Hubbry Logo
Pinus sibiricaPinus sibiricaMain
Open search
Pinus sibirica
Community hub
Pinus sibirica
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pinus sibirica
Pinus sibirica
Pinus sibirica
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Siberian pine
Pinus sibirica
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Gymnospermae
Division: Pinophyta
Class: Pinopsida
Order: Pinales
Family: Pinaceae
Genus: Pinus
Subgenus: P. subg. Strobus
Section: P. sect. Quinquefoliae
Subsection: P. subsect. Strobus
Species:
P. sibirica
Binomial name
Pinus sibirica
Du Tour
Synonyms[2]
  • Pinus arolla Petrov
  • Pinus cembra f. coronans (Litv.) Krylov
  • Pinus cembra subsp. sibirica (Du Tour) A.E.Murray
  • Pinus cembra var. sibirica (Du Tour) A.E.Murray
  • Pinus cembra var. sibirica (Du Tour) G.Don
  • Pinus cembra subsp. sibirica (Du Tour) Krylov
  • Pinus coronans Litv.
  • Pinus hingganensis H.J.Zhang

Pinus sibirica, or Siberian pine, in the family Pinaceae is a species of pine tree that occurs in Siberia from 58°E in the Ural Mountains east to 126°E in the Stanovoy Range in southern Sakha Republic, and from Igarka at 68°N in the lower Yenisei valley, south to 45°N in central Mongolia.

Description

[edit]

Pinus sibirica is a member of the white pine group, Pinus subgenus Strobus, and like all members of that group, the leaves ('needles') are in fascicles (bundles) of five, with a deciduous sheath. They are 5–10 cm long. Siberian pine cones are 5–9 cm long. The 9–12 mm long seeds have only a vestigial wing and are dispersed by spotted nutcrackers.

Siberian pine is treated as a variety or subspecies of the very similar Swiss pine (Pinus cembra) by some botanists. It differs in having slightly larger cones, and needles with three resin canals instead of two in Swiss pine.

Like other European and Asian white pines, Siberian pine is very resistant to white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola). This fungal disease was accidentally introduced from Europe into North America, where it has caused severe mortality in the American native white pines in many areas, notably the closely related whitebark pine. Siberian pine is of great value for research into hybridisation and genetic modification to develop rust resistance in these species.

  • Flowering pine cones
    Flowering pine cones
  • Cone
    Cone
  • Foliage
    Foliage
  • seeds
    seeds

Distribution

[edit]

In the north of its range, it grows at low altitudes, typically 100–200 m, whereas further south, it is a mountain tree, growing at 1,000-2,400 m altitude. It often reaches the alpine tree line in this area. The mature size is up to 30–40 m height, and 1.5 m trunk diameter. Its maximum lifetime is 800–850 years.

  • Pinus sibirica Ulagansky Pass near Ulagan, Russia
    Pinus sibirica Ulagansky Pass near Ulagan, Russia
  • Pinus sibirica in Ergaki, Ermakovskiy district
    Pinus sibirica in Ergaki, Ermakovskiy district

Cultivation

[edit]
Young trees growing in a park

Siberian pine, Pinus sibirica, is a popular ornamental tree in parks and large gardens where the climate is cold, such as central Canada, giving steady though not fast growth on a wide range of sites. It is very tolerant of severe winter cold, hardy down to at least –60 °C, and also of wind exposure.

The seeds are also harvested and sold as pine nuts, which in Russia are marketed as Cedar nuts (Russian: Кедровые орехи).

"Siberian cedar"

[edit]

The Russian name Сибирский кедр (tr. Sibirsky kedr)[3] is usually translated in English as "Siberian cedar." References to "cedar" or "dwarf cedar" in texts translated from Russian usually refer to this tree or related pines, not to true cedars.

