Hubbry Logo
HyperpyronHyperpyronMain
Open search
Hyperpyron
Community hub
Hyperpyron
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Hyperpyron
Hyperpyron
Hyperpyron
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Hyperpyron of Emperor Manuel I Komnenos (r. 1143–1180), showing its typical scyphate (cup-shaped) form.

The hyperpyron (Greek: νόμισμα ὑπέρπυρον, nómisma hypérpyron lit. 'highly refined')[1] was a Byzantine coin in use during the late Middle Ages, replacing the solidus as the Byzantine Empire's standard gold coinage in the 11th century. It was introduced by emperor Alexios I Komnenos.

History

[edit]

The traditional gold currency of the Byzantine Empire had been the solidus or nomisma, whose gold content had remained steady at 24 carats for seven centuries and was consequently highly prized. From the 1030s, however, the coin was increasingly debased, until in the 1080s, following the military disasters and civil wars of the previous decade, its gold content was reduced to almost zero.[2] Consequently, in 1092, Emperor Alexios I Komnenos (r. 1081–1118) undertook a drastic overhaul of the Byzantine coinage system and introduced a new gold coin, the hyperpyron (meaning "super-refined"). This was of the same standard weight (4.45 grams) as the solidus, but only 20.5 carat purity (0.854 fineness) instead of the standard 24 carat, resulting in a reduced gold content of only 4.1 grams instead of 4.8 grams. The lower purity was due to melting down and inclusion of earlier debased coins.[3]

The hyperpyron remained the standard gold coin until gold coins ceased to be minted by the Byzantines in the mid-14th century. It too, however, was subject to gradual debasement: under the Empire of Nicaea (1204–1261), its gold content fell gradually to 18 carats, under Michael VIII Palaiologos (r. 1259–1282) to 15 and under his son and successor Andronikos II Palaiologos (r. 1282–1328) to 12 carats. At the same time, the quality of the coins declined as well, and in the 14th century, their weight was far from uniform.[4] The last hyperpyra, and thus the last Byzantine gold coins, were struck by Emperor John VI Kantakouzenos (r. 1347–1352). The name remained in use thereafter solely as a money of account, divided into 24 keratia.[5]

The name was adopted in various forms by Western Europeans (Latin: perperum, Italian: perpero) and the Slavic countries of the Balkans (perper, iperpero, etc.) designating various coins, usually silver, as well as moneys of account.[6] More often in the West the hyperpyron was called the bezant, especially among Italian merchants.

In the early Komnenian period, the hyperpyron was the equivalent of three electrum trachea, 48 billon trachea or 864 copper tetartera, although with the debasement of the trachea it eventually came to rate 12 electrum trachea and 288 to 384 billon trachea.[7] In the 14th century, the hyperpyron equalled 12 of the new silver basilika, 96 tournesia, 384 copper trachea and 768 copper assaria.[8]

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Hyperpyron in "The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium", Oxford Reference, Retrieved 24 February 2025
  2. ^ Grierson 1999, p. 10.
  3. ^ Grierson 1999, p. 11; Kazhdan 1991, p. 964.
  4. ^ Grierson 1999, pp. 11–12.
  5. ^ Grierson 1999, p. 12; Kazhdan 1991, pp. 964–965.
  6. ^ Kazhdan 1991, p. 965.
  7. ^ Grierson 1999, p. 44.
  8. ^ Grierson 1999, p. 45.

