Hubbry Logo
Hot blastHot blastMain
Open search
Hot blast
Community hub
Hot blast
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hot blast
Hot blast
Hot blast
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Blast furnace (left), and three Cowper stoves (right) used to preheat the air blown into the furnace.
Hot blast furnace: note the flow of air from the stove in the background to the two blast furnaces, and hot air from the foreground furnace being drawn off to heat the stove.

Hot blast is the preheated air blown into a blast furnace or used in other metallurgical process. This technology, which considerably reduces the fuel consumed, was one of the most important technologies developed during the Industrial Revolution.[1] Hot blast also allowed higher furnace temperatures, which increased the capacity of furnaces.[2][3]

As first developed, it worked by alternately storing heat from the furnace flue gas in a firebrick-lined vessel with multiple chambers, then blowing combustion air through the hot chamber. This is known as regenerative heating. Hot blast was invented and patented for iron furnaces by James Beaumont Neilson in 1828 at Wilsontown Ironworks[citation needed] in Scotland, but was later applied in other contexts, including late bloomeries. Later the carbon monoxide in the flue gas was burned to provide additional heat.

History

[edit]

Invention and spread

[edit]

James Beaumont Neilson, previously foreman at Glasgow gas works, invented the system of preheating the blast for a furnace. He found that by increasing the temperature of the incoming air to 149 °C (300 °F), he could reduce the fuel consumption from 8.06 tons of coal to 5.16 tons of coal per ton of produced iron with further reductions at even higher temperatures.[4] He, with partners including Charles Macintosh, patented this in 1828.[5] Initially the heating vessel was made of wrought iron plates, but these oxidized, and he substituted a cast iron vessel.[4]

On the basis of a January 1828 patent, Thomas Botfield has a historical claim as the inventor of the hot blast method. Neilson is credited as inventor of hot blast, because he won patent litigation.[1] Neilson and his partners engaged in substantial litigation to enforce the patent against infringers.[5] The spread of this technology across Britain was relatively slow. By 1840, 58 ironmasters had taken out licenses, yielding a royalty income of £30,000 per year. By the time the patent expired there were 80 licenses. In 1843, just after it expired, 42 of the 80 furnaces in south Staffordshire were using hot blast, and uptake in south Wales was even slower.[6]

Other advantages of hot blast were that raw coal could be used instead of coke. In Scotland, the relatively poor "black band" ironstone could be profitably smelted.[5] It also increased the daily output of furnaces. In the case of Calder ironworks from 5.6 tons per day in 1828 to 8.2 in 1833, which made Scotland the lowest cost steel producing region in Britain in the 1830s.[7]

Early hot blast stoves were troublesome, as thermal expansion and contraction could cause breakage of pipes. This was somewhat remedied by supporting the pipes on rollers. It was also necessary to devise new methods of connecting the blast pipes to the tuyeres, as leather could no longer be used.[8]

Ultimately this principle was applied even more efficiently in regenerative heat exchangers, such as the Cowper stove (which preheat incoming blast air with waste heat from flue gas; these are used in modern blast furnaces), and in the open hearth furnace (for making steel) by the Siemens-Martin process.[9]

Independently, George Crane and David Thomas, of the Yniscedwyn Works in Wales, conceived of the same idea, and Crane filed for a British patent in 1836. They began producing iron by the new process on February 5, 1837. Crane subsequently bought Gessenhainer's patent and patented additions to it, controlling the use of the process in both Britain and the US. While Crane remained in Wales, Thomas moved to the US on behalf of the Lehigh Coal & Navigation Company and founded the Lehigh Crane Iron Company to utilize the process.[10]

Anthracite in ironmaking

[edit]

Hot blast allowed the use of anthracite in iron smelting. It also allowed use of lower quality coal because less fuel meant proportionately less sulfur and ash.[11]

At the time the process was invented, good coking coal was only available in sufficient quantities in Great Britain and western Germany,[12] so iron furnaces in the US were using charcoal. This meant that any given iron furnace required vast tracts of forested land for charcoal production, and generally went out of blast when the nearby woods had been felled. Attempts to use anthracite as a fuel had ended in failure, as the coal resisted ignition under cold blast conditions. In 1831, Dr. Frederick W. Gessenhainer filed for a US patent on the use of hot blast and anthracite to smelt iron. He produced a small quantity of anthracite iron by this method at Valley Furnace near Pottsville, Pennsylvania in 1836, but due to breakdowns and his illness and death in 1838, he was not able to develop the process into large-scale production.[10]

