.jpg/250px-Rougemont_Castle_gatehouse,_2010_(cropped).jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
Community hub
Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Rougemont Castle
View on Wikipedia
Rougemont Castle, also known as Exeter Castle, is the historic castle of the city of Exeter, Devon, England. It was built into the northern corner of the Roman city walls starting in or shortly after the year 1068, following Exeter's rebellion against William the Conqueror. In 1136 it was besieged for three months by King Stephen. An outer bailey, of which little now remains, was added later in the 12th century.
Key Information
.jpg)
The castle is mentioned in Shakespeare's play Richard III in a reference to that king's visit to Exeter in 1483. Devon's county court was located here from at least 1607, and the three Devon Witches—the last people in England to be executed for witchcraft—were tried and convicted at the Exeter Assizes in 1682.
All the buildings inside the walls were swept away in the 1770s to make way for a new courthouse, which was extended by the addition of wings in 1895 and 1905. Because of its function as a court, the interior of the castle was not open to the public until the court moved to a new site in 2004. The entire site was later sold to a developer whose stated aim was to transform it into "the Covent Garden of the South West".[1]
The castle is named after the red stone found in the hill, and used in the construction of the original buildings, of which the large early Norman gatehouse is the main remaining feature. It is surrounded on three sides by the Rougemont Gardens and Northernhay Gardens, public parks now maintained by Exeter City Council.
Construction and early history
[edit]
After the Norman Conquest of 1066, Gytha, mother of the defeated King Harold, was living in Exeter and this may have caused the city to become a centre of resistance to William the Conqueror. Another reason for discontent may have been William's insistence that the city's traditional annual tribute of £18 must be increased. After Exeter's citizens rejected William's demand that they should swear an oath of fealty to him, he marched to the city in 1068 and laid siege to it for 18 days before it capitulated.[2]
The citizens of Exeter had been able to withstand William's siege thanks to the city wall, which had been first built by the Romans and extensively repaired in around 928 by King Athelstan.[3] Although the siege ended with the surrender of the city, William ordered a castle to be built within the wall to safeguard his position. The place selected was at the highest point, inside the northern angle of the wall,[2] on a volcanic outcrop.[4]
The building of the castle was left to Baldwin FitzGilbert who was appointed castellan, amongst other honours.[5] A deep ditch and internal rampart were constructed between the north-western and north-eastern city walls, forming a roughly square enclosure with sides of about 600 feet (180 m). The Domesday Book of 1086 reported that 48 houses had been destroyed in Exeter since the King came to England—this has been interpreted by historians to mean that this many houses were on the site cleared for the castle.[6] A large stone gatehouse, which still survives, was built into the bank at the south side of the enclosure. It has clear elements of Anglo-Saxon architecture, such as long-and-short quoins and double triangular-headed windows, suggesting that it was built very early by English masons on the Normans' orders. At this early stage the rampart was probably surmounted by a stockade, though two corner turrets were soon built where the bank met the city walls, the western one of which (mistakenly known as "Athelstan's Tower") is still present.[7]
The stockade was soon replaced by a masonry curtain wall. The remains of this wall shows that it was bonded into the repaired city walls, but not the gatehouse, indicating that it was built from the former towards the latter.[7] Another early enhancement was the construction of a protective barbican over the city side of the drawbridge.[8] There is evidence that the castle was attacked before it was completed. This evidence is both physical, in the form of repairs to Athelstan's Tower; and documentary, in a report made by Orderic Vitalis of an attack made on Exeter in 1069.[9]
In the early 12th century a chapel dedicated to St Mary was built within the castle walls. It had four prebendaries and was said to have been founded by William de Avenell, a son of the castle-builder Baldwin FitzGilbert; de Avenell also founded a priory at nearby Cowick.[10]
The siege of 1136 and after
[edit]In 1136, Baldwin de Redvers seized the castle as part of his rebellion against King Stephen. Although Stephen's army moved quickly to besiege the castle, Redvers was able to resist for three months until the failure of his water supply, which had been provided by a well and probably a rainwater cistern.[11] It is possible that the absence of an eastern tower to match Athelstan's Tower is due to its destruction by undermining during this siege,[12] and the discovery in c. 1930 of a short section of crudely built tunnel leading towards this point of the wall has been interpreted as associated with this event.[13] It is also likely that the barbican was captured and destroyed at this time.[12]
On a hill just to the north of the castle lies a small circular earthwork. It is known today as "Danes' Castle", but from the 12th century until the 16th it was called "New Castle". It was thought to be an outwork of Rougemont Castle, built to defend its northern side,[14] but following excavation in 1992 it is now believed to have been built by Stephen during his siege.[15]
After Stephen's attack it appears that the advancing technology of siege engines prompted the construction in the late 12th century of an outer bailey. This consisted of a wall with an outer ditch which ran from the eastern city wall on the north side of Bailey Street—where the only remaining section of its wall survives—to the western city wall near today's city museum,[16] where portions of the infilled ditch were discovered during renovation works in 2009.[17]
"Richmond! When last I was at Exeter,
The mayor in courtesy show'd me the castle,
And call'd it Rougemont: at which name I started,
Because a bard of Ireland told me once
I should not live long after I saw Richmond."