General and cited sources

[edit]
  • Grierson, Philip (1999). Byzantine Coinage. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. ISBN 978-0-88402-274-9. Archived from the original on 2013-12-14.
  • Kazhdan, Alexander, ed. (1991). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hyperpyron

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The hyperpyron was a high-value gold coin introduced by Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos in 1092 as part of a comprehensive monetary reform to restore economic stability after the debasement of earlier coinage like the solidus. Weighing approximately 4.45 grams with an initial purity of about 85% (20.5 carats), it became the empire's standard gold currency, often struck in a distinctive scyphate (cup-shaped) form to facilitate stacking and trade. The name derives from the Greek hyperpyron, meaning "over the fire," alluding to the cupellation refining process that achieved near-pure gold. This coin played a pivotal role in Byzantine commerce, earning the moniker "dollar of the " for its dominance in trade networks, where it competed with Islamic dinars and served as a reliable medium for international transactions, , and gifting. Under emperors like John II and in the , abundant issues reflected the empire's renewed prosperity, with the hyperpyron symbolizing imperial authority amid challenges such as the and Norman invasions. Its value underpinned fiscal policies that helped Alexios I consolidate power after the empire's 11th-century crises. Typically featuring intricate designs, the obverse often depicted seated in majesty, blessing with one hand and holding the Gospels in the other, encircled by Greek inscriptions invoking divine protection. The reverse portrayed the ruling , such as Alexios I standing and receiving a crown from or, in later examples, being crowned by the Virgin Mary while holding a labarum scepter and . With a diameter of around 31 mm—roughly 25% larger than a modern U.S. quarter—these coins were visually imposing, blending Roman imperial traditions with Christian to affirm the Byzantine 's divine right to rule. Production continued until the mid-14th century under rulers like , though progressive debasement to 50% reflected the empire's economic decline.

Origins

Introduction by Alexios I Komnenos

The hyperpyron was introduced in 1092 by Emperor (r. 1081–1118) as a key element of his efforts to restore confidence in the Byzantine currency, which had suffered severe debasement during the economic and political crises of the . These crises, marked by military defeats, territorial losses, and fiscal instability under emperors like and , had reduced the gold content of the solidus to as low as 10-15% by the early 1080s, eroding trust in the and contributing to and trade disruptions. Alexios's reform aimed to halt this decline by establishing a new standard that symbolized imperial reliability and economic revival, thereby supporting the empire's recovery during the . The name "hyperpyron," derived from the Greek term hypérpyron meaning "highly refined" or "super-pure" (literally "over-fired," referring to the purification of ), underscored its elevated purity compared to its debased predecessors and served as a tool for Alexios's reformist agenda. This highlighted the coin's role as a marker of imperial innovation, positioning it as a "fire-refined" of renewed Byzantine prestige in networks. Initially, the hyperpyron maintained a total weight of 4.45 grams, with a of 20.5 carats (approximately 85.4% ), resulting in about 3.8 grams of pure per coin—slightly less than the original solidus but a significant improvement over contemporary debased issues. This specification allowed it to function as a while enabling higher production volumes to meet the empire's fiscal needs. These changes were embedded in Alexios's broader monetary reforms of 1092, which overhauled the entire coinage by introducing new denominations in , electrum, billon, and , and standardizing their production to eliminate variability and counterfeiting. The reforms, enacted through imperial decrees, not only stabilized domestic finances but also facilitated military funding and diplomatic payments, such as those to Western allies during the .

Replacement of the Solidus

The solidus, or , was established by Emperor Constantine I in 312 AD as the Byzantine Empire's primary , weighing approximately 4.5 grams and composed of nearly pure at 24 karats , providing a stable monetary standard for and imperial finances for over seven centuries. By the mid-11th century, severe economic strains from military defeats, territorial losses, and fiscal demands prompted successive debasements of the . Under (r. 1068–1071) and (r. 1078–1081), the coin's content declined sharply, reaching about 36% by the late 1070s, which exacerbated and eroded trust in Byzantine abroad. In 1092, Emperor enacted a comprehensive , abolishing the debased and introducing the hyperpyron as its successor—a slightly lighter in weight but with higher purity to counteract ongoing and rebuild credibility in trade networks. Valued equivalently to the pre-debasement solidus for official purposes, the hyperpyron effectively recalibrated the gold standard without disrupting established exchange rates. This transition formed part of a broader overhaul, integrating the hyperpyron with newly minted billon aspron trachy and denominations to create a balanced tri-metallic system that addressed the absence of reliable silver and base-metal coins. The reform played a key role in steadying imperial finances following the catastrophic defeat at the in 1071 and amid the economic disruptions of the First Crusade's onset around 1095.

