Hubbry Logo
HM Prison ExeterHM Prison ExeterMain
Open search
HM Prison Exeter
Community hub
HM Prison Exeter
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
HM Prison Exeter
HM Prison Exeter
from Wikipedia

HM Prison Exeter is a category B local and resettlement men's prison, located in Exeter in the county of Devon, England. It holds men sentenced by the courts of Devon, Cornwall, Dorset and Somerset. There are also prisoners from further afield who have been transferred from other prisons. Exeter Prison is operated by His Majesty's Prison Service.

Key Information

History

[edit]

In the reign of King Henry I (1100–1135) the manor of Bicton, near Exeter, was granted by the king to John Janitor,[4] who held the manor by the feudal tenure of grand serjeanty requiring him to provide a county jail,[5] which was an honourable position of trust. The Latin noun Janitor means "door-keeper", generally understood in the sense janitor carceris, "door-keeper of a jail".[6] Thus the tenant took his surname from his form of tenure.[7] The county prison was later transferred to a building beneath[8] Exeter Castle[9] in the county capital Exeter, but the feudal tenant of Bicton was nevertheless for many centuries required to meet part of the repair and maintenance costs of the newly sited jail. The Devon topographer John Swete (d.1821) stated that Dennis Rolle Esq. (d.1797), the proprietor of Bicton at the time of his visit, had paid the sum of £1,000 to the Treasury to be released in perpetuity from his vestigial feudal liabilities.[10] The release was effected by an Act of Parliament in 1787, Public Act, 27 George III, c. 59 summarised as:[11]

"An Act for making and declaring the Gaol for the County of Devon, called the High Gaol, a Public and Common Gaol; and for discharging Denys Rolle and John Rolle Esquires, and their respective Heirs and Assigns, from the Office of Keeper of the said Gaol; and for improving and enlarging the same or building a new one; and also for taking down the Chapel in the Castle of Exeter; and for other Purposes therein mentioned".

The current Exeter prison was built in 1853, and is of a typical Victorian design, by local architect John Hayward.[12] The prison was based on the plan of the model prison at Pentonville, with four residential wings.

The prison has been the setting for many executions. Of particular note is the attempted execution of John Babbacombe Lee in February 1885. Three attempts were made to carry out his execution. All ended in failure as the trap door of the scaffold failed to open. This was despite the fact it had been carefully tested by James Berry, the executioner, beforehand. As a result, Home Secretary Sir William Harcourt commuted the sentence to life imprisonment. Lee continued to petition successive Home Secretaries and was finally released from Exeter prison in 1907.[13]

Exeter Gaol painted in 1810 by John White Abbott.

Criticisms

[edit]

In August 1999 a report by His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons severely criticised conditions at Exeter prison, with some inmates still having to slop out despite government claims that the practice had been eradicated from all jails three years previously. The report went on to state that Exeter Prison seemed to be "at the end of the line" and that industrial relations there bordered on anarchy.[14]

On 8 July 2002, ex-inmate Gareth Connett broke into Exeter Prison and protested on the roof for four hours, demanding compensation for an alleged injury caused by another inmate.[15] The prison successfully denied liability.

A report issued by the Prison Reform Trust in May 2005 stated that Exeter was struggling with the result of overcrowding. The report criticised the lack of meaningful activities at the prison, resulting in inmates spending too much time locked in their cells. The report also noted, however, that Exeter Prison was among the best in the country at helping to rehabilitate offenders.[16] Exeter was highlighted again months later for its overcrowding by the Howard League for Penal Reform, who stated that the prison was running at 70% over capacity.[17]

In recent years, Exeter Prison has regularly featured in the Howard League for Penal Reform's list of most crowded prisons in the UK. In 2014, it was revealed that the number of prison staff employed at Exeter Prison had dropped by 32%, yet numbers of inmates still continued to remain as high. A 2013 inspection concluded that there were 'weaknesses and gaps' in the operation of the prison, and that the establishment was 'old and difficult to maintain.'[18]

The Independent Monitoring Board found staffing levels (set by the Ministry of Justice) were too low and optimum care of prisoners, specially vulnerable prisoners could not be ensured. Violence and self-harm were at worrying levels. Prisoners with psychiatric issues may need to wait months for a place in a secure mental health unit.[19]

The prison today

[edit]
The prison (right) from Exeter Central Station
The prison viewed from New North Road in 2020

HMP Exeter accepts all male adults and young offenders committed to prison by the courts from Cornwall, Devon and West Somerset.

The prison offers prisoners employment in the kitchens, waste management, stores and domestic cleaning. Exeter also offers accredited training courses in education, computers, sports and vocational skills that link with local employer requirements. The prison was awarded 'across the board' Grade 2 accreditation by Ofsted in August 2013 for its Learning and Skills provision and continues to drive up the quality of their reducing reoffending services.

