Hubbry Logo
SkullSkullMain
Open search
Skull
Community hub
Skull
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Skull
Skull
Skull
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Skull
Volume rendering of a mouse skull
Details
SystemSkeletal system
Identifiers
MeSHD012886
FMA54964
Anatomical terminology

The skull, or cranium, is typically a bony enclosure around the brain of a vertebrate.[1][2] In some fish, and amphibians, the skull is of cartilage. The skull is at the head end of the vertebrate.

In the human, the skull comprises two prominent parts: the neurocranium and the facial skeleton,[3] which evolved from the first pharyngeal arch. The skull forms the frontmost portion of the axial skeleton and is a product of cephalization and vesicular enlargement of the brain, with several special senses structures such as the eyes, ears, nose, tongue and, in fish, specialized tactile organs such as barbels near the mouth.[4]

The skull is composed of three types of bone: cranial bones, facial bones and ossicles, which is made up of a number of fused flat and irregular bones. The cranial bones are joined at firm fibrous junctions called sutures and contains many foramina, fossae, processes, and sinuses. In zoology, the openings in the skull are called fenestrae, the most prominent of which is the foramen magnum, where the brainstem goes through to join the spinal cord.

In human anatomy, the neurocranium (or braincase), is further divided into the calvaria and the endocranium, together forming a cranial cavity that houses the brain. The interior periosteum forms part of the dura mater, the facial skeleton and splanchnocranium with the mandible being its largest bone. The mandible articulates with the temporal bones of the neurocranium at the paired temporomandibular joints. The skull itself articulates with the spinal column at the atlanto-occipital joint. The human skull fully develops two years after birth.

Functions of the skull include physical protection for the brain, providing attachments for neck muscles, facial muscles and muscles of mastication, providing fixed eye sockets and outer ears (ear canals and auricles) to enable stereoscopic vision and sound localisation, forming nasal and oral cavities that allow better olfaction, taste and digestion, and contributing to phonation by acoustic resonance within the cavities and sinuses. In some animals such as ungulates and elephants, the skull also has a function in anti-predator defense and sexual selection by providing the foundation for horns, antlers and tusks.

The English word skull is probably derived from Old Norse skulle,[5] while the Latin word cranium comes from the Greek root κρανίον (kranion).

Structure

[edit]

Humans

[edit]
For details and the constituent bones, see Neurocranium and Facial skeleton.
Skull in situ
Human head skull from side
Anatomy of a flat bone – the periosteum of the neurocranium is known as the pericranium
Human skull from the front
Side bones of skull

The human skull is the bone structure that forms the head in the human skeleton. It supports the structures of the face and forms a cavity for the brain. Like the skulls of other vertebrates, it protects the brain from injury.[6]

The skull consists of three parts, of different embryological origin—the neurocranium, the sutures, and the facial skeleton. The neurocranium (or braincase) forms the protective cranial cavity that surrounds and houses the brain and brainstem.[7] The upper areas of the cranial bones form the calvaria (skullcap). The facial skeleton (membranous viscerocranium) is formed by the bones supporting the face, and includes the mandible.

The bones of the skull are joined by fibrous joints known as sutures—synarthrodial (immovable) joints formed by bony ossification, with Sharpey's fibres permitting some flexibility. Sometimes there can be extra bone pieces within the suture known as Wormian bones or sutural bones. Most commonly these are found in the course of the lambdoid suture.

Bones

[edit]
Main article: Bone

The human skull is generally considered to consist of 22 bones—eight cranial bones and fourteen facial skeleton bones. In the neurocranium these are the occipital bone, two temporal bones, two parietal bones, the sphenoid, ethmoid and frontal bones.

The bones of the facial skeleton (14) are the vomer, two inferior nasal conchae, two nasal bones, two maxilla, the mandible, two palatine bones, two zygomatic bones, and two lacrimal bones. Some sources count a paired bone as one, or the maxilla as having two bones (as its parts); some sources include the hyoid bone or the three ossicles of the middle ear, the malleus, incus, and stapes, but the overall general consensus of the number of bones in the human skull is the stated twenty-two.

Some of these bones—the occipital, parietal, frontal, in the neurocranium, and the nasal, lacrimal, and vomer, in the facial skeleton are flat bones.

Cavities and foramina

[edit]
CT scan of a human skull in 3D

The skull also contains sinuses, air-filled cavities known as paranasal sinuses, and numerous foramina. The sinuses are lined with respiratory epithelium. Their known functions are the lessening of the weight of the skull, the aiding of resonance to the voice and the warming and moistening of the air drawn into the nasal cavity.

The foramina are openings in the skull. The largest of these is the foramen magnum, of the occipital bone, that allows the passage of the spinal cord as well as nerves and blood vessels.

Processes

[edit]

The many processes of the skull include the mastoid process and the zygomatic processes.

Other vertebrates

[edit]

Fenestrae

[edit]
Chimpanzee skull

The fenestrae (from Latin, meaning windows) are openings in the skull.

Bones

[edit]

The jugal is a skull bone that found in most of the reptiles, amphibians and birds. In mammals, the jugal is often called the zygomatic bone or malar bone.[8]

The prefrontal bone is a bone that separates the lacrimal and frontal bones in many tetrapod skulls.

Fish

[edit]
Fish head parts, 1889, Fauna of British India, Sir Francis Day

The skull of fish is formed from a series of only loosely connected bones. Lampreys and sharks only possess a cartilaginous endocranium, with both the upper jaw and the lower jaws being separate elements. Bony fishes have additional dermal bone, forming a more or less coherent skull roof in lungfish and holost fish. The lower jaw defines the chin.

The simpler structure is found in jawless fish, in which the cranium is normally represented by a trough-like basket of cartilaginous elements only partially enclosing the brain, and associated with the capsules for the inner ears and the single nostril. Distinctively, these fish have no jaws.[9]

Cartilaginous fish, such as sharks and rays, have also simple, and presumably primitive, skull structures. The cranium is a single structure forming a case around the brain, enclosing the lower surface and the sides, but always at least partially open at the top as a large fontanelle. The most anterior part of the cranium includes a forward plate of cartilage, the rostrum, and capsules to enclose the olfactory organs. Behind these are the orbits, and then an additional pair of capsules enclosing the structure of the inner ear. Finally, the skull tapers towards the rear, where the foramen magnum lies immediately above a single condyle, articulating with the first vertebra. There are, in addition, at various points throughout the cranium, smaller foramina for the cranial nerves. The jaws consist of separate hoops of cartilage, almost always distinct from the cranium proper.[9]

Skull of a swordfish

In ray-finned fish, there has also been considerable modification from the primitive pattern. The roof of the skull is generally well formed, and although the exact relationship of its bones to those of tetrapods is unclear, they are usually given similar names for convenience. Other elements of the skull, however, may be reduced; there is little cheek region behind the enlarged orbits, and little, if any bone in between them. The upper jaw is often formed largely from the premaxilla, with the maxilla itself located further back, and an additional bone, the symplectic, linking the jaw to the rest of the cranium.[10]

Although the skulls of fossil lobe-finned fish resemble those of the early tetrapods, the same cannot be said of those of the living lungfishes. The skull roof is not fully formed, and consists of multiple, somewhat irregularly shaped bones with no direct relationship to those of tetrapods. The upper jaw is formed from the pterygoids and vomers alone, all of which bear teeth. Much of the skull is formed from cartilage, and its overall structure is reduced.[10]

Tetrapods

[edit]

The skulls of the earliest tetrapods closely resembled those of their ancestors amongst the lobe-finned fishes. The skull roof is formed of a series of plate-like bones, including the maxilla, frontals, parietals, and lacrimals, among others. It is overlaying the endocranium, corresponding to the cartilaginous skull in sharks and rays. The various separate bones that compose the temporal bone of humans are also part of the skull roof series. A further plate composed of four pairs of bones forms the roof of the mouth; these include the vomer and palatine bones. The base of the cranium is formed from a ring of bones surrounding the foramen magnum and a median bone lying further forward; these are homologous with the occipital bone and parts of the sphenoid in mammals. Finally, the lower jaw is composed of multiple bones, only the most anterior of which (the dentary) is homologous with the mammalian mandible.[10]

In living tetrapods, a great many of the original bones have either disappeared or fused into one another in various arrangements.