The castle continued to be repaired at intervals until the early 14th century; the last recorded repair to the defences being in 1352. By c.1500 the original gateway was out of use, and its entrance blocked up, in favour of an adjacent archway.[19] In the northernmost corner of the castle there was a sally port beneath a large tower and a drawbridge over the ditch outside the wall.[20] These were destroyed in 1774 and no trace now remains.[21]
Although it has always officially been called "Exeter Castle", the more common name of "Rougemont Castle" first appeared in a local record dated around 1250. It refers to the red colour of the rock on the hill and the colour of the walls built from these rocks.[14] King Richard III visited Exeter in 1483 and in Shakespeare's Richard III, the bard makes him later recall a premonition of his death when he is shown the castle and confuses Rougemont with Richmond.[22] The castle was said to have been badly damaged during the Second Cornish uprising of 1497 when Perkin Warbeck and 6,000 Cornishmen entered the city, and by 1600 it was said to display "gaping chinks and an aged countenance."[23]
17th to 20th centuries
[edit]
In 1607 a courthouse was built within the castle walls,[24] and in 1682 and 1685 the three "Devon witches" were tried here, before being executed at Heavitree. They were the last people in England to be executed for witchcraft; a plaque on the wall by the gatehouse commemorates the events.[25]
The noted cartographer and chorographer, John Norden produced a plan of the castle and its precincts in 1617. It shows, amongst other features, the newly built court houses,[26] the chapel, the position of the castle well, the north sally-port and what may have been the ruined walls of a rectangular keep against the north-eastern wall.[27]
The castle did not play a major role during the Civil War, although in late 1642 Parliament authorised the City of Exeter to use £300 of public funds to fortify the city and perform repairs to the castle.[28] Despite there being at least four artillery batteries at the castle, the city fell to the Royalists in 1643, then to the Parliamentarians in 1646. During part of the war the gatehouse was used as a prison.[29]
| Devon Shire Hall Act 1772 | |
|---|---|
| Act of Parliament | |
 | |
| Long title | An Act for taking down the Shire Hall of the County of Devon, and for building a New Shire Hall in a more commodious Manner. |
| Citation | 13 Geo. 3. c. 16 |
| Territorial extent | Great Britain |
| Dates | |
| Royal assent | 16 March 1773 |
| Commencement | 26 November 1772[a] |
| Other legislation | |
| Relates to | Lease of Exeter Castle Act 1710 |
Status: Current legislation | |
| Text of statute as originally enacted | |
In 1773 all the buildings within the castle walls were demolished and replaced with a courthouse built in limestone in the Palladian style.[30] The design was by local architect Philip Stowey, amended by James Wyatt.[24] At this time, the early-16th-century entrance arch was replaced by a new one, built of reclaimed stone and sporting a false portcullis. This remains the entrance to the site today.[19] The court buildings were extended to the west in 1895, creating offices for the new county council, and extended again in 1905 by the addition of a neo-Palladian wing to the east.[24]
A section of the castle wall between the gatehouse and the eastern city wall was found to be in imminent state of collapse in 1891 and despite efforts to repair it, it fell in October of that year. The unstable part of the wall was that around the site of the circular tower shown on Norden's plan of 1617. It was speculated that when this tower was demolished (at an unknown date), the rebuild was of very poor quality. After the demolition of St Mary's chapel with the other buildings in the late 18th century, a lodge had been built close to the new castle entrance. This lodge was threatened by the unsafe wall and during works to make it safe, excavations in its floor revealed a number of human skeletons which were assumed to have been buried in the grounds of the chapel. Thomas Westcote wrote in around 1630 that the chapel was "ruinous" and a document of 1639 records that Bishop Hall was requested to assign the chapel precinct "for buryall of such Prisoners as shall die in the Gaole."[31]
Other notable events that took place at the castle included a Monsieur St Croix making the first hot-air balloon ascent in Exeter from the Castle yard in June 1786;[32] and on 15 May 1832 the first Annual Exhibition of the Devon Agricultural Society, the forerunner of the Devon County Show, was held here.[33][34] The County Council moved to Devon County Hall in 1964.[35]
Notable hearings in the Old Law Courts in the 20th century included the trial and conviction of an airline pilot, Andrew Newton, in March 1976, on charges of possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life: the charges resulted from a bungled attempt by Newton to shoot a former male model, Norman Scott, that resulted in the killing of Scott's Great Dane. During the trial Scott made lurid allegations against the then leader of the Liberal Party, Jeremy Thorpe, which ultimately lead to Thorpe's resignation as party leader.[36]
21st century
[edit]
Until 2003 the intact Georgian buildings of the castle remained the seat of royal power in the county and continued to serve as home the Crown Court and the County Court. As a result, the castle was one of the least known and accessible parts of the city, and few local residents had set foot beyond its gates; it had never been accessible to tourists.[37][38] However difficulties over disabled access on the steep castle site had become a major problem, and new Law Courts were completed in Exeter's legal quarter in 2004. Following the failure of a scheme for Exeter City Council to purchase the site, it was sold by Her Majesty's Courts Service in early 2007 to GL50 Properties, whose managing director said "Rougemont Castle is an amazing building which we will transform into the Covent Garden of the South West of England."[1]
Today, the castle is subject to a high degree of legal protection as a scheduled monument, and its main structures are all either Grade I or Grade II* listed buildings. A statue, dated 1863, by E. B. Stephens of the 1st Earl Fortescue stands in the yard: it is Grade II listed.[29] As the relevant planning authority, the city council explained its concerns about the future of the castle. It stated its view that whatever its future use, the castle should be opened up to reasonable public access and integrated into the cultural quarter of the city as a key element, the historic importance and quality of the site and buildings should be respected, and at least the impressive courtyard of the castle should be available for public events even if the buildings are purchased for commercial use. As an example of this new use, the band Coldplay played a charity concert in the courtyard in December 2009 during its Viva la Vida Tour.[39]
In 2011, the former Court 1 reopened as the Ballroom, with its arched windows lowered to floor level; lavatories were installed in the former holding cells for prisoners. Court 2 reopened as the Gallery, of 150 square metres. In addition, 12 new apartments were created within the walls of the castle.[40]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Start of session.
