Hubbry Logo
Francine PattersonFrancine PattersonMain
Open search
Francine Patterson
Community hub
Francine Patterson
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Francine Patterson
Francine Patterson
Francine Patterson
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Francine "Penny" Patterson (born February 13, 1947) is an American animal psychologist. From 1972 onwards, she taught a modified form of American Sign Language, which she called "Gorilla Sign Language" (GSL), to a gorilla named Koko. The scientific validity of Patterson's claims about the extent of Koko's language mastery has been widely rejected in linguistic and other specialist circles.[1][2][3][4]

Key Information

Early life and education

[edit]

Patterson is the second oldest of seven children and daughter of C. H. Patterson,[5] a professor of psychology, and Frances Spano Patterson. She was born in Chicago and moved with her family to Edina, Minnesota, when she was young, and then to Urbana, Illinois. Her mother died of cancer when Patterson was a freshman in college and the youngest of her siblings was just five years old. This triggered her interest in developmental psychology, a theme which pervaded much of her later work.

Patterson earned her bachelor's degree in psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1970. She attained her Ph.D. in 1979 from Stanford University, with her dissertation Linguistic Capabilities of a Lowland Gorilla, on teaching sign language to Koko and Michael, another Western lowland gorilla, who died in 2000.

Career

[edit]

Patterson is the president and research director of The Gorilla Foundation. The foundation was founded with her longtime research colleague Ronald Cohn and Barbara F Hiller[6] in 1978 using monetary support from a Rolex Award. The Gorilla Foundation had been trying to move from its current home in Woodside, California, to Maui, Hawaii.[7] Patterson is an adjunct professor of psychology at Santa Clara University and a member of the Board of Consultants at the Center for Cross Cultural Communication in Washington, D.C. She is the Editor-in-Chief of the Gorilla journal.

Patterson and her work with Koko are the subject of Barbet Schroeder's 1978 feature-length documentary Koko: A Talking Gorilla. She is also an author of nonfiction works, including The Education of Koko, Koko's Kitten, Koko-Love!: Conversations With a Signing Gorilla, and Koko's Story. All of these books deal with her personal experiences with Koko.

Patterson's work has garnered controversy. Multiple allegations, made by former employees, said that she would routinely show her nipples to Koko and demand that other employees, both female and male, present their nipples to the gorilla. These demands never occurred with important donors. A sexual harassment lawsuit over this matter was settled out of court.[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Francine Patterson

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Francine "Penny" Patterson is an American developmental recognized for initiating Project Koko in 1972, a long-term effort to teach a modified form of —termed Gorilla Sign Language—to , a female born at the . As a Ph.D. candidate at , Patterson began the project after observing the young Koko's adaptability following early maternal separation, relocating the gorilla to a custom trailer for intensive interaction and documentation. Her approach emphasized , treating Koko as part of a human-like social environment to elicit communicative behaviors, which Patterson documented in her Stanford dissertation and subsequent publications. Patterson's research claimed that Koko developed a functional of approximately 645 signs by age six and a half, with later estimates exceeding 1,000 signs and comprehension of around 2,000 spoken English words, enabling expressions of abstract concepts like (e.g., signing "horse sad" after seeing a picture of an injured animal) and self-referential statements. These findings, promoted through media appearances and books co-authored with H. Cohn, positioned Koko as evidence of great ape cognitive sophistication, contributing to heightened public interest in gorilla conservation and influencing organizations like , which Patterson co-founded in 1976 to sustain the project and advocate for preservation. Supporters credit her work with humanizing perceptions of gorillas, fostering that supported initiatives and awareness. However, Patterson's assertions have faced substantial empirical scrutiny from linguists and primatologists, who argue that Koko's gestural output lacked syntactic , displaced , or generative productivity indicative of true , resembling instead conditioned or ritualized signals prompted by trainers. Critics, including experts like Gerardo Ortega and , highlight methodological flaws such as Patterson's interpretive role in translations, potential unconscious cueing during sessions, and limited independent verification, which prevented rigorous testing for grammatical competence or spontaneous usage akin to human children. Comparisons to failed projects like underscore a broader consensus that ape "" experiments often reflect human projection and rather than causal evidence of linguistic capacity, rendering Patterson's claims scientifically unsubstantiated despite their cultural impact. Koko's death in at age 46 reignited these debates, with coverage emphasizing the gap between popular narratives and peer-reviewed skepticism.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Influences

