Hubbry Logo
Humvee replacement processHumvee replacement processMain
Open search
Humvee replacement process
Community hub
Humvee replacement process
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Humvee replacement process
Humvee replacement process
Humvee replacement process
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Humvee replacement process
A Humvee vehicle
Duration2012–2015
(selection phase)[1][2]
2015–2040
(replacement phase)[3][4]
LocationUnited States
ThemeReplacement of military vehicles
Organised byU.S. military
Participants

The Humvee replacement process was an effort by the U.S. military to replace the current AM General Humvee multi-purpose motor vehicle. The Humvee had evolved several times since its introduction in 1985,[5][6] and is now used in tactical roles for which it was not originally intended.[7] The U.S. military pursued several initiatives to replace it, both in the short and long term. The short-term replacement efforts utilize commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) vehicles, while the long-term efforts focused on building requirements for the Humvee replacement and technology research and evaluation in the form of various prototype vehicles.

After going through the replacement process, the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV), manufactured by Oshkosh Corporation, was chosen as the successor.[8][9][10]

Short term

[edit]
International MaxxPro Category 1 MRAP

In the short term, Humvees that were in service in Iraq were replaced by Category 1 MRAP (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) armored vehicles, primarily the Force Protection Cougar H and the International MaxxPro.[11]

The United States Marine Corps replaced all Humvees patrolling "outside the wire" with MRAP vehicles. The U.S. military began procuring a lighter vehicle under the MRAP All Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV) program in 2009.[12]

Long term

[edit]
The Combat Tactical Vehicle, a prototype Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle will replace around 55,000 Humvees and traces back to 2005, but did not publicly emerge until January 2006. Early government requests for information noted: "In response to an operational need and an ageing fleet of light tactical wheeled vehicles, the joint services have developed a requirement for a new tactical wheeled vehicle platform that will provide increased force protection, survivability, and improved capacity over the current Up-Armoured High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (UAH) while balancing mobility and transportability requirements with total ownership costs." The joint service nature of the effort was assured through Congressional language in the Fiscal Year 2006 (FY06) Authorization Act, which mandated that any future tactical wheeled vehicle program would be a joint program.[13][unreliable source?]

International FTTS UV Concept

The U.S. military was seeking a long term replacement for the Humvee under the Future Tactical Truck Systems (FTTS) program, which was seeking to introduce a Maneuver Sustainment Vehicle and a Utility Vehicle. Navistar International and Lockheed Martin's proposals for the Utility Vehicle were selected for competition as well as the Armor Holdings proposal for the Maneuver Sustainment Vehicle.[14] In August 2006 they were tested at the Aberdeen Proving Ground. Following this evaluation they were parked in The Pentagon courtyard for evaluation by higher-ranking military officials. The JLTV program incorporated lessons learned from the earlier and now halted Future Tactical Truck Systems (FTTS) program and other associated efforts.[15]

The Office of Naval Research has also funded several projects to research other technologies that may be implemented on the Humvee replacement, including the Shadow RST-V and Georgia Tech's ULTRA AP, a combat concept vehicle based on the F350 chassis, but with a "blast bucket" passenger compartment, and Ultra 3T, a project with more advanced (but unproven) technologies.[citation needed]

In early 2011, DARPA initiated the eXperimental Crowd-derived Combat-support Vehicle (XC2V) Design Challenge to find a replacement design for the Humvee for which Local Motors served as a hub for the challenge. The challenge specifically aimed for a Combat Reconnaissance and Combat Delivery & Evacuation vehicle.[16][17] The design entries were open for voting on March 4.[18] On June 27, a Local Motors XC2V was premiered at Carnegie Mellon University's National Robotics Engineering Center in Pittsburgh with President Obama attending.[19] On June 28, 2011, DARPA announced the selection of Local Motors’ XC2V FLYPMode as the winner of the competition. It was selected among 162 entries.[19][20] The XC2V went on to compete with vehicles from TARDEC's FED program such as British Ricardo's FED ALPHA[21] which appears to have been selected over FED BETA.[22]

The JLTV program (including numbers required and pricing) evolved considerably as the program developed and requirements stabilized. Oshkosh's L-ATV was selected as the winner of the JLTV program on 25 August 2015. The company was awarded a $6.75 billion low rate initial base contract with eight options to procure the first 16,901 vehicles for both the Army and Marines. Oshkosh CEO, Charles Szews, said the production contract award would involve more than 300 suppliers in 31 states across the country. The Army initially refused to detail why the L-ATV was chosen over its competitors (AM General and Lockheed Martin), likely owing to anticipations of protests from either or both of the losing bidders, these to be submitted within ten days of contract award.[23][24]

On 8 September 2015, it was disclosed that losing JLTV bidder Lockheed Martin would protest the award to Oshkosh. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) had 100 days to review the program and issue a decision on the protest.[25] On December 15, the GAO dismissed Lockheed Martin's protest because the company on December 11 decided to file a “Notice of Post-Award Bid Protest” with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. The company filed its official protest on December 17.[26] Lockheed Martin withdrew its protest in the Court of Federal Claims on 17 February 2016. Around the time Lockheed Martin withdrew its protest some potentially crucial data from JLTV testing was revealed. The 472 page annual report from the Pentagon's independent Director of Operational Test & Evaluation revealed that in testing Oshkosh's JLTV offer lasted nearly six times longer between significant breakdown than the next closest, Lockheed Martin's offer. The Oshkosh offer achieved 7,051 Mean Miles Between Operational Mission Failure (MMBOMF), Lockheed Martin's offer achieving 1,271 MMBOMF. The target for JLTV is 2400 MMBOMF, the current up-armored HMMWV achieving 2,968 MMBOMF.[27][28] Information on protection levels was also released. It was found in testing that both Oshkosh and Lockheed prototypes met all threshold force protection requirements and some objective-level requirements. This level of protection is better than that of up-armored HMMWVs, and similar to Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected (MRAP) All-Terrain Vehicles (M-ATV) without the underbody improvement kit across all spectrum of tested threats.[29]