Birds

[edit]
Cuckoo skull

Birds have a diapsid skull, as in reptiles, with a prelacrimal fossa (present in some reptiles). The skull has a single occipital condyle.[11] The skull consists of five major bones: the frontal (top of head), parietal (back of head), premaxillary and nasal (top beak), and the mandible (bottom beak). The skull of a normal bird usually weighs about 1% of the bird's total bodyweight. The eye occupies a considerable amount of the skull and is surrounded by a sclerotic eye-ring, a ring of tiny bones. This characteristic is also seen in reptiles.

Amphibians

[edit]
Amphibians' skulls, Hans Gadow, 1909 Amphibia and Reptiles

Living amphibians typically have greatly reduced skulls, with many of the bones either absent or wholly or partly replaced by cartilage.[10] In mammals and birds, in particular, modifications of the skull occurred to allow for the expansion of the brain. The fusion between the various bones is especially notable in birds, in which the individual structures may be difficult to identify.

Development

[edit]
Skull of a new-born child from the side

The skull is a complex structure; its bones are formed both by intramembranous and endochondral ossification. The skull roof bones, comprising the bones of the facial skeleton and the sides and roof of the neurocranium, are dermal bones formed by intramembranous ossification, though the temporal bones are formed by endochondral ossification. The endocranium, the bones supporting the brain (the occipital, sphenoid, and ethmoid) are largely formed by endochondral ossification. Thus frontal and parietal bones are purely membranous.[12] The geometry of the skull base and its fossae, the anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae changes rapidly. The anterior cranial fossa changes especially during the first trimester of pregnancy and skull defects can often develop during this time.[13] The prenatal growth of the anterior cranial fossa is not uniform. During the first trimester, there is allometric growth, with the longitudinal dimension increasing from 5 to 17 millimeters between the 8th and 14th week of fetal life. At the same time, the angle of the anterior cranial fossa decreases, and its depth increases towards the middle cranial fossa. In the second trimester, growth continues but becomes more uniform, with only slight changes in the angle of the anterior cranial fossa. There is a gradual decrease in the angle between the lesser wings of the sphenoid bone as the depth of the anterior cranial fossa increases in the frontal plane.[14]

At birth, the human skull is made up of 44 separate bony elements. During development, many of these bony elements gradually fuse together into solid bone (for example, the frontal bone). The bones of the roof of the skull are initially separated by regions of dense connective tissue called fontanelles. There are six fontanelles: one anterior (or frontal), one posterior (or occipital), two sphenoid (or anterolateral), and two mastoid (or posterolateral). At birth, these regions are fibrous and moveable, necessary for birth and later growth. This growth can put a large amount of tension on the "obstetrical hinge", which is where the squamous and lateral parts of the occipital bone meet. A possible complication of this tension is rupture of the great cerebral vein. As growth and ossification progress, the connective tissue of the fontanelles is invaded and replaced by bone creating sutures. The five sutures are the two squamous sutures, one coronal, one lambdoid, and one sagittal suture. The posterior fontanelle usually closes by eight weeks, but the anterior fontanel can remain open up to eighteen months. The anterior fontanelle is located at the junction of the frontal and parietal bones; it is a "soft spot" on a baby's forehead. Careful observation will show that you can count a baby's heart rate by observing the pulse pulsing softly through the anterior fontanelle.

The skull in the neonate is large in proportion to other parts of the body. The facial skeleton is one seventh of the size of the calvaria. (In the adult it is half the size). The base of the skull is short and narrow, though the inner ear is almost adult size.[15]

Clinical significance

[edit]

Craniosynostosis is a condition in which one or more of the fibrous sutures in an infant skull prematurely fuses,[16] and changes the growth pattern of the skull.[17] Because the skull cannot expand perpendicular to the fused suture, it grows more in the parallel direction.[17] Sometimes the resulting growth pattern provides the necessary space for the growing brain, but results in an abnormal head shape and abnormal facial features.[17] In cases in which the compensation does not effectively provide enough space for the growing brain, craniosynostosis results in increased intracranial pressure leading possibly to visual impairment, sleeping impairment, eating difficulties, or an impairment of mental development.[18]

A copper beaten skull is a phenomenon wherein intense intracranial pressure disfigures the internal surface of the skull.[19] The name comes from the fact that the inner skull has the appearance of having been beaten with a ball-peen hammer, such as is often used by coppersmiths. The condition is most common in children.

Injuries and treatment

[edit]

Injuries to the brain can be life-threatening. Normally the skull protects the brain from damage through its high resistance to deformation; the skull is one of the least deformable structures found in nature, needing the force of about 1 ton to reduce its diameter by 1 cm.[20] In some cases of head injury, however, there can be raised intracranial pressure through mechanisms such as a subdural haematoma. In these cases, the raised intracranial pressure can cause herniation of the brain out of the foramen magnum ("coning") because there is no space for the brain to expand; this can result in significant brain damage or death unless an urgent operation is performed to relieve the pressure. This is why patients with concussion must be watched extremely carefully. Repeated concussions can activate the structure of skull bones as the brain's protective covering.[21]

Dating back to Neolithic times, a skull operation called trepanning was sometimes performed. This involved drilling a burr hole in the cranium. Examination of skulls from this period reveals that the patients sometimes survived for many years afterward. It seems likely that trepanning was also performed purely for ritualistic or religious reasons. Nowadays this procedure is still used but is normally called a craniectomy.

In March 2013, for the first time in the U.S., researchers replaced a large percentage of a patient's skull with a precision, 3D-printed polymer implant.[22] About 9 months later, the first complete cranium replacement with a 3D-printed plastic insert was performed on a Dutch woman. She had been suffering from hyperostosis, which increased the thickness of her skull and compressed her brain.[23]

A study conducted in 2018 by the researchers of Harvard Medical School in Boston, funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH), suggested that instead of travelling via blood, there are "tiny channels" in the skull through which the immune cells combined with the bone marrow reach the areas of inflammation after an injury to the brain tissues.[24]

Transgender procedures

[edit]

Surgical alteration of sexually dimorphic skull features may be carried out as a part of facial feminization surgery or facial masculinization surgery, these reconstructive surgical procedures that can alter sexually dimorphic facial features to bring them closer in shape and size to facial features of the desired sex.[25][26] These procedures can be an important part of the treatment of transgender people for gender dysphoria.[27][28]

Society and culture

[edit]
Adam was believed to have been buried on Mount Calvary. Silk embroidery (17th century).

