Hubbry Logo
ContinentContinentMain
Open search
Continent
Community hub
Continent
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Continent
Continent
from Wikipedia

Animated, colour-coded map showing some continents and the region of Oceania (purple), which includes the continent of Australia. Depending on the convention and model, some continents may be consolidated or subdivided.

A continent is any of several large terrestrial geographical regions. Continents are generally identified by convention rather than any strict criteria. A continent could be a single large landmass, a part of a very large landmass, as in the case of Asia or Europe within Eurasia, or a landmass and nearby islands within its continental shelf. Due to these varying definitions, the number of continents varies; up to seven or as few as four geographical regions are commonly regarded as continents. Most English-speaking countries recognize seven regions as continents. In order from largest to smallest in area, these seven regions are Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Antarctica, Europe, and Australia (sometimes called Oceania or Australasia). Different variations with fewer continents merge some of these regions; examples of this are merging Asia and Europe into Eurasia,[1] North America and South America into the Americas (or simply America), and Africa, Asia, and Europe into Afro-Eurasia.

Oceanic islands are occasionally grouped with a nearby continent to divide all the world's land into geographical regions. Under this scheme, most of the island countries and territories in the Pacific Ocean are grouped together with the continent of Australia to form the geographical region of Oceania.[2]

In geology, a continent is defined as "one of Earth's major landmasses, including both dry land and continental shelves".[3] The geological continents correspond to seven large areas of continental crust that are found on the tectonic plates, but exclude small continental fragments such as Madagascar that are generally referred to as microcontinents. Continental crust is only known to exist on Earth.[4]

The idea of continental drift gained recognition in the 20th century. It postulates that the current continents formed from the breaking up of a supercontinent (Pangaea) that formed hundreds of millions of years ago.

Etymology

[edit]

From the 16th century the English noun continent was derived from the term continent land, meaning continuous or connected land[5] and translated from the Latin terra continens.[6] The noun was used to mean "a connected or continuous tract of land" or mainland.[5] It was not applied only to very large areas of land—in the 17th century, references were made to the continents (or mainlands) of the Isle of Man, Ireland and Wales and in 1745 to Sumatra.[5] The word continent was used in translating Greek and Latin writings about the three "parts" of the world, although in the original languages no word of exactly the same meaning as continent was used.[7]

While continent was used on the one hand for relatively small areas of continuous land, on the other hand geographers again raised Herodotus's query about why a single large landmass should be divided into separate continents. In the mid-17th century, Peter Heylin wrote in his Cosmographie that "A Continent is a great quantity of Land, not separated by any Sea from the rest of the World, as the whole Continent of Europe, Asia, Africa." In 1727, Ephraim Chambers wrote in his Cyclopædia, "The world is ordinarily divided into two grand continents: the Old and the New." And in his 1752 atlas, Emanuel Bowen defined a continent as "a large space of dry land comprehending many countries all joined together, without any separation by water. Thus Europe, Asia, and Africa is one great continent, as America is another."[8] However, the old idea of Europe, Asia and Africa as "parts" of the world ultimately persisted with these being regarded as separate continents.

Definitions and application

[edit]

By convention, continents "are understood to be large, continuous, discrete masses of land, ideally separated by expanses of water".[9] By this definition, all continents have to be an island of some metric. In modern schemes with five or more recognized continents, at least one pair of continents is joined by land in some fashion. The criterion "large" leads to arbitrary classification: Greenland, with a surface area of 2,166,086 square kilometres (836,330 sq mi), is only considered the world's largest island, while Australia, at 7,617,930 square kilometres (2,941,300 sq mi), is deemed the smallest continent.

Earth's major landmasses all have coasts on a single, continuous World Ocean, which is divided into several principal oceanic components by the continents and various geographic criteria.[10][11]

The geological definition of a continent has four criteria: high elevation relative to the ocean floor; a wide range of igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks rich in silica; a crust thicker than the surrounding oceanic crust; and well-defined limits around a large enough area.[12]

Extent

[edit]

The most restricted meaning of continent is that of a continuous[13][non-tertiary source needed] area of land or mainland, with the coastline and any land boundaries forming the edge of the continent. In this sense, the term continental Europe (sometimes referred to in Britain as "the Continent") is used to refer to mainland Europe, excluding islands such as Great Britain, Iceland, Ireland, and Malta, while the term continent of Australia may refer to the mainland of Australia, excluding New Guinea, Tasmania, and other nearby islands. Similarly, the continental United States refers to "the 49 States (including Alaska but excluding Hawaii) located on the continent of North America, and the District of Columbia."[14]

From the perspective of geology or physical geography, continent may be extended beyond the confines of continuous dry land to include the shallow, submerged adjacent area (the continental shelf)[15] and the islands on the shelf (continental islands), as they are structurally part of the continent.[16]

From this perspective, the edge of the continental shelf is the true edge of the continent, as shorelines vary with changes in sea level.[17] In this sense the islands of Great Britain and Ireland are part of Europe, while Australia and the island of New Guinea together form a continent. Taken to its limit, this view could support the view that there are only three continents: Antarctica, Australia-New Guinea, and a single mega-continent which joins Afro-Eurasia and America via the contiguous continental shelf in and around the Bering Sea. The vast size of the latter compared to the first two might even lead some to say it is the only continent, the others being more comparable to Greenland or New Zealand.[12]

Map of island countries: these states are often grouped geographically with a neighboring continental landmass.

As a cultural construct, the concept of a continent may go beyond the continental shelf to include oceanic islands and continental fragments. In this way, Iceland is considered a part of Europe, and Madagascar a part of Africa. Extrapolating the concept to its extreme, some geographers group the Australian continental landmass with other islands in the Pacific Ocean into Oceania, which is usually considered a region rather than a continent. This divides the entire land surface of Earth into continents, regions, or quasi-continents.[18]

Separation

[edit]

The criterion that each continent is a discrete landmass is commonly relaxed due to historical conventions and practical use. Of the seven most globally recognized continents, only Antarctica and Australia are completely separated from other continents by the ocean. Several continents are defined not as absolutely distinct bodies but as "more or less discrete masses of land".[19] Africa and Asia are joined by the Isthmus of Suez, and North America and South America by the Isthmus of Panama. In both cases, there is no complete separation of these landmasses by water (disregarding the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal, which are both narrow and shallow, as well as human-made). Both of these isthmuses are very narrow compared to the bulk of the landmasses they unite.

North America and South America are treated as separate continents in the seven-continent model. However, they may also be viewed as a single continent known as America. This viewpoint was common in the United States until World War II, and remains prevalent in some Asian and most Latin American six-continent models.[20] The single American continent model also remains a common view in European countries like France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta, Portugal, and Spain, as well as in some Asian countries and most Latin American countries.

The criterion of a discrete landmass is completely disregarded if the continuous landmass of Eurasia is classified as two separate continents (Asia and Europe). Physiographically, Europe and the Indian subcontinent are large peninsulas of the Eurasian landmass. However, Europe is considered a continent with its comparatively large land area of 10,180,000 square kilometres (3,930,000 sq mi), while the Indian subcontinent, with less than half that area, is considered a subcontinent. The alternative view—in geology and geography—that Eurasia is a single continent results in a six-continent view of the world. Some view the separation of Eurasia into Asia and Europe as a residue of Eurocentrism: "In physical, cultural and historical diversity, China and India are comparable to the entire European landmass, not to a single European country. [...]."[21] However, for historical and cultural reasons, the view of Europe as a separate continent continues in almost all categorizations.

If continents are defined strictly as discrete landmasses, embracing all the contiguous land of a body, then Africa, Asia, and Europe form a single continent which may be referred to as Afro-Eurasia.[22] Combined with the consolidation of the Americas, this would produce a four-continent model consisting of Afro-Eurasia, America, Antarctica, and Australia.

When sea levels were lower during the Pleistocene ice ages, greater areas of the continental shelf were exposed as dry land, forming land bridges between Tasmania and the Australian mainland.[23] At those times, Australia and New Guinea were a single, continuous continent known as Sahul. Likewise, Afro-Eurasia and the Americas were joined by the Bering Land Bridge. Other islands, such as Great Britain, were joined to the mainlands of their continents. At that time, there were just three discrete landmasses in the world: Africa-Eurasia-America, Antarctica, and Australia-New Guinea (Sahul).

