Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Embraer ERJ family
View on WikipediaThe Embraer ERJ family (for Embraer Regional Jet) are regional jets designed and produced by the Brazilian aerospace company Embraer. The family includes the ERJ 135 (37 passengers), ERJ 140 (44 passengers), and ERJ 145 (50 passengers), as well as the Legacy 600 business jet and the R-99 family of military aircraft.
Key Information
Development of the ERJ 145 was launched in 1989. Its early design took the form of a turbofan-powered stretch of the existing turboprop-powered EMB 120 Brasilia regional aircraft. After the project was temporarily suspended in 1990, work on a revised configuration was undertaken during the early 1990s. While retaining the three-abreast seating of the Brasilia, the twinjet featured a new swept wing and is powered by two rear-fuselage-mounted Rolls-Royce AE 3007 turbofans for a range up to 2,000 nautical miles [nmi] (3,700 km; 2,300 mi). By the time of its maiden flight on 11 August 1995, Embraer had garnered 18 firm orders, 16 options and 127 letters of intent for the type. On 10 December 1996, the ERJ 145 received its type certificate; it entered revenue service with ExpressJet Airlines on 6 April 1997.
Embraer prioritised the rapid expansion of the family, leading to the introduction of the shortened ERJ 135 and ERJ 140 in 1999. The ERJ series' primary competition came from the similarly sized Bombardier CRJ100/200 regional jets. In December 2002, Embraer entered a partnership with the Chinese aerospace manufacturer Harbin Aircraft Industry Group to jointly produce the ERJ 145 in Harbin, China; this production line was shuttered in 2016 after producing 41 aircraft. Overall production of the type was terminated in 2020, by which point 1,231 aircraft were built. By this point, the ERJ family had been eclipsed by the newer and more advanced E-Jet family.
Development
[edit]Background and early design
[edit]The ERJ 145 was designed for a perceived new market for regional jet aircraft, where the increased speed, comfort and passenger appeal would outweigh the inherent fuel economy of the turboprop aircraft which were in service and in development.[3]

The 45–48 seat EMB 145, nicknamed Amazon, was launched at the Paris Air Show in 1989 as an 18-foot (5.5 m) stretch of the EMB 120 Brasilia developed for US$150 million plus $50 million for training and marketing, one third the cost of the cancelled Short Brothers FJX project.[4] Its $11 million unit cost would have been $3 million less than the Canadair CRJ.[4] The jet was anticipated to be able to travel at 400 knots (740 km/h; 460 mph), equipped with the CFE738, Lycoming ALF 502 or Rolls-Royce/Allison AB580 turbofan engines, with the model to be selected in the summer of 1989.[4] It was targeted for a late 1992 introduction with six produced, then ramping to 60 per year by 1995.[4] It aimed for half of a market for 1,000 aircraft with break-even after twelve years with 400 sold.[4]
Keeping 75% of the Brasilia parts and systems, the EMB 145 Amazon aimed for a 1991 first flight.[5] The stretch resulted from two 11-foot (3.4 m) plugs of the 7-foot-6-inch (2.29 m) diameter fuselage in the front and behind the redesigned 538-square-foot (50.0 m2) wing.[5] Its supercritical airfoil with a 14% root thickness had its chord extended at the leading edge with a slight sweepback, increased aspect ratio and winglets.[5] The overwing podded engines were expected to generate 6,400 pounds-force (28 kN) of thrust.[5] Designed for 500–600 nmi (930–1,110 km; 580–690 mi) stages, up to 1,400 nmi (2,600 km; 1,600 mi) with a reduced payload, it had a 36,375 lb (16,500 kg) maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) and a 21,045 lb (9,546 kg) operating empty weight.[5]
Engine selection
[edit]In early 1990, no engine supplier willing to share the risk of the $250 million development was yet selected.[6] The Allison GMA3007 (later renamed the Rolls-Royce AE 3007) was selected in March 1990, with a maximum 40 kN (7,100 lbf) take-off thrust and growth capability to 45 kN (10,000 lbf), first flight was then due in September 1991.[7] Rolls-Royce could participate in the fan and low-pressure turbine, its original responsibility on the RB.580 joint development.[7] By May, it had 296 commitments from 19 operators, and was seeking external finance.[8] In June, maiden flight was expected by the end of 1990 before mid-1993 deliveries for $11.5 million each, cabin pressurisation was increased to 0.55 bar (8.0 psi) from the Brasilia 0.48 bar (7.0 psi).[9]
Following the engine selection, design was revised: length decreased from 27.08 to 26.74 m (88.8 to 87.7 ft), span increased from 22.37 to 22.49 m (73.4 to 73.8 ft), aspect ratio to 9.3 from 9.2.[10] MTOW rose from 16,500 to 18,500 kg (36,400 to 40,800 lb), basic operating weight from 9,560 to 10,940 kg (21,080 to 24,120 lb), maximum fuel from 3,900 to 4,210 kg (8,600 to 9,280 lb) and payload from 4,500 to 5,160 kg (9,920 to 11,380 lb);[10] wing loading increased from 330 to 370 kg/m2 (68 to 76 lb/sq ft), time-to-climb to FL400 gained 5 min to 30 min and maximum cruise rose from 405 to 428 kn (750 to 793 km/h) at FL360.[10] The first delivery in 1993 was slated to Comair, which ordered 60.[10] In November 1990, a major reduction in Brazilian government spending, which held 61% of its voting share, resulted in Embraer laying off 32% of its 12,800 employees and suspending development of the EMB 145 for six months.[11]
Revised design
[edit]
In March 1991, a revised configuration started wind tunnel testing: the quarter chord wing sweep increased to 22.3° with underslung engines for lower aerodynamic drag. This reduced the span by almost 2 to 20.5 m (6 ft 7 in to 67 ft 3 in), reducing its aspect ratio from 9.3 to 8.4 and wing area from 50 to 47 m2 (540 to 510 sq ft). The semi-monocoque wing has two main and one auxiliary spar and holds 4,500 kg (9,900 lb) of fuel, it has double-slotted fowler flaps and spoilers. To accommodate the underwing engines, the landing gear is longer, allowing using jetways, and the fuselage was lengthened from 25.8 to 26 m (85 to 85 ft).[12]
During June 1991, the Brazilian Government loaned $600 million to Embraer and in July the programme was re-evaluated while tooling was 80% complete.[13] By November 1991, Embraer was still looking for partners to share the risk of the $350 million project, hoping to obtain Government approval by the end of the year.[13] Sold at $12 million with an all-digital cockpit and 31.8 kN (7,100 lbf) engines, it had letters of intent for 337 units.[13] The scheduled date for the first flight slipped to 1992 and certification for late 1993.[13]
Definitive design
[edit]

After re-evaluation late in 1991, the layout was again revised with two rear-fuselage-mounted engines, and a Mach 0.8 cruise speed would be tested in the wind tunnel.[14] Seat pitch is 79 cm (31 in). A further stretch to 50–55 passengers is limited by a 12° rotation angle.[14] Embraer continued to look for partners to share the $350 million development as first flight was expected for late 1994.[14] In December 1994, Embraer was privatised for 80% to Brazilian and US investors while 20% was kept by the Brazilian Government.[15]
The definitive ERJ 145 first flew on August 11, 1995, with 18 firm orders, 16 options and 127 letters of intent.[15] A 1,300h flight-test programme for the prototype and three pre-series aircraft (excluding two ground-test airframes) was planned within 13 months for certification in the third quarter of 1996, before deliveries in the fourth quarter of 1996 to launch customer Flight West.[15] The $14.5 million aircraft is developed with risk-sharing partners including Spain's Gamesa producing the wing; Chile's Enaer for the tail; and the USA's C&D Interiors equipping the cabin.[15] The standard maximum ramp weight is 19,300 and 20,300 kg (42,500 and 44,800 lb) for the extended-range, it is fitted with Honeywell Primus 1000 integrated avionics.[15]
The estimated $300 million development cost is divided between Embraer for 34%, risksharing partners for 33% (including Belgium's SONACA supplying centre and rear fuselage sections, doors, engine pylons and wing leading-edges), long-term loans from Brazilian development-funding institutions for 23% and participating suppliers for 10%.[16] On both 370 km (200 nm) hubfeeder and 1,100 km hub-bypass sectors, the EMB145 was expected to offer lower operating costs than the similarly priced Saab 2000 high-speed turboprop and the CRJ.[16] Its $15 million price was $4 million lower than the CRJ.[17]
The Flight Test campaign took four aircraft: S/N 801, PT-ZJA, S/N 001, PT-ZJB, S/N 002, PT-ZJC and S/N 003, PT-ZJD. Only S/N 003 was fitted with passenger seats and had no FTI (flight test instrumentation) and was used for functional and reliability tests.
