samir; Gheerbrant, Emmanuel (2022-06-02). "An African Radiation of 'Dryolestoidea' (Donodontidae, Cladotheria) and its Significance for Mammalian Evolution". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 29 (4): 733–761. doi:10.1007/s10914-022-09613-9. ISSN 1064-7554. S2CID 249324444.
- ^ a b Kielan-Jaworowska, Cifelli & Luo 2004, pp. 14, 375, 379–380
- ^ Rougier, Guillermo W. (2009). "Mammals from the Allen Formation, Late Cretaceous, Argentina". Cretaceous Research. 30 (1): 223–238. Bibcode:2009CrRes..30..223R. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2008.07.006. hdl:11336/103413.
- ^ ZHE-XI, LUO; RUF; Irina; Martin, Thomas (2012). "The petrosal and inner ear of the Late Jurassic cladotherian mammal Dryolestes leiriensis and implications for ear evolution in therian mammals". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 166 (2): 433–463. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00852.x.
- ^ Jäger, K. R. K.; Luo, Z.-X.; Martin, T. (2020-09-01). "Postcranial Skeleton of Henkelotherium guimarotae (Cladotheria, Mammalia) and Locomotor Adaptation". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 27 (3): 349–372. doi:10.1007/s10914-018-09457-2. ISSN 1573-7055. S2CID 145881918.
- ^ von Koenigswald 2000, p. 107
- ^ Martinelli, Agustín G.; Soto-Acuña, Sergio; Goin, Francisco J.; et al. (7 April 2021). "New cladotherian mammal from southern Chile and the evolution of mesungulatid meridiolestidans at the dusk of the Mesozoic era". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 7594. Bibcode:2021NatSR..11.7594M. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87245-4. PMC 8027844. PMID 33828193.
- ^ Rose 2006, pp. 335–6
- ^ Averianov, Alexander O.; Martin, Thomas; Lopatin, Alexey (2014-06-07). "The oldest dryolestid mammal from the Middle Jurassic of Siberia". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 34 (4): 924–931. Bibcode:2014JVPal..34..924A. doi:10.1080/02724634.2014.837471. ISSN 0272-4634. S2CID 85070390.
- ^ Freeman, E. F. 1979. A Middle Jurassic mammal bed from Oxfordshire. Palaeontology 22:135–166.
- ^ Haddoumi, Hamid; Allain, Ronan; Meslouh, Said; Metais, Grégoire; Monbaron, Michel; Pons, Denise; Rage, Jean-Claude; Vullo, Romain; Zouhri, Samir (January 2016). "Guelb el Ahmar (Bathonian, Anoual Syncline, eastern Morocco): First continental flora and fauna including mammals from the Middle Jurassic of Africa" (PDF). Gondwana Research. 29 (1): 290–319. Bibcode:2016GondR..29..290H. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2014.12.004. ISSN 1342-937X.
- ^ Martin, Thomas; Averianov, Alexander; Schultz, Julia; Schellhorn, Rico; Schwermann, Achim (2022). "First spalacotheriid and dryolestid mammals from the Cretaceous of Germany". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 67. doi:10.4202/app.00914.2021. S2CID 247876132.
- ^ Lillegraven, J.A. and McKenna, M.C. 1986. Fossil mammals from the “Mesaverde” Formation (Late Cretaceous, Judithian) of the Bighorn and Wind River basins, Wyoming, with definitions of Late Cretaceous North American land-mammal “ages”. American Museum Novitates 2840: 1–68.
- ^ Rougier et al. 2009, p. 208.
- ^ Harper T, Parras A, Rougier GW. 2018. Reigitherium (Meridiolestida, Mesungulatoidea) an enigmatic Late Cretaceous mammal from Patagonia, Argentina: morphology, affinities, and dental evolution. Journal of Mammalian Evolution.
- ^ Florentino Ameghino (1891). "Nuevos restos de mamíferos fósiles descubiertos por Carlos Ameghino en el Eoceno inferior de la Patagonia austral. Especies nuevas, adiciones y correciones". Revista Argentina de Historia Natural. 1: 289–328.
