Hubbry Logo
Holy ordersHoly ordersMain
Open search
Holy orders
Community hub
Holy orders
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Holy orders
Holy orders
from Wikipedia
Ordination of John of Matha

In certain Christian denominations, holy orders are the ordained ministries of bishop, priest (presbyter), and deacon, and the sacrament or rite by which candidates are ordained to those orders. Churches recognizing these orders include the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox (ιερωσύνη [hierōsynē], ιεράτευμα [hierateuma], Священство [Svyashchenstvo]), Oriental Orthodox, Anglican, Assyrian, Old Catholic, Independent Catholic and some Lutheran churches.[1] Except for some Lutherans and some Anglicans, these churches regard ordination as a sacrament (the sacramentum ordinis).[2]

Denominations have varied conceptions of holy orders. In some Lutheran and Anglican churches the traditional orders of bishop, priest and deacon are bestowed using ordination rites contained within ordinals. The extent to which ordination is considered sacramental in these traditions has, however, been a matter of some internal dispute. Baptists are among the denominations that do not consider ministry as being sacramental in nature[3] and would not think of it in terms of "holy orders" as such. Historically, the word "order" (Latin ordo) designated an established civil body or corporation with a hierarchy, and ordinatio meant legal incorporation into an ordo. The word "holy" refers to the church. In context, therefore, a holy order is set apart for ministry in the church. Other positions, such as pope, patriarch, cardinal, monsignor, archbishop, archimandrite, archpriest, protopresbyter, hieromonk, protodeacon and archdeacon, are not sacramental orders but specialized ministries.

Anglicanism

[edit]

The Anglican churches hold their bishops to be in apostolic succession, although there is some difference of opinion with regard to whether ordination is to be regarded as a sacrament. The Anglican Articles of Religion hold that only baptism and the Lord's Supper are to be counted as sacraments of the gospel, and assert that other rites 'commonly called sacraments' by other denominations (e.g. Catholicism), were not ordained by Christ in the Gospel.[4] They do not have the nature of a sacrament of the Gospel in the absence of any physical matter such as the water in baptism and the bread and wine in the Eucharist. Various editions of the Book of Common Prayer and other Anglican liturgical texts provide rites for ordination of bishops, priests and deacons. Only bishops may ordain people. Within Anglicanism, three bishops are normally required for ordination to the episcopate, while one bishop is sufficient for performing ordinations to the priesthood and diaconate.

Catholicism

[edit]
Ordination to the Catholic priesthood in the Latin Church. Devotional card, 1925.

The ministerial orders of the Catholic Church include the orders of bishops, deacons and presbyters, which in Latin is sacerdos.[5] The ordained priesthood and common priesthood (or priesthood of all the baptized) are different in function and essence.[6]

A distinction is made between priest and presbyter. In the 1983 Code of Canon Law, "The Latin words sacerdos and sacerdotium are used to refer in general to the ministerial priesthood shared by bishops and presbyters. The words presbyter, presbyterium and presbyteratus refer to priests [in the English use of the word] and presbyters".[7]

While the consecrated life is neither clerical nor lay by definition,[8] clerics can also be incardinated in an institute of consecrated life or society endowed with this faculty from the Apostolic see.[9]

Eastern Orthodoxy

[edit]
Metropolitan Hilarion (Kapral) performs the laying on of hands (Cheirotonia), conferring the holy order of presbyter (priest) upon an Orthodox deacon.
After the transmutation of the Holy Gifts, the bishop presents to the newly ordained priest a portion of the Lamb (i.e., the Body of Christ).
The laying on of hands (Cheirotonia), conferring the holy order of deacon upon an Orthodox subdeacon.

The Eastern Orthodox Church considers ordination (known as cheirotonia, "laying on of hands") to be a sacred mystery (μυστήριο, what in the West is called a sacrament). Although all other mysteries may be performed by a presbyter, ordination may only be conferred by a bishop, and the ordination of a bishop may only be performed by several bishops together. Cheirotonia always takes place during the divine liturgy.

The Eastern Orthodox teach that it was the mission of the apostles to go forth into all the world and preach the Gospel, baptizing those who believed in the name of the Holy Trinity.[10] In the early Church those who presided over congregations were referred to variously as episcopos (bishop) or presbyteros (priest). These successors of the apostles were ordained to their office by the laying on of hands, and according to Eastern Orthodox theology formed a living, organic link with the apostles, and through them with Jesus Christ himself.[11]

The Eastern Orthodox Church also has ordination to minor orders (known as cheirothesia, "imposition of hands") which is performed outside of the Divine Liturgy, typically by a bishop, although certain archimandrites of stavropegial monasteries may bestow cheirothesia on members of their communities.

In Eastern Orthodoxy, a bishop is the collector of the money of the diocese and the living Vessel of Grace through whom the energeia (divine grace) of the Holy Spirit flows into the rest of the church.[11] A bishop is consecrated through the laying on of hands by several bishops; although, with the consent of several other bishops, a single bishop has performed the ordination of another bishop in emergency situations, such as times of persecution.

The consecration of a bishop takes place near the beginning of the liturgy, since a bishop can, in addition to performing the mystery of the Eucharist, also ordain priests and deacons. Before the commencement of the liturgy, the bishop-elect professes, in the middle of the church before the seated bishops who will consecrate him, in detail the doctrines of the Eastern Orthodox faith and pledges to observe the canons of the apostles and councils, the Typikon and customs of the Eastern Orthodox Church and to obey ecclesiastical authority. After the Little Entrance, the archpriest and archdeacon conduct the bishop-elect before the church's royal gates where he is met by the bishops and kneels before the altar on both knees. The Gospel Book is laid over his head and the consecrating bishops lay their hands upon the Gospel Book, while the prayers of ordination are read by the eldest bishop. After this, the newly consecrated bishop ascends the synthranon (bishop's throne in the sanctuary) for the first time.[12] Customarily, the newly consecrated bishop ordains a priest and a deacon at the liturgy during which he is consecrated.

A priest may serve only at the pleasure of his bishop. A bishop bestows faculties (permission to minister within his diocese) giving a priest chrism and an antimins; he may withdraw faculties and demand the return of these items. The ordination of a priest occurs before the Anaphora (Eucharistic Prayer) in order that he may on the same day take part in the celebration of the Eucharist:[12] during the Great Entrance, the candidate for ordination carries the Aër (chalice veil) over his head (rather than on his shoulder, as a deacon otherwise carries it then) as a symbol of giving up his diaconate, and comes last in the procession and stands at the end of the pair of lines of the priests. After the Aër is taken from the candidate to cover the chalice and diskos, a chair is brought for the bishop to sit on by the northeast corner of the holy table (altar). Two deacons go to priest-elect who, at that point, had been standing alone in the middle of the church, and bow him down to the west (to the people) and to the east (to the clergy), asking their consent by saying "Command ye!" and then lead him through the holy doors of the altar where the archdeacon asks the bishop's consent, saying, "Command, most sacred master!" after which a priest escorts the candidate three times around the altar, during which he kisses each corner of the altar or holy table as well as the bishop's epigonation and right hand and prostrates himself before the holy table at each circuit. The candidate is then taken to the southeast corner of the holy table and kneels on both knees, resting his forehead on the edge of the Holy Table. The ordaining bishop then places his omophor and right hand over the ordinand's head and recites aloud the first Prayer of Cheirotonia and then prays silently the other two prayers of cheirotonia while a deacon quietly recites a litany and the clergy, then the congregation, chant "Lord, have mercy". Afterwards, the bishop brings the newly ordained priest to stand in the holy doors and presents him to the faithful. He then clothes the priest in each of his sacerdotal vestments, at each of which the people sing, Worthy!. Later, after the epiklesis of the liturgy, the bishop hands him a portion of the Lamb (Host) saying:[13]

Receive thou this pledge, and preserve it whole and unharmed until thy last breath, because thou shalt be held to an accounting therefore in the second and terrible Coming of our great Lord, God, and Saviour, Jesus Christ.

A deacon may not perform any sacrament and performs no liturgical services on his own but serves only as an assistant to a priest and may not even vest without the blessing of a priest. The ordination of a deacon occurs after the anaphora (eucharistic prayer) since his role is not in performing the mystery or sacrament but consists only in serving;[12] the ceremony is much the same as at the ordination of a priest, but the deacon-elect is presented to the people and escorted to the holy doors by two sub-deacons (his peers, analogous to the two deacons who so present a priest-elect), is escorted three times around the altar by a deacon, and he kneels on only one knee during the Prayer of Cheirotonia. After being vested as a deacon and given a liturgical fan (ripidion or hexapterygion), he is led to the side of the altar where he uses the ripidion to gently fan the holy gifts (the consecrated Body and Blood of Christ).

Lutheranism

[edit]
Nathan Söderblom is ordained as the Lutheran archbishop of the Church of Sweden, 1914.
An ordination to the priesthood in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland, 2015

Ordination to holy orders is considered to be either a sacrament or rite in the Lutheran churches, depending on the churchmanship.[2] According to the Book of Concord, an explication of the doctrine of the Lutheran churches: "But if ordination be understood as applying to the ministry of the Word, we are not unwilling to call ordination a sacrament. For the ministry of the Word has God's command and glorious promises, Rom. 1:16: The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. Likewise, Isa. 55:11: So shall My Word be that goeth forth out of My mouth; it shall not return unto Me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please. ...If ordination be understood in this way, neither will we refuse to call the imposition of hands a sacrament. For the Church has the command to appoint ministers, which should be most pleasing to us, because we know that God approves this ministry, and is present in the ministry [that God will preach and work through men and those who have been chosen by men]."[14]

The Lutheran reforms are considered to be the most conservative of those that emerged in the Reformation. As such, much of Lutheranism follows the threefold office of deacon, priest, and bishop.[15] The Lutheran archbishops of Finland, Sweden, etc. and Baltic countries are the historic national primates and some ancient cathedrals and parishes in the Lutheran church were constructed many centuries before the Reformation.

Lutherans universally believe that "no one should publicly teach in the Church or administer the Sacraments unless he be regularly called".[16] The Lutheran churches in Scandinavia, and those established in other parts of the world as a result of Scandinavian Lutheran missionary activity (such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Kenya), practice episcopal succession in which the bishop whose holy orders can be traced back to the Apostles, performs ordinations.[17][18][19]

Additionally, Martin Luther taught that each individual was expected to fulfill his God-appointed task in everyday life. The modern usage of the term vocation as a life-task was first employed by Martin Luther.[20] Therefore Luther's Small Catechism provides passages of Scripture to encourage those in holy orders, including bishops, pastors, preachers, as well as those in governmental offices, citizens, husbands, wives, children, employees, employers, young people, and widows.[21]

Process and sequence

[edit]
At priestly ordination the bishop imposes hands upon the deacon who is by that matter and the form of the consecratory preface ordained to the priesthood. Pictured is the third imposition of hands as in the pre-1968 Roman Pontifical, in 1999, Fontgombault Abbey, France.

The sequence in which holy orders are received are: minor orders, deacon, priest, bishop.

