Hubbry Logo
EryopsEryopsMain
Open search
Eryops
Community hub
Eryops
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Eryops
Eryops
Eryops
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Eryops
Temporal range: Pennsylvanian to Cisuralian (Gzhelian to Kungurian), 299–273 Ma
Skeleton of Eryops megacephalus at the American Museum of Natural History
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Tetrapoda
Order: †Temnospondyli
Family: †Eryopidae
Genus: †Eryops
Cope, 1877
Species:
†E. megacephalus
Binomial name
†Eryops megacephalus
Cope, 1877

Eryops (/ˈɛri.ɒps/; from Greek ἐρύειν, eryein, 'drawn-out' + ὤψ, ops, 'face', because most of its skull was in front of its eyes) is a genus of extinct, amphibious temnospondyls. It contains the type species Eryops megacephalus, the fossils of which are found mainly in early Permian deposits of the Texas Red Beds, and Eryops grandis from New Mexico. Fossils have also been found in late Carboniferous rocks from New Mexico and early Permian deposits of Oklahoma, Utah, the Pittsburgh tri-state region, and Prince Edward Island. Several complete skeletons of Eryops have been found in lower Permian rocks, but skull bones and teeth are its most common fossils.

Description

[edit]
Life restoration

Eryops averaged a little over 1.5–2.0 m (4 ft 11 in – 6 ft 7 in) long and could grow up to 3 m (9 ft 10 in),[1] making them among the largest land animals of their time. Adults have been estimated to weigh between 102 and 222 kg (225 and 489 lb).[2] The skull was large and relatively broad compared to coeval temnospondyls; the skull reached lengths of around 45 cm (18 in).[3][4]

The postcranial skeleton of Eryops is among the most completely known of all temnospondyls.[5][6][7][8][9] The configuration of the postcrania is similar to that of other temnospondyls, but the relative degree of ossification and overall size of the animal produce some of the sturdiest and most robust postcrania among Paleozoic temnospondyls.[10]

The texture of Eryops skin was revealed by a fossilized "mummy" described in 1941. This mummy specimen showed that the body in life was covered in a pattern of oval bumps.[11]

Discovery and species

[edit]
Cast of the skull

Eryops is currently thought to contain two presently valid species. The type species, E. megacephalus, refers to the "large-headed" aspect of the genus. Remains of E. megacephalus have been found in rocks dated to the early Permian period (Sakmarian age, about 295 million years ago) in the southwestern United States. Most of these specimens, including the type material, have little to no locality information other than that they are from the early Permian of Texas,[12] but more definitively placed specimens are recorded for much of the Cisuralian, including the Putnam, Admiral, Belle Plains, and Clyde Formations.[13][3][14][15][8] The second nominal species is Eryops grandis, which was described from the Cutler Formation of New Mexico and also known from Colorado.[16][12][17]

Various other valid temnospondyl taxa were previously placed in the genus. During the mid-20th century, some older fossils were classified as a second species of Eryops, E. avinoffi. This species, known from Carboniferous period fossil found in Pennsylvania, had originally been classified in the genus Glaukerpeton.[18] Beginning in the late 1950s,[19][20] some scientists concluded that Glaukerpeton was too similar to Eyrops to merit taxonomic distinction. However, revision of the material confirmed that it could be differentiated from Eryops based on various morphological features.[21] 'Eryops anatinus' and 'Eryops latus' are both junior synonyms of E. megacephalus. 'Eryops' ferricolus is now recognized as a dissorophid, Parioxys,[12][22] 'Eryops platypus' is a junior synonym of the amphibamid Platyrhinops lyelli,[23] and 'Eryops africanus' and 'Eryops oweni' are rhinesuchids.[24] 'Eryops reticulatus' is regarded as a nomen vanum,[16] though it is alternatively regarded as a junior synonym of E. grandis.[12]

Material only tentatively referred to E. megacephalus or only to the genus has been reported from Kansas,[25] New Mexico[16], Utah,[26][27] Oklahoma,[28][29][30] and Prince Edward Island.[31] The primary material of Eryops that has been reported from the Conemaugh Group in West Virginia[20] has also been reidentified as Glaukerpeton,[21] although unpublished specimens referred to Eryops sp. (and with acknowledgment of the validity of Glaukerpeton) have been listed from this region.[12]

Paleobiology

[edit]