Anthracite was displaced by coke in the US after the Civil War. Coke was more porous and able to support the heavier loads in the vastly larger furnaces of the late 19th century.[2]: 90 [13]: 139 

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hot blast

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The hot blast is a key innovation in ironmaking, involving the injection of preheated air—typically at temperatures of 1200–1300 °C—through tuyeres at the base of the furnace to combust coke and generate high-temperature reducing gases that efficiently convert into molten . This process, which operates on a counter-current where descending iron-bearing materials meet ascending hot gases, achieves adiabatic temperatures of 2100–2300 °C in the raceway zone, enabling the reduction of iron oxides while minimizing energy loss. Invented by Scottish engineer James Beaumont Neilson and patented in 1828 under British Patent No. 5701 as an "Improved Application of Air to Produce Heat in Fires, Forges, and Furnaces where Bellows or other Blowing Apparatus are Required," the hot blast marked a pivotal advancement during the by preheating the combustion air, initially with external heating and later using waste exhaust heat from the furnace in regenerative stoves. Initially tested at and refined at Clyde , it reduced fuel consumption by up to two-thirds when using coke and one-third with , while allowing the use of lower-quality raw or instead of processed coke, thereby lowering costs and impurities in the output. The technology's adoption rapidly transformed global iron production, boosting furnace capacity and efficiency, and solidifying Britain's early 19th-century dominance in , which in turn fueled expansions in machinery, railways, and other heavy industries. Today, hot blast remains integral to modern blast furnaces, where it is preheated in hot stoves for continuous operation, supporting the production of hot metal at around 1500 °C for .

Process

Air Preheating Mechanism

The hot blast process involves injecting air preheated to temperatures ranging from 200°C to 1200°C into the tuyeres of a to enhance by providing higher for the reduction of . This preheating occurs primarily through regenerative in specialized stoves, where exhaust gases from the furnace or auxiliary fuels pass through chambers filled with checkerbricks—porous structures designed to maximize surface area for absorption. During the heating phase, these gases raise the brick temperature via and , storing ; in the subsequent blowing phase, cold ambient air flows through the hot checkerbricks, absorbing the stored to reach the desired blast temperature before delivery to the furnace. Recuperative methods, which enable continuous exchange without storage cycles, are less common but can supplement regenerative systems in modern setups for additional in recovery. Early implementations achieved modest preheating, such as 149°C during trials, while contemporary systems routinely attain 1100–1200°C (and up to 1250°C in advanced configurations) to optimize , with the elevated temperatures limited by in the stoves and furnace lining. From a thermodynamic perspective, increasing the blast air elevates the at the tuyeres, which intensifies the of carbon-based fuels like coke or , promoting the formation of (CO) as the primary for without requiring excess fuel. This process leverages the endothermic nature of the (C + CO₂ → 2CO) and kinetics, where higher heat input shifts equilibrium toward greater CO yield and overall energy utilization in the furnace shaft. The preheating mechanism significantly reduces fuel consumption by minimizing the demand from the fuel itself, as demonstrated in initial tests where hot blast at 149°C lowered usage from 8.06 s per of iron (cold blast) to 5.16 tons, representing a approximately 36% savings. Modern applications build on this principle, achieving even greater efficiencies through refined heat recovery, though the core benefit remains the enhanced combustion zone temperature that supports consistent CO generation and fluidity.