In May 2018 Peter Clarke put Exeter Prison under an emergency protocol having found the prison, “unequivocally poor” with soaring levels of violence and self-harm. An inspection in May had found high levels of self-harm and 6 suicides, also high levels of assaults against prisoners and staff and high drug use. Clark wrote, “During the inspection we saw many examples of a lack of care for vulnerable prisoners which, given the recent tragic events in the prison, were symptomatic of a lack of empathy and understanding of the factors that contribute to suicide and self-harm.” Clarke maintained prison safety had “significantly worsened in many respects” since the August 2016 inspection. Prisoner on prisoner assaults rose by 107% and assaults on staff rose by 60% since the previous inspection. Clarke noted there was a, “strong smell” of drugs in some wings and some prisoners were, “clearly under the influence”. Many cells needed repair with broken windows, leaking toilets and sinks and badly screened toilets. Deborah Coles of Inquest said, “This cannot be blamed on staffing levels. That serious safety concerns are systematically ignored points to an institutional and shameful indifference to the well-being of prisoners. In any other setting this institution would be closed down.”[1]

Notable inmates

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

HM Prison Exeter is a Category B men's local situated in the city centre of , , . Built in 1853 as a Victorian radial-design facility, it primarily receives adult male prisoners on remand or serving short sentences from courts in , , and West , while also providing limited resettlement services. The prison has an operational capacity of approximately 560 inmates, though it has operated overcrowded for extended periods, exacerbating internal pressures.
Despite its central urban location facilitating court access, HM Prison Exeter has encountered chronic operational difficulties, including elevated levels of interpersonal violence and among inmates. Inspections have documented persistent safety shortcomings, such as inadequate care for at-risk individuals in early custody stages and substandard support, contributing to multiple self-inflicted deaths—10 recorded prior to a urgent notification invoking ministerial intervention. In response, the Ministry of Justice deployed additional staff and oversight measures to bolster frontline security and risk management. Subsequent reviews in 2023 and 2024 noted modest progress in governance and crisis response but highlighted ongoing vulnerabilities, including reliance on temporary personnel and deficient surveillance infrastructure. The facility's aging , characteristic of many 19th-century prisons still in use, underscores broader systemic strains within the English custodial estate, where outdated designs impede modern rehabilitative and protocols.

Location and Overview

Site and Capacity

HM Prison Exeter is situated at 30 New North Road in the centre of , , , serving as a Category B facility for adult males. The site occupies an urban location adjacent to residential areas and transport links, facilitating its role as a local reception prison for courts in and . Constructed primarily between 1848 and 1853 as the County Prison, the facility features a radial layout typical of Victorian-era penitentiaries, with wings extending from a central hub to enable . The prison's architecture, designed by county surveyor John Hayward, employs red brick construction in a plan, including three main residential wings (A, B, and C) arranged around the core, each with three storeys plus a basement level. A fourth wing (D) supports additional functions, though parts of the have undergone refurbishments, such as en-suite installations on B wing, while others exhibit maintenance issues like damp and mould. The design draws from the model, emphasizing separation and control, with along multi-storey landings. As of March 2025, HMP Exeter's operational capacity stands at 310 places, with 308 prisoners held, resulting in above the 193 certified normal accommodation cells and requiring cell-sharing in many instances. This reduced capacity reflects temporary wing closures for safety and maintenance, down from historical figures exceeding 500; earlier inspections in 2023 recorded 306 prisoners against a higher baseline prior to restrictions. The prison maintains a small resettlement function alongside its primary reception role, accommodating remand and short-sentence inmates.

Operational Category and Role in Justice System

HM Prison Exeter functions as a Category B establishment within the UK's prison classification system, designed for adult male prisoners who present a notable escape risk but do not necessitate the stringent perimeter security of Category A facilities. This category mandates robust internal controls, high staffing ratios, and enhanced surveillance to mitigate threats from inmates convicted of serious offenses such as , , or drug trafficking, while allowing for some regime flexibility compared to higher-security prisons. As a local reception prison, it plays a core role in the justice system by receiving and initially processing individuals remanded in custody or sentenced by serving , , and West , accommodating both untried prisoners awaiting trial and those serving determinate sentences generally up to four years. This function supports judicial efficiency by providing immediate custodial space post-arrest or , thereby enabling continuity in court proceedings and reducing reliance on police cells for overflow. The prison's operations align with Her Majesty's and Probation Service (HMPPS) objectives of maintaining public protection through secure detention, with an emphasis on basic order and limited purposeful activity amid chronic pressures reported in inspections. Complementing its reception duties, Exeter incorporates a modest resettlement pathway, facilitating prisoner progression toward release through partnerships with services, schemes, and community housing providers, though implementation has been hampered by high turnover and resource constraints. This dual role underscores its contribution to the broader correctional continuum, balancing immediate incarceration needs with efforts to interrupt cycles via structured exit planning, albeit with outcomes varying based on compliance and external support availability.