For Catholics, it is typical in the years of seminary training that a man will be ordained to the diaconate, which Catholics since the Second Vatican Council sometimes call the "transitional diaconate" to distinguish men bound for priesthood from permanent deacons. They are licensed to preach sermons (under certain circumstances a permanent deacon may not receive faculties to preach), to perform baptisms, and to witness Catholic marriages, but to perform no other sacraments. They assist at the eucharist or the Mass, but are not able to consecrate the bread and wine. Normally, after six months or more as a transitional deacon, a man will be ordained to the priesthood.[22] Priests are able to preach, perform baptisms, confirm (with special dispensation from their ordinary), witness marriages, hear confessions and give absolutions, anoint the sick, and celebrate the Mass.[23]

Eastern Orthodox seminarians are typically tonsured as readers before entering the seminary, and may later be made subdeacons or deacons; customs vary between seminaries and between Eastern Orthodox jurisdictions. Some deacons remain permanently in the diaconate while most subsequently are ordained as priests. Orthodox clergy are typically either married or monastic.[24][25][26][27] Monastic deacons are called hierodeacons, monastic priests are called hieromonks. Eastern Orthodox clergy who marry must do so prior to ordination to the subdiaconate (or diaconate, according to local custom) and typically one is either tonsured a monk or married before ordination. A deacon or priest may not marry, or remarry if widowed, without abandoning his clerical office.[28] Often, widowed priests take monastic vows. Eastern Orthodox bishops are always monks; a single or widowed man may be elected a bishop but he must be tonsured a monk before consecration as a bishop.[29]

For Anglicans, a person is usually ordained a deacon once he (or she) has completed training at a theological college.[30] The historic practice of a bishop tutoring a candidate himself ("reading for orders") is still to be found. The candidate then typically serves as an assistant curate and may later be ordained as a priest at the discretion of the bishop. Other deacons may choose to remain in this order. Anglican deacons can preach sermons, perform baptisms and conduct funerals, but, unlike priests, cannot celebrate the eucharistic liturgy.[31] In most branches of the Anglican church, women can be ordained as priests, and in some of them, can also be ordained bishops.[32]

Anointment of the hands of a newly ordained priest.

Bishops are chosen from among priests in churches that adhere to Catholic usage. In the Catholic Church, bishops, like priests, are celibate and thus unmarried; further, a bishop is said to possess the fullness of the sacrament of holy orders, empowering him to ordain deacons, priests, and—with papal consent—other bishops. If a bishop, especially one acting as an ordinary—a head of a diocese or archdiocese—is to be ordained, three bishops must usually co-consecrate him with one bishop, usually an archbishop or the bishop of the place, being the chief consecrating prelate.

Among Eastern Rite Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, which permit married priests, bishops must either be unmarried or agree to abstain from contact with their wives. It is a common misconception that all such bishops come from religious orders; while this is generally true, it is not an absolute rule. In the case of both Catholics—(Western and) Eastern Catholic, Oriental Orthodox and Eastern Orthodox, they are usually leaders of territorial units called dioceses (or its equivalent in the east, an eparchy). Only bishops can validly administer the sacrament of holy orders.

Recognition of other churches' orders

[edit]

The Catholic Church unconditionally recognizes the validity of ordinations in the Eastern churches. Some Eastern Orthodox churches reordain Catholic priests who convert while others accept their Catholic ordination using the concept of economia (church economy). In 1988, the Ordination Joint Committee of Orthodox and Catholic Bishops stated the following:[33]

With either the Roman Catholic understanding of character or the Orthodox understanding of the creation of a permanent hindrance due to sin, "reordination" is impossible. Even in cases when a Roman Catholic cleric may lose clerical status either through cause or petition, the sacred Ordination never becomes invalid. For both Orthodox Christians and Roman Catholics, when a member of the clergy who has been ordained in a church that shares with them an understanding of the Priesthood and by a Bishop in an unquestionable apostolic succession is received into either the Orthodox or the Roman Catholic Church, his ordination should be recognized. It should be noted, however, that until such time when the practice of the Orthodox Church will be unified, these cases will be decided by each Autocephalous Orthodox Church.

Anglican churches claim to have maintained apostolic succession.[34] The succession of Anglican bishops is not universally recognized, however. The Catholic Church judged Anglican orders invalid when Pope Leo XIII in 1896 wrote in Apostolicae curae that Anglican orders lack validity because the rite by which priests were ordained was not correctly worded from 1547 to 1553 and from 1559 to the time of Archbishop William Laud (Archbishop of Canterbury 1633–1645). The papacy claimed the form and matter was inadequate to make a Catholic bishop. The actual "mechanical" succession, prayer and laying on hands, was not disputed. Two of the four consecrators of Matthew Parker in 1559 had been consecrated using the Edwardine Ordinals and two using the Roman Pontifical. Nonetheless, they believed that this caused a break of continuity in apostolic succession, making all further ordinations null and void.

Eastern Orthodox bishops have, on occasion, granted "economy" when Anglican priests convert to Eastern Orthodoxy. Various Eastern Orthodox churches have also declared Anglican orders valid subject to a finding that the bishops in question did indeed maintain the true faith, the Orthodox concept of apostolic succession being one in which the faith must be properly adhered to and transmitted, not simply that the ceremony by which a man is made a bishop is conducted correctly.[35] Some Eastern Orthodox have also considered holy orders from canonically unrecognized or disputed, or independent Eastern Orthodox churches as valid.[36][37][38][39]

Several Eastern Orthodox patriarchs and synods have recognized the validity of Anglican orders. In 1922, the Ecumenical Patriarch Meletios IV issued a statement recognizing that Anglican ordinations were "of the same validity as those of the Roman, Old Catholic, and Armenian Churches."[40] The 1923 Synod of Constantinople reaffirmed this position. Following this statement from Constantinople, the Holy Synod of the Church of Cyprus recognized the validity of Anglican orders in 1923,[41] as did the patriarch of the Greek Orthodox Church of Jerusalem, Damian I, and the synod of his church, in the same year.[42] The Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Alexandria officially recognized the validity of Anglican orders in 1930.[43] In 1936, the Holy Synod of the Romanian Orthodox Church formally recognized the validity of Anglican orders.[44] Ecumenical dialogues between the Eastern Orthodox and Anglican churches on the recognition of orders are ongoing.

Changes in the Anglican ordinals since King Edward VI, and a fuller appreciation of the pre-Reformation ordinals, suggest that the correctness of the enduring dismissal of Anglican orders is questionable.[45] To reduce doubt concerning Anglican apostolic succession, especially since the 1931 Bonn agreement between the Anglican and Old Catholic churches, some Anglican bishops have included among their consecrators bishops of the Old Catholic Church, whose holy orders are recognised as valid and regular by the Catholic Church.

Neither Catholics nor Anglicans recognize the validity of ordinations of ministers in Protestant churches that do not maintain apostolic succession; but some Anglicans, especially Low Church or Evangelical ones, commonly treat Protestant ministers and their sacraments as valid. Rome also does not recognize the apostolic succession of those Lutheran bodies which retained apostolic succession.[citation needed]

Officially, the Anglican Communion accepts the ordinations of those denominations which are in full communion with their own churches, such as the Lutheran state churches of Scandinavia. Those clergy may preside at services requiring a priest if one is not otherwise available.

The Oriental Orthodox Churches recognizes the ordinations of both Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.[46]

Marriage and holy orders

[edit]

Married men may be ordained to the diaconate as permanent deacons, but in the Latin Church of the Catholic Church generally may not be ordained to the priesthood. In the Eastern Catholic Churches and in the Eastern Orthodox Church, married deacons may be ordained priests but may not become bishops. Bishops in the Eastern Rites and the Eastern Orthodox churches are almost always drawn from among monks, who have taken a vow of celibacy. They may be widowers, though; it is not required of them never to have been married.

In some cases, widowed permanent deacons have been ordained to the priesthood. There have been some situations in which men previously married and ordained to the priesthood in an Anglican church or in a Lutheran church have been ordained to the Catholic priesthood and allowed to function much as an Eastern Rite priest but in a Latin Church setting. This is never sub conditione (conditionally), as there is in Catholic canon law no true priesthood in Protestant denominations. Such ordination may only happen with the approval of the priest's Bishop and a special permission by the Pope.

Anglican clergy may be married or may marry after ordination. In the Old Catholic Church and the Independent Catholic Churches there are no ordination restrictions related to marriage.

Other concepts of ordination

[edit]

Ordination ritual and procedures vary by denomination. Different churches and denominations specify more or less rigorous requirements for entering into office, and the process of ordination is likewise given more or less ceremonial pomp depending on the group. Many Protestants still communicate authority and ordain to office by having the existing overseers physically lay hands on the candidates for office.

Methodist churches

[edit]

The American Methodist model is an episcopal system loosely based on the Anglican model, as the Methodist Church arose from the Anglican Church. It was first devised under the leadership of Bishops Thomas Coke and Francis Asbury of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the late 18th century. In this approach, an elder (or 'presbyter') is ordained to word (preaching and teaching), sacrament (administering Baptism and the Lord's Supper), order (administering the life of the church and, in the case of bishops, ordaining others for mission and ministry), and service. A deacon is a person ordained only to word and service.

In the United Methodist Church, for instance, seminary graduates are examined and approved by the Conference Board of Ordained Ministry and then the Clergy Session. They are accepted as "probationary (provisional) members of the conference." The resident bishop may commission them to full-time ministry as "provisional" ministers. (Before 1996, the graduate was ordained as a transitional deacon at this point, a provisional role since eliminated. The order of deacon is now a separate and distinct clergy order in the United Methodist Church.) After serving the probationary period, of a minimum of two years, the probationer is then examined again and either continued on probation, discontinued altogether, or approved for ordination. Upon final approval by the Clergy Session of the Conference, the probationer becomes a full member of the Conference and is then ordained as an elder or deacon by the resident bishop. Those ordained as elders are members of the Order of Elders, and those ordained deacons are members of the Order of Deacons.

John Wesley appointed Thomas Coke (above mentioned as bishop) as 'Superintendent', his translation of the Greek episcopos ("overseer") – which is normally translated 'bishop' in English. The British Methodist Conference has two distinct orders of presbyter and deacon. It does not have bishops as a separate order of ministry. The British Methodist Church has more than 500 superintendents,[citation needed] who are not a separate order of ministry but a role within the order of presbyters. The roles normally undertaken by bishops are expressed in ordaining presbyters and deacons by the annual Conference through its president (or a past president); in confirmation by all presbyters; in local oversight by superintendents; in regional oversight by chairs of Districts.

Presbyterian churches

[edit]

Presbyterian churches, following their Scottish forebears, reject the traditions surrounding overseers and instead identify the offices of bishop (episkopos in Greek) and elder (presbuteros in Greek, from which the term "presbyterian" comes). The two terms seem to be used interchangeably in the Bible (compare Titus 1.5–9 and I Tim. 3.2–7). Their form of church governance is known as presbyterian polity. While there is increasing authority with each level of gathering of elders ('Session' over a congregation or parish, then presbytery, then possibly a synod, then the General Assembly), there is no hierarchy of elders. Each elder has an equal vote at the court on which they stand.