Chemistry

[edit]

Pinostilbene is a stilbenoid found, along with resveratrol, in the bark of P. sibirica.[4]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pinus sibirica

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Pinus sibirica, commonly known as Siberian pine or Siberian cedar, is a large coniferous in the pine family (), native to the boreal forests of northern , where it plays a key ecological role in the Siberian . It typically grows to heights of 35–40 meters with a up to 1.8 meters, forming a broad, conical crown with spreading branches, and its bark transitions from smooth and thin when young to gray, scaly, and fissured with age. The leaves are needle-like, occurring in fascicles of five, measuring 6–11 cm long, and persisting for 2–4 years, while the seed cones are cylindrical, 7–10 cm long, and dark brown at maturity, containing wingless seeds that are notably large (10–14 mm long) and edible. This species is distributed across a vast area of approximately 450,000 km², ranging from the through in , extending to northern , , and parts of northern (including , Nei Mongol, and ), primarily at elevations between 100 and 2,400 meters in cool, continental climates with moist conditions. It thrives in mountainous regions, along river valleys, and on wet western slopes, often forming pure stands or mixed forests with associates such as Picea obovata, Abies sibirica, Pinus sylvestris, Larix species, and broadleaf trees like Betula. Ecologically, P. sibirica is well-adapted to cold environments, with seeds primarily dispersed by the Eurasian nutcracker (Nucifraga caryocatactes), which caches them and promotes regeneration, and it supports diverse wildlife as a food source. Pinus sibirica holds significant economic and cultural value, with its soft, rose-colored wood used for timber and furniture, resin extracted for production, and seeds harvested commercially—yielding up to 300 kg per —as a nutritious rich in oils and proteins for and in local diets. It is also cultivated ornamentally in outside its native range, including in parts of like the , , , , and , though it faces no major conservation threats and is classified as Least Concern by the IUCN. Notable specimens include trees over 48 meters tall and more than 1,000 years old, highlighting its longevity and stature in old-growth ecosystems.

Taxonomy

Classification

Pinus sibirica belongs to the kingdom Plantae, phylum Tracheophyta, class Pinopsida, order Pinales, family Pinaceae, genus Pinus, subgenus Haploxylon (also known as Strobus), and section Cembrae (or subsection Cembrae within section Quinquefoliae). This species occupies a position within the white pines group of the subgenus Haploxylon, characterized by phylogenetic analyses that place it alongside other five-needle pines in the section Cembrae. Close relatives include Pinus cembra (European stone pine) and Pinus koraiensis (Korean pine), with molecular studies confirming shared ancestry in East Asian and Eurasian lineages. Key morphological traits distinguishing section Cembrae from other pine sections include needles in clusters of five and wingless seeds, adaptations linked to their ecological roles in montane forests. Historically, P. sibirica was classified as a variety or subspecies of P. cembra due to similarities in overall habit, but taxonomic revisions in the 19th century established it as a distinct species based on differences in cone structure and seed dispersal mechanisms. These separations were formalized through comparative morphology, with early descriptions by Du Tour in 1803 and further refinements by botanists like G. Don in 1830 highlighting geographic and anatomical distinctions. Known commonly as Siberian pine or Siberian stone pine, it exemplifies the diversity within Eurasian white pines.

Nomenclature

The binomial name of this species is Pinus sibirica Du Tour, first published in 1803 in the Nouveau Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle. The type locality is , reflecting its native range across the region's forests, though no specific type specimen was designated. This naming belongs to the genus in the family . Several synonyms have been used historically, including Pinus cembra L. var. sibirica (Du Tour) G. Don (1830), which treated it as a variety of the Swiss pine, and P. cembra subsp. sibirica (Du Tour) Krylov (1914). Other names include regional variants like P. hingganensis H.J. Zhang (1985) from eastern . These reflect taxonomic debates on its distinction from related stone pines, but P. sibirica is now widely accepted as the valid name. In Russian vernacular, it is known as kedr sibirskiy (Siberian cedar), a term that persists despite the species belonging to the pine genus rather than true cedars (Cedrus spp.), due to the wood's comparable durability, fragrance, and resistance to decay. This misnomer underscores its cultural reverence in , where the tree symbolizes strength, stability, and the enduring power of Siberian nature, often evoked in and as a "king of the " for its massive stature—reaching up to 45 meters tall and living over 500 years—and vital role in traditional livelihoods through nuts and timber.