Physical Characteristics

Weight, Composition, and Design

The hyperpyron was characterized by its distinctive scyphate, or cup-shaped, form, which measured typically 25-30 mm in diameter. This concave facilitated better die striking by providing greater surface contact and deterred clipping, as the curved edges made unauthorized metal removal more detectable and difficult. In terms of composition, the hyperpyron consisted initially of 85.4% , equivalent to 20.5 carats, with the remaining alloy primarily —a natural gold-silver mixture that lent a subtle pale tone compared to the purer solidus it replaced. Some issues from later Komnenian production were fire-gilded, applying a thin layer via mercury amalgamation and heating to improve luster and visual appeal without altering the base alloy. The obverse design prominently displayed enthroned, depicted facing forward with a cruciform nimbus, clad in and colobium, his right hand raised in and left holding an open ; flanking the figure were the abbreviations IC XC, while the field or exergue bore the inscription +KE RO HΘEI, invoking ", help." On the reverse, the emperor appeared standing facing, adorned in stemma (jeweled crown), divitision (jeweled collar), and (imperial cloak), holding a (military standard) in his right hand and a (orb surmounted by a ) in his left, often with descending from above; the exergue inscription read [Emperor's name] ΔΕCΠΟΤΗ [family name], such as "AΛΕΞΙΩ ΔΕCΠΟΤΗ TW KOMNΗNΩ" for Alexios I, meaning " Alexios, Despot ." These design elements were prototypical in the reigns of (r. 1081–1118) and his son (r. 1118–1143), establishing the hyperpyron's iconographic standard that emphasized divine authority and imperial legitimacy through and . For instance, issues from post-1092 reform faithfully adhered to this bilateral scheme, while early hyperpyra maintained the core motifs with minor refinements in portraiture. The initial weight standard of approximately 4.5 grams tied directly to the reform's aim to stabilize the amid prior debasements.

Variations Across Reigns

During the Komnenian period (1081–1185), the hyperpyron maintained a high level of consistency in quality under emperors Alexios I, John II, and Manuel I, with weights stabilizing around 4.4–4.5 grams and at approximately 20–21 carats of gold. Under Manuel I (r. 1143–1180), some issues reached 4.5 grams and featured the Virgin Mary on the obverse in certain varieties, alongside the more common depiction of Christ Emmanuel. In the Angelid period (1185–1204), the hyperpyron underwent minor stylistic changes while preserving the standard weight of about 4.4 grams and 20-carat fineness, typically showing the Virgin and emperor on opposite faces. For instance, under (r. 1185–1195), the emperor's figure appeared more ornate, with enhanced detailing in attire and posture. Following the and the establishment of the (post-1204), as well as the restored after 1261, the hyperpyron exhibited reductions in size and thickness compared to earlier issues. Under Andronikos II (r. 1282–1328), examples weighed 3.5–4 grams with ranging from 18 to 12 carats, accompanied by simplified designs such as the Virgin within city walls on the obverse. The Palaiologan period (1261–1354) saw the hyperpyron evolve into thinner, flatter scyphate forms, reflecting ongoing adjustments in production. The final issues under John V (r. 1341–1391) often depicted two emperors, such as John V and (r. 1347–1354), on the reverse, marking these as the last full hyperpyra struck in debased 11-carat gold. 's reign produced the ultimate examples of this coin type before its obsolescence.