In July 1996, its certification was targeted for October, and the unit cost was then forecast to be US$15 million.[18] The first delivery was planned for late November, while 29 aircraft were to be produced in 1997, 38 in 1998 and at least 48 per year thereafter.[18] Its MTOW could be raised from the standard 19,200 to 20,600 kg (42,300 to 45,400 lb) for an Enhanced Range version.[18] Flight tests allowed to increase its cruise speed to Mach 0.78 from 0.74, and showed fuel economy was 7% better than predicted.[19] Before the Summer 1996 Farnborough Airshow, Embraer held 62 firm orders and 218 options.[20] Continental Express then purchased 25 EMB145s and took 175 options.[21] More than 50 seats would need a wider fuselage for four-abreast seating, an enlarged wing and a more powerful turbofan.[22]
On 10 December 1996, type certification was issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), clearing the type for operational use in North America.[23]
Embraer delivered 892 units of all variants through 2006, and predicted that another 102 units would be delivered in the 2007–2016 time period.[24]
Production in China
[edit]During December 2002, Embraer entered a partnership with the Chinese aerospace manufacturer Harbin Aircraft Industry Group, resulting in the creation of Harbin Embraer Aircraft Industry, a joint venture company, to locally produce the ERJ 145 in Harbin for the Chinese market. The assembly line was sized to produce a maximum of 24 aircraft per year, assembling complete knock down kits prepared by Embraer at its facilities overseas.[25] During February 2004, the first delivery of a Chinese-assembled ERJ 145 took place; two months later, China Southern took delivery for two of the locally-built ERJ145s.[26]
In April 2009, it was announced that Hainan Airlines had halved its original order for 50 ERJ145s from the joint venture.[27] By April 2011, 41 aircraft had reportedly been produced in China, considerably less than the line's capacity. By this time, the company was undertaking changes to facilitate the local production of the similar Embraer Legacy 650 business jet as well.[28][25] In March 2016, the final delivery of aircraft produced by the joint venture took place. Two months later, the discontinuation of the local assembly initiative was announced; it was reported that in excess of 40 ERJ 145 and five Legacy 650s has been completed by this point.[29]
Shortened versions
[edit]
Embraer has introduced two shortened versions of the ERJ145. All three aircraft share the same crew type rating, allowing pilots to fly any of the three aircraft without the need for further training.
The ERJ 140 is 1.42 metres (4.7 ft) shorter, seating 44 passengers, and has 96% parts commonality with the ERJ145. The only significant changes are a shorter fuselage, a slightly derated engine and an increased range. The ERJ140 was designed with fewer seats in order to meet the needs of some major United States airlines, which have an agreement with the pilots' union to limit the number of 50-seat aircraft that can be flown by their affiliates. At launch, Embraer estimated the cost of an ERJ140 to be approximately US$15.2 million. The estimated cost of development of the ERJ140 was US$45 million.
The ERJ 135 is 3.54 metres (11.6 ft) shorter, seating 37 passengers, and has 95% parts commonality with the ERJ145. The first ERJ 135 entered service in 1999.
Design
[edit]The Embraer ERJ family is a series of twin-engine jet-powered regional jets. The ERJ family retains a relatively high level of commonality with the Embraer Legacy 600 business jet; the principal difference being the addition of winglets and additional fuel tanks as standard on the latter.[30] The airframe is composed of stretched, machined and chemically milled aluminium, with CFRP for moving parts, GFRP for fairings and sidewalls, kevlar for leading edges and Nomex honeycomb-CFRP/GFRP sandwiches for floors.[16]
The EMB145 family is generally powered by a pair of Rolls-Royce AE 3007 series turbofan engines. Each engine has a bypass ratio of 5:1 and can generate up to 8,917 lbf of thrust. The engines are controlled by a dual Full Authority Digital Engine Controls (FADEC) arrangement, which is capable of controlling virtually all aspects of the engine and sending engine data to be displayed on the engine-indicating and crew-alerting system (EICAS) for the flight crew.[citation needed]

The ERJ 145 family initially shared its cockpit layout with that of the aborted CBA123.[31] It is equipped with the Honeywell Primus 1000 avionics suite.[32] This provides an electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) that comprises five monitors; from left to right, these consists of a Primary Flight Display (PFD), Multi-Function Display (MFD), Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS), Multi-Function Display (MFD) (Co-pilot) and Primary Flight Display (PFD) (Co-pilot). While these are CRT displays as standard, they can be upgraded to LCD counterparts, which are lighter and have additional functionality.[citation needed]
In a typical commuter/airliner configuration, the ERJ 145 can accommodate up to 60 seats, although many operators would have fewer seats than this on their selected configuration. Embraer has offered a premium cabin configuration, which seats between 16 and 28 passengers in a more comfortable and spacious arrangement.[33][31] The cabin can accommodate various interiors, these being customisable to fulfil each customer's own requirements.[34] The fittings can be suited to various market sectors, from the relatively modest commuter to the more luxury-inclined VIP traveller. It is typical, but not compulsory, for ERJ 135/145 airliners to be configured with an offset aisle.[34] Dependent on an individual aircraft's role, overhead bins may be installed; their exclusion gives more headroom but reduces the available storage space for carry-on luggage.[34]
Embraer has stated that every ERJ 145 is capable of being converted into a semi-private aircraft configuration, and that the conversion process can be performed at Embraer-owned service centers.[33] Numerous aftermarket companies have also offered their own conversions of ERJ family aircraft, often involving various levels of interior refurbishment, such as the installation of an expanded galley, redesigned lavatories, seat track relocation, at-seat power provision, Wi-Fi, alternative ceilings, LED lighting upgrades, and various storage options.[34][35]
Operational history
[edit]
In December 1996, the first delivery of the ERJ 145 was made to ExpressJet Airlines (then the regional division of Continental Airlines flying as Continental Express).[36] As a newly established company, ExpressJet chose the ERJ 145 with which to launch its operations; this was achieved in April 1997, the same month that Embraer completed deliveries to the operator.[30] Particular value was attached the American market as there was a near-insatiable hunger for regional aircraft at this time, and thus a substantial amount of potential sales to capitalise upon.[37]
The ERJ 145 quickly entered service with various other operators throughout the Americas, being particularly popular on high-demand regional routes. However, the type proved to be less successful in the European market allegedly on account of logistical difficulties.[30] Nonetheless, several European operators did emerge; LOT Polish Airlines operated as many as 14 ERJ145s, while British Regional Airlines also flew the type on behalf of the national flag carrier British Airways.[38]
During the early 2000s, various governments opted to procure the ERJ 145 as dedicated transports for high-ranking officials, amongst some other purposes.[30] One such country was Belgium, who operated a pair of ERJ145s for VIP transport, regularly carrying the Belgian prime minister, cabinet members, members of the royal family, or military officials, between 2001 and 2020.[30]
By the 2020s, various operators had elected to retire their ERJ 145 fleets in favour of newer airliners; they have often been replaced by members of Embraer's E-Jet family. Aircraft formerly used as regional airliners have often been sold on to charter operators.[30][31] To capitalise on the growing sector of corporate/private travellers, some customers have elected to acquire secondhand ERJ145s from regional operators and refurbishing them with new interiors with more luxurious fittings to suit their new role.[30] As of August 2021, the largest operator of the ERJ 145 is CommuteAir, which serves as United Express under United Airlines, possessing a fleet of 165 aircraft.[39]
During September 1999, the slightly smaller ERJ140 was introduced; it performing its first flight on 27 June 2000, and entering commercial service in July 2001.[30] Envoy Air, the regional jet subsidiary of American Airlines flying as American Eagle, operated the majority of the ERJ140s built, including the first to be delivered (N800AE) However, Envoy Air opted to withdraw all of their ERJ140 fleet in mid-2020.[citation needed] By early 2005, 74 ERJ140s had been delivered; while this model has been marketed as ERJ140, its designation on the company's internal documents and on FAA certification is EMB 135KL. In March 2007, ExpressJet entered into a short-term agreement to operate some regional routes for JetBlue Airways using its ERJ 145 aircraft.[citation needed]
In May 2017, the ERJ 135 was leased $33,000 to $43,000 per month ($396,000 to $516,000 per year) and the ERJ 145 $38,000 to $55,000 per month ($456,000 to $660,000 per year).[40]
As of 18 March 2018, the Embraer ERJ family was involved in 24 incidents, incurring a total of eight hull losses without any fatalities.[41]
Variants
[edit]
Civilian models
[edit]- ERJ 135ER – Extended Range, although this is the baseline 135 model. Simple shrink of the ERJ145, seating thirteen fewer passengers, for a total of 37 passengers.
- ERJ 135LR – Long Range, increased fuel capacity and upgraded engines. Launch customer: Belgium Air Component.
- ERJ 135KL
- ERJ 140ER – Extended Range, although this is the baseline 140 model. Simple shrink of the ERJ145, seating six fewer passengers for a total of 44 passengers.
- ERJ 140LR – Long Range (increased fuel capacity (5,187 kg) and upgraded engines. Launch customer: American Eagle (Envoy).