Historical Development

Establishment and Victorian Era (1850s–1900)

HM Prison Exeter originated as the Devon County Prison, rebuilt between 1848 and 1853 on the site of earlier 18th-century facilities to consolidate county penal operations. This reconstruction merged the adjacent County Gaol and House of Correction under unified management, reflecting broader Victorian reforms to standardize local prisons following the Prison Act 1865. Designed by county surveyor John Hayward in a radial layout inspired by the Pentonville model, the prison featured three wings radiating from a central hub for panoptic surveillance, with 193 individual cells measuring approximately 13 feet by 7 feet. Architectural elements emphasized isolation, including ventilation flues, food hatches in doors, and separate radiating exercise yards and chapel pews to minimize prisoner interaction. High walls, 20 feet in height, enclosed the perimeter, underscoring the era's focus on security and deterrence. Operations adhered to the separate or silent system, confining prisoners in for reflection, labor, and moral instruction via religious services, with warders summoned by bell pulls. Annual commitments fluctuated between 1,118 in 1858 and 1,714 in 1878, with daily averages ranging from 148 to 226 , primarily awaiting trial or serving short sentences. Executions, conducted on a atop a flat roof until public hangings ended in , included notable cases like that of James Landick in 1849, drawing large crowds before the shift to private ceremonies.

20th Century Adaptations and World Wars

In the early decades of the , HM Prison Exeter saw physical expansions, including an extension to the west to address capacity constraints in the aging Victorian . These modifications reflected broader efforts to modernize local prisons amid rising incarceration rates, though the core radial design remained intact. Governance transitioned through several appointments, with George E. Northey serving as governor in 1901, followed by Carleton Haynes in 1906, E. G. Humphrey in 1926, G. D. Turner in 1927, L. H. Morris in 1929, Commander A. L. Saunders in 1939, and H. G. Evered in 1950. During , the prison accommodated conscientious objectors among its population, where harsh conditions—including limited and —led to severe health declines for some by 1917. Unlike some facilities that experienced sharp population drops due to prisoner enlistment, maintained operations for civilian offenders and those refusing military service, aligning with national trends of enforced in major prisons. No major structural adaptations for wartime use, such as POW internment, are recorded specifically for , though prisons generally prioritized domestic incarceration over military repurposing. In the , the prison continued standard local functions without documented large-scale reforms, though governors like Saunders oversaw routines amid economic pressures. brought aerial threats during , with suffering heavy bombing in 1942; the prison's tower remained a visible landmark against city fires, indicating it stayed operational without evacuation or closure like bombed sites such as . Population pressures mounted nationally as convictions rose 50% from 1938 to 1946, but 's role as a category B facility focused on local remand and short-term sentences, with no evidence of conversion to POW camps—unlike temporary sites elsewhere in . Inmates likely contributed to war efforts through manual tasks, consistent with system-wide practices of producing goods and food under rationed conditions.

Post-1945 Modernization and Policy Shifts

In the immediate post-war period, HM Prison Exeter aligned with broader penal reforms that prioritized rehabilitation and reduced reliance on corporal and harsh labor punishments. The Criminal Justice Act 1948 abolished penal servitude, hard labour, and whipping across English and Welsh prisons, including Exeter, while expanding provisions for , borstals, and corrective training to foster offender through and work rather than retribution alone. These changes marked a causal shift from 19th-century punitive isolation toward structured regimes aimed at reducing , though implementation in aging facilities like Exeter was constrained by outdated infrastructure. A key local adaptation occurred in 1946, when the prison's women's wing was repurposed as the for young female offenders aged 17 to 21, emphasizing vocational training and discipline to prevent hardened criminality in line with national policies introduced earlier but expanded . This conversion reflected empirical evidence from interwar experiments showing borstals' potential to lower reoffending rates compared to adult prisons, though outcomes varied due to inconsistent program quality. The institution closed in 1969 amid evolving youth justice policies, with the wing reintegrated into the male estate as Exeter transitioned fully to a Category B local prison serving , , Dorset, and courts. Subsequent decades saw policy emphasis on resettlement and risk management, influenced by the Criminal Justice Act 1967's introduction of and the 1990 Woolf Inquiry's recommendations post-Strangeways riot, which mandated safer, more purposeful regimes with incentives for good behavior. At , this translated to incremental enhancements like expanded and work programs, but physical modernization lagged; the Victorian layout persisted with minor additions, contributing to —by 2012, the prison held far beyond its original 317 capacity, ranking fifth most crowded nationally. Recent targeted refurbishments, including a new reception area, visits hall, and en-suite cells on select wings by the 2020s, addressed decay but highlighted systemic underinvestment in legacy sites amid rising inmate numbers driven by sentencing policies.

