Hubbry Logo
Ordinary (church officer)Ordinary (church officer)Main
Open search
Ordinary (church officer)
Community hub
Ordinary (church officer)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ordinary (church officer)
Ordinary (church officer)
Ordinary (church officer)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pope Pius XI (left), depicted in this window at the Cathedral of Our Lady of Peace, Honolulu, was (according to the Roman Catholic Church) ordinary of the universal Church as well as the Diocese of Rome from 1922 to 1939. At the same time, Bishop Stephen Alencastre (facing viewer), Apostolic Vicar of the Sandwich Islands, was the ordinary of what is now the Diocese of Honolulu.

An ordinary (from Latin ordinarius) is an officer of a church or civic authority who by reason of office has ordinary power to execute laws.

Such officers are found in hierarchically organised churches of Western Christianity which have an ecclesiastical legal system.[1] For example, diocesan bishops are ordinaries in the Catholic Church[1] and the Church of England.[2] In Eastern Christianity, a corresponding officer is called a hierarch[3] (from Greek ἱεράρχης hierarkhēs "president of sacred rites, high-priest"[4] which comes in turn from τὰ ἱερά ta hiera, "the sacred rites" and ἄρχω arkhō, "I rule").[5]

Ordinary power

[edit]

In canon law, the power to govern the church is divided into the power to make laws (legislative), enforce the laws (executive), and to judge based on the law (judicial).[6] An official exercises power to govern either because he holds an office to which the law grants governing power or because someone with governing power has delegated it to him. Ordinary power is the former, while the latter is delegated power.[7] The office with ordinary power could possess the governing power itself (proper ordinary power) or instead it could have the ordinary power of agency, the inherent power to exercise someone else's power (vicarious ordinary power).[8]

The law vesting ordinary power could either be ecclesiastical law, i.e. the positive enactments that the church has established for itself, or divine law, i.e. the laws which were given to the Church by God.[9] As an example of divinely instituted ordinaries, when Jesus established the Church, he also established the episcopate and the primacy of Peter, endowing the offices with power to govern the Church.[10] Thus, in the Catholic Church, the office of successor of Simon Peter and the office of diocesan bishop possess their ordinary power even in the absence of positive enactments from the Church.

Many officers possess ordinary power but, due to their lack of ordinary executive power, are not called ordinaries. The best example of this phenomenon is the office of judicial vicar, a.k.a. officialis. The judicial vicar only has authority through his office to exercise the diocesan bishop's power to judge cases.[11] Though the vicar has vicarious ordinary judicial power, he is not an ordinary because he lacks ordinary executive power. A vicar general, however, has authority through his office to exercise the diocesan bishop's executive power.[12] He is therefore an ordinary because of this vicarious ordinary executive power.

Catholic usage

[edit]
See also: Hierarchy of the Catholic Church § Ordinaries and local ordinaries, and Bishops in the Catholic Church

Local ordinaries and hierarchs

[edit]

Local ordinaries exercise ordinary power and are ordinaries in particular churches.[13] The following clerics are local ordinaries:

Also classified as local ordinaries, although they do not head a particular church or equivalent community are:

Ordinaries who are not local ordinaries

[edit]

Major superiors of religious institutes (including abbots) and of societies of apostolic life are ordinaries of their respective memberships, but not local ordinaries.[20]

Eastern Orthodox Christianity

[edit]

In the Eastern Orthodox Church, a hierarch (ruling bishop) holds uncontested authority within the boundaries of his own diocese; no other bishop may perform any sacerdotal functions without the ruling bishop's express invitation. The violation of this rule is called eispēdēsis (Greek: εἰσπήδησις, "trespassing", literally "jumping in"), and is uncanonical. Ultimately, all bishops in the Church are equal, regardless of any title they may enjoy (Patriarch, Metropolitan, Archbishop, etc.). The role of the bishop in the Orthodox Church is both hierarchical and sacramental.[21]

This pattern of governance dates back to the earliest centuries of Christianity, as witnessed by the writings of Ignatius of Antioch (c. 100 AD):

The bishop in each Church presides in the place of God.... Let no one do any of the things which concern the Church without the bishop.... Wherever the bishop appears, there let the people be, just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church.