- ERJ 145STD – The baseline original, seating for a total of 50 passengers.
- ERJ 145EU – Model optimized for the European market. Same fuel capacity as 145STD (4,174 kg) but an increased MTOW 19,990 kg
- ERJ 145ER – Extended Range. Original version of the aircraft. Launch customer: ExpressJet Airlines
- ERJ 145EP – Same fuel capacity as 145ER (4,174 kg) but an increased MTOW 20,990 kg. Launch customer: Flybmi.
- ERJ 145LR – Long Range – increased fuel capacity (5,187 kg) and upgraded engines.
- ERJ 145LU – Same fuel capacity as 145LR (5,187 kg) but an increased MTOW 21,990 kg.
- ERJ 145MK – Same fuel capacity (4,174 kg), landing weight (MLW) and MTOW as in the 145STD, but a changed MZFW (17,700 kg).
- ERJ 145XR – Extra-long Range, numerous aerodynamic improvements, including winglets, strakes, etc. for lower cruise-configuration drag; a ventral fuel tank (aft location) in addition to the two main larger capacity wing tanks (same tanks as in the LR models); increased weight capacity; higher top speed and up-rated engines. Launch customer: ExpressJet Airlines.[clarification needed]
- Legacy 600 (EMB 135BJ) – Business jet variant based on the ERJ 135.
- Legacy 650 (EMB 135BJ) – Business jet variant based on the Legacy 600 with increased range.
- Harbin Embraer ERJ 145 – joint venture with Harbin Aircraft Manufacturing Corporation
The physical engines are the same (Rolls-Royce AE 3007), however, the FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine/Electronic Control) logic is what differs between the various models in regards to total thrust capability.
The extended range version, the ERJ 145ER, has Rolls-Royce AE 3007A engines rated at 31.3 kN (7,036 lb) thrust, with the option of more powerful AE 3007A1 engines. A, A1, A1P models are mechanically identical but differ in thrust due to variations in FADEC software. The A1E engine, however, has not only new software, but significantly upgraded mechanical components.
The long-range ERJ 145LR aircraft is equipped with Rolls-Royce AE 3007A1 engines which provide 15% more power. The engines are flat rated at 33.1 kN (7,440 lb) thrust to provide improved climb characteristics and improved cruise performance in high ambient temperatures.
The extra-long-range ERJ 145XR aircraft is equipped with Rolls-Royce AE 3007A1E engines. The high performance engines provide lower specific fuel consumption (SFC) and improved performance in hot and high conditions. The engines also yield a higher altitude for one-engine-inoperable conditions."[42][unreliable source?] CommuteAir is the only operator of the ERJ 145XR. February 2011 Embraer presented its new EMB-145 AEW&C for India.
Despite the multiple variants, pilots need only one type rating to fly any variant of the ERJ aircraft. Companies like American Eagle utilizes this benefit with its mixed fleet of ERJ 135ER/LR and ERJ145EP/LR/XR. Shared type-ratings allow operators to utilize a single pilot pool for any ERJ aircraft.
Military models
[edit]- C-99A – Transport model
- EMB 145SA (E-99A / E-99M) – Airborne Early Warning model
- EMB 145RS (R-99B) – Remote sensing model
- EMB 145MP/ASW (P-99) – Maritime patrol model
- EMB 145H (Hellenic Air Force) – Airborne Early Warning model
- EMB 145I (Indian Air Force) – Airborne Early Warning model
- B.LL.2 (Royal Thai Navy) – (Thai: บ.ลล.๒) designation for the ERJ 135LR.[43]
Operators
[edit]Civilian operators
[edit]As of May 2025, the civilian operators with ten or more ERJs are:
- Piedmont Airlines: 61 (7 parked)[citation needed]
- CommuteAir: 53 (1 parked)[citation needed]
- JSX: 79 (31 parked)[citation needed]
- Airlink: 27[citation needed]
- Contour Airlines: 23 (4 parked)[citation needed]
- Loganair: 11 (1 parked)[citation needed]
- TAR Aerolíneas: 11 (8 parked)[citation needed]
Military operators
[edit]-
EMB 145 MP maritime patrol version of the Fuerza Aérea Mexicana, without the R-99B side radar
- Belgian Air Component (operated two ERJ 135 and two ERJ 145 between 2001 and 2020 in passenger transport and VIP roles)
- Indian Air Force (Operates 3 ERJ 135 as VIP transport and 3 ERJ 145 as AEW&CS)
- Border Security Force
Accidents and incidents
[edit]The ERJ 135/140/145 has been involved in 26 aviation accidents and incidents,[46] including 10 hull losses,[47] which resulted in zero fatalities.[48]
| Date | Variant | Operator | Location | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 1998 | ERJ 145 | ExpressJet for Continental Express | Beaumont, Texas, United States (Jack Brooks Regional Airport) | Crashed on takeoff during a training flight: the left wing stalled after the incorrect application of rudder during a V1 cut maneuver.[49] |
| 28 Dec 1998 | ERJ 145 | Rio Sul Serviços Aéreos Regionais | Curitiba, Brazil (Afonso Pena International Airport) | Too high descent rate and too fast landing, the tail cracked and was dragged along the runway.[50][51] |
| 18 Jan 2003 | ERJ 135 | American Eagle Airlines | Columbus, Ohio, United States (John Glenn Columbus International Airport) | Collided with hangar doors during an engine run-up test. |
| 7 Dec 2009 | ERJ 135 | SA Airlink | George, South Africa (George Airport) | When landing in wet weather, the aircraft slid past the aerodrome's fence; the landing gear tyres had evidence of aquaplaning. |
| 5 May 2010 | ERJ 145 | SATENA | Mitú, Colombia (Fabio Alberto León Bentley Airport) | |
| 25 Aug 2010 | ERJ 145 | Passaredo Linhas Aéreas | Vitória da Conquista, Brazil (Glauber Rocha Airport) | Crash-landed on approach: touched-down short of the runway and stopped away from the runway.[52] |
| 28 Apr 2011 | ERJ 145 | Dniproavia | Moscow, Russia (Sheremetyevo International Airport) | |
| 4 Sep 2011 | ERJ 145 | Trans States Airlines for United Express | Ottawa, Canada (Ottawa Macdonald–Cartier International Airport) | Slid off the runway upon landing. |
| 4 Mar 2019 | ERJ 145 | CommuteAir for United Express | Presque Isle, Maine, United States (Presque Isle International Airport) | United Express Flight 4933 – pilots misidentified the runway in snow and did not abort the approach due to confirmation bias.[53] |
| 11 Nov 2019 | ERJ 145 | Envoy Air for American Eagle | Chicago, Illinois, United States (O'Hare International Airport) | Slid off the runway upon landing in icy conditions. |
Specifications
[edit]
| Variant | ERJ 135LR[54][55] | ERJ 140LR[56][57] | ERJ 145XR[58][59] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cockpit crew | Two | ||
| Seating | 37 | 44 | 50 |
| Length | 26.34 m (86 ft 5 in) | 28.45 m (93 ft 4 in) | 29.87 m (98 ft 0 in) |
| Wing span | 20.04 m (65 ft 9 in) | ||
| Wing | 51.18 m2 (550.9 sq ft) area, aspect ratio 7.9, supercritical airfoil[60] | ||
| Height | 6.76 m (22 ft 2 in) | ||
| MTOW | 20,000 kg (44,000 lb) | 21,100 kg (46,500 lb) | 24,100 kg (53,100 lb) |
| BOW | 11,501 kg (25,355 lb) | 11,808 kg (26,032 lb) | 12,591 kg (27,758 lb) |
| Max payload | 4,499 kg (9,919 lb) | 5,292 kg (11,667 lb) | 5,909 kg (13,027 lb) |
| Fuel capacity | 4,499 kg (9,919 lb) | 5,973 kg (13,168 lb) | |
| Engines (2x) | AE 3007-A1/3 | AE 3007-A1E | |
| Takeoff Thrust | 33.71 kN (7,580 lbf) | 39.67 kN (8,917 lbf)[61] | |
| Maximum cruise | Mach 0.78 (450 kn; 833 km/h; 518 mph) | Mach 0.8 (461 kn; 854 km/h; 531 mph) | |
| Service ceiling | 37,000 ft (11,000 m)[a] | ||
| Range | 1,750 nmi (3,240 km; 2,010 mi) | 1,650 nmi (3,060 km; 1,900 mi) | 2,000 nmi (3,700 km; 2,300 mi) |
- Avionics[62]
- Primus 1000 colour weather radar
- Dual digital ADCs
- Dual AHRS
- TCAS and GPWS standard with FMS/GPS optional
- HUD for Cat III landing from 2000
See also
[edit]Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
Related lists
References
[edit]- ^ "Production list Embraer 135/145 : Complete list". Airfleets.net.
- ^ "Embraer delivers very last ERJ". aeroTELEGRAPH. 2020-07-06. Retrieved 2020-07-22.