Francine Patterson was born on February 13, 1947, in , , as the second oldest of seven children to C. H. Patterson, a professor of at the University of , and Frances Spano Patterson. Her family's academic orientation, centered on her father's work in counseling and , immersed her in an environment of intellectual inquiry into and from an early age. The Patterson family relocated to , during her youth, though she completed her secondary education in . She attended University Laboratory High School in Urbana, graduating with the class of 1965, and was actively involved in multiple student organizations, experiences that honed her engagement with collaborative and exploratory activities. These pre-collegiate years, shaped by a household attuned to psychological principles, laid a foundational curiosity in behavioral sciences that informed her trajectory toward studying developmental processes.

Academic Background

Patterson earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in psychology from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1970. She pursued graduate studies in developmental psychology at Stanford University, where she was enrolled as a Ph.D. candidate by 1972. Patterson completed her Ph.D. in developmental psychology from Stanford in 1979. Her dissertation, titled "Linguistic Capabilities of a Lowland Gorilla," analyzed the acquisition of a modified form of American Sign Language by the gorilla Koko, providing empirical data on interspecies communication and cognitive development in non-human primates. This work established her academic foundation in applying developmental psychological principles to animal behavior and language learning.

Research Career Beginnings

Initiation of Project Koko

In July 1972, Francine Patterson, a doctoral candidate in at , received permission from the to initiate language research with , a one-year-old female (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) who had been separated from her mother due to health issues shortly after birth on July 4, 1971. Patterson began daily interactions with Koko the following day at the zoo's nursery facilities, establishing the foundational setup for what became Project Koko as part of her dissertation work. The primary objective was to assess whether gorillas could acquire symbolic communication through gestures, given their anatomical limitations for vocal speech, by teaching a modified form of (ASL, then termed Ameslan). This built directly on the techniques of Project Washoe, the earlier study by R. Allen and Beatrice Gardner starting in 1966, which had demonstrated apes' potential for basic sign use through immersion and molding of hand shapes. Patterson adapted these methods to gorilla physiology and behavior, emphasizing consistent caregiving to foster attachment and learning akin to human . Initial logistics centered on securing zoo approval for extended access, with Koko placed on loan to Patterson for the study's duration, enabling cross-fostering in a controlled environment at the . Sessions occurred in the Children's Zoo area, involving hours of hands-on signing and verbal immersion daily; by 1973, the project relocated to a dedicated trailer on zoo grounds to accommodate expanded training needs while remaining under zoo oversight.

Early Interactions and Milestones with Koko

Francine Patterson initiated direct interactions with , a one-year-old , in July 1972 at the , establishing daily signing sessions as part of an study. In her dual capacity as researcher and primary caregiver, Patterson provided hands-on care, including feeding and grooming, while modeling (ASL) gestures during routine activities to foster bonding and encourage imitation. Koko demonstrated rapid initial acquisition of signs, learning basics such as "," "more," and "" within weeks of training's onset. By the end of the first year and a half, her active vocabulary reached approximately 18 signs, with an acquisition rate of about one new sign per month. This progress accelerated following Koko's relocation to a trailer at in 1974, where Patterson intensified immersive sessions; by 36 months of training in 1975, Koko reliably used 184 signs. Key milestones included Koko's early combinations of signs into rudimentary by 1975, such as "Horse sad" in response to a picture and "Me cry there" during discussions of events. She also expressed emotions through signing, for instance, articulating frustration as "Because mad" after a 1975 incident involving a bite, and later demonstrating apparent . By late 1977, at age 6.5, Koko had produced a cumulative total of 645 signs, though her consistent working repertoire stood at around 375. These developments occurred amid Patterson's ongoing efforts to integrate signing into all aspects of Koko's daily life, blurring lines between research observation and maternal caregiving.