In the Pentagon's FY 2017 budget, it requested USD587.5 million to procure 1,828 JLTVs for the Army and USD113.2 million to procure 192 for the Marines.[30]

The first delivery order for JLTV was announced on 23 March 2016 with the U.S. Army ordering 657 JLTVs, along with kits and support. The $243 million order includes vehicles for the Army and Marines and these will be delivered by first quarter FY2018. JLTV requirements remain with the Marines procuring 5,500 until 2022, and the Army buying 49,099 until 2040.[31]

U.S. Army

[edit]

The Army issued a request for information for a Humvee recapitalization program in January 2010. The Army asked Congress to shift funds from procuring Humvees to recapitalizing aging Humvees. This request was denied. A second request for information was planned and would be followed up by a request for proposals.

No Humvee procurements were planned beyond 2012. The Army's 260,000 truck fleet was planned to be reduced by 15 percent by fiscal year 2017.[32]

U.S. Marines

[edit]

The United States Marine Corps planned to replace all Humvees patrolling "outside the wire" with MRAP vehicles. The Marines were to reduce their fleet of Humvees from 44,000 to 32,500.[33] The current plan is to reduce the Marine's fleet of light tactical vehicles from 24,600 to 18,500 by 2017. The planned end state is to have 3,500 A2 series Humvees, 9,500 ECV Humvees, and 5,500 Joint Light Tactical Vehicles.[34]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Humvee replacement process

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Humvee replacement process denotes the U.S. military's multi-phase initiative to supplant the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV), known as the , with light tactical vehicles engineered for greater survivability against improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and ballistic threats encountered in and , where the HMMWV's unarmored underbody and deficiencies contributed to high casualty rates among occupants. Triggered by operational data showing up-armored HMMWVs still suffering 22% casualty rates from IED attacks compared to 6% for interim Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, the process prioritized causal factors like blast-resistant hull shapes and modular armor over the HMMWV's original emphasis on speed and at the expense of protection. This effort evolved from urgent wartime adaptations, including rapid fielding of over 27,000 MRAPs between 2007 and 2014 to mitigate HMMWV vulnerabilities that up-armoring alone exacerbated through added weight, reduced mobility, and heightened rollover risks, into a structured long-term program: the (JLTV). The JLTV, an Army-led joint acquisition with the Marine Corps launched in 2007, seeks to recapitalize about one-third of HMMWV fleets with variants balancing under 14,000-pound empty weights for C-130 compatibility, STANAG Level 1 armor equivalence, and off-road performance rivaling the HMMWV's, while incorporating advanced suspensions and electronic architecture for future upgrades. Oshkosh Defense's L-ATV prototype prevailed in 2015 after technology demonstrations involving competitors like and , leading to low-rate initial production contracts in 2018 and full-rate approval by 2023, with over 18,000 units procured amid debates over sustainment costs exceeding $30,000 per vehicle annually and reliability shortfalls in early field tests. Defining achievements include restored tactical mobility lost to HMMWV up-armoring—such as speeds over 70 mph off-road—and integrated underbody protection reducing mine blast effects by dispersing energy, though critics highlight persistent trade-offs like diminished and higher lifecycle expenses compared to the baseline HMMWV. The program underscores a shift toward causal realism in vehicle design, prioritizing empirical threat data from operations over legacy doctrinal assumptions of peer-state mechanized warfare.

Background and Rationale

Historical Context of the Humvee

The High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV), known as the , emerged from U.S. military efforts in the late to consolidate and modernize its fleet of light tactical vehicles, including the M151 and various trucks, into a single, versatile platform. The drafted specifications in 1979 for a four-wheel-drive capable of air transport, towing, and operations across rough terrain while carrying personnel, weapons, or cargo. initiated preliminary design work that year to meet these demands for enhanced mobility over predecessors limited by narrow wheelbases and low payload capacities. Following prototype evaluations, awarded a production contract valued at over $1 billion on , 1983, for 55,000 units. Production models underwent military testing in 1984, with deliveries beginning in March 1985, enabling the HMMWV's integration into inventories as the M998 series. Initial variants emphasized speed, a 1.25-ton , and for superior off-road performance compared to the Jeep's leaf-spring setup. The Humvee debuted in combat during Operation Just Cause in Panama in December 1989, primarily for troop and supply transport amid urban and jungle conditions. It achieved widespread recognition in the 1991 Gulf War, where over 20,000 units supported rapid maneuvers across Kuwaiti deserts, including patrols to locate Iraqi Scud missiles. This operational success, demonstrating reliability in conventional warfare, popularized the design and inspired civilian adaptations, though the vehicle's unarmored baseline prioritized mobility over protection.