And it is the bishop's primary and distinctive task to celebrate the Eucharist, "the medicine of immortality."[21][22] Saint Cyprian of Carthage (258 AD) wrote:

The episcopate is a single whole, in which each bishop enjoys full possession. So is the Church a single whole, though it spreads far and wide into a multitude of churches and its fertility increases.[23]

Bishop Kallistos (Ware) wrote:

There are many churches, but only One Church; many episcopi but only one episcopate."[24]

In Eastern Orthodox Christianity, the church is not seen as a monolithic, centralized institution, but rather as existing in its fullness in each local body. The church is defined Eucharistically:

in each particular community gathered around its bishop; and at every local celebration of the Eucharist it is the whole Christ who is present, not just a part of Him. Therefore, each local community, as it celebrates the Eucharist ... is the church in its fullness."[21]

An Eastern Orthodox bishop's authority comes from his election and consecration. He is, however, subject to the Sacred Canons of the Eastern Orthodox Church, and answers to the Synod of Bishops to which he belongs. In case an Orthodox bishop is overruled by his local synod, he retains the right of appeal (Greek: Ἔκκλητον, Ékklēton) to his ecclesiastical superior (e.g. a Patriarch) and his synod.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ordinary (church officer)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In ecclesiastical law, an ordinary is a cleric or church officer who possesses ordinary jurisdiction, defined as the power of governance inherently attached to their office by divine or positive church law, encompassing the authority to legislate, adjudicate, and govern in the external forum over a designated territory, community, or group of persons. This jurisdiction is distinguished from delegated authority, which is granted temporarily to an individual rather than tied to an office, and it forms the basis of hierarchical structure in traditions such as the Catholic and Anglican churches. In the Catholic Church, ordinaries include the Roman Pontiff with universal jurisdiction; diocesan bishops over their dioceses; those who govern particular churches or communities equivalent to dioceses, such as vicars apostolic or prefects apostolic; vicars general and episcopal vicars with executive power; and major superiors of clerical religious institutes of pontifical right over their members. Local ordinaries, a subset focused on territorial oversight, exclude superiors of religious institutes unless specified otherwise. The term originates from the Latin ordinarius, denoting something regular or customary, reflecting the stable, office-bound nature of this authority. In the Anglican Communion, particularly the Episcopal Church, the ordinary typically refers to the , who exercises ordinary jurisdiction over the as distinct from suffragan, assistant, or coadjutor bishops, enabling oversight of , matters, and within that territory. This role underscores the bishop's responsibility for unity, sacramental leadership, and governance, aligning with broader Anglican principles of where the ordinary ensures the church's mission and doctrinal fidelity. Across these traditions, the ordinary's powers extend to appointing vicars, supervising parishes, and representing the church in legal and administrative affairs, though specifics may vary by or provincial constitutions.

Definition and Etymology

Canonical Meaning

In ecclesiastical law, an ordinary is defined as a church officer who exercises jurisdiction by inherent right attached to their office, rather than through delegation or temporary appointment, enabling them to execute laws and govern within a specified ecclesiastical territory or community. This authority is "ordinary" in the sense that it is regular, stable, and proper to the position, distinguishing it from extraordinary or vicarious powers that require specific commissioning. The concept applies primarily to hierarchically structured churches, where ordinaries ensure the application of canon law in matters of faith, discipline, and administration. The term originates from the Latin ordinarius, meaning "regular" or "pertaining to order," which in the context implies a standard, non-delegated form of judicial or governing power, often likened to a (judex ordinarius) with permanent oversight. While the word "ordinary" appears in civil law to describe officials with inherent judicial authority, such as certain magistrates, the usage is confined to the church setting, emphasizing spiritual over secular matters. In the Catholic Church's , Canon 134 explicitly identifies ordinaries as including the Roman Pontiff, diocesan bishops, those temporarily in charge of a or equivalent particular church, vicars general, and episcopal vicars. Similarly, in Anglican , the ordinary is typically the , who holds ordinary jurisdiction for discipline and oversight within the , as outlined in the Principles of Canon Law common to Anglican churches. These examples illustrate the ordinary's role as the foundational authority for ecclesiastical order in their respective traditions.