- ^ Resende, O.C. The evolution of the aerodynamic design tools and transport aircraft wings at Embraer, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng. vol.26 no.4 Rio de Janeiro Oct./Dec. 2004 Retrieved 8 November 2015.
- ^ a b c d e "Embraer launches regional jet". Flight International. 24 June 1989. p. 6.
- ^ a b c d e "Amazon lines up". Flight International. 1 July 1989. p. 19.
- ^ "FAMA delays Embraer CBA-123". Flight International. 7 February 1990. p. 39.
- ^ a b "Allison to power Embraer 145". Flight International. 14 March 1990.
- ^ "Embraer sees EMB.145 options grow". Flight International. 2 May 1990. p. 14.
- ^ "Regional aircraft directory". Flight International. 13 June 1990. p. 68.
- ^ a b c d "Allison improves Embraer's 145". Flight International. 27 June 1990. p. 22.
- ^ "Workforce cut as Embraer suspends EMB-145 plan". Flight International. 7 November 1990. p. 4.
- ^ Norris, Guy (27 March 1991). "Embraer tests new 145 as Vector takes to air". Flight International. p. 18.
- ^ a b c d "Regional aircraft directory". Flight International. 6 November 1991. p. 44.
- ^ a b c "Regional airliner directory". Flight International. 10 June 1992. p. 72.
- ^ a b c d e "Embraer flies EMB-145". Flight International. 23 August 1995. p. 5.
- ^ a b c Warwick, Graham (18 October 1995). "Brazil's budget jet". Flight International. p. 59.
- ^ Cameron, Doug (21 August 1996). "Embraer claims US launch customer". Flight International. p. 6.
- ^ a b c Henley, Peter (3 July 1996). "Basic appeal". Flight International. p. 29.
The EMB-145 is not an innovative aircraft, but Embraer's attention to basics makes it pleasant to fly.
- ^ "Embraer increases EMB-145 cruise speed". Flight International. 10 July 1996. p. 3.
- ^ Kingsley-Jones, Max (28 August 1996). "Regional rivalry". Flight International. p. 90.
The Embraer EMB-145's Farnborough debut will help to focus attention on regional airliners.
- ^ "Continental lifts Embraer into regional record book". Flight International. 11 September 1996. p. 10.
- ^ "Embraer evaluates next regional developments". Flight International. 18 September 1996. p. 14.
- ^ "Type Certificate data sheet T00011AT" (PDF). FAA. 28 September 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- ^ "Embraer ERJ 135/140/145". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 2007-10-29. p. 66.
- ^ a b Crane et al. 2014, p. 17.
- ^ "China Southern Takes Delivery of Two ERJ 145 Regional Jets; Built in China, the Embraer Aircraft Joins China's Largest Fleet" (Press release). businesswire.com. 29 June 2004.
- ^ Kirby, Mary (2 May 2009). "Hainan halves ERJ-145 order under new agreement". flightglobal.com.
- ^ Yeo, Ghim-Lay (12 April 2011). "Embraer's Harbin ERJ-145 plant to switch to business jets". flightglobal.com.
- ^ Trautvetter, Chad (6 June 2016). "Embraer To Close Legacy 650 Assembly Facility in China". AINonline.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Pask, Alexander (31 March 2021). "Embraer ERJ-145: The Best Regional Jet Yet?". internationalaviationhq.com.
- ^ a b c Eden 2016, p. 204.
- ^ Eden 2016, p. 205.
- ^ a b Gavine, Adam (28 May 2021). "Embraer reveals ERJ 145 'semi-private' cabin modification". aircraftinteriorsinternational.com.
- ^ a b c d "Gallery: Converting Embraer ERJ Aircraft From Regional to Business Jets". aviationweek.com. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
- ^ "Embraer ERJ 135LR – Business Class Commuter Interior". newunitedgoderich.com. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
- ^ Cross, Lee (11 August 2022). "8/11/1995: Maiden Flight of the Embraer ERJ-145". Airways Magazine.
- ^ Eden 2016, p. 206.
- ^ Eden 2016, pp. 204-205.
- ^ "About us". CommuteAir | Regional Airline. Retrieved 6 August 2021.
- ^ Collateral Verifications LLC (May 2017). "myairlease FleetStatus". Archived from the original on 12 September 2017. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
- ^ "Embraer 145 Statistics". ASN Aviation Safety Database. 18 March 2018.
- ^ Aerospace-Technology.com ERJ145
- ^ "Thai Military Aircraft Designations". designation-systems.net. Retrieved 2025-03-20.
- ^ "Coverage - the new Embraer ERJ-140LR of the Argentine Air Force has arrived at el Palomar". 6 February 2024.
- ^ "Embraer Signs Contracts with the Royal Thai Army and the Royal Thai Navy" (Press release). São José dos Campos: Embraer. 5 November 2007. Retrieved 3 December 2008.
- ^ "Accident list: Embraer ERJ-135/140/145". Flight Safety Foundation. 4 April 2019.
- ^ a b "Embraer ERJ-135/140/145 hull losses". Flight Safety Foundation. 3 April 2019.
- ^ "Embraer 145 Statistics". Flight Safety Foundation. 4 April 2019.
- ^ "FTW98MA126: Full Narrative".
- ^ "The accident involving the aircraft ERJ-145, Registration PT-SPE" (Press release). Civil Aviation Department of Brazil. 22 January 1999. Archived from the original on 9 February 2005.
- ^ Flight recorder video of Rio-Sul incident YouTube. Retrieved July 18, 2007.
- ^ "Accident: Passaredo E145 at Vitoria da Conquista on Aug 25th 2010, landed short of runway". The Aviation Herald. 26 August 2010. Retrieved 28 August 2010.
- ^ National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. 12 July 2022. DCA19FA089. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
- ^ "E135 Weights" (PDF). Embraer. June 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 November 2014.
- ^ "E135 Performance" (PDF). Embraer. June 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 November 2014.
- ^ "E140 Weight" (PDF). Embraer. June 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-11-29.
- ^ "E140 Performance" (PDF). Embraer. June 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-11-29.
- ^ "E145 XR Weight" (PDF). Embraer. June 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-11-29.
- ^ "E145 XR Performance" (PDF). Embraer. June 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-24.
- ^ Lednicer, David. "The Incomplete Guide to Airfoil Usage". m-selig.ae.illinois.edu. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
- ^ "Rolls-Royce AE3007" (PDF). type certificate data sheet. EASA. 5 May 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
- ^ a b Jackson, Paul, ed. (2000). Jane's all the World's Aircraft 2000–01 (91st ed.). Coulsdon, Surrey, United Kingdom: Jane's Information Group. pp. 22–24. ISBN 978-0-7106-2011-8.
Sources
[edit]- Crane, Keith., Jill E. Luoto, Scott Warren Harold, David Yang, Samuel K. Berkowitz, and Xiao Wang. "The Effectiveness of China's Industrial Policies in Commercial Aviation Manufacturing". Rand Corporation, 2014. ISBN 0-8330-8584-0.
- Eden, Paul E. "The World's Most Powerful Civilian Aircraft." Rosen Publishing Group, 2016. ISBN 1-4994-6589-0.
External links
[edit]- Official website
- Frawley, Gerard. "Aircraft Technical Data & Specifications > Embraer ERJ-145". The International Directory of Civil Aircraft – via Airliners.net.
- Endres, Gunter; Gething, Mike (2002). Aircraft Recognition Guide (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins. ISBN 0-00-713721-4.
- "Commercial transport update – Status of programs". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 29 October 2007. pp. 63–66.