Emergence of Replacement Needs

The High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV), commonly known as the , was designed in the late 1970s and early 1980s primarily for rapid mobility in conventional warfare scenarios, entering U.S. military service in 1985 as a , unarmored successor to the M151 and other utility vehicles. Its aluminum body and open-top variants prioritized speed, off-road capability, and transportability over ballistic or blast protection, reflecting doctrinal assumptions of operations against peer adversaries with armored threats rather than improvised explosives. During the initial , Humvees performed effectively in high-speed maneuvers and reconnaissance, but the subsequent shift to operations against non-state actors exposed fundamental design limitations. Insurgent use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) surged in from 2004 onward, with roadside bombs inflicting disproportionate casualties on occupants due to the vehicle's thin underbody armor and V-shaped hull absence, which allowed blasts to penetrate and fragment interiors. By 2006, U.S. analyses confirmed that standard offered minimal against such mines and IEDs, contributing to hundreds of fatalities and severe injuries among convoy personnel, as insurgents adapted tactics to target these ubiquitous vehicles. Similar vulnerabilities emerged in post-2001, where mountainous terrain amplified exposure to ambushes and buried explosives, prompting field reports of inadequate survivability in asymmetric environments unforeseen during the vehicle's Cold War-era development. Efforts to retrofit Humvees with add-on armor kits, such as Frag Kit 5, began in 2004 but proved insufficient against evolving IED threats, while added weight—often exceeding 10,000 pounds—compromised the vehicle's core mobility, fuel efficiency, and reliability, leading to higher rollover risks and maintenance demands. Military leaders, including those in , recognized by mid-2006 that these stopgap measures could not restore the Humvee's original advantages without a purpose-built successor, as up-armored variants sacrificed agility for partial protection, rendering them suboptimal for both combat patrols and logistics in protracted irregular wars. This realization, grounded in empirical casualty data and operational feedback, underscored the causal mismatch between the Humvee's design parameters and 21st-century threats, necessitating a replacement to balance protection, , and maneuverability.

Interim Solutions

MRAP Vehicle Procurement

The Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle procurement program emerged as a rapid-response initiative by the U.S. Department of Defense in 2006 to counter escalating threats in and , where up-armored Humvees proved insufficiently protective against underbody blasts. Initial operational testing of MRAP prototypes began in limited numbers as early as 2003 for route clearance, but formal requirements crystallized in October 2006 with a baseline order for 1,185 vehicles across the , Marine Corps, , and . The Marine Corps Systems Command established the MRAP Joint Program Office in 2006 to coordinate multi-service efforts, emphasizing designs for blast deflection and modular armor for quick production scaling. In May 2007, Secretary of Defense prioritized MRAP as the department's highest acquisition focus, forming the MRAP Task Force under the Office of the Secretary of Defense to streamline approvals, bypass traditional acquisition timelines, and secure supplemental funding from . This expedited process involved issuing over 90 contracts to six original equipment manufacturers, producing more than 50 variants categorized by and mobility: Category I for urban operations (e.g., smaller 4x4 designs), Category II for general utility (e.g., medium 6x6 trucks), and Category III for heavy engineering tasks. Key manufacturers included Navistar (MaxxPro), later variant), (various up-armored models), and (), with indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts enabling surge production. By 2010, approximately 22,500 vehicles had been delivered, with total reaching over 27,000 units across services at an average of about $1 million, funded primarily through $22.7 billion in supplemental appropriations. Procurement emphasized off-the-shelf technologies and foreign designs adapted for U.S. needs, such as South African influences, to achieve fielding rates exceeding 1,000 vehicles per month by mid-2008, significantly reducing fatalities from IEDs by enhancing through raised and energy-absorbing floors. However, the program's scale drew scrutiny from the Government Accountability Office for potential over-acquisition relative to evolving threat landscapes, though empirical data confirmed a causal drop in underbody blast injuries post-fielding. Contracts incorporated performance-based logistics for rapid spares delivery, with additional orders like 2,400 more vehicles announced in 2008 to meet surge demands in . Overall, the MRAP effort exemplified urgent operational needs driving non-traditional acquisition, prioritizing lives over long-term lifecycle costs.

Operational Limitations and Drawbacks

The Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, rapidly procured starting in 2007 to mitigate threats in and , imposed significant operational constraints as interim substitutes for the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (). Their gross vehicle weights, typically ranging from 14 to 30 tons depending on the variant, exceeded the load-bearing capacity of many bridges and roads in theater, limiting route options and complicating maneuver in rugged or infrastructure-compromised environments. MRAPs demonstrated inferior off-road mobility relative to the Humvee due to their elevated center of gravity, bulkier dimensions, and heavier mass, resulting in slower acceleration, extended stopping distances, increased rollover susceptibility, and reduced traversability on steep side slopes or uneven terrain. This diminished their utility for reconnaissance, rapid response, and dismounted infantry support missions where the Humvee's lighter 5-7 ton configuration enabled superior agility. Fuel consumption averaged 4-8 miles per for MRAPs, roughly double that of up-armored Humvees, exacerbating logistical demands in fuel-scarce forward operating areas and increasing vulnerability during resupply operations. Additionally, their size and weight hindered strategic and tactical transportability; most variants required transporters for road movement off installations and were incompatible with standard C-130 without disassembly, constraining rapid deployment and rotation capabilities. In urban and confined settings, the MRAP's large footprint—often over 20 feet in length—reduced maneuverability, complicating patrols and ambushes while exposing crews to small arms fire from elevated positions due to limited fields of view and responsiveness. These drawbacks, while offset by enhanced ballistic and underbody protection against IEDs, underscored the MRAPs' unsuitability as a universal successor, prompting a pivot toward lighter, more versatile platforms like the .