Monetary System and Value

Denominations and Equivalents

The hyperpyron occupied the highest position in the early 12th-century Byzantine monetary hierarchy, serving as the standard gold coin equivalent to 3 electrum aspron trachea—each an alloy of gold and silver valued at roughly one-third of the hyperpyron—48 billon trachea of lower precious metal content, and 864 copper tetartera for smaller transactions. These equivalents reflected the Alexian reform's intent to stabilize the currency through a tiered system of gold, electrum/billon, and copper denominations. In the mid-13th century, during the Empire of Nicaea, the gold hyperpyron was debased to 18 carats fineness under John III Vatatzes (r. 1222–1254), reflecting adjustments to maintain value amid limited resources, though the core denomination structure persisted. In the 14th century, further debasement and reform under the Palaiologoi shifted equivalents to emphasize silver and base metals: 1 hyperpyron equaled 12 silver basilika—a miliaresion revived by Andronikos II as a pure silver coin imitating the Venetian grosso—96 billon tournesia (or politika) for mid-value exchanges, 384 copper trachea, and 768 small copper assaria. The silver hyperpyron (or stavraton), introduced around 1367 under John V Palaiologos, served as a major denomination valued at approximately half a gold hyperpyron initially. Throughout its history, the functioned as a divided into 24 keratia (singular keration), where 1 keration represented 1/24 of the hyperpyron; this accounting framework endured for fiscal records long after physical production declined in the late . Internationally, the hyperpyron was commonly known as the "" in , denoting its status as a premier in Mediterranean trade until its debasement reduced its prestige relative to purer currencies like the Venetian ducat by the .

Role in the Byzantine Economy

The hyperpyron functioned as the cornerstone of high-value transactions within the , primarily serving to remunerate officials, fund military payments, and collect taxation. As the standard coinage introduced by in 1092, it provided a reliable medium for disbursing salaries to the imperial bureaucracy and army officers, thereby sustaining the administrative and defensive apparatus of the state. Taxation in hyperpyra, often levied on land and commercial activities, ensured fiscal inflows that supported imperial expenditures, with the coin's high content—approximately 85% purity—enhancing its acceptability for these purposes. In , the hyperpyron played a pivotal role by facilitating commerce with Italian merchants, notably Venetians and Genoese, who operated extensively in and Black Sea ports such as Trebizond. These traders relied on the hyperpyron for settling high-value exchanges in goods like , spices, and slaves, while the coin underpinned the kommerkion system—a 10% imposed on imports and exports—that generated significant state revenue and regulated foreign economic activity. This integration bolstered Byzantine control over Mediterranean and Black Sea trade routes during the , despite occasional tensions arising from imperial monetary policies favoring the hyperpyron over foreign currencies. Under the Komnenoi dynasty (1081–1185), the hyperpyron contributed to by countering the severe that had devalued earlier coinage in the , thereby aiding the empire's revival after Alexios I's accession in 1081. Its consistent weight and purity restored confidence in Byzantine , spurring agricultural recovery, urban growth, and commercial expansion, which collectively strengthened the until the late . Beyond its economic utility, the hyperpyron embodied imperial prestige, often employed in diplomatic gifts to foreign rulers and substantial donations to the Orthodox Church, reinforcing Byzantium's cultural and political influence. By 1204, hyperpyra had achieved widespread circulation across the and , functioning as a international standard in regional networks and even influencing Crusader economies.

Production

Minting Techniques

The primary mint for the hyperpyron was the imperial facility in , which served as the central hub for Byzantine coin production throughout most of the coin's history. During periods of exile, such as the Latin occupation of following the (1204–1261), temporary mints operated in and Magnesia under the . These facilities ensured continuity in hyperpyron production despite political disruptions. The striking process for the hyperpyron involved hand-hammering heated metal blanks, known as , between engraved dies to imprint the designs. To achieve the characteristic scyphate (cup-shaped) form, blanks were first cast in concave molds or hammered over a stake to create the bowl-like curvature, after which flat dies were used for striking—often requiring multiple blows at angled orientations to fully transfer the imagery, such as the enthroned Christ Pantokrator and the emperor's with titles. Dies were typically changed with each reign to incorporate the ruling emperor's name, regnal titles, and specific , ensuring the coin reflected current imperial authority. Early hyperpyra under (r. 1081–1118) were produced from nearly pure gold refined via , a fire-based process that achieved high purity levels, aligning with the coin's name deriving from "hyper" (above) and "pyron" (fire). Quality control was maintained through imperial oversight, primarily by the sakellarios, a high-ranking responsible for financial administration, including the supervision of mint operations in the Great Palace complex to enforce standards in weight, fineness, and design. This official ensured adherence to prescribed specifications, with the emperor's serving as an implicit guarantee of authenticity. Materials for the hyperpyron were sourced mainly from mines in the Balkan regions, including Macedonia and , where extraction continued from Roman-era sites, supplemented by from earlier coins and inflows from with eastern partners.