Elders are usually chosen at their local level, either elected by the congregation and approved by the Session, or appointed directly by the Session. Some churches place limits on the term that the elders serve, while others ordain elders for life.

Presbyterians also ordain (by laying on of hands) ministers of Word and Sacrament (sometimes known as 'teaching elders'). These ministers are regarded simply as Presbyters ordained to a different function, but in practice they provide the leadership for the local Session.

Some Presbyterians identify those appointed (by the laying on of hands) to serve in practical ways (Acts 6.1–7) as deacons (diakonos in Greek, meaning 'servant'). In many congregations, a group of men or women is thus set aside to deal with matters such as congregational fabric and finance, releasing elders for more 'spiritual' work. These persons may be known as 'deacons', 'board members' or 'managers', depending on the local tradition. Unlike elders and ministers, they are not usually 'ordained', and are often elected by the congregation for a set period of time.

Other Presbyterians have used an 'order of deacons' as full-time servants of the wider Church. Unlike ministers, they do not administer sacraments or routinely preach. The Church of Scotland has recently begun ordaining deacons to this role.

Unlike the Episcopalian system, but similar to the United Methodist system described above, the two Presbyterian offices are different in kind rather than in degree, since one need not be a deacon before becoming an elder. Since there is no hierarchy, the two offices do not make up an 'order' in the technical sense, but the terminology of holy orders is sometimes still developed.

Congregationalist churches

[edit]

Congregationalist churches implement different schemes, but the officers usually have less authority than in the presbyterian or episcopalian forms. Some ordain only ministers and rotate members on an advisory board (sometimes called a board of elders or a board of deacons). Because the positions are by comparison less powerful, there is usually less rigor or fanfare in how officers are ordained.

Irvingian churches

[edit]

Irvingian churches teach a fourfold ministry of "apostles, prophets, evangelists, and pastors."[47]

Latter Day Saint movement

[edit]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

[edit]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) accepts the legal authority of clergy to perform marriages but does not recognize any other sacraments performed by ministers not ordained to the Latter-day Saint priesthood. Although the Latter-day Saints do claim a doctrine of a certain spiritual "apostolic succession," it is significantly different from that claimed by Catholics and Protestants since there is no succession or continuity between the first century and the lifetime of Joseph Smith, the founder of the LDS church. Mormons teach that the priesthood was lost in ancient times not to be restored by Christ until the nineteenth century when it was given to Joseph Smith directly.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a relatively open priesthood, ordaining nearly all worthy adult males and boys of the age of twelve and older. Latter-day Saint priesthood consists of two divisions: the Melchizedek Priesthood and Aaronic Priesthood. The Melchizedek Priesthood because Melchizedek was such a great high priest. Before his day it was called the Holy Priesthood, after the Order of the Son of God. But out of respect or reverence to the name of the Supreme Being, to avoid the too frequent repetition of his name, the church, in ancient days, called that priesthood after Melchizedek. The lesser priesthood is an appendage to the Melchizedek Priesthood. It is called the Aaronic Priesthood because it was conferred on Aaron and his sons throughout all their generations.[48] The offices, or ranks, of the Melchizedek order (in roughly descending order) include apostle, seventy, patriarch, high priest, and elder. The offices of the Aaronic order are bishop, priest, teacher, and deacon. The manner of ordination consists of the laying on of hands by two or more men holding at least the office being conferred while one acts as voice in conferring the priesthood or office and usually pronounces a blessing upon the recipient. Teachers and deacons do not have the authority to ordain others to the priesthood. All church members are authorized to teach and preach regardless of priesthood ordination so long as they maintain good standing within the church. The church does not use the term "holy orders."

Community of Christ

[edit]

Community of Christ has a largely volunteer priesthood, and all members of the priesthood are free to marry (as traditionally defined by the Christian community). The priesthood is divided into two orders, the Aaronic priesthood and the Melchisedec priesthood. The Aaronic order consists of the offices of deacon, teacher and priest. The Melchisedec Order consists of the offices of elder (including the specialized office of seventy) and high priest (including the specialized offices of evangelist, bishop, apostle, and prophet). Paid ministers include "appointees" and the general officers of the church, which include some specialized priesthood offices (such as the office of president, reserved for the three top members of the church leadership team). As of 1984, women have been eligible for priesthood, which is conferred through the sacrament of ordination by the laying-on-of-hands. While there is technically no age requirement for any office of priesthood, there is no automatic ordination or progression as in the LDS Church. Young people are occasionally ordained as deacon, and sometimes teacher or priest, but generally most priesthood members are called following completion of post secondary school education. In March 2007 a woman was ordained for the first time to the office of president.

Ordination of women

[edit]

The Catholic Church, in accordance with its interpretation of the theological tradition on the issue, and the definitive clarification found in the encyclical letter Ordinatio sacerdotalis (1994) written by Pope John Paul II, officially teaches that it has no authority to ordain women as priests and thus there is no possibility of women becoming priests at any time in the future. "Ordaining" women as deaconesses is not a possibility in any sacramental sense of the diaconate, for a deaconess is not simply a female who is a deacon but instead holds a position of lay service. As such, she does not receive the sacrament of holy orders. Many Lutheran, Anglican and other Protestant churches ordain women,[49] but in many cases, only to the office of deacon.

Various branches of the Eastern Orthodox churches, including the Greek Orthodox, currently set aside vows of deaconesses. Some churches are internally divided on whether the Scriptures permit the ordination of women. When one considers the relative size of the traditions (1.1 billion Catholics, 300 million Orthodox, 590 million Protestants), it is a minority of Christian churches that ordain women. Protestants constitute about 27 percent of Christians worldwide, and most of their churches that do ordain women have only done so within the past century; moreover, denominations within the same tradition may differ with respect to women's ordination. For example, in Methodism, the Primitive Methodist Church does not ordain women, while the Free Methodist Church does ordain women.[50][51]

In some traditions women may be ordained to the same orders as men. In others women are restricted from certain offices. Women may be ordained bishop in the Old Catholic churches and in the Anglican/Episcopal churches in Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Cuba, Brazil, South Africa, Canada, US, Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand and Polynesia. The Church of Ireland had installed Pat Storey in 2013. On 19 September 2013, Storey was chosen by the House of Bishops to succeed Richard Clarke as Bishop of Meath and Kildare.[52] She was consecrated to the episcopate at Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin, on 30 November 2013.[53] She is the first woman to be elected as a bishop in the Church of Ireland and the first woman to be an Anglican Communion bishop in Ireland and Great Britain.[52][53][54] The Church of England's General Synod voted in 2014 to allow women to be ordained to the episcopate, with Libby Lane being the first woman to be ordained bishop. Continuing Anglican churches of the world do not permit women to be ordained. In some Protestant denominations, women may serve as assistant pastors but not as pastors in charge of congregations. In some denominations, women can be ordained to be an elder or deacon. Some denominations allow for the ordination of women for certain religious orders. Within certain traditions, such as the Anglican and Lutheran, there is a diversity of theology and practice regarding ordination of women.

Ordination of LGBT clergy

[edit]

The ordination of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender clergy who are sexually active, and open about it, represents a fiercely contested subject within many mainline Protestant communities. The majority of churches are opposed to such ordinations because they view homosexuality as a sin and incompatible with Biblical teaching and traditional Christian practice. Yet there are an increasing number of Christian congregations and communities that are open to ordaining people who are gay or lesbian. These are liberal Protestant denominations, such as the Episcopal Church, the United Church of Christ, and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, plus the small Metropolitan Community Church, founded as a church intending to minister primarily to LGBT people, and the Church of Sweden where such clergy may serve in senior clerical positions. The Church of Norway has for many years had both gay and lesbian priests, even bishops, and in 2006 the first woman who was appointed a bishop in Norway came out as an active homosexual herself, and that she had been a homosexual since before she joined the church.[55]

The issue of ordination has caused particular controversy in the worldwide Anglican Communion, following the approval of Gene Robinson to be Bishop of New Hampshire in the US Episcopal Church.

Footnotes

[edit]
[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Holy orders is the through which the mission entrusted by Christ to his apostles is continued in the by the of men to the diaconate, presbyterate, or episcopate. It imprints an indelible spiritual character, configuring the recipient to Christ as head and of the Church, and is conferred via the by a . The three degrees—deacon, , and —each entail distinct roles: deacons serve in ministry of the word, liturgy, and charity; priests participate in Christ's priesthood by offering sacrifice and forgiving sins; bishops possess the fullness of orders, governing the particular church and ensuring . In the , holy orders similarly ordain bishops, priests, and deacons through cheirotonia (), maintaining the Church's hierarchical order and the continuity of . This guarantees the presence of the in the ordained, enabling them to administer other mysteries and lead the faithful. Protestant traditions generally reject holy orders as a conferring ontological change, viewing instead as a public recognition of a divine calling to ministry without an indelible mark or sacramental grace. Biblical precedents, such as the apostles' appointment (Mark 3:13-19) and imposition of hands (Acts 6:6, 1 Timothy 4:14), form the scriptural foundation, though interpretations differ across denominations regarding the necessity of hierarchical succession. Key characteristics include the reservation of orders to males in Catholic and Orthodox doctrine, based on Christ's example and apostolic practice, amid ongoing debates in some Protestant groups over inclusivity. Controversies historically involve schisms over validity, such as Anglican orders declared invalid by in (1896) due to defects in form and intent. (contextual reference to historical papal document; direct Vatican archive for Leo XIII available via search verification)

Definition and etymology

Core concept

Holy orders refer to the ordained ministries of , (presbyter), and within , conferred through a rite of that sets individuals apart for sacred service in the Church. In sacramental traditions such as Roman Catholicism and , this constitutes a imparting an indelible spiritual character and sacred power derived from Christ, enabling the ordained to participate in the threefold ministry of teaching, sanctifying, and governing. The traces to the Latin ordo, denoting an established hierarchical body or rank, as in Roman civil corporations; ordinatio signifies incorporation into such an order, adapted by the Church to describe the structured clerical hierarchy instituted by Christ and continued via . typically involves the 's laying on of hands (cheirotonia in Greek traditions), invoking the to bestow grace for ministry, distinguishing it from mere ecclesiastical appointment. At its core, holy orders perpetuate the mission Christ entrusted to the apostles, ensuring the Church's unity and doctrinal fidelity through divinely authorized leadership, with as direct successors holding fullness of orders, sharing in priestly functions, and deacons serving in diakonia (service). While Catholic doctrine emphasizes an ontological change configuring the recipient to Christ the , Orthodox similarly views it as a mystical participation in apostolic grace, though Protestant traditions generally regard as a symbolic commissioning without sacramental efficacy.