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Program

Program Initiation and Requirements

The (JLTV) program was initiated in 2006 by the U.S. Department of Defense as a joint effort between the U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps to address the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV, or )'s limitations in protection against improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and fire, while preserving its mobility advantages over heavier Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles. By 2008, the program had formalized as a joint pre-Major Defense Acquisition Program (pre-MDAP), with the Army in the lead role and the Marine Corps as a key partner, focusing on developing a family of vehicles and trailers to incrementally replace aging fleets. This initiative incorporated operational lessons from and , prioritizing a balanced design that avoided the logistical burdens of MRAPs. Core requirements emphasized enhanced survivability, with the JLTV mandated to provide superior crew protection against IEDs, underbody blasts, and ballistic threats compared to the baseline Humvee, through scalable armor systems that could be adjusted for mission needs without compromising transportability. Mobility specifications required off-road performance akin to or better than the Humvee, including high-speed maneuverability and compatibility with tactical transport aircraft like the C-130 Hercules, while achieving higher reliability metrics to reduce maintenance demands in austere environments. Payload capacity was a critical , structured into categories (A, B, and C) to support varied missions, with combat payloads exceeding 3,500 pounds for heavy gun carrier and close combat weapons carrier configurations to accommodate weapons, ammunition, and personnel. The design also incorporated fuel efficiency improvements and commonality across variants to minimize lifecycle costs, with the overall goal of enabling , direct fire support, and maneuver operations in contested environments. These requirements were outlined in the program's Initial Capabilities Document and refined through technology demonstrations and industry prototyping phases starting in the late .

Development Milestones and Contracts

The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) program reached Milestone A in December 2007, authorizing entry into the technology development (TD) phase focused on prototyping and risk reduction. In October 2008, the U.S. Army awarded three cost-reimbursable contracts for this 27-month TD phase, requiring each contractor to deliver seven full-up prototype vehicles for government testing. The contractors included BAE Systems, General Dynamics Land Systems, and Lockheed Martin, who competed through demonstrations emphasizing mobility, protection, and payload capabilities. Following downselection from the TD phase, the Army issued a request for proposals for the engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) phase on January 26, 2012, anticipating up to three contracts for a 27-month performance period within an overall 33-month EMD effort. EMD contracts were awarded in August 2012 to Oshkosh Defense, , and , each tasked with producing 12 to 16 prototypes for rigorous testing in survivability, sustainment, and performance. This phase culminated in B approval, enabling competitive prototyping to refine designs before production downselect. Oshkosh Defense's Light Armored Tactical Vehicle (L-ATV) variant advanced from EMD prototypes built starting in early 2013 on an existing . After EMD completion and government-led operational testing, the program achieved Milestone C in June 2015, transitioning to low-rate initial production (LRIP). On August 25, 2015, the awarded Oshkosh Defense a five-year indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity LRIP valued at $6.7 billion for up to 16,901 JLTVs and trailers, including options for . LRIP quantities were later expanded from an initial 2,221 vehicles to 11,087 to support incremental fielding and reliability assessments. Full-rate production (FRP) approval followed in June 2019 after successful initial operational test and evaluation, confirming the vehicle's threshold requirements in protection, mobility, and networked communications.

Key Technical Features and Improvements

The (JLTV) represents a significant advancement over the (HMMWV, or ) by delivering enhanced protection levels comparable to Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected (MRAP) vehicles while retaining the mobility and transportability of lighter tactical platforms. This design addresses the HMMWV's vulnerabilities exposed in and , where add-on armor reduced and degraded off-road performance. Key improvements include a scalable armor system, for superior handling, and increased capacity, enabling the JLTV to fulfill roles from troop transport to weapons carrier without compromising operational agility. In terms of protection, the JLTV features a V-shaped hull to mitigate underbody blasts from improvised devices (IEDs), blast-attenuating seats, and modular armor that can be adjusted in the field for threat-specific configurations. These elements provide baseline survivability against 14.5mm armor-piercing rounds and anti-tank mines, far exceeding the up-armored HMMWV's capabilities, which often required trade-offs in speed and reliability when fitted with bolt-on kits. The vehicle's and transparent armored glass further bolster crew safety, with testing validating key performance parameters (KPPs) for ballistic and blast resistance during engineering and manufacturing development. Mobility enhancements stem from the TAK-4i independent suspension system, offering 20 inches of wheel travel and 70% faster off-road speeds compared to predecessors, allowing sustained operations over rough without the HMMWV's tendency to bog down under armored weight. The JLTV maintains a weight under 14,000 pounds for air transportability via C-130 and CH-47 helicopters, preserving strategic deployability while achieving higher reliability—averaging over 7,000 miles between significant failures versus the up-armored HMMWV's approximately 3,000 miles. This addresses the HMMWV's post-armoring mobility shortfalls, where added protection halved effective speeds and strained the chassis. Payload capacity marks another leap, with the four-seat variant supporting 3,500 pounds and the two-seat utility version up to 5,100 pounds, enabling carriage of heavier weapons, ammunition, or sensor suites without sacrificing protection or speed—contrasting sharply with the HMMWV's base 1,500-pound limit that diminished further under armor. Integrated C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) architecture supports networked warfare, with plug-and-play interfaces for battlefield systems, enhancing beyond the HMMWV's analog setups. Overall, these features restore the tactical mobility lost in HMMWV up-armoring while bridging the gap to heavier protected vehicles.