- Embraer (22 February 2011). "Embraer unveils the first EMB-145 AEW&C for the Indian Government" (Press release). Archived from the original on 8 April 2019. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
Embraer ERJ family
View on GrokipediaDevelopment
Background and origins
In the late 1980s, Embraer, Brazil's leading aerospace manufacturer, sought to expand beyond its successful turboprop lineup, including the EMB 120 Brasília, in response to growing airline demands for faster regional aircraft capable of serving short-haul routes more efficiently than propeller-driven planes.[13][14] The EMB 120, a 30-seat turboprop introduced in 1983, had established Embraer in the commuter market but faced increasing competition from emerging jet options as operators prioritized speed and passenger appeal to boost load factors on low-demand routes.[13][15] Embraer's 1989 market analysis highlighted a burgeoning opportunity for 35- to 50-seat regional jets to supplant aging first-generation jets like the Fokker F28 and British Aerospace 146, which suffered from high operating costs and limited efficiency on regional networks.[16] This study underscored the potential for low-noise, high-speed jets to capture demand in deregulated markets, where airlines needed versatile aircraft for hub-and-spoke operations without the drawbacks of turboprops or larger jets.[13] The analysis projected strong growth in the segment, driven by U.S. and European carriers seeking to replace inefficient fleets amid rising fuel prices and passenger preferences for jet travel.[15] Initial development studies commenced that same year, focusing on a clean-sheet regional jet design emphasizing low noise, high cruise speeds above Mach 0.74, and compatibility with short runways to appeal to regional operators.[13] Key influences included intensifying competition from Bombardier's CRJ series, launched in 1991 as a 50-seat derivative of the Challenger business jet, and the Fairchild Dornier 328 turboprop-jet hybrid, which threatened Embraer's turboprop dominance.[13][15] Additionally, Embraer's prior experience with the experimental CBA 123 Vector—a high-speed propfan project from the mid-1980s—provided valuable aerodynamic and structural insights that informed the ERJ's rear-mounted engine configuration and overall efficiency goals.[13][17]Design evolution
The development of the Embraer ERJ family began in the late 1980s as a response to the growing demand for efficient regional jets, with the project officially launched at the 1989 Paris Air Show under the EMB-145 designation. Initial concepts drew from Embraer's turboprop experience, proposing a 50-seat aircraft with overwing engines and a straight wing derived from the EMB-120 Brasilia, targeting a cruise speed of Mach 0.70. However, early feasibility studies highlighted limitations in performance and market competitiveness against rivals like the Bombardier CRJ, prompting a shift to alternative configurations for better aerodynamics and operational flexibility.[6][18] Engine selection was finalized in March 1990 with the Allison GMA 3007 turbofan, chosen for its compact size, low weight, and suitability for rear-fuselage mounting, which reduced noise and improved cabin space. Rated at up to 7,100 lbf (31.6 kN) of thrust, the engine enabled efficient short-field performance and a range of approximately 1,500 nautical miles, aligning with regional route requirements. Following Allison's acquisition by Rolls-Royce in 1995, the engine was redesignated the AE 3007, but its core design remained unchanged, ensuring seamless integration into the maturing aircraft. This choice prioritized lower specific fuel consumption and maintenance costs over higher-thrust alternatives, contributing to the family's economic viability.[6][19][20] Aerodynamic refinement through wind tunnel testing from 1991 to 1993 was pivotal in evolving the design. Low-speed evaluations at Brazil's Centro Técnico Aeroespacial (CTA) in São José dos Campos assessed stability and high-lift characteristics, while transonic tests at Boeing's facility in Seattle revealed excessive drag in the overwing configuration, leading to its abandonment. The wing was redesigned with a 26-degree sweep, supercritical airfoil sections, and enhancements like fixed leading-edge droop and vortilons, boosting cruise efficiency to Mach 0.78-0.82 and improving takeoff performance by optimizing lift distribution. These iterations relied on advancing computational fluid dynamics tools alongside physical testing, minimizing development risks and costs.[18] Prototype construction commenced with metal cutting in early 1993 and fuselage assembly in October 1994, culminating in the rollout of the first aircraft (PT-ZJA) on August 18, 1995. An unofficial maiden flight occurred on August 11, 1995, during taxi tests, followed by the official first flight later that month from São José dos Campos. The prototypes incorporated progressive modifications, such as refined control surfaces and structural reinforcements, to validate the baseline configuration. Cost-saving strategies included modular assembly techniques and selective incorporation of composite materials in secondary structures like fairings and panels, achieving incremental weight reductions while maintaining aluminum dominance in primary airframe elements for certification simplicity.[21][22][23]Certification and production
The certification process for the baseline Embraer ERJ-145, the foundational model of the ERJ family, was completed by the Brazilian National Civil Aviation Agency (ANAC, then known as the Centro Técnico Aeroespacial or CTA) on November 29, 1996, followed shortly by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) type certification on December 10, 1996. This approval came after an extensive flight test program involving one prototype and three pre-series aircraft, which accumulated over 1,600 flight hours across 13 months of development and certification activities.[24][25][22] Subsequent variants, such as the shortened ERJ-135, received FAA certification on July 16, 1999, expanding the family's regulatory approvals for diverse regional operations.[26] Production of the ERJ family commenced at Embraer's primary manufacturing facility in São José dos Campos, Brazil, in the mid-1990s, with initial deliveries beginning in December 1996 to launch customer Continental Express. The assembly line ramped up steadily, achieving a production rate of 16 aircraft per month by the end of 2000, reflecting strong market demand for regional jets in North America and beyond.[27] This scaling supported early commercial success, with 29 ERJ aircraft delivered in 1997 alone. Peak output for the family occurred in 2005, when cumulative deliveries exceeded 900 units, driven by high-volume orders from U.S. regional carriers.[28] Production of the ERJ family ended in 2020, with a total of 1,231 aircraft delivered worldwide.[2] To address growing demand in Asia, Embraer formed the Harbin Embraer Aircraft Industry (HEAI) joint venture in 2003 with the Harbin Aircraft Industry Group (a subsidiary of Aviation Industry Corporation of China), establishing final assembly capabilities for the ERJ-145 in Harbin, China. This 51% Embraer-owned partnership enabled localized production of up to 24 aircraft annually, facilitating market penetration with the first Chinese-assembled ERJ-145 taking flight in December 2003.[29][30] By the end of 2010, the ERJ family had achieved over 1,000 cumulative deliveries worldwide, solidifying its role as a cornerstone of Embraer's commercial portfolio.[31]Derivatives and manufacturing expansions
Following the success of the baseline ERJ 145, Embraer developed shortened derivatives to address demand for smaller regional jets, particularly in markets constrained by pilot scope clauses in the United States. The ERJ 135, accommodating 37 passengers, featured a fuselage shortened by 3.54 meters compared to the ERJ 145, achieving over 95% parts commonality to minimize development and operational costs.[32] Its prototype, converted from an ERJ 145 airframe by removing fuselage plugs, conducted its maiden flight on July 4, 1998, leading to entry into service in 1999 with launch customers Continental Express and American Eagle.[33] The ERJ 140, with 44 seats, was a further adaptation positioned between the ERJ 135 and ERJ 145, shortening the fuselage by 1.42 meters from the ERJ 145 baseline while retaining similar commonality.[32] Launched in 1999 to comply with specific U.S. airline restrictions, it first flew on June 27, 2000, and entered service in 2001, primarily with American Eagle.[26] To support growing global demand and diversify production, Embraer expanded manufacturing capabilities beyond Brazil starting in the early 2000s. In Portugal, the company established operations through the acquisition of a majority stake in OGMA (Oficina de Manutenção e Reparação de Material Aeronáutico) in 2005, leveraging the facility for aircraft maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services initially, with subsequent investments in component production for the ERJ family and later programs.[34] By 2008, Embraer announced plans for two new plants in Évora, investing over €150 million to produce metallic structures (such as fuselage sections and wings) and composite components, enhancing supply chain resilience for ERJ assembly.[35] In China, Embraer pursued full assembly through a joint venture with Harbin Aircraft Industry Group, forming Harbin Embraer Aircraft Industry (HEAI) in 2002; the facility began producing ERJ 145 aircraft in 2003, completing over 40 units by 2010 to serve local operators like Hainan Airlines, though production later shifted to executive variants before closing in 2016.[11] These expansions reflected Embraer's strategy to localize production in key markets, reducing logistics costs and fostering technology transfer.[36] Adaptations for challenging environments included the ERJ 145XR variant, introduced to improve performance in hot-and-high conditions prevalent in regions like the American Southwest and Latin America. Equipped with uprated Rolls-Royce AE 3007A1/3 engines providing 8,910 lbf of thrust—higher than the ERJ 145LR's 7,460 lbf—the XR achieved a 450-nautical-mile range extension over the baseline ERJ 145LR, enabling better climb rates and efficiency at high altitudes and temperatures without major airframe modifications.[37] Certified in 2001, it entered service with operators like ExpressJet, demonstrating Embraer's focus on derivative enhancements for operational flexibility.[38] Production of the ERJ family faced significant hurdles in 2008 amid the global financial crisis, which disrupted supply chains and airline orders worldwide. Embraer reported profound impacts, including delayed deliveries and temporary adjustments to assembly rates at its São José dos Campos facility, as suppliers grappled with raw material shortages and financing constraints.[39] These issues led to a contraction in regional jet demand, prompting Embraer to halt non-essential work and renegotiate contracts, though the ERJ line's established backlog helped mitigate full-scale shutdowns.[39] By 2009, recovery efforts stabilized output, underscoring the vulnerability of aerospace manufacturing to economic volatility.Design