Artificial cranial deformation is a largely historical practice of some cultures. Cords and wooden boards would be used to apply pressure to an infant's skull and alter its shape, sometimes quite significantly. This procedure would begin just after birth and would be carried on for several years.[citation needed]

Osteology

[edit]

Like the face, the skull and teeth can also indicate a person's life history and origin. Forensic scientists and archaeologists use quantitative and qualitative traits to estimate what the bearer of the skull looked like. When a significant amount of bones are found, such as at Spitalfields in the UK and Jōmon shell mounds in Japan, osteologists can use traits, such as the proportions of length, height and width, to know the relationships of the population of the study with other living or extinct populations.[citation needed]

The German physician Franz Joseph Gall in around 1800 formulated the theory of phrenology, which attempted to show that specific features of the skull are associated with certain personality traits or intellectual capabilities of its owner. His theory is now considered to be pseudoscientific.[citation needed]

Sexual dimorphism

[edit]
Main article: Sexual dimorphism

In the mid-nineteenth century, anthropologists found it crucial to distinguish between male and female skulls. An anthropologist of the time, James McGrigor Allan, argued that the female brain was similar to that of an animal.[29] This allowed anthropologists to declare that women were in fact more emotional and less rational than men. McGrigor then concluded that women's brains were more analogous to infants, thus deeming them inferior at the time.[29] To further these claims of female inferiority and silence the feminists of the time, other anthropologists joined in on the studies of the female skull. These cranial measurements are the basis of what is known as craniology. These cranial measurements were also used to draw a connection between women and black people.[29]

Research has shown that while in early life there is little difference between male and female skulls, in adulthood male skulls tend to be larger and more robust than female skulls, which are lighter and smaller, with a cranial capacity about 10 percent less than that of the male.[30] However, later studies show that women's skulls are slightly thicker and thus men may be more susceptible to head injury than women.[31] However, other studies shows that men's skulls are slightly thicker in certain areas.[32] Some studies show that females are more susceptible to concussion than males.[33] Men's skulls have also been shown to maintain density with age, which may aid in preventing head injury, while women's skull density slightly decreases with age.[34][35]

Male skulls can all have more prominent supraorbital ridges, glabella, and temporal lines. Female skulls generally have rounder orbits and narrower jaws. Male skulls on average have larger, broader palates, squarer orbits, larger mastoid processes, larger sinuses, and larger occipital condyles than those of females. Male mandibles typically have squarer chins and thicker, rougher muscle attachments than female mandibles.[36]

Craniometry

[edit]

The cephalic index is the ratio of the width of the head, multiplied by 100 and divided by its length (front to back). The index is also used to categorize animals, especially dogs and cats. The width is usually measured just below the parietal eminence, and the length from the glabella to the occipital point.

Humans may be:

  • Dolichocephalic — long-headed
  • Mesaticephalic — medium-headed
  • Brachycephalic — short-headed[15]

The vertical cephalic index refers to the ratio between the height of the head multiplied by 100 and divided by the length of the head.

Humans may be:

  • Chamaecranic — low-skulled
  • Orthocranic — medium high-skulled
  • Hypsicranic — high-skulled

Terminology

[edit]

History

[edit]

Trepanning, a practice in which a hole is created in the skull, has been described as the oldest surgical procedure for which there is archaeological evidence,[37] found in the forms of cave paintings and human remains. At one burial site in France dated to 6500 BCE, 40 out of 120 prehistoric skulls found had trepanation holes.[38]

Additional images

[edit]

See also

[edit]
This article uses anatomical terminology.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Skull

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The skull is the skeletal structure of the head that encloses and protects the brain, supports the face, and provides attachment sites for muscles and sensory organs in vertebrates. In humans, it consists of 22 bones divided into the neurocranium (eight bones forming the brain case) and the viscerocranium (14 bones comprising the facial skeleton), connected primarily by immovable fibrous joints known as sutures. These sutures allow for slight movement during infancy to accommodate brain growth, gradually ossifying into rigid unions in adulthood to enhance structural integrity and protection. Beyond neuroprotection, the skull anchors masticatory muscles, houses organs of special sense including the orbits for eyes and nasal cavities, and articulates with the vertebral column at the foramen magnum for neural and vascular continuity with the body. Embryologically, the skull derives from intramembranous and endochondral ossification, reflecting its dual role in rapid cranial expansion and durable enclosure of vital neural tissue.

Anatomy

Human Skull

The human skull comprises 22 bones in adults, with 21 forming immovable joints and the being mobile. These bones unite via fibrous sutures to create a rigid structure that protects the and supports facial features. The skull divides into the , which encases the , and the viscerocranium, which forms the . The includes eight bones: the anteriorly, two parietal bones superiorly, the posteriorly, two temporal bones laterally, the at the base anteriorly, and the centrally. These form the (calvaria) and cranial base, providing structural support and attachment for muscles while housing the , , and cerebral vasculature. The cranial base features foramina such as the for the and jugular foramina for venous drainage and . The viscerocranium consists of 14 bones: two maxillae, two zygomatic bones, the , two , two lacrimal bones, two palatine bones, two inferior nasal conchae, and the . These support the orbits, , and oral cavity, anchoring teeth and facilitating mastication and sensory functions. The , the largest facial bone, articulates with the temporal bones at the temporomandibular joints, enabling movement. In infants, the skull includes fontanelles—membranous gaps at suture intersections—that allow growth and molding during birth; the closes by 18-24 months, while posterior closes by 2-3 months. Adult sutures, such as coronal, sagittal, and lambdoid, remain fibrous but fuse progressively with age, typically beginning in the third decade. This enhances structural integrity but reduces flexibility.

Vertebrate Skull Comparisons

In vertebrates, the skull comprises three primary components: the (or chondrocranium), which forms the braincase from that may ossify; the dermatocranium, consisting of bones overlaying the braincase; and the splanchnocranium, derived from branchial arches for and support. These elements vary across classes to accommodate aquatic versus terrestrial locomotion, feeding , and sensory demands. Fishes exhibit the most primitive skull configurations, with chondrichthyans (e.g., ) retaining a fully cartilaginous structure for flexibility in predatory strikes, lacking extensive to reduce weight in buoyant environments. Osteichthyans (bony fishes) develop dermal and endochondral bones, including opercular series for cover and branchiostegal rays for respiration, enabling precise suspension via quadrate-articular joints. This contrasts with tetrapods, where arches reduce to form jaws and elements, eliminating opercular bones. Amphibian skulls are lighter and less ossified than those of fishes, with extensive loss of dermal roofing bones (e.g., reduced intertemporal) and a kinetic quadrate allowing loose articulation for swallowing large prey, adaptations tied to moist terrestrial habitats and larval aquatic stages. In lissamphibians, the braincase remains partially cartilaginous, and palatal bones are simplified, differing from the robust, fully bony skulls of amniotes that support dry environments. Amniote skulls diversify via temporal —lateral openings for adductor muscle expansion. Anapsids (e.g., ) retain a solid skull roof without , prioritizing protective enclosure over muscle leverage. Synapsids, ancestral to mammals, feature one infratemporal , evolving into a mammalian configuration with a dentary-dominant , secondary for simultaneous breathing and chewing, and enlarged braincase housing expanded cerebral hemispheres. Diapsids (reptiles and birds) have two (supra- and infratemporal), enhancing bite force; reptiles often fuse the postorbital and squamosal bars for rigidity, while crocodilians retain partial kinesis. Bird skulls, derived from ancestors, are highly lightweight with pneumatized bones forming air-filled sinuses (up to 30% volume reduction compared to reptiles) and extensive via flexible synovial joints between the , , and braincase, facilitating beak manipulation for seed cracking or probing without robust musculature. This contrasts with mammalian skulls' rigid immobilization for precise occlusion of complex teeth, where birds replace with a keratinous rhamphotheca and lose the lower temporal bar entirely.
Vertebrate ClassTemporal FenestraeKey Skull Features
Fishes ()NoneFully cartilaginous; hyostylic jaw suspension for flexibility.
AmphibiansNone (variable kinesis)Reduced dermal bones; streptostylic quadrate for gape.
Reptiles (Diapsids)TwoFused bars for strength; ectopterygoid present.
Birds (Diapsids)Modified (one fused)Kinetic, pneumatized; loss of teeth, quadrate.
Mammals (Synapsids)One (evolved)Secondary ; dentary ; two .