Branch-Specific Adoption

U.S. Army Implementation

The U.S. Army began low-rate initial production fielding of the (JLTV) to operational units in April 2019, prioritizing infantry and brigade combat teams to replace High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs) in high-threat environments where enhanced ballistic and underbody protection, payload capacity, and networked mobility were required. Initial deliveries focused on closing capability gaps identified post- and , with the JLTV's and up to 4,500-pound payload enabling sustained operations beyond HMMWV limits. By late 2023, Oshkosh Defense had fulfilled orders for over 23,000 JLTVs across U.S. services under prior contracts, with Army units integrating vehicles into formations alongside for maintenance and tactical employment. The 's objective stood at 49,099 JLTVs to equip approximately one-third of its tactical wheeled fleet in combat roles, preserving lighter HMMWVs for rear-area and low-threat tasks. In February 2023, the Army awarded an $8.08 billion follow-on full-rate production contract to for additional JLTVs and trailers, shifting from Oshkosh Defense to leverage competitive bidding amid rising costs and sustainment needs. Fielding progressed to Army Reserve and units by 2019, with interim contractor support providing logistics and parts through fiscal year 2019 onward. Implementation emphasized modular upgrades, including JLTV A2 variants for improved reliability and electronic architecture by fiscal year 2027, aligned with modernization. However, in April 2025, Secretary of Defense directed the Army to terminate of "obsolete systems," leading to cancellation of further JLTV buys beyond existing contracts and deliveries, including 250 units received in January 2025; this pivot reflected fiscal constraints and a reassessment of light tactical needs amid great-power competition priorities. The decision preserved fielded JLTVs for high-risk missions but halted expansion, prompting debates on vulnerability gaps without full HMMWV replacement.

U.S. Marine Corps Implementation

The U.S. Marine Corps implemented the (JLTV) as a partial replacement for its aging High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) fleet, aiming for a one-for-one swap to modernize the light ground tactical vehicle portfolio. The HMMWVs, introduced in 1984 with the latest Expanded Capacity Variant fielded between 2006 and 2012, were deemed insufficient for contemporary threats due to vulnerabilities exposed in operations. The JLTV provides superior protection, payload capacity, mobility, and integrated digital communications, enabling adaptability for expeditionary missions. Fielding commenced in February 2019 with deliveries of low-rate initial production vehicles to training units at Camp Pendleton, California, followed by operational units such as the School of Infantry and The Basic School. By July 2019, an infantry battalion (3rd Battalion, 8th Marines, II Marine Expeditionary Force) received JLTVs, achieving combat readiness. The program reached initial operational capability on August 2, 2019—nearly a year ahead of the June 2020 schedule—allowing deployment to support naval expeditionary forces worldwide. Subsequent fielding extended to I Marine Expeditionary Force and III Marine Expeditionary Force by late 2019. The Marine Corps planned to acquire up to 15,000 JLTVs, with approximately half procured by September 2025, through contracts primarily awarded to Oshkosh Defense for production. Multiple variants and mission packages, including general purpose and heavy guns carrier configurations, support diverse roles such as troop transport and weapons systems integration. As of May 2025, the Marine Corps reaffirmed its commitment to JLTV procurement despite the U.S. Army's decision to cancel future purchases, emphasizing the vehicle's role as a foundational "workhorse" for tactical operations and integration with systems like ROGUE-Fires and MADIS. However, unit costs are expected to increase due to reduced joint order volumes, with production backlogs extending deliveries through 2027 under AM General's involvement in follow-on phases. The fiscal year 2026 budget request includes a procurement pause to address these delays, prioritizing completion of existing orders before resuming buys.

Involvement of Other Services

The U.S. procures Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLTVs) independently of the Army-Marine Corps joint program to replace aging High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs), particularly for and nuclear protection missions. In April 2023, the began fielding JLTVs equipped with advanced features like the 4 directed-energy system for remote ordnance disposal, enhancing capabilities for Rapid Airfield Damage Repair and Base Operability missions. contracts have included Air Force allocations, such as 214 vehicles in a $208 million order awarded to Oshkosh Defense on November 6, 2023, and additional units in an $803.9 million order issued December 18, 2019. The U.S. Navy similarly acquires JLTVs outside the primary joint framework, focusing on expeditionary and security roles, with vehicles incorporated into orders like the aforementioned and 2023 contracts. These procurements support naval forces requiring light tactical mobility, though in smaller quantities compared to ground services, reflecting the Navy's emphasis on maritime operations over extensive land vehicle fleets. The U.S. maintains limited involvement in JLTV adoption, continuing reliance on HMMWVs and specialized vehicles without dedicated JLTV procurement programs, due to its primary focus on coastal and roles.

Recent Developments and Shifts

Production and Fielding Progress

Oshkosh Defense, the initial prime contractor, began low-rate initial production of the (JLTV) following a $6.7 billion contract awarded in August 2015 for 16,901 vehicles. Full-rate production was approved by the U.S. , enabling broader manufacturing and initial fielding to and Marine Corps units starting in the late 2010s. By early 2025, Oshkosh continued production under subsequent contracts, with the company expecting output into that period before transition efforts. In 2023, was selected for a follow-on production contract to manufacture an upgraded JLTV A2 variant, with the first vehicle coming off the line in April 2025 and initial deliveries planned for the second quarter of that year. aimed for near full-rate production of approximately 15 vehicles per day, incorporating over 200 improvements such as enhanced engineering changes. However, the U.S. Army's May 1, 2025, directive to cease further JLTV halted additional buys beyond existing inventories, potentially impacting A2 rollout despite early production milestones. As of July 2025, the Army had acquired approximately 20,000 JLTVs, with fielding integrated into operational units to replace portions of the fleet. The Marine Corps, maintaining its commitment, had about 7,500 of its planned 15,000 vehicles by September 2025, though it announced a pause for 2026 amid rising costs post-Army . Fielding progress includes specialized variants, such as JLTV-based mobile command vehicles slated for certain Marine units in 2025.