Number

[edit]

There are several ways of distinguishing the continents:

Color-coded map showing the various continents.
Similar shades exhibit areas that may be consolidated or subdivided.
Number Continents Sources Comment
Four     Afro-Eurasia (Old World or World Island)    America (New World)   Antarctica   Australia [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Continuous landmasses
Five   Africa    Eurasia    America   Antarctica   Australia [32][33][34] Physiographic regions
Six   Africa    Eurasia   North America   South America   Antarctica   Australia [35][36] Geological continents
  Africa   Asia   Europe    America   Antarctica   Australia [37] UNSD continental regions
Seven   Africa   Asia   Europe   North America   South America   Antarctica   Australia [35][38][39][40][41][42] "Parts" of the world

In the English-speaking countries, geographers often use the term Oceania to denote a geographical region which includes most of the island countries and territories in the Pacific Ocean, as well as the continent of Australia.[48] Outside of the English-speaking world, Oceania is generally considered a continent, while Mainland Australia is regarded as its continental landmass.[49][50][51][52]

Eighth continent

[edit]

Zealandia (a submerged continent) has been called the eighth continent.[53]

Area and population

[edit]

The following table provides areas given by the Encyclopædia Britannica for each continent in accordance with the seven-continent model, including Australasia along with Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia as parts of Oceania. It also provides populations of continents according to 2021 estimates by the United Nations Statistics Division based on the United Nations geoscheme, which includes all of Egypt (including the Isthmus of Suez and the Sinai Peninsula) as a part of Africa, all of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Georgia, Indonesia (including Western New Guinea,) Kazakhstan, and Turkey (including East Thrace) as parts of Asia, all of Russia (including Siberia) as a part of Europe, all of Panama and the United States (including Hawaii) as parts of North America, and all of Chile (including Easter Island) as a part of South America.

Land areas and population estimates
Continent Land area[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] Population[62][63]
km2 mi2 % of
world
2021
(estimate)
% of
world
Earth 149,733,926 57,812,592 100.0 7,909,295,151 100.0
Asia 44,614,000 17,226,000 29.8 4,694,576,167 59.4
Africa 30,365,000 11,724,000 20.3 1,393,676,444 17.6
North America 24,230,000 9,360,000 16.2 595,783,465 7.5
South America 17,814,000 6,878,000 11.9 434,254,119 5.5
Antarctica 14,200,000 5,500,000 9.5 0 0
Europe 10,000,000 3,900,000 6.7 745,173,774 9.4
Oceania[α] 8,510,926 3,286,087 5.7 44,491,724 0.6
  1. ^ Not usually considered to be a continent in the English-speaking world. Its land area and population includes Australia, New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea, but excludes the Aru Islands and Western New Guinea.

Other divisions

[edit]

Supercontinents

[edit]
Reconstruction of the supercontinent Pangaea approximately 200 million years ago

Apart from the current continents, the scope and meaning of the term continent includes past geological ones. Supercontinents, largely in evidence earlier in the geological record, are landmasses that comprise most of the world's cratons or continental cores.[64] These have included Vaalbara, Kenorland, Columbia, Rodinia, Pannotia, and Pangaea. Over time, these supercontinents broke apart into large landmasses which formed the present continents.

Subcontinents

[edit]
The Indian subcontinent

Certain parts of continents are recognized as subcontinents, especially the large peninsulas separated from the main continental landmass by geographical features. The most widely recognized example is the Indian subcontinent.[65] The Arabian Peninsula, Southern Africa, the Southern Cone of South America, and Alaska in North America might be considered further examples.[65][66]

In many of these cases, the "subcontinents" concerned are on different tectonic plates from the rest of the continent, providing a geological justification for the terminology.[67] Greenland, generally considered the world's largest island on the northeastern periphery of the North American Plate, is sometimes referred to as a subcontinent.[68][69] This is a significant departure from the more conventional view of a subcontinent as comprising a very large peninsula on the fringe of a continent.[65]

Where the Americas are viewed as a single continent (America), it is divided into two subcontinents (North America and South America)[70][71][72] or three (Central America being the third).[73][74] When Eurasia is regarded as a single continent, Asia and Europe are treated as subcontinents.[65]

Submerged continents

[edit]
Zealandia, the largest submerged landmass or continent

Some areas of continental crust are largely covered by the ocean and may be considered submerged continents. Notable examples are Zealandia, emerging from the ocean primarily in New Zealand and New Caledonia,[75][non-tertiary source needed] and the almost completely submerged Kerguelen Plateau in the southern Indian Ocean.[76]

Microcontinents

[edit]

Some islands lie on sections of continental crust that have rifted and drifted apart from a main continental landmass. While not considered continents because of their relatively small size, they may be considered microcontinents. Madagascar, the largest example, is usually considered an island of Africa, but its divergent evolution has caused it to be referred to as "the eighth continent" from a biological perspective.[77]

Geological continents

[edit]

Geologists use four key attributes to define a continent:[78]

  1. Elevation – The landmass, whether dry or submerged beneath the ocean, should be elevated above the surrounding ocean crust.
  2. Geology – The landmass should contain different types of rock: igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary.
  3. Crustal structure – The landmass should consist of the continental crust, which is thicker and has a lower seismic velocity than the oceanic crust.
  4. Limits and area – The landmass should have clearly defined boundaries and an area of more than one million square kilometres.[a]

With the addition of Zealandia in 2017, Earth currently has seven recognized geological continents:

Due to a seeming lack of Precambrian cratonic rocks, Zealandia's status as a geological continent has been disputed by some geologists.[80] However, a study conducted in 2021 found that part of the submerged continent is indeed Precambrian, twice as old as geologists had previously thought, which is further evidence that supports the idea of Zealandia being a geological continent.[81][82]

All seven geological continents are spatially isolated by geologic features.[83]

History of the concept

[edit]

Early concepts of the Old World continents

[edit]
The Ancient Greek geographer Strabo holding a globe showing Europa and Asia

The term "continent" translates the Greek word ἤπειρος, meaning "landmass, terra firma", the proper name of Epirus and later especially used for Asia (i.e. Asia Minor).[84]

The first distinction between continents was made by ancient Greek mariners who gave the names Europe and Asia to the lands on either side of the waterways of the Aegean Sea, the Dardanelles strait, the Sea of Marmara, the Bosporus strait and the Black Sea.[85] The names were first applied just to lands near the coast and only later extended to include the hinterlands.[86][87] But the division was only carried through to the end of navigable waterways and "... beyond that point the Hellenic geographers never succeeded in laying their finger on any inland feature in the physical landscape that could offer any convincing line for partitioning an indivisible Eurasia ..."[85]

Ancient Greek thinkers subsequently debated whether Africa (then called Libya) should be considered part of Asia or a third part of the world. Division into three parts eventually came to predominate.[88] From the Greek viewpoint, the Aegean Sea was the center of the world; Asia lay to the east, Europe to the north and west, and Africa to the south.[89] The boundaries between the continents were not fixed. Early on, the Europe–Asia boundary was taken to run from the Black Sea along the Rioni River (known then as the Phasis) in Georgia. Later it was viewed as running from the Black Sea through Kerch Strait, the Sea of Azov and along the Don River (known then as the Tanais) in Russia.[90] The boundary between Asia and Africa was generally taken to be the Nile River. Herodotus[91] in the 5th century BCE objected to the whole of Egypt being split between Asia and Africa ("Libya") and took the boundary to lie along the western border of Egypt, regarding Egypt as part of Asia.[92][93][94][95] He also questioned the division into three of what is really a single landmass,[96] a debate that continues nearly two and a half millennia later. Herodotus believed Europe to be larger (at least in width) than the other two continents:

I wonder, then, at those who have mapped out and divided the world into Libya, Asia, and Europe; for the difference between them is great, seeing that in length Europe stretches along both the others together, and it appears to me to be wider beyond all comparison.[97]

Eratosthenes, in the 3rd century BCE, noted that some geographers divided the continents by rivers (the Nile and the Don), thus considering them "islands". Others divided the continents by isthmuses, calling the continents "peninsulas". These latter geographers set the border between Europe and Asia at the isthmus between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, and the border between Asia and Africa at the isthmus between the Red Sea and the mouth of Lake Bardawil on the Mediterranean Sea.[98]

The Roman author Pliny the Elder, writing in the 1st century CE, stated that "The whole globe is divided into three parts, Europe, Asia, and Africa", adding:

I shall first then speak of Europe, the foster-mother of that people which has conquered all other nations, and itself by far the most beauteous portion of the earth. Indeed, many persons have, not without reason, considered it, not as a third part only of the earth, but as equal to all the rest, looking upon the whole of our globe as divided into two parts only, by a line drawn from the river Tanais to the Straits of Gades.[99]

Medieval T and O map showing the three continents as domains of the sons of Noah—Asia to Sem (Shem), Europe to Iafeth (Japheth), and Africa to Cham (Ham).