Development

Embryonic Formation

The embryonic skull develops from mesenchymal tissues originating in the cranial and paraxial , with formation initiating during the early stages of and neural tube closure around the third to fourth week of . Cranial cells, which delaminate from the dorsal and migrate ventrally, provide the primary cellular contribution to the viscerocranium () and significant portions of the , including the and cranial base elements such as the ethmoid, sphenoid, and parts of the occipital and temporal bones. Paraxial -derived predominates in the formation of the (calvaria), including the parietal bones, through direct differentiation without a cartilaginous intermediate. The , which encases the developing , emerges from two interrelated components: the desmocranium (a membranous precursor) and the chondrocranium (a cartilaginous precursor). By the eighth week of , the desmocranium transitions via into cartilage models that support initial skull base formation, while begins in the vault regions around the seventh to eighth week, with ossification centers appearing in the frontal and parietal areas. of the chondrocranium, involving hypertrophic replacement by bone, commences precisely at 12 weeks and 4 days of in the basioccipital and basisphenoid regions, driven by signaling pathways such as TGF-β, BMP, Wnt, and FGF that regulate neural crest-derived differentiation. The viscerocranium arises from mesenchymal condensations associated with the pharyngeal arches, where cells populate the first two arches to form precursors of the , , and associated bones through starting around the eighth to tenth week. These processes ensure modular growth, with the cranial base flexing to accommodate rapid expansion, a feature more pronounced in humans compared to other due to encephalization pressures. Disruptions in migration or signaling, such as mutations affecting FGF or BMP pathways, can lead to congenital anomalies like , underscoring the precision of these embryonic mechanisms.

Postnatal Growth and Variations

Postnatal growth of the human skull primarily occurs through appositional bone deposition at sutures, , and remodeling influenced by the expanding , which drives centrifugal displacement of the calvarial bones. The reaches approximately 25% of adult size at birth, 50% by six months, and 65% by one year, with most expansion completing by age 10 and minimal further growth thereafter. This process accommodates rapid brain volume increase, which triples in the first year, primarily affecting the while the grows more gradually via functional demands like mastication. Fontanelles, the soft membranous gaps between cranial bones, facilitate this expansion and ossify progressively. The posterior fontanelle typically closes by 1-2 months, the sphenoidal by around 6 months, the mastoid by 12-15 months, and the anterior by 7-19 months on average, though full suture fusion may continue into adulthood. By three months, only 1% of infants have a closed anterior fontanelle; by 12 months, 38% do; and by 24 months, nearly all. Delayed closure beyond 24 months or early fusion before 9 months can indicate underlying conditions, but normal variation exists. Variations in postnatal skull growth include , where male crania tend to be larger overall from birth, with midfacial features diverging early in ontogeny and potentially accentuating during due to hormonal influences on deposition. Population differences also appear, such as larger fontanelles in infants of African descent compared to other groups, correlating with head circumference variability. changes are most pronounced in the first 12 months, with the cranium undergoing greater proportional transformation than the face, including harmless natural variations such as slight depressions along sutures (where skull bones meet) or in areas like the temples or crown, which are typically benign and often go unnoticed until closely examined; these are influenced by genetic and environmental factors like positional molding, though severe positional resolves spontaneously in most cases without intervention. These patterns reflect coordinated modeling and displacement, ensuring structural adaptation to neural and biomechanical loads.

Function

Protective and Structural Roles

The skull's primary protective function is to encase the within the , a rigid bony vault formed by eight cranial bones that shields the encephalon from trauma and mechanical impacts. This structure also safeguards associated , cerebral vasculature, and , minimizing injury risk during falls or collisions. Additionally, the orbits formed by frontal, zygomatic, maxillary, and sphenoid bones protect the eyes, while the temporal bones encase the delicate structures essential for balance and hearing. The , supported by ethmoid and sphenoid bones, shields and respiratory passages from external forces. Structurally, the skull provides a foundational framework for the face via 14 facial bones, enabling support for soft tissues, , and muscular attachments. The and anchor teeth and facilitate mastication through leverage points for temporalis, masseter, and pterygoid muscles. Cranial base and calvaria offer attachment sites for neck musculature, such as sternocleidomastoid and , stabilizing head position relative to the vertebral column. Sutures and foramina integrate the skull with vascular and neural pathways, maintaining structural integrity while permitting necessary conduits. Overall, these roles ensure the skull not only defends vital neural tissues but also upholds architecture and biomechanical efficiency.

Integration with Sensory and Muscular Systems

The skull provides protective bony enclosures and foramina for the organs of special sensation, integrating with sensory function. The orbits, composed of contributions from the frontal, zygomatic, maxillary, sphenoid, ethmoid, lacrimal, and palatine bones, encase the eyeballs, optic nerves, and , thereby shielding the visual apparatus from trauma while permitting cranial nerve passage via the and . The temporal bones house the and structures, including the and vestibular apparatus, with the petrous portion containing these labyrinthine components to facilitate auditory transduction and balance via connections to the and internal acoustic meatus. The ethmoid and sphenoid bones contribute to the and , supporting and allowing penetration of filaments for the . These integrations ensure sensory organs are positioned optimally relative to the for neural processing, with cranial foramina such as the and ovale enabling trigeminal and other egress. The skull anchors muscles critical for head movement, , mastication, and through specific bony processes, ridges, and fossae. The —temporalis, masseter, medial pterygoid, and lateral pterygoid—originate from cranial attachments including the (temporalis), (masseter), and pterygoid plates of the sphenoid (pterygoids), inserting primarily on the to enable elevation, depression, protrusion, and lateral excursion for chewing. muscles, such as orbicularis oculi and zygomaticus major, arise from facial bones like the and zygomatic and insert into skin or other muscles, allowing nuanced mimetic control without direct involvement. and neck muscles integrate via attachments to the (occipitofrontalis and ) and mastoid process of the (sternocleidomastoid), supporting head flexion, extension, and rotation while transmitting forces through sutures and aponeuroses. These attachments distribute mechanical loads during function, with tendinous origins on the skull minimizing displacement and enhancing efficiency, as evidenced by biomechanical analyses of masticatory strain on cranial sutures.