Integration in Blast Furnaces

The hot blast is integrated into blast furnace operations through a network of piping that delivers preheated air from the stoves to the tuyeres, which serve as the primary entry points for the hot air at the base of the furnace. Tuyeres, typically water-cooled copper nozzles arranged circumferentially around the hearth perimeter, inject the hot blast directly into the combustion zone, where it mixes with the descending burden of iron ore, coke fuel, and flux, initiating rapid combustion and gasification reactions. The hot blast is supplied at typical total flow rates of 3000–6000 m³/min (approximately 100–250 m³/min per ), pressurized to 2–4 bar to overcome resistance from the furnace burden and ensure uniform distribution via the bustle pipe and blowpipes. This pressurized delivery maintains consistent penetration into the coke bed, forming raceways that facilitate gas ascent through the furnace shaft. Preheating temperatures reaching 1200–1250°C enable the blast to achieve these dynamics without excessive energy loss. To ensure a continuous supply, hot blast stoves operate in an alternating sequence of on-blast and on-gas phases across multiple units (typically three or four per furnace). During the on-blast phase, one stove delivers to the tuyeres while the others are in the on-gas phase, where blast furnace top gas mixed with or coke oven gas is combusted to recharge the stove's checkerwork with heat; the cycle rotates every 20–30 minutes to sustain uninterrupted flow and temperature stability. The introduction of the hotter blast intensifies conditions in the zone near the tuyeres, accelerating coke and indirect reduction of iron oxides by elevating local temperatures above 2000°C, which promotes faster formation of molten iron and for subsequent separation in the . This enhanced reaction kinetics in the lower furnace zones improves overall burden descent and gas utilization without altering upper reduction processes. Safety in hot blast integration relies on robust piping systems, with hot blast mains and blowpipes constructed from refractory-lined or to endure temperatures up to °C and pressures of 2–4 bar, preventing structural failure under thermal cycling. Insulation and heating elements are incorporated to eliminate cold spots in the lines, avoiding condensation of from residual moisture or products, which could introduce excess into the blast and risk , reduced efficiency, or explosive reactions.

History

Invention

The hot blast process was invented by Scottish engineer James Beaumont Neilson in 1828 while working at the Glasgow Gas Works. Motivated by the high costs of fuel in iron and observations of seasonal variations in furnace performance—where warmer air in summer improved yields—Neilson developed the concept of preheating the blast air to enhance . He secured a for the invention on September 11, 1828, in , and on October 1, 1828, in and (British Patent No. 5701), titled "An Invention for the Improved Application of Air to Produce Heat in Fires, Forges, and Furnaces," which described heating the air in an interposed vessel before delivery to the furnace. The first practical trial occurred in 1829 at Wilsontown Ironworks in , where Neilson implemented a basic system using a cast-iron pipe heated by the furnace's exhaust gases to preheat the incoming air. This setup marked a significant departure from the traditional cold blast method and demonstrated immediate potential for fuel economy, though the trials were experimental and limited in scale. Initial challenges included frequent pipe failures caused by and expansion from the heated air and exhaust contact, which disrupted operations and required frequent repairs. These issues were addressed through rudimentary insulation techniques, such as wrapping the pipes in non-conductive materials, enabling more stable performance in subsequent tests. Neilson enforced his patent rights aggressively amid widespread interest, initiating lawsuits against unauthorized adopters. Later landmark cases, such as Neilson v. Harford (1841) and Neilson v. Baird & Co. (1843), successfully defended the 's validity against claims that it merely described a scientific principle without novelty, resulting in substantial damages and injunctions that solidified Neilson's legal position.

Spread and Early Adoption

Following James Beaumont Neilson's patent for the hot blast process in 1828, the technology achieved its first commercial success at Muirkirk Ironworks in in 1830, where it demonstrated practical viability in iron production. Adoption accelerated through a licensing model that charged a royalty of one per ton of produced, encouraging uptake while generating substantial revenue for Neilson and his partners. By 1840, this system had resulted in approximately 58 licenses in and 13 in , yielding £30,000 in license fees for that year alone, with widespread implementation across , , and Wales. Key early sites highlighted the process's effectiveness, such as at , where output rose from 5.6 to 8.2 tons of per day after installation, underscoring the technology's capacity to boost productivity without exhaustive numerical benchmarking across all facilities. Despite these successes, initial resistance arose from ironmasters skeptical of the process, particularly due to the perceived high costs of licensing, which some viewed as burdensome amid legal challenges over enforcement. Firms like the Bairds of Gartsherrie initially refused fees, leading to protracted lawsuits that tested the 's validity but ultimately reinforced its adoption. The technology's dissemination extended internationally in the 1830s, reaching in the early 1830s, where it integrated into existing operations to enhance efficiency. In the United States, hot blast was introduced in in 1836, with installations at furnaces like those documented in early American records, marking the start of transatlantic transfer. followed suit in the mid-1830s, with numerous blast furnaces adopting the preheated air method amid regional industrial expansion. Early implementations faced technical hurdles, notably the breakage of pipes due to thermal expansion and contraction during heating cycles. In response, during the 1830s, engineers introduced rollers to support the pipes, improving durability and allowing more reliable operation of the air delivery system. This adaptation addressed a critical limitation, facilitating broader industrial scaling without requiring complete redesigns of furnace infrastructure.