Eryops was one of the largest non-amniote tetrapods of the early Permian; among temnospondyls, it was rivaled in size only by edopoids, which were relatively rare.[32] The ecology of Eryops has been extensively debated and remains without consensus due to conflicting signals from different lines of evidence, such as external morphology,[8][4] biomechanical modeling,[33] and bone histology.[34][35][36][37] Eryops lived in lowland habitats in and around ponds, streams, and rivers, and the arrangement and shape of their teeth suggests that they probably ate mostly large fish and aquatic tetrapods.[1] The torso of Eryops was relatively stiff and the tail stout, which would have made them poor swimmers. While they probably fed on fish, adult Eryops must have spent most of their time on land.[1]

Like other large primitive temnospondyls, Eryops would have grown slowly and gradually from aquatic larvae, but they did not go through a major metamorphosis like many modern amphibians. While adults probably lived in ponds and rivers, perhaps venturing onto their banks, juvenile Eryops may have lived in swamps, which possibly offered more shelter from predators.[38][1]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Eryops

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Eryops is a genus of extinct temnospondyl amphibians belonging to the family Eryopidae, characterized by their robust, salamander-like bodies, broad skulls with raised orbits, and strong limbs adapted for both aquatic and terrestrial locomotion. The type and only widely recognized species, E. megacephalus, named by Edward Drinker Cope in 1877, measured up to approximately 2.5 meters in length, with skulls reaching 34 cm in width, and possessed fang-like teeth suited for a carnivorous diet of fish and smaller tetrapods. Fossils of Eryops are primarily known from Lower Permian deposits in North America, particularly the Admiral Formation in Texas, dating to around 295 million years ago, though earlier Pennsylvanian records have been reported from New Mexico. A nearly complete skull was discovered in North Central Texas in June 2025, confirming the abundance of well-preserved material from these deposits. These early tetrapods inhabited stream, lake, and environments during the late to early Permian, exhibiting an amphibious lifestyle with gradual ontogenetic shifts from aquatic larvae to more terrestrial adults, lacking a dramatic seen in modern amphibians. Anatomically, Eryops featured a heavily ossified , including a complete bony braincase enclosing a primitive brain with a prominent pineal eye, and hindlimbs capable of sprawling gaits similar to those of extant salamanders, supporting efficient movement on land and in water. As apex predators in their ecosystems, they played a key role in understanding the transition of vertebrates from water to land, bridging fish-like ancestors and more advanced amniotes.

Taxonomy

Etymology

The genus name Eryops was coined by the American paleontologist in 1877, deriving from the Greek ἐρύειν (eryein, meaning "to draw out") and ὤψ (ops, meaning "face"), in reference to the elongated anterior portion of the skull that extends well in front of the eye sockets. This naming occurred in Cope's original description published in the American Naturalist, where he introduced the taxon based on fossil material from Permian deposits. The , E. megacephalus, bears an from megas (large) and kephalē (head), emphasizing the notably oversized relative to the body, a defining characteristic observed in the initial specimens. A second species, E. grandis, was subsequently named by in 1878, with the Latin grandis (large) highlighting the substantial overall dimensions of the preserved fossils.

Classification and phylogeny

Eryops is classified within the subclass , a major group of extinct amphibian-like tetrapods that dominated aquatic and semi-aquatic ecosystems from the to the periods. Specifically, it belongs to the family Eryopidae, part of the superfamily Eryopoidea or the higher-order group Eryopiformes, which encompasses basal temnospondyls characterized by robust skeletal features adapted for both aquatic and terrestrial environments. This placement positions Eryops as a non- stem-tetrapod, distinct from more derived amniote lineages that emerged in the late . The genus was first described and named by in 1877 based on skull material from the Early Permian of , initially grouped among the broad category of labyrinthodont amphibians due to the folded enamel in its teeth. In the mid-, Alfred Sherwood Romer refined temnospondyl taxonomy in his 1947 review, formally including Eryops within as a representative of the Eryopidae family, emphasizing its primitive yet specialized morphology relative to earlier forms. Subsequent revisions in the late , such as those by Andrew Milner in 1990, incorporated cladistic methods to affirm Eryopidae's and its position outside more advanced temnospondyl clades like . Phylogenetic analyses consistently recover Eryops as a basal eryopoid temnospondyl, often forming a to Dissorophoidea within the larger Euskelia, supported by synapomorphies such as a heavily ossified roof and reinforced limb girdles indicative of increased terrestrial competency. A 2012 study by Rainer Werneburg and David S. Berman proposed Onchiodon as the closest to Eryops, with Glaukerpeton as an outgroup to this pair, based on shared cranial and vertebral characters in a parsimony analysis of 25 taxa. More recent cladograms from the , including Schoch's 2013 comprehensive phylogeny of , place Eryopiformes as a stem-ward group to limnarchian temnospondyls, highlighting Eryops' role in early diversification of predatory forms. In a 2021 analysis by Schoch, Eryops megacephalus is positioned as a derived eryopid within Eryopidae using cladistic methods, and discusses ontogenetic shifts in eryopids, including comparisons between juvenile and adult stages of Onchiodon and other taxa. A 2024 phylogenetic study incorporating new eryopid material from identifies a , Stenokranio boldi, as the immediate sister to Eryops, resolving a among basal eryopids like Osteophorus and Glaukerpeton through 128 osteological characters. These findings confirm Eryops' status as one of the largest Permian non-amniote tetrapods, rivaled in size only by basal edopoids like Edops, underscoring its ecological dominance in North American floodplains.