Evolution

Origins in Primitive Vertebrates

The origins of the vertebrate skull lie in primitive jawless fishes (agnathans), which appeared during the period around 485 million years ago and persisted into the (419–359 million years ago). These early vertebrates lacked jaws and possessed a rudimentary primarily composed of mesodermally derived , overlaid by dermal bony plates that formed a protective head . Fossil evidence from ostracoderms, such as osteostracans and galeaspids, reveals a one-piece dermal enveloping the and sensory organs, representing an initial evolutionary adaptation for defense against predators in shallow marine environments. This structure differed from later skulls by lacking extensive , with the underlying often remaining unmineralized or partially calcified. Dermal bones in these primitive forms arose through , originating from neural crest-derived cells that contributed to superficial armor extending from head to tail, a feature conserved in extant cyclostomes like lampreys and hagfishes. In ostracoderms, these plates fused into rigid, tessellated structures without the regional specialization seen in jawed vertebrates, serving to shield the notochord-proximate braincase while accommodating branchial baskets for respiration. Living agnathans retain a cartilaginous cranium devoid of , suggesting that bony dermal elements were lost secondarily in modern lineages but were primitive innovations for mineralization around 500 million years ago. Evolutionary transitions in the agnathan skull involved gradual incorporation of ectomesenchyme anterior to the , prefiguring gnathostome advancements, though the primitive condition emphasized dermal over endochondral components for structural support. Paleontological data indicate that this dermal evolved synchronously with early odontogenic tissues, forming tooth-like denticles integrated into the head plates, which provided both and possibly sensory functions. Endochondral elements, such as trabeculae, emerged later in stem gnathostomes during the , marking a shift from mesodermal dominance to hybrid construction. This foundational dermal-mesodermal framework in primitive vertebrates laid the groundwork for skull diversification, prioritizing causal of the amid increasing ecological pressures.

Diversification Across Lineages

The diversification of skulls reflects adaptations driven by developmental modularity, particularly through organizers like the hinge in 1 (PA1) and the frontonasal ectodermal zone (FEZ), which facilitate independent evolution of jaw and facial structures across lineages. In gnathostomes, the addition of a bony dermatocranium to the cartilaginous chondrocranium enabled protective armor and sensory enhancements, with jaws evolving from PA1 elements to support varied feeding modes in early fish-like forms. Cranial morphological variation often preceded postcranial changes during evolutionary radiations, as seen in gnathostome bursts where skull shapes diversified rapidly before body plans stabilized. The transition to tetrapods involved key innovations such as internal choanae for nasal-mouth connectivity, aiding air breathing, alongside snout elongation and loss of opercular and -related bones. skulls exhibit reduced and absence of temporal fenestrae, maintaining an condition without openings for jaw muscles, though bone fusions like quadrate-otic links supported terrestrial feeding. Fossils like illustrate intermediate features, including robust jaws for substrate biting and dorsally positioned eyes, bridging lobe-finned fish skulls—characterized by intracranial joints and arches—with more consolidated crania. Among amniotes, skull diversification accelerated via temporal fenestration patterns: diapsids (ancestral to reptiles and birds) developed two fenestrae to accommodate enlarged jaw adductors, while synapsids ( lineage) featured one lower fenestra. In birds, derived from theropod dinosaurs, skulls lightened through bone reduction and fusion, evolving kinetic linkages and diverse morphologies despite decelerated overall evolutionary rates post-origin around 150 million years ago; a single ossicle serves hearing, with encephalization driving flexible . skulls, conversely, incorporated three ossicles from repurposed bones, a secondary for simultaneous mastication and respiration, and expanded neurocrania for larger brains, enabling extensive dietary and sensory specializations. These modular shifts underscore how conserved embryonic derivations, with variations like altered contributions in frogs, underpin lineage-specific cranial evolvability.

Pathology and Medicine

Injuries and Trauma

Skull fractures represent a primary form of skeletal trauma to the cranium, often resulting from high-impact forces that exceed the 's tensile strength, typically ranging from 4,000 to 6,000 psi for . These injuries are classified into linear fractures, which involve a simple break without displacement and constitute the majority of cases; depressed fractures, where fragments are driven inward; diastatic fractures, separating suture lines particularly in infants; and basilar fractures, affecting the skull base and carrying higher risks of vascular and neural complications. Linear fractures predominate, accounting for over 80% of diagnosed skull fractures in adults, while depressed types are more frequent in penetrating or high-velocity impacts. The leading causes of skull trauma include falls, which contribute to nearly half of traumatic brain injury-related hospitalizations often involving skull compromise; motor vehicle accidents, responsible for a significant portion of severe cases due to deceleration forces; assaults or ; and sports-related impacts. In the United States, emergency department visits for head trauma with skull fractures number approximately 16 per 100,000 population annually across ages, with higher incidence in children under 2 years from falls or non-accidental trauma and in adults over 65 from falls. Pediatric skull fracture rates reach about 250 per 100,000 yearly for head injuries broadly, though isolated skull fractures without intracranial damage are more common in young children due to thinner and higher plasticity. Diagnosis relies on computed tomography (CT) imaging as the gold standard, revealing fracture lines, depressions exceeding 5-10 mm, or associated , with non-contrast CT sensitivity near 99% for detecting calvarial disruptions. Treatment for non-displaced linear s is conservative, involving observation, analgesics, and anticonvulsants if seizures occur, as most heal within 3-6 months without intervention. Depressed fractures warrant surgical elevation if depression depth surpasses 1 cm, underlying dural laceration exists, or risk is elevated, with procedures like craniectomy reducing and contamination. Basilar fractures often require monitoring for (CSF) leaks, managed conservatively unless persistent beyond 7-10 days, prompting dural repair. Complications from skull trauma include CSF or otorrhea in up to 20% of basilar cases, predisposing to ; cranial deficits, such as or facial palsy; vascular injuries like carotid dissection; and epidural or subdural hematomas from associated dural tears. Mortality correlates with severity and comorbidities, with in-hospital rates reaching 44% in severe cohorts featuring skull s, though isolated s carry lower lethality under 5%. Long-term sequelae encompass post-traumatic in 10-20% of cases and chronic headaches, underscoring the causal link between initial disruption and secondary neural cascades.

Diseases and Congenital Defects

Craniosynostosis represents the most common congenital defect of the skull, characterized by the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, which restricts skull growth and can lead to abnormal head shape and elevated if untreated. This condition occurs in approximately 1 in 2,000 to 2,500 live births, with nonsyndromic forms accounting for about 75% of cases, while syndromic variants are associated with genetic syndromes such as Crouzon or . Etiologically, it arises from a combination of genetic mutations—such as in FGFR2 or TWIST1 genes—and environmental factors like or in utero exposures, though most instances are sporadic without identifiable cause. Other congenital skull defects include , where a sac-like protrusion of tissue and emerges through a skull base defect, often in the occipital or frontal regions, with an incidence of about 1 in 5,000 to 10,000 births depending on geographic variation. , a severe , results in incomplete development of the and , leading to absence of the calvaria superior to the orbits; it affects roughly 1 in 10,000 pregnancies globally but is largely preventable with folic acid supplementation. Rare isolated congenital skull defects, such as with underlying bony absence, may occur without associated anomalies but often require surgical reconstruction to prevent complications like . Among acquired diseases, frequently involves the skull, causing focal areas of excessive followed by disorganized new bone formation, resulting in skull enlargement, due to auditory ossicle involvement, and headaches from basilar impression. It affects up to 2-3% of individuals over age 55 in regions like the and , with genetic factors such as SQSTM1 mutations contributing in familial cases alongside environmental triggers like paramyxovirus infection hypotheses, though causality remains unproven. Fibrous dysplasia of the craniofacial bones, a non-inherited due to GNAS gene somatic mutations, replaces normal bone with fibro-osseous tissue, leading to asymmetric skull expansion, , and potential cranial compression; monostotic forms predominate in the skull (up to 25% of cases), often presenting in childhood or adolescence with pain or visual/hearing deficits. Skull base , typically a complication of or in immunocompromised patients, involves progressive bone erosion by bacterial pathogens like , with mortality rates exceeding 10% if undiagnosed early via imaging and .