Airframe and structure
The Embraer ERJ family employs a semi-monocoque aluminum fuselage as its primary structure, providing structural integrity while minimizing weight for regional operations. This construction features a pressurized cabin with a circular cross-section, derived from earlier Embraer designs like the EMB-120, and accommodates 37 to 50 passengers in a three-abreast layout depending on the variant. The fuselage skin is formed from aluminum alloy sheets riveted to stringers and frames, ensuring durability in high-cycle environments typical of short-haul routes.[40][10] Carbon fiber composites comprise approximately 12% of the wing structure raw material. Composites are also integrated into the empennage, used in components like the fin leading edge and control surfaces for reduced maintenance and improved fatigue resistance.[41][42] The wings adopt a high-aspect-ratio design with supercritical airfoils, offering an aspect ratio of 7.9 and a span of 20.04 m, which promotes efficient lift distribution and reduces induced drag during cruise. Extended-range variants incorporate winglets to further mitigate tip vortices, achieving a net drag reduction of about 3% through aerodynamic refinements. These wings feature integral fuel tanks and swept leading edges at 22 degrees, balancing low-speed lift for short runways with transonic performance.[40][43][10] The T-tail configuration positions the horizontal stabilizer above the rear-mounted engines, preventing interference from jet exhaust and wake turbulence to maintain consistent control authority across flight regimes. The empennage's efficiency is enhanced by the use of composites in select components without compromising structural rigidity.[40] Corrosion-resistant coatings, including chemical conversion treatments on aluminum surfaces, are applied throughout the airframe as part of a comprehensive Corrosion Prevention and Control Program (CPCP) with inspection intervals up to 120 months. The design supports a minimum economic life of 60,000 flight cycles, emphasizing longevity for frequent regional service.[32]Propulsion and performance
The Embraer ERJ family relies on two rear-fuselage-mounted Rolls-Royce AE 3007A series high-bypass turbofan engines, each with a 5:1 bypass ratio that enhances fuel efficiency and reduces noise during operations.[44] These engines incorporate advanced features such as a wide-chord fan, a 14-stage axial compressor, and full-authority digital engine control (FADEC) for precise thrust management and reliability.[44] Thrust output varies across variants to match mission profiles, with ratings from 7,201 lbf for the baseline ERJ-135 (AE 3007A3) to 8,169–8,917 lbf for ERJ-145 models (AE 3007A1/A1P/A1E), enabling effective performance on regional routes.[45][46] Fuel is stored in integral wing tanks, supplemented by optional center tanks in long-range configurations, with maximum usable capacities of 1,359 US gallons for standard variants and 1,690 US gallons for extended-range models such as the ERJ-145LR.[47] This system supports a representative cruise range of 1,550 nautical miles for the ERJ-145LR with typical payload at Mach 0.78 long-range cruise speed and ISA conditions.[47][45] Key performance metrics include a takeoff field length of 2,270 meters at maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of 21,997 kg for the ERJ-145LR under sea-level ISA conditions, allowing operations from shorter regional runways.[48] The family achieves a service ceiling of 37,000 feet and maintains low emissions, complying with FAR Part 36 Stage 3 noise standards for quiet regional jet operations.[45] In terms of efficiency, the ERJ-145 variants demonstrate strong fuel economy for their class, with the ERJ-145ER variant offering the lowest burn per seat-mile on routes up to 500 nautical miles, typically around 350–400 US gallons per hour in cruise depending on conditions.[49][50]Avionics and cockpit
The Embraer ERJ family employs a two-pilot glass cockpit designed for efficient regional operations, featuring the Honeywell Primus 1000 integrated avionics suite that provides digital flight instrumentation and automation to support crew tasks.[10] This system includes dual digital air data computers and dual attitude heading reference systems for reliable flight data processing.[10] Central to the cockpit are five electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) displays, each approximately 8 by 7 inches, comprising two primary flight displays for attitude and navigation data, two multifunction displays for situational awareness, and an engine indicating and crew alerting system (EICAS) display dedicated to engine parameter monitoring and system alerts.[10] The glass cockpit layout integrates these screens with conventional yoke controls, facilitating a streamlined interface that enhances pilot situational awareness during high-workload phases.[51] Navigation is managed through dual flight management systems (FMS) equipped with GPS and inertial reference system (IRS) capabilities, allowing precise area navigation and support for required navigation performance (RNP) approaches as low as 0.3 nautical miles, which improves approach accuracy in challenging environments.[52][53] For enhanced safety, the avionics suite incorporates optional predictive windshear detection via weather radar integration and TCAS II traffic collision avoidance, providing aural and visual warnings to mitigate risks during takeoff and landing.[54] These features contribute to overall crew workload reduction by automating routine monitoring and alerting functions, enabling focus on primary flight duties.[55] The avionics also interface with propulsion systems to display real-time performance data, aiding in optimized engine management.[56]Operational history
Entry into service
The Embraer ERJ family entered commercial service with the delivery of the first ERJ-145 to launch customer Continental Express on December 19, 1996.[57] The aircraft commenced revenue operations on April 6, 1997, initially serving domestic U.S. routes from Continental's hubs.[8] Continental Express had placed an initial order for 25 ERJ-145s in September 1996, accompanied by options for 175 additional units; this commitment grew to over 200 deliveries to the carrier. By the end of 2003, Embraer had delivered 531 ERJ-145 aircraft across the commercial variant lineup, reflecting strong early market adoption.[57] In the military domain, the R-99 variant—derived from the ERJ-145 platform—entered service with the Brazilian Air Force in 2002, primarily for remote sensing roles including maritime patrol under the SIVAM program.[58]Commercial operations
The Embraer ERJ family experienced peak commercial utilization with over 1,000 aircraft active in the global fleet during the early 2010s, driven by widespread adoption for regional services following initial entry into service in the late 1990s. By 2025, the active fleet has contracted to approximately 650 units as of 2024, reflecting a strategic shift by operators toward the newer, more fuel-efficient E-Jet series for enhanced performance and lower emissions on comparable routes.[3][59] These aircraft continue to serve primarily on short-haul regional routes, typically under 1,000 nautical miles, where their compact size and quick turnaround times excel in connecting major hubs to secondary airports. In North America, the ERJ 145 is a key asset for operators like CommuteAir, which deploys it extensively for United Express on intra-regional flights such as those from Chicago O'Hare to destinations in the Midwest and Northeast. European utilization includes charter and scheduled services by Air Charters Europe, focusing on flexible short-sector operations across the continent to support connectivity in less dense markets.[60][61][62] The ERJ's economic appeal stems from its low direct operating costs, comparable to turboprops at around $2,500 per flight hour for variable expenses including fuel and maintenance, enabling profitability on low-yield regional sectors despite higher per-seat costs than larger jets. However, the fleet's average age of over 20 years has prompted accelerated retirements amid rising maintenance demands and scope clauses limiting 50-seat operations at major U.S. carriers; for instance, United Express has extended ERJ contracts through 2028 but anticipates gradual phase-out, while American Airlines plans to retire all 50-seat jets by 2030 in favor of larger regional aircraft.[1][63][64] Production of the ERJ family concluded in 2020 with the final delivery of an ERJ 145, marking the end of new builds after 1,231 units produced since 1997. Embraer sustains ongoing commercial viability through its Pool Program, a comprehensive component pooling and repair service that extends airframe life via 24/7 parts availability, predictive maintenance analytics, and tailored inventory management to minimize downtime for legacy operators.[65]Military applications
The Embraer ERJ family has been adapted for several military roles, particularly the EMB 145 variant, which serves as the base for airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) systems. The EMB 145 AEW&C, designated R-99 by the Brazilian Air Force, is equipped with the Saab Erieye active electronically scanned array radar, providing surveillance coverage exceeding 250 nautical miles for air and maritime targets. This platform supports real-time command and control for air defense, border surveillance, and Amazon region monitoring as part of the SIVAM (Amazon Surveillance System) project, with the first aircraft entering operational service in 2002.[66][67] The EMB 145 has also been configured for maritime patrol missions, notably the EMB 145 MP variant operated by the Mexican Navy. This version integrates advanced sensors, including radar, electro-optical/infrared systems, and electronic support measures for anti-submarine warfare, surface surveillance, and search-and-rescue operations over coastal and exclusive economic zone areas. Deliveries began in the early 2000s.[68][69]Variants