- ^ Gelfo, J. N.; Bausza, N.; Reguero, M. (2019). "The fossil record of Antarctic land mammals: commented review and hypotheses for future research". Advances in Polar Science: 274–292. Archived from the original on 2022-01-06. Retrieved 2020-12-07.
- ^ Rougier, Guillermo W.; Wible, John R.; Beck, Robin M. D.; Apesteguía, Sebastian (2012). "The Miocene mammal Necrolestes demonstrates the survival of a Mesozoic nontherian lineage into the late Cenozoic of South America". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (49): 20053–20058. Bibcode:2012PNAS..10920053R. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212997109. PMC 3523863. PMID 23169652.
- ^ Averianov, Alexander O.; Martin, Thomas; Lopatin, Alexey V. (2013). "A new phylogeny for basal Trechnotheria and Cladotheria and affinities of South American endemic Late Cretaceous mammals". Naturwissenschaften. 100 (4): 311–326. Bibcode:2013NW....100..311A. doi:10.1007/s00114-013-1028-3. PMID 23494201. S2CID 18504005.
- ^ Nicolás R. Chimento, Federico L. Agnolin and Fernando E. Novas (2012). "The Patagonian fossil mammal Necrolestes: a Neogene survivor of Dryolestoidea" (PDF). Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. Nueva Serie. 14 (2): 261–306. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-11-04. Retrieved 2013-03-21.
Works cited
[edit]- von Koenigswald, Wighart (2000). "Two different strategies in enamel differentiation: Marsupialia versus Eutheria". In Teaford, Mark F; Smith, Moya Meredith; Ferguson, Mark WJ (eds.). Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-511-06568-2.
- Rougier, Guillermo W.; Forasiepi, Analía M.; Hill, Robert V.; Novacek, Michael (June 2009). "New Mammalian Remains from the Late Cretaceous La Colonia Formation, Patagonia, Argentina". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 54 (2): 195–212. doi:10.4202/app.2006.0026. S2CID 54027098.
- Rose, K.D. (2006). The Beginning of the Age of Mammals. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-8472-6.
Further reading
[edit]- Kielan-Jaworowska, Zofia; Cifelli, Richard L; Luo, Zhe-Xi (2004). Mammals from the Age of Dinosaurs: Origins, Evolution, and Structure. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 14, 379–393. ISBN 978-0-231-11918-4.
- The Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Prehistoric World page 344
Dryolestida
View on GrokipediaEtymology and definition
Name origin
The taxon Dryolestida derives its name from the genus Dryolestes, established by American paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh in 1878 for the type species Dryolestes priscus. This species was based on isolated dental remains recovered from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation in Colorado, USA.[6] The genus name Dryolestes combines two Greek roots: drys (δρῦς), meaning "oak tree," and lestes (λῃστής), meaning "robber" or "pirate."[7] Originally classified within the family Dryolestidae, which Marsh named in 1880 as part of his broader grouping Pantotheria, the taxon expanded to the ordinal level as Dryolestida in 1981 through the work of Donald R. Prothero, who redefined it to include non-tribosphenic therians beyond the initial family scope. Dryolestida is now recognized as a clade encompassing the families Dryolestidae and Paurodontidae, as well as the derived South American group Meridiolestida.Diagnostic characteristics
Dryolestida are distinguished by several key synapomorphies that define their position as basal cladotherians, including an elongated rostrum adapted for precise feeding maneuvers. Upper molars exhibit a specialized pre-tribosphenic pattern characterized by a reduced paracone, a prominent stylocone formed by expansion of the paracrista, and enhanced shearing crests, with the occlusal outline wider transversely than long (L/W ratio typically <0.75).[2] Lower molars feature unilaterally hypsodont crowns, a small unicuspid talonid lacking a basin, and unequal roots where the distal root is smaller than the mesial one, promoting efficient carnassial-like occlusion.[2] These dental traits emphasize shearing over grinding, contrasting with the more symmetric, triangular molars of symmetrodontans, which have balanced trigonid and talonid basins and typically 5–6 molars per quadrant.[2] In terms of dentition count, Dryolestida exhibit variation in the number of molars (3–9 per quadrant depending on the subfamily), with Dryolestidae and Paurodontidae typically having more (7–9) than Meridiolestida (3–4), compared to the 5–6 in many symmetrodontans, reflecting a streamlined occlusal battery suited to their niche.