Physical Infrastructure

Architectural Features and Layout

HM Prison Exeter was designed by architect John Hayward and completed in 1853 as the County Prison, adopting a Victorian radial layout inspired by the model prison. The structure utilizes red brick construction arranged in a radial plan, with wings featuring three storeys above a basement level. The original design incorporated four residential wings extending from a central hub, facilitating surveillance and control typical of mid-19th-century penal architecture. Each wing housed single-occupancy cells measuring approximately 13 feet by 7 feet, emphasizing isolation as a reformative principle. In the late , the layout expanded with the addition of D wing, increasing capacity and segregating enhanced prisoners, while earlier extensions included western additions for workshops and kitchens. Contemporary configuration designates A wing for employed and general population inmates, B wing for vulnerable prisoners, C wing for first-night induction and detoxification, and D wing as a self-contained unit for incentivized prisoners. The perimeter includes a retained with Moneypenny's original gateway, flanked by the governor's and chaplain's houses; ancillary structures such as the original and H-plan debtors' ward were demolished by 1903. These features reflect ongoing adaptations to a core Victorian framework, balancing historical design with modern operational demands.

Cell Conditions and Maintenance Challenges

HM Prison Exeter's cells, largely Victorian in design and intended for single occupancy, have faced chronic strain from , resulting in routine doubling up of prisoners. In 2018, 77% of cells exceeded their certified capacity, with 75% of inmates housed in shared accommodations lacking adequate or storage. This practice persisted into 2023, when the prison held 309 inmates against an operational capacity of 321, contributing to heightened tensions and limited time out of cell. Cell conditions have been consistently substandard, characterized by cramped spaces, inadequate furnishings, broken windows, and unhygienic toilets without lockable storage. A 2018 found many cells unfit for purpose, with 44% of arrivals reporting very dirty conditions on their first night and only 24% deeming cells clean overall. Ventilation problems, mould growth from dampness, and pest infestations—such as rats entering via poorly fitted windows in D wing—further degraded habitability in 2023. The temporary Care and Separation Unit in C wing's basement was described as smelly, noisy, and unhygienic, exacerbating risks for vulnerable prisoners. Maintenance challenges stem from the aging of the Category B facility, with extensive repair backlogs tolerated by staff and compounded by . in 2018 noted widespread disrepair in communal areas and cells, urging urgent national intervention to decertify substandard units. Refurbishment efforts, including the completion of B wing and closure of for upgrades, have aimed to mitigate these issues but temporarily reduced available space and delayed resolutions for facilities like the segregation unit. By early 2025, southwest prisons including remained crowded, sustaining cell-sharing pressures amid national capacity strains.

Prisoner Population and Admissions

HM Prison Exeter, as a category B men's local , holds exclusively adult male prisoners, with a small number of young adults aged 18-20. The population consists primarily of those on remand or serving short , reflecting its role in receiving prisoners from courts in and . As of March 2025, the prison held 308 inmates against an operational capacity of 310. Demographic data indicate a predominantly population, with limited ethnic diversity. In 2023, approximately 85% of prisoners identified as , and 15% as Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME). Over 90% held British nationality. Age distribution skews toward middle adulthood, with the largest group in the 30-39 range.
Age GroupPercentage (2023 Average)
18-205%
21-249%
25-2915%
30-3939%
40-4920%
50-598%
60+4%
The prison experiences high population turnover characteristic of local facilities, with a 72% monthly rate at the end of 2023, driven by its reception function. Up to 80% of the population has been on remand at peak times, contributing to instability and short average stays of 90 days for sentenced prisoners. Population levels have remained near capacity, fluctuating around 300-386 amid broader prison pressures, though specific overcrowding at Exeter has involved doubled cells without exceeding adjusted operational limits. No major shifts in ethnic or age composition were reported over recent years, but the remand-heavy profile has persisted, aligning with national trends in rising .