Output and Debasement

The hyperpyron enjoyed robust production during the early Komnenian period, particularly under (r. 1081–1118) and (r. 1143–1180), where it served as a key instrument for financing extensive campaigns and stabilizing the empire's economy following the monetary reforms of 1092. These issues maintained high gold purity, close to 21 carats, reflecting the empire's access to precious metals at the time. Debasement of the hyperpyron accelerated in the 13th century amid the fragmentation following the Fourth Crusade's in 1204, which disrupted trade routes and depleted imperial reserves. Under the , (r. 1222–1254) oversaw a reduction to approximately 18 carats, as the regime in exile prioritized economic recovery through controlled minting. After the reconquest in 1261, (r. 1259–1282) further lowered the fineness to about 15.5 carats to fund the restoration efforts and ongoing wars. In the , debasement intensified under (r. 1282–1328), reaching roughly 12 carats by his later years, driven by persistent gold shortages, territorial losses to the Turks and Serbs, and inflationary pressures from increased silver circulation in the . Output correspondingly declined, shifting to sporadic emissions as the empire struggled with fiscal constraints. Physical production of the hyperpyron as a ceased by the mid-14th century, after which it persisted only as a .

Decline and Legacy

Factors Leading to Obsolescence

The during the in 1204 severely disrupted Byzantine minting operations, halting the production of the hyperpyron at the imperial capital for decades and leading to the looting of the treasury, which undermined the empire's . Following the exile of the imperial court, coinage resumed under the in 1261 upon the restoration of Byzantine rule, but the hyperpyra issued there were of significantly lower quality, with fineness reduced to about 15.5 karats compared to the pre-1204 standard. This shift marked the beginning of a prolonged decline in the hyperpyron's reliability and prestige as a . In the , a series of interconnected crises further eroded the hyperpyron's viability by constricting supplies and diminishing economic output. , such as the conflict in the 1320s between Andronikos II and his grandson Andronikos III, fragmented administrative control and diverted resources from minting, while the more devastating civil war of 1341–1347 between the regency for and exacerbated territorial losses and invited foreign interventions from powers like , , and Ottoman-aligned emirates. The , arriving in in 1347 via routes, killed an estimated 30–60% of the in its initial wave and repeatedly disrupted commerce through nine major epidemic waves and eleven local outbreaks until , severely impacting labor, hubs, and the overall capacity to sustain -based currency production. Concurrent Ottoman advances after 1350 capitalized on this instability, conquering key territories in the and , which reduced access to mines and revenues essential for the hyperpyron's maintenance. These pressures collectively led to progressive , with the hyperpyron's dropping to around 11 karats by the mid-century. The rise of purer Western gold coins intensified the hyperpyron's obsolescence in . The Venetian ducat, introduced in 1284 under Doge Giovanni Dandolo, was struck at 24 karats (99.7% pure gold) and weighed consistently at about 3.56 grams, offering superior reliability over the increasingly debased hyperpyron, which Venice had previously favored but abandoned due to its declining value post-1261. Similarly, the Florentine florin, minted from 1252, maintained high purity and became a preferred medium in Mediterranean exchanges, displacing the hyperpyron as Italian merchants like those from and dominated Byzantine ports. This competition prompted Byzantine attempts to imitate Western designs, such as the 1304 basilikon, but ultimately accelerated the hyperpyron's marginalization in commercial transactions. By the 1350s, the hyperpyron had transitioned from a physical to a notional , persisting in administrative contexts like tax records while actual circulation relied on silver alternatives. It was physically supplanted by the silver stavraton, introduced around 1367 and valued at half a hyperpyron, and the debased copper hyperpyrakon, reflecting the empire's shift toward base-metal currencies amid gold shortages. No new hyperpyra were minted after 1354, during the co-rule of and , though existing issues continued to circulate in hoards until the fall of in 1453.