Terminology across traditions

In Roman Catholicism, the rite establishing clergy is designated the sacrament of Holy Orders, encompassing three degrees: the episcopate (bishop), presbyterate (priest), and diaconate (deacon), each conferring specific sacramental faculties through episcopal imposition of hands. Eastern Orthodox churches employ cheirotonia for ordination to the major orders of bishop, presbyter, and deacon, a term from the Greek cheir (hand) and teinein (to stretch), signifying the bishops' collective laying on of hands as both sacramental act and conciliar election, distinct from cheirothesia applied to minor orders like reader or subdeacon. This terminology underscores the rite's patristic roots in apostolic practice, as seen in texts like the Apostolic Tradition. Anglican traditions retain the phrase holy orders for the threefold ministry of , , and , with rites emphasizing the conveyance of the via , akin to Catholic usage though debated for validity by due to form alterations in the . In Protestant denominations, such as Lutheran or Reformed, the process is generally termed , functioning as a public commissioning or ordinance for ministry rather than a imparting indelible character, often without fixed hierarchical degrees and allowing for congregational or presbyterial involvement. Baptists and evangelicals may use "licensing" for preliminary roles or "installation" alongside , reflecting a without sacerdotal distinctions.

Biblical foundations

Scriptural precedents for ordination

In the , the ordination of the Aaronic priesthood provided a foundational for consecration to sacred . Leviticus 8 describes the of and his sons, involving washing with water for purification, vesting in sacred garments, with oil symbolizing divine empowerment, and sacrificial offerings including blood applications to the priests and to signify and dedication; this seven-day process culminated in their entry into priestly service on the eighth day (Leviticus 8:1-36; 9:1-24). These rites, commanded in Exodus 28-29 and executed by under divine instruction, established a hereditary priestly order tasked with mediating between and through temple duties, sacrifices, and teaching the law. Similarly, Numbers 3:5-13 and 8:5-26 detail the consecration of the Levites as assistants to the priests, involving purification by sprinkling of water, shaving, washing clothes, and a wave offering, setting them apart from the congregation for service without the full sacrificial given to Aaron's line. The New Testament shifts from elaborate Old Testament rituals to simpler acts of appointment and commissioning for church leadership, often involving prayer, fasting, and laying on of hands to confer authority or spiritual gifts. In Acts 6:1-6, the apostles selected seven men of good repute to serve tables and distribute food amid a dispute, presenting them to the assembly after prayer and laying on hands, marking their formal installation as deacons or early ministerial servants. Titus 1:5 instructs Titus to appoint elders (presbyters) in every town according to specified qualifications, reflecting an apostolic directive for structured leadership installation without detailed ritual description. Key passages on laying on of hands include 1 Timothy 4:14, where Timothy receives a spiritual gift through prophetic utterance and the elders' imposition of hands, and 2 Timothy 1:6, attributing a divine gift to Paul’s laying on of hands; these are interpreted by some scholars as precedents for transmitting ministerial charisms, though the texts emphasize endowment rather than ontological change. Acts 13:1-3 further depicts the church in Antioch setting apart Barnabas and Saul (Paul) for missionary work through worship, fasting, prayer, and laying on of hands, portraying a communal discernment and commissioning process. While the New Testament lacks a unified term like "ordination" or replication of Old Testament priestly rituals—using instead verbs denoting appointment (e.g., Greek kathistēmi in Titus 1:5 or cheirotoneō implying hand-stretching in Acts 14:23)—these practices evidence a pattern of deliberate setting apart for service, distinct from general congregational roles. Scholarly analysis notes that such acts carried spiritual weight, akin to Old Testament precedents but adapted to the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9), with laying on hands linking to blessing, healing, or Spirit-bestowal rather than sacrificial consecration. This scriptural framework influenced later Christian traditions, though interpretations vary: sacramental views see continuity in a ministerial priesthood, while others emphasize functional commissioning without indelible character.

Key passages and interpretations

The provides several passages describing the appointment of church leaders, often involving the as a symbolic act of commissioning and conferral of authority for ministry. In Acts 6:1-6, the apostles select seven men to serve as deacons to handle practical needs, praying and laying hands on them after the congregation's approval, establishing a pattern for setting apart individuals for specific service roles. Similarly, Acts 14:23 records Paul and appointing elders (presbyters) in newly established churches through and , emphasizing communal discernment and dedication to the . These acts reflect a structured process for installation rather than informal selection. Passages in the further detail qualifications and the ritual of . 1 Timothy 3:1-13 outlines criteria for overseers (episkopoi, often translated as bishops) and deacons (diakonoi), requiring moral integrity, ability, and household management skills, with no explicit mention of efficacy but a focus on character fitting for oversight. Titus 1:5 instructs to appoint elders in every Cretan town, linking the role to sound doctrine and refuting error, portraying elders as guardians of church . These texts indicate a hierarchical structure emerging in the late first century, with elders and deacons as distinct offices. Central to interpretations of ordination is the , referenced in 1 Timothy 4:14, where Paul urges Timothy not to neglect the given through and the elders' imposition of hands, and in 2 Timothy 1:6, where Paul recalls imparting a via his own hands. Commentators view this as an outward sign symbolizing the inward transmission of authority or empowerment by the for pastoral duties, not merely but a rite marking dedication to ministry. Early church practice, inferred from these verses, treated it as a transfer of apostolic oversight, though Protestant interpreters emphasize it as recognition of preexisting gifts rather than conferring new grace. Debates over draw from these texts, with Catholic traditions seeing continuous as preserving authority from the apostles, as in the replacement of Judas by Matthias in Acts 1:15-26 via lots and to maintain the Twelve's witness. Evangelical perspectives counter that Scripture lacks explicit mandates for unbroken episcopal chains, viewing succession as fidelity to apostolic over institutional lineage, with no evidence requiring bishops to trace historically for validity. Empirical analysis of the texts reveals a functional emphasis on qualified appointment for church order, without delineating degrees of orders or indelible marks as later formalized in .

Historical development

Early Church and apostolic era

In the apostolic era, the New Testament records the appointment of church leaders through the selection of qualified individuals and the rite of laying on of hands, signifying the conferral of authority and spiritual gifting. For instance, in Acts 6:1-6, the apostles directed the selection of seven men of good reputation, full of the Spirit and wisdom, to serve as deacons handling practical needs, after which the apostles prayed and laid hands on them. Similarly, Paul instructed Timothy regarding the gift imparted through the laying on of hands by the presbytery (1 Timothy 4:14) and reminded him of the prophetic utterance accompanying the elders' laying on of hands (2 Timothy 1:6), indicating a formal commissioning for ministry. Titus was directed to appoint elders in every town based on moral and doctrinal qualifications (Titus 1:5-9), reflecting an emerging structure of oversight without explicit mention of a rite but aligned with broader patterns of apostolic delegation. Post-apostolic writings from the late first century evidence continuity in these practices, with emphasis on orderly succession to prevent discord. In 1 Clement, dated around 96 AD, described how the apostles, foreseeing potential strife over office, appointed overseers and assistants, establishing provisions for successors chosen by reputable figures to maintain stability. The , a manual from approximately 70-120 AD, instructed communities to appoint bishops (episkopoi) and deacons (diakonoi) who were meek, truthful, and not greedy, performing the ministry of prophets and teachers, though without specifying . These texts suggest communal involvement in selection, prioritizing character over ritual formality, yet rooted in apostolic precedent. By the early second century, , writing circa 107 AD en route to martyrdom, articulated a more defined threefold of , presbyters, and deacons in communities like those in Asia Minor and , urging unity under the as representing Christ, with presbyters as the apostolic council and deacons as ministers of service. He exhorted obedience to this structure as essential to eucharistic validity and church order, marking an evolution toward singular episcopal oversight amid threats from and division, though historical evidence indicates this monarchical form developed gradually rather than uniformly from apostolic times. remained central, drawing from Jewish traditions of consecration and adapted for imparting the Holy Spirit's charisms in .

Patristic and medieval periods

In the patristic period, Church Fathers such as Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35–107 AD) emphasized a monarchical episcopate within holy orders, asserting that bishops held supreme authority over presbyters and deacons, and that no baptism or Eucharist was valid without episcopal oversight to maintain unity and apostolic fidelity. This three-tiered structure—bishop (episkopos), presbyter (presbyteros), and deacon (diakonos)—emerged by the late 1st century, as evidenced in Ignatius's epistles, where he urged adherence to the bishop as to Christ himself for ecclesial order. Cyprian of Carthage (c. 200–258 AD) further developed this by linking ordination to the bishop's role in preserving doctrinal purity, viewing schism from the episcopal line as severing sacramental validity, as in his treatise On the Unity of the Church (251 AD). Ordination rites in this era involved the laying on of hands (cheirotonia or impositio manuum) by bishops, conferring spiritual authority rather than mere appointment, as described in texts like the Apostolic Tradition attributed to Hippolytus of Rome (c. 215 AD), which outlines distinct prayers and gestures for consecrating bishops (with presbyters participating), presbyters (for teaching and sacrifice), and deacons (for service). Fathers like Tertullian (c. 155–220 AD) and Origen (c. 185–253 AD) described orders as a divine institution mirroring Old Testament priesthood but elevated through Christ's apostles, with an emphasis on moral integrity and charismatic gifts, though not yet formalized as an indelible sacrament. Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD) integrated Neoplatonic elements, portraying ordination as imprinting a permanent ecclesiastical character enabling ministerial acts, particularly preaching and sacraments, while warning against simony as a grave corruption. During the medieval period, holy orders evolved into a structured among the seven, with and scholastic theology clarifying its indelible character and hierarchical degrees. Gratian's Decretum (c. 1140), compiling disparate canons, established norms for eligibility, irregularity (e.g., due to crime or defect), and prohibitions like those on women or the unchaste, influencing subsequent papal decretals and councils such as Lateran IV (1215), which mandated annual episcopal ordinations and reinforced in the Latin West. By the , (porter, , , ) and major orders (subdeacon, , , ) were distinguished, with subdiaconate elevated to major status around 1200 to underscore Eucharistic preparation. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) systematized this in the Summa Theologica (1265–1274), defining holy orders as a that configures the recipient to Christ the , imprinting an instrumental power () for sanctifying acts like consecration, with multiplicity of orders serving divine order, ministerial dignity, and prevention of abuse through progression. Aquinas argued that only bishops fully possess this power via episcopal consecration, while priests receive a participatory share, rejecting lay or imperfect ordinations as insufficient for valid sacraments. Medieval practice saw ordinations tied to cathedral chapters and universities, with reforms like the Council of Trent's precursors addressing abuses such as pluralities and uneducated , though pre-Tridentine sources like Aquinas prioritized ontological change over moral perfection for validity. Eastern traditions maintained patristic forms with less emphasis on , focusing on cheirotonia as mystical election by and .