Following the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the culture that developed in its place, linked to Latin and the Catholic church, began to associate itself with the concept of Europe.[87] Through the Roman period and the Middle Ages, a few writers took the Isthmus of Suez as the boundary between Asia and Africa, but most writers continued to consider it the Nile or the western border of Egypt (Gibbon).[citation needed] In the Middle Ages, the world was usually portrayed on T and O maps, with the T representing the waters dividing the three continents. By the middle of the 18th century, "the fashion of dividing Asia and Africa at the Nile, or at the Great Catabathmus [the boundary between Egypt and Libya] farther west, had even then scarcely passed away".[100]

European arrival in the Americas

[edit]

Christopher Columbus sailed across the Atlantic Ocean to the Caribbean in 1492, sparking a period of European exploration of the Americas. But despite four voyages to the Americas, Columbus never believed he had reached a new continent—he always thought it was part of Asia.

In 1501, Amerigo Vespucci and Gonçalo Coelho attempted to sail around what they considered the southern end of the Asian mainland into the Indian Ocean, passing through Fernando de Noronha. After reaching the coast of Brazil, they sailed along the coast of South America much farther south than Asia was known to extend, confirming that this was a land of continental proportions.[101] On return to Europe, an account of the voyage, called Mundus Novus ("New World"), was published under Vespucci's name in 1502 or 1503,[102] although it seems that it had additions or alterations by another writer.[103] Regardless of who penned the words, Mundus Novus credited Vespucci with saying, "I have discovered a continent in those southern regions that is inhabited by more numerous people and animals than our Europe, or Asia or Africa",[104] the first known explicit identification of part of the Americas as a continent like the other three.

Within a few years, the name "New World" began appearing as a name for South America on world maps, such as the Oliveriana (Pesaro) map of around 1504–1505. Maps of this time, though, still showed North America connected to Asia and showed South America as a separate land.[103]

Universalis Cosmographia, Waldseemüller's 1507 world map—the first to show the Americas separate from Asia

In 1507 Martin Waldseemüller published a world map, Universalis Cosmographia, which was the first to show North and South America as separate from Asia and surrounded by water. A small inset map above the main map explicitly showed for the first time the Americas being east of Asia and separated from Asia by an ocean, as opposed to just placing the Americas on the left end of the map and Asia on the right end. In the accompanying book Cosmographiae Introductio, Waldseemüller noted that the earth is divided into four parts, Europe, Asia, Africa, and the fourth part, which he named "America" after Amerigo Vespucci's first name.[105] On the map, the word "America" was placed on part of South America.

Beyond four continents

[edit]

The Sanskrit text Rig Veda often dated 1500 BCE[note 1] has the earliest mention of seven continents in the Earth, the text claims that the Earth has seven continents and Lord Vishnu Measured the entire universe from his first foot from the land of Earth which has 7 continents.[112]

ato devā avantu no yato viṣṇurvicakrame |
pṛthivyāḥ saptadhāmabhiḥ ||

idaṃ viṣṇurvi cakrame tredhā ni dadhe padam |
samūḷhamasya pāṃsure ||

trīṇi padā vi cakrame viṣṇurghopā adābhyaḥ |
ato dharmāṇi dhārayan ||

—RigVeda transliteration of Book 1, Hymn 22, Verses 16-18[113]
Translation:

The Gods be gracious unto us even from the place whence Vishnu strode
Through the seven regions of the earth!

Through all this world strode Vishnu; thrice his foot he planted, and the whole
Was gathered in his footstep's dust.

Vishnu, the Guardian, he whom none deceiveth, made three steps; thenceforth
Establishing his high decrees.

—RigVeda translation by Ralph T.H. Griffith (1896) of Book 1, Hymn 22, Verses 16–18[114]
Rigveda page in Sanskrit

In regard to the above-quoted verses, it is commonly accepted that there are Seven Continents or 'regions of the earth'. A. Glucklich adds that 'In the Matsya Purana, for instance, there is a seven-part map of the world ... [it has] one centre, where an immense mountain – Mount Meru (or Maha Meru, Great Meru) – stands ... The continents encircle the mountain in seven concentric circles ... It seems clear that the Himalayas were the approximate location of Mt. Meru and the text is clear that the earth has seven continents.[112]

Hollandia Nova, 1659 map prepared by Joan Blaeu based on voyages by Abel Tasman and Willem Jansz, this image shows a French edition of 1663

From the late 18th century, some geographers started to regard North America and South America as two parts of the world, making five parts in total. Overall though, the fourfold division prevailed well into the 19th century.[115]

Europeans discovered Australia in 1606, but for some time it was taken as part of Asia. By the late 18th century, some geographers considered it a continent in its own right, making it the sixth (or fifth for those still taking America as a single continent).[115] In 1813, Samuel Butler wrote of Australia as "New Holland, an immense island, which some geographers dignify with the appellation of another continent" and the Oxford English Dictionary was just as equivocal some decades later.[116] It was in the 1950s that the concept of Oceania as a "great division" of the world was replaced by the concept of Australia as a continent.[117]

Antarctica was sighted in 1820 during the First Russian Antarctic Expedition and described as a continent by Charles Wilkes on the United States Exploring Expedition in 1838, the last continent identified, although a great "Antarctic" (antipodean) landmass had been anticipated for millennia. An 1849 atlas labelled Antarctica as a continent but few atlases did so until after World War II.[118]

Over time, the western concept of dividing the world into continents spread globally, replacing conceptions in other areas of the world. The idea of continents continued to become imbued with cultural and political meaning. In the 19th century during the Meiji period, Japanese leaders began to self-identify with the concept of being Asian, and renew relations with other "Asian" countries while conceiving of the idea of Asian solidarity against western countries. This conception of an Asian identity, as well as the idea of Asian solidarity, was later taken up by others in the region, such as Republican China and Vietnam.[119]

From the mid-19th century, atlases published in the United States more commonly treated North and South America as separate continents, while atlases published in Europe usually considered them one continent. However, it was still not uncommon for American atlases to treat them as one continent up until World War II.[120] From the 1950s, most U.S. geographers divided the Americas into two continents.[120] With the addition of Antarctica, this made the seven-continent model. However, this division of the Americas did not appeal to Latin Americans, who saw their region spanning an América as a single landmass, and there the conception of six continents remains popular.

Some geographers regard Europe and Asia together as a single continent, dubbed Eurasia.[121] In this model, the world is divided into six continents, with North America and South America considered separate continents.

Geology

[edit]

Geologists use the term continent in a different manner from geographers. In geology, a continent is defined by continental crust, which is a platform of metamorphic and igneous rocks, largely of granitic composition. Continental crust is less dense and much thicker than oceanic crust, which causes it to "float" higher than oceanic crust on the dense underlying mantle. This explains why the continents form high platforms surrounded by deep ocean basins.[122][3]

Some geologists restrict the term continent to portions of the crust built around stable regions called cratons. Cratons have largely been unaffected by mountain-building events (orogenies) since the Precambrian. A craton typically consists of a continental shield surrounded by a continental platform. The shield is a region where ancient crystalline basement rock (typically 1.5 to 3.8 billion years old) is widely exposed at the surface. The platform surrounding the shield is also composed of ancient basement rock, but with a cover of younger sedimentary rock.[123] The continents are accretionary crustal "rafts" that, unlike the denser basaltic crust of the ocean basins, are not subjected to destruction through the plate tectonic process of subduction. This accounts for the great age of the rocks comprising the continental cratons.[124]

The margins of geologic continents are either active or passive. An active margin is characterised by mountain building, either through a continent-on continent collision or a subduction zone. Continents grow by accreting lighter volcanic island chains and microcontinents along these active margins, forming orogens. At a passive margin, the continental crust is stretched thin by extension to form a continental shelf, which tapers off with a gradual slope covered in sediment, connecting it directly to the oceanic crust beyond. Most passive margins eventually transition into active margins: where the oceanic plate becomes too heavy due to cooling, it disconnects from the continental crust, and starts subducting below it, forming a new subduction zone.[125]

Sixteen principal tectonic plates of the continents and the floor of the oceans

There are many microcontinents, or continental fragments, that are built of continental crust but do not contain a craton. Some of these are fragments of Gondwana or other ancient cratonic continents: Zealandia,[78] which includes New Zealand and New Caledonia; Madagascar; the northern Mascarene Plateau, which includes the Seychelles. Other islands, such as several in the Caribbean Sea, are composed largely of granitic rock as well, but all continents contain both granitic and basaltic crust, and there is no clear boundary as to which islands would be considered microcontinents under such a definition. The Kerguelen Plateau, for example, is largely volcanic, but is associated with the breakup of Gondwanaland and is considered a microcontinent,[126][127] whereas volcanic Iceland and Hawaii are not. The British Isles, Sri Lanka, Borneo, and Newfoundland were on the margins of the Laurasian continent—only separated from the main continental landmass by inland seas flooding its margins.