References
[edit]- ^ a b "LSH announce the sale of Exeter's landmark building Rougemont Castle". Lambert Smith Hampton. 12 January 2007. Archived from the original on 16 June 2007. Retrieved 9 April 2012.
- ^ a b Hoskins 2004, pp. 24–27.
- ^ Hoskins 2004, p. 23.
- ^ Variously described as a "volcanic cone" (Laming & Roche 2009, p. 3), a "volcanic outcrop" (Perkins 1971, p. 122) or a "volcanic mound" (Mellor 1989, p. 77).
- ^ Vachell 1966, p. 335.
- ^ See, for instance, Vachell 1966, p. 336.
- ^ a b Vachell 1966, pp. 335–8.
- ^ Vachell 1966, p. 341.
- ^ Vachell 1966, pp. 339–40.
- ^ Wykes-Finch, Rev. W. (1903). "The Ancient Family of Wyke of North Wyke, Co. Devon". Report & Transactions of the Devonshire Association. XXXV: 391.
- ^ Vachell 1966, pp. 340–42.
- ^ a b Vachell 1966, pp. 342–3.
- ^ Exeter Excavation Committee 1932, pp. 192, 195, 197.
- ^ a b Hoskins 2004, p. 31.
- ^ Nenk, Beverley. S.; Margeson, Sue; Hurley, Maurice (1993). "Danes Castle" (PDF). Medieval Britain and Ireland in 1993. 38: 203–4.
- ^ Vachell 1966, p. 344
- ^ Steinmetzer, MFR (January 2011). Archaeological Investigation and Building Recording at the Royal Albert Memorial Memorial Museum, Exeter (PDF). Exeter Archaeology.
- ^ "Richard III, Act IV, Scene 2". Open Source Shakespeare. Retrieved 5 April 2012.
- ^ a b Pevsner & Cherry 1989, p. 400.
- ^ Shown as point "A" on Norden's plan of 1617.
- ^ Jenkins, Alexander (1806). The History and Description of the City of Exeter. Exeter: P. Hedgeland. pp. 217–8. A copy of the wood engraving referred to in Jenkins' text appears on Devon County Council's Etched on Devon's Memory website Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 9 April 2012.
- ^ Cornforth, David. "Interesting and Famous visitors to Exeter". Exeter Memories. Retrieved 5 April 2012.
- ^ Addleshaw, Percy (1921). Bell's Cathedrals: The Cathedral Church of Exeter (revised ed.). London: G. Bell and Sons Ltd. pp. 92–3.
- ^ a b c Mellor 1989, p. 77.
- ^ Preston-Ellis, Rom (25 May 2018). "The dark history of Exeter - the first and last place to kill a 'witch'". Devon Live. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
- ^ Mistakenly annotated by George Oliver, in whose History of the City of Exeter (1861) the plan appeared, as "built in about 1624".
- ^ "Detailed Result: Exeter Castle". Pastscape. Archived from the original on 15 September 2014. Retrieved 9 April 2012.
- ^ Andriette, Eugene A (1971). Devon and Exeter in the Civil War. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. p. 72. ISBN 0-7153-5256-3.
- ^ a b "Central Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan". Exeter City Council. August 2002. pp. 29–44. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 9 April 2012. (pdf file)
- ^ Historic England. "The Castle (Crown Court) (1169617)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 31 January 2023.
- ^ Phear, Sir J. B. (1891). "Recent Discoveries at the Castle, Exeter". Report & Transactions of the Devonshire Association. XXIII: 318–321.
- ^ Cornforth, David. "First balloon ascent". Exeter Memories. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
- ^ "Devonshire: The First Annual Exhibition of the Devon Agricultural Society". Sherborne Mercury. 21 May 1832. p. 4. Retrieved 4 April 2012 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ Cornforth, David. "Rougemont Castle". Exeter Memories. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
- ^ "History of County Hall". Devon County Council. Archived from the original on 20 March 2012. Retrieved 31 October 2009.
- ^ Chester, Lewis; Linklater, Magnus; May, David (1979). Jeremy Thorpe: A Secret Life. London: Fontana Books. pp. 261–264. ISBN 978-0-00-635733-9.
- ^ "Rougemont Castle". Open Buildings. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
- ^ Historic England. "Northernhay and Rougemont Gardens (1001631)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
- ^ "Castle gig for Coldplay's Martin". BBC News. 2 December 2009. Retrieved 30 March 2012.
- ^ The Times (London), 28 February 2011.
Bibliography
[edit]- "Report on the Underground Passages in Exeter". Proceedings of the Devon Archaeological Exploration Society. 1 (4). Exeter Excavation Committee: 191–200. 1932.
- Hoskins, W. G. (2004). Two Thousand Years in Exeter (Revised and updated ed.). Chichester: Phillimore. ISBN 1-86077-303-6.
- Laming, Deryck; Roche, David (2009). "Devon Geology Guide – Permian Breccias, Sandstones and Volcanics" (PDF). Devon County Council. p. 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 30 March 2012.