Valid species

The genus Eryops is currently recognized to contain two valid based on post-2014 taxonomic revisions. The , E. megacephalus Cope, 1877, is diagnosed by a large reaching up to 45 cm in length and a robust overall build adapted for semi-aquatic predation; its (AMNH 4189, a ) originates from the Early Permian Petrolia Formation (Wichita Group) of , designated in the original description. This is temporally restricted to the Sakmarian stage of the Early Permian, approximately 295 million years ago, with primary occurrences in . The second valid species, E. grandis Marsh, 1878, represents a larger-bodied form distinguished by proportionally longer limbs and an extended body reaching up to 3 m in total length, with a more slender exhibiting fine dermal sculpturing and a narrow ; its is lost, but plesiotypes (e.g., MCZ 2732, MCZ 2733) come from the Lower Permian Cutler Group and Abo Formation of . It is geographically and temporally distinct, known from Early Permian deposits in and , though some specimens are tentatively assigned pending further material. Several proposed taxa have been synonymized or reclassified, reducing the number of valid species to these two. For instance, E. avinoffi (originally described as Eryops cf. E. avinoffi) was reclassified as the valid species Glaukerpeton avinoffi Romer, 1952, in the 1950s based on its more aquatically adapted morphology from Upper Pennsylvanian localities in West Virginia; this assignment was reaffirmed in 2010s phylogenetic analyses. Other invalid names include E. reticulatus Cope, 1881, deemed a nomen vanum due to inadequate description, and Eryopsoides Douthitt, 1917, synonymized with Eryops in mid-20th-century reviews; additional referrals to genera like Sclerocephalus stem from European material re-evaluated in the 2010s.

Description

Overall size and morphology

Eryops exhibited a robust, crocodile-like typical of large temnospondyl amphibians, featuring a broad head, a stiff and heavily ossified , powerful limbs suited for on , and a relatively short tail.80[561:TASOEM]2.0.CO;2/THE-APPENDICULAR-SKELETON-OF-ERYOPS-MEGACEPHALUS-COPE-1877-TEMNOSPONDYLI/10.1666/0022-3360(2006)80[561:TASOEM]2.0.CO;2.full) This build emphasized structural strength over agility, with the vertebral column and limb girdles providing firm support for . Most specimens of the type species E. megacephalus measured 1.5–2.0 m in total length, though larger individuals could reach up to 3 m. Body mass estimates, derived from three-dimensional volumetric models of well-preserved skeletons, range from to kg for adults. The of Eryops was preserved in a rare "mummy" specimen, revealing a textured covered in small, oval-shaped dermal scutes or bumps arranged in rows, forming a scaly surface unlike the smooth, glandular of extant amphibians. This non-smooth texture likely provided some and may have aided in terrestrial water retention.