Influence on Later Currencies

The hyperpyron exerted significant influence on the monetary systems of Byzantine successor states after the fragmentation of the empire in 1204. In Serbia, it was adopted as the "perper," a silver coin introduced in the late 13th century under Stefan Uroš II Milutin (r. 1282–1321) and continued through the 14th century under rulers like Stefan Dušan (r. 1331–1355), directly modeled on the Byzantine gold hyperpyron in design, weight, and role as a standard unit to facilitate trade and underscore cultural ties with Byzantium. Similarly, in the Despotate of Epiros during the 13th century under Michael I Komnenos Doukas (r. 1205–1215) and Theodore Komnenos Doukas (r. 1215–1230), the hyperpyron—known locally as "iperpera"—functioned as a key unit of account for high-value transactions, including dowries (e.g., 30 hyperpyra) and ecclesiastical taxes (e.g., 1,000 gold coins from paroikoi), despite gold scarcity leading to substitutions with billon equivalents like trikephala. The Latin Empire of Constantinople (1204–1261) further perpetuated its legacy by minting gold imitations termed "bezants," which replicated the hyperpyron's form and fineness to maintain continuity in the empire's fiscal administration and international commerce, blending Latin oversight with Byzantine numismatic traditions. Beyond the immediate successor realms, the hyperpyron shaped gold coinage in , where it circulated widely as the "perpero" or "bisanzio" and inspired emulations amid the empire's economic prestige. In , the —minted from 1284 with approximately 3.5 grams of high-purity gold—emerged as a direct competitor to the increasingly debased hyperpyron, yet it appropriated the latter's reputation for reliability in Mediterranean routes, influencing Venetian and exports to Byzantine territories. similarly drew on the hyperpyron's model for its early gold florins in the 13th–14th centuries, adopting comparable weight standards and to integrate into the same commercial networks, thereby extending Byzantine numismatic influence into Central European economies. In the post-1453 , the hyperpyron's nomenclature endured as "hyperper" in fiscal accounting, serving as a reference unit in tax records and trade ledgers to bridge Byzantine and emerging Ottoman systems under (r. 1451–1481), who briefly issued gold imitations akin to the in form to assert legitimacy over conquered Byzantine lands. Across the and into , the coin persisted as "iperper" in Bulgarian and Russian commerce through the , acting as a benchmark for cross-border exchanges in goods like furs and spices, and later informing accounting units such as the Polish "hyperper" in early modern . The hyperpyron's legacy endures as an emblem of Byzantine monetary innovation, prized in modern for its historical and artistic value. Contemporary collectors value specimens from $500 for circulated examples of mid-14th century emperors like (r. 1347–1354) to over $50,000 for pristine issues from earlier rulers such as (r. 1143–1180), with prices varying by condition, rarity, and provenance at major auctions.