The movement of plates has caused the continual formation and breakup of continents, and occasionally supercontinents, in a process called the Wilson Cycle. The supercontinent Columbia or Nuna formed during a period of 2.0–1.8 billion years ago and broke up about 1.5–1.3 billion years ago.[128][129] The supercontinent Rodinia is thought to have formed about 1 billion years ago and to have embodied most or all of Earth's continents, and broken up into eight continents around 600 million years ago. The eight continents later reassembled into another supercontinent called Pangaea; Pangaea broke up into Laurasia (which became North America and Eurasia) and Gondwana (which became the remaining continents).[130]

Criticism

[edit]

Some academics, such as the historical geographer Martin W. Lewis, argue that the systems we understand today are more rooted in social, political, and cultural history than in geological fact, a view particularly outlined in his book The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography.[131]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A continent is a major continuous landmass of Earth, geologically characterized by its composition of low-density sialic (granitic) crust that forms thick, buoyant portions of the lithosphere, distinct from the denser simatic (basaltic) oceanic crust. These landmasses, which include both subaerial terrain and adjacent continental shelves, aggregate to cover approximately 29% of Earth's surface and have been shaped by plate tectonics over billions of years, involving cycles of assembly into supercontinents like Pangaea and subsequent rifting. Conventionally, seven continents are recognized—Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania (or Australia), and South America—though this count reflects a mix of geological, cultural, and historical conventions rather than a strict scientific criterion, with debates persisting over mergers like Eurasia or inclusions like the submerged Zealandia. The concept originated in ancient Greco-Roman geography, dividing the known world into Europe, Asia, and Africa (Libya), and evolved with exploration and scientific advances, culminating in the acceptance of continental drift and plate tectonics in the mid-20th century, which explained continental positions and geological features through rigid plate movements on the asthenosphere.

Etymology

Linguistic Origins and Evolution

The term "continent" derives from the Latin continentem, present participle of continēre ("to hold together" or "contain"), entering English by the 1550s to denote a "continuous tract of land," often as a translation of terra continens ("continuous land" or "mainland"). This usage emphasized interconnected landmasses distinguishable from islands, rooted in Roman geography where the known world formed a single, cohesive terra firma surrounding the Mediterranean. Precursors to this terminology appear in ancient Greek texts, such as Herodotus' Histories (c. 440 BCE), which divided the inhabited world (oikoumene) into three principal land divisions—Europe, Asia, and Libya (an early term for much of Africa)—based on observed terrestrial connections like the Nile and Danube rather than oceanic isolation. These divisions, while not employing the Latin root, underscored a conceptual linkage of vast, adjoining territories, influencing later Roman and Byzantine mappings that treated Eurasia-Africa as a unified continental entity subdivided for descriptive purposes. In medieval European scholarship, the tripartite model endured, with texts and diagrams like T-O mappaemundi portraying Europe, Asia, and Africa as the three continents separated by waterways (the "T") yet collectively forming the continuous dry land encircled by ocean (the "O"), reflecting inherited classical views adapted to Christian cosmology. This framework prioritized adjacency and continuity over modern scale or isolation criteria. By the 16th century, European voyages prompted linguistic adaptation: the term "continent" extended to the Americas as a fourth discrete landmass, recognized for its internal continuity despite oceanic separation from Eurasia, as evidenced in post-1507 cartography and texts describing "continent land" empirically rather than through mythic encirclement. This shift decoupled the concept somewhat from strict Old World connectivity, aligning nomenclature with verifiable transatlantic extents while retaining the core etymological sense of cohesion.

Definitions and Criteria

Core Geological Criteria

Continents represent large, stable expanses of continental crust, typically consisting of ancient cratons and orogenic belts formed through prolonged magmatic accretion and tectonic stabilization. This crust averages 35-40 km in thickness, with variations from 20 to 70 km, and is primarily felsic in composition, dominated by granitic rocks rich in silica and aluminum. In contrast, oceanic crust is mafic, basaltic, and significantly thinner at 5-10 km. The continental crust's low density, approximately 2.7 g/cm³, arises from its mineralogy including quartz and feldspar, enabling isostatic buoyancy that maintains elevations predominantly above sea level. Key empirical criteria for identifying continents include this crustal thickness and composition, verifiable through seismic refraction surveys revealing higher seismic velocities in the upper crust indicative of felsic materials, and lower velocities deeper due to layering. Gravity anomalies further distinguish continents, with positive free-air anomalies over elevated terrains and isostatic compensation reflecting the crust's resistance to sinking into the denser mantle. Unlike oceanic lithosphere, which subducts due to its higher density of about 3.0 g/cm³, continental crust's buoyancy precludes wholesale subduction, preserving it over billions of years through partial recycling at convergent margins. Tectonic independence is another hallmark, as continents often form coherent blocks on lithospheric plates, exhibiting relative stability against fragmentation except during rifting. This geological framework underscores causal processes over arbitrary delineations; for instance, the Eurasian landmass, encompassing both Europe and Asia, resides on a unified tectonic plate with continuous continental crust, undivided by oceanic trenches or rifts that separate other continents. Seismic and paleomagnetic data confirm its integrity as a single cratonic assembly, formed via Gondwanan and Laurasian collisions, rather than fragmented by cultural conventions like the Ural Mountains boundary. Such evidence prioritizes empirical plate boundaries and crustal continuity in defining continents, revealing how non-geological partitions obscure underlying tectonic unity.

Conventional and Cultural Boundaries

Conventional boundaries between continents often rely on prominent topographic features such as mountain ranges and bodies of water, selected through historical precedent rather than uniform geological criteria. For instance, the boundary between Europe and Asia conventionally follows the Ural Mountains in Russia, extending southward along the Ural River to the Caspian Sea, and then through the Caucasus Mountains or the Turkish Straits, a delineation tracing back to ancient Greek geographers like Anaximander, who placed it along the Phasis River (modern Rioni River) in the 6th century BCE, and later formalized by figures such as Philipp Johann von Strahlenberg in the early 18th century. These choices reflect early European exploratory and cultural perspectives, prioritizing navigable or visible divides over tectonic realities, where Eurasia forms a single continental mass without inherent separation. Similarly, the Bering Strait serves as the conventional divide between Asia and North America, separating Russia's Chukchi Peninsula from Alaska by approximately 82 kilometers of water, a narrow marine barrier that underscores human categorization amid otherwise proximal landmasses connected historically via submerged land bridges during glacial periods. This boundary, while verifiable topographically, diverges from geological continuity, as both regions sit on the North American and Eurasian plates' edges without a sharp crustal discontinuity. Cultural and pedagogical models further illustrate the influence of human perception on continental delineations, with variations in grouping and counting driven by educational traditions rather than empirical geology. The seven-continent model prevalent in English-speaking countries distinguishes Europe and Asia separately alongside Africa, North and South America, Australia (or Oceania), and Antarctica, whereas six-continent schemes merge Europe and Asia into Eurasia, reflecting a more unified landmass view. Alternative five-continent frameworks, such as that symbolized by the Olympic rings introduced by Pierre de Coubertin in 1913, represent inhabited landmasses—Africa, the Americas (combined), Asia, Europe, and Oceania—excluding Antarctica due to its lack of permanent human population and emphasizing cultural participation over strict physiography. These divergences highlight categorization as a heuristic tool shaped by historical context and utility in teaching, not causal geological processes, often prioritizing sociopolitical familiarity in Eurocentric traditions. The designation of the Indian subcontinent exemplifies how cultural isolation and physiographic prominence inform subdivisions within broader continents. Encompassing India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives, this region is treated as a distinct entity due to its protrusion into the Indian Ocean, bounded by the Himalayas to the north and diverse coastal features, fostering unique biodiversity, climates, and historical civilizations isolated from mainland Asia. This convention arose from British colonial mapping in the 19th century but aligns with pre-existing perceptions of natural barriers enabling independent cultural evolution, contrasting with the seamless tectonic integration of the Indo-Australian plate into Asia despite ancient Gondwanan origins. Such boundaries reveal discrepancies between human-imposed lines and underlying crustal dynamics, where empirical geology favors larger, plate-based units over fragmented cultural ones.