Skull and dentition

The skull of Eryops megacephalus is characterized by its broad, flat structure, with lengths reaching up to approximately 45 cm in adult specimens, representing about one-third of the total body length. This morphology includes a robust dermal roof composed of thick, ornamented bones featuring irregular ridges and pits, and large temporal fenestrae that facilitated the attachment of strong adductor muscles for powerful biting. Prominent fangs on the and vomerine bones, measuring several centimeters in length, project from the and served to secure prey during capture. Sensory features of the skull reflect adaptations for a semi-aquatic lifestyle. The orbits are notably large and positioned dorsally, suggesting enhanced for detecting prey above the water surface. Grooves indicative of a system are present on several dermal bones, such as the lacrimal and jugal, enabling detection of vibrations and pressure changes in aquatic environments. Additionally, a pineal is situated midline on the frontal-parietal suture, consistent with the presence of a functional pineal organ for light perception. The of Eryops is adapted for predation, featuring marginal teeth along the jaws that are conical, recurved, and sharply pointed, with some reaching lengths of up to 5 cm in larger individuals. These teeth exhibit labyrinthodont infolding of the enamel-dentine junction, providing structural reinforcement. The palatal dentition includes of small, conical teeth arranged in transverse rows on the vomers, , and ectopterygoids, supplemented by larger pairs on the vomers and for initial prey impalement. Histological analyses of marginal teeth reveal evidence of replacement, with resorption pits and developing successor teeth positioned labially, indicating a cyclical renewal process that maintained functional dentition throughout .

Postcranial skeleton

The vertebral column of Eryops exhibits a rhachitomous structure typical of basal temnospondyls, composed of paired pleurocentra dorsally and unpaired intercentra ventrally that together form a cylindrical centrum surrounding the for rigid support. The intercentra are crescent-shaped and amphicoelous, while the pleurocentra are smaller and often fused to the neural arches, contributing to the overall stiffness of the . There are approximately 22 presacral vertebrae, including cervical, thoracic, and regions, with neural arches bearing broad spines for epaxial muscle attachment. The limb s and limbs are massively constructed to support the animal's weight on land, featuring a robust pectoral with a well-ossified scapulocoracoid and dermal elements like the and interclavicle. The is stout and cylindrical, reaching lengths of up to 20 cm in large specimens, with prominent deltopectoral crests and entepicondylar foramina for muscle and nerve passage. The is similarly robust, slightly longer than the , and the pelvic consists of a fused ilium, , and pubis forming a strong . The autopodia are pentadactyl, with a phalangeal formula of 2-2-3-3-2 in both manus and pes, featuring short, robust phalanges suited for terrestrial traction. Ribs are single-headed and robust, articulating with the diapophyses of the vertebrae; are straight, while trunk ribs curve ventrally and bear blade-like uncinate processes for additional structural reinforcement. Neural spines are broad and tall throughout the presacral region, providing extensive surfaces for muscle attachment to maintain posture. The is short and robust, comprising about 25 caudal vertebrae that decrease in size posteriorly, with haemal arches (chevrons) present but not extensively elongated, limiting tail flexibility.

Discovery

Initial discovery

The initial discovery of Eryops began in the 1870s through excavations in the Permian red beds of north-central , where Swiss-born naturalist Jacob Boll collected fossils on behalf of paleontologist . Boll's fieldwork, starting around 1877 in areas like Archer County, yielded numerous specimens from these terrestrial deposits, including skull material that Cope recognized as belonging to a new of large . These early finds were part of a broader effort by Cope to document the Permian fauna, with Boll's collections providing key insights into the diversity of early tetrapods in the region. In 1877, Cope formally named the genus Eryops and its E. megacephalus based on a partial from Boll's collections, describing it in a paper published in The American Naturalist. The name derived from for "drawn-out face," reflecting the elongated morphology, while the description highlighted its labyrinthodont tooth structure—characterized by infolded enamel forming a maze-like pattern—which led to its initial classification among the labyrinthodont amphibians, a broad group encompassing early temnospondyls. This naming marked the first recognition of Eryops as a distinct Permian batrachian, distinct from contemporary reptilian finds in the same beds. Early 20th-century efforts further advanced understanding of Eryops through institutional collections and mounts at the (AMNH). Specimens collected by Ermine C. Case in around 1906, including catalog number AMNH 4657, were assembled into skeletal mounts during the , allowing for public display and detailed study of the postcranial skeleton. These mounts, based on multiple individuals, showcased Eryops as a robust, aquatic predator and facilitated comparisons with other Permian vertebrates. A significant came in 1941 with the discovery of a "mummy" specimen in Oklahoma's Lower Permian deposits, preserved with skin impressions; described by Alfred Sherwood Romer and Robert V. Witter, it revealed a scaly dermal covering of oval, partially ossified scales, providing the first direct evidence of Eryops' . In June 2025, a nearly intact was reported from the , contributing to ongoing collections of the genus.