Description

Morphology

Pinus sibirica is an that typically attains a height of 35–40 m with a trunk of up to 1.8 m, though exceptional individuals can reach 48 m in height and 3.5 m in girth. The crown is broadly conical in youth, featuring numerous spreading branches arranged in whorls, and may become more rounded with age. The bark is initially smooth and pale brown on young trees, becoming thick, scaly, gray to gray-brown, and deeply fissured on mature trunks. The leaves are needles borne in fascicles of five, measuring 6–11 cm in length and 1.2–1.7 mm in width, with a stiff, dark green appearance and triangular cross-section; they feature white stomatal lines on the adaxial surfaces and persist for 2–4 years. Juvenile needles are shorter than mature ones, often produced singly during the first year of growth. Branches are whorled, with twigs initially pale yellow and pubescent, maturing to glabrous, smooth, and yellowish-brown. Male cones are clustered at the base of new shoots, forming short cylindrical structures 1–2 cm long that are reddish, turning red-brown. Female cones are ovoid to conical, 7–12 cm long and 4–8 cm wide, initially glaucous green to purplish before maturing to dark brown. The root system is shallow and extensive, particularly on or poorly drained soils, but can penetrate deeper in drier conditions, and forms ectomycorrhizal associations essential for nutrient uptake. The wood is soft and lightweight with a rose-colored heartwood and notable content that contributes to its and use in construction. At high elevations near the treeline, P. sibirica exhibits krummholz growth, forming dwarf, shrubby, or prostrate individuals due to environmental constraints.

Reproduction

Pinus sibirica is a monoecious species, bearing both male and female cones on the same tree. It is wind-pollinated, with male pollen cones clustered and cylindrical, producing abundant yellow pollen during spring, typically from May to June. Female seed cones are initiated in the year prior to pollination and develop over three vegetation seasons, maturing in the second autumn after pollination. Seed cones are ovoid-conical, 7-10 cm long, with thick scales that lack wings, but the seeds themselves are wingless, oblong-obovoid, 10-14 mm long, and edible. In good years, seed production can reach up to 300 kg per hectare in regions like the . Cone crops exhibit irregular masting, with high yields occurring approximately every 3-4 years, influenced by weather factors such as late spring frosts during the stage. Seed dispersal is primarily facilitated by the Eurasian nutcracker (Nucifraga caryocatactes), which caches seeds in the , promoting regeneration over distances. Secondary dispersal occurs via that scatter-hoard seeds and by from slightly opening cones. Germination requires cold stratification at 3-5°C for 30-60 days to break , followed by in moist, well-drained under optimal moisture conditions. Seeds maintain viability for up to 2 years when stored properly. Trees reach at 15-25 years in open conditions or 50-70 years in dense stands, with initial cone production varying by site.

Distribution and

Native range

Pinus sibirica is native to , particularly from the to the , as well as an isolated population on the in northwestern , , , and northern . Its distribution spans approximately 58°E to 126°E and 45°N to 72°N . The core area of this species lies within the Russian taiga, where it covers about 45 million hectares. In terms of elevation, it occupies lowlands at 100–200 m, primarily along major rivers, and extends up to 2000–2400 m in mountainous regions. The population is divided into regional groups, including western (Ural to Ob River), central (Yenisei to Lena River), and eastern (east of Lena to the Pacific) subpopulations, reflecting genetic variations such as north-eastern, central, and south-western clusters. Introduced populations exist outside the native range, such as in Scandinavia (e.g., Sweden, Norway), where it has been planted ornamentally. Fossil evidence from the Pleistocene indicates historical range stability in refugia like the and Urals during the , followed by post-glacial expansion to the .