Extent, Separation, and Number

The seven major continents collectively span approximately 149.3 million square kilometers of land surface, constituting about 29% of Earth's total surface area. Asia covers 44.6 million km², Africa 30.3 million km², North America 24.7 million km², South America 17.8 million km², Antarctica 14.0 million km², Europe 10.2 million km², and Australia 7.7 million km². These extents primarily reflect exposed continental crust, though continental margins extend beneath surrounding oceans via passive shelves. Continental separations arise from tectonic plate divergence, where lithospheric plates pull apart at mid-ocean ridges, generating new oceanic crust through seafloor spreading driven by mantle convection. This process creates expansive oceanic basins that physically isolate continental blocks; for instance, the Atlantic Ocean formed as the North American and Eurasian/African plates diverged following the rifting of the supercontinent Pangaea around 180 million years ago. Such mechanisms, observable via magnetic striping on ocean floors and GPS-measured plate motions averaging 2-10 cm per year, underscore causal separations rooted in geophysical dynamics rather than superficial land connections. The conventional count of seven continents—Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America—aligns broadly with discrete continental plates, including the African, Antarctic, Eurasian, Indo-Australian, North American, and South American plates. However, empirical challenges persist, as the Afro-Eurasian landmass lacks oceanic separation despite plate boundaries like the Red Sea rift, favoring tectonic discreteness over continuous terrestrial unity for rigorous delineation.
ContinentArea (million km²)
Asia44.6
Africa30.3
North America24.7
South America17.8
Antarctica14.0
Europe10.2
Australia7.7
Total149.3

Geological Foundations

Formation Processes and Composition

Continental crust primarily formed during the Archean eon, between approximately 4.0 and 2.5 billion years ago (Ga), through partial melting of the mantle or mafic proto-crust, producing felsic magmas that crystallized into tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) suites characteristic of early cratons. These stable Archean cratons, such as those in the Superior or Pilbara regions, represent the foundational nuclei of modern continents, with radiometric dating of zircon crystals providing direct evidence of their antiquity and long-term preservation. Isotopic signatures, including elevated εNd values in TTG rocks, indicate derivation from mantle sources depleted by prior extraction, supporting episodic rather than continuous differentiation from the primordial Earth. The bulk composition of continental crust averages about 60% silica (SiO₂) by weight, significantly higher than the ~50% in oceanic crust, reflecting repeated fractional crystallization and incompatible element enrichment during magmatic processes. It is preferentially concentrated in lithophile (incompatible) elements such as potassium (K), uranium (U), thorium (Th), and rubidium (Rb), with abundances often 10–100 times those in the mantle, as evidenced by analyses of granulite xenoliths and ophiolite complexes that sample deep crustal levels. This contrasts sharply with the mafic, tholeiitic composition of oceanic basalts, underscoring the role of subduction-related arc magmatism in sustaining felsic crust over time, though early formation predates modern plate tectonics. Net modern growth of continental crust remains minimal, estimated at approximately 0.5–1 km³ per year, largely offset by recycling through subduction erosion and delamination, which returns ~1–2 km³/yr of material to the mantle. Radiogenic isotope systems, including Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf, reveal a near-steady-state mass balance since the Proterozoic, with crustal volumes stabilizing as production rates declined from Archean peaks, corroborated by global detrital zircon age distributions showing limited juvenile addition post-2 Ga. A 2025 study proposes that early continental crust originated via plume-induced melting of hydrated mafic sources in a two-stage process involving mantle upwelling and sagduction, rather than uniform accretionary margins, challenging gradualist models by emphasizing pulsed, deep-mantle driven genesis in a hotter, pre-subduction Earth. This aligns with geochemical evidence from Eoarchean gneisses indicating high-pressure melting (>50 km depth), inconsistent with shallow arc-like settings.

Plate Tectonics and Continental Drift

![Tectonic plates map](./assets/Tectonic_plates_20222022 The theory of plate tectonics describes the lithosphere as composed of rigid plates that float on the asthenosphere and move relative to one another at rates typically between 1 and 10 centimeters per year, driven by mantle convection and slab pull at subduction zones. This framework explains continental drift as the passive transport of continental crust embedded within these plates, rather than continents plowing through oceanic crust as initially envisioned. Empirical evidence, including paleomagnetic data and matching geological features across continents, supports this dynamic model over prior static views of Earth's surface. Alfred Wegener first proposed the hypothesis of continental drift in 1912, arguing from jigsaw-like continental fits, identical fossil distributions, and similar rock sequences that continents had once been joined and subsequently separated. Lacking a plausible driving mechanism, the idea faced skepticism until mid-20th-century oceanographic discoveries provided causal substantiation. Harry Hess's 1960 seafloor spreading concept posited new oceanic crust formation at mid-ocean ridges, while the 1963 Vine-Matthews hypothesis demonstrated that symmetric magnetic anomaly patterns flanking ridges recorded geomagnetic reversals during crustal accretion, directly verifying spreading rates and continental separation. These observations shifted consensus toward mobile plates, with continental positions reconstructed via paleomagnetism and isotopic dating aligning with observed drift trajectories. Seven major tectonic plates primarily carry the continental landmasses: the African Plate (Africa), Antarctic Plate (Antarctica), Eurasian Plate (Europe and Asia), Indo-Australian Plate (India and Australia), North American Plate (North America), South American Plate (South America), and the oceanic Pacific Plate influencing continental margins through subduction. Convergent boundaries exemplify drift's consequences, such as the Indian Plate's northward collision with the Eurasian Plate approximately 50 million years ago, which compressed continental crust to form the Himalayan orogeny and ongoing elevation of the Tibetan Plateau. Divergent boundaries, like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, continue to widen the Atlantic Ocean at about 2.5 centimeters per year. Intra-plate phenomena, such as hotspots, reveal volcanism decoupled from plate boundaries; the Hawaiian Islands chain results from the Pacific Plate overriding a stationary mantle plume, producing seamounts as the plate drifts northwestward at roughly 7-10 centimeters per year. Global Positioning System (GPS) networks now measure these motions in real-time, detecting velocities as low as millimeters per year and confirming plate vectors with sub-millimeter precision over baselines spanning continents. This data empirically debunks fixist models, as no alternative hypothesis—such as vertical crustal oscillations or expanding Earth—accounts for the observed seafloor age gradients, magnetic records, or GPS-derived displacements without contradicting geophysical measurements. Plate tectonics' predictive utility manifests in identifying seismic hazards at boundaries, where 90% of earthquakes occur due to stress accumulation from differential plate motions, enabling probabilistic forecasting of rupture zones despite timing uncertainties. The theory's causal coherence, rooted in convection-driven flow and validated by diverse datasets, renders it the sole framework reconciling continental configurations, volcanic distributions, and seismic patterns.

Supercontinents and Tectonic Cycles

Supercontinents form through the episodic assembly of continental crust via tectonic collisions, recurring on timescales of approximately 300 to 500 million years, a process encapsulated in the supercontinent cycle or Wilson cycle. These cycles involve the closure of ocean basins through subduction, leading to continental convergence and orogenesis, followed by thermal insulation of the overlying mantle, which promotes heat accumulation and subsequent rifting. Mantle convection instabilities, including degree-1 circulation patterns, drive these dynamics by facilitating slab pull and plume upwelling that initiate breakup phases. Documented supercontinents include Columbia (also known as Nuna), which assembled around 1.8 billion years ago and fragmented between 1.7 and 1.4 billion years ago; Rodinia, forming approximately 1.1 billion years ago and dispersing by about 750 million years ago; and Pangaea, which coalesced during the late Paleozoic around 300 million years ago. Pangaea's breakup, initiating around 200 million years ago during the Mesozoic, produced the modern continental configuration through rifting that opened the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. Paleomagnetic records, including apparent polar wander paths (APWPs) that align when continents are reconstructed into supercontinent configurations, alongside stratigraphic correlations, provide key evidence for these assemblies. Fossil distributions further corroborate supercontinent integrity, as exemplified by Glossopteris flora, a Permian seed fern found across southern continents (South America, Africa, India, Antarctica, and Australia), indicating these landmasses were contiguous within Gondwana, a Pangaean fragment. Matching geological features, such as the Appalachian-Caledonian mountains continuous with African and European ranges, support assembly via ocean closure. Projections for future cycles, based on subduction-driven models, suggest the formation of Amasia in approximately 200 to 300 million years, resulting from Pacific Ocean closure and convergence of Eurasia with the Americas near the North Pole. This orthoversion scenario contrasts with introversion models like Pangaea Ultima, emphasizing inertial forces from subducting slabs over plume-driven dispersion.