Fossil record and localities

The fossil record of Eryops is primarily documented from Early Permian strata in the , with the most abundant material originating from the Texas of the Wichita Group, particularly the Formation. These deposits date to the Sakmarian stage approximately 295 million years ago and have produced numerous skulls, partial skeletons, and isolated postcranial elements, establishing E. megacephalus as the for the . The Texas sites, located in north-central including Archer and Baylor counties, represent fluvial and environments that favored the preservation of robust temnospondyl remains, with bonebeds such as the Geraldine Bonebed yielding concentrated assemblages of Eryops alongside other vertebrates. Additional localities extend the temporal and geographic range of Eryops into Late Carboniferous and Early Permian rocks across . In , fossils occur in the Cutler Formation, including the Halgaito Shale Member near the Carboniferous-Permian boundary, with specimens tentatively assigned to E. grandis based on cranial morphology. Comparable material is reported from early Permian deposits in Oklahoma's , such as those in the area, as well as in Utah's Cutler Group (including the Cedar Mesa Sandstone) and . These sites collectively span the to Sakmarian stages (~299–295 Ma), indicating a broad distribution across equatorial Pangea during the Late . Preservation in these assemblages is characterized by predominantly disarticulated bones and teeth, reflecting transport and accumulation in dynamic riverine and settings, though rare articulated partial skeletons provide insights into taphonomic processes such as rapid burial in channel lags or overbank fines. In and red beds, Eryops elements often show and abrasion consistent with subaerial exposure before entombment, while Cutler Formation sites in and preserve multitaxic bonebeds with minimal sorting, suggesting mass mortality events in marginal aquatic habitats.

Paleobiology

Locomotion and lifestyle

Eryops megacephalus exhibited a sprawling for locomotion, with its hindlimbs capable of adopting postures similar to those of modern during walking cycles. Osteological range-of-motion analyses of the and joints reveal sufficient flexibility for phases on land, including maximum hip flexion of 40°, extension of -65°, and abduction of 45°, supporting viable terrestrial movement despite differences in femoral torsion compared to salamander analogs. The robust postcranial , featuring strong limbs and a disconnected from the , facilitated improved terrestrial traversal over uneven terrain, though the animal's low-slung body and short legs suggest it was not a fast mover. As adults, Eryops led an amphibious lifestyle as slow-moving predators in Permian lowland floodplains and near riverine environments, transitioning from more aquatic juvenile stages in swampy lakes and streams. Fossil assemblages from sites like the Texas Red Beds indicate these habitats were wetland-dominated, with associated remains of and smaller tetrapods suggesting Eryops occupied ecological niches in seasonally variable aquatic-terrestrial mosaics. Bone microanatomy of the , characterized by extensive spongiosa with fine trabeculae, points to semi-aquatic adaptations overall, balancing time between and . Juveniles likely remained more tied to stable aquatic refugia like ponds, while adults ventured onto open floodplains, reflecting an ontogenetic habitat shift driven by growth and for better support.

Diet and feeding

Eryops was a carnivorous predator that subsisted primarily on fish, small tetrapods, and invertebrates within its semi-aquatic Permian environments. Potential prey included chondrichthyans such as Xenacanthus and paleoniscoid fish, as well as smaller amphibians like Trimerorachis and Archeria, based on co-occurring fauna in Texas red bed deposits. Invertebrates, including large arthropods, likely formed part of its diet, reflecting the diverse ecosystem of floodplain ponds and streams where Eryops fossils are common. The feeding mechanism of Eryops involved bilateral biting, with its robust adapted to generate for crushing and holding prey on or in shallow . This strategy emphasized terrestrial predation, as indicated by finite element analyses showing efficient stress distribution during symmetrical closure, though it could extend to lateral strikes against aquatic targets. Sharp, conical fangs along the jaws and pierced and secured struggling prey, facilitating whole-body without extensive intraoral processing. Fossil evidence from localities, particularly the and Wichita groups, supports this predatory ecology through abundant Eryops remains alongside potential prey taxa in bonebeds. Associated faunal assemblages from these sites highlight Eryops as an apex or near-apex predator in early Permian .