Institutional Developments

Founding of the Gorilla Foundation

was established in 1976 by Francine Patterson, Ron Cohn, and Barbara Hiller as a to institutionalize and sustain the research Patterson had begun with the gorilla Koko in 1972. The founding aimed to facilitate ongoing studies demonstrating gorillas' cognitive and emotional capacities through , with the explicit goal of applying these findings to gorilla conservation by raising public awareness and influencing policy to avert . Headquartered initially in proximity to , where the research originated, the foundation relocated its facilities to , in 1980 to offer and future subjects a more secure, naturalistic forested environment amid the . from inception relied primarily on grants and individual donations, enabling operational independence for long-term gorilla care and research dissemination without reliance on zoo or institutional affiliations. Core objectives encompassed providing lifelong sanctuary and veterinary support for communicative gorillas like , while extending insights to all great species to for welfare improvements grounded in evidence of their relational and intellectual abilities. This framework positioned the foundation as a bridge between scientific observation and broader ethical considerations for preservation, emphasizing communication as a tool for protection and species advocacy.

Expansion to Other Gorillas

In 1976, Francine Patterson introduced Michael, a male born in on March 17, 1973, to as a companion for , aiming to provide the female with conspecific social interaction in captivity. Michael, who arrived at age three from the Vienna Zoo, was integrated into the environment to foster group dynamics, with Patterson initiating training for him soon after to enable parallel communication studies alongside . This expansion sought to replicate aspects of social structures, observing how signing might influence interactions between the two animals. Building on this, Patterson oversaw the arrival of , a born on October 18, 1981, at the Zoo, who was loaned to in 1991 specifically as a potential breeding mate for . Ndume's integration included instruction under Patterson's direction, extending the communication framework to the enlarged group and allowing for examination of signed exchanges in a multi-male, multi-female setting. The presence of Michael, , and Ndume formed the core of Patterson's envisioned gorilla "family," designed to study social behaviors through inter- signing while maintaining human oversight for care and research. Michael's death from congestive heart failure on April 19, 2000, reduced the group to Koko and Ndume, but the prior configuration had enabled observations of companionship and attempted mating dynamics.

Methodological and Scientific Claims

Development of Gorilla Sign Language

Francine Patterson developed (GSL) as a modified variant of (ASL) specifically tailored for gorillas, adapting signs to account for differences in hand morphology, finger dexterity, and overall physical capabilities compared to humans. This adaptation involved simplifying certain gestures and allowing gorillas to approximate signs using their broader palms and shorter fingers, while incorporating interpretations of the animals' natural gestures into the lexicon. Patterson selected ASL as the foundational system in 1972 due to its visual-gestural nature, which aligned with ' visual strengths, and began implementing GSL through direct, one-on-one instruction with the infant Koko. Training protocols emphasized immersive, human-like rearing environments to foster continuous exposure, combining positive reinforcement—such as rewards with food, play, or affection—with modeling of signs during daily interactions. Patterson and her team signed simultaneously while speaking English to , aiming to build associations between signs, spoken words, and objects or concepts, starting with basic nouns like "food" and "drink" taught via tactile guidance of the gorilla's hands. Over time, the approach expanded to include spontaneous signing by , with Patterson documenting and reinforcing novel combinations or approximations of existing signs to encourage expansion. This method relied on Patterson's role as primary interpreter, shaping GSL through iterative adjustments based on observed gorilla responses rather than rigid standardization. Under these protocols, Koko's active vocabulary reportedly grew to over 1,000 GSL signs by adulthood, encompassing categories such as objects, actions, , and abstract concepts, with demonstrations of combining signs into short phrases. Patterson claimed Koko also comprehended approximately 2,000 spoken English words, evidenced by responses to verbal cues without signing, though this was assessed through Patterson's observations in controlled play sessions. The system's implementation extended to other gorillas like Michael, using similar adaptations, but remained centered on Patterson's foundational framework without formal peer-reviewed standardization beyond initial project reports.