[5][2] A median cusp row on upper molars indicates early protocone development, but without the full basined talonid or hypocone expansion seen in therians, marking their basal status within Cladotheria where dental replacement is reduced and angular process orientation shifts posteriorly.[2] Members of Dryolestida exhibit a small body size, typically ranging from 10 to 50 cm in total length, with a shrew-like or rodent-like build featuring slender limbs and adaptations for agile terrestrial or scansorial locomotion. Their dentition and cranial proportions suggest primarily insectivorous diets, with robust shearing capabilities for processing hard-shelled prey, though some taxa show trends toward omnivory in later forms.[1]Anatomy
Cranial features
The cranium of dryolestids exhibits an elongate, low-roofed structure, reflecting adaptations for sensory functions in a Mesozoic environment. In the derived dryolestoid Cronopio dentiacutus from the early Late Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina, the partial skull reveals an elongated and narrow cranium with a primitive overall architecture compared to more advanced therian mammals.[8] The facial region is dominated by a long, narrow snout that extends anteriorly, providing space for sensory structures. In Cronopio dentiacutus, the snout is markedly elongated, suggesting specialization for probing or detecting prey at close range.[8] This morphology aligns with inferred enhancements in olfaction, as the elongate rostrum would accommodate expanded olfactory bulbs relative to the small overall brain size typical of Mesozoic mammals.[8] Cranial remains of Dryolestida are generally fragmentary, underscoring a conserved cranial plan with primitive features across the clade. These traits collectively highlight dryolestid adaptations for sensory acuity and masticatory efficiency.Dentition
The dentition of Dryolestida is characterized by a specialized, pretribosphenic molar pattern adapted primarily for shearing, reflecting a diet likely centered on insects, small vertebrates, or tough plant material. Upper molars are transversely wide and mesio-distally compressed, often exhibiting a reversed triangular configuration of the primary trigon formed by the paracone, stylocone, and metacone, with the apex oriented buccally. In many taxa, the metacone is reduced or absent, enhancing the prominence of buccal cusps like the stylocone, which functions as a shearing blade. Prominent crests, including the ectocrista (connecting the paracone to the stylocone) and preparacrista, facilitate precise occlusion with lower teeth during the power stroke, promoting efficient cutting and minimal grinding. This morphology, seen in genera like Dryolestes and Hercynodon, underscores a functional emphasis on transverse jaw movement for processing resilient foods, distinct from the more versatile tribosphenic dentition of derived therians.[9][2][9] Lower molars complement this arrangement with a well-developed trigonid basin defined by a tall protoconid and paraconid, forming a V-shaped shearing platform that aligns with upper crests for embrasure occlusion. The talonid is shallow and narrow, often bearing a single hypoconulid and limited basin depth, which restricts grinding capabilities and prioritizes slicing over crushing. Dryolestida exhibit a reduced number of lower molars compared to more basal mammaliaforms, typically ranging from 3 to 7 depending on the taxon, allowing for a compact jaw optimized for rapid, forceful bites. Wear patterns reveal dentine exposure along the protocristid and paracristid due to thin enamel, indicating heavy attrition from tooth-to-tooth contact during mastication of fibrous or chitinous items. This setup, evident in specimens from the Morrison Formation, implies a carnivorous to insectivorous paleoecology, with the shallow talonid providing secondary support for initial food breakdown.[9][10] Heterodonty in Dryolestida is pronounced, featuring enlarged caniniform canines for piercing and grasping prey, alongside multicusped premolars that bridge the transition to molars with increasing complexity in cusp arrangement. Premolars often display 2-3 accessory cusps, aiding in initial food manipulation before molar processing. The enamel is thin, contributing to distinctive wear patterns observed in the clade.[9]Postcranial skeleton