Historical Development

The concept of ordinary jurisdiction in the emerged in the early centuries, drawing from Roman legal traditions where "ordinarius iudex" denoted a regular or inherent judge with fixed authority over a , as opposed to temporary or delegated roles. Following the in 313 AD and the legalization of under Constantine, bishops assumed this inherent authority as the primary governors of local Christian communities, exercising disciplinary power over and without needing external delegation. This development was formalized in the fourth century through conciliar decrees, such as those from the Council of Nicaea (325 AD), which established the principle of one per city with autonomous oversight, reflecting the adaptation of Roman administrative structures to ecclesiastical needs. During the medieval period, the notion of ordinary episcopal jurisdiction was systematized through the compilation of canon law collections, culminating in Gratian's Decretum around 1140 AD. Gratian's work harmonized earlier patristic and conciliar sources, distinguishing ordinary power—attached by law to the bishop's office—as the foundational authority for governance, sacraments, and adjudication within the , separate from papal or delegated interventions. This framework influenced subsequent glosses and decretals, embedding the term "ordinary" as a technical descriptor for bishops' perpetual, non-transferable rights, which became central to the ius commune of the church. The (1545–1563) further clarified the distinction between ordinary and delegated powers amid critiques of ecclesiastical hierarchy. In its Fourteenth Session (1551), the council affirmed that bishops' ordinary jurisdiction over reserved cases, such as from grave sins, was divinely instituted and invalid without proper authority, countering Protestant denials of priestly powers while reinforcing episcopal autonomy against excessive centralization. This response to challenges preserved the balance between local ordinaries and papal oversight, shaping post-Tridentine reforms. In the twentieth century, the concept was codified in the 1917 Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law, which defined ordinary jurisdiction in Canon 197 as power attached to an and exercised by its holder, applying it to bishops, vicars general, and others with inherent diocesan authority. The , promulgated after Vatican II, refined this amid reforms emphasizing and the church's pastoral mission; Canon 131 defined ordinary power as joined to an itself, while integrating conciliar emphases on bishops' shared responsibility in (e.g., Canon 381). These codifications adapted the historical ordinary to modern ecclesiastical needs without altering its core as inherent episcopal authority.

Ordinary Jurisdiction

Types of Authority

In , ordinary power refers to the inherent to a specific church office, derived directly from divine or , rather than being temporarily granted by a superior. This contrasts with delegated power, which is conferred on an individual for a particular purpose or duration without attachment to an office, and ceases upon completion of the task or revocation. According to the Code of Canon Law, ordinary power is "that which is joined to a certain office by the law itself," while delegated power "is that which is granted to a person but not by means of an office." The power of governance exercised by ordinaries is classified into three primary types: legislative, executive, and judicial. Legislative power involves the establishment of laws or norms for the community, such as issuing diocesan statutes, and is generally non-delegable except in cases explicitly permitted . Executive power pertains to the administration and enforcement of those laws, including oversight of personnel and resources. Judicial power concerns the of disputes or offenses within the , often through ecclesiastical courts. These distinctions ensure a balanced exercise of authority, with each type governed by specific norms to prevent overreach. Ordinary power can further be categorized as proper or vicarious. Proper power allows the ordinary to exercise directly and personally, as in a bishop's administration of the sacraments of and . Vicarious power, by contrast, enables the ordinary to functions to subordinates, such as vicars general, who act on their behalf while remaining accountable to the ordinary. This delegation does not diminish the ordinary's ultimate responsibility. Sources of ordinary authority typically stem from episcopal for bishops, which confers powers, combined with installation into office under for jurisdictional scope. For instance, a diocesan bishop's ordinary power over the sacraments arises from the fullness of the priesthood received at , as enshrined in , while broader governance is attached to the by law.