Modern Treatments and Technologies

Computed tomography (CT) scanning remains the primary imaging modality for acute cranial trauma, enabling rapid detection of skull fractures, hemorrhages, and secondary injuries with high sensitivity for bony disruptions. (MRI), including advanced sequences like susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), provides superior soft tissue characterization for identifying subtle contusions, , and vascular complications when CT findings are inconclusive. These technologies facilitate precise preoperative planning, with CT angiography increasingly used to assess associated vascular injuries in complex fractures. For severe involving skull fractures, is a standard intervention, involving temporary removal of a bone flap to alleviate , followed by delayed . In cases of depressed or growing skull fractures, surgical elevation, debridement, and dural repair with watertight closure are performed to prevent leptomeningeal cysts and promote healing. Minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted reduction, reduce operative time and morbidity compared to open approaches in select pediatric fractures. Cranioplasty reconstructs calvarial defects post-craniectomy or trauma using autologous , alloplastic materials like or polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or bioceramics such as . Patient-specific implants fabricated via from CT achieve precise fit, with clinical studies reporting complication rates below 10% and high cosmetic satisfaction (mean score 7.8/10), particularly with PEEK implants cleared by the FDA in 2024 for reduced material use. Emerging regenerative biomaterials incorporate to promote osteointegration and formation, though long-term remain limited. In congenital defects like , endoscopic strip craniectomy in infants under 6 months allows suture release through small incisions, followed by custom molding helmet therapy to guide skull growth, yielding outcomes comparable to open but with reduced blood loss (transfusion rate ~5%) and shorter hospital stays. This approach minimizes perioperative risks while leveraging natural brain expansion for remodeling, supported by postoperative orthotic management.

Forensic and Anthropometric Uses

Biological Profiling

The biological profile derived from the human skull in encompasses estimates of , age at death, and population affinity, aiding in the identification of unknown skeletal remains. These assessments rely on morphological and metric analyses of cranial features, which exhibit sexually dimorphic, ontogenetic, and population-specific variations shaped by and . While the skull is less diagnostic than the for or long bones for stature, its preservation in taphonomic contexts makes it a primary tool, with methods validated through samples from documented collections. Sex estimation from the cranium exploits dimorphic traits such as the prominence of the supraorbital torus, robusticity of the mastoid process, and gonial eversion of the , often combined with multivariate functions on measurements like bizygomatic breadth or nuchal crest development. Traditional visual and metric approaches yield accuracies of 70-90% for the skull alone, with experienced analysts achieving up to 95% reliability on complete crania, though error rates rise to 20-30% in fragmented remains or atypical individuals. Recent validations confirm these ranges persist across diverse populations, underscoring the method's utility despite overlaps in variation. Age estimation primarily involves scoring the degree of obliteration in cranial sutures, both ectocranial (e.g., sagittal, coronal) and endocranial, using phased systems like those of Todd (1912) or (1985), which correlate closure progression with chronological age from onward. Reliability diminishes with advancing age, yielding broad ranges (e.g., 20-40 years) and error margins of 10-15 years on average, as suture fusion is influenced by genetic and biomechanical factors rather than strictly linear time; computed tomography enhances precision by quantifying partial synostosis, showing statistically significant but imperfect correlations. Despite documented unreliability for precise aging, suture analysis remains a standard supplementary indicator in protocols, particularly when dental or pubic symphyseal data are unavailable. Population affinity estimation, often termed ancestry in forensic contexts, employs cranial metrics (e.g., vault shape, facial via principal components or geometric ) and non-metric traits (e.g., simian shelf, post-bregmatic depression) to probabilistically assign remains to broad continental groups, with discriminant functions achieving 80-90% accuracy for binary or ternary classifications on reference datasets. These methods reflect clinal genetic gradients rather than discrete categories, with limitations in admixed or underrepresented populations leading to errors exceeding 20% in some validations; forensic applications prioritize empirical reference samples over social race constructs, though overlaps necessitate cautious interpretation. Advances like 3D laser scanning refine metrics, but biological profiling overall integrates skull data with postcranial evidence for probabilistic narrowing, not definitive identification.

Craniometric Variations and Debates

Craniometric studies reveal consistent in human skulls, with males exhibiting larger overall dimensions and cranial capacities than females. On average, male cranial capacity exceeds female by 10-15%, as documented in volumetric assessments from MRI and CT scans across diverse populations; for instance, in a Saudi cohort, males averaged 1481.6 cm³ compared to 1375.4 cm³ in females, a 7% difference, while broader meta-analyses confirm this pattern holds after adjusting for body size. Skull shape also differs, with males showing more robust features such as pronounced supraorbital ridges, mastoid processes, and occipital protuberances, enabling forensic sex estimation accuracies of 88-95% using discriminant functions or 3D morphometrics. These dimorphisms arise from androgen-driven during , reflecting underlying genetic and hormonal influences on skeletal growth. Population-level variations in craniometrics are evident, particularly in cranial capacity and vault shape, with East Asians averaging larger capacities (approximately 1416 cm³) than Europeans (1364 cm³) and Africans (around 1280-1300 cm³), based on international and volumetric data adjusted for body size. Europeans tend toward wider and higher crania relative to length, while Africans exhibit proportionately longer heads; these patterns persist across datasets spanning centuries, from 18th-century measurements to modern imaging. In , such metrics aid ancestry estimation, with geometric morphometric analyses achieving 70-98% accuracy for broad continental groups via outline and landmark data, though precision declines for admixed individuals due to clinal variation. Critics argue ancestry categories oversimplify continuous trait distributions, potentially inflating error rates in diverse populations, yet empirical validation supports their utility when calibrated to samples. Debates surrounding craniometric variations center on their , adaptive significance, and correlations with cognitive traits. Twin and studies estimate 80-90% heritability for cranial capacity, paralleling volume genetics, with environmental factors like exerting secondary effects. A moderate positive (r ≈ 0.40) exists between and (g-factor) across individuals and meta-analyses of MRI , suggesting larger crania accommodate greater neural tissue and connectivity, though causation remains inferential as confounds like myelination influence outcomes. Racial differences in cranial capacity align with observed IQ gaps (East Asians > Europeans > Africans by 5-15 points), as synthesized in reviews by Rushton and Lynn, but face critiques for methodological biases in IQ testing and potential cultural confounders; nonetheless, within-group brain-IQ links and cross-species encephalization patterns bolster the association beyond environmental explanations alone. Institutional reluctance to engage these findings, often attributed to egalitarian priors over empirical patterns, has led to underfunding and barriers for hereditarian hypotheses, despite forensic applications relying on the same variational without .