The postcranial skeleton of Dryolestida is incompletely known across the clade, with the most detailed information derived from the nearly complete articulated skeleton of Henkelotherium guimarotae from the Late Jurassic of Portugal, serving as a key representative for reconstructing features in other dryolestids.[11] The axial skeleton exhibits primitive therian characteristics adapted for a small-bodied, agile form. It comprises seven cervical vertebrae, which are relatively elongated and opisthocoelous, with neural spines inclined at approximately 45 degrees, facilitating a flexible neck for maneuverability.[11] The thoracic region includes 13 vertebrae bearing ribs, forming a compact thorax that supports efficient respiration in a diminutive animal estimated at around 11 cm in presacral length.[11] The lumbar series consists of five to six vertebrae, contributing to trunk flexibility, while two sacral vertebrae anchor the pelvis, and an elongated tail of at least 15 slender caudal vertebrae likely aided in balance.[11] Forelimb elements indicate adaptations for versatile locomotion. The scapula measures about 10.2 mm in length and features a laterally flared acromion process and crest, providing robust attachment sites for deltoid and other shoulder muscles.[11] The humerus (11.6 mm long) has a spherical head, pronounced entepicondyle, and trochlear condyles, while the radius (11.5 mm) and ulna (14.3 mm) are slender and slightly curved, suggesting elongated forelimbs suited to cursorial or scansorial habits; the manus follows the primitive therian phalangeal formula of 2-3-3-3-3, with prominent flexor tubercles on phalanges for grasping.[11][12] The pelvic girdle and hindlimbs emphasize hindquarter strength. The ilium (11.7 mm) is elongated and flared distally, accommodating gluteal muscle attachments for powerful propulsion.[11] The unfused pelvic bones include a short ischium (5.7 mm) and epipubis (5.3 mm). The femur (15.8 mm) bears a spherical head with a 30-degree neck angle and prominent trochanters, including a third trochanter for iliopsoas and other flexor attachments, consistent with agile terrestrial or arboreal capabilities; the tibia (13.8 mm) is robust and sigmoidal, the fibula (12.8 mm) slender, and the pes shows a phalangeal index of 153%, reflecting elongated digits for climbing.[11]Systematics
Taxonomic history
The taxonomic history of Dryolestida begins with the description of initial fossils from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation in North America by Othniel Charles Marsh, who in 1880 established the order Pantotheria to encompass these nontribosphenic mammals, including the genus Dryolestes as a key example. Marsh's classification grouped them with other Mesozoic mammals based on shared dental features, marking the first formal recognition of the group. In the late 20th century, Donald R. Prothero revised the taxonomy in 1981, elevating Dryolestidae to the order Dryolestida and distinguishing it from other "pantothere" groups through phylogenetic analysis of Jurassic specimens from Wyoming, emphasizing their unique molar morphology and interrelationships among non-tribosphenic therians. This separation highlighted Dryolestida's distinct evolutionary trajectory within Mesozoic mammals. Later, Malcolm C. McKenna in 1975 incorporated Dryolestida into the supercohort Eupantotheria as a basal component of Cladotheria, based on comparative studies of mammalian phylogeny that integrated fossil and morphological data. A significant shift occurred in 2004 with the comprehensive synthesis by Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska, Richard L. Cifelli, and Zhe-Xi Luo, who positioned Dryolestida as stem cladotherians in their influential monograph on mammalian evolution, drawing on updated cladistic analyses of cranial and dental traits to refine their placement relative to tribosphenic mammals. Post-2010 discoveries have expanded the recognized diversity of Dryolestida in Gondwana, revealing a broader southern hemisphere radiation previously underrepresented in the fossil record. Notably, analyses in 2022 by Florian Lasseron and colleagues erected the family Donodontidae based on abundant specimens from Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous African sites in Morocco, such as the Ksar Metlili Formation, integrating these into cladotherian phylogenies to underscore Dryolestida's global extent and adaptive radiation.[13]Accepted classification