Scope and Exercise

The territorial scope of ordinary jurisdiction is generally limited to a defined territory, such as a , , or equivalent unit, over which the ordinary exercises pastoral governance as assigned by church law. This jurisdiction applies to the Christian faithful within that territory, including both and , and is rooted in the office's inherent connection to the local church structure. However, the scope can extend beyond strict territorial boundaries in cases of , such as military ordinariates that cover armed forces personnel regardless of location or jurisdictions for specific groups like migrants or Eastern Catholics in situations. In practice, ordinary jurisdiction is exercised through the governance of and , encompassing the oversight of life, the administration of church property, and the enforcement of ecclesiastical discipline. The ordinary holds the to appoint and supervise , regulate liturgical and practices, manage temporal goods for the church's mission, and convene bodies such as diocesan synods for legislative purposes or tribunals for judicial resolution of disputes. This power operates in the external forum for public governance and, where appropriate, in the internal forum for conscience-related matters, always in accordance with the threefold division into legislative, executive, and judicial functions prescribed by . Limitations on ordinary jurisdiction ensure hierarchical accountability, including subjection to supreme authorities such as the Roman Pontiff in the Catholic tradition, who possesses that supersedes local ordinaries. Decisions made under ordinary are subject to review through established appeals processes to higher instances, preventing finality at the local level and maintaining unity in church governance. Additionally, ordinary jurisdiction lapses or is suspended during vacancies in the office, with interim administration provided by vicars, chapters, or supplied jurisdiction in cases of necessity to avoid harm to the faithful. In contexts where and civil jurisdictions overlap, ordinary jurisdiction upholds the church's in spiritual, doctrinal, and internal disciplinary matters, while deferring to civil law in temporal affairs such as property rights or criminal proceedings that do not infringe on religious freedom. This balance reflects the church's recognition of the state's role in secular , ensuring that ordinary jurisdiction remains focused on the end of the faithful without direct conflict, as affirmed in principles of non-interference.

Usage in the Catholic Church

Local Ordinaries

In the , local ordinaries are authorities who exercise ordinary jurisdiction over a particular or equivalent to it, as defined in Canon 134 §2 of the Code of (CIC), which excludes superiors of religious institutes and societies of apostolic life from this category. These figures possess inherent, proper, and immediate power necessary for , ensuring the spiritual and administrative oversight of the faithful within their . The primary types of local ordinaries include diocesan s in the , who govern dioceses as the fundamental units of particular churches. In , eparchs fulfill an analogous role, heading eparchies, which are the Eastern equivalents of dioceses, under the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (CCEO). Other local ordinaries encompass those appointed over specific territorial structures: territorial prelates and territorial abbots, who lead territorial prelatures and abbacies respectively, exercising full episcopal authority in these semi-autonomous areas often established for missionary or specialized pastoral needs. Vicars apostolic and prefects apostolic govern apostolic vicariates and prefectures, which are mission territories in regions where the Church is not yet fully organized into dioceses, with vicars holding broader delegated powers than prefects. Apostolic administrators temporarily manage sees during vacancies or transitions, wielding the same ordinary powers as the incumbent . In addition to these territorial local ordinaries, ordinaries of personal ordinariates exercise ordinary over non-geographical communities, such as those established for groups like former Anglicans entering , with jurisdiction based on personal affiliation rather than territory, as provided in the Anglicanorum coetibus. Qualifications for local ordinaries, particularly those requiring episcopal such as diocesan bishops and eparchs, are outlined in Canon 378 §1 of the CIC, emphasizing outstanding faith, moral integrity, piety, pastoral zeal, wisdom, prudence, and other virtues suitable for , along with a good reputation. Candidates must be at least 35 years old, ordained as for a minimum of five years, and hold a or licentiate in scripture, theology, or from an Apostolic See-approved institution, or demonstrate equivalent expertise; the definitive judgment rests with the . Similar criteria apply under CCEO Canon 180 for eparchs, adapted to Eastern traditions. For non-episcopal local ordinaries like vicars general or apostolic administrators, qualifications focus on canonical fitness and appointment by , often requiring presbyteral . ordinaries may include married former Anglican bishops ordained as , subject to celibacy norms for future admissions. Local ordinaries bear comprehensive responsibilities for the governance of their territories, including the power to ordain , confer confirmations, and provide , as inherent in their ordinary jurisdiction per Canon 381 §1 of the CIC. They legislate, execute, and judge in matters of faith, morals, and discipline, fostering the spiritual growth of the faithful through , , and administration of sacraments. This extends to overseeing parishes, religious institutes, and lay associations within their bounds, ensuring compliance with universal Church law while adapting to local needs. As members of the hierarchical communion, local ordinaries are directly accountable to the , with their appointments and major decisions subject to papal confirmation or oversight. They hold the right to participate in ecumenical councils and synods, contributing to the universal governance of the Church, and collaborate through episcopal conferences for regional coordination. This status underscores their role as successors to the apostles in specific locales, bridging the universal and particular dimensions of the .