Variations and Subdivisions

Subcontinents and Microcontinents

Subcontinents represent large fragments of continental crust that have rifted from major landmasses and exhibit semi-independent tectonic behavior, often forming distinct plates capable of significant relative motion. Microcontinents, by contrast, are smaller detached crustal blocks, typically surrounded by oceanic lithosphere, that have been isolated through rifting processes and maintain geological autonomy despite their modest size. Both types are characterized by passive margins where continental crust transitions to oceanic crust, allowing for prolonged isolation that fosters unique evolutionary trajectories in tectonics and biology. The Indian subcontinent exemplifies a subcontinent detached from the Gondwanan supercontinent around 132 million years ago, subsequently drifting northward at rates reaching 18-20 cm per year during the late Cretaceous period before colliding with Eurasia approximately 50 million years ago. This rapid motion, driven by mantle plume dynamics beneath the rift, enabled the preservation of Gondwanan flora and fauna, such as Glossopteris fossils, distinct from Eurasian assemblages until the Himalayan orogeny integrated it geologically. Similarly, the Arabian plate rifted from the African plate—itself a Gondwanan remnant—beginning around 25 million years ago, forming the Red Sea rift system and achieving independent northward motion relative to Africa at about 2 cm per year. These subcontinents' passive margins, lacking active subduction, facilitated their detachment and role as tectonic intermediaries, bridging larger plates during continental dispersal. Microcontinents like the Jan Mayen Microcontinent in the North Atlantic illustrate smaller-scale rifting, originating as a fragment during the separation of Greenland from Eurasia in the Paleocene, approximately 55 million years ago. Spanning roughly 400 km by 200 km, it features thickened continental crust up to 30 km thick, bounded by the extinct Ægir Ridge to the east and the active Kolbeinsey Ridge to the west, with minimal volcanic overprint allowing preservation of pre-rift sedimentary sequences. Such fragments serve as "stepping stones" in plate reconstructions, recording rift propagation and asymmetric spreading; for instance, Jan Mayen's isolation has trapped unique seismic and magnetic signatures that trace North Atlantic opening phases, while analogous blocks elsewhere harbor endemic fossil records unaltered by adjacent continental influences. Their independent kinematics, often involving limited rotation or translation, underscore causal links between localized extension and broader supercontinent cycles without dominating global tectonics.

Submerged and Proto-Continents

Submerged continents consist of continental crust regions that are largely underwater, delineated through bathymetric mapping, seismic refraction, gravity anomalies, and rock sampling via drilling. These features possess the diagnostic traits of continents—elevated crustal thickness exceeding 20 km, felsic composition, and low density—yet their submergence obscures them from surface observation, necessitating geophysical verification to distinguish them from oceanic plateaus. Zealandia exemplifies this category, spanning 4.9 million km² with over 94% below sea level, its continental affinity confirmed by a crustal thickness averaging 20-40 km and granitic basement rocks exposed in New Zealand and New Caledonia. This landmass rifted from eastern Gondwana approximately 80-100 million years ago during the Late Cretaceous, with subsequent extension and thinning precipitating its descent. The subsidence of such proto-continents arises primarily from post-rift thermal contraction: extension during rifting elevates mantle temperatures, thinning the lithosphere and buoying the crust temporarily, but cooling over millions of years restores density, inducing isostatic sinking independent of erosional unloading. In Zealandia's case, Late Cretaceous extension reduced crustal buoyancy, compounded by sediment loading on plateaus, resulting in widespread marine inundation without reliance on mythical erosive dominance. This mechanism, rooted in conductive cooling models, aligns with observed bathymetric profiles and heat flow data across rifted margins. Beyond Zealandia, the Southern Kerguelen Plateau harbors continental slivers, as garnet-biotite gneiss xenoliths dredged from its flanks indicate Precambrian basement detached from India amid Gondwana fragmentation around 120 million years ago. Seismic data reveal localized thick crust beneath volcanic overprint, though much of the plateau derives from plume-related basalts, blurring strict continental classification. Similarly, Mauritius overlies fragments of the microcontinent Mauritia, where zircon grains in beach sands yield U-Pb ages up to 3 billion years, predating Gondwana assembly and embedded within 9-million-year-old hotspot lavas from the Reunion plume. These proto-continental remnants, verified by geochronology and isotopic tracing, underscore dispersed Gondwanan lithosphere now conducive to seabed mining for rare earths and strategic minerals in associated volcanics and sediments. Such discoveries, grounded in empirical sampling over speculative bathymetry alone, expand continental inventories and inform tectonic reconstructions.

Recent Geological Discoveries

In July 2024, geophysical surveys identified the Davis Strait proto-microcontinent, an incompletely rifted submerged fragment of continental crust spanning the tectonic boundary between west Greenland and Baffin Island, Canada, with an area estimated at approximately 100,000 km² and featuring abnormally thick crust indicative of failed rifting around 58–60 million years ago. This proto-microcontinent, detached during early Paleogene extension, was delineated through aerogeophysical data revealing high-velocity anomalies and structural highs distinct from surrounding oceanic crust. A February 2025 study utilizing seismic tomography and geochemical analysis uncovered two continent-sized domains in the lower mantle—corresponding to the large low-velocity provinces (LLVPs) beneath Africa and the Pacific—with divergent chemical signatures and evolutionary trajectories tracing back billions of years, suggesting they may represent primordial reservoirs or roots anchoring overlying continental lithosphere. These domains exhibit enriched incompatible elements and distinct isotopic ratios, challenging uniform mantle convection models by implying long-term isolation from surface recycling processes. Refinements to Zealandia's continental status through 2023–2025 geophysical mapping and magnetic surveys confirmed its ~4.9 million km² extent, with only about 5% emergent as New Zealand and New Caledonia, while highlighting disputes over plate boundaries, including a nascent subduction zone fragmenting its southern margin along the Pacific-Australian plate interface. These updates, derived from integrated seismic and bathymetric data, underscore Zealandia's thinned, submerged crust formed via Mesozoic rifting from Gondwana, with ongoing tectonic stresses influencing its boundaries.

Historical Evolution of the Concept

Pre-Modern and Ancient Perceptions

In ancient Greek thought, the concept of continents emerged from observations of landmasses separated by bodies of water yet connected at extremities, forming a tripartite division of the known world. Herodotus, writing around 440 BCE, described Europe, Asia, and Libya (corresponding to North Africa) as distinct regions extending into the encircling world-ocean, Okeanos, critiquing earlier maps for portraying them as equal in size when Europe alone rivaled the combined extent of the others based on his travels and inquiries during the Persian Wars. This framework, rooted in coastal explorations and trade routes rather than interior surveys, assumed a static geography where landmasses converged northward and southward, rejecting symmetrical mythical enclosures by a uniform ocean. Roman geographer Claudius Ptolemy, in his Geography composed circa 150 CE, reinforced this tripartition through a coordinate-based system compiling data from mariners and astronomers, depicting Europe, Asia, and Libya as contiguous continents bounded by the Mediterranean, Red Sea, and Indian Ocean, with unknown southern and eastern extents speculated but unverified. Medieval European cartography perpetuated this model in T-O schema, where the T-shaped Mediterranean and Nile-Don rivers divided Europe and Africa below from Asia above, enclosed in an O of ocean, symbolizing Christian unity under Jerusalem at the center and emphasizing empirical inheritance from classical sources amid limited new exploration. Islamic scholars like Muhammad al-Idrisi, in his 1154 Tabula Rogeriana commissioned by Roger II of Sicily, integrated Ptolemaic coordinates with Arab travel accounts to map the three continents in detail, orienting south upward and extending known Africa northward while portraying Eurasia as a vast, interconnected landmass devoid of oceanic barriers beyond the encircling sea. In contrast, ancient Chinese cosmology conceived the world as a China-centered Tianxia (all under heaven), with surrounding peripheral regions of barbarians but no formalized continental divisions, reflecting isolation by natural barriers like the Himalayas and Gobi Desert rather than systematic global partitioning. These pre-modern views, constrained by sail-and-overland reconnaissance, uniformly treated the Old World as a cohesive, unchanging entity, with mythical separations like Plato's Atlantis dismissed in favor of observable connectivity.