Dryolestida is classified as an extinct order within the clade Cladotheria, a group of Mesozoic mammals characterized by advanced dental and cranial features relative to earlier mammaliamorphs. The order encompasses the families Dryolestidae and Paurodontidae, as well as the derived South American clade Meridiolestida, reflecting a Laurasian-Gondwanan distribution with diverse molar morphologies adapted for shearing and grinding. Recent phylogenetic analyses (as of 2024) suggest that the broader superfamily Dryolestoidea, traditionally including these groups, may be paraphyletic, with Donodontidae forming a separate African clade more closely related to Zatheria than to Dryolestida.[13][14] Dryolestidae, the nominal family, includes genera such as Dryolestes (type species D. priscus from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation) and Henkelotherium (from the Late Jurassic of Portugal), known for their high molar counts (up to 7–9) and robust lower jaws. Paurodontidae comprises genera like Paurodon (from the Late Jurassic of North America) and Drescheratherium (from the Early Cretaceous of Germany), distinguished by narrower, more elongate molars with reduced cusp complexity compared to dryolestids. Meridiolestida includes Gondwanan forms such as Mesungulatum from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia, with bunodont postcanines adapted for herbivory. Donodontidae, a related dryolestoid group from Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Africa, includes genera like Donodon (type species D. prescriptoris), Stylodens, Anoualestes, and Amazighodon, featuring transversely wide molars suited for insectivory.[13] Approximately 20 valid genera are currently recognized across Dryolestida, incorporating synonymies from Jurassic European assemblages, such as the consolidation of provisional taxa like Amphitherium fragments into established dryolestid species based on shared root and cusp patterns. These revisions stem from micro-CT analyses revealing previously overlooked dental homologies. In recent phylogenetic analyses, Dryolestidae and Paurodontidae are recovered as a monophyletic group sister to Zatheria (encompassing Tribosphenida), with Meridiolestida as a derived clade within Dryolestida. This arrangement renders traditional Dryolestoidea paraphyletic, supported by character matrices emphasizing postcranial and dental traits from 2021–2024 studies.[13][14]Phylogeny
Position in Mammalia
Dryolestida occupies a basal position within the mammalian clade Cladotheria, serving as the sister group to Zatheria, which encompasses Tribosphenida (including crown therians: Marsupialia + Placentalia) and Meridiolestida. This placement is supported by phylogenetic analyses that recover Dryolestida as stem cladotherians, characterized by dental features transitional between more primitive Mesozoic mammals and the fully tribosphenic dentition of crown therians.[15] Specifically, dryolestidans exhibit upper and lower molars with a non-tribosphenic occlusal pattern, including a reversed triangular upper molar lacking a distinct protocone and a simple talonid heel on lowers for enhanced shearing functions, but they lack the entoconid cusp on the lower talonid that is diagnostic of zatherians (the clade including Tribosphenida).[9] Within the broader Mesozoic mammalian radiation, Dryolestida is more derived than eutriconodontans, which represent a separate, non-therian lineage with multicuspidate, transversely aligned molars suited for carnivory rather than the more versatile tribosphenic system. However, dryolestidans remain basal to crown Theria, positioned outside the therian total group but sharing key synapomorphies of Cladotheria, such as reduced premolar count and angular jaw morphology.[16] The divergence of Dryolestida from the lineage leading to Tribosphenida is estimated to have occurred in the Middle Jurassic, around 170 million years ago, based on the appearance of the oldest known dryolestid fossils and their use as minimum constraints in molecular clock analyses.[17] Fossil evidence from Middle Jurassic localities, such as the Itat Formation in Siberia and the Anoual Syncline in Morocco, provides direct calibration points for these divergence estimates, confirming a Jurassic origin for Dryolestida and supporting molecular clock models that place the initial cladotherian radiation in this period.[16][18] These analyses integrate fossil constraints with genomic data from extant mammals, yielding consistent timelines for therian origins that align with the paleontological record of early cladotherians.[17]Relationships within Dryolestoidea