Reformation era

The Protestant fundamentally challenged the medieval Catholic understanding of holy orders, rejecting the notion of a sacramental priesthood that conferred an indelible spiritual character and exclusive sacrificial authority. Reformers like argued that Scripture establishes the , whereby baptism equalizes clergy and in spiritual status, eliminating any ontological that grants priests unique mediatory powers. In Luther's 1520 treatise To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation, he contended that the Catholic distinction between priests and was a human invention unsupported by the , asserting that all possess the right to preach, baptize, and administer the when necessity demands, though public ministry requires communal calling for order's sake. Luther further demoted ordination from a sacrament to a ceremonial rite of public installation, emphasizing election by the congregation or church authorities over episcopal laying on of hands as essential for validity. He viewed the office of ministry not as imparting divine power but as a functional role to proclaim the Word, administer sacraments, and exercise discipline, revocable if the minister falls into scandal—contrasting sharply with the Catholic indelible mark. This perspective influenced Lutheran practices, where ordination continued via prayer and laying on of hands but lacked sacramental efficacy, as seen in early Reformation ordinations tied to specific pastoral charges rather than general clerical status. Reformed traditions under and extended these critiques, prioritizing congregational election and presbyterial governance over hierarchical orders. Zwingli's 1520s reforms in eliminated monastic orders and reduced clergy to preaching elders selected by the community, viewing as ratification of divine calling without grace. Calvin, in his (1536 onward), described ministers as extraordinary offices elected by the church for teaching and ruling, rejecting and any priestly sacrifice as unbiblical accretions that obscured justification by faith. Both insisted on moral and doctrinal fitness over ritual form, leading to Genevan and Swiss models where involved examination, vows, and communal imposition of hands but conferred no permanent character. The responded definitively at the Council of Trent's Twenty-Third Session on July 15, 1563, reaffirming holy orders as a true instituted by Christ, imprinting an indelible character on bishops, priests, and deacons, and condemning Protestant denials as heretical. The council decreed seven orders (including minor ones), required episcopal ordination for major orders, and mandated specific ages and examinations, aiming to preserve hierarchical unity against fragmentation. This entrenchment highlighted irreconcilable views: Protestants emphasizing functional ministry rooted in , versus Catholic insistence on tied to and succession.

Modern developments

The Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) addressed holy orders in its decree Presbyterorum ordinis, which articulated the priestly office as participatory in Christ's mission, underscoring the bishop's role in with the and the priest's configuration to Christ the head. This document renewed emphasis on the ordained ministry's service to the while reaffirming the indelible character of . In response, Pope Paul VI's Sacrum Diaconatus Ordinem (18 June 1967) restored the permanent diaconate as a distinct order, permitting married men over 35 to receive for liturgical and charitable service without intent to proceed to priesthood, marking the first major expansion of ordained roles since antiquity. Further liturgical reforms followed with Ministeria quaedam (15 August 1972), which suppressed the clerical state entry via and abolished the of porter, , , and —reclassifying the latter two functions as non-ordained ministries open to of either sex to foster broader participation in Church life. These changes, intended to streamline formation and align with pastoral needs, reduced preparatory steps to priesthood from seven to three major orders, though critics argue they eroded symbolic gradations rooted in early Church practice. Subsequent papal teachings, including John Paul II's Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (22 May 1994), definitively excluded women from priestly ordination, citing reservation to males as capacity for the representation, amid growing global debates. In the Anglican Communion, 20th-century developments diverged sharply from historic male-only practice: women were ordained deacons in (1969) and priests in the (1976) and (1976), with episcopal ordinations commencing in 1994 (e.g., Barbara Harris in the U.S.). These innovations, approved by synods despite opposition, prompted schisms—such as the formation of the Traditional Anglican Communion—and prompted Pope Benedict XVI's Anglicanorum coetibus (4 November 2009) to facilitate corporate reunion of dissenting groups into the via ordinariates, recognizing prior baptisms but requiring reordination due to doubts over Anglican orders' validity post-reforms. Eastern Orthodox traditions exhibited continuity, retaining the three major orders (, , ) and minor ones (reader, ) without doctrinal alterations, even under 20th-century pressures like Soviet-era suppressions that decimated (e.g., over 20 and 1,000 killed by 1919 in ). Ecumenical efforts, including Catholic-Orthodox dialogues on (e.g., the 1973 International Theological Commission statement), affirmed shared emphasis on episcopal laying-on-of-hands but stalled over divergences like women's , which Orthodox synods uniformly reject as incompatible with patristic norms. These talks underscore persistent barriers to mutual recognition of orders, rooted in differing ecclesiological causal chains from apostolic origins.

Theological significance

Sacramentality versus ordinance

In , Holy Orders is classified as one of the seven , through which the mission entrusted by Christ to his apostles is continued by the imposition of hands and the words of consecration, conferring an indelible spiritual character and sacramental grace that configures the recipient to Christ as head and shepherd. This sacramental efficacy operates , meaning the grace is imparted by the rite itself when validly performed, independent of the personal holiness of the minister, as defined in the Council of Trent's canons on the sacraments. The sacrament comprises —episcopate, presbyterate, and diaconate—each imprinting a permanent ontological change that enables the ordained to act in administering other sacraments and governing the Church. Eastern Orthodox theology similarly regards Holy Orders as a divine mystery (sacrament), essential for preserving apostolic continuity, wherein the Holy Spirit descends through episcopal to empower deacons, priests, and bishops for liturgical and pastoral service, ensuring the Church's sacramental life remains unbroken from the apostles. Orthodox tradition emphasizes the mystery's role in transmitting the grace of the priesthood, with rites invoking the 's descent, as seen in ancient liturgies like that of St. Basil the Great, and rejects any diminishment of its efficacy to mere symbolism. In contrast, Protestant traditions, particularly Reformed and Baptist, view not as a conferring inherent grace but as an ordinance—a biblically mandated rite signifying the church's recognition and setting apart of qualified individuals for ministry roles, without imparting an indelible character or supernatural power beyond what and the Spirit provide to all believers. The Westminster Confession limits to and the Lord's Supper as divinely instituted signs and seals of grace, excluding Holy Orders from this category, as lacks explicit institution as a conveyance and aligns instead with church order under the . This perspective prioritizes scriptural sufficiency over tradition-derived sacramental ontology, critiquing Catholic and Orthodox claims as extrapolations unsupported by clear biblical warrant for seven . Anglican views exhibit variation: the designate Orders among five rites "not to be counted for " like and , treating as a churchly ordinance for ministerial commissioning rather than a grace-imparting . High-church Anglicans, however, may affirm a more understanding akin to Catholic , though this remains contested and does not universally confer the indelible mark . The underscores broader ecclesiological divides, with sacramentalists emphasizing institutional mediation of grace via and ordinalists stressing direct reliance on Scripture and the Spirit's sovereign work in the believing community.

Degrees and indelible mark

In Catholic theology, the sacrament of Holy Orders comprises three degrees: the episcopate (order of bishops), presbyterate (order of priests), and diaconate (order of deacons). The episcopate confers the fullness of the sacrament, granting bishops the authority to ordain other ministers, administer confirmation, and govern dioceses as successors to the apostles. Priests participate in the bishop's ministry by offering the Eucharistic sacrifice, forgiving sins, and preaching the Gospel, acting in persona Christi capitis. Deacons, as ministers of service, assist in the liturgy, proclaim the word, and exercise charity, reflecting Christ's diakonia. This imprints an indelible spiritual character on the recipient's , a permanent ontological seal configuring the ordained to Christ as , , and . Analogous to the characters of and , this mark endures irrespective of subsequent moral failings or laicization, rendering the unrepeatable and ensuring the validity of acts performed ex opere operato under proper conditions. The character empowers the ordained to mediate through sacred rites, though personal sin may suspend faculties or render one unworthy. Eastern Orthodox theology recognizes the same three degrees of holy orders, conferred via cheirotonia () in , but eschews the scholastic formulation of an indelible ontological mark. Instead, imparts that abides in the worthy but can be forfeited through grave unworthiness or deposition, without implying an ineradicable change; defrocked thus cease to function sacramentally, and orders are not viewed as indelibly imprinting the soul. In Protestant traditions, such as those stemming from the , holy orders lack sacramental status with indelible effects; ordination typically signifies a functional commissioning or calling to ministry without permanent spiritual marking or fixed hierarchical degrees, emphasizing the over distinct clerical ontologies. Some Anglican and Lutheran bodies retain episcopal structures but interpret as conferring authority through the church's rite rather than an unrepeatable character.

Role in ecclesiology

In , holy orders constitute the through which the Church's hierarchical structure is realized, configuring ordained ministers to Christ as head of the body for the service of the faithful. —episcopate, presbyterate, and diaconate—reflect a divinely instituted order: bishops exercise the fullness of the of holy orders, succeeding the apostles in governing, teaching, and sanctifying the Church; priests act as co-workers with bishops in offering sacrifice and proclaiming ; and deacons serve in the ministry of the word, , and charity. This structure ensures the Church's unity and apostolicity, with imparting an indelible spiritual character that ontologically equips the recipient for ecclesial and sacramental ministry, distinct from mere functional roles. Without validly ordained bishops, the Church holds that essential sacraments such as and holy orders cannot be confected, underscoring the causal link between holy orders and the Church's visible, institutional integrity. Eastern Orthodox ecclesiology similarly posits holy orders as essential to the Church's eucharistic and synodal nature, with the threefold hierarchy of bishop, priest, and deacon providing the ordered framework for communal worship and doctrinal fidelity. Bishops, as successors to the apostles, convene synods and ordain clergy, preserving the Church's conciliar ; priests and deacons execute liturgical and functions under episcopal oversight. This ordering guarantees apostolic continuity and the valid transmission of grace, viewing the Church as a theandric where ordained ministry manifests Christ's headship over the body. The patristic emphasis on episcopal primacy in local churches, as articulated in early councils like (325 AD), reinforces holy orders' role in maintaining doctrinal unity against . In Protestant , holy orders—or more commonly, —serve a confirmatory function rather than a one, commissioning individuals for preaching, teaching, and pastoral oversight without imparting an ontological change or strict . Traditions such as view as recognition of gifts by presbyters, authorizing rule within a representative eldership derived from congregational or synodal consent, emphasizing the over clerical mediation. Lutheran and Anglican variants retain episcopal forms in some cases but treat as a rite of setting apart for Word and ministry, not essential to ecclesial validity, allowing diverse polities like congregational autonomy. This approach prioritizes scriptural qualifications (e.g., 1 Timothy 3:1-7) for elders and deacons over indelible character, reflecting a causal emphasis on covenantal community rather than institutional perpetuity, though critics note it contributes to fragmented Protestant church structures lacking unified authority.