History and Pseudoscience

Early Anatomical Studies

Ancient Egyptian practitioners demonstrated early knowledge of skull anatomy through mummification processes, which involved removing the via the in the skull base using hooks inserted through the , as evidenced by preserved mummies and tools from the Early Dynastic Period onward (c. 3100–332 BCE). The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus (c. 1600 BCE), one of the oldest medical texts, describes skull fractures, injuries, and cranial sutures, reflecting empirical observations from trauma cases rather than systematic . In (c. 500–336 BCE), of Kos (c. 460–370 BCE) advanced understanding through clinical descriptions of and skull trepanation, a surgical technique to relieve by drilling holes in the cranium, often using flint or obsidian tools; surviving trepanned skulls show survival rates up to 80% in some and cases, indicating practical anatomical insight. At the Ptolemaic Medical School in (c. 300 BCE), Herophilus of and Erasistratus of Chios conducted the first documented human dissections, identifying , the brain's role in intellect, and distinguishing the from , though their works survive only in fragments quoted by later authors like . Galen of Pergamum (129–c. 216 CE), the preeminent Roman anatomist, relied primarily on vivisections of animals such as oxen and apes, describing key skull-related structures including the cranial sutures, , , pineal and pituitary glands, and seven pairs of ; however, his extrapolations to human contained errors, such as overestimating the rete mirabile (a vascular network absent in adult humans) at the skull base. Galen's texts, preserved through translations during the medieval period, dominated European until the , stifling direct human study due to religious prohibitions on and deference to his authority. The marked a shift with (1514–1564), whose De humani corporis fabrica (1543) featured precise illustrations of human skull dissections, including exploded views of the cranium and facial bones, derived from his own work at the ; these corrected Galen's animal-based inaccuracies, such as the human jaw's single bone structure versus the ape's dual halves, and emphasized the skull's role in protecting the brain. ' methods—public dissections with systematic bone preparation—laid the foundation for empirical craniology, influencing subsequent anatomists like , though access to fresh remained limited by legal and ethical constraints.

Misapplications in Racial and Intellectual Theories

, developed in the early by and popularized by Johann Gaspar Spurzheim, claimed that the external contours of the skull reflected the relative sizes of underlying organs dedicated to specific mental faculties, such as reasoning, combativeness, and . Proponents asserted that these phrenological maps could assess individual and character, with applications extending to racial comparisons where European skulls were deemed to exhibit superior development in intellectual regions compared to those of Africans or , purportedly justifying social hierarchies, , and colonial domination. Despite its empirical pretensions, phrenology lacked causal mechanisms, as neurological evidence shows cognitive functions are not modularly localized to skull-adjacent bumps but distributed across networks with significant plasticity; controlled experiments, including Gall's own, failed to demonstrate for trait assessment. Craniometry, a related but distinct practice, emphasized overall cranial capacity as a proxy for volume and intellectual potential. American physician collected over 1,300 skulls by 1849 and measured their interiors using mustard seeds (later lead shot for precision), yielding average capacities of 87 cubic inches for Caucasians, 83 for East Asians, 80 for sub-Saharan Africans, and 76 for Native Americans. Morton interpreted these gradients as innate, fixed differences supporting polygenist views of separate racial origins and intellectual rankings, influencing pro-slavery arguments in the antebellum United States. Subsequent critiques, notably Stephen Jay Gould's 1978 and 1981 analyses alleging Morton's subconscious bias in underpacking non-Caucasian skulls, reflected mid-20th-century anthropological commitments to environmental determinism amid egalitarian ideologies, but empirical remeasurements in 1988 and 2011 confirmed Morton's raw data as accurate to within 2-4% error, with no directional fudging; observed capacity differences align with modern population-level skeletal data influenced by both genetic and nutritional factors. While cranial capacity correlates modestly with cognitive performance (r ≈ 0.3-0.4 in contemporary MRI studies across individuals), extrapolating group averages to hierarchical causation overlooks confounds like body size proportionality and ignores that brain efficiency, not gross volume alone, drives variance in outcomes. These frameworks misapplied skull metrics to essentialize racial intellect, fueling eugenics policies in the early 20th century, including U.S. immigration restrictions and forced sterilizations, despite the absence of direct causal links from morphology to complex abilities.

Terminology

Etymological and Historical Terms

The English term "skull" derives from sculle or scolle, first attested around the 13th century, likely borrowed from skalli, meaning "bald head" or "skull," reflecting its resemblance to a smooth, shell-like dome. This Scandinavian root traces further to Proto-Germanic forms akin to Swedish skalle, evoking a protective or shape enclosing the , as paralleled in terms like the Scandinavian toast skål (from a similar etymon meaning shell). In anatomical and medical contexts, the preferred historical term has been "cranium," adopted into English in the early via cranium, directly from kranion (κρανίον), denoting the upper part of the head or skull, derived from karē (κεφαλή), "head." The Greek kranion emphasized the bony vault safeguarding the , a usage formalized in Hippocratic texts by the 5th century BCE and later in ’s works (c. 129–216 CE), where it distinguished the from facial bones. By the mid-16th century, English anatomists like in De humani corporis fabrica (1543) employed cranium to describe the brain-enclosing portion of the skull, prioritizing precision over vernacular "skull," which retained connotations of the entire head including . Other historical terms include Latin calvaria (from calvus, "bald"), used since the for the dome-like upper skull, evoking its exposed, hairless appearance post-dissection, as in early osteological studies. In medieval European texts, "brain-pan" or "head-bone" appeared in vernacular translations, but scientific standardized around cranium by the , influencing binomial systems in Linnaean (1758 onward). These terms underscore a shift from descriptive, shape-based folk etymologies to functionally oriented Greco-Latin roots in , driven by empirical rather than symbolic or cultural overlays.