Ecological requirements

Pinus sibirica thrives in cold continental climates typical of the Siberian , where mean annual temperatures range from -8.5°C in the northeastern parts of its range to 1.5°C in the west, with extreme winter lows reaching -50°C or lower. Annual precipitation varies from 460 to 800 mm, predominantly occurring during the summer months, supporting growth in moderately humid conditions. In high-mountain areas like the Altai, average annual precipitation can reach 563 mm, with about 75% falling in the warm period, while overall ranges extend to 600–1000 mm in northern Ural mountain . The species prefers well-drained soils, including sandy-loamy, loamy turfy-podzolic, and podzolic types, with a range of 5.0–7.0, optimally above 5.5 for best performance. It tolerates soils with shallow active layers in northern and eastern regions but favors deep, moist substrates over waterlogged or heavy clay soils, which hinder root development and growth. In glacial basins, it occupies mesotrophic soils such as coarse-humus gleyed cryozems and skeletal coarse-stony podburs, avoiding overly acidic or nutrient-poor sites. As a shade-intolerant , Pinus sibirica requires full sun exposure for vigorous growth and , performing poorly in dense understories but tolerating open woodlands. Seedlings demand consistent moisture to establish, though mature trees exhibit once rooted in suitable substrates. Key adaptations enable survival in harsh environments, including cold hardiness to -45°C during and exceptional winter tolerance up to -65°C in eastern , supported by frost-resistant buds. It occupies elevational zones from lowland along major rivers at 100–200 m to subalpine forests up to 2400 m, forming pure stands at higher altitudes where and exposure are intense.

Ecology

Forest ecosystem role

Pinus sibirica plays a dominant role in the structure and dynamics of Siberian taiga forests, often forming pure stands or co-dominating mixed coniferous forests alongside Larix sibirica, Picea obovata, and Abies sibirica, where it contributes significantly to the upper canopy layer. These forests, characteristic of the dark taiga biome, rely on P. sibirica for maintaining closed canopies that shape light availability and understory composition. In forest succession, P. sibirica facilitates post-fire regeneration primarily through by nutcrackers (Nucifraga caryocatactes), which cache seeds in mineral soil, promoting establishment in disturbed areas and aiding ecosystem recovery after wildfires common in the . Additionally, its extensive root systems stabilize soils on slopes, reducing in rugged terrains of its native range. The species supports substantial , with mature stands accumulating carbon stocks estimated at 100-130 t C/ha, contributing to the taiga's role as a major . Its dense canopy influences local microclimates by moderating wind speeds and enhancing retention, which buffers temperatures and moisture in harsh continental winters. P. sibirica enhances biodiversity by creating vertically stratified habitats that support diverse understory plants, such as ericaceous shrubs, and a range of fungi, including ectomycorrhizal associates. Its mycorrhizal networks, formed with species like Suillus and Rhizopogon, improve nutrient cycling by facilitating phosphorus and nitrogen uptake and transfer across the forest floor, bolstering overall ecosystem productivity.

Biotic interactions

Pinus sibirica forms mutualistic ectomycorrhizal associations with various fungi, enhancing nutrient acquisition in nutrient-poor soils typical of its boreal habitat. Notable symbionts include species in the genus , such as Suillus sibiricus and Suillus subluteus, which form ectomycorrhizae with the roots, featuring a and external hyphal mantle that facilitate uptake through elevated activity in long-distance exploration types. These associations can involve over 50 fungal species, providing the tree with improved mineral nutrition and pathogen resistance in exchange for photosynthates, with contact-type mycorrhizae dominating in denser forest biotopes. Seed dispersal and establishment are heavily reliant on the Eurasian (Nucifraga caryocatactes), which serves as the principal agent by harvesting and caching seeds in , often creating clusters that lead to multi-stemmed upon of unrecovered caches. Nutcrackers consume up to 85% of cached seeds for their own sustenance and offspring, but the remaining unutilized caches drive regeneration, with seedling abundance strongly correlating (R² = 0.81) to prior-year nutcracker populations in regions like the Northern Urals. This mutualism promotes seed establishment over long distances, as birds transport seeds beyond the parent tree's immediate vicinity. The tree experiences significant herbivory and pest pressure from insects and mammals. Bark beetles of the genus Ips, including Ips amitinus and Ips sexdentatus, infest stressed P. sibirica trees, boring into the and introducing associated fungi that disrupt nutrient transport, leading to tree mortality in outbreaks. Defoliators such as the Siberian silk moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) cause widespread foliage loss during outbreaks, weakening trees across Siberian forests. Mammalian browsers like (Alces alces) target young shoots and bark, particularly in winter, while the tree's provides a against pathogens and some herbivores by sealing wounds and deterring fungal ingress. In mixed boreal stands, P. sibirica engages in competitive interactions, particularly with faster-growing during early succession, where larch's shade intolerance and rapid height gain can suppress pine recruitment in open post-disturbance sites. Conversely, established P. sibirica facilitates shrubs like species by moderating and soil conditions in moister forest types, creating suitable habitats for ericaceous vegetation beneath its canopy. Pollination in P. sibirica is anemophilous, with facilitating the transfer of from male to female cones during spring, a process typical of without specialized biotic vectors. Seed dispersal, however, is predominantly biotic, mediated by nutcrackers that cache 70-90% of harvested seeds, influencing recruitment success and spatial patterns of regeneration.