References

  1. https://learn.apmex.com/answers/what-was-a-byzantine-hyperpyron/
  2. https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O117869/gold-nomisma-hyperpyron-coin-unknown/
  3. https://www.doaks.org/newsletter/news-archives/2012/the-so-called-dollar-of-the-middle-ages-the-hyperpyron-of-manuel-i-komnenos-114320131180
  4. https://www.academia.edu/35680076/The_Fiscal_Revolution_of_Alexios_I_Komnenos_Timing_Scope_and_Motives
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3678761
  6. https://rosetta.bham.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Nobes_Economic-Policy_Rosetta11.pdf
  7. https://journals.phil.muni.cz/graeco-latina-brunensia/article/view/26802/22219
  8. https://www.oxfordreference.com/viewbydoi/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.013.2390
  9. https://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/books/catalogue-of-the-byzantine-coins-in-the-dumbarton-oaks-collection-and-in-the-whittemore-collection-4
  10. https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O118316/gold-nomisma-hyperpyron-coin-nomismata-unknown/
  11. https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/alexios-i-komnenos-hyperpyron-unknown/uAH2BBtCdPjS3w
  12. https://harvardartmuseums.org/collections/object/75864
  13. https://vdoc.pub/documents/coinage-and-money-in-the-byzantine-empire-1081-1261-2u48th0unt60
  14. https://www.doaks.org/resources/coins/catalogue/BZC.2004.11
  15. https://www.coinarchives.com/a/results.php?search=hyperpyron+AND+Andronicus
  16. https://www.ime.gr/chronos/10/en/o/oc/oc1a.html
  17. https://new.coinsweekly.com/antiquity/gold-for-the-coronation/
  18. https://www.ime.gr/chronos/09/en/o/1081/main/o13cm.html
  19. https://www.scribd.com/doc/161979543/Michael-F-Hendy-Coinage-and-Money-in-the-Byzantine-Empire-1081-1261-1969
  20. http://www.serbianmedievalcoins.com/resources/Byzantine%20Coinage%20Philip%20Grierson.pdf
  21. https://novoscriptorium.com/2018/11/07/coinage-in-the-christian-roman-empire/
  22. https://classicworldcoins.ch/byzantine-coinage/
  23. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/3062
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9362599/
  25. https://www.vcoins.com/en/coins/ancient/byzantine/empire_of_nicaea-520.aspx
  26. https://en.numista.com/93284
  27. https://coinweek.com/byzantine-coins-become-cup-shaped/
  28. https://www.coinarchives.com/a/results.php?search=hyperpyron
  29. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/PS10/COM-200938.xml?language=en
  30. https://www.academia.edu/36865476/Archaeological_Exploration_of_Sardis_Monographs_13_Coins_from_the_Excavations_at_Sardis
  31. https://www.academia.edu/39872122/Gold_Goldsmiths_and_Goldsmithing_in_Byzantium
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288558802_Byzantine_Money_Its_Production_and_Circulation
  33. https://www.persee.fr/doc/numi_0484-8942_2018_num_6_175_3429
  34. https://www.academia.edu/37338372/The_Effects_of_the_Fourth_Crusade_on_European_Gold_Coinage
  35. https://www.doaks.org/resources/coins/catalogue/BZC.2006.46
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/210243853_Complex_historical_dynamics_of_crisis_the_case_of_Byzantium
  37. https://infezmed.it/media/journal/Vol_19_3_2011_10.pdf
  38. https://www.peopleinmotion-costaction.org/2021/04/28/trade-wars-and-counterfeiting-in-the-mediterranean-the-zecchino-of-venice-and-the-imitations-and-counterfeits-issued-by-the-republics-rivals-in-a-ruthless-trade-war-giorgio-giacosa/
  39. http://auctions.cngcoins.com/lots/view/4-QVUAU/john-v-palaeologus-with-john-vi-1341-1391-av-hyperpyron-21mm-350-g-6h-constantinople-mint-phase-ii-struck-1347-1354
  40. http://www.serbianmedievalcoins.com/resources/Serbian%20and%20Byzantine%20Coinage%20in%20Serbia.pdf
  41. https://ia601605.us.archive.org/18/items/DOP55_11_Laiou/DOP55_11_Laiou.pdf
  42. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004434646/BP000008.pdf
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382204178_Byzantine_Currency_An_analysis_of_the_Byzantine_expansion_and_its_development_through_Numismatics_during_the_ten_centuries_of_the_Medieval_Era
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.