Evaluations of Linguistic Competence

Patterson conducted longitudinal evaluations of 's acquisition starting from 1972, documenting steady vocabulary expansion and syntactic complexity through daily interactions and video recordings. By age 6.5 years, Koko had acquired 645 signs in total, with a core working vocabulary of approximately 375 signs deployed spontaneously and contextually appropriate. Patterson reported Koko's (MLU) reaching about 2.7 signs per statement by mid-development, surpassing the Chimpsky's MLU of 1.5 and indicating multi-word combinations earlier than in some peers like Washoe, who achieved two-sign utterances after ten months compared to Koko's second month. In her 1981 book The Education of Koko, co-authored with Eugene Linden, Patterson detailed Koko's vocabulary surpassing 200 signs by age 5.5 years, with accelerated growth between ages 2.5 and 4.5 years yielding 161 new signs, and comprehension extending to over 2,000 spoken English words by adulthood. Patterson highlighted Koko's application of signs to abstract concepts, including temporal references like "first" for past events and "later" for future intentions (e.g., "Later Koko drink"), as well as self-descriptive compounds such as "fine animal " in response to queries about her . Emotional abstraction was evident in expressions of , such as signing "horse sad" upon seeing a with a bit or "me cry there" while viewing a mistreated animal, and intensified self-labeling like "red mad " to convey . For mourning, Patterson observed Koko's following the 1984 death of her pet All Ball, during which the gorilla signed "sad," "cry," and related terms while whimpering and discussing the loss over several days, demonstrating referential use of signs for absence and sorrow. Instances of humor underscored Patterson's assessment of pragmatic competence, with Koko grinning while signing "" at a white towel speckled with red lint or playfully distorting "drink" by directing it to her ear to evade tasks. Patterson interpreted these as intentional incongruity and language play, akin to children's, further supported by creative compounds like "" for a zebra or rhyming neologisms such as "hair bear." Overall, Patterson's metrics positioned Koko's abilities comparably to aspects of preschooler development, including metaphor comprehension exceeding that of some 7-year-olds (90% accuracy versus 82%), though constrained by physical factors like competing manual activities.

Scientific Criticisms and Debates

Doubts on True Language Acquisition

Herbert Terrace, a psychologist who led the Nim Chimpsky sign language project, extended his critiques of chimpanzee studies to Koko's performance after reviewing transcripts from Francine Patterson's 1978 dissertation and related videotapes. He identified Koko's utterances as lacking syntactic structure, often comprising repetitive, associative strings such as "mess red thirsty mouth thirsty" or "please milk please me like apple bottle," which failed to exhibit consistent word order, embedding, or other grammatical rules indicative of true language. These patterns paralleled Nim's output, where approximately 90% of signs were reactive to human prompts and about 50% directly imitated prior teacher signs, suggesting imitation and reinforcement-driven behavior rather than generative syntax. Terrace contended that claims of Koko's overstated non-grammatical strategies, such as simple chaining of nouns and verbs motivated by immediate needs (e.g., requesting food), without evidence of novel rule-based combinations or comprehension of hierarchical sentence structures. Independent analyses post-1979, including Terrace's, found no differentiation from Nim's in terms of spontaneity or , with the majority of Koko's signs elicited by prompts like "What's this?" rather than independently conveying abstract ideas or displaced . The potential for cueing further undermined assertions of autonomous language use, as Patterson's interactions involved familiar handlers who interpreted ambiguous gestures in context, evoking the phenomenon observed in non-blind animal experiments where subtle human signals guide responses. Although Patterson employed double-blind methods for basic vocabulary matching—confirming associations like object-to-sign— these did not extend to evaluating syntactic novelty or sentence comprehension under controlled, blinded conditions, allowing for handler bias in transcribing and attributing meaning to sign sequences. Critics, including Terrace, argued this interpretive latitude led to overreading vague or erroneous signs (e.g., approximations of "pink" as "stink" retrofitted into narratives) as evidence of propositional thought, without verifiable replication in rigorous, syntax-focused trials.