- Mellor, Hugh (1989). Exeter Architecture. Chichester: Phillimore. ISBN 0-85033-693-7.
- Perkins, John W. (1971). Geology Explained in South and East Devon. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-5304-7.
- Pevsner, Nikolaus; Cherry, Bridget (revision) (1989) [1952]. The Buildings of England: Devon. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-071050-7.
- Vachell, E. T. (1966). "Exeter Castle, its Background, Origin and History". Report & Transactions of the Devonshire Association. 98.
External links
[edit]
- Exeter Castle official website – www.exetercastle.co.uk.
- "Historic castle goes up for sale". (7 November 2005). BBC News
- "Northernhay Gardens including the castle".
Rougemont Castle
View on GrokipediaRougemont Castle, also known as Exeter Castle, is a Norman ringwork and bailey castle located on Rougemont Hill in the northern part of Exeter, Devon, England, constructed starting in 1068 by William the Conqueror following an 18-day siege of the city that resisted Norman rule after the Conquest.[1][2] The fortress incorporated elements of the preexisting Roman city walls and an Anglo-Saxon burh, forming a strategic motte-and-bailey structure with a timber stockade initially, later enhanced with stone elements including a gatehouse, towers, and curtain walls.[2] Supervised by Baldwin de Meules, the castle's establishment involved demolishing Saxon houses and symbolized Norman dominance over a key southwestern English stronghold.[3][1] Throughout its history, Rougemont Castle endured sieges, such as that by King Stephen in 1136, and served as a royal residence, military outpost, and administrative center, with the Duchy of Cornwall holding tenure from 1337.[2][1] It transitioned to use as a county gaol and courthouse by the 16th century, hosting assizes and notorious events like the late 17th-century witchcraft trials that led to executions.[3] During the English Civil War, Parliamentarian forces under General Fairfax captured it in 1646, after which much of the defensive architecture was slighted.[1][3] Today, surviving remnants include the 12th-century gatehouse and parts of the walls, integrated into modern judicial facilities like the Crown Court, while the site is designated a scheduled monument and public gardens.[2]
Location and Prehistory
Geological Formation and Etymology
The site of Rougemont Castle is situated on a prominent hill in Exeter, Devon, formed by an outcrop of Permian volcanic rocks from the Exeter Volcanic Series, primarily basalt lavas dating to the late Paleozoic era around 299–252 million years ago.[4][5] These rocks, known locally as the "Exeter Traps," consist of fine-grained, vesicular basalts exhibiting reddish hues due to iron oxidation, with the largest such exposure underlying the castle at grid reference SX 921 930.[5][6] The volcanics form the basal sequence beneath the overlying New Red Sandstone deposits, providing a natural elevated motte for the Norman fortress while historically yielding building stone for early Roman and later structures in the area.[4][7] The name "Rougemont" derives from the Norman French phrase rouge mont, translating to "red hill" or "red mount," a direct reference to the characteristic reddish color of the exposed volcanic basalt on the hilltop.[3] This etymology reflects the site's geological distinctiveness amid Exeter's broader landscape of sedimentary rocks, with the term first applied post-Norman Conquest to distinguish the castle's location.[1]Pre-Norman Fortifications and Strategic Role
The site of Rougemont Castle occupies a prominent volcanic knoll in northeastern Exeter, initially fortified during the Roman occupation as part of the legionary fortress Isca Dumnoniorum, established around AD 55 following the Claudian invasion of AD 43. This fortress served as a military base for Roman campaigns into southwestern Britain, housing up to 5,000 troops before transitioning to a civilian administrative center for the Dumnonii tribe by AD 75. Defenses were later expanded to enclose approximately 37 hectares, incorporating earthworks and stone walls constructed circa AD 160–180, leveraging the hill's steep northeastern and northwestern slopes for natural protection.[8][3] After Roman withdrawal in the early 5th century, the site experienced decline, with limited occupation until the late 9th century, when Exeter was refounded as an Anglo-Saxon burh under Alfred the Great or his successors as part of the defensive network against Viking raids. The existing Roman walls were refurbished and integrated into the burh's fortifications, forming a continuous circuit that enclosed the city, including the Rougemont promontory; archaeological evidence includes Saxon masonry techniques observable in later Norman structures on the site. Traditional accounts attribute an early fortified palace or stronghold to King Athelstan (r. 924–939), located at the hill's summit, which was destroyed during a Danish raid led by Ulfkytel Snillingr in 1003.[8][2][1] Strategically, the Rougemont site's elevated position—rising sharply above the River Exe—commanded the lowest practical crossing of the river, facilitating control over trade routes, regional administration, and military movements in Devon, where Exeter ranked as one of only four burhs. As a minting center and nodal point for international exchange (evidenced by imported pottery from France and the Low Countries), it bolstered Wessex's southwestern frontier, enabling rapid defense and economic oversight amid persistent Viking threats from the 9th to 11th centuries. This pre-Conquest resilience underscored the hill's defensibility, prompting William the Conqueror's selection of the location for his motte-and-bailey castle in 1068 to subdue Anglo-Saxon resistance.[8][3][2]Construction and Norman Conquest
Origins under William the Conqueror