Conservation

Status assessment

Pinus sibirica is assessed as Least Concern (LC) on the , a status assigned in 2013 due to its extensive distribution across northern and lack of immediate risk. The occupies an estimated 45 million hectares of , primarily in the Siberian , supporting tens of millions of mature individuals. trends are stable overall, with no evidence of continuing decline in numbers or habitat extent. Genetic diversity remains high in core range populations, though levels are reduced at peripheral margins such as . Regionally, the is in Russian Siberia, where it occurs in multiple protected areas, while in it forms part of the native range without identified specific threats elevating its status. The LC designation aligns with IUCN criteria, as the ' abundance and wide range preclude qualification for threatened categories; length is estimated at 25 years.

Threats and management

Pinus sibirica faces primary threats from , particularly targeting mature trees for timber and pine nuts, which has contributed to the degradation of old-growth stands across its range in and . exacerbates these pressures by inducing droughts that increase tree vulnerability to mortality, with models projecting northward range shifts as warmer conditions alter suitable habitats. Secondary threats include altered fire regimes due to suppression policies, which hinder natural regeneration by preventing the low-intensity fires essential for release and establishment. Outbreaks of the Siberian silkmoth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) represent another significant risk, as warming temperatures facilitate pest proliferation and defoliation in stressed stands. from activities further isolates populations, particularly in the , reducing genetic connectivity and resilience. Conservation efforts protect Pinus sibirica within Russian zapovedniks, such as the Barguzin Nature Reserve, where strict no-harvest zones safeguard ecosystems encompassing the species. Sustainable forestry practices, including (FSC) certification, promote responsible harvesting in managed areas to minimize illegal activities and maintain . In , reforestation initiatives have planted thousands of hectares of forests annually, focusing on ribbon-like stands to restore fragmented habitats. Ongoing monitoring emphasizes genetic conservation through seed banks and ex situ collections to preserve adaptive variation amid environmental changes. into assisted migration strategies explores relocating seedlings to track projected northward shifts, informed by dendrochronological and genomic studies of . Overall, the species is assessed as Least Concern by the IUCN due to its extensive distribution, though localized threats necessitate continued interventions.

Uses

Cultivation

Pinus sibirica exhibits excellent hardiness, thriving in USDA zones 1-6 and tolerating temperatures down to -45°C when fully dormant. This cold tolerance, derived from its native Siberian habitats, makes it suitable for northern temperate gardens, parks, and plantations where severe winters prevail. Propagation of P. sibirica is most commonly achieved through seed sowing in spring following cold stratification for 6 weeks at 4°C to enhance rates. onto compatible rootstocks provides another effective method, achieving success rates of 80-90% in initial years. with ectomycorrhizal fungi during significantly improves establishment and survival, with increases in growth and nutrient uptake. For optimal growth, P. sibirica requires full sun exposure and well-drained, acidic to neutral soils, such as sandy or gravelly loams. In plantations, trees are typically spaced 5-10 m apart to accommodate their mature size. Irrigation is essential during the first 2-3 years to support root development, after which the species demonstrates good drought tolerance once established. The growth rate is slow, typically around 10-30 cm annually in early years, increasing moderately with maturity. Ornamental plantings in European arboreta date back to 19th-century introductions, valued for their aesthetic form and resilience. Cultivation challenges include vulnerability to late spring frosts in non-native regions, which can harm emerging shoots due to fluctuating temperatures. Additionally, pests such as pine weevils (Hylobius spp.) pose threats to young trees and are managed through targeted pesticide applications.