Application to Anthracite Smelting

, abundant in the particularly , proved challenging for iron due to its low volatile content, which hindered ignition and sustained combustion with traditional cold air blasts. The application of hot blast technology addressed this by preheating the air to temperatures around 300–400°C, enabling the high heat required to effectively burn anthracite in blast furnaces. This innovation built on earlier hot blast developments but was specifically adapted for anthracite's properties, transforming it from an underutilized resource into a viable for iron production. Dr. Frederick Geissenhainer, a German-born inventor, advanced this adaptation by patenting the process in 1833 and implementing it experimentally at a small furnace in before constructing the Valley Furnace in , where it operated briefly in 1836 using and hot blast. The first commercially successful production of with occurred in 1839 at the Pioneer Furnace in , marking a breakthrough that spurred widespread adoption. By the late , over 50 -fired blast furnaces were operational in , contributing approximately 20% of the nation's iron output and fueling rapid industrialization in the region. This success significantly boosted the U.S. iron industry in anthracite-rich areas like eastern , where local supplies reduced transportation costs and supported the expansion of furnace operations along canals and early railroads. However, anthracite's dominance waned after the Civil War as the industry transitioned to bituminous -derived coke, which offered superior coking properties for maintaining furnace stability and enabled the construction of larger, more scalable blast furnaces. By the 1870s, bituminous coke had largely supplanted anthracite in iron , reflecting broader shifts toward efficiency and volume production.

Advantages and Impacts

Technical Benefits

The hot blast achieves substantial reductions in operations by preheating the incoming air, with historical comparisons indicating that cold blast furnaces required 7–10 tons of coke per ton of , whereas hot blast implementations reduced this to 1.5–2 tons per ton, representing a reduction of approximately 70–80%. In modern setups, this efficiency contributes to specific consumption rates of 0.5–0.6 tons of coke equivalent per ton of hot metal, measured as tons of per ton of iron produced, reflecting ongoing optimizations in blast temperature and injection practices. Preheating the blast air to around 1000°C elevates the temperature in the zone (raceway) to approximately 2000°C, accelerating reaction rates for carbon and reduction while enhancing overall . This temperature rise reduces the coke ratio by about 2.8% for every 100°C increase in blast temperature above 1000°C, directly boosting the furnace's ability to process materials more rapidly. Consequently, furnace throughput can increase by 2–3 times, as the intensified heat promotes faster gas generation and better permeability in the burden. These thermal enhancements have enabled dramatic output gains, with early 19th-century British blast furnaces seeing average production rise from around 4–5 tons per day under cold blast conditions to significantly higher rates following hot blast adoption. In contemporary large-scale operations, hot blast contributes to daily hot metal outputs exceeding 10,000 tons per furnace, supporting high-volume ironmaking without proportional fuel escalation. The savings from hot blast also yield , including reduced CO₂ emissions per of iron due to lower overall carbon input requirements, though this is secondary to the primary operational gains. In recent developments as of 2025, integration of hot blast with injection has further lowered coke rates to below 0.4 s per of hot metal while enabling carbon capture, advancing sustainable ironmaking toward net-zero emissions.

Economic and Industrial Effects

The introduction of the hot blast process significantly reduced fuel consumption in iron , dropping usage from approximately 8.2 s to 3 s per of produced, which lowered overall production costs by enabling more efficient operations and the use of lower-quality raw materials. This efficiency translated into cheaper iron, exemplified by Scottish prices declining from around £4 12s per in 1828 to about £3 per by the late , making the metal more accessible for widespread industrial applications. The technology catalyzed explosive growth in the iron sector, with British pig iron output surging from 698,900 tons in 1830 to over 2 million tons by 1850, underpinning expansions in railways, engines, and machinery that drove the broader industrial economy. Regionally, it revitalized Scotland's iron industry, boosting production from 37,000 tons in 1830—about 5% of the total—to over 200,000 tons by the mid-1840s and establishing the region as a low-cost producer. In the United States, hot blast adoption from the early onward accelerated industrialization in Appalachian and iron districts by enhancing furnace efficiency and output. Higher furnace productivity from hot blast reduced labor requirements per ton of iron but spurred net employment gains through the sector's rapid expansion and related industries. Neilson's 1828 patent generated substantial royalties at 1 shilling per ton of iron, yielding £30,000 annually by 1840 from 58 licensees and funding subsequent metallurgical innovations; its expiration around 1842 promoted broader technology diffusion across and .