European Exploration and Expansion

European explorers' transatlantic voyages in the late 15th century provided empirical evidence for the existence of a vast landmass west of Europe and Africa, distinct from Asia and later recognized as the Americas. Christopher Columbus, sailing under Spanish sponsorship, departed Palos de la Frontera on August 3, 1492, with three ships—the Niña, Pinta, and Santa María—and a crew of about 90 men, reaching an island in the Bahamas on October 12 after five weeks at sea. Although Columbus believed he had arrived in the East Indies, his four voyages between 1492 and 1504 documented extensive coastlines and islands, necessitating revisions to prior maps that underestimated Earth's circumference. Pedro Álvares Cabral's fleet, dispatched by Portugal in 1500 to follow Vasco da Gama's route to India, deviated westward and sighted the Brazilian coast near present-day Porto Seguro on April 22, confirming a substantial southern extension of the western landmass. Ferdinand Magellan's expedition, launched from Spain in 1519 with five ships, sought a western passage to the Spice Islands but instead navigated the strait later named for him and crossed the Pacific Ocean, demonstrating the Americas' separation from Asia through direct traversal of intervening seas. Magellan perished in the Philippines in 1521, but one vessel, the Victoria under Juan Sebastián Elcano, completed the circumnavigation in 1522, returning to Spain after 60,440 kilometers of sailing and verifying the planet's oceanic connectivity and continental isolation via accumulated log data. These feats relied on advancements like the astrolabe for latitude and dead reckoning for longitude, though accurate longitude remained elusive until later chronometric methods; the voyages' success stemmed from iterative corrections based on observed discrepancies from Ptolemaic projections. Pacific explorations further isolated Australia as a discrete continent. Dutch navigator Abel Tasman, commissioned by the Dutch East India Company, departed Batavia in August 1642 with two ships, sighting and charting Van Diemen's Land (Tasmania) on November 24 and approaching the west coast of Australia without landing, thus outlining its southern boundaries amid searches for Terra Australis. British explorer James Cook, on his first voyage aboard HMS Endeavour, made landfall on Australia's east coast near present-day Point Hicks in April 1770, mapping northward to Cape York by August and claiming the territory for Britain, confirming the continent's continuity and separation from Asia via precise coastal surveys. Antarctic sightings in the 1820s culminated empirical confirmation of a polar continent. Russian explorer Fabian Gottlieb von Bellingshausen, leading a two-ship expedition, approached the Antarctic mainland on January 28, 1820, recording ice shelves within sight of the coast during a circumnavigating voyage that disproved open polar seas hypothesized earlier. American sealer Nathaniel Palmer independently sighted the continent's peninsula on November 17, 1820, amid fur-sealing pursuits, providing corroborative accounts of its icy extent. These observations, enabled by reinforced hulls and southern latitudes pushed beyond prior limits, integrated Antarctica into global continental frameworks through direct visual and navigational data. The cumulative impact of these expeditions—driven by Iberian and northern European maritime innovations like caravels and magnetic compasses—shifted cartography from speculative models to evidence-based delineations, fostering trade routes and population movements that quantified continental separations via repeated transits and measurements.

Modern Scientific Paradigm Shifts

In 1885, Austrian geologist Eduard Suess proposed the concept of Gondwanaland, a southern supercontinent comprising Africa, South America, India, Australia, and Antarctica, based on matching fossil floras like Glossopteris and similar stratigraphic sequences across these now-separated landmasses. This idea built on earlier observations of geological continuity but lacked a dynamic mechanism for continental separation. Suess's work challenged static views of Earth's crust, yet it gained limited traction amid prevailing fixist paradigms that assumed continents were fixed features. Alfred Wegener advanced these insights in his 1912 lecture and 1915 book Die Entstehung der Kontinente und Ozeane, synthesizing evidence for continental drift including the jigsaw-like fit of continental margins (notably South America and Africa), identical fossil species across oceans (e.g., Mesosaurus in Brazil and South Africa), congruent geological formations, and paleoclimatic indicators like Carboniferous glaciers in equatorial regions. Wegener posited that continents moved through the oceanic crust, but without a plausible driving force—his suggestion of tidal or centrifugal forces was critiqued as insufficient—the hypothesis encountered vehement institutional resistance, particularly from American geologists wedded to uniformitarian fixism and viewing drift as geologically implausible. This opposition persisted for decades, prioritizing doctrinal consistency over accumulating empirical data, dismissing Wegener's evidence as coincidental despite its causal coherence under lateral movement. The paradigm shifted decisively in the 1960s with Harry Hess's 1960 hypothesis of seafloor spreading, where new oceanic crust forms at mid-ocean ridges and migrates outward, complemented by Vine and Matthews's 1963 interpretation of symmetrical magnetic stripes in seafloor basalt recording geomagnetic reversals—directly validating episodic spreading rates of centimeters per year. These findings, alongside alignments of earthquake and volcanic belts with proposed plate boundaries, enabled Jason Morgan, Xavier Le Pichon, and Dan McKenzie to formalize plate tectonics in 1967-1968, a rigid-lithosphere model that mechanistically integrated drift via mantle convection, subduction, and transform faults, predicting observable rifts and seismic zones with high fidelity. By the early 1970s, empirical seafloor data overwhelmed prior resistance, unifying disparate geological phenomena under causal realism and rendering fixism untenable. Post-2000 advancements, including Global Positioning System (GPS) networks measuring plate velocities (e.g., Pacific Plate at 7-10 cm/year), have empirically confirmed tectonic motions matching paleomagnetic reconstructions, while seismic tomography reveals mantle convection patterns driving slab pull and ridge push. These technologies debunk lingering anti-drift skepticism as empirically unfounded, underscoring how institutional biases delayed but ultimately yielded to verifiable causal mechanisms and data-driven inference.

Quantitative Aspects

Area and Population Comparisons

Asia is the largest continent by land area, encompassing 44.58 million square kilometers, which constitutes approximately 30% of the Earth's total land surface. In contrast, Antarctica spans about 14 million square kilometers but remains uninhabited due to its extreme cold and ice cover, supporting no permanent human population. The table below compares the areas and 2025 population estimates for the seven continents, highlighting disparities in scale and human occupancy:
ContinentArea (million km²)Population (2025 est.)
Asia44.584,978 million
Africa30.371,550 million
North America24.71617 million
South America17.84434 million
Antarctica14.000
Europe10.18744 million
Australia7.6945 million
Data on areas derived from standard geographic measurements; population figures from United Nations-based projections adjusted for 2025. Population densities vary starkly across continents, with Europe exhibiting one of the highest at approximately 73 people per square kilometer, attributable to its temperate climate fostering extensive arable land, navigable rivers, and historical agricultural surpluses that supported dense settlements. Australia's density remains low at around 6 people per square kilometer, primarily due to its arid interior dominating over 70% of the landmass, which restricts freshwater availability and viable farming to coastal fringes. These patterns reflect environmental determinism, where habitable zones—characterized by reliable precipitation and moderate temperatures—concentrate human activity, limiting interior expansion in dry or frozen regions. Globally, about 40% of the world's population resides within 100 kilometers of coastlines, driven by access to marine resources, trade routes, and moderated climates that mitigate inland extremes. Equatorial proximity further influences densities in tropical zones through extended growing seasons, though offset in some areas by disease vectors and soil depletion; conversely, high-latitude or hyper-arid interiors see near-zero habitation. In Africa, rapid population growth to 1.55 billion by 2025 stems from persistently high fertility rates exceeding 4 births per woman, improved child survival from medical advances, and a burgeoning youth cohort comprising over 60% under 25, fueling urban migration toward resource-driven economies in mining and agriculture. This demographic surge has accelerated urbanization, with over 40% now in cities as of recent trends, shifting from rural subsistence to industrial and service sectors amid commodity booms.