Non-Local Ordinaries

In the , non-local ordinaries encompass major superiors of clerical religious institutes of and societies of apostolic life of , including positions such as abbots, superiors general, and provincials. These individuals possess ordinary executive power of by virtue of their office, as defined in Canon 134 §1 of the Code of Canon Law, but they are explicitly excluded from the category of local ordinaries under Canon 134 §2. The authority of non-local ordinaries extends primarily over the members of their respective institutes or societies, encompassing matters of discipline, personnel assignments, and internal governance. This power is exercised in a spirit of service, fostering obedience among members while adhering to the institute's approved constitutions and proper law, which delineate specific rights and duties such as the supervision of formation, community life, and apostolic works. For instance, Canon 618 mandates that superiors govern with divine authority received through the Church, promoting the spiritual and communal welfare of their charges. However, Canon 134 §3 extends certain canonical provisions applicable to local ordinaries to these superiors only insofar as the context permits, ensuring their role supports rather than overrides broader ecclesiastical structures. Key limitations define the scope of non-local ordinaries' jurisdiction: they hold no authority over external , outside their community, or any defined territory, distinguishing them from local ordinaries who exercise power over particular churches or dioceses. Their powers derive exclusively from the constitutions of their institute, which must be approved by the , and are subject to oversight by the competent ecclesiastical authority, such as the Dicastery for Institutes of and Societies of Apostolic Life. This framework ensures that internal governance aligns with universal Church law without encroaching on diocesan or territorial competencies. Representative examples include the superior general of the Society of , who oversees the assignment and discipline of Jesuit members worldwide, or a in a order like the Dominicans, managing regional communities' internal affairs. Similarly, an of an exempt exercises ordinary power over the monastic community, handling matters like vows, liturgical observance, and fraternal correction within the abbey's bounds, as outlined in the institute's proper law. These roles underscore the non-territorial nature of their authority, focused on the of their members.

Usage in Eastern Orthodox Christianity

Role of Hierarchs

In the , hierarchs refer to ruling who exercise episcopal authority over their dioceses, serving as the primary shepherds responsible for the spiritual oversight of the faithful within a defined territory. This authority is firmly rooted in the sacred canons of the ecumenical councils, such as those from the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea, which establish the bishop's role in maintaining ecclesiastical unity and discipline, and is further shaped by decisions of local synods that ensure canonical compliance in governance. The key responsibilities of hierarchs include ordaining , consecrating churches and holy objects, and presiding over the , where they act as the central figure in life, often symbolized by liturgical vestments like the and staff that denote their and . All bishops, irrespective of titles such as metropolitan or , are considered equal in their episcopal dignity and authority, reflecting the Orthodox emphasis on among hierarchs as successors to the apostles. Selection of hierarchs occurs through election by a synod of fellow bishops, in accordance with ancient canons such as those of the ecumenical councils (e.g., Canon 4 of Nicaea on provincial synods), ensuring provincial concurrence to preserve doctrinal integrity. Their installation involves enthronement, a sacramental rite that underscores the bishop's assumption of authority, often accompanied by prayers and symbolic acts such as receiving the dikērotríkēra to signify their role in illuminating the Church. Within autocephalous churches, local hierarchs operate under the primate—typically a or metropolitan—who holds a position of honor as first among , yet each retains autonomous over their , allowing for self-governing administration while upholding communion with the broader Orthodox world. This structure parallels the concept of ordinary jurisdiction outlined in traditions, emphasizing local episcopal autonomy within the conciliar framework.