In early 1068, Exeter emerged as a focal point of resistance to Norman rule following William the Conqueror's victory at Hastings in 1066, influenced in part by the presence of Anglo-Saxon nobles opposed to the new regime.[1] The city's rebellion prompted William to march on Exeter, initiating an 18-day siege that ended with the submission of the defenders on terms that preserved the lives and property of the inhabitants.[9][10] To consolidate control over this strategically vital southwestern stronghold, William selected the summit of Rougemont hill—a prominent volcanic outcrop of red breccia at the northeastern angle of the Roman city walls—for the castle's site, demolishing approximately 48 houses in the process.[3] Construction began immediately after the siege, in 1068 or 1069, as an earthen motte-and-bailey fortification with timber defenses, incorporating sections of the preexisting Roman walls for added strength.[2][1] William placed the project under the oversight of Baldwin de Meules (also known as Baldwin FitzGilbert), a trusted Norman lord whom he appointed as sheriff of Devon and custodian of the castle.[2][3] The choice of Rougemont reflected standard Norman tactics for rapid fortification in conquered territories, prioritizing defensibility on high ground while minimizing construction time through reuse of ancient defenses.[1] The site's name, derived from the French rouge mont ("red hill"), stems from the distinctive reddish volcanic rock exposed there, which provided a natural defensive advantage.[11] This early castle marked one of William's first post-Conquest strongholds in the West Country, serving primarily as a military base to deter further uprisings and enforce feudal authority over Devon.[12]Initial Siege of Exeter and Defensive Enhancements
Following the Norman victory at the Battle of Hastings in October 1066, Exeter emerged as a center of Anglo-Saxon resistance, harboring figures such as Gytha Thorkelsdóttir, mother of the slain King Harold Godwinson, and closing its gates against William the Conqueror's authority.[9] In late January or early February 1068, William advanced on the city with his army, initiating a siege to compel submission and prevent broader western rebellion.[13] The defenders, bolstered by the city's ancient Roman walls and strategic topography, held out as William's forces encircled the perimeter.[12] The siege endured for 18 days, marked by Norman sapping operations that undermined the East Gate through tunnels excavated by engineers, threatening structural collapse and breaching the defenses.[9] [13] Casualties mounted on both sides, with William's troops suffering losses from sorties and disease, though primary accounts emphasize the psychological strain on the besieged rather than pitched assaults.[12] On approximately 28 February 1068, the citizens surrendered under negotiated terms that preserved their lives and property from plunder, with William pledging to uphold the city's liberties in exchange for hostages—including women and children of prominent families—to ensure loyalty.[13] [12] To consolidate control and deter future defiance, William immediately commissioned Rougemont Castle on the commanding Rougemont hill at the northeastern angle of the Roman city walls, demolishing 48 houses to clear the site and relocating inhabitants.[9] Overseen by Baldwin de Moeles, Sheriff of Devon, the initial structure comprised a motte-and-bailey design: an artificial motte mound, raised approximately 100 feet high through the displacement of around 50,000 tonnes of earth, topped with a wooden keep for elevated command, flanked by a bailey enclosure for troops and supplies, all integrated into the pre-existing Roman fortifications for enhanced defensibility.[1] [12] This fortification, named for the red volcanic soil (from Latin rubeus mons), represented a deliberate escalation over prior Anglo-Saxon earthworks, providing Norman overlords with a vantage to surveil and suppress the city while leveraging natural contours for ballistic advantage.[1] These enhancements transformed Rougemont from a peripheral hillock into a pivotal stronghold, enabling rapid garrisoning and projecting power across Devon, as evidenced by its role in quelling subsequent unrest without immediate recourse to full-scale rebuilding until later medieval phases.[12] The castle's emplacement directly within urban bounds underscored William's strategy of embedding military dominance amid populations, minimizing logistical vulnerabilities while exploiting the site's geological prominence for passive defense.[1]Medieval Period
Siege of 1136 and the Anarchy
In the early stages of the Anarchy, the civil war contesting the English throne between King Stephen and Empress Matilda following Henry I's death in December 1135, Baldwin de Redvers, Earl of Devon and a former adherent of Henry I, emerged as one of the first major barons to challenge Stephen's usurpation.[14] De Redvers, leveraging his regional influence in the southwest, seized control of Rougemont Castle in Exeter during 1136, fortifying it as a base against the king and aligning implicitly with Matilda's claim despite her not yet actively contesting the crown in England.[14] [15] This act of defiance reflected broader baronial discontent with Stephen's rapid ascension without securing oaths of fealty from key figures, exacerbating the instability that defined the period's decentralized warfare and castle-based power struggles.[14] King Stephen responded swiftly, marching on Exeter and initiating a siege of Rougemont Castle in early summer 1136, which lasted approximately three months.[16] [3] To maintain pressure, Stephen constructed a temporary earthen siege castle at Southernhay, adjacent to the main fortifications, enabling his forces to blockade access routes and disrupt supplies without immediate direct assaults.[3] The citizens of Exeter, resentful of de Redvers' governance and exactions, petitioned Stephen for intervention, highlighting internal divisions that undermined the defenders' resolve; contemporary accounts in the Gesta Stephani note the king's appeals for mercy toward the townsfolk amid the standoff.[17] [18] This siege exemplified the Anarchy's reliance on attrition over pitched battles, with castles like Rougemont serving as focal points for loyalty tests and resource denial. The blockade culminated in de Redvers' surrender by mid-1136, primarily due to dwindling water supplies and famine within the castle, compelling the garrison to capitulate without a storming of the walls.[14] [15] Stephen granted lenient terms, allowing de Redvers and his followers safe passage into exile in France, from where the earl later joined Matilda's court and continued resistance, including further seizures in the southwest.[14] [15] Rougemont Castle reverted to royal control under Stephen, who appointed a constable to secure it, though the episode underscored the fortress's strategic vulnerability to prolonged encirclement and the Anarchy's pattern of fleeting allegiances, with the southwest remaining a contested zone for years thereafter.[3]12th-15th Century Developments and Conflicts