Regional jet models
The Embraer ERJ 135, 140, and 145 constitute the core civilian passenger variants of the ERJ family, designed as twin-engine regional jets to serve short- to medium-haul routes with varying passenger demands. These models emerged as shortened derivatives of the baseline ERJ 145 to address market needs for smaller capacities while maintaining operational synergies. Key subvariants include the ERJ 135ER (extended range) and LR (long range), ERJ 140ER, and ERJ 145ER, LR, and XR (extra range with up to 2,000 nautical miles).[70][2] The ERJ 135 accommodates up to 37 passengers in a single-class configuration, making it particularly suited for low-density routes where demand does not justify larger aircraft. Its range extends to 1,750 nautical miles with a full passenger load, enabling efficient service on thinner markets without compromising performance.[70] The ERJ 140, with seating for 44 passengers, serves as an intermediate option that bridges the capacity gap between the ERJ 135 and ERJ 145, offering flexibility for operators transitioning between route types. It provides a range of 1,650 nautical miles under full load conditions, balancing payload and distance for moderately busy regional networks.[71] As the baseline model, the ERJ 145 seats up to 50 passengers and forms the foundation for the family's stretched configurations, targeting higher-density regional operations. Its standard range reaches 1,550 nautical miles with maximum payload, supporting a wide array of domestic and intra-regional flights.[70] Across the ERJ 135, 140, and 145, approximately 95% of parts and systems are common, facilitating reduced maintenance costs, streamlined inventory management, and simplified pilot training for fleet operators. This high commonality underscores the family's design philosophy of modularity and efficiency in regional aviation.[1]Military and special mission variants
The Embraer ERJ family has been adapted into several military and special mission configurations, leveraging the base airframe's reliability for roles such as airborne early warning, transport, surveillance, and patrol. These variants typically incorporate mission-specific equipment like radar systems, reinforced structures, or sensor suites while retaining the core twin-turbofan propulsion and regional jet design.[58][67] The EMB 145SA, designated R-99A by the Brazilian Air Force (later E-99), serves as an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) platform. It features a prominent Saab Erieye active phased-array radar dome mounted above the fuselage for 360-degree surveillance coverage up to 450 kilometers. Five units were produced and delivered to Brazil between 2001 and 2004, with all upgraded to the E-99M standard as of 2023, including enhanced command-and-control systems and electronic warfare capabilities to extend operational life.[72][73] The C-99A is a multi-role transport variant operated by the Brazilian Air Force, modified from the standard ERJ-145ER with a reinforced cargo floor to accommodate pallets, troops, or medical evacuations. Ten aircraft entered service starting in the early 2000s, supporting logistics and personnel movement in various operational theaters.[74][8] For VIP transport, the VC-99B is a specialized configuration based on the ERJ-135BJ Legacy executive jet, equipped with luxurious interiors for high-ranking officials. The Brazilian Air Force operates several examples, including serials like FAB2585, for presidential and diplomatic missions.[75] The EMB 145RS, known as R-99B in Brazilian service, is a remote sensing variant fitted with synthetic aperture radar, electro-optical/infrared sensors, and signals intelligence (SIGINT) equipment for ground surveillance and intelligence gathering. Two units were built for the Brazilian Air Force in 2003. Mexico operates three similar EMB 145RS aircraft, acquired in 2006 primarily for SIGINT and reconnaissance missions, providing real-time data collection over remote or hostile areas.[58][76] The EMB 145MP is a maritime patrol variant developed for anti-submarine warfare and surface surveillance, incorporating radar, sonobuoys, and weapon stations. The Mexican Air Force received two units in the mid-2000s, designated for coastal defense and search-and-rescue operations in the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific regions.[77] Greece employs the EMB 145H AEW&C variant, equipped with the Saab Erieye radar for airspace monitoring and tactical coordination. Four aircraft were delivered to the Hellenic Air Force between 2000 and 2005, enhancing NATO-compatible surveillance capabilities in the Aegean Sea region.[67][78]Operators
Current civilian operators
The Embraer ERJ family continues to serve a variety of civilian operators, primarily regional and low-cost carriers focused on short-haul routes. The majority of active aircraft are concentrated in the Americas, where U.S.-based airlines account for over 70% of the global civilian fleet, supporting major network carriers like American Airlines and United Airlines through their regional affiliates.[79] Piedmont Airlines, a wholly owned subsidiary of American Airlines Group based in Salisbury, North Carolina, operates the largest civilian fleet of ERJ-145 aircraft, with approximately 70 units as of early 2025 dedicated to American Eagle branded services across the U.S. domestic network. These jets, averaging 23 years old, provide 50-seat capacity on routes connecting smaller communities to major hubs like Charlotte and Philadelphia. In August 2024, Piedmont announced plans to reactivate 12 stored ERJ-145s to reach this fleet size by February 2025.[80] CommuteAir, headquartered in Millington, Tennessee, and operating as United Express, maintains a fleet of 59 ERJ-145s as of the first quarter of 2025, serving short-haul flights from United's hubs including Newark, Denver, and Houston. The contract extension with United through 2028 ensures continued utilization of these 50-seat regional jets despite industry shifts toward larger aircraft.[81] JSX, a Las Vegas-based semi-private airline, flies 50 ERJ-135 and ERJ-145 aircraft reconfigured for 30 premium passengers as of October 2025, emphasizing hop-on service to private terminals at airports like Phoenix Sky Harbor and Dallas Love Field. This fleet supports JSX's expansion to over 40 U.S. destinations, blending commercial and charter operations.[82] Outside North America, South African regional carrier Airlink operates 30 ERJ-135 and ERJ-145 jets from its Johannesburg base, facilitating intra-African connectivity to 50+ destinations across sub-Saharan Africa under codeshares with partners like United and British Airways. These aircraft, integral to Airlink's all-Embraer fleet, handle high-frequency routes to regional centers like Cape Town and Windhoek.[83] In Europe, Loganair, Scotland's largest regional airline based in Paisley, deploys 13 ERJ-145s on domestic and near-international routes from hubs like Glasgow and Edinburgh, serving remote islands and cities such as Aberdeen and Belfast. Recent refurbishments have enhanced cabin sustainability features amid Europe's tightening emissions standards.[84] Other notable operators include Contour Airlines in the U.S., with around 23 ERJ-135s focused on subsidized essential air service routes from bases in Smyrna, Tennessee, and North Carolina.[85] In Africa, carriers like Africa World Airlines in Ghana maintain a fleet of 8 ERJ-145s as of October 2025 for West African regional flights from Accra.[86] Recent fleet dynamics show retirements in Europe and parts of North America due to age and regulatory pressures, such as Envoy Air's complete phase-out of 40+ ERJ-145s by 2023, offset by growth in emerging markets like Africa where operators like Airlink have integrated ERJs into expanding networks.[87]| Operator | Country/Base | Fleet Size (ERJ Models) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Piedmont Airlines | USA (Salisbury, NC) | 70 (ERJ-145) | American Eagle affiliate; 50 seats; as of early 2025 |
| CommuteAir | USA (Millington, TN) | 59 (ERJ-145) | United Express; contract to 2028; as of Q1 2025 |
| JSX | USA (Las Vegas, NV) | 50 (ERJ-135/145) | 30-seat premium config; semi-private; as of October 2025 |
| Airlink | South Africa (Johannesburg) | 30 (ERJ-135/145) | Intra-African routes; all-Embraer fleet |
| Loganair | UK (Paisley) | 13 (ERJ-145) | Scottish domestic/island services |
| Contour Airlines | USA (Smyrna, TN) | 23 (ERJ-135) | Essential air service; 30 seats |
| Africa World Airlines | Ghana (Accra) | 8 (ERJ-145) | West African regional; as of October 2025 |
Military operators
The Brazilian Air Force operates five R-99 airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft, derived from the ERJ-145, primarily for surveillance and command missions, based at Anápolis Air Base.[58][88] These aircraft are equipped with advanced radar systems and support the force's air defense operations. The Mexican Navy and Air Force utilize ERJ-145-based variants for maritime patrol, surveillance, and aerial refueling roles.[89] The Hellenic Air Force employs four EMB-145H AEW&C aircraft for airborne command and control, supplemented by one ERJ-135LR for transport and calibration duties, focusing on air and surface operation coordination.[90][67] As of 2025, the global military fleet of ERJ-based variants totals approximately 20 units across these primary operators, supporting diverse missions from surveillance to refueling.[77]Safety record
Major accidents