Governance Structure

In the , episcopal authority is primarily exercised through a synodal framework, where local synods of bishops convene to address governance matters such as the consecration of bishops, doctrinal clarifications, and ecclesiastical disputes within each autocephalous church. These local synods operate in concert with the broader tradition of ecumenical councils, particularly the first seven recognized by the Church, whose canons establish the foundational principles of conciliar decision-making and limit unilateral actions by individual hierarchs. Appeals from local synodal decisions can be directed to higher synods or the primate of the respective autocephalous church, with the historically serving as a court of final appeal for certain inter-church matters, as affirmed in canonical tradition. The absence of a universal primate underscores the boundaries of episcopal authority, as each autocephalous church maintains full in internal , preventing any single hierarch from exerting over other churches without synodal consensus. This structure, rooted in the equality of bishops as successors to the apostles, limits the scope of individual hierarchs to their dioceses or defined roles within their , ensuring that decisions on , , and administration require collective agreement among and bishops. Autocephalous churches, such as those of , , and , thus preserve their autonomy, with like patriarchs or metropolitans chairing but not dominating their Holy Synods. Within this conciliar tradition, hierarchs oversee diocesan affairs but share authority with and monastics through participatory mechanisms, reflecting the Church's emphasis on communal discernment. Laity contribute to episcopal elections and administrative councils in various autocephalous churches, such as through mixed bodies in that include lay representatives. Monastics, while under hierarchical supervision, exert influence in synodal deliberations, particularly in churches like the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of , where monastic communities hold significant advisory roles in governance. This shared authority aligns with the patristic principle that the Church's unity emerges from the of , monastics, and faithful. Modern adaptations to this governance structure have addressed challenges from diaspora communities and national contexts, notably in the Russian Orthodox tradition following the 1917 Revolution. The Outside Russia (ROCOR) was established in 1920 as a self-governing entity to manage émigré faithful, convening All-Diaspora Councils to adapt al practices for scattered populations while maintaining ties to the Moscow Patriarchate. Post-Soviet reforms in the further decentralized , incorporating diaspora vicariates and enhancing al oversight to respond to global migration, as seen in the 2007 Act of Canonical Communion that reintegrated ROCOR under a unified al framework. More recent developments include the Ecumenical Patriarchate's granting of to the in January 2019, which prompted the to break eucharistic communion with . As of 2025, this continues to impact inter-Orthodox relations and the exercise of in diaspora and contested territories. These changes preserve conciliar independence amid geopolitical shifts, allowing autocephalous churches to extend episcopal to new territories without compromising traditional boundaries.

Usage in the Anglican Communion

Equivalent Positions

In the , diocesan bishops serve as the primary equivalents to ordinaries, exercising ordinary over their respective sees in matters of oversight, , , and ecclesiastical , as established in the Church of England Canons. Archbishops, including those of and , hold similar ordinary authority within their own dioceses while also possessing metropolitical over their provinces during visitations and in correcting episcopal deficiencies. Suffragan bishops function as assistants to diocesan bishops, with jurisdiction that is delegated and limited to specific areas or ministries as licensed by the diocesan ordinary, though they may exercise ordinary powers in those delegated sub-areas. , such as the , embody a broader leadership role across the Communion but retain ordinary jurisdiction principally within their dioceses, underscoring the decentralized nature of Anglican . Appointments to these positions occur through the Crown Nominations Commission in the , which consults stakeholders and nominates candidates by a two-thirds majority vote for formal approval by , a process that highlights the church's established ties to the state while incorporating synodal input for autonomy. In other Anglican provinces, such as those in the or the , similar roles are filled by synods or electoral colleges, adapting the model to local contexts. This framework maintains historical continuity with the pre-Reformation Catholic model of episcopal ordinaries, reformed during the to emphasize national sovereignty and scriptural authority without establishing a new church entity, as evidenced by the uninterrupted succession and legal retention of episcopal under monarchs like .