Reception Processes and Classification

Upon arrival at HM Prison Exeter, a Category B men's local prison functioning primarily as a reception facility for courts in , , Dorset, and , new prisoners undergo an initial processing sequence designed to assess immediate risks and . This includes searches, property logging, and provision of a hot drink and meal, though showers are infrequently available due to operational constraints. All arrivals receive private interviews with first night and healthcare staff to screen for vulnerabilities, issues, and substance misuse, with approximately 2,338 receptions annually as of 2022. Health screenings, however, often face delays, contributing to gaps in timely medication or detoxification monitoring. Pin phone accounts are activated within 48 hours for most, barring public protection cases, facilitating early family contact. Prisoner classification begins with an initial during reception, evaluating factors such as offence type, prior convictions, and escape potential to determine security category under the A-D framework, where Category B—suitable for those not requiring maximum security but with escape made difficult—predominates at . Sentenced prisoners receive timely Offender Assessment System (OASys) evaluations and sentence plans, enabling representations against categorisation decisions, though transfers for lower-category (C or D) inmates can lag, sometimes resulting in direct release without relocation. Vulnerable prisoners, including those charged with sexual offences, are intended for separation, but misallocations to general population wings have occurred, heightening risks amid Exeter's elevated rates—the highest among English reception prisons at 1,636 incidents per 1,000 prisoners in 2022. Weekly safety intervention meetings and staff training on risk identification, implemented post-2022, aim to mitigate these through better initial placement in "safest locations" based on needs and threats. Following reception, prisoners are allocated to wings via procedures on C4 landing, serving as the induction unit, with cells inspected for readiness prior to occupancy. B wing houses vulnerable inmates, C wing manages first nights and detox, D wing accommodates enhanced-privilege prisoners, and prioritizes work-eligible individuals. Induction programs, revised for multidisciplinary input including learning difficulty screenings, provide orientation to services, assignments, and regime access, though only 27% of prisoners in 2022 reported comprehensive coverage, with persistent backlogs and low session attendance due to shortages. A dedicated Band 5 induction case manager role, introduced for 12 months from early 2023, and a temporary oversight post seek to standardize these processes, yet HM Inspectorate of Prisons noted insufficient embedding by late 2023, underscoring ongoing challenges in high-turnover environments.

Daily Operations and Regime

Daily Schedule and Activities

Prisoners at HM Prison Exeter follow a structured daily centered on a core day introduced in July 2023, which provides part-time activities averaging approximately 2.5 hours per weekday, alongside consistent access to domestic periods, association, and exercise. This regime aims to balance purposeful activity with basic needs, though implementation has been hampered by staffing constraints and low prisoner engagement. Unlock and lock-up times vary across wings, with surveys indicating only 44% adherence to scheduled routines as of late 2022. Time out of cell remains limited, with time-check observations in 2023 showing 28% of prisoners locked up during core hours and 29% engaged in activities, despite allocations reaching 79% in August before declining to 64% due to unfilled places. Unemployed prisoners typically receive about 2.5 hours out of cell daily, including one hour of outdoor exercise and a 90-minute domestic period for showers, laundry, and phone use; employed individuals access 4 to 6.5 hours, incorporating work or . Attendance at allocated activities hovers around or below 50%, attributed to factors such as inadequate incentives, a narrow lacking accredited or long-term options, and disruptions from or drug issues. Available activities emphasize basic skills and vocational training, with two industry workshops providing low-skill tasks like cleaning or assembly, primarily benefiting vulnerable prisoners in a calmer environment. offerings include short, unaccredited courses in English, maths, and , but suffer from chaotic inductions, low completion rates, and underutilization of resources like the virtual campus; no IT training is available. Physical activities consist of daily outdoor exercise, often delayed, and two weekly gym sessions of good quality, though without specialized programs; library and enrichment options like clubs exist but are infrequently accessed during curtailed domestic periods. Association time, integrated into domestic periods, allows limited socializing but is constrained by regime inconsistencies and early lock-ups. Efforts to enhance the regime include appointing a full-time custodial manager for oversight and introducing incentives like wages and rewards, alongside a new well-being center, yet inspectors noted insufficient progress in maximizing purposeful engagement or addressing overcrowding's impact on access. Overall, only 29% of prisoners were observed in purposeful activity during 2022 checks, underscoring persistent shortfalls in rehabilitation opportunities despite policy intentions.

Staffing Levels and Management Practices

HM Prison Exeter has faced persistent staffing shortages, particularly in healthcare and , which have compromised operational effectiveness and prisoner safety. A 2022 inspection identified chronic shortages in health services that undermined and substance misuse support, alongside insufficient teaching staff resulting in frequent cancellations of and work sessions. High frontline staff attrition exacerbated these issues, contributing to inadequate oversight of basic processes such as prisoner property access and induction. Leadership instability has been a recurring challenge, with three governors, eight deputy governors, and eight heads of safety appointed since the prior full inspection before 2022, hindering sustained progress on and regime delivery. A new governor took office in May 2023, introducing daily briefings and visibility, but reliance on temporary appointments persisted, including interim roles for supervising officers and custodial managers. By November 2023, the prison maintained a full complement of officers during inspections, though some were detached to other sites, while health service vacancies reached 48%, including eight unfilled positions with no substantive hires since 2022. Management responses included an approved in early 2023 to uplift team grades for retention, alongside for roles such as an interim head of , ACCT floorwalkers, and induction coordinators, targeting completion by mid-2023 to early 2024. A new core day regime launched in July 2023 aimed to standardize operations, supported by a summit and staff guidance documents, yet interactions achieved only 14% of planned sessions due to resource constraints. Progress remained fragile into 2024, with effective staff often in temporary positions and ongoing national pressures limiting stability. These practices reflect causal links between understaffing and elevated risks, such as , as documented in multiple HM Inspectorate of Prisons reviews.