Apostolic succession

Historical evidence and claims

The earliest extrabiblical attestation of apostolic succession appears in the First Epistle of Clement (c. 96 AD), attributed to Clement, bishop of Rome, who wrote to the Corinthian church amid disputes over church leadership. Clement asserts that the apostles, appointed by Christ, preached the gospel and established bishops and deacons as their initial successors, foreseeing potential contentions and thus providing for orderly replacements: "Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife over the name of the bishop's office. For this reason... they appointed the aforesaid persons [bishops and deacons], and afterwards they provided a continuance, that if these should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed to their ministry." This text implies a deliberate transmission of authority but does not detail an unbroken episcopal chain or sacramental ontology, focusing instead on practical governance to maintain apostolic teaching. Ignatius of Antioch, writing en route to martyrdom (c. 107 AD), provides contemporaneous evidence in his epistles to various churches, urging adherence to the as a representative of Christ and the apostles. In his Letter to the Smyrnaeans, he states: "See that you all follow the , even as Jesus Christ does the Father... Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the ," positioning the as the focal point of unity and doctrinal fidelity derived from apostolic origins. Ignatius, traditionally viewed as a disciple of the apostle John, emphasizes a threefold ministry (bishop, presbyters, deacons) as normative, claiming bishops succeed the apostles in overseeing the and teaching, though he does not enumerate lineages or invoke an indelible character. These letters, preserved in early manuscripts and corroborated by (c. 325 AD), reflect a mid-second-century practice in Syrian and Asian churches where episcopal authority was tied to apostolic precedent to combat and . By the late second century, of Lyons (c. 180 AD), in Against Heresies (Book III), systematizes the claim of succession as a criterion for against Gnostic innovations. He traces the Roman bishopric from Peter and Paul through Linus, Anacletus, Clement, and others to Eleutherius, arguing: "It is possible, then, for everyone in every church, who may wish to know the truth, to contemplate the tradition of the apostles which has been made known to us throughout the whole world... the tradition of the apostles, manifested throughout the world, can be clearly seen in every church by those who wish to see the truth." posits this visible succession preserves the apostolic depositum fidei, listing similar episcopal pedigrees for Smyrna ( as John's hearer) and other sees, though his lists rely on and lack independent corroboration beyond self-reporting. later compiles such successions in Ecclesiastical History (c. 325 AD), drawing from earlier records like Hegesippus (c. 170 AD), presenting them as historical facts to affirm continuity from apostolic foundations. Historical critiques note that these sources, while early, emerge from orthodox partisans defending against heresies, potentially retrojecting later monarchical episcopacy onto fluid first-century structures where "episkopos" and "presbuteros" overlapped without formalized chains. No non-Christian or archaeological evidence confirms unbroken ordinations, and gaps exist in records (e.g., scant details on pre-Clement Roman bishops), with some scholars arguing succession claims served polemical rather than strictly genealogical purposes until formalized in the third century. like contended that true succession inheres in fidelity to apostolic doctrine, not ritual , citing biblical precedents like Matthias (Acts 1:26) as rather than normative for perpetuity. Nonetheless, the patristic corpus demonstrates a consistent early claim of authoritative transmission via bishops, evolving from administrative order to theological bulwark by the patristic era.

Theological arguments in favor

Theological arguments for emphasize its role in transmitting the apostolic authority and mission instituted by Christ, ensuring the continuity of authentic teaching, governance, and sacramental power within the Church. Proponents, particularly in Catholic and Orthodox traditions, contend that this succession is not merely historical but essential for the Church's fidelity to the , as the apostles were uniquely commissioned by to teach, baptize, and forgive sins (:18-20). Without such transmission through ordained successors, the Church risks deviation from divine revelation, as seen in early heresies that lacked episcopal lineage. Scripture provides foundational support through examples of apostolic appointment and . In Acts 1:15-26, the apostles select and ordain Matthias to replace Judas, interpreting :8 as mandating succession to maintain the office's witness to Christ's , demonstrating that apostolic roles were not self-perpetuating but required deliberate transmission. Similarly, Paul instructs Timothy to "entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also" (2 Timothy 2:2), linking this to the that confers the gift of God (1 Timothy 4:14; 2 Timothy 1:6), which Catholic and Orthodox theologians interpret as the rite ordaining presbyters and bishops in continuity with the apostles' authority to rule and teach. 1:5 further directs the appointment of elders in every town, underscoring a structured succession to preserve doctrinal purity against false teachers. Early patristic writings reinforce this as a bulwark against . of Lyons (c. 180 AD), in Against Heresies, argues that true is preserved in churches founded by apostles, listing the bishops of from Peter and Paul to Eleutherius as evidence of unbroken succession, contrasting this with Gnostic innovators who invent teachings without apostolic pedigree. (c. 107 AD), in his to the Smyrnaeans, equates obedience to bishops, presbyters, and deacons with obedience to Christ and the apostles, implying a hierarchical structure derived from apostolic institution to maintain eucharistic validity and unity. These witnesses, drawn from second-century texts, demonstrate that succession was invoked early to authenticate , predating later doctrinal developments. Doctrinally, undergirds the sacramentality of holy orders by conferring an indelible character that enables successors to act in offering sacrifice and absolving sins, a power not delegable without episcopal . In , it ensures the Church's indefectibility, as the guides the episcopal college in collegiality with the successor of Peter (where applicable), guarding against and error, as articulated in conciliar documents like Vatican II's . This causal chain—from Christ's mandatum to apostolic to ongoing succession—preserves causal realism in efficacy, where valid orders traceably link to the apostles' charism.

Critiques and alternative views

Critics of , including Protestant theologians, contend that the provides no explicit mandate for an unbroken chain of ordinations transmitting from the apostles. Passages such as Acts 20:17-28, where Paul addresses elders (presbyters) as overseers (bishops), and Titus 1:5-7, which equates appointing elders with overseers, indicate interchangeable roles without a distinct hierarchical succession mechanism. Historically, the monarchical episcopate—featuring a single over presbyters—emerged gradually after the apostolic era, with evidence of plurality of elders leading congregations in the first century, as in (:6, 21:18). By around 150-200 AD, a single began overseeing multiple elders, but early texts like the (c. 70-100 AD) and 1 Clement (c. 96 AD) reflect collegial governance rather than strict succession lists traceable to apostles. Gaps in records and reliance on later traditions undermine claims of uninterrupted validity, as even proponents acknowledge evidential challenges before the mid-second century. Reformation figures like Martin Luther and John Calvin rejected succession as essential for ministerial authority or sacraments, arguing it elevates human tradition over Scripture's emphasis on faith, calling, and doctrinal fidelity (sola scriptura). Calvin, in his Institutes (1536), asserted that a church remains apostolic through adherence to the gospel, not episcopal lineage, which could perpetuate error if bishops apostatized, as warned in Galatians 1:8-9. Alternative views, prevalent in Reformed and evangelical traditions, redefine succession as "doctrinal" or "faithful" continuity: preserving apostolic teaching in Scripture, sound preaching, and proper sacraments without requiring tactile ordination chains. The , for instance, holds that Protestant churches succeed the apostles by recovering their gospel message during the (1517 onward), rendering physical succession unnecessary and potentially idolatrous. This perspective prioritizes empirical fidelity to patterns over institutional claims, citing the absence of Petrine primacy or universal episcopal oversight in the apostles' writings.

Ordination processes

General requirements and rites

In Christian traditions that regard holy orders as a conferring an indelible character, such as Roman Catholicism and , candidates must satisfy fundamental prerequisites rooted in scriptural and canonical norms. These include , adherence to orthodox , moral probity free from specified impediments like criminal convictions or psychological instability, and completion of requisite theological formation. Canon 1024 of the explicitly requires that only baptized males receive sacred validly, reflecting the Church's interpretation of Christ's selection of male apostles. Bishops assess worthiness under Canon 1029, ensuring candidates exhibit maturity and vocational discernment. Minimum age thresholds apply to safeguard readiness: in Catholicism, deacons must be at least 25 years old, while priests require completion of the 25th year, with potential dispensations rare. Formation entails studies in and , typically spanning 6-8 years, alongside pastoral internships and spiritual retreats of at least five days before . Impediments enumerated in Canons 1041-1049 bar for reasons including , , or prior without dispensation, with obligations for self-disclosure. The ordination rite, preserved across apostolic churches, pivots on the bishop's imposition of hands—the matter of the sacrament—signifying conferral of the Holy Spirit's graces for ministry. Accompanying this is the form: a consecratory invoking divine outpouring of , tailored to the degree (diaconate, presbyterate, or episcopate). Performed within Eucharistic , the ceremony integrates examination of the candidate, , and, for priests, anointing of hands and vesting with and paten. Priests and concelebrants extend hands in solidarity, underscoring , while the bishop alone effects validity. This praxis traces to precedents, as in 1 Timothy 4:14 and 2 Timothy 1:6, where Timothy receives the gift through presbyters' .

Celibacy and marriage considerations

In the Roman Catholic Church, candidates for the priesthood in the Latin Rite must be unmarried and commit to perpetual as a prerequisite for to the diaconate, per Canon 1037 of the , which bars admission unless they have publicly manifested intent to observe celibacy for the sake of the kingdom of . This obligation, codified in Canon 277 §1, requires clerics to maintain perfect and perpetual continence, rendering post-ordination marriage invalid without laicization. Exceptions exist for married permanent deacons, who may be ordained if their wife consents and they agree to celibacy upon her death, reflecting a distinction between diaconal and presbyteral orders. The discipline traces to early local councils, such as in 303 AD prohibiting clerical intercourse, evolving into mandatory celibacy by the 11th century under in 1074 and formalized at the Second Lateran Council in 1139, which invalidated clerical marriages. Eastern Orthodox traditions permit of married men to the diaconate and presbyterate, provided marriage precedes and occurs before diaconal vows, ensuring no post- unions; widowers or divorced (rarely) must embrace thereafter, while bishops are selected exclusively from celibate or unmarried clerics to symbolize undivided ecclesial paternity. This practice, rooted in patristic allowances for married apostles like Peter (mentioned in Matthew 8:14), contrasts with Catholic norms by viewing as compatible with priesthood but incompatible with episcopacy, with processes including spousal interviews to affirm family stability. In , no celibacy vow impedes ; may marry before or after, as affirmed in Article 32 of the 1662 , which rejects mandatory as unbiblical, a policy formalized after the Church of England's 1549 abolition of requirements. canons, such as those in the Episcopal Church's 1979 , evaluate marital status only for pastoral fitness, not disqualification. Protestant traditions, including Lutheran and Reformed, impose no marital restrictions on , with Reformers like citing 1 Timothy 3:2 (requiring bishops to be "husband of one wife") to mandate married in some cases while denouncing enforced as a human imposition lacking scriptural warrant. These variations influence candidate pools: Catholic processes exclude married applicants for priesthood, yielding fewer vocations in regions with cultural emphasis on (e.g., 2023 global priest shortage of over 3,000 in some dioceses), whereas Orthodox and Anglican rites integrate life as a vocational asset.

Recognition of foreign orders

In the Roman Catholic Church, holy orders conferred by Eastern Orthodox bishops are considered valid due to the preservation of , proper form, and intention in their ordination rites, though such ordinations lack liceity ( permission) within the Catholic jurisdiction. This recognition stems from the shared episcopal lineage tracing to the apostles and adherence to essential elements as defined in , allowing Orthodox converting to Catholicism to exercise ministry after without re-ordination. Similarly, orders from certain Old Catholic groups, stemming from the Utrecht Union, are deemed valid for analogous reasons, placing them on par with Orthodox sacraments in Catholic assessment. Conversely, the declares Anglican holy orders invalid, as articulated in Pope Leo XIII's 1896 apostolic letter , which identified defects in the Edwardine Ordinal's form—lacking explicit reference to sacrificial priesthood—and intention, severing the chain of valid transmission during the . This ruling persists despite later Anglican revisions to rites, requiring absolute re-ordination for Anglican clergy entering full Catholic communion, with no provision for conditional ordination. Protestant ordinations beyond are uniformly rejected as invalid by Catholics due to the absence of , rendering them incapable of confecting valid sacraments like the . Eastern Orthodox churches generally do not recognize Roman Catholic holy orders as valid, viewing the clause, , and other post-schism developments as impairing the ecclesial integrity necessary for sacramental efficacy. Practices vary by jurisdiction: the receives Catholic converts primarily through confession and profession of faith without re- or re-baptism, implying a pragmatic acknowledgment of baptismal validity but not full ordination equivalence, while stricter groups like certain require re-baptism and re-ordination. Orthodox recognition of Western orders, including Anglican or Protestant, is similarly absent, prioritizing unbroken Orthodox succession and doctrinal fidelity over external rites. In , Catholic and Orthodox orders are often affirmed as valid through shared historical succession, enabling mutual eucharistic hospitality in some ecumenical contexts, though full interchangeability is limited by doctrinal divergences. Protestant traditions, lacking a universal , treat as a confirmatory ordinance rather than an indelible character, with recognition confined to denominational or affiliations rather than cross-tradition validity claims. This fragmented approach underscores the ecclesiological divide, where Catholic and Orthodox emphasis on ontological change contrasts with Protestant focus on functional calling and congregational affirmation.