Technical Developments

Stove Designs

The initial designs for hot blast stoves, introduced by James Beaumont Neilson in 1829, utilized simple exhaust-heated pipes to preheat the air blast. This apparatus directed furnace waste gases through iron pipes, warming the incoming cold blast to temperatures around 150–200°C, which marked a significant but limited advancement in efficiency compared to cold blast methods. A major innovation came with the Cowper stove, developed by Edward Alfred Cowper in 1857. This regenerative system employed checkerbrick arrangements—interlocking firebrick lattices within a cylindrical chamber—to store and release heat more effectively. Typically, two or more stoves operated in alternation: one on the "on-gas" cycle, where combustion gases heated the bricks, and the other on the "on-blast" cycle, where cold air passed through the hot bricks to reach 600–800°C before delivery to the furnace. This design achieved substantial heat recovery, reducing fuel consumption in the preheating process. The Whitwell stove, introduced in the 1860s by Thomas Whitwell, built upon the regenerative principle with enhancements for greater durability. It featured a similar checkerwork structure but incorporated silica bricks, which offered superior resistance to and chemical erosion from furnace gases. These stoves allowed for larger heating surfaces, up to approximately 8,500 m² in some 1870s models, enabling consistent delivery of hot blast temperatures in the 450–600°C range while extending operational lifespan. In modern variants, hot blast stoves integrate oxygen enrichment to boost efficiency, with oxygen levels up to 29% mixed into the cold blast prior to heating. , such as refractories, support operations exceeding 1,200°C by providing enhanced thermal conductivity and resistance to high-temperature degradation. These developments maintain the alternating cycle but optimize it for higher throughput in large-scale blast furnaces. The standard of regenerative hot blast involves 45–60 minute periods for both on-gas and on-blast phases, with a brief transition for stove switching. This cyclic typically recovers 70–80% of the , minimizing loss through the checkerbricks' storage.