Rehabilitation, Education, and Reintegration

Available Programs and Initiatives

HM Prison Exeter offers education and skills training provided by Weston College, including accredited courses in English, mathematics, , personal and social development, and . Additional offerings encompass , behaviour , skills, , and decorating at Level 1, , gym instruction, and English for speakers of other languages, alongside the Shannon Trust peer-led reading programme. Vocational and employment initiatives include workshops for light assembly, packing tasks, textiles work, and model train assembly and painting under local and national contracts. The Twinning Project, in partnership with Exeter City Football Club, provides employability enhancement activities. Launched in November 2023, the Future Skills Programme, funded by His Majesty's Prison and Probation Service and delivered by Weston College, features six-week courses in hospitality and catering, utilities, , and warehousing , culminating in guaranteed employer interviews to facilitate post-release employment and reduce reoffending. Rehabilitation efforts incorporate the THREADS peer support programme, a strength-based initiative by Recoop funded by HMPPS, aimed at developing emotional intelligence, addressing behavioral cycles, and supporting emotional wellbeing through peer facilitation. The Link Up Club offers basic living skills training, while pre-release support via the Offender Management Unit and Department for Work and Pensions includes assistance with employment, benefits, CV preparation, and accommodation, supplemented by the New Futures Network for job linkages. Temporary release for community work experience and induction programmes covering health, wellbeing, and personal development further aid reintegration, with family support provided through partnerships like PACT.

Measured Outcomes and Recidivism Data

In HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) evaluations, rehabilitation and release planning at HMP Exeter has fluctuated between reasonably good and poor ratings. The 2018 unannounced inspection judged this area reasonably good, noting effective discharge planning and liaison with external agencies like the community rehabilitation company , which handled 272 through-the-gate referrals in the prior year; however, over 20% of releases lacked sustained accommodation, and only 39% of surveyed prisoners needing support reported receiving it. By the 2022 inspection, outcomes deteriorated to poor, with an inadequate key worker scheme delivering only transactional interactions and limited progress in addressing high-risk cases or resettlement needs. A 2023 independent review of progress found reasonable advancements in staff-prisoner relationships and basic release support, but key worker sessions achieved just 14% of planned delivery over six months, underscoring persistent gaps in individualized planning. Purposeful activity outcomes, integral to rehabilitation, have been rated not sufficiently good or poor across inspections, reflecting low prisoner engagement and limited skill-building impact. In 2018, only 36% of prisoners attended or sessions at least twice weekly, with deeming overall provision requiring improvement due to insufficient vocational relevance and qualifications in prison jobs; 44% of surveyed believed their experiences reduced reoffending likelihood, while 43% completed offending behaviour programmes and 49% engaged in one-to-one work. The 2022 assessment highlighted part-time activity allocations for most prisoners but poor attendance and quality, contributing to the poor overall judgement. By 2023, a new core day regime allocated 64-79% of prisoners to activities, yet attendance fell below 50% in sessions, 28% remained locked up during working hours, and 33% were unemployed within the prison; noted insufficient progress, with a narrow focused on short unaccredited courses and no robust data tracking course outcomes or gains. Specific recidivism data for HMP Exeter remains sparse in recent official releases, but figures cited in 2019 indicated a proven reoffending rate of 64.1%, elevated relative to the national adult average of approximately 47% for similar cohorts, likely attributable to the prison's role as a local facility handling short sentences and remand prisoners prone to higher reoffence risks. No prison-specific reoffending metrics for 2020-2025 appear in aggregated proven reoffending statistics, which emphasize cohort-level trends without disaggregation by establishment; HMIP reports do not track long-term recidivism but infer poor outcomes from low purposeful activity engagement and resettlement failures, factors causally linked to reoffending in broader empirical studies of prisons.

Security Incidents and Measures

Historical Escapes and Riots

One notable escape attempt occurred at the Exeter City Gaol and Bridewell, where inmate McCarthy, a , used a spoon to cut through his cell door panel, donned a secretly fashioned baker's jacket and cap, and employed a bag containing a attached to blanket ropes to scale the wall. He was spotted by a warder's wife during the climb and recaptured after a struggle, later receiving a sentence of 20 years' transportation. In 1903, at the New North Road Prison (predecessor to the current facility), Robert Graham removed bricks from his cell, used a plank as a makeshift to surmount the outer wall, and broke into the governor's house via a to steal civilian clothes. He evaded capture for approximately one day before upon discovery of his discarded garb. A group of three unnamed inmates successfully escaped in September 1960 by climbing a 20-foot wall and stealing a from nearby Velwell Road, though their subsequent fate remains undocumented in available records. In 2007, Darren Humphreys extracted five layers of bricks using only his bare hands and a dustpan brush but fell 30 feet during the attempt, suffering a broken ankle before recapture. That same year, Daniel Vail burrowed a 2-by-3-foot hole with a metal leg, created a dummy occupant, and fashioned a 32-foot from , but guards detected falling and intervened. An attempted breakout in involved unnamed inmates digging through a 50-inch-thick wall using improvised tools, concealing the hole with and paint until brick dust and misalignment alerted staff. Historical records indicate sporadic declarations of "riot conditions" at Exeter Prison during the mid-20th century to manage disturbances, involving rapid cell confinement of inmates, though specific triggers and scales for these events are not detailed. In November 2016, a "mini-riot" erupted at HM Prison Exeter amid broader prison unrest, during which inmates held a staff member ; the incident underscored chronic understaffing but was contained without further escalation reported. No large-scale historical riots comparable to those at other facilities, such as , are documented for .