Critiques of Experimental Controls

Critics have highlighted the absence of independent observers in Patterson's research with Koko, noting that Patterson served as the primary caregiver, teacher, and interpreter of signs, which introduced risks of experimenter bias through unintentional cueing or subjective translation. Without protocols for blind testing or third-party verification of sign meanings, interpretations relied heavily on Patterson's assessments, limiting replicability and objectivity. For instance, Terrace argued that Patterson's claims projected human-like intentions onto ambiguous hand movements, as detailed records of unprompted sequences were not systematically provided for external scrutiny. The project's design lacked standardized controls common in , such as double-blind procedures to prevent handlers from influencing responses via gestures, tone, or expectations. Patterson's immersive, child-rearing approach, while fostering , deviated from rigorous experimental isolation of variables, allowing for potential of desired signs through immediate feedback loops. This mirrored flaws exposed in Terrace's study (1973–1977), where analysis of over 19,000 sign combinations revealed that apparent multi-sign utterances were often human-prompted rather than spontaneous, with sequences lacking syntactic productivity independent of trainer cues. Terrace extended these methodological concerns to Koko's project, emphasizing that without comparable video analysis and cue-free data, claims of advanced communication remained unverifiable. By the 1980s, the increasingly regarded Patterson's work as prioritizing over empirical rigor, evidenced by sparse peer-reviewed publications subjecting raw data to independent analysis. Terrace's critique, which questioned the validity of ape "" across projects including Koko's, contributed to reduced funding for similar endeavors, reflecting a consensus that methodological laxity—such as incomplete logs and reliance on anecdotal reports—undermined assertions of linguistic equivalence. Subsequent reviews confirmed that ape sign studies, including Patterson's, demonstrated associative learning but faltered under controlled replication due to these design shortcomings.

Controversies and Ethical Concerns

Employee Allegations and Lawsuits

In February 2005, two former employees of , Nancy Alperin and Kendra Keller, filed a civil against the organization and its president, Francine Patterson, alleging wrongful termination and a . The plaintiffs claimed that Patterson pressured female staff members, including themselves, to expose their breasts to the gorilla on multiple occasions to fulfill what Patterson interpreted as Koko's sign-language requests for "nipples," purportedly as a means to strengthen emotional bonds with the animal. They further alleged that Patterson made it clear that refusal could result in dismissal, with such directives occurring both indoors and outdoors, sometimes in view of others, and that they were ultimately fired after objecting. The lawsuit highlighted Patterson's reported practice of routinely exposing her own breasts to in response to the gorilla's signs, framing it as essential for interspecies , though the plaintiffs contested the scientific or ethical validity of these methods. No criminal charges arose from the allegations, which centered on civil claims of retaliation and inappropriate workplace demands rather than illegality. By December 2005, the case was settled out of with confidential terms, including nondisclosure agreements that prevented public discussion of details by the parties involved. The settlement did not include any admission of liability by or Patterson, but the ensuing media coverage damaged the organization's public image, raising questions about professional boundaries and oversight in gorilla care protocols. While the allegations underscored potential ethical irregularities in staff directives, they remained unadjudicated in and did not lead to broader regulatory actions against the foundation.

Institutional and Custody Disputes

In the early 1970s, Francine Patterson, then a graduate student, initiated her project with the lowland at the , where the gorilla had been born in captivity on July 4, 1971. Patterson sought to relocate Koko to facilitate extended study, leading to a custody conflict with zoo officials who initially resisted the transfer. The dispute resolved in Patterson's favor when she purchased Koko from the , enabling the gorilla's move to Stanford facilities and later to the Gorilla Foundation's preserves, marking the foundation's establishment of independent management over its primate subjects. Decades later, a major institutional dispute arose over , a loaned to from the in 1991 for potential breeding with under a agreement. A 2015 contract update explicitly required Ndume's relocation to an accredited facility following Koko's death on June 19, 2018, to integrate him into a social gorilla group. The Foundation refused to coordinate the transfer, citing concerns over Ndume's welfare including reported distress behaviors upon hearing relocation discussions, prompting the to file suit in October 2018 for . In February 2019, a superior court judge ordered Ndume's return, ruling the Foundation lacked authority to override the agreement, though further negotiations ensued until a June 2019 order enforced the transfer to the . Amid these custody battles, faced scrutiny over facility conditions at its , and preserves, with state inspections in the mid-2000s documenting violations including rodent infestations and unsanitary environments that incurred fines. Critics, including zoo representatives in the Ndume litigation, highlighted these issues to argue against the Foundation's capacity for ongoing primate stewardship. Patterson defended the facilities by underscoring the Foundation's customized care protocols tailored to communication and enrichment needs, positioning such disputes as challenges to their specialized conservation model rather than evidence of neglect.