Economic and cultural significance

Pinus sibirica timber is a valuable resource, prized for its straight grain, durability, and resistance to decay, making it suitable for , furniture, and applications. In , where the dominates Siberian forests, annual timber harvests from P. sibirica contribute significantly to the national wood supply, with estimates from the late indicating availability of up to 5 million cubic meters per year in key regions like the and . This wood supports both domestic industries and exports, forming a cornerstone of Russia's forestry sector, which remains one of the world's largest producers of softwood . The edible seeds, known as cedar nuts or Siberian pine nuts, represent another major economic asset, harvested primarily from wild stands and yielding between 100 and 300 kg per hectare in productive areas such as the southern and . These nuts are collected by hand during mast years or incidentally by wildlife like squirrels, which aid in natural dispersal but also compete with human gatherers. exports a substantial portion of its pine nut production, valued at approximately $101 million in 2023, contributing to the global market for this high-demand used in worldwide. From August 2024, introduced a 25% export duty on in-shell pine nuts to encourage domestic processing. The nuts' nutritional profile enhances their commercial appeal, containing about 68% fat, 14% protein, and significant levels of , which supports their use in health foods and supplements. Beyond timber and nuts, P. sibirica provides tapped for production and bark rich in employed in tanning and processes. In Siberian indigenous cultures and Russian traditions, the holds cultural significance, symbolizing strength and longevity; its wood and bark are used in traditional crafts. Historically, since the , P. sibirica products have been integral to Russian networks, with nuts and timber exchanged along Siberian routes, though modern exploitation has prompted measures including harvest quotas and requirements to retain at least 20% canopy cover in logged areas to promote regeneration.

Chemical and medicinal applications

The essential oils of Pinus sibirica are primarily extracted from needles and resin via , yielding approximately 0.5-1% oil from needles. These oils contain 1-3% volatile compounds, dominated by monoterpenes such as (40-60%), (up to 20%), and (around 2%). The profile contributes to the oil's characteristic fresh, woody aroma and bioactive properties. The seeds, or pine nuts, of P. sibirica are rich in fatty acids, with pinolenic acid comprising 14-20% of the total lipid content, alongside linoleic and oleic acids. They also contain significant levels of tocopherols, primarily α- and γ-isomers, which act as natural . The bark is a source of polyphenols, including , which exhibits strong activity by scavenging free radicals and inhibiting . Overall, the nuts provide a nutrient-dense profile high in unsaturated fats and vitamins, supporting their role in dietary applications. In traditional Siberian , infusions and teas from P. sibirica needles and have been used to treat respiratory ailments, such as coughs and colds, due to their expectorant and effects. Modern studies confirm properties, with seed oil extracts reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α and IL-6 in animal models of and . These findings support the use of P. sibirica-derived supplements, such as oil capsules, for immune modulation and overall health maintenance. Terpenes from P. sibirica , including pinenes and acids, are utilized industrially in the production of varnishes, adhesives, and as precursors in pharmaceutical formulations for their and stabilizing properties. While generally low in , the can act as a and respiratory irritant, potentially causing allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. Recent research in the 2020s has highlighted the antimicrobial potential of P. sibirica essential oils against Staphylococcus aureus, with needle oils demonstrating bacteriostatic effects through membrane disruption at concentrations as low as 0.5%. These studies underscore the plant's value in developing natural antimicrobials for medicinal applications.