2025 Army Procurement Decisions

In early 2025, the U.S. acquisition executive James Mingus announced that the service had acquired sufficient Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLTVs) and would conduct no further procurement beyond existing contracts, with the final tranche purchased in January. This decision aligned with a broader transformation initiative outlined in a May 1, 2025, directive, which prioritized canceling procurement of excess ground vehicles including JLTVs and certain High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV, or ) variants to redirect resources toward emerging priorities like unmanned systems and lighter formations. Despite the JLTV cap—totaling around 49,000 units across services since program inception—the Army shifted toward sustaining and upgrading its fleet for interim tactical mobility needs. In August 2025, the awarded AM General a $127 million contract for 545 additional HMMWVs, including up-armored variants like the M1151A1, to maintain operational readiness amid delays in next-generation replacements. This followed a September procurement of 112 new s for $51 million, emphasizing variants such as the M1152A1B2 and M1165A1B3 with enhanced protection and electronics. These buys reflected a pragmatic assessment that JLTV's higher unit cost—exceeding $400,000 per vehicle—and logistical demands outweighed benefits for non-high-threat missions, favoring cheaper sustainment at roughly $200,000-$300,000 per upgraded unit. The procurement pivot raised oversight concerns for Congress, particularly regarding the 2023 JLTV follow-on production contract awarded to AM General (valued at over $8 billion for up to 40,000 vehicles and trailers), which the Army's 2025 halt effectively curtailed for its share. While the Marine Corps continued JLTV acquisitions—anticipating higher per-unit costs due to reduced joint economies of scale—the Army's strategy emphasized hybrid fleets blending legacy Humvees with selectively fielded JLTVs for peer threats, pending development of lighter, optionally manned successors under programs like the Infantry Squad Vehicle enhancements. This approach aimed to balance fiscal constraints, with FY2026 budget recommendations allocating only $345 million for limited Army JLTV-related funding amid broader cuts.

Criticisms and Controversies

Cost Overruns and Fiscal Efficiency

The (JLTV) program, intended as the primary replacement, has faced scrutiny for its high per-unit costs, which averaged approximately $400,000 as of negotiated rates in 2025, far exceeding the initial target range of $230,000 to $270,000 per vehicle. In comparison, up-armored s cost around $233,000 per unit, while basic models were procured for under $100,000 historically, highlighting the JLTV's premium pricing driven by enhanced armor, mobility, and survivability features. A 2011 tradeoff by program officials reduced projected JLTV costs from $475,000 to $399,000 through design adjustments, yet actual expenditures remained elevated due to production complexities and low-volume effects post-Army . Government Accountability Office (GAO) assessments in 2019 identified persistent cost overruns and schedule delays in the JLTV program as part of broader issues across $1.69 trillion in major Pentagon weapons acquisitions, attributing problems to immature technologies and inadequate risk management during early development phases. The program's total estimated procurement outlay reached tens of billions, with a 2023 follow-on contract to AM General valued at up to $8.66 billion for 20,682 vehicles, though fiscal year 2023 unit pricing hovered at $413,000 under prior Oshkosh agreements. Efforts to improve efficiency, such as the Army's 2023 recompete of production contracts, aimed to yield savings through competition but ultimately contributed to strategic reevaluation amid rising sustainment burdens. By 2025, the U.S. Army's decision to halt future JLTV procurements—labeling both JLTV and excess Humvees as surplus—exacerbated fiscal pressures on remaining users like the Marine Corps, where reduced order volumes are projected to increase per-unit costs further. The Marines planned a procurement pause in fiscal year 2026, reflecting affordability challenges, while Army projections indicated a need for over 105,000 light tactical vehicles through 2050, including cost-effective modernized Humvees at lower lifecycle expenses. This shift underscores debates on fiscal efficiency, as alternatives like the lighter, cheaper Infantry Squad Vehicle emerged for partial Humvee supplementation without JLTV's full armored capability premium. Overall, the program's structure prioritized protection over affordability, leading to higher operational costs per protected mile compared to retained or upgraded Humvee fleets.

Reliability and Suitability Assessments

The (JLTV) program emphasized reliability improvements over the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV), targeting a mean miles between operational mission failures (MMBOMF) threshold of 140 miles during developmental testing, which Oshkosh Defense's entry surpassed with scores exceeding 7,000 miles in comparative evaluations against competitors. This performance contributed to the program's progression to low-rate initial production in 2018, with over 100,000 miles of cumulative testing validating enhanced mobility and protection under combat-like conditions. Operational testing from 2018 to 2019, however, identified significant suitability shortfalls. The Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) assessed all JLTV variants as not operationally suitable, citing deficiencies in reliability (e.g., subsystem failures in tires, wiring, and power distribution), (requiring specialized tools and contractor intervention), ineffective training and technical manuals, elevated crew workload, and inadequate sustainment support. While deemed operationally effective for tactical missions—offering superior blast protection and mobility over up-armored HMMWVs—these issues resulted in maintenance man-hours per operating hour roughly double those of legacy vehicles, exacerbating logistical burdens in deployed units. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reviews corroborated these findings, noting in 2020 that JLTV complexity hindered field-level repairs without external support, with reliability metrics falling short of operational thresholds despite design intent to exceed HMMWV benchmarks. Remedial efforts post-testing, including software updates and simplified diagnostics, enabled full-rate production approval in May 2019, yet field reports indicated persistent challenges, such as frequent electronic faults and suspension wear under rugged conditions, leading to higher downtime compared to the simpler HMMWV. By 2023–2025, accumulated operational data revealed ongoing sustainment strains, with JLTV's 14,000–20,000-pound curb weight and advanced systems complicating transportability and repair in austere environments, factors cited in the U.S. Army's decision to divest from further procurements in favor of lighter alternatives. The U.S. Marine Corps, continuing JLTV fielding, has prioritized upgrades like the A2 variant for improved fuel efficiency and diagnostics, but suitability assessments underscore trade-offs: enhanced survivability at the expense of HMMWV-like simplicity and reduced lifecycle costs. These evaluations highlight causal links between JLTV's technological ambitions—such as independent suspension and integrated armor—and elevated operational risks in high-tempo scenarios without robust support infrastructure.