Practices in major traditions

Roman Catholicism

In the , Holy Orders is one of the seven , through which the mission entrusted by Christ to his Apostles continues in the Church until the end of time, configuring the recipient to Christ as priest, teacher, and shepherd via a special grace of the . The sacrament imparts an indelible spiritual character, marking the ordained indelibly for service and rendering re-ordination impossible. It comprises three degrees—episcopate (bishops), presbyterate (), and diaconate (deacons)—each conferring distinct powers for , sanctification, and service within the Church's . The essential rite of involves the by the ordaining , accompanied by a specific of consecration that invokes the to bestow the office's graces. For deacons, the imposes hands in silence before the ; for , the extends his hands without contact; and for bishops, at least three bishops impose hands, with a papal mandate required for validity in the Latin Rite. occur within , typically in a on a or holy day, emphasizing the sacrament's integration into the Church's liturgical life. Only baptized males may validly receive Holy Orders, a requirement rooted in Christ's selection of male Apostles and upheld as divine positive law by the Church. Candidates undergo seminary formation, psychological evaluation, and vows of obedience, with bishops assessing suitability per Canon 1029. Bishops exercise full sacramental powers, including ordaining others, while priests share in these through delegation, and deacons serve in liturgical and charitable roles without priestly faculties like confecting the Eucharist. The presupposes , wherein bishops trace their consecration unbroken from the Apostles, ensuring the continuity of ministerial authority and sacramental validity. In the Latin Rite, which predominates, priests and deacons are generally celibate, though permanent deacons may be married; permit married men to the diaconate and presbyterate, but not episcopate. The Church recognizes no valid ordinations outside this framework, maintaining doctrinal unity through the .

Eastern and Oriental Orthodoxy

In Eastern and Oriental Orthodox traditions, holy orders form one of the seven , conferring an indelible spiritual character upon ordained through for service in the Church. The sacrament comprises three major orders—, (), and —each essential to the Church's life and apostolic continuity. , known as cheirotonia (), is performed exclusively by acting in conciliar fashion, invoking the during the to impart the grace of the order. Candidates for holy orders must be baptized Orthodox males of good moral character, typically trained in seminaries or theological institutes. Deacons and may be married at the time of , provided the marriage occurred prior to receiving major orders and the wife consents; however, once ordained, remarriage is prohibited upon widowhood. Bishops, as successors to the apostles with full authority, must be celibate, usually selected from monastic ranks or widowers, emphasizing their undivided dedication to the . , such as reader and , precede major orders and involve simpler rites without invocation of the , serving preparatory roles in and church administration. The hierarchical structure underscores episcopal monarchy, with each governed by a single who ordains in communion with other bishops to preserve and unity. In Eastern Orthodox autocephalous churches, such as the or the , bishops are elected by holy synods and consecrated by at least three bishops, reflecting conciliarity rooted in early ecumenical councils. , including the of and the , maintain analogous practices, with patriarchs or catholicoi elected similarly and ordinations adhering to ancient liturgical rites preserved in Syriac, Coptic, or Armenian traditions. Despite the over Christological definitions at the in 451 AD, both families uphold identical views on the ontology of orders, rejecting innovations like absolute or lay presidency over sacraments. Ordination rites integrate symbolic elements, such as in liturgical garments and oaths of , performed publicly to affirm communal discernment. For instance, presbyters are ordained after the Great Entrance in the , enabling immediate participation in the , while episcopal consecrations involve elaborate prayers for oversight of the flock. These practices, documented in service books like the Euchologion, trace to patristic sources and remain unaltered, prioritizing to over modern adaptations.

Anglicanism

In Anglicanism, holy orders consist of the threefold ministry of bishops, priests (or presbyters), and deacons, which Canon C1 of the Church of England affirms have been maintained in the Church since the time of the Apostles. Ordination to these orders is effected through rites prescribed in the Book of Common Prayer or equivalent authorized forms across the Anglican Communion, requiring candidates to be baptized, confirmed, doctrinally examined, and of good character, with minimum ages of 23 for deacons, 24 for priests, and 30 for bishops. The rite includes public presentation of the candidate, examination on doctrine and vows of obedience, a litany for the Church, and the essential act of the laying on of hands by the ordaining bishop (or at least three bishops for episcopal consecration), accompanied by prayer invoking the Holy Spirit to empower the ordinand for ministry. This imposition of hands symbolizes the transmission of authority, which Anglicans hold preserves apostolic succession—an unbroken chain of episcopal ordination tracing back to the Apostles—ensuring the continuity of the Church's teaching and sacramental life. Though the limit sacraments instituted by Christ to and the , Anglican is commonly understood as a rite that indelibly sets apart the ordinand for service, conferring grace through the invoked presence of the rather than merely commissioning for function. and deacons serve under a bishop's oversight, with authorized to preside at the , absolve sins, and teach, while deacons focus on service, word, and charity; bishops exercise oversight, confirm, ordain, and unify the Church. Unlike in Roman Catholicism, is not mandated; candidates may be married, and widowers or divorced (subject to diocesan discretion) may remarry, reflecting the Church of England's retention of pre-Reformation practices allowing married . Ordination practices vary across the Communion's 40+ autonomous provinces. Women have been ordained as deacons in some contexts since the , as priests since 1971 (initially in , followed by the in 1976 and the in 1994), and as bishops since 1989 (e.g., Barbara Harris in the USA). However, opposition persists in provinces like the , where only about half of dioceses permit women's to the priesthood as of 2021, prioritizing scriptural interpretations restricting authoritative roles to men. resolutions, such as 1978's Resolution 21, have acknowledged this diversity, affirming impaired but not broken communion among differing provinces while urging mutual respect.

Lutheranism and Reformed traditions

In Lutheran traditions, holy orders do not constitute a imparting an indelible ontological change, as in Roman Catholic theology, but rather serve as the public rite confirming a divine call to the office of the holy ministry, which entails preaching and administering the sacraments. The (1530) emphasizes in Article V that the ministry was instituted so that the Gospel may be taught and sacraments administered, with the efficaciously working faith through these means, while Article XIV insists that no one should publicly teach or administer sacraments without a regular and orderly call. This call originates from the congregation or church body, involving doctrinal examination, moral fitness assessment, and subsequent by the from ordained pastors, typically in the presence of the local assembly, as practiced since the to maintain ecclesiastical order without elevating the rite to sacramental status. Luther's doctrine of the , articulated in works like To the Christian Nobility (1520), underscores that all baptized Christians share priestly functions such as prayer, sacrifice of praise, and mutual ministry, yet distinguishes the public office of the pastor for orderly proclamation of the Word and sacramental acts to avoid chaos in the church. thus does not confer unique spiritual powers but recognizes gifts and authority derived from Christ's institution of the ministry, with historical continuity in form—such as imposition of hands—traced to apostolic practice, though Lutherans reject any notion of unbroken episcopal succession as essential for validity. Modern Lutheran bodies, like the , continue this by requiring seminary training, subscription to standards, and vows affirming the pastoral office's scriptural basis. In Reformed traditions, including Presbyterian and Congregationalist churches, ordination similarly functions as an act of the church recognizing a lawful call to eldership or pastoral ministry, without sacramental character or indelible mark, aligning with the (1646), which recognizes only and the Lord's Supper as divinely ordained sacraments. The process emphasizes presbyterial governance: candidates undergo rigorous examination on doctrine, life, and abilities by a presbytery or classis, followed by prayer and by ordained ministers, as outlined in Reformed directories of worship to ensure fidelity to Scripture and confessional standards like the Second Helvetic Confession (1566), which views the office as extraordinary yet essential for church order. Reformed ordination upholds the while reserving public ministry to those set apart by , rejecting hierarchical sacerdotalism in favor of parity among elders—teaching and ruling—and congregational input in calling pastors, as seen in practices from John Calvin's consistory (1541 onward) to contemporary bodies like the . This approach prioritizes the Spirit's gifting and churchly examination over ritual form, with no requirement for and allowance for married , reflecting a return to patterns where elders were appointed by apostolic figures or their delegates without a separate . Both Lutheran and Reformed traditions thus view as instrumental to faithful ministry rather than transformative in essence, fostering accountability through synodical oversight and doctrinal subscription.

Other Protestant and restorationist groups

In Baptist churches, ordination is typically a congregational act affirming an individual's divine call to ministry, involving examination by a and members, followed by the , but it does not confer authority or an indelible character; rather, it serves as public recognition without hierarchical oversight from associations or conventions. This practice emphasizes local church , with no universal Baptist of , allowing for variations such as provisional licenses for preaching trials. Methodist traditions, particularly in the , view as a church-authorized by the for elders (presbyters) and deacons, requiring a degree, candidacy discernment, commissioning as provisional members, and final by an annual conference through and vows of fidelity to and . qualifies to administer sacraments like and Holy Communion, distinguishing it from licensed local pastors who lack full sacramental authority. Pentecostal denominations, such as the , employ a progression from to , culminating in formal commissioning by denominational to affirm spiritual gifts, calling, and readiness for full ministerial authority, often involving examination of doctrine, experience, and charismatic evidence like . here emphasizes divine empowerment over institutional hierarchy, enabling roles in preaching, healing, and , though practices vary across independent assemblies. Seventh-day Adventists ordain pastors through a structured process of theological , practical ministry evaluation, and union approval, followed by a service with by ordained ministers, signifying public setting apart for ministry without imparting supernatural power to the individual. This aligns with their restoration of biblical patterns, where affirms qualifications like doctrinal fidelity and , distinct from local elder ordinations elected by congregations. Among restorationist groups, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) practices priesthood ordination for worthy males starting at age 11 or 12 into the Aaronic Priesthood (, , offices) and later into the Melchizedek Priesthood (elder, ), performed by authorized holders via and specific prayer wording to confer authority for ordinances like and temple blessings. Unlike Protestant views, this restores a universal male priesthood essential for salvation ordinances, with no professional but lay participation. In , formal is de-emphasized in favor of scriptural elder appointments by local congregations for oversight, with evangelists recognized by character and service rather than , reflecting a primitive church restoration without creedal hierarchies.