Modern Security Protocols and Breaches

As a Category B men's , HM Prison Exeter implements security protocols including routine cell and perimeter searches, , and intelligence-led operations to mitigate risks of and internal disorder. In February 2020, body scanners were installed to detect drugs, mobile phones, and weapons concealed on visitors and inmates, aiming to reduce internal . Following national initiatives, these scanners contributed to thwarting over 28,000 attempts across prisons by 2023, with Exeter benefiting from enhanced detection capabilities. To address , a 2023 action plan introduced Challenge, Support, and Intervention Plans (CSIP) with weekly Safety Intervention Meetings, peer-led Violence Reduction Representatives, and monthly at Safety Custody Meetings to identify incident drivers and implement targeted reductions. Urgent measures in December 2022 included recruiting additional frontline staff to bolster patrols and response capacity, amid ongoing challenges with staffing shortages exacerbating vulnerabilities. Security breaches have included persistent contraband incursions, with drugs such as new psychoactive substances and thrown over perimeter walls almost daily as of a 2017 inspection, contributing to 96 assaults and 45 fights in the preceding six months. A mini-riot in November 2016 resulted in a staff member being , highlighting lapses in order maintenance. An inmate attempted escape in 2012 using homemade tools from his cell, leading to an extended sentence but exposing potential weaknesses in cell search rigor. Despite these incidents, protocols showed efficacy by 2024/25, with inmate assaults dropping 43% to 100 incidents—the lowest in five years—and staff assaults at 45, even as -wide reached record highs. No successful escapes have been recorded in recent years, though elevated rates persisted into early 2024, one of the highest among adult male facilities. These reductions suggest that combined technological and procedural enhancements, alongside stabilized , have improved containment, though underlying issues like drug supply continue to undermine full security.

Notable Inmates

Prominent Historical Detainees

(1864–1945), convicted of murdering his employer Emma Anne Keyse by arson and stabbing on 15 November 1884 at , , was detained at HM Prison Exeter pending execution. On 23 February 1885, three attempts to hang him failed when the trapdoor jammed despite prior testing and lubrication, prompting William Harcourt to commute his sentence to on 24 February 1885; Lee served 22 years before release in 1907 and died in the United States. Emmeline Pankhurst (1858–1928), founder of the and militant leader, was imprisoned at Exeter Prison in late 1913 under the Prisoners (Temporary Discharge for Ill-Health) Act 1913—known as the "Cat and Mouse Act"—after conviction for inciting and other protest-related offenses. Released temporarily on 7 December 1913 due to from hunger striking, the Act allowed temporary releases for recovering hunger strikers before rearrest upon recovery, reflecting authorities' response to suffragette militancy.

Contemporary High-Profile Cases

In September 2025, inmate Steven Kempster, aged 65, was found unresponsive in his cell at HM Prison Exeter on September 15, prompting a murder investigation by Devon and Cornwall Police. Fellow inmate James Desborough, 39, from Lower Sticker in Cornwall, was charged with Kempster's murder the following day and remanded in custody after appearing at Exeter Magistrates' Court on September 18. The Crown Prosecution Service authorized the charge based on evidence meeting the test for a realistic prospect of conviction and public interest, with Desborough scheduled for trial at Exeter Crown Court on March 10, 2026. This incident represents one of the few recent cases drawing national media attention to violence among at the facility, though neither individual had prior public notoriety. Kempster's death marked a within the , contrasting with patterns of self-inflicted deaths that have also occurred, such as the 2021 suicide of despite his placement on protocols. No evidence indicates systemic links to high-profile external criminal trials involving or politically prominent figures held at HMP Exeter in the , with the primarily housing local Category B offenders from , , and .