Debates on Full Replacement Viability

The viability of fully replacing the (HMMWV) fleet with the (JLTV) has been questioned primarily due to prohibitive costs and mismatched capabilities for diverse missions. The JLTV's unit cost averages around $400,000, compared to approximately $220,000 for an up-armored , rendering a complete swap uneconomical given the Army's historical HMMWV inventory exceeding 100,000 units. Early program goals aimed for JLTV costs of $230,000–$270,000 per unit to facilitate broader adoption, but actual pricing and challenges precluded scaling to full replacement levels. Operational debates highlight that the JLTV, designed for superior blast and ballistic in high-threat environments, overmatches requirements for , , or low-intensity roles where lighter, more agile Humvees suffice. U.S. Army projections as of 2019 envisioned a hybrid fleet retaining 55,000 Humvees alongside up to 49,000 JLTVs and 800 Infantry Squad Vehicles (ISVs), acknowledging that total JLTV substitution would compromise fleet versatility and air transportability despite the vehicle's engineered compatibility with systems like the CH-47 Chinook. Reliability concerns further eroded confidence, with a 2018 report and 2019 Defense Department operational testing deeming the JLTV "not operationally suitable" owing to deficiencies in , crew , and . By May 2025, the halted JLTV procurement beyond a final delivery tranche of 250 vehicles in January, classifying both Humvees and JLTVs as "excess ground vehicles" under its Transformation Initiative to prioritize autonomous systems and lighter platforms like the ISV for maneuver warfare. Analysts such as Mark Cancian of the Center for Strategic and International Studies described this as a calculated risk, potentially reducing soldier protection against improvised threats but aligning with doctrinal emphasis on speed over static armor in peer competitions. The Marine Corps persists with its planned acquisition of up to 15,000 JLTVs—half already procured—but faces elevated per-unit costs without bulk buys, prompting concerns from Gen. Eric Smith about fulfilling mobility strategies. These developments affirm that full replacement lacks viability amid fiscal limits and shifting threat paradigms favoring distributed, rapid forces over uniform heavy protection.