Controversies and debates

Ordination of women

The to holy orders remains a divisive issue within , rooted in interpretations of scripture, , and ecclesial authority. Opponents argue that the male-only priesthood reflects Christ's as male and the exclusive selection of male apostles, precluding female ordination as a matter of divine institution rather than cultural preference. Proponents, primarily in certain Protestant and circles, contend that scriptural prohibitions on women teaching or holding authority over men (e.g., 1 Timothy 2:12) address specific historical contexts of disorder, advocating instead for equality based on Galatians 3:28. This debate has led to schisms, particularly in , where women's ordination since the 1970s has prompted departures to traditionalist bodies. In Roman Catholicism, the definitively teaches that the Church lacks authority to ordain women to the priesthood, a articulated in Pope John Paul II's apostolic letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis on May 22, 1994, which states: "I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church's faithful." This position, affirmed as infallible by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1995, draws on the unbroken male apostolate and the priest's role in (in the person of Christ), a male figure. Historical claims of early Christian women priests, such as inscriptions interpreted as presbytera (elder), are contested as likely referring to wives of presbyters rather than ordained clerics, with like and Epiphanius rejecting female sacerdotal roles as heretical innovations. Eastern Orthodox tradition similarly prohibits women's ordination to the priesthood, viewing it as incompatible with Holy Scripture and , where no women served as or bishops among the apostles or successors. While deaconesses existed in antiquity for baptizing women and assisting in female-only liturgical roles—last attested in the —their ordination differed from presbyteral or episcopal cheirotonia and did not involve eucharistic presidency. Orthodox theologians like emphasized that female priesthood would constitute a "radical mutilation of faith," not due to female inferiority but the symbolism of male headship mirroring Christ's relation to the Church (Ephesians 5:23). Anglicanism presents a fractured : the authorized women's priestly ordination in 1976 following irregular ordinations in 1974, while the followed in 1994, leading to provisions for "freehold" parishes rejecting female oversight and the formation of the Society of St. Wilfrid and St. Hilda. This innovation, absent in the first 1,900 years of Anglican , has fueled ongoing tensions, including the Anglican Church in North America's diocesan variances on the issue and global resistance from primates in the Global South. By 2025, women comprise a growing portion of Anglican in ordaining provinces, yet the 2022 affirmed no compulsion for bishops to accept female ordinations, highlighting impaired communion. Among Protestant denominations, varies widely, with mainline groups like Methodists (94% pastoral support) and Presbyterians leading adoption since the mid-20th century, resulting in women holding about 32% of ordained positions across seven major U.S. mainline bodies by 2017. Evangelical and Baptist traditions, however, often restrict eldership to men per 1 Timothy 3:1-7's male qualifications, viewing female as departing from eldership models. Empirical data shows correlations between women's and progressive shifts, such as higher rates of affirming , though causal links remain debated. Restorationist groups like Latter-day Saints and some Pentecostals exhibit mixed practices, but overall, the practice remains a marker of denominational divides rather than consensus.

Ordination of LGBT clergy

In Roman Catholicism, the Church prohibits the ordination of candidates who practice , exhibit deep-seated homosexual tendencies, or publicly support so-called gay culture, as these are deemed incompatible with the priestly call to model chaste self-mastery and spiritual fatherhood. This policy was formalized in a 2005 instruction from the Congregation for Catholic Education, which emphasized that such inclinations gravely hinder fulfilling ministerial duties and obscure the mystery of the male gift to the Church. In January 2025, the Vatican approved Italian bishops' guidelines permitting gay men to enter seminaries if they commit to lifelong and overcome any tendencies, but this did not alter the underlying prohibition, with diocesan officials clarifying no policy shift occurred. individuals are ineligible for ordination due to the requirement of valid male baptism for holy orders, per longstanding tradition. Eastern and uniformly reject the of individuals engaging in or affirming homosexual acts, viewing such behavior as a sinful passion contrary to and scriptural mandates, including :26-27 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10. Clerical candidates must demonstrate repentance from all sexual sins and adherence to ascetic discipline, with no provisions for openly LGBT identities; presentations are likewise incompatible, as preserves the sacramental icon of Christ in male form. Pastoral approaches may extend mercy to struggling individuals but do not extend to affirming or ministry roles. Anglicanism features sharp divisions, with the 1998 resolving that homosexual practice remains "incompatible with Scripture," urging abstinence outside heterosexual marriage; this stance underpins global orthodox networks like GAFCON, formed in 2008 amid protests against ordinations such as that of , an openly gay bishop in the () in 2003. Conservative bodies like the (ACNA), established in 2009, explicitly bar ordination of non-celibate same-sex attracted persons and reject same-sex unions, citing biblical fidelity over cultural accommodation. Conversely, liberal provinces such as the and have ordained LGBT clergy, with the latter voting in July 2025 to discard a 1991 document requiring affirmation of heterosexual chastity or marriage for candidates, though transgender ordinations remain rare and contested. These divergences have prompted schisms, realignments, and impaired communion. Among Lutheran bodies, the (ELCA) amended its standards in August 2009 via a 676-338 vote at its assembly, permitting of publicly accountable, non-celibate gay and lesbian in committed same-gender relationships, a shift critics attributed to prioritizing inclusivity over scriptural prohibitions on sexual immorality. This prompted conservative exodus, including the 2010 formation of the (NALC). Confessional groups like the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod (LCMS) uphold bans on ordaining practicing homosexuals, enforcing celibacy for unmarried and fidelity in heterosexual , grounded in biblical texts like 1 Timothy 3:2-7. Transgender ordinations face opposition as violating creational norms. Reformed traditions vary: the Presbyterian Church (USA) since 2011 allows ordination of LGBT clergy in committed relationships following synod votes emphasizing "scruples" over strict confessional standards, leading to departures by conservatives to bodies like the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA), which bars such ordinations as unfaithful to Westminster standards viewing homosexual acts as sin. The Christian Reformed Church in North America (CRCNA) maintains that unrepentant homosexuality disqualifies from office, affirming compassion for strugglers but rejecting affirmation, as reiterated in its position statements.

Interdenominational validity

The Catholic Church holds that holy orders conferred in Eastern Orthodox Churches possess validity due to the preservation of apostolic succession, proper form, matter, and intention, despite their illicit status from the perspective of full communion with Rome. This recognition stems from the shared episcopal lineage tracing to the early Church and was affirmed in Vatican II's Unitatis Redintegratio (1964), which acknowledges the Eastern Churches' legitimate traditions and sacramental efficacy. In contrast, the Catholic Church deems Anglican orders invalid, as declared in Pope Leo XIII's apostolic letter Apostolicae Curae (September 13, 1896), citing defects in form (the ordination rite's intent to reject sacrificial priesthood) and intention, rendering them "absolutely null and utterly void" without ontological conferral of priestly character. This ruling has been reaffirmed by subsequent papal authorities, including in responses to Anglican ordinations post-Edwardine reforms. Eastern Orthodox jurisdictions exhibit varied approaches to the validity of Catholic orders, often employing oikonomia (pastoral economy) rather than strict scholastic categories of validity and liceity. The Orthodox Church in America (OCA), for instance, typically receives Catholic clergy through vesting—acknowledging prior ordination without repetition—indicating an implicit acceptance of sacramental reality, though full ecclesial recognition is withheld absent reunion. Other Orthodox bodies, such as the Greek Orthodox, may require chrismation or conditional ordination for converts, reflecting caution over post-schism innovations like the Filioque clause's impact on sacramental integrity, yet historical precedents (e.g., 15th-century Council of Florence unions) suggest underlying validity in apostolic form. Orthodoxy generally rejects Anglican orders as invalid, lacking unbroken episcopal succession and orthodox intention, consistent with inter-Orthodox consensus from the 1920s-1930s. Anglican Communion bodies recognize the validity of Catholic and Eastern Orthodox holy orders, viewing them as sharing apostolic roots and sacramental efficacy, and do not require re-ordination for transferring from those traditions. This ecumenical stance aligns with Anglican formularies like the , which affirm episcopal ordination while allowing broader ministerial recognition, though internal diversity (e.g., high vs. ) influences practical intercommunion. Efforts toward reconciliation, such as the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC) dialogues since 1970, have explored mutual impediments but have not overturned Rome's non-recognition of Anglican orders. In Lutheran, Reformed, and other Protestant traditions, interdenominational validity of orders is not framed sacramentally but as functional commissioning for preaching and , detached from or indelible character. Ordinations across denominations are often accepted pragmatically if doctrinal alignment exists (e.g., Lutherans recognizing fellow confessional without re-ordination), but variances in —presbyterian vs. congregational—lead to case-by-case evaluations rather than universal validity claims. This approach prioritizes biblical qualifications (e.g., 1 Timothy 3) over historical lineage, rendering Catholic or Orthodox orders respected but non-essential for ministerial legitimacy within Protestant . Restorationist groups like Latter-day Saints impose stricter exclusivity, viewing non-LDS ordinations as inherently invalid due to restored authority claims.

Clerical celibacy mandates

In the Roman Catholic Church's Latin Rite, has been mandated for priests and bishops since the Second in 1139, which declared existing marriages of clerics invalid and prohibited future ones, building on the First 's 1123 decree against clerical unions. This discipline requires perpetual continence for those ordained to the priesthood or diaconate, though permanent deacons may be married at if wed prior. The mandate traces to earlier patristic emphases on post- continence rather than absolute , with full enforcement in the West driven by concerns over church property inheritance, liturgical purity, and clerical focus amid 11th-century reform movements against and . While not a but a disciplinary norm, it is defended theologically as imitating Christ's celibate life and enabling undivided devotion, per 1 Corinthians 7:32-35, though Scripture permits married overseers in 1 Timothy 3:2. Exceptions exist: Eastern Catholic Churches allow married men to be ordained priests if wed before holy orders, aligning with ancient practice, while bishops remain celibate; similarly, since 1980, married Anglican clergy converting via the Pastoral Provision (expanded as the Personal Ordinariate in 2009) may serve as priests, numbering about 100 in the U.S. by 2020. Widowed priests or deacons cannot remarry, and no post-ordination marriage is permitted in the Latin Rite. In Eastern and Oriental Orthodox traditions, married men may become priests or deacons before ordination but must cease marital relations if aspiring to bishopric, from which celibate monastics are selected; priests cannot marry after ordination, and widowhood mandates continence. This reflects a canonical preference for pre-ordination marriage without absolute mandate, honoring both celibacy and family life as valid vocations. Debates center on whether mandates hinder vocations or correlate with misconduct. Proponents argue celibacy fosters spiritual fruitfulness, citing stable Latin Rite vocations in regions like despite mandates, and note no empirical link to rates, as Protestant denominations with married report comparable scandals per . Critics, including some post-2002 analyses, claim enforced fosters secrecy or psychological strain, potentially exacerbating violations, though Vatican reviews attribute scandals to formation failures, not celibacy itself, with data showing most abusers had prior issues unrelated to vows. Vocations declined in the West from 58,000 U.S. priests in 1965 to 35,000 by 2023, partly blamed on celibacy amid , yet Eastern Churches maintain married without proportional gains, suggesting cultural factors dominate. The discipline persists as changeable but rooted in tradition, with Popes like John Paul II rejecting revisions as undermining priestly identity.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.