Growth and ontogeny

Eryops exhibited a pattern of slow, continuous growth characterized by incremental increases in body size over an extended lifespan, as evidenced by bone histology revealing thick zones and annuli indicative of periodic pauses in deposition. specimens suggest juveniles began at lengths of approximately 30 cm, developing into adults reaching up to 2 meters or more in total length. This growth trajectory, spanning over 20 years based on growth ring analysis in related eryopids, reflects to stable Permian environments where resources allowed prolonged development without rapid maturation pressures. Ontogenetic progression in Eryops lacked the dramatic metamorphosis seen in modern amphibians, featuring instead a gradual transition from aquatic larval stages to more terrestrial adult forms. Larval phases were likely paedomorphic, with early juveniles retaining aquatic adaptations such as potentially external gills in swampy habitats, though direct evidence of gill loss is absent in preserved fossils. Skull proportions shifted subtly through ontogeny, with orbits reducing in relative size and the cheek region widening, enabling a shift toward predatory lifestyles on land without abrupt skeletal remodeling. Sexual maturity in Eryops is inferred to occur in larger subadults, potentially following a pattern of iteroparity seen in temnospondyl analogs, allowing multiple reproductive cycles. likely involved egg-laying in aquatic or moist marginal environments, with adults possibly migrating seasonally to breeding sites, though no direct evidence of eggs or nesting exists. This life history , combining prolonged growth with flexible use, underscores the evolutionary success of eryopids as apex predators in late ecosystems.

References

  1. https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-24-295-2021
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282291631_A_well-preserved_partial_skull_of_Eryops_Temnospondyli_Eryopidae_from_the_Pennsylvanian_of_New_Mexico
  3. https://www.popsci.com/science/skull-fossil-toy-story-texas/
  4. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/49909/900620108_ftp.pdf?sequence=1
  5. https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=70396
  6. https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=70397
  7. https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=507262
  8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2012.699006
  9. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2023.58
  10. https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=70397&is_real_user=1
  11. https://doi.org/10.1006/zjls.1998.0184
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282291631_First_Pennsylvanian_Eryops_Temnospondyli_and_its_Permian_record_from_New_Mexico
  13. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0503c/report.pdf
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273863396_Revision_of_the_Aquatic_Eryopid_Temnospondyl_Glaukerpeton_avinoffi_Romer_1952_from_the_Upper_Pennsyl_Vanian_of_North_America
  15. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pala.12629
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9405718/
  17. https://ajsonline.org/article/57955
  18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1300709
  19. https://mczbase.mcz.harvard.edu/publication/14281
  20. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.23373
  21. https://fr.pensoft.net/article/125460/
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231954085_Tooth_histology_patterns_in_early_tetrapods_and_the_presence_of_%27dark_dentine%27
  23. https://www.academia.edu/706353/Warren_A_A_and_Turner_S_2006_Tooth_histology_patterns_in_early_tetrapods_and_the_significance_of_dark_dentine_Trans_R_Soc_Edinb_Geol_for_2005_96_113_130
  24. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/32633
  25. https://doi.org/10.1666/0022-3360(2006)80[561:TASOEM]2.0.CO;2
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254237969_Jacob_Boll_Robert_T_Hill_and_the_early_history_of_vertebrate_paleontology_in_Texas
  27. https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleontology/comments/1lldlne/intact_eryops_skull_found_in_texas/
  28. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/d0e92d84-1fa7-4c77-8157-0e2431b705c1/download
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0031018287900514
  30. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/books/edited-volume/1917/chapter/107437456/Global-Permian-tetrapod-biostratigraphy-and
  31. https://ajsonline.org/api/v1/articles/125401-the-carboniferous-and-permian-age-of-the-red-beds-of-eastern-oklahoma-from-stratigraphic-evidence.pdf
  32. https://fr.copernicus.org/articles/24/295/2021/fr-24-295-2021.pdf
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323842507_A_multitaxic_bonebed_near_the_Carboniferous-Permian_boundary_Halgaito_Formation_Cutler_Group_in_Valley_of_the_Gods_Utah_USA_Vertebrate_paleontology_and_taphonomy
  34. https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/62/2/139/6605284
  35. https://www.gbif.org/species/144097699
  36. https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-pdf/109/3/644/16708448/bij12066.pdf
  37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(89)90153-3
  38. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152586
  39. https://fr.copernicus.org/articles/24/295/2021/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.