Jurisdictional Differences

In the , the authority of ordinaries, such as diocesan bishops, differs markedly from the centralized papal oversight in the and the conciliar, autocephalous structures in Eastern Orthodox Christianity, emphasizing national and collegial governance instead. Unlike the Catholic model, where the holds universal ordinary over all bishops as the , ordinaries operate within independent provinces that retain full legislative and doctrinal , coordinated through non-binding Instruments of Communion rather than a supreme hierarchical authority. Similarly, while Orthodox hierarchs exercise ordinary within their autocephalous churches under the honorary primacy of the Ecumenical Patriarch, structures avoid such a focal point of unity, prioritizing mutual interdependence among provinces. A distinctive feature in the is the subordination of ordinaries to the British as Supreme Governor, which uniquely blends ecclesiastical and civil ; the appoints bishops and grants assent to synodal measures, exercising supreme authority in both spiritual and temporal causes as defined by Canon A7, though typically on the advice of ministers. This contrasts with autonomous Anglican provinces elsewhere, such as the in the USA, where civil authorities lack any spiritual oversight—revised in Article 37 of the in 1801 to confine magistrates to temporal matters—allowing bishops fuller ordinary powers without monarchical intervention. In Catholic and Orthodox contexts, no equivalent secular head integrates state and church governance to this degree, preserving stricter separation from civil rulers. Anglican , as chief bishops of their provinces, serve a limited coordinating role without a papal equivalent's universal ordinary power; they convene in the Primates' Meeting under the as to foster dialogue and shared mission, but possess no binding authority over other churches, relying instead on the Instruments of Communion for consensus. This decentralized approach highlights Anglicanism's emphasis on provincial , differing from the Catholic Pope's direct or the Orthodox emphasis on synodal equality among patriarchs. Following the 1534 Act of Supremacy, which severed ties with and vested supreme headship in the monarch, Anglican episcopal authority shifted from delegated papal powers to more inherent ordinary jurisdiction, as reaffirmed under Elizabeth I's 1559 settlement that retained episcopal structures while embedding them in national law. This evolution influenced Communion-wide variations, such as in the in the USA, where post-independence bishops gained autonomous ordinary powers free from British Crown oversight, adapting the English model to republican contexts without monarchical subordination. Ecumenical dialogues have increasingly recognized Anglican orders as conferring valid ordinary , fostering mutual acknowledgment; for instance, the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC I, 1970–1981) achieved substantial agreement on ministry, prompting Catholic reconsideration of historical nullity declarations in light of theological convergence. With Eastern Orthodox churches, early 20th-century exchanges, including the 1930 Lambeth Conference's endorsement of eucharistic doctrine, have led to affirmations of Anglican orders' validity by figures like the Ecumenical , supporting ongoing recognition of episcopal despite jurisdictional differences.

References

  1. https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib1-cann129-144_en.html
  2. https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/dictionary/index.cfm?id=35302
  3. https://www.episcopalchurch.org/glossary/ordinary-of-a-diocese/
  4. https://www.anglicancommunion.org/media/129201/LC-Reader.pdf
  5. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11284b.htm
  6. https://www.anglicancommunion.org/media/124862/AC-Principles-of-Canon-Law.pdf
  7. https://prelaturaspersonales.org/territorial-and-personal-jurisdictions-ordinariates/
  8. https://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc06/htm/iii.lxi.htm
  9. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/574424.pdf
  10. https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=5357
  11. https://cdn.restorethe54.com/media/pdf/1917-code-of-canon-law-english.pdf
  12. https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_introduction_en.html
  13. https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib2-cann368-430_en.html
  14. https://www.vatican.va/resources/resources_glossary-terms_en.html
  15. http://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_ben-xvi_apc_20091104_anglicanorum-coetibus.html
  16. https://orthocath.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/1990_code_of_canons_of_the_eastern_churches.pdf
  17. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20091104_norme-anglicanorum-coetibus_en.html
  18. https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib2-cann607-709_en.html
  19. https://orthodoxwiki.org/Bishop
  20. https://www.goarch.org/-/obedience-and-authority-dimensions-of-a-hierarchical-church
  21. https://publicorthodoxy.org/2018/05/07/episcopacy-and-hierarchy/
  22. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Eastern-Orthodoxy/The-structure-of-the-church
  23. https://www.goarch.org/-/the-synodal-structure-of-the-orthodox-church
  24. https://mospat.ru/en/news/90540/
  25. https://www.russianorthodoxchurch.ws/synod/engdocuments/enart_svassasobor.html
  26. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Orthodox-Church-of-Ukraine
  27. https://orthodoxwiki.org/2018_Moscow–Constantinople_schism
  28. https://www.churchofengland.org/about/governance/legal-resources/canons-church-england/section-c#c18
  29. https://www.churchofengland.org/about/governance/legal-resources/canons-church-england/section-c#c17
  30. https://www.churchofengland.org/about/governance/legal-resources/canons-church-england/section-c#c20
  31. https://www.churchofengland.org/about/governance/general-synod/committees-and-commissions/crown-nominations-commission
  32. https://anglicanhistory.org/ssje/puller/continuity2.html
  33. https://www.anglicancommunion.org/structures/instruments-of-communion.aspx
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ecclesiastical-law-journal/article/king-and-the-law-of-the-church-of-england/D1578B172EFC920D95CA18F2F6806FA3
  35. https://www.anglicancommunion.org/structures/instruments-of-communion/primates-meeting.aspx
  36. https://www.churchofengland.org/about/history-church-england
  37. https://www.usccb.org/committees/ecumenical-interreligious-affairs/anglican-orders-report-evolving-context-their
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.