Modern Implementations

Hot blast remains the standard practice in virtually all modern blast furnaces, accounting for nearly 100% of global production, which reached approximately 1.3 billion tonnes as of 2023. This technology enables the efficient of , including lower-grade ores that would otherwise be uneconomical, by providing the high temperatures necessary for rapid reduction reactions. For instance, major producers like in operate blast furnaces with hot blast temperatures around 1200°C, often integrated with pulverized coal injection (PCI) to optimize fuel use and productivity. Similarly, large-scale plants in , which dominate global output, routinely employ hot blast at comparable temperatures alongside PCI to process vast quantities of domestic ores. Contemporary enhancements to hot blast systems focus on and . Top-pressure recovery turbines (TRT) capture the pressure and from top gas, generating without altering the gas composition or furnace operations; these systems are widely installed in facilities worldwide, contributing to overall plant energy savings of up to 30-40% in some cases. Integration with PCI has further reduced coke consumption to as low as 299-300 kg per ton of hot metal, allowing to operate with lower carbon footprints while maintaining high output rates exceeding 200 kg/ton PCI. These adaptations underscore hot blast's role as the core technology in primary making via the -basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) route, which produced about 72% of global crude in 2023. While alternatives like (DRI) processes and furnaces (EAFs) partially replace traditional in secondary —using or DRI without hot blast—hot blast furnaces continue to dominate due to their and ability to handle raw ores directly. DRI, for example, relies on gas-based reduction at lower temperatures (800-1100°C) and feeds into EAFs, but it accounts for only about 10% of global iron input as of 2023, leaving hot blast essential for the majority of virgin iron needs. Looking ahead, pilots for injection into hot blast streams represent a key trend toward sustainable ironmaking, aiming to cut CO2 emissions by up to 20% through partial replacement of carbon-based reductants. Projects like Nippon Steel's Super COURSE50 test heated injection in experimental furnaces to enable low-carbon operations, with broader industry goals targeting carbon-neutral by the via such modifications to existing hot blast infrastructure; testing expanded in 2024-2025. These developments build on hot blast's foundational efficiency while addressing decarbonization challenges in the 1.3+ billion tonnes of annual production as of 2023.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/blast-furnace-ironmaking
  2. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=4754
  3. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/changes-to-iron-production/
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/hot-blast-stove
  5. https://www.ispatguru.com/hot-blast-stoves/
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317827757_Investigation_of_Heat_Recovery_and_Saving_Potential_of_Hot_Stoves_in_Blast_Furnaces
  7. https://www.ispatguru.com/blast-furnace-tuyeres-and-tuyere-stocks/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785322051276
  9. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/isijinternational/62/3/62_ISIJINT-2021-371/_html/-char/en
  10. https://www.tec-science.com/material-science/steel-making/blast-furnace-process/
  11. https://thinkhwi.com/industries/iron-steel/hot-blast-stove/
  12. https://www.imia.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/wgp3905.pdf
  13. https://www.amphilsoc.org/sites/default/files/2017-07/attachments/Miller_1.pdf
  14. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/british-patent-system-during-the-industrial-revolution-17001852/patent-system/E7B14D6AC49C0FB351F9E8D6BFA33577
  15. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/html_publications/memorandum/gd55.pdf
  16. https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~carbdat/genealogy/m&h/app_b.htm
  17. https://journals.psu.edu/pmhb/article/download/43041/42762/42880
  18. https://www.ispatguru.com/evolution-of-blast-furnace-iron-making/
  19. https://www.thehopkinthomasproject.com/TheHopkinThomasProject/TimeLine/IndustrialRevAmerica/Iron/Eggert.htm
  20. https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/essays/coal/
  21. https://www.construction-physics.com/p/the-blast-furnace-ironmaking
  22. https://metall-mater-eng.com/index.php/home/article/download/414/333
  23. https://www.iipinetwork.org/wp-content/Ietd/content/blast-furnace-system.html
  24. https://www.academia.edu/3743060/Hot_blast_iron_smelting_in_the_early_nineteenth_century_a_reappraisal
  25. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/11/f4/cfd_blastfurnace.pdf
  26. https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/stories/sustainability-and-climate-protection/the-steel-of-the-future:-digital-and-climate-neutral
  27. https://cfindlay17.wixsite.com/clydebridge/history-of-iron-and-steel-in-scotla
  28. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-349-06457-1_7
  29. https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/62552/1/2354700202.pdf
  30. https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/four-phases-of-industrial-revolution-phase-one
  31. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/developments-in-the-scottish-pig-iron-trade-18441848/E5968A498FC4FA417FE65D63B9ED92C7
  32. https://ethw.org/w/images/9/99/The_History_of_Iron_and_Steelmaking_in_the_United_States.pdf
  33. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/bls/bls_0474_1928.pdf
  34. http://www.glasgowwestaddress.co.uk/100_Glasgow_Men/Neilson_James_Beaumont.htm
  35. https://graphsearch.epfl.ch/concept/4838287
  36. https://www.streathamsociety.org.uk/blogs--posts/edward-alfred-cowper3798658
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/cowper-stove
  38. https://www.thehopkinthomasproject.com/TheHopkinThomasProject/TimeLine/IndustrialRevAmerica/Iron/TurnerText.htm
  39. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/engineering/use-of-blast-furnaces.php
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/hot-stove
  41. https://psecommunity.org/wp-content/plugins/wpor/includes/file/2406/LAPSE-2024.0837-1v1.pdf
  42. https://worldsteel.org/wp-content/uploads/World-Steel-in-Figures-2024.pdf
  43. https://www.construction-physics.com/p/the-blast-furnace-800-years-of-technology
  44. https://newsroom.posco.com/en/blast-furnace-anatomy-1/
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544225007030
  46. https://www.primetals.com/en/portfolio/solutions/ironmaking/blast-furnace/top-gas-recovery-turbine/
  47. https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/pulverized-coal-injection-system-market
  48. https://www.steelsupplylp.com/blog/electric-arc-furnace-vs-blast-furnace
  49. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ashish-shukla-79aa78269_steel-production-difference-between-blast-activity-7372456429166882816-4W-b
  50. https://www.midrex.com/insight/world-dri-production-reaches-135-7-mt-in-2023/
  51. https://www.mheavytechnology.com/industries/blast-furnace-design-and-construction-in-steel-plant/
  52. https://www.nipponsteel.com/en/news/20230804_200.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.