References

  1. https://www.military.com/off-duty/autos/rise-and-fall-of-humvee.html
  2. https://amuedge.com/jltvs-the-versatile-replacement-vehicles-for-humvees/
  3. https://inss.ndu.edu/news/Article/1428853/tell-tale-mraps/
  4. https://www.army.mil/article/72533/army_drives_ahead_with_joint_light_tactical_vehicle_program
  5. https://www.peocscss.army.mil/pmjltv.html
  6. https://media.defense.gov/2014/Sep/30/2001713411/-1/-1/1/DODIG-2014-125.pdf
  7. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/PDF/IF11729/IF11729.4.pdf
  8. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2024/FY2024_Weapons.pdf
  9. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a26520005/pentagon-report-humvee-replacement-jltv/
  10. http://www.ltw.net/history.html
  11. https://www.militarytrader.com/mv-101/hummer-history
  12. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/march-22/the-origins-of-the-hummer
  13. http://www.army-guide.com/eng/product2759.html
  14. https://www.amgeneral.com/humvee-first-operations/
  15. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/the-u-s-armys-humvee/
  16. https://www.army.mil/article/101572/out_on_a_limb
  17. https://www.historynet.com/m998-humvee/
  18. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna11810053
  19. https://www.army-technology.com/features/featureend-of-an-icon-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-humvee-4381884/
  20. https://www.yanktank.com.au/post/the-history-of-the-heroic-humvee
  21. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna17105332
  22. https://www.arabnews.com/node/802351/amp
  23. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA482799.pdf
  24. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-management-lives-stake-5837
  25. https://www.marcorsyscom.marines.mil/News/Article/932752/mrap-program-celebrates-10-years-of-protecting-those-who-protect-us/
  26. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-10-155t.pdf
  27. https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2025/08/25/2be47465/bulletin-13-05-mine-resistant-ambush-protected-mrap-vehicles.pdf
  28. https://media.defense.gov/2007/Jun/27/2001712178/-1/-1/1/07-107.pdf
  29. https://www.forecastinternational.com/samples/F652_CompleteSample.pdf
  30. https://nation.time.com/2012/10/02/the-mrap-brilliant-buy-or-billions-wasted/
  31. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-10-155t
  32. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/524263/defense-department-contracts-2400-more-mrap-vehicles
  33. https://euro-sd.com/2021/02/articles/exclusive/20598/mrap-origins-requirements-future/
  34. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/call/call_08-30.pdf
  35. https://www.army.mil/article/218550/under_secretary_remarks_at_brookings_institute
  36. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1001236/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  37. https://www.johnsoncountyiowa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-05/MRAP_fact_sheet.pdf
  38. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR800/RR879/RAND_RR879.pdf
  39. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/jltv-program.htm
  40. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2015/army/2015jltv.pdf
  41. https://defenseinnovationmarketplace.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2018_ATIP_7_06_JLTV.pdf
  42. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%2520Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2019_SARS/20-F-0568_DOC_47_JLTV_SAR_Dec_2019_Full.pdf
  43. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2017/army/2017jltv.pdf
  44. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA634105.pdf
  45. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%2520Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2022_SARS/JLTV_SAR_DEC_2022_v1.pdf
  46. https://www.army.mil/article/13729/army_awards_development_contracts_for_jltv
  47. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA580230.pdf
  48. https://www.dau.edu/sites/default/files/Migrated/CopDocuments/CRS%2520Report%2520Re%2520JLTV.pdf
  49. https://oshkoshdefense.com/oshkosh-defense-l-atv-achieves-key-milestone-in-jltv-program-testing/
  50. https://oshkoshdefense.com/u-s-army-awards-6-7-billion-joint-light-tactical-vehicle-contract-to-oshkosh-corporation/
  51. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%2520Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2023_SARS/JLTV_MSAR_Dec_2023.pdf
  52. https://asc.army.mil/web/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/April-June2013_army_al.pdf
  53. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2013/army/2013jltv.pdf?ver=2019-08-22-111328-080
  54. https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/348286.pdf
  55. https://oshkoshdefense.com/vehicles/light-tactical-vehicles/jltv/
  56. https://www.usar.army.mil/News/News-Display/Article/2765694/soldiers-navigate-with-jltv/
  57. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11729
  58. https://www.army.mil/article/263884/army_announces_joint_light_tactical_vehicle_follow_on_production_award
  59. https://oshkoshdefense.com/oshkosh-defense-receives-jltv-order-for-208-million/
  60. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%2520Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2021_SARS/22-F-0762_JLTV_SAR_2021.pdf
  61. https://www.usar.army.mil/News/News-Display/Article/1836699/86th-training-division-first-army-reserve-unit-to-receive-jltv/
  62. https://news.usni.org/2025/05/13/report-to-congress-on-the-joint-light-tactical-vehicle-program
  63. https://www.marcorsyscom.marines.mil/News/News-Article-Display/Article/1718854/marine-corps-is-rolling-forward-with-fielding-new-jltv/
  64. https://www.marines.mil/News/News-Display/Article/1932142/the-corps-jltv-achieves-initial-operational-capability/
  65. https://www.defenseone.com/defense-systems/2025/09/marines-press-ahead-jltv-purchase-after-army-quits-program/407957/
  66. https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your-marine-corps/2025/05/20/marines-sticking-with-jltv-after-army-cancels-future-vehicle-buys/
  67. https://www.defensedaily.com/marine-corps-budget-includes-jltv-procurement-pause-in-fy-26-cites-delivery-backlog/navy-usmc/
  68. https://insidedefense.com/share/224546
  69. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3374692/air-force-modernizes-nuclear-security-with-advanced-jltv-vehicle/
  70. https://oshkoshdefense.com/oshkosh-awarded-803-9-million-jltv-order-for-army-marine-corps-air-force-and-navy/
  71. https://www.army.mil/article/223482/army_approves_jltv_full_rate_production
  72. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/4/29/first-jltv-2-vehicle-comes-off-production-line-this-week-am-general-reports
  73. https://www.army-technology.com/news/idex-2025-am-general-disclose-jltv-a2-plans-and-production/
  74. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2025-05-14_IF11729_b7ff422a47175328441bc1690b85ff0b39e25901.pdf
  75. https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-marine-corps/2024/12/13/these-marine-units-will-field-new-mobile-command-vehicle-in-2025/
  76. https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-marine-corps/2025/05/20/marines-sticking-with-jltv-after-army-cancels-future-vehicle-buys/
  77. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/6/25/axed-army-vehicle-programs-leave-unanswered-questions
  78. https://www.army.mil/article/285100/letter_to_the_force_army_transformation_initiative
  79. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2025-05-14_IF11729_a3b9e57f3cd8481ee777a29b2c71b2bb1183871a.html
  80. https://insidedefense.com/daily-news/army-buys-545-humvees-following-procurement-cancellation
  81. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2djNUhs-e8
  82. https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2025/09/05/military-retiring-humvee
  83. https://insidedefense.com/insider/insider-daily-digest-may-15-2025
  84. https://www.buylakewoodranch.com/blog/us-army-humvee-replacement-faster-cheaper-vehicle/
  85. https://www.motortrend.com/features/humvee-compares-to-new-oshkosh-jltv
  86. https://www.autoblog.com/features/oshkosh-jltv-cost-less-399000-fully-loaded
  87. https://www.dodig.mil/Reports/Audits-and-Evaluations/Article/1119069/army-and-marine-corps-program-officials-appropriately-assessed-the-affordabilit/
  88. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/05/10/major-problems-persist-jltv-zumwalt-destroyer-gao-finds.html
  89. https://www.govconwire.com/articles/am-general-wins-potential-8-7b-follow-on-army-jltv-production-contract
  90. https://breakingdefense.com/2023/02/army-says-its-saving-money-with-jltv-recompete-expects-new-test-vehicles-within-18-months/
  91. https://yakym.house.gov/posts/rep-yakym-leads-bipartisan-letter-urging-additional-funding-for-ltv-modernization
  92. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/08/02/armys-replacement-for-humvee-infantry-squad-vehicle/85421688007/
  93. https://www.defensedaily.com/hub_updates/report-oshkosh-jltv-five-times-more-reliable-than-lockheed-in-army-marine-corps-testing/
  94. https://www.defensenews.com/2019/03/01/most-problems-found-in-joint-light-tactical-vehicle-have-been-fixed-officials-say/
  95. https://news.usni.org/2019/06/28/report-to-congress-on-joint-light-tactical-vehicle-program
  96. https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-jltv-maintenance-reliability-problems/
  97. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-151.pdf
  98. https://tacticalgear.com/experts/oshkosh-jltv-vs-am-general-humvee
  99. https://taskandpurpose.com/tech-tactics/jltv-humvee-replacement-budget/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.