Inspections, Challenges, and Reforms

Key Inspection Findings (2000s–2025)

In 2007 and 2009, HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) conducted unannounced follow-up and announced s, respectively, highlighting operational shortcomings at HMP Exeter, though specific quantitative data from those reports remains limited in public summaries; subsequent follow-ups in 2011 and 2013 continued to note inadequate progress in core areas like and regime management. The 2016 unannounced identified rising vulnerabilities, including poor responses to self-harm and limited purposeful activity, setting a pattern of decline amid and pressures. The 2018 unannounced inspection triggered an Urgent Notification, citing disturbingly high levels of violence, , and — with cell call bells routinely ignored despite elevated risks— alongside normalized drug use observed during the visit and systemic failures in vulnerability assessments. Inspectors documented six self-inflicted deaths since the prior inspection, underscoring inadequate support and induction processes for at-risk arrivals. A 2022 unannounced again prompted an Urgent Notification, revealing persistently poor safety outcomes: 626 incidents (equivalent to 1,636 per 1,000 prisoners), 250 assaults, and easy drug access reported by 22% of surveyed prisoners, exacerbated by chaotic inductions and ineffective strategies for vulnerable new arrivals. Respect and purposeful activity were judged poor, with 85% of cells overcrowded, chronic healthcare staffing shortages, low activity participation (only 29% of prisoners engaged), and extended lock-up periods; rehabilitation was reasonably good but hampered by weak and release gaps, including 25% of releases without . By 2023, an independent review of progress acknowledged some governance improvements under new , including better and care, but persistent high prisoner-on-prisoner violence—one of the highest rates in adult male prisons—, and a recent self-inflicted indicated fragile advances. The 2024 assessment reiterated , deficient CCTV coverage in key areas, and slow implementation of recommendations for protecting public protection cases (PPOs), with ongoing instability (eight deputy governors and heads since 2018) contributing to incomplete reforms. Across the period, HMIP reports consistently attributed issues to chronic understaffing, infrastructural decay, and insufficient national support, rather than isolated management failures.

Root Causes of Issues and Policy Critiques

Persistent issues at HM Prison Exeter, including elevated violence and rates, stem primarily from chronic and insufficient , which exacerbate tensions and limit effective oversight. In 2022, 85% of prisoners were housed in cells designed for single occupancy, leading to cramped conditions with mould, broken windows, and inadequate , fostering frustration and interpersonal conflicts. shortages, with high turnover and only temporary stability—such as eight deputy governors since 2018—have impaired basic functions like inductions and vulnerability assessments, directly contributing to 626 incidents (1,636 per 1,000 prisoners) and 250 assaults in the preceding year. Drug availability further destabilizes the environment, with 22% of prisoners reporting easy access in , driven by daily perimeter breaches and ineffective mandatory testing focused on rather than broader supply controls. Root causes include outdated infrastructure, such as delayed CCTV upgrades, and a lack of purposeful activities, leaving many inmates locked in cells for extended periods, which heightens boredom and demand for substances as coping mechanisms. These factors compound nationally, where prison population pressures from remand backlogs and sentencing policies outpace capacity expansions, resulting in Exeter's 71% double-celling rate persisting into 2023 despite population reductions. Policy critiques highlight failures in resource allocation and oversight by His Majesty's Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), which has been slow to fund essential fixes like CCTV and provide sustained leadership post-urgent notifications in 2018 and 2022. Critics argue that national underinvestment in —exacerbated by real-terms cuts—and mismatched development against rising incarceration rates have created a feedback loop of instability, undermining rehabilitation and safety. HM Inspectorate of Prisons has noted that without stable governance and enhanced national support, temporary measures risk reversal, as seen in insufficient progress on violence reduction despite targeted interventions. Broader systemic critiques point to , where delays inflate remand numbers without corresponding or community alternatives, perpetuating and diverting resources from core security.

Government Responses and Improvement Efforts

In response to a 2018 inspection highlighting safety and living condition failures, the Justice Secretary published an improvement plan emphasizing immediate actions such as enhanced safety protocols, better prisoner experiences for vulnerable individuals in early custody, and increased support from national specialist teams. A November 2022 Urgent Notification from HM Inspectorate of Prisons prompted swift intervention, with Prisons Minister announcing urgent measures on December 16, 2022, including the deployment of additional frontline staff to bolster security and daily regime management, alongside targeted enhancements to purposeful activities and outreach in partnership with charities. This was followed by a 28-day submitted in December 2022, focusing on systematic cell checks to ensure decency in living conditions, improved prisoner consultation, and ongoing monitoring to sustain habitability standards. By February 2023, HMP Exeter's addressed delivery by reviewing staff rosters, enhancing response times to prisoner requests, and expanding access to information services, aiming to reduce operational delays and improve accountability. Subsequent efforts included bolstering activities for prisoners, such as increased and vocational programs, to mitigate idleness contributing to unrest. In September 2024, correspondence affirmed high-level oversight through an Urgent Notification Strategy and Action Group to evaluate improvement sustainability, incorporating feedback from the Monitoring Board on persistent challenges like and regime consistency. A January 2024 inspection acknowledged progress in governance, , and crisis care at the prison, attributing these to targeted HMPPS interventions, though rates remained elevated, necessitating continued .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.