Contemporary Anatomical Nomenclature

The contemporary anatomical nomenclature for the skull adheres to the standards established by the Federative International Programme on Anatomical Terminologies (FIPAT), under the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA), as outlined in the latest revisions to Terminologia Anatomica. This system, updated in the 2019 edition for cranial and extracranial structures, emphasizes precise, eponym-free Latin terms derived from descriptive morphology, replacing older vernacular or historically variable names to promote international consistency in medical education, research, and clinical practice. The nomenclature distinguishes the cranium (encompassing the neurocranium or braincase and the viscerocranium or facial skeleton) from auditory ossicles, totaling 22 principal bones in the adult human skull, excluding the middle ear ossicles. The comprises eight bones: os frontale (, unpaired, forming the and superior orbital margins); ossa parietalia (paired parietal bones, forming the sides and roof); ossa temporalia (paired temporal bones, housing the auditory structures and contributing to the cranial base); os occipitale (, unpaired, forming the and ); os sphenoidale (, unpaired, central to the cranial base with pterygoid processes); and os ethmoidale (, unpaired, contributing to the and orbital walls). These terms reflect functional roles, such as the calvaria (skullcap, specifically the superior portion of the excluding the base) and basis cranii (cranial base), with updates in 2019 refining descriptors for foramina and processes to avoid ambiguity. The viscerocranium includes 14 bones: ossa nasalia (paired ); ossa maxillae (paired maxillae, forming the upper jaw); ossa zygomatica (paired zygomatic bones, or malars); os mandibulae (, unpaired lower jaw); ossa lacrimalia (paired lacrimal bones); ossa palatina (paired palatine bones); conchae nasales inferiores (paired inferior nasal conchae); and os vomer (, unpaired midline bone). Recent nomenclature prioritizes terms like viscerocranium over outdated "" to underscore its role in housing visceral structures such as the oral and nasal cavities, with modifications in the 2019 FIPAT update addressing inconsistencies in prior editions, such as standardized naming for sutural bones (ossa suturalia) when present. Sutures and articulations follow analogous precision: sutura coronalis ( between frontal and parietals), sutura sagittalis ( between parietals), and sutura lambdoidea ( at occipitals), with the nomenclature discouraging eponyms like "" in favor of positional descriptors where possible, though landmarks persist for clinical utility. This framework, ratified through peer-reviewed consensus, ensures reproducibility in fields like and , superseding national variants from the 19th-20th centuries.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499834/
  2. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/imagepages/8915.htm
  3. https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/anatomyandphysiology/chapter/the-skull/
  4. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/skull-anatomy
  5. https://www.kenhub.com/en/library/anatomy/the-skull
  6. https://teachmeanatomy.info/head/osteology/skull/
  7. https://www.kenhub.com/en/library/anatomy/the-viscerocranium
  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542197/
  9. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/skull-sutures
  10. https://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~millen/oldvertebrate/skull_composition.htm
  11. https://pressbooks.palni.org/comparativevertebrateandhumananatomy/chapter/the-skull/
  12. https://berkeley.pressbooks.pub/morphology/chapter/fish-skulls/
  13. https://bio.libretexts.org/Courses/Lumen_Learning/Fundamentals_of_Biology_I_%28Lumen%29/15%253A_Module_12-_Vertebrates/15.06%253A_Evolution_of_Amniotes
  14. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/zoology/anapsids-synapsids-and-diapsids
  15. https://berkeley.pressbooks.pub/morphology/chapter/mammal-skulls/
  16. https://veterinarykineticsrehab.com/basics-of-musculoskeletal-anatomy-in-birds/
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24147-z
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8010074/
  19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6075/
  20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29139535/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4877539/
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/skull-development
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4072849/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4320944/
  25. https://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/cranial-development-in-the-first-trimester-the-use-of-3d-in-the-study-of-complex-structures-1-10995.html
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322576603_Embryology_of_the_craniocervical_junction_and_posterior_cranial_fossa_Part_I_Development_of_the_upper_vertebrae_and_skull
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5454308/
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10267183/
  29. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002320.htm
  30. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2003/0615/p2547.html
  31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36208113/
  32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-36646-8
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3972044/
  34. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-ap1/chapter/the-skull/
  35. https://open.oregonstate.education/anatomy2e/chapter/skull/
  36. https://www.getbodysmart.com/skull-cranial-bones/
  37. https://www.kenhub.com/en/library/physiology/special-senses
  38. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Skull
  39. https://medicine.uams.edu/neuroscience/education/medical-school-courses/human-structure-module/anatomy-tables/muscle-tables/muscles-of-the-head-and-neck/
  40. https://www.nap.edu/read/25652/chapter/14
  41. https://www.kenhub.com/en/library/anatomy/head-anatomy
  42. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-ap1/chapter/axial-muscles-of-the-head-neck-and-back/
  43. https://www.tamug.edu/marshall/Pubs_repository/pig_mastication.pdf
  44. https://zoologicalletters.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40851-017-0083-6
  45. https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.10217
  46. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2221120120
  47. https://www.calacademy.org/skull-stories
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5999547/
  49. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspb.2011.2454
  50. https://berkeley.pressbooks.pub/morphology/chapter/amphibian-and-reptile-skulls/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7437466/
  52. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2411138122
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10184257/
  54. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms6661
  55. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/skull-fracture
  56. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/248108-overview
  57. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/head-injury
  58. https://www.cdc.gov/traumatic-brain-injury/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
  59. https://entokey.com/skull-fractures-and-structural-brain-injuries/
  60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482218/
  61. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/248108-treatment
  62. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/rg.2021200189
  63. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470175/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10083455/
  65. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33740570/
  66. https://www.nature.com/articles/gim2013134
  67. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35787827/
  68. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1175957-overview
  69. https://www.cdc.gov/birth-defects/about/encephalocele.html
  70. https://hhs.iowa.gov/about/data-reports/health-disease/congenital-and-inherited-disorders/neural-tube-disorders
  71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22801147/
  72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430805/
  73. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pagets-disease-of-bone/symptoms-causes/syc-20350811
  74. https://stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-conditions/bones-joints-and-muscles/pagets-disease-of-the-bone/symptoms.html
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10165234/
  76. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/482543
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6208218/
  78. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/rg.2019190076
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7192808/
  80. https://ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/AJR.09.3687
  81. https://neurosurgery.ucsf.edu/news/snapshot-surgical-care-traumatic-brain-injury-us
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11711024/
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30326316/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11050949/
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10115682/
  86. https://www.3dsystems.com/press-releases/3d-systems-announces-fda-clearance-worlds-first-3d-printed-peek-cranial-implants
  87. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/15/4/84
  88. https://www.childrenshospital.org/treatments/endoscopic-strip-craniectomy
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4729850/
  90. https://www.seattlechildrens.org/clinics/craniofacial/services/endoscopic-strip-craniectomy/
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6474557/
  92. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15567621/
  93. https://bookcafe.yuntsg.com/ueditor/jsp/upload/file/20230403/1680486937260016880.pdf
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1344622319301075
  95. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31901460/
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10102175/
  97. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379073819305237
  98. https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wfs2.1369
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6474543/
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10519656/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8726594/
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11627412/
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031320325001104
  104. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2058&context=gradschool_theses
  105. https://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/1994%2520INTELL%2520%28ILO%2520sex-race%2520brain%2520size%2520diffs%29.pdf
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016028960200137X
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886999002561
  108. https://digitalcommons.library.uab.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=etd-collection
  109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321379092_A_Morphometric_Outline_Analysis_of_Ancestry_and_Sex_Differences_in_Cranial_Shape
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2668913/
  111. https://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/iq-race-brain-size-kamin-omari-rushton-personality-individual-differences-2000.pdf
  112. https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
  113. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/758839c8-105d-492b-9ef8-b07459e35a46/content
  114. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22853833/
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5380415/
  116. https://thejns.org/focus/view/journals/neurosurg-focus/23/1/foc-07_07_e11.pdf
  117. https://journals.lww.com/njca/fulltext/2015/04010/ancient_human_cadaveric_dissection.11.aspx
  118. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282470370_GALEN_AND_HIS_CONTRIBUTION_TO_ANATOMY_A_REVIEW
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4762440/
  120. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/358129
  121. https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/essays/phrenology/
  122. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7329220/
  123. https://ethos.lps.library.cmu.edu/article/id/482/
  124. https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/the-samuel-george-morton-cranial-collection/
  125. https://classes.matthewjbrown.net/teaching-files/hps/gould-science.pdf
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3110184/
  127. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002444
  128. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13194-022-00485-7
  129. https://www.science.org/content/article/racist-scientist-built-collection-human-skulls-should-we-still-study-them
  130. https://www.etymonline.com/word/skull
  131. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/skull
  132. https://www.etymonline.com/word/cranium
  133. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/cranium_n
  134. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cranium
  135. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31802475/
  136. https://journals.viamedica.pl/folia_morphologica/article/viewFile/66118/49680
  137. https://ifaa.net/committees/anatomical-terminology-fipat/fipat-ifaa-terminologies/
  138. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337766825_New_Terminologia_Anatomica_cranium_and_extracranial_bones_of_the_head
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.