In the late 12th century, following the instability of the Anarchy, Rougemont Castle saw enhancements to its fortifications, including the addition of an outer bailey to expand the defended area beyond the original ringwork and inner bailey.[19] These developments reflected ongoing royal investment in maintaining the site as a key defensive stronghold in the southwest, integrating it further with Exeter's Roman and Saxon walls. A chapel dedicated to St. Mary was also constructed during this period, serving both military and religious functions for the garrison and visitors.[20] The castle's military role persisted into the 13th century amid the First Barons' War (1215–1217). In July 1216, baronial forces under Falkes de Breauté, a mercenary captain loyal to the embattled King John, besieged Rougemont after capturing the city of Exeter. The royalist garrison successfully defended the castle, preventing its fall despite the temporary loss of the surrounding town, which underscored the structure's enduring strategic value and robust Norman earthworks.[21] Intermittent repairs followed such pressures, with the castle remaining under direct crown control and used for administrative purposes alongside defense. By the early 14th century, maintenance shifted focus; records indicate the castle was in poor condition by 1325, with subsequent work limited to internal buildings rather than defensive walls. During the 1326–1327 invasion by Queen Isabella and Roger Mortimer against Edward II, Exeter's authorities, including the castle, surrendered without resistance, allowing the invaders to occupy the city peacefully while a mob killed the royalist Bishop of Exeter, Walter Stapledon.[22] This event highlighted declining military readiness, as the castle posed no significant barrier to the coup. Throughout the 15th century, amid the Wars of the Roses (1455–1487), Rougemont experienced no major sieges, reflecting its reduced frontline role in national conflicts; Exeter aligned with the Yorkist cause, denying entry to Lancastrian forces under Margaret of Anjou in 1471. The castle primarily functioned as a custodial site for prisoners and a base for local governance, with fortifications falling into further neglect as artillery advancements diminished the efficacy of such earth-and-timber defenses.[23]Early Modern and Judicial History
Tudor-Stuart Era Uses and Perkin Warbeck Rebellion
During the Tudor dynasty (1485–1603), Rougemont Castle functioned primarily as a military stronghold and administrative center for Exeter, supporting regional defense against domestic threats. Its elevated position integrated with the city's Roman and medieval walls provided oversight of northern approaches, enabling rapid response to incursions from Cornwall and Devon.[15] The castle housed royal officials and stored important regalia, such as the Great Seal of England during Edward I's absences abroad in the late 13th century, a practice that underscored its trusted security role persisting into later periods.[14] By the early 16th century, residential occupation ceased around 1521, shifting emphasis to fortification maintenance and occasional judicial functions.[10] A pivotal event occurred in 1497 amid Perkin Warbeck's rebellion, when the castle bolstered Exeter's resistance to the pretender's Cornish forces. Warbeck, a Flemish merchant's son advancing a fabricated claim as Richard of Shrewsbury (younger son of Edward IV), capitalized on Cornish grievances over a 1497 subsidy tax to rally approximately 6,000 rebels.[14] On 17 September, the army reached Exeter, demanding entry and proclaiming Warbeck's royal title.[15] City leaders refused, prompting assaults on the walls using mining, ladders, and fire; defenders from Rougemont Castle repelled these, leveraging the gatehouse's Norman architecture and earthworks to counter attacks near the northern defenses.[24] After two days of failure and significant rebel losses, Warbeck abandoned the siege on 19 September, retreating eastward where Henry VII's army defeated the remnants near Taunton on 5 October.[14] This defense preserved Tudor control in the southwest without direct royal intervention at the site. In the Stuart era (1603–1714), the castle retained military utility amid escalating national conflicts, though its prominence waned as centralized artillery diminished traditional fortress roles. Artillery platforms and a bowling green—recreational yet dual-use for training—appear in John Norden's 1617 survey, indicating late-16th to early-17th-century enhancements for gun emplacements.[25] During the First English Civil War, Royalist-held Exeter endured a prolonged siege from May 1645 to April 1646 by Parliamentarian forces under Sir Thomas Fairfax.[10] The castle served as a bastion within the defenses, but starvation and disease forced surrender on 9 April 1646; Parliamentarians subsequently occupied it as a garrison base until demilitarization.[15] These episodes highlight the castle's adaptation from medieval stronghold to early modern artillery site, bridging Tudor rebellions like Warbeck's with Stuart civil strife.Assizes, Prisons, and Witch Trials
A courthouse was constructed within Rougemont Castle's walls in 1607 to accommodate Devon's county courts, including the assizes, which handled serious criminal trials such as murder, treason, and felony cases presided over by itinerant judges from London's courts.[3] These sessions convened periodically, drawing prisoners from the county gaol associated with the castle precincts, where incarceration occurred prior to hearings.[1] The castle's judicial role extended to imprisonment, with facilities including cells in the gatehouse and surrounding structures used to detain debtors, minor offenders, and those awaiting assize trials or execution; conditions were typically harsh, featuring overcrowding and poor sanitation common to pre-modern English gaols.[26] Executions following convictions often took place at nearby Heavitree gallows rather than within the castle itself.[27] Rougemont Castle gained notoriety for hosting witchcraft trials during the late 17th century, amid waning but persistent prosecutions under statutes like the 1604 Witchcraft Act. In the 1682 summer assizes, three women from Bideford—Temperance Lloyd, Mary Trembles, and Susannah Edwards—were tried on 14 August for sorcery and consorting with the devil, based on accusations of causing harm through supernatural means; they confessed under examination and were convicted, leading to their hanging at Heavitree on 25 August.[27] [28] Alice Molland faced trial at the Exeter Lent Assizes, likely in March 1685, for witchcraft involving harm to individuals including Joane Snow and John Read; convicted on scant documented evidence, she was the last woman executed for witchcraft in England, hanged shortly thereafter.[29] These cases, prosecuted despite growing skepticism toward spectral evidence and coerced confessions, marked the effective end of capital witchcraft convictions in England before the 1735 repeal of anti-witchcraft laws.[30]Modern Transformations