Conservation Advocacy and Later Work

Efforts for Gorilla Preservation

Patterson co-founded in 1976 to advance gorilla preservation through research, directing 74% of its funds toward gorilla-related programs including habitat protection and efforts. The foundation leveraged 's abilities to advocate for conservation, producing public service announcements where Koko conveyed messages on environmental threats, such as a 2015 "Voice of Nature" video urging at the COP21 climate summit to address affecting . This approach aimed to foster public empathy by highlighting gorilla intelligence and sensitivity to poaching and deforestation, exemplified by Michael's signed accounts of his family's slaughter by bushmeat hunters, which informed campaigns like the 2002 Bushmeat Action Alert. In support of wild gorillas, the foundation funded community-based projects in , partnering with local organizations to combat and the trade while backing initiatives like Denis Ndeloh Etiendem's surveys, and implemented empathy-focused curricula in over 350 Cameroonian schools reaching more than 150,000 students to reduce encroachment. For captive populations, it promoted gorilla-centered sanctuaries emphasizing natural settings and autonomy over traditional zoos, seeking to enhance breeding viability and welfare for lowland gorillas facing extinction risks from low wild numbers estimated below 100,000 in 2018. Public outreach included documentaries such as the PBS production A Conversation with Koko (aired 1990), which documented Patterson's work and gorilla cognition to underscore extinction perils from poaching and logging, alongside books like Koko-Love: Conversations with a Gorilla (1987) that detailed signed interactions to educate on conservation needs. These efforts collectively raised awareness of gorilla population declines, with western lowland subspecies classified as critically endangered due to habitat loss exceeding 60% in recent decades.

Legacy and Ongoing Influence

Following Koko's death on June 19, 2018, at age 46, , founded by Patterson in 1976, committed to perpetuating her work through archival preservation of communication records, initiatives in , and advocacy for great ape sanctuaries. The organization has maintained focus on preservation efforts, including habitat protection and research, though without a successor demonstrating comparable proficiency. These activities reflect Patterson's emphasis on applied conservation over replicable experimentation, sustaining public engagement with welfare amid declining wild populations. Patterson's project with influenced discourse by challenging anthropocentric boundaries, prompting renewed scrutiny of non-human symbolic capacities and emotional awareness since the . It popularized questions about interspecies and rudimentary syntax in apes, inspiring subsequent studies in gestural communication despite lacking peer-validated evidence of acquisition. This legacy endures in educational media and ethical debates on animal , where Koko's reported 1,000+ —though contested for cueing artifacts—elevated public valuation of great ape conservation funding. Reception remains divided: proponents credit Patterson with fostering empathy-driven advocacy that bolstered protection efforts, while detractors argue her interpretive framework favored anthropomorphic projections over falsifiable controls, yielding unverifiable claims that prioritized narrative appeal against empirical skepticism in and . Academic critiques, including from linguists like Herbert Terrace, highlight insufficient independent verification, attributing persistent influence to media amplification rather than methodological rigor. Patterson's approach thus exemplifies tensions between conservation and scientific standards, informing ongoing caution in ape claims.