The internal phylogeny of Dryolestoidea remains contentious, with recent analyses indicating that the superfamily is paraphyletic, encompassing a diverse array of Jurassic and Cretaceous cladotherians but excluding or variably including Meridiolestida depending on character scoring and taxon sampling.[19] In matrices incorporating dental and cranial characters from micro-CT scans of new specimens, Dryolestida—traditionally comprising families like Dryolestidae and Paurodontidae—forms a grade leading toward Zatheria, the clade uniting therians and their closest fossil relatives.[13] Key synapomorphies supporting these groupings include a high mandibular molar count (typically 7–9), a unique talonid structure with a single prominent cusp, and zalambdodont-like upper molars lacking a protocone, though these features vary across subgroups and contribute to debates over monophyly.[19] If Meridiolestida (e.g., genera like Cronopio and Necrolestes) is nested within Dryolestoidea as a derived gondwanan offshoot, Dryolestida sensu stricto becomes paraphyletic; conversely, excluding Meridiolestida renders Dryolestida more cohesive but still a basal assemblage within the superfamily.[13] Phylogenetic branches within Dryolestoidea reflect a Laurasian Jurassic radiation dominated by Dryolestidae, which occupies a basal position in most cladograms as the earliest diverging dryolestoids, exemplified by taxa like Dryolestes priscus from the Morrison Formation.[19] This early diversification in northern continents contrasts with a later Gondwanan Cretaceous expansion involving Paurodontidae and related forms, which exhibit narrower molars and similar high molar counts (typically 7 or more) compared to dryolestids, suggesting adaptive shifts toward insectivory in southern ecosystems. Recent 2022–2024 analyses, drawing on expanded datasets with over 300 characters and micro-CT-derived 3D reconstructions of African and Patagonian fossils, further highlight the role of endemic radiations, such as the Moroccan Donodontidae, positioned as a monophyletic clade near the base of Dryolestoidea but sister to more derived prototribosphenidans rather than a strict outgroup.[13] These studies, using parsimony-based approaches in software like TNT, yield strict consensus trees with low to moderate support (Bremer indices of 1–3), underscoring unresolved polytomies but affirming Donodontidae's contribution to an early African diversification within the superfamily.[19] A simplified cladogram from these integrated analyses places Dryolestidae as the sister group to a polytomy including Paurodontidae, Donodontidae, and the meridiolestidan-Zatheria lineage, with the latter branching later in the Cretaceous.[13] This topology implies a complex biogeographic history, where Laurasian basal forms gave way to gondwanan and African innovations, potentially influencing the broader placement of Dryolestoidea as a stem clade to crown Theria within Mammalia.[19]Biogeography and paleoecology
Temporal range
Dryolestida first appeared in the fossil record during the Middle Jurassic, with the earliest known specimens dating to approximately 168 million years ago in the Bathonian stage. These initial records come from the Kirtlington Quarry in the United Kingdom, where isolated teeth and jaw fragments represent basal dryolestids.[20] This early presence marks the onset of dryolestidan diversification within Laurasian ecosystems, shortly after the emergence of their broader clade, Dryolestoidea.[5] The group achieved its peak diversity during the Late Jurassic, specifically in the Kimmeridgian and Tithonian stages (approximately 157–145 million years ago), particularly in Laurasian continents where dryolestids formed a significant component of mammalian faunas alongside docodonts and other holotherians. In contrast, Gondwanan records show a later peak in the Late Cretaceous, from the Campanian to Maastrichtian stages (about 83–66 million years ago), with diverse forms such as meridiolestidans dominating southern assemblages in formations like the Allen Formation of Patagonia. This temporal shift highlights a Laurasian-Jurassic radiation followed by a Gondwanan-Cretaceous expansion, reflecting continental drift and ecological opportunities.