References

  1. https://conifers.org/pi/Pinus_sibirica.php
  2. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77095028-1
  3. https://s7.lite.msu.edu/res/msu/botonl/b_online/earle/pi/pin/sibirica.htm
  4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=62752
  5. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.41705
  6. https://www.conifers.org/pi/Pinus_sibirica.php
  7. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs/rmrs_p032/rmrs_p032_085_097.pdf
  8. https://www.conifers.org/topics/Strobus_of_Asia.php
  9. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/26798/26798-h/26798-h.htm
  10. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/450
  11. https://www.fs.usda.gov/psw/publications/krugman/psw_1974_krugman002.pdf
  12. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/224/1/012049
  13. https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2021.1793
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7319130/
  15. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/42415/2978539
  16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S102279541405010X
  17. https://worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000481525
  18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-023-01592-z
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272573053_Ecology_of_Siberian_stone_pine_Pinus_sibirica_Du_Tour_and_Siberian_larch_Larix_sibirica_Ledeb_in_the_Altai_mountain_glacial_basins
  20. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/8/1196
  21. https://pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Pinus%20cembra%20sibirica
  22. https://temperate.theferns.info/plant/Pinus+sibirica
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/pinus-sibirica
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780125173674500188
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Biomass-carbon-stocks-including-roots-t-C-ha-1-in-the-investigated-plots-Dark-taiga_tbl2_258607840
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330883953_Ecological_Aspects_of_Pinus_sibirica_Du_Tour_Mycotrophy_in_Forest_Ecosystems_of_West_Siberia
  27. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/224/1/012049/pdf
  28. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/352e/8b48d2a71be760a6efef20fe98646edbc588.pdf
  29. https://www.cwejournal.org/vol19no1/pgeographical-peculiarities-of-pinus-sibirica-du-tour-natural-regeneration-as-related-to-its-seed-cropsp
  30. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/12/2383
  31. https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2024/64/bioconf_ForestryForum2024_01015.pdf
  32. https://www.nrs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/jrnl/1998/1998_exotic-pests-papers/baranchikov_1998-exoticpests.pdf
  33. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.29995
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25715470/
  35. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/sg-2021-0008
  36. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045034
  37. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/74450/1/746884362.pdf
  38. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170000254
  39. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11027-005-9019-0
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425719305589
  41. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/6/2/63
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8497665/
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725002375
  44. https://www.balticbirch.com/files/133202725.pdf
  45. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/316/1/012047/pdf
  46. https://admin.apfnet.cn/uploads/soft/20250416/Forestry%2520Development%2520and%2520Best%2520Practices%2520of%2520Forest%2520Management%2520in%2520Kazakhstan7037.pdf
  47. https://www.nordgen.org/media/zjskc0tz/genetic-conservation-of-forest-trees-in-the-nordic-countries.pdf
  48. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02827580902845823
  49. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/21/11767
  50. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/pdf/2978539
  51. https://pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Pinus+cembra+sibirica
  52. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs/rmrs_p032/rmrs_p032_064_072.pdf
  53. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/822/1/012037/pdf
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282832586_Study_on_ectomycorrhizea_of_Siberian_Pine_Pinus_sibirica
  55. https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122436/records/675ac3eb0ce2cede71d0a5e9
  56. https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/fthr/pest-and-disease-resources/large-pine-weevil-hylobius-abietis/
  57. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/5645/1/IR-98-001.pdf
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23738241_Siberia_and_Far_East_Russia%27s_Future_Wood_Supply_An_Analysis
  59. https://www.freshplaza.com/asia/article/9650341/russia-tightens-control-over-pine-nut-harvesting-and-export/
  60. https://www.freshplaza.com/europe/article/9616797/pine-nut-export-duty-implemented-to-boost-domestic-processing-in-russia/
  61. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/8/1043
  62. https://limberlostforest.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/forests_of_eastern_russia_ebook_-working_draft_dec_2012.pdf
  63. https://www.essentialoil.com/pages/percentage-yield
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10610429/
  65. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10412905.1996.9700686
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9861571/
  67. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejlt.200800221
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222164701_Chemical_composition_antioxidative_activity_and_cell_viability_effects_of_a_Siberian_pine_Pinus_sibirica_Du_Tour_extract
  69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18452053/
  70. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/2/1171
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8309100/
  72. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8181
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348552406_ANTIMICROBIAL_AND_ANTIRADICAL_ACTIVITY_OF_INDIVIDUAL_FRACTIONS_OF_PINUS_SIBIRICA_DU_TOUR_AND_ABIES_SIBIRICA_LEDEB_NATIVE_TO_THE_SIBERIAN_REGION
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.