References

  1. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/conversations-with-koko-the-gorilla
  2. https://www.koko.org/about/history-milestones/
  3. https://anthropology.iresearchnet.com/francine-g-patterson/
  4. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44576449
  5. https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/on-animals-language-koko-and-wish-fulfilment/
  6. https://www.encyclopedia.com/women/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/patterson-francine-1947
  7. https://graphsearch.epfl.ch/en/concept/632258
  8. https://uni.illinois.edu/alumni/class-century/dr-francine-patterson-class-1965
  9. https://www.myhero.com/F_Patterson_mead_US_2010_ul
  10. https://freshfiction.com/author.php?id=21872
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378216688900185
  12. https://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/patterson01.htm
  13. https://www.koko.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TEOK_Part_1.pdf
  14. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/koko-gorilla-gone-she-left-legacy
  15. https://www.koko.org/communication/
  16. https://stanfordmag.org/contents/is-koko-s-clock-ticking
  17. https://nypost.com/2016/07/28/inside-the-world-of-the-gorilla-who-can-talk/
  18. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/548611/facts-about-koko-the-gorilla
  19. https://www.koko.org/news-and-events/669/press-release-an-exciting-new-focus/
  20. https://www.guidestar.org/profile/94-2386151
  21. https://www.koko.org/about/funding/
  22. https://www.koko.org/about/mission/
  23. https://www.koko.org/top-videos/4409/meet-the-gorilla-foundation/
  24. https://www.koko.org/conservation/michaels-story/
  25. https://www.koko.org/about/gorilla-ndume/
  26. https://www.animallaw.info/case/zoological-society-cincinnati-v-gorilla-foundation
  27. https://www.koko.org/emails/kokos_gorilla_family/
  28. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/conversation-koko-thumbs/11394/
  29. https://www.koko.org/about/programs/project-koko/interspecies-communication/sign-language/
  30. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/08/koko-the-talking-gorilla-sign-language-francine-patterson/402307/
  31. https://www.koko.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/teok_book.pdf
  32. https://www.koko.org/kids4koko/read-about-koko/kokos-kitten/
  33. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-01-10-mn-9038-story.html
  34. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1980/12/04/more-on-monkey-talk-1/
  35. https://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/21/archives/researcher-challenges-conclusion-that-apes-can-learn-language.html
  36. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00437956.1990.11435816
  37. https://pages.ucsd.edu/~johnson/COGS143/ComparLangSlides.pdf
  38. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041723
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0093934X79900476
  40. https://www.littletree.com.au/koko.htm
  41. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Lips-sealed-in-settlement-of-Koko-case-2558702.php
  42. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/feb/21/2
  43. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6998057
  44. https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2005/12/01/gorillas-fetish-lawsuit-settled/
  45. https://www.livescience.com/3950-lawsuit-koko-gorilla-nipple-fetish-resolved.html
  46. https://www.heraldmailmedia.com/story/news/2019/01/31/infestations-nipple-scandals-checkered-past-haunts-foundation-in-fight-with-zoo-for-gorilla/44276127/
  47. https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2018/10/26/cincinnati-zoo-ndume-gorilla-foundation/1772230002/
  48. https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judge-orders-transfer-of-ndume-the-gorilla-from-sanctuary-to-cincinnati-zoo
  49. https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/judge-ndume-koko-companion-must-return-zoo/
  50. https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/koko-ndume-cincinnati-zoo/
  51. https://www.ktvu.com/news/fight-over-gorillas-future-home-headed-to-san-francisco-court
  52. https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2005/11/30/gorilla-foundation-settles-koko-nipple-fetish-suit/
  53. https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2019/01/31/fight-ndume-gorilla-foundations-past-obstacle/2726525002/
  54. https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-says-hes-not-fit-to-say-whats-best-for-a-gorilla/
  55. https://www.koko.org/about/
  56. https://www.koko.org/
  57. https://www.koko.org/top-videos/4397/kokos-voice-of-nature-psa/
  58. https://adage.com/creativity/work/koko-gorilla-voice-nature-cop21/44566/
  59. https://www.koko.org/conservation/
  60. https://www.koko.org/mission-projects/
  61. https://www.livescience.com/62879-koko-gorilla-dead-at-46.html
  62. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/conversation-koko-friendship-blossoms/11397/
  63. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/gorillas-koko-sign-language-culture-animals
  64. https://www.npr.org/2018/06/21/622160278/koko-the-gorilla-dies-redrew-the-lines-of-animal-human-communication
  65. https://www.animals24-7.org/2018/06/22/death-of-koko-46-raises-question-what-will-become-of-her-rejected-mate-ndume/
  66. https://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-koko-gorilla-dies-20180621-story.html
  67. https://religiondispatches.org/saw-eyes-koko-talking-gorilla-1971-2018/
  68. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/199911/do-animals-think
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.