[5] Dryolestida are generally considered to have gone extinct at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary around 66 million years ago, coinciding with the global mass extinction event that profoundly impacted Mesozoic mammals. However, there is evidence for post-K-Pg survival in South America, including the early Paleocene Peligrotherium tropicalis from Patagonian deposits, interpreted as a dryolestidan relic.[10] Further extension into the Miocene with Necrolestes patagonensis, a surviving dryolestidan (meridiolestid) into the early Miocene of Patagonia.[21] Phylogenetic estimates place the dryolestidan origin slightly earlier than the oldest fossils, around the Early-Middle Jurassic transition.[5]Geographic distribution
Dryolestids were initially widespread across Laurasia during the Late Jurassic, with significant fossil records from North America, Europe, and Asia. In North America, specimens such as Dryolestes priscus have been recovered from the Morrison Formation in Wyoming, representing one of the most diverse assemblages of Jurassic mammals.[22] In Europe, fossils including isolated molars attributed to Laolestes andresi occur in the Lourinhã Formation of Portugal, highlighting a shared faunal province with contemporaneous North American sites.[23] Asian occurrences are exemplified by the oldest known dryolestid, Anthracolestes sergeii from the Middle Jurassic Itat Formation in Siberia, indicating an early diversification in the region.[16] A marked Gondwanan radiation of dryolestids emerged by the Late Cretaceous, particularly in South America, where they became dominant components of mammalian faunas. Key localities include the Allen Formation in Río Negro Province, Argentina, yielding diverse dryolestoid taxa such as Cronopio dentiacutus and others based on isolated teeth and jaw fragments. In Patagonia, additional records come from the Cañadón Seco Formation in Chubut Province, contributing to the understanding of late Mesozoic diversification in the region.[24] Recent discoveries in Africa further support this southern expansion, with donodontid dryolestoids from the Ksar Metlili Formation in the High Atlas Mountains of Morocco, dated to the Tithonian–Berriasian, representing over 34% of the site's mammalian specimens and indicating an endemic African clade.[4] Biogeographic patterns suggest vicariance driven by the breakup of Pangaea as the primary mechanism for dryolestid dispersal, with Laurasian and Gondwanan lineages diverging by the Middle Jurassic while maintaining distinct radiations thereafter.[4] No confirmed records exist from Australia or Antarctica, underscoring a biogeographic gap in these southern Gondwanan landmasses despite their proximity to South American sites.[1]Ecological inferences
Dryolestids and paurodontids, the core families of Dryolestida, exhibited dentition adapted for a primarily insectivorous diet, with shearing molars featuring high protocones and basined talonids suited to crushing insect exoskeletons and other small prey.[25] This plesiomorphic condition for dryolestoids underscores their role as generalist feeders in Mesozoic ecosystems. Some paurodontids displayed more specialized blade-like premolars and sectorial teeth, potentially indicating a shift toward carnivory or consumption of tougher prey items compared to the basal dryolestid condition.[26] Locomotor adaptations in Dryolestida suggest scansorial habits during the Jurassic, particularly in forested or wooded environments of Laurasia, where elongated limbs and grasping phalanges in related forms like donodontids facilitated tree-climbing and arboreal foraging.[27] By the Cretaceous, dryolestidans transitioned to more terrestrial lifestyles in floodplain and fluvial settings of Gondwana and Laurasia, sharing habitats with diverse dinosaur assemblages in formations such as the Allen Formation of Patagonia.[25] Dryolestida occupied niche spaces often marginal in Mesozoic mammalian faunas dominated by multituberculates or eutriconodontans, appearing rare or absent in Central Asian and some North American assemblages despite intensive sampling.[16] Their late Mesozoic decline coincided with the radiation of early therians, potentially reflecting competitive exclusion in small-mammal guilds as therian tribosphenic dentition enabled broader dietary versatility.[28]References
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dryolestidae_molars.jpg