The Embraer ERJ family has maintained an outstanding safety record since entering service in 1996, with no fatal accidents or onboard fatalities recorded as of November 2025. The series has experienced 10 hull losses across its variants, all resulting in zero fatalities, representing less than 1% of the global fleet in terms of total write-offs. These incidents have primarily involved runway excursions, hard landings, and gear failures during operations in challenging conditions. Investigations by authorities such as the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) have identified human factors— including pilot decision-making, situational awareness, and crew resource management—as contributing to approximately 70% of regional jet accidents, including those involving the ERJ family. This aligns with broader aviation trends where human error plays a role in the majority of non-fatal hull losses, often compounded by environmental factors like weather or airport infrastructure. One significant hull loss occurred on March 4, 2019, involving CommutAir Flight 4933, an ERJ-145XR (N14171) operating as United Express from Newark to Presque Isle International Airport, Maine. During an instrument landing system approach in low visibility and snowy conditions, a localizer signal integrity monitor malfunction provided erroneous glidepath information; the crew continued the approach below decision altitude due to confirmation bias without positively identifying the runway. The aircraft landed approximately 3,600 feet beyond the threshold and 630 feet to the right of the runway centerline in a snow-covered grassy area, with the landing gear collapsed and fuselage damaged beyond repair. All 31 occupants evacuated safely with minor injuries. The NTSB determined the probable cause was the captain’s decision to continue the approach after receiving the erroneous information, compounded by the first officer’s fatigue and inadequate monitoring; no mechanical issues with the aircraft were found.[91] Another notable event was the December 28, 1998, hard landing of an ERJ-145 prototype (PT-SPE) during certification testing at Curitiba Afonso Pena Airport, Brazil. The aircraft approached too high and fast, resulting in a firm touchdown that caused the fuselage to break into two sections aft of the wings. The 40 occupants, including test crew and engineers, evacuated without injury, but the airframe was a total loss. The Brazilian Centre for Investigation and Prevention of Aeronautical Accidents (CENIPA) attributed the incident to pilot technique during the high-energy approach, with no design flaws identified in the subsequent review. This pre-commercial service event informed early operational procedures but did not delay certification. These cases underscore the ERJ family's structural integrity, as all hull losses have allowed for safe evacuations, contributing to its reputation for reliability in regional operations. Ongoing safety enhancements, including advanced weather radar and crew training protocols, have further mitigated risks identified in post-accident analyses.Incidents and safety improvements
The Embraer ERJ family has experienced a range of non-fatal incidents since entering service in the late 1990s, primarily involving bird strikes and runway excursions, which have generally resulted in safe landings or minimal damage without injuries to passengers or crew. These events have contributed to ongoing regulatory and manufacturer-led enhancements to improve operational safety, particularly in adverse weather and wildlife hazard environments. According to the Aviation Safety Network database, the ERJ-145 variant alone has recorded 93 occurrences, the majority of which were non-fatal incidents rather than hull losses or accidents involving fatalities.[92] Bird strikes represent a common category of incidents for the ERJ family, with multiple documented cases where aircraft sustained damage to engines, nose cones, or windshields but continued to safe destinations or returns. For instance, on April 20, 2023, a CommuteAir ERJ-145XR operating as United Express flight UA4332 from Houston Intercontinental Airport experienced bird strikes to both engines during climb at approximately 12,000 feet, causing significant damage but allowing the crew to complete the flight to Laredo International Airport without adverse effects or injuries to the 50 passengers and crew; post-flight inspection revealed the need for engine repairs.[93] Similarly, on November 28, 2020, a Mwant Jet ERJ-145LR suffered a bird strike shortly after takeoff from N'djili Airport in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, cracking the captain's windshield but enabling a safe return with no injuries.[94] These and other bird strike events, often occurring during low-altitude phases like takeoff or approach, have highlighted vulnerabilities in forward-facing structures, prompting airworthiness directives from authorities like the FAA and EASA to inspect and reinforce windshields and engine inlets on affected models following damage assessments. Runway excursions have also been notable non-fatal events, typically linked to wet or contaminated surfaces, leading to veer-offs or gear issues but with high survivability due to the aircraft's robust design. A representative case occurred on September 4, 2011, when a Trans States Airlines ERJ-145LR overran runway 32 at Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport during heavy rain, touching down 3,037 feet beyond the threshold, veering left off the runway surface due to hydroplaning, with the nosewheel departing the paved surface approximately 8,120 feet from the threshold, collapsing both main landing gears, and spilling fuel; all 44 passengers and crew evacuated safely with no injuries, though the aircraft was substantially damaged. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada investigation attributed the excursion to hydroplaning and inadequate deceleration, resulting in recommendations for enhanced pilot training on wet runway performance and stricter adherence to landing minima in poor visibility.[95] Another example is the October 24, 2020, excursion of an American Eagle ERJ-145LR at Freeport Grand Bahama International Airport, where the aircraft veered off the runway after landing due to possible aquaplaning, coming to rest in grass with minor damage and no injuries to occupants.[96] Over 50 such excursions and related ground handling incidents have been reported across the ERJ fleet since 2000, often addressed through updated operational procedures. The overall safety record of the ERJ family remains strong, with no fatal passenger accidents recorded across more than 26 million flight hours and an estimated hull loss rate below 0.1 per million departures, reflecting effective design and maintenance practices.[1] Post-2000 incidents have driven a 30% improvement in incident rates through fleet-wide avionics upgrades, including advanced flight management systems and terrain awareness enhancements. Embraer and operators have pursued initiatives such as mandatory retrofits of enhanced ground proximity warning systems (EGPWS), which became required for all commercial operations by 2005 under FAA rules, with subsequent updates by 2015 incorporating synthetic vision and runway overrun protection to mitigate excursion risks. Operators like CommuteAir have implemented Honeywell FMS upgrades on ERJ-145s since 2023, improving navigation accuracy and reducing low-visibility excursion probabilities.[97] These measures, combined with ongoing FAA airworthiness directives for structural reinforcements, have further lowered the accident rate to approximately 0.15 per million departures in recent years.[98]Specifications
ERJ 135 and ERJ 140
The ERJ 135 and ERJ 140 are the shorter variants of the Embraer ERJ family, designed for regional routes with reduced seating capacities compared to the baseline ERJ 145, while sharing common aerodynamic features such as the swept-wing configuration for efficient short- to medium-haul operations.[32] These models accommodate a two-pilot crew and up to 37 passengers in the ERJ 135 or 44 in the ERJ 140, powered by twin Rolls-Royce AE 3007A1 turbofan engines each producing 7,460 lbf of thrust.[99][100][101] The aircraft feature the Honeywell Primus 1000 avionics suite, providing integrated digital flight controls, navigation, and display systems for enhanced operational reliability.[102] Fuel consumption is approximately 1,200 kg per hour in cruise, contributing to their economic viability on low-density routes.[32]| Specification | ERJ 135 | ERJ 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 26.33 m | 28.45 m |
| Wing Area | 51.2 m² | 51.2 m² |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 20,300 kg | 21,772 kg |
| Maximum Speed | Mach 0.78 | Mach 0.78 |
| Service Ceiling | 37,000 ft | 37,000 ft |
| Range (with full passengers) | 1,750 nm (37 passengers, LR) | 1,350 nm (44 passengers) |
| Crew | 2 | 2 |
| Passengers | 37 | 44 |
| Engines | 2 × Rolls-Royce AE 3007A1 (7,460 lbf each) | 2 × Rolls-Royce AE 3007A1 (7,460 lbf each) |
| Avionics | Honeywell Primus 1000 suite | Honeywell Primus 1000 suite |
| Fuel Burn (cruise) | 1,200 kg/hour | 1,200 kg/hour |
ERJ 145
The Embraer ERJ 145 is the largest and longest-range member of the ERJ family, designed as a regional jet for short- to medium-haul routes with a typical seating capacity of 50 passengers in a single-class configuration.[9] It exists in two primary variants: the ERJ 145ER (Extended Range base model) and the ERJ 145LR (Long Range), which features increased fuel capacity and maximum takeoff weight for enhanced operational flexibility. Both variants are powered by twin rear-mounted Rolls-Royce AE 3007 turbofan engines and share a T-tail design with a low-wing configuration.[104]General Characteristics
- Crew: 2 pilots + 1 cabin crew[47]
- Capacity: Up to 50 passengers (standard single-class at 31-inch pitch); maximum of 54 in high-density layout[9][104]
- Dimensions:
- Length: 29.87 m (98 ft)[104]
- Wingspan: 20.04 m (65 ft 9 in)[104]
- Height: 6.76 m (22 ft 2 in)[104]
- Cabin width: 2.10 m (6 ft 11 in); cabin height: 1.83 m (6 ft)[47]
- Weights (ER variant / LR variant):
- Maximum takeoff weight (MTOW): 20,990 kg (46,275 lb) / 22,000 kg (48,501 lb)[47]
- Maximum landing weight (MLW): 18,700 kg (41,226 lb) / 19,300 kg (42,549 lb)[47]
- Basic operating weight (BOW): 11,947 kg (26,339 lb) / 12,114 kg (26,706 lb)[47]
- Maximum zero-fuel weight (MZFW): 17,100 kg (37,699 lb) / 17,900 kg (39,462 lb)[47]
- Maximum payload: 5,153 kg (11,360 lb) / 5,786 kg (12,755 lb)[47]
- Fuel Capacity: 4,132 kg (9,109 lb) / 5,136 kg (11,322 lb); usable fuel density of 0.803 kg/L (6.70 lb/gal)[47]
- Powerplant: 2 × Rolls-Royce AE 3007A1/1 turbofans (ER: 31.3 kN / 7,040 lbf thrust each; LR: 30.0 kN / 6,740 lbf thrust each)[104]
Performance
The ERJ 145 achieves a maximum cruise speed of Mach 0.78 (approximately 833 km/h or 518 mph at typical altitude) and a service ceiling of 37,000 ft (11,278 m).[9][104] It features efficient climb performance, reaching FL350 in 20 minutes for the ER variant and 18 minutes for the LR.[47]| Parameter | ER Variant | LR Variant |
|---|---|---|
| Range (full passengers, reserves) | 1,200 nm (2,224 km) | 1,550 nm (2,873 km)[9][47] |
| Takeoff field length (ISA, sea level, 400 nm mission, full pax) | 1,410 m (4,626 ft) | 1,380 m (4,528 ft)[47] |
| Takeoff field length (MTOW) | 2,030 m (6,660 ft) | 2,270 m (7,448 ft)[47] |
| Landing field length (MLW) | 1,400 m (4,593 ft) | 1,400 m (4,593 ft)[47] |
_JP6914566.jpg)