Human Impacts and Civilizational Patterns

The orientation and connectivity of continents have influenced the diffusion of technologies, crops, and ideas throughout human history, with Eurasia's predominant east-west axis enabling more rapid spread of innovations across similar latitudes compared to north-south oriented landmasses. This hypothesis, advanced by Jared Diamond, posits that such geographical alignment facilitated the dissemination of agriculture and domesticable species from the Fertile Crescent westward to Europe and eastward to East Asia, contributing to denser populations and complex societies. However, quantitative analyses testing the axis hypothesis across global archaeological data have found no consistent evidence that continental orientation uniformly predicts the pace or extent of cultural innovation diffusion. In contrast, Australia's extreme isolation after human arrival around 65,000 years ago resulted in limited external influences, with Aboriginal populations developing sophisticated but regionally confined adaptations suited to hunter-gatherer lifestyles, without transitions to agriculture, metallurgy, or urbanization seen elsewhere. Genetic studies indicate that by 31,000 years ago, Aboriginal communities had diverged significantly due to geographic barriers, maintaining technological continuity in stone tools and fire management rather than cumulative advancements. This stasis underscores how oceanic separation curtailed idea exchange, contrasting with Eurasia's interconnected land corridors that amplified technological compounding. The Americas' north-south axis similarly constrained diffusion, as varying climates and ecosystems along latitudinal gradients hindered the adaptation and spread of crops and technologies from Mesoamerica southward or northward, delaying unified civilizational advances relative to Eurasia's latitudinal parallels. Empirical patterns of innovation, such as the independent invention of agriculture in multiple American regions without widespread convergence, correlate with these barriers, rejecting notions of uniform human potential independent of environmental constraints. Resource distributions tied to continental geology have also shaped civilizational trajectories, as seen in Africa's ancient gold-rich cratons that fueled the Ghana Empire (c. 300–1100 CE), which controlled trans-Saharan trade routes and amassed wealth through gold exports from Bambuk and Bure regions. Successor states like Mali (c. 1235–1670 CE) expanded this network, leveraging gold fields to support urban centers such as Timbuktu and scholarly pursuits, demonstrating how mineral gradients incentivized trade and state formation. In modern contexts, continental shelves host significant hydrocarbon reserves, with offshore fields contributing notably to global supply, though exact proportions vary; for instance, U.S. outer continental shelf production accounted for about 15% of domestic oil in 2020. These patterns affirm geography's causal influence on economic and technological disparities, beyond egalitarian assumptions of equivalent outcomes across isolated versus connected realms.

Controversies and Criticisms

Debates on Continental Numbering

The prevailing model in much of the English-speaking world, particularly the United States and United Kingdom, recognizes seven continents: Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, and Australia (or Oceania). This framework emphasizes distinct landmasses separated by oceans or cultural boundaries, with Europe treated separately from Asia despite the lack of a natural divider beyond the Ural Mountains and Ural River. In contrast, many European educational systems adopt a six-continent model by combining Europe and Asia into Eurasia, reflecting the continuous land connection and shared tectonic plate. A five-continent model appears in some curricula, such as in parts of Latin America, where North and South America are unified as a single "America" due to historical and cultural ties, alongside Europe, Asia, Africa, and Oceania; Antarctica is often omitted as uninhabited. This approach prioritizes human settlement and regional identity over strict geological separation. Olympic symbolism reinforces a variant by representing five inhabited continents (Africa, Americas, Asia, Europe, Oceania), excluding Antarctica. Geological perspectives challenge these counts by incorporating plate tectonics and continental crust thickness, potentially yielding eight or more divisions. Zealandia, a mostly submerged landmass comprising New Zealand and surrounding regions, qualifies as an eighth continent due to its distinct crustal composition and separation from Australia during Gondwanan breakup around 80 million years ago. Some researchers propose up to 11 fragments if including microcontinents like the Seychelles or Kerguelen Plateau, based on seismic data showing continental rather than oceanic crust. A 2024 study in Gondwana Research argued for six continents by asserting that the North American and Eurasian plates remain connected beneath the Atlantic, preventing full separation of North America from Europe-Eurasia, though this relies on mantle convection models and faces skepticism for overlooking surface geography. These discrepancies highlight educational inconsistencies: Anglophone curricula favor seven for pedagogical emphasis on political boundaries, while others integrate geophysical unity. No universally "correct" count exists, as definitions oscillate between arbitrary cultural conventions and empirical criteria like elevation above sea level (94% of Zealandia is submerged, disqualifying it in surface-based models) or tectonic independence. Geology empirically supports more than seven when accounting for submerged crust, but traditional models persist due to entrenched teaching and avoidance of revising maps.
ModelContinents IncludedBasisPrevalent In
7Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, AustraliaSurface landmasses and cultural/political divisionsU.S., Canada, Australia
6Africa, Antarctica, Australia, Eurasia, North America, South America (or variants merging Americas)Tectonic/land continuityMuch of Europe, Russia
5Africa, America (combined), Asia, Europe, OceaniaInhabited regions, cultural unityLatin America, Olympic contexts
8+Standard 7 plus Zealandia (and microcontinents)Continental crust and plate fragmentsGeological research

Arbitrariness and Cultural Influences

The conventional boundary between Europe and Asia along the Ural Mountains constitutes an arbitrary demarcation, as no tectonic plate boundary separates the two; both occupy the Eurasian Plate, with the mountains resulting from ancient subduction rather than an ongoing continental rift. This division traces to ancient Greek geographers like Herodotus, who differentiated Europa from Asia based on cultural familiarity with Mediterranean lands versus the expansive eastern territories, a convention sustained by historical inertia despite lacking physiographic discontinuity. Cultural and institutional preferences further highlight subjective influences on continental classification, as seen in the International Olympic Committee's adoption of a five-continent model limited to inhabited landmasses—Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe, and Oceania—symbolized by the interlocking rings to represent global athletic unity excluding Antarctica. In contrast, the standard seven-continent framework, encompassing Antarctica alongside the five plus Australia as a distinct entity, prevails in geographical education and international statistics, reflecting a broader inclusion of uninhabited but geologically significant masses. Postcolonial critiques, prevalent in academic discourse, portray continental divisions as Eurocentric artifacts imposed through colonial mapping to justify expansion, yet such boundaries fundamentally arise from empirical observations of land-water separations verified by exploratory voyages and surveys from the 15th to 19th centuries, prioritizing mappable physical realities over ideological deconstructions. These deconstructions, often advanced by scholars in institutions exhibiting systemic biases toward relativizing Western empirical traditions, overlook the causal primacy of observable geographic features—like Australia's Sahul shelf isolation—in shaping classifications independent of cultural imposition. Indigenous perspectives, such as those of Aboriginal Australians, underscore additional cultural variances by conceptualizing the land as interconnected "country" governed by spiritual and kinship ties spanning the continent, rather than aligning with external continental silos; however, geophysical evidence of Australia's tectonic separation from Asia via deep ocean trenches substantiates its standalone status, grounding modern delineations in verifiable data over purely local ontologies.

Scientific and Definitional Challenges

The geological definition of a continent centers on large, stable landmasses composed primarily of thick, buoyant continental crust (typically granitic, averaging 30-50 km thick) distinct from thinner oceanic crust (basaltic, 5-10 km thick), but lacks a universally agreed threshold for size, separation, or emergence above sea level. This fuzziness arises from transitional zones like continental shelves and shelves extending thousands of kilometers, blurring boundaries between continental and oceanic domains. For instance, Greenland possesses continental crust and is geologically linked to the North American plate, yet is classified as an island rather than a separate continent due to its integration with mainland North America and lack of independent tectonic isolation. Submerged features exacerbate definitional ambiguity, as continental crust can extend beneath oceans without surfacing, challenging surface-based models. Zealandia exemplifies this: a mostly submerged landmass of approximately 4.9 million square kilometers, recognized by geologists as meeting criteria for continental status—including distinct geology, elevation above abyssal plains, and geophysical properties—despite 94% being underwater, with full mapping completed by 2023 revealing intact crustal structure from Gondwanan origins. Recent studies, such as a 2025 analysis of tectonic connections beneath Iceland, propose merging North America and Europe into one continent based on shared crustal continuity and plate interactions, questioning the rigidity of the traditional seven-continent framework by highlighting hidden subsurface links. Critiques portray the continent concept as partly mythical, overemphasizing discrete units that poorly align with underlying physical realities like plate tectonics or cratonic stability, as argued in Martin W. Lewis and Kären E. Wigen's 1997 analysis of metageography, which faults it for inconsistencies between cultural divisions and natural patterns. Geologically, continents better approximate assemblages of ancient cratons—stable Archean-Proterozoic crustal blocks resisting deformation—serving as empirical building blocks rather than arbitrary blobs, though the term persists as a heuristic for scaling planetary features amid causal processes like subduction resistance and mantle convection. This echoes historical resistance to continental drift, where fixed-landmass assumptions delayed acceptance of dynamic tectonics until empirical seismic and paleomagnetic data prevailed, underscoring the need for criteria grounded in verifiable crustal properties over legacy conventions.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.