18th-20th Century Courthouse and Decline
In 1770, an Act of Parliament authorized the construction of a new entrance to Rougemont Castle and the cutting of Castle Street to accommodate increased traffic from the Assizes and address the decaying drawbridge.[3] The existing courthouse, dating from 1607, was demolished in 1773, and a new Palladian-style County Courthouse was erected within the inner bailey, designed by Philip Stowey with cost-saving modifications influenced by James Wyatt.[3] This structure served as the venue for Devon's county courts and Assizes, marking the castle's primary function as a judicial center through the 18th century.[31] During the 19th century, the courthouse underwent expansions to meet growing demands, with wings added in 1895 and a neo-Palladian extension in 1905.[31] It continued to host significant trials as part of the Assizes system, while the associated county gaol within the castle precincts faced criticism for overcrowding and unsanitary conditions, described as a "disgrace to humanity" prompting plans for new prison facilities elsewhere.[32] The castle's military and residential roles had diminished entirely by this period, with surviving structures like the gatehouse falling into partial ruin amid the prioritization of judicial infrastructure.[10] Into the 20th century, the courthouse remained operational for Crown and County Courts, handling cases until the late 1900s, though the broader site reflected decline through utilitarian adaptations such as converting grounds into a car park.[3] The prisons were phased out earlier in favor of modern facilities, underscoring the castle's transition from multifaceted fortress to specialized, aging judicial outpost, with maintenance focused narrowly on court functions amid encroaching urban development.[31]21st Century Preservation Efforts
In the early 2000s, Rougemont Castle's remains, including the Norman gatehouse and curtain walls, benefited from its designation as a scheduled ancient monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, enforced by Historic England to protect against unauthorized works and ensure long-term conservation.[2] This legal framework has facilitated routine maintenance rather than large-scale reconstruction, with the site integrated into public access areas like Rougemont Gardens, managed by Exeter City Council to balance preservation with recreational use.[2] Archaeological investigations continued into the 21st century, with excavations and building recording conducted between 1985 and 2016, culminating in detailed topographic and structural analyses presented by archaeologist Dr. Stuart Blaylock in 2022, emphasizing the castle's urban context without altering its physical fabric.[25] In July 2016, Oakford Archaeology oversaw a geotechnical borehole survey in Rougemont Gardens on behalf of Exeter City Council, monitoring ground stability to inform future conservation without invasive development.[33] Adjacent Rougemont House, part of the castle precinct, was transferred in 2014 to the Royal Albert Memorial Museum's architecture and archaeology department, establishing a dedicated conservation unit to safeguard its historical elements amid urban pressures.[34] Ongoing efforts in the surrounding Northernhay and Rougemont Gardens, Grade II listed on the Register of Historic Parks and Gardens, include protective measures for mature trees and general upkeep to mitigate environmental degradation, as reported by council initiatives up to 2025.[35] These activities reflect a strategy prioritizing non-intrusive stewardship over restoration, preserving the site's authenticity as ruins within a landscaped public space.[36]Architecture and Features
Surviving Structures and Materials
The principal surviving structure of Rougemont Castle is the early Norman gatehouse, erected in the early 1070s as the primary entrance to the inner bailey.[37] This square, three-storey edifice features a broad arched passageway measuring 3 meters wide by 3.5 meters high, flanked by triangular-headed windows, cushion capitals, and billet ornamentation, with evident Anglo-Saxon influences in its pointed upper arches constructed by local English masons.[37][3] Originally accessed via a timber bridge over a moat and equipped with internal wooden floors, the gatehouse retains its original arches and stands partially intact today.[3][2] The gatehouse and associated curtain walls were built using local dark purple volcanic trap rubble sourced from the Rougemont knoll—a natural rock outcrop whose reddish hue inspired the site's name, derived from French for "red hill"—with white Triassic sandstone freestone employed for quoins and bound by dark brown sandy mortar.[37][3] These stone elements replaced an initial timber stockade by the early 12th century, forming a defensive curtain wall cut into the hillside.[37][2] Additional remnants encompass sections of the castle's curtain wall and junction towers integrated with reutilized Roman city defenses, particularly along the northeast and northwest flanks where walls survive to significant heights.[2] Notable among these are Athelstan’s Tower and King John’s Tower, adapted for medieval use.[3] Partial outer bailey walls persist near Bailey Street, while earthworks including the Norman ringwork, bailey, and ditches remain as buried archaeological features beneath modern public gardens.[37][2] The site's military architecture, scheduled as a monument and with the gatehouse Grade I listed, reflects robust Norman engineering adapted to the pre-existing topography and Roman infrastructure.[37][2]Military Engineering and Innovations
Rougemont Castle was constructed as a ringwork castle between 1068 and 1069 by William the Conqueror following the siege of Exeter, under the supervision of Baldwin de Meules, to assert Norman control over a rebellious Anglo-Saxon population.[2][37] The design featured a circular inner enclosure defined by a substantial ditch and internal bank, which supported an initial timber stockade later upgraded to a stone curtain wall by the early 12th century, enhancing durability against assaults.[37][2] This ringwork form, a variant of motte-and-bailey fortifications, leveraged the natural volcanic knoll for elevation, utilizing local red breccia stone for construction, which provided robust defensive height without extensive artificial mounding.[3][37] The primary entrance was fortified by an early 11th-century stone gatehouse to the inner bailey, a square three-storey structure with a 3-meter-wide and 3.5-meter-high arched passageway, approached via a timber bridge over a moat, incorporating murder holes for dropping projectiles on attackers.[37][3] Defensive engineering integrated existing Roman city walls on the north and east flanks, augmented by early towers at wall junctions and a large southern ditch with stockaded bank, creating a layered barrier system that proved effective during the 1136 siege by King Stephen, which lasted three months.[2][37] Self-sufficiency was ensured by an internal well and rainwater cistern, critical for prolonged defense.[3] In response to evolving siege technologies demonstrated in the 1136 attack, an outer bailey was added before 1200, enclosed by walls, a ditch, and barbican, extending the defended area and providing additional buffer against artillery and mining.[37][2] Construction employed hybrid techniques, with evidence of Saxon masonry methods in the gatehouse, indicating the use of local English labor alongside Norman oversight, which accelerated building while adapting to regional materials and skills.[3] These adaptations exemplified Norman military engineering's emphasis on rapid fortification of strategic urban sites, blending earthworks, stone masonry, and pre-existing defenses for comprehensive protection.[37]Significance and Legacy
Military and Political Impact
Rougemont Castle, constructed in 1068 by William the Conqueror immediately following an 18-day siege of Exeter, served as a pivotal military stronghold to consolidate Norman authority in southwestern England after local resistance led by Anglo-Saxon leaders, including Gytha Thorkelsdóttir, mother of Harold Godwinson.[1] The castle's motte-and-bailey design, built atop a volcanic knoll and integrating pre-existing Roman walls, deterred further uprisings by projecting royal power and enabling control over Devonshire, with initial oversight granted to Baldwin de Moels as sheriff.[3] This strategic placement not only secured supply routes but also symbolized the shift from Anglo-Saxon to Norman governance, reducing the region's potential as a base for anti-Norman revolts during the Harrying of the North and subsequent consolidations.[1] During the Anarchy, the castle demonstrated its defensive resilience in 1136 when Baldwin de Redvers, Earl of Exeter, seized it in rebellion against King Stephen; despite a three-month siege involving earthen fortifications and assaults, it held until internal water supply failures—damage to the well and cistern—forced surrender, highlighting advanced Norman engineering like thick walls and gatehouse defenses.[3] [17] Politically, such events underscored the castle's role in feudal power struggles, with custody oscillating between royal favorites and earls like the de Redvers family under Henry I, later seized by Henry III in 1232 and integrated into the Duchy of Cornwall by Edward III in 1337, ensuring monarchical oversight amid baronial tensions.[1] In the English Civil War, Rougemont played a subdued military role, with parliamentary funds in 1642 allocated for repairs amid Exeter's Royalist leanings, but it surrendered to General Fairfax's forces in 1646 without major combat, marking its transition from active fortress to administrative site as battlements were dismantled.[1] [26] Overall, the castle's endurance through sieges reinforced central authority, stabilizing political control over the West Country and exemplifying how Norman fortifications curbed local autonomy, though its later demilitarization reflected evolving warfare and governance by the 17th century.[1]Cultural References and Public Perception
Rougemont Castle receives a literary reference in William Shakespeare's Richard III (c. 1593), where the dramatist alludes to King Richard III's historical visit to Exeter in 1483 during his royal progress through the West Country.[3] The castle itself is not depicted onstage, but the mention underscores its role as a royal residence and administrative center in late medieval England.[3] Beyond this, the site features minimally in subsequent literature, with no prominent appearances in novels or poetry identified in historical records.[26] Public perception of Rougemont Castle centers on its enduring status as a symbol of Norman military dominance and Exeter's turbulent medieval past, often romanticized in local histories for its red volcanic rock foundations and strategic hilltop position.[26] Its association with the 1682 Bideford witch trials—the last executions for witchcraft in England, involving Temperance Lloyd, Mary Trembles, and Susanna Edwards—has fostered a darker folklore, linking the site to supernatural lore and modern commemorations, including plaques and annual vigils by contemporary pagan groups in adjacent gardens.[38] This legacy contributes to its appeal in heritage tourism, where it draws visitors via guided walks emphasizing hauntings and judicial history rather than active military function.[39]The castle's ruins and gatehouse evoke preservation efforts amid urban integration, viewed positively as a preserved artifact of England's feudal era, though critiques note its partial demolition in the 18th-19th centuries diminished its original grandeur.[3] Contemporary accounts portray it as a venue for educational events and seasonal ghost tours, reinforcing perceptions of historical